MISSION OF THE NEWSLETTER (U) To keep the Intelligence Community informed of intelligence activities which are of interest to all Naval Intelligence personnel from both a professional and personal standpoint. te ati +e TA om enema ge 2 FF me . . a) ene
, UNCLASSIFIED . J _ NAVAL - INTELLIGENCE NEWSLETTER ‘APRIL 1986 CONTENTS OFFICE OF NAVAL INTELLIGENCE PAGE Washington D.C. : I. DNI'S COLUMN (RADM W. 0. STUDEMAN, USN) I 1-8 RADM W.0O. STUDEMAN Noval tatelligence COMMENTS ON THE FY-87 CAPTAIN I 9-10 SELECTION BOARD (RADM T. A. BROOKS, USN) RADM 1.8. McFARLAND Nacat intelngence OFFICE OF NAVAL INTELLIGENCE STAFF I 11-12 REORGANIZATION (LCDR R. C. BARKELL, USN) MR. &.L. HAVER Deputy Director of ' - pe puty Dliector ° II. EDITOR'S COLUMN (AUDREY E. HAGER) II-1 IIL. FEATURE ARTICLE III RADM D.N. HAGEN Commander, Naval THE ROLES AND FUNCTIONS OF INTELLI- III 1-5 intelligence Command GENCE OFFICERS SUPPORTING OPERA- TIONAL COMMANDERS (RADM JOHN R. LCDR JM. KEYDASH, IR. BATZLER, USN, COMCARGRU THREE) Editor NIC-21A IV. GENERAL INTELLIGENCE IV FLEET INTELLIGENCE COLLECTION IV 1-2 COMNAVINTCOM (CDR THOMAS R. WILSON, USN, CTG 4600 Silver Hill Rd. 168.3) Washington, D.C. 20389 CHINA DISPLAYS NEW SUBMARINE- Iv 3-7 LAUNCHED BALLISTIC MISSILE (LCDR JAMES L. DOUTHIT, USNR-R) CLASSIFIED ARTICLES HAVE BEEN MARKED WITH THE APPROPRIATE CLASSIFICATION; ALL THOSE UNMARKED ARE UNCLASSIFIED i UNCLASSIFIED
V. VI. VII. SECURITY UNCLASSIFIED KENNEL FREELANCE SURVEILLANCE OPERATIONS (CTG 168.1) BEAR H: SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW (LT RICH SAUNDERS, USN, FICEURLANT) FROM THE FLEET FITCPAC CELEBRATES 30TH BIRTHDAY (CO, FITCPAC) NARCOTICS INTERDICTION (ISC D. COLE, USN, NNBIS, GULF REGION) LONG BEACH INTELLIGENCE ACTION GROUP (IAG) ESTABLISHED (CAPT E. A. BROOKES, USN, COMNAVSURFPAC N2) CTF 168 AT SEA (CDR P. KIDDER, USN, ASSISTANT NAVAL ATTACHE, USDAO, SINGAPORE) FLEET INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS COORDINATOR'S COLUMN (CDR SKIP OLSEN, USN) NIPS INTELLIGENCE CENT RS (ICS) DESK TALK (Maj I. L. HOLDREDGE, USMC, AND GySgt T. MOSES, USMC) FLEET FIST COMMENTS. FROM FICEURLANT~-FIST: AN OPERATIONAL PERSPECTIVE (LCDR J. HOEY, USN, FICEURLANT) NIPS DATA BASE DESK TALK (IS1 JON THOMAS, USN) OSIS MANAGEMENT DESK TALK (LT PAUL GARDELLA, USN) REVIEW OF OBU (LCDR SKIP SAMPSON, USN) ZENITH 150 PERSONAL COMPUTER NIPSTRAFAC NOTES (CDR F. T. COSTARINO, USN) NIPS SUBSYSTEMS, OSIS NODES, AND AFLOAT STAFFS ROSTER RETRIEVAL AND ANALYSIS OF NAVY CLASSIFIED INFORMATION (RANKIN) SECURITY CLASSIFICATION GUIDES (NAVSECINVCOM) ~ ii UNCLASSIFIED PAGE IV 7-9 IV 10-12 V 1-4 V 4-5 V 5-6 VI VI-1 VI 1-4 VI 5-6 VI 7-8 VI 8-9 VI 9-15 VI 15-16 VI 16 VI 17-19 VII VII-1
VIII. IX. XI. XII. XIII. XIV. XV. UNCLASSIFIED INTELLIGENCE TRAINING AND EDUCATION DEVELOPMENTS AT THE NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL (NAVPGSCOL) (RADM R. H. SHUMAKER, USN, SUPT, NAVPGSCOL) INTELLIGENCE OFFICER DETAILER'S DESK SELECTION BOARDS (NIC-01) TS COORDINATOR'S COLUMN (ISCM G. L. COBURN, USN, FORMER NIC~113) IS CAREER PLANNING AND ADVANCEMENT (ISCM J. L. JOHNSON, USN) FROM THE DESK OF THE NAVINTCOM MASTER CHIEF (ISCM TERRY L. SCHROEDER, USN, FORMER NIC~OOMC) RECOGNITION CORNER ‘(CDR JOHN R. LEWIS, USNR-R) ANSWERS TO THE RECOGNITION CORNER IS ALPHA LISTING ORGANIZATION CHARTS DISTRIBUTION LIST 1it (RB) UNCLASSIFIED PAGE VIII VIII-1 IX IX-1 X 1-2 X 3-6 XI 1-4 XIT 1-5 XII-6 XIII 1-10 XIV 1-3 DL 1-3
(U) Well, these are some initial thoughts. If you want more elaboration or addressal of other topics, drop a line to my aide expressing your interests. Aide's address is: LT Christopher Geving, USN Office of Naval Intelligence Navy Department (OP-009A1) Washington, DC 20350-2000 W. O. STUDEMAN Rear Admiral, U. S. Navy Director of Naval Intelligence
UNCLASSIFIED rn A er NN Se Sst neve lr wsheeseecemeringr COMMENTS. ON THE FY-87 CAPTAIN SELECTION BOARD os a ? Editor's Note: The following article was submitted by RADM T. A. Brooks, the 1630 Flag officer on the FY-87 Captain Selection Board. In February 1986, the FY-87 Captain Selection Board reported out. Passageways are filled with naval officers trying to analyze the results. “What do you have to do to be selected?” Statistical analyses are printed in Navy Times and elsewhere. Yet some uncertainty persists. As the 1630 Flag officer on the Captain Selection Board, I would like to share with you my perception of what gets you selected. In a word, it's Fitness Reports. How good are yours vis-a-vis the other officers in the zone? What kind of career pattern you have had is also very important, of course, but the world's best career pattern will fail to select if the Fitness Report jacket won't compete. What is a good Fitness Report? Ideally all "A"s and a meaningful comparison of your performance against that of your contemporaries. A recommendation for accelerated promotion ranking you "1 of 9" is a show- stopper. A Fitness Report jacket showing you consistently on the top of the pack is virtually a shoo-in. In this era of inflated Fitness Report marks, this comparison of "cut" becomes even more critical. But the Navy has eiiminated the ranking for lieutenants. True, but the evaluation summary is stili there and is useful. A reporting sentor who really wants to help one of his top performers can do so by including in the comments words such as “this officer is the top lieutenant of the nine on board." This brings us to a discussion of the comments section of che Fitness Report. Remember, only the marks are projected in front of the Selection Board. They never see the comments. It is up to the 1630 officer on the board to read the entire report and brief the Board on significant comments. A reporting senior who writes three pages of prose filled with job description and cliches does you no favor. There is no premium for having long fitness reports. In fact I would maintain that precisely the opposite is true. A good short write-up, bulletized, and having a few key things underlined will ensure that the points you want to make will be noticed. As for career patterns, I can give you the best possible advice in three words: go to sea. If you examine the recent Board you will see that I-9 UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED the above-the-zone selectee just returned from a tour as CARGRU Intelligence Officer. The below-the-zone selectee is at sea as the Second Fleet N2 and has had sea duty in each rank since ensign. In the zone 3 of 5 officers at sea were selected (60% vs 50% opportunity for in-the-zone selection as a whole) and 5 of 7 who had recently returned from sea duty as a commander and these were relatively late transfers from the Unrestricted Line with good sea duty tickets while in the URL (remember, 9 out of 10 members of the Selection Board are URL officers). Clearly, the records with top Fitness Reports from good sea duty and operationally-oriented shore duty jobs sold themselves easily. What is the impact of having a Joint tour, a DIA tour, or some other tour “out of the Navy"? One or two such tours are inevitable and, in the case of a good Joint tour, could well prove advantageous if current trends continue. Almost all of your competitors will have a DIA/Joint tour, so good tours (defined as one which produced good Fitness Reports) will not hurt. A career full of back-to-back tours of this nature, however, will kill you. That should come as no surprise. One final word for career patterns. Your career is your resposibil~ ity. You cannot blame a poor pattern on the detailer. Fight for sea duty and good OPINTEL tours. If your Fitness Report jacket is competitive, you should easily get it. If you don't have the record to support being sent to sea, you will not--and should not--get it. Ideally, only our top officers should go to sea. I would like to see Selection Boards where all our at-sea officers are promoted. In closing, I would say a word for “the system.” No Selection Board can please everyone and there will always be remarks that “it wasn't fair to pass-over good old Charlie in favor of the other turkey." Yet I can assure you that every one of the five Selection Boards I have sat on has been scrupulously fair. It's hard work to be on a Selection Board and you never come out of the Board with the precise results you wanted, but I have always come out satisfied that the results were eminently fair. Superior performance in challenging jobs has always been the bottom line. I hope it always will he. I-10 UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED OFFICE OF NAVAL INTELLIGENCE STAFF REORGANIZATION by LCDR R. C. BARKELL, USN, OP-009D ° In March, the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) was reorganized to Streamline various OPNAV staff functions which are the responsibility of the Director of Naval Intelligence. Primary organizational changes took place in the plans, policy and resources functional areas. In addition, each OP-009 division head assumed a new title of Assistant Director of Naval Intelligence (DNI). The following major ONI organizational changes were effected: a. A new Plans and Policy Division (OP-009P) was created by combining personnel dedicated to cryptologic plans and policy functions in OP-009H (Cryptologic Plans and Programs Division) with personnel in OP-O09F (Intelligence Plans and Policy). Both OP-O009H and OP-O09F codes have been disestablished. CAPT Jerry Clark is the new Assistant DNI for Plans and Policy (OP-009P), and his responsibilities will include formulation of intelligence and cryptologic plans, policies and requirements; coordination with interservice, interagency, joint and national boards and committees; and development of intelligence and cryptologic support to naval warfare requirements. b. A new Resources Division was formed by combining OP-009N (Resource Management Division) with personnel in OP-009H who were responsible for cryptologic resource issues. The new Resource Division (OP-009R) is headed by CAPT Terry Lapierre. His responsibilities include implementing all intelligence and cryptologic program and budget matters, to include reserves, and ail intelligence and cryptologic manpower, personnel and training matters. Additional changes to ONI are: a. The code and title for OP-009S (Administrative Assistant to DNI) was changed to OP-009D (Assistant DNI for Administration). The OP-009S code has been disestablished. LCDR Rich Barkell is the current OP-009D. b. Mr. Clark Magruder retired in February 1986. His position, Civilian Deputy to the DNI (OP-O009E), was disestablished and functions and responsibilities assumed by various ONI staff elements. ce. The code and title for OP-009Y1 (CNO Current Intelligence Branch) was changed to OP-O09I (Asststant DNI for Current Intelligence). With this change, OP-O09I has officially assumed Division Head status. CDR Dave Herrington is the current OP-009I. I-11 UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED d. The Assistant DNI for Legal Matters (JAG), OP-009J, has been established. LCDR Pat Genzler is the new JAG for the DNI. e. The code OP-009Q, Assistant for Intelligence Systems, has been disestablished. These functions will be handled by OP-009P in close coordination with COMNAVINTCOM and CO, NIPSSA. f. Anew position, Assistant DNI for Reserve Affairs (OP-009W) , has been established. CAPT Dave Zickafoose is the first OP-009W, and he is responsible for naval reserve intelligence program development, policy and planning. &- The code and title for OP-009y2 (Intelligence Analysis Branch) has been changed to OP-O09Y (Assistant DNI for Analysis). With this change, OP-O009Y formally assumes Division Head status. CAPT Jim Eglin is the current OP-009Y. h. A new position, Assistant DNI for Joint National Intelligence Development (OP-009U), has been established. CAPT Roger Betts, Director, Joint National Intelligence Development Staff (JNIDS), is the initial OP-009U incumbent. He is responsible for exercising centralized management control over the design, development approval, funding, procurement, testing and installation of modular enhancements to selected intelligence processing systems. The current ONI organizational wiring diagram with billet incumbents can be found on page XIV-1. I-12 UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED II. EDITOR'S COLUMN p -  # . en cnn As mentioned in the last issue of the Newsletter, LCDR Rich Barkell de- parted NAVINTCOM in March 1985. The editorial staff passes on thetr many thanks to LCDR Barkell for his outstanding leadership as Newsletter editor and we wish him the very best. On 6 September 1985, LCDR J. M. Keydash, Jr., reported in as the new Newsletter editor and Deputy Director for Military Manpower and Personnel (NIC-11A). In this issue's feature article, RADM Batzler draws on his experience as a battle group commander and provides his views of an intelligence officer's duties and responsibilities. The article was extracted from the speech RADM Batzler gave at the beginning of this year in San Diego to the OPINTRL Afloat Course. All intelligence officers, regardless of experience, can profit from this insightful contribution to the Newsletter. As evidenced in this issue, we continue to receive a diverse selection of contributions. CDR Thomas R. Wilson's article in the "General Intelli- gence” section provides good advice on how intelligence officers can get better results from collectors and produce higher quality products. A Naval Reserve officer, LCDR James L. Douthit, has written an informative article on the Chinese Navy's new submarine-launched ballistic misstle. The last article in this section, written by LT Rick Saunders of FICEURLANT, analyzes the Soviet Union's new strategic weapon system, the BEAR H and AS-15 combina- tion. In "From the Fleet", ISC D. Cole's article highlights the Navy's growing involvement in the Government's efforts to stop the drug flow into the country. Finally, CDR Paul Kidder describes the activities and benefits of attache duty. The IS alpha listing you have been waiting for is in section XIV. We last published this list in the May 1984 Lssue. We want to emphasize that we need your help to ensure the Newsletter achieves the broadest possible dissemination among members of the Naval ; Intelligence Community. Please inform your mailroom of the desired internal distribution within your command. AUDREY FE. HAGER Assistant Editor (NIC-018) II-1 (RB) UNCLASSIFIED
III. FEATURE ARTICLE THE ROLES AND FUNCTIONS OF INTELLIGENCE OFFICERS SUPPORTING OPERATIONAL COMMANDERS by RADM JOHN R. BATZLER, USN, COMMANDER, CARRIER GROUP THREE (U) Editor's Note: This article is an extract of a speech given by RADM Batzler to the OPINTEL Afloat Course, FITCPAC, on 21 January 1985. (U) I believe there are several roles and functions that an intelligence officer must fulfill to successfully support his operational commander. I will address these in a general way, focusing on concepts, problems, and issues, rather than specific tasks. I will illustrate some of my points with examples from Battle Group FOXTROT's May-December 1984 deploy- ment. Before discussing the intelligence officer's primary responsibilities, I want to make three introductory points. (U) The first point is the fundamental linkage between operations and intelligence. Those involved in operations must consider all aspects of the intelligence estimate. Similarly, the estimate cannot be properly made with- out full knowledge and appreciation of impending operations. (U) Second, today's intelligence officer must manage information in all its varied forms. During Battle Group FOXTROT's deployment, relatively junior intelligence officers in supplementary plot (SUPPLOT) processed huge amounts of data searching for those few bits most relevant to our group. The intelligence officer must be a generalist while at the same time be able to manipulate several pieces of sophisticated equipment and know esoteric but pertinent facts about potential adversaries. _ (U) Returning to the roles and functions, I see the intelligence officer fulfilling four general responsibilites in supporting an operational commander: indications and warning, supporting specific naval missions, training, and reporting. IlI-1 qy—yy
(U) The intelligence officer must remember there is a risk associated with any analysis. One aspect of the risk is the possibility of providing an incorrect assessment. Perhaps the most damaging result of this is that future assessments will be viewed more critically or with less credibility. However, operators generally realize the difficulty of determining adversary intentions and will usually understand failures. But, they must be kept informed. Therefore, a third characteristic is that the intelligence officer must pro~ vide the operator, the officer ultiuately responsible for the decision, with the evidence and logic that formed his assessment. Give all the information. The intelligence officer must be prepared to give the bad news as well as the good. He cannot fall into the trap of providing decision-makers with what they want to hear; he must provide what they need to hear. To do any less would be a disservice to the command. 11I~-2
(J) The intelligence officer's second major responsibility is support of naval missions. The four missions generally assigned to the Navy are: strategic deterrence, sea control, naval presence, and power projection. The intelligence officer's biggest challenges come in sea control and power pro- jection. His primary functions in these two misstons are in AAW, strike planning, and antisubmarine warfare (ASW). III-3
(U) This then is what I expect of intelligence officers. He and his subordinates must be responsive to the needs of decision-makers. Deciston- makers must make clear what they want and need and provide immediate feedback if they are not satisified. Additionally, decision-makers should be trained in the capabilities and Limitations of intelligence collection systems and analysis and know what they can, can't, should, and shoulda't do for them. Decision~makers must be confident that intelligence products are accurate and dependable. Intelligence officers bear the responsibility of working with decision-makers toward a common goal and sharing information openly, within the bounds of security constraints. Although the demands are severe, I have found that intelligence officers, working in conjunction with operations, can ‘achieve these objectives and thus materially assist in mission accomplishment. (U) RADM John R. Batzler was commtssioned in June 1955 and reported for flight training in Pensacola, Florida. He received his wings and was designated a Naval Avtator in January 1957. He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Mathe- matics from the University of California at Berkeley and a Master of Science degree in Computer Systems Management from the Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California. (U) He has commanded Fighter Squadron 24, USS ASHTABULA (AO 51), and USS NIMITZ (CVN 68). The highlight of his NIMITZ tour was the shooting down of two Libyan SU-17 FITTERs by NIMITZ-based Fighter Squadron 41 F-14 TOMCATS. After his change of command in NIMITZ in February 1982, he was promoted to flag rank and was assigned to the Joint Chiefs of Staff as the Deputy Director for Operations (Reconnatssance, Space, Electronic Warfare, and C” Counter- Measures). RADM Batzler assumed command of Carrier Group THREE on board USS ENTERPRISE (CVN 65) on 25 June 1984. (U) We has flown more than 50 different Navy aircraft. His combat experfence includes more than 270 missions in Vietnam. RADM Batzler's awards include the Legion of Merit, Distinguished Flying Cross, Bronze Star, numerous Air Medals, Navy Commendation Medal, and various service and campaign medals and ribbons. IlI-5 _ (RB)
ana IV. GENERAL INTELLIGENCE ARTICLES . FLEET INTELLIGENCE COLLECTION by CDR THOMAS R. WILSON, USN (U) Eight years ago, I read an informative article called “The Greedy Analyst." Reprinted by the Naval Intelligence Command from a British intelli- gence nublication, the article discussed publications written by allied intelligence analysts on Soviet naval strategy, tactics, doctrine, and ship and aircraft characteristics. These publications, designed to give our at-sea commanders the upper hand in fighting and winning a war at sea, result from analysts putting together the immense jigsaw puzzle that is the Soviet Navy. “The Greedy Analyst" stated he was always looking for the piece to complete the jigsaw puzzle: How fast did the ship go? How did it maneuver? What was its turning radius? Did it make black or white smoke when it got underway? What was the period of roll from port to starboard and back? Any of these bits of information may have been the final piece of the jigsaw puzzle and, as "The Greedy Analyst” said, "I won't know until a cooperative ship or aircraft tells me.” TY =}
a em (U) CDR Wilson has had sea duty tours in USS KITTY HAWK (CV~63) and with Carrier Air Wing THREE (CVW-3). He has extensive maritime patrol aviation experience with the Ice- land Sector ASW Group and as Force Intelligence Officer for Commander, Patrol Wings, U. S. Atlantic Fleet. Joint assignments have included the United States Taiwan Defense Command, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and as a student at the Defense Intelligence College. He is currently assigned as Commander, Task Group 168.3 (European Forward Area Support Team) in Naples, Italy. Iv~2
eer RA A SE TN CHINA DISPLAYS NEW SUBMARINE-LAUNCHED BALLISTIC MISSILE (SLBM) by LCDR JAMES L. DOUTHIT, USNR-R eo. id (U) On 1 October 1984, the People's Republic of China observed. the 35th anniversary of its revolution. As part of the celebration in Beijing, they conducted their first major military parade since coming to power. Not unlike May Day celebrations in the Soviet Union, the parade involved thousands of participants and featured processions of military hardware including tanks, artillery, missiles, and rockets. . eae Peay bs -y . * ™ 4 OO siege at Ye rr og heres As ine ee oe ord Cate Rare ie UNCLASSIFIED (U) Communist Chinese 35th Anniversary Parade
(U) Although the missile probably is still in development, the New China News Agency reported in October 1982 that the Chinese had successfully launched a ballistic missile from a submerged submarine. The test was reportedly conducted from a GOLF Class with its missile tubes modified to permit subsurface launch. (The Soviet-designed GOLF Class was ‘originally capable of launching only when on the surface.) Reports also indicated that China launched its first fleet ballistic missile submacine (SSBN), capable of carrying 12 SLBMs, in April 1981. Both of these events were major milestones in China's development of a sea-based deterrent force that began in 1957. UNCLASSIFIED (U) October 1982 test launch of the Chinese SLBM IV-5
‘(U) LCDR Douthit is the Production Department Head of Naval Intelligence Support Center Reserve Space and Weapons Technology Unit 0108, located at Patrick AFB, Florida. This Naval Reserve unit supports the Ballistic Missile Systems Division (NISC-41). LCDR Douthit has been following the Chinese SLBM development program for the past 4 years. KENNEL FREELANCE SURVEILLANCE OPERATIONS 1V-7
BEAR H: SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW by LT RICK SAUNDERS, USN (U) BEAR H UNCLASSIFIED INTRODUCTION (U) Initially observed in late 1954, and officially displayed at the Soviet's Tushimo Aviation Day ceremonies in July 1955, the TU-95/BEAR long-range bomber has enjoyed unprecedented longevity and withstood numerous mission demands throughout its history. Range, endurance, speed, size, maintainability, and adaptability to various large payloads are this air- craft's long suit. The need for a stand-off, air-launched cruise missile (ALCM) platform to meet the demands of new strategic nuclear warfare technology and to offset the emerging U. S. (B-52/AGM-86) threat led to the development of BEAR H and the AS-15 ALCM. PRODUCTION AND CHARACTERISTICS IV-10
UNCLASSIFIED VY. FROM THE FLEET FITCPAC CELEBRATES 30TH BIRTHDAY The Fleet Intelligence Training Center, Pacific (FITCPAC), celebrated its 30th anniversary on 2 May 1985. Established in 1955 as the Fleet Air Intelligence Training Center, Pacific, at the Naval Air Station, Alameda, the command was redesignated the Fleet Operational Intelligence Training Center, Pacific, in 1963. The command relocated to the Fleet Antisubmarine Warfare Training Center, San Diego, in December 1970. In 1972 it was again redesigna~ ted, this time to its present title. FITCPAC moved to its current location in the Naval Training Center, San Diego, during September 1979. FITCPAC provides basic and specialized training in naVal intelligence to fleet, reserve, and foreign naval personnel, as well as to other members of the Department of Defense, through a wide variety of formal classroom and mobile training team programs. FITCPAC's 15 instructors trained 3,799 students during 1984. CAPT Ronald L. Brown, USN, commands FITCPAC. (CO, FITCPAC) NARCOTICS INTERDICTION Due to an easing of the century-old Posse Comitatus Act, the U. S. Navy has been playing an ever increasing role in narcotics interdiction. The Posse Comitatus Act prohibits the military under the Department of Defense from direct participation in seizing, apprehending, or arresting civilians. However, a military unit may provide information collected during its normal operations to federal, state, and local civilian law enforcement officials. The military may also offer advice to civilian law enforcement agencies. The U. S. Coast Guard is not covered by Posse Comitatus because it is under the Department of Transportation. Although an armed force, the Coast Guard is specifically charged with enforcing United States laws on the high seas against U. S. registered (civilian) vessels and foreign vessels if the nation of registry consents. The Coast Guard has adopted a new enforcement concept in an effort to use naval ships operating in high narcotics shipping areas. The program uses tactical law enforcement teams (TACLETs) and law enforcement detachments (LEDETs) of Coast Guard personnel trained in narcotics lew enforcement embarked in naval ships. Once underway, the Coast Guard v-1 UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED officer-in-charge tells the ship's commanding officer of potential narcotics smuggling vessel sightings while the ship conducts its assigned operations. When a vessel fitting a smuggler profile is sighted, the commanding officer may help the embarked TACLET or LEDET board the suspect vessel. If the team discovers illegal drugs, the vessel's crew will be taken into custody and the vessel seized for violating U. S. law. Intelligence Specialists (ISs) assigned to U. S. Navy ships and aircraft squadrons could become involved in identifying narcotics snuggling vessels and planes. A suspect vessel normally has several of the following traits: --50 to 100-foot fishing vessels or 80 to 250-foot coastal freighter operating outside normal fishing or merchant areas, “--numerous electronic or communication antennas, ~~excessive crew for the apparent purpose, --false waterline, --riding low in the water, --poorly maintained, --rubber fenders or tires over the side, “-rub marks on the side, ~-no visible fishing equipment, ~-equipment in disuse or ili-repair, -~~foreign registry, ~-maneuvering erratically when sighted, ~-dead in water (DIW) for no apparent reason with smaller vessels nested alongside or in the immediate area, -~no identifying marks as required by law, ~-attempting to conceal true identity through voice or pennant . * communications, , --crew ignoring a military unit in their area, V-2 UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED —-operating at night without running tights, ‘--needing assistance but refusing offers to help, --bales visible on deck. A suspect plane may have several of the following traits: ~-passenger seats missing; --numerous cardboard boxes, duffel bags, plastic bags, or other containers inside; -~windows covered; --side numbers or markings altered, falsified, or obscured; —flight beginning from a foreign airfield; --non-squawking transponder; -~extra fuel tanks; --altitude less than 15,000 feet; -~speed 180 knots or less; ~-navigation or anticollision lights off; --dropping to low altitude prior to reaching the U. S. border. Signting reports by U. S. Navy ships or planes may begin a series of events leading to the successful seizure of illegal drugs coming to the country. Within operational restrictions and prudent airmanship and seaman- ship, Fleet Commanders in Chief (FLTCINCs) encourage their units encountering suspect vessel ae or aircraft to send information in the following format: Time of sighting. Position. Heading. Speed. Altitude (if a plane). V-3 UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED f. narrative (transponder, markings, color, engine number, etc.). Immediate precedence message should be sent to the FLTCINC, nearest regional national narcotics border interdiction system (NNBIS) center, and the Coast Guard Intelligence Coordination Center. Message addresses are: --CINCLANTFLT NORFOLK VA, --CINCPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI, --COORD GULF REGION NNBIS NEW ORLEANS LA, --COORD SE REGION NNBIS MIAMI FL, --COORD NE REGION NNBIS NEW YORK NY, ~-COORD PAC REGION NNBIS LONG BEACH CA, ~-COGARD INTELCOORDCEN WASHINGTON DC. (ISC D. COLE, USN, NNBIS, GULF REGION) LONG BEACH INTELLIGENCE ACTION GROUP (IAG) ESTABLISHED Intelligence assistance for Surface Squadron ONE (SURFRON 1) and other Long Beach-based Naval Surface Force, Pacific (NAVSUZFPAC) ships has been limited to imported briefings and training provided by San Diego-based intel- ligence units because a intelligence support facility is not in the Long Beach area. To remedy this situation, the Long Beach Intelligence Action Group (IAG) was established to assist fleet units fulfill their intelligence train- ing requirements, to develop a dynamic intelligence awareness program for ship's crews, and to provide predeployment intelligence training and briefings. Composed of Intelligence Specialists from USS NEW JERSEY (BB-62) and USS PELELIU (LHA-5), the Long Beach IAG works for the COMNAVSURFPAC Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence (N2). Currently headed by the senior IS assigned to USS NEW JERSEY, the IAG consists of USS NEW JERSEY Snoopy Team members and volunteer ISs from USS PELELIU. These intelligence professionals are charged with providing direct support to the COMSURFRON 1 Staff, SURFRON 1, and other Long Beach ships. The IAG assists in establishing or upgrading shipboard intelligence programs, maintaining adequate intelligence libraries, coordinating formal training for the Snoopy Team, and improving shipboard intelligence collection and reporting procedures. They report their findings v-4 ~ UNCLASSIFIED
directly to the COMNAVSURFPAC N2, ensuring that the chain of command is kept equally informed. (v) Designed to last no longer than 4 hours, each assist visit | includes a debrief for the Commanding Officer and the Executive Officer. The IAG schedules follow-up visits to provide intelligence assistance, training, and support, including an assessment of improvement, scheduling necessary schools, and general intelligence awareness briefs. (CAPT E. A. BROOKES, USN, COMNAVSURFPAC N2) CTF 168 AT SEA
(U) Duty for 1630s and ISs within the Defense Attache System, such as the post in Singapore, offers a variety of challenges in interesting cities around the world. The Assistant Naval Attache in Singapore is a 1630 billet for a lieutenant commander or commander, and the DAO has two billets for chief or first class Intelligence Specialists. There is no language requirement for duty in Singapore and life in the island nation is comfortable. For those with an interest in photography, and a resistance to sunburn, DAO Singapore is a post to be considered. (CDR PAUL KIDDER, USN, ASSISTANT NAVAL ATTACHE, USDAO SINGAPORE) vV-6
VI. FLEET INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS COORDINATOR'S COLUMN by CDR SKIP OLSEN, USN (U) After a successful Initial Operational Test and Evaluation, the Fleet Imagery Support Terminal (FIST) program was the subject of a NAVELEX Acquisition Review Board (NARB) and a Sponsor's Program Review (SPR), both of which were concluded successfully. With the signing of the Test and Evalua- tion Master Plan (TEMP), a limited production contract will be signed with Northrop Corporation. The acquisition process works slowly, but it works. (U) In response to the continuing requests for biographic information on military and political personalities, we are incorporating biographic data in the Naval Intelligence Processing System (NIPS) Data Base. You should have received the initial release. (U) Our efforts in developing analytical aids continue unabated. Some, like the Developmental Aircraft Reports Tracker (DART) and Developmental Submarine Analysis Testbed (DSAT), have been providing assistance to analysts, with varying degrees of success, for some time, while the Developmental Unified ELINT Tracker (DUET) was installed at NAVOPINTCEN. The Developmental Surface Analyst Testbed (DSURT) is a “documentation-only” DWARF, while the Prototype Ocean Surveillance Terminal (POST) is a dynamic software package running on an HP 9020C. (U) The “bottom line” for all our efforts is you, the fleet user. If you have any questions, comments, or suggestions, please provide them and we. will do our utmost to respond immediately and, hopefully, positively. NIPS INTELLIGENCE CENTERS (ICS) DESK TALK by Maj I. L. HOLUREDGE, USMC, and GySgt T. MOSES, USMC (U) FLEET IMAGERY SUPPORT TERMINAL (FIST) (U) Since our last Newsletter, the FIST has undergone some major developments and milestones. VI-1
(U) We continue to work on the FIST concept of operations and implementation plan. We have distributed a strawman to the fleet so your comments can be incorporated into the final product. (U) GySgt Moses has completed and published the preventive maintenance manual for the Honeywell VGR-4000 hard copy device. Use of this manual will help prevent or solve some of the problems you have encountered. ° (U) Northrop has finished four production units for non-Navy users. Even though not destined for Navy use, they incorporated the recommendations you submitted. The keyboard and trackball shelf can be pushed into the cabinet for ease of storage; the dual disk drives have been moved from the computer area to above the monitor; the computer, hard copy unit, and image processor have been merged into one cabinet under the keyboard; a message display screen is located between the monitor and the keyboard (this will replace voice coordination via the KY-8); and the Honeywell hard copy device has been replaced by the VISOR D (a unit proven in sea service with the French Navy). (U) See Figures (1) and (2) for recent and projected FIST assignments. (U) You may have heard this before, but it is still valid. We realize the need for spares for the demonstration FISTs, but only a limited amount of money is available for their purchase. One source of Spares is the FIST we have set aside as the “worldwide spare." Although the system can be deployed for a high priority contingency, its main use is as a source of spares for demonstration units afloat and ashore that must be repatred immediately. The spares problem will go away with the arrival of the production units which will he fielded with full spares kits. (U) NIPSSA is sponsoring a FIST decal design contest. The coatest is open to all fleet FIST users. The winner and winning entry will be published in a future issue of the Newsletter. The FIST logo should center around the idea of imagery transmission. Due to the cost of producing the decals, it is requested that the number of colors be kept to a minimum. Submit your entries to: Naval Intelligence Processing System Support Activity (NIPSSA~41), 4600 Silver Hill Rd., Washington, D.C. 20389-5000.
QaIdISSVIONA €-IA FIST DEPLOYMENT CHRONOLOGY: JANUARY 1984 ~- MAY 1985 FIST TWO - FICPAC Since September 1982 FIST THREE FICEURLANT Since April 1983 FIST ONE FIST FOUR FIST FIVE FIST FIVE FIST SEVEN 1984 _ JAN RANGER INDEPENDENCE xk NORTHROP GUAM FEB RANGER INDEPENDENCE/KENNEDY NORTHROP GUAM ~ MAR * NORTHROP KENNEDY NORTHROP GUAM APR NORTHROP KENNEDY /SARATOGA NORTHROP GUAM/NASSAU MAY KITTY HAWK SARATOGA NORTHROP NASSAU JUN KITTY HAWK/AMERICA SARATOGA ENTERPRISE NASSAU JUL AMERICA SARATOGA ENTERPRISE NASSAU « AUG AMERICA/ENTERPRISE SARATOGA ENTERPRISE NASSAU/SHREVEPORT z SEP ENTERPRISE/EN ROUTE SARATOGA/AMERICA ENTERPRISE SHREVEPORT Ee OCT EN ROUTE/NAVELEX AMERICA/ EISENHOWER ENTERPRISE SHREVEPORT INDEPENDENCE 7 NOV eke NAVELEX EISENHOWER ENTERPRISE . SHREVEPORT INDEPENDENCE ba DEC NAVELEX , EISENHOWER ENTERPRISE/EN ROUTE SHREVEPORT INDEPENDENCE a 1985 __ JAN NAVELEX . ETSENHOWER EN ROUTE SHREVEPORT INDEPENDENCE /VINSON FEB NAVELEX EISENHOWER EN ROUTE/TARAWA SHREVEPORT/SAIPAN VINSON PROJECTED FIST DEPLOYMENTS MAR NAVELEX EISENHOWER TARAWA=>MIDWAY SAIPAN VINSON APR NAVELEX EISENHOWER=>MIDWAY MIDWAY SAIPAN VINSON MAY NAVELEX NIMITZ MIDWAY SAIPAN VINSON=>CONSTELLATION ¢ * At Northrop for preventive maintenance. ** At Northrop as worldwide spare. ***k At NAVELEX, ST. Inigoes, MD, for refurbishment and service as source of ’ worldwide spares. ‘ ts FIGURE 1
daldIssvTOnn PROPOSED FIST SHIP IMPLEMENTATION FY-86 FY-87 EE A nee FORRESTAL RANGER MIDWAY SARATOGA MT. WHITNEY BELLEAU WOOD INCHON KENNEDY - CONSTELLATION NIMITZ KITTY HAWK LA SALLE PELILEU GUADALCANAL AMERICA ENTERPRISE CORAL SEA INDEPENDENCE CORONADO NASSAU OKINAWA SAIPAN VINSON EISENHOWER BLUE RIDGE TARAWA TWO JIMA NEW ORLEANS FY-88 FY-89 ROOSEVELT LINCOLN TRIPOLI LOWA WISCONSIN LHD(s) (5) ' WASHINGTON GUAM MISSOURI NEW JERSEY FIGURE 2 Gz1AISSVIONA
Ee FLEET FIST COMMENTS. FROM FICEURLANT--FIST: AN OPERATIONAL PFRSPECTIVE by LCDR J. HOEY, USN, FICEGRLANT en RR ee (U) Based on this experience, a number of observations can be made concerning FIST: (U) Terminal flexibility. The flexibility and capability of the terminal is impressive. There is no limitation to the type of image that can be transmitted. Data ranging from imagery to charts and fingerprints have been transmitted. Annotation capability makes it extremely easy to present the data in the most descriptive and useful format. VI-5
a ; (U) FICEURLANT has been actively involved in a number of other aspects of FIST. Over 250 people, ranging from flag officers and Congres- sional subcommittee members to fleet operators, have been briefed or trained on the operation of FIST. FICEURLANT has produced a comprehensive training manual and provided copies to fleet units. Currently a standard operating procedures manual for LANTFLT is under development to include such information as formatted message summaries and support requests, basic troubleshooting procedures, procurement, and training.
UNCLASSIFIED Sa NIPS DATA BASE DESK TALK by IS1 JON THOMAS, USN ene In response to fleet requests, the NIPS Data Base is now enhanced with biographic information that is being distributed to the fleet through the NIPS Augmentation Program (NAP) and the Shipboard Microfiche Program (SMP). NIPSSA-42 has recently accumulated biographic data that is being updated regularly from COMSEVENTHFLT, CIA, and DIA. This information has been forwarded to NISC-61 for miniaturization in a biographic microfiche format to be distributed to NIPS capable ships through the NAP and the SMP. CIA initially provided approximately 4,000 biographies which included chiefs of state, mintsters of defense, mayors, and prime ministers of various countries of interest. DIA provided additional biographic data on military personnel. NIPSSA will receive approximately 6,000 updates to this BIO data base biannually from CIA. In addition, 2,000 - 3,000 updates will be provided annually by DIA. NAP tabulates the biographic files and their contents which have been microfiched for the miniaturized data base. The reference index consists of the following: I. Long Title of Biographic Il. Short Title III. Accession Number Iv. Subject VII. Topic (Biography) Parts I, II, and III are intended primarily to serve as library document accession tools. Part IV of NAP is where the subject of your search can he inittally located and retrieved by: country of personality, subject within country, and name of personality (last name, first name, rank or position, photo, and personal history). Part VII is the topic (Biography, e.g.; long title: biographic data--Italy.) Part V, object category, and part VI, object class, will not he used. twee VI-7 UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED This biographic data will be combined with the reference index (publication file). The major difference lies with the accession number order: biographies will have the prefix BIO. ST ST et PN OSIS MANAGEMENT DESK TALK by LT PAUL GARDELLA, USN SR sr in The DART system installed at FOSIF WESTPAC has been operating for over a year. We have learned a lot about how to automate the air problem (in some cases how not to automate it) and have made several modifications or enhancements to the system. There are still some problems which plague the system, but we are trying to correct these. In the meantime, we are providing lessons learned to the OSIS Baseline Upgrade (OBU) folks to help them build an effective aircraft reports tracker in Phase II. DSAT, a prototype system to develop and validate submarine analysis requirements, is currently accessible to analysts at NAVOPINTCEN, SAC, CNO (IP) and CINCLANTFLT, and will soon incorporate Phase II capabilities. These focus on providing increased auto-input and auto-correlation of data; enhanced display, annotation, and data manipulation features; and readiness and statistical analysis tools geared toward forecasting trends and activities. Expansion of DSAT to CINCPACFLT and connectivity to the I-2 network is also in the works. Although not a formal DWARF effort, NIPSSA and NAVOPINTCEN tasked the Naval Ocean Systems Center (NOSC), San Diego, to produce functional and data base descriptions of a DSURT. This documentation, some of which has already been delivered, will define requirements and analytical techniques for processing, correlation and interpretation of multi-source intelligence on Soviet surface forces. DSURT's conceptual foundation will draw heavily upon the successes of DSAT and DUET, and will provide surface analysis requirement input to the development ef SEAWATCH III and O8U. Though it's been a long time in coming, the DUET system is finally something we can see and touch. Though we will not see a DUET system at any of the OSIS sites, we feel a valuable contribution has been made to the OBU effort by passing on the expertise gained through building the system to the people building the OBU ELINT correlator/tracker. We are still highly optimistic that DUET will provide NAVOPINTCEN with a viable ELINT capability. In the last issue of the Newsletter, you read about the POST. At the time, its performance had not been adequately evaluated. We now know enough about it to proceed with plans to deploy the system to the OSIS sites. POST VI-8 UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED is still experimental so we are expecting continual feedback from the sites to fold back into POST as future enhancements. We recognize that POST will not solve the ELINT problem in OSIS--it was not designed to. However, given that it is only an interim solution until the arrival of OBU, we think it Will give you enough to make it worthwhile. , Last, but not least, personnel changes in the OSIS Management Division have occurred. CDR Dean Baird was transferred to the “Navy Space and Warfare Systems Command (formerly NAVELEXSYSCOM) to take the helm of the Afloat Correlation System (ACS) Program. His relief is CDR Scott Schneberger. We are pleased to welcome aboard Mr. Don Gerbozy, formerly of FICPAC, and LTJG Stan Siver who comes to us from VA-75 in Oceana, Virginia. Don will provide some needed computer expertise. This, coupled with Stan's recent fleet experience, will add strength to our OSIS Division. Don't forget, we're here to “support the fleet” so don't hesitate to call if you need anything. Our AUTOVON numbers are 293-3512/3444/3645. eee REVIEW OF OBU by LCDR SKIP SAMPSON, USN eee Introduction The history of conflict has shown that victory does not always go to the numerically superior force. Often the deciding factor has heen a force muhtiplier: effective command, control, communications and intelligence (C°1). Today as never before, the U. S. Navy needs reliable, rapid communications and accurate, timely intelligence to offset the increasing threat of the Sovtet Navy. The Ocean Surveillance Information System (OSIS) is an essential element of the Navy Command and Control System (NCCS) which is helping to fulfill this need. The mission of OSIS has been clearly stated: OSIS shall receive, process, and disseminate timely, all source ocean surveillance information on mobile targets of interest above, on and under the oceans to the Navy and other services at all levels of command. In order to accomplish this mission, OSIS requires an effective and secure automatic data processing (ADP) system. Currently, this is the OSIS Baseline Subsystem (OBS). OBS was installed at five of the six OSIS nodes to handle the flow of locational data, provide word processing capabilities, and assist in analysis through display and manipulation of data. Though fully operational by 1979, it was quickly stressed beyond tts limits by increasing data flow and operational tasking. Recognizing that the ADP “-VI-9 UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED support at the sites had become the key limiting factor, a contract was let for a replacement system called OSIS Baseline Upgrade (OBU), which ts the subject of this article. The Commander, Navy Space and Warfare Systems Command (PDW-120) manages the program with requirements and guidance coming directly from the Director of Navy Command and Control (OP-094) and the Director of Naval Intelligence (OP-009). TRW, Inc. is che prime contractor for OBU. OSIS Baseline Upgrade (OBU) Approach. OBU is designed as an integrated system, with all modules having their place within the whole. It will retain the functional capability of the existing OBS, enhance that capability through new hard- ware and software, and provide additional capabilities. By design, OBU will exceed the performance of OBS in such areas as number ard types of targets handled, number of operator workstations, display and graphic capability, speed of operation, target tracking and correlation, message handling, and security. OBU's integrated architecture eliminates any single point of failure, provides protection against power surge or loss, and allows ease of maintenance and repair. Schedule. The first of three phases of OBU is scheduled to he operational in December 1986. Phase I is the Intelligence Support Group (ISG), which is essentially the hardware and software replacing the current OBS plus additional capabilities. Phase II is the Operations Support Group (OSG), which supports the CNICs and their staffs in London, Norfolk, and Hawaii. Phase III will incorporate enhancements to both the ISG and OSG. Although the sequence of OBU installation has not heen determined, installation is slated for five OSIS nodes (Rota, Norfolk, London, Hawait, and Kami Seya), NMITC, and CONUS support sites. Another key OSIS player, NAVOPINTICEN, will upgrade its ADP system, called SEAWATCH, during the same time. Hardware. The basis ISG site configuration will consist of the following hardware and analyst workstations: 3 host computers DEC VAX 8600; each processing at 4.2 million instructions per second (MIPS) and having 32 MB memory. 19 workstation DEC MICROVAX II; 8 MIPS, 4MB memory, drivers 62MB hard disk and dual 400KB floppy disk drives. ° Star Coupler Couples host processors and disk farm. VI-10 UNCLASSIFIED
Dual Ethernet Bus Couples all the CPUs (host and MICRO- VAX IIs). i2 A/N work- Ann Arbor Guru alphanumeric (A/N) . stations large screen terminals (56 line display) with amber screen. 8 graphics--A/N High resolution (1,280 x 1,024) workstations Genisco 8000 series color graphics terminals each linked with a Guru terminal. 1 system Three Guru terminals for system workstation manager acess to the host computers. System printers A site-specified mix of high speed and dot matrix printers and color and black and white graphics copiers. Storage devices Removable and nonremovable hard disks and magnetic tape drives. (U) Capabilities at Phase I. (U) Automatic Correlator Tracker (ACT). The OBU ACT is of particular importance in that it deals with the essence of fleet support: event~by-event locational reporting. The ACT is designed to function ina fully automatic mode, with analyst interaction required only to resolve correlation ambiguities. It automatically receives incoming contact reports. and continually accomplishes contact-to-track and track-to-track correlation. Pre- and post-correlation filters are available in the ACT. (U) The ACT correlates by unique and non-unique attribute data, ELINT, and spatial information. In general, the ACT will first attempt to correlate using unique attributes coupled with a geo-feasibility check. ELINT data is correlated using the Target Evaluation and Recognition by Extraction of Statistical Attributes (TERESA) algorithm and statistics drawn from the Naval ELINT Analysis Tool (NEAT). TERESA is designed to track an emitter on a specific ship wrile developing parametric ranges for that emitter and was chosen specifically for its automatic correlation capahilities. The Maneu- vering Target Statistical Tracker (MTST) algorithm is used for statistical correlation of spatial data. MTST is also the algorithm accepted for general use by the member systems of the over the horizon (OTH) community, giving OBU a high degree of commonality with other OTH correlation and tracking systems.
(U) In cases where correlation does not occur, the contact and likely tracks are presented to the analyst for resolution. Tools such as time, distance, speed, and bearing calculations, automated ELINT tools drawn from NEAT and editing functions are available to the analyst to assist in his decision. Also available is the capability to dead reckon (DR) tracks using land mass avoidance. (U) Automatic Message Handling System (MHS). Another important feature of OBU is the MHS, which is capable of automatically processing all incoming messages. If desired, a site could operate in a paperless environ- ment using the features of the MHS. Specifically, this capability consists of the automated receipt, retrieval, display, distribution, sorting, and deletion of formatted and narrative messages. Input message filters are available in eight general categories (e.g., alerts, event-by-event). Each category can have 256 filters, with 128 enabled per category at any one time. (U) All messages (input and output) are logged and stored online for 7 days. After that time, they are stored offline, with storage criteria and duration determined by the site. (U) Analyst Support Terminals. OSIS analysts can interface with the ~ system from alphanumeric or graphic workstations. (U) Graphics Workstations. The graphics workstation consists of a Guru A/N terminal, a Genesco color graphics terminal, a keyboard and a 3” variable rate trackball, all controlled by a MICROVAX II. The majority of analyst interaction is with the MICROVAX, with only occasional access to the host computers. This architecture minimizes the number of interrupts needed for the host to handle analyst queries and permits much faster overall processing of the system. The analyst generally downloads working files into the MICROVAX and performs data manipulation and analysis there. The MICROVAX can handle up to 300 tracks and 2,500 contacts. , VI-12
(U) Analyst commands may be entered in a variety of ways (e.g., hard or soft function keys, direct command entry from the keyboard, menu selection, track ball, or analyst-defined macro commands). Also available are a number of interactive analyst computational tools such as calculation of distance, bearing, speed, and time spans between locations, calculation of projections and intercepts (including DR or tracker projection using land mass avoidance), calculation of histograms and time-drift plots and editing locational and track data. Information may be retrieved from the data base by using specific sets of criteria (e.g., all Soviet ships in a geographic area between certain times) to support ongoing analysis. Further, the analyst can request and display weapon and radar coverage ranges for specific platforms by accessing the Technical Data Base. Finally, a “HELP” function exists to provide assistance to the user. (U) The mapping available in OBU is the World Data Bank II, which has a resolution of approximately .5 nm. Mercator and Polar Stereographic projections are provided in Phase I; True View will he available in Phase II. Up to 99 levels of zoom are available from a 5 nm by 5 nm display to a world map. Land/sea and political boundaries, cittes and special areas can be displayed, as can site-specified geographic overlays. (U) A/N Terminal. The A/N workstation is a Guru terminal and a keyboard driven by a MICROVAX II. As with the graphics workstation, most of the analyst interaction will be with the MICROVAX. Such functions as word processing, message generation, and system queries may be done on these terminals (whether stand alone or as part of a graphics workstation). The terminal screen has 56 lines total, though 12 of these are reserved for classification, prompts, alerts, command entry, and system status. The analyst may use all 44 lines for his work or he may choose to work in the split screen mode, which results in two screens, each of 22 lines. In this mode he may accomplish two specific tasks, independent of the other if desired, or related, such as copying from one screen to the other. (U) The word processing functions of the A/N terminal are roughly comparable to those of Wang. In addition to the normal editing features, some of special interest to the OSIS analyst are also incorporated: super copy, glossaries (called Macros), strikeover, wrap-around, vertical scrolling, search, search and replace, and pagination. (JU) Worth mentioning here is the Macro capability, which is the stringing together of OBU commands. The Macro in OBU can be used for interaction with the entire system. Further, three types are available: the VI-13
normal Macro run for a specific reason, a Macro that has built in stops for user-supplied inputs, and a Macro that can be automatically executed on a periodic basis (e.g., every 60 minutes). (U) System Management. OBU will be a very flexible system and responsive to operational requirements. To effectively use this flexibility, each site must have a well trained ADP operations cell for system management to “tune” the system, monitor its operations, analyze throughput and data flow, ensure up-to-date security, etc. This cell nay be a combination of civilian contractors and on site ADP personnel. Sufficient diagnostics are included in OBU to ensure that system management personnel (both dayworkers and watchstanders) can monitor the system and detect and take action on problems before they become critical. Further, three of the A/N terminals plus other hardware may be devoted to a system management workstation. (U) OBU Maintenance and Performance. Because of the built-in hardware redundancy and distributed processing software, the system will be designed for high operational availability. When failures occur, the system per- formance will gracefully degrade, vice ending completely, until recon- figuration efforts by on scene personnel are completed. Features to assist site maintenance efforts include automatic recovery from failure, online system diagnostics and extensive system logs to aid in analysis and trouble- shooting. (U) Security. Much of OBU design is driven by security, as is much of the cost. OBU is not unique in this regard as ADP security is achieving greater recognition within the milftary. Further, OBU is touching upon areas of security where there is no precedence, so much pioneering work has been done. At IOC, OBU shall be accredited for operation in the compartmented mode using B2 requirements delineated in CSC-STD-001-83 (DOD Orange Book) as a guide. (J) Capabilities at Phase II and III. Phase II will install the Operations Support Group (OSG) which will integrate blue force readiness, VI-~-14
UNCLASSIFIED locational planned movement, and planned employment data.- OSG consists of additional graphics and A/N workstations and large screen displays. Phase IT also provides Collection Management and, as noted elsewhere, True View map projection. Phase II further upgrades the air tracking capability of the system by automatically processing sensitive source air data. Phase III will enhance both the ISG and OSG and is still in the definition stage. Conclusion. The increased rates of data thrcughput and operational requirements currently experienced by OSIS nodes have gone far beyond the capabilities of its existing ADP support system, OBS. More and more, OBS ts the limiting factor in OSIS performance. OBU is designed to enhance the performance of the OSIS analyst. It will automatically perform routine functions (e.g., message sorting, contact correlation) while at the same time assisting analysis through tts expanded computational capabilities. OBU will be the “force multiplier” for the OSIS analyst. LCDR Thomas N. Sampson II is assigned to the Command Systems Program Office (PDE-120) within the Navy Space and Warfare Systems Command. His current duty centers upon the development and deployment of the OSIS Baseline Upgrade. Prior duty stations include COMSIXTHFLT, FOSIF ROTA Spain, Monterey Naval Postgraduate School, and Attack Squadron 113 in Lemoore, California. ZENITH 150 PERSONAL COMPUTER The Navy and the Air Force have entered into a joint requirement contract for TEMPEST-approved microcomputers with Zenith Data Systems Corporation. The award was for the 2-159 micro plus assorted peripherals such as various printers and plotters. The Z-150 is an IBM PC compatible personal computer which essentially duplicates the performance of an IBM PC in all areas. The primary basic system includes a 2~150 with 320K-bytes of RAM (random-access read/write memory), two 360K-bytes disk drives, a monachrome monitor, keyhoard, MS-DOS (operating systems), basic interpreter, diagnostic software, and required user manuals for less than $3,000. The secondary basic system additionally includes a 10M-byte removable disk cartridge unit for under $4,300. Various optional peripherals such as color monitor, letter quality printer, graphics plotter and software such as high-level language compiles, Multimate Wordstar, Lotus 1~2-3, d Base II are extra. Both Mail Back/Carry In and On-Call, On-Site Maintenance are available. VI-15 UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED The 2-150 PC may be the “total solution” for your intelligence related personal computing needs. It is a system with IBM PC compatibility to accese the wealth of software and peripherals developed for the IBM PC. The Z=-150 PC is compact, lightweight and features a detached keyboard. But productivity of any computer system depends to a significant degree on the software selected. The Z-150 PC allows a selection from the full range of 16-bit software developed for the IBM Personal Computer. Whether it is direct Intelligence support or more general Intelligence Management support, the 2-150 appears to meet the full spectrum of requirements of a stand-alone PC. For additional information see NAVDAC Advisory Bulletin #68 dated 19 October 1984. NIPSTRAFAC NOTES REVISED JUNIOR AFLOAT INTELLIGENCE OFFICER COURSE AT NIPSTRAFAC A review of the Junior Afloat Intelligence Officer Course and the Afloat Storage and Retrieval (S&R) Officer Course was conducted to determine whether course content was up to date and adequate to meet current fleet training requirements. The review indicated that because Junior Afloat Intelligence and S&R Officers would be working closely in the operating CVIC, both would benefit from some cross training. The new course is designed to provide the Junior Intelligence Officer with the necessary skills and knowledge to effectively manage the Multi-Sensor Interpretation (MSI), Mission Planning, and S&R areas of the NIPS Afloat Intelligence Center (IC). Informa- tion is provided on the overall capabilities of the Afloat IC, and detailed information is provided on the operations and equipment of the MSI, Mission Planning, and S&R functions. Emphasis is placed on the interface of the intelligence files (NIPS Data Base) with photo reconnaissance products and their use to support the tactical commander. The initial junior afloat course commenced 11 February with a four officer class representing VF-102, VF-103, USS DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER, and USS AMERICA. (CDR F. T. COSTARINO, USN) VI-16 UNCLASSIFIED
GaIaIssvIoNn LT-IA A A PS Aan STEP, NIPS SUBSYSTEMS, OSIS NODES, AND AFLOAT STAFFS ROSTER —— ee te BP RUOLER PRIMARY PERSONNEL ROSTER USS INDEPENDENCE (CV-62) (SLEP) (4/85 - 8/87) USS KITTY HAWK (CV-63) CDR OATES USS CONSTELLATION (CV-64) CDR GOODE USS ENTERPRISE (CVN-65) CDR WEBORG USS AMERICA (CV-66) CDR WADE USS JOHN F. KENNEDY (CV-67) LCDR DUBOIS USS NIMITZ (CVN-68) CDR NEWMAN USS DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER (CVN-69) CDR WILSON (COH 10/85 - 01/87) USS CARL VINSON (CVN-70) - CDR NIEUWSMA PCO, THEODORE ROOSEVELT (CVN-71) LCDR STESHKO LCC ~ AMPHIBIOUS COMMAND USS BLUE RIDGE (LCC-19) LCDR PFLUEGER USS MOUNT WHITNEY (LCC-20) LCDR UTTERBACK LHA - AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT A TCA OI ca eres renee USS TARAWA (LHA-1) LCDR TURNER USS SAIPAN (LHA-2) LCDR THOMAS USS BELLEAU WOOD (LHA-3) LCDR ROARK USS NASSAU (LHA-4) LT TUGMAN USS PELELIU (LHA-5) LCDR SCHULTZ a *CCTV-equipped only LCDR PERANICH LCDR STOLL LCDR SEIGLE LCDR OZOUF LCDR RAMSAY LCDR GRICE LT BREEN LCDR FOWLER LCDR SANTEZ LT SILK LT DAML A ee re COMMAND INTEL OFF ASST INTEL OFF CRYPTOLOGIC OFF LT Ct CE rn a a hn gre, CV_~ CARRIERS *USS MIDWAY (CV-41) CDR LESLEY LT RUBBO LT DUFFY *USS CORAL SEA (CV-43) CDR TOWER LT ALCOCK LT HARRELL USS FORRESTAI, (CV-59) LCDR CARRINGTON LCDR BLYTHE LT HAYES USS SARATOGA (CV-60) CDR WILCOX LCDR ABBOTT LCDR LINTHICUM USS RANGER (CV-61) CDR POSEY LT GENT LT MCELRATH LT NEWELL LT PELHAM LT DUFECK LT LAFORCE LCDR WOJDYLA LT TUOWERY LT PALUSZEK daIdISSVIONN LT PRODGER NONE CDR WHITON CDR DOHERTY ee
qa la4Issv1onn 8T-IA i COMCARGRU ONE cDR C. DAVIS TWO CDR CRABTREE THREE CDR MARTIN FOUR CDR ALEXANDER FIVE CDR VINSON SIX CDR GRIFFIN SEVEN CDR WARSHAWSKY EIGHT CDR JACOBY ene eee COMPHIBGRU COMMAND INTEL OFF ASST INTEL OFF CRYPTOLOGIC OFF LCDR JACOBSUN LT SANSOM LCDR MARTINI LCDR JOHNSON LCDR RUZICKA LCDR KEMHUS LCDR BORTMES LCDR BOYD, JR. LCDR SAHRBECK LT FIMUZIO LCDR SCHUSTER LT NIXSON LT WHETST INE LCDR CULVER LCDR FALLMEZGER LCDR WALTHER, JR. a ne LCDR BOURGEUIS ENS HARDING CAPT KACZMAR LT LEWANDOWSKI perieeteaeememeneeremens ee LT SWORD LT COUVILLION LCDR LYNN LT WELCH LT DRAKE LT WEINER LCDR DUFEK LCDR FLTZSIMMONS LCDR METHENY Se A pate peer, LCDR WILLIAMS LT TAGGERT TT ONE CDR BELL TWO CDR VANDERWEST THREE LCDR O'MALLEY ene COMCRUNESGRU ONE CDR DECKER TWO CDR PESZKO THREE CDR LAVEN FIVE CDR ERSKINE EIGHT CDR SMITH TWELVE CDR CROWLEY nee COMIDEASTFOR CDR SELDEN COMPHT BRON ONE LCDR EAKIN TWO LCDR PATULLO THREE LODR THOMAS FOUR LCDR WILDMAN FIVE LCDR IRWIN SIX LCDR STEWART SEVEN LCDR MAZURKIEW EIGHT CZ LCDR KEE . A aalTaISsvIonoa
GaIdISSVIONN t83) 6T-IA ee RS aR Tc eee COMMAND . co/oIc X0/AOIC/CIO/ISO OPS/swo CSG nen C/CLO/ISO OPS/SWO CSG FICs FICPAC CAPT JONES CDR WALLS FICEURLANT CAPT LEVIN CAPT SCHMIDT FOSICs/FOSIFs FOSIC CINCLANTFLT CDR PORTERFIELD LCDR WEIDMAN LCDR O'BRIEN LCDR KETTERER FOSIC CINCPACFLT ; CDR DUNCAN CDR LEGROW LCDR SHELEHEDA FOSIC CINCUSNAVEUR CDR LAUTENSCHLAGER LCDR KERCZ LCDR M. WILLIAMS CAPT LEWIS FOSIF WESTPAC CAPT SMITH CDR PREVAS LCDR MARSH CDR BARNETT FOSIF ROTA CAPT HELM CDR BULMER CDR BARTHOLOMEW A NIPSTRAFAC m CDR HOLLENDER CDR COSTARINO LCDR GORE eee GaIdISSVIONA
UNCLASSTIF TED VII. SECURITY RETRIEVAL AND ANALYSIS OF NAVY CLASSIFIED INFORMATION (RANKIN) SECURITY CLASSIFICATION GUIDES Many people have never used a classification guide to determine whether or not information in thetr automated data bases require protection. If you are one of these people, you should review the OPNAVINST 5513 series to determine which guides apply to programs in your command. After reviewing the fastructlons, you should distribute the guides to technical or management people in charge of programs or, at the very least, let them know where the guides are maintained. Encourage pertodic revtew to make sure that technical and operational tnformation is properly classified or controlled. Statements limiting distribution may also be appropriate for unclassified publications. A review of security classlfication guides is especially tmportant when small sets of technical data in individual data bases network with other data bases. While individual items may be unclassified, the aggregate could be classified or require distribution control. (NAVSECINVCOM) VII-1 (RB) UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED VIII. INTELLIGENCE TRAINING AND EDUCATION eh eee DEVELOPMENTS AT THE NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL (NAVPGSCOL) — EE RLS AA ra A a ae carp $e veamen e __ Editor's Note: The following excerpts from a recent letter signed by NAVPGSCOL Superintendent, RADM R. H. Shumaker, USN, are provided for your information. There are several interesting developments taking place at the NAVPGSCOL. A major laboratory improvement project is underway, a new academic building is planned for FY-86, a technical transition program has started for non-engineers, and a Systems Acquisition Management curriculum has been proposed as a split tour between the NAVPGSCOL and a Systems command. RADM Shumaker expects the NAVPGSCOL to play an active role in supporting the new Materiel Professional career path. An advanced degree earned as an 0-3 will preserve the option for a downstream transition at the 0-5 level. An advanced degree will provide the analytic skills, judgment, and maturity needed to succeed along the operations path as well. VIII-1 (RB) UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED IX. INTELLIGENCE OFFICER DETAILER'S DESK SELECTION BOARDS The following information was extracted from the Naval Military Personnel Manual and the latest issue of Perspective. It is intended to help you prepare for future selection boards. If you are being considered by a selection board, take time to verify the accuracy of your record. Order your microfiche record 4 to 6 months prior to the convening date of the board and review it for completeness. Officers and enlisted members may receive a free, personal copy of their microfiche service record by submitting a written request to NAVMILPERSCOM (NMPC-312), the Military Personnel Records Control Branch. See NAVMILPERMAN 5030150 for detailed instructions. Be aware of board convening dates early enough to check and, if necessary, correct your record. Selection board schedules are published in the Navy Times or can he obtained by calling NMPC-321, the Selection Board Services Branch, at AUTOVON 224-3105, commercial (202) 694-3105. (NIC-01) IX-1 (RB) UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED X. IS COORDINATOR'S COLUMN cn RRNA (Editor's note: The telephone number for the IS Detailer is commercial 202-694-3133 or AUTOVON 224-3133.) Liaison with ISCM Fish, former IS Rating detailer, indicates that all too frequently there is a discrepancy concerning the recording of an individuals Navy Enlisted Classification (NEC). All of you should review the Enlisted Distribution Verification Report (EDVR) to ensure that proper coding is reflective of the NEC you hold. If your NEC is in error you need to take steps to correct it in accordance with the Navy Enlisted Manpower and Personnel Classifications and Occupational Standards Manual, Section II, Navy Enlisted Classifications, NAVPERS 18068D. The NEC is a true indication of your previous training and in some cases your experience. In conjunction with the above, it is a very. good idea for ISs to be cognizant of the existence of other manpower documents. I realize that in most cases the intelligence diviston/department/command relies on the manpower people to monitor the manpower issue. I would recommend that beginning ith the paygrade of E-5, ISs become familiar with the Following: --EDVR, a monthly statement of the activity's personnel account, reflecting all individual assignments, including projected losses and gains; --Manpower Authorization (MPA), OPNAV 1000/2, shows how many of each paygrade are authorized by CNO for your activity; --Officer Distribution Control Report (ODCR), NAVPERS 1391/5, a monthly report that displays each officer billet, authorized by CNO, and the incumbent. In addition to these documents, you should. also take the time to familiarize yourself with the terms Basic Allowance (BA) which is an indicator of the billets authorized by CNO after considering current budgetary constraints, priorities, and manpower policies; and Navy Manning Plan (NMP) which is the fair share distribution of total available IS assets to your command. The above documents and terms will help you better understand and influence manpower decisions. On 19 July 1985, I was relieved by ISCM Jim Holmes. He comes to the job with excellent credentials and will be able to use the skills he attained at the "A" School as the senior instructor. He will continue the difficult task X-1 UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFTED of monttoring the IS Community and insure that our billets and bodies are coordinated. My tour in Washington, D.C. was a most educational one. The interaction is of a magnitude that I find difficult to explain. Probably the best way to describe the job is that it was frustrating but very rewarding. By this, T mean it takes time to see an idea come to fruition. When this idea is fulfilled with visible concrete improvements, it is very gratifying. All I want to leave you with is--the people in Washington cannot make meaningful decisions without your valuable input. Keep them advised and offer solutions to any problems of which you may be aware. Continue to “blossom" no matter where you are assigned. (ISCM G. L. COBURN, USN, FORMER NIC-113) IS CAREER PLANNING AND ADVANCEMENT (NIC-01 note: We received the following article from Master Chief Johnson, a member of the FY-86 CPO Selection Board. All TSs and al] those who supervise ISs should read it.) Each of us has great interest in selection boards. Selection boards seem mystical: they operate in secrecy, perform some deeds, then evaporate. After the results of a board are announced, some people are elated, some are depressed, and some wonder what happened. Those selected traditionally offer advice which often sounds something like this: "This is the way to get selected because it worked for me." The purpose of this article is twofold: to provide some insight for TSs into the process of a selection board, and to share some general notions on career management. MENTOR: As early as possible in your career, find as senior a person aS you can and pump them for information, for advice. You don't have to use it, but make your own decision. Discuss your long term career objectives with them. This is more extensive than the "Sea Daddy” concept because it should look further into the future. Talk to a person who ts at the place, or point in their career that you aspire to reach. OBJECTIVES: Define some career objectives, specific milestones. If you are a First Class for example, you should already have in mind how you X~-2 UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED plan to get to Master Chief. An assignment should be looked upon as a specific building block, not as merely something to do for the next two, three, or four years. Some assignments will he more useful at a given point in your career over another point. An example: If you are being looked at for promotion to CPO, SCPO, or MCPO and your last assignment was’ either an independent one, or you simply had no one to supervise, you may be doing your self an injustice by taking another assignment just like that. There can he exceptions, of course. Write down your career objectives, the milestones to get you there, and the people whose help you may need to accomplish it. Of course, it is okay if you choose a comfortable job over possible advancement opportunities. People do this all the time; but know why you are doing what you are doing, and don't be surprised at the result. When you are getting ready for a new assignment, are you primarily interested in: the location, the command itself, and an assignment that will help you develop professionally in areas where you may be presently weak. DETAILER: In my opinion, this is one of the best and most knowledge- able sources of information available. Since 1975, every IS detailer has worked closely with me to improve retention and expertise in my command, or simply to get someone the slot they wanted. Detailers know which commands are “promoters” and which jobs are also. Your career is too important to attempt managing it without actively consulting the detailer. FRONT RUNNERS: What are some of the things that consistently separate selectees from nonselectees? From reading lots of evaluattons, this came through to me: front runners seemed more intense, stretched more to reach goals, tock on more challenges, recognized more opportunities to achteve and to help others develop. The question comes to mind: How comfortable are you with your job? Do you have it down to the point that now you can relax some? How is your time spent: is there slack in your time on the job? Do you feel you are performing at peak profictency? Front runners seemed to allow little slack in their career. A key word to remember: initiative! Front runners look for ways to expand, look for additional challenges. Their evaluations talked about improving the command in ways that impacted the mission, made significantly better use of scarce resources, and balanced superb technical competence with the ability to inspire others. JOBS: Some jobs offer more opportunity than others, but that is no handicap for hard-chargers. The handicap is being in a low-demand type job and then performing in an ordinary way. There were examples of jobs such as this, and some ISs were not content with that: either they appeared to make the job grow or they reached beyond the job and performed outstandingly with collateral duties, in the community, or in self-development through Navy X-3 UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED courses or off-duty college. A job is no greater or poorer than the person filling it. No matter how many words are used, a low-demanding job being - filled with little initfative will come through loud and clear on the eval. Keep in mind that the entire period of service, from the first day on, may be reviewed. As a minimum, the most recent five years will be reviewed. That means consistent performance is what the IS Community and the Navy is built on. HERE IS THE BEEF: The most important factors are: sustained superior performance for a period of at least five years, top marks, ranking in or near the top of your peers, top marks in leadership and counseling, with credible comments and justification, tours that offered challenge and required stretching, involvement in the command beyond one's joh, leadership in the community. The job description must be clear and comprehensive, minimum jargon. The most effective bullets start with a power action verb Ce.g., initiated, developed, identified and designed) and end with a result ("which improved retention by 37%, reduced transmission time by 18%, saved $47,500 during two years, etc."). EVALUATIONS: It is recognized that a difficulty often exists when attempting to capture the details of IS performance because of the classification problem. You can overcome this by using this little model: INTENT, ACTION, and RESULT. The most effective bullets descrihe an action and the result it obtained, ideally a measurable, quantifiable result. The weakest bullets described only intent (t.e., TS1 Soandso thought up a new systen, or planned out how to improve the Center). These are pretty nebulous because it cannot be determined how IS1 Soandso performed (action/behavior), or the quality of the new system (result/outcome). Where possible, start with action. Define the action taken and its attendant result. This is especially good when henefit can be shown, even tf the result cannot be described in detail. For example, "ISl Soandse studied this data for two months and was the First to identify a significant feature that NISC had flagged as a priority item. Received a NISC kudo for the effort." Significant unit deployments or activities should be indicated. However, remember this eval is about the IS, not about the command. A good many evals used valuable space describing the command. The board cannot promote. a command. Show how the IS performed under difficult or arduous circumstances, dealt with stressful situations, took on big jobs. X=4 UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSTFIED Peer breakout is a great bonus for the top runners in a command, especially when there are large numbers in the same pay grade. Some commands seemed timid about this. Tf the breakout is not done on the front (in the numerical columns), at least mention on the back the person's ranking (1.e., this PO is number five out of 42 POL'’s in this command; or this IS1 {is number one of seven ISl's at this command). Saying 1S1 Soandso is the hest in his/her division (without elaborately describing the division) begs the issue. Another way for this to be useful 1s to say “top five" or “in the top seven of 33.” DETRIMENTS: If NJP is awarded, say so. If it was an isolated incident or completely out of character for the person, say so. If there was a temporary condition of reduced performance, describe (t but when performance is back up to par at a later time, be sure and close the loop by stating that the temporary condition has passed and performance is again up to standards. When there is a drop in marks with no apparent reason given in the narrative, the board is left to wonder how to deal with it. Was it an oversight, or did the command actually intend the drop. Don't be coy about this if you want your input respected by the board. SERVICE RECORDS:. ISs, it is your responsibility to ensure your promotion jacket contains current information. The board was stymied several times because of missing data. On other occasions, it was necessary to slog through a couple of inches of stuff a person submitted to the board, trying to find information not on the microfiche. Please, only send NEW information, not a complete rehash of the entire service jacket. Also, copies of special request chits and letters from home are seldom useful. Before you send in anything, check the fiche: if information you. consider important is missing, by all means send it in. Here is a hint on how to get your potat across to the board: make sure the package is neat, correct, and easy to use, an index on the first page ts helpful, all the sheets turned the same way, and all sheets are legible. ‘This package reflects you. If tt is neat, informative, and easy to use, it can help create a good impression of you. If you are sloppy about something as potentially important to your career as this, what does tt suggest about the rest of your professional activities? Finally, I have two last suggestions: FOR THE IS: Keep a record of your accomplishments through the year and keep your eval writer informed, not just at eval time but all the time, about what you have accomplished. Before you sign your eval, make sure it reflects your accomplishments and the overall character of duty you have X-5 UNCLASSTFIED
UNCLASSIFIED performed. If you disagree with it, it is your responsibility to submit a letter of rebuttal. Keep the letter of rebuttal to the point, deal with facts, avoid accusations and broad generalized statements. The board will respect this. FOR THE COMMAND: An eval should be clear enough that anyone reading it would understand your message. It sometimes seems that an average performer, for instance, deserves to get a bland eval. There are two parts to this: one is the average performance of the individual; the other is the average performance by the eval writer. Sloppy evals, evals‘that are hard or impossible to read, evals with incorrect data, evals that are not submitted anywhere near on time, and finally evals that fail to give the true neasure of the IS (regardless of the character of performance) don't do justice to our community! I want to point out, though, this was not the norm. The norm was well-prepared evals that were a credit to the command. REFERENCE: One of the best treatments on the selection process was prepared by ISCM Terry Schroeder last year. I have attempted to provide additional insights and not duplicate his article. However, I recommend that you read it whether you are up for selection or writing evals for those who may be. X-6 UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED a XI. FROM THE DESK OF THE NAVINTCOM MASTER CHIEF ee After talking with Intelligence Specialists throughout the Navy, I'm impressed with the positive attitude and professional growth ISs have experienced throughout the Intelligence Community. This has not always heen the case. Many of us were unsure of the future of the rating and perhaps unsure of our own ability to perform professionally. fortunately, the tide has turned and we have every right to be proud of our rating. Pride and professionalism is abundant in the Naval Intelligence Community. It should be clear to all of us that each IS is important to the command mission, the Naval Intelligence mission, and, most importantly, to the Navy. Quality of first termers is at an all-time high and retention remains stable. Retention of the career IS has never been better. Sadly, some of our senior career people prefer to be technictans instead of petty officers or chiefs. Those who are leaders are hard-charging, dedicated, highly motivated, morally strong ISs that we heavily rely on to provide the professionalism needed in the IS Rating and Naval Intelligence Community. My message to senior petty officers and chiefs is that the 1S Rating has never needed you more. Now is the time to be a professional military man or woman. It's time to be NAVY. TI know many of you have already made this commitment, but there are also quite a few that need to hear the message and become professional sailors. I know that far too often ISs who were not properly trained have been given less demanding duties while other ISs have taken up the slack. No longer can we allow this luxury. There are no excess ISs. Fach I$ must be properly trained and led. They must be able to perform the duties they were trained for at IS "A" School. We must start now to motivate them better, provide meaningful on-the-job training (OJT) opportunities, and care for then better. We need to develop good, professional ISs and future leaders. You senior petty officers and chiefs can make the difference. The Navy is yours and mine and we are charged with this responsibility in the Petty Officer and CPO creeds. To sum up in three words-~BE A LEADER. The following list can help you become a hetter leader. A Leader's Personal Check List 2 eae neck bist 1. Have I promulgated a clear set of standards for my division or department? XI-1 UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED a. Are these standards clearly understood by my subordinates? b. ‘Are these standards routinely and consistently enforced by me and my subordinates? c. Do my standards accurately reflect Navy standards of discipline? d. Do my standards include prohibition of drug usage and drug dealing? Alcohol Abuse? Inappropriate conduct aboard and ashore? 2. Have I promulgated a clear set of policies for my division? a. Are these understood? b. Are these policies realistic and are they foilowed? c. Do these policies reflect Navy policy? 3. Does my division have a set of clearly defined priorities? a- Are my subordinates involved in setting priorities? b. Are these priorities based on achieving maximum readiness for war? c. Are my priorities realistic, given my rescurces? 4. Do I have a clear understanding of the resources available to me? a- Have I inventoried my resources (fiscal, manpower, skills, experience, equipment, sustainability)? b. Do my POs manage their resources effectively? c.- Do my POs match command prtortties to division resources? d. Do my POs clearly understand the level of our command sustainability? 5. Does my division exhibit a high level of military professionalism? a- Are my POs effective? Are the leadership skills of my POs at a high level? b. Are we a disciplined division? XI~-2 UNCLASSIFIED
6. UNCLASSIFIED c. Do we have a professional's sense of pride? d. Do we have a winning attitude? e. Do we consistently look and act like professionals? Does my division have a high level of technical professionalism? a. Are we well trained? bh. Is my training program linked to my priorities and does it recognize my resource limitations and my training shortfalls? ready? 7. retention? 8. c.- Is my training clearly geared to making my division mission d. Do we conduct a realistic testing of our technical skills? e. Are we tactically proficient? Are we an involved division? a. Am TI an active teacher and counselor for my CPOs and enlisted? b. Are my CPOs and POs active as teachers and counselors? ce Are we all involved in safety, discipline, communicating, and d. Do we care about each other? e- Do we know each other? f. Do we communicate with each other face to face? Does my division retain its sense of balance and its perspective or are buried in detail? weaknesses? ae Do we really understand our misston? b. Do we have a clear and honest view of our strengths and c. Have we lost our sense of humor? Does my division or department have the will to fight and win? XI-3 UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED a. Are we mentally and phystcally tough? b. Are we physically fit? c.- Do we clearly understand that we are first and foremost warriors? d. Finally, do my CPOs and enlisted clearly understand that we can win only if: (1) We are disciplined, (2) We are trained, and (3) We are a team? 10. Does ny division have a strong, visible, and effective chain of command? a- Do my CPOs and POs clearly understand thete military and technical functions within the chain of command? be. Do all members of the unit clearly understand the critical tole of the chain of command in the combat readiness of this command? If you follow this check list you will see leadership really does work. You will become the LEADERS needed in the IS Rating and the Navy. I sincerely look forward to hearing from and working with each of you. (ISCM TERRY it. SCHROEDER, USN, FORMER NIC-COMC) XI-4 UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED Rn ee eye, XII. RECOGNITION CORNER by CDR JOHN R. LEWIS, USNR-R ee MOAR os ° . A A Soviet Surface-to-Air Missiles This Recognition Corner asks you to identify the Sovtet surface-to-air missile system, usually just from the launcher, and the associated fire control radar. I considered scrambling them, but thought that was un- nessarily cruel. I'm asking for the SA-N- number, not the NATO nickname that starts with a G, such as GOA. All Soviet naval missile systems are known by their NATO designations. When we discover the Soviet designation, the use of the NATO name has become so common that conversion would require republishing a huge number of references. In fact, we become so accustomed to the NATO nickname that many, especially the press, begin to believe the SA-N~ numbers and the names are the real Russian names. Ll. SA=-N- __ and fire control radar. XIT-1 UNCLASSTFTIED
UNCLASSIFIED fire control radar. 3. SA-N- Why is there no fire control radar shown? XII-2 UNCLASSIFIED
“S6A-N- and the UNCLASS IF LED XII-3 UNCLASSIFIED fire control radar.
UNCLASSIFIED 6. SA-N- and the fire control radar. Le, 7. SA-N- and the fire control radar. XII-5 UNCLASSTFIED
UNCLASSTFIED ee ANSWERS TO THE RECOGNITION CORNER UES, CURIE eee 1. The SA-N-3 with HEADLIGHTS. The photograph is of a HEADLIGHTS C to be exact. HEADLIGHTS C has solid twin reflectors on the top and a small dish located below and between the large twin mesh dishes. The SA-N-3 missile launcher can be distinguished from the SA-N~1 because the top of the rails are smooth. 2. The SA-N-4 and POP GROUP. The twin launcher for the SA-N-4 is shown here raised, a rare condition. The launcher retracts into the cylindrical magazine and usually only a split-coin cover is seen. 3. SA-N-5. There is no fire control rader because the missile is the naval version of the SA-7, an individually fired, heat-seeking homing missile. Seen here is the naval Stand, no SA-N~5 launch tubes have heen clamped into this stand, hut the four clamps can be seen where the tubes fit. With the advent of the head-on capable version, the Intelligence Community has curiously designated the new version with a new number, SA-N-8. As this missile is supplied to the Soviet Fleet the SA-N-5 designation will disappear, probably in just a few years. 4. The SA-N-1l and the PEEL GROUP. Shown here is the PEEL GROUP A. A PEEL GROUP C would have a fair sized dish projecting out from the center of the array. 5. The SA-NX-9. The associated fire control radar is the CROSS SWORDS which is only on the most recent UDALOY DD. Photographs of CROSS SWORDS are still in short supply and an unclassified one was not available for this article. 6. The SA-N-6 and TOP DOME. This picture is of the installation on KIROV. There are twelve doors for the vertically launched missile and the tops of the missile Tings are not visible. On SLAVA there are eight launch positions and the top of the missile ring is visible. 7. The SA-N-7 and FRONT DOME. The SA-N-7 launcher is a single arm launcher reminiscent of the UJ. S. Navy's TARTAR. Only the SOVRENNYY Class ) carries it so far. - XIT-6 UNCLASSIFIED
GIIAISSVIONN T~AIX OFFICE OF NAVAL INTELLIGENCE ORGANIZATION CHART AS OF APRIL 1986 EE MRCANT GALLON CHART —— DIRECTOR OF NAVAL INTELLIGENCE RADM W. O. STUDEMAN (U0P-009) 695-3944 /697-3960 EXECUTIVE ASSESTANT (OP-O09A) CAPT SAENZ 695-0124/74869 AIDE (OP-009A1) LT GEVING 697-3960/70261 DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INTELLIGENCE (OP-009B) INTELLIGENCE (OP-009C) MR. Re Le. HAVER RADM J. S. MCFARLAND 694-4408 695-2988 Crt Ne een ween ASST DNI FOR ADMIN ASST DNI FOR OPERA- (OP-009D)LCDR BARKELL] {TIONAL SUPPORT (OP-009G) DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ASST DNI FOR LEGAL MATTERS (JAG) (OP-009J) LCDR GENZLER ASST DNI FOR CURRENT INTELL (OP-009T) 694-0228 CAPT MOORE _ 697-4199 CDR_HERRINGTON 697-2916 697-0077 SAT SUORE 6974199 AERA ENGTON 69772916 J 697-0077 ~ ae a ASST DNI FOR PLANS & | | ASST DNI FOR RESOURCES | [ASST DNI FOR INTER- | [Asst DNI FOR FOREIGN | |ACENCY COORD (OP-009K) | LIAISON (OP-O09L) | CAPT WILBOURNE 695-4727 | [CAPT BRONSON 695-5333 POLICY (OP-O009P) CAPT CLARK 697-6071 (OP-009R) CAPT LAPIERRE 697-2070 ASST DNI FOR RESERVE AFFAIRS (OP-0U9W) CAPT ZICKAFOUSE 695-6255 “ASST DNI FOR SPEGIAL PROGRAMS (OP-009V) MR. LOWELL 695-9217 ASST DNI FOR JOINT NAT INTEL DEV (OP-009U) CAPT BETTS 763-3462 ASST DNI FOR TECHNOLOGY (OP-009T) CDR MURPHY (A) 697-4384 rer ae, ASST DNI FOR FOREIGN COUNTER INTEL (OP-009X) RADM FYNNN 763-3750 —RADM FYNNN 763-3750 _ (OP-009Y) CAPT EGLIN 694-0310 | ASST DNI FOR ANALYSIS Exchange /AUTOVON 694 224 695 225 697 227 763 293 daTAISSVIONA
GALAISSVIONN @~A1X “NICKEL TEAM CDR SWEETMAN-763- wk NIC-SBO - SPEC ASST FOR CIVILIAN PERS , MS. MOORE - 763-3542 | NIC-ON0R - SPECIAL ASST FOR R&D CAPT RILEY - 695-921 NIC-00Z - INSPECTOR GENERAL MR. RUNYON - 763-3557] id “—nic-0l1 <4 MANPOWER, { PERSONNEL & | TRAINING CAPT ‘BUCKLEY 763-3544 | | co, NISC | CAPT HOLIFIELD 763-2120/21 | NAVAL INTELLIGENCE COMMAND ORGANIZATION CHART HEADQUARTERS NAVAL INTELLIGENCE COMMAND NICc-00 COMNAVINTCOM RADM D. N. HAGEN 763-3552 NIC-00C NIC-00B DEPUTY DIRECTOR “| DEPUTY AND CHIEF OF STAFF MR. PD. HARMAN CAPE W. H. CRACKNELL 763-3556 763-3552 | 1 . ASSISTANT CUMMANDERS | NIC-02 | NIC-03 . ~~ NIC-04 FINANCIAL | OPERATIONS SECURITY MANAGEMENT / CAPT WEST CAPT HORN COMPTROLLER |__| 763-3595 763-3582 MS. SWLFT 763-3410 COMPONENT COMMANDS Co, NIPSSA | ore | CAPT WEST CAPT MCKNIGHT 763-3506/07 763-3595 “CO, NAVOPINTCEN CAPT LOVELAND 763-3694/95 a a a tle He — 7 NIC-O0J —- DIR, CAPT BETTS 763-3462 NIC-UON - ASST FOR AS OF APRIL 1986 NIC-00A ATDE/FLAG SECRETARY CWO2_RUGEN - 763-3552 | _| NIC-OONC” COMMAND MASTER CHIEF ISCM FISH (P) 763-3551 | NIC-O0OS - SECRETARY MRS. BISHUP 763-3554 NIC-QOE - DEPUTY EQUAL OPPURTUNITY OFF ~| MR. ANTOINE 763-3540 JNIDS _JATTACHE AFFAIRS CAPT IDLEBERG 763-3440 NIC-00Q - ASST FOR _JPROCESSING SYSTEMS CAPT MCKNIGKT 763-3406 NIC-CSO - CONSOLIDATED _{SECURLITY OFFICE MR. MARTZ 763-1282 Nic-05 DATA MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION CDR JAMES 763-1614 Exchange /AUTOVON 695 225 763 293 | aes da 14 ISSVTIONA
NAVAL SECURITY GROUP AS OF APRIL 1986 ORGANIZATION CHART HEADQUARTERS — NAVAL SECURITY GROUP COMMAND | rn rc ee COMMANDER eee [ —_—— {_ G. . ASST. FOR FORCE MASTER || INSPECTOR GEN RADM D. H. MCDOWELL MARINE CORPS ASST. FOX PLANS, PRO- CHIEF GK 282-0444 GM ASSISTANT RESERVE PLANS GRAMS, BUDGET GE CAPT J. P. DEPUTY COMMANDER LTCOL J. E. DEICHMAN! |& READINESS & RESouRcES | | crTcM R. H. OGREN GB 282-0251 GR MANAGEMENT / ANDERSON, ILI 282-0306 __| CAPT J. C. LEWIS RADM W. J. COMPTROLLER 282-0264 282-0444 _ MILES 282-0201 GD CAPT C. W. _— MORRIS __. 282-0491 —— $ OQ e 2 as 5 cave a os OT - | o | ASSISTANT COMMANDER | ASST. COMMANDER ASS‘. ASST. | ASST. fa _ | (SPECIAL OPERATIONS) (SIGNALS SECURITY) COMMANDER COMMANDER COMMANDER a G50 G60 (PERSONNEL/ (TELECOMMUNICA~ (LOGISTICS & ~ | CAPT T. F. STEVENS CDR A. FOGERSON TRAINING) TIONS & AUTO- MATERIEL) | 282-0236 | 282-0479 | G10 DATA SYSTEMS) G40 | CDR D. Le G30 CAPT J.: CAPT G. E. —— CURRIE LEONARD __ 282-0758 |__HUKE 282-0531 __ ASST. COMMANDER ASST. COMMANDER 282-0459 | (TECHNICAL DEVELOP- NAVSECGRU a MENT) G80 FT. MEADE GF SPECIAL CAPT D. W. CAPBELL CAPT E. J. SULLIVAN ASST. ‘ 282-0630 688-6446 FOR ‘ SECURITY MR. G. G. Exchange/AUTOVON HENRIKSEN 282 292 282-0235 688 ~ 235
Diatribution: SWDL Al Au’ at a B2A B22 us as 21a 22a 23a 2342 23 2381 2392 238) 2386 tea 240 aan 266 zou 26a 260 26rd 26P3A z6rsa 26H 269 268 2ov 2ace 26HH 260Q1 269Q2 26YY 26000 26HHH 26KK z4Pe? 28a 258 zacl 282 zaAnt 2832 2451 UNCLASSIFIED (Tamedtare Office of the Secrecary) (Secretary of the Mavy (3 copies), Assiscanc Secretaty of tne Navy Reanearch, Engineering and Syerems (1 copy}, and Manpower and Reserve Affairs (2 copies)) (Deparcuert of the Navy Stctf Offices) (Office of Peogras Appraisal, Judge Advocate Ceneral, and Chief of Navel fi osly} (Chief of Navel Operations) (Ope M09, 1098, NOFA, CO9D, GO, OOSE, 0G9G, 009K, 30%), COOK, N08r, OO9P (2 coptes), OO9R, ON9T, OSV, HOM, HO9X, HOSY (2 copies), OO, OF, 02, 226, 03, 3S_ 37, 372, O8, 63, 0S, $066, 55, $9, O6C, 642, O9N, M1, 922, 940, 962, M6C, 945, 0950, 982, 986, 987, 098, O98D, £372L10, OOK, and OfR, only) (Headquarters U.S. Martine Corps) (Codes INT, INTC, INTH, INTP, INTS, and SNTX, only} ry (Secretary of Defense? (Coden C°I/TIS, and OUSD(P)/IPS, only) (Spectal Agencies, Staffe, Boards, ané Committees) (JCS (3 coptes); BIR, DIA (65 copt NSA (S$ coptes); Defense Langusge Ineeieute, Foreign Language Center; OIC (Codes AIS! (1 copy) and AISIB (2 copies), only) (Defense Mapping Agercy Coeponents and Elements) (Sefense Mapping Agancy Hydrographic/topographic Cencer; DYA Office Norfolk; DMA Branch Office Jacksonville; DHA Office Sen Diego; Defense Mapping Agency Azroszace Center; ond Defense Mapping School, Fr. Selvotr, only) {College and University) (Nactonal Defense University, National Wer College, and Arwed Forces Staff Colle only) (Commandant, U.S. Coase Guard (G-OIS-3) (ATTN: CMC-0)) (Fleet Commanders tn Chief and Detachment (lesa CINCUSMAVEUR DZT) (5 coptes each}) {fleet Commanders) (Navel Force Commander LANT) (COMNAVPORAZORES and CONKAVICE, only) (Naval Force Commander PAC) (COMNAVPORIAPAN, COMNAVMARIANAS, COMUSNAVPHIL, COMNAVFORKOREA, and COMNAVFORKOREA DET CRIC CHINHAE, only} (Naval Force Conmander CNO) (COMUSNAVCENT, only) (Spectal Force Commenter LANT) (Special Force Commander PAC) (COMCARSTRFORSEVENTHFLT, COMSURFCOMBATANTFORSEVENTHFLT, and COHPATRECONTORSEVENTHFLT, only) (Spectai force Commanders) (Special Force Commanders CENTRAL) (COMLOESTFOR) {Ate Force Commanders) (Surface Force Commenders) . (Hine Warfare Command) (Subdsarine Force Commander) (fleece Teatning Commande) {Aaphtbious Croup) {SEAL Team and SEAL Delivery Vehicle Team) (Operacionsl Test and Evaluation Force Commander) (Operational Test end Evesuation Force, Deputy Commander Pactfic) (Operational Test and Evalustion Force Detachment Sunnyvale) (CPleet Training Group) (Nuclear Weapons Training Croup) (WR Ineghore Under Wattare Group} (COMNRIUWGAU ONE, only) (Landing Force Tratning Command) (CG, LETCLAKT (2 copten)) (Fleet Coordinating Croup) (Combined Services Support Progras School) CSpectal Warfare Group LANT) (COMNAVSPFCWARGRU TWO, CO, NAVSPECUARUNIT TWO, AND CO, MAVSPECWARUNTT FOUR, only) (Spectal Warfare Group and Unie PAC) (COMNAVSPECWARCAU ONT, and NAVSPECWARUNIT ONE, onlv) (Fleet Gcean Survetilance {Information Factlity (3 coples each)) (Fleet Coabac Syeteas Training Unic) (Fleet Compoatee Operational Readiness Croup) (Taceteal Training Croup) (Fleet Itnrettigence Support Center (5 coptes)) (Cacetee Group) (Lese COMCARGRU $) (Ceutser-Sesicoyer Group) {Surface Group LANT} (COMSURFWARDEVGQU, only) (Surface Ceoup and Faree Representative PAC) (COMMAVSURFCRU CUEDPAC and COMNAVSURFCRU WESTPAC, only) (Service Croup and Squadron, LANT) (COMSERVCRU 2, only) {Service Croup and Squadron, PAC) (COMSERVGRU 2, only) (Submarine Sroup and Squadron, LANT) (COMSUSCRU 2, COMSUBCRU 4, and COMSUBCRU B, anly) arch, DL-1 Ot etetbetion: 2aK2 zat 2902 298 2981 29¢2 rare 29L2 29Aal na v1a1 a1a2 32¢ aul haz 4283 4202 $208 4202 62 ame am bin 420 ap 4251 4282 arr 4201 rid ou 422 4258 42Cck 62CC2 42cc3 4205 42cG 42H 45aL *5A2 ssn ay <8 eACt Ya se 30D 5G UNCLASSIFIED (Sone’é) (Subwarine Croup ané Sausdron Pac) (COMSUBGAU $, CONSUBCRU 7, and COMSUBCRU @, only) (Amphidsous Squsdron) (Guided Misaile Crutser PAC (CC) ACCH)) (USS VILLIAN W. STANDLEY (CC-32), and USS TRUXTON (CON=35), aniy) {Atrcrate Cacrter (CV) (OUN)) (3 copies each) (Oestroyer LANT (05) 94) Clase) (255 O'BANNON (DD-987), ang LSS PETERSON (00-96%), onlv) (Dasreoyer PAC (DD) 953 Class) (USS OLDENDORP (DD-972), only) C¥etgace LANT (FF), 1078/1097 Clase) (USS MOIWESTER (FP-3097), only} (Frigate PAC CFF), 1078/1097 Class) (USS BREWTON (PF-1086), enly) (Culded Mtsstle Frigate LANT (77C) 7 Clase ané Fleet tntre- duction Team) (PCO, SAMUEL S. ROBERTS (FFC-58), only) (Asphibious Command Shios) (3 coptes each) (CAmpridtous Asesuit Ship LANT (UHA), (LPAD) (ESS CUADALCANAL (LPH~7), USS GUAM (LPH-%), USS INCHON (LPH~12), USS Tuo JIMA (LPRi-2), USS NASSAU (LRA-#) (2 copied), and USS SAIPAN (LHA-2) {2 coptes)} (amphidtoua Agsaule Ship PAC (LMA), (LPR) (USS BELLEAU WCOD (LAA-3) (2 copies), USS NEW ORLEANS (LPA-11), USS OKINAWA (LPH-3), USS PELELIC (1 HA-3) (2 cootes), USS TARAWA (LMAM1) (2 copies), and USS TRIPOLE (LPRe10), only) (Amphibious Ship) (USS KISKA (AE-35), only) (PFleez Aie Command LAST) (COMPAIRKEPLAVIE, only) CRleec Atr Command PAC) (COMFAIRSESTPAC OET CUBL FT, only) (Fleet Ale Command EUR) (COMFAIRNED) CFunectonal Ying Conzander and Squadron LANT) (Funcelonal ving Cowanser PAC) (C°MASHWINCPAC, COMPITAEWWING- PAC, COMLATWINCPAC, CC™MATVAQUINGPAC, and COMPATWINCSPAC, only) CFleee Avtation Spectalized Operational Training Greup LANT) CFASOTRACRULANT, only) (Fleet Aviation Spectalized Operstional Tratning Group PAC) CFASQTRACRUPAC, only) (Type Win; Commanders) CCaveter Air Wing (CVU) (CVWR)) CActack !qusdron) (VA)) (Tighter Squadron (VF) and Weapons School) (Air Anct-Subwarine Support Unie) (Air Ancit-Subssetne Squadron) (VS)) (Patrol Wing and Squadron) (VP) (VPt!)) {ate Test and Evaluation Squadron ('t) and Oceanographic Development Squadron (VX) LANT) (AIATEVRONM 1 (VR-1), only) (ate Test and Evaluation Scquedron (VX) and Antarctic Sevelop- went Squadron (VKE) PAC) (ALRTEVROW & (VX-6), AIRTEVRON $ (VX-$), and ANTARTICOEVROM 6 (VXE-6), only) CTectical Ate Control Group and Squaéron (VTC) (Helicopter Coadact Support Squaéron LANT (HC)) (AC-6, HC-8, aad HC-16, only) (Helicopter “tne Countermeasures Squadron (HM)) (CO, AELIL“ERON TWELVE, only {2 copies’) (Fleece Air Reconnatssance Squadron (VQ)) (Tectleal Electronic tarface Squedron (VAQ)) (Helleopter anci-Subserine Squadron) (4S) {(Hellcoprer Antt-Subsarine Squadros, Lighe LANT (HSL)) (Helltcopcer Anti-Subsarice Squadton, Lighe PAC (HSL)} CHelfcopeer AnttoSubmarine Squadron, Light Reserve (HSL)} CHSL-RG, only) (Carrier Aichorne Zarly vacning Squadron) (VAW) {Strike Fighcee Squedton (VFA)) (VFA~t06, VFA=131, VPA~t32, VFA-2S, YVFATIT), VFACL25, and VFA*3"F, only) (Hesteooter Attach Squadron Light (KAL)} (fleece Marine Force Consands) (Maeiae asphihbtous Forze! (Marine Oiviston) (CS FIRST MARDIV, CG SECOND MARDIV, and CC THIRD MARDIV, only) (tttgade and Amohidbious Caica) (CC FIRST MAR BDE, CG SIXTH MAB, and CG SEVENTH MAB, oriv) CAlrcrate Wing) (Ateceafe Croup) (MAG 1S, only) (Contfied Commande) (ISCINCPAC, USCISCLAST, USCINCCENT, an@ USCINCSO, only) (Subordinate Unified Cosmands) (COMUSKOREA, COMICEDE?OR, and COMUSFOACARIS, onty) {Components of Unified Casmands) (CINCUSAFE (2 coptes), only? Cacetvittes of Unified Commands) (COMLANTCOMELINTCEN ond IPAC ($ coptes), only)
Disetrtbucton: SIA suse cz cu CcaPso cen c7 cz0 Can Coe coos CBLA CALE Ly 2302 €303 £3046 E306 e3o7 £30 e3010 Fa2 Fab Fain Far? Fare Fal Fae Eas fer FES UNCLASSIFIED (Cone’d) (Supreae NATO Commands) (Supreme Allied Commander, Atlantte, only) (Mediterranean Area) (COMNAVSOUTH (2 coptes), only) (Sentor Naval Officety at Alr Force Activicies) (Senior Naval Officer, 3428th Technical Training Squadron, Offutt AFB, NE 68113. only) {To Wavel Personnel act DOD of other Government Agencies) (U.S. Wavy Elesent, USEUCOM Defense Analysis Center; U.S. Navy~Harine Corps Element, Headquarters, LSEUCOM (Code £C52+5): Milicary Assistant co che Presiderc: United Stares Liaison Officer to Supreme Allied Comsender Atlartic; and Nevy Elesent, Joint flectronic Warfsre Center, only) (Education and Training Prograp Development Center) (Corry Division) (Progtas Managers) (Director, Joint Cruise Missiles Progras Office (M-3) and (Code JOM=5514); and Prograa Manager, Thester Muctear Varfare Program Office (?4-23)) (U.S. Defense Attache Offices) (U'SDAO ANKARA, USDAO ANTANANARTVO, USDAO ATHENS, USDAO BANGKOK, USDAO BEIJING, USDAD GEIRUT, VSDAO BELGRADE, USDAO SOCOTA, LSDAO BONN, USDAO BRASILIA, USDAO BRAZZAVILLE, USDAO BRIDCETOWM, LSDAO BRUSSELS, USDAO BLENOS AIRES, USOAO CAIRO, USDAO CANBERRA, USDAO CARACAS, USDAO COLOMBO, USDAO COPENHACEN, USDAO DAKAR, USDAO CUATEMALA CITY, USDAO HELSINKI, USDAO HONG KONG, USDAO ISLAMABAD, USDAO JAKARTA, ESDAO KINGSTON, USDAO KUALA LUMPUR, USDAO LAGOS, USDAO LIMA, USDAO LISBON, USDAQ LONDON, USDAO MADRID, USDAG MANILA, USDAO MEXICO CITY, USDAO MOGADISHU, USDAO 4OXROVIA, USDAO MONTEVIDED, USOAD MOSCOW, USDAO MUSCAT, USDAO NEW DELHI, U'Spao OSLO, USDAO OTTAWA, USDAO PARIS, USDAO PRETORIA, USDAG QUITO, USDAO RABAT, USDAO RIYADH, USDAO ROME, USDAO SAN SALVADOR, USDAO SANTIAGO, USDAO SANTO DOMINGO, USDAO SINCAPORE, USDAO STOCKHOLM, USDAO TEL AVI¥, USDAO THE HACLE, USDAO TOKTO, uSDAO TUNIS, USDAO WARSAW, and USDAO WELLINGTON, only) (CNR Shote Bamed Detachments) (Office of Nevel Research Detachment, Bay St. Louta; Navel Research Laboratory, Chesaveake Bey Detachnent;, Navel Research Laboratory, Underwater Sound Reference Detactwent; Ladorerory, Flight Support Setactment; Uaborarory, Spectal Projects Detachment; Navel Research Laboratory Field Sire Detachment, Pacific Missile Test Center; and Novel Research Laboratory Field Site Detachment, Navel Construction Battalion Cenrer, only) (Naval Securicy Group Decachwente) (COMNAVINTCOM Shore Based Derachments) (NAVOPINTCEN DET, Wewport, AI, onty) (Navel Inceliigence Operations Group and Unit Derachments) (CTC 168.1, CTU 168.1.1, CTU 168.1.2, CTC 168.2, CTC 168.3, CTC.4, CTY 168.6.1, CTC 166.5, and CTC 168.6 (3 coptes each)) (Mavel Electronic Syetens Engineering Activity Detachment) (navel Weapons Station Detachment) (FLTAC Corona (Code-8640), only (Laboratory ONR) (NRL (Codes 1406, 1225, snd 2627), Washington, DC 20375 (h copies)) (Ait Develoguent Center) (Conetel Systems Center) (Ocean Systema Center) (Code 17? (2 eoptes)) (Ship Reasearch and Development Center) (Surface Weapuns Center) (2 coples) (Undervater Syacens Center) (Weapons Center) (Fleet Incellipence Cencer EUR ond LANT) (20 copies) (Ate Stecton LANT) (CG, U.S. NAS, FPO dew York 09560; CO, NAS, Srunewich, ME OSOLL: and CO, U.S. NAS, FPO New York 09393, only) (Sutmarine Rage LANT) (Oceanographic Syetem LAT) (Base LANT) (CCOMNAVBASE, Charleston, SC 22408-$109; COMNAVBASE, for te FRO New York 09593; and COMNAVBASE, Norfolk, VA 23521, only’ (Fleet Inretitgence Cenver Pac) (10 eoples) (Ate Factlicy PAC) (CO, "1S. NAF, FPO San Francieco 9668$-1200, only) (Meeanographic System PAC) (Oceanogeapnic Of fice) {Securtty Group Heedquarters) (1& copirs) (Security Group Acetvity) (CM, U.S. NAVSFCCRUACT, APO Sew York OF65A; CO, U.S. NAVSECCRLACT, APO San Francisco 96276; CO, NAVSECCRUACT, Naval Base, Chariesron, SC 29698: CO, NAVSECCRU- - DL-2 Distribucton: FF20 FF38 Pre? Free Fro) rc. Fla FIALIO vse FRAlA PRAIS FRAIC FRAIG FRASF FKNZ FKPIC FKPIS reyes FREIG FKQ2 FRQIA FRR FRRGA Fees ru FLa ra Ta FNY FNS Fst ¥s> ose rss Fs? Ftl FT10 FTGS FT22 FT24 FFTs FTF FFTs} PT4h FTSl yTs6 Frag ev6s ST7A rs? FTIN2 vi2 UNCLASSIFIED (Cone 4) ACT, Northwest, Chesapeace. VA 23322; CO, NAVSECGRUACT, FPO ‘ev Yorw OF528: CO, SAVSECCRLACT, Ancnorage, AK 99598; CO, NAVSECe GRUACT, Fort George G. “eade, WD 29755-9285; CO, U.S. NAVSEC- ERUACT, FPO Miami 32060: C0, U.S. NAVSECCRUACT, 3.8. Naval Base, Box 61, FPO New York 09593; CO, U.S. NAVSECCRUACT, Toret Station, APO San Francisco 36331; CO, ‘AVSECCAUACT, Slow FL 33039-4628; CO, U.S. NAVSECCRLACT, FPO New York 29871; CO, U.S. NAVSECCRLACT, APO San Francisco 9621: CO, U.S. NAVSECe GREACT, Box 37, FPO New York 09523-2900; CO, U.S. NAVSECORTACT, FRO Miaei 34953; CO, U.S. NAVSECCRUACT, APO New York 09240: €0, U.S. NAVSECCRUACT, Saungs Island, Sonoma, CA 95476; £9, U.S. MAVSECCRUACT, AYO Sew York 09606; CO, U.S. NAVSECGRUACT, Kunie, Wheoler AFB, AL $6856; CO, NAVSECCRLACT, Winter Harbor, HE 04693-0909; and CO, NAVSECGRUACT, FPO Seartle 98777, only} (Historical Center) (Naval Academy) ‘Intelligence Officer) CSCOL Postgraduste} (Code 388 (6 copies)? (Naval War College) (2 copies) (Strike Yarfare Cencer) (Telecommunications Commend Headquarters) (M1litery Pezsonnel Cossand) (Codes SMPC-608 end S41t, only) (avy Manpower Engineecing Center) (Recruiting Diserice) (CO, Navy Becrutcing Distrles, New Jersey, only) (Air Svstems Command (4 copies) (Space ond wal warfare Systems Command) {Code PDW 106, POV 10? (2 coptes), POW 220 (2 copten), SPAWAR 191, SPAWAR 62°, ané SPAWAR 633, only) (Facilities Engineering Coomand) (Sea Systems Commara) (3 copies} (Straceric Sesteas Progran Of fice) (Construction Bartalion Center) ( Center, Pore Hueneae, only) (Ship Weapon Systeas Engineering Station) (Ordnance Starion) (CO, NAVORDSTA, Indian Head, YD 206405000, only) (Explosive Ordnance Disposa} Technology Center) (Fleet Combat Direstion Svateas Suppore Activity) (Blectronic Systems Security Engineering Center? (flectronte Svstemp Engineering Center and Activity (CO, NAVELENSYSENCCEN, San Diego, only) (Naval Air Test Center) (Code SYC2C) (Missile Teste Center) (avionics Cencer) (Data Avtowation Command) (Regional Daca Autowation Center and Dats Autosation Factlity) (CO, NARDAC, Washington, Washington Navy Vatd, Washington, v¢ 20376, only) (Naval Security and Investigative Command) (faveatigative Service Regional Cfftce) (Space Command) (Space Surveillance Svstea) (Intelligence Command Headquarters) (NIC-00, 008, OOMC, O02, 003, COON, C2, 03, O4 (4 coptes), and 05, only) (intelligence Suppore Center) (16 coptes) CIacellizence Processing System Support activity) (Codes Ot, 93, 0% (15 copies), and IAIPS PMO, only) (Operactonal tncel Center} (14 coptes) (Task Force 168--5 copies) {Chief of Nawal Education and Tratning) (Chief of Kaval Technical Training) (avtation Schools Commend) (Savas Unset CNET (5 coptest) {Fleet Combat Training Center) (Fleet Trainina Cencer) (ampntbtous Schnol) (Submarine Training Center) (Surface Warfare Officers Sehnol Cawmand) (fleet anct-Sutmarine warfare Trainter Centet) (Fleet and “ine Warfare Training Centec) CSCOL Submarine) (Cade 10) (fducetion and Training Support Center} (CO, SAVEDTRASUP PLES CANT, only) CFleee Intelligence Training Center, Pectfic (2 coptes)) (Education and Training Prograa Development Center) (Mave and Marine Corps Intelligence Training Center (10 coptes)) Cinteltigence Peecessing Svetee Tretning Facility) (3 copies) (Development and Education Command (2 copia) 1 Conetructton Saccaltion
UNCLASSIFIED Diateibucton: (Cone'd? Deparcmane of State, {Code [NR/IL), RM, AS34, Washington, BC 20520 IC Staff, t?26 F St. N.W., Washineton, OC 20595 (ATTN: VADY Surkhaicer) Neadquartera CIA, (Codes STIC-OSWC, IADSACLIB, and OCR/OSD (3 copies)), Washington, OC 20505 Asoletanc SECOEF, Net Assessment, Pentagon, Washington, OC 20301 OIC, FOSIC DET, CINCLANTFLT, Norfolk, VA 23512 () coptes) O%C, FOSIC PAC, CINCPACFLT, Pearl Yarhor, HI 94860 (3 copies) OTC, FOSIC DET, CINCUSNAVELR, FPO New York 99510 (3 copies) Commander, Headquarters Electronics Sysceas Oirfiston (AFSC) (OCW), Nanecee ATB, Beéford, MA OL771 Commanding Officer, Aerospace Defense Center (Code 32K), Peterson AFB, CO 80918 USCINCREOCOM (Navy Element), “acDill AFS, FL 33698 LAOLCE (SACGS) Joint Straregic Target Planning Staff, COOP-X, STOP #6, Cheyenne Mt. Complex, CO 40914 Cencer for Naval Analysis, 2000 N. Seauregerd St., ATTN: Intelligence Officer, Alexandria, VA 22311 Joint Strategic Target Planning Staff (Codes JL and JLWP (1 copy each), JLA and JLT (2 coptes each)), Offuce AFB, NE 6411} Copordinator, jet Unic, Lowry AFB, Denver, CO 80230 Naval Reserve Intelligence Program, Bldg. 6$0, Navel Scatien, Treasure Island, San Francisco, CA 96130 Reserve Intelligence Program Officer, Area 1, NOR, NAS, Whidbey Island, Oak Warbor, WA 92878 (10 copies) : Reserve Inrelli. e@ Vrozram Officer, area 2, Sidg. i14, MAS, Alameda, CA 94501 (% coptes? Reserve Intelligence Program Officer, Area 4, NAR, SAS, North Island, San Diego, Ca 92135 (13 coptes) Reserve Intelligence Program Offtcer, Area 5, NARC Denver, Buckley Aic tonel Guard Base, Aurora, CO AMNIL (8 copies) Raserve Incelligence Program Officer, Area &, Sldg. it, WAS, Dalles, TX 7$21% (9 copiee) Resarve Intelligence Program Officer, Area ?, NAS, Sew Orleans, LA 70166 (9 coples) Reserve Incelitgence Program Officer, Area 9, NAS, Glenview, It 60025 (¢ ecaptes) . Reserve Incelligence Prograe Officer, Area 10, NARC Twin Cities, €. 62nd & Jot Avenue South, Minneapolis, M¥ $5459 (8 copies) Reserva Intelligence Program officer, Area ll, NAF Decrotc, Me. Cleuens, 4T 48043 (3 coptes) Reserve Inreliigence Prograe Officer, Area 12, Oldg. 1902, Rickenbecher Air National Cusrd Base, Columbus, OH 43217 (8 copies) Reserve tncelligence Progras Officer, Areggli, NAR, Box &, NAS, Jacksonville, FL 32212 (13 coptes) . Reserve Incelligence Program Officer, area t6, NAS, Atlante, Marietta, CA 30060 (11 copies) Reserve Intelitgence Progeaw Officer, Area 15, NARU, NAS, Horfolk, VA 23511 (le copies) Reserve Inteliigence Program Officer, Area 16, NARU, NAS, Willow Crove, PA 19090 (7? coptes} Reserve tatelligence Program Officer, Area 17, SMC Reserve Center, Floyd Rennece Field, Brookiyn, N¥ £1234-70@7? (19 contes) Resecve Incelligence Program Offtcer, Area 18, NAS, South Weymouth, MA 02140 (A copies) Reserve Inrelitgence Program Offtcer, Area 29, NAF, Washington, DC 20390 (26 coptes) OIA Liaison Office, DL-4, American Fabassv, Box 195, APO New York 09080 HQ, INSCOM, ATTN: Public Affairs Officer, Arlington Hall Station, Arlington, VA 22212 CO, DEFINTERROG O31}, NAS, Glenview, IL 4nn26 Speclal Agente in Charge, Naval Investigative Service Resident Agency, Naples, Bow 36, FPO New York 09$21 FUDAC, ATTN: Ofrector of Operations, APO New York M9t26 Office of the U. S. Representative, “hlitary Commiccee, North attantic Treaty Organtzacion, AP¥O Sew York 29h87 COMNAVALRLANT OPEUNTEL O186, NARU, SAS, Norfotk, VA 23511 Reserve Intelligence Aten Conrdinator, Aten 1), Naval Invesrieative Service Regional Office, 94 Church St., Ae. KOT, Sew York [C007 OIA (DLeL), fox 97, SPO NY 09910 Naval Renecve Coastal Defense Coordination Component 11%. (Code 3), COMMAVBASE, San Ofeqo, CA 92192 Headquarters, Spectal Operations Command, Fusnpe, Sow LIAL, APO New York OF] 28 Director, NKBIS, Cull Region, SOM Camp Sc., “ew Orleane, LA 20130 Oleectoe, NMBIS, Western Region, 690 Ocean Cate Bivd., tation Rank Bldg. @A10, tong Reach, CA 99922 Dlrectoe, NNBIS, Southeas¢ Regton, $15 UV. ise Ave., Federal Sidg.. Miami, #L y3a3a Chief of Staff Officer, Reserve Patral Winge Artantte 14%, NARC, NAS Peturent River, “MD 29070 DL-3 uncuAsetrren DisretSutian: (fone’dd Naval Insoeceoe General, idg. 200, Washington Navy Yard, Washington, 3C 20374-2902 (ATYN: *APT Leon) Commander, Task Unter 104.0.), Sen Ofego, CA 92152-4100 Unite 106.0.9, 19460 S.d. b27th ave, Miamd, FL 33177 (aTtN: Frere tecerca) ° Commanding Officer, 26th Marine Amphibious unte, or, TPO ttew York 09502-0024