ANNUAL  HISTORICAL  REVIEW 
U.S.  ARMY  INTELLIGENCE  AND  SECURITY  COMMAND 
FISCAL  YEAR  1985 
History  Office 
Office  of  the  Deputy  Chief  of  Staff,  Operations 
Headquarters,  U.S.  Anny  Intelligence  and  Security  Coomand 
Arlington  Hall  Station 
Arlington,  Virginia  22212-5000 
(RCS  CSHIS-6(R3)) 
September  1986 
SI-233726/87 
^SMM^^ 
I
UNCLASSIFIED 
WARNING 
THIS  DOCUMENT  CONTAINS  CLASSIFIED  INFORMATION 
AFFECTING  THE  NATIONAL  SECURITY  OF  THE  UNITED 
STATES  WITHIN  THE  MEANING  OF  THE  ESPIONAGE  LAWS, 
U.S.  CODE  TITLE  18,  SECTIONS  793t  791,  AND  798. 
THE  LAW  PROHIBITS  ITS  TRANSMISSION  OR  THE 
REVELATION  OF  ITS  CONTENTS  IN  ANT  MANNER 
PREJUDICIAL  TO  THE  SAFETY  OR  INTEREST  OF  THE  UNITED 
STATES  OR  FOR  THE  BENEFIT  OF  ANY  FOREIGN  GOVERNMENT 
TO  THE  DETRIMENT  OF  THE  UNITED  STATES. 
THIS  DOCUMENT  MUST  BE  KEPT  IN  COMINT  CHANNELS  AT 
ALL  TIMES:  IT  IS  TO  BE  SEEN  ONLY  BY  U.S.  PERSONNEL 
ESPECIALLY  INDOCTRINATED  AND  AUTHORIZED  TO  RECEIVE 
COMINT  INFORMATION  ON  A  STRICTLY  NEED-TO-KNOW 
BASIS.  REPRODUCTION  AND/OR  FURTHER  DISSEMINATION 
OF  THIS  DOCUMENT  OUTSIDE  THE  U.S.  ARMY  INTELLIGENCE 
AND  SECURITY  COMMAND  IS  PROHIBITED  WITHOUT  PRIOR  HQ 
INSCOM  APPROVAL. 
ill 
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 
PREFACE 
(U)  The  Annual  Historical  Review  was  prepared  in  compliance  with 
Alt  870-5 ,  Military  History:  ■  Responsibilities,  Policies,  and 
Procedures.  The  purpose  of  the  report  is  to  provide  a  quick 
reference  and  research  base  of  the  significant  activities,  events, 
and  accomplishments  of  the  U.S.  Army  Intelligence  and  Security 
Command  (INSCOM)  during  FY  1985.  Principal  source  materials  used 
in  compilation  included  the  Annual  Historical  Reports  submitted  by 
headquarters  staff  elements  and  subordinate  commands,  briefings, 
Interviews,  and  miscellaneous  documents. 
(U)  A  portion  of  the  MACOM  Historians  Conference  held  in  May  1986 
focused  upon  the  role  and  importance  of  the  Annual  Historical 
Review.  There  was  consensus  that  the  review  be  written  at  a 
classified  level  to  be  meaningful.  The  new  Chief  of  Military 
History,  Brigadier  General  Stofft  is  extremely  supportive  of  the 
review,  and  it  is  possible  that  in  the  near  future  the  field  can 
see  more  effort  on  the  part  of  the  center  to  monitor  the 
preparation  of  the  reports.  In  October  1985,  the  INSCOM  History 
Office  received  a  kudo  for  its  timely  completion  of  the  summaries 
through  the  years. 
(D)  This  s^enort  was  prepared  for  the  first  time  in  a  number  of 
years  by  the  entire  history  staff  which  includes  Dr.  John  P. 
Finnegan  and  Ms.  Diane' L.  Hamm,  who  both  wrote  and  edited  portions 
of  the  document  along  with  the  undersigned.  Final  review  and 
assembly  were  performed  by  Ms.  Hamm. 
September  1986  JAMES  L.  GILBERT 
Command  Historian 
UNCLASSIFIED 
v  «■
FO 
FORWARD 
(0)  In  a  letter  to  General  John  A.  Wiekham,  Jr.,  Chief  of  Stiff 
Amy,  dated  31  July  198H,  Major  General  Harry  E.  Soyater,  - 
summarised  the  managerial  steps  which  he  had  taken  during  his  f<rst 
year  as  Commander,  INSCOM.  Sinee  this  letter  uniquely  summarises 
•any  of  the  important  organisational  changes  occurring  during  the 
report  period,  it  is  believed  that  the  document  may  serve  as  a 
suitable  introduction  to  this  year's  Annual  Historical  Review. 
(U)  "During  my  first  year  in  command  I  have  overseen  a  significant 
change  in  the  thrust  of  INSCOM  missions,  functions,  and  operations 
Although  I  would  like  to  take  credit  for  all  these  changes,  many  * 
have  been  additional  taskings  to  support  the  Army's  intelligence 
and  security  requirements.  The  new  challenges  have  been  across  all 
of  our  disciplines.  The  missions  that  have  affected  our  current 
resources  most  are  projects  for  Central  America  (CENTAM),  special 
access  programs,  Increased  counterintelligence  and  espionage 
investigations  and  operations,  more  polygraph  examinations, 
implementation  of  a  Head  of  Contracting  Activity  (HCA),  and  the 
increasing  requirements  for  the  Army's  new  training  initiative 
TROJAN.  Last  March,  I  recognized  that  only  limited  resources  to 
meet  these  new  demands  would  be  provided.  Accordingly,  I  directed 
my  staff  to  undertake  a  thorough  review  of  the  missions  and 
functions  of  the  INSCOM  headquarters  staff  elements.  Concurrently, 
I  began  to  look  at  the  headquarters  staff  as  soon  as  possible.  The 
purpose  of  the  staff  review  was  to  realign  my  existing  resources  to 
address  our  most  pressing  missions.  I  felt  it  was  imperative  that 
I  eliminate  or  reduce  those  efforts  that  were  in  conflict  with  the 
new  and  higher  priority  intelligence  and  aecurity  requirements.  In 
May,  I  approved  a  10  percent  realignment  of  the  INSCOM  headquarters 
staff  spaces  and  transferred  80  percent  of  those  spaces  to 
subordinate  INSCOM  units  to  meet  operational  requirements. 
(U)  "This  realignment  will  provide  resourcing  for  a  number  of  high 
priority  INSCOM  missions.  I  am  providing  staffing  for  TROJAN 
operational  and  logistical  management  and  some  initial  field 
operations.  I  am,  however,  concerned  about  the  seemingly 
exponential  increase  in  TROJAN  systems  without  any  increase  in 
resources.  I  will  provide  the  initial  resources  to  successfully 
initiate  our  new  Head  of  Contracting  Authority  mission 
requirements.  This  requirement  grew  out  of  the  DAIG  investigation 
of  Special  Mission  Funds.  I  am  establishing  a  capability  to 
respond  to  low-intensity  warfare  requirements  for  quick  reaction 
systems  development.  This  capability  will  ensure  that  INSCOM  can 
successfully  field  new  systems  such  as  ■      Bf  (Echelon  Above 
5USC55?  (b)  {& 
Vii 
^jjyjjweiKRJSPflRLY
>FeR-emi;iAL  ust  uMlv" 
SUSC5S2V>)(?> 
Corps  Avl^tio^oDDuv ) ,  I      pReactely  Piloted  Vehicles 
(RPV))I|         WJSTARS  Ground  Support  Nodule),  RG-8  powered 
gliders,  and  dirigibles.  Z  an  also  looking  closely  at  the  eomaand 
and  control  mechanism,  the  Aviation  Intelligence  Battalion  (AIB), 
that  will  bring  these  high  technologies  together  Initially  in 
SOUTHCOM  but  will  have  the  capability  of  deploying  anywhere  in  the 
world.  Z  have  further  strengthened  ny  Intelligence  oversight 
staffing  to  ensure  active  assistance  for  these  expanding 
operations.  X  am  applying  resources  to  meet  our  Increasing 
requirements  in  support  of  operational  security  projects  and 
special  access  programs.  Finally,  the  echelon  above  corps 
cryptologlc  effort  will  receive  reinforcement  for  CENTRAM. 
(U)  "In  addition  to  those  actions  taken  to  orient  the  headquarters 
on  our  priority  missions,  we  will  begin  consolidating  our 
headquarters  elements  currently  at  Fort  Meade  to  Arlington  Hall 
Station.  We  will  begin  this  move  by  the  end  of  the  year.  We  are 
also  planning  to  consolidate  our  CONUS  counterintelligence  command, 
the  902d  MI  Group,  «t  Fort  Meade  and  reorganize  functionally  as 
opposed  to  geographically.  We  have  just  begun  to  assess  whether 
the  functions  of  the  INSCOM  Intelligence  Threat  and  Analysis  Center 
In  the  Pacific  can  be  eliminated  and  its  functions  placed  in  other 
Army  commands. 
(U)  "The  reductions  I  have  directed  will  not  be  without  costs.  I 
am  eliminating  the  existing  MACOM  liaison  officers  but  retaining 
the  liaison  function  at  the  National  Security  Agency.  I  have 
redirected  the  assets  that  currently  work  in  the  HUMINT  area  of 
biographies.  We  are  consolidating  OPSEC  (operations  security) 
support  functions.  As  a  result,  many  commanders  throughout  the 
Army  will  be  supported  from  field  offices  throughout  a  geographical 
area  rather  than  dedicated  OPSEC  support  personnel  on  their 
respective  staffs.  In  addition  some  areas  of  OPSEC,  support  will 
be  reduced  and  in  some  cases  elminated.  For  example,  I  expect  that 
Operational  Security  Evaluations  will  be  performed  by  local 
security  managers  rather  than  expert  INSCOM  operational  security 
personnel.  The  major  reduction  of  headquarters  functions  lies  in 
administrative  support  functions.  I  expect  a  slowdown  in 
responsiveness  in  some  areas  but  will  accept  this  in  view  of  the 
gain  we  will  experience  in  higher  priority  areas. 
(U)  "I  have  instructed  my  commanders  to  undertake  a  similar  review 
of  their  headquarters  stsffs  and  orient  on  operations  within  thalr 
Intelligence  disciplines  and  geographical  areas.  My  commanders 
will  advise  me  of  their  findings  and  subsequent  actions  during  my 
19S5  INSCOM  Commanders'  Conference  in  late  October. 
ix 
"ONLY
l/NCLASSIFIED 
(U)  "As  I  have  highlighted,  it  was  imperative  that  I  eliminate  or 
reduce  those  efforts  that  did  not  totally  support  the  new  and 
higher  priority  Army  intelligence  and  security  requirements  that 
have  been  given  us.  With  this  extensive  look  at  our  utilisation  of 
resources,  I  believe  that  I  have  aligned  my  efforts  to  successfully 
meet  the  new  challenges.  We  will  be  integrating  these  changes  as 
swiftly  as  possible— starting  immediately.  Reprogramming  to 
implement  these  formal  organisational  changes  has  been  addressed  in 
the  Command  Operating  Budget  submission  and  will  be  implemented  in 
organisational  documents  during  the  next  two  "Management  of  Change 
(MOC)  Windows."  One  major  consideration  that  continually  has  an 
impeet  on  my  decisions  are  the  different  rules  and  procedures  that 
must  be  adhered  to.  As  you  are  aware,  INSCOM  units  are  resourced 
by  a  wide  variety  of  programs  for  both  funds  and  personnel  spaces. 
Realignments  in  INSCOM  resources  must  be  consistent  with  the 
management  procedures  that  dominate  our  complex  resource  management 
requirements,  i.e.,  Consolidated  Cryptologie  Program  (CCP),  General 
Defense  Intelligence  Program  (CDIP),  Foreign  Counterintelligence 
Program  (FCI),  Security  and  Investigative  Activities  (S&IA),  and 
the  limitations  of  these  diversified  programs.  Because 
intelligence  collection  and  counterintelligence  requirements  will 
continue  to  expand,  I  am  sure  that  the  headquarters  reduction  and 
space  realignment  I  have  taken  to  meet  our  expanding  operational 
requirements  are  in  keeping  with  your  stated  requirement  to 
accomplish  manpower  savings.  While  they  do  not  represent  direct 
savings  for  future  cosbat  forces,  these  actions  are  intended  to 
ensure  the  best  possible  intelligence  support  for  these  combat 
forces  and  for  the  intelligence  units  already  engaged. 
(U)  "As  my  commanders  complete  their  evaluations  of  their 
organizations  and  initiate  their  resource  realignments,  I  expect  a 
major  shift  of  resources  throughout  the  command  that  will  meet  the 
new  challenges  INSCOM  has  been  directed  to  perform  for  the  Army. 
In  summary,  we  are  making  and  will  oontinue  to  make,  significant 
changes  in  INSCOM  to  streamline  and  more  effectively  carry  out  our 
growing  mission." 
(U)  In  a  reply  letter  from  General  Wickham  which  was  dated 
September  10,  19B5,  the  Chief  of  Staff  Army  largely  confirmed  the 
actions  which  Major  General  Soyster  had  taken. 
(U)  "In  view  of  the  cap  we  have  on  military  and  civilian  end 
strengths,  your  resource  realignments  in  response  to  changing 
missions  and  functions  are  on  the  mark  and  have  additional  benefit 
of  returning  soldiers  to  field  units.  By  asking  your  subordinate 
commanders  to  orient  more  of  their  resources  towards  operational 
requirements,  similar  results  should  be  achieved. 
xi 
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 
(D)  "Your  assessment  of  the  requirement  for  the  Intelligence 
Threat  Analysis  Center  in  the  Pacific  should  he  completed 
expeditiously*  The  results  of  your  review  will  he  a  factor  in* 
deciding  how  Intelligence  support  can  best  he  provided  to  the 
Commander,  WESTCOM.  Z  have  asked  the  ACSI  to  determine  whether  the 
KESTCOM  G2  capability  should  be  enhanced,  or  if  such  support  can  be 
provided  by  the  Commander,  PACOM. 
(U)  "I  encourage  you  to  continue  to  realign  counterintelligence 
resources  to  meet  priority  requirements  such  as  special  access 
program  support,  polygraph  examinations,  and  counterespionage 
operations.  To  be  effective,  operational  security  oust  come  from 
field  organizations.  The  commander  and  his  staff  must  take  the 
lead  to  implement  sound  operational  security  policies  and 
practices.  Z  support  your  efforts  to  energize  commanders,  but  Z  am 
concerned  that  local  security  managers  may  lack  expertise  to 
conduct  Operational  Security  Evaluations.  The  ACSI  plans  to 
address  this  issue  separately."1 
xili 
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 
FOOTNOTES:  FOREWORD 
1.  Ltr,  XACG,  subjt  Resource  Realignment  C31  Jul  85)  (O)j  * 
Ltr,  CSA,  subji  Resource  Realignnent  (ID  Sep  65)  (U). 
xv 
UNCLASSIFIED  8
CONTENTS 
Chapter  Page 
I.  MISSION,  FUNCTIONS,  AND  LOCATION 
Mission  and  Functions*.   •••••  1 
Transfer  of  Production  Functions   •    2 
INSCOM's  Mission  and  Goals    3 
Transfer  of  the  Amy  Biographic  depository    4 
Transfer  of  DA  Intelligence  Dissemination 
Validation  Offloe    * 
Support  to  Low  Intensity  Conflict   •    U 
Location   •••    5 
II.  COMMAND  AND  STAFF  RELATIONSHIPS 
Command  Staff  Relationships. ••   •••••••••••••  7 
Executive  Authority  for  TROJAN..   •    7 
High  Technology/Low  Intensity  Conflict. ••••    6 
Command  and  Control  of  Echelon  Above  Corps  (EAC) 
Intelligence  Units   ••••••   ••••  9 
Changes  in  TRADOC/INSCOM  on  Combat/Training 
Development   ••••••    11 
\ 
III.  ORGANIZATION 
INSCOM  Organization   •' 
Resubordination  of  U.S.  Liaison  Branch..    22 
Transfer  of  BQ  Spaces  to  Subordinate  Units    22 
Consolidation  at  Arlington  Hall  Station..    23 
HQ  INSCOM  Reorganization    23 
'      Transfer  of  Detachment  Hahn*    25 
Relocation  of  Pentagon  Counterintelligence 
Force    25 
Relocation  of  the  USA  Special  Security  Group    26 
Reorganization  of  the  902d  MI  Group    26 
Reassignment  of  the  USA  Systems  Exploitation 
Detachment.   ••••  29 
Reorganization  and  Redesignation  of  the  USA 
Special  Operations  Detachment    29 
Establishment  of  Subcontrol  Offices   .'.♦..  29 
Military  Intelligence  Battalion  (Low  Intensity)..  30 
HUMINT  Subarchiteeture— POW  Interrogation  and 
Document  Exploitation  Activities  During 
Wartime   •  •••  30 
Operational  Guides  (OG)  for  EAC  Intelligence  and 
Electronic  Warfare  (IEW)  Unit    31 
xvii 
UNCLASSIFIED
Chapter 
XV.  RESOURCES  AND  MANAGEMENT 
Operations  and  Maintenance,  Amy  (OMA)  Funds   
Family  Bousing  Units   • 
 
XNSCOM  Program  and  Budget  Guidance,  FT  1985 
(Authorised  Strength)   
Civilian  Strength  by  Program.....   
Morale  and  Welfare   •••••   
Command  Of floor  Personnel  Strength   
HQDA  Reenllstment  Award   
Operations  and  Maintenance,  Army  (OMA)  Funds   
ADP  Security.. •••••••   ••••••   
Microfilm  Index  Project  for  Investigative  Records 
Repository  (MIP  IRR)   
Personnel  Security   
INSCOM  Commanders  Badges. •••••••••••.   
Public  Affairs  Activities   
IGAR's   
Congressional  Inquiries   „   •   
IG  Investigations   
The  Army  Space  Programs..   •••••   
Historical  Monographs   ,. 
Program  Analysis  and  Resource  Review  (PARR)   
Military  Justice   
Enlisted  Personnel  Strength  Posture....*....,.... 
Commend  Personnel  Situation   ••••• 
INSCOM  Senior  Level  (13-15)  Positions  (High 
Grade),   
PMO  Advisory  Committee   
Equal  Employment  Opportunity  Program   
DOD  Polygraph  Test  Program.   
fcsw  Polygraph  Facility  Construction  Funding   
Freedom  of  Information/Privacy  Act....   
Upward  Mobility  Program   
Investigative  Reoords  Repository  (IRR)   
Command  Strength   « 
 
INSCOM  Headquarters  Concept  Design..   
Travis  Trophy   •   ,. 
Director* s  Trophy. ••••••   .*..... 
INSCOM  Key  Personnel.   •   
First  Annual  Army  HUMINT  Collection  Plan...   
INSCOM  Average  Grade   
SIDPERS  Performance   ...•• 
DSAINSCOM  Organization  Day  Military/Civilian 
Team  Awards   
xix 
UNCLASSIFIED
CO 
TIAL 
*       '      ;  '  
.  
... 
Chapter 
XV.    RESOURCES  AND  MANAGEMENT  (Continued) 
Grade  Rollback  Program   
Information  Searob  on  Dr.  Mengele   
ZNSCOM  Commanders*  Conference   ••••••   
Performance  Management  and  Recognition  System 
_,  (PMRS)   
^      JOgdjmm^jgjralle. 
«        -STU-n  Program. 
I   
|f  Digital  Tm»gaT»Y  Tfi»naml»»lan  System  (DITS). 
Ling  (ETSC). 
fating  Distrioution  acnievement. 
Cash  Awards......   •••••••   
ZNSCOM  Planning  Program   
Command  Intern  Program   •••••••••• 
XTIC-PAC  Physical  Plant   
V.  OPERATIONAL  ACTIVITIES 
Multldlr-'-''4—  % 
j 
IMINT/MASINT 
i 
XJCi 
5B 
CON 
TIAL 
li
COJiPH^NTIAL 
Chapttr 
V.  OPERATIONAL  ACTIVITIES  (Continued) 
SIGIKT/EW 
I 
Page 
7* 
7* 
xxiii 
CO 
IAL
I 
Chapter 
V.     ftPEWftTTOHAL  AcrryiTIES  (Continued) 
Counterintelligence/Operatlons  Security 
Personnel  Securityxnvestigation  (PSD  Support 
ounter-SIGINT  Conc< 
ssues. 
Key  Management  Automation   
COMSEC  Serial  Number  Tracking. 
COMSEC  Insecurities.   
MoblleTEMPESTTcst  System  (MTTS). 
Appendix 
A.  USAINSCOM  Organization  Structure   
B.  TOE  Units   
C.  Changes  in  Status  of  TOE  Units..   
D.  TDA  Units....   
£.  Changes  in  Status  of  TDA  Units   
F.  USAINSCOM  Personnel  Strength  by  Unit.., 
G .  Provisional  Units   
H.  Changes  in  Status  of  Provisional  Units. 
I.  USAINSCOM  Key  Personnel...   
J.  Travis  Trophy  Winners   
K.  Director* s  Trophy  Winners   
£*££ 
9« 
100 
100 
102 
102 
103 
103 
103 
109 
114 
115 
115 
117 
119 
124 
125 
126 
135 
137 
XXV 
i3
CONFIDENTIAL 
Page 
INSCOM  Staff  Directory  -  August  1965  *   138 
GLOSSARY  .     139 
Tables 
No. 
1.  Direct  Funding  by  Subprogram   •    34 
2.  Direct  Obligations  for  FY  1985    37 
3.  INSCOM  Program  and  Budget  Guidance,  FY  1985    38 
4.  Civilian  Strength  by  Program   •    38 
5.  FY  1987-1991  PARR  Initiative    42 
6.  Enlisted  Personnel  Posture  for  FY's  1984-1985    44 
7.  Enlisted  Personnel  Strength  Posture  by  Area  and 
Unit 
8.  FY  1985  Polygraph  Statistics    49 
9.  COMSEC  Insecurities    101 
UNCUSSIFIED 
xxvii
TIAL 
CHAPTER  I 
MISSION,  FUNCTIONS,  AND  LOCATION 
j* 
The  mission  of  the  CC,  INSCOM  la  to 
Mission  and  Functions. 
conduct  and  coordinate  electronic  warfare  (EW);  intelligence 
collection  processing,  analysis,  and  reporting;  counterintelligence 
(CI)  activities;  operations  security  (OPSEC)  support;  and  related 
operations  in  support  of  the  U.S.  Army. 
1.  Commands  military  intelligence  organizations  tailored  to 
provide  aupported  force  requirements  fors 
a.  Intelligence  within  the  corps  commander* a  srea  of 
interest  and  to  supplement  the  corps  intelligence  and  electronic 
warfare  (IEW)  system  for  certain  Intelligence  within  the  corps  area 
of  influence. 
fc.  Intelligence  with  the  echelon  above  corps  (EAC) 
commander's  area  of  influence  and  coordination  of  the  provision  of 
Intelligence  within  the  EAC  commander'*  area  of  Interest. 
c.  Counterintelligence  support  beyond  the  organic 
capabilities  of  all  supported  commanders. 
d.  Specialized  Intelligence,  EW,  and  security  support* 
C 
a 
s 
TIAL
IAL 
7«  Acts  as  the  Service  Crypt ologic  Element  (SCE)  executive 
agent  for  target  exploitation  (TAREX1 
8.  Conducts  and  coordinates  counterintelligence  support  to 
U.S.  Army  programs . 
9*  Conducts  electronic  surveillance  support  operations. 
10.  Conduets  special  operations. 
11.  Conducts  and  coordinates  EW  operations. 
12.  Operates  the  DA  Special  Security  System. 
13.  Administers  functions  relating  to  management, 
organization,  equipment,  training,  administration,  logistics,  and 
automated  data  processing.1 
Transfer  of  Production  Functions.  (U)  The  Intelligence 
Organization  and  Stationing  Study  which  led  to  the  establishment  of 
INSCOM  in  1977  had  recommended  that  all  Army  intelligence 
production  agencies  be  consolidated  into  a  single  entity.  However, 
only  those  production  agencies  directly  under  OACSI  or  F0RSC0M  were 
Consolidated  under  INSCOM  on  1  January  1977*  From  these  newly 
acquired  production  elements,  INSCOM  formed  the  U.S.  Army 
Intelligence  and  Threat  Analysis  Center  (ITAC)  in  1978.  However, 
after  subsequent  relooks,  support  grew  for  a  larger  consolidation. 
The  CG,  INSCOM' s  position  was  that  the  elements  should  be 
consolidated  under  his  major  Army  command  (MACOM),  but  even  more 
importantly,  such  a  consolidation  should  take  place.  As  a  result 
of  a  study  initiated  in  September  1983»  the  Vice  Chief  of  Staff, 
U.S.  Army  directed- that  ITAC  be  placed  under  the  operational 
control  of  the  newly  established  U.S.  Army  Intelligence  Agency 
(AIA)  (Provisional),  a  field  operating  agency  under  OACSI.  The 
operational  control  of  ITAC  was  transferred  in  July  1984;  later,  on 
1  December,  the  center  was,  reassigned  to  the  newly  established  Army 
Intelligence  ^— ,^^^^^^^^_ ^^^^ 
ITAC  physically 
"eiocatea  in  December  1981  to  the  partially  completed  facility  at 
the  Washington  Navy  Yard,  Washington;  D.C.* 
I 
4, 
TIAL
UNCLASSIFIED 
IMSCOM'a  Mission  and  Ooala.  (0)  During  the  198*  INSOOM 
Commanders'  Conferenoe  held  at  Gettysburg!  the  commander*  an4 
INSCOM  staff  present  defined  the  command' »  mission  as  follows j 
"Conduct  high  quality  operations  to  satisfy  intelligence  collection 
requirements  and  to  deny  collection  by  adversaries."  A  goal  was 
also  established,  "Provide  highest  quality  intelligence,  security, 
and  electronic  warfare  support  for  the  Army  in  peace  and  war." 
(U)  Zn  addition,  a  number  of  areas  identified  at  the  conference 
were  Included  within  the  "INSCOM  Plan,"  which  was  published  in 
September  19B5.  The  INSCOM  Plan  prioritized  objectives  and  tasks 
in  each  of  these  functional  areas  in  concert  with  the  Army  Plan  and 
the  Army  Intelligence  Master  Plan  (AIMP).  The  areas  along  with 
their  stated  objectives  were  as  follows: 3 
Readiness t  (1)  Enhance  the  capabilities  of  the  FY  1985-87 
tactical  intelligence  and  electronic  warfare  (IEW)  force  through 
achievable  upgrades  to  operational  and  C2  systems  within  available 
resources.  (2)  Improve  forward  deployed  or  deployable  EAC  MI 
brigades/groups  by  structuring,  manning,  and  equipping  them  within 
Army  of  Excellence  (AOE)  guidelines  by  end  of  FY  1991. 
Transition  to  War/Support  to  Military  Operations:  Improve 
capability  through  increased  participation  In  realistic,  war  plan 
derived  exercises  during  FY  1985-86. 
Security;  Develop  a  Security  Management  Plan  with  an  upgraded 
timetable  for  enhanced'  protection  of  people,  facilities, 
information,  and  operations  by  31  July  1985. 
*       Force  Integration:  Develop  procedures  necessary  to  document, 
field,  and  maintain  force  capabilities,  ooncepts,  and  doctrine,  and 
to  facilitate  implementation  of  materiel  .and  unit  fielding  plans 
for  the  first  program  year  and  all  out  years  in  the  Fiscal  Year 
Defense  Program  (FYDP)  by  March  1986. 
People:  Improve  personnel  readiness,  retention,  quality  of 
life,  and  civilian  career  programs  by  December  1985. 
Leadership:  Develop  a  Performance  Management  Plan  for  all 
personnel  which  requires  that  individuals  establish  performance 
objectives  which  are  related  to  the  organization's  goal  and 
reviewed  between  rater  and  rated  individual  more  frequently  than 
the  rating  period  itself  by  3d  Qtr,  FY  1985. 
UNCLASSIFIED
IAL 
Oversight t    Establish  oommand-wlde  prooess  to  ensure  ethical 
propriety,  legal  sufficiency  and  appropriateness  of  operational 
activities,  resource  use,  and  acquisitions  of  goods  and  services  by 
3d  Qtr,  FX  1985. 
Fesource  Management*  Improve  productivity  and  efficiently  and 
affectively  utilize  manpower  and  dollar  resources  through  planning, 
management,  programming,  budgeting,  and  financial  accounting 
methods  by  30  September  1985. 
Materiel;  Sustain  highest  levels  of  materiel  accountability 
and  readiness  through  innovative,  dedicated  management  in 
compliance  with  regulations  and  policy  guidance  to  maximize 
intelligence  capability. 
Technology;  Coordinate  and  develop  Innovative  ways  in  which 
technology  efforts  can  be  Identified  that  will  improve  INSCOM 
intelligence,  security,  and  electronic  warfare  (ISEW)  operations. 
Transfer  of  the  Army  Biographic  Repository.  (U)  On  27  August 
1965,  the  CG,  INSCOM  informed  ACSI,  DA  that  in  FY  1986  INSCOM  would 
discontinue  functions  Involving  maintenance  of  the  Army  Biographic 
Repository  and  that  resources  Involved  in  that  activity  would  be 
transferred  to  higher  priority  HUMINT  tasks.  On  27  September  1985, 
ACSI,  DA  concurred  with  the  decision  and  directed  that  INSCOM 
coordinate  with  DIA  on  disposition  of  the  Army  biographic  files  and 
give  ample  notification  to  the  analytical  community  of  the 
repository's  closure.  'Although  several  DOD  users  had  indicated 
that  they  might  be  interested  in  some  of  the  files,  it  was  doubtful 
that  anyone,  including  DIA,  would  want  them  all.  It  was  believed 
$hat  the  files  would  be  most  useful  if  transferred  to  a  single 
organization  rather  than  being  removed  piecemeal,  it  was  intended 
to  exhaust  all  DOD  prospects  before  offering  them  to  CIA.4 
Transfer  of  DA  Intelligence  Dissemination  Validation  Office.  (0) 
Vith  the  establishment  of  the  Army  Intelligence  Agency,  the 
Department  of  the  Army  dissemination  validation  responsibility 
previously  performed  by  HO  INSCOM  was  transferred  and  consolidated 
with  HQ,  Army  Intelligence  Agency.  A  space  went  with  the 
transfer. 5 
>ort  to  Low  Intensit 
CON 
TIAL
CONF 
>NFJWEN TIAL 
Location.  (0)  Headquarters,  U.S.  Army  Intelligence  and  Security 
Cesunand  is  located  at  Arlington  Rail  Station,  4000  Arlington 
Boulevard,  Arlington,  Virginia  22212.  Until  a  final  stationing 
decision  is  effected,  certain  staff  functions  will  continue  to  be 
located  at  Fort  George  C.  Meade,  Maryland  20755. 
CO 
t 
TIAL
Unclassified 
FOOTNOTES 3  CHAPTER  Z.  MISSION,  FUNCTIONS,  AND  LOCATION 
1.  DF,  DCSRM,  subjt  AN  10-53f  Organisation  and  Funotions,  U.S. 
Amy  Intelligence  and  Security  Command  (U)  (Ondtd)  (C).  * 
2.  "INSCOM  and  Its  Heritage,"  History  Ofc,  HQ  INSCOM  (1985),' 
pp.  5i  12,13  (D)S  FY  19BX  INSCOM  AHR  (TSCW),  pp.  2-3. 
3.  "1985  INSCOM  Plan  FY  1988  -  2002"  (Executive  Summary)  (5  Sep  85) 
(S/NOFORN)!  Msg,  CDRINSCOM,  subjt  INSCOM  Organizational 
Objectives  (2315352)  (U)>  IA  Poster  360-1,  "INSCOM  Mission" 
(1  Feb  85). 
*.  FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  p.  5. 
.  5.  Ltr,  fm  CDR  INSCOM  to  CDR  AMC,  subjt  DA  Intelligence 
Dissemination  Validation  Office  (8  Oct  85)  (0);  Interview, 
with  Mr.  Charles  Allen  (ODCSOPS)  (21  Jun  86)  (0). 
6.  FY  1985  DCSPPM  £HR  (S),  oh  IV;  Msg,  CDR  INSCOM,  subj:  Low 
Intensity  Conflict  (031900Z  Oct  8U)  (C). 
UNCLASSIFIED
CHAPTER  XI 
-  ♦ 
COMMAND  AND  STAFF  RELATIONSHIPS 
Command  and  Staff  Relationships.  (0)  The  CO,  INSCOM  is  under 
supervision  of  the  Chief  of  Staff,  United  States  Amy.  Directives, 
authorities,  policy,  planning t  and  programming  guidance,  approved 
programs,  resource  allocations,  and  other  methods  of  command 
direction  are  issued  to  CG,  INSCOM  by  the  Chief  of  Staff,  United 
States  Army. 
(U)  The  CO,  INSCOM— 
1.    Commands  all  assigned  units  and  activities. 
a 
(0)  INSCOM  and  other  major  Army  commands  (MACOM's)  are  coordinate 
elements  of  DA.  The  CG,  INSCOM  is  authorised  to  communicate 
'directly  with  other  major  Army  commanders  or  with  heads  of  Army 
Staff  agencies  on  matters  of  mutual  interest. 
(U)  The  CG,  INSCOM  will  maintain  liaison  as  necessary  with  other 
MACOM's,  field  operating  agencies,  other  eryptologic  and 
intelligence  activities,  and  other  foreign  domestic  governmental 
agencies  to  maintain  an  awareness  of,  to  exchange  information  on, 
and  to  ensure  coordination  of  matters  of  mutual  concern*1 
Executive  Authority  for  TROJAN.  (U)  Although  the  official  MOU 
between  HQDA  and  affected  MACOM's  was  awaiting  final  coordination, 
a  message  dated  27  September  1985  outlined  INSCOM1 s 
responsibilities  as  the  executive  authority  for  TROJAN.  INSCOM  was 
responsible  to  HQDA  OACSI  (DA  proponent)  for  logistical  support, 
SIGINT  technical  support,  and  mission  steerage  for  TROJAN 
operations. 
roNttr
Unclassified 
(0)  In  the  area  of  logistics,  INSCOM  will  be  responsible  for 
administering  TROJAN  logistics  support  end  negotiating  TROJAN* 
logistics  contracts.  INSCOM' s  Mission  Support  Activity  (MSA)- will 
act  for  INSCOM's  DCSLOG  to  arrange  TROJAN  logistios  support. 
ZNSCOM  will  also  be  responsible  for  worldwide  logistios  support 
less  the  routine  maintenance  duties  such  as  fault  location  (using 
built-in  testing  equipment),  line  replacement  unit  (LRU)  changes, 
minor  adjustments,  cleaning,  lubricating,  and  tightening,  which 
will  be  performed  by  the  user  units. 
(U)  Maintenance  of  equipment  over  and  above  designated  unit  tasks 
will  be  contracted.  INSCOM  will  create  a  Theater  Intermediate 
Support  Activity  (TRISA)  in  each  theater  to  make  repairs  beyond  the 
user's  ability  and  to  keep  a  stock  of  TROJAN  parts  (beyond  those 
maintained  by  the  units). 
(U)  In  the  area  of  SIGINT  technical  support/mission  steerage, 
INSCOM  had  the  responsibility  to  ensure  adequate  SIGINT  technical 
support  and  mission  steerage  to  TROJAN  users.  This  responsibility 
will  be  met  by  INSCOM's  Army  Technical  Control  and  Analysis  Element 
(ATCAE)  and  Primary  Control  and  Analysis  Center  (fCAC).  The  66th 
MI  Group,  OPCON  to  USAREUR,  will  operate  the  PCAC  for  OSAREOR 
TROJAN'S.  CONOS  MI  Group  will  operate  a  PCAC,  OPCON  to  FORSCOM, 
for  all  CONUS  based  TROJAN'S.  The  ATCAE  provides  support  to  the 
PCAC's  and  to  TROJAN  users  not  currently  supported  by  a  PCAC  (such 
as  SOUTHCOM,  WESTCOM,  and  the  8th  U.S.  Army).  Technical  support 
and  mission  steerage  provided  by  the  ATCAE  and  the  PCAC a  will 
consist  primarily  of  target  environment  data  base  management  and 
tipoffs  to  impending  or  occuring  target  activity. 
fU)  INSCOM  did  not  have  a  responsibility  in  the  areas  of 
developing,  fielding,  and  testing  the  TROJAN  systems  nor  for  any 
product  Improvement  plans  (PIP);  these  were  to  be  the 
responsibility  of  the  Army  Materiel  Command* a  (USA  Electronics 
Research  and  Development  Command)  project  manager,  USA  Signals 
Warfare  Laboratories.  USA  Information  Systems  Command  (USAISC)  had 
full  responsibility  for  communications  support  to  include:  crypto- 
net  establishment,  Defense  Special  Security  Communications  System 
(DSSCS)  requirements,  commerical  communications  contracts,  and 
overall  communications  requirements  monitoring.2     ' 
High  Technology /Low  Intensity  Conflict.  (U)  In  a  letter  dated  6 
August  1984,  the  Vice  Chief  of  Staff  Army  assigned  INSCOM  the  task 
of  addressing  the  intelligence  requirements  of  low  intensity 
conflicts.  Low  intensity  conflicts  were  defined  as  those  military 
operations  involving  U.S.  Forces  in  a  aupport  role  to  friendly  and 
allied  nations  which  are  being  militarily  threatened  or  attached  by 
UNCLASSIFIED  n
UNCLASSIFIED 
internal  and/or  external  military  and/or  para-military  forces. 
Dnder  these  conditions,  it  was  assumed  that  no  major  U.S.  ground 
forces  were  employed  in  defense  of  the  friendly  and/or  allied* 
governments •  Under  such  situations  as  this,  the  U.S.  army  and 
other  aervioe  and  departmental  intelligence  resources  wovtld.be 
brought  to  bear  against  the  opposing  military  and/or  para-military 
forces  as  a  major  means  to  execute  U.S.  policy  in  the  affected 
region. 
(U)  In  Mght  of  this  tasking,  the  DCSOPS,  HQ  INSCOM  proposed  the 
creation  of  a  headquarters  steering  committee  which  would  bring 
together  the  principal  staff  heads  with  the  Science  Advisor  to 
discuss  and  investigate  the  possibilities  for  the  application  of 
high  technology  to  intelligence  operations  in  the  low  intensity 
conflict  environment.  The  proposal  for  such  a  group  was  initiated 
in  September  1985.  Final  action  by  the  Command  Group  %?as  delayed 
until  the  next  fiscal  year. 3 
Command  and  Control  of  Echelon  Above  Corps  (EAC)  Intelligence 
Units.  (U)  Although  the  issue  of  command  and  control  of  EAC 
intelligence  assets  was  not  specifically  raiaed  during  the  FY  1985 
time  period,  it  is  essential  to  understand  what  had  transpired.  In 
April  1963,  the  Director  of  Management  under  the  Chief  of  Staff  Army 
proposed  that  the  66th  MI  Group,  the  USAINSCOM  Theater  Intelligence 
Center-Pacific,  and  501st  MI  Group  (less  Field  Station  Korea)  be 
commanded  by  the  theater  Army  (TA).  In  addition,  the  controlled 
collection  operations  ,(CCO)  and  offensive  counterintelligence 
operations  (OFCO)  assets  would  also  be  commanded  by  the  theater 
Army  with  technical  direction  provided  by  INSCOM,  which  would 
remain  a  MACOM.  After  the  above  actions,  INSCOM  would  continue  to 
command  Field  Station  Korea  SIGINT  assets  and  MASINT  resources  from 
the  above  mentioned  units  as  well  as  CCO  and  OFCO  not  given  to  a 
TA.  In  essence,  the  proposal  transferred  command  responsibilities 
for  the  affected  units  from  INSCOM  to  the  TA  commander,  with  the 
latter  then  charged  with  operating,  programming,  budgeting, 
equipping,  and  sustaining  and  training,  as  well  as  the  health  and 
welfare  and  other  command  related  matters  for  those  organizations. 
(U)  In  a  reply  dated  April  1983,  OACSI  elaborated  in. detail  of 
what,  for  example,  the  transfer  of  the  501st  MI  Group  would  mean. 
The  conclusion  of  the  memorandum  was  that  the  transfer  command  of 
the  501st  MI  Group  to  the  TA  commander  would  cost  dearly,  would  not 
provide  more  efficient  and  effective  support,  and  the  TA  commander 
would  have  to  still  rely  upon  INSCOM  to  a  considerable  extent  for 
numerous  areas  of  support.  "The  present  command  relationships 
undoubtedly  provide  the  optimum  training  and  utilization  of  acarce 
intelligence  resources.  It  retains  the  capability  to  rapidly 
UNCLASSIFIED  23
UNCLASSIFIED 
reinforce  the  Commander,  501st  HZ  Group  with  a  wide  variety  or  low 
density,  specialised  intelligence  personnel,  and  provides  timely 
supply  end  Bsintensnoe  of  erlticml  and  unique  equipments.  If 
likewise  provides  the  benefits  of  selective  emphasis  thst  accrue  to 
INSCOM  as  the  single  aanager  of  such  resources.  Zn  short,  OPCON 
now  provides  the  7A  oonosnder  with  requisite  supervision  of  501st 
MI  Group  intelligenee  and  security  functions  while  relieving  him  of 
the  numerous  administrative  and  logistical  areas  of  support 
currently  the  eonoern  of  the  INSCOM  commander. 
(0)  "Although  the  readily  quantifiable  costs  are  few  at  this  point, 
the  cost  to  OACSI  and  Army  Staff  is  apparent— the  stsff  will  grow 
and  necessitate  further  Involvement  in  operational  matters  now  left 
to  the  INSCOM  commander  and  stsff.  Likewise,  the  development  of  an 
Implementation  plan  to  accomplish  the  proposal  will  be  s  time 
consuming  and  difficult  tasking  requiring  additional  resources  from 
the  Army  Staff  (ARSTAF)  and  affected  commands  as  well,  at  the 
expense  of  ongoing  Army  programs," 
(0)  Perhaps  it  was  more  then  ironic  that  the  memorandum  to  the 
Director  of  Management  contained  the  signature  block  of  Brigadier 
General  Harry  E.  Soyster,  Acting  ACofS  for  Intelligence.  A  little 
over  a  year  later,  Brigadier  General  Soyster  wss  again  defending 
INSCOM,  but  this  time  as  its  commander.  In  a  memorandum  by 
Brigadier  General  Soyster  to  the  Vice  Chief  of  Staff  of  the  Army 
and  dated  11  August  1984,  Brigadier  General  Soyster  reiterated  his 
previous  position  of  not  giving  INSCOM  assets  to  commanders  TA. 
His  second  memorandum,'  however,  contained  additional  rational 
gained  from  his  first  dsys  as  INSCOM  commander.  "The  SIGINT  world, 
backed  up  by  national  directives  and  billions  of  dollars,  is  not 
going  to  surrender  any  significant  assets  or  prerogative  to  theater 
commanders.  We  will  lose  that  battle  even  if  all  of  us  sign  up  to 
it.  The  Army  is  already  viewed  as  fragmented  when  NSA  compares  us 
to  the  other  services.  The  ACSI  is  the  SIGINT  focal  point  for  the 
Army.  INSCOM  is  the  Service  Cryptologie  Element  and  the  Tactical 
Cryptologic  Program  is  managed  by  ODCSOPS.  General  Faurer  and  his 
staff  deal  with  Lieutenant  General  Odom,  Major  General  Woodmansee 
and  Brigadier  General  Soyster.  They  will  not  expand  the  Army 
circle  to  include  General  Otis,  General  Livsey,  General  Gorman,  or 
wherever  we  cut  it  off.  Lieutenant  General  Odom  and  1   (and  I*m 
sure  Major  General  Woodmansee  will  Join  us)  are  working  to  present 
a  common  position.  If  we  take  any  action  that  creates  a  void,  the 
Air  Force  will  fill  it  and  we  will  play  a  lesser  role  in  national 
collection. 
UNCLASSIFIED
\ 
\ 
Changes  in  TRADOC/IWSCOM  on  Combat/Training  Development.  (0)  On 
the  occasion  of  the  annual  review  of  the  INSCOM/TRADOC  HOU,  several 
important  changes  occurred.  On  1  October  1985 ,  the  responsibility 
for  development  of  echelon  above  corps  (EAC)  architecture  from 
1NSC0M  to  TRADOC  was  to  take  place.  This  was  the  date  when 
INSCOM's  effort  to  document  the  new  force  structure  in  accordance 
with  the  EAC  Intelligence  and  Electronic  Warfare  (IEW) 
architecture/Army  of  Excellence  Force  Design  was  to  be  completed. 
At  the  request  of  USA  Intelligence  Center  and  School  (USAICS), 
INSCOM  agreed  to  retain  responsibility  for  the  preparation  of 
initial  Automated  Unit  Reference  Sheet  (AURS)  on  new  EAC  MI 
organizations.  Although  the  new  HOU  did  not  extricate  INSCOM 
completely  from  the  TOE  development  process—and  in  fact  continued 
to  involve  INSCOM  .in  that  process  more  than  other  MACOM's— it  was 
considered  an  acceptable  level  of  involvement  and  one-  that  provided 
for  a  smoother  transition  toward  USAICS  someday  assuming  total 
responsibility  for  INSCOM  unit  TOE's. 
(U)  The  same  MOU  also  transfered  combat  development  maintenance 
responsibility  for  EAC  TOE  to  USAICS  on  1  October  1985.  INSCOM 
would  assume  a  support  role  similar  to  other  MACOM's  vioe  being 
responsible;  USAICS  would  assume  the  advocacy  role.  Finally,
UNCLASSIFIED 
XNSCOM  furnished  one  space  to  USAICS  to  perform  funotlons  in  area 
of  the  combat  development  maintenance  for  EAC  TOE.   Although^ 
resigned  on  1  October,  the  spsoe  would  not  be  filled  until  later. 5 
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 
FOOTNOTES!  CHAPTER  XX.  COMMAND  AND  STAFF  RELATIONSHIPS 
1.  DF,  DCSRM,  subjt  AR10-53f  Organization  and  Function*,  JD\3. 
Amy  Intelligence  and  Security  Command  (Undtd)  (C). 
2.  Msg,  CDR  INSCOM,  subjt  INSCOM  as  Executive  Authority  for 
TROJAN-Defined  (271929Z  Sep  85)  (0). 
3*  XA  Form  32,  DCSOPS,  aubjt  High  Technology/Low  Intensity 
Conflict  Steering  Group  (17  Sep  85)  (U). 
4.  Memo  for  Chief  of  Staff  Army,  CDR  INSCOM,  subjt  Command 
and  Control  of  EAC  Intelligence  Units  (17  Aug  84)  (S/NOFORN); 
Memo  for  Director  of  Management,  Acting  ACSI,  subjt 
Recommendations  on  the  DACS-DMC  Proposal  to  Alter  the 
Command  Structure  of  Selected  EAC  Units  (12  Apr  83)  (S/NOFORN). 
5.  Info  Paper,  IAPPM-AD,  subjt  TRADOC/INSCOM  MOU  en  Cbt/Tng 
Development,  Tng  and  Doctrine  (16  Aug  85)  (U). 
UNCLASSIFIED
CHAPTER  211 
ORGANIZATION 
INSCOM  Organization.  (D)  At  the  elcae  of  FT  1985*  there  was  a 
total  of  78  units  (34  TOE  and  44  TDA)  within  INSCOM.  The  TDA 
figure  does  not  Include  Augmentation  or  Provisional  units.  All 
types  of  units  are  listed  in  appendix  A.  For  individual  lists  of 
TOE,  TDA,  and  Provisional  units  at  the  close  of  FT  1985,  see 
appendices  B,  D,  and  G  respectively.  Changes  in  the  status  of  TOE, 
TDA,  and  Provialonal  are  Hated  in  appendioea  C,  E,  and  B. 
(9)  Throughout  FT  1985»  MG  Barry  E.  Soyater  aerved  as  Commander, 
INSCOM.  On  7  February  1985,  BG  James  V.  Bunt,  DCG,  left  INSCOM  for 
reassignment.  BG  Charlea  F.  Soanlon  remained  as  DCG.  Upon  bia 
aaaignment  to  INSCOM,  BG  George  J.  Walker  assumed  the  position  of 
Chief  of  Staff.  Thia  waa  the  firat  time  in  the  history  of 
INSCOM/Army  Security  Agency  that  a  general  officer  had  aerved  aa 
chief  of  ataff  since  the  position  waa  created  in  1950.  The  change 
waa  not  a  part  of  the  BQ  INSCOM  reorganization  plan  ongoing  at  the 
time.  After  discussion  within  the  Command  Group,  MG  Soyater  made 
the  deciaion  baaed  on  hie  own  management  philosophy.  Initially,  BG 
Scanlon  provided  overaight  to  single  diacipline  organisations  in 
the  command  while  MG  Soyater  overaaw  the  multidiaclpline  groups, 
auch  aa  the  66th,  470th,  500th,  501st,  and  513th  MI  Groups.  The  new 
Chief  of  Staff  would  oontinue  to  be  the  focal  point  for  all  actions 
of  the  ataff  and  oversee  aelected  activities.  MG  Soyster  foresaw 
the  likelihood  that  during  a  tour  with  INSCOM,  a  Chief  of  Staff 
would  also  aerve  in  the  position  of  the  deputy  commander  upon  the 
Encumbent* a  departure.  MG  Soyater  also  foresaw  the  possibility 
being  forced  to  let  go  of  one  of  the  general  officer  spaces.  Prior 
to  BG  Walker' a  arrival,  COL  Richard  J.  Powers,  Jr.,  had  been  Chief 
of  Staff.  On  30  December  1984,  CSM  Sammy  W.  Wise  replaced  CSM 
George  W.  Howell,  Jr. 
(U)  At  the  end  of  FY  1985,  Beadquartera,  U.S.  Army  Intelligence 
and  Security  Command  waa  organized  to  consist  of  a  Command  Group, 
Office  of  the  Chief  of  Staff,  Special  Staff,  Peraonal  Staff,  and 
Coordinating  Staff  aa  ahown  below: 
Command  Group: 
Commanding  General  (CG).  (U)  The  CG,  U.S.  Army  Intelligence  and 
Security  Command  waa  responsible  to  the  Chief  of  Staff,  U.S.  Army 
for  aecompliahment  of  the  miaaiona  and  functions  prescribed  by  AR 
10-53  and  waa  concurrently  reaponaible  to  the  Chief.  Cantral 
Seeuri ty  Service  for  all
UNCLASSIFIED 
Deputy  Commander  (DCG).  (U)  The  deputy  commander  assisted  the 
commander  in  the  management  of  all  intelligence  and  support 
operations  of  XNSCOM  to  Include  the  review  and  execution  of  all 
tasked  and  delegated  operations  and  the  determination  of  future 
requirements. 
Command  Sergeant  Major  (CSM).  (0)  The  Command  Sergeant  Major  as 
the  senior  enlisted  person  in  the  command  provided  advice  and 
assistance  to  the  CG  on  all  matters  involving  enlisted  personnel. 
Office  of  the  Chief  of  Staff t 
Chief  of  Staff  (CofS).  (0)  The  CofS  acted  as  the  principal 
coordinating  agent  of,  and  advisor  to,  the  CG  and  DCG  on  those 
matters  pertaining  to  INSCOM;  directed  and  coordinated  the  staff  to 
achieve  efficiency  and  unit  of  action;  and  assisted  the  CG  and  DCG 
in  the  supervision  of  the  execution  of  orders.  Directly 
subordinate  to  the  CofS  were  the  Liaison  Offioers,  the  Office  of 
Public  Affairs,  Organizational  Effectiveness  Office,  and  Internal 
Review  Office. 
Command  Group  Executive  Office.  (U)  On  16  September  1985,  the 
Chief  of  staff  created  the  position  of  Command  Group  XO.  The 
executive  officer's  purpose  was  to  coordinate  the  activities  and 
communications  of  the  CG  and  DCG  offices  with  the  Chief  of  Staff. 
Deputy  Chief  of  Staff  (DCS).  (U)  The  DCS  acted  for  the  Chief  of 
Staff  during  his  absence  and  assisted  to  coordinate  all  actions  of 
the  HQ  INSCOM  staff,  and  supervised  the  activities  of  or  provided 
support  to  the  Command  Chaplain,  Organizational  Effectiveness 
Office,  Secretary  of  the  General  Staff,  Staff  Psychologist, 
Scientific  Advisor,  Public  Affairs  Office,  and  INSCOM  Liaison 
Officers. 
Secretary  of  the  General  Staff  (SGS).  (U)  The  SGS  acted  as 
executive  ofiicer  for  the  CofS  and  as  office  manager  for  the 
offices  of  the  CG,  DCG's,  and  CofS. 
Special  Assistant  -to  Chief  of  Staff.  (U)  The  Special  Assistant  to 
Chief  of  Staff  acted  as  special  advisor  and  consultant  to  the 
commander,  deputy  commanders,  and  the  Chief  rf  Staff. 
Protocol  Office.  (U)  The  Protocol  Officer  served  to  advise  the 
Command  Group  on  matters  related  to  protocol. 
UNCLASSIFIED  29
UNCLASSIFIED 
Liaison  Offlcen.  <U)  The  liaison  officers  provided  liaison 
representation  to  NSACSS,  FORSCOM,  TRADOC,  USAREUR,  and  other 
commands  as  required.  The  liaison  positions  at  both  USAICS  and 
USACACDA  were  both  discontinued  upon  the  departure  of  the 
incumbents.  The  USAICS  position  in  May  1965  and  the  USACAGDA 
llaision  position  on  15  December  1981.  (Although  not  considered  a 
liaison  officer  as  such,  INSCOM  decided  in  August  1985  to  provide  a 
space  to  the  combat  developments  section  of  the  USAICS.  The 
position  would  not  be  filled  until  4th  Qtr,  FY  1986.)  It  was 
planned  that  as  incumbents  left  a  number  of  the  liaison  offices, 
there  would  be  no  replacement.  This  was  part  of  the  headquarters 
voluntary  decrement  undergone  in  FY  1986  to  transfer  spaces  to  the 
field  and  new  command  initiatives. 
Special  Staff t 
Chief.  Organizational  Effectiveness  (OE)  Office.  (U)  The  OE 
Office  assisted  INSCOM' s  senior  leaders  in  leading  the  human 
element  of  their  organizations  through  complex  organizational 
change.  The  OE  Office  also  provides  assistance  to  INSCOM's  leaders 
in  management  and  leadership  training  programs.  Finally,  the  OE 
Office  managed  the  INSCOM's  OE  Program. 
Chief.  Internal  Review  (IR)  Office.  (U)  Served  as  the  principal 
advisor  to  the  CDR,  INSCOM  on  internal  review  matters.  Conducted 
independent  review  and  examination  of  command  operations  and 
Internal  controls  to  provide  the  commander  with  an  objective 
evaluation  of  the  effectiveness  and  efficiency  with  which  his 
financial  and  related  functions  were  being  performed. 
Scientific  and  Cryptologlc  Affairs  Advisor.  (U)  Served  as  the 
principal  advisor  to  the  CDR,  INSCOM  and  his  staff  on  aclentific 
and  cryptologlc  matters. 
Public  Affairs  Officer  (PAO).  (U)  Served  as  the  Public  Affairs 
Officer  of  INSCOM,  advising  the  commander  and  staff  on  all  public 
affairs  matters. 
Command  Psychologist.  (U)  Served  as  the  psychologist  of  INSCOM 
advising  the  commander  on  matters  pertaining  to  mental  health  and 
providing  guidance  on  psychological  factors  pertaining  to 
intelligence  operations. 
Command  Chaplain.  (U)  Served  as  the  chaplain  of  INSCOM  providing 
advice  and  assistance  to  the  commander  and  his  staff  on  religious, 
moral,  moral  leadership,  and  human  self-development  matters. 
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 
Personal  Staffs 
Inspector  General  (10).  (U)  The  XG,  as  member  of  the  personal 
staff,  inquired  into  and  reported  upon  natters  affecting  the 
performance  of  mission  and  state  of  the  economy,  efficiency-, 
discipline,  and  morale  of  every  phase  of  activity  which  was  within 
the  sphere  of  responsibility  of  the  commanding  general  and  as 
prescribed  by  law.  On  15  October  1981,  a  Plans  and  Analysis 
Division  was  created.  Given  the  conditions  of  a  stable  force  of  13 
people  and  the  fact  that  the  Command  Group  was  undergoing  a 
transition  itself,  it  was  believed  that  mid  1984  offered  a  unique 
opportunity  for  the  Office  of  the  Inspector  General  to  reorganize. 
The  newly  created  Plans  and  Analysis  Division  was  designed  to 
fulfill  the  following  needs:  (1)  the  need  for  a  more  systematic 
approach  to  Inspection  planning  and  the  analysis  of  inspection 
findings,  IGAR  trends,  and  other  data  to  identify  systematic  Issues 
requiring  detailed  inspection  and  resolution;  (2)  the  need  to 
utilize  personnel  resources  more  effectively  between  inspections; 
and  (3)  the  need  for  an  element  to  incorporate  the  functions  of  a 
Deputy  IG,  Executive  Officer,  or  Operations  Officer.  Besides  the 
Plans  and  Analysis  Division,  there  remained  the  Inspections 
Division  and  the  Assistance  and  Investigations  Divlson. 
Staff  Judge  Advocate  (SJA).  (D)  The  SJA  served  as  legal  advisor 
to  the  CG,  DCG,  CofS,  and  all  staff  elements  of  HQ  INSCOM  and,  as 
necessary,  to  subordinate  elements  of  the  command. 
General  Staff: 
Deputy  Chief  of  Staff,  Personnel  (DCSPER).  (0)  The  DCSPER  served 
as  the  principal  staff  officer  for  the  administration  of  military 
and  civilian  personnel.  Acted  for  the  CDR,  INSCOM  in  the 
direction,  supervision,  and  coordination  of  plans,  policies,  and 
procedures  for  personnel  administration,  distribution,  and 
management;  maintenance  of  order  and  discipline;  safety;  welfare; 
morale;  human  affairs;  and  nonappropriated  fund  activities. 
Throughout  FY  1985,  DCSPER  remained  divided  between  the  ADCSPER 
Military  and  the  ADCSPER  Civilian.  The  ADCSPER  Military  oversaw 
the  Military  Personnel  Division  and  Plans  and  Proponeocy  Division. 
The  ADCSPER  Civilian  oversaw  Human  Resources  Division,  Equal 
Opportunity  Program  Division,  and  Civilian  Personnel  Division. 
Deputy  Chief  of  Staff.  Operations  (DCSOPS).  (U)  The  DCSOPS  was 
the  principal  coordinating  staff  officer  responsible  for  ourrent 
Intelligence  collection,  production,  electronic  warfare,  and 
counterintelligence,  and  security  support  operations.  Provided 
operational  policy  guidance  and  direction,  coordinated,  and 
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 
v* 
supervised  current  operation*.  Managed  REDTRAIN  directions 
coordinated  and  supervised  current  operations.  Managed  REDTRAIN 
program  as  Army  executive  agent.  Provided  operationally  oriented 
IMSCOM  lnterfaoes  between  national,  departmental,  theater  (echelon 
above  corps),  and  tactical  (echelon  below  corps),  Intelligence 
organisations.  Served .as  the  stsff  Budget  Director  (current  and 
budget  year)  for  allocation  and  employment  of  Program  2,  3,  and  8 
operational  resources.  Coordinated  operational  matters  with 
Department  of  the  Army,  HSA/CSS,  Department  of  Defense,  DIA,  CIA, 
FBI,  Joint/combined  commands,  other  MACOM'a,  and  other  governmental 
agencies.  Supervised  command  aviation  activities.  Prepared  and 
coordinated  command  operational  plans  and  manages  command 
operational  planning  system;  was  command  focal  point  for  reserve 
affairs.  Supervised  command  historical  program.  Exercised  staff 
proponency  over  the  Intelligence  Exchange  Support  Center,  Systems 
Exploitation  Detachment,  and  Administrative  Survey  Detachment.  As 
a  result  of  the  DA1C  investigation  in  198U,  the  functions  of  the 
Special  Disbursing  Agent  and  the  Intelligence  Contingency  Funds 
(ICF)  manager  were  separated  on  1  October  198H.  The  office  of  the 
ICF  Management  Officer  remained  within  DCSOPS  but  the  disbursing 
functions  were  transferred  to  DCSRM.  The  ICF  Management  Officer 
advised  on  all  aspects  of  the  control,  administration,  supervision, 
and  utilisation  of  ICF.  The  officer  was  accountable  to  and 
received  technical  financial  guidance  from  the  Special  Finanoe  and 
Accounting  Officer. 
(U)  Unlike  many  recent  years,  there  was  little  reorganisation  of 
the  structure  of  DCSOPS.  On  1  December  198U,  a  Project 
Coordination  Office  was  established  directly  under  the  DCSOPS.  Its 
function  was  to  make  recommendations  as  to  how  the  military 
Intelligence  community  was  to  handle  special  operations.  On  1  July 
1985,  the  Program,  Policy,  and  Readiness  Division  was  dissolved  and 
its  assets  scattered  among  other  DCSOPS  elements.  At  the  close  of 
FY  1985,  DCSOPS  consisted  of  the  following  major  divisions: 
Project  Coordination  Office,  Administrative  Office,  History  Office, 
Reserve  Affairs  Office,  ADCSOPS  Plans/Training,  ADCSOPS  OPSEC, 
ADCSOPS  HUMINT,  ADCSOPS  SIGINT/EW,  ADCSOPS  IMINT/EO,  and  ADCSOPS  • 
Intelligence  Support. 
* 
Deputy  Chief  of  Staff,  Logistics  (DCSLOG).  (U)  DCSLOG  was  the 
principal  coordinating  staff  officer  for  logistics,  and  was 
responsible  for  integrated  logistics  planning  policy; 
procurement/contracts;  budgeting;  distribution,  storage,  and 
maintenance  of  electronic  equipment  systems  (less 
telecommunications);  engineering;  construction;  support  services; 
transportation;  materiel  readiness;  and  real  property  management. 
UNCLASSIFIED  32
FOROFBCWaJSEONfc* 
The  DCSLOG  also  hid  staff  supervision  of  the  Materiel  Support 
Activity  and  the  Maintenance  Assistance  and  Instruction  Teaa  • 
Activity.  
* 
(0)  During  FY  198U,  the  organisation  of  the  DCSLOO  remained 
basically  the  same  and  oonsisted  of  the  following:  Supply  and 
Services  Division,  Maintenance  Division,  Installation  Division, 
Fixed  Station  Engineering  Division,  Management  Office,  Contracts 
Support  Office,  and  Administrative  Office.  The  Contracts  Support 
Office  was  new  and  was  established  for  the  purpose  of  providing  the 
required  supervisory,  technical  review,  staff  guidance,  and 
contract  oversight  necessary  to  act  as  Reading,  Contracting 
Activity  (BCA),  for  procuring  supplies  and  services  in  support  of 
classified  intelligence  operations.  The  authority  to  exercise  the 
procurement  mi  S3  ion  was  by  letter  on  7  June  1985  by  the  Assistant 
Secretary  of  the  Amy  (Research,  Development,  and  Acquisition). 
The  CG,  INSCOM  had  requested  RCA  authority  in  April  1985  as  a 
result  of  the  DA  Inspector  General  (DAIG)  findings  in  1984.  The 
DAIG  found  that  acquisitions  were  being  made  by  INSCOM  activities 
without  the  authority  of  a  contracting  officer  as  required  by  the 
Federal  Acquisition  Regulation.  In  order  to  correct  this 
deficiency  BCA  was  requested. 
Deputy  Chief  of  Staff.  Systems  (DCSSYS).  (U)  DCSSYS  was  the 
principal  coordinating  staff  officer  responsible  for  INSCOM 
materiel/systems  development.  DCSSYS  represented  INSCOM  as  the 
Army's  materiel  developer  of  fixed  strategic  signal  intelligence 
systems  and  INSCOM  operated  fixed  automated  systems.  DCSSYS  also 
represented  INSCOM  in  the  materiel  development  process  for  systems 
to  be  used  by  INSCOM. 
(0)  The  DCSSYS  was  divided  into  the  Special  Assistant  Automation, 
Requirement  Division,  Systems  Division,  Automat^yjanagement 
Division,  Program  Management  Office,  the  fl      p  Project  Office, 
and  the  Data  Administrator  Office.  On  1  nay1985T  this  was  changed 
with  the  transfer  of  the  Special  Assistant  for  Automation  and  the 
Data  Administrator  to  the  newly  established  DCSIM.  At  the  same 
time,  staff  supervision  of  the  Automated  Systems  Activity  was  also 
transferred .  • 
Deputy  Chief  of  Staff.  Resource  Management  (DCSRM).  (U)  The  DCSRM 
was  the  principal  staff  officer  in  matters  concerning  management, 
financial  management,  and  manpower  management.  The  DCSRM 
established  and  maintained  administrative  oontrol  of  appropriated 
funds,  exercised  responsibility  for  manpower  management  and  The 
Army  Authorization  Document  System  (TAAD),  developed  and  supervised 
the  implementation  of  force  requirements,  administered  the 
E.0NLY  33
UNCLASSIFIED 
structure  and  strength  program,  exercised  oontrol  ever  tbe  aanpover 
and  equipment  survey  progress,  end  reviewed  and  prepered  flnanolal 
and/or  manpower  annexes  for  operational  and  force  development 
plans.  Zn  addition,  the  DCSRM  exercised  staff  supervision  over  the 
Finance  and  Accounting  Activity.  As  a  result  of  the  1984  DAIG 
investigation,  the  Special  Finance  Accounting  Offloer  wss 
established  within  DCSRM  on  1  October  1984.  The  office  provided 
disbursing  services  to  activities  utilizing  Special  Mission  Funds 
(SMF)  and  Intelligence  Contingency  Funds  (ICF). 
(U)  During  FY  1985,  DCSRM  was  oooposed  of  the  following  elements: 
Administrative  Office,  Budget  Division,  Finance  and  Accounting 
Division,  Management  and  Analysis  Division,  and  Manpower  Division. 
Deputy  Chief  of  Staff.  Telecommunications  (POSTED.  (U)  (See 
Deputy  Chief  of  Staff,  Information  Management.) 
Deputy  Chief  of  Staff.  Plans.  Programs,  and  Modernization  (DCSPPM). 
(0)  DCSPPM  was  the  principal  coordinating  staff  officer 
responsible  for  INSCOM  long-range  and  mid-range  planning;  force 
design  and  operational  concepts;  resource  program  development, 
submission,  defense,  and  evaluation.  Represented  INSCOM  in  the 
conceptual  and  doctrinal  aspects  of  the  combat  development  process. 
Served  as  staff  point  of  contact  with  other  Army/DOD  activities  for 
force  planning,  combat  developments,  TENCAP  planning,  program 
submission,  and  force  integration. 
(U)  At  the  close  of  FT.  1985,  DCSPPM  consisted  of  the  Concepts  and 
Studies  Division  (formerly  the  Long  Range  Plans  and  Studies 
Office),  Force  Design  and  Integration  (formerly  Force  Modernization 
Division),  Programs  Division,  and  Program  Plans  Division. 
Deputy  Chief  of  Staff.  Information  Resource  Management.  (0)  (See 
Deputy  Chief  of  Staff,  Information  Management.) 
Deputy  Chief  of  Staff  for  Information  Management.  (U)  On  1  May 
1985,  based  upon  Chief  of  Staff  Army  guidance,  the  responsibility 
for  all  information  management  was  placed  under  a  single  manager 
and  the  Deputy  Chief  of  Staff  for  Information  Management  (DCS1M) 
was  established.  The.  DCSIM  was  the  principal  staff  assistant  to 
the  Commander,  INSCOM  for  all  matters  pertaining  to  information 
management.  Served  as  Program  Area  Director  for  command  programs, 
budgets,  and  the  Army  Management  System  as  they  relate  to 
telecommunications/automation.  Discharged  primary  staff 
responsibilities  for  engineering,  installation,  and  maintenance  of 
INSCOM  information  systems.  Exercised  staff  supervision  over 
operation  of  the  Defense  Special  Security  Communication  System 
UNCLASSIFIED
(JNCLASSIFIED 
(DSSCS),  CRITICOMM,  and  other  telecommunications  activities  of  the 
coaaand.  Directed  development  of  tactical  information  systems 
objectives  concepts  and  requirements  of  the  command.  Direota. 
development  of  tactical  information  systems  objectives,  concepts, 
and  requirementa  within  INSCOM  areas  of  interest,  finally,  the 
DCSIM  exercised  operational  control  over  the  USAISC  Communications 
Center  aupporting  USAINSCOM,  Arlington  Hall  Station.  The  new  ataff 
element  also  exercised  oontrol  over  the  Automated  Systems  Activity 
and  the  Administrative/Audiovisual  Support  Activity. 
(D)  DCSIM  waa  formed  by  merging  the  ACSTEL,  the  DCSIRM,  and  the 
functions  of  the  Special  Assistant  for  Automation  and  the  Data 
Administrator  from  DCSSIS  into  one  staff  element.  Besides  an 
Adminiatrative  Branch,  the  DCSIM  was  divided  into  the  ADCSIM 
Telecommunications,  ADCSIM  Information  Services,  and  ADCSIM 
Automation. 
Coaaand  Security  Office  (CSO).  (0)  The  Chief,  CSO  formulated, 
implemented,  and  supervised  policies  and  procedures  for  personnel, 
physical,  automation,  and  information  aecurity  and  acted  as  command 
and  headquarters  security  manager,  internal  OPSEC  manager,  TEMPEST 
Coordinating  Officer  (TCO),  and  chief  law  enforcement  official  for 
IKSCOM. 
UNCLASSIFIED  *   35
'''fir."* ■*   'v"    *" 
Resubordlnatlon  of  P.S.  Liaison  Branch* 
Jfnln  October  198*  t  DSAREOR  requested  the  ^subordination  be 
delayed  until  a  new,  mutually  satisfactory  MOU  between^NSCO^nd^ 
PSABEUB  could  be  prepared. 
Transfer  of  HQ  Spaces  to  Subordinate  Units.  (0)  A  headquarters 
reorganization  study  led  by  Colonel  Campbell  had  recommended 
several  transfers  of  functions  and  spaces  from  the  staff  to  the 
field  (e.g.  TAREX,  Technical  Surveillance  Countermeasures  (TSCM)). 
There  was  no  agreement  among  the  staff  as  to  what  If  any  spaces 
should  be  transferred.  This  failure  coupled  with  new  and  higher 
priority  intelligence  and  security  requirements  such  as  Central 
America,  special  access  programs,  increased  counterintelligence  and 
polygraph  programs,  implementation  of  a  Head  of  Contracting 
Activity  (HCA),  and  the  new  training  initiative,  TROJAN,  all  led  to 
a  relook  at  the  headquarters  base. 
(U)  In  March  1985,  the  Chief  of  Staff,  INSCOM  directed  each 
headquarters  element  to  prioritize  staff  functions  to  identify 
possible  decrements  for  reallocation  to  high  priority  headquarters 
or  field  requirements  and  excess  spaces  gained  from  consolidation 
of  headquarters  staff  elements  at  Arlington  Hall  Station.  Each 
staff  element  was  then  to  prioritize  their  functions  bused  on 
possible  5  percent,  10  percent,  and  15  percent  decrements. 
IH 36
UNCLASSIFIED 
(0)  In  May,  after  the  results  of  the  above  drill  was  in,  the 
Commander,  INSCOM  approved  the  10  peroent  realignment  of  the  JNSCOM 
headquarters  staff  spaces  and  transferred  four  out  of  every  five 
identified  spaces  to  subordinate  INSCOM  unite  to  meet  operational 
requirements.  The  remainder  went  to  meeting  the  requirements  for 
new  programs  or  emphasis  such  as  TROJAN.  Prior  to  the  decision, 
there  was  again  reservations  voioed  by  some  staff  elements.  Some 
because  of  the  fear  of  losing  resources;  others  beoause  concern  for 
future  DA  manpower  surveys  whose  outs  would  be  doubly  nevtr; 
Brigadier  General  Se anion,  DCG  INSCOM,  reportedly  a  long  time 
advocate  of  transfer  of  spaces  from  the  headquarters  to  the  field, 
believed  that  the  headquarters  could  take  up  to  20  percent  outs 
without  harm  to  staff  functions.  The  cuts  resulting  from  the  May 
decision  by  the  Commander,  INSCOM  would  not  take  place  until  FT 
1986;  officer  apaces  would  be  delayed  until  FY  1987. 2 
Consolidation  at  Arlington  Hall  Station.  (V)    On  20  June  1985,  the 
long-awaited  approval  by  the  Director  of  the  Army  Staff  to 
consolidate  the  INSCOM  headquarters  staff  at  Arlington  Ball  Station 
was  received.  This  was  to  be  accomplished  for  the  most  part  by  CY 
1985.  Rehabilitation  of  the  facilities  vacated  by  the  Intelligence 
and  Threat  Analysis  Center  was  one  mitigating  factor  which  would 
possibly  delay  the  final  consolidation.  A  draft  OPLAN  was 
published  to  provide  the  INSCOM  staff  and  work  force  guidance  to 
facilitate  the  consolidation  and  accomplishment  of  the  milestones. 
DCSL0&  and  DCSRM  personnel  could  relocate  as  determined  by  the 
respective  staff  head  prior  to  December  1985.  The  movement  of  the 
DCSOPS  personnel,  by  far  the  largest  number  of  personnel  from  Fort 
Meade,  would  occur  in  early  January  1986  unless  it  could  be 
accomplished  sooner.  In  June,  the  DCSOPS  took  the  initial  steps  of 
assigning  new  military  personnel  to  duty  ststion  at  Arlington  Ball 
Station,  civilian  vacancies  at  Fort  Meade  would  in  the  future  be 
filled  at  Arlington  Ball,  and  MI  Excepted  Career  Program  (MICEP) 
assignment  to  DCSOPS  at  Fort  Meade  would  be  assigned  to  Arlington 
Ball  Station.  The  Director  of  the  INSCOM  Support  Activity  at  Fort 
Meade  was  directed  to  develop  a  support  plan  which  would  continue 
to  provide  records,  mail,  and  audiovisual  support  to  remaining 
units  at  Fort  Meade.. 3 
HQ  INSCOM  Reorganization.  (0)  In  July  1983  a  reorganization  plan 
for  HQ  INSCOM  was  approved,  and  it  was  to  be  implemented  over  a  3 
year  period.  Before  the  first  year  of  the  plan  had  ended,  the 
Chief  of  Staff  directed  a  postponement  of  the  pending  DCSOPS 
reorganization.  The  DCSOPS  was  due  to  transfer  spaces  to  other 
headquarters  elements.  Because  of  the  potential  loss  of 
operational  capability  and  the  arrival  of  a  new  Command  Group  who 
was  committed  to  operations,  a  relook-  was  felt  to  be  necessary. 
UNCLASSIFIED
'unclassified 
Colonel  Powers,  the  DCSOPS,  was  directed  to  relook  the  DCSOPS 
portion  or  the  plan,  and  Colonel  Hambric,  serving  as  a  speoial 
assistant  to  the  Chief  of  Staff,  was  to  relook  the  larger 
reorganization  plan.  The  relook  ooneluded  that  the  basic  structure 
of  the  headquarters  was  sound;  however,  DCSOPS  required  additional 
resources  to  accomplish  its  mission. 
(U)  The  relook  still  did  not  provide  the  sought  after  answers. 
There  was  a  perception  that  the  DCSOPS  was  not  totally  effective  in 
quick,  efficient  working  issues;  did  not  heavily  impact  on 
requirements;  and  lacked  the  capability  to  effectively  deal  with 
Quick  Requirements  Capability,  low  intensity  warfare, 
•ultidlscipllne  support  to  subordinate  units  (maintained  a 
discipline  vice  geographical  orientation),  and  special  access 
programs.  It  was  then  decided  that  a  new  study  would  be  led  by 
staff  (Mr.  Paul  Sutton,  Special  assistant)  within  the  Office  of  the 
Chief  of  Staff  Itself. 
(0)  A  relook  was  accomplished  by  starting  with  the  results  of  the 
1963/84  DCSPPM  effort  and  its  resulting  draft  Mission  and  Functions 
Manual  dated  March  1984.  Key  staff  heads  and  deputies  were 
consulted  and  their  recommendations  and  opinions  polled.  A  very 
quick  staff  concurrence  was  obtained  that  the  DCSPPM  and  DCSSYS 
ahould  be  consolidated  with  the  DCSQPS  and  that  the  two  most 
important  Issues  to  IHSCOM  were  the  Improvement  of  DCSOPS  and 
consolidation  of  information  management/automatic  data  processing 
(ADP).  Additionally, -provisions  must  be  made  to  add  or  enhance  all 
of  the  capabilities  mentioned  in  the  previous  paragraph. 
<0)  The  consensus  lasted  only  a  week,  and  very  quickly  strong 
statements  were  being  made  for  a  status  quo  with  the  exception  of 
consolidating  all  ADP/information  functions  in  DCSIM.  Mr.  Sutton's 
group  recommended  a  number  of  alternatives.  The  ideal  solution  was 
to  combine  DCSOPS,  DCSSYS,  and  DCSPPM  to  create  under  the  DCSOPS 
a  dual  deputy,  both  the  current  operations  and  readiness  along 
with  that  element  that  builds  the  future  organisational  force  and 
structure.  A  dual  deputy  for  each  area  is  seen  as  the  most 
advantageous. 
* 
(U)  The  problem  with  this  approach  was  that  success  would  be 
dependent  upon  having  an  extremely  strong,  tough  manager  and 
leader,  capable  of  influencing  his  peers,  two  deputy  commanders  and 
the  commander.  The  continual  rapid  turnover,  split  locations,  and 
shortage  of  this  type  of  a  leader  negates  this  approach.  Instead 
the  design,  planning,  and  programming  of  the  future  foroe  needed  to 
be  separate  from  the  daily  operations  to  successfully  compete  for 
resources  and  give  these  functions  the  primary  attention  they 
UNCLASSIFIED
«~  ■  1  -- 
UNCLASSIFIED 
deserve.  The  current  split  allowed  an  economy  of  force  to  give 
each  function  the  best  possible  effort  within  available  personnel 
resources.  Future  Improvement  In  the  command  requires  a  cleaV  view 
of  the  future  force  and  the  necessary  programing  action  to  get 
there.  The  recent  reorganization  effort  properly  divided  the  staff 
functions  for  HQ  INSCOM  but  stripped  an  excessive  number  of 
personnel  from  DCSOPS.  The  programing  and  force  structure  efforts 
of  DCSPPM  and  DCSSYS  effort  should  be  retained  but  done  1n  current 
resources.  The  DCSOPS  should  restructure  Internally  to  gain  a 
decreased  span  of  control,  provide  a  geographical  orientation  and 
reduce  the  discipline  split.  A  ytry  concentrated  effort  should  be 
made  to  lessen  the  Impact  of  the  Fort  Meade  split  location. 
(U)  The  basic  findings  of  the  study  were  confirmed  by  the  study 
group  led  by  Colonel  Campbell  and  then  acted  upon.  Separate 
DCSOPS.  DCSSYS,  and  DCSPPM  were  maintained.  The  DCSOPS  would  be 
strengthen  by  halting  the  pending  transfer  of  resources  to  other 
staff  elements.  These  resources  should  be  used  1n  developing  a 
geographical  orientation.  A  final  major  step  was  the  consolidation 
of  all  Information  resource  management,  automation,  and 
Administrative/Audiovisual  Support  Activity  functions  under  the 
DCSIM.  The  consolidation  of  functions  under  DCSIM  took  place  on  2 
May  1985.  Colonel  Campbell's  study  group  also  recommended 
reduction  of  headquarters  staff  to  meet  operational  needs  1n  the 
field  and  new  command  Initiatives.4 
Transfer  of  Detachment  Hahn.  (U)  Detachment  Hahn,  a  paragraph  on 
the  augmentation  of  the  66th  MI  Group,  had  the  mission  of  providing 
SI 61 NT  and  1MINT  support  to  echelon  corps  and  below  commanders  and 
«  echelon  above  corps  battle  managers.  Additionally,  the  detachment 
was  to  demonstrate  the  mobility  of  the  Tactical  Reconnaissance 
Exploitation  Demonstrations  System  (TREDS)  and  assist  1n 
development  of  equipment  testing  and  organizational  structures 
which  maximize  efficiency,  speed,  and  responsiveness.  Detachment 
Hahn  was  located  at  Metro  Tango,  8  miles  northeast  of  Hahn  A1r  Base 
In  Germany.  On  1  May  1985,  the  administrative  and  operational 
control  of  the  detachment  was  transferred  from  the  502d  ASA 
Battalion  to  the. 66th  MI  Group.  Because  the  detachment  had  to  rely 
upon  the  A1r  Force  for  support,  1t  was  felt  that  subprdinatlon  to  a 
higher  level  of  command  would  be  advantageous.5 
Relocation  of  Pentagon  Counterintelligence  Force.  (U)  The 
Pentagon  Space  Manager  directed  that  the  INSCOM  Pentagon 
Counterintelligence  Force  (PCF)  be  relocated  elsewhere  than  the 
Pentagon  due  to  demands  upon  space  In  the  building.  The  PCF  was 
low  on  the  priority  list  due  to  the  fact  that  1t  was  a  subordinate 
element  to  a  MACOM  and  not  the  HQDA  staff.  The  notice  to  vacate 
UNCLASSIFIED
mmi^ 
TIAL 
was  done  with  less  than  than  30  days  notice.  On  a  ehort-term 
basis,  the  PCF  was  relocated  to  Building  A,  Arlington  Rail  Station, 
on  18  March  1985*  But  this  relocation  oould  only  be  temporary  due 
to  space  constraints.  Also  Colonel  Francis  Cr  tight  on,  Commander, 
902d  MI  Group  which  exereiaed  control  of  the  PCP,  had  expreased  a 
goal  of  decreasing  the. emphasis  on  operations  security  (OPSEC)  and 
giving  priority  to  the  "classics!  counterintelligence"  skills  such 
as  interviewing,  survelllsnee,  and  report  writing.  To  aohleve  this 
goal,  plans  were  made  to  establish  a  training  unit  at  Fort  Meade, 
Maryland,  whose  purpose  would  be  to  train  the  personnel  or  the  902d 
MI  Group  in  counterespionage,  ADP  security,  and  other  aspects  of 
counterintelligence.  With  the  relocation  of  PCF  and  the  decreased 
emphasis  on  OPSEC  ensbled  Colonel  Creighton  to  reduce  the  support 
to  the  Pentagon  to  a  five-man  Resident  Office  at  Arlington  Ball 
Station  and  transfer  the  remainder  to  Fort  Meade  to  form  the 
training  unlt. 
X0)    On  10  July  1985t  the  PCF  was  restationed  to  Building  2842, 
Fort  Mesde,  Maryland.  Six  personnel  remained  at  Arlington  Rail 
Station  to  form  the  Pentagon  Resident  Office  (PRO)  and  became 
subordinate  to  the  Fort  Meade  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
(MID).  Due  to  restrictions  on  moving  military  personnel  twice  in 
one  year  and  the  commander1  a  deaire  to  preclude  oausing  financial 
and  peraonnel  hardships  *o  families  who  had  located  in  the 
Washington,  B.C.  area,  many  members  of  the  PCF  were  assigned  out  of 
the  902d  MI  Group,  assigned  special  duty  to  nearby  units  while 
remaining  assigned  to  PCF,  or  assigned  to  the  Pentagon  Resident 
Office.  The  Technical  Surveillance  Countermeasures  (TSCM)  team  was 
detached  and  remained  at  Arlington  Rail  Station;  it  was  later 
combined  with  the  Capitol  Rill  Team  to  aervioe  the  entire  National 
Capital  Region. 
(0)  On  19  Auguat  1985,  the  PCF  was  subordinated  to  the  MI 
Battalion  (CI)  East  Coast  at  Fort  Meade  as  a  military  intelligence 
training  detachment .6 
Relocation  of  the  PSA  Special  Security  Group.  (0)  During  FT  1985» 
the  USA  Special  Security  Group  underwent  two  relocations:  22 
January  to  1  February  1985  from  the  Pentagon  to  A  Building,  Wing  5t 
Arlington  Rail  Station,  and  20  to  27  May  1985  from  Wing  5  to  Wing  8 
of  the  same  building.  The  move  from  the  Pentagon  to  Arlington  Hall 
Station  was  directed  by  the  Pentagon  Spaoe  Manager.  This  was  due 
to  the  prioritization  of  apace.  Subordinate  unite  to  major  Army 
commands  had  lower  priority  than  elements  belonging  to  RQDA  Staff.7 
Reorganization  of  the  902d  MI  Group.  J0I    During  FT  1985 1  the  902d 
MI  Group  reorganised  its  sssets  internally. 
% 
%
%. 
% 
   _^__________   0°  1  fjpteber 
1SF8H,  the  INSCOM  Counterintelligence  and  Signal  Seeurity  Support 
Battalion,  Fort  Sam  Houston  itas  discontinued  and  its  assets. divided 
upon  three  reorganised  battalions.  At  the  sane  tine,  the  CI  and 
SXGSEC  Support  Battalion,  Presidio  or  San  Franoisoo  was 
redesignated  as  the  INSCOM  MI  Battalion  (CI)  Vest  Coast;  the  CI  and 
SIGSEC  Support  Battalion,  Fort  George  G.  Meade  was  redesignated  the 
INSCOM  MI  Battalion  (CI)  East  Coast;  and  the  INSCOM  Seeurity 
Support  Detachment,  Fort  George  0.  Mesde  was  redesignated  as  INSCOM 
MI  Battalion  (Security), 
Additional  personnel  resources  were  requested  to  support  tne 
expanding  polygraph  amission  and  to  support  ADP  security  software 
analysis,  but  neither  had  been  resourced* 
(U)  However,  it  was  felt  that  the  organisation  of  the  902d  MI 
Group  did  not  provide  the  optimum  structure  to  accomplish  the 
group* s  mission.  The  mix  of  functional  and  geographical  missions 
created  problems  in  command  and  control  and  did  not  allow  adequate 
flexibility  to  focus  assets  on  the  group* s  priority  missions. 
Within  the  functional  (primarily  technical  CI  support)  tasks,  the 
problem  was  compounded  by  a  mix  of  centralised  (Technical 
Surveillance  Counteraeasures  (TSCM),  polygraph,  and  ADP  seourity) 
end  decentralized  TEMPEST  operations.  There  was  an  urgent  need  to 
provide  adequate  oommand  and  staff  supervision  of  tech  services  and 
tech  training  through  centralized  control  of  the  CI  services.  This 
could  produce  significant  resource  savings,  provide  needed 
technical  control,  and  allow  more  efficient  allocations  of  aoaroe 
resources  against  priority  missions. 
CON 
IAL
UNCLASSIFIED 
(0)  During  the  902d  MI  Group' •  In  Process  fievlew  held  on  16  July 
1985 1  there  was  a  realignment  of  the  902d  MX  Group.  By  late 
August,  approval  had  been  reoelved  from  the  VCSA  to  proceed  as  an 
exception  to  the  then  current  Documentation  Modernisation  (DOCMOD) 
restrictions.  The  Implementation  date  for  the  realignment  was  set 
for  1  March  1986. 
(0)  The  goU  of  the  realignment  was  to  functionally  reorganize  and 
restructure  the  902d  MI  Group  to  meet  the  increasing  demands  for  CI 
support  to  DA  approved  SAP's,  increase  and  improve  the  command, 
control,  and  oversight  of  assigned  teohnical  CI  capabilities,  and 
create  a  functionally  structured  organization  that  oould  conduct 
the  total  range  of  CI  operations,  investigations,  and  services  with 
maximum  efficiency..  The  significant  increase  in  the  number  of  DA 
approved  SAP's  which  required  IMSCOM  CI  support  IAW  AR  380-381,  the 
assumption  by  the  902d  MI  Group  of  the  CONUS  counterespionage 
mission  in  1985,  and  the  laok  of  adequate  command,  control,  and 
oversight  of  CI  technical  assets  dictste  this  reorganization  and 
restructuring. 
(U)  In  general  terms,  the  realignment  will  result  in  the  group 
being  aligned  along  functional  mission  lines  to  provide  enhanced 
command,  control,  and  oversight  of  group  operations.  The  902d  MI 
Group  headquarters  will  exercise  command  and  control  of  its  three 
subordinate  battalions  for  all  CI  operations.  The  MI  Detachment 
(CI)  (Support)  will  be  attached  to  MI  Battalion  (CI)  (Technical) 
and  MI  Detachment  (CI)  Defense  Nuclear  Agency  (DNA)  will  be 
attached  to  MI  Battalion  (CI)  (Security)  for  command  and  control. 
(0)  The  following  name  changes  are  required  to  accurately  reflect 
*he  distinct  missions  of  the  subordinate  battalions  and 
detachments:  East  Coast  Battalion  becomes  MI  Battalion  (CI) 
(Technical),  Vest  Coast  Battalion  becomes  MI  Battalion  (CI), 
Pentagon  CI  Force  becomes  MI  Detachment  (CI)  (Support),  CI 
Detachment  DNA  becomes  MI  Detachment  (CI)  (DNA),  and  MI  Battalion 
(Security)  becomes  MI  Battalion  (CI)  (Security).  This 
reorganization  will  be  completed  utilizing  current  allocated  group 
assets  of  683. 
(U)  In  the  second  phase  of  the  reorganization  (FY  1987),  the  MI 
Battalion  (CI)  headquarters  will  be  relocated  from  Presidio  of  San 
Francisco,  California,  to  Fort  George  G.  Meade,  Maryland.  At  the 
same  time,  the  MI  Detachment  (CI)  (Support)  will  be  made  organic  to 
MI  Battalion  (CI)  (Technical)  and  MI  Detachment  (CI)  (DNA)  will  be 
made  organic  to  MI  Battalion  (CI)  (Security). 8 
UNCLASSIFIED  i*
% 
Reassignment  of  the  PSA  Syst 
jn  15  Hay  1985 t  the  operational  and  administrative  control  of  the 
unit  and  its  functions  were  transferred.  (The  USA  Operational 
Group  designated  the  new  element  as  Detachment  S.)  The  aotual 
discontinuance  of  the  USA  Systems  Exploitation  Detachment  would  not 
take  place  until  PX  1986,  and  due  to  administrative  procedures,  the 
actual  transfer  of  personnel  spaces  from  the  TDA  of  the  detachment 
to  the  other  TDA*s  would  not  happen  until  PX  1987.9 
Reorganization  and  Redesl 
Detachment* 
atlon  of  the  USA  Speolal  Operations 
% 
$ 
_      rhe  culmination  or  the  reorganization 
was  the  redesignation  of  the  Special  Operations  Detachment  to  USA 
Foreign  Counterintelligence  Activity  on  1  July.1** 
Establishment  of  Subcontrol  Offices.  Jjn    USAINSCOM  fetter  of 
Instruction,  dated  27  February  1985,  subject:  U.S.  Army 
Counterespionage  (CE)  Programs  Conducted  by  INSCOM, 
approved/directed  the  establishment  of  subcontrol  offices  (SCO) 
within  the  470th,  500th.  and  902d  MI  Groups  for  the  management  of 
CE  activities.
;o 
AL 
_     The  Foreign  Counterintelligence 
ictivity  continued  to  function  as  the  ZNSCOM  Control  Offloe  for 
Management  of  CE  investigative  activities,  retaining  overall 
aanagenent  responsibility  within  ZNSOOM. 
Military  Intelligence  Battalion  (Low  Intensity).  ^#H  During  PY 
1385,  the  Vice  Chief  of  Staff  Army  tasked  ZNSCOM  to  field  high 
^technology  systems  to  support  low  intensity  conflict  operations. 
HUMINT  Subarchltecture— POW  Interrogation  and  Document  Exploitation 
Activities  during  Wartlmer  (U)  USAREUR  was  responsible  for 
developing  a  HUMINT  subarchltecture  which  will  be  one  of  several 
subarchitectures  supporting  the  OSSUCOK  Theater  Intelligence 
Architecture  Plan  (TIAP).  The  TIAP  was  designed  to  enable  the 
theater  commander  to  better  coordinate  intelligence  planning  by 
identifying  and  programming  use  of  available  and  projected  service, 
natiOnalf  and  allied  resources.  INSCOM  was  responsible  for 
addressing  the  Interrogation  of  Prisoners  of  War  (IPW)  and  Document 
Exploitation  (DOCEX)  portions  of  the  HUMINT  subarchltecture.  This 
effort  was  to  result  in  a  strawman  theater  concept  of  operations  of 
IPtf/DOCEX  consisting  of  a  baseline  definition  (our rent 
capabilities),  requirements  identification,  shortfall 
identification,  and  a  concept  architecture. 13 
IAL
UNCLASSIFIED 
Operational  Guides  (00)  for  EAC  Intelligence  and  Electronic  Warfare 
(IEW)  Units.  (U)  Concepts  and  studies  continued  to  develop «OG's 
to  ensure  the  new  echelon  above  corps  (EAC)  IEW  units  had 
appropriate  "how  to"  guldanoe.  An  operational  guide,  titled  "EAC 
IEW  Operations,"  which  provided  an  overview  of  the  EAC  IEW  force 
structure  and  operations,  was  completed  and  distributed  in  March 
1985.  Several  operational  guides  were  completed  on  EAC  units  which 
had  been  developed  as  part  of  the  Army  of  Excellence:  Intelligence 
Center  (EAC)  (April  1985);  MI  Company/Battalion,  Imagery 
Interpretation  (EAC)  (April  1985);  Headquarters  and  Headquarters 
Company  (HHC)  (EAC),  MI  Brigade  (April  1985);  MX  Company/Battalion 
Collection  and  Exploitation  (EAC)  (May  1985);  and  MI  Battalion, 
Interrogation  and  Exploitation  (SAC)  (August  1985)*  These  guides 
were  provided  to  USA  Intelligence  Center  and  School  (OSAICS)  to  be 
used  as  a  basis  for  the  development  of  field  circulars  for  EAC  MI 
units.  The  HHC  (EAC),  MI  Brigade  Operational  Guide  was  used  as  the 
basic  reference  document  by  OSAICS  in  the  development  of  FC  3*1-123, 
HHC  (EAC),  MI  Brigade,  dated  June  1985*  Still  under  development 
were  operational  guides  for  MI  Company/Ml  Battalion,  SIGINT  (EAC); 
MI  Battalion,  Counterintelligence  (EAC);  MI  Battalion,  Controlled 
Collection  (EAC);  and  MI  Battalion  Low  Intensity  (EAC).14 
UNCLASSIFIED
FOR 
ONLY 
FOOTNOTES:  CHAPTER  III.  ORGANIZATION 
1. 
2. 
3. 
4. 
S. 
6. 
7. 
8. 
9. 
10. 
11. 
12. 
13. 
44. 
?!!EkiA?M"M"PC0»  $ubJ:  ^subordination  of  USLB  (5  Feb  86) 
(S/NOFORN).  •   ' 
?fi„I?0PS*'PPR»  subj:  W  ^organization  (29  Mar  85)  (U);  OF. 
IARM-S.  $ubj:  HQ  Organization  (14  May  85)  (U).        * 
i?1!*   S6"1*,!!^:  L01  for  Implementation  of  Arlington  Hall 
%lXu0n  ft?*?.1.!1  Jlan  "  u's-  Arro*  Intelligence  and  Security  Command 
i«l  nf  VI  Sc  ;iSi-  iJ°Pflr!ubj:  ,HQ»  IN*C0M  Consol1dat1on/Baaf?ll 
AHS  (17  Jun  85)  (U);  OF.  IACS.  subj:  Consolidation  at  Arlington 
Hall  Station  (27  Jun  85)  (U).  * 
Paper,  Mr.  Paul  Sutton (OCofS),  subj:  Headquarters  INSCOM 
Reorganization  (5  Nov  84),  (U). 
Msg,  COR  INSCOM  (IA0PS-PPR),  subj:  Change  of  OPCON/ADCON  of 
M  HBhn  to66  NI6P  C182130Z  Mar  85)  (\))\  Interview,  Mr.  Oavld 
Renlere  (00CS0PS)  (15  Jun  86)  (U). 
fttnS5D5i^n  (S$t  S°8$t)  A!JR  (U)*  W-  75-7fiS  Ms9*  CDR  «SC0M 
FY  1985  SSG MR  (S)    9$*    U"U  M0V'  Approval  <27145°Z  *r  85)  (U)( 
H  JnS5T2S5n«MI  GP  AHRjS)»  "Personnel"  Section;  Ltr,  COR  902d  MI  Sp 
to  COR  INSCOM,  subj:  Proposed  Realignment  of  902d  MI  6rouo 
(27  Aug  85)  (U). 
?9,.RRfI5SILl!A0PS'M)«  subj:  Un1t  designation  (1716052 
M«y  ?5)  (C/NOFORN):  Invgrvi»w.  Mr.  David  fonW  lC\nr\f\i*\   fu  Jun 
86)   (U)j_^   TYI  M   IM  IW 
pp.  2-6. 
Ibid.,  p.  10,  Annex. 
FYT985  DCSPPM  AHR  (S/NOFORN),  ch  IV, 
Ibid. 
TbldT 
USE  ONLY
UNCLASSIFIED 
Chapter  IV 
RESOURCES  AND  MANAGEMENT 
Operations  and  Maintenance,  Army  (OMA)  Funds*  (0)  FT  1985  was  an 
extraordinary  year  for  INSCOM  in  that  over  $15  Billion  was  returned 
to  DA.  Of  this  figure,  $11  Billion  was  INSCOM' a  and  $U  Billion 
belonged  to  other  activities  in  INSCOM  funding  profile.  Below  is  a 
quick  overview  of  what  subprograns  and  associated  projects  were 
affected  by  the  turn-in:1 
P2 
2,925  INSCOM 
2.ap0  ELT  «0ther  Activity 
5,325 
P3I 
7,975  INSCOM 
1,665  ITAC/AIA  'Other  Activity 
206  LANCE  PERRY  «0ther  Activity 
9,8U6 
PgC 
215  BASEOPS  and  TEMPEST 
34  Second  Destination  Transportation 
P*8T 
100  Military  Training 
P80 
32  ACES/EDC 
P£ 
11  QRIP 
(0)  The  U.S.  Army  Intelligence  and  Security  Command's'  OMA  funding 
program  at  the  close  of  FY  1985  consisted  of  $206,077,000  of  Direct 
Funds  and  $35,000  of  Funded  Reimbursements  for  a  total  of 
$206,112,000.  The  table  below  shows  a  breakout  of  direct  funding 
by  subprogram  at  the  close  of  FY  1985. 2 
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 
Table  1.  -  Direct  Punding  by  Subprogram. 
(As  of  30  September  1985)    •   * 
Subprogram  FY  1985 
P2  (General  Purpose  Forces)  $  35,315,000 
P3I  (Intelligence  Activities)  1U3,85«,000 
P3C  (Communications  Security)  3»030,000 
P7  (Troop  Issue)  98,000 
P80  (Education  Services)  1,087,000 
P8T  (Training)  1,61*1,000 
P9  (Administration  and  Associated  Activities)  22,000 
Base  Operations  (AHS  A  VHFS)  21.057.000 
TOTAL  i206.077.000 
(U)  The  following  is  an  audit  trail  ($  in  thousands)  from  DA 
dollar  guidance  use  for  preparation  of  the  FY  1985  Command 
Operating  Budget  (COB)  to  final  FY  1985  Annual  Funding  Program 
(AFP):3 
Program  2 
Dollar  Guidance  -  FY  1985  COB       %         *  37,*33 
Leased  Communications  (195) 
Force  Mod  TENCAP  1|388 
FY  1985  Initial  AFP                       t  38,626 
ELT  95 
CW  1»229 
REDTRAIN  to  FORSCOM  (50) 
P2  Mission  (2,800) 
OPFOR  FMA  715 
ELT  (2.500) 
Final  FY  1985  AFP  *  35.315 
Program  31  * 
3* 
UNCLASSIFIED
41- 
Collar  Guidance  -  FY  1985  COB  $159,3*8 
1 gpg| 
Transferto  ACSI 
(173) 
« 
C3 
(97) 
PBG  Corrections 
(2,468) 
AIA  AdJ/Transfer 
(382) 
MPR  Align 
Classified  Program 
(1,048) 
DOMA 
330 
CRA  Withhold 
(14,437) 
g 
FY  1985  Initial  AFP 
$138,138 
I 
DOM^d^^^ 
(330) 
200 
2 ^^^HKedProJeet 
225 
HAC  Restored 
1,000 
Canal  Pilot 
461 
OPSEC  Spt 
(2,311) 
CRA  Release 
14,437 
Unemployment/KPM 
(514) 
Customs 
ADPE  Lease  Restored 
650 
TSCM  Equipment 
165 
WPE  Buyout 
200 
AIA  Returned 
(322) 
P3I  Mission 
(5,384) 
in 
CJI 
TTAC  Reduction- 
(1,343) 
0    pugpr 
(206) 
s 
g 
"Transfer  to  BASEOPS 
(1,260) 
Final  FY  1985  AFP 
Program  3C 
$143,854 
Dollar  Guidance  -  FY  1985  COB 
$  3,233 
CRA  Withhold 
(,81) 
FY  1965  Initial  AFP 
$  3,152 
CRA  Withhold  Restored 
Program  Directors  AdJ 
(65) 
Pay  Raise 
Transferred  to  BASEOPS 
(73) 
P3C  Returned 
(95) 
Final  FY  1985  AFP 
$  3.030 
1 1  
III  I II I  WW  II M1 1  
ll'll  V
UNCLASSIFIED 
Program  7 
Dollar  Guidance  -  FY  1985  COB               $    132 
CRA  Withhold  (7) 
FY  1985  Initial  AFP  $    125 
CRA  Restoral  7 
Funds  Returned  (3*0 
Final  FY  1965  AFP  t          98 
Program  8T 
Dollar  Guidance  -  FY  1985  COS               $  1,510 
Physical  Fitness  4 
FY  1985  Initial  AFP  $  1,51* 
Anti-Terrorist  Tng  200 
Funds  Returned  (100) 
Final  FY  1985  AFP  f  1.61H 
Program  80 
Dollar  Guidance  -  FY  1985  COB               $   507 
COA  Reduction  (16) 
CTED  624 
FY  1985  Initial  AFP  *  1,115 
Funds  Returned  (28) 
Final  FY  1985  AFP  *  1.087 
BASSOPS ' 
Dollar  Guidance  -  FY  1985  COB  $19.»00 
CRA  Withhold  (2,431) 
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 
FY  1985  Initial  AFP 
CRA  Release 
Environmental  (Cong.  Ad j) 
RPMA/BASEOPS  Cut 
Funds  Returned 
Progran  Adjustments 
Commercial  Activities 
RPMA  Projects 
Pay  Raise 
Transfer  from  P3I 
Transfer  from  P3C 
Final  FY  1985  AFP 
Program  9 
Dollar  Guidance  -  FY  1985  COB 
FY  1985  Initial  AFP 
QRIP/PECIP  OMA  Funds 
Funds  Returned 
Final  FY  1985  AFP 
•16.96) 
2,131 
(5) 
(686) 
(305) 
(13) 
583 
610 
140 
1,260 
$21,057 
(11) 
(D)    The  following  table  reflects  direct  obligations  by  elements  of 
expense  for  FY  1985  (♦  in  thousands):     Obligations  of  $205,812,000 
and  Annual  Funding  Program  of  $206,077,000  resulted  in  an  obligation 
rate  of  99.9  percent. * 
Table  2.  -  Direct  Obligations  for  FY  1985. 
Element  of 
Expense 
P2 
PJI 
121 n 
P8T 
P80 
P£   B0 
Total 
Percent 
Civ  Pay 
1,151 
18,169 
1,269 
- 
701 
-  5,378 
57,301 
Travel 
1,510 
9,301 
353 
1,273 
126 
15,689 
T/T 
638 
863 
1,551 
Rnt/Com/Ut 
679 
5,177 
206 
- 
_ 
. 
375 
6,137 
Cont  Svc 
20,120 
60,321 
199 
316 
216 
6  11,816 
93,362 
Supplies 
7,518 
15,131 
691 
'16  3,179 
26,865 
FNIH 
315   1.289 
35,291  113,851 
3,033 
«» 
L,085 
•         «• 
205,842 
TOTAL 
1,6CS  ] 
22  20,851 
100 
UNCLASSIFIED
Family  Housing  Pnlts.  (U)  The  U.S.  Aray  Intelligence  and  Security 
Command  operated  and  maintained  family  housing  units  at  Arlington 
Hall  Station  and  Vint  Hill  Farms  Station.  Funds  received  from 
Department  of  the  Army  for  these  units  for  FY  1985  were  $1,550  of 
which  $1,518  was  obligated  (99.9  percent). 5 
INSCQM  Program  and  Budget  Guidance.  FY  1985  (Authorized  Strength). 
Jj/T  Based  on  DA  Program  and  Budget  Guidance,  October  1985 >  the 
manpower  data  shown  in  the  following  table  represents  the 
authorized  strength  for  end  of  FY  1985:® 
Table  3.  -  INSCOM  Program  and  Budget  Guidance,  FY  1985. 
Authorized  Strength 
Program  OFF   WO 
P2  Gen  Purpose  Forces 
P3  Intel  &  Corns 
F7  Supply 
F8  Training 
P3  Support  to  NSA 
MFH 
TOTAL  _ 
Civilian  Strength  by  Program.  ^Tlhe  following  table  reflects 
authorized  and  assigned  civilian  strength  by  program.  It  includes 
foreign  nationals,  temporaries,  and  permanent  overhires.? 
'  Table  4.  -  Civilian  Strength  by  Program. 
Program 
2  Cen  Purpose  Forces 
3  CCP 
Cryptologic  Acty 
Base  Opns/RPMA 
AMHA 
GDIP 
HUKIKT 
ADP 
TSCPAS 
DCSS 
AKHA 
Other 
Authorized 
Actual 
I
Program 
CRP 
COKSEC 
Base  Opns/RPMA 
AMHA 
CI  k  Ik 
Authorized 
Actual 
I 
TOTAL 
Morale  and  Welfare.  (0)  The  command  supported  numerous  programs 
evolving  from  the  Family  Action  Plan  Z  and  II,  most  of  which 
pertained  only  to  Vint  Hill  Farms  sinoe  they  were  the  only  INSCOM 
installation  providing  quarters  for  married  personnel.  Survey 
results  indicated  that  host  Installations  were  providing  an 
excellent  service  to  INSCOM  personnel  and  that  INSCOM  personnel, 
through  their  volunteer  services,  provided  invaluable  assistance 
and  support  to  the  host  command  programs. 
(U)  The  command  was  successful  in  obtaining  $1.3  Billion  on 
nonappropriated  funds  from  the  Army  Morale  Support  Fund  to  build  « 
community  center  at  Vint  Rill  Farms  Station.  Construction  began  in 
May  and  is  scheduled  for  completion  in  2d  Quarter  FY  1986.  The  new 
structure  will  house  the  Army  community  service,  youth  activities, 
privacy  rooms  for  counselling,  and  an  auditorium-type  area  for 
family  meetings,  plays,  ate' 
Command  Officer  Personnel 
I 
s 
s 
HQDA  Reenllstment  Award.  (U)  U.S.  Army  Intelligence  and  Security 
Command  was  presented  the  HQDA  Reenllstment  Award  for  FY  1984  at 
the  meeting  of  the  DA  Reenllstment  Steering  Group  in  March  1985. ,0 
Operations  and  Maintenance,  Army  (OMA)  Funds.  (U)  a.  PE  381055: 
FY  1985  funds  were  allotted  a  level  of  $2,082K  for  supplies,  TOY, 
and  various  support  services.  A  further  I770K  was  provided  in  the 
PE  for  civilian  compensation.11
UNCLASSIFIED 
b.  PE  3931U*  Civilian  compensation  was  A115K  and  an 
additional  7.5K  was  provided  for  TDY.  ■*- 
e.  PE  814771*  I9-4K  was  allocated  for  military  TDY  for 
training. 
ADP  Security.  -  (U)  The  ZNSCOM  Automation  Security  Program  Manager 
(SPM)  function  was  transferred  from  the  Command  Security  Office  to 
the  Office  of  the  Assistant  Deputy  Chief  of  Staff  for  Information 
Management-Automation  affective  1  August  1985.  This  decision  was 
based  on  the  availability  of  manpower  and  technical  expertise 
within  DCSIM  to  effectively  manage  the  program— two  essentials 
which  were  lacking  in  the  CSO. 
<U)  DCSIM  facility  accreditation  documentation  was  forwarded  to 
the  CSO  in  August  1985  in  support  of  the  SCIF  reacereditation  of 
INSCOM  Readquartera  Building  1  and  "A"  Building.1 2 
Microfilm  Index  Project  for  Investigative  Records  Repository  (MIP 
IBB).  (U)  In  conjunction  with  providing  the  information 
concerning  Mengele  requested  by  President  Reagan,  Information  from 
the  microfilm  library  of  more  than  15*800  reela  of  intelligence 
investigative  material  and  1,700  reels  of  index  data,  catalogs,  and 
microfiche  were  entered  into  the  Defense  Central  Index  of 
Investigations.  An  estimated  500,000  records  remain  to  be  entered. 
SE3  supported  this  effort  through  our  Automated  Data  Section  which 
provides  data  entry  services  to  IRR.13 
Personnel  Security.  (U)  In  June  all  MACOM's  were  directed  to 
eliminate  and  reduce  security  clearances.  The  overall  Army  target 
was  a  10  percent  reduction.  Due  to  the  missions  of  INSCOM  and  the 
pervasive  sensitivity  of  the  command,  a  more  modest  reduction  of 
2  percent  was  asked.  With  considerable  help  from  INSCOM  DCS0PS 
and  DCSPER  along  with  honest  efforts  from  subordinate  units,  a 
total  of  290  security  clearances  were  Identified  for  elimination. 
This  represented  2.34  percent  of  all  aecurlty  clearances.11* 
IRSCOM  Commanders  Badges.  (U)  A  new  series  of  personalized  badges 
was  developed  for  INSCOM  commanders  for  their  use  when  visiting  the 
headquarters.  The  badges  were  made  using  copies  of  command 
photographs.1 5 
Public  Affairs  Activities.  (U)  Vhe  Office  of  Public  Affairs 
exercises  staff  supervision  over  authorized  INSCOM  unit  newspapers 
and  critiques  authorized  unit  newspapers  in  preparation  for  the 
annual  Keith  L.  Ware  awards.  The  following  is  a  list  of  INSCOM 
publications  as  of  30  September  1985.'16 
UNCLASSIFIED
Publication 
Unit  Publisher 
Alamo  Wrangle 
Augsburg  Profile 
Bed  Dragon 
The  Dagger 
Torll  Typhoon. 
Vanguard 
Kunia  Underground  News 
Caribbean  Sentinel 
Diogenes  Review 
Field  Station  Berlin  Voice 
USAFS  San  Antonio    * 
USAFS  Augsburg 
501st  MI  Group 
66th  MI  Group 
USAFS  Okinawa 
Vint  Hill  Farms  Station 
CONUS  MI  Group 
USAFS  Kunia 
USAFS  Key  West 
USAFS  Berlin 
IGAB's.  (U)  There  was  a  decrease  in  IGAR's  prooessed  by  HQ  INSCOM 
detailed  IG's  during  FY  1965,  to  include  those  evolving  from 
complaint  periods  conducted  as  an  integral  part  of  inspections. 
Eighty-four  such  IGAR's  were  completed  in  FY  1985  compared  to  104 
in  FY  1984.  Acting  Inspectors  General  at  major  subordinate  units 
processed  113  additional  IGAR*s(  representing  57  percent  of  the 
total  IGAR  eases  as  compared  to  47  percent  in  FY  1§'84.  Of  the 
total  197  IGAR's  processed  by  INSCOM  IG/AIG's  in  FY  1985,  31 
percent  were  substantiated,  59  percent  were  nonsubstantlated  and  10 
percent  were  assistance  cases.1' 
Congressional  Inquiries.  (U)  During  FY  1985,  34  Congressional 
Inquiries  were  responded  to,  an  increase  from  the  28  processed  in 
FI  1984 »  In  addition, -AIG's  reported  two  Congressional  Inquiries 
processed  directly  between  HQDA  and  INSCOM  subordinate  commands. 
Of  the  36  total  inquiries,  4  were  defined  as  assistance  cases,  25 
as  nonsubstantlated,  and  7  were  substantiated.™ 
IG  Investigations.  (U)  No  IG  investigations  were  completed  during 
FY  1985  and  none  were  pending  at  the  close  of  the  period.1? 
% 
I
UNCLASSIFIED 
Historical  Monographs .  (U)  To  continue  the  efforts  of 
communicating  interested  historical  matters  to  the  troops  and -MI 
specialists,  the  History  Office  extended  its  affective  writing 
tools.  Zn  FY  1985 t  the  "MIt  A  Picture  History"  was  completed  and 
published  through  the  Government  Printing  Office.  In  April  1985, 
3f000  copies  (1,000  hardback  end  2,000  soft  oover)  of  the  pictorial 
history  were  Issued  to  INSCOM  for  distribution  within  the  command. 
The  book  represents  the  first  history  on  military  intelligence  to 
be  published  end  sold  by  the  U.S.  Government  end  the  first  INSCOM 
history  accepted  for  publication  by  the  Government  Printing  Office.21 
Program  Analyals  and  Resource  Review  (PARR).  (0)  The  PARR  is 
another  vehicle  by  which  INSCOM  submits  dollar  and  manpower 
requirements  for  the  program  years.  These  requirements  must  not  be 
fundable  by  any  of  the  NFIP  programs.  The  command's  FY  1987-1991 
PARR  was  submitted  to  DA  on  11  January  1985.  Fiscal  guidance 
constrained  INSCOM* s  dollar  growth  to  1  percent  of  its  total 
obligational  authority  (T0A),  which  amounted  to  A1.213M  and  zero 
manpower  growth.  For  the  first  time,  the  MACOM's  were  invited  to 
brief  their  initiatives  to  the  Army  Functional  Panels.  Out  of 
INSCOM' s  29  initiatives,  only  11  chose  to  brief  the  panels  and  did 
so  between  29  January  to  19  February  1985.  In  addition,  the 
MACOM's  were  required  to  brief  the  Director  of  Program  and 
Evaluation,  MG  Woods,  on  their  PARR.  Chief,  Programs  Division 
briefed  on  2U  January  1985  while  eight  other  INSCOM  staff 
representatives  attended. 
(U)  Also  for  the  first  time,  feedback  on  INSCOM' s  PARR  submission 
was  received  from  ACSI  (Plan,  Programs,  and  Budget  Office)  on  2 
April  1985.  This  enabled  feedback  to  the  staff  on  the  status  of 
INSCOM' s  initiatives,  up  to  the  Program  Budget  Committee  (PBC) 
Review  and  before  the  Select  Committee  (SELCOM)  Review.  A  profile 
of  INSCOM' s  PARR  initiatives  follows.  It  displays  how  many 
initiatives  ACSI  supported  by  converting  them  to  an  Army  Staff 
(ARSTAF)  Program  Development  Increment  Package  (PDIP),  thereby 
elevating  their  priority.  It  also  reflects  which  PDIP's  were 
integrated  into  the  Army's  Program  Objective  Memorandum  (POM).22 
Table  5.  -  FY  1987-1991  PARR  Initiatives.' 
ACSI 
INSCOM  SPTD    POM  SPTD  PDIP  #  AND  TITLE 
Initiated: 
9  New  Initiatives  -     257D  AGR  Mod  Planners 
269H  AHS  Caretaker  Costs 
8  Special  Displays  (Mnpr)     5     2S7B  INSCOM  HCA  Operations 
11  Special  Displays  (i)        5  •  " 
3  Recommended  Changes         -    +2SA3  REDTRAIN 
(Only  one  requested  funding  increase  ♦) 
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 
INSCOH 
Responded  tot 
4  DA-Directed  (Non-TAA) 
ACSI 
SPTD 
POM  SPTD  PDIP  #  AND  TITLE 
DD70  Force  Prottotlon 
Military  Justice,  (0)  .  A  breakdown  ©f  the  military  justioe  reports 
for  FY  1965  revealed  the  following  statistics: 23 
Article  15*8 
FY  1984:  561 
FY  1965:  Summarised  -  179/Formal  -  426 
Courts-Martial 
FY  1984 
FY  1985 
Summary 
Special 
General 
TOTAL 
FY  1984:  72 
FY  19S5:  109 
(AR  635-200) 
Hon 
Summary 
Special 
General 
TOTAL 
Chapter  5  (Sep  for  Convenience  for  Govt)  6  0 
Chapter  9  (Alcohol  or  Drug  Abuse)  10  5 
Chapter  10  (Discharged  for  Good  of  Service)  0  1 
Chapter  13  (Separated  for  Unsuitability)  23  15 
Chapter  14  (Separated  for  Misconduct)  1  6 
All  others:  25  *3 
FY  1985  Administrative  Eliminations 
Chapter  5  (Sep  for  Convenience  of  Govt)  17 
Chapter  9  (Alcohol  or  Drug  Abuse)  4 
Chapter  10  (Discharged  for  Good  for  Service)  6 
Chapter  13  (Separated  for  Unsuitability)  21 
Chapter  14  (Separated  for  Misconduct)  27 
Chapter  15  (Separated  for  Homosexuality)  2 
All  others:  30 
Drue  Offenses 
FY  1984  Administrative  Eliminations 
Hon   Gen   Less  Than 
UNCLASSIFIED
««**-s<«**aBtV'^-.v, 
. 
-■    i- 
Enlisted  Personnel  Strength  Posture.  (U)  Enlisted  personnel 
posture  by  MOS  (EW/Crypto  and  HUMINT  MOS's)  is  shown  in  the  table 
below.*1*  «. 
Table  6.  -  Enlisted  Personnel  Posture  for  FY»s  1984-1985, 
MOS 
05D 
05G 
05H 
05K 
33M 
33P 
33Q 
33R 
33T 
33S 
98C 
98G 
9SJ 
982 
96E 
96C 
96D 
97B 
97C 
970 
97S 
Notes: 
4th  Qtr 
FT  1984 
Auth/Asg 
Percent 
Of 
Fill 
113 
101 
105 
113 
Kth  Qtr 
FY  1985 
Auth/Asg 
104 
116 
ZNSCOM 
Percent 
Of  Fill 
119 
121 
118 
107 
104 
103 
124 
300 
DA 
Percent 
Of  Fill 
134 
140 
140 
100 
106 
1.  MOS  05G  converted  to  MOS  97G. 
2.  MOS  33S  converted  to  MOS  33M,  33P,  33Q,  33R,  33T 
3°  MOS  96C  converted  to  MOS  97E. 
Table  7.  -  Enlisted  Personnel  Strength  Posture  by  Area  and  Unit. 
(As  of  30  September  1985) 
Unit 
European  Arsa 
Field  Station  Augsburg 
Field  Station  Berlin 
Field  Station  Sinop 
USA  Cryptologic  Support  Group 
66th  MI  Group 
USjS  Russian  Institute 
USA  Foreign  Lan  Trng  Ctr  Europe 
TOTAL 
Authorizations 
Assigned 
8. 
T3
■'FORornowLuse^H^ 
»■* 
Onlt 
Panama  Area 
470th  MI  Group 
EAC  Aviation  Intel  Co 
Field  Station  Panama 
TOTAL 
Authorizations 
Assigned 
MAIT  Team 
USA  MAIT  Team 
DSA  Mission  Support  Activity 
TOTAL 
Pacific  Area 
Field  Station  Kunia 
Field  Station  Okinawa 
ITIC-PAC 
500th  MI  Group 
501st  MI  Group 
TOTAL 
CONUS  Area 
AS=in/AV  Support  Activity 
Automated  Survey  Set 
Admin  Survey  Set 
Central  Security  Facility 
CONUS  MI  Group 
Finance  Accounting  Activity 
513th  MI  Group 
Rational  Training  Ctr 
USA  Garrison,  AHS 
RQ  IKSCOM 
HQ  INSCOM,  Ft.  Meade 
HQ  Support  Activity 
Intel  Exchange  and  Support  Ctr 
Field  Station  Key  Vest 
902d  MI  Group 
Operational  Group 
Field  Station  San  Antonio 
Foreign  CI  Activity 
Special  Security  Group 
USA  Garrison,  VHFS 
TOTAL 
I 
S
TonnrnniM  urni'iiy,- 
Authorizations 
Pnit 
INSCOM  Consolidated 
European  Area 
Panama  Arei* 
MAIT  Team 
Pacific  Area  . 
COKOS  Area 
TOTAL 
Command  Personnel  Situation.  (C)  Actual  total  command  strength 
for  FY  1964  and  FY  1985  are  shown  below.25 
Assigned 
g 
30  September  1984 
Actual 
30  September  1985 
Actual 
(U)  FY  1985  command  personnel  strength  by  unit,  see  appendix  F. 
INSCOM  Senior  Level  (13*15)  Positions  (High  Grade).  (U)  In  March 
1964,  DA  lifted  the  high  grade  ceiling,  but  INSCOM  continues  to 
centrally  manage  and  a'llocate  its  high  grade  positions.  In  its 
place,  OMB/OPM  directed  that  each  DOD  agency  reduce  its  GS/OM  li-15 
population  by  1.5  percent  a  year  in  FY  1985  through  FY  1988. 
During  FY  1985,  INSCOM  increased  its  GS/GM  11-15  strength  by  84 
positions.  Failure  to  meet  its  FY  1985  reduction  goal  (which  was 
11)  was  due  to  new  priority  mission  requirements,  internal 
promotions,  increased  fill,  and  26  newly  authorized  manpower 
spaces.  On  14  May  1985,  the  Chief  of  Staff  issued  a  policy  letter 
directing  that  all  nonsupervisory  GS-11  and  12  positions  be  filled 
at  the  GS-09  level  or  lower  in  an  effort  to  comply  with  the  high 
grade  reduction  initiative.26 
PMO  Advisory  Committee.  (U)  In  July  1984,  the  Chief' of  Staff 
established  a  Position  Management  Officer  Advisory  Committee  to 
assist  him  in  ensuring  that  the  INSCOM  Position  Management  Program 
is  judiciously  managed.  The  committee  members  designated  were:  P. 
Singleton,  D.  Perthel,  W.  Willoughby,  P..  Altman,  R.  Hutchinson,  J. 
Davis,  A.  Bessler  (chairman),  and  A.  Cardillo  (executive  agent). 
-ronornoiALuoc
UNCLASSIFIED 
In  mid-year,  R.  Hutchinson  was  replaced  by  D.  Smith.  The  committee 
reviewed  and  recommended  approval/disapproval  of  request*  for 
additional  high  grade  positions  (QS/GM  13-15),  and  exceptlons*°to 
the  XNSCOM  grade,  provided  advioe  on  restructuring  of  positions  and 
reorganizations,  ensured  maintenance  of  average  grade,  and 
recommended  the  reallocation  of  high  grade  resources  as  priorities 
changed.  Curing  FY  1985,  the  committee  reviewed  28  position  management 
cases.2' 
Equal  Employment  Opportunity  Program.  (0)  The  following  is  a 
brief  command  overview  of  USAINSCOM'a  efforts  In  eliminating 
underrepresentation  of  women  end  minorities  in  mid  and  senior  level 
positions  in  the  workforce:2* 
White  Female 
Black  Kale 
Black  Female 
Hispanics  Male 
Hispanics  Female 
AA/PI  Male 
AA/PI  Female 
AT/AN  Male 
AI/AN  Female 
White  Female 
Black  Male 
Black  Female 
Hispanics  Male 
Hispanics  Female 
AA/PI  Male 
AA/PI  Female 
AI/AN  Male 
AI/AN  Female 
GS^i 
«•> 
'H 
GSz2 
GS-10 
As  of  30  September  1984 
GS-11  CS-12  GS-13  0S-14  GS-15  Total 
135 
As  of  30  September  1985 
GS-10  GS-11  CS-12  GS-13  CS-14  GS-15  Total 
154 
UNCLASSIFIED
'UNCLASSIFIED 
DOD  Polygraph  Test  Program.  (U)  The  Congress  of  the  United  States  has, 
in  enacting  the  FY  1985  Defense  Authorization  Act,  authorised  the 
Department  of  Defense  to  oonduct  a  test  program  of  its  proposed  use 
of  a  counterintelligence  scope  polygraph  examination  to  assist  in 
determining  the  eligibility  of  DOD  civilian,  military,  and  * 
contractor  personnel  fort  access  to  specifically  designated 
classified  information  protected  within  special  access  programs 
(SAP's);  employment,  assignment,  or  detail  to  positions  within  the 
Defense  Intelligence  Agency  (D1A)  designated  as  critical 
intelligence  positions  by  the  Director,  DIA;  and  interim  access  to 
Sensitive  Compartmented  Information  (SCI).  Requirements  that  the 
results  of  the  test  program  be  reported  to  appropriate  elements  of 
Congress  by  31  December  1985 f  have  since  been  extended  to  31 
December  1986.  In  view  of  the  continuing  sensitivity  of  the  issue 
of  the  polygraph,  and  the  importance  of  the  success  of  the  test 
program  to  future  use  of  the  polygraph  within  DOD,  revised  DOD 
Directive  5210.48,  wrote  DOD  Regulation  5210.48,  and  then  iasued 
the  DOD  Polygraph  Test  Program  SOP,  all  dated  January  1985.  The 
SOP  requires  all  examinations,  to  include  NSA  examinations,  be  tape 
recorded  in  their  entirety  with  cassettes  that  are  compatible  with 
USAINSCOM  Quality  Control,  DOD  Oversight  Committee,  and 
Congressional  Oversight  Committee.  A  representative  sample  must  be 
obtained  in  each  of  the  three  categories  of  proposed  polygraph  use. 
(U)  On  9  January  1985,  the  Office  of  the  Deputy  Under  Secretary  of 
Defense  for  Policy  (ODUSD(F))  issued  a  memorandum  to  the  military 
departments  to  initiate  the  DOD  Polygraph  Test  Program.  A  ceiling 
of  3t500  individuals  was  established  for  FT  1985.  In  October  1985, 
the  program  was  extended  through  FT  1987*  The  FY  1985  ceiling  was 
parried  over  through  FY  1986  and  a  ceiling  of  7,000  was  established 
for  FY  1987,  with  the  Army  share  being  about  2,335. 
(U)  On  9  June  1985,  INSC0M  began  this  program  in  CONUS  utilising 
current  assets.  Twenty-three  Individuals  were  examined,  all  in 
connection  with  SAP's.  INSC0M  does  not  have  additional  polygraph 
assets  to  address  this  program.  Authority  to  obtain  additional 
resources  needed  to  meet  the  new  requirements  was  not  received 
until  September  1985.  In  March  1985,  0ACSI,  DA  established 
priorities  for  INSC0M  to  carry  out  its  polygraph  mission.  In  May 
1985,  NSA  denied  INSCOM's  request  for  nine  civilian  spaces  from  the 
Consolidated  Cryptologic  Program.  The  nine  spaces  were  finally 
realized  as  the  result  of  a  HQ  INSC0M  staff  decrement  and  will  be 
available  in  FY  1986  and  FY  1987.  At  this  time,  INSCOM  is 
committed  to  an  Internal  realignment  to  provide  an  additional  50 
spaces  to  the  polygraph  effort  from  the  S&IA  Program.  These  spaces 
are  to  be  made  available  in  the  FY  1986-1987  timeframe. 29 
U8 
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 
Hew  Polygraph  Facility  Construction  Funding.  (U)  Due  to  the 
INSCOM  ;olygraph  program,  a  request  for  allocation  of  funds  ($180K) 
to  oonstruct  and  equip  a  new  polygraph  facility  was  submitted8  on  16 
January  1985.  Funding  for  the  polygraph  facility  construction  was 
requested  in  the  FY  1985  Budget  Execution  Review  (BER),  dated  16 
January  1985 ,  as  an  unfinaneed  requirement.  This  request  was 
approved  and  authorized  on  2  April  1985. 
(U)  One  hundred  and  eighty  thousand  dollars  has  been  allocated  to 
oonstruct  and  equip  a  new  2NSC0M  polygraph  facility  on  the  2d  floor 
of  Building  #1155*1,  Fort  Meade,  Maryland.  Included  In  this 
construction  will  be  administration  spaces  for  the  Office  of  the 
Polygraph  Program  Manager,  902d  MI  Group  and  641st  MI  Company 
polygraph  examiners,  six  sound  proof  polygraph  rooms,  and  a  reception 
area.  The  estimated  date  of  completion  of  this  facility  is  15 
April  1986.  At  this  time,  ao  problem  areas  have  surfaced  in 
regards  to  this  action. 30 
Table  8.  -  FT  1935  Polygraph  Statistics. 
Technical  Reviews 
Review  of  Permanent  Files 
Pre-polygraph  Dossier  Reviews 
Certification  Actions 
Seainars  Conducted 
Examiner  Refresher  Training 
Intern  Examiner  Supervision 
Examinations  Conducted: 
<  Hq  INSCOM  and  902d  MI  Gp 
66th  MI  Gp 
501st  MI  Gp 
TOTAL 
Support  to  NSA  (Examinations) 
Freedom  of  Information/Privacy  Act.  (U) 
the  breakdown  as  of  30  September  1985:31 
Privacy  Act  Request 
Freedom  of  Information  Request 
Classified  Pages  Reviewed 
Unclassified  Pages  Reviewed 
Administrative  Support  Actions 
Operational  Support  Actions 
Case  Opening  Procedures 
Case  Closing  Procedures 
TOTAL 
510 
431 
941 
1002 
1188 
2190 
406 
355 
761 
O 
396 
301 
697 
114 
18U 
491 
439 
930 
The  following  list  shows 
934 
1,075 
118,075 
312,203 
17,337 
1,019,047 
1,994 
  hm 
1,472,818 
UNCLASSIFIED
Upward  Mobility  Program.  (U)  Command  emphasis  was  provided  to 
promote  a  significant  increase  in  the  INSCOM  participation  in  the 
Upward  Mobility  Program.  It  was  a  specific  objective  in  the  INSCOM 
Planning  Document  to  expand  the  size  of  the  program  to  fill  2 
percent  of  the  command  authorised  and  funded  positions  at  AHS  and 
VHFS. 
(U)  The  emphasis  placed  on  the  Upward  Mobility  Program  resulted  in 
a  100  percent  increase  in  the  number  of  spaces  filled  in  FX  1985. 
The  momentum  of  this  emphasis  resulted  in  this  command  coming  within 
two  spaces  of  achieving  the  DA  goal  in  this  vital  program  area.  This 
was  the  best  ever  performed  of  this  command. 32 
Investigative  Records  Repository  (IBB).  (U)  A  listing  of  IRR 
procedures  during  FX  1985  is  shown  below: 33 
Request 
Dossiers  Reviewed 
Direct  Database  Maintenance 
and  Verification  Actions 
Supplements  Processed 
Dossiers  Created 
Dossiers  Reviewed  for  Permanents 
Transfer  to  NARS 
Dossiers  Deleted 
Special  Acts  Processed 
Source  Data  Cards  Processed 
Reproductions 
Dossiers  Controlled 
Filing/Refiling 
•Mengele  Project  Hard  Copy  and 
Microfilm  Reviews 
••Mengele  Project  Microfilm  Deletes 
TOTAL 
157,916 
222,532 
718,360 
60,758 
37,763 
1,298 
71,737 
249 
34,447 
401,600 
4,873 
83,044 
12,945 
8.475 
1,815,997 
•Special  project  designated  by  the  Secretary  of  the  Army,  which 
entailed  5  months  of  work  oyer  and  above  regular  tasking. 
•■Quality  control  actions  continue. 
Command  Strength.  (U)  The  command  strength  as  of  30  September, 
1984 
S
INSCOM  Headquarters  Concept  Design.  (U)  The  INSCOM  Headquarters 
Concept  Design  Is  the  plan  for  construction  of  the  proposed  INSCOM 
headquarters  building  at  Fort  Belvolr,  Virginia.  In  December  1984, 
plans  were  made  available  by  the  Baltimore  Corps  of  Engineers  for 
review  by  INSCOM  staff  members.  Construction  1s  projected .to 
start  1n  early  1986  and  be  completed  1n  1988. 
(U)  TEMPEST  Branch,  C-H  Division,  ADCSOPS-CI  reviewed  the  concept 
design  with  DCSLOG.  The  purpose  of  the  review  was  to  validate  the 
TEMPEST  countermeasures  Included  1n  the  design  of  the  building.  It 
was  originally  planned  that  the  entire  building  would  be  RFI- 
shielded  (radio  frequency  Interference).  However,  there  was  no 
TEMPEST  requirement  for  shielding.  Other  needless  countermeasures 
were  eliminated  which  will  result  1n  saving  of  an  estimated  $3.5 
million  without  any  reduction  1n  security.  No  significant  problem 
was  encountered.35 
:.1# 
Travis  Trophy.  (#?  The  Travis  Trophy  recognizes  the  most 
significant  contribution  In  the  field  of  operations,  management 
and  administration  bv  fixed  field  stations. 
of  previous  winners. 
Director's  Trophy.  (U)  During  FY  1980,  Vice  Admiral  B.R.  Inman, 
DIRNSA,  established  a  new  award  which  would  recognize  the  mobile 
SIGINT  element  making  the  most  significant  contribution  to  the 
cryptologlc  community  during  the  calendar  year.  For  1984,  DIRNSA 
chose  the  U.S.  Army's  224th  Military  Intelligence  Battalion  (Aerial 
Exploitation),  as  the  winner  of  the  Director's  Trophy.  See 
'appendix  K  for  a  complete  list  of  the  year's  winners. 37 
INSCOM  Key  Personnel.  (U)  Appendix  I  contains  a  listing  of 
personnel  occupying  key  positions  within  the  U.S.  Army  Intelligence 
and  Security  Command,  as  of  30  September  1985.38 
First  Annual 
% 
t
INSCOM  Average  Grade.  (0)  The  DA  average  grade  ceiling  assigned 
to  INSCOM  is  9*17*  The.  FY  1984  average  grade  was  9.07.  During  FY 
1985,  the  average  grade  rose  to  9*11.  The  reason  for  the  increase 
was  greater  allocation  in  fill  of  higher  grade  positions  and  a 
general  upgrading  of  the  workforce .*** 
SIDPERS  Performance.  (0)  Benefits  of  the  continued  emphasis 
placed  on  timely  and  accurate  reporting  of  personnel  data  input  to 
the  SIDPERS  was  reflected  in  FY  1985  accomplishments.  For  the 
first  time,  over  95  percent  of  INSCOM  units  either  met  or  exceeded 
the  HQDA  standards  of  90  percent  for  data  acceptability  and  7 
days  for  timeliness.1!1 
USAINSCOM  Organization  Day  Military/Civilian  Team  Awards.  (0) 
Major  General  Harry  E.  Soyster,  commander  of  INSCOM  presented  the 
annual  awards  for  outstanding  performance  and  meritorious  service 
for  employees  of  the  INSCOM  community.  The  presentation  included 
awarding  Mr.  John  B.  Aral  stead,  Jr.,  DCSLOG,  with  the  Albert  V. 
Small  Award;  Major  Daniel  D.  Denlin,  66th  MI  Group  (U.S.  Army 
Interrogation  Unit},  with  the  Colonel  Richard  F.  Judge 
Military/Civilian  Team  Improvement  Award  for  military  recipient  and 
Mr.  Peter  A.  Petito,  66th  MI  Group  (584th  MI  Detachment)  as  the 
civilian  recipient;  Ms/  Carolyn  J.  Brown,  DCSLOG,  was  presented  the 
Jackie  Keith  Award;  Ms.  Joanne  F.  Swartz,  Hq,  66th  MI  Group,  with 
the  Virginia  McDill  Award;  Ms.  Nancy  H.  Inger,  USAG  VHFS  (CPO), 
with  the  Equal  Employment  Opportunity  Award;  Mr.  Charles  K. 
Brummett,  U.S.  Army  Engineer  Activity,  Capital  Area  (ARS),  with  the 
Annual  Wage  Grade  Award;  and  Ms.  Dorothy  L.  Wood,  USAG  VHFS 
(Installation  Club  System),  the  Nonappropriated  Fund  Employee  of 
the  Year  Award.*2 
Grade  Rollback  Program.  (U)  In  May  1985,  HQ  USAINSCOM  Issued 
guidance  on  the  implementation  of  the  Administration's  Grade 
Rollback  Program.  This  is  a  presidentially  mandated  program  to 
reduce  the  number  of  GS/GM  11-15  positions  by  approximately  1.5 
percent  by  the  end  of  FY  1985* 
(U)  The  Grade  Rollback  Program  is  to  be  accomplished  by  filling 
all  vacant  nonsupervlsory  GS-11  and  GS-12  positions  at  or  below  the 
GS-09  grade  level.  Career  ladder  positions  will  be  established  and 
may  have  promotion  potential  to  the  original  grade.  By 
reengineering  positions  to  the  lower  grade  levels,  employees  as 
well  as  managers  can  benefit.  This  program  can  provide  career
UNCLASSIFIED 
opportunities  for  employees,  further  EEO  goals,  help  achieve  a 
balance  1n  professional /technical /support  positions,  and  provide  a 
more  efficient  organization  overall. 
(U)  When  management  determines  that  a  position  cannot  be 
restructured  and/or  filled  at  the  lower  grade  levels,  a  written 
request  for  exception  must  be  submitted  with  the  SF-52,  Request  for 
Personnel  Action,  the  Civilian  Personnel  Office  covering  the  pros 
and  cons  of  the  proposed  action .43 
Information  Search  on  Dr.  Menoele.  (U)  A  memorandum  from  the 
Secretary  of  Army  John  0.  Marsh,  Jr.,  dated  20  February  1985,  subj: 
Search  for  Information  Concerning  Dr.  Nengele,  was  sent  through  the 
Office  of  the  Assistant  Chief  of  Staff  for  Intelligence  directing 
the  assembly  of  a  special  task  force  to  cause  a  search  of  relevant 
Army  records  for  Information  of  Dr.  Josef  Mengele.  In  turn,  the 
ACSI  tasked  the  Commander,  USAINSCOM  to  conduct  a  search  of  the 
Investigative  Record  Repository  to  complete  the  task.  The  U.S. 
Army  Central  Security  Facility  was  advised  to  notify  the  USAINSCOM 
DCSOPS  of  its  findings  on  a  periodic  status. 
(U)  The  search  was  focused  on  administrative,  historical,  and 
personnel  records  or  any  other  records  providing  clues  to  Indicate 
any  association  the  Army  had  with  Dr.  Mengele  of  his  whereabouts. 
Particular  attention  >*as  given  to  the  time  period  just  before  and 
just  after  the  end  of  World  War  11.44 
rflNSCOM  Commanders'  Conference.  (U)  The  FY  1985  Commanders' 
Conference  was  held  on  7-11  November  1984  at  the  Sheraton  Inn- 
Gettysburg,  Pennsylvania.  As  an  added  attraction  to  the  conference 
a  Gettysburg  Military  HI storv  Battlefield  Tour  with  dinner  was 
provided  by  the  War  Col lege .45 
Performance  Management  and  Recognition  System  (PMRS).  (U)  On  10 
October  1984,  both  houses  of  Congress  passed  HR-2300,  a  bill  with 
Merit  Pay/SES  reforms  and  provisions  for  ex-spouse  claims  on 
federal  annuities.  Upon  the  President's  approval,  the  new  system 
would  be  called  the  Performance  Management  and  Recognition  System 
(PMRS),  not  Merit  Pay  System. 
(U)  On  7  December  1984,  the  Department  of  the  Army  provided  a 
message  Implementing  the  merit  Increase  provisions  of  the  new  PMRS. 
The  provisions  affected  all  INSCOM  employees  1n  the  GM  pay  plan  on 
the  statutory  effective  date  of  the  merit  Increase.  The  new  PMRS 
replaced  the  merit  pay  system  but  retained  the  GM  designation  merit 
Increases  that  will  now  be  based  on  full  or  partial  equivalent 
amounts  to  counterpart  GS  w1th1n-grade  (WIG)  Increases.  The  new 
PMRS  gives  generally  less  to  the  Exceptional  (EX)  and  Highly 
1 INPI  ASSiFIFH
Successful  <HS)  in  base  pay  Increases  than  the  old  Merit  Pay 
System.  In  most  cases,  however,  PMRS  will  generally  guarantee, 
unlike  the  old  Merit  Pay  System,  full  base  pay  parity  between  those 
rated  Fully  Successful  (FS)  and  their  GS  counterparts. 
(0)  On  11  December  1984  0PM  also  directed  that  employees  who  were 
hired,  reassigned,  or  promoted  into  merit  pay  within  90  days  prior 
to  the  7  or  14  October  1984  effective  date,  and  who  received  a  pay 
increase  (i.e.,  a  promotion  or  a  WIG)  during  the  period,  would  not 
get  a  merit  increase— not  to  Include  employees  promoted  from  one  GM 
grade  to  another  GM  grade  during  that  90  days. 
(0)  The  purpose  of  the  recent  legislation  is  to  both  guarantee 
full  pay  parity  with  GS  counterparts  for  all  GM  employees  rated  FS 
and  above  and  to  provide  additional  monetary  rewards  for  superior 
performance.  Both  a  supplemental  performance  and  a  cash  awards 
program  were  established  by  this  legislation  to  allow  performance 
based  cash  awards  and  oash  awards  to  additionally  reward  a  number 
of  deserving  GM  employees.  The  features  and  procedures  for  PMRS 
performance  and  cash  awards  are  projected  to  be  very  close  to  those 
for  SSPA's  and  SASA's.  The  name  "Significant  Accomplishment  Award" 
now  used  under  the  merit  pay  system  is  expected  to  be  dropped  in 
favor  of  those  names,  recombining  much  of  the  GS  and  GM  award 
systems.  However,  GM  employees  will  continue  to  be  ineligible  for 
Quality  Step  Increases. 
(U)  The  reform  legislation  also  establishes  for  the  first  time  a 
monetary  limit  for  performance  awards  (SSPA's)  between  an  amount 
equivalent  to  .75  and  1.5  percent  of  the  aggregate  base  salaries  of 
all  GM  employees  within  an  agency.  No  limit  is  mandated  by  this 
law  for  cash  awards,  however,  INSCOM  is  considering  establishment 
of  a  separate  goal  of  a  range  between  .75  and  1.5  percent  of  the 
aggregate  base  pay.1*6 
the  902d 
902d  MI  Group  Shortfalls. _J*T  At  the  close  of  FT  1985, 
MI  Group  was  manned  at  an^ustere  1« 
IAL
Jfff   The  personnel  shortfall  within  the  902d  MI  Group  wee  ml»o 
*exacerbattd  by  new  standards  of  grade  authorization  levels  that, 
when  applied  to  the  group*  a  MTOE  and  its  augmentation  TDA,  resulted 
in  significant  grade  and  experience  level  reductions  for  97B  and 
authorizations. 
I 
STU-II  Program.  (U)  The  INSCOM  ST0-1I  program  will  provide  Secure 
Voice  Communications  throughout  the  command.  Eleven  STO-II 
terminals  have  been  installed  with  approximately  M  more  planned 
installations  before  project  completion.  Additionally,  Narrowband 
Subscriber  Terminals  (NBST)  are  expected  to  be  replaced  by  STU-II' s 
throughout  Department  of  the  Army.  The  STU-III  program  is  expected 
to  reach  implementation  stsges  upon  completion  of  the  STU-II 
program,  with  Department  of  Defense  fielding  in  excess  of  800, 000 
units.  INSCOM  will  participate  aggressively  in  this  program  as 
well,  with  requirements  projected  to  be  in  excess  of  2,000  units 
command-wide.*? 
i 
IAL
Digital  Imagery  Transmission  System  (PITS).  (U)  During  FI  1986 
the  DCSIM  Installation  Team* a  efforts  were  directed  at  projects  at 
Field  Station  Kunia,  the  engineering  and  installation  of  the 
Conaunl  cations  Support  Package  for  the  Digital  Imagery  Transmission 
System  (PITS).  DITS  will  provide  near  real-time  imagery  to  the 
470th  MI  Group  and  the  513th  MI  Group  from  IJLPD  at  the  Washington 
Navy  Yard.  The  terminals  are  being  installed  by  Northrop,  and  the 
Communications  Support  Package  will  be  installed  by  DCSIM  to 
include  a  circuit  switch  at  IAPD.  Site  surveys  for  DITS  were  begun 
in  January  1985  and  completed  in  March  1985.  During  the  July- 
September  time  frame  a  three-man  team  installed  the  Communications 
Support  Packages  at  the  Washington  Navy  Yard  and  in  Panama. 
Installations  at  Fort  Bragg,  Bergstrom  AFB,  Shaw  AFB,  and  Fort 
Monmouth  are  schedueld  for  FT  1986.52 
% 
^ 
t 
I  AT.
European  Troop  Strength  Celling  (ETSC).  (U)  The  Deputy  Chief  of 
Staff,  Plans,  Programs,  and  Modernization  assisted  HQ,  USAREUR  1n 
defining  and  defending  INSCOM  military  manpower  requirements  under 
the  ETSC.  The  TAA  91  program  growth  for  the  66th  MI  Group' (234 
spaces)  had  not  Initially  been  accommodated  within  the  ETSC. 
Through  negotiation  with  the  USAREUR  staff  and  defense  through  the 
USAREUR  review  process,  153  of  the  programmed  growth  spaces  were 
eventually  prioritized  above  other  USAREUR  requirements  and 
accommodated  under  the  celling.  However,  this  was  partially  offset 
by  the  reduction  of  37  previously  authorized  spaces  not  associated 
with  the  TAA  91  program  growth.  Other  INSCOM  requirements  were 
sustained  through  FY  1987,  but  the  Foreign  Language  Training 
Center,  Europe  (FLTCE)  and  INSCOM  field  stations  ware  Identified 
for  further  review.  New  Issues  impacting  on  INSCOM  units  In  NATO 
Europe  are  also  expected  to  arise  1n  the  future.  Semi-annual 
USAREUR  reviews  against  ETSC  will  become  a  recurring  process,  with 
the  next  review  scheduled  for  1st/2d  Qtr  FY  19B6.54 
anned  for 
INSCOM  Rating  Distribution  Achievement.  (U)  In  FY  1985,  the 
rating  distribution  for  GPAS  employees  approximated  38  percent 
rated  Exceptional  (EX),  23  percent  rated  Highly  Successful  (HS), 
and  39  percent  rated  Fully  Successful  (FS).  This  1s  a  significant 
change  (and  possibly  represents  Inflation)  over  FY  1984 
performance,  where  27  percent  were  rated  EX;  21  percent  were  rated 
HS;  and  52  percent  were  rated  FS.  There  was  a  similar  growth  In 
the  rating  distribution  for  PMRS  employees  1n  FY  1985.  Thirty- five 
percent  were  rated  EX;  34  percent  were  rated  HS;  and  31  percent 
were  rated  FS.  Only  one  employee  was  rated  below  FS.  In  FY  1984, 
only  11  percent  of  all  GM  employees  were  rated  EX;  34  percent  were 
rated  HS;  55  percent  were  rated  FS.  There  Is  clearly  an 
"undesirable"  trend  toward  higher  ratings.  It  1s  considered 
undesirable  because  it  has  not  been  validated  by  commonly 
recognized,  "improved"  organizational  performance,  because  1t  tends 
to  undermine  the  FS  rating  as  a  "positive"  rating,  and  because  1t 
has  not  been  accompanied  by  Identification  of  poor  performers.
UNCLASSIFIED 
(U)  The  following  rating  distribution  model  is  now  •stabllshed  for 
both  PMRS  and  GPASt  15  percent  should  be  rated  EXj  30  pareent 
should  be  rated  HS;  and  55  percent  should  be  rated  PS  or  below.  A 
"specific"  aodel  has  been  ohosen  to  depict  an  appropriate  split 
between  EX  and  HS  as  well  as  between  PS  and  higher  ratings. ?& 
Cash  Awards.  (D)  Goals  for  the  peroentage  of  the  population 
recognized  were  net  for  both  GPAS  and  PMRS  employees  in  FY  1985. 
Twenty-five  percent  of  GPAS  employees  were  recognised  in  FX  1985 
versus  only  18  peroent  in  FY  1981.  Thirty-eight  percent  of  PMRS 
employees  were  recognised  in  FY  1985  versus  an  undesirable  high  in 
FY  1984  of  51  percent.  Goals  for  amount  of  funds  expended  were  not 
met,  however,  in  FY  1985.  An  amount  equivalent  to  1.0  percent  was 
expended  for  GPAS  employees  and  an  amount  equivalent  to  1.8  percent 
was  expended  for  PMRS  employees.  It  is  believed  that  a  midyear 
change  in  goal  for  GPAS  employees,  from  a  maximum  of  1.5  to  a 
maximum  of  2.0  percent  may  account  for  much  of  the  shortfall  for 
GPAS  employees,  however,  it  is  known  that  many  organizations  still 
do  not  closely  manage  "performance"  awards.  The  shortfall  in 
expenditure  of  PMRS  award  funds  is  largely  attributed  to  the  high 
number  of  EX  ratings  that  required  mandatory  performance  awards. 
So  many  performance  awards  were  given  to  those  rated  EX  that  ail  cf 
the  command* s  performance  award  funds  were  expended  before  awards 
could  be  granted  to  those  rated  HS  or  FS.57 
IWSCOM  Planning  Program.  (0)  A  planning  conference  was  held  st 
Airlie  House  in  Warrenton,  Virginia,  in  January  1985*  The  HQ 
XNSCOM  Civilian  Personnel  Division  staff;  XNSCOM  Civilian  Personnel 
Officers  from  U.S.  Army  Garrison,  Arlington  Rail  Ststion;  U.S.  Army 
Garrison,  Vint  Rill  Farms  Station;  and  the  Administrative  Survey 
Detachment,  Fort  George  G.  Meade,  and  their  functional  chiefs  met 
for  3  days  to  develop  the  FY  1985-86  Civilian  Personnel  Management 
Plan  for  this  command.  The  fiscal  year  plan  subsequently  was 
endorsed  by  the  Commanding  General,  XNSCOM  and  distributed  to 
headquarters  staff  heads  and  XNSCOM  commanders  worldwide. 
(U)  One  of  the  major  results  of  this  conference  was  the  issuance 
of  the  FY  1985-86  planning  document.   The  newly  issued  plan 
provided  for  considerable  decentralization  of  HQ  control  factors. 
The  plan  also  had  an  extended  life-cycle  from  1  to  2  years,  thus 
cutting  down  on  future  administrative  requirements  to  reissue 
guidance  annually.  It  emphasizes  that  the  Civilian  Personnel 
Program  Plan  is  a  living,  management  document,  not  just  a  CPO 
issuance.  Foremost  is  the  fact  that  the  plan  eliminated  HQ 
micromanagement  of  local  command  CPO  planning  and  evaluation  which 
had  the  result  of  improved  credibility  of  program  planning  in  the 
operating  CPO.  This  and  other  headquarters  program  guidance 
UNCLASSIFIED  72
UNCLASS1FIE] 
promoted  i  significant  increase  in  planning  and  evaluation  activity 
in  the  operating  CPO's.  Each  CPO  now  conducts  a  aid-year  program 
review  to  evaluate  its  service  and  provides  to  management  the 
results  of  the  evaluation. 58 
Command  Intern  Program.  (U)  In  response  to  past  problems  * 
encountered  and  an  identified  need  for  a  single  and  comprehensive 
command-wide  training  plan,  INSCOM  developed  a  Master  Intern 
Training  Plan  (MITP)  for  intelligence.  This  plan  is  designed  to 
permit  modifications  in  order  to  meet  specific  needs  of  individual 
intern  personnel  assigned  in  the  various  intelligence  sub- 
specialties. The  Office  of  the  Deputy  Chief  of  Staff  for 
Operations  (DCSOPS)  was  the  staff  proponent  for  this  action.  The 
Intelligence  MITP  will  be  formally  Issued  as  an  INSCOM  pamphlet. 
This  is  the  second  MITP  developed  by  this  command.  The  other  MITP 
developed  in  FY  1984  was  for  the  Civilian  Personnel  Administration 
career  program. 
(U)  One  significant  accomplishment  in  the  Intern  program  was  the 
creation  of  a  Equal  Employment  Opportunity  (EEO)  intern  position. 
This  was  a  shared  resource  with  the  Military  Traffic  Management 
Command.  Neither  MACOM  had  manpower  resources  which  Indicated  a 
projected  ability  to  place  an  EEO  intern  after  the  individual 
completed  the  program*  The  two  commands  will  pool  their  resources 
to  identify  an  appropriate  position  for  post-training  placement  of 
the  graduating  intern.  This  is  the  first  time  two  comands  have 
shared  an  Intern  space.  This  approach  significantly  increased  the 
probability  of  a  good  placement  for  the  graduating  EEO  intern. 59 
ITIC-PAC  New  Physical  Plant.  (U)  USAITIC-PAC  occupies  two 
'  buildings  in  the  area  of  Fort  Shafter  known  as  "Shafter  Flats,"  a 
half  of  a  mile  from  RQ  VESTCOM  and  16  miles  from  Field  Station 
Korea.  The  Command  Group,  Support  Division  and  Counterintelligence 
Branch  occupy  Building  T-1504,  a  two-story  frame  structure  of 
1950*8  vintage.  The  deputy  for  operations  and  the  Intelligence 
Branch  are  located  200  yards  away  in  Building  1543t  which  is  a 
modern  Secure  Compartmented  Information  Facility  (SCIF).  An  ADP 
element  of  HQ  WESTCOM  shares  the  SCIF.  With  Building  T-150K 
scheduled  for  demolition  in  1986,  and  given  the  cramped  facilities 
in  the  SCIF,  HQ  WESTCOM  and  INSCOM  are  currently  seeking  a  facility 
that  will  provide  for  the  consolidation  of  all  of  USAITIC-PAC  in 
one  location.  The  future  home  of  USAITIC-PAC  will  probably  be  a 
section  of  an  extensive  tunnel  complex  under  the  Aliamanu  Military 
Reservation  (a  joint  service  housing  area  one  mile  from  Fort 
Shafter)  that  until  1974  was  the  Alternate  Command  Post  of  USARPAC. 
This  complex,  vacant  for  the  past  11  years,  is  currently  being 
cleaned  up  and  surveyed  for  occupancy  feasibility  by  HQ  WESTCOM.60 
UNCLASSIFIED
tJNCLASSlFIEb 
FOOTNOTES:  CHAPTER  IV.  RESOURCES  AND  MANAGEMENT 
1.  FY  1985,  OCSRM  AHR  (C),  pp.  6-7. 
2.  Ibid.,  p.  7. 
3.  Idid..  pp.  8-11. 
4.  TbldT.  p.  12. 
5.  Ibid.,  p.  30. 
6.  TbToT.  p.  21. 
7.  Ibid.,  p.  21. 
8.  TT~T^85.  DCSPER  AHR  (U),  pp.  4-5. 
9.  Ibid.,  p.  8. 
10.  "TbTd.,  p.  16. 
11.  771585,  OCSIM  AHR  (S),  p.  12. 
12.  Ibid.,  p.  26. 
13.  TTTO85,  ASA  AHR  (U),  p.  11-51. 
14.  FY  1985,  CSO  AHR  (U),  p.  4. 
15.  Ibid.,  p.  6. 
16.  TTT5B5,  PAO  AHR  (U),  p.  0-1. 
17.  FY  1985,  IG  AHR  (U),  p.  12. 
18.  Ibid.,  p.  12. 
19.  TbldT 
20.  TTT585,  OCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  p.  37. 
21.  Ibid.,  p.  51. 
22.  TbldT  \ 
23.  TTT985.  SJA  AHR  (U),  p.  8. 
24.  FY  1985,  DCSPER  AHR  (U),  pp.  10-13. 
25.  INSCOM  Command  Strength  Report  from  Plans  &  Proponency  Division, 
DCSPER,  as  of  30'September  1985,  published  21  October  1985  (C). 
26.  FY  1985,  DCSPER  AHR  (U),  p.  31. 
,27.  Ibid.,  pp.  31-23. 
28.  Ibid.,  p.  38. 
29.  T71?85,  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  pp.  275-276;  FY  1985.  501st  MI  Gp, 
524th  MI  Bn  AHR  (TSCW),  p.  29. 
30.  FY  1985,  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  p.  293, 
31.  FY  1985,  Central  Security  Facility  AHR  (FOUO),  p.  5. 
32.  FY  1985,  DCSPER  AHR  (U),  p.  28. 
33.  FY  1985,  Central  Security  Facility  AHR  (FOUO),  p.  5. 
34.  FY  1985,  DCSPER  AHR  (U),  p.  8. 
35.  FY  1985,  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  p.  272. 
36.  Travis  Trophy  Awards  Program  Brochures,  1985  (U)'. 
37".  Ibid. 
38.  Key  Personnel  Roster,  dtd  April  1985  (FOUO). 
39.  FY  1985,  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  p.  68. 
40.  FY  1985,  DCSPER  AHR  (U),  p.  32. 
41.  Ibid.,  pp.  6-7. 
42.  U5KTNSC0M  Organization  Day  1985  Mil/Civ  Team  Awards  Ceremony 
Brochure  (U). 
UNCLASSIFIED  74
UNCLASSIFIED 
43.  DF,  IAG-CIV,  subjt  Personnel  Update  for  Manager*  and  Supervisors, 
dtd  21  Nov  85. 
44.  See  of  Army  Memo,  dtd  20  Feb  85 ,  subj«  Sear  oh  for  Information 
Concerning  Dr.  Mengele;  DAMI-CIS(L)  Ltr  to  CDR,  USAINSCOM, 
dtd  4  Apr  85f  subj:  SAB;  1st  End,  IACS  to  CDR,  CSF,  dtd 
8  May  85 »  aubjt  SAB. 
45.  Ltr,  1A0PS-PMD,  sub J i  Commanders*  Conference,  dtd  18  Oct  81. 
46.  ZAPER-CP  Msg  dtg  1916002  Oct  84,  subj:  Merit  Pay  Reform;  IAPER-CP 
Ltr,  dtd  27  Dec  84,  sub J:  Performance  Management  and  Recognition 
System  (PMRS). 
47.  FY  1985,  902d  MI  Group  ARR  (S),  e.  III. 
46.  FY  1985,  DCSIM  ARR  (S),  p.  17. 
49*  Ibid.,  p.  16. 
50.  Ibid.,  p.  18. 
51.  Ibid.,  p.  18. 
52.  Ibid.,  p.  18. 
53.  Ibid.,  p.  19. 
54.  FY  1985,  DCSPPM  AHR  (0),  e.  Ill,  p.  3. 
55.  Ibid.,  c.  IV.  p.  3* 
56.  FY  1985,  DCSPER  ARR  (0),  pp.  21,  23. 
57.  Ibid.,  pp.  21-22. 
58.  Ibid.,  pp.  26,  27. 
59.  Ibid.,  pp.  28,  29. 
60.  FY  1965,  USAITIC-PAC  AHR  (TSCW)»  p.  .1. 
UNCLASSIFIED  ™
RBCTRAIN.  (U)  Army  Regulation  350-3,  Tactical  Intelligence 
Readiness  Training  (REDTRAIN)  Program,  was  revised  with  an 
effective  date  of  20  November  1984.  .The  revision  outlined  for  the
Unclassified 
first  tine  the  specific  responsibilities  of  IKSCOM  as  DA  Exooutlve 
Agent  for  the  program.  ZNSCOM  was  charged  with  providing  an 
analysis  of  semiannual  unit  REDTRAIN  reports  to  OACSI  and  DA*. 
Additionally,  the  revised  AR  required  that  all  tactical 
intelligence  units  of  the  Total  Army  develop  an  annual  REDTRAIN 
Plan  for  submission  to.INSCOM  on  30  June  of  each  year.  Zn  March 
1985,  the  REDTRAIN  Division,  HQ  INSCOM,  provided  its  first 
analytical  report  on  the  status  of  REDTRAIN  activities  within  the 
Regular  Army.  It  was  found  that  reports  submitted  by  reserve 
oomponent  units  were  so  sketchy  and  so  poorly  prepared  as  to 
preclude  any  meaningful  analysis. 
(0)  At  the  Fourth  REDTRAIN  Executive  Planning  Committee  (REPC  IV) 
meeting  held  5-7  March  1985  at  Arlington  Hall  Station,  REDTRAIN 
Division  put  forth  a  strawman  presentation  that  pinpointed  the  lack 
of  clear  technical  standards  for  which  MI  personnel  could  train. 
This  problem  was  Identified  as  having  a  tremendous  impact  upon  the 
Live  Environment  Training  (LET)  aspects  of  REDTRAIN.  U.S.  Army 
Intelligence  School-Devcns  (USAIS-D)  concurred  and  agreed  to 
establish  a  MACOM  working  group  to  address  the  Issue.  In  April, 
the  U.S.  Army  Intelligence  Center  and  School  (USAICS)  initiated 
action  to  develop  proficiency  standards  for  SICINT/EW  collective 
tasks.  A  rewrite  of  the  CEWI  battalion  training  program  for 
SICINT/EW  MOS's  was  presented  to  the  G2/MI  commanders  conference  in 
July  1985 1  and  Is  scheduled  for  publication  as  a  revised  Army 
Training  and  Exercise  Plan  (ARTEP)  sometime  next  year.10 
UNCLASSIFIED
>*    ^  -    -. 
*..  .*.••* 
■>T*.*--." 
•*■"? 
ZTHHELJ) 
.  \V> : . 
--  J  !•-./ 
1  ...>■'./•». 
"-■.■";-i?:'-v^-"5v.-?-.;'"^--:::'-s •'--«"    -  '  * 
»v  *•*  -;.  ■  .*' 
»-  •"*' 
>s  -■:•?■ 
tO^loq
TIAL 
Personnel  Security  Investigation 
z 
g 
Counter-SIOINT  Concept.  (0)  In  early  1983 »  the  ACSI 
Counterintelligence  Task  Force  had  Identified  the  need  for  a  new 
concept  for  SIGSEC  support  to  the  Army  as  its  second  priority.  In 
June  of  that  year,  IKSCOM  hosted  a  working  group  of  MACOM 
representatives  which  considered  the  issue.  The  group,  outlined  a 
new  concept  for  counter-SIGIN?  operations.  A  draft  document 
prepared  by  the  OACSI  action  officer  was  coordinated  with  working 
group  members,  finalized  by  the  INSCOM  staff,  and  provided  to  ACSI 
in  January  1985.  The  concept  was  validated  by  TRADOC  In  March 
1985 i  and  Field  Circular  3^-62,  embodying  the  new  approaoh,  was 
published  in  July  1985.  ? 
110
(0)  Counter-SIGINT  narked  a  radleal  departure  froo  the  traditional 
amy  idea  of  SXCSEC.  Xt  moved  support  froo  a  reactive  to  a 
proactive  node.  The  essence  of  the  eoncept  was  to  assess  the 
SICINT  threat  to  supported  commanders,  assess  vulnerability  In  the 
light  of  that  threat,  develop  oounteraeasures,  and  evaluate* 
oountermeasures  once  implemented.  COMSEC  monitoring  activities 
would  only  come  into  play  during  the  fourth  of  these  phases j  even 
then,  they  would  be  restricted  to  a  minor  role.  Xn  order  to 
support  the  new  oobcept,  10  additional  SXOSEC  officer  spaces  were 
provided  XNSCOM  in  FY  1985.  at  the  same  time,  under  the  Army  of 
Excellence  (AOE)  Concept  programmed  for  implementation  in  FY  1986, 
5XGSEC  personnel  in  MX  units  at  the  divisional  and  eorpa  levels 
were  to  be  eliminated,  an  action  that  would  eoncentrate  the  bulk  of 
Army  SXGS5C  personnel  in  the  ooomand  and  would  allow  XNSCOM  to  be 
at  the  leading  edge  of  implementation  of  the  new  initiative.  One 
significant  barrier  to  full  implementation  was  lack  of  an  Immediate 
AD?  capability  to  support  the  threat  and  vulnerability  assessment 
process  and  facilitate  real-time  analysis.  W 
COMSEC  Issues.  (U)  AR  530-2  charges  the  CG,  XNSCOM  with  the 
responsibility  of  assisting  the  HQDA  staff  and  commanders  at  all 
levels  in  developing  and  evaluating  COMSEC  policies,  plans, 
operating  procedures,  and  training  programs.  Xn  FX  1985,  there 
were  significant  ehanges  to  the  natipnal-level  COMSEC  struoture 
111
T1AL 
which  DA  and  XNSCOM  functioned.  National  Security  Decision 
Directive  (NSDD)  1*5,  Issued  on  17  September  198U,  replaoed  the 
former  National  COMSEC  Committee  with  a  more  elaborate 
architecture.  NSDD  145  established  a  senior  level  steering  group, 
the  Systems  Security  Steering  Group  (SSSG);  an  interagency  * 
operating  group,  the  National  Telecommunications  and  Information 
Systems  Seeurity  Committee  (NTISSC).  Under  the  new  arrangement, 
the  Secretary  of  Defense  served  as  executive  agent  in  all  O.S 
Government  COMSEC  matters,  with  DXRNSA  as  national  manager.  12 
I 
112
% 
Key  Management  Automation*  (U)  Most  of  the  new  COMSEC  devices 
being  fielded  by  the  Army  employed  electronic  key.  The  steady 
expansion  of  cryptonets  throughout  the  Army  and  the  increase  in  the 
demand  for  electronic  key  degraded  the  capability  of  manual  methods 
of  management  to  meet  operational  needs.  In  late  October  19BH , 
representatives  of  the  U.S.  Army  Signal  Center  and  INSCOM  prepared 
a  draft  plan  to  automate  the  cryptonet  and  key  management 
functions.  The  draft  was  used  as  a  strawman  at  a  meeting  of 
representatives  from  all  MACOM'a  that  INSCOM  hosted  in  November 
113
UNCLASSIFIED 
COMSEC  Serial  Number  Traoklna.  (0)  COMSEC  equipment  which  is 
declassified/unclassified,  but  subject  to  NSA  accountability  falls 
into  the  oategory  of  Controlled  Cryptographic  I  teas  (CCI).  * 
(Equlpsent  is  unclassified  when  unkeyed;  when  keyed,  the  equipment 
assumes  the  sane  classification  as  the  key.)  The  Amy  has  announced 
plans  to  transfer  CCI  from  the  Amy  COMSEC  Material  Control  System 
to  the  standard  logistics  system.  Sinoe  NSA  continues  to  require 
access  to  CCI  accounts,  the  new  initiative  required  the  Army  to 
devise  a  means  of  tracking  CCI  through  its  supply  and  maintenance 
system  at  both  wholesale  and  retail  levels,  This  would  be  done 
through  s  process  of  tracking  serial  numbers  of  individual  CCI 
items.  AMC  requested  INSCOM  representation  at  the  first  serial 
number  tracking  (SNT)  meeting  held  on  24  August  1984. 
Subsequently,  INSCOM  took  part  in  a  series  of  COMSEC  working 
groups.   A  number  of  SNT  systems  were  evaluated  as  possible 
candidates  for  application  to  CCI.  It  was  found  that  the  present 
DOD  Small  Arms  Serialisation  Program  appeared  to  be  the  most 
suitable  SNT  program  for  eryptologic  application.  15 
COMSEC  Insecurities.  (U)  The  INSCOM  COMSEC  Insecurity  Program  for 
the  purpose  of  monitoring,  reviewing,  and  when  required,  evaluating 
COMSEC  insecurity  reports  initiated  within  DA  was  implemented  in 
February  1981.  The  program  serves  primarily  to  ensure  that  all 
detected  insecurities  to  COMSEC  material  are  reported  promptly  to 
the  officials  responsible  for  evaluating  the  incidents  and 
initiating  action  to  minimise  their  security  impact.  These  reports 
of  insecurities  also  serve  as  the  basis  for  identifying  trends  in 
insecurity  occurrences,  and  for  developing  procedural  and  doctrinal 
measures  to  prevent  recurrences.  Evaluations  of  Insecurities  are 
rendered  by  the  cryptonet  controlling  authority  (CONAUTH)  in  the 
Oase  of  key  at  the  user  level;  by  INSCOM,  when  the  key  is  in 
distribution  channels,  when  multiple  Army  CONAUTH's  are  involved, 
or  when  there  is  a  personnel  insecurity;,  by  DIRNSA,  for 
cryptographic  insecurities,  physical  insecurities  (COMSEC  equipment 
and  documents),  and  cases  involving  CONAUTH* s  from  more  than  one 
service). 
(U)  Total  reported  COMSEC  insecurities,  by  MACOM,  for  CY  1984  and 
1985  are  as  follows: 
100 
UNCLASSIFIED 
114
UNCLASSIFIED 
Table  9*  -  COMSEC  Insecurities 
Command  CY  198H             CY  1985 
USAISC  67  M 
AMC  2                •    * 
USAREUR  266  175 
FORSCOM  125  73 
HQDA  0  1 
ZNSCOM  12  B 
Joint  3  0 
EDSAK  29  9 
NGB  16  19 
IRADOC  3  1 
WESTCOM  1  0 
Other  _H  _10 
TOTAL         536  3*»8 
(U)  As  of  1  October  1985t  80  esses  were  yet  to  be  opened,  bringing 
the  totsl  CY  1985  esses  to  028.  1* 
(U)  COMSEC  sumnsry  letters  to  MACOM's  were  sent  out  for  the  first 
time  in  Jsnusry  end  February  1983  and  covered  the  entire  CY  1982 
period.  Although  responses  from  the  MACOM's  have  been  positive, 
there  hss  been  no  detectsble  improvement  other  thsn  in  a  few  of  the 
less  serious  insecurities.  The  third  report  to  the  MACOM's  for  CY 
1984  wss  provided  in  Msy  1985.  During  CY  1984,  the  majority  of  the 
Army's  COMSEC  insecurities  oontinued  to  be  csused  by  an  apparent 
disregard  for  estsblished  COMSEC  procedures;  negligence  on  the  pert 
of  assigned  personnel}  fslsification  of  destruction  certificates;  s 
tfaok  of  educstlon  on  the  part  of  users,  custodians,  unit 
commanders;  and,  in  many  oases,  a  lack  of  oommand  emphasis. 
Analysis  hss  revesled  thst  oommand  emphasis  and  formal  training  of 
COMSEC  custodians  yielded  the  highest  psy  back  in  terms  of  any 
corrective  actions  taken  by  field  commands.  1< 
(U)  As  the  result  of  sn  HSA  briefing  to  the  DA  staff  on  the  HUMINT 
threat  to  COMSEC  in  1982,  HQDA  DCSOPS  was  tssked  to  coordinate 
establishment  of  a  standardised  course  for  Army  COMSEC  custodians. 
INSCOM  worked  with  and  assisted  HQDA  and  TRADOC  in  the  development 
of  an  appropriate  curriculum.  The  first  elsss  of  the  Standardized 
COMSEC  Custodian  Training  Course  began  2  April  1981  at  the  Signal 
Center,  Fort  Gordon,  Georgia.  The  course  provides  instruction  on 
safeguarding  and  destruction  of  classified  materials,  documenting 
reports;  establishing,  transferring,  and  closing  COMSEC  accounts; 
threat  and  security  swareness  programs;  COMSEC  supply  and 
maintenance  procedures;  COMSEC  emergency  procedures;  and  all  major 
101 
UNCLASSIFIED 
115
!,*»  i  V>,  «.'..!.>.. : 
duties  required  of  COMSEC  personnel.  E7  the  end  of  FY  1985,  tbt 
cour»e  was  also  bains  liven  by  OSAREDR,  EUSAX,  WESTCOM,  and  t£e 
National  Guard.  1B
% 
% 
*. 
Mobile  TEMPEST  Test  Svatem  (MTTS).  (0)  Tbi»  project,  an 
initiative  to  upgrade  nine  FETTS-160  TEMPEST  systems  and  to 
fabricate  a  tenth  ays  tea  for  deployment  to  the  field,  was  first 
undertaken  in  1979*  Sinoe  that  time,  the  scope  of  the  project  was 
expanded  to  include  replacing  all  10  overloaded  vehicles  mounting 
the  system  as  well  as  upgrading  mission  equipment.  During  FY  1985, 
the  project  oontinued  to  be  plagued  with  difficulties.  The 
contractor  charged  with  providing  the  prime  mover  and  trailer 
submitted  a  deficient  product  and  then  went  bankrupt.  By  the  end 
of  the  fiscal  year,  it  was  revealed  that  the  prise  contractor, 
Chronometric  Inc.,  was  involved  in  voucher  discrepancies  and  was 
under  government  audit,  a  fact  that  would  delay  the  MTTS  program 
yet  another  6  months.  «
CIAL  USE  ONLY 
POOTNOIESt  CHAPTER  V.  OPERATIONAL  ACTIVITIES 
•  •  j 
Multldisclollne  - 
(U     FT  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCH),  passim. I  Ltr,  IA0PS-IS-W,  subjt 
U.S.  Amy  Requirement  for  Direct  Weather  Support  (16  Jul  85)  (S), 
Fact  Sheet,  IAOPS-F/T,  subjt  OPCON  of  500th  MI  Oroup  (12  Oct 
84)  (S);  Ltr,  IAOPS-PL,  subjt  Wartime  Mission  for  500th 
MI  Group  (20  Nov  84)  (S). 
Issue  Paper,  XAGD-OF-FT,  subjt  Foroe  Design  MI  Brigade 
Pacific  (-)  Korea  (Undtd). 
FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCH),  pp.  26-271  DF,  IAOPS-PL,  sub J:  JCS 
CPX  POWDER  RIVER  85  (25  Sep  84)  (C);  Ltr,  IAOPS-PL,  sub J* 
INSCOM  After  Action  Re^rt  for  JCS  CPX  POWDER  RIVER  85.  encl 
<31  Jsn  65)  (C).  ' 
Encl,  INSCOM  After  Aotion  Report,  op.  cit.t  FT  1985  DCSOPS  AHR 
(TSCW),  p.*  317.    
Ltr,  IAOPS-PL,  subjt  INSCOM  Letter  of  Instruction  for  JCS 
Exercise  WINTEX-CIMEX  65  (18  Dec  84)  (S);  Msg  IAOPS-PL, 
subjt  OSAINSCOM  First  Impression*  Report  for  Exercise 
WINTEX-CIMEX  85  (18  Mar  85)  (S);  Addendum  to  msg  (S-C 
Fac^heet,  IAOPS-PL,  subjt  Command  Group  Visit  % 
Pte  (8  Jul  85)  (S);  FT  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW)" 
EWTlAOPS-IS-W,  subjt  O.S.  Army  Requirement  for  Direct 
Weather  Support  (16  Jul  85)  (S);  conversation  with  Mr.  Herbert 
Tax,  DCSOPS,  4  Aug  86. 
FT  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  p.  DO. 
Ibid.,  pp.  43-48. 
2. 
3. 
4. 
5. 
6. 
7. 
8. 
9. 
10. 
IMINT/MASINT 
7V 
2. 
3. 
4. 
5. 
6. 
7. 
8. 
9. 
FT  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  pp.  18,  23. 
Ibid.,  p.  20. 
Fact  Sheet,  ADCSOPS,  subjt  INSCOM* s  MASINT  Activities  in 
Europe  (8  Aug  85)  (S/WNINTEL). 
Ibid.?  FT  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  p.  19;  conversation  with  Ms. 
Ruby  Benacquista,  DCSOPS,  25  Jul  66. 
FT  1965  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  p. 
Info  Paper,  IA0PS-E0,  subjt 
Info  Paper,  IA0PS-E0,  subjt 
Info  Paper,  IA0PS-E0,  subjt 
to  SOUTHCOM  (18  Oct  84)  (S). 
FT  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  pp. 
Ibid.,  p.  26. 
Ibid.,  p.  29;  Fact  Sheet,  IAOPS-I,  subjt 
Activity-Korea  (27  Aug  85). 
J 15  Nov  85)  (C); 
      (15  Nov  85)  (C); 
)M  Electro  Optics  Support 
21-22. 
Imagery  Systems 
105 
uSEONLY 
119
USE ONLY 
10. 
11. 
12. 
13. 
14. 
15. 
Fact  Sheet,  ADCSOPS,  oubjt    INSCOM'a  IMINT  Activities 
In  Europe  (9  Aug  85)  (S/NOFORN). 
Info  Paper,  IA0PS-I,  sub  J:    1KINT  Action*  in  Europe  (29 
Jul  85). 
DF,  IA0PS-IMINT/E0,  aubjx     10  Inspections  (1  Aug  85)  (S/NOFORN). 
FZ  1985  DCSOPS  ARR  (TSCW),  p.32. 
Ibid.,  p.  30.  ^^p^p^ 
Ibid.,  p.  27|  Mag.,  ZAOPS-OW,  subjt     Froj«ot|  I  Update 
ov  84)  (S/NOFORN)  t  Memo  for  C  of  S,  subjt     Crash  of  T 
ir  Vehicle  (AV)  #12  (25  Jun  85)  (S). 
1985JJCSQES^HRjTSCH)t  pp.  35-36}  Fact  Sheet,  IA0PS-I, 
subjtj  WIS  Jun  86)  (S)f  DF,  DAMO-FDI,  subjs. 
M        V (12  Jul  85)  (S)|  Fact  Sheet,  IA0PS-I,  aubj: 
_    m  (26  Jun  85)  (S). 
HOMINT/TAREX   . 
I.  FY  1985  DCSOPS  ARR  (TSCW),  p.  65. 
2.  Ibid. 
3.  Ibid.,  p.  68. 
4.  Ibid.,  p.  69* 
5.  Ibid.,  pp.  75-76J  Ltr,  XAOPS-H,  sub J: 
Implementation  Plan  (30  Aug  85)  (C/N0F0RN77 
6.  FY  1985  DCSOPS  ARR  (TSCW),  pp.  58-61f  65. 
7*  Ibid.,  p.  92{  conversation  with  Mr.  James  C.  Oerhart,  ADCSOPS- 
H,  25  Jun  86. 
8.  FY  1985  DCSOPS  ARR  (TSCW),  pp.  78-84. 
9.  Ibid.,  p.  77. 
10.  FY  1985  ASD  ARR  (S)|  FY  1985  DCSOPS  ARR  (TSCW),  pp.  70-72. 
II.  FY  1985  DCSOPS  ARR  (TSCW),  p.  77. 
12.  Ibid.,  pp.  90-91. 
<3«  Ibid.,  p.  99* 
14.  FY  1955  ASA  History  (TSCW),  Vol.  I,  p.  83}  FY  1973  ASA  History 
(TSCW),  p.  28. 
15.  FY  1985  DCSOPS  ARR  (TSCW),  p.  94. 
16.  FY  1984  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  p.  23. 
17.  FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  p.  93* 
18.  Ibid.,  p.  95. 
19.  Ibid.,  p.  97. 
20.  Ibid.,  p.  96. 
21.  Ibid.,  p.  98. 
22.  Ibid.,  p.  101. 
23.  Ibid.,  p.  102. 
S 
SIGINT/EW 
2. 
FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  pp.  142-44. 
Ibid.,  p.  121 |  Ltr,  IAOPS-SE-SP,  subjt 
IPR,  End  1  (23  Jan  85)  (S-CCO). 
INSCOM/OACSI  SIGINT/EW 
USE ONLY 
120
FOR 
EONLY 
'3. 
5. 
6. 
7. 
8. 
9* 
10. 
11. 
12. 
13. 
14. 
15. 
16. 
17. 
18. 
19. 
20. 
21. 
22. 
23. 
24. 
* 
26. 
27. 
28. 
29. 
30. 
31. 
32. 
FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  p.  107f  Ltr,  IA0PS-SE-SP,  op.  elt.t 
oonveraation  with  LTC  Knight,  DCSFI,  17  Jul  86.  •  . ,  . 
FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  p.  149. 
Ibid.,  pp.  128-31 s  Info  DP,  IA0PS-SE-SM0,  subjt    Analysis  of 
Project  V    BP(7  Jun  85)  (S-CCO). 
FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  pp.  128-31* 
FY  1984  INSCOM  AHR  (TSCW),  p.  67|  FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW), 
pp.  115-16. 
FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  pp.  119-20. 
Ibid.,  p.  157}  1984  Travis  Trophy  Nomination  Briefing  (TSCW), 
pp.  1-2. 
FY  1984  INSCOM  AHR  (TSCW),  p.  71. 
FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  pp.  125-26. 
Ibid.,  p.  127. 
Ibid.,  pp.  .137-38. 
138. 
103. 
104. 
.  160-61. 
      132-34;  FY  1985  501st  MI  Op  AHR  (S/NOFORN),  p.  18. 
FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  pp.  150-51;  Ltr,  IACG,  subj:  1985 
Fell  Commanders •  Conference,  End  1  (13  Sep  85)  (TSCW);  Ltr, 
IAOPS-SE-SP,  op^.  clt..  End  1. 
FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  p.  146. 
Ibid.,  pp.  146-47. 
Ltr,  IAHK-0P,  subj:  Southeast  Asia  Task  Force  (C),  End  1 
(17  Jun  85)  (S-CCO). 
Briefing  by  FS  San  Antonio,  28  Dec  84;  Msg,  IAOPS-SE-0, 
subj:  CENTAM  SIGINT  Initiatives  (241515Z  Sep  85)  (S-CCO), 
pp.  1-3;  FY  1985  CONUS  MI  Gp  AHR  (S),  p.  8. 
Summary  Trip  Report,  COL  Robert  M.  Bowe  (21  Oct  85) »  PP*  1-2» 
Mag,  IAOPS-SE-0,  op^  clt..  pp.  8-9* 
FY  1985  FS  Panama  AHR  (S-CCO),  ch  III,  p.  5;  Mag,  IAOPS-SE-0, 
op.  clt.,  p.  10;  FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  pp.  135-36;  Fact 
Sheet,  IAOPS-SE-0,  subj:  CENTAM  Fixed  SIGINT  Operations 
(5  Oct  85)  (TSCW). 
Ltr,  IA0PS-0R-GC,  subj:  El  Salvador:  Tactical  Update  (18 
Oct  85)  (S/N0F0RN/CC0). 
FY  1983  INSCOM  AHR  (TSCW),  pp.  110-11;  FY  1985  DCSSYS  AHR 
(S-CCO),  pp.  55-56. 
FY  1984  INSCOM  AHR  (TSCW),  pp.  75-76;  FY  1983  INSCOM  AHR 
(TSCW),  p.  108;  FY  1985  DCSSYS  AHR  (S-CCO),  p.  59. 
FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  p.  105. 
\ 
% 
USE ONLY 
121
■■JSV-M.1." 
FOR. 
USEONLY 
Countcrlntelllgence/Operatlons  Security 
xO.  FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  p.  296;  Ltr,  DAMI-CIC,  subJcArmy 
Security  and  Investigative  Activities  (SUA)  Program  Guidance 
Memorandum  (POM)  (26  Apr  85)  (S);  FY  1985  902d  HI  Oroup  AHR 
(S),  eh  XXI,  Annex  J|  FY  1985  FCA  AHR  (S),  pp.  1.  10. 
FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  pp.  278-81. 
Info  Paper,  XAOPS-CI-PG,  aubj:  XNSCOM  Polygraph  Program 
Status  (8  Nov  85)  (U). 
FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  pp.  275-77,  293. 
Fact  Sheet,  IAOPS-CI-OC,  aubj:  Clarification  of  Statistical 
Data  for  Otto  Gilbert  Testimony,  Tab  A  (16  Apr  85)  (0);  Ltr, 
DAMI-CIC,  aubj:  Aggressive  Counterespionage  Initiatives 
(30  Aug  85)  (S). 
FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  pp.  29U-95;  Ltr,  DAMI-CIC,  S&IA  PGM, 
pp.  olt. 
2. 
3. 
4. 
5. 
6. 
7. 
6. 
9. 
10. 
-11. 
12. 
-13. 
14. 
15. 
16. 
17. 
18. 
19. 
-20. 
-21. 
22. 
'23. 
^24. 
FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  pp.  259-64. 
Fact  Sheet,  XAOPS-CI-RAP,  aubj:  USAREUR-Direeted  Mission  RE: 
Overt  Surveillance  of  SMLM-F  (28  May  85)  (C):  FY  1985  527th 
MI  Bn  AHR  (S),  p.  74. 
FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  pp.  213-16;  Ltr,  XAOPS-CI-P,  aubj: 
Counter-SIGINT  Concept  (28  Aug  85)  (U). 
Ltr,  XAOPS-CI-P,  aubj:  Counter  Signals  Intelligence 
(Count er-SIGIKT)  Concept  (29  Apr  85)  (U);  Msg,  aubj:  Counter 
SIGINT  in  Theater  (081330Z  Aug  85)  {0)1  Fact  Sheet,  IA0PS-CI- 
OS,  aubj:  Counter-SIGINT  Support  under  Army  of  Excellence 
(AOE)  (5  Sep  65)  (0). 
Concept  Paper,  XAOPS-CI-OS,  aubj:  National  Communication 
Security  (COMSEC).  Assessment  Center  (NCAC)  (28  Aug  85)  (C). 
FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  pp.  165-66. 
Ibid.,  pp.  185-94. 
Ibid.,  p.  254. 
Ibid.,  pp.  217-20. 
Ibid.,  pp.  241-42. 
Ibid.,  pp.  242-431  Ltr,  XAOPS-CI-OS,  aubj:  Summary  of  1984 
COMSEC  Insecurities  (6  May  65)  (S). 
FY  1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW 
\ 
ract  snee 
85)  (S). 
1985  DCSOPS  AHR  (TSCW),  pp.  232-3* 
Ibid.,  pp.  205-08. 
Ibid.,  pp.  265-66. 
Ibid.,  pp.  267-69. 
-CI-OS,  aubj:  Army  Cryptonet  Review  (5  Sep     ^ 
FOR 
SEONLY 
122
Fj7ir"">-*T".f.T^*pj  i!.:.,^t|iiv«p},,  v 
■PWBWPPWP^^ 
APPENDIX  A 
U&INSOOM  ORGANISATIONAL  STRUCTURE 
(As  of  30  September  1985) 
OIC 
*+  IMffiQ  668  XW  (1) 
to 
CO 
Onlt  Designation 
§ 
HEADQUARTERS,  U.S.  ARMY  INTELLIGENCE  AND  SECURITY  COMMAND 
U.S.  Army  Garrison ,  Arlington  Hall  Station 
USAINSCON  CONUS  Military  Intelligence  Group 
U.S.  Army  Field  Station  Key  Neat 
U.S.  Amy  Field  Station  San  Xntonlo 
U.S.  Amy  Element,  National  Security  Agency 
U.S.  Army  Garrison,  Tint  Hill  Farms  Station 
U.S.  Army  Field  Station  Okinawa 
U.S.  Army  Field  Station  Berlin 
U.S.  Amy  Field  Station  Sinop 
U.S.  Army  Special  Security  Group  ., 
U.S.  Amy  Programs  Analysis  Group 
U.S.  Amy  Administrative  Surrey  Detachment 
U.S.  Army  Foreign  Area  Officers  Detachment 
U.S.  Amy  Russian  Institute 
U.S.  Army  Intelligence  and  Security  Foreign  Language 
Training  Center  Europe 
U.S.  Army  Field  Station  Augsburg 
USAINSCOM  Automated  Systems  Activity 
U.S.  Army  Cryptologic  Support  Group 
USAINSCOM  Support  Activity 
U.S.  Army  Operational  Group 
U.S.  Amy  Systems  Exploitation  Detachment 
U.S.  Army  Central  Security  Facility 
USAINSCOM  Finance  and  Accounting  Activity 
Location 
5U5CW3XHXXX
1  ■«f|i;i,iw^fii|'f!jiw» 
OIC 
SmmkHM 
Unit  Designation 
HEADQUARTERS,  U.S.  ARMT  INTELLIGENCE  AND  SECURITY  COMMAND 
USAINSCOM  Maintenance  Assistance  and  Instruction  Team 
U.S.  Army  Foreign  Counterintelligence  Activity 
U.S.  Army  Systems  Exploitation  Detachment 
USAINSCOM  Administrative/Audiovisual  Support 
Activity 
U.S.  Army  Field  Station  Kunia 
USAINSCOM  Theater  Intelligence  Center  Pacific 
U.S.  Army  Intelligence  Support  Activity 
USAINSCOM  Mission  Support  Activity 
U.S.  Army  Intelligence  Exchange  and  Support  Center 
902d  Military  Intelligence  Group 
Augmentation,  902d  Military  Intelligence  Group 
USAINSCOM  Pentagon  Counterintelligence  Force 
USAINSCOM  Military  Intelligence  (Counterintelligence) 
East  Coast 
USAINSCOM  Counterintelligence  Detachment, 
Defense  Nuclear  Agency 
USAINSCOM  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
(Security) 
USAINSCOM  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
(Counterintelligence)  West  Coast 
66th  Military  Intelligence  Group 
Augmentation,  66th  Military  Intelligence  Group 
18th  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
Augmentation,  18th  Military  Intelligence 
Battalion 
5th  Military  intelligence  Company 
Augmentation,  5th  Military  Intelligence 
Company 
HHC,  502d  Army  Security  Agency  Battalion 
Augmentation,  502d  Army  Security  Agency  Battalion 
M09th  Army  Security  Agency  Company  (Operations) 
(Rear) 
CO 
5USC  603  i»HH
"■".?i™  A;1  !■'  '•T!l 
UIC 
Unit  Designation 
HEADQUARTERS,  U.S.  ARMY  INTELLIGENCE  AND  SBCURtTT  COMMAND 
66th  Military  Intelligence  Group 
HHC,  502d  Army  Seourlty  Agency  Battalion 
328th  Army  Security  Agency  Company 
581st  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
582d  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
583d  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
527th  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
Augmentation,  527th  Military  Intelligence 
Battalion 
Company  A,  527th  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
Company  B,  527th  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
430th  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
Augmentation,  430th  Military  Intelligence 
Detachment 
766th  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
Augmentation,  766th  Military  Intelligence 
Detachment 
430th  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
(Provisional) 
584th  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
470th  Military  Intelligence  Group 
Augmentation,  470th  Military  Intelligence  Group 
U.S.  Army  Field  Station  Panama 
500th  Military  Intelligence  Group 
Augmentation,  500th  Military  Intelligence  Group 
U.S.  -Army  Field  Station  Mlsawa 
149th  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
Augmentation,  149th  Military  Intelligence 
Detachment 
181st  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
Augmentation,  181st  Military  Intelligence 
Detachment 
U.S.  Army  Asian  Studies  Detachment 
Location 
CO 
en 
£12ft6.e&3jU>)U) 
ftttQftlt 
111 
»)  U)
mtu***1 
UIC 
to 
6USQ  663  .(t»)  .(X) 
Unit  Designation 
HEADQUARTERS,  U.S.  ARMY  INTELLIGENCE  AND  SECURITY  COMMAND 
HHC,  501st  Military  Intelligence  Group 
Augmentation,  501at  Military  Intelligence  Group 
U.S.  Amy  Field  Station  Korea 
332d  Military  Intelligence  Company  (Electronic 
Warfare) 
524th  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
Augmentation,  524th  Military  Intelligence 
Battalion 
209th  Military  Intelligence  Company  (Operations  Security) 
Augmentation,  209th  Military  Intelligence 
Company 
3d  Military  Intelligence  Battalion  (Aerial 
Exploitation) 
Headquarters,  Headquarters  and  Service  Company,  3d 
Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
Company  A,  3d  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
Company  B,  3d  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
HHC,  513th  Military  Intelligence  Group 
513th  Military  Intelligence  Center  (Provisional) 
174th  Military  Intelligence  Company  (Operations) 
HHC,  201st  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
17th  Military  Intelligence  Company 
166th  Military  Intelligence  Company 
U.S.  Army  EAC  Aviation  Intelligence  Company 
HHC,  202d  Military  Intelligence  Battalion  (Collection/ 
Exploitation) 
6<flst  Military  Intelligence  Company  (Collection) 
219th  Military  Intelligence  Company 
164th  Military  Intelligence  Company 
HHC,  203d  Military  Intelligence  Battalion  (Technical 
Intelligence) 
11th  Military  Intelligence  Company  (Technical 
Intelligence) 
Augmentation,  11th  Military  Intelligence 
Company  (Technical  Intelligence) 
112 
Location 
JUttfiHitiUJ
APPENDIX  B 
TOE  UNITS 
(As  of  30  September  1985) 
66th  Military  Intelligence  Group 
470th  Military  Intelligence  Group 
500th  Military  Intelligence  Group 
HHC,  501 at  Military  Intelligence  Group 
513th  Military  Intelligence  Group 
902d  Military  Intelligence  Group 
3d  Military  Intelligence  Battalion  (Aerial  Exploitation) 
16th  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
HHC,  201 at  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
HHC,  202d  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
(Collection/Exploitation) 
HHC,  203d  Military  Intelligence  Battalion  (Technical 
Intelligence) 
HHC,  502d  Army  Security  Agency  Battalion 
524th  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
527th  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
5th  Military  Intelligence  Company 
17th  Military  Intelligence  Company 
11th  Military  Intelligence*  Company  (Technical  Intelligence) 
164th  Military  Intelligence  Company 
166th  Military  Intelligence  Company 
174th  Military  Intelligence  Company  (Operations) 
209th  Military  Intelligence  Company 
219th  Military  Intelligence  Company 
332d  Military  Intelligence  Company  (Electronic  Warfare) 
328th  Army  Security  Agency  Company 
U09th  Army  Security  Agency  Company  (Operations)  (Rear) 
641st  Military  Intelligence  Company  (Collection) 
149th  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
181st  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
430th  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
581st  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
582d  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
583d  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
584th  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
766th  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
e»sc6&»ito>*l) 
113 
127
,^JMb:*i4£«*i. 
APPENDIX  C 
CHANGES  IN  STATUS  OF  TOE  ONITS 
NONE 
REGBAMD  UNCLASSXIXO  ^ 
ON       8JH0VW'  / 
BY  CDRUSAINSCOIIFOIPO 
•  Auth  Para  1-603  DoO  5200.  1-fc 
11* 
J28
•J^ 
L>1  A  XiTLJL-r 
APPENDIX  D 
TDA  UNITS* 
(As  of  30  September  1985) 
Headquarters,  U.S.  Amy  Intelligence  and  Security  Command 
U.S.  Amy  Garrison,  Arlington  Hall  Station 
USAINSCOM  CONUS  Military  Intelligence  Group 
U.S.  Army  Element,  National  Security  Agency 
USAINSCOM  Pentagon  Counterintelligence  Force 
USAINSCOM  Military  Intelligence  Battalion  (Counterintelligence) 
West  Coast 
USAINSCOM  Counterintelligence  Detachment,  Defense  Nuclear 
Agency 
U.S.  Army  Garrison,  Vint  Hill  Farms  Station 
U.S.  Army  Field  Station  Key  West 
U.S.  Army  Field  Station  Okinawa 
U.S.  Army  Field  Station  Berlin 
U.S.  Army  Field  Station  Sinop 
•U.S.  Army  Special  Security  Group 
I  U.S.  Army  Programs  Analysis  Group 
lu.S.  Army  Administrative  Survey  Detachment 
IU.S.  Army  Russian  Institute 
U.S.  Army  Field  Station  San  Antonio 
USAINSCOM  Military  Intelligence  Battalion  (Counterintelligence) 
East  Coast 
I  
U.S.  Army  Central  Security  Facility 
USAINSCOM  Finance  and  Accounting  Activity 
USAINSCOM  Maintenance  Assistance  and  Instruction  Team 
U.S.  Army  Foreign  Counterintelligence  Activity 
USAINSCOM  Support  Activity 
U.S.  Army  Operational  Group 
U.S»  Army  Foreign  Area  Officers  Detachment 
U.S.  Army  Field  Station  Augsburg 
U.S.  Army  Field  Station  Misawa 
USAINSCOM  Automated  Systems  Activity 
U.S.  Army  Field  Station  Korea 
USAINSCOM  Theater  Intelligence  Center-Pacific 
U.S.  Army  Cryptologic  Support  Group        • 
USAINSCOM  Military  Intelligence  Battalion  (Security? 
U.S.  Army  Systems  Exploitation  Detachment 
USAINSCOM  Administrative/Audiovisual  Support  Activity 
U.S.  Army  Field  Station  Kunla 
U.S.  Army  Asian  Studies  Detachment 
U.S.  Army  Intelligence  Support  Activity 
ftUSCBWJl*)^ 
115 
129
>  .*  /,«.  -«**t- 
•  -*.l^  ■  -• . 
.v*  •*.- 
U.S.  Army  Field  Station  Panama 
OSAINSCOM  Mission  Support  Activity 
USAINSCOM  Foreign  Language  Training  Center  Europe 
U.S.  Amy  EAC  Aviation  Intelligence  Company 
U.S.  Ana 
Augoenta 
Augoenta 
Augoenta 
Augoenta 
'Augoenta 
Augoenta 
Augoenta 
Augoenta 
Augoenta 
*"  Augoenta 
Augoenta 
Augoenta 
Augoenta 
Augoenta 
Augoenta 
Augoenta 
Intelligence  Exchange  and  Support  Center 
ion,  902d  Military  Intelligence  Group 
ion,  66tb  Military  Intelligence  Group 
ion,  470th  Military  Intelligence  Group 
ion,  500th  Military  Intelligence  Group 
ion,  527th  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
ion,  5th  Military  Intelligence  Company 
ion,  209th  Military  Intelligence  Company 
ion,  430th  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
ion,  766th  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
ion,  521th  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
ion,  I8lst  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
ion,  502d  Army  Security  Agency  Battalion 
Ion,  149th  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
ion,  18th  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
Ion,  501st  Military  Intelligence  Group 
ion,  nth  Military  Intelligence  Company 
6USC  662  .(b)(1) 
116 
NTIAL 
130
Unit 
APPENDIX  E 
CHANGES  IN  STATUS  OF  TDA  UNITS 
REDESIGNATED 
Eff  Date 
Authority 
From:  INSCOM  Counterintelligence  1  Oct  84 
end  Signal  Security 
Support  Battalion,  PSF 
To:    USAINSCOM  MI  Battalion  (Counterintelligence) 
Vest  Coast 
PO  63-5 ,  HQ  USAINSCOM, 
24  Sep  84 
From:  INSCOM  Counterintelligence  1  Oct  84 
and  Signal  Security 
'  Support  Battalion,  Ft  Meade 
To:    USAINSCOM  MI  Battalion  (Counterintelligence) 
East  Coast 
PO  63-4,  HQ  USAINSCOM, 
24  Sep  84 
From:  INSCOM  Security  Support    1  Oct  84 
Detachment,  Ft  Meade 
To:    USAINSCOM  Military  Intelligence 
Battalion  (Security) 
From:  U.S.  Army  Special         1  Jul  85 
Operations  Detachment 
To:    U.S.  Army  Foreign  Counterintelligence 
Activity 
PO  63-3,  HQ  USAINSCOM, 
24  St?  84 
PO  62-1,  HQ  USAINSCOM, 
17  Jul  85 
REASSIGNED 
U.S.  Army  Systems  Exploitation 
Detachment 
From:  HQ  USAINSCOM 
To:  U.S.  Army  Operational  Group 
15  May  86   PO  42-2,  HQ  USAINSCOM, 
8  May  85 
U.S.  Army  Intelligence  and 
Threat  Analysis  Center 
From:  HQ  USAINSCOM 
To:    U.S.  Army  Intelligence  Agency 
1  Dec  84    00-3,  HQS  DA, 
•  15  Feb  85 
6USC5Sa  (b)(1) 
RELOCATED 
U.S.  Army  Special  Security  Group 
From:  Pentagon,  Washington, 'DC 
To:  Arlington  Hall  Station,  VA 
117 
1  Jan  85    PO  41-1,  HQ  USAINSCOM, 
14  Jan  85 
131
Unit 
USAIMSCOM  Pentagon  Counter- 
intelligence Force 
From:  Pentagon,  Washington,  DC 
Tos  Arlington  Hall  Station,  VA 
USAIHSCOM  Pentagon  Counter- 
intelligence Force 
Froo:  Arlington  Hall  Station,  VA 
Tot  Ft.  George  G.  Meade,  MD 
Eff  Date 
18  Mar  85 
1  Jul  85 
Authority 
USAINSpOM  MI  (CI) 
East  Coast  FY  1985 
AHR 
Msg,  CDR  OSAINSCOM, 
6  May  85 
^paittlU 
132
r^.mMti>^^^'^-'w''tm'^m^'*vi>mmrmm 
,<fcijM[Y  ^pty&*w%&4^**iy**£Ci!! 
APPENDIX  P 
USAINSCOM  PERSONNEL  STRENGTH  BT  ulftT* 
(As  of  30  September  1985) 
ACTUAL  STRENGTH 
CO 
Ca3 
Command  or  Unit 
OPP 
HQ9  U.S.  Army  Intelligence  and  Security 
Coanand  (INSCOM) 
USAG,  Arlington  Hail  Station 
USAINSCOM  CONUS  Military  Intelligence 
Group  (SIGINT/BW) 
U.S.  Amy  Element,  National  Security 
Agency 
USAG,  Vint  Hill  Pants  Station 
U.S.  Amy  Field  Station  Key  West 
••U.S.  Amy  Administrative  Survey 
Detachment 
USAINSCOM  Automated  Systems  Activity 
11th  Military  Intelligence  Company 
(Technical  Intelligence)  v/ 
Augmentation 
U.S.  Army  Pield  Station  San  Antonio 
V*S»   Army  Central  Security  Facility 
USAINSCOM  Finance  and  Accounting 
Activity 
USAINSCOM  Maintenance  Assistance 
and  Instruction  Team 
••U.S.  Army  Poreign  Area  Officers 
Detachment 
U.S.  Army  EAC  Aviation  Intelligence 
Company 
•The  table  Is  taken  from  DCSPER,  INSCOM  Command  Strength  Report  dtd  30  Sep  85* 
••As  of  31  August  1985. 
■■m-  ••■' 
■i'V-'iff 
AOCHSCATE 
)??ii. ... 
..  «a 
oinoimxbiiu 
119 
IAL
ACTUAL  STRENGTH 
Command  or  Unit; 
OFF 
WO 
ENL 
MIL  TOTAL 
Clf 
AGGREGATE 
USAINSCOM  Support  Activity 
U.S.  Army  Foreign  Counterintelligence 
Activity 
U.S.  Army  Operational  Group 
U.S.  Army  Special  Security  Group 
USAINSCOM  Administrative/Audiovisual 
Support  Activity 
902d  Military  Intelligence  Group  w/ 
Augmentation 
USAINSCOM  Pentagon  Counterintelligence 
Force 
USAINSCOM  Counterintelligence  Detachment, 
Defense  Nuclear  Agency 
17th  Military  Intelligence  Company 
174th  Military  Intelligence  Company 
HHCt  Z026  Military  Intelligence 
Battalion  (Collection  Exploitation) 
USAINSCOM  Mission  Support  Aotlvlty 
U.S.  Army  Intelligence  Exchange  and 
Support  Center  (IESC) 
HHC,  203d  Military  Intelligence 
Battalion  (Technical  Intelligence) 
513th  Military  Intelligence  Group 
v/Augmentatlon 
HHCf  201at  Military  Intelligence 
Battalion 
USAINSCOM  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
(CI)  East  Coast  (Ft  Meade,  MD) 
USAINSCOM  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
(CI)  West  Coast  (Pres  of  SF,  CA) 
GO 
6USC  663  (b)(1)
"*ryft"  -«*  ****  "ft  ■  ■■  - •••»».-  ■r"'-<v>wm-'.ruwm,  iKji'iiiipiP  n^^'^jyj|ur'^f^g|ppp^p|Hp||p|p^|p||pMM 
ACTUAL  STRENGTH 
Command  or  Unit 
USAINSCOM  Military  Intelligence 
Battalion  (Scty) 
l6Hh  Military  Intelligence  Company 
166th  Military  Intelligence  Company 
219th  Military  Intelligence  Company 
TOTAL  CONUS 
i»70th  Military  Intelligence  Group 
w/Augmentatlon 
U.S.  Army  Pield  Station  Panama 
TOTAL  CARIBBEAN 
••USAINSCOM  Theater  Intelligence  Center- 
Pacific 
U.S.  Army  Pield  Station  Okinawa 
U.S.  Army  Pield  Station  Misawa 
500th  Military  Intelligence  Group  w/ 
Augmentation 
••HHC,  501st  Military  Intelligence  Group 
Augmentation 
181st  Military  Intelligence 
Detachment 
••209th  Military  Intelligence 
Company  (Operations  Security) 
U.S.  Army  Asian  Study  Detachment 
••U.S.  Army  Pield  Station  Korea 
••332d  Military  Intelligence  Company 
(Electronic  Warfare) 
OFP 
BNL 
K  L  TOTAL 
Clf 
AGGREGATE 
••As  of  31  August  1985. 
wsfi&eaxb)  (i) 
121
CO 
CO 
.vniv*j.>  ■  wnpinP'>,|Jf*" .  ■^ »»»TVr-!  *"'""  '  5»,W| 
Command  or  Unit 
1*9th  Military  Intelligence 
Detachment 
U.S.  Army  Field  Station  Kunla 
••3d  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
(Aerial  Exploitation) 
•»HHCf  52Hh  Military  Intelligence 
Battalion 
TOTAL  PACIFIC 
0.S.  Army  Cryptologlc  Support  Group 
■•O.S*  Army  Field  Station  Berlin 
D.S.  Army  Field  Station  Augsburg 
66th  Military  Intelligence  Croup  v/ 
Augmentation 
5th  Military  Intelligence  Company 
HHC,  l'8th  Military  Intelligence 
Battalion 
*30th  Military  Intelligence 
Detachment 
527th  Military  Intelligence  Battalion 
766th  Military  Intelligence 
Detachment 
HHC,  502d  Army  Security  Agency 
Battalion 
328th  Army  Security  Agenoy 
Company 
409th  Army  Security  Agency  Company, 
Operations  (Rear) 
581st  Military  Intelligence 
Detachment 
••As  of  31  August  1985. 
OFF 
VO 
ACTUAL  STRENGTH 
EHL      MIL  TOTAL 
CI? 
AGGREGATE 
6USC  6S3  (b)  (1) 
122
-'MWfjf  *m*njm  urn '  wm  k  ■  ■  <ujw>  '  n-ywiPW PUP^r-1^^^ 
|PJ*WP»»WP»PP*«»^iJ"| 
ACTUAL  STRBNOTfl 
Command  or  Unit 
582d  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
583d  Military  Intelligence  Detachment 
581th  Military  Intelligence 
Detachment 
U.S.  Army  Field  Station  Slnop 
•■U.S.  Army  Russian  Institute 
••USAINSCOM  Foreign  Language  Training 
Center  Europe 
TOTAL  EUROPE 
••As  of  31  August  1985* 
OFF 
MO 
EHL 
MIL  TOTAL 
CI? 
AGGREGATE 
wscewjibjci) 
•  • 
CO 
-*2 
123 
TIAL
APPENDIX  G 
PROVISIONAL  UNITS 
(As  of  30  September  1985) 
U30th  Military  Intelligence  Battalion  (Provisional) 
513th  Military  Intelligence  Center  (Provisional) 
138
APPENDIX  B 
CHANGES  IN  STATUS  OP  PROVISIONAL  UNITS 
DISCONTINUED 
Unit 
USAINSCOM  Security  Support 
Battalion  (Provisional) 
Eff  Data    Authority 
1  Oct  8K    PO  63-3 1  RQ  USAINSCOM, 
2U  Sep  8K 
•Upon  redesignation  of  XNSCOM  Security  Support  Detachment,  Ft.  Meade  to 
USAINSCOM  Military  Intelligence  Battalion  Security. 
125 
REGRiDEDUKCLASSinD    v 
on   S  9  NOV  W 
BT    CDR  USAINSCOM  FOIPO 
AuthPara  1-603  DoD  5200.  1-1 
^^•■IKI 
139
CO 
APPENDIX  I 
USAINSCOM  KEY  PERSONNEL 
Position/Name 
COMMANDING  GENERAL 
MG  Harry  E.  Soyster 
DEPUTY  COMMANDING  GENERAL 
BG  Charles  F.  Scanlon 
BG  Janes  V.  Hunt 
DEPUTY  COMMANDING  GENERAL,  SUPPORT 
BG  Charles  F.  Scanlon 
DEPUTY  COMMANDING  GENERAL,  INTELLIGENCE 
BG  Janes  V.  Hunt 
COMMAND  SERGEANT  MAJOR 
CSM  Sanny  V.  Vise 
CSM  George  V.  Howell,  Jr. 
CHIEF  OF  STAFF 
BG  George  J.  Walker 
COL  Richard  J*  Powers,  Jr. 
COL  Louis  D.  Kirk 
DEPUTY  CHIEF  OF  STAFF 
♦LTC  Eugene  Johnson 
SECRETARY  OF  THE  GENERAL  STAFF 
MA J  Grady  J.  Howell,  Jr. 
DSAINSCOM  LIAISON  OFFICE,  FORSCOM 
LTC  Buddy  L.  Parker 
USAINSCOM  LIAISON  OFFICE,  TRADOC 
LTC  Perry  E.  Cole 
USAINSCOM  LIAISON  OFFICE,  USAREUR 
LTC  Donald  Tait 
USAINSCOM  LIAISON  OFFICE,  USAICS 
MAJ  Dallas  M.  Vibbert 
USAINSCOM  LIAISON  OFFICE,  USACACDA 
MAJ  John  L.  Pannier 
126 
FaGKADJ^  U*"Cr..£SSIFIED 
03   2  3  NOV  1987 
VY  CHVJSAIHS20XS0XPO 
^fcrsr&i-eosr'O-vvoo.  i ••: 
Dates  Served 
29  Jun  84  •  Present 
19  Feb  65  -  Present 
30  Sep  82-7  Feb  85 
Nov  83  -  19  Feb  85 
30  Sep  82  -  C7  Feb  85 
30  Dec  Q4 
15  Mar  82 
19  Feb  85 
21  Nov  84 
31  Jan  84 
Present 
30  Dec  84 
Present 
19  Feb  85 
21  Nov  84 
Jul  84  -  Present 
05  Jun  64  -  Present 
28  Mar  84  -  Present 
30  Sep  83  •  Present 
05  Oct  83  -  Present 
21  Jun  84  -  May  85 
29  Oct  82  -  15  Dec  84 
140
Position/Name 
USAINSCOM  LIAISON  OFFICE,  NSA 
COL  James  P.  Brown 
SENIOR  RESERVE  COMPONENT  ADVISOR 
COL  Robert  E.  Elmore 
CHIEF,  OFFICE  OF  ORGANIZATIONAL 
EFFECTIVENESS 
MA J  Paul  A.  Mann 
CPT  B.E.  Prestridge 
INSPECTOR  GENERAL 
COL  Robert  L.  Wolf 
STAFF  JUDGE  ADVOCATE 
COL  John  R.  Thornoek 
COL  Edward  S.  Adamkerwlcz,  Jr. 
STAFF  ADVISOR  FOR  SCIENTIFIC  AND 
CRYPTO  AFFAIRS 
Mr.  Edwin  A.  Speakman 
CHIEF,  OFFICE  OF  PUBLIC  AFFAIRS 
LTC  Richard  P.  Hoik 
LTC  William  S.  Birdseye 
COMMAND  CHAPLAIN 
COL  William  T.  Smith 
SPECIAL  DISPURSING  OFFICER 
Mr.  Benjamin  Strucken 
COMMAND  PSYCHOLOGIST 
MAJ  Dennis  Kowal 
DEPUTY  CHIEF  OF  STAFF,  PERSONNEL 
COL  Arthur  A.  Remling  II 
DEPUTY  CHIEF  OF  STAFF,  INFORMATION 
MANAGEMENT 
COL  William  R.  Barnes 
DEPUTY  CHIEF  OF  STAFF,  INFORMATION 
RESOURCE  MANAGEMENT 
COL  Alan  H.  Byrne 
Dates  Served 
06  Jul  84  -  Present 
12  Sep  83  -  Present 
May  85  -  Present 
Aug  84  -  May  85 
06  Aug  84  -  Present 
01  Jul  85  -  Present 
30  Jun  82  -  1  Jul  85 
12  Aug  68  -  Present 
01  Jul  85  -  Present 
20  Oct  80  -  12  Jul  85 
06  Jul  83  -  Present 
01  Mar  84  -  Present 
Aug  84  -  Present 
31  Mar  84  -.Present 
01  May  85  -  Present 
Jun  84  -  01  May  85 
REGRADED  UNCLASSIFIED  ^ 
M         *  3  NOV  1987     "    / 
X  CDftUSAINSCOltrOXFO 
Atttb  Para  1-603  DoP  5300.  1-P 
127 
141
Position/Name 
Dates  Served 
DEPUTY  CHIEF  OF  STAFF,  PUNS,  PROGRAMS, 
AND  MODERNIZATION 
Mr.  James  D.  Davis 
DEPUTY  CHIEF  OF  STAFF,  OPERATIONS 
COL  Robert  M.  Bowe 
COL  Richard  J.  Powers,  Jr. 
DEPUTY  CHIEF  OF  STAFF,  LOGISTICS 
COL  Charles  L.  Bell 
COL  Robert  G.  Haltiner 
DEPUTY  CHIEF  OF  STAFF,  RESOURCE  MANAGEMENT 
COL  John  G.  Quest 
COL  John  A.  Oroft 
DEPUTY  CHIEF  OF  STAFF,  SYSTEMS 
Mr.  George  A.  Harvey,  Jr. 
DEPUTY  CHIEF  OF  STAFF,  TELECOMMUNICATIONS 
COL  William  R.  Barnes 
CHIEF,  COMMAND  SECURITY  OFFICE 
Mr.  Stephen  M.  Earle 
01  Oct  83  -  Present 
08  Jul  85  -  Present 
02  Jul  84  -  08  Jul  84 
Aug  85 
31  May  81 
20  Oct  84 
19  Jul  81 
Present 
Aug  85 
Present 
20  Oct  84 
03  Jan  78  -  Present 
27  Aug  84  -  01  May  65 
31  Aug  81  -  Present 
Unit/Commander 
66th  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  GROUP 
COL  John  G.  Lackey  III 
470th  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  GROUP 
COL  Thomas  K.  Newell 
COL  M.E.  Pheneger 
500th  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  GROUP 
COL  John  L.  Leide 
HHC,  501st  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  GROUP 
COL  Paul  E.  Menoher,  Jr. 
513th  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  GROUP 
COL  William  A.  Bentz 
902d  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  GROUP 
COL  Francis  W.  Cr eight on 
REGRAD©  WCLaSSUZB 
£«..  CMUSA™scoifroiw 
Auth  Para  1-603  DoD  5200.  I-* 
128 
27  Jul  84  -  Present 
10  Jul  85  -  Present 
07  Jul  83  -  10  Jul  85 
12  Jul  84  -  Present 
15  Jun  84  -  Present 
13  Aug  84  -  Present 
10  Jul  84  -  Present 
142
Unit/Commander 
Dates  Served 
USAINSCOM  CONUS  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE 
GROUP  (SIGINT/EW) 
COL  Eleas  A.  Cozanltis 
U.S.  ARMY  OPERATIONAL  GROUP 
COL  Michael  A.  Scott 
U.S.  ARMY  SPECIAL  SECURITY  GROUP 
COL  Arlelgh  D.  Waterman 
COL  George  C.  Campbell 
U.S.  ARMY  CRYPTOLOGIC  SUPPORT  GROUP 
LTC  Sherman  J.  Blanchard 
U.S.  ARMY  FIELO  STATION  AUGSBURG 
COL  Charles  S.  Simerly 
COL  Floyd  L.  Runyon 
U.S.  ARMY  FIELD  STATION  BERLIN 
COL  Kenneth  D.  Roney 
U.S.  ARMY  FIELD  STATION  KEY  WEST  - 
CPT  Charles  M.  Frechette 
U.S.  ARMY  FIELD  STATIDN  KUNIA 
COL  William  H.  Campbell 
COL  Robert  M.  Bowe 
U.S.  ARMY  FIELD  STATION  KOREA 
LTC  Ronald  W.  Carter 
U.S.  ARMY  FIELD  STATION  MISAWA 
LTC  Savatore  M.  Bruni 
LTC  Bernard  J.  Lawless 
U.S.  ARMY  FIELD  STATION  OKINAWA 
LTC  Manuel  A.  Conley 
COL  Walter  L.  Cressler,  Jr. 
U.S.  ARMY  FIELD  STATION  PANAMA 
MAJ  Dennis  A.  McGaugh 
U.S.  ARMY  FIELD  STATION  SAN  ANTONIO 
LTC  Brian  C  Warren 
LTC  John  R.  Dickson 
RE6*u°SPUirCLISSXJZfl> 
J    *  3  NOV  887  '  *> 
Atith  Para  1-603  DoD  5200.  l-j» 
129 
04  Nov  83  -  Present 
29  Jun  84  •  Present 
Dec  84  -  Present 
01  Jul  82  -  Dec  84 
17  Jun  83  -  Present 
16  Aug  85  -  Present 
15  Aug  83  -  16  Aug  85 
01  Aug  84  -  Present 
25  Jun  84  -  Present 
14  Jun  85  -  Present 
14  Jun  83  -  14  Jun  85 
15  Jun  84  -  Present 
Nov  84  -  Present 
Nov  82  -  Nov  84 
Oct  84  -  Present 
Jul  84  -  Oct  84 
Sep  84  -  Present 
26  Jul  85 
08  Jul  83 
Present 
26  Jul  85 
143
Unit/ Commander 
Dates  Served 
U.S.  ARMY  FIELD  STATION  SINOP 
COL  David  W.  Tellaan 
COL  Theodore  C.  Friehtl 
3d  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  BATTALION 
(AERIAL  EXPLOITATION) 
LTC  John  D.  Thomas,  Jr. 
LTC  Lindon  D.  Jones 
KHC,  18th  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  BATTALION 
LTC  John  C.  Linley,  Jr. 
HHC,  201st  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  BATTALION 
LTC  Robert  D*  McKay 
HHC,  202d  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  BATTALION 
CPT  Dennis  E.  Royer 
LTC  Cbarles  M.  Jackson 
HHC,  203d  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  BATTALION 
(TECHNICAL  INTELLIGENCE) 
LTC  Michael  A.  Petersen 
LTC  Neal  E.  Norman 
430th  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  BATTALION 
(PROVISIONAL) 
LTC  Raymond  T.  Haity 
LTC  James  M.  Dorton 
502d  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  BATTALION 
LTC  Carol  M.  Hemphill 
LTC  Norman  E.  Youngblood  III 
HHC,  524th  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  BATTALION 
LTC  Charles  W.  Nerburgh 
527th  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  BATTALION 
LTC  George  R.  Brock 
OSAINSCOM  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE 
(COUNTERINTELLIGENCE)  EAST  COAST 
LTC  William  A.  McDonough 
LTC  Elizabeth  G.  Tullis 
13  Aug  85  -  Present 
23  Jul  84  -  13  Aug  85 
31  Jul  85  -  Present 
15  May  83  -  03  Jul  85 
02  Jul  84  -  Present 
14  Jun  84  -  Present 
03  Jun  85  -  Present 
25  May  84  -  03  Jun  85 
07  Jun  85  -  Present 
14  Mar  83  -  07  Jun  85 
14  Jun  85  -  Present 
15  Jul  82  -  14  Jun  85 
24  Jul  85  -  Present 
02  Sep  83  -  24  Jul  85 
Jun  84  -  Present 
> 
09  Jul  84  -  Present 
25  Mar  85  -  Present 
17  Mar  83  -  25  Mar  85 
REea&ES  UNCLASSIimi  V 
©*  2  3  NQV  198?        /' 
BT  CDRUSAINSCOIIFOIPO 
Auth  Para  1-f  03  DoD  5200.  1-R 
130 
144
Unit/Commander 
Dates  Served 
USAINSCOM  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE 
(COUNTERINTELLIGENCE)  WEST  COAST 
LTC  Lawrence  Schneider 
LTC  John  A.  MoCloud  . 
OSAINSCOM  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  BATTALION 
(SECURITY) 
LTC  David  W.  Clark 
5th  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  COMPANY 
CPT  Connie  S.  Labadie 
MAJ  William  A.  Doyle,  Jr. 
11th  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  COMPANY 
(TECHNICAL  INTELLIGENCE) 
CPT  Jeffrey  C.  Holle 
CPT  William  R.  Brown 
17th  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  COMPANY 
MAJ  A.J.  Paluska,  Jr. 
164th  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  COMPANY 
CPT  Timothy  0«Neil 
CPT  Richards  A.  Rice 
166th  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  COMPANY 
CPT  Alan  S.  Taylor 
171th  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  COMPANY 
CPT(P)  William  G.  Fillman 
CPT  Elizabeth  D.  Estler 
219th  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  COMPANY  . 
MAJ  Stanley  R.  Chrzanoski 
MAJ  Harvey  H.  Latson  III 
332d  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  COMPANY 
(ELECTRONIC  WARFARE) 
CPT  Monte  F.  Hengot 
CPT  Daniel  G.  Doby 
INSCOM  EAC  AVIATION  INTELLIGENCE  COMPANY 
MAJ  Douglas  Roberts 
MAJ  Roderick  J.  Isler 
06  Aug  85  -  Present 
17  Aug  83  -  06  Aug  85 
11  Sep  81  -  Present 
25  Jul  85  -  Present 
29  Jul  84  -  25  Jul  85 
20  Sep  85  -  Present 
09  Aug  84  -  20  Sep  85 
31  Jul  84  -  Present 
17  Jun  85  -  Present 
16  Apr  84  -  17  Jun  85 
31  Jul  84  -  Present 
20  May  85  -  Present 
01  Apr  84  -  20  May  85 
14  Dec  84  -  Present 
09  Aug  83  -  14  Dec  84 
16  Aug  85 
15  Aug  84 
30  Sep  85 
02  Aug  84 
Present 
16  Aug  85 
Present 
30  Sep  85 
REGI  LADED  UBCLASSUIJH)  , 
ON    2  3  NOV  1987    '  ' 
BY     CDR  USAINSCOM  FOIFO  . 
AtttnPara  1-603  DoD  5200.  1-F 
131 
145
Unit /Commander 
328th  ARMY  SECURITY  AGENCY  COMPANY 
CPT  Nancy  B.  Sullivan 
641st  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  COMPANY 
(COLLECTION) 
MAJ  Theodore  V.  Waronioki 
CPT  David  M.  Moak 
209th  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  COMPANY 
CPT  Kevin  R.  Cunningham 
CPT  Terry.  B.  Wilson 
lH9th  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  DETACHMENT 
LTC  William  R.  Eieholz 
LTC  Lee  G.  Smith 
181st  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  DETACHMENT 
MAJ  Charles  L.  Robertson 
MAJ  Edward  C.  Olson 
409th  ARMY  SECURITY  AGENCY  COMPANY 
CPT  Jack  Home,  Jr. 
CPT  Tamara  C.  Kaseman 
66th  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  GROUP, 
DETACHMENT  HAHN 
LTC  Rodney  P.  Miller 
*   LTC  Lawrence  P.  Carr 
430th  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  DETACHMENT 
LTC  Raymond  T.  Waity 
LTC  James  M.  Dorton 
561st  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  DETACHMENT 
(IMAGERY  INTERPRETATION) 
CPT  Ann  M.  Peterson 
582d  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  DETACHMENT 
(IMAGERY  INTERPRETATION) 
CPT  Dennis  R.  Delnes 
CPT  Alexander  G.  Hodges 
583d  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  DETACHMENT 
(IMAGERY  INTERPRETATION) 
MAJ  John  J.  Ciriaco 
Dates  Served 
10  Aug  84  -  Present 
10  Jul  85  -  Present 
21  May  84  -  10  Jul  85 
16  Jun  85  -  Present 
Jun  84  -  16  Jun  85 
Jan  85  -  Present 
11  Apr  83  -  Jan  85 
17  Dec  84  -  Present 
30  Nov  83  -  17  Dec  84 
03  May  85  -  Present 
12  Dec  83  -  03  May  85 
07  Aug  85  -  Present 
01  Jan  84  -  07  Aug  85 
14  Jun  85  -  Present 
15  Jul  82  -  14  Jun  85 
04  May  84  -  Present 
19  Nov  84  -  Present 
12  May  83  -  19  Nov  84 
Jan  83  -Present 
ftEGRADSD        
0M  2  8N0V"1987     .  , 
W  CDRUSAINSCOU7OIP0 
Auth  Para  1-603  DoD  5200.  1-1 
132 
146
!*' 
Unit/Commander 
584th  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  OETACHNENT 
LTC  Bruce  N.  Ey 
766th  MILITARY  INTELLIGENCE  DETACHMENT 
LTC  Stuart  A.  Herrlngton 
U.S.  ARMY  ASIAN  STUDIES  DETACHMENT 
Mr.  Seljl  Aizawa 
USAINSCOM  CI  DETACHMENT,  DEFENSE  NUCLEAR 
AGENCY 
LTC  Will  Urn  E.  Hawkins 
U.S.  ARMY  ADMINISTRATIVE  SURVEY  DETACHMENT 
COL  Robert  W.  Sheffield 
USAINSCOM  THEATER  INTELLIGENCE  CENTER  - 
PACIFIC 
LTC  James  A.  Roberts 
Dates  Served 
09  Jan  84  *  Present 
15  Jul  83  -  Present 
01  Oct  80  -  Present 
15  Apr  83  -  Present 
20  Jul  84  -  Present 
15  Jun  84  -  Present 
U.S.  ARMY  INTELLIGENCE  EXCHANGE  AND  SUPPORT 
CENTER 
COL  Charles  R.  Cleveland 
LTC  Allen  Berg 
USAINSCOM  FOREIGN  LANGUAGE  TRAINING  CENTER 
EUROPE 
'  LTC  Alan  R.  Meyer 
LTC  James  D.  Phillips  III 
1  Aug  85  -  Present 
15  Jul  83  -  1  Aug  85 
03  Jun  85  -  Present 
29  Aug  83  -  03  Jun  85 
USAINSCOM  PENTAGON  COUNTERINTELLIGENCE  FORCE 
MAJ  Charles  C.  Glunchenhaus 
LTC  Philip  J.  Gillen,  Jr. 
USAINSCOM  AUTOMATED  SYSTEMS  ACTIVITY 
LTC(P)  Stepehn  L.  Weisel 
COL  Thomas  M.  Herri ck 
10  Jul  85  -  Present 
21  May  82-10  Jul  85 
01  Jun  85—  Present 
01  Aug  84  -  01  Jun  85 
USAINSCOM  ADMINISTRATIVE/AUDIOVISUAL  SUPPORT 
ACTIVITY 
Mr.  David  Stein 
USAINSCOM  FINANCE  AND  ACCOUNTING  ACTIVITY 
MAJ  Donald  B.  Pargoff 
30  Nov  78  -  Present 
14  May  84  -  Present 
W    CDR  USAINSCOM  FOIFO 
Auth  Para  1-603  DoD  5200.  1-R 
133 
147
^ w^s^^.^j^^f. w«j«-4  <w«cy««*./  «w.!«i^?5SSS5SSfSSf 
Unit/Commander 
USAINSCOM  SUPPORT  ACTIVITY,  PORT  MEADE 
CPT  Hark  S.  Wilkins 
CPT  Dennis  S.  Driggera 
USAINSCOM  MAINTENANCE  ASSISTANCE  AND 
INSTRUCTION  TEAM 
CPT  Larry  E.  Monger 
USAINSCOM  MISSION  SUPPORT  ACTIVITY 
Mr,  Donald  L.  Valcheff 
U.S.  ARMY  FOREIGN  COUNTERINTELLIGENCE 
ACTIVITY 
JCOL  Robert  G.  Lunt 
U.S.  ARMY  CENTRAL  SECURITY  PACILITY 
COL  Claude  H.  Johnson 
U.S.  ARMY  RUSSIAN  INSTITUTE 
COL  Don  0.  Stovall 
U.S.  ARMY  GARRISON,  ARLINGTON  HALL  STATION 
LTC  Harry  F.  Ferguson 
Dates  Served 
Aug  85  -  Present 
19  Dec  83  -  Aug  85 
15  Aug  84  -  Present 
01  Oct  82  -  Present 
21  Sep  84  -  Present 
21  Mar  83  -  Present 
11  Aug  83  -  Present 
20  Jul  84  -  Present 
U.S.  ARMY  GARRISON,  VINT  HILL  FARMS  STATION 
COL  Leland  J.  Holland 
14  Jun  83  -  Present 
REGRADED  UHCLASSUUD  * 
0N    23W0VWfl7     / 
MT    CDRUSAWSfcOMFOIPO 
Auth  Para  1-603  D?D  5200.  1-P 
134 
148
ENTIAL 
Calendar  Year 
1964 
1965 
1966 
1967 
1968 
1969 
1970 
1971 
1972 
1973 
197^ 
1975 
1976 
1977 
APPENDIX  J 
TRAVIS  TROPHY  WINNERS 
•Winner 
[53d  USASA  Special  Operations  Command) 
313th  ASA  Battalion  (Corps) 
ASA  Training  Center  and  School) 
509th  USASA  Group 
330th  ASA  Company) 
USASA  Field  Station,  Udorn 
USASA  Field  Station,  Udorn) 
USASA  Field  Station,  Berlin 
USASA  Field  Station,  Sobe 
470th  Military  Intelligence  Group 
I 
135 
149
'^ ny  -•"■-»*;»-  -;» 
NTIAL 
Calendar  Year 
1978 
1979 
Winner 
1980 
1981 
1982 
1983 
1984 
l.S.  Amy  Field  station  soi 
U.S.  Army  Field  Station  Mlsawa 
U.S.  Amy  Field  Station  Berlin 
I 
I 
U.S.  Amy  Field  Station  Berlin) 
U^SHHyFiHa^Katlon^ugsburg) 
TJTsTArayFielWtationjRugsbiirg ) 
136 
TIAL 
150
CO 
IAL 
APPENDIX  K 
DIRECTOR*S  TROPHY  WINNERS 
Calendar  Year 
1979 
•Winners 
1980 
1981 
1982 
1983 
1984 
)MINEE:  193d  Brigade  Support  Company,  Fort 
Amador,  Panama) 
r,  Oahu,  Hawaii) 
NOMINEES  372d  ASA  Co,  25th  Inf 
(ARMY 
NOMINEE:  372d  ASA  Co,  25th  Inf  Div,  Oahu,  Hawaii) 
Task  Force  138,  U.S.  Southern  Command 
^__   ___  [ARMY  NOMINEE:  T? 
iary  Intelligence  Company  (CEWI),  Panama) 
22Uth  Military  Intelligence  Battalion  (Aerial 
Exploitation) 
* 
\ 
137 
CQ 
NTIAL 
151
CON 
TIAL 
GLOSSARY 
* 
ACofS   Assistant  Chief  of  Staff 
ACS!   Assistant  Chief  of  Staff  for  Intelligence 
ACSTEL   Assistant  Chief  of  Staff,  Telecommunications 
ADC. •  ••......*.   Army  Document  Center 
ADCSLOG   Assistant  Deputy  Chief  of  Staff,  Logistics 
ADCSOPS   Assistant  Deputy  Chief  of  Staff,  Operations 
ADCSPER   i... Assistant  Deputy  Chief  of  Staff,  Personnel 
admin   administration 
ADP......   automatic  data  processing 
•  AFCITC   Adv  need  Foreign  Counterintelligence  Training 
Course 
AFP   .  apprcv  ed  funding  program 
AHR.....   ......Annual  Historical  Report 
ARS    Arlington  Hall  Station 
AIA   U.S.  Army  Intelligence  Agency 
AI8   Aviation  Intelligence  Battalion 
AIG   Acting  Inspector (s)  General 
ALO   authorized  level  of  organization 
AMC   U.S.  Army  Materiel  Command 
AOE   Army  of  Excellence 
AOR   Area  of  Responsibility 
AR   Army  Regulation 
ARDF   ,   aerial  radio  direction-finding 
ARTEP   Army  Training  and  Exercise  Plan 
ASA    .Army  Security  Agency;  Automated 
  ^_^__      Systems  Activity;  Automated  Support  Activity 
ASD   U.S.  Army  Administrative  Survey  Detachment; 
ATCAE   Army  Technical  Control  and  Analysis  Element 
ATT   American  Telephone  and  Telegraph  Company 
AURS   Automated  Unit  Reference  Sheet 
auth   authorized 
AWOL   absence  without  leave 
BER   Budget  Execution  Review 
BG   i.... brigadier  general  ' 
BIFF   Battlefield  Identification  Friend  or  Foe 
BLP   Baseline  Plan 
Bn.   battalion 
NTIAL 
153 
tjH
NTIAL 
CA   .California 
CCI .  •   Controlled  Cryptographic  Items 
CCP   Consolidated  Cryptologio  Program 
cdr/CDR • * •••••••••. commander 
CE 
 counterespionage 
CENTAM.  •   •   Central  America 
CET   Critical  Events  Templating 
CG......   commanding  general 
CHCSS.   Chief,  Central  Security  Servioe 
CI   ••••  counterintelligence 
CIA   .Central  Intelligence  Agency 
CINCDSAREOR   Commander-in-Chief,  U.S.  Army  Europe 
CIRAK   Counterintelligence  Resource  Allocation 
Model 
civ    civilian 
CMF   •••••  .Career  Management  Field 
CNL   .••.•.••.••commanders  needs  letters 
CO 
 control  office 
COB   .command  operating  budget 
CofS   Chief  of  Staff 
COL.   colonel 
CONAUTH   cryptonet  controlling  authority 
CONUS   Continental  United  States 
COS   ....CONUS  operations  site 
C&P   ••  .control  and  processing 
CPAR    collection,  processing,  analysis,  and 
reporting 
CPO   Civilian  Personnel  Office 
CPX   Command  Post  Exercise 
CSC   ,   Community  Support  Center 
CSM..,   command  sergeant  major 
CSO   •CommandSacuc^^^ffice; 
CSOC   .TomoineaTecurltyTperations  Center 
CSS   Central  Security  Service 
CSU   Conventional  Signal  Upgrade 
CTED   Civilian  Training,  Education,  and  Development 
DA...-   ,   Department  of  the  Army 
DARCOM   U.S.  Army  Materiel  Development  and  Readiness 
Command 
•a 
NTIAL 
154
TIAL 
DCA   ••..Defense  Communications  Agency 
DCG   deputy  commanding  general  * 
DCG-I.   Deputy  Commanding  General,  Intelligence 
DCG-S   .Deputy  Commanding  General,  Support 
DCS   •   Deputy  Chief  of  Staff;  Defense  Communications 
Systems 
DCSAUT......   Deputy  Chief  of  Staff,  Automation 
DCSFM. .c   Deputy  Chief  of  Staff,  Force  Modernisation 
DCSIM   Deputy  Chief  of  Staff,  Information  Management 
DCSIKT   Deputy  Chief  of  Staff  for  Intelligence 
DCSIRM   Deputy  Chief  of  Staff,  Information, 
Resource  Management 
DCSLOG.....   Deputy  Chief  of  Staff,  Logistics 
DCSOPS..... ........ Deputy  Chief  of  Staff,  Operations 
DCSPER   ••••••  .Deputy  Chief  of  Staff,  Personnel 
DCSPPM   Deputy  Chief  of  Staff,  Plans,  Programs,  and 
Management 
DCSRM   Deputy  Chief  of  Staff,  Resource  Management 
DCSSYS   ..Deputy  Chief  of  Staff,  Systems 
DCSTEL   Deputy  Chief  of  Staff,  Telecommunications 
DF   ••••  .disposition  form;  direction-finding 
DIA   Defense  Intelligence  Agency 
DIRNSA.....   Defense  Intelligence  Production  Schedule 
DIS   Defense  Investigative  Service 
DITS   Digital  Imagery  Transmission  System 
DNA   Defense  Nuclear  Agency 
DOCEX   document  exploitation 
DOCMID   Documentation  Modernization 
DOD   Department  of  Defense 
PSA   Defense  Security  Agency 
DSSCS. . .TTT^^^^DerenseSpeeiaTsecurity  Communications 
System 
EAC   echelon  above  corps 
EPDS    .Electronic  Processing  and  Dissemina'tion  System 
ESAF   European  Special  Activities  Facility 
ESC   Electronic  Security  Command 
TIAL 
155