NUPARTMENT OF THE AiR FORCE ™ .. ESC REGULATION 23-10 Ha Electronic Security Command San Antonio, TX 78243 . 15 July 1980 Organization and Mission—Field HEADQUARTERS ESC REORGANIZATION PROPOSALS This regulation states command poticy and procedures for changing HQ ESC organization and functions. 4. Organization and Functions. Much of HQ ESC is organized according to standards prescribed by HQ 'JSAF in AFR 26-2. The balance of HQ ESC is a nonstandard structure set up to Support missioa re- uirements. 2. Command Policy. Staff functional managers will not implement changes to HQ ESC organization and functions until ali requirements of this directive are satisfied. Command Section aporovai of a proposed change offered by a staff functional manager does not constitute implementation approval; it does con- st:tute approval in principle to submit the request to DCS/Plans (XP) for further reviewing, developing, and presenting of findings to the Commander. This policy a and the following procedures apply to XP-generated organizational-change proposals. | - 3. Procedures: a. Staff functional managers will arrange to brief or forward written proposals for change to the Chief of Staff. This presentation or documentation will address the following minimum points: (1) Why is the change necessary? (2) What are the actual organizational, functional, and manpower changes proposed? (3) What manpower costs or savings are involved? (4) How will civilian positions and incumbents be affected? (5) What changes in felationships will be incurred to other staff elements, to ESC units, and to external sources? ~(6) How will mobilization augmentation positions and incumbents be affected? ' (1) ‘When would the change be implemented? b. Assuming Chief of Staff concurrence, the staff functional manager will forward a written proposal! (containing organization charts, functional statements, manpower change requests (MCRs), justification, statemenis of ESS Total Force impact, and Chief of Staff guidance) to XP for review, development, and presentation to the Commander. c The XP review phase wiil be performed with the functional manager and will consider Total Force needs and, as a minimum, the following points: : (1) Will HQ USAF approval be required? (2) Are the organization and functional changes acceptable or are undesirable aspects includ- ed; for example, duplication, fragmentation, and span? - (3) Ooes the change constitute active duty, Reserve, or civilian manpower resource re- quirements beyond or below currently approved levels by force structure element? Have trade-offs been identified in the manager’s submission? Will a program change proposal be required? Supersedes USAFSSR 23-10, 12 March 1979. (See signature page for summary of changes.) No of Printed Pages: 2 OPR: XPMMO (Mr. B” H7 Mongeon) Approved by:_. Coil Fred I> Norton #2. Writer-Editer~" Joan E Grover: Distribution: "M; X:: AUUSE (1)“USAF Aud Gen/ACUB Lib, Norton (1); HQ USAF/MPMM (2); HO USAFIINY (2); HQ ESC/XPMMO (2) a
ESCR 23-10 §) What impact on HQ ESC manpower ceilings is incurred? 1s accommodation possible? ‘§¢ What Is the impact on civilian positions (grades, etcetera) and what does DPC say in this Regardy OP will obtain this OP input) . d, Tha XP development phase may require returning the proposal to tite staff functional manager for fuathedata er reconsidering the proposal (depending on XP findings during the review stage). . . e, Ta. XP presentation. phase will be an extensive briefing or documentation to the Commanderon _ , the. findings of the XP review and XP organization, manpower, and ceiling recommendations for the Com- MANder: consideration before decision. The functional manager will be present during briefings ane will . are the osportunity to offer views on the findings. <. Approval of the proposal after this stage constitutes staff functional-manager authority to imple- Men: ‘the change except when the change requires prior HQ USAF approval. Then, XP will issue further quiti>:.c2 to the staff functional manager regarding the satisfaction of AFR 26-2 documentation required for «!Q USAF review. 4, cttalf Implemaniation and Use. Once the XP presentation phase is completed and the Commander’s a provel is given, XP will issue approved MCRs, adjust the unit manpower document, and publish the Com- Wiende’s guidance as appropriate for staff Implementation and use. . it THE COMMANDER awe oy. Oo | WILLIAM. Re CARROLL: Lt Gol, USAF ‘Director's of ‘Administration Suramary of Changes Revised to correspond with HQ ESC reorganization. ~ — —