HliPARTMENT  OF  THE  AIR  FORCE  ""  .     ESC  REGULATION  23-10 
HO  Electronic  Security  Command 
"en  Antonio,  TX  78243  15  July  1980 
Organization  and  Mission— Field 
HEADQUARTERS  ESC  REORGANIZATION  PROPOSALS 
This  regulation  states  command  policy  and  procedures  for  changing  HQ  ESC  organization  and  functions. 
1.  Organization  and  Functions.  Much  of  HQ  ESC  is  organized  according  to  standards  prescribed  by  HQ 
•JSAF  in  AFR  26-2.  The  balance  of  HQ  ESC  is  a  nonstandard  structure  set  up  to  support  mission  re- 
quirements. 
2.  Command  Policy.  Staff  functional  managers  will  not  implement  changes  to  HQ  ESC  organisation  and 
functions  until  all  requirements  of  this  directive  are  satisfied.  Command  Section  approval  of  a  proposed 
change  offered  by  a  staff  functional  manager  does  not  constitute  implementation  approval;  it  does  con- 
stitute approval  in  principle  to  submit  the  request  to  DCS/Plans  (XP)  for  further  reviewing,  developing,  and 
presenting  of  findings  to  the  Commander.  This  policy  and  the  following  procedures  apply  to  XP-^nerated 
organizational-change  proposals. 
3.  Procedures:  "  -    "  '  ■■- 
a.      Staff  functional  managers  will  arrange  to  brief  or  forward  written  proposals  for  change  to  the 
Chief  of  Staff.  This  presentation  or  documentation  will  address  the  following  minimum  points: 
(1)  Why  is  the  change  necessary? 
(2)  What  are  the  actual  organizational,  functional,  and  manpower  changes  proposed? 
(3)  What  manpower  costs  or  savings  are  involved? 
(4)  How  will  civilian  positions  and  incumbents  be  affected? 
(5)  What  changes  in  relationships  will  be  incurred  to  other  staff  elements,  to  ESC  units,  and  to 
external  sources? 
(6)  How  will  mobilization  augmentation  positions  and  incumbents  be  affected? 
(7)  When  would  the  change  be  implemented? 
b.  Assuming  Chief  of  Staff  concurrence,  the  staff  functional  managerwill  forward  a  written  proposal 
(containing  organization  charts,  functional  -statements,  manpower  change  requests  (MCRs),  justification, 
statements  of  ttZ  Total  Force  impact,  and  Chief  of  Staff  guidance)  to  XP  for  review,  development,  and 
presentation  to  the  Commander. 
c.  The  XP  review  phase  will  be  performed  with  the  functional  manager  and  will  consider  Total  Force 
needs  and,  as  a  minimum,  the  following  points:  * 
(1)  Will  HQ  USAF  approval  be  required? 
(2)  Are  the  organization  and  functional  changes  acceptable  or  are  undesirable  aspects  includ- 
ed; for  example,  duplication,  fragmentation,  and  span? 
•  (3)  Does  the  change  constitute. active  duty,  Reserve,  or  civilian  manpower  resource  re- 
quirements beyond  or  below  currently  approved  levels  by  force  structure  element?  Have  trade-offs  been 
identified  in  the  manager's  submission?  Will  a  program  change  proposal  be  required? 
Supersedes  USAFSSR  23-10, 12  March  1979.  (See  signature  page  for  summary  of  changes.) 
No  of  Printed  Pages:    2 
OPR:    XPMMO  (Mr.  b: HrMbrigeon) 
Approved  byu  Co!  Fred X  Norton  j&r. 
Writer-Editor^  "Joan  E" Grover  8 " 
Distribution:  *M;  X/  AUL/SE  (IJTUSAF  Aud  Gen/ACUB  Lib,  Norton  (1);  HQ  USAF/MPMM  (2):  HQ  USAF/!N\ 
(2);  HQ  ESC/XPMMO  $)  * 
flfck  3i
2'  ESCR  23-10 
(4)     Whai  impact  on  HQ  ESC  manpower  ceilings  is  incurred?  Js  accommodation  possible? 
S»     What  is  the  impact  on  civilian  positions  (grades,  etcetera)  and  what  does  DPC  say  in  this 
R«3  &«!*(&?  will  obtain  this  DP  input) 
i.     Th&  XP  development  phase  may  require  returning  the  proposal  to  the  staff  functional  manager  for 
f  uKikemtzt*  or  reconsidering  the  proposal  (depending  on  XP  findings  during  the  review  stage).  . 
€,  T*.cs  XP  presentation  phase  will  be  an  extensive  briefing  or  documentation  to  the  Commander  on 
the-  findings  of  the  XP  review  and  XP  organization,  manpower,  and  ceiling  recommendations  for  the  Com- 
HBN&efz  consideration  before  decision.  The  functional  manager  will  be  present  during  briefings  and  wili 
•haft  ib*  opportunity  to  offer  views  on  the  findings. 
Approval  of  the  proposal  after  this  stage  constitutes  staff  functional-manager  authority  to  imple- 
ment (he  change  except  when  the  change  requires  prior  HQ  USAF  approval.  Then,  XP  will  issue  further 
g-uici?;.ce  to  the  staff  functional  manager  regarding  the  satisfaction  of  APR  26-2  documentation  required  for 
-  !0  USAF  review. 
4.  Otaff  Implementation  and  Use.  Once  the  XP  presentation  phase  is  completed  and  the  Commander's 
approval  is  given,  XP  will  issue  approved  MCRs,  adjust  the  unit  manpower  document,  and  publish  the  Con> 
tfiar.der*s  guidance  as«appropriate  for  staff  Implementation  and  use. 
.'.3!  "HE  COMMANDER 
jWILUAMJfc  CARROU^U  Col, 
-Director  orAdnilhistratlon 
Summary  of  Changes 
Revised  to  correspond  with  HQ  ESC  reorganization.