@ ANNUAL RISTORICAL REVIEW U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND FISCAL YEAR 1985 History Office Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, Operations Headquarters, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command Arlington Hall Station Arlington, Virginia 22212-5000 (RCS CSHIS~6(R3)) September 1986 $1-233726/87
- a . s UNCLASSIFIED WARNING THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CLASSIFIED INFORMATION AFFECTING THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE ESPIONAGE LAWS, THE LAW PROHIBITS ITS TRANSMISSION OR THE REVELATION OF ITS CONTENTS IN ANY MANNER PREJUDICIAL TO THE SAFETY OR INTEREST OF THE UNITED STATES OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANY FOREIGN GOVERNMENT TO THE DETRIMENT OF THE UNITED STATES. THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE KEPT IN COMINT CHANNELS AT ALL TIMES: IT IS TO BE SEEN ONLY BY U.S. PERSONNEL ESPECIALLY INDOCTRINATED AND AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE COMINT INFORMATION ON A STRICTLY NEED-TO-KNOW BASIS. REPRODUCTION AND/OR FURTHER DISSEMINATION OF THIS DOCUMENT OUTSIDE THE U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR HQ INSCOM APPROVAL. 1ii UNCLASSIFIED
o- s Py EEE EEE EE UNCLASSIFIED PREFACE Sd (U) The Annual Historical Review was prepared in compliance with Ak 870-5, Military History: : Responsibilities, Policies, and Procedures. The purpose of the report is to provide a quick reference and research base of the significant activities, events, and accomplishments of the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) during FY 1985. Principal source materials used in compilation included the Annual Historical Reports submitted by headquarters staff elements and subordinate commands, briefings, interviews, and miscellaneous documents. (U) A portion of the MACOM Historians Conference held in May 1986 focused upon the role and importance of the Annual Historical Review. There was consensus that the review be written at a Classified level to be meaningful. The new Chief of Military History, Brigadier General Stofft is extremely supportive of the review, and it is possible that in the near future the field can see more effort on the part of the center to monitor the preparation of the reports. In October 1985, the INSCOM History Office received a kudo for its timely completion of the summaries through the years. (U0) This «enort was prepared for the first time in a number of years by the entire history staff which includes Dr. John P. Finnegan and Ms. Diane’ L. Hamm, who both wrote and edited portions of the document along with the undersigned. Final review and assembly were performed by Ms. Hamn. 4 September 1986 JAMES L. GILBERT Command Historian UNCLASSIFIED
FORWARD (U) In a letter to General John A. Wickham, Jr., Chief of Starr Arny, dated 31 July 1984, Major General Harry E. Soyster, - summarized the managerial steps which he had taken during his first year as Commander, INSCOM. Since this letter uniqueiy summarizes many of the important organizational changes occurring during the report period, it is believed that the document may serve as a suitable introduction to this year's Annual Historical Review. (U) "During my first year in command I have overseen @ Significant Change in the thrust of INSCOM missions, functions, and operations. Although I would like to take credit for all these changes, many have been additional taskings to support the Arny's intelligence and security requirements. The new challenges have been across a)l of our disciplines. The missions that have affected our current resources most are projects for Central America (CENTAM), Special access programs, increased counterintelligence and espionage investigations and operations, more polygraph examinations, implementation of a Head of Contracting Activity (BCA), and the increasing requirements for the Arny's new training initiative, TROJAN. Last March, I recognized that only limited resources to meet these new demands would be provided. Accordingly, I directed my staff to undertake a thorough review of the missions and funetions of the INSCOM headquarters staff elements. ‘Concurrently, ZI began to look at the headquarters staff as soon as possible. The purpose of the staff review was to realign my existing resources to address our most pressing missions. I felt it was imperative that ZI eiiminate or reduce those efforts that were in conflict with the new and higher priority intelligence and security requirements, In May, I approved a 10 percent realignment of the INSCOM headquarters staff spaces and transferred 80 percent of those spaces to subordinate INSCOM units to mect operational) requirements. (U) "This realignment will provide resourcing for a number of high priority INSCOM missions. I am providing staffing for TROJAN operational and logistical management and some initial field Operations. I am, however, concerned about the seemingly exponential increase in TROJAN systems without any increase in resources. I will provide the initial resources to successfully initiate our new Head of Contracting Authority mission requirements. This requirement grew out of the DAIG investigation of Special Mission Funds. I am establishing a capability to respond to low-intensity warfare requirements for quick reaction systems development. This capability will ensure that INSCOM can successfully field new systems such as (Echelon Above SUSC552 (b) £2) vii
§uSc552 b) Corps Aviation Company), GE re2ctery Piloted Vehicles Cr) aa 3S S Ground Support Module), RG-8 powered gliders, an rigibles. TI am also looking closely at the command and control mechanism, the Aviation Intelligence Battalion (AIB), that will bring these high technologies together initially in SOUTHCOM but will have the capability of deploying anywhere in the world. I have further strengthened my intelligence oversight staffing to ensure active assistance for these expanding operations. JI am applying resources to meet our increasing requirements in support of operational security projects and special access programs. Finally, the echelon above corps eryptologic effort will receive reinforcement for CENTRAM. (U) "In addition to those actions taken to orient the headquarters on our priority missions, we will begin consolidating our headquarters elements currently at Fort Meade to Arlington Hall Station. We will begin this move by the end of the year. We are also planning to consolidate our CONUS counterintelligence command, the 902d MI Group, at Fort Meade and reorganize functionally as opposed to geograpiically. We have just begun to assess whether the functions of the INSCOM Intelligence Threat and Analysis Center in the Pacific can be eliminated and its functions placed in other Arny commands. (U) "The reductions I have directed will not be without costs. I at eliminating the existing MACOM liaison officers but retaining the ifaison function at the National Security Agency. I have redirected the assets that currently work in the HUMINT area of biogrephics. We are consolidating OPSEC (operations security) support functions. As a result, many commanders throughout the ray will be supported from field offices throughout a geographical area rather than dedicated OPSEC support personnel on their respective staffs. In addition some areas of OPSEC, support will be reduced and in some cases elminated. For example, I expect that Operational Security Evaluations will be performed by local security managers rather than expert INSCOM operational security personnel. The major reduction of headquarters functions lies in administrative support functions. I expect a slowdown in responsiveness in some areas but will accept this in view of the gain we will experience in higher priority areas. (U) "I have instructed my commanders to undertake a similar review of their headquarters staffs and orient on operations within their intelligence disciplines and geographical areas. My commanders will advise me of their findings and subsequent actions during ny 1985 INSCOM Commanders’ Conference in late October. ix
UNCLASSIFIED (0) “As I have highlighted, it was imperative that I eliminate or reduce those efforts that did not totally support the new and higher priority Army intelligence and security requirements that have been given us. With this extensive look at our utilization of resources, I believe that I have aligned ny efforts to successfully meet the new challenges. We will be integrating these changes as swiftly as possible-estarting immediately. Reprogramming to implement these formal organizational changes has been addressed in the Command Operating Budget submission and will be implemented in organizational documents during the next two "Management of Change (MOC) Windows." One major consideration that continually has an impact on my decisions are the different rules and procedures that must be adhered to. As you are aware, INSCOM units are resourced by a wide variety of programs for both funds and perscnnel spaces. Realignments in INSCOM resources must be consistent with the Management procedures that dominate our complex resource management requirements, i.e., Consolidated Cryptologic Program (CCP), General Defense Intelligence Program (GDIP), Foreign Counterintelligence Program (FCI), Security and Investigative Activities (S&IA), and the limitations of these diversified programs. Because intelligence collection and counterintelligence requirements will continue to expand, I am sure that the headquarters reduction and space realignment I have taken to meet our expanding operational requirements are in keeping with your stated requirement to accomplish manpower savings. While they do not represent direct savings for future combat forces, these actions are intended to ensure the best possible intelligence support for these combat forces and for the intelligence units already engaged. (U) "As my commanders complete their evaluations of their grganizations and initiate their resource realignments, I expect a major shift of resources throughout the command that will meet the new challenges INSCOM has been directed to perform for the Arny. In summary, we are making and will continue to make, significant changes in INSCOM to streamline and more effectively carry out our growing mission." (U) In a reply letter from General Wickham which was dated September 10, 1985, the Chief of Staff Army largely confirmed the actions which Major General Soyster had taken. ‘ (U) "In view of the cap we have on military and civilian end strengths, your resource realignments in response to changing missions and functions are on the mark and have additional benefit of returning soldiers to field units. By asking your subordinate commanders to orient more of their resources towards operational requirements, similar results should be achieved, xi UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED (U) "Your assessment of the requirement for the Intelligence Threat Analysis Center in the Pacific should be completed expeditiously. The results of your review will be a factor irr deciding now intelligence support can best be provided to the Commander, WESTCOM. I have asked the ACSI to determine whether the WESTCOM G2 capability should be enhanced, or if such support can be provided by the Commander, PACOM. (0) "ZX encourage you to continue to realign counterintelligence resources to meet priority requirements such as special access program support, polygraph examinations, and counterespionage operations. To be effective, operational security must come from field organizations. The commander and his staff must take the lead to implement sound operational security policies and practices. I support your efforts to energize commanders, but I an concerned that local security managers may lack expertise to conduct Operational Security Evaluations. The ACSI plans to address this issue separately."! xiii UNCLASSIFIED
’ UNCLASSIFIED FOOTNOTES: FOREWORD 1. Ltr, IACG, subj: Resource Realignment (31 Jul 85) (0); * Ltr, CSA, subj: Resource Realignment (10 Sep 85) (U). xv UNCLASSIFIED 8
Chapter CONTENTS I. MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND LOCATION Mission and Functions. cccccccccscsccscsecsceseeses Transfer of Production Functions. ccccvcsccccesces INSCOM's Mission and Goals.ccoccccccccsccsccvccecs Transfer of the Arawy Biographic Repository...ccee Transfer of DA Intelligence Dissemination Validation Office. csccccsccsesccescccccccsvcccse Support to Low Intensity Conflict.cccccccccscccces Location. cocccccsecesencccnesevccssenseeesescccce II. COMMAND AND STAFF RELATIONSHIPS Command Staff Relationships. cccccecsscsvccccesece Executive Authority for TROJAN. coccccccoveseceses High Technology/Low Intensity Conflict..ccccscere Command and Control of Echelon Above Corps (EAC) Intelligence Units. cccscccsccccccscccscnsceceece Changes in TRADOC/INSCOM on Combat/Training Development. cccccccccccveccssesesessesevessnseve \ III. ORGANIZATION INSCCOM Organization. ecccereccccccccccccccscsesece Resubordination of U.S. Liaison Branch. cccccceos Transfer of HQ Spaces to Subordinate Units.....0- Consolidation at Arlington Hall Station.ceccscces HQ INSCOM Reorganization. cecccccccscnescesevesves Transfer of Detachment Hahnecceseccccscccccccecsece Relocation of Pentagon Counterintelligence Force cccscccccccccecccceseceseeeeseeeceseseseses Relocation of the USA Special Security Group..... Reorganization of the 902d MI Group.ccccccccccses Reassignment of the USA Systems Exploitation Detachment. scccccssecccsesecsecsesssccsscvesesss Reorganization and Redesignation of the USA Special Operations Detachment. ccccsccccccsescecs Establishment of Subcontrol Offices..cccccccceces Military Intelligence Battalion (Low Intensity).. HUMINT Subarchitecture--POW Interrogation and Document Exploitation Activities During Wartime. ccoccccccsccccecsesecesesceseessssessoees Operational Guides (0G) for EAC Intelligence and Electronic Warfare (IEW) Units. cocccvecscvccssece e xvii UNCLASSIFIED COND LDEPIALT™ Vere FWA aw oOo @-~)-) 14 22 22 23 23 25 25 26 29 29 29 30 30 31
= Chapter IV. RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT Operations and Maintenance, Army (OMA) Funds.ccose Fanily Housing UNL te. wecccccccccccccccccccenccece INSCOM Program and Budget Guidance, FY 1985 (Authorized Strength) cccccccccccccccsccscececce Civilian Strength by Program. ccccccasccccccesccce Morale ané Welfare. accccccccccsccccccccccccescoes Command Officer Personnel Strength. csecccccccccce HQDA Reenlistment AWAPd. cccvccccccccccscccccccces Operations and Maintenance, Army (OMA) Funds...s. ADP SOCurityeccccccesccccccccccsvccccccccececcees Microfilm Index Project for Investigative Records Repository (MIP IRR) cccccccccccccccovccccceccees Personnel SeCurity.cccccccscccccccsscccccccescece INSCOM Commanders Badges. ceccnccscccccescsccccses Public Affairs Activities. ccccccccccccccccsccsces IGAR' B. cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccecccesesces Congressional TNQUIPLES. cocccocrccccccesccccccese IG Investigations. .ccccccccccccscccssccecsesccece The Arny Space PrOgramS.scccccccccccccccccececsece Historical MOnOgraphS.ceccccccccccccecccsccsecens Program Analysis and Resource Review (PARR)..ccee Military Justice. cccccccsccccccccccccensesscesces Enlisted Personnel Strength Posture..ccsccccesccs Command Personnel Situation. ccccccccsccccccesccces INSCOM Seniof Level (13-15) Positions (High Grade) .ccccccccccccvscvccsccccescscesecesceccess PMO Advisory Committee. ccccccccccccscccccencccces Equal Employment Opportunity Program.cccrecccvccs DOD Polygraph Test Prograti.ercocccsccccceccsccsccs Kew Polygraph Facility Construction Funding...e. Freedom of Information/Privacy ACbeccccccseccccce Upward Mobility Program. cccccccccccccccescccccecs Investigative Records Repository (IRR)..csccceees Command Strength. ceccccccccccccccccescccscceseses INSCOM Headquarters Concept Design. .cccccccsscece Travis TROPNY. ccccsccccvccscvccscccscccccscscsesne Director's Trophy scccvcccccccsesasccccccrseccsecece INSCOM Key Personnel. .cccccncccccccccccncsccscsces First Annual Army HUMINT Collection Plan..ccescose INSCOM Average Grade. .ccccccccccccccccccsccsccecs SIDPERS Performance.ccvecccsccecccsccccccececcces USAINSCOM Organization Day Military/Civilian Tean AWardS.ccccccccccocccccccccenssecccceceeees xix UNCLASSIFIED GONEIDED Fit IcURER o 10
"co TIAL s . 9 7} Chapter IV. RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT (Continued) Grade Rollback PPOBPatd.cccccccccccccsccecccvecceee , Information Search on Dr. Mengele.ccccccccccceces INSCOM Commanders’ Conference. ccccccccccceceversce Performance Management and Recognition System . CPMRS) ccccccvcccccccncccccscccccevcceccescceocee BeLLAlls.cccccccccccccscccsescces PSROHOHSHSOHSSEHHHTHHOOSOHSSHOHSSEESE smission Systen (DITS) wccccee SPHOSHSHSHSHHHSHSSSHSSESEHOHSHSOSOSSSOSEHESZE (ETSC) cccccosccce SUSE B68 (>) (ay ating Distribution Achlevement.ccccccvcce Cash AwardS.ccccccccccvccscccccccsccccvescecescce INSCOM Planning PPOBraMm.coccvccccccecevssecessaes Command Intern Program. scccccccsccccccccvccvences ITIC-PAC Physical Plant. cccccccccercccccceccesese UE a OR Sa < OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES eee eeoeneecesoaoenesese SHOHSHSSKRSSCHSSSCCHSSCSHSESESEBZSE SHSEHSSHPSHHSHSHSTSHEHRSESHSHHSSSCHOSSESESESCHOES SPPOHSSSHHCHSHESHEHESCSHSSOHHHHHEEHHHHHEEED Rua ped 4D) SOCHSSRSOCSECCHSHSSEHSEHEHHEEHOE COCSHOKSESCCHCSCERESSCESEBEOBEES SSCHSSHSHSHSHSSHSHSHSHAESCHEHSHSHHAOSHHHESSCSSCEBOOCSLESHE IMINT/MASINT SCHOESOSHSHSHSHSHHSHHHSKOHSHSKESERERSOOSEHESCOCEEOS SOOSSHSSHSHSHSHOHRHSSHHSHCHHSCHHSHSSHHECEHEHSEE COHSHCEHSHHHSOSHOHSHHHSHEHHOHOEHTSCOMEOOE SOS9HSHOHSHOHSEOHSSOHEHOSSSSEHSHSSOHHEOSEEOE . POCSCSHORECCCEECEOCSCOCEEHE OS SCOSBEOTECOHOCHOHREHUOESOBE gus6 662 A>) Lad. Oe oeeseeecocerooesccoscemes Coeeogeececesesevesccccecce SP SSSHHEHHHHHTOHHHOCEHHOCEHOETOOS ¢ SCGCeeessosevneeeeseeeeeeeeeeeeseees
Chapter ° - Vv. SUSC 868 4b) (15 BUSQ 562 {>) (2) OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES (Continued) SIGINT/EW SOHSHHOHSHSSESTOTSCHHOOCESCEECOEES SSSHCHOHHOHSHEHSEHELESHSOKTESEROECES SHSSSHHESCEHOSEHCEHESCOCHOHECVOHHOCEOLO SSOSHSHHEHHSHSESHSHOHHSOCHSCHTEHOHHEDELE a SSCOOSSHHHHSHOHSOHSSHEHSHRESOHECEHOCEEOE O©OO8OCCECO eseee 3 . % eee t . x eee CHOHHHEHES ESCH HLEEOELOES , PUYTITILITIYIV ITT TTTTTe > ss | @eeeee SCCHECHOOEEE ae eecvcce SOSHSHHOSHOHSSEOHEROHOHEEHEOESOO SCHOTT ESHSEHEHOHOHOSOHOCOECOEOOOEE SOOHHOSHEAHSOCOHHOHOHOHOHEEEOOOD COSSSCOEEHSCHOHCOCHEESEOSOEROBOS SPOCHHOSEDHHSOSOHEOCOHOESEOCOSCES re SPCOHSSCHSEOCECCEOCHHEHECHHEOES * SCHPOOCHHSHOSCASEHSEHSESCHEEEOEEES C , Sr eseesesr -. fh BE SPCOCOHCHEEEEHOHCHTOESCEHDE \ PCHOHHHHSOHSESEHEDLIONEECE , CHOSHSHSHSEHCHOCHCCHOHSTOOLEOEEEOE f VOCCCEOHOHEHSEHOHOESHEEEHTOEE eeveoveaces eoeneeeecese eeeeeeeeseeeeen eeseeoeeeoeeees eeeeoeseeeeeeone @e@eeeeeseeeeecaeeseeenees SPHSHHSSHOSEHESCEEHHEHHHEHHEESEHEEHHEEH COHCHCEECESCEE EEE EEEROLE LOOSE SOHOSSHHSHOHSHSSSHSSSSHOHCHESCHHSCEEEEE OCOCOCHEOHEHOROOEHE SHOSHSSEHSHSOHSSSEHEEHEHRHAOEEEEEEOD SSSSSESHOSHEHOSHEESHEHEMECOHOTCESEOOEO a xxiii eeeteooeseeseeeese 12
Chapter V. OPERAT IVITIES (Continued) SCHOSHHSEHOHSOHESSESCH AOE TEHHESCEEEEEE SOSHSHTHSOSSOSESH*SHHOHEHEEHHESHOTCOSOCEECHS « SCHOSOSTHSCHEHHEHEHHEHEEREHOHECHOSEASEEOEEDE SOOHHSHSSHOHOHSHOSHCHSEEECHESEHETCETOELOCSE SOHSHHSEHRHSHOHEESCSOSESCESREHEBE Counterintelligence/Operations Securit POCSHSSHSECSHTOSCOSHOHRSOBESCH EEE é eeeeeeeoeoeceseeseaneenesaeeee CHOCO SHSEOHEHEOCHCHOCHHHESEOBE POEOHSOHSHSESSCHOSHSSESOSOCRERUEE COCCOCOHS CHOSE COSCHCERODBDESCE BES Personnel Security Investigation (PSI) Support eeo8 SPOOCOSSEHSSCECHCEHEHEEHCEEECHEEEE SUSQ B52 £b) (2) untereSIGI one e©oe@e00 @eeeoeneveeoooeoeaeseeovoeve SSUCS cece e ee eeeeeeeeesesereseeseneseces Key Management Automation. cccccscccscccccccsceses COMSEC Serial Number Tracking. ccccccccccccccseces COMSEC Insecurities.ccccccccccvccvccccccecesceece e@eeeetoovneeeeenee est System (MTTS)..ccccccccceccee esveeeveseseeeeeecesceaeeeneenaeeeaeeese 4 Appendix A. USAINSCOM Organization Structure..ccsccsscccccscccsece B. TOE Units. cccccccccccccncscccssecscscceesesecesesccese C. Changes in Status of TOE Units..sccccccccccccccevccees Di. TDA Units. ccccccccccccccccccscccceeccvcccceeesesseanse E. Changes in Status of TDA Units. cccrccccccccccccccccses F. USAINSCOM Personnel Strength by Unit. cccccccccscccvces G. Provisional. Units. ccccocccccccescccvecccccessecsesssecs H. Changes in Status of Provisional Units...cccccsceseces I. USAINSCOM Key PEPSOMNnel.ccocscccececsssccssvccsesevese J. Travis Trophy Winners..cccccsccscccccccssccccccesesecs K. Director's Trophy Winners.cccccsccccccccccsevcccccoues XXV 109 114 115 135 117 119 124 125 126 135 137 13
Page INSCOM Staff Directory - August 1985 ° 138 GLOSSARY . 139 Tables No. 1. Direct Funding by Subprogram. scccsccccccccsccccssesees 34 2. Direct Obligations for FY 1985 OVER EREC ECOSOC ES ECE S EY 37 &. Civilian Strength by PrOBPrami. ncocccaccacenccencesseess 38 5. FY 1987-1991 PARR Initiative. cccccccccccscsccccecersess &2 6. Enlisted Personnel Posture for FY's 19BY~1985....cecee 4y 7. Enlisted Personnel Strength Posture by Area and Unit. nccncccsenessccveccesesessessecasenceseneeeseesce gy 8. FY 1985 Polygraph Statistics. .ccccccccccsvsccescesasses &9 QQ. COMSEC Insecurities.cseccccccccccccccccccvescccseseces 202 " UNCLASSIFIED xxvii €02.+>i 14 SE ec
TIAL CHAPTER I MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND LOCATION OM Mission and Functions.. The mission of the CG, INSCOM is to concuct and coordinate electronic warfare (EW); intelligence collection processing, analysis, and reporting; counterintelligence (CI) activities; operations security (OPSEC) support; and related operations in support of the U.S. Arny. 1. Commands military intelligence organizations tailored to provide supported force requirements for: a. Intelligence within the corps commander's area of interest and to supplement the corps intelligence and electronic warfare (IEW) system for certain intelligence within the corps area of influence. b. Intelligence with the echelon above corps (EAC) commander's area of influence and coordination of the provision of intelligence within the EAC commander's area of interest. c. Counterintelligence support beyond the organic capabilities of all supported commanders. d. Specialized intelligence, EW, and security support. C) © a > rt 15 (2) (a)-209 98NS
8. Conducts and coordinates counterintelligence support to U.S. Army programs. 9. Conducts electronic surveillance support operations. 10. Conduets special operations. 11. Conducts and coordinates EW operations. 12. Operates the DA Special Security Systen. 13. Administers functions relating to management, organization, equipment, training, administration, logistics, and automated data processing. ! Transfer of Production Functions. (U) The Intelligence Organization and Stationing Study which led to the establishment of INSCOM in 1977 had recommended that all Army intelligence production agencies be consolidated into a single entity. However, only those production agencies directly under OCACSI or FORSCOM were Consolidated under INSCOM on 1 January 1977. From these newly acquired production elements, INSCOM formed the U.S. Army Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center (ITAC) in 1978. However, after subsequent relooks, support grew for a larger consolidation. The CG, INSCOM's position was that the elements should be consolidated under his major Army command (MACOM), but even more importantly, such a consolidation should take place. As a result of a study initiated in September 1983, the Vice Chief of Staff, U.S. Army directed-that ITAC be placed under the operational control of the newly established U.S. Army Intelligence Agency (AIA) (Provisional), a field operating agency under OACSI. The operational control of ITAC was transferred in July 1984; later, on 1 Decenber, the center was reassigned to the newly established Arny %, ° , % % <S ITAC physically to the partially completed facility at the Washington Navy Yard, Washington, D.C. 16
oo eo 4 41 He ‘UNCLASSIFIED INSCOM's Mission and Goaiz. (U) Dur‘ng the 1984 INSCOM Commanders' Conference held at Gettysburg, the commanders and INSSOM staff present defined the command's mission as follows: “Conduct high quality operations to satisfy intelligence collection requirements and to deny collection by adversaries." A goal was also established, “Provide highest quality intelligence, security, and electronic warfare support for the Army in peace end war." (U0) In addition, a number of areas identified at the conference were included within the "INSCOM Plan," which was published in September 1985. The INSCOM Plan prioritized objectives and tasks in each of these functional areas in concert with the Army Plan and the Army Intelligence Master Plan (AIMP). The areas along with their stated objectives were as follows: Readiness: (1) Enhance the capabilities of the FY 1985-87 tactical intelligence and electronic warfare (IEW) force through achievable upgrades to operational and C@ systems within available resources. (2) Improve forward deployed or deployable EAC MI brigades/groups by structuring, manning, and equipping then within Army of Excellence (AOE) guidelines by end of FY 1991. Transition to War/Support to Military Operations: Improve capability through increased participation in realistic, war plan derived exercises during FY 1985-86. Security: Develop a Security Management Pian with an upgraded timetable for enhanced protection of people, facilities, information, and operations by 31 July 1985. e Force Integration: Develop procedures necessary to document, field, and maintain force capabilities, concepts, and doctrine, and to facilitate implementation of materiel and unit fielding plans for the first program year and all out years in the Fiscal Year Defense Program (FYDP) by March 1986. People: Improve personnel readiness, retention, quality of life, and civilian career programs by December 1985. Leadership: Develop a Performance Management Pian for ail personnel which requires that individuals establish performance objectives which are related to the organization's goal and reviewed between rater and rated individual more frequently than the rating period itself by 3d Qtr, FY 1985. UNCLASSIFIED OOM
Oversight: Establish command-wide process to ensure ethical propriety, legal sufficiency and appropriateness of operational activities, resource use, and acquisitions of goods and services by Resource Management: Improve productivity and efficiently and effectively utilize manpower and dollar resources through planning, management, programming, budgeting, and financial accounting methods by 30 September 1985. Materiel: Sustain highest levels of materiel accountability and readiness through innovative, dedicated management in compliance with regulations and policy guidance to maximize intelligence capability. Technology: Coordinate and develop innovative ways in which technology efforts can de identified that will improve INSCOM intelligence, security, and electronic warfare (ISEW) operations. Transfer of the Army Biographic Repository. (U) On 27 August 1985, the CG, INSCOM informed ACSI, DA that in FY 1986 INSCOM would Giscontinue functions involving maintenance of the Army Biographic Repository and that resources involved in that activity would be transferred to higher priority HUMINT tasks. On 27 September 1985, ACSI, DA concurred with the decision and directed that INSCOM coordinate with DIA on disposition of the Army biographic files and give ample notification to the analytical community of the repository's ciosure. -Although several DOD users had indicated that they might be interested in some of the files, it was doubtful that anyone, including DIA, would want them all. It was believed $hat the files would be most useful if transferred to « single organization rather than being removed piecemeal, it was intended to exhaust all DOD prospects before offering them to cza.4 Transfer of DA Intelligence Dissemination Validation Office. (U) With the establishment of the Army Intelligence Agency, the Department cof the Army dissemination validation responsibility previously performed by HQ INSCOM was transferred and consolidated with HQ, Army Intelligence Agency. A space went with the transfer.> ° . Support to Low Intensity Conflict. Sh % % ~
Locaticn. (U) Headquarters, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command is located at Arlington Hall Station, 4000 Arlington Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22212. Until a final stationing Gecision is effected, certain staff functions will continue to be iocated at Fort George G. Meade, Maryland 20755. CO ! TIAL 8 tah Tal BAITS
FOOTNOTES: CHAPTER I. MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND LOCATION 1. 2. 3. 5s 6. DF, DCSRM, subj: AR 10-53, Organization and Functions, U.S. Arny Intelligence end Security Command (U) (Undtd) (C). « “INSCOM and Its Heritage," History Ofe, HQ INSCOM (1985),° pp. 5, 12,13 (U)3 FY 198% INSCOM AHR (TSCW), pp. 2-3. "1985 INSCOM Plan FY 1988 ~ 2002" (Executive Summary) (5 Sep 85) (S/NOFORN)3; Msg, CDRINSCOM, subj: INSCOM Organizational Objectives (2315352) (U)3 IA Poster 360-1, "INSCOM Mission" FY 1985 DCSOPS ABR (TSCW), p. 5. Ltr, fm CDR INSCOM to CDR AMC, subj: DA Intelligence Dissemination Validation Office (8 Oct 85) (U); Interview, with Mr. Charles Allen (ODCSOPS) (21 Jun 86) (0). FY 1985 DCSPPM &HR (S), ch IVs Msg, CDR INSCOM, subj: Low Intensity Conflict (0319002 Oct 84) (C). UNCLASSIFIED 20
f a CHAPTER II | COMMAND AND STAFF RELATIONSHIPS =. = ~° . Command and Staff Relationships. (U) The CG, INSCOM is under supervision of the Chief of Staff, United States Army. Directives, authorities, policy, planning, and programming guidance, approved prograns, resource allocations, and other methods of command direction are issued to CG, INSCOM by the Chief of Staff, United States Aray. (U) The CG, INSCOM-- 1. Commands all assigned units and activities. a eee — Cee (U) INSCOM and other major Army commands (MACOM's) are coordinate giements of DA. The CG, INSCOM és authorized to communicate Girectly with other major Army commanders or with heads of Arny Staff agencies on matters of sutual interest. @2 fn) zeGosns (U) The CG, INSCOM will maintain liaison as necessary with other MACOM's, field operating agencies, other cryptologic and intelligence activities, and other foreign domestic governmental agencies to maintain an awareness of, to exchange information on, and to ensure coordination of matters of mutual concern. ! Executive Authority for TROJAN, (U) Although the official MOU between HQDA and affected MACOM's was awaiting final coordination, a message dated 27 September 1985 outlined INSCOM's responsibilities as the executive authority for TROJAN. INSCOM was responsible to HQDA OACSI (DA proponent) for logistical support, SIGINT technical support, and mission steerage for TROJAN operations.
UNCLASSIFIED (U) In the area of logistics, INSCOM will be responsible for adainistering TROJAN logistics support and negotiating TROJAN. logistics contracts. INSCOM's Mission Support Activity (MSA) will act for INSCOM*’s DCSLOG to arrange TROJAN logistics support. INSCOM will also be responsible for worldwide logistics support less the routine maintenance duties such as fault location (using built-in testing equipment), line replacement unit (LRU) changes, minor adjustments, cleaning, lubricating, and tightening, which will be performed by the user units. (U) Maintenance of equipment over and above designated unit tasks will be contracted. INSCOM will create a Theater Intermediate Support Activity (TRISA) in each theater to make repairs beyond the user's ability and to keep a stock of TROJAN parts (beyond those maintained by the units). (U) In the area of SIGINT technical support/mission steerage, INSCOM had the responsibility to ensure adequate SIGINT technical support and mission steerage to TROJAN users. This responsibility will be met by INSCOM's Army Technical Control and Analysis Element (ATCAE) and Primary Control and Analysis Center (PCAC). The 66th MI Group, OPCON to USAREUR, will operate the PCAC for USAREUR TROJAN's. CONUS MI Group will operate a PCAC, OPCON to FORSCOM, for all CONUS based TROJAN's. The ATCAE provides support to the PCAC's and to TROJAN users not currently supported by a PCAC (such as SOUTHCOM, WESTCOM, and the 8th U.S. Army). Technical support and mission steerage provided by the ATCAE and the PCAC's will consist primarily of target environment data base management and tipoffs to impending or occuring target activity. (U) INSCOM did not have a responsibility in the areas of developing, fielding, and testing the TROJAN systems nor for any product improvement plans (PIP); these were to be the responsibility of the Army Matesiel Command's (USA Electronics Research and Development Command) project manager, USA Signals Warfare Laboratories. USA Information Systems Command (USAISC) had full responsibility for communications support to include: erypto- net establishment, Defense Special Security Communications System (DSSCS) requirements, commerical communications contracts, and overall communications requirements monitoring. High Technology/Low Intensity Conflict. (U) In a letter dated 6 August 1984, the Vice Chief of Staff Army assigned INSCOM the task of addressing the intelligence requirements of low intensity conflicts. Low intensity conflicts were defined as those military operations involving U.S. Forces in a support role to friendly and allied nations which are being militarily threatened or attached by UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED internal and/or external military and/or para-military forces. Under these conditions, it was assumed that no major U.S. graund forces were employed in defense of the friendly and/or allied governments. Under such situations as this, the U.S. Army and other service and departmental intelligence resources world. be brought to bear against the opposing military and/or para-military forces as a major means to execute U.S. policy in the affected region. (0) In Jight of this tasking, the DCSOPS, HQ INSCOM proposed the creation of a headquarters steering committee which would bring together the principal staff heads with the Science Advisor to discuss and investigate the possibilities for the application of high technology to intelligence operations in the low intensity conflict environment. The proposal for such a group was initiated in September 1985. Final action by the Command Group vas delayed until the next fiscal year.3 Command and Control of Echelon Above Corps (EAC) Intelligence Units. (U) Although the issue of command and control of EAC intelligence assets was not specifically raised during the FY 1985 time period, it is essential to understand what had transpired. In April 1983, the Director of Management under the Chief of Staff Arny proposed that the 66th MI Group, the USAINSCOM Theater Intelligence Center-Pacific, and 50lst MI Group (less Field Station Korea) be commanded by the theater Arny (TA). In addition, the controlled collection operations (CCO) and offensive counterintelligence operations (OFCO) assets would also be commanded by the theater Army with technical direction provided by INSCOM, which would remain a MACOM. After the above actions, INSCOM would continue to command Field Station Korea SIGINT assets and MASINT resources fron the above mentioned units as well as CCO and OFCO not given to a TA. In essence, the proposal transferred command responsibilities for the affected units from INSCOM to the TA commander, with the latter then charged with operating, programming, budgeting, equipping, and sustaining and training, as well as the health and welfare and other command related matters for those organizations. (U) In a reply dated April 1963, OACSI elaborated in, detail of what, for example, the transfer of the 501st MI Group would mean. The conclusion of the memorandum was that the transfer command of tne 501st MI Group to the TA commander would cost dearly, would not provide more efficient and effective support, and the TA commander would have to still rely upon INSCOM to a considerable extent for numerous areas of support. "The present command relationships undoubtedly provide the optimum training and utilization of scarce intelligence resources. It retains the capability to rapidly S UNCLASSIFIED _ 23
‘UNCLASSIFIED reinforce the Commander, 501ist MI Group with a wide variety of low Gensity, specialized intelligence personnel, and provides timely supply and maintenance of critical and unique equipments. It likewise provides the benefits of selective emphasis that accrue to INSCOM as the single manager of such resources. In short, OPCON now provides the TA commander with requisite supervision of 50ist MI Group intelligence and security functions while relieving him of the numerous administrative and logistical areas of support currently the concern of the INSCOM commander. (0) “Although the readily quantifiable costs are few at this point, the cost to OACSI and Army Staff is apparent--the staff will grow and necessitate further involvement in operational matters now left to the INSCOM commander and staff. Likewise, the development of an implementation plan to accomplish the proposal will be a time consuming and difficult tasking requiring additional resources fron the Arny Staff (ARSTAF) and affected commands as well, at the expense of ongoing Army programs."® (0) Perhaps it was more than ironic that the mezorandun to the Director of Management contained the signature block of Brigadier General Harry E. Soyster, Acting ACofS for Intelligence. A little over a year later, Brigadier General Soyster was again defending INSCOM, but this time as its commander. .In a memorandun by Brigadier General Soyster to the Vice Chief of Staff of the Army and dated 11 August 1964, Brigadier General Soyster reiterated his previous position of not giving INSCOM assets to commanders TA. His second memorandum, however, contained additional rational gained from his first days as INSCOM commander. "The SIGINT world, backed up by national directives and billions of dollars, is not going to surrender any significant assets or prerogative to theater commanders. We will lose that battle even if all of us sign up to it. The Army is already viewed as fragmented when NSA compares us to the other services. The ACSI is the SIGINT focal point for the Army. INSCOM is the Service Cryptologic Element and the Tactical Cryptologic Program is managed by ODCSOPS. General Faurer and his staff deal with Lieutenant General Odom, Major General Woodmansee and Brigadier General Soyster. They will not expand the Army circle to include General Otis, General Livsey, General Gorman, or wherever we cut it off. Lieutenant General Odom and f (and I's sure Major General Woodmansee will join us) are working to present a common position. If we take any action that creates a void, the Air Force will fi11 it and we will play a lesser role in national collection. 10 UNCLASSIFIED 7
Changes in TRADOC/INSCOM on Combat/Training Development. (U) On the occasion of the annual review of the INSCOM/TRADOC MOU, several important changes occurred. On 1 October 1985, the responsibility for development of echelon above corps (EAC) architecture fron INSCOM to TRADOC was to take place. This was the date when INSCOM's effort to document the new force structure in accordance with the EAC Intelligence and Electronic Warfare (IEW) architecture/Army of Excellence Force Design was to be completed. At the request of USA Intelligence Center and School (USAICS), INSCOM agreed to retain responsibility for the preparation of initial Automated Unit Reference Sheet (AURS) on mew EAC MI organizations. Although the new MOU did not extricate INSCOM completely from the TOE development process--and in fact continued to involve INSCOM in that process more than other MACOM's--it was considered an acceptable level of involvement and one that provided for a smoother transition toward USAICS someday assuming total responsibility for INSCOM unit TOE‘s. (U) The same MOU also transfered combat development maintenance responsibility for EAC TOE to USAICS on 1 October 1985. INSCOM would assume a support role similar to other MACOM's vice being responsible; USAICS would assume the advocacy role. Finally, 11 CO IAL 05
UNCLASSIFIED INSCOM furnished one space to USAICS to perform functions in area o” the combat development maintenance for EAC TOE. Although assigned on 1 October, the space would not be filled until later.5 12 UNCLASSIFIED 26
UNCLASSIFIED © FOOTNOTES: CHAPTER II. COMMAND AND STAFF RELATIONSHIPS 1. 2. 3. a, 5. DF, DCSRM, subj: AR10-53, Organization and Functions, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (Undtd) (C). Msg, CDR INSCOM, subj: INSCOM as Executive Authority for TROJAN=Defined (2719292 Sep 85) (0). ° IA Form 32, DCSOPS, subj: High Technology/Low Intensity Conflict Steering Group (17 Sep 85) (U). Memo for Chief of Staff Army, CDR INSCOM, subj: Command and Control of EAC Intelligence Units (17 Aug 84) (S/NOFORN); Memo for Director of Management, Acting ACSI, sub$: Recommendations on the DACS-DMC Proposal to Alter the Command Struc.ure of Selected EAC Units (12 Apr 83) (S/NOFORN). Info Paper, IAPPM-AD, subj: TRADOC/INSCOM MOU on Cbt/Tng Development, Tng and Doctrine (16 Aug 85) (U). . 13 UNCLASSIFIED 27
CHAPTER III ORGANIZATION " e INSCOM Organization. (U) At the close of FY 1985, there was ea total of 78 units (34 TOE and &4 TDA) within INSCOM. The TDA figure does not include Augmentstion or Provisional units. Ali types of units are listed in appendix A. For individual lists of TOE, TDA, and Provisional units at the close of FY 1985, see appendices B, D, and G respectively. Changes in the status of TOE, TDA, and Provisional are listed in appendices C, E, and H. (0) Throughout FY 1985, MG Harry E. Soyster served as Commander, INSCOM. On 7 February 1985, BG James W. Hunt, DCG, left INSCOM for reassignment. BG Charles F. Scanion remained as DCG. Upon his assignment to. INSCOM, BG George J. Walker assumed the position of Chief of Staff. This was the first time in the history of INSCOM/Arny Security Agency that a general officer had served as chief of staff since the position was created in 1950. The charge was not a part of the HQ INSCOM reorganization plan ongoing at the time. After discussion within the Command Group, MG Soyster made the decision based on his own management philosophy. Initially, BG Seanlon provided oversight to single discipline organizations in the command while MG Soyster oversaw the multidiscipline groups, such as the 66th, 470th, 500th, S01st, and 513th MI Groups. The new Chief of Staff would continue to be the focal point for e11 actions of the staff and oversee selected activities. MG Soyster foresaw the likelihood that during a tour with INSCOM, a Chief of Staff would also serve in the position of the deputy commander upon the f{ncumbent's departure. MG Soyster also foresaw the possibility being foreed to let go of one of the general officer spaces. Prior to BG Walker's arrival, COL Richard J. Powers, Jr., had been Chief of Staff. On 30 December 1984, CSM ‘Samtiy W. Wise replaced CSM George W. Howell, Jr. (U) At the end of FY 1985, Headquarters, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command was organized to consist of a Command Group, Office of the Chief of Staff, Special Staff, Personal Staff, and Coordinating Staff as shown below: Commané Group: Commanding General (CG). (U) The CG, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command was responsible to the Chief of Staff, U.S. Arny for accomplishment of the missions and functions prescribed by AR 10-53 and was Conurr ere responsible to the Central Security Service for all § . aE 28 gins
UNCLASSIFIED Deputy Commander (DCG). (U) The deputy commander asaisted the commander in the management of all intelligence and support operations of INSCOM to include the review and execution of #11 tasked and delegated operations and the determination of future requirements. . Command Sergeant Major (CSM). (U) The Command Sergeant Major as the senior enlisted person in the command provided advice and assistance to the CG on all matters involving enlisted personnel. Office of the Chief of Staff: Chief of Staff (CofS). (U) The CofS acted as the principal coordinating agent of, and advisor to, the CG and DCG on those matters pertaining to INSCOM; directed and coordinated the staff to achieve efficiency and unit of action; and assisted the CG and DCG in the supervision of the execution of orders. Directly subordinate to the CofS were the Liaison Officers, the Office of Public Affairs, Organizational Effectiveness Office, and Internal Review Office. Command Group Executive Office. (U) On 16 September 1985, the Chief of staff created the position of Command Group XO. The executive officer's purpose was to coordinate the activities and communications of the CG and DCG offices with the Chief of Staff. Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS). (U) The DCS acted for the Chief of Staff during his absence and assisted to coordinate all actions of the HQ INSCOM staff, and supervised the activities of or provided support to the Command Chaplain, Organizational Effectiveness Office, Secretary of the General Staff, Staff Psychologist, Scientific Advisor, Public Affairs Office, and INSCOM Liaison Officers. Secretary of the General Staff (SGS). (U) The SGS acted as executive ofiicer for the CofS and as office manager for the offices of the CG, DCG's, and CofSs. Special Assistant to Chief of Staff. (U) The Special Assistant to Chief of Staff acted as special advisor and consultant to the commander, deputy commanders, and the Chief ef Staff. Protocol Office. (U) The Protocol Officer served to advise the Command Group on matters related to protocol. 15 UNCLASSIFIED 29
‘UNCLASSIFIED Liaison Officers. (U) The liaison officers provided lieison representation to NSACSS, FORSCOM, TRADOC, USAREUR, and other commands as required. The liaison positions at both USAICS end USACACDA were both discontinued upon the departure of the dneumbents. The USAICS position in May 1985 and the USACACDA liaision position on 15 December 1984. (Although not considered a liaison officer as such, INSCOM decided in August 1985 to provide a space to the combat developments section of the USAICS. The position would not be filled until 4th Qtr, FY 1986.) It was . Planned that as incumbents left a number of the liaison offices, there would be no replacement. This was part of the headquarters voluntary decrement undergone in FY 1986 to transfer spaces to the field and new command initiatives. Special Staff: Chief, Organizational Effectiveness (OE) Office. (0) The OE Office assisted INSCOM's senior leaders in leading the human element of their organizations through complex organizational change. The OE Office also provides assistance to INSCOM's leaders in management and leadership training programs. Finally, the O£ Office managed the INSCOM's O£ Progran. Chief, Internal Review (IR) Office. (U) Served as the principal advisor to the CDR, INSCOM on internal review matters. Conducted independent review and examination of command operations and internal controls to provide the commander with an objective evaluation of the efféctiveness and efficiency with which his financial and related functions were being performed. Scientific and Cryptologic Affairs Advisor. (U) Served as the principal advisor to the CDR, INSCOM and his staff on scientific and cryptologic matters. Public Affairs Officer (PAO). (U) Served as the Public Affairs Officer of INSCOM, advising the commander and staff on all public affairs matters. Command Psychologist. (U) Served as the psychologist of INSCOM advising the commander on matters pertaining to mental health and providing guidance on psychological factors pertaining to intelligence operations. Comnand Chaplain. (U} Served as the chaplain of INSCOM providing advice and assistance to the commander and his staff on religious, moral, moral leadership, and human self-development matters. 16 UNCLASSIFIED 30
UNCLASSIFIED Personal Staffs: Inspector General (IG). (U) The IG, as member of the personal ataff, inquired into and reported upon matters affecting the performance of mission and state of the economy, efficiency, discipline, and morale of every phase of activity which was within the sphere of responsibility of the commanding general and as prescribed by law. On 15 October 1984, a Plans and Analysis Division was created. Given the conditions of a stable force of 13 people and the fact that the Command Group was undergoing a transition itself, it was believed that mid 1984 offered a unique opportunity for the Office of the Inspector General to reorganize. The newly created Plans and Analysis Division was designed to fulfill the following needs: (1) the need for a more systematic approach to inspection planning and the analysis of inapection findings, IGAR trends, and other data to identify systematic issues requiring detailed inspection and resolution; (2) the need to utilize personnel resources more effectively between inspections; and (3) the need for an element to incorporate the functions of a Deputy IG, Executive Officer, or Operations Officer. Besides the Plans and Analysis Division, there remained the Inspections Division and the Assistance and Investigations Divison. Staff Judge Advocate (SJA). (U0) The SJA served as legal advisor to the CG, DCG, CofS, and all staff elements of HQ INSCOM and, as necessary, to subordinate elements of the command. General Staffs: Deputy Chief of Staff, Personnel (DCSPER). (U) The DCSPER served as the principal staff officer for the administration of military and civilian personnel. Acted for the CDR, INSCOM in the éirection, supervision, and coordination of plane, policies, and procedures for personnel administration, distribution, and management; maintenance of order and discipline; safety; welfare; morale; human affairs; and nonappropriated fund activities. Throughout FY 1985, DCSPER remained divided between the ADCSPER Military and the ADCSPER Civilian. The ADCSPER Military oversaw the Military Personnel Division and Plans and Proponenacy Division. The ADCSPER Civilian oversaw Human Resources Division, Equal Opportunity Program Division, and Civilian Personnel Division. Deputy Chief of Staff, Operations (DCSOPS). (U) The DCSOPS was the principal coordinating staff officer responsible for current intelligence collection, production, electronic warfare, and counterintelligence, and security support operations. Provided operational policy guidance and direction, coordinated, and 17 UNCLASSIFIED 31
UNCLASSIFIED a Se supervised current operations. Managed REDTRAIN Cirection; coordinated and supervised current operations. Managed REDTRAIN program as Army executive agent. Provided operationally oriented INSCOM interfaces between national, departmental, theater (echelon above corps), and tactical (echelon below corps), intelligence organizations. Served.as the staff Budget Director (current and budget year) for allocation and employment of Program 2, 3, and 8 Operational resources. Coordinated operational matters with Department of the Army, NSA/CSS, Department of Defense, DIA, CIA, ‘FBI, joint/combined commands, other MACOM's, and other governmental agencies. Supervised command aviation activities. Prepared and coordinated command operational plans and manages command operational planning system; was command focal point for reserve affairs. Supervised command historical program. Exercised staff proponency over the Intelligence Exchange Support Center, Systens Exploitation Detachment, and Administrative Survey Detachment. As a@ result of the DAIG investigation in 1984, the functions of the Special Disbursing Agent and the Intelligence Contingency Funds (ICF) manager were separated on 1 October 1984. The office of the ICF Management Officer remained within DCSOPS but the disbursing functions were transferred to DCSRM. The ICF Management Officer advised on all aspects of the control, administration, supervision, and utilization of ICF. The officer was accountable to and received technical finaneial guidance from the Special Finance and Accounting Officer. (U) Unlike many recent years, there was little reorganization of the structure of DCSOPS. On 1 December 1984, & Project Coordination Office was established directly under the DCSOPS. Its Function was to make recommendations as to how the military intelligence community was to handle special operations. On 1 July 1985, the Program, Policy, and Readiness Division was dissolved and its assets scattered among other DCSOPS elements. At the close of FY 1985, DCSOPS consisted of the following major divisions: Project Coordination Office, Administrative Office, History Office, Reserve Affairs Office, ADCSOPS Pians/Training, ADCSOPS OPSEC, ADCSOPS HUMINT, ADCSOPS SIGINT/EW, ADCSOPS IMINT/EO, and ADCSOPS Intelligence Support. Deputy Chief of Staff, Logistics (DCSLOG). (U) DCSLOG was the principal coordinating staff officer for logistics, and was responsible for integrated logistics planning policy; procurenment/contracts; budgeting; distribution, storage, and maintenance of electronic equipment systems (less telecommunications); engineering; construction; support services; transportation; materiel readiness; and real property management. 18 UNCLASSIFIED 32
_ FOR OFICATUSEONLY— The DCSLOG also had staff supervision of the Materiel Support Activity and the Maintenance Assistance and Instruction Tean - Activity. (U) During FY 1984, the organization of the DCSLOG remained basically the same and.consisted of the following: Supply and Services Division, Maintenance Division, Installation Division, Fixed Station Engineering Division, Management Office, Contracts Support Office, and Administrative Office. The Contracts Support J<fice was new and was established for the purpose of providing the required supervisory, technical review, staff guidance, and contract oversight necessary to act as Heading, Contracting Activity (HCA), for procuring supplies and services in support of classified intelligence operations. The authority to exereise the procurezent mission was by letter on 7 June 1985 by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Research, Development, and Acquisition). The CG, INSCOM had requested HCA authority in April 1985 as a result of the DA Inspector General (DAIG) findings in 1984. The DAIG found that acquisitions were being made by INSCOM activities without the authority of a contracting officer as required by the Federal Acquisition Regulation. In order to correct this deficiency HCA was requested. Deputy Chief of Staff, Systems (DCSSYS). (U) DCSSYS was the principal coordinating staff officer responsible for INSCOM materiel/systems development. DCSSYS represented INSCOM as the Army's materiel developer of fixed strategic signal intelligence Systems and INSCOM operated fixed automated systems. DCSSYS also represented INSCOM in the materiel development process for systezs to be used by INSCOM. i (U) The DCSSYS was divided into the Special Assistant Automation, a Requirement Division, Systems Division, Au anagement : Division, Program Management Office, che, lili Project Office, . and the Data Administrator Office. On 1 May 1985, this was changed 2 with the transfer of the Special Assistant for Automation and the S Data Administrator to the newly established DCSIM. At the same time, staff supervision of the Automated Systems Activity was also transferred. ° Deputy Chief of Staff, Resource Management (DCSRM). (U) The DCSRM was the principal staff officer in matters concerning management, financial management, and manpower management. The DCSRM established and maintained administrative control of appropriated funds, exercised responsibility for manpower management and The Arny Authorization Document System (TAAD), developed and supervised the implementation of force requirements, administered the 19 FOR OFEIGMO@TISE ONLY 33
UNCLASSIFIED structure and strength program, exercised control over the manpower and equipment survey programs, and reviewed and prepared financial and/or wanpower annexes for operational and force development plans. In addition, the DCSRM exercised staff supervision over the Finance and Accounting Activity. As a result of the 1984 DAIG investigation, the Special Finance Accounting Officer was established within DCSRM on 1 October 1984. The office provided disbursing services to uctivities utilizing Special Mission Funds (SMF) and Intelligence Contingency Funds (ICF). (U) During FY 1985, DCSRM was composed of the following elements: Administrative Office, Budget Division, Finance and Accounting Division, Management and Analysis Division, and Manpower Division. Deputy Chief of Staff, Telecommunications (DCSTEL). (0) (See Deputy Chief of Staff, Information Management.) Deputy Chief of Staff, Plans, Programs, and Modernization (DCSPPM). (0) DCSPPM was the principal coordinating ataff officer responsible for INSCOM long-range and mid-range planning; force Gesign and operational concepts; resource program development, submission, defense, and evaluation. Represented INSCOM in the conceptual and doctrinal aspects of the combat development process. Served as staff point of contact with other Army/DOD activities for force planning, combat developments, TENCAP planning, progran submission, and force integration. (U) At the close of FY 1985, DCSPPM consisted of the Concepts and Studies Division (formerly the Long Range Plans and Studies Office), Force Design and Integration (formerly Force Modernization Division), Programs Division, and Program Plans Division. Deputy Chief of Staff, Information Resource Management. (U) (See Deputy Chief of Staff, Information Management.) Deputy Chief of Staff for Information Management. (U) On 1 May 1985, based upon Chief of Staff Aray guidance, the responsibility for all information management was placed under a single manager and the Deputy Chief of Staff for Information Managemént (DCSIM) was established. The DCSIM was the principal staff assistant to the Commander, INSCOM for all matters pertaining to information management. Served as Program Area Director for command prograns, budgets, and the Army Management System as they relate to telecommunications/automation. Discharged primary staff responsibilities for engineering, installation, and maintenance of INSCOM information systems. Exercised staff supervision over operation of the Defense Special Security Communication System 20 UNCLASSIFIED 34
UNCLASSIFIED (DSSCS), CRITICOMM, and other telecommunications activities ef the command. Directed development of tactical information systenzs objectives concepts and requirements of the command. Directs. development of tactical information systems objectives, concepts, and requirements within INSCOM areas of interest. Finally, the DCSIM exercised operational control over the USAISC Communications Center supporting USAINSCOM, Arlington Hall Station. The new staff element also exercised control over the Automated Systems Activity and the Administrative/Audiovisual Support Activity. (U) DCSIM was formed by merging the ACSTEL, the DCSIRM, and the functions of the Special Assistant for Automation and the Data Admainistrator from DCSSYS into one staff element. Besides an Administrative Branch, the DCSIM was divided into the ADCSIM Telecommunications, ADCSIM Information Services, and ADCSIM Automation. . Command Security Office (CSO). (U) The Chief, CSO formulated, implemented, and supervised policies and procedures for personnel, physical, automation, and information security and acted as command and headquarters security manager, internal OPSEC manager, TEMPEST Coordinating Officer (TCO), and chief law enforcement official for INSCOM. 21 UNCLASSIFIED 35
In October 1984, USAREUR requested the resubdordination be delayed until a new, mutually satisfactory MOU between INSCOM and USAREUR covld be prepared. Transfer of HQ Spaces to Subordinate Units. (U) A headquarters reorganization study 1ed by Colonel Campbell had recommended several transfers of functions and spaces from the staff to the field (e.g. TAREX, Technical Surveillance Countermeasures (TSCM)). There was no agreement among the staff as to what if any spaces should be transferred. This failure coupled with new and higher priority intelligence and security requirements such as Central America, special access programs, increased counterintelligence and polygraph programs, implementation of a Head of Contracting Activity (HCA), and the new training initiative, TROJAN, all led to a relook at the headquarters base. (U) In March 1985, the Chief of Staff, INSCOM directed each headquarters element to prioritize staff functions to identify possible decrements for reallocation to high priority headquarters or field requirements and excess spaces gained from consolidation of headquarters staff elements at Arlington Hall Station. Each staff element was then to prioritize their functions bused on possible 5 percent, 10 percent, and 15 percent decrements. 22 GN SERET 36
‘UNCLASSIFIED (0) In May, after the results of the above drill was in, the Commander, INSCOM approved the 10 percent realignment of the JNSCOM headquarters staff spaces and transferred four out of every five identified spaces to subordinate INSCOM units to meet operational requirements. The remainder went to meeting the requirements for new programs or enphasis such as TROJAN. Prior to the decision, there was again reservations voiced by some staff elements. Some because of the fear of losing resources; others because concern for future DA manpower surveys whose cuts would be doubly severe. Brigadier General Scanion, DCG INSCOM, reportedly a long time advocate of transfer of spaces from the headquarters to the field, believed that the headquarters could take up to 20 percent cuts without harm to staff functions. The cuts resulting from the May Gecision by the Commander, INSCOM would not take place until FY 1986; officer spaces would be delayed until FY 1987.2 Consolidation at Arlington Hall Station. (U) On 20 June 1985, the long-awaited approval by the Director of the Army Staff to consolidate the INSCOM headquarters staff at Arlington Hall Station was received. This was to be accomplished for the most part by CY 1985. Rehabilitation of the facilities vacated by the Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center was one mitigating factor which would possibly delay the final consolidation. <A draft OPLAN was published to provide the INSCOM staff and work force guidance to facilitate the consolidation and accomplishment of the milestones. DCSLOG and DCSRM personnel could relocate as determined by the respective staff head prior to December 1985. The movement of the DCSOPS personnel, by far the largest number of personnel from Fort Meade, would occur in early January 1986 unless it could be accomplished sooner. In June, the DCSOPS took the initial steps of assigning new military personnel to duty station at Arlington Hall Station, civilian vacancies at Fort Meade would in the future be filled at Arlington Hall, and MI Excepted Career Program (MICEP) assignment to DCSOPS at Fort Meade would be assigned to Arlington Hall Station. The Director of the INSCOM Support Activity at Fort Meade was directed to develop a support plan which would continue to provide records, mail, and audiovisual support to remaining units at Fort Meade,.3 . HQ _INSCOM Reorganization. (U) In July 1983 a reorganization plan for HQ INSCOM was approved, and it was to be implemented over a 3 year period. Before the first year of the plan had ended, the Chief of Staff directed a postponement of the pending DCSOPS reorganization. The DCSOPS was due to transfer spaces to other headquarters elements. Because of the potential loss of operational capability and the arrival of a new Command Group who was committed to operations, a relook was felt to be necessary. 23 UNCLASSIFIED + 8 em a ee eens me ee | ee wewm pee mc mmmnne peme 8. en gee
‘ UNCLASSIFIED Colonel Powers, the DCSOPS, was directed to relook the DCSOPS portion of the plan, and Colonel Hambric, serving as a special assistant to the Chief of Staff, was to relook the larger reorganization plan. The relook concluded that the basic structure of the headquarters was sound; however, DCSOPS required additional resources to accomplish its mission. (U) The relook still did not provide the sought after answers. _ There was a perception that the DCSOPS was not totally effective in quick, efficient working issues; did not heavily impact on requirements; and lacked the capability to effectively deal with Quick Requirements Capability, low intensity warfare, wultidiscipline support to subcerdinate units (maintained a Giscipline vice geographical orientation), and special access programs. It was then decided that a new study would be led by staff (Mr. Paul Sutton, Special Assistant) within the Office of the Chief of Staff itself. (0) A relook was accomplished by starting with the results of the 1963/84 DCSPPM effort and its resulting draft Mission and Functions Manual dated March 1984. Key staff heads and deputies were consulted and their recommendations and opinions polled. A wery quick staff concurrence was obtained that the DCSPPM and DCSSYS should be consolidated with the DCSOPS and that the two most important issues to INSCOM were the improvement of DCSOPS and consolidation of information management/automatic data processing (ADP). Additionally,-provisions must be made to add or enhance all of the capabilities mentioned in the previous paragraph. {U0} The consensus lasted only a week, and very quickly strong statements were being made for a status quo with the exception of consolidating all ADP/information functions in DCSIM. Mr. Sutton's group recommended a number of alternatives. The ideal solution was to combine DCSOPS, DCSSYS, and DCSPPM to create under the DCSOPS a@ dual deputy, both the current operations and readiness along with that element that builds the future organizational force and structure. A dual deputy for each area is seen as the most advantageous. (U) The problem with this approach was that success would be dependent upon having an extremely strong, tough manager and leader, capable of influencing his peers, two deputy commanders and the commander. The continual rapid turnover, split locations, and shortage of this type of a leader negates this approach. Instead the design, planning, and programming of the future force needed to be separate from the daily operations to successfully compete for resources and give these functions the primary attention they 24 UNCLASSIFIED 38
UNCLASSIFIED deserve, The current split allowed an economy of force to give each function the best possible effort within avaflable personnel resources. Future improvement fn the command requires a cledr view of the future force and the necessary programing action to get there. The recent reorganization effort properly divided the staff functions for HQ INSCOM but stripped an excessive number of personnel from DCSOPS. The programing and force structure efforts of OCSPPM and DCSSYS effort should be retained but done in current resources. The DCSOPS should restructure internally to gain a decreased span of control, provide a geographical orientation and reduce the discipline split. A very concentrated effort should be made to lessen the impact of the Fort Meade split location. (U) The basic findings of the study were confirmed by the study group led by Colonel Campbell and then acted upon. Separate DCSOPS, DCSSYS, and DCSPPM were maintained. The DCSOPS would be strengthen by halting the pending transfer of resources to other staff elements. These resources should be used in developing a geographical orientation. A final major step was the consolidation of all information resource management, automatfon, and Administrative/Audiovisual Support Activity functions under the DCSIM. The consolidation of functions under DCSIM took place on 1 May 1985. Colonel Campbell’s study group also recommended reduction of headquarters staff to meet operational needs in the field and new command initiatives. Transfer of Detachment Hahn. (U) Detachment Hahn, a paragraph on the augmentation of the 66th MI Group, had the mission of providing SIGINT and IMINT support to echelon corps and below commanders and «echelon above corps battle managers. Additionally, the detachment was to demonstrate the mobility of the Tactical Reconnaissance Exploitation Demonstrations System (TREDS) and assist in development of equipment testing and organizational structures which maximize efficiency, speed, and responsiveness. Detachment Hahn was located at Metro Tango, 8 miles northeast of Hahn Air Base in Germany. On 1 May 1985, the administrative and operational control of the detachment was transferred from the 502d ASA Battalion to the.66th MI Group. Because the detachment had to rely upon the Air Force for support, it was felt thgt subordination to a higher level of command would be advantageous. Relocation of Pentagon Counterintelligence Force. (U) The Pentagon Space Manager directed that the INSCOM Pentagon Counterintelligence Force (PCF) be relocated elsewhere than the Pentagon due to demands upon space in the building. The PCF was low on the priority list due to the fact that it was a subordinate element to a MACOM and not the HQDA staff. The notice to vacate 25 UNCLASSIFIED 7 39
TIAL was done with less than than 30 days notice. On a short-tern basis, the PCF was relocated to Building A, Arlington Kall Station, on 18 March 1985. But this relocation could only be temporary due to space constraints. Also Colonel Francis Creighton, Commander, 902d MI Group which exercised control of the PCF, had expressed a goal of decreasing the emphasis on operations security (OPSEC) and giving priority to the “classical counterintelligence" skills such as interviewing, surveillance, and report writing. To achieve this goal, plans were sade to establish a training unit at Fort Meade, Maryland, whose purpose would be to train the personnel of the 9024 MI Group in counterespionage, ADP security, and other aspects of counterintelligence. With the relocation of PCF and the decreased emphasis on OPSEC enabled Colonel Creighton to reduce the support to the Pentagon to a five-man Resident Office at Arlington Hall Station and transfer the renainder to Fort Meade to form the training unit. ~ (3) On 10 July 1985, the pcr. was restationed to Building 2842, Fort Meade, Marylend. Six personnel remained at Arlington Hall Station to form the Pentagon Resident Office (PRO) and became subordinate to the Fort Meade Military Intelligence Detachment (MID). Due to restrictions on moving militery personnel twice in one year and the commander's desire to preclude causing financial and personnel hardships x«o families who had located in the Washington, D.C. area, many members of the PCF were assigned out of the 902d MI Group, assigned special duty to nearby units while remaining essigned to PCF, or assigned to the Pentagon Resident Office. The Technical Surveillance Countermeasures (TSCM) team was Getached and remained at Arlington Hall Station; it was later eonbined with the Capitol Hill Tean to service the entire National Capital Region. (U) On 19 August 1985, the PCF was subordinated to the MI Battalion (CI) East Coast at Fort Meade as a ellitary intelliesnce training detachment. Relocation of the USA Special Security Group. (0) During FY 1985, the USA Special Seeurity Group underwent two relocations: 22 January to 1 February 1985 from the Pentagon to A Building, Wing 5, Arlington Hall Station, and 20 to 27 May 1985 from Wing 5 to Wing 8 of the same building. The move from the Pentagon to Arlington Hall Station was directed by the Pentagon Space Manager. This was due to the prioritization of space. Subordinate units to major Arny commands had lower priority than elements belonging to HODA Staff.7 Reorganization of the 902d MI Group. a7 During FY 1985, the 902d MI Group reorganized its assets internally 26 | oY
CO TAL | 7 “ a Pee. On 1 Getober Y 19 the INSCOM Counterintellsgence and Signal Security Support Battalion, Fort Sam Houstcn was discontinued and its assets. divided upon three reorganized battalions. At the same time, the CI and SIGSEC Support Battalion, Presidio of San. Francisco vas redesignated as the INSCOM MI Battalion (CI) West Coast; the CI and SIGSEC Support Battalion, Fort George G. Meade was redesignated the INSCOM MI Battalion (CI) East Coast; and the INSCOM Security Support Detachment, Fort George G. Meade was redesignated as INSCOM MI Battalion (Security) nl personnel resources were requested to support expanding polygraph mission and to support ADP security software analysis, but neither had been resourced. (U) However, it was felt that the organization of the 9024 MI Group did not provide the optimum structure to accomplish the group's mission. The mix of functional and geographical missions created problems in command and control and did not allow adequate flexibility to focus assets on the group's priority missions. Within the functional (primarily technical CI support) tasks, the problem was compounded by a mix of centralized (Technical Surveillance Countermeasures (TSCM), polygraph, and ADP security) and decentralized TEMPEST operations. There was an urgent need to provide adequate command and staff supervision of tech services and tech training through centralized control of the CI services. This could produce significant resource savings, provide needed technical control, and allow more efficient allocations of scarce resources against priority missions, 27 CON IAL 41
‘UNCLASSIFIED — (0) During the 902d MI Group's In Process Review held on 16 duly 1985, there was a realignment of the 902d MI Group. By late &ugust, approval had been received from the VCSA to proceed as an exception to the then current Documentation Modernization (DOCMOD) restrictions. The implementation date for the realignment was set for 1 March 1986. ° (U) The goil of the realignment was to functionally reorganize ané restructure the 902d MI Group to meet the increasing demands for CI support to DA approved SAP's, increase and improve the command, control, and oversight of assigned technical CI Capabilities, and create a functionally structured organization that could conduct the total range of CI operations, investigations, and services with maximum efficiency, The significant increase in the number of DA approved SAP's which required INSCOM CI support IAW AR 380-381, the assumption by the 9026 MI Group of the CONUS counterespionage mission in 1985, and the lack of adequate command, control, and oversight of CI technica: assets dictate this reorganization and restructuring. (0) In general terms, the realignment will result in the group being aligned along functional mission lines to provide enhanced command, control, and oversight of group operations. The 902¢ MI Group headquarters will exercise command and control of its three subordinate battalions for all CI operations. The MI Detachment (CI) (Support) will be attached to MI Battalion (1) (Technical) and MI Detachment (CI) Defense Nuclear Agency (DNA) will be attached to MI Battalion (CI) (Security) for command and control. (U) The following name changes are required to accurately reflect the distinct missions of the subordinate battalions and detachments: East Coast Battalion becomes MI Battalion (CI) (Technical), West Coast Battalion becomes MI Battalion (CI), Pentagon CI Force becomes MI Detachment (CI) (Support), CI Detachment DNA becomes MI Detachment (CI) (DNA), and MI Battalion (Security) becomes MI Battalion (CI) (Security). This ; reorganization will be completed utilizing current allocated group assets of 683. (U) In the second phase of the reorganization (FY 1987), the MI Battalion (CI) headquarters will be relocated from Presidio of San Franciseo, California, to Fort George G. Meade, Maryland. At the same time, the MI Detachment (CI) (Support) will be made organic to MI Battalion (CI) (Technical) and MI Detachment (CI) (DNA) will be made organic to MI Battalion (CI) (Security).& 28 UNCLASSIFIED  . @
955, the operational and administrative control of the unit and its functions were transferred. (The USA Operational Group designated the new element as Detachment S.) The actual discontinuance of the USA Systems Exploitation Detachment would not take place until FY 1986, and due to administrative procedures, the actual transfer of personnel spaces from the TDA of the detachment to the other TDA's would not happen until FY 1987. Detachnent. na was the redesignation of the Special Operations Detachment to USA Foreign Counterintelligence Activity on 1 July. Establishment of Subcontrol Offices. ST USAINSCOM Letter of Instruction, dated 27 February 1985, subject: U.S. Army Counterespionage (CE) Programs Conducted by INSCOM, approved/directed the establishment of subcontrol offices (SCO) within the 470th 00th, and 902d MI Groups for the management of CE activities. _ Se :
The Foreign Counterintelligence continued to function as the INSCOM Control Office for Management of CE investigative activities, retaining overall managenent responsibility within INSCOM. Pd -_ Militery Intelligence Battalion (Low Intensity). aE During FY 1985, the Vice Chief of Staff Army tasked INSCOM to field high technology systems to support low intensity conflict operations. » HUMINT Subarchitecture--POW Interrogation and Document Exploitation Activities during Wartine. (U) USAREUR was responsible for developing a HUMINT subarchitecture which will be one of several subarchitectures supporting the USEUCOM Theater Intelligence Architecture Plan (TIAP). The TIAP was designed to erable the theater commander to better coordinate intelligence planning by identifying and programming use of available and projected service, national, and allied resources. INSCOM was responsible for addressing the Interregation of Prisoners of War (IPW) and Document Exploitation (DOCEX) portions of the HUMINT subarchitecture. This effort was to result in a strawman theater concept of operations of IPW/DOCEX consisting of a baseline definition (current Capabilities), requirements identification, shortfall identification, and a concept architecture. 30 CO IAL ct) (a) 229 oars 44 cay Cay eas Dat
_ UNCLASSIFIED Operational Guides (0G) for EAC Intelligence and Electronic Warfare (IEW) Units. (U) Concepts and studies continued to develop OG's to ensure the new echelon above corps (EAC) IEW units had appropriate "how to" guidance. An operational guide, titled "EAC IEW Operations," which provided an overview of the EAC IEW force structure and operations, was completed and distributed in March 1985. Several operational guides were completed on EAC units which had been developed as part of the Army of Excellence: Intelligence . Center (EAC) (April 1985); MI Company/Battalion, Imagery Interpretation (EAC) (April 1985); Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC) (EAC), MI Brigade (April 1985); MI Company/Battalion Collection and Exploitation (EAC) (May 1985); and MI Battalion, Interrogation and Exploitation (EAC) (August 1985). These guides were provided to USA Intelligence Center and School (USAICS) to be used as a basis for the development of field circulars for EAC MI units. The HHC (EAC), MI Brigade Operational Guide was used as the basic reference document by USAICS in the development of FC 34-123, HHC (EAC), MI Brigade, dated June 1985, Still under development were operational guides for MI Company/MI Battalion, SIGINT (EAC); MI Battalion, Counterintelligence (EAC); MI Battalion, Controlled Collection (EAC); and MI Battalion Low Intensity (EAC).14 31 UNCLASSIFIED 45
FOOTNOTES: CHAPTER I1J. ORGANIZATION 1. Paper, IAOPS-H-PCO, subj: Resubordination of USLB (5 Feb 86) (S/NOFORN). ° 2. DF, IAOPS-PPR, subj: HQ Reorganization (29 Mar 85) (U)s DF, IARM-S, subj: HQ Organization (14 May 85) (U). 3. LOI, IALOG-1, subj: LOI for Implementation of Arlington Hall Station Backfill Plan - U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (29 May 84) (U); DF, TAOPS, subj: HQ, INSCOM Consol idation/Backfi11 AHS (17 Jun 85) (U); DF, IACS, subj: Consolidation at Arlington Hall Station (27 Jun 85) (U). 4. Paper, Mr. Paul Sutton (OCofS), subj: Headquarters INSCOM Reorganization (5 Nov 84), (U). 5. Msg, COR INSCOM (IAOPS-PPR), subj: Change of OPCON/ADCON of Det Hahn to 66 MIGP (1821302 Mar 85) (U); Interview, Mr. David Reniere (ODCSOPS) (15 Jun 86) (U). 6. FY 1985 MI Bn (East Coast) AHR (U), pp. 75-76; Msg, COR INSCOM (TAOPS-PPR), subj: Request for Unit Hove Approval (2714502 Mar 85) (U). 7. FY 1985 SSG AHR (S), p. 9. 8. FY 1985 902d MI Gp AHR (S), "Personnel" Section; Ltr, CDR 902d MJ Gp to COR INSCOM, subj: Proposed Realignment of 902d MI Group (27 Aug 85) (U). 9. Msg, CDR INSCOM (IAOPS-H), subj: May 85) (C/NOFORN); jew, Mr 86) (U); Unit Redesignation (1716052 David Re DC 5 c a tz) () 2SSIENS 10. ® PP. 2-6. ll. Ibid., p. 10, Annex. 12. FY 1985 DCSPPM AHR (S/NOFORN), ch IV. 13. Ibid. #14, bid. 32 FOR OfSe1AT USE ONLY _ 46
- UNCLASSIFIED Chapter IV -_ RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT Operations and Maintenance, Army (OMA) Funds. (U) FY 1985 was an extraordinary year for INSCOM in that over $15 million was returned to DA. Of this figure, $11 million was INSCOM's and $4 million belonged to other activities in INSCOM funding profile. Below is a quick overview of what subprograms and associated projects were affected by the turn-in:! P2 2,925 INSCOM 2,400 ELT *Other Activity 5,325 P31 7,975 INSCOM 1,665 ITAC/AIA *Other Activity 206 LANCE PERRY *Other Activity 9,846 P3C 215 BASEOPS and TEMPEST P7 . 34 Second Destination Transportation PET 100 Military Training ~~ oo oO 32 ACES/EDG 11 QRIP (0) The U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command's OMA funding program at the close of FY 1985 consisted of $206,077,000 of Direct Funds and $35,000 of Funded Reimbursements for a total of $206,112,000. The table below shows *, breakout of direct funding by sudprogram at the close of FY 1985.2 33 UNCLASSIFIED 47
UNCLASSIFIED Table 1. = Direct Funding by Subprogran. | (As of 30 September 1985) . o Subprogram FY 1985 . P2 (General Purpose Forces) $ 35,315,000 P3I (Intelligence Activities) 143,854,000 P3C (Communications Security) ; 3,030,000 P7 (Troop Issue) 98,000 P80 (Education Services) 1,087,000 P&T (Training) 1,624,000 PQ (Administration and Associated Activities) 22,000 Base Operations (AHS & VHFS) , 21,057,000 TOTAL $206 077,000 (0) The following is an audit trail ($ in thousands) from DA dollar guidance use for preparation of the FY 1985 Command Operating Budget (COB) to final FY 1985 Annual Funding Program (AFP): Program 2 Dollar Guidance = FY 1985 COB * $ 37,433 Leased Communications | (195) Force Mod TENCAP . 21,388 FY 1985 Initial AFP $ 38,626 ELT 95 cw 1,229 REDTRAIN to FORSCOM (50) P2 Mission (2,800) OPFOR FMA 715 ELT , (2,500) Final FY 1985 AFP $ 35,315 Program 31 . . ; 34 UNCLASSIFIED “8
2 (0) 265505 4 (0 egg08NF @) (d 2gsIsns Dollar Guidance - FY 1985 COB $159,348 rare 62 * ransfer to ACSI (173) c3 (97) PBG Corrections . (2,468) AIA Adj/Transfer (382) MPR Align 3 Ciassified Progran (4,048) DOMA 330 CRA Withhold (14,437) FY 1985 Initial AFP $138,138 200 assified Project 225 BAC Restored 21,000 Canal Pilot 464 OPSEC Spt (2,311) CRA Release 14,437 Unemploynent/MPPI (514) Customs 4s ADPE Lease Restored 2 §50 TSCM Equipment . 165 WPE Buyout . 200 AIA Returned ; (322) P3I Mission (5,384) (1,343) ere (208) ransfer to BASEOPS (1,260) Finel FY 1985 AFP . . $143,854 Program 3C Dollar Guidance - FY 1985 COB $ 3,233 CRA Withhold (81) FY 1985 Initial AFP $ 3,152 CRA Withhold Restored 81 Program Directors Adj (65) Pay Raise 30 Transferred to BASEOPS (73) P3C Returned (95) Final FY 1985 AFP . $ 3,030 35 _EOROSROIMSUSEUNTY
UNCLASSIFIED Progran Dollar Guidance - FY 1985 COB | $ 12° <« CRA Withhold . (7) - FY 1985 Initial AFP . $ 125 CRA Restoral 7 Funds Returned (34) Final FY 1965 AFP $ 98 Program 8T Doller Guidance - FY 1985 COB $ 1,520 Physical Fitness 4 FY 1985 Initial AFP $ 1,514 Anti-Terrorist Tng 200 Funds Returned (100) Final FY 1985 AFP $2,614 Program 80 : Dorlar Guidance - FY 1985 COB $ 507 COA Reduction (16) £TED 624 FY 1985 Initial AFP $ 1,115 Funds Returned . (28) Final FY 1985 AFP $ 1,087 BASEOPS Dollar Guidance - FY 1985 COB $29,400 CRA Withhold (2,431) 36 UNCLASSIFIED 9
____$__ ce UNCLASSIFIED FY 1985 Initial AFP $15,969 ‘, CRA Release 2,432 . Environmental (Cong. Adj) (5)... RPMA/BASEOPS Cut (686) . Funds Returned (305) Program Adjustments. (13) Commercial Activities 583 RPMA Projects 610 Pay Raise 140 Transfer from P3I 1,260 Transfer from P3C Final FY 1985 AFP 21,0 Progran 9 Dollar Guidance = FY 1985 CoB $ 0 FY 1985 Initial AFP ‘ 0 QRIP/PECIP OMA Funds 33 Funds Returned Qi) Final FY 1985 AFP . 22 (U0) The following table reflects direct obligations by elements of expense for FY 1985 ($ in thousands): Obligations of $205,642,000 and Annual Funding Program of $206,077,006 resulted in an obligation rate of 99.9 percent. , Table 2. - Direct Obligations for FY 1985. Element of . . , Expense P2 P3I 4 =6P3I PT 4 860P8T) «6CPBO OCPSSSBO Total Percent Civ Pay 1,451 48,469 1,269 30 - 704 - 5,378 57,301 2 Travel 4,540 9,301 353 52 1,273 126 - 44 =.15,689 8 T/T 638 663 15 1 3 2 - 32 1,554 1 Rnt/Com/Ut 679 5,177 206 - - - - 375 6,437 3 Cont Sve 20,120 60,324 499 0S 316 26 6 11,846 93,362 45 Supplies 7,518 15,431 691 9 14 7 °16 3,179 26,865 13 FNIH 345 4,289 - _- = us - 4,634 2 TOTAL . 35,291 143,854 3,033 97 1,6€65 1,085 22 20,854 205,842 100 37 of ____UNCLASSIFIED —— tle een ewe — wwe ms ama owen oe
Family Housing Units. (U) The U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command operated and maintained family housing units at Ari Hall Station and Vint Hill Farms Station. Funds received fr Department of the Army for these units for FY 1985 were $1,550 of which $1,548 was obligated (99.9 percent) .° INSCOM Program and Budget Guidance, FY 198 (Authorized Strength). ys Based on DA Program and Budget Guidance, October 1985, the manpower data shown in the following table represents the ‘authorized strength for end of FY 1985: ton Table 3. = INSCOM Program and Budget Guidance, FY 1985. Authorized Strength Program OFF wo ENL Pe Gen Purpose Forces P3 Intel & Comm P7 Supply P8 Training. P3 Support to NSA MFH TOTAL Civilian Strength by Program. a The following table reflects authorized and assigned civilian strength by program. It includes foreign nationals, temporaries, and permanent overhires.? & Table 4. = Civilian Strength by Program. Program Authorized Actual 2 Gen Purpose Forces 3 Ccp Cryptologic Acty Base Opns/RPMA AMAA GDIP HUMINT ADP TECRAS pess AMHA Other (ry (a) 280 O88 92 (x) (a) 89 9809
CO AL Progran Authorized Erogram CRP ae ‘= Ce < ec [J rer ‘ > t) COMSEC Base Opns/RPMA AMHA Morale and Welfare. (U) The command supported numerous programs evolving from the Family Action Plan I and II, most of which pertained only to Vint Hill Farms since they were the only INSCOM installation providing quarters for married personnel. Survey results indicated that host installations were providing an excellent service to INSCOM personnel and that INSCOM personnel, through their volunteer services, provided invaluable assistance and support to the host command prograns. (U) The command was successful in obtaining $1.3 million on nonappropriated funds from the Army Morale Support Fund to build « comnunity center at Vint Hill Farms Station. Construction began in May and is scheduled for completion in 2d Quarter FY 1986. The new structure will house the Army compunity service, youth activities, $rivacy rooms for counselling, and an auditoriumetype area for family meetings, plays, etc.~ Command Officer Personnel Strength wt zgEGISN* HQDA Reenlistment Award. (U) U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command was presented the HQDA Reenlistment Award for FY 1984 at the meeting of the DA Reenlistment Steering Group in March 1985. 10 Operations and Maintenance, Army (OMA) Funds. {(U) a. PE 381055: FY 1985 funds were allotted a level of $2,082K for supplies, TDY, and various support services. A further $770K was provided in the PE for civilian compensation. . 39 CONJ IAL fi, _ a
UNCLASSIFIED be. PE 393112: Civilian compensation was $115K and an .. additional 7.5K was provided for TDY. “8 CG. PE 614771: $9.4K was allocated for military TDY for training. ADP Security.: (U) The INSCOM Automation Security Program Manager (SPM) function was transferred from the Command Security Office to the Office of the Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff for Information Managenent-Automation effective 1 August 1985. This decision was based on the availability of manpower and technical expertise within DCSIM to effectively manage the program--two essentials which were lacking in the CSO. {U) DCSIM facility accreditation documentation was forwarded to the CSO in August 1985 in support of the SCIF reaccreditation of INSCOM Headquarters Building 1 and ®A" Building. 12 - Microfilm Index Project for Investigative Records Repository (MIP IRR). (U) In conjunction with providing the information concerning Mengele requested by President Reagan, information fron the microfilm library of more than 15,800 reels of intelligence investigative material and 1,700 reels of index data, catalogs, and microfiche were entered into the Defense Central Index of Investigations. An estimated 500,000 records remain to be entered. SE3 supported this effort through our Automated Data Section which provides data entry services to IRR. Personnel Security. (U) In June all MACOM's were directed to wlininate and reduce security clearances. The overall Army target was a 10 percent reduction. Due to the missions of INSCOM and the ' pervasive sensitivity of the command, a more modest reduction of 2 percent was asked. With considerable help from INSCOM DCSOPS and DCSPER along with honest efforts from subordinate units, a total of 290 security clearances were identified for elimination. This represented 2.34 percent of all security clearances. 14 INSCOM Commanders Badges. (U0) A new series of personalized badges was developed for INSCOM commanders for their use when’ visiting the headquarters. The badges were made using copies of command photographs. ! Public Affairs Activities. (U) ‘the Office of Public Affairs exercises staff supervision over authorized INSCOM unit newspapers and eritiques authorized unit newspapers in preparation for the annual Keith L. Ware awards. The following is a list of INSCOM publications as of 30 September 1985.1 40 UNCLASSIFIED 4
CO IAL Publication Unit Publisher Alamo Wrangle USAFS San Antonio ° Augsburg Profile USAFS Augsburg Red Dragon 501st MI Group ° The Dagger 66th MI Group Torii Typhoon. . USAFS Okinawa Vanguard Vint Hill Farms S‘ation Kunia Underground News CONUS MI Group Caribbean Sentinel USAFS Kunia Diogenes Review USAFS Key West Field Station Berlin Voice USAFS Berlin IGAR's. (U) There was a decrease in IGAR's processed by HQ INSCOM detailed IG's during FY 1965, to include those evolving fron complaint periods conducted as an integral part of inspections. Eighty-four such IGAR's were completed in FY 1985 compared to 104 in FY 1984. Acting Inspectors General at major subordinate units processed 113 additional IGAR's, representing 57 percent of the total IGAR cases as compared to 47 percent in FY 1984. Of the total 197 IGAR's processed by INSCOM IG/AIG's in FY 1985, 31 percent were substantiated, 59 percent were nonsubdstantiated and 10 percent were assistance cases. ! ae Congressional Inquiries. (U) During FY 1985, 34 Congressional Inquiries were responded to, an increuss from the 28 precessed in FY 1984. In addition,-AIG's reported two Congressional Inquiries processed directly between HQDA and INSCOM subordinate commands. Of. the 36 total inquiries, 4 were defined as assistance cases, 25 as nonsubstantiated, and 7 were substantiated. ! IG Investigations. (U0) No IG investigations were completed during FY 1985 and none were pending at the close of the period. ! The Army Space Progran. 2
UNCLASSIFIED Historical Monographs. (U) To continue the efforts of communicating interested historical matters to the troops andé-MI specialists, the History Office extended its affective writing tools. In FY 1965, the "MI: A Picture History" was completed and published through the Government Printing Office. In April 1985, 3,000 copies (1,000 hardback and 2,000 soft cover) of the pictorial history were issued to INSCOM for distribution within the command. The book represents the first history on military intelligence to be published and sold by the U.S. Government and the first INSCOM history accepted for publication by the Government Printing Office.2! Program Analysis and Resource Review (PARR). (U) The PARR is another vehicle by which INSCOM submits dollar and manpower requirements for the program years. These requirements must not be fundadle by any of the NFIP programs. The command's FY 1987-1991 PARR was submitted to DA on 11 January 1985. Fiscal guidance constrained INSCOM's dollar growth to 1 percent of its total obligational authority (TOA), which amounted to $1.213M and zero manpower growth. “or the first time, the MACOM's were invited to brief their initiatives to the Army Functional Panels. Out of INSCOM's 29 initiatives, only 11 chose to brief the panels and did So between 29 January to 19 February 1985. In addition, the MACOM'sS were required to brief the Director of Program and Evaluation, MG Woods, on their PARR. Chief, Programs Division briefed on 24 January 1985 while eight other INSCOM staff representatives attended. (U) Also for the first time, feedback on INSCOM's PARR submission was received from ACSI (Plan, Programs, and Budget Office) on 2 Mpril 1985. This enabled feedback to the staff on the status of INSCOM's initiatives, up to the Program Budget Committee (PBC) Review and before the Select Committee (SELCOM) Review. A profile of INSCOM's PARR initiatives follows. It displays how many initiatives ACSI supported by converting them to an Army Staff (ARSTAF) Program Development Increment Package (PDIP), thereby elevating their priority. It also reflects which PDIP's were integrated inte the Army's Program Objective Memorandum (POM) .22 Table 5. - FY 1987-1991 PARR Initiatives.’ . acsi INSCOM SPTD POM SPTD PDIP ¢ AND TITLE Initiated: 9 New Initiatives - 257D AGR Mod Planners 269H AHS Caretaker Costs 8 Special Displays (Mnpr) 5 2S7B INSCOM HCA Operations 11 Special Displays ($) 5° " 3 Recommended Changes - +2SA3 REDTRAIN (Only one requested funding increase +) 42 UNCLASSIFIED 56 SSSR
“0 ee t¢ UNCLASSIFIED ACSI : INSCOM SPTD POM SPTD PDIP ¢ AND TITLE Responded to: 4 DA-Directed (Non-TAA) - DD7U Force Protection Military Justice. (U).A breakdown ef the military justice reports for FY 1985 revealed the following statistics:23 Article 15's FY 1984: 562 FY 1985: Summarized = 179/Formal - 426 Courts-Martial FY 1984 FY 1985 Summary 8 Summary 9 Special 8 Special 7 Geneval 4 General 8 TOTAL — 19 TOTAL 24 Drug Offenses’ FY 198k: 72 Fi 1955: 109 ° FY 1984 Administrative Eliminations é (AR 635-200) Hon Gen Less Than Hon Chapter 5 (Sep for Convenience for Govt) 6 0 2 Chapter 9 (Alcohol or Drug Abuse) 10 5 6 Chapter 10 (Discharged for Good of Service) 0 i 10 Chapter 23 (Separated for Unsuitability) 23 15 0 Chapter 14 (Separated for Misconduct) 1 6 1 All others: 25 3 0 FY 1985 Administrative Eliminations Chapter 5 (Sep for Convenience of Govt) 17 Chapter 9 (Alcohol or Drug Abuse) 7] Chapter 10 (Discharged for Good for Service) 6 Chapter 13 (Separated for Unsuitability) 21 Chapter 145 (Separated for Misconduct) 27 Chapter 15 (Separated for Homosexuality) 2 All others: 30 43 UNCLASSIFIED
Enlisted Personnel Strength Posture. (U) Enlisted personnel posture by MOS (EW/Crypto and HUMINT MOS's) 49 shown in the table below. ° ° Table 6. = Enlisted Personnel Posture for FY's 1984-1985, bth Qtr Percent uth Qtr INSCOM DA FY 1964 or FY 1985 Percent Percent MOS Auth/Asg Fil) Auth/Asg Of F411 Of F412 osD 113 Pd 119 134 05G 101 O58 105 121 140 O5K 113 118 140 33M 68 91 33P 97 100 33Q 107 99 33R 104 54 33T 99 68 33S 98 g96c 204 103 99 98G 97 99 82 983 95 124 106 962 116 . 95 87 965 65 86 98 96C 82 300 96D 71 68 90 97B 72 80 80 97C 26 39 47 97G 85 72 g7E 90 - 63 Noves: 1. MOS 05G converted to MOS 97G. @. MOS 33S converted to MOS 33M, 33P, 33Q, 33R, 33T 3- MOS 96C converted to MOS 97E. Table 7. - Enlisted Personnel Strength Posture by Area and Unit. (As of 30 September 1985) Assigned Unit Authorizations European Area Field Station Augsburg Field Station Berlin Field Station Sinop USA Cryptologic Support Group 66th MI Group . USé Russian Institute . USA Foreign Lan Trng Ctr Europe . TOTAL uy ane (2) (9) 26S98N§ ex) (e) zg598NS 28
a nit Authorizations Assigned Panama Area &70th MI Group EAC Aviation Intel Co Field Station Panama TOTAL ° MAIT Tean USA MAIT Tean USA Mission Support Activity TOTAL Pacific Area Field Station Kunia Field Station Okinawa ITIC-PAC 500th MI Group 50lst MI Group TOTAL CONUS Area S¢sin/AV Support Activity Automated Survey Det Adnin Survey Det Central Security Facility CONUS MI Group ° Finance Accounting Activity 513th MI Group Rational Training Ctr USA Garrison, AHS BQ INSCOM HQ INSCOM, Ft. Meade BQ Support Activity Intel Exchange and Support Ctr Field Station Key West 902d MI Group Operational Group Field Station San Antonio Foreign CI Activity . Special Security Group USA Garrison, VHFS TOTAL 45 RSOROFHCIEHSESNTT — 88 tg) te) zSS9SNS
Unit Authorizations Assi Assigned INSCOM Consolidated wo European Area Z Panama Arev a MAIT Team 2 Pacific Area . ° 5] CONUS Area TOTAL Command Personnel Situation. (C) Actua} ,rotal command strength for FY 1964 and FY 1985 are shown below.25 30 September 1984 OFF wo ENL TOT MIL CIV GRAND TOTAL Actual a 0 September 1985 ___ a OFF Wo ENL TOT MIL cIV GRAND TOTAL S Actual iB (U) FY 1985 command personnel strength dy unit, see appendix F. INSCOM Senior Level (13-15) Positions (High Grade). (U) In March 21984, DA lifted the high grade ceiling, but INSCOM continues to centrally manage and allocate its high grade positions. In its place, OMB/OPM directed that each DOD agency reduce its GS/GM 1:15 population by 1.5 percent a year in FY 1985 through FY 1988. During FY 1985, INSCOM increased its GS/GM 11-15 strength by 84 positions. Failure to meet its FY 1985 reduction goal (which was 11) was dve to new priority mission. requirements, internal promotions, increased fill, and 26 newly authorized manpower spaces. On 14 May 1985, the Chief of Staff issued a policy letter Girecting that all nonsupervisory GS-11 and 12 positions be filled at the GS-09 level or lower in an effort to comply with the high grade reduction initiative.2 PMO Advisory Committee. (U) In July 1984, the Chief of Staff established a Position Management Officer Advisory Committee to assist hin in ensuring that the INSCOM Position Management Program is judiciously managed. The committee members designated were: P. Singleton, D. Perthel, W. Willoughby, R. Altman, R. Hutchinson, J. Davis, A. Ressler (chairman), and A. Cardillo (executive agent). * 46 FOR CFIGHEHSE ONLY 60 rr ee
Cd as UNCLASSIFIED In mideyear, R. Rutchinson was replaced by D. Smith. The committee reviewed and recommended approval/disapproval of requests for. additional high grade positions (GS/GM 13-15), and exceptions to the INSCOM grade, provided advice on restructuring of positions and reorganizations, ensured maintenance of average grade, and recommended the reallocation of high grade resources as priorities changed. During FY 1985, the committee reviewed 28 position management ‘eases. Equal Employment Opportunity Program. (U) The following is a brie? comuand overview of USAINSCOM's efforts in eliminating underrepresentation of women end minorities in mid and senior leve) positions in the workforce:*" As_ of 30 September 1984 GS-9 GS-10 GS-1] GS-12 GS-13 GS-14 GS-15 Total White Female 4s 2 50 34 4 2 0 135 Black Male 3 2 5 18 2 2 0 30 Black Female 8 0 9 3 0 0 0 20 Hispanics Male — 2 0 1 9 i '¢) i 13 Hispanics Female 0 0 i 2 0 0 0 3 AA/PI Male “5 i il 25 8 2 0 50 AA/PI Female a v 1 3 0 0 0 5 AI/AN Male 0 0 0 i 0 1 0 2 AI/AN Female i?) 0 0 0 0 fe) 0 fe) As of 30 September 1985 GS-9 GS-10 GS-11 GS-12 GS-13 GS-14 GS-15 Total White Female 43 2 54 46 8 1 0 154 Black Male y 2 4 14 yo. 0 29 Black Female 6 0 9 8 1 0 0 24 Hispanics Male 3 0 0 6 3 0 1 12 Hispanics Female 1 0 1 2 a ¢) 0 0 4 AA/PI Male 3 1 9 27 8 1 1 50 AA/PI Female 0 0 i i 0 ) 0 2 AI/AN Male 0 0 0 1 0 i 0 2 AI/AN Female 0 0 0 fs) 's) 0 0 0 47 UNCLASSIFIED
‘UNCLASSIFIED DOD Polyrraph Test Program. (U) The Congress of the United States has, in enacting the FY 1985 Defense Avthorization Act, authorized the Department of Defense to conduct a test program of its proposed use of a counterintelligence scope polygraph examination to assist in determining the eligibility of DOD civilian, military, and ° contractor personnel for: access to specifically designated classified information protected within special access programs (SAP's); employment, assignment, or detail to positions within the Defense intelligence Agency (DIA) designated as critical intelligence positions by the Director, DIA; and interim access to ‘Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI). Requirements that the results of the test program be reported to appropriate elements of Congress by 31 December 1985, have since been extended to 31 December 1986. In view of the continuing sensitivity of the issue of the polygraph, and the importance of the success of the test program to future use of the polygraph within DOD, revised DOD Directive 5210.48, wrote DOD Regulation 5210.48, and then issued the DOD Polygraph Test Program SOP, all dated January 1985. The SOP requires all examinations, to include NSA examinations, be tape recorded in their entirety with cassettes that ere compatible with USAINSCOM Quality Control, DOD Oversight Committee, and Congressional Oversight Committee. A representative sample must be obtained in each of the three categories of proposed polygraph use. (U) On 9 January 1985, the Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Policy (ODUSD(P)) issued a memorandum to the military Gepartments to initiate the DOD Polygraph Test Program. A ceiling of 3,500 individuals was established for FY 1985. In October 1985, the program was extended through FY 1987. The FY 1985 ceiling was parried over through FY 1986 and a ceiling of 7,000 was established for FY 1987, with the Army share being about 2,335. (U) On 9 June 1985, INSCOM began this program in CONUS utilizing current assets. Twenty-three individuals were examined, all in connection with SAP's. INSCOM does not have additional polygraph assets to address this program. Authority to obtain additional resources needed to meet the new requirements was not received until September 1985. In March 1985, OACSI, DA established priorities for INSCOM to carry out its polygraph mission. In May 1985, NSA denied INSCOM's request for nine civilian spaces from the Consolidated Cryptologic Program. The nine spaces were finally realized as the result of a HQ INSCOM staff decrement and will be available in FY 1986 and FY 1987. At this time, INSCOM is committed to an internal realignment to provide an additional 50 spaces to the polygraph effort from the S&IA Program. These spaces are to be made available in the FY 1986-1987 timeframe.2 48 UNCLASSIFIED ~
. -. ‘UNCLASSIFIED New Polygraph Facility Construction Funding. (U) Due to the INSCOM ; olygraph program, a request for allocation of funds ($180K) to construct and equip a new polygraph facility was submitted on 16 January 1985. Funding for the polygraph facility construction was requested in the FY 1985 Budget Execution Review (BER), dated 16 January 1985, as an unfinanced requirement. This request was approved and authorized on 2 April 1985. (U) One hundred and eighty thousand dollars has been allocated to construct and equip a new INSCOM polygraph facility on the 2d floor of Building #4554, Fort Meade, Maryland. Included in this construction will be administration spaces for the Office of the Polygraph Program Manager, 9024 MI Group and 64lst MI Company polygraph examiners, six sound proof polygraph rooms, and a reception erea. The estimated date of completion of this facility is 15 April 1986. At this time, no problem areas have surfaced in regards to this action.30 Table 8. - FY 1985 Polygraph Statistics. ist/2d Qtrs 34/4th Qtrs FY Total | Technical Reviews 510 431 941 Review of Permanent Files 1002 1188 2190 Pre-polygraph Dossier Reviews - 406 355 761 Certification Actions 3 0 3 Sezinars Conducted 0 0 0 Examiner Refresher Training 0 5 5 Intern Examiner Supervision i \ 5 Examinations Conducted: + Hq INSCOM and 902d MI Gp 396 301 697 66th MI Gp 70 114 7184 50lst MI Gp 25 2h 4g TOTAL 491 439 930 Support to NSA (Examinations) 0 Freedom of Information/Privacy Act. (U) The following list shows the breakdown as of 30 September 1985:31 Privacy Act Request 924 Freedom of Information Request 1,075 Classified Pages Reviewed 118,075 Unclassified Pages Reviewed 312,203 Administrative Support Actions 17,337 Operational Support Actions 1,019,647 Case Opening Procedures 1,994 Case Closing Procedures . 2,16 TOTAL 1,472,818 49 UNCLASSIFIED
Upward Mobility Program. (U) Command emphasis was provided to promote a significant increase in the INSCOM participation in the Upward Mobility Program. It was a specific objective in the ENscoM Planning Document to expand the size of the program to f4i11 2 percent of the command authorized and funded positions at AHS and VHFS. . (U) The emphasis placed on the Upward Mobility Program resulted in a 100 percent increase in the number of spaces filled in FY 1985. The momentum of this emphasis resulted in this command coming within two spaces of achieving the DA goal in this vital program area. This was the best ever performed of this command. Investigative Records Repository (IRR). (U) A listing of IRR procedures during FY 1985 is shown below: 33 Request 157,916 Dossiers Reviewed 222,532 Direct Database Maintenance and Verification Actions 718, 360 Supplements Processed 60,758 Dossiers Created 37,763 Dossiers Reviewed for Permanents Transfer to NARS 1,298 Dossiers Deleted 71,737 Special Acts Processed 249g Source Data Cards Processed 34,447 Reproductions 401,600 Dossiers Controlled 4,873 , Filing/Refiling 63,044 @Mengele Project Hard Copy and Microfilm Reviews 12,945 @#Mengele Project Microfilm Deletes 8,475 TOTAL 1,815,997 *Special project designated by the Secretary of the Army, which entailed 5 months of work over and above regular tasking. ##Quality control actions continue. Command Strength. (U) The command strength as of 30 Septenp 1984 ; 2) (@ ZSSIRNS 50 64
INSCOM Headquarters Concept Design. (U) The INSCOM Headquarters Concept Beston is the plan for construction of the proposed INSCOM headquarters building at Fort Belvoir, Virginia. In Decembér 1984, plans were made available by the Baltimore Corps of Engineers for review by INSCOM staff members. Construction is projected .to start in early 1986 and be completed in 1988. (U) TEMPEST Branch, C-H Division, ADCSOPS-CI reviewed the concept design with DCSLOG. The purpose of the review was to validate the TEMPEST countermeasures included in the design of the building. It was originally planned that the entire building would be RFI- shielded (radio frequency interference). However, there was no TEMPEST requirement for shielding. Other needless countermeasures were eliminated which will result in saving of an estimated $3.5 million without any reduction in security. No significant problem was encountered .39 Travis Trophy. The Travis Trophy recognizes the most significant contribution in the field of operations, mana and administration by fixed field station "* ament of previous winners .°° Director's Trophy. (U) During FY 1980, Vice Admiral B.R. Inman, DIRNSA, established a new award which would recognize the mobile SIGINT element making the most significant contribution to the Cryptologic community during the calendar year. For 1984, DIRNSA chose the U.S. Army's 224th Military Intelligence Battalion (Aerial Exploitation), as the winner of the Director's Trophy, See ‘appendix K for a complete list of the year's winners.27 INSCOM Key Personnel. (U) Appendix I contains a listing of personnel occupying key positions within the U,3. Army Intelligence and Security Command, as of 30 September 1985.38 cay fa) 298 0808 First Annual Army HUMINT Collection Plan. 65
% *% ty) INSCOM Average Grade. (U) The DA average grade ceiling assigned to INSCOM is 9.17. The FY 1984 average grade was 9.07. During FY 1985, the average grade rose to 9.11. The reason for the increase was greater allocation in fill of higher grade positions and a general upgrading of the workforce.4 SIDPERS Performance. (U) Benefits of the continued emphasis placed on timely and accurate reporting of personnel data input to the SIDPERS was reflected in FY 1985 accomplishments. For the first time, over 95 percent of INSCOM units either met or exceeded the HQDA standards of 90 percent for data acceptability and 7 days for timeliness. 42 USAINSCOM Organization Day Military/Civilian Team Awards. (U) Major General Harry E. Soyster, commander of INSCOM presented the annual awards for outstanding performance and peritorious service for employees of the INSCOM community. The presentation included awarding Mr. John H. Armistead, Jr., DCSLOG, with the Albert W. Small Award; Major Daniel D. Denlin, 66th MI Group (U.S. Army Interrogation Unit, with the Colonel Richard F. Judge Military/Civilian Team Improvement Award for military recipient and Mr. Peter A. Petito, 66th MI Group (584th MI Detachment) as the civilian recipient; Ms« Carolyn J. Brown, DCSLOG, was presented the Jackie Keith Award; Ms. Joanne F. Swartz, Hq, 66th MI Group, with the Virginia McDill Award; Ms. Nancy H. Inger, USAG VHFS (CPO), with the Equal Employment Opportunity Award; Mr. Charles K. Brummett, U.S. Army Engineer Activity, Capital Area (AHS), with the Annual Wage Grade Award; and Ms. Dorothy L. Wood, USAG VHFS (Installation Club System), the Nonappropriated Fund Employee of the Year Award.4 Grade Rollback Program. (UJ) In May 1985, HQ USAINSCOM issued guidance on the implementation of the Administration's Grade Rollback Program. This is a presidentially mandated program to reduce the number of GS/GM 11-15 positions by approximately 1.5 percent by the end of FY 1985. (U) The Grade Rollback Program is to be accomplished by filling all vacant nonsupervisory GS-11 and GS-12 positions at or below the GS-09 grade level. Career ladder positions will be established and may have promotion potential to the original grade. By reengineering positions to the lower grade levels, employees as well as managers can benefit. This program can provide career 52 66 sat SE
UNCLASSIFIED opportunities for employees, further EEO goals, help achieve a balance in professional/technical/support positions, and provide a more efficient organization overall. (U) When management determines that a position cannot be restructured and/or filled at the lower grade levels, a written request for exception must be submitted with the SF-52, Request for " Personnel Action, the Civilian Personnel Office covering the pros and cons of the proposed action.43 Information Search on Dr. Mengele. (U) A memorandum from the Secretary of Army John 0. Marsh, dr., dated 20 February 1985, subj: Search for Information Concerning Dr. Mengele, was sent through the Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence directing the assembly of a special task force to cause a search of relevant Army records for information of Dr. Josef Mengele. In turn, the ACSI tasked the Commander, USAINSCOM to conduct a search of the Investigative Record Repository to complete the task. The U.S. Army Central Security Facility was advised to notify the USAINSCOM OCSOPS of its findings on a perfodic status. (U) The search was focused on administrative, historical, and personnel records or any other records providing clues to indicate any association the Army had with Dr. Mengele of his whereabouts. Particular attention was given to the time period just before and just after the end of World War 11,44 sINSCOM Commanders’ Conference. (U) The FY 1985 Commanders’ onference was held on 7-11 November 1984 at the Sheraton Inn- Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. As an added attraction to the conference a Gettysburg Military History Battlefield Tour with dinner was provided by the War College.45 Performance Management and Recognition System (PMRS). (U) On 10 ctober 1984, both houses of Congress passed HR-2300, a bill with Merit Pay/SES reforms and provisions for ex-spouse claims on federal annuities. Upon the President's approval, the new system would be called the Performance Management and Recognition System (PMRS), not Merit Pay System. (U) On 7 December 1984, the Department of the Army provided a message implementing the merit increase provisions of the new PMRS. The provisions affected all INSCOM employees in the GM pay plan on the statutory effective date of the merit increase. The new PMRS replaced the merit pay system but retained the GM designation merit increases that will now be based on full or partial equivalent amounts to counterpart GS within-grade (WIG) increases. The new PMRS gives. generally less to the Exceptional (EX) and Highly 53 INC ASSIFIFD 67
Successful (RS) in base pay increases than the old Merit Pay System. In most cases, however, PMRS will generally guarantee, unlike the old Merit Pay System, full base pay parity between those rated Fully Successful (FS) and their GS counterparts. (U) On 11 December 198% OPM also directed that employees who were hired, reassigned, or promoted into merit pay within 90 Gays prior to the 7 or 14 October 1984 effective date, and who received a pay increase (1.e., a promotion or a WIG) during the period, would not get @ merit increase--not to include employees promoted from one GM grade to another GM grade during that 90 days. (U) The purpose of the recent legislation is to both guarantee full pay parity with GS counterparts for all GM employees rated FS and above and to provide additional monetary rewards for superior performance. Both a supplemental performance and & cash awards program were established by this legislation to allow performance dased cash awards and cash awards to additionally reward a number of deserving GM employees. The features and procedures for PMRS performance and cash awards are projected to be very close to those for SSPA's and SASA's. The name "Significant Accomplishment Award" now used under the merit pay system is expected to be Gropped in favor of those names, recombining much of the GS and GM award systems. However, GM employees will continue to be ineligible for Quality Step Increases. - (U) The reform legislation also establishes for the first time a monetary limit for performance awards (SSPA's) between an amount equivalent to .75 and 1.5 percent of the aggregate base salaries of all GM employees within an agency. No limit is mandated by this 4aw for cash awards, however, INSCOM is considering establishment of a separate goal of a range between .75 and 1.5 percent of the aggregate base pay. 9026 MI Group Shortfalis. Pa the close of FY 1985, the 902d t . til Group was manned at an“austere 1 , T IAL - 68
Soret, The personnel shortfall within the 902d MI Group was also exacerbated by new standards of grade authorization levels that, when applied to the group's MTOE and its augmentation TDA, resulted in significant grade and experi erience level reductions for 97B and 97G authorizations. cry (a) 289 osnd STU-II_ Program. (U) The INSCOM STU-II program will provide Secure Voice Communications throughout the command. Eleven STU-II terminals have been installed with approximately 44 more planned installations before project completion. Additionally, Narrowband Subscriber Terminals (NBST) are expected to be replaced by STU-II's throughout Department of the Aray. units. The STUeIII program is expected to reach implementation stages upon completion of the STU-II program, with Department of Defense fielding in excess of 800,060 INSCOM will participate aggressively in this program as well, with re quirements projected to be in excess of 2,000 units command-wide."9 (ry (a) 299 gene 55 cay tat 202 0809
Digital Imagery Transmission System (DITS). (U) During FY 1986 the DCSIM Installation Team's efforts were directed at projects at Field Station Kunia, the engineering and installation of the Comaunications Support Package for the Digital Imagery Transmission System (DITS). DITS will provide near real-time imagery to the 470th MI Group and the 513th MI Group from IAPD at the Washington Navy Yard. The terminals are being installed by Northrop, and the Communications Support Package will be installed by DCSIM to include a circuit switch at IAPD. Site surveys for DITS were begun in January 1985 and completed in March 1985. During the July- September time frame a three-man team installed the Communications Support Packages at the Washington Navy Yard and in Panama. Installations at Fort Bragg, Bergstrom AFB, Shaw AFB, and Fort Monmouth are schedueld for FY 1986.52 - 56 IAL - 70
wSEORET European Troop Strength Ceiling (ETSC). (U) The Deputy Chief of taff, Plans, Programs, and Modernization assisted HQ, USAREUR in defining and defending INSCOM military manpower requirements under the ETSC. The TAA 9) program growth for the 66th MI Group’ (234 spaces) had not initially been accommodated within the ETSC. Through negotiation with the USAREUR staff and defense through the USAREUR review process, 153 of the programmed growth spaces were eventually prioritized above other USAREUR requirements and accommodated under the ceiling. However, this was partially offset - by the reduction of 37 previously authorized spaces not associated with the TAA 91 program growth. Other INSCOM requirements were sustained through FY 1987, but the Foreign Language ‘raining Center, Europe TFLTce) and INSCOM field stations were identified for further review. New issues impacting on INSCUM units in NATO Europe are also-expected to erise in the future. Semi-annual USAREUR reviews against ETSC will become a recurring process, with the next review scheduled for Ist/2d Qtr FY 1986.94 easibility demonstration 4 INSCOM Rating Distribution Achievement. (U) In FY 1985, the rating distribution for GPAS employees approximated 38 percent rated Exceptional (EX), 23 percent rated Highly Successful (HS), and 39 percent rated Fully Successful (FS). This is a significant change (and possibly represents inflation) over FY 1984 performance, where 27 percent were rated EX; 21 percent were rated HS; and 52 percent were rated FS. There was a Similar growth in the rating distribution for PMRS employees in FY 1985. Thirty-five percent were rated EX; 34 percent were rated HS; and 31 percent were rated FS. Only one employee was rated below FS. In FY 1984, only 11 percent of al] GM employees were rated EX; 34 percent were rated HS; 55 percent were rated FS. There is clearly an “undesirable” trend toward higher ratings. It is considered undesirable because it has not been validated by commonly recognized, “improved” organizational performance, because it tends to undermine the FS rating as a “positive” rating, and because it has not been accompanied by identification of poor performers. . 57 .
_“ UNCLASSIFIE (U) The following rating distribution model 1s now established for both PMRS and GPAS: 15 percent should be rated EX; 30 percent should be rated HS; and 55 percent should be rated FS or below. A “apecific" model has been chosen to depict an appropriate eppit between EX and HS as well as between FS and higher ratings.0© Cash Awards, (U) Goals for the percentage of the population recognized were met for both GPAS and PMRS employees in FY 1985. Twenty-five percent of GPAS employees. were recognized in FY 1985 versus only 18 percent in FY 1984. Thirty-eight percent of PMRS enployees were recognized in FY 1985 versus an undesirable high in FY 1984 of 54 percent. Goals for amount of funds expended were not met, however, in FY 1985. An amount equivalent to 1.0 percent was expended for GPAS employees and an amount equivalent to 1.8 percent was expended for PMRS employees. It ia believed that a midyear change in goal for GPAS employees, from a maximum of 1.5 to a maximum of 2.0 percent may account for much of the shortfall for GPAS employees, however, it is known that many organizations still do not closely manage "performance" awards. The shortfall in expenditure of PMRS award funds is largely sttributed to the high number of EX ratings that required mandatory performance awards. So many performance awards were given to those rated EX that all of the command's performance award funds were expended before awards could be granted to those rated HS or FS.957 INSCOM Planning Program. (0) A planning conference was held at Airlie House in Warrenton, Virginia, in January 1985. The HQ INSCOM Civilian Personmel Division staff; INSCOM Civilian Personnel Officers from U.S. Arny Garrison, Arlington Hall Station; U.S. Army Garrison, Vint Hill Farms Station; and the Administrative Survey Detachment, Fort George G. Meade, and their functional chiefs met for 3 days to develop the FY 1985-86 Civilian Personnel Management Plan for this command. The fiscal year plan subsequently was endorsed by the Commanding General, INSCOM and distributed to headquarters staff heads and INSCOM commanders worldwide. (U0) One of the major results of this conference was the issuance of the FY 1985-66 planning document. The newly issued plan provided for considerable decentralization of HQ control factors. The plan also had an extended life-cycle from 1 to 2 years, thus cutting down on future administrative requirements to reissue guidance annually. It emphasizes that the Civilian Personnel Program Plan is a living, management document, not just a CPO issuance. Foremost is the fact that the plan eliminated HQ micromanagement of local command CPO planning and evaluation which had the result of improved credibility of program planning in the operating CPO. This and other headquarters program guidance 58 UNCLASSIFIED 2
UNCLASSIFIED promoted a significant increase in planning and evaluation activity in the operating CPO's. Each CPO now conducts a mid-year program review to evaluate its service and provides to management the results of the evaluation.°9 Command Intern Program. (U) In response to past problems ~ encountered and an identified need for a single and comprehensive commandewide training plan, INSCOM developed a Master Intern Training Plan (MITP) for intelligence. This plan is designed to permit modifications in order to meet specific needs of individual 'dntern personnel assigned in the various intelligence sub- . specialties. The Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations (DCSOPS) was the staff proponent for this action. The Intelligence MITP will be formally issued as an INSCOM pamphlet. This is the second MITP developed by this command. The other MITP developed in FY.1984 was for the Civilian Personnel Administration career progran. (U) One significant accomplishment in the intern program was the creation of a Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) intern position. This was a shared resource with the Military Traffic Management Command. Neither MACOM had manpower resources which indicated a projected ability to place an EEO intern after the individual completed the program. The two commands will pool their resources to identify an appropriate position for post-training placement of the graduating intern. This is the first time two comands have shared an intern space. This approach significantly increased the probability of a good placement for the graduating EEO intern.99 ITIC-PAC New Physical Plant. (U) USAITIC-PAC occupies two buildings in the area of Fort Shafter known as "Shafter Fiats," a half of a mile from HQ WESTCOM and 16 miles from Field Station Korea. The Command Group, Support Division and Counterintelligence Branch occupy Building T-1504, a two-story frame structure of 1950's vintage. The deputy for operations and the Intelligence Branch are located 200 yards away in Building 1543, which is a modern Secure Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF). An ADP element of HQ WESTCOM shares the SCIF. With Building T-1504 scheduled for demolition in 1988, and given the cramped facilities in the SCIF, HQ WESTCOM and INSCOM are currently seeking a facility that will provide for the consolidation of all of USAITIC-PAC in one location. The future home ef USAITIC-PAC will probably be a section of an extensive tunnel complex under the Aliamanu Military Reservation (a joint service housing area one mile from Fort Shafter) that until 1974 was the Alternate Command Post of USARPAC. This complex, vacant for the past 11 years, is currently being cleaned up and surveyed for occupancy feasibility by HQ WESTCOM. 60 59 UNCLASSIFIED
‘JNCLASSIFIED FOOTNOTES: CHAPTER IV. RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT 1. FY 1985, DCSRM AHR (C), pp. 6-7. le 2. Ibid., p. e 4. Tbid., Pp. « 5. Tbid., p. 30. 6. Ybid., p. 21. 7. Ibid., p. 21 ?. ° » Pp. 16. 1. ropes DCSIM AHR (S), p. 12. 12, Ibid., p. 26. 13, FY Tss5" "ASA AHR (U), p. 11-51. 14. FY 1985, CSO AHR (U), p. 4. 15. Ibid., p. 6. 16. FY 1985, PAO AHR (U), Ps D-1. 17, FY 1985, IG AHR (U), p. 12. 18. Ibid., p. 12. Toid. bid. 20. FY 1985, DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), p. 37. 21. Ibid., p. 51. 22. Ibid. " 23. FY 1985, SJA AHR (U), p. 24. FY 1985, DCSPER AHR (U), OD. 10-13. 25. INSCOM Command Strength Report from Plans & Proponency Division, DCSPER, as of 30°September 1985, published 2) October 1985 (C). 26. FY 1985, DCSPER AHR (U), p. 31. 27. Ibid., pp. 31-23. 28. Tbid., p. 38. 29. FYI $85, DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), pp. 275-276; FY 1985, SOlst MI Gp, 524th MI Bn AHR (TSCW), p. 29.. 30. FY 1985, DCSOPS AHR (7SCW), p p.° 293. 31. FY 1985, Central Security Facility AHR (FOU0), p. 5. 32. FY 1985, DCSPER AHR (U), p. 33. FY 1985, Central aR tO) Fectitty AHR (FOU0), p. 5. 34. FY 1985, DCSPER AHR (U), p. 8. 35. FY 1985, DCSOPS AHR (TStn), p. 272. +a ibe. Trophy Awards Program Brochures, 1985 (uy. 37. Ibid 38... Key Personnel Roster, dtd April 1985 (FOU0). 39. FY 1985, DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), p. 68. 40. FY haar ar AHR (U), p. 32. 41. Ibid., pp. 6-7. 42. USAT gcON “Organization Day 1985 NTC ty Team Awards Ceremony Brochure (U). —_ So e fRE a ° 60 UNCLASSIFIED “4
&3. ay, 45. 46. a7. 4B. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54, 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. UNCLASSIFIED DF, IAG-CIV, sudjs Personnel Update for Managers and Supervisors, étd 21 Nov 85. See of Army Memo, dtd 20 Feb 85, subj: Search for Inforgation Concerning Dr. Mengele; DAMI-CIS(L) Ltr to CDR, USAINSCOM, étd 4 Apr 85, subj: SAB; ist End, IACS to CDR, CSF, dtd 8 May 85, subj: SAB. Ltr, IAOPS-PMD, subj: Commanders’ Conference, dtd 18 Oct 84. IAPER-CP Msg dtg 1916002 Oct 64, subj: Merit Pay Reform; IAPER-CP Ltr, dtd 27 Dec 68, subj: Performance Management and Recognition System (PMRS). FY 1985, 902d MI Group AHR (S), e. III. FY 1985, DCSIM AHR (S), p. 17. Ibid., p. 18. Ibdid., p. 18. Ibid., p. 19. FY 1985, DCSPPM AHR (U), c. III, p. 3. Ipid., c. IV. p. 3. FY 1985, DCSPER AHR (U), pp. 21, 23. ibdid., pp. 21-22. Ibid., pp. 26, 27. Ibid., pp. 28, 29. FY 1985, USAITIC-PAC AHR (TSCW), p..1. 61 UNCLASSIFIED ar
REDTRAIN. (U) Army Regulation 350-3, Tactical Intelligence Readiness Training (REDTRAIN) Program, was revised with an effective date of 20 November 1984. .The revision outlined for the 64
UNCLASSIFIED first time the specific responsibilities of INSCOM as DA Excoutive Agent for the program. INSCOM was charged with providing an. analysis of semiannual unit REDTRAIN reports to OACSI and DA. -. Additionally, the revised AR required that all tactical | intelligence units of the Total Army develop an annual REDTRAIN Plan for submission to INSCOM on 30 June of each year. In March 1985, the REDTRAIN Division, HQ INSCOM, provided its first analytical report on the status of REDTRAIN activities within the Regular Army. It was found that reports submitted by reserve component units were so sketchy and so poorly prepared as to preclude any meaningful analysis. (U0) At the Fourth REDTRAIN Executive Planning Committee (REPC IV) meeting held 5-7 March 1985 at Arlington Hall Station, REDTRAIN Division put forth a strawman presentation that pinpointed the lack of clear technical standards for which MI personnel could train. This problem was identified as having a tremendous impact upon the Live Environment Training (LET) aspects of REDTRAIN. U.S. Aray Intelligence School-Devens (USAIS-D) concurred and agreed to establish a MACOM working group to address the issue. In April, the U.S. Army Intelligence Center and School (USAICS) initiated action to develop proficiency standards for SIGINT/EW collective tasks. A rewrite of the CEWI battalion training program for SIGINT/EW HMOS's was presented to the G2/MI commanders conference in July 1985, and 4s scheduled for publication as a revised Arny Training and Exercise Plan (ARTEP) sometime next year. 10 1 @ 65 UNCLASSIFIED 79
” . . . « e case ” © waite 0-109 ei aaa ne any
zation TT TaY ved OSNS Counter-SIGINT Concept. (U) In early 1983, the ACSI Counterintelligence Task Force had identified the need for a new eoncept for SIGSEC support to the Army as its second priority. In June of that year, INSCOM hosted a working group of MACOM representatives which considered the issue. The group outlined a new concept for counter-SIGINT operations. A draft document prepared by the OACSI action officer was coordinated with working group members, finalized by the INSCOM staff, and provided to ACSI in January 1985. The concept was validated by TRADOC in March 1985, and Field Circular 34-62, embodying the new approach, was published in July 1985. 9 96 CONDDBENTIAL 110
(0) Counter-SIGINT marked a radical departure from the traditional arny idea of SIGSEC. It moved support from a reactive to a proactive mode. The essence of the concept was to assess the SIGINT threat to supported commanders, assese vulnerability in the sight of that threat, develop countermeasures, and evaluate- countermeasures once implemented. COMSEC monitoring activities would only come into play during the fourth of these phases; even then, they would be restricted to a minor role. In order to support the new concept, 10 additional SIGSEC officer spaces were provided INSCOM in FY 1985. At the same time, under the Army of . Excellence (AOE) Concept programmed for implementation in FY 1986, SIGSEC personnel in MI units at the divisional and corps levels were to be eliminated, an action that would concentrate the bulk of Aray SIGSEC personnel in the command and would allow INSCOM to be at the leading edge of implementation of the new initiative. One significant barrier to full icplementation was lack of an immediate ADP capability to support the threat and vulnerability assessment process and facilitate real-tine analysis. COMSEC Issues. (U) AR 530-2 charges the CG, INSCOM with the responsibility of assisting the HCDA staff and commanders at all levels in developing and evaluating COMSEC policies, pians, Operating procedures, and training programs. In FY 1985, there were significant changes to the natipnal-level COMSEC structure 97 CON 11i
N TIAL which DA and INSCOM functioned. Wational Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 145, issued on 17 September 1984, replaced the former National COMSEC Committee with a more elaborate ° architecture. NSDD 145 established a senior level steering group, the Systems Security Steering Group (SSSG); an interagency * operating group, the National Telecommunications and I.,formation Systems Security Committee (NTISSC). Under the new arrangement, the Secretary of Defense served as executive agent in all U.S Government COMSEC matters, with DIRNSA as national manager. 12
Key Management Automation. (U) Most of the new COMSEC devices being fielded by the Army employed electronic key. The steady expansion of eryptonets throughout the Army and the increase in the demand for electronic key degraded the capability of manual methods of management to meet operational needs. In late October 1984, representatives of the U.S. Army Signal Center and INSCOM prepared a draft plan to automate the cryptonet and key management functions. The draft was used as a strawman at a meeting of representatives from all MACOM's that INSCOM hosted in November 1984. 99
“UNCLASSIFIED COMSEC Serial Number Tracking. (UV) COMSEC equipment which is declassified/unclassified, but subject to NSA accountability falis into the category of Controlied Cryptographic Items (CCI). > (Equipment is unclassified when unkeyed; when keyed, the equipaent assumes the same classification as the key.) The Army has announced plans to transfer CCI from the Army COMSEC Material Control Systen to the standard logistics system. Since NSA continues to require access to CCI accounts, the new initiative required the Arny to Gevise a means of tracking CCI through its supply and maintenance system at both wholesale and retail levels. This would be done “through a process of tracking serial numbers of individual CCI items. AMC requested INSCOM representation at the first serial number tracking (SNT) meeting held on 24 August 1984. Subsequently, INSCOM took part in a series of COMSEC working groups. A number of SNT systems were evaluated as possible candidates for application to CCI. It was found that the present DOD Small Arms Serialization Program appeared to be the most suitable SNT program for cryptologic application. 1 COMSEC Insecurities, (U) The INSCOM COMSEC Insecurity Program for the purpose of monitoring, reviewing, and when required, evaluating COMSEC insecurity reports initiated within DA was implemented in February 1961. The program serves primarily to ensure that all Getected insecurities to COMSEC material are reported promptly to the officials responsible for evaluating the incidents and initiating action to minimize their security impact. These reports of insecurities also serve as the basis for identifying trends in insecurity occurrences, and for developing procedural and doctrinal measures to prevent recurrences. Evaluations of insecurities are rendered by the cryptonet controlling authority (CONAUTH) in the case of key at the user levels by INSCOM, when the key is in Gistribution channels, when multiple Army CONAUTH's are involved, or when there is a personnel insecurity;. by DIRNSA, for cryptographic insecurities, physical insecurities (COMSEC equipment and documents), and cases involving CONAUTH's from more than one service). (U) Total reported COMSEC insecurities, by MACOM, for CY 1984 and 1985 are as follows: e rf 100 UNCLASSIFIED 114
UNCLASSIFIED Table 9. = COMSEC Insecurities Command CY 1984 cy 1286 USAISC 67 ) AMC 2 . 4 USAREUR . 266 175 FORSCOM , 125 73 HQDA 0 1 INSCOM 12 8 Joint 3 0 EUSAK 29 9 NGB 16 19 TRADOC 3 1 WESTCOM 1 6 Other 12 10 TOTAL §36 348 (0) As of 1 October 1985, 80 cases were yet to be opened, bringing the total CY 1985 cases to 428. 1 (U) COMSEC summary letters to MACOM's were sent out for the first time in January and February 1983 and covered the entire CY 1982 period. Although responses from the MACOM's have been positive, there has been no detectable improvement other than in a few of the Jess serious insecurities. The third report to the MACOM's for CY 1984 was provided in May 1985. During CY 1984, the majority of the Army's COMSEC insecurities continued to be caused by an apparent Gisregard for established COMSEC procedures; negligence on the part of assigned personnel; falsification of destruction certificates; a Yack of education on the part of users, custodians, unit commanders; and, in many cases, a lack of command emphasis. Analysis has revealed that command emphasis and formal training of COMSEC custodians yielded the highest pay back in terms of any corrective actions taken by field commands. 1 (U) As the result of an NSA briefing to the DA staff on the HUMINT threat to COMSEC in 1982, HQDA DCSOPS was tasked to coordinate establishnent of a standardized course for Army COMSEC custodians. INSCOM worked with and assisted HQDA and TRADOC in the development of an appropriate curriculum. The first class of the Standardized COMSEC Custodian Training Course began 2 April 1964 at the Signal Center, Fort Gordon, Georgia. The course provides instruction on safeguarding and destruction of classified materials, documenting reports; establishing, transferring, and closing COMSEC accounts; threat and security awareness programs; COMSEC supply and maintenance procedures; COMSEC emergency procedures; and all major 104 UNCLASSIFIED 115
Guties required of COMSEC personnel. By the end of FY 1985, the course was also beins given dy USAREOR, EUSAX, WESTCOM, and the National Guard. 1 te
Mobile TEMPEST Test System (MTTS). (0) This project, an initiative to upgrade nine FETTS-160 TEMPEST systems and to fabricate a tenth system for deployment to the field, was first undertaken in 1979. Since that time, the scope of the project was expanded to include replacing all 10 overloaded vehicles sounting the system as well as upgrading mission equipment. During FY 1985, the project continued to be plagued with difficulties. The contractor charged with providing the prime mover and trailer submitted a deficient product and then went bankrupt. By the end of the fiscal year, it was revealed that the prime contractor, Chronometric Inc., was involved in voucher discrepancies and was under government audit, a fact that would delay the MITS program yet another 6 months. 2
"wohl OR Pp EIB gy NE Rp A Bedee we ow of GUSC 662 (b) (2) 104
CIAL USE ON! y FOOTNOTES: CHAPTER V. OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES 7 . Multidiseipline “ee /1,. FY 1965 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), passim.s Ltr, IAOPS-IS-W, subj: U.S. Arny Requirement for Direct Weather Support (16 Jpl 85) (S). 2. Fact Sheet, IAOPS-P/T, subj: OPCON of 500th MI Group (12 Oct 84) (S)3 Ltr, IAOPS-PL, subj: Wartime Mission for 500th MI Group (20 Nov 84) (S). 3. Issue Paper, IAGD-OP-PT, subj: Force Design MI Brigade Pacific (-) Korea (Undtd). 4. FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), pp. 26-273 DF, ZIAOPS-PL, subjs JCS CPX POWDER RIVER 85 (25 Sep 84) (C)3 Ltr, IAOPS-PL, subje INSCOM After Action Repsrt for JCS CPX POWDER RIVER 65, encl (31 Jan 85) (C). S- Encl, INSCOM After Action Report, op. cit.3 FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR . (TSCW), p. 317. 6. Ltr, IAOPS-PL, subj: INSCOM Letter of Instruction for JCS Exercise WINTEX-CIMEX 85 (18 Dec 84) (S)3 Msg IAOPS-PL, subj: USAINSCOM First Impressions Report for Exercise WINTEX-CIMEX 85 (18 Mar 85) (S); Addendum to msg (S-CCO). 7. Fact Sheet, ZAOPS-PL, subj: Command Group Visit 5 (8 Jul 85) (S)s; FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW)>p. 6. » ZAOPS-IS-W, subj: U.S. Army Requirement for Direct Weather Support (16 Jul 85) (S)3 conversation with Mr. Herbert _s—- Tax, DCSOPS, 4 Aug 86. . 9. FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), p. 40. IMINT/MASINT 7. FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), pp. 18, 23. 2. Ibid., p. 20. 3. Fact Sheet, ADCSOPS, subj: INSCOM's MASINT Activities in Europe (8 Aug 85) (S/WNINTEL). 4. Ibid.3 FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), p. 193 conversation with Ms. Ruby Benacquista, DCSOPS, 25 Jul 66. 5 2 b= 5. FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), p 6. Info Paper, IAOPS-E0, subj (15 Nov 85) (C); Info Paper, IAOPS-EO, subj: (15 Nov 85) (C); Info Paper, IAOPS-E0, subj: M Electro Optics Support to SOUTHCOM (18 Oct 84) (S). 7. FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), pp. 21-22. 8. Ibid., p. 26. 9. Ibid., p. 293 Fact Sheet, IAOPS-I, subj: Imagery Systems Activity-Korea (27 Aug 85). 119
USEONLY 10. Fact Sheet, ADCSOPS, subj: INSCOM's IMINT Activities in Europe (9 Aug 85) (S/NOFORN). 11. Info reper, IAOPS-I, subj: IMINT Actions in Europe (29° Jui 85). 12. DF, IAOPS-IMINT/EO, subj: IG Inspections (1 Aug 85) (S/NOFORN). 13. FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), p.32. 1h. Ibid., p. 30. 15. Ibid., Pe 273 Msg., TAOPS-GW, subj: Project Update ov 84) (S/NOFORN)s Memo for C of S, subj: Crash of aik:. Vehicle (AV) #12 (25 Jun 85) (S). 16. FY 1985 TSCW), pp. 35-363 Fact Sheet, IAOPS-I (§ Jun 86) (S)3 DF, DAMO-FDI, subj: (S)3 Fact Sheet, IAOPS-Z, subj: (26 Jun 85) (3). - HUMINT/TAREX . 71. FY 1965 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), p. 65. 2. Ibid. 3. Ibdid., p. 68. 4. Ibid., p. 69. 5. Ibid., pp. 75-763 Ltr, IAOPS-H, subj: eal ' Implementation Pian (30 Aug 85) (C/NOFORN). 6. FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), pp. 58-613 65. 7. Ibid., p. 923; conversation with Mr. James C. Gerhart, ADCSOPS- H, 25 Jun 86. 8. FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), pp. 78-84. 9. Ipid., pe 17. ¢ 10. FY 1985 ASD AHR (S)3 FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), pp. 70-72. 41. FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), p. 77. 12. Ipid., pp. 90-91. 13. Ibid., p. 99. 14. FY 1955 ASA History (TSCW), Vol. I, p. 833 FY 1973 ASA History (TSCW), p. 26. 15. FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), p. 94. 16. FY 1984 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), p. 23. 17. FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), p. 93. 18. Idid., Pe 95. 19. Ibid., p. 97. 20. Ibid., p. 96. , 21. Ibid., Pe 98. 22. iIbid., p. 101. 23. Ibid., p. 102. eg ro zsseen SIGINT /EW 7y. FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), pp. 142-44. 2. Ibid., p. 1213 Ltr, IAOPS-SE-SP, subj: INSCOM/OACSI SIGINT/EW IPR, Encl 1 (23 Jan 65) (S-CCO). 106 ICIAL USEONLY 120
24. 25 o 26. 27. 26. 29. 30. 31. 32. FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), p. 2073 Ltr, IAOPS-SE-SP, op. cit.3 conversation with LTC Knight, DCSFI, 17 Jul 86. © -... FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), p. 149. Ibid., pp. 128-313 Info DF, IAOPS-SE-SM0, subj: Analysis of Project (7 dun 85) (S-CCO). _ FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), pp. 128-31. FY 198% rane AHR (7SCW), p. 673 FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), @ FY 1985 DCSOPS ABR (TSCW), pp. 119-20. Ibid., pe 1573 1984 Travis Trophy Nomination Briefing (TSCW), FY 1984 INSCOM AHR (TSCW), p. 71. FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), pp. 125-26. Ibid., pe 127. . ibid. Ibid. Ibid., pe 138. Ibid.» pe 103. Ibid., pe 104. Tbid., Pp. 132-343 FY 1985 S5O01st MI Gp AHR (S/NOFORN), p. 18. FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), pp. 150-513 Ltr, IACG, subj: 1985 Fall Commanders’ Conference, Encl 1 (13 Sep 85) (TSCW); Ltr, IAOPS-SE-SP, op. cit., Encl 1. FY 1985 DCSOPS ABR (TSCW), p. 146. Ibid., pp. 146=-47. ‘ Ltr, IARK-OP, subj: Southeast Asia Task Force (C), Encl 1 (17 Jun 85) (S-CCO). Briefing by FS San Antonio, 28 Dec 84; Msg, IAOPS-SE-0, subj: CENTAM SIGINT Initiatives (2415152 Sep 85) (S-CCO), pp. 1©33 FY 1985 CONUS MI Gp AHR (S), p. 8. Summary Trip Report, COL Robert M. Bowe (21 Oct 85), pp. 1-2. Msg, IAOPS-SE-0, op. cit., pp. 8-9. FY 1985 FS Panama AHR (S-CCO), ch III, p. 53 Msg, TAOPS-SE-0, op. cit., pe 10; FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), pp. 135-36; Fact Sheet, IAOPS-SE-0, subj: CENTAM Fixed SIGINT Operations (5 Oct 85) (TSCW). Ltr, IAOPS-OR-GC, subj: El Salvador: Tactical Update (18 Oct 85) (S/NOFORN/CCO). FY 1983 INSCOM AHR (TSCW), pp. 1102113 FY 1985 DCSSYS AHR od {(S-€C0), pp. 55-56. FY 1984 INSCOM AHR (TSCW), pp. 75-76; FY 1983 INSCOM AHR (TSCW), p. 108; FY 1985 DCSSYS AHR (S-CCO), p. 59. FY 1985 DCSOPS ARR (TSCW), p. 105. 121
Counterintellizgence/Operations Securit “\, FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), p- 2963 Ltr, DAMI-CIC, subjte Arny Security and Investigative Activities (S&IA) Program Guidance Memorandum (PGM) (26 Apr 85) (S)s FY 1985 902d MI Group AHR (S), ch III, Annex J; FY 1985 FCA AHR (S), pp. 1, 10. . 2. FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), pp. 278-81. 3. Info Paper, IAOPS-CI-PG, subj: INSCOM Polygraph Program Status (8 Nov 85) (U). 4, FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), pp. 275-77, 293. 5. Fact Sheet, IAOPS-CI-0C, subj: Clarification of Statistical Data for Otto Gilbert Testimony, Tab A (16 Apr 85) (U); Ltr, DAMI-CIC, subj: Aggressive Counterespionage Initiatives (30 Aug 85) (S). 6. FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), pp. 294-95; Ltr, DAMI-CIC, S&IA PGM, —~ op. eit. 7. FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), pp. 259-64. 6. Fact Sheet, IAOPS-CI-RAP, subj: USAREUR-Directed Mission RE: Overt Surveillance of SMLM-F (28 May 85) (C); FY 1985 527th w» MI Bn AHR (S), p. 74. 9. FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), pp. 213-163 Ltr, IAOPS-CI-P, subj: Counter-SIGINT Concept (28 Aug 85) (U). 10. Ltr, IAOPS-CI-P, subj: Counter Signals Intelligence (Counter-SIGINT) Concept (29 apr 65) (U); Msg, subj: Counter SIGINT in Theater (081330Z Aug 65) (0); Fact Sheet, IAOPS-CI- OS, subj: ‘“Counter-SIGINT Support under Army of Excellence (AOE) (5 Sep 85) (U). a “11. Concept Paper, IAOPS-CI-OS, subj: National Communication Security (COMSEC). Assessment Center (NCAC) (28 Aug 85) (C). 12. FY 1985 DCSOPS AHR (TSCW), pp. 165-66. “13. Ibid., pp. 185-94. “4, Ibid., p. 254. 17. Ibid., pp. 242-43; Ltr, IAOPS-CI-0S, subj: Summary of 1984 COMSEC Insecurities (6 May 85) (S). 18. FY 1985 DCSOP (TSCW - 19. -20. % % ac ’ -CI-0S, subj: Army Cryptonet Review (5 Sep 2 85) (S). ’ “21. 1985 DCSOPS AHR {TSCW), pp. 232-34. 108
APPENDIX A USAINSCOM ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE (As of 30 September 1985) Unit Designation HERDQUABTERS » U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND U.S. Arny Garrison, Arlington Hall Station USAINSCOM CONUS Military Intelligence Croup U.S. Aruy Field Station Key West U.S. Army Field Station San Antonio U.S. Aray Blement, National Security Agency U.S. Army Garrison, Vint Hill Farms Station U.S. Army Field Station Okinawa U.S. Army Field Station Berlin U.S. Army Pield Station Sinop U.S. Army Special Security Group .. U.S. Army Programs Analysis Group U.S. Army Administrative Survey Detachment U.S. Army Foreign Area Officers Detachnent U.S. Army Russian Institute U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Poreign Language Training Center Europe U.S. Arny Field Station Augsburg USAINSCOM Automated Systems Activity U.S. Aray Cryptologic Support Group USAINSCOM Support Activity U.S. Army Operational Group U.S. Army Systems Exploitation Detachment U.S. Arny Central Security Facility USAINSCOM Finance and Accounting Activity : 4d BUSQ 662 (b) (1) — a] Qo SUSC 652 (b) (2)
Vel BYSE 662 <b) (2). uric Unit Designation HEADQUARTERS, U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND USAINSCOM Maintenance Assistance and Instruction Tean U.S. Army Foreign Counterintelligence Activity U.S. Army Systems Exploitation Detachment USAINSCOM Administrative/Audiovisual Support Activity U.S. Army Field Station Kunia USAINSCOM Theater Intelligence Center Pacific U.S. Army Intelligence Support Activity USAINSCOM Mission Support Activity U.S. Army Intelligence Exchange and Support Center 902d Military Intelligence Group | Augmentation, 902d Military Intelligence Group USAINSCOM Pentagon Counterintelligence Force USAINSCOM Military Intelligence (Counterintelligence) East Coast USAINSCOM Counterintelligence Detachment, Defense Nuclear Agency USAINSCOM Military Intelligence Battalion (Security) ; USAINSCOM Military Intelligence Battalion (Counterintelligence) West Coast 66th Military Intelligence Group Augmentation, 66th Military Intelligence Group 18th Military Intelligence Battalion Augmentation, 18th Military Intelligence Battalion Sth Military Intelligence Company Augmentation, Sth Military Intelligence Company . HHC, 502d Army Security Agency Battalion Augmentation, 502d Army Security Agency Battalion kO9th Army Security Agency Company (Operations) (Rear) 110 SUSC 662 (bd) (2)
vIC Unit Designation 3 Location HEADQUARTERS, U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND 66th Military Intelligence Group HHC, 502d Arny Security Agency Battalion 328th Army Security Agency Company 58ist Military Intelligence Detachment 562d Military Intelligence Detachment 583d Military Intelligence Detachment S27th Military Intelligence Battalion Augmentation, 527th Military Intelligence Battalion Company A, 527th Military Intelligence Battalion Company B, 527th Military Intelligence Battalion 930th Military Intelligence Detachment Augnentation, 430th Military Intelligence Detachment 766th Military Intelligence Detachment Augmentation, 766th Military Intelligence Detachment... 430th Military Intelligence Battalion (Provisional) . 584th Military Intelligence Detachment 470th Military Intelligence Group Augnentation, 870th Military Intelligence Group U.S. Army Field Station Panama 500th Military Intelligence Group Augmentation, 500th Military Intelligence Group U.S. Army Field Station Misawa 149th Military Intelligence Detachment Augmentation, 149th Military Intelligence Detachment 181st Military Intelligence Detachment Augnentation, 181st Military Intelligence Detachment U.S. Army Asian Studies Detachment onal 0 on BURG 562 (bd) (2) : 111 Conia.
Locz: tion vICc Unit Designation HEADQUARTERS, U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND HHC, 50ist Military Intelligence Group | - Augmentation, 501ist Military Intelligence Group U.S. Army Field Station Korea 332d Military Intelligence Company (Electronic Warfare) S2hth Military Intelligence Battalion Augmentation, 524th Military Intelligence Battalion 209th Military Intelligence Company (Operations security) Augmentation, 209th Military Intelligence Compan 3d Military Intelligence Battalion (Aerial Exploitation) Headquarters, Headquarters and Service Company, 3d Military Intelligence Battalion Company A, 3d Military Intelligence Battalion Company B, 34 Military Intelligence Battalion HHC, 513th Military Intelligence Group 513th Military Intelligence Center (Provisional) 174th Military Intelligence Compahy (Operations) HHC, 201st Military Intelligence Battalion 17th Military Intelligence Company 166th Military Intelligence Cospany U.S. Army EAC Aviation Intelligence Company HHC, 202d Military Intelligence Battalion (Collection/ Exploitation) 64ist Military Intelligence Company (Collection) 219th Military Intelligence Company 164th Military Intelligence Company HHC, 203d Military Intelligence Battalion (Technical Intelligence) 1ith Military Intelligence Company (Technical Intelligence) Augmentation, ith Military Intelligence Company (Technical Intelligence) a | cm - BUSC 662 (b) (i) 112 SAD 652 Lb) (2)
APPENDIX B- TOE UNITS oo {As of 30 September 1985) - 66th Military Intelligence Group k70th Military Intelligence Group 500th Military Intelligence Group RHC, 501st Military Intelligence Group 513th Military Intelligence Group 9026 Military Intelligence Group 34 Military Intelligence Battalion (Aerial Exploitation) 18th Military Intelligence Battalion HHC, 201st Military Intelligence Battalion HHC, 2026 Military Intelligence Battalion (Collection/Exploitation) RHC, 203d Military Intelligence Battalion (Technical Intelligence) HHC, 502d Army Security Agency Battalion S2uth Military Intelligence Battalion 527th Military Intelligence Battalion Sth Military Intelligence Company i7th Military Intelligence Company 1ith Military Inteliigencé Company (Technical Intelligence) 16Nth Military Intelligence Company 166th Military Intelligence Company 174th Military Intelligence Company (Operations) 209th Military Intelligence Company 219th Military Intelligence Company 332d Military Intelligence Company (Electronic Warfare) 328th Army Security Agency Company 4O9th Army Security Agency Company (Operations) (Rear) 64ist Military Intelligence Company (Collection) 149th Military Intelligence Detachment 18ist Military Intelligence Detachment 430th Military Intelligence Detachment 58ist Military Intelligence Detachment 582d Military Intelligence Detachment 583d Military Intelligence Detachment ° 584th Military Intelligence Detachment 766th Military Intelligence Detachment gusc 664 (b) (2) 127
Sit Shy Rape Rie dck ah ter dein et APPENDIX C CHANGES IN STATUS OF TOE UNITS an NONE - a REGRADED UNCLAS RN on §6=—. 3 «NOV i f BY CDR USAINSCOU FOIPO - Auth Para 1-603 DoD 8200. 1-R 114 128
_— a & ad Ad APPENDIX D TDA UNITS® 8 (As of 30 September 1985) Headquarters, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command U.S. Army Garrison, Arlington Hall Station USAINSCOM CONUS Military Intelligence Group U.S. Army Element, National Security Agency USAINSCOM Pentagon Counterintelligence Force USAINSCOM Military Intelligence Battalion (Counterintelligence) West Coast USAINSCOM Counterintelligence Detachment, Defense Nuclear Agency U.S. Army Garrison, Vint Hill Farms Station U.S. Army Field Station Key West U.S. Army Field Station Okinawa U.S. Army Field Station Berlin U.S. Army Field Station Sinop U.S. Army Special Security Group U.S. Army Programs Analysis Group U.S. Arny Administrative Survey Detachment U.S. Army Russian Institute U.S. Army Field Station San Antonio USAINSCOM Military Intelligence Battalion (Counterintelligence) East Coast U.S. Army Central Security Facility YSAINSCOM Finance and Accounting Activity USAINSCOM Maintenance Assistance and Instruction Tean U.S. Army Fereign Counterintelligence Activity USAINSCOM Support Activity U.S. Army Operational Group . U.S. Army Foreign Area Officers Detachment U.S. Army Field Station Augsburg U.S. Army Field Station Misawa USAINSCOM Automated Systems Activity U.S. Army Field Station Korea USAINSCOM Theater Inteliigence Center-Pacific U.S. Army Cryptologic Support Group . USAINSCOM Military Intelligence Battalion (Security) U.S. Army Systems Exploitation Detachment USAINSCOM Administrative/Audiovisual Support Activity U.S. Army Field Station Kunia U.S. Arpy Asian Studies Detachment U.S. Army Intelligence Support Activity gus 662 (b) (4) 115 129
adn eile stern O.S. Army Field Station Panama . OSAINSCOM Mission Support Activity USAINSCOM Foreign Language Training Center Europe U.S. Army EAC Aviation Intelligence Company U.S. Army Intelligence Exchange and Support Center . Augmentation, 902d Military Intelligence Group Augmentation, 66th Military Intelligence Group Augnentation, 870th Military Intelligence Group Augnentation, 500th Military Intelligence Group Augnentation, 527th Military Intelligence Battalion Augnentation, 5th Military Intelligence Company Augmentation, 209th Military Intelligence Company Augnentation, 430th Military Intelligence Detachment Augnentation, 766th Military Intelligence Detachment Augmentation, 524th Military Intelligence Battalion Augmentation, 16ist Military Intelligence Detachment Augmentation, 502d Army Seourity Agency Battalion Augmentation, 149th Military Intelligence Detachment Augmentation, 18th Military Intelligence Battalion Augmentation, 501st Military Intelligence Group Augnentation, 11th Military Intelligence Company GUSC 652 (b) (2). r) 116 130
Unit Tos . Tos qm From: Tos qa From: To: From: To: APPENDIX E CHANGES IN STATUS OF TDA UNITS REDESIGNATED Eff Date INSCOM Counterintelligence 1 Oct 84 and Signal Security Support Battalion, PSF ad Authority PO 63-5, HQ USAINSCOM, 2h Sep 64 USAINSCOM MI Battalion (Counterintelligence) West Coast INSCOM Counterintelligence 1 Oct 84 and Signal Security Support Battalion, Ft Meade PO 63-4, HQ USAINSCOM, 24 Sep 84 USAINSCOM MI Battalion (Counterintelligence) East Coast INSCOM Security Support 1 Oct 84 Detachment, Ft Meade USAINSCOM Military Intelligence Battalion (Security) U.S. Army Special Operations Detachment U.S. Army Foreign Counterintelligence Activity 1 Jul 85 REASSIGNED aT ».:. Army Systems Exploitation 15 May 86 Detachment HQ USAINSCOM " U.S. Army Operational Group 1 Dec 84 ay U.S. Ary Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center From: To: GHEE v.s. ray special security Group From: Tos SUSC 652 (b) (2) HQ USAINSCOM U.S. Army Intelligence Agency RELOCATED 1 Jan 85 Pentagon, Washington, “DC Arlington Hall Station, VA 117 _CO Sinan PO 63-3, BQ USAINSCOM, 24 Sep 84 PO 62-1, HQ USAINSCOM, 17 Jul 85 PO 42-2, HQ USAINSCOM, 3 May 8&5 GO-3, HOS DA, * 15 Feb 85 PO Gl-1, HQ USAINSCOM, 1u Jan 85 . 131
nit Eff Date Authority |g USAINSCOM Pentagon Counter- 16 Mar 85 USAINSCOM MI (CI) intelligence Force East Coast FY 1985 From: Pentagon, Washington, DC AHR To: Arlington -Hall Station, VA ° ABBR vsarwscon pentagon counter- 1 Jul 85 Msg, CDR USAINSCOM, intelligence Force 6 May 85 From: Arlington Hall Station, VA To: Ft. George G. Meade, MD guna 652 (0) )
- Tetras arama = tee comin Anns ae re ms all cet . APPENDIZ F : USAINSCOM PERSONNEL STRENGTH BY UNIT® (As of 30 Septeaber 1985) ACTUAL STRENGTH Command or Unit , MIL _MIL TOTAL HQ, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security an Command (INSCOM) | | USAG, Arlington Hall Station USAINSCOM CONUS Military Intelligence Group (SIGINT/EW) U.S. Army Element, National Security Agency USAG, Vint Hill Farms Station U.S. Army Field Station Key West #8Y.S. Army Administrative Survey: Detachment USAINSCOM Automated Systems Activity 11th Military Intelligence Company (Technical Intelligence) w/ Augmentation U.S. Army Field Station San Antonio U.S. Army Central Security Facility USAINSCOM Finance and Accounting Activity USAINSCOM Maintenance Assistance and Instruction Team #9y.8. Aray Foreign Area Officers Detachment U.S. Army EAC Aviation Intelligence Company "The table is taken from DCSPER, INSCOM Command Strength Report dtd 30 Sep 85. USC 652 £b) (2). *®As of 31 August 1985. 119 y
ACTUAL STRENGTH Command or Unit MIL TOTAL _ cll USAINSCOM Support Activity U.S. Army Foreign Counterintelligence Activity U.S. Army Operational Group U.S. Army Special Security Group USAINSCOM Administrative/Audiovisual Support Activity 902d Military Intelligence Group w/ Augmentation USAINSCOM Pentagon Counterinteliigence Force USAINSCOM Counterintelligence Detachnent, Deferse Nuclear Agency 17th Military Intelligence Company 174th Military Intelligence Company HHC, 202d Military Intelligence. Battalion (Collection Exploitation) USAINSCOM Mission Support Activity U.S. Army Intelligence Exchange and Support Center (IESC) HHC, 203d Military Intelligence Battalion (Technical Intelligence) 513th Military Intelligence Group w/Augnentation HHC, 201st Military Intelligence Battalion USAINSCOM Military Intelligence Battalion - (CI) Bast Coast (Ft Meade, MD) USAINSCOM Military Intelligence Battalion (CI) West Coast (Pres of SF, CA) ‘. ie ar . é : ’ % 4 tp x 4 é 4 we: °. ( i ra Ms i [ 4 “ a f 4 3 4 4 q ‘ ‘ 4 ‘ : re a E 4 3 4 Q be : ‘ « ‘ 9 ‘ £ “ % + i euSC 662 (b) (2) an eo
cel WANE A SS To SS age Pe a a Command or Unit OFF Wo USAINSCOM Military Intelligence Battalion (Sety) 164th Military Intelligence Company 166th Military Intelligence Company 219th Military Intelligence Company TOTAL CONUS h70th Military Intelligence Group w/Augmentation U.S. Army Field Station Panama TOTAL CARIBBEAN S@USAINSCOM Theater Intelligence Center- | Pacific Looe U.S. Array Field Station Okinaw U.S. Army Field Station Misawa . 500th Military Intelligence Group w/ Augmentation SFHHC, SO1st Military Intelligence Group w Augnentation 181st Military Intelligence Detachment ##209th Military Intelligence Company (Operations Security) U.S. Army Asian Study Detachment **y.S8. Army Field Station Korea #4332d Military Intelligence Company (Electronic Warfare) *9As of 31 August 1985. ACTUAL STRENGTH ENL KEL TOTAL civ AGGREGATE 6 » , 4 4 BUSC 852 (b) (1)
get Detachment U.S. Army Field Station Kunia 9934 Military Intelligence Battalion (Aerial Exploitation) ®MHHC, S2kth Military Intelligence Battalion TOTAL PACIFIC U.S. Aray Cryptologic Support Group ®*y.S. Army Field Station Berlin — U.S. Arny Field Station Augsburg 66th Military Intelligence Group w/ Augmentation Sth Military Intelligence Company . HHC, 18th Military Intelligence Battalion 430th Military Intelligence Detachment 527th Military Intelligence Battalion 166th Military Intelligence Detachaent HHC, 502d Aray Security Agency Battalion 328th Aray Security Agency Company - 409th Aray Security Agency Company, Operations (Rear) 58ist Military Intelligence Detachment Command or Unit ' OFF wo 149th Military Intelligence *5As of 31 August 1985. ACTUAL STRENGTH ENL MIL TOTAL Civ AGGREGATE USC 652 (b) (1)
Lei ad he i Si Te 2” ios Command or Unit 582d Military Intelligence Detachment 583d Military Intelligence Detachment 58hth Military Intelligence Detachment ; U.S. Army Field Station Sinop #9y.S. Aray Russian Institute ®®USAINSCOM Foreign Language Training Center Europe TOTAL EUROPE *#as of 31 August 1985. 123 ACTUAL STRENGTA ENL MIL TOTAL GUSC 662 (by (2)
APPENDIX G PROVISIONAL UNITS he (As of 30 September 1985) 430th Military Intelligence Battalion (Provisional) 513th Military Intelligence Center (Provisional) REGRADED UNCLASSINED 0 SS NOV Ol CDR USATHSCOU FOXPO Auth Para 1-603 DoD 6200. LeR 138
APPENDIX 8 CHANGES IN STATUS OF PROVISIONAL UNITS ” DISCONTINUED ° Unit Eff Date Authority USAINSCOM Security Support 1 Oct 84 PO 63-3, HQ USAINSCOM, Battalion (Provisional) 24 Sep 84 *Upon redesignation of TNSCOM Security Support Detachment, Ft. Meade to USAINSCOM Military Intelligence Battalion Security. REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED | on 2&9 NOV 18? | . BY CDRUSATNSCOM FOIPO Auth Para 1-603 DoD 5200. lf 125 _coSeeexIiL 139
‘@) O APPENDIX I USAINSCOM KEY PERSONNEL Position/Name | . Dates Served COMMANDING GENERAL MG Harry E. Soyster 29 Jun 84 ~ Present DEPUTY COMMANDING GENERAL BG Charles F. Scanlon i9 Feb 85 - Present BG James W. Hunt 30 Sep 82 ~ 7 Feb 85 ¢ DEPUTY COMMANDING GENERAL, SUPPORT BG Charles F. Scanlon Wov 63 - 19 Feb 85 : DEPUTY COMMANDING GENERAL, INTELLIGENCE BG James W. Hunt 30 Sep 62 — G7 Feb 85 COMMAND SERGEANT MAJOR CSM Samny W. Wise 30 Dec 84 ~ Present CSM George W. Howell, Jr. 15 Mar 82 = 30 Dec 64 ‘ CHIEF OF STAFF me BG George J. Walker ; 19 Feb 85 = Present COL Richard J. Powers, Jr. 21 Nov 64 =~ 19 Feb 85 COL Louis D. Kirk ~~ 31 Jan 64 = 21 Nov 84 > DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF *LTC Eugene Johnson Jul 84 = Present ’ SECRETARY OF THE GENERAL STAFF . . MAJ Grady J. Howell, Jr. : 05 Jun BY - Present USAINSCOM LIAISON OFFICE, FORSCOM _ LTC Buddy L. Parker 28 Mar 64 - Present USAINSCOM LIAISON OFFICE, TRADOC . LTC Perry E. Cole 30 Sep 83 - Present USAINSCOM LIAISON OFFICE, USAREUR . LTC Donald Tait 05 Oct 83 ~ Present USAINSCOM LIAISON OFFICE, USAICS MAJ Dallas M. Vibbert 21 Jun 84 = May 85 USAINSCOM LIAISON OFFICE, USACACDA MAJ John L. Pannier 29 Oct 82 ~ 15 Dee 84 . 126 REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ot =. 2.8: NOV 1997 Mth Pare L605 Te 5799, 2-5 140
Aap rs ae Position/Name USAINSCOM LIAISON OFFICE, NSA COL James P. Brown SENIOR RESERVE COMPONENT ADVISOR COL Robert E. Elmore CHIEF, OFFICE OF ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS MAJ Paul A. Mann CPT B.E. Prestridge INSPECTOR GENERAL COL Robert L. Wolf STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE COL John R. Thornock COL Edward S. Adamkerwicz, Jr. STAFF ADVISOR FOR SCIENTIFIC AND CRYPTO AFFAIRS Mr. Edwin &. Speakman CHIEF, OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS LTC Richard P. Holk LTC Wiliiam S. Birdseye COMMAND CHAPLAIN COL William T. Smith @ SPECIAL DISPURSING OFFICER Mr. Benjamin Strucken COMMAND PSYCHOLOGIST MAJ Dennis Kowal DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, PERSONNEL COL Arthur A. Remling II DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, INFORMATION MANAGEMENT COL William R. Barnes DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, INFORMATION RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COL Alan H. Byrne Dates Served 06 Jul 84 12 Sep 83 May 85 Aug 84 06 Aug 84 01 Jul 85 30 Jun 82 12 Aug 68 Q1 Jul 85 20 Oct 80 06 Jul 83 01 Mar 64 Aug 88 31 Mar 84 01 May 85 Jun 84 zs * - Present Present ’ Present - May 85 = Present - Present - 1 Jul 85 - Present - Present ~ 12 Jul 85 - Present ~ Present - Present -, Present - Present - 01 May 85 | 127 REGRADED UNCLASSLFIZQ We 2B NOV i997? B) 4 CDR USAINSCOM FOTPO Auth Fora 1-605 040 5200, 1-> aaeoaaaiaela Maile iafeteiaaase 141
3 vat Position/Name Dates Served DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, PLANS, PROGRAMS, oe AND MODERNIZATION Mr. James D. Davis 01 Oct 83 = Present DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, OPERATIONS COL Robert M. Bowe 08 Jul 85 = Present COL Richard J. Powers, Jr. ve 02 Jul 84 - 08 Jul 84 DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, LOGISTICS COL Charies L. Bell Aug 85 - Present 7 COL Robert G. Haltiner 31 May 81 = Aug 85 - DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, RESOURCE MANAGEMENT e COL John G. Quast . 20 Oct 84 = Present COL John A. Croft 19 Jul 81 = 20 Oct 84 DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, SYSTEMS Mr. George A. Harvey, Jr. 03 Jan 78 - Present DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, TELECOMMUNICATIONS COL William R. Barnes 27 Aug 84 - 01 May 85 CHIEF, COMMAND SECURITY OFFICE - Mr. Stephen M. Earle 31 Aug 81 = Present Unit/Commander 66th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP COL John G. Lackey III 27 Jul 84 - Present 470th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP COL Thomas K. Newell 10 Jul 85 - Present COL M.E. Pheneger ; 07 Jul 83 = 10 Jul 85 500th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP COL John L. Leide 12 Jul 84 - Present HHC, S0ist MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP COL Paul E. Menoher, dr. 15 Jun 84 - Present 513th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP COL William A. Bentz 13 Aug 84 = Present 902d MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP COL Francis W. Creighton . 10. Jul 84 = Present 128 REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED A 3Y ss opRUSA ee ergo ae Auth Pa TNSCOM FOIPO ps 142 7é 1-603 DoD 5200, 1-R
Unit/Commander — Dates Served USAINSCOM CONUS MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP (SIGINT/EW) COL Eleas A. Cozanitis 04 Nov 83 - Present U.S. ARMY OPERATIONAL GROUP COL Michael A. Scott 29 Jun 84 - Present U.S. ARMY SPECIAL SECURITY GROUP COL Arleigh D. Waterman Dec 84 - Present COL George C. Campbell 01 Jul 82 - Dec 84 U.S. ARMY CRYPTOLOGIC SUPPORT GROUP LTC Sherman J. Blanchard 17 Jun 83 - Present U.S. ARMY FIELD STATION AUGSBURG COL Charles S. Simerly 16 Aug 85 ~ Present COL Floyd L. Runyon 15 Aug 83 - 16 Aug 85 U.S. ARMY FIELD STATION BERLIN COL Kenneth D. Roney 01 Aug 84 - Present U.S. ARMY FIELD STATION KEY WEST - CPT Charles M. Frechette 25 Jun 84 - Present U.S. ARMY FIELD STATION KUNIA COL Willfam H. Campbel) 74 Jun 85 - Present COL Robert M. Bowe 14 Jun 83 - 14 Jun 85 U.S. ARMY FIELD STATION KOREA LTC Ronald W. Carter 15 Jun 84 - Present U.S. ARMY FIELD STATION MISAWA LTC Savatore M. Bruni Nov 84 = Present LTC Bernard J. Lawiess Nov 82 - Nov 84 U.S. ARMY FIELD STATION OKINAWA ; LTC Manuel A. Conley Oct 84 - Present COL Walter L. Cressler, dr. Jul 84 - Oct 84 U.S. ARMY FIELD STATION PANAMA MAJ Dennis A. McGaugh Sep 84 - Present U.S. ARMY FIELD STATION SAN ANTONEO LTC Brian C. Warren 26 Jul 85 - Present LTC John R. Dickson ‘ 08 Jul 83 - 26 Jul 85 : 129 UNCLASSIFIED 23 NOV 1997, * BY CDR USAINS Cou rir CN PIa iia L, Auth Para 1-603 DoD 5200, 1-p 143
Unit/Commander ‘ Dates Served U.S. ARMY FIELD STATION SINOP “e COL David W. Tellinan 13 Aug 85 - Present COL Theodore C. Frichtl 23 Jul 84 ~ 13 Aug 85 34 MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION (AERIAL EXPLOITATION) LTC John D. Thomas, Jr. 31 Jui 85 = Present LTC Lindon D. Jones 15 May 83 - 03 Jul 85 HHC, 18th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION LTC John C. Linley, dr. 02 Jul 84 - Present HHC, 201st MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION LTC Robert D. McKay 14 Jun 84 - Present HHC, 202d MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION ' CPT Dennis E. Royer 03 Jun 85 - Present LTC Charles M. Jackson 25 May 84 = 03 Jun 85 HHC, 203d MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION (TECHNICAL INTELLIGENCE) LTC Michael A. Petersen . 07 Jun 85 - Present LTC Neal E. Norman 14 Mar 83 = 07 Jun 85 430th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION (PROVISIONAL) . LTC Raymond T. Waity 14 Jun 85 - Present LTC James M. Dorton 15 Jul 82 = 14 Jun 85 ed 502d MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION LTC Carol M. Hemphill * 2h Jul 85 - Present LTC Norman E. Youngblood III . 02 Sep 83 = 24 Jul 85 HHO, S24th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION LTC Charles W. Nerburgh Jun 84 - Present 527th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION ‘ LTC George R. Brock 09 Jul 84 = Present USAINSCOM MILITARY INTELLIGENCE (COUNTERINTELLIGENCE) EAST COAST LTC William A. McDonough 25 Mar 65 = Present LTC Elizabeth G. Tullis 17 Mar 83 = 25 Mar 85 REGRANED UNCLASSEFERD » 130 On © 3 NOV 1997“: Math Pare CoS ay Talla Auth Para 1-€03 DoD 5200. 1-R 144
Unit/Commander USAINSCOM MILITARY INTELLIGENCE (COUNTERINTELLIGENCE) WEST COAST LTC Lawrence Schneider ~ LTC John A. MeCloud . USAINSCOM MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION (SECURITY) LTC David W. Clark Sth MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY CPT Connie S. Labadie MAJ William A. Doyle, Jr. Vith MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY (TECHNICAL INTELLIGENCE) CPT Jeffrey C. Holle ‘ CPT William R. Brown 17th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY MAJ A.J. Paluska, Jr. 164th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY CPT Timothy O'Neil CPT Richards A. Rice 166th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY CPT Alan S. Taylor 17Nth MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY CPT(P) William G. Fillman CPT Elizabeth D. Estler 219th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY MAJ Stanley R. Chrzanoski MAJ Harvey H. Latson III 332d MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY (ELECTRONIC WARFARE) CPT Monte F. Hengot CPT Daniel G. Doby INSCOM EAC AVIATION INTELLIGENCE COMPANY MAJ Douglas Roberts MAJ Roderick J. Isler REGHADED UNCLASSIFIED 131 ON 23 NOV 1997. BY  CDRUSAINSCOM FOIPO . Auth Para 1-603 DeD 5200. 1=F Dates Served 06 Aug 85 = Present 17 Aug 83 - 06 Aug 85 11 Sep 84 — Present 25 Jul 85 - Present 29 Jul 84 = 25 Jul 85 20 Sep 85 = Present 09 Aug 84 ~ 20 Sep 85 31 Jul 84 — Present 17 Jun 85 ~ Present 16 Apr 84 - 17 Jun 85 31 Jul 84 - Present 20 May 85 = Present 01 Apr 84 = 20 May 85 14 Dec 84 ~- Present 09 Aug 83 = 14 Dec 84 16 Aug 85 = Present 15 Aug 84 - 16 Aug 85 30 Sep 85 - Present 02 Aug 84 - 30 Sep 85 COD ieee
66th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP, DETACHMENT HAHN LTC Rodney P. Miller 07 Aug 85 - Present « LTC Lawrence P. Carr 01 Jan 84 - 07 Aug 85 430th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DETACHME! NT LTC Raymond T. Waity . 14 Jun 85 ~ Present LTC James M. Dorton 15 Jul 82 = 14 Jun 85 58ist MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DETACHMENT (IMAGERY INTERPRETATION) CPT Ann M. Peterson O4 May 84 - Present . 582d MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DETACHMENT (IMAGERY INTERPRETATION) CPT Dennis R. Deines 19 Nov 84 - Present CPT Alexander G. Hodges 12 May 83 - 19 Nov 64 583d MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DETACHMENT (IMAGERY INTERPRETATION) MAJ John J. Ciriaco ‘ Jan 83 -Present - REORADED UNCLAgS LASSE 132 OM 28 NOV 1987 BY CDR USAINSCOU POIPO 3 Unit/Commander , Dates Served . 328th ARMY SECURITY AGENCY COMPANY . CPT Nancy B. Sullivan 10 Aug 84 = Present 641st MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY (COLLECTION) MAJ Theodore W. Waronicki 10 Jul 85 - Present CPT David M. Moak 21 May 84 - 10 Jul 85. 209th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY CPT Kevin R. Cunningham 16 Jun 85 ~ Present - CPT Terry. B. Wilson Jun 84 - 16 Jun 85 449th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DETACHMENT LTC William R. Eicholz Jan 85 - Present LTC Lee G. Smith 11 Apr 83 = Jan 85 1ist MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DETACHMENT MAJ Charles L. Robertson 17 Dec 84 = Present MAJ Edward C. Olson 30 Nov 83 = 17 Dec 84 RO9th ARMY SECURITY ACENCY COMPANY CPT Jack Horne, Jr. 03 May 85 - Present CPT Tamara C. Kaseman . 12 Dec 83 = 03 May 85 146
MBORTESEIEELA L Unit/Commander | Dates Served —, S84th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DETACHMENT LTC Bruce N, Ey 09 Jan 84 - Present 766th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DETACHMENT LTC Stuart A. Herrington 15 Jul 83 + Present U.S. ARMY ASIAN STUDIES DETACHMENT Mr. Seiji Aizawa 01 Oct 80 - Present USAINSCOM CI DETACHMENT, DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY LTC William £. Hawkins 15 Apr 83 = Present U.S. ARMY ADMINISTRATIVE SURVEY DETACHMENT _ COL Robert W. Sheffield 20 Jul 84 - Present USAINSCOM THEATER INTELLIGENCE CENTER - PACIFIC LTC James A. Roberts 15 Jun 84 - Present : U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE EXCHANGE AND SUPPORT , CENTER COL Charles R. Cleveland 1 Aug 85 - Present LTC Allen Berg . 15 dul 83 - 1 Aug 85 ~ USAINSCOM FOREIGN LANGUAGE TRAINING CENTER EUROPE * LTC Alan R, Meyer 03 Jun 85 - Present LTC James D. Phillips I11 29 Aug 83 - 03 Jun 85 USAINSCOM PENTAGON COUNTERINTELLIGENCE FORCE MAJ Charles C. Glunchenhaus 10 Jul 85 - Present LTC Philip J. Gillen, dr. 2) May 82 - 10 Jul 85 USAINSCOM AUTOMATED SYSTEMS ACTIVITY . LTC(P) Stepehn L. Weisel 01 Jun 85-- Present COL Thomas M, Herrick 01 Aug 84 - 01 Jun 85 USAINSCOM ADMINISTRATIVE/AUDIOVISUAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY Mr. David Stein 30 Nov 78 - Present USAINSCOM FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING ACTIVITY MAJ Donald B. Pargotf 14 May 84 - Present PTS a, ” BY CDR USAINSCOM FOIFO
re EE ane NT ES OE A EAE TS Fetes aici aac 3. FEer te Reker, Saeber ian? % CRs a," Aeed ir eey Unit/Commander Dates Served USAINSCOM SUPPORT ACTIVITY, FORT MEADE on CPT Mark S. Wilkins Aug 85 - Present CPT Dennis S. Driggers 19 Dec 83 ~ Aug 85 USAINSCOM MAINTENANCE ASSISTANCE AND INSTRUCTION TEAM CPT Larry E. Monger 15 Aug 84 ~ Present USAINSCOM MISSION SUPPORT ACTIVITY Mr. Donald L. Valcheff O01 Oct 82 = Present U.S. ARMY FOREIGN COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITY . SOL Robert G. Lunt 21 Sep 84 ~ Present U.S. ARMY CENTRAL SECURITY FACILITY COL Claude W. Johnson 21 Mar 83 = Present U.S. ARMY RUSSIAN INSTITUTE COL Don 0. Stovall 11 Aug 83 - Present U.S. ARMY GARRISON, ARLINGTON HALL STATION LTC Harry F. Ferguson 20 Jul 84 = Present U.S. ARMY GARRISON, VINT HILL FARMS STATION COL Leland J. Holiand 14 Jun 83 = Present REGRADED UNCLASSLFLED ON 23N0 ou! BY CDR WeareeCon FOIPO 38 Auth Para 1-603 DoD 5200, 1eP “CONFIDEALLLA Lam 148
EN TIAL APPENDIX J TRAVIS TROPHY WINNERS ° Calendar Year -Winner " 1964 53d USASA Special Operations Command) 1965 313th ASA Battalion (Corps) 1966 © ASA Training Center and School) % 1967 509th USASA Group % s 1968 = USASA, Europe) c 1969 330th ASA Company) 1970 USASA Field Station, Udorn 1971 1972 USASA Field Station, Vint Hill Fargs pg USASA Field Station, Udorn) 1973 USASA Field Station, Berlin 1974 1975 USASA Field Station, ugsburg A Field Station, San Antonio 1976 USASA Field Station, Sobe 1977 470th Military Inteliigence Group 135 149
CONBOEN TIAL Calendar Year Winner 1978 1979 *: 1980 1981 1982 -% 1983 ~~ 1984 ; . ‘ . . . 4 . . . * . . . a . eo. . U.S. Arny Field Station Augsburg - eS. Army Fiel a U.S. Army Field Station Misawa (>) U.S. Army Field Station Berlin U.S. Army Field Station Berlin) U.S. Army Field Station Augsburg) U.S. Army Fie ation Augsburg) 136 150
APPENDIX K DIRECTOR'S TRUPHY WINNERS Calendar Year Winners i. 1979 MINEE: 193d Brigade Support Company, Fort ¥ Amador, Panama) % 1980 ARMY NOMINEE: 372d ASA Co, 25th Inf & v, Oahu, Hawaii) io) . -m 1981 (ARMY NOMINEE: 372d ASA Co, 25th Inf Div, 1962 ahu, Hawaii) Task Force 138, U.S. Southern Command 1983 ARMY NOMINEE: 1 ary Intelligence Company (CEWI), Panama) 1984 v 22uth Military Intelligence Battalion (Aerial Exploitation) " 137 CO
GLOSSARY ? ACOTS. ccccccccccccchSsistant Chief of Staff ACSI. cecvccccccccccAssistant Chief of Staff for inteliigence ACSTEL..ccccscoece Assistant Chief of Staff, Telecommunications ADC. ccccccccccvcccccArmy Document Center ADCSLOG...cccccee Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff, Logistics ADCSOPS....ecccee-sAssistant Deputy Chief of Staff, Operations ADCSPER. coccccscescAssistant Deputy Chie? of Staff, Personnel admin. .cccccccccce administration ADP. cccccccccceces mitomatic data processing * AFCITC. .cccccccccccAdvinced Foreign Counterintelligence Training Course AFP. ccccccccccccc ce cBppresed fundin rogram AHR. scccccccceeccechnnual Historical Report AHS. cccccccccvcces Arlington Hall Station ATA. cccccccccceceeeUeS. Army Intelligence Agency AIB.cccccccccccseccAviation Intelligence Battalion AIG. cccccccccccccccsActing Inspector(s) General ALO. cccccccsccccestuthorized level of organization BMC ccccccccrenccseUeSe Army Materiel Command AOE. cccncccccccccccArmy Of Excellence AOR. cccccccescccecsArea Of Responsibility AR. cocvecccccccces oAMBY Regulation ARDF.ccccccoscccee terial radio direction-finding ARTEP.cecccccccccesArmy Training and Exercise Plan ASA. cccccccesececeeArmy Security Agency; Automated Systems Activity; Automated Support Activity ASD. cccccccccccccseUeSe Arny Administrative Survey Detachment; ATCAE. .ceceeeeeees Army Technical Control and Analysis Element ATT. cocccccccececseAmerican Telephone and Telegraph Company AURS..cccccevcecccAutomated Unit Reference Sheet BUtK. cccccccccccee authorized , AWOL. seccccccccccesabsence without leave BER. CeCe oeceseenes Budget Execution Review BG. ccowccccvcccccvebrigadier general BIFF..ccccccsccvee battlefield Identification Friend or Foe BLP. cccccccccccccesbaseline Plan Briccccccccasccsceses dattalion ey tate ost 153
CAccccccccccencece California . CCT ccs ccccceccs Controlled Cryptographic Items - COP. ccccccccvevece sLonsolidated Cryptologic Program Cdr/CDR.ceccccccee -COMmmaNndEr CE. cwccccvccccccce counterespionage CENTAM. evcccencece Central America CET. ccccccccccccce Critical Events Templating CC. cccccccccsccoes COMmmanding general . CHCSS. ccccccccccce Chief, Central Security Service CI cccccccccccccee counterintelligence CTAnccvccccccsccce central Intelligence Agency CINCUSAREUR...e-..eCommander=in-Chief, U.S. Army Europe CIRAM. ccccccccceee Counterintelligence Resource Allocation Model C1Ve cccccccccccvee Civilian CMF. wcccccccccccee Career Management Field CNL eccccccccsccece Commanders needs letters CO. ccvccscesescece COntrol office COB. occcccccccceee -COMmmANG operating budget CofS.cccceccccccceChief of Staff COL. cccccccccceccee eCOLOnel CONAUTH. .oeccecoeeeecryptonet controlling authority CONUS. ccccccccccee Continental United States COS. cccccccceccsceeCONUS operations site C&P. cccccccccccesseONtrol and processing CPAR. cc ccccevccvessCOllection, processing, analysis, and séporting CPO. cccccccccvccceeCivilian Personnel Office CPX. wccccccccccees Command Post Exercise CSC. reccrsccceveccee Community Support Center CSM. evecccccccccees command sergeant major CSO. ccccccccccceses’O a) sees (1) (a) 299 0806  CSOC. nccccccccccee vompined Security Operations Center “CSS. cccccccccceeee Central Security Service CSU. scccccccesccese Conventional Signal Upgrade CTED. . cnccccccccceeCivilian Training, Education, and Development Dh. ce wcccsccesvecce Department of the Army DARCOM. .ccccccceceeUess Army Materiel Development and Readiness Command 140 i54
DCA. wcccccvccceves Defense Communications Agency DCG. ccvcccescccces sdeputy commanding general ad DCG-I. wc ccccccccee Deputy Commanding General, Intelligence DCG-S.ccccccvcevceseDeputy Commanding General, Support DCS. cccccccrsccccce eDeputy Chief of Staff; Defense Communications cine Systens DCSAUT.. eoccccvvece Deputy Chief of Staff, Automation DCSFM.ececcccccccceedeputy Chief of Staff, Force Modernization DCSIM. .cescscecccesDeputy Chief of Staff, Information Management DCSINT..coccccscceeDeputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence DCSIRM. cocccccccce Deputy Chief of Staff, Information, Resource Management DCSLOG.cccccccccceeDeputy Crief of Staff, Logistics DCSOPS. cccscccccee Deputy Chief of Staff, Operations DCSPER. ccccscccvece Deputy Chief of Staff, Personnel DCSPPM. cocccevccce Deputy Chief of Staff, Plans, Programs, and Management DCSRM. ccccccccccceeDeputy Chief of Staff, Resource Management DCSSYS..cecccccceee Deputy Chief of Staff, Systems DCSTEL. cccccccccessbdeputy Chief of Staff, Telecommunications DF. coccccccccsvcecs disposition forn; direction-finding DIA. cocccccccccece Defense Intelligence Agency DIRNSA. cccccoceese Defense Intelligence Production Schedule DiS. cccccvecccccceedefense Investigative Service DITScocccccocsccsedigital Imagery Transmission System DNA. cccccccccccsee Defense Nuclear Agency DOCEX. occsccecveee dockment exploitation DOCMID. «cccccecceeDOCUMEeNtation Modernization DOD. ccccccccccvcce Department of Defense DSA. ccccccccccceee Defense Security Agency y Communications BAC cccescceccseeees@thelon above corps EPDS. cccccccccceessbiectronic Processing and Dissemination System seer rirreeseseeseczuropean Sheotal Activities Facility ESC. ccccccccees Elec Security Command TIAL (1) (a) 299 9809 155
Eee re Geer Tag, . ETSC..cccccccccces European Troop Strength Ceiling ne BUCOM. ocvccccccceecburopean Command EW cccccccccccsvcesGlectronic warfare “ EX. ccccccccccccece exceptional FCA. .ccccccccseceesForeign Counterintelligence Activity FCI. cccsccccsceesssForeign Counterintelligence Program FLIR. ccocccccccsccceforward looking infrared FORSCOM. cccccccceecUede Army Forces Command FRG. wccccccccccccecFederal Republic of Germany FS. cccccccccccccccettlily successful PY ccccccccccsccccefi8cal year FYDP.cccccvccccccceeFiScal Year Defense Progran 3 GCM. coccccccccscee Ground Control Module GDIP.cccccccerseceeGeneral Defense Intelligence Program GEN. cccccccccccces Beneral GPAS.sccccccesecee General Performance Appraisal System GS. csccccccccccece General Schedule (Civilian Employees) ‘GSM. cceccccccvcecee Ground Station Module HCA ceccvcvccccscce cHead of Contracting Activity HF... cccnccccccccceehigh frequency cocccccocccccose sheadquarters and Headquarters Company Q/HQ. ccccccccccee headquarters HQDA. scccccccceeeeeHeadquarters, Department of the Arny HS. ccccccccccccsccehighly successful HUMINT..escccccoeeshuman intelligence - : IBEX. coccccccsccceeINSCOM Beyond Excellence ICP. wcocccoscocsvecinstallation confinement facility IDHS. cc cccccccccceeuntelligence Data Handling System TEW. cocccccccccscccintelligence and electronic warfare TFF occcccesccccsccsidentification Friend or Foe TGrececccccccscsecsinspector general IGAR. ccecccccccccceernspector General Action Requests (1) (a) 299 OSNS IMINT. coccccscccsecimagery intelligence INSCOM. ccocccccccecUeS. Army Intelligence and Security Command TOC. wcnccvcvcccceccinitial operational capability TOSS. .ccccccccccceeitntelligence Organization and Stationing Study «< 156
IPR. coccccccccccesclM=Process Review IPW. ccccccccceccceelnterrogation of Prisoners of War TReevcccccccccsccceinternal review IRR. cccccccccccccccinvestigative Records Repository . ITAC...........0...Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center ” ITEP. ceccccccccccesinterim Tactical ELINT Processor JCS................Joint Chiefs of Staff TDS. ccccccce ecee VOINt Tactical Information Distribution Systen SJUSMAG. ccccccccccesdOint U.S. Military Advisory Group LET. Ceoeceecscecen velive environment training LRU. cccccccccscccccliie replacement unit LTC. ccccccccccccesctieutenant colonel MACOM. ecccccccccceeDajor Army command MAS. cccccccccccces oM8jor MAP. cocccccccccccceMateriel Acquisition Plan MGecccccccccvcccoeeMajor general MI. ccccccccccccccceMilitary Intelligence MIA. cccccccccccccseMissing In Action MICECP..ccccccccceeMl Civilian Excepted Career Program MID. cccccccccccceeeMilitary Intelligence Detachment MILPERCEN...cccoeeeU.Ss Army Military Personnel Center sia 1) PREP TOTIT Index Project for Investigative ’ Records Repository MOA. ccccccsceccceeMemorandum of Agreement MOS. cccccccccccccceMilitary occupational specialty MOU. ccccccccccccee Memorandum of Understanding MSA. ccccecsecccces eMission Support Activity MII. ccccccccsesese Moving Target Indicator (t) (aY 289 O89 National Collection Division NCO. ceccsccccceces noncommissioned officer NCR(C)..ceccceecee National Cryptologic Representative (C) 143 TIAL 157
el hi ae ce ay ae ee Sie ee ae) att or eA o : eS ee wt NSA. cccvccccccccce National Seourity Agency NSACSS.. ccccccccccesNational Security Agency/Central Security ‘agency NSAGA. evccccccccce National Security Agency Group Activity . NSDD.cccccccccceceeNational Security Decision Directive  ~ NTC. cccccccccccscesNavional Training Center er NTCISSC.ccccccccceeNational Telecommunications and Information Systems Security Steering Group OACST .ccccccecceee Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence OCMC. wecccccesecee Overhead Collection Management Center ODCSIRM..ccccsceeeeOffice of Deputy Chief of Staff, Information Resource Management ODCSPER. ecccccsese-Office of Deputy Chief of Staff, Personnel ODUSD(P)..ccceccneOffice of Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Policy OE. cccccccccscccceQrganizational Effectiveness OG.. ccccvcccccccce Operational Guides OMA. cccccccccccsce Operation and Maintenance, Arny OPCON. ccsccccsecse Operational control OPFOR. .cccccccceee Opposing forces OPM. cccecccascesceeQffice Of Personnel Management O80. .ccccccccccee. Oreanizational and operational OXO nc ccccccccvece: 4@ yeor or older PAO. coccccccceces ’ Affairs Officer PARR. cccccccvscce: . Analysis and Resource Review BBC ccccccccccses: wo Budget Committee Pow cccccccccscccese - IP8o:: od Computer PCAC. cccccccccces: oPi imal y Control and Analysis Centers PCF. ccccccccccccsesPentagon Counterintelligence Force PDIP. .cccocccscceeerrogram Development Increment Package PIP... cccccvccceee product improvement plans ‘ Tey Tay B90 OSN9 PMRC..cccccceoceceererrormance Management and Recognition System . POC. ccccccsccccesseepoint of contact ’ POM. wocccecccccceesProgram Objective Memorandum PRC. .ccccccccecceeePeoples’ Republic of China PSA. ceccecee eeeces oProject Security Analysis 1hy N TIAL 158 i a Aen Tiss. PAS ee Oe
PSI ce ccccccsccssee Personnel Security Investigations Qtr. ccccccscccccee Quarter DA. ccccccccccccce esearch, development, and acquisition RDTE. .ccccccccccee esearch development test and evaluation REDTRAIN...........neadiness Trainin eccccccccccescce flS ident office ROC. ccccccccsccese Required Operational Capability ROF. wn cccccccccees remote operative facility ROK. ..ccccccsesces Republic of Korea SAC. .ccncsccevcncesUSAF Strategic Air Command SAEDA.--++-++ +++» Sabotage and espfonage directed against Ecc cece ccssssass ervice ryp I ogic SCI. cc cccccccccces scensitive teeparenent Information SCO.........00....,8udcontrol of SEADEV....cceseese-s0utheast Asia Development SELCOM. ....ccee00..Select committee SEM. cc ccccenssncee Sergeant major SOS wa wc ence cnces Secretary of the General Staff SHAPE... eee cenees nUpreme omar Allied Powers Europe SBIAL. ccc cccennee Security and Investigative Activities SIDPERS.....002.+.-9tandard Information Division Personne} ; Reporting System SIGINT. ...c0ceeeeeeSignal intelligence SIGSEC, woececeeSignal securit, -CONMDEN TIAL (1) (a) gaa gsna 159
cccccccccsccese support, Maintenance, and Settlement SNT. .ccccccccsscee Serial number tracking SON.............2,.5catement of Need . SRRG. .nccvccercccscedy. curity Steering Group S86. 2oe eee special Security Group SSh. ccc recesceesecingie Station Locator SSO. occcccccccesenpecial Security Office SSRC...cccccccceeceSIGINT regional reporting center TA. cccccccccccccce theater Army TAAD. ccccccccccceee ne Army Authorization Document System TACIES. .cccccccscestactical Imagery Exploitation System TCO. ccsccccsccccsctampest Coordinating Officer TDA. caccccccccecceetabdles Of distribution and allowances TECRAS ..ccccevecsse neater Document Exploitation System TENCAP, ...ccccccese tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities - TGIF cccccwccccevcetactical Ground Intercept Facility Tl wcccccccccccves technical intelligence TIAP. .ccccccccccens theater Intellgience Architecture Plan TICOM. ...ccsscveese target Investigation Committee TIP. ccccccvcseeceetne INSCOM Plan efAREX Management Div1si0 TOA total obligational authority TOE. .cccccccccceestadle(s) of organization and equipment TRADOC.........0.20U.5. Army Training and Doctrine Command TREDS....cccecceces tactical Reconnaissance Exploitation Demonstration System TRISA. .cccccnccseew neater Intermediate Support Activity TSCM. .cccccessseeee echnical Surveillance Countermeasure TUT. cc cccccccccvceetactical users terminal (vt) (ay 78 gens US. ccecccccccssce United States USAF. cc cccnccccseeeUeds Air Force 146 COL” IAL 166
PT Ee ee ee ag eee ME TIRE TTY 6 wr USAFS. cccccccccsccededs Arny Field Station DSAICS. cccccscccceeUeS. Army Intelligence Center . and Sehool USAINSCOM. «.cc00000U.S. Aray Intelligence and Seourity Command USAINTC. cocccccccceUeS. Army Intelligence Command USAISC. occcccccceceUsS. Arsy Information Systems Comzand USAIS-D..sccccccceeU.S. Army Intelligence School-Devens USAOG. cccccocccceseU.S. Army Operational Group USAR. cccccccccescesVede Arny Reserve USAREUR. eeeaeneenede sd aUeSe Arny, Europe USASSG. ccccccssccceUeS. Army Special Security Group USDAO. cocecccccccceUeS. Defense Attache Office USFK. cccsscccccseesUeS. Forces Korea USL3. a2ee08008006089 eoeSe Liaison Branch USM. oe eeseecceseeseDeSs | Marines USN. ccccccccscccveed USSS. era vesseenecse U.S. Security Service VHFS...+. arms Station WESTCOM. cccsceucceeU.S. Army Western Command WIG. cscsccccsccses-Within-grade - WO. cccccvcccscceee warrant officer WWMCCS. occccccceee WOPidwide Military Command and Control System ag TAY yas res 347 . NTIAL 16,