DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL SECURITY GROUP COMMAND HEADQUARTERS 3801 NEBRASKA AVENUE, NW. WASHINGTON, ©.C. 20390 «5912 5750 Ser GH/S 7/77 TT 05 JUN 1985 MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTOR OF NAVAL INTELLIGENCE Subj: NAVAL INTELLIGENCE ANNUAL HISTORY PROGRAM Ref: (a) CNO Itr OP-009E/4U445144 of 31 Dec 84 Encl: (1) 1984 Annual History Report for the Headquarters Naval Security Group Command 1. As requested by reference (a), enclosure (1) is forwarded. fi. —_ "fy — “__ 6. G, HENRiXSEN By direction ee et NR Re ESE A AN DUC AS COVURKNYEDRT EXPPASE
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES NAVAL SECURITY GROUP COMMAND ANNUAL HISTORY REPORT: 1984 PREPARED BY: HISTORIAN, NAVAL SECURITY GROUP COMMAND OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL ASSISTANT FOR SECURITY MAY 25, 1985 Ne oer age Te Sn emepeeeen neem” AS GOVEENMENT LAPIS
(t fm rm ot roy “ 4 i H os lea -~ - .e a Pars ae - ae 7 moe awe a oo > . wed "8 oe “se ae a 84 te rm on — ° a bad ao. ” he EV GP 3R6 sd ay UNCLASSIFIED ” TABLE OF CONTENTS «us EXECUTIVE Summary MiSs 4 itn 1934: TRE YEGR fin REVI COMPOSITION AND GEGenIZATior DIVISIONS ANG THE GR Pine TECH Hoa VSECORUs PER SOMES ORGANI 247 Lowa CHANSES Willis reels SEO SE is OCRGEAMI ZATION CHGORTS: HON VEE CGR UL REY faANBGEMENT FRIGRITIES ek LSSUES SFECIAL OPERATIONS SIGNALS SELURITY AND RELATED FUNCT Toi SIGNIFICANT TECHNICAL DEVELOF MENTS SIGNIFICGH) LOGISTIC AND MATERIAL DEVEL GH MEd! FERSONWEL. TRAINING. AND ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY MaTERIAL SyYSTEr. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS UNCLASSIFIED we Ta tn 2 conse ge emer name RRR Ae TS OR ODT AS GOVERNMENT PETE SF
. eo BOSC AD GNARNEAMY SU Ue i 4 Ig UNCLASSIFIED ' SECTION 21 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (uU) 1.1 (1) MISSION 1.1.1 @) Cn 1 July 1958, the Naval Security Group Command (NEVEECGRUD was established as an echeion = Command. to proaviuc support to the Chief of Naval Operations (CNG) in the related fields of signals exploitation and signals security. In addition ts the Headquarters and assiqned shore activities (TABLE 1). it iS composed of elements located throughout the U.5. Naval Operating Force= and Shore Establishmants (TABLE 2;. and the Navy Courier Service (TABLE 72). 1.3.2 tli) The command and suopert responsicility for the «¢NAVSECGRU have been delegated by tne CNO to the Commander. Naval Security Group Command (CGMNAVSECGRU). The mission oat the COMNAVSECGRU is defined in GFNAY Instruction S450.191 CH-i: TO perform cryptologic and related functions: rare provide operate and maintain an adequate Naval Security Groups; to approve requirements for the use cof Oxi sting Naval Security Group capabilities and ressurces: to ccecordinate the execution of approved cryptoloaic programs; and to exercise command authority over. be responsible for the primary suppert of the ¢« : activities of the Navai Security 6broup as ai Nava} service-wide system, and such other activities and resources as may be assiaoned. UNCLASSTIFIED a , csmtante"banntesa noni aniammnte, deaptenaiannemeneeaall =e — oe - tee ste eee - Vat AL GOVERNMENT OXTHAFE
cooe eee Ue Pe es UNCLASSIFIED ” () The instruction furthermore specifies the functions which are essential to the accomplishment of this mission. These furctisnes includes “The Management of Eiectronic Warfare fFreoaran Cryptologic Cperations in support of GFNRAV and the National Security Agency (NSA) Frofessional and Technical Advice and Support to the ChO and Fleet Commanders-in-Chie- The conduct of Signals Tintelligqence Operations. including communications and electronic inteliicence (COMINT and ELINT respectively) Maintenance of Sianals Security tamnciudina Communications and Electronic Security) Operstions Security, including policy. plannans., training, and education " a oy pa oa Operations Tecmnical Guidance and Support The application of Electronic Cover and Deception ts Naval Operations Frograms The Management _ of the Wavy HFDF and other electromagnetic wave Direction Finding The Recruitment. Trainino, and Evaluation of Navy Cryptologic Fersonnel UNCLASSIFIED inate ne en perme peepee RNY REE SEE ET - soe : PER OTCLED AS GOVERNMENT PEPRASE
ee GOA GRERNGEIWS OO OOO it ee UNCLASSIFIED ? (Lt - The provision of Professions! and Technical support to the U.S, Marine Corps in its conduet cf Crynotoloaic Activities ~ Direction and Manaoement of the Naval Reserve security Group within the framewori. of the G& 3ftans Naval Reserve Organization ~ Flanning and Maneocement of the Coneolidatac Cryptologic Frogram, the Communications Security Resources Frogam, and in part, the Cryptologic Direct Support Froqram - The Development, Evaluation, Maintenance and Supoort of NAVSECGRU, Navy. Joint. and Combined Strategic Flans ~ Command and Frimary Support cof eSigned Shore Activities - The provision of Fersonnel, Fhvsrcal. and Indorratiar a! autres Security throughout the Command - The provision of Automated Data Frocessina Suroars for Naval Cryptoloav ~ The Supervision of the Navai Communications Securit, Material System - The Inspection and Investiqation of NAVSECGAU end other DOD elements as directed, to determine readiness and efficiency UNCLASSIFIED a + Te wee magnneepenmmpipemaae re rene
« GSN3IXZ LNAWNYBACS LW 20058 42) — UNCLASSIFIED .Ua - Staffing and Management of the Noy Element o1 Lhe Armed Forces Courier System - Research and Development of Cryptologic and felated Systems (with the exception of cryptographic equipment), including coordination with NSA, bon elements and civilian contractors - Material and Logistics Support of NAVGECGRU. and Nevy Elements of the NSA/Centrai Security Service (C35;. (lib Im 61979, =the COMNAVSECGRU wes designated ae the Deputy Director of Naval Intelligence (Flans;, OF -OO9C. As CF- wusc, the COMNSVSECGRU ais responsible for providing cryptologic support tor operational commanders, and ensuring that Naval cryptologic systems are compatible with Waval Commcnicacione. evstems. The COMNAYSECGRU is 4lso0 the Commander ar tne Navy element of the Central Security Service (CES), which onecates avy shore-based SIGINT antercept sites. : (Ud) The three NAVSECGRU Area Directors (TABLE 1) act as representatives of COMNNGAVSECGRU for cryptoliogic matters. Attached to fleet commands in Norfolk, Fearl Hartor and London, the Cirectore perform Cryptologic and related tases as a5519MeS Cy CFNAY Instruction C2501.5£. As Crvptclogic Captains (1410 GCesignator). the srea Girectors are in charge of the NAVSECGRY UNCLASSIFIED ee soe oe i a ae ee SIE OTS CD A? GOVERNMES® peor cep
WUNChLASSIFIED , wu) GOetachmentsS azrsigqned the fliecet commanocers. The erea Girectors also represent COMNAVSECGRU an matters where NAVSEcaaRY wort.s closeiyv with the operating forces or with other branches: of the shore establishment. Area directors also recrezentie COMMNAVESECSRU in NSA/CSS matters. 1.1.2 (UW) Tne Headquarters, Naval Security Groug cormmenc CHONASSECGRU? supports the COMNAYSECGRU in eccomplishing the aFsiagned mistion and operates as staf i for the Commander. it exercises executive and managerial responsibilities for all Nawy cryptolosic matters, ang supports U. 5S. Naval ervotslsosic Elements throughout the world. it works with NA. the Department of Defense (DOD), and other federal agencies cn ay variety of cryptologic and relatec matters. ei. 2 (Ur 2964: THE YESR IN REVIEW 1.2. GI From the standpoint of the Assistant Commenders and Special Assistants. 19284 was a year ef achievement for the HONGVSETGREL. In spite of dGifficuities due to Bvedgetary ena manpower shortages experienced by some Depvartments, individucl functions were successfully performed, assuring overall m:2sian SUCCess. UNCLASSIFIED see 1 EO OE a ” ~
eens se. Py . 2 ee 2 rr a LE I i TECTIA ma - - UNCLASSIFIED 1.2.5 (UW) Important organizational changes stimulate efficiency in HONAVSECGRU. Effective 24 Oc the duties and responsibilities of the Gssistant Conma Security Group Command (ACNSG) were separated from th Commanding Qfficer, Naval Security Group Activity, Within the Office of the Assistant for Flans, Froara and Rescurces Manacement (6D), tne functions of the Fivision (G6DS) and the Operations Division (6D6) were create the Eudset Division (6D5). On 1 September Cirector of the Security Division (Gl) became t I ESistant for Security (GH). Subsequentiv, Gie was re -. on es the Assistant Commander for Fersonnel and Training. tu: Cnenget were not confines to tre There was ai masor restructurinao of Nav ty eecuri Group Unite, resucing the total number fro. This coansolidation facilitated the management of both missions. 1.2.4 (J) In the field, Waval Gecurity Group kamisseva was uporaded to an activity on 25 Mav 19754. 1.2.5 (U) Another important factor in the completion of HONAVSECGRU’s 1984 mission wes the UNCLASSIFIE Pe eee eee ee ee ee ee eee ee ee ee eee Te Te ho od ~ . helpeas t tober Ioce. neer., WNavai tr. cSse OF .e Ft. Meade. ms. BKiudaget Investmernte merged ta 1784, the fhe Special dcesiransted al re i] bs] it 3 Di i] 7 et successful effective use of Se er eer caida’ ~
eB ee EEE eee a Fane ge EOLA TATION OOS Tainan ee ——- UNCLASSIFIED (U) #inanciai resources. Rear Admiral 1 particpated in the Conaressional Eucsget Hearinas held on 1 March 1°64. Beginning 11 July 1984 and ending 5S Octeher 1564, a pre-aucit Survey was conducted by the Naval Aucit Service of tne finance. perscnnel and equipment administrative functions of the NAVSECGAU and selected NAVSECGRU activities. The cur vey indicateo that WNAVSECGRU Headquarters and fieid sitez .isitec properly administered their resources. Thus, am irnv~oepten adult ans an fuditor General of the Navy, Mr. 1 visited GD and COMNGVSECGRU ts personally thenk the Command for the cooperation of those functions was not warranted. On 22 October 1954, the and courtesies extended to the auditors of the Waval fudit Service who had conducted the pre-audit survey. At that time he provided a aeneral debrief af the survey. « HONAYVSECGRU HIGHLIGHTS OF i984 2.2.6 (Uh) Durine 1984 there was a 20% reducticn am a tt + wy number of security violations at HONAVSECGRU. vi 1.2.7 (Us No tormai complaints of discrimination were filed during 197684, @ fact whicm has been attributed tS wutstanding EEO counseling. UNCLASSIFIED ———m oO en pe te ewenatcngcnewe Puree OF 42 Ad
pe he ad 12.8 (U) On 10 December, tne Cryptologic Training Support Office (GiZ2) was officially opened with RAD McDowell cutting tne ribbon. The CTSO was establishec to provide trainina media in support of NAVSECGRU field requirements. 1.2.9 | On 22 June 1984, an office automation cantract for HONAYSECGRU and its field sites was awarded to | has been providing new word processing capabilities. 1.2.10 (2) COMNSVSECGRU has received increased tunding (approximately $23.6M) from the CCF program throuan several initiatives which are enhancing COMNAVSECGRU's capabilities ain word trocetsing. data management, and secure voice Oy: - (U4) Obtsainina financial resovrces for orojectes egrowth in acquisition management/maintenance of Computer Ss .rteme software (S/W) in NAVSECGRU cryptologic operations. - (UW) Froviding contract software development personnel to perform project management and technical functions of software development isvstems analysis, programming and loaic coding. program testing, system implementation and conversior?. - (U) Obtaining hardware and software improvements at Headquarters necessary toa meet needs for new
UNCLASSIFIED : (WU) capacity/operating demands of an interactive environment increasing securityv and records control. - (UW) Frocuring micro computer system wort.stetions to atitomate functions presently performed manually beth an the field and at Headquarters to enhance mission efficiency and effectiveness. This initiative places automated intelliaent wort. stations at strategic Ilccations within each activity thar performs data ‘(infarmation) collection. proacessina. Gistrisution and storaoe functions of SI support. It will also provide woric wide interchange, updating, utilization and dieposition of business data between the Headquarters and fieic Sites tor administrative support. Emnhasi¢e is placed on the wte Go: common multi-use software throughout NAVSECGRU. - (J) Frocuring, installing, and providing Lite Cycle Supeort for modern digitai secure téelenpnmone switching “equipment and telephones to replace obsolete, failure~sronce equipment and/or provides where none now exists at 22 NAVSECGRU Bites where service is essential to efficient coordination cr time-sensitive operations/other classzitied actians. 1.2.11 (UW) The COMNAVSECGRU selected Naval Security oraus Activity Edzeil. Scotland to represent the U. 5. Navy an the i954 Travis Trophy competition. This NSA hosted competion annually UNCLASSIFIED ~ we tees sees we ee te ane ro renee aoe ae eee = eT “OD Ag GAVEPNYRST REPPsk
” WW: selects the unit wnich has made the most sianificart crvptclogic centribution to the U. Ss. SISINT sveten. in competition Letweenr all the services: USA. UEN. USAF and Uern. NSG& Edzreli won the 1954 Travis Trophy. 1.2.12 iU) NAVSECGRUACT Naples received the Critstandina Unit Certificate of Merit tor 1984 from tne Association ct Oid - Crows for "GQutstanding" performance in support of the multi- national peace keepina force during the Lebanon crisis.
1.2.14 | Reactivation of the USS SFHINX (ARL-24>. USS SFHINX <(ARL-24) beoan procedures for reactivation oan October 1984. SFHINX i¢ due ta be operational 4 October 1985.
UNCLASSIFIED (u) TABLE 1: ASSIGNED SHORE ACTIVITIES NAVAL SECURITY GROUF GCTIVITIES WWAVSECGRUACT? Adal, Alaska Anchorage. Alaska Athens. Greece Auasburg, Federal Republic of Germany Charleston, South Carolina Edzell, Scotland Fort Meade, Marviand Galeta Island, Fanama Groton, Connecticut Guantanamo Bay, Cuba Hanza, Gkhkinawa Fretecture. Japan Homestead, Florida Kamiseva, Japan Keflavik, Iceland Kev West. Floriida Kunia, Hawaii Misawa, Japan Naples. Italy Northwest. Virainia Fearl Harbor, Hawari Clark AFE. Fhilippines Fyongtaet:, Republic of Korea Seana Seca. Fuerto Rice Ean Vita Dei Normanni, Italy Skaqas Ieland. Californie eerceira Island, Azores, Fortigal Wint er Harbor. Maine Ae | Director Communications Material System, Washinaqton, DC HAVAL SECURITY GROUF DETACHMENTS NAVSECGRIDET) Atsugai, Japan Barbers Foint, Hawaii Brunswick, Maine Crene. Indiana London, Britain Meyport., Floride Monterev, California UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED Norfolt, Varadinia Subic Hav. Fhilippines Sugar Grove, West Virginia Yotosuia. Japan NAVCURFSUFFGRU Rota, Spain NAVAL SECURITY GROUF DEPARTMENTS (NAVSECGRUDEFT) LOCATE NAVCAM EASTFAC Honolulu, Hawaii NAVYCAM WESTFAD Guam, Mariana Islands NAYVCOMMNSTA Diego Garcia, Chagos Archipelago, EIGT San Dieoo, Californie Spain, Rota Tr SSISTANT COMMANDERS /AMREA DIRECTORS ASSTCOMNAVSECGRU (ACNSG), Ft. Meade, tarvland DIRNAVSECGRUEUR,. London DIRNAVSECGRULANT. Nortolk, Virginia DIRNAVSECGRUFAC, Fearl Harbor, Hawaii UNCLASSIFIED me twee Pe em ee ern ReRRERampanmeEnErp ane arerees PrP oeCep AS GOVERNMENT PXPIASE $] AT:
UNCLASSIFIED (Ud TABLE 2: NAVSECGRU ELEMENTS LOCATED WITHIN U.S. NAVAL GFERATING FORCES GN SHORE ESTABLISHMENTS MAJOR STGFF DIVISIONS AFLOAT WAVSECGRUDIV, Staff COMSECONDFLT NAVSECGRUDIV, Staff COMTHIRDFLT NAVSECGRUDIV, Staff COMSIXTHFLT NAVSECGRUDIV, Staff COMSEVENTHFLT NAVSECGRULIV. Staff COMIDEASTFOR NAVSECGRUUDIV, Staff CUOMCRUDESFORSEVENTHFLT <CTF 75) N&VSECGRUDIV. USS MIDWAY (CV 41) NAVSECGRUDIV, USS CCRAL SEA (CV 47) NA&VSECGRUDIV, USS SARATOGA (CV 60) NAVSECGRUDIV, USS RANGER (CV 41) NAVSECGRUDIV. USS INDEFENDENCE «CV 62) NAVSECGRUDIV, USS EITTY HAW (CV 63) NAVSECGRUDIV, USS CONSTELLATION (Cv 64) NAVSECGRUDIV, USS ENTERFRISE (CVN 65) NAVSECGRUDIV, USS AMERICA (CV 66) NAVSECGRUDIV, USS JOHN F. KENNEDY (Cv 67) NAVSECGRUDIV., USS NIMITZ (CVN 663 NAVSECGRUDIV, USS LHIGHT 2D. EISENHOWER (CVN 65) WAVSECGRUDIV, USS CARL VINSON (CYN FO) NAVSECGRUDIV, USS JOUETT «(CG 29) NAVSECGRUDIV, USS WILLIAM H. STANDLEY (CG 22) NAVSECGRUDIV, USS FOX (CG 23) NAVSECGRUDIV, USS BIDDLE (CG 24) NAVSECGRUDIV, USS TICONDERGGA (CG 47) NAVSECGRUDIV. USS LONG BEACH (CGN 9) NAVSECGRUDIV, USS TRUXTUN (CGN =5) NAVSECGRUDIV, USS CALIFORNIA «(CGN mo) NAVSECGRUDIV, USS TEXAS (CGN T>) NSVSECGRUDIV, USS MISSISSIFFI (CGN 40) NAVSECGRUDIV, USS OLDENDORF (DD 472) NAVSECGRUDIV, USS SPRUANCE (DD Ger) UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED NaVSECGEUDIV, LESS FETERSON (DL 569) WAVSECSRULIV, USS CARON (DD 970) AVSECGRULIV, USS MERRILL (DD 976) NAVSECGAUL USS JOHN RODGERS (DD 96Er) NAVSECGRULIV, USS DEYG (Db S&F) AVSECGRUDIV, USS INGERSOLL (DD 990) NAVEECORUDIO” USS FIFE (DD 991) NEVSECGRUDIV. FAIRECONRON ONE Guem NAVSECGRUDIV, FAIRECONRON TWO Rote TRAINING ACTIVITIES CNTECHTRA (Code N=4) ~ NAVTECHTRACEN Fensaccla NAVTECHTRACENDET Fort Devens NAVTECHTRACENDET Goodfellow OFE NAVEDTRAFRGDEVCENCORDIV Fensaccla FIELD CFFICES NOVSECGRU FG. RTC Great Lales NAVSECGRU FO, ATC Orlando AAVSECGFU FO. Fensacoia WAVSECGRU FO. RTC San Diego UNCLASSIFIED
- GSNEUNA LNINNEZACS LW GP 9OL0 vag. UNCLASSIFIED TABLE 3: THE NAVAL COURIER SERVICE NAVAL COURIER DIRNAVYCURSERV NAVCURSERVDET NAVCURSERVDET NAVCURSERVDET NAVCURSERVDET NAVCURSERVDET NAVCURSERVDET NAVCURSERVELET NAVCURSERYDET NAVCURSERVDET NAVCURSERVDET NAVCURSERVDET NAVCURSERVDET NAVCURSERVDET “SERVICE Adak - Boston Guam Honolulu Jacksonville Los Anceles Mildenhall Neples Norfolk Rota San Dieao Siogonella Subic Bav UNCLASSIFIED
= eee UNCLASSIFIED SECTION = H@NAVSECGRU: COMFOSITION AND ORGANIZATION (Ud =e (U) DIVISIONS AND THEIR FUNCTIONS =.e1.1 (U) The COMNAVSECGRU is designnated by the letter "6G." en historical reference to "OF -20-G," the former “Code and Signal Section” of the Office of Naval Communications. The Executive Assistant of the COMNGVSECGRU is desionates GA. 2.1.5 (U) The Deputy Commander, Naval Security Grous Command (GF), is the executive and principal advisor and assistent to COMNAVSECGRLU, Functions included the implementation of the Policies of the COMNAVSECGRU, and the coordination of the component elements of the HONAVSECGRU in order to insure the accomplishment of the mission. 2.1.5 (U) GEA is the Assistant to GER for Headquarters Administrative Support. The Primary functions of GEA Curing 1784 were: to assist the Deputy Commander in Crganizins. planning and controiling Headquarters’ administrative metterss: to ze “ t the Ww Deputy Commander in the consideration of administrative Pprobiems Perteining to Headquarters: to perform haiaison with and provide UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED (uy) administrative support to Stat GHSS1istents where mnecessery to formulate and execute the Heacquarters cperating budgerc: to rt perform civilian personnel liaison: ang to act as the centrai control point for forms management. 2.1.4 (U) GD designates the Office of the Assistant for Flans, Froarams, Budget. and Resources Management/Comptroller far Calendar Year 1984. The primary function of GD tor 1904 was to act aS principal advisor to and executive for the COMNAVSECGRU ir; the formulation and implementation of NAVSECGRYU plans, programe, budget and ressources management and comptroller matters. =.1.5 (U) Tne mission af the Force Master Chiet (GE: is to function as the Principal enlisted advisor to tne CoMNAVSECGK ws m ra i ty 6 4 bringing ta the Commander's ettention e@xistina cr  poter eFltuaticons, Procedures anc practices which affect the weltare. moraie, Job satisfaction = and utilication of the command s enlisted personnel and their dependents. =a-1.6 (U) GF i¢ the desianator for the Assistant commander, Naval Security Grous Command ‘ACNSG). Effective 24 October 1344. the duties ancg responsibilities of the ASNSS were separated ¢ron, UNCLASSIFIE D
. . WN, LV GFD06 wi i: UNCLASSIFIED (Ui those of the Commanding Gfficer. NGVSECGRUACT: Fort meade. The ACNSG is responsible for representina the COMNAVSECGRU to the NSG/CSS. Functions tor 19784 included the foliowzng: | ~ to advise the COMNAVSECGRU as to current and future NSA/CSS plans. policies and Proarams which impactea woon naval cryptologic operations and resources ~ te canarct liaison with the DIRNS&/CH CSS anc a Ww hi IS 2 oan the evaluation of NAVSECGRU Field Stations (particacate in the Field Assistance Froeram) -— to provide services, including the coorciinatison ct v ee yr o~ ct scheduling for NAVSECGRU personnel visitina NSA/CSS ~ tO serve as focal point for NAVSECGRU CSSA recwiremercte anc coordinate with NSA/TSS provision o¢ technical intormation - tG Coordinate and participate with Assistant Commanders ang Staff Assistents in the formulation of filens and programs. aei.7 (Ui; GH is the Special Assistant tor Security to tre COMNASECGRu. GH assists the COMNAVSECGRU in the Gevel opment organization, and execution of NAVSECGRU security programs including: information security, personnel security, physical security, and security education. UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED ~-1.8 (J) The primary mission of GK, tne Inspector General. for 1934 was to inspect, investigate, or inquire into any ano all matters of importance to the COMNAVSECGRU, with partacuiar emphasis on readiness including but not limited to: effectiveness, efficiency, economy and safety, personnel discipline, morale, welfare, and managewment practices. commana reiationships and organizational structure. =.1.9 (U> The Marine Corps Assistant to the COMNAVSECGRL (Gr), acts as principal staff advisor and assistant on ervptoclogical matters concerning the Marine Corps on an additional duty basis. GM is the Commanding Officer of the Marine Support Battalion, which provides Marine Coros augmentation to the NAVSSCGRU. Thais is accomplished throsuan ietter companies which are located at NAVSECGRU Command elements worldwide. =e1.16 (UW) There are three Associate Technical Directors ior: Operetions in ystems Analysis (GF?. Threat Assessment iGQ). and Data Automation (GZ). w2eiwil (U) The Assistant Commander for Reserve Plans ara Reaciness is desiqnated as GR. The primary mission of GR for UNCLASSIFIED
« GSNZIX2 LNIWNYZAOCD LV G7D:.5 ita UNCLASSIFIED tut) 1954 was tO acvise and aseist the COMNGVSECGRU ano matter: Fh concerning the Naval Reserve Security Group (NAVRESECGRU) plans. Oolic:es, programs. and training objectives, anc to achieve a high state of readiness. ze1.12 (U) The Assistant Commander for Fersonnel and Trainana (Git) QASzists anc advises the COMNGVSECGRU in metters of perscnnel management and training. Functional responsibilities for 1934 inmciudecs: ~ Tke formulation of personnel and training policy for the NAVSECGRU - Liaison with representatives of other DOD and covernnent orGanizations in matters involving personnei and training - Representation of the COMNAVSESGRU on y a m CL cf - ’ arm a rt 5 ty rw pe] a 3 o committees. and at conferences in personnel and matters - Management of the NAVSECGRU Automated Fersonnel Information Management System - Flanning for the career development and trainina of cryptologic officers and enlisted personnel an tne Nevy - Administration of NAVSECGRU special training prcorams - Coorsination of arrangements for special operetisnai training and forward area training for Marine Corps crycetoloagic personnel UNCLASSIFIED
2.1.15 (Ui G30 is the Office of the Assistant Telecommunications and Automated Lata tunctions for 1984 were designated by G30 elements G2: Girector of Current OGperations) and G22 (the vl: oe BP A ed RE tee 8 ad ew nee ee er TT CA CEI ies aia) 2a —— UYNCLASSIFIED te ~ Development and coordination of policies, Plans an procedures to improve manpower control, utilization and productivity improvements - Collaboration with commands. bureaus, anc ortace concerned to ensure the adequacy and availability of pers - Management of Human Resource Management Support Svete Frograms. including Equal Spportunity., Race Relatichs Drug Abuse Control and Alcoholism Frevention. Comander ¢f5 Systems. Tne primar ttn Dsrector o Configuration, respectively: - To serve as the functional sponsor for teLrecommunication= and automatec cate under the cognizance of the NAVSECSGRU. ang ensure th continuing ettectiveness and reesine * aS5Sees and validate communication and S2 Of tnese evsetems: aqeta SWE LE requirements within tne centext of current operatiana capabilities. - To act as the software contiaquraticn manacer +ar thes telecommunications and automated data Svsteme in which th UNCLASSIFIED ~- he distripution o- iJ annel 7 r 7 < £ * = ] € &
GMX LNEWNYAACS JV G8... ily. eee - e UNCLASSIFIED ~—— om Cus WAVSECGRU has support restonsibaiat.: ta ert at tA] rt] f rm be | 4 - ° y fecal point for systems security matters: to maximicze intercrersbility of svstems through stendardizstion review proposed policy and precedured under the purview of the COMNAVSECGRU and to ensure compliance with higher authority directives. 2.1.14 (3) G40 designates the Assistant Commander Losistacs end Méeterial. The mission of G4G is: To aesist é6édvise COMNAVEECGRU in the timely provision. evalvazicn support of equipment. material and facilities tc requirements for the aperation of the NAVSECGAU shore elemer, Under tnit reguirement tne paertment Mat two sperisi GELI=. -er anc era meet a ~ Fe — | rt bie ang three Givisione: GaorF Assistant for Flanning and Froor amas a2 CG @SSi ft ans advise tne Assistant Cemmander air torsmuietinas soCutIing the Flanming. Froorammina anc Budasting Froacan e Assistant tor Integrates Logistics Support in matters pertainins tc ILS and Maintenance Manpower: G41 Logistics/Maintenance Equipment Control Divieion to perform matters pertainins es Suopl. ¥ and maintenance functions relating to the NoVSECSRi!: Fecilities Re ft a 1 aGiness Division to pertorm facilities management and Safety and Gccupetional Healtn functions required UNCLASSIFIED
(ui COMMAVSECGAU as oa major claimant and an Echelon Teo Commancer, includina planning anc procrammina facilities contruction and public works management and staff civil enoarneer functions: G44 Shore Equipment Installation ang Flannins Daivis:oar to execute responsibilities in the planning tor anG implementation of shore electronic equipment installation requirements worldwide within the Commans and te maintein eErace éllocation and svstems confiquration contre! at ail NASSECEE U shore sites =e1.15 (Ui The Assietant Commander for Special Operetions a¢é Sestiaqnated by GS, It is composed of three divisions 351. G7, ang Gh4, | | The miszionm of S21, the Cryptclooic Svatems: Mensgement Tavisian. 1S tG advise and assist the Aetretant Commander tor Srecial <dOcperations ini menacing Crvetciocac Operations ashore and afloat. im order to ensure time and efffective response to Nave and Natacnal tagkhana. Tne davirsian 23 Organized inte tour branchesssectianse. Tne Rescurces Branco focuses on day to day aseration of NAVSECGRU field stations enn mobile cryptclesic svstems. and is subdivisec 2Mto Fecorranes Geaiina with Facitic. European, and CONUS/Caribbean issues Tre
= Requirements Eranch deals with lena ‘term projzects ans Pprosrams., ancgis focused on future asnore ans afloat Crvptoiao.s svstem= wnich heve worldwide application. The Darect pareeal orate Resources Section is concerned soiely with manacement of the personne] end equipment resources of a specific comrpertmenten Navy program. The Battle Group Fassive Horizon E:;teneion Eevetem \EGFHES) Groerationmal Review Team (BORT) wore Closeiy with thre Navel Electronics Systems Command te ensure that gevelsooment a the BGOFHES system follows a path which will maximize ite etility to the Bettie Grous Commander. 1) (4) The 1564 mission of tne Gcean Surverliance Svetems Davision \GOl) wes to agvite enc assist Ge in MaMNSsinsa wme lysey Mian Fresuency Direction Fandina VHF DF 3 SVStem ta Ennstre etfective HFDF to acean surveiliance prosrame and in sitistaction of other emitter location recuirements. < aul: The orimery mission of the =necia: EommGams Civicion (G54) was to advice and assist Go concerning tr operétionai readiness, sunport. anc performance of the CLetiic WIZARD evstem. anmcludina the management of the five Chal! WIZGRED Feaisnal Feportina Centers. i216 tUd Geu as the Assistant Commander for ¢ ba uw "y 134na4l1 Security. The mission for 13734 inciuded: support to the Nav.
ADSM TD GNARNN AGS SY oot. UNCLASSIFIED ‘Ur Operations Security (OFSEC) and Operations Deception wWrrei: proarams, collection and analysis of Navy electromacnetic EMIS51CGNS: assessment of the status of Signals Security within the Navy; application of Signals Security data to eliminate Fossible vulnerabilities in Navy electronic systems: and Siqnals Security resource management. Gé6u and a staft of sever officers. twenty Enlisted personnel anc ten cavilziens carry out tne misziar ang functions ct Gem, The department 1s organized ints a front Office ana tive divisions. The functions of the divisions are: Gel - Crvptciosic Security: Gé=z - Signals Security Goerations: 663 ~— Vulnerability Assessment: 54 ~ Fians/FProar ame anc Resources Management: and Get - TEMFEST Mana ert. wel. i? (Ud) The Gttice of the Assistant Commander for Technical Tevelopment if desisnated a in GSe0. The primary mission for iff4 te WSS (‘tS St21Et and advise the COMNAVSECGRU ain: the Tormudsetion cf mid and long-range technical objectives, development and desl coordination of concepts. Separetion and steaftina Lior. CU} trormsd a research and the development of reauirements ac necessers ana liaison and coordinetian pertainina to all cryptciasic RITEE (less cryptographic) proorame eponsored by tae COMMAYSECEFU Ge eving NAVSECGRU participation. UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 2.2 (Uo HONAVSECGRU: FERSONNEL (ASSISTANT COMbimRDERS. THEIR PEFUTIES AND DIVISION HEADS:
ao (UW) ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES WITHIN THE HEADCUOR I ERS. NeVAL SECURITY GROUP COMMAND aeael (Us On 24 October 1934, the duties and resronsibilitie of the Assistant Commander, Naval Security Group Commend were separated from those of the Commanding Officer, Naval Security Group Activity. Fort Meade. BBM Gs part of a realisnment of overall Assistant Commander. Wavali Security Group (ACNSG?, tne Commanding Ctticer. naval Security Group Activity, Ft. Meade, Mi asssumned responsibility for ‘a 0s (ir Within the Gtfice of the Agsistent for Fiens,. Frogreme. Evodoet, and Resources Management (GD). the functions of “ ecne Investments Division (GDS; and the Urerations (GLMN: Division (GDé> were merged to create thhe Budget Division (GDS).
« USNEdXZ LNIWNYZACS JV G7O..G ily. UNCLASSIFIED mete sul? OFREVYNOTE S450 of 1 June 1952 announced that the sceretary ot the Navy nad approved tne estaplienment of the wllc. Naval Security Group Activity. Kamas ye, Japan at of ST Mav 1564 {sec Section 10.2.1). SGUFCTE: 6L ae oe 4 Uo With the appreval by SECNAY for tne eEstanlashmen or U.S. NAVSECGRUSCT Kamiseva om 25 May 1964. autnoracetion wast Given by the Chief of Naval Gperations by ONG ltr Ser UGRSED, Fury e7G ot 1 June 1954 tc diztestablisn the uted. BavVseCGRULET ham fe a (see section Oo.S.5:. ima s Was accomplished cov NAVSECGRUNGTE &4 in , G + ray a any Gs c ma Tr et fl tlt ee in oh rm ig ry n r ~ f \ eee \U) On 1 Septemper 1954, the Director of the Security Pavisican (Giz> in the Office of the Assistant Commander tor Agmanistration, Fersonnel and Security (Gio. became the Sscerial mEesistant for Security (Giis. eee tU) Within the Ofrice cr tne Assistant Commanoer ter Reserve Flans and Readiness tnere was a maier restructurins oa UNCLASSIFIED
7 e « ISNAMXS LNGWNSZACS LW G27905 jade TT a A CCL I ET CTE SI Ae ES A — UNCLASSIFIED (Us the NAVRESSECGRU units. The number of units was reduceo tram te «ac. Thi¢e°* was done to consolidate undersetrenath wumits ann fecilitate the management of units. and missions. At tne era of 19354, there were 421 officers and 1,975 enlisted reserve personnel oanboarc. A list of Regional Active Duty cUrveteregic Cificers (RADCO ¢) and Naval Reserve Security Group Unite rma cy cond to restructuring is found in Section 10.3.) Seae7 (UW) Grol September 1954, the Assistant Commander tar Administration. Fersonne) and Security (610) was recdesionated as tre Assistant Cannander for Fersonnel and Training. tu t (U? ORGGRIZATION CHARTEs HEGDOUARTERS. Wevan SEL”. we GROUF COMMAND 1984 f UNCLASSIFIED ict
gg EO EEEEOOEEEE—E———E——E—E—E—E—E—E—EEEE . 3SN3dNT LNIWNYAACD LV GF. tg ——— . aera es et TINIE OT ce aan tnsmentem nineties: — nt UNCLASSIFIED 2.5 vu) KEY MANAGEMENT FRIORITIES anb ISSUES: r HEBLUUARTERS DIVISION =.5.1 (UW) GEA fulfilled its basic mission tv placina amcreasecg emphesis On customer service to include same day service. end Evy ensuring total aoministrative support ta oF. Metters of routine importance included keeping abreast of chaences in administrative policy, disseminating those chanoes to tne depertments, and mainteining a smooth flow of paperwork. Emohatis 1 on customer satisfaction. Froblems were created be manning shorttails due to resources emoploved out of GEG to other commeards «Tentagoan/White House). ne Dee ‘Us; During 1964, GE spent 120 days Tab WREGTing hisd& -. A . . j . ° wiéld activities, ashore and afloat, He conducted briediace sn the status of issues of concern to enlisted personne). hE 5 Framery Goal was to enhance enlisted job satisfaction. promare 9000 order and discipliine. and tc improve the "quality of lite! % MY be -+. 0 “4 in scene enlisted personnel and their families. Enlisted mw reenlistment results and retention data for FYG4 ere to be fours im Section 10.4,.1.3 ang Section it.4.4 respectively. UNCLASSIFIED
« SNAKE LNAWNYZAOD LV OP2D65 Ege e UNCLASSIFIED aedew WwW) The Fersonnel Security Divasion of GH processed T1865 appiicants into the NAVSECGAU. In addition. it precressea 1622 access review cases and 2000 SBI-FR's, a total of Fost cases. tu) There was a total of 241 inmelioiple decisions. Trere were 29 appeésls which resulted in 17 reversals. Gt the J revercals, one individual was subsesuently declared ineligisie a second time. The breakdown of ineligible decisions Gy Cause 15 as follows: Druge-elchoha! 4S.1% +3,.8% Surtebility Se aide ee Financial 5.8% +1.5% Foreign National ae ute -Z.E2 Criminalsmistonduct .o -2.o% . 7 Security 4% - .6% from 1983 fran 1963 fram i733 from 1933 from 1787 from 1702 from 1952 CU) The new ONT courier card svstem was imnlementea within the NaVSECGRUCOM. The new system requires of more than 2a00 cards. (U) There were a 20 per cent reduction in security violations at the HO during 17664. UNCLASSIFIED bal) weTuNteoriarits the number at ssh
throughout 1934: System Sugar Grove. « ASNAdXA LNSWNYTACD LY GPO ary. UNCLASSIFIED (Ud Fhysical security installations continues a. Joint Services Interior Intrusion Detection (JSIIDS? were installed at NSGA/D‘s Greton. Adak. and This program is now 9O% camplete. b. Remote Sensor Svstem for Frnysical Security (RESFS) installations began at NSGA’D’s Galeta Island and Northwest. Work started in smcathiw throughout the year. praviced Fhveical the fall af 1984 and progressed ce Bullet proof clothing anc briefe to NScA Athens for protection against terrori= cd. GH= served as the Navv Giternate to tne Dc] Security sub-committee cf the DCI Security Committee, GHD physical security personnel attenoed the weeb-lons worthains or oun Feminars tor SC1l facilities. 2.5.4 Glementse leland 24-29 2-7 December (U) Gh conducted 20 command inspections at 20 NavSECS during 1984 (TAELE 4). Gt. visited NAVSECGFRUSCT Gale: June 19784. Gt: and GEE visited NAVSECGRUATT t.ev Wer 934 in response to Hotline case C-125-55. UNCLASSIFIED Pm
e GSNIdXZ LNAWNYZACD LY GIOGs Gag ey Seo are | a one eieetenenenensmenamensseeamne =“ UNCLASSIFIED TABLE 4 COMMAND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED DURING CY 1984 BY GK A eS tne ene ig NAVSECSTA 23 Jan - 08 Feb 84 DCMS 06-09 Mar 84 NAVCURSERVDET Los Angeles 19 Mar 84 NAVSECGRUDEPT, NAVCOMMSTA San Diego 20-23 Mar 84 NAVSECGRUDEPT, NAVCAMS EASTPAC Wahiawa 26-29 Mar 84 NAVSECGRUACT Pearl Harbor 30 Mar — 04 Apr 84 NAVCURSERVDET Honolulu 02 Apr 84 NAVSECGRUACT Kunia 05-09 Apr 84 NAVSECGRUACT Fort Meade 30 Apr ~ 03 May 84 NAVSECGRUDET Sugar Grove , 14-17 May 84 NAVSECGRUACT Anchorage 11-13 Jul 84 NAVSECGRUACT Adak 16-23 Jul 84 NAVSECGRUACT Skaggs Island 25-31 Jul 84 NAVSECGRUDET Monterey 01-03 Aug 84 NAVSECGRUDEPT NAVCAMS WESTPAC Guam 17-23 Oct 84 ' NAVCURSERVDET Guam 19 Oct 84 NAVSECGRUDEPT NAVCOMMSTA Diego Garcia 25-28 Oct 84 NAVSECGRUACT Philippines/NAVSECGRUDET Subic ll Oct = 08 Nov 84 NAVCURSERVDET Subic 05 Nov 84 UNCLASSIFIED a : ae
. SSNSUXY LNIWNYTACD LY G2. dis. _ TEED — eee UNCLASSIFIED 22a (wu) GM and Staff conducted inspections/wisits of lu at tre letter companies, and one detachment of the Meraine Suscert Battalion. 2.5.6 (Ld) Key management priorities and icsues wre comcernes GF ancluded: n &. The CLASSIC BUOYANT Frogram continued to te ! the major program availeble to provide live readiness tréainina tor NAVRESSECGAU units. Under tne SIGSEC Porticn of the procram. units monitored fleet tacticel comms and reported EEFI‘s. which ranged from call sion compromises to disclosurese of fleet TOvENENCS. Tne SFECOPS portion of the program continued unger tasting for projects such as RKRIVEREOORD and MOONWSAIL. edditional cne time short term prosects. named CAMPAIGNER and BATTLE TOAD. were urcerteren and completed during 1964. Also & marer new “target. Fresect TOF GALLANT. wa WwW added to the CLASSIC BUS ANT Frooram. b. There were two major inetallatisn Brawvects: wnGerwey during 1954. One of these wes an wporade to the LLaisdc BUCGYANT SFECOFS and SIGSEC eauipment. This effort invol 65 rewlacing aging Re-LeO's ano MOLb-LeTty s witr new helen. recovers and WOD-40d's, The log periodic antennas were medified to te UNCLASSIFIED ne +; eee _
. QSNGdXE SNAWNWZACD LY O7D.0 sage we : - e nee UNCLASSIFIED (U) rotatable. Soma of the stations alse received new recorazires, converters or VHF/UHF receivers, Fifteen unite were vparagcse during 1964, By 1985 all of the units with equipment should be uparaded. The other proaram involves installing communications equipment at the Reserve Centers to Give the NAVRESSECGRU unite a Secure comms capability. Ry tae end of 19664, 11 communications suites were anstalled: 14 more are scheduled. es (Us Gio identified the following kev management Priorities ard istuee in terms af fulfillment of basic micsion. metters of routine importance. and major problems resrectively: ¥ : y a. G0) fulfillment of Basic Mission: Pevelopment of data element standards ts woe used By systems developers will leac te svstem interosersbilits. m de m ney e 3 or ui n i n PEGESIQN will teagd te ancreasec dete shearing. and encourege better management of NAVSECGRU data. 3 ti Develops. reviews end monitors stansarde ¢e y precedtres reauired to cserate crvptoadraphic telecommnication eng autamated data svstems. Appraise the adequacy ant erticiency c4 operationel methodology relating ta cryptaiogic UNCLASSIFIED Pe oc: © oe mm ptr eee tae tna eta PF eOmr. Ph
ean , e CET LOLS LI ee tase atten antes 8 « BSNAdXS LNEWNETACD LV OF505 (ira, UNCLASSIFIED (Uy teiecommunications and automated data initiate systems: recommend. an actions to Improve concepts and/or correct svctteas deficiencies. Ferform the analytical support mecessarv to ensure meintenance and upkeep of data bases essential ta the management of cryptologic telecommunications and automated dats svstems. Ensure that current operating procecuren fa- cryptclocic telecommuinicstions and automated qate svstemse accommodated when changes to the software systeme. aroaraems Of ODeratianal are made en d manages the contiguration contro] bosrase of those svetems for which the Telecommunications and Automated Deta Lepartment is the functianal sponser. Assi t SCS im the determination and ~ of training objectives for communicat s ‘alidaticn LOne ang ADF personnel. Coordinates and operational automated telecomminicatians dats systems issues with other oragéenizatisnal Elements within NAVSECGRU as well ae with external oraanizations such as the DIA, NSA. DIA and the SCE’s, at aoprcoriate, Fepresented COMNAVSECGRU at coniorances, working Groups and panels on Current crvptolaoic teleconmunications and automated data matters. svstems operatisnal UNCLASSIFIED en
telecaanmunicatians functionally . SSNGGXS LNAWNYGACD JV G29K5 Fira UNCLASSIFIED . Keview requirements for nee and ADF svstemz to ensure compatibilit. 12 sponsored current SYSTEMS and oroccaurce arts tacilitate planning -for any new interfeces and procedures. As the Software Confiouration Manager tor ALF svstem=e which NAVSECGRU provides Sottware suoport. Go peartsacipated and syst Closely managed ems in order in Gesign and development reviews for new  sottiuere changes to the aftware cof operational vt DT) to enhance operability and maintain the interoperability of interfaced systems. Also drafted and started NAVSECGRL GDF securit be FLD pp Séistase to facilitat the dete by ali Heada * M experienced persenn Rctivities to provid ADF svetems. C Gfeftwere Suspoart &e 7 a’ Overseas rotation Vv anstructions, netices, policies end plans. Matters of Routine Imnortance: eévelcoment of a Headquerters corperste & data sharing and increase arcensatilit. te juarters elements. aintenance at sudfiacrent THUD Br oF 3 .@t the NAVSECGRU Software fuceort @ adequate software support te toe ‘ey SSE IST ortinual loss ot experienced perztonnel froas tivities to their original ratings due requirements. UNCLASSI‘FIED en -<- Te en aea en re, ee we ae, Pee Cee STV tT eT. er er. 7 cree 20 4d
« FSNSMXS LNSWNEAACS JW GPO. ia: UNCLASSIFIED Lack of Getinitive MEVSECEARU colacier ane instructions on ADF softwere stanaardizetion. and microcompriter Software cuppert. Fillina militarv/civilian biilets wa th Qualified individuals in the ADF Security end Software sections of Gls Livisicn. c. ‘U> Major Froblems: Major issue was indoctrination and training OF Fone-nDF orientec personnel in the use and tenefits «at automation and eyvstems interoperability. Unanticipated softwere support problems being resol vec on snort notice. NAVSECGARG ADF Security Flan terano comotetecyu for subdmissio0n to iad. Significant prooress Wes Made toware il ry anmcressing the retention and use ot persomnel evperiencec in softwere support in the field. 2.5.8 fU) Durine calendar vear 1964, G42 was involved in many Giftferent Lathe. projects anc WAY SECGRU releted mztters. Suopoartine 23 WNAVSECGSU field eites worldwide. G40 correctes m Equipment Casualty Reports (leSREF ss and promulqated a total of Git taste to COMNAVELEXSYSCOM arc UNCLASSIFIED 54 _ i ~ ce nN Ser en RT
ae « SSNGdNE UNSWNWZACD LY O22 rEg: eee UNCLASSIFIED ‘Us comrleted 185 tasks. A total of 4 military construction troiects were beaqun for 6 total of £22.7 million and thirty Minar Construction and Maior Facilities Repair projects were funded from OM for a total of #5.7 million. Under the coanizance a4 GAOL 4 new major system acquisition projects were begun with if mayor prejects still active. G40 has tultiriled its missicon with the dedication and devotion of the personnel assianed. ~~ & & tis aewe F lw hey management priorities end issues #2 cutlined ao- [Divisions GS2 and GS4 (of GS): Be Uo GSS’s mission is essentially that of a Becond echelon command. As such, it manages the shore based Nev High Frequency Direction Findina \HFDF) svstem (EUILL SE yi). Primary issue= af concern were programm:na resources &= necessary. monitoring related oroject developrent. allocetins retources (personnel end equipment), develarnment ana fromuigati or of governing operational policy and procedures, anc evaluation of evetem performance. The only major problems encountered in i> “ ff) were inzurticient merzonnel and, toa a lesser dearee. inztufficient travel funds. UNCLASSIFIED
« BSNAUNZ SMAWNUTACS LV GP O10 4 tgy —— we UNCLASSIFIED b. (Us G54 was generally succezetul in fulfallina its tre ma jor mission objectives - ensuring that the RFegisannal Reporting Centers (RRC! have the manpower, training. and support to carry out tneir mission, and ensuring that CLASSIC WIZARD reporting meets the needs of consumers. Ce (3) Matters of routine importance includes enything perteining ta RRO or overall system status, CL&asSz1c WIZARD reporting, and both CLASSIC WIZARD and IMF system = development is of concern to G54. d. (U) The major problem which G54 encountered in fulfilling its mission was ailact of personnel. With two 4) individuals wortans at - “Vere, anc several orilet G54 wes hard pressec to fulfill its obligations concerning resier * ile ry iT a + ty of docunentation, attendance at desian and status meetings woth locally and out of srea;, as well as its advisory rove within “the headquarters. The arrival of additicnal oersannel (LTS LC __ fang LCDR fF to fill previously vacant billets somewhst alleviated the situation. See Lis (U) Fey Management Fricrities enc Tesuet of Ges UNCLASSIFIED oo 57. Tan ne cee renner mennemeummeprenmenet ae sere" eg FEES Fy we WN ee PEPE LSE
. SSNGUNS LSSWNETALD LY G70.0 Kita: UNCLASSIFIED (U) GeO fulfills its basic mission through management of the Navy's Sicnal Security proocrams. This ‘meoduoces coordination of resource requirements, preparation of proares documentation and instruction, and direct supervision of Se eral Vulnerability Assessment proarams. 1) Matters of routine importance to Sew ancluce the status of program resources, ccordination ot resource s0UstmMInwe and changes. resolution of issues whicn involve cosrainetian between the Nevy and other agencies on SiSSEL Matters. assesements of the security of U.S. Navy electronic systems. the adequacy and correctnezs of program instructions. trairnins materials. working aids, and cther documents. (U2 Major problem ereas which had to oe edaressec during 19754 included: Ge the imolementation of a major Vulineransiit, 1" “assessment program iLbVGL) with an attencent need ta cevelor resource requirements. a program infra-structure, and soceratinea procedures: t. difficulties. as vet Unresolved. os > rere) establishing an effective course or instruction #32 Gs qu Ly tes UNCLASSIFIED - ne co ccc eee eR TN OTC AD GOVERNMPST EAPEASE
« ASNGIXA LNAWNEZACS LW QTD on ta, Te A ae e eT OITA ECTS ED: BID SAGA neha te UNCLASSIFIED c. (U3 the need to resolve issues relating to Gveral: program resource requirements, a topic which led te Te scheduling of a major SIGSEC pregram review during 1725. ena: d. a continued manning problem resuiting trom difficuities e:perienced in obtaining qualified civilian personnel to *211 all authorized billets. “a & ad a 1 (Us fithin the canstraints imposec bv personnel limitations G&o successfully accomplished its mission. MNatter ny ef routine importance included personnel staffina. suppert to the fleet amd other national consumers, and timeliness of retponse. UNCLASSIFIED ee ween BQ 0 ee rege: .. Teh reco A GOVERNMENT BMPERSE
BOT SNRRNUTAAGD SECTION 2% SPECIAL OPERATIONS. (UU) A | (U) The Office of the Assistant Commander for Special Operations is subdivided into three divisions: Cryptologic Sys- tems Management (651), Ocean Surveillance Systems (G32). and Special Technology (G54). 2.2 (U) Major programs/projects begun, continued or com- pleted during 1984 by GSi include the following: on 2 MMlBspsce-atiocation study at NSGD Rota, Spain: In the fall 19°64, CNSG directed a space allocation study at NSGD Rota/CSG Sixth Fleet. Severe space constraints at Rota necessi- tated a review of current and future space requirements to assets possible impact on operations. Tecan Be onvined Cryptologic Shore Support Activity at NOSE Edzell: On 3i Jan 84, the U.S. Navy’s first, and currently only. Combined Cryptologic Shore Support Activity (CCSSA) was estab- 60
. Material Require. 2nts Study Group: COMNAVSECGRU was asked to provide a thresi study to the OFNAY (0096) chaired MRSG which was formed to iss .tigate how to accommodate all the current and planned In addition to providing a threat briefing. CNSG provided a description of the minimum capability required to provide cryptologic support to the tactical commander.
WINGS SNTWNAGAC SD SW OCRMGUAS IE. Sere = 3.2.6 (S) BGPHES Operational Review Team: During this last, year, BORT continued to provide fleet experience input into the development of BGFHES. 3.2. (U)} Travis Trophy: CNSG selected Naval Security Group Edzell, Scetland to represent the U.S. Navy in the 1984 Travis Trophy competition. This NSA hosted competition annually selects the unit which has made the most significant cryptologic contri- bution to the U.S. SIGINT system. In competition between all the 62
a TST GSWNMACL CN G20 0 0 een GUS ANU SSRN HAG SD CW GIDL: —— ere ce eineatcetnnnceee maarenprcmeet arene (U) services. USA, USN, USAF, and USMC, NSGA Edzell won the 1984 e . Travis Trophy. 3.2.9 (U)} NSGA Naples received an award from the Association of Old Crows: In November 1984, the Association cf Old Crows awarded the Outstanding Unit Certificate of Merit for 1984 to Naval Security Group Activity, Naples, Italy. The award citation commended Naples for “outstanding performance in support of the multi-national peaceleeping force during the Lebanon crisis.” eee lO (U) MCATS: The National Security Agency (R24) began a TCF program to provide microcomputer support for tactical units. This effort involved providing small, portable computers, with software, to tactical units in the field. The purpose was to give Direct Support elements the use of current ADF equipment without having to spend limited acquisition funds. After using the equipment for a short period of time, the units would be ina ‘better position to make smart budget decisions regarding procure- ment of computer equipment. Any applications developed by the units with the MCATS computers would be made available to other activities through R24. CNSG asked R24 for 16 systems for our DIRSUP units worldwide. The final disposition of the R24 systems would not be made until early 1985. Na ela ae NE aa ee ee
& 4 3 On Re Bhs * or He 2.2.16 Misawa Flanning Task Force: COMNAVSECGRU partici~ pated in regularly*held sessions of the Misawa Planning Task
ISITE LNAWNUZACL SV Gro. will be identified, milestones established, and responsible orqa- nizations tasked.
2.21? (U) SCSS: G51 provided technical load tapes to NSGA Northwest for database build for OFEVAL/TECHEVAL testing. Analy- tic expertise was provided to NOSC, NW, NAVELEX, and the contrac- tor. Arrangements were made for NSA AIS management personnel to view equipment and operations at NOSC and NW. Additionally, the program was briefed to CINCLANTFLT, CINCFACFLT, and field stetion personnel during the year. 2.2.21 (U) ADF applications for mobile support: G51 provided briefings and discussions with FLTCINC reps and field stations “for use of portable ADF suites in tactical settinas. A standard has been recommended to guide tactical users toward common/trans- portable applications. 3.2.22 (U) Misawa automation: Arrangements were made to pro- vide NSGA Misawa a mini-computer for automation of certain FANDR functions. Work continues into 1985 to provide applications software and additional hardware.
Ne Dea (U) On 8 August 1984, COMNAVSECGRU promulgated a dis- tribution schedule for surface carry-on cryptologic equipment to all fleet Commanders-in-Chief. The distribution schedule reflects FOM-86 planning/programming initiated by CNO tasking and “supported by documented fleet requirements. The FOM 86-70) programming actions supplement other ongoing program initiatives; reflect the phased introduction of new systems to replace obso- lete carry-on cryptologic equipment; constitute the basis for future FOM planning. The programmed O&2MN resources will provide long-term support of newer generation equipment only. Additionally, CNO tasking designed Commander, Naval Security a 68
(U) Group Command as the principal coordinator for the distribu- tion and inventory management of replacement carry-on equipment. 3.2.27 (U)} A total of nine "NEW" OUTBOARD Message Format Conversion Units (QMFCU) were bought and COMNAVSECGRU promulgated
(U) a distribution schedule to fleet CINC*’s and all sites recesving the equipment. The nine OMFCU’s satisfy stated fleet require- ments in the short term. In the long run, integration of data currently provided via OMFCU into Navy C2 plan is required to eliminated limited capability QRC efforts. COMNAVSECGRU will centinue to work with OPNAV to initiate such a solution. Fleet CINC’s were requested to stress a longer term solution with CNO. The units will be installed IAW the following schedule: NCOLANT, late Mar 85, 2 NEW OMFCU's NCO MED, mid Mar 85, 1 NEW OMFCU Naples, IT, late Apr &5, 1 NEW OMFCU Skaggs 1S, early May 85, 1 NEW OMFCU NCEF HI, mid May 85, 2 NEW OMFCU’s NCWF Guam, late May 85, 2 NEW OMFCU*s
Reactivation of the USS SFHINX (ARL-24): The USS - SFHINX (ARL-24) began procedures for reactivation on 1 Oct 84. ARL-24 is assigned to the Atlantic Fleet and will be employed by to be operational 4th @TR 1985.
3.2.24 (U) Relocation of Company Delta MARSFTEN: Relocatior of Company Delta MARSFTBN Hanza, JA to Company Delta MARSE TEN Galeta Island, Fanama began 1 Oct 64. Relocation is scheduled to be completed by 1 Oct 85. This relocation is being done to increase manning at NSGA Galeta Island and to make NSGA Hanza a Navy only shore site. Saw {U) Major programs/projects begun, continued or com- pleted during 1984 by GS2 include the following: 72 we tw wet rw nee ——— nnn
2.5.5 (U) Froject NOBLESSE is a High Frequency Direction Finding (HFDF) replacement program for the Army and Air Force using Navy BULLDOG Narrowband System (NBS) equipments. Upon “completion of equipment deployment, all United States SIGINT System (USSS) HFDF sites will have similar narrowband equipment. This will increase site capabilities and enhance unitary (joint? operations among services. Ref: n/a 3.3.4 (WU) Action continues to replace/upgrade BATTLE equip- ment at Naval Security Group Activities San Vito, Italy and Misawa, Japan. The system acquisition plan has been developed and reviewed. Ref: n/a
3.207 (U) BULLDOG Narrowband System Upgrade. A program to replace obsolete equipment and improve the reliability and capa- bility of the Narrowband System (NES). In addition to tradi- tional direction finding capabilities, the BULLDOG NES has an unmanned, Automatic Direction Finding (ADF) subsystem which sig- nificantly reduced the tasking load on the manned Semi-Automatic Direction Finding (SDF) position.
. FST RG SNGRNE Ge. OE OO - 2.228 (Lo The 1984 BULLSEYE Operations Working Group met 11 to 13 Sep 84 at Norfolk, VA. The group, chaired by Commander, Naval Security Group Command (653), included representatives of the three Fleet Commenders-~-in-Chief, the Net Control Stations, “National Security Agency, Canadian Forces Supplementary Radio System Headquarters, Assistant Commander Naval Security Group, and Naval Security Group Activity. Skaggs Island. CA, Ferformance Analysis Group. Discussions centered on immediate and future High Frequency Direction Finding (HFDF) operational matters rele- vant to the management and operation of the BULLSEYE system. Ref: (1) COMNAVSECGRU ltr Ser GS3/S9234 of 14 Oct 84 (BOM) (Not enclosed) - aes “ a  mneemmnll +) RO Peryyrstpossegtmes st Toy eit ep
3.3.9 (UW) WIDEBAND Operations Doctrine Revision completed. A eo comprehensive revision of the U.S. Navy High Frequency Direction Finding Wideband Operations Manual was completed and distributed to the appropriate activities on 9 Nov 84. The manual contains policy, guidance, and operational procedures for net control and net station wideband operations.
See 14 (U) BULLSEYE TEC Flash Channels. Triple Error Correc— i a | tion (TEC) flash channel use was discontinued in Jul 1984. TEC 79 2 ee A EEE eres
(U) adds data bits to each transmitted character to ensure error-free reception of messages. TEC flash channels were necessary when high frequency communications circuits were used for BULLSEYE traffic. Fresent day circuit routing has eliminated the need to use TEC. Ref s: (a) COMNAVSECGRU 182220Z JUL B84 (CU) | (U) Major programs/projects begun, continued oer com- pleted during 1984 by G54 including the following: Cece’ Fe rn eee nee rN ere ere EE TT Peg D AS COVERNMENT EXPEOSE
. GavatNd SNAWNWAAC DS YYOOC, — _ ES aeee Ce ane De4.S (U) CCF Billet Initiative: As the result of a divisional study. backed up by a SFO contractor study, it wes «determined that due to the increasing complexity that was being designed into the Improved CLASSIC WIZARD (IMP) system, the increase of 19 billets which were in the CCF program for the record would be inadequate to operate the RAC's during the IMF era. The actual number of billets required, reduced to an abso- lute minimum, was determined to be 127. As of the end of 1984, the budget process was well underway, but the likelihood of approval of the billets was in significant doubt. "81
C~ SECTION 4 SIGNALS SECURITY AND RELATED FUNCTIONS (U) ° 4.1 || Within HONAVSECGRU, Signals Security (SIGSEC) fun- ctions were supervised by the Assistant Commander for Signals | Security (G60). G60 was subdivided into five divisions: Crypto- graphic Security (G41), Signals Security Operations (G62), Vulne- rability Assessment (G65), Flans, Programs and Resources (G64) and Tempest Management (G65). G60 reported the following develo- pments for 1984: 4.23 (U) CLASSIC COYOTE DEVELOFMENT. Development of CLASSIC COYOTE, the replacement program for the CLASSIC NOMAD, continued throughout the year. As part of the contract with NAVELEX, Sperry Corporation conducted a two week training session in March for seven NAVSECGRUACT Charleston personnel (4 CTT, 2 CTM and 1 EN) who would constitute the first COYOTE team. The equipment installation in the van was completed and environmental testing was conducted on the COYOTE vehicle. The van was delivered to NAVSECGRUACT Charleston in early August and was used for two weeks of advanced operator training conducted by two Sperry technicians. Sperry released the van in August for DT IIB/OT II testing by COMOFTEVFOR in the Norfolk area. Testing was com- pleted and the COYOTE tractor-trailer then turned over to NAVSEC- GRUACT Charleston. 82
4.2% | FY84 NAVY TEMPEST PROGRAM. “During FY84, G65 eva- luated 6798 TEMFEST Vulnerability Assessment Requests (TVAR’s). Of these, 275 were tasked as Instrumented TEMPEST Surveys (1TS) while 255 were acceptable risks. In FY84, 198 ITS were completed leaving a FY85 backlog of about 600. In FY84 a joint Army, Navy, Air Force and NSA team completed zoning all major SIGINT facilities in the Facific, European and CONUS areas. We began evaluating selected stations with large Controlled Spaces (CS) to designate them as a TEMFEST acceptable risk with a subsequent Zoning test. 4.4 (U) SHIELDED ENCLOSURES. In 1984, seventeen MILCON Shielding efforts have been eliminated from Navy centracts. Can- cellation of these enclosures saved the Navy about 30 million doliars in one time construction costs and an indeterminate cost for enclosure preventative maintenance and repairs. These enclo- sures were Gliminated because sites either had large controlled *spaces or TEMFEST accredited equipment was used. Flans to pro- cure shielding for TEMFEST purposes are first submitted to NAVE- LEXSECCEN for technical evaluation and then to COMNAVSECGRU (G65) for final approval. 4.5 (UW) SIGSEC EQUIFMENT
C\ Re eh. Ly On he 2 UNCLASSIFIED 4.5.1 (U) Efforts to locate a MiSSing AN/GSH-S2 under ships ment from NAVSECGRUDET London to NAVELEXCEN Fortemouth for re- pairs were unsuccessful. COMNAVSECGRU requested an NIS investi- gation and the equipment was found at NSC Norfolk in January. Shipping guidance for the equipment was issued and fieid sites were reminded to use the services Provided in Military Traffic Management Regulations. A request for eucecs AN/GTA-19*s and/ar components was received from the U.S. Army. AS sponsor, Gé2 asked all holders to review their AN/GTA-19 requirements and to Geclare the equipment excess and provide to the army. 4.5.2 (U) Robbins Bulk erasers were Sent to each FLTCINC. The 15 erasers (#10 a unit) are used to degaucs cassette tapes and will simplify field operations. Distribution of 2& AN/TNH-25 narrowband recorders was completed in 1984, The recorders were shipped to sites having TAQOGL, TAQOOZ, gr TANOOT positions and will be used to replace the AN/TNH-117%5 breviously in place. fay Tequest from NAVSECGRUACT Fearl Harbor ty install two TANGO? SIGSEC positions was received in September. Upgrading and forma- lizing two currently installed but untasleg training positions would effectively create the two TAQ002 positions. COMNAVSECBRY Vwi concurred with the request and will identity funds when equipment deficiencies are received. 4.& (WU) FUBLICATION UFDATES UNCLASSIFlED 84
UNCLASSIFIED 4.6.1 (UU) A reques: for recommended additions, changes and deletions to NAVSECGRUINST C22645.1 and Unit Mission Frofile for’ SIGSEC was forwarded to the field sites and area directors. Responses will be used to update the NAVSECGRU publications. 4.6.2 (J) Using information submitted by NAVSECGRUACT North- west and NAVSECGRUDEFT San Diego, a draft CLASSIC NOMAD Advance Flianning Guide was developed. The guide will assist commands in budgeting, maintenance, and ancillary support. In addition, a draft CLASSIC NOMAD Frocedures Manual, using information “submitted by NAVSECGRUACT Charleston, NAVSECGRUACT Northwest and NAVSECGRUDEFT San Diego, was further developed addressing the use of the van to support EFDB collection. 4.6.3 (U) NAVSECGRUINST C3260.4, which will replace NAVSECGRU- INST C220O0.4A, is nearing completion. The draft instruction will be reviewed to ensure compliance with present National, DOD and -Navy Policy and to ensure that all new SIGSEC initiatives are covered. 4.7 — (WU) SIGNAL NOTATION SYSTEM FOR SIGSEC. NAVSECGRUACT Charleston was tasked to review all active Signal Notation Letters and compile them into a draft publication outlining use of the Signal Notation System. The draft was coordinated with UNCLASSIFIED 85 Se atte cette oe, 1 ORE Ee perme rae we semen e © ” SOD BCR NAT SOVPLAMENT EXPP AOE
oN + non © Renal anlage jan ame. tae eee UNCLASSIFIED (UW) NAVSECSRUATT Northwest and NAVSECGRUDEFT San Diego. Charleston will maintain and update the final version of the publication. 4.e (UW) CLASSIC ASCOT/NOMAD OJT TRAINING MG@NUALS. Two complete sets of Operations and Maintenance OJT Manuals, and Instructor /Student Handbooks for CLASSIC ASCOT and NOMAD were forwarded to NAVSECGRUDEFT San Diego between early January and late March. NAVSECGRUACT Northwest received their CLASSIC NOMAD manuals in March. Both commands had previously completed the OJT ~training in each area. It was determined that sites would receive the manuals prior to OJT training in the future. The Commander, Naval Surface Reserve Force received CLASSIC NOMAD GJT Manuals as requested to aid in planning for eventual van turnover to reserves. 4.9 (U) FORMAL SIGSEC TRAINING 4.9.1 (U)} Continuing progress was made throughout the year on developing a formal SIGSEC training course (Class "C" School) at NAVTECHTRACEN Fensacola. The contractor, SFC of Rosslyn, VA, with representatives from the FLTCINC’s, NAVELEX, selected SIGSEC field sites, and G60, completed the Tasts and Skill Analysis (TASA>, and Job Task Inventory. The final TASA was approved and submitted to NAVELEX in November. UNCLASSTIFITIED 86 : : emer a ere nil --: tate POP LA SOS | Sol AS GONLSNMES? PNT RASE
4.9.2 (Uu) A SIGSEC Officer Correspondence Course/Enlisted Correspondence Course (OCC/ECC) is being developed by SFC as part of the contract award for the SIGSEC "C" School. The first draft of the course was received and reviewed for technical accuracy, classification, and graphics in mid July. Many errors were found and consequently NAVELEX disapproved the first draft. 4.10 be | SIGSEC PROGRAM REVIEW. The SWSC data base issue brought into focus questions concerning the data tapes needed, how much, and the resources needed to produce it. On F1 August “4984, CNO requested o a -..:-.. which was really directed at "the csiata base" from a data collector view- point. CNO (OF-956) was briefed to his satisfaction on 16 Nov. The OF-956 request drove out some strongly differing opinions within the N6&VSECGRU ranks. A more indepth SIGSEC program review was scheduled to be completed in early 1985. «4.11 (WU) SIGNSLS WARFARE SUFFORT CENTER (SWSC) 4.11.1 ME a; the SWSC moved toward FOC, a considerable number of prior years* ECF"*s generated early in the year for additional hardware and software capabilities. Installation and checkout of a second VAX 11/780 computer was completed on 16 April, and a multi-year CASFAR signals analysis software development ended 87 wre ees Sa ieee ore penne SQ ere NE * TUCAD AP GOVERNMENT LATTE
|| when installation, check out and training was completed by JSC on =1 Auqust. 4.11.23 (U) In November, the SWSC developed a comprehensive set of CY8S goals and objectives. These, however, were later to be modified in line with early 1985 NAVSECGRUACT Charleston/Swsc SIGSEC mission, organization and resource reviews, a major part of the overall 1985 SIGSEC Frogram Review. 4.12 } | EXERCISE SUFFORT AND SFECIAL COLLECTION. During “the year, support was provided via Headquarters to several exercise situations. ELSEC/Signals analyst personnel, one each from NAVSECGRUACT Northwest, NAVSECGRUACT Naples, and NAVSECGRUACT Charleston, provided support for LANTFLT REAPEX 2-84 and GALLANT ENIGHT 84. In January, NAVSECGRUDET San Diego was tasked to provide two Signal analysts to assist SESEF in collecting Flue Data in the form needed by SWSC Charleston. In 88 An Eee OT en: ee * OCS AS GONE ESMENT RXPEAE
P May, NAVSECGRUDEFT San Diego was tasked to support COMJSOC COMSEC effort during Exercise FREVIOUS VOYAGE. , 4.12 (WU) COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC). On 18 June, CDR Fogerson and CDR Fallen (Dems) attended a meeting organized by OF-941 to discuss the planned transfer of COMSEC policy responsibilities from OF-944 to OF-941. Incident to this action, COMNAVELEXSYSCOM assumed increased COMSEC equipment planning responsibilities and the responsibility for COMSEC equipment manaaement/inventory functions were transferred from COMNAVTELCOM to COMNAVSECGRU (DCMS). 4.14 (WU) MSS CONTRACTORS. Along with representation from CNO (OF-942), Mr. Hammack attended a meeting on 16 Jan at MSC to provide further assistance in planning for assumption of communi-~ cations aboard some MSC contractor-operated ships. Of prime concern was the use of foreign owned U.S. Registry Ships. Guidance wes provided and assistance in preparing necessary requests for exceptions to the National policy was extended. 4.15 (U) MANUAL CRYFTOSYSTemS. mr. QR attended a meeting A-G on 6 Jan called by vr. BR cro (OF-9413). The subject was paper cryptosystems and the impact auto-manual systems (EL-42 and follow-on devices) will have on Navy requirements. OF-941 i¢ considering a tasker te FLTCINC’s and this Headquarters which 89 — sere .- Far Neen aes crane rpg ee ner aE Sa Al GOVERNMENT LXPEASE
UNCLASSIFIED (UW) will call for a five-year projection of requirements for paper systems based on the Navy Secure Voice Improvement Flan and NSA- production of auto-manual systems. 4.16 (U) SIGNALS SUSCEFTIBILITY AND VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT (SSVA). The Navy Data Link Vulnerability (DVAL) program was begun in 1983 with a request from OSD for implementation into the Navy and incorporation into the existing COMNAVSECGRU (660) SSVA program. At the conclusion of 1982, formal tasting for DVAL implementation by COMNAVSECGRU, though impending, had not been received. The following is a brief chronology of events in the DVAL evolution: - JAN: CNOQ (OF-098) memo to FD, ASN, RE&S outlined the Navy’s DVAL implementation plan. OF-O98 received oversight, OF-094 received resource sponsorship and COMNAVSECGRU became Executive Agent. - MAR: DVAL Information Management System (DVIS), edesigned as a G65 assessment management tool, was developed as part of the Headquarters corporate data base. - AFR: OF-094 formally tasked COMNAVSECGRU to implement DVAL and identified the following seven candidate systems: — High Frequency Improvement Frogram (HFIF) NAVSTAR GFS Joint Tactical Information Distribution System (JTIDS) UNCLASSTFIED 90 wee eee amen SES UTD AS GAVERRMENT EXPE AE
eB ata meee Fare Se we BF _ I nn ELE SPECI entrar: ~~ UNCLASSIFIED Combat Identification System (CIS) EHF SATCOM Terininals 7 ELF Communications Direct Downlink (DDL) - MAY: COMNAVSECGRU submitted FYB4-FY90 finding estimates. - JUN: OFNAV and NAVSECGRUH@ action officers attended DVAL methodology seminar at DVAL JTF, Eirtland AFB, Albuquerque, NM. - - JUL/AUG: NOSC began resource requirements and availability survey of 13 different facilities across the country. - AUG: AFL began multi-year Navy Signals Security Vulnerability Assessment Frogram. FY85S efforts to concentrate on High Frequency Anti-Jamming (HFAJ). - SEF: DVAL JTF presented DVAL Methodology seminars to SWSC Charleston and NAVSECGRUHO. - ~ SEF: FOM submission made for FY&6 and FY8? for: RDT&E - $3M per year; OFN -— #1.0M in FY86, $1.546M in FY87; O&%MN ~ €¢76F in FY87, T1IS2E in outyears (4 billets). ~- SEF: Identified jamming equipment required and phased plan for obtaining equipment with FY86/FY87 OFN. - OCT: OF-O95 (became sponsor after OCT OFNAY reorganization) reprogrammed #626F of RDT&E funds for DVAL FYes. UNCLASSIFIED 91 Fe set ees ee eeeremenap neem ere me” TODD AS GOVERNMEST EYPERSE
i F son ore | 4.17 MMM comecetep ASSESSMENTS. The Vulnerability Assessment Division (G42) completed a number of assessment during the : calendar year. The systems involved included the AN/WSC-6 SHF Spread Spectrum Satellite Transceiver; Advanced Narrowband Digital Voice Terminal (ANDVT); VINSON EY-S8/NESTOR EY-28 Cryptographic Equipments; an AN/SYS-48 Radar System Special study involving probability of detections and an EHF SATCOM study of an extremely high frequency satellite system. 4.18 (C) ONGOING ASSESSMENTS. Ongoing assessments being managed by the Vulnerability Assessment Division at years end included: 4.19 (U) TEMPEST
i. UNCLASSIFIED 4.19.1 (U) TEMFEST Management Information Support System . (TEMISS) hardware was procured by NAVELEXSYSCOM 22 Jan 1984. TEMISS software upgrade was provided by NOSC to speed-up standard report generation and provide new data input screens. 4.19.2 (U) GAO DOD TEMFEST Evaluation - on 20 Nov, COMNAVSECGRU representatives with NESSEC representative Mr. _met CNO (OF-009F) representatives to brief Mr. we -: GAD on the Navy TEMFEST Frogram. This brief was in response to a GAO evaluation of TEMPEST protective measures for NON-SCI at DOD and contractor facilities. Congressman GE « 2cucstec GAD investigate the DOD TEMFEST program primarily as it pertains to contractors. This was brought about by complaints that te government was requiring more stringent TEMFEST protective measures for contractors than for government facilities. For the most part, the Navy has not placed TEMPEST requirements on contractors. A recent change to “the National Folicy may force the Navy to place more stringent protective measures on contractors. However, these requirements will be no more stringent than those placed upon Navy facilities. There is no standardized DOD policy on the treatment of contractors. A standardized policy was being developed by the Subcommittee on Compromising Emanations, but with the disbandment of the NCSC all official work in this direction has stopped. UNCLASSIFIED 93
4.19.3 (U) Draft TEMPEST OFNAVINST C5510.93E - the draft was sent to CNO but is still undergoing significant modifications die to a change in program sponsor and the disestablishment of CHNAVMAT. 4.20 (U) EMITTER. DATA BASE 4.20.1 JBBF navsecGru responsibilities for the coltection/management of data on U.S. Navy emitters ("blue force" data) include support for DOD EW and C=CM programs. However, in “early 1984 it was realized that information on our own force systems was not intelligence and, as such, could not be driven by DIA and the National Intelligence System. The JCS, to ensure optimum accepted intelligence support to EW and CCM, established the U.S. Noncommunication System Data Base (USNCSDB). The JCS USNCSDE Flan memorandum to the services was issued on 12 October 1984. The plan provides that JCS will task the services and that «the services will: designate FOC’s; forward requirements on other services in JEWC; assist JEWC in validating and prioritizing requirements; and task service elements to produce the required data. On 7 and 8 November, JEWC hosted the first JCS sponsored USNCSDE meeting at San Antonio. The initial liste of requirements for all services were reviewed, prioritized and accepted by the service FOC’s. The Navy*s FOC from OF-956 assumed Electronic Warfare Integrated Reprogramming (EWIR) 94 a eee a niece ee coe ener
(C) production responsibility for S1 Navy noncommunication emitters - of which 15 had no EWIR files at all. JCS’s 28 November message officially tasked the services to produce EWIR data on the accepted emitter lists. CNO had not yet formally tasked nor funded NAVSECGRU to produce the EWIR’s by years end. 4.20.2 i « review was conducted of data base functions/requirements at NAVSECGRUACT Charleston's Sianals Warfare Support Center (SWSC) systems. Ey year’s end, it was determined that: a considerable amount of data had been collected for which there are no consumers: there were require~ ments for some data not held; and the disorganized data collection and data base development efforts needed to be fine tuned to collect, analyze and maintain only the data required to satisfy validated production requirements. The issue was to be addressed in the 1985 SIGSEC proaram review. ‘ “4.21 (U) SIGSEC AUDIOVISUAL (AV) PRODUCTION. A new training film to promote security awareness and discipline on radio- telephone circuits was initiated in 1984. A free-lance civilian script writer was contracted through the Defense Audiovisual Agency (DAVA) to write the film script. During development of the script outline, education and backaround materials were provided by G62. The writer observed a Combined Inport training exercise in Norfolk. The completed outline was reviewed by
(U) COMNAVSECGRU and delivered to. DAVA in late August for production. A 1966 film, “U.S. NAVAL COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY" had lost its relevancy to today’s audiences and action was taken to remove it from the list of effective Navy AV products. Audiovisual training materials were provided to field sites, including a new NSA production, “THREAT TO U.S. COMMUNICATIONS IN EUROFE." While the videotape primarily addressed U.S. Army communications, its points were applicable to Navy units worldwide. Fifteen copies of the tape were received from NSA and distributed to SIGSEC units. Copies of a NATO version were sent to the FLTCINC’s in December. Individual SIGSEC sites were tasked te develop and forward various SIGSEC awareness briefings ta COMNAVSECGRU to be held as "Master" briefs. The Navy AV Center agreed to create Camera-ready art work/graphics and corresponding slides in support of the "Master" briefs and five other briefinas developed under contract. NSA (S15) agreed to support SIGSEC awareness initiative and offered to provide various AV products including ‘videos, posters, and briefings. 4.22 | NATIGNAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY COMMITTEE (NTISSC). The National Telecommunications and Information Systems Security Committee was established in 1984 to replace the National COMSEC Committee and to operate under the direction of the Systems Security Steering Group. The new structure is intended to replace both the FD-24 Interagency Group i = rete Reema ne ae mene oe Oo ETERS CT
Ml tor Telecommunications Protection (IG/TF) and the National COMSEC Committee (NCSC). The Systems Security Steering Group consisting of the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, the Director of Central Intelligence, and chaired by the Assistant to the Fresident for National Security Affairs was established for this purpose. The NTISSC was tasked to consider technical matters and develop operating policies as necessary to implement the provisions of the National Security Directive. The committee is chaired by a representative of the Secretary of Defense and composed of a non-voting representative of each member of the Steering Group and a voting representative of each of the following: The Secretary of State The Secretary of the Treasury The Attorney General The Secretary of Commerce = . The Secretary of Transportation The Secretary of Energy The Director of Central Intelligence Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff Administrator, General Services Administration Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency The Chief of Staff, United States Army The Chief of Naval Operations
-—~ gi The Chief cf Staff, United States Air Force Director, National Security Agency Manager, National Communications System apa (WU) DVAL FROGRAM ESTABLISHMENT. In 1984, the Navy’s Data Link Vulnerability Assessment (DVAL) program was established under the management of COMNAVSECGRU H@ with the RDT&E funds under the claimancy of the Office of Naval Research (ONR). DVAL funding will now be programmed for by COMNAVSECGRU in the annual FOM submission.
- UNCLASSIFIED SECTION S SIGNIFICANT TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENTS (UU) ; ° 3.1 (U) G80 is the Office of the Assistant Commander for Technical Development. Major programs begun, continued or completed during CY 1984 include the following. Sel. (YJ) CLASSIC SEACOAST. A program review was held on 9 Feb, 1984. The approval for production (AFF) was granted by CNOQ as a result of this review. The first two CLASSIC SEACOAST production systems will go to NTTN Fensacola. Twenty additional systems will be produced through Oct 87. 5.1.2 — (U) CLASSIC CENTERBOARD. Following a system review group meeting in December 1983, a CLASSIC CENTERBOARD system capability statement and a requirements definition were developed. A candidate architecture was developed and major .progress was made towards developing a "Class A" system speci- fication. 5.1.5 (U) CLASSIC FLAGHOIST. The CLASSIC FLAGHOIST system design review was held at RCA 16-20 Jan 1984. A program review es held 2-6 April 1984. Following the critical design review held 14-17 May 1984, RCA was awarded the contract for the CLASSIC FLAGHOIST development and service test model hardware. The CLASSIC FLAGHOIST "IMF" became operational on 29 October 1984. UNCLASSIFIED 99 ~- ans we Stn 0 oan nn ep RS ERR TT
5.1.4 (U) The FROJECT BANDALORE in-plant acceptance test, " BANDALORE-OFU interfacing, and special signal recognizer testina were completed at NSGA Winter Harbor 16-20 January 1984. The BANDALORE site acceptance test and the DTZE were successfully completed at NSGA Winter Harbor during the week of 71 July. The BANDALORE site survey for field station Augsburg installations was conducted zo January - = February 1984. The Augsburg site acceptance testing commenced on 2 October 1984. 2.1.7 (U} DARFA/OF-O95 FROJECT SUFFORT. Continuing management and technical support was provided for development of special purpose surveillance equipment sponsored by DARFA/OF-O95. 5.1.8 [—scss/score/mstpF systems. The SCORE factory acceptance test was held 16-20 April 1984. There were no major
; | failures. The production hardware was shipped to NSGA Northwest * for site acceptance testing. Site acceptance testing was complete on 13 July 1984. 21.8.1 S| MSTDF & SCORE were tested at NSGA Northwest during the weet: of 14 August 1984. It was discovered that the interface to STREAMLINER needed work and retesting was scheduled for late September 19684. The MSTDF techeval was completed on 24 October 1984. 5.1.8.2 [MMB 411 aspects of MSTDF tested satisfactorily except for its interfaces with SCORE. This was to be tested in connection with SCORE's techeval. The SCORE techeval was successfully completed on 7 December 1984. 5.1.9 (U) CLASSIC ORACLE. A CLASSIC ORACLE project review was held at interstate Electronics Corp during the week of 17 Jan 84. “A factory acceptance test was scheduled for June with a filed technical evaluation to follow in July. This schedule slipped and the FAT was conducted for AFOCALYFSE (the CLASSIC ORACLE STM) during the week of 32 July. The FAT was terminated and rescheduled for the week of 2 August due to software problems. The AFOCALYFSE factory acceptance test was finally completed on & Aug 84 and a site acceptance test was scheduled for 4-5 Sep 84 at NSGA Edzell, Scotland. A technical evaluation commenced 101 ee ee oF woo pee me teas a TNE UD CR
UNCLASSIFIED (U) following the SAT on 10 Sep 1984. During the week of 16 Oct 84, the interfacing of the directive RF antenna to the AFOCALYFSE system was accomplished. 3.1.10 (U) SFREAD SFECTRUM. The DELTA BLUE critical design review was held at GTE during the week of 17 Jan 84. Sei.ld (U) SES (SIGNALS EXFLOITATION SYSTEM). One SES (essentially the same as the "Advanced Signals Analysis Fosition" at NSGA Edzell) was built by the Navy Research Laboratory for installation at NSGA Misawa, Japan. Installation planning was started for a 1985 installation of this system. 3.1.12 (U2 SUB-HF INITIATIVES. The LANDWAYII antenna system was installed at NSGA Edzell, Scotland in early calendar year 1984. 5.1.13 (U) CLASSIC CIRCUS. The CLASSIC CIRCUS search system installation at NSGA Edzell continued into CY1984. CLASSIC CIRCUS was essentially completed by the end of the calendar year. 5.1.14 (U) ADVANCED SEARCH COORDINATOR/CLASSIC FISHNET. Sanders presented a rough draft of the ADVANCED SEARCH COORDI- NATOR/CLASSIC FISHNET concept plan during the weet of 24 Jan 84. A program review as held at Sanders on 1-2 Nov 84. UNCLASSIFIED 102 - “e enn
UNCLASSIFIED 5.1.15 (U) GSOX was formed in February 1984. This group served as the nucleus for a new CNO directed special project. t UNCLASSIFIED 103 wet ree .s- Ne ane
UNCLASSIFIED SECTION 6 COMMUNICATIONS ‘AND ADF (U) 6.1 (U) G2O is the Office of the Assistant Commander for Telecommunications and Automated Data Systems. Major programs or projects begun, continued or completed during 1984 include the following. 6.1.1 (U) Master Data Element Dictionary (MDED) Release 1.0 containing over 400 standardized data elements related to the Mobile Systems Technical Data Facility (MSTDF), published on 2 March 1984. (G20D) 6.1.2 (WU) Information Systems Flanning (ISF) study to define functions, organizational interfaces, information flow and data requirements of each department within Headquarters completed on Zi March 1984. Initiated Headquarters database redesign effort. (GED) 6.1.3 (UW) Froject Information and Coordination System (FICS) delivered to GD11 as project management and tracking tool on 15 April 1984. (G20D) 6.1.4 (U) DATABASE 84 Colloquium co-sponsored with Naval Ocean Systems Center (NOSC), San Diego, 4-8 June 1984. (Gi0D) UNCLASSIFIED
6.1.5 (JU) MDED Release 2.0, containing nearly 500 High Frequency Direction Finding (HFDF) related elements, published on 21 October 1984. (G20D) 6.1.6 (WU) The NAVSECGRUACT Edzell, Scotland, UNCLAS computer support replacement project was initiated. The computer hardware and the off-the-shelf software selected. This system (IBM System =6) will replace the obsolete IBM System 22 as well as provide additional capabilities to support command UNCLAS functions such as supply and public works. (G322) 6.1.7 BBM comnevseceru automation. On 22 June 1984, an office automation contract or Headquarters NAVSECGRU and its field sites was awarded iy for a total amount of This contract has been providing new word processing capabilities. (G23) 6.1.8 (UY) CLASSIC FLAGHDIST Network Communications Uparade: - (U) Three separate deliveries of NSA network components to FLAGHOIST contractor facility for in-plant test completed. - (U) Flans and regotiations for installations of NSA network cemmunications service at BULLSEYE TEST NET sites in Maine and Calif- ornia completed. 105
- (UW) Liaison with Canadian Forces counterparts >» initiated, head of CFSRS, Ottawa briefed. - | | System Acquisition Flan for BULLSEYE Net components initiated. Total size of this effort is on the order of €20M. - any NAVSECGRU requirements and tasks for NSA’s first network modelling and simulation contract developed. (GS33) 6.1.9 (WU) PLATFORM EMEROIDERY Froject Liaison. Detailed NAVSECGRU response to NSA*s first acquisition plan for PLATFORM network components coordinated and drafted. NSA EMBROIDERY implementation planning activities, including consolidated site network pians and preliminary costing for implementation tasking et NAVSECGRU sites initiated. (GZ22) 106
6.1.12 (u) NCSSA. In June 1984 an initiative to establish a joint NAVSECGRU/NAVELEX Cryptologic Systems Support Activity was developed within Gi0 and forwarded to NAVELEX. This project will provide both hardware and software life cycle support for existing and future NAVSECGRU cryptologic systems. A CCF budget initiative was submitted in the FOM 87 build for a MILCON for FY8S8. Several locations were investigated to determine the optimum location for this new activity. (6332) 6.1.13 (U) Continued as the software configuration manager for the BULLSEYE system. During this year, GES actively participated as secretariat in the BULLSEYE Configuration Control meetinas held on 17-16 May and 29-30 November 1984 at the Naval Security “Station, Washington, DC. G22 developed and promulgated tasking for the myriad Navy supported BULLSEYE systems as well as providing contractor coordination and management efforts for developing systems such as FLAGHOIST and CENTERBOARD. (G22) 107 — @<- eee ee lle ee pee 8 ee ree gegen ee
UNCLASSIFIED (Wy) Major events during 1984 included participation in two TACINTEL~ RNINTEL Configuration Control Board (CCE) Meetings held on 11-12 January and 1-2 August 1984 at NAVSECGRUACT Skaggs Island. This year marked the establishment of a stable TACINTEL baseline to assist NOSC in their development of a COMBAT DF during the next two years. (G32). 6.1.15 (UW) Continued the Configuration Management of the BOWSFRIT/SAIL system software as well as the management of the software support efforts of the HSSF (Homestead Software Support Facility). G22 actively participated in the BOWSFRIT/SAIL Configuration Control Hoard (CCB) Meetings held on 17 April 1984 at NAVSECGRUACT Homestead and 1 November 1984 at HONAVSECGRU Washington DC. This year marked the transfer of the chair of the CCE from G32 to GSO with G22 continuing as the CCB secretariat. The hardware CCE was also combined with the software CCB for the first time this year. (G22) 6.1.16 (WJ) Continued as the software configuration manager for the Signals Warfare Support Center (SWSC) system, however, NAVELEXSYSCOM retained final approval until the system becomes fully operational. Major events for the year included partici-~ pation in the SWSC CCE held on 15 May &4 at Naval Electronic Systems Command, Washington, DC. (G22) UNCLASSTIFITIED 108 Fe ee ae RNR
2 6.1.17 (UW) Continued as the software configuration manager for the Communication Routing Device (CRD). No major events for the year. (G22) 6.1.18 (U) Gi2 and Grs continued close monitoring of the MUSIC system software development. A G22 representative continued Providing support in the final testing and evaluation of the MUSIC system. (G22) 6.1.19 (UW) In the field of ADF Security, G22 continued to provide guidance to all NAVSECGRU elements, and formulate policy for Headquarters in conforming to higher directives. Major events for the year included the completion of the consolidated NAVSECGRU ADF Security Flan which was forwarded to NSA via CNO “Declassification of Classified Defective Memory Units." (G22) 109
— 9SSGUKG SNOUWNEGACS JY G20... 2a” 6.1.22 (U) Headquarters Ethernet Services. Cabling. file servers and print servers are installed. Connection of Xerox equipment was initiated in December. 6.1.23 (U) NSA secure telephone service. Service for NAVSECGRU Area Directors in FAC and LANT completed. Formal program for service at NAVSECGRU sites initiated.
© BQ AUSGAD SSNS SS OW ah ie JES DS, . Pat a beeeummnnitattee) < Py a ar en el reer * UNCLASSTIFIED SECTION 7 ™ SIGNIFICANT LOGISTIC AND MATERIAL DEVELOFMENTS (U) 7.1 (U) G40 is the Assistant Commander for Logistics and Material. During calendar year 1984, G40 was involved in many different tasks. projects and NAVSECGRU related matters. Supporting 28 NAVSECGRU field sites worldwide, G40 corrected approximately 500 Equipment Casualty Reports (CASREFs) and promulgated a total of 313 tasks to COMNAVELEXSYSCOM and completed 186 tasks. A total of 4 military construction projects were begun for a total of $12.7 million and thirty Minor Construction and Major Facilities Repair Frojects were funded from O&MN for a total of $5.7 million. Under the cognizance of G40L, 4 new major system acquisition projects were begun with 12 major projects still active. UNCLASSIFIED 111 er a eee RR TE I
« GSNIAXY LNIWNAUZAGS 2V GPOKS sila: — - Py eae ne gee — UNCLASSIFIED SECTION 8 FERSONNEL, TRAINING AND ADMINISTRATION cu) &.1 Or 1 September 1984, the Assistant Commander for Administration, Fersonnel and Security (G10) was redesignated as the Assistant Commander for Fersonnel and Training. 610 was consequently subdivided into three divisions: Human Resource Management /Oraanization Effectiveness (611), Military Personnel Frograms/Career Development (G12), and Cryptologic Training Frograms (Giz). B.2 G11 HIGHLIGHTS 8.2.1 Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO): No formal complaints of discrimination filed during 1984, which has been attributed to outstanding EED counseling. Newly designated Upward Mobility Frogram Coordinated assigned and trained. 8.2.2 Human Resource Management (HRM): Increased emphasis was placed on all areas of the drug and alcohol program. Results of urinalysis ecreening revealed a 3% positive rate compared to 6.4% Navy-wide. The druq preference continued to show tetrahydro- cannabinol (THC) from marijuana smoking with the use of cocaine increasing. A811 commands have been random screening with many doing unit sweeps. Five Drug Abuse Frogram Advisories were UNCLASSIFIED 112 wee em fee wee en ene
ee Ee ee ee ee re . ASTANS LINEWNNGACS LV GPOGG dus. f —<— ee - UNCLASSIFIED provided to all elements of NAVSECGRU during 1984. . ° 8.2.5 Command Managed Equal Opportunity (CMEO) Program: Flans have been completed and the program guidelines developed for implementation of CMEO. The HRMS/EOPS Team has trained 20 Command Training Team (CTT)/Command Assessor Teams (CAT) members at NAVSECSTA, and at NAVSECGRUACTs Winter Harbor and Sabana Seca. No military EO complaints were filed during 1984. 8.2.4 Organizational Effectiveness (O£) Frogram: The Navy revised organizational structure of HRM was promulgated by OFNAVINST S400.239 in April. The OE program will function as a part of the HRM Support System. Trained Navy personnel from OE centers will provide consulting services based on special knowledge of human and organizational behavior and skills. = GiS HIGHLIGHTS 6.2.1 The NAVSECGRU Fersonnel Utilization Report (FUR) was canceled 15 May ending several decades of field personnel reporting using that vehicle. The NAVSECGRU Direct Support Utilization Report (DUR) was established on 15 May to provide for field reporting of all NAVSECGRU aperational TAD and flight hours ona weekly basis. UNCLASSIFIED 113 rE CenOrrnEn OPS” Cot tre EEE Trea stan camel
| ZSNBAXS INIWNWAAGD <¥ GPQLSudda: - csi eR meaen entrees bones tea ——~ UNCLASSIFIED B.7.2 CNO approved a G12 proposal that monthly cryptologic * billet tapes be provided to COMNAVSECGFU to streamline proceséing of OUTSIDE MARF billet changes within Headquarters. 6.2.5 COMNAVMILFERSCOM approved a G12 recommendation that GENSER personnel attached to COMNAVSECGRU (approximately 1000 personnel) be included in the monthly officer and enlisted MAFMIS tape in order to provide a tool for management of those recources. 8.7.4 The 1984 Cryptologic Technician Listing (E7-E9) was published in April. 8.2.5 A special edition of the annual Cryptologic Officers Listing (COL) was published in May. wore The first edition of the CT Career Handbook was published in March. 8.2.7 Effective 1 July, the Type Duty Code assigned to Canadian Forces Station Masset, British Columbia was changed from preferred overseas shore duty (sea/shore code 6) to overseas shore duty (sea/shere code 3). For personnel who reported on or before 320 June, the entire tour is credited as overseas shore duty (sea/shore code =) until PRD. UNCLASSIFIED
+» aSNEdXD LNINNETZAOD LV GPOLS dg. ae . ~ nce LE ETI reesei °c UNCLASSIFIED 8.4 G12 HIGHLIGHTS 8.4.1 In January, the Navy Occupational Development and Analysis Center (NODAC) forwarded NOTAF Surveys to every command where Cryptologic Technicians (CTs) are assigned. The purpose of the survey was to gather information necessary to update the CT Occupational Standards (OCC-STDS). The CT OCC-STDS have been maintained by COMNAVSECGRU (G12) because of classification and have not been updated since 1976. The survey responses were returned to COMNAVSECGRU by May and the unclassified response booklets were forwarded to NODAC for processing. The necessary documentation has been prepared and indoctrination for SCI requested for Mr. Oscar Line (GS-12) who will perform analysis on the clazsified portion of the survey. 6.4.2 An evaluation of the potential and capabilities of the Cryptologic Field Trainer (CFT).was conducted at NAVSECGRUACT “Misawa in March. The evaluation was conducted from a courseware development/authoring system perspective, and initial impressions indicate that use of the system, from an operator viewpoint, was excellent. The evaluator was able to be thoroughly proficient after a 10-15 break-in period. From an authoring standpoints however, at least 20 hours of concentrated training was needed before effective authoring proficiency could be reached. The UNCLASSTFIED 115 wee ee ere a aE en Pest Ty Ar COVE RENMER® EP KE
« BSNGdXS LNUWNUZAGS LY GP905 ig: a - 2 pee ae ae SRE lene caesar meanest seen —— —_—~- UNCLASSIFIED potential for the CFT as a Cryptologic Shore Support Activity : (CSSA) trainer is outstanding. 8.4.4 On 10 December, the Cryptologic Training Support Office (G1i72) was officially opened with RADM | cutting the ribbon. The CTSO was established to provide training media in support of NAVSECGRU field requirements. Original personnel included — 6.4.5 a | of NAVCAMS WESTPAC and CTRi { of NAVCOMMSTA Spain were awarded the NAVSECGRU Morse Code Froficiency Frogram Gold Award for demonstrated ability in the reception of International Morse Code at 40 GFM. UNCLASSIFIED 116 oe Be art ce roe er RRR ro
eee eae . @SNEdXS LNGWNUZACD LV G7Ii0 G27 UNCLASSIFIED SECTION 9 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY MATERIAL SYSTEM 9.1 On 1 October 1984, the responsibility for the control and direction of cryptographic equipment was transferred from “COMNAVTELTCOM to DCMS. As DCMS has produced a separate COMMAND HISTORY for 1984, it is reproduced here for inclusion into the HONAVSECGRU 1984 ANNUAL HISTORY REFORT. nS by Ae 73 8S sy A RAVE Dep Py pee
Se My write PS -- ; REQ U NCLA Natrackl ¢ ¢ : Te? oe _° wwe. ee ee ee - Communications Security Material System - 3801 Nebraska Avenue, N. W. - Washington, D.C. 20390-5252 OPNAV Report 5750-1 Command History for 1984 Part I ; Basic Historical Narrative Part if Key-Commend-Persomre1 ee AD APR #2 Part II!l Part IV Statistics ee mate sees seee ee. OB — - easy dye are KOOTETE ota AT GOVEFPNYPNT EXPEASE
2 @SNBIXT LINEWNBZACD LY G3900 pig: ras a a ee ” ert Ty tara wg Lol: en is: soe ac Orme Part I . - Basic Historical Narrative 1. Executive Summary. a. Transfer of responsibility for control and distribution of cryptographic equipment from COMNAVTELCOM to DCMS on 1 October 1984 was the most significant event of the year. This transfer added two Navy officers, three Navy enlisted, one Marine Corp enlisted and five civilian billets to DCMS. Other significant’ events during 1984 which had a major impact on our primary mission: (1) Automated COMSEC Material Systes upgrade commenced with hardware installation. (2) Civilian vacancies and downgrades in TsO (Inventory and Accounting Department) severely hampered personnel manning profile. 2. Chronological Summary. ae OP-0941 Meeting. During the lst quarter, cor A) attended OP-0941 meetings on KW-46 and KG~84 crypto transition along with ~ representatives from COMSUBLANT, CNO (OP-02), CINCLANTFLT, COMNAVTELCOM, NAVELEX, and NSA. b. Transfer of Cryptographic Equipment Cognizance. On 3 July 1984, CDR T), LCDR (TB) and CDR G60) met with CAPT Aggnd CDR COMNAVTELCOM (Code 01) to discuss the transfer of crypto~equipment functions and billets from COMNAVTELCOM to COMNAVSECGRU claimancy. Effective 1 October 1984, the functions and billets for crypto-equipment allocation and inventory control management were under the cognizance of COMNAVSECGRU. - c¢. CMIO Norfolk Computer Site Survey. On 10 July 1984, vr LCR A 2s Lig n= with representatives of CMIO Norfolk, NAVELEX Portsmouth and WANG Laboratories at CMIO Norfolk to discuss site preparation and installation of the ACMS Computer System at CMIO Norfolk. d. CMIO San Diego Visit. From 24-26 July 1984, LOR GE cro San Diego), Mt EY (Distribution) and te. GER cto Vault) visited DCMS, COMNAVTELCOM and Headquarters to liaise on matters and be briefed on FY-85/FY~86 ACMS integration with NSA (S33). e. _ACMS Project Officer. ul checked onboard DCMS to relieve LCDR as the ACMS Project Officer. Joint Key Management Working Group (JKMWG). On 30 and 31 July 1984, CDR (T) and Mis (130) attended a Joint Management Meeting at NSA. riefings were given on new electronic key generation concepts and their impact on distribution, accounting and usage. g- Automanual System/KL-42. On 23 August 1984, LoD (7) and Miss (T30B) attended the meeting at NSA ($755) ad@ressing the implemen n of the TSEC/KL~42 , an alphanumeric encryption/decryption device. UN ree To CPV OY le UPTUODMC.D AT GOVERNMEST ENPESSE
(, QSNG4X3 LNUWNWZAGD JW G2902 5655 en ad UNCT Coen Gn pul th Maar Ned On PA Nee a TE Atos, Baeenee ee h. CMIO Norfolk Visit. On 20 August 1984, LCDR ATS) visited CM1O Norfolk and CINCLANTFLT Communications Coordinator, L (Code N612) to * discuss COMSEC accounting and distribution issues. i. STU II Binding.- On 30 August 1984, DCMS hosted a meeting with GSA, COMNAVSECGRU (G60), COMNAVTFLCOM (Code 632) and Booz-Allen representatives. GSA System Manager presented an overview of the STU-II (TSEC/KY-71) future implementation and details of the Secure Voice System. j. AKAV 500 Series Meeting. On 29 August 1984, Mr. NSA/S75) briefed Navy representatives from CNSG/DCMS on the new AKAV 500 series, addressing the impact of 36 booklets as opposed to one booklet on the Navy Distribution System (LANT only at this time). The AKAV 500 is II MAF CEOI (Marine operational changing call sign/frequency system), compatible with AKAI 16. k. CMIO San Diego Site Survey, On 28-29 August 1984, Lt EH 1508) and LT 00) met with CMIO San Diego, WANG Labs and NAVELEX representatives to conduct and coordinate the ACMS computer site survey at CM1O San Diego. 1. CMIO San Diego 7 5 14 September 1984, con a (75) met with CMIO San Diego (LCDR and Assistant NAVSECGRU Department Head (LCDR td to tour, discuss and preview upcoming changes to the COMSEC issuing tacility and cryptographic hardware storage vault. m. Automanual Program KL-42 Meeting. On 20 September 1984, Loon (TB) and cD met with CNO (OP-0941J) representatives fo discuss the r nN Of paper codes with the implementation of the TSEC/KL-42. n. “SOLID SHIELD “ Initial Communications Planning Conference. On 25 September 1984, CD (T) briefed USCINCLANT (J621) and “Solid Shield 85” exercise planners a é€ Initial Communications Planning Conference (ICPC) held at Fort Bragg, NC. The brief centered on CMS modus operandi of Gistribution of keying material for the exercise and informed exercise ‘planners of the identification, production and storage pipeline problems to avoid in keying material planning for “Solid Shield 85.” This is the first time in which DCMS has briefed exercise planners. o. Navy Key Distribution System Briefin (T) attended the brief for Mr. CNKDS). On 15 October 1984, CDR (DDC), presented by ur > (NAVELEX/PDE-110) at NSA. Mr. expressed considerable interest in the proposed NKDS concept and expressed Surprise that the Navy had started on the concept two years (1982) in advance of NSA. p» COMSEC Insecurity Coding Meeting. On 13 September and 18 October 1984, Miss 0) attended meetings at NSA concerning a proposed, expanded COMSEC insecurity coding scheme NSA intends to use to produce their 1984 reports on COMSEC insecurity statistics and trends. q- NAVSTAR Global Positioning System (GPS) COMSEC Working Group. On 23-24 October 1984, Miss {T30) attended the NAVSTAR COMSEC Working Group meeting to discuss a Solve action items proposed by the crypto key management subgroup. NSA has forwarded an information memorandum to SECDEF addressing recommendations for. distribution and management of keying material for the GPS. i A VEPEODNCED AT GOVERNMENT EXPENSE eee
JSNSGAZT SMINNGSAVS ST US dis Fi Sgt UNCT rm rr ery fae ger tt at, r. HYX-58 In-Theatre Replacement. During the 4th quarter, DCMS requested FLTCINC consideration/concurrence for the establishment of ten HYX-58 > equipments to be staged with Battle Groups for temporary emergency ° replacement. Due to continued failure of these supplies, the VINSON replacement equipment remained under DCMS control for authority to transfer as a crossdeck item for relieving Battle Group. s. KW-46 Keying Concept Briefing. On 23 October 1984, a meeting was held at DCMS, sponsored by NSA representative), to discuss the KW-46 and the appropriate ke rial involved. t. KGR-96 Planning Conference. On 8 November 1984, Hrs. A 131) and ur - EN conte? 00) attended the KGR-96 follow-on planning meeting held at Air Force Cryptologic Support Center (AFCSC), Kelly AFB. The meeting was held to discuss KGR-96 cryptologic equipment/keying material distribution plans. u. Joint Tactical Information Distribution System (JTIDS) Keyin Requirements. On 16 November 1984, Miss xo Program Manager (Naval Air elopment Center) and Mr. SSEC) to discuss preliminary requirements for JTIDS Software Deve lopment System. JTIDS is undergoing a five year developmental program and is expected to be operational FY-88. oe v. Keying Material Re virements. On 19 November 1984, DCMS hosted a meeting with yale to discuss and project the Navy COMSEC keying material ULrements for FY-86 through FY-91. w. Leased Satellite (LEASAT) Keying Requirements. On 20 November 1984, (TB), Mrs. (T31) and CTA2 met with Mr. NAVELEX Project Manager) to plan keying material distribution for e LEASAT project for FY-85/86. x. KG-84 SURTASS Key Distribution. On 29 November 1984, . aw *(NAVELEX) hosted a meeting with NSA (S1) and DCMS (T30) representatives to plan KG-84 keying material requirements for SURTASS. y. Coast Guard STU II Binding. On 28 November 1984, DCMS (T30) hosted an STU II Binding coordinator meeting with Coast Guard Agency Terminal Coordinators, L and Mre DCMS will handle distribution of keying material for Coast Guard and coordinate with GSA to ensure distribution continuity and confirmation of requirements. 3. Basic Narrative. a. Administrative Services Department (T10) The function of the Administrative Services Department is to provide a variety of administrative services to the staff of DCMS. Primary functions include the processing of incoming and outgoing mail, preparation and distribution of correspondence and messages, fiscal management, military and civilian personnel administration, physical and personnel security, military and civilian training, maintenance of activity files and classified material control. TTT ons eR i sony ee ry “et . TT gay ; JAk Ca ° | Se + te a eal we ae Sh Pte CUCED AP GOVERNMENT EXPESSE
ee BD UA AD STFS SEM OS ST att the 2-23! oo cnaeepeneaal > AP © a CEs a ay - ar . » a peoeneanmeannen ne cemenationp aainicham nena gemmemecenestins mae Nokes fy, 7s) bee om. be Plans, Policy, and Procedures Department (120) The Plans, Policy, and Procedures Department develops COMSEC Material System plans, policies, and procedures; prepares and promulgates publications containing the Navy's COMSEC Material System policy and procedures; determines requirements and develops plans for personnel, facilities, and other resources within the COMSEG Material System; reviews and monitors reports of COMSEC material insecurities; and provides technical guidance concerning COMSEC material matters to Navy, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, and Military Sealift Command CMS accounts. (1) As part of an intensive effort by COMNAVSECGRU to reduce the steadily increasing number of insecurities reported each year, DCMS started publishing expanded insecurity statistics in the CMS UPDATE concerning the number of insecurities that were reported to DCMS during the previous month and/or quarter. These expanded statistics were broken down by branch of service (Navy/Marine) and area/location (LANT/PAC), and then by the type of unit (e.g., ashore/afloat) within each area. Quarterly, a list of the top three insecurities committed were published. At the top of the list was always Missing Material. (2) To help in compiling statistics on insecurities, DCMS developed a program for use on a mini-computer. With the help of this program, it was possible to enter a CMS account number and find out how many insecurities that account committed. The program also gave the number of insecurities that occurred during a certain time period as well as the frequency a certain short title was subjected to compromise. (3) CINCLANTFLT and CINCPACFLT required the name and collateral duties of a custodian involved in an insecurity be included in each insecurity report and through CMS standdowns, required an intense review of CMS procedures by each command. (4) ‘A combination of FLTCINC involvement and DCMS expanded listing of cinsecurities reduced 1984 report of insecurities by one-third in comparison to 1983. ce CMS Operations Department (130) The CMS Operations Department is responsible for the acquisition, control, distribution, status, and disposition of COMSEC material (software) and technical publications required to fulfill the secure communications requirements of the Navy, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, and Military Sealift Command. (1) 130 was responsible for special programs that ensured the proper projection for software for new cryptographic systems and concepts. These programs include: - NAVSTAR - Space-based radio navigation system designed to provide U.S. and Allied land, sea, and air forces with worldwide, three-dimensional position and velocity information by late 1980's. - ACME - Low data. rate, remotely. rekeyable system for satellite data downlinks. It is scheduled for implementation FY-88. ! r > oe $f T"Cen AT GOVERNMENT EXPELSE
« FSNZIXE LNINNYZAOS LV GFOG5 way a _ bi ah ee ee ei . NCH ra CaF or eoeee Ls Lind’ - ELF - U.S. Navy communications system that will broadcast messages to operational submarines. - KEMPLE-P - KG-30 modification program designed for communications support of TACAMO operations. - NKDS - Navy key distribution operational concept. NKDS will improve the flexibility of CMS by providing a greater responsiveness in meeting Navy distribution, accounting, and management functions. - STU II - KY-71 phased program of the Federal Secure Telephone Service (FSTS) designed to operate over commercial telephone networks. ~ AKAV 500 - Marine CEOI cperational changing call sign/frequency System. The series encompass the concept of key for unique operational environments and will eventually replace all CEOI LANT/PAC areas. - AMP - Automanual program designed for use in controlled environments and to replace manual cryptosystems. The automanual device is the KL-42, ~ SURTASS - Surveillance Towed Array Sensor System. This system is installed on civilian operated ships under operational control of FLTCINCS. - KW-46 - Scheduled to replace the KW-37 and the KG-14 on fleet broadcast. ~ LEASAT - Leased satellite communications system. (2) The accurate development, assessment and evaluation of these programs, from the software approach, is essential to the readiness and effectiveness of the operating forces. Miscalculation in software planning, stocking and availability could cause irreparable interruption in communications, disruption of mission capability and in some instances, delays sin deployment. These programs will have a lasting impact on the future of Navy communications. (3) The Navy management for the NAVSAT Security Program was terminated in September 1984, and the software transferred to Sperry, the relevant civilian contractor. The remainder of the program will be under the auspices of Sperry with NSA concurrence. d. Accounting Department (140) The Accounting Department's mission is to verify the acuracy of COMSEC material inventories, to determine and to resolve CMS accounting errors and to maintain CMS account history files. (1) The Accounting Department provided COMSEC material support and CMS accounting service to approximately 1300 CMS accounts. The accuracy of 2672 COMSEC material inventories was verified; this number represents an increase of 872 over 1838. Also increasing over 1983 figures is the quantity of correspondence of 4880 pieces over 1983. The number of military personnel queers. TTT: NT TT cam wey UNCL ASSIFTER. aeresee jos lust Pole D A? GOVERSHMEST FAPEASE | | |
AL - GSNGdNS INSWNUZACD LY OFC ag: — EEE | a ° ot tet * & Bem neeee ew Sk hours devoted to collateral duties increased 824 hours over 1983. The number of DECOMS increased by 4 over 1983. The number of AUTODIN inventories was 12 over 1983. (2) The above was accomplished with three civilian vacancies, the downgrading of five civilian positions and an increase in collateral military duties. e. Computer Support Department (TSO) The function of the Computer Support Department is to develop, Maintain, and manage computer systems in support of DCMS with regard to distribution, accounting, and material management of COMSEC material throughout the Naval Establishment. (1) Computer Upgrade - The ACMS computer upgrade remained on schedule for implementation on 1 October 1985. The following significant project milestones were noted: (a) ACMS contract awarded to WANG Laboratories on 9 May 1984, (b) Lt ER: « ives LODRYQIPMPMs the acus Project Officer in August 1984. . (c) Installation of DCMS WANG computer hardware was accomplished in October 1984. (d) Data Base Management System (DBMS) SPEED I1 installed in November 1984. £. COMSEC Equipment/Ancillary Department (T60) The COMSEC Equipment/Ancillary Department is responsible for the acquisition, control, distribution, status, and disposition of COMSEC material (hardware) and technical publications required to fulfill the secure communications requirements of the Navy, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, and Military Sealift Command. (1) Our newest department is tasked with controlling and distributing crypto equipment to Navy, Marine, Coast Guard, and foreign sales and service to specified allies. (2) T60 is involved in several long range COMSEC equipment projects including: (a) VINSON Implementation. 1. Outfitted all deploying Battle Groups, including air wings, carrier and all supporting surface ships with VINSON. If the ship or ships had completed Regular Overhaul, their full allowance of VINSON equipment was provided; otherwise, a temporary VINSON Augmentation Package (VAP) was provided. The following Battle Groups were outfitted during 1984: USS CONSTELLATION, USS CORAL SEA, USS INDEPENDENCE and USS NIMITZ. woes ——-——- UT POT BR OCTIV GR ern * !3™ o “PERC CED AT GOVERNMENT EXPESSE
2 35'.5.¥3 LNTANWZACS LV OPC ag So  , . eee - TITS meng ad - UN NO Orme, Lo. CL, ticndl ren 2- Marine Corps. 95% of the ground forces of FMFLANT were provided VINSON (KY-57) during 1984. Atlantic Fleet MARC airborne units were». converted to VINSON. VINSON implementation started in FMFPAC this year and ~- was about 20% completed by December 1984. Two squadrons of F-18 MARCORPS airborne units are fitted with VINSON. (b) PARKHILL Implementation in Marine Corps. KY-65 and KY-75 PARKHILL equipment was completed in FMFLANT ground units. 51% of PARKNILL deliveries have been completed to FMFPAC ground units. (c) KG-81 Implementation, During 1984, there were 206 KG-81 equipments shipped and installed by the operational users. This represents 32.5% of the total implementation of the various KG-81 package~switching network. (dé) KG-84 Implementation. There was a total of 708 KG-84/84A equipments installed for various functions during 1984. This figure represents only .03% of the programmed 24,291 KG-84/84A installations. (e) KL-47 Phase-Out. In June 1984, the Navy phased out the utilization of the KL~47 for submarine communications equipment and commenced operational implementation of the KL~51 (RACE) communications network. L bode’ Dre Tei AD AWLENYENT EXPELEE ~ ¥ t o pre be : > re 2 ee Se ee) . once
ASS IX LNAWNYaAGS es GF lg TT mtr -, a ™ 4 Ww te rhe - wee, “! 5 se Part IV ; STATISTICS Number of ARFCOS Shipments 87 Number of packages shipped via ARFCOS 811 Total pounds shipped via ARFCOS 116,162 Number of registered mail packages received 683 Number of registered mail shipments 447 Number of packages received from NSA/ARFCOS 2,171 Total pounds received from NSA/ARFCOS 139,208 Number of packages shipped via supply 127 Total pounds shipped via supply 15,137 Number of CMS accounts established 79 Number of CMS accounts disestablished 46 DCMS Vauit Storage Space Hardware Storage Space 15,715 Software Storage Space 1,188 DCMS Action Line Calls received 3 5436 T10/TB 15 T20 499 T30 1,516 T40 1,410 T50 5 Number of communication messages transmitted 4,727 Crypto Repair Facility Total equipment forwarded 421 Total equipment returned 334 Modification kits forwarded 193 CMS Material Destruction other than monthly 2-1 Software 20,953 Hardware 1,102 FR rn res ee er ee remem, ee eg Ni T ry Oy ST i ieee “im AS VERNMENT PPS n-
— . SSNBdXN3 INAWNYIACD IW G2Dt5 .isar -—= ae . - gaara. = nanawenamarammmanpssmnssfoen on. tae ; Ultcir vee = mie SA rey Ncw SAAS: aa ads i ~- Bee SECTION 10 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (10) ——~ TIinycey ¢ _ U aN On tee ar CEN ae — —~ ~- _.* —— wet, = —_ = Pit tUCabD AP GOVERNYENT EXPENSE os 43 | ~ vee acantemmescne ‘
10.1.1 /// UNCLAS EF TO /// . —— inne ae wo ie os ee OS ae aS F ¢562422 OCT &4 | SOLD ACT/TOG ccuaenesesenenencee sseonsesersaerrecsmasamysnecemuunnasemesenceeneeeeeet ¥™m ACNSG (> rere ero CINCCENT . OMNEVSECURU - ae cc coeag ensues ae saneureseemmmesnenseaneneeneseatin . COORD1 ia. fe Jun erence coe + COMUENAVCERT je Oot ESW REQ/LATE Yo? seonnesenenscscenanres aa COA IRSCOMDETNEA ! — ZEM “UNCLAS EFT O ACKSG~1196-84 CUTEIs MISSION, TASES AKDT FUNCTIONS OF ackSs AND NSuA FORT “ERDE hk. HONSGINST €5452@.2C (NOTAL) te. NSGINST 5454.23F (NCTAL) 1. EFFECTIVE 24 OCTOBER 1964, TEE DUTIES AND FESPONEIFILITIES OF _ ASSTCOMNAVSECSPRU WILL FE SEPARATED FROm TEOSE OF THE CO, NSSA FORT MEADE. Z. acCnSG IS FESPOMSIPLE FCR REPRESEATING TEE COMMANDER, NAVAL SECURITY GPOUP TO TEE NETIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL CECURITI ‘FVICE AnD AS DELINEATED REF A IE ASSIGNED THE FOLLOWING FIACTIONS: AK. SEEVE AS TEE PFESCNAL REPRESERTATIVE OF COMNAYSECERY AT NSA/CSS. t, ASSIST COMNAVSECSEU IN TRE ROLE OF NAVY ELEMENT COMMANTER, CSS. C. ADVISE COMNAVSECGEUD AS TD CUREENT AND FITURE NSA/CSS PLENS, POLICIES @KD PROGRAMS IMPACTING UPOK NAVAL CRYPTOLOSIC CPERATIONS AND RESOUFCES. ID. CONDUCT LIAISON WITH THE DIFNSA/CH CSS AND ASSIST IN THE EVELUA- TION OF NAVSECGPU FIELD STATIONS. (PRETICIPATE IN TEE FIELD | SSISTANCE PROGRAM). F. PROVIDE SERVICES, INCLUDING COORDINATION OF VISIT SCHEDULING, FOR NAVSECGRU PERSGNNEL VISITING KEA/CES, F. SEPVF AS FOCAL POINT FOR NAVSECURU CSSA RECCIREMENTS AND COCEDI- KATES BITE NSA/CSS PROVISION OF TECRNICAL INFORMATION. G. COORDINATE AND PARTICIPATE WITH ASSISTANT COMMENDERS AND STAFF ASSISTENTS IN FORMULATION OF PLANS AND PROGRAMS. hOTE: TO PERFORM TEIS MISSION IT IS-NETESSARY THAT ACNSG BE INCLUDED AS AN AIDRESSEE ON ALL CORRESPONTENCE WITH KEA/CES OTHER THAN PURE RNALYTICAL EXCHANGES. 3. TRE FUNCTIONS OF NSGA FORT MEATE TA® REF: E INCLUDE: &. PEFFORM TEOSE FUKCTIONS AS a CSSA FOR FLEET COMMANDERS TO IKCLUD CLASSIC PALADIN RESPONSIBILITIES ///__UNCLAS EFT O /// — ep er nner rere enn gee ef A DOE EC AA CL OAC I A CA OC
GSUAGNA aNaAWNUdAGS «WO G?,. . eae son men 10.1.1 | s/f) WCLAS EFT O /// >, PMEINTAIN TRANSPORTAPLE TECEXRIC#L LIERARIES. C. FEPFOP™ KAVY SIGSEC FUKCTIOKS LZ. DIRECT THE DEVELOPMENT &xDd ADMINISTRATION OF TEE FLEFMEA AND © FOVF PROGFAMS. E. FE TRE FXECUTIVE AGENT FOR WITEFAKT OPERATIONS OF TEE EDSLLSEYE EYSTEF. }. OPERATE TEE SNIF. &G. FXERCISE ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL OVER ALL NAVAL PERSCANEL ESSIGHKET TG KEA/CES AKT NSGA FORT MEAPE. €. TEF FGLLOZING PERSONNEL ESSIGNMENTS WILL EF EFFECTIVE 24 OCT it&ss ECKSG = cart 2 LiPUTY acxé €.0,. NEVA ie - CAPT Pe _ EXECCTIVE CFFICER KESA EM ~ a cr OFFFATIONS OFFICER NSUA FM = tbe ee oe ee TEE AFCVE INFOPSMATION IE PRO} EL TO ASSIET COmMaANTS IN TEPMINING PEE CORFECT ADDRESSEE TO USE FOR CORPESFONDENCE. COMMENT CATIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT AEE COMMON, TOEREFCEE, INTEFNAL ACTION BILL ENSURE TEAT TEE AFFROPRIATE OFFICE PECEIVES THE CORRESPONLTENCE. CORRESPCNIENCE WILL EE ANSWERED FY THE CFFICE PAVIKG COGNIZANCE. €. acess, CO NES& FM, OPS OFFICER NESA FX AND AIMIN SERVICES ARE TOCATED IX MSA HDOTRS BLT FM ©A164, PRONE VON 225-C4<5, TOY €ER-6446, GEEY €€3-3951 ext ASVCM 2320 EXT 33. CO NSGA Fu &LEO MAINTAINS EN OFFICE IN RLUDS SECS RS WELL AS TEE EXECUTIVE OFFICEE, eepeaee VCkh 235-6421/EZ23-£351, COMM 688-8491 /677-S3S51. RAEN J// UNCLAS EFT O ///
Pres - ISTIAXS LNAWNUFACS LV OFS 34 gp: _ UNULASS Tic . “ooo wet cb UtICLASSIFILO (> 10.1.2 [ Oria ino Documerfe is of Poor Quralife ana iMe910 ie 7 ~ J }¢°. 4 ae ez cuemese iv z ani MM, ware “S ree . ated Mr ‘y estls SRN TDN ™~ pene ety ~ vy tweets. yen wees Mv TV IVAS rey sere aees ae Ne erm . ‘+e re See rr Pane a tees ST alae ely “I6T S52 Oriuingtiag “y Natersination 7: flassif jot ary 2 CPIAY Declassify on: ‘s Cie Inclosure (1) UUCUASSIEI LD
» QSGdXa SNIWNWAALD LV CP0GC 34: Nae: 3 as earner cence CTI TT itaasasitancen eisai Sroryon I: PRECUOIVE SU-siAry A. CUDpOQMALO GY fe sper pep oc pe eurEpyag . 1. (0) ("2 Ja") vanily Pow Training Progran irplocaatad with tan volunteers trains? for how: visits, ("efor to eoction Il, 72a. 4.1). ?. "() (SO JAC) Sirst MASA? class hel’. (Pefor to fection 11, para. A.2). 2. (2) (VP DAN) Somartnontal Substance Aoise Caoresontative projras nogan. (Tafer to Locttion 1Y, sara. 4.3). AL (2) (INN) Sorront erations an? Tochnical Poaliness Plomert (COTPL) establisho? within the Pleat Support Yivision (CM5-22).  (Pefar to Section II, nor. Rot.9). 5.0 (2) (381) Resartment of the avy, Wwyenizational Tifectivoness Center, Alexantria, Viryinia, econ a Coon Tssesesnent Survoy. ("efor to Section II, parn. *.4). 6. (UY) (SL FE) Teo Sos ttlyai Inforcation Pacility (SuIh) (OPS-331) took delivery fro: a contractor oreanization of Coal arbor processing softwarc. ("ofer to Section Tl, ara. ".4.0). 7. (9) (SN PES) Toman? ranton urinalysis oroyray start’. Fifty-six nerbors are txste? en a tonthly basis.  (“cfer to Section Il, mara. 4.5). - 2. (D) (CO PMS) Sane Seareness trtining bel? fer T's ant 70's by the Aruy “ental Health Csaraselor. (Mofer to fection TI, para. AL). 9, Gy (ae wey rey apleeto 1 as MIG eR PoG4 Sailor of tis. Year. ‘losination subrittad to TN prwentomy) foc consiferation as t'cir Sniior of toe Yaar cin lidate. te (CY) (ME AS) Sareand Fitness Ceortiartor ent Menartoost Fitness Coorfinzters vor’ atcGinta? to avorsa2 4 Torvans Meith and Physica] heatiness ordurn. Doar OVUAVNOTE S117, (Rofor to eestion II, para. A.7). fue = V1.0 (UY (MW 2D IN) OPS -352 morsonneal particizate: in v.c. “aval War Colleya, “escort, “atie [slan? 227! vargas 2.0 G3) (AD AY) Tirst Aanual Ire  M-tho-Taof Tans (OTPC) Sard aresents? to CTIC(’ *) Ep >: the most ovtstanfting enlists? navy Cryctoloyist for 1003, 13.0 (SY) (P41) Tomran? 4217 its first Srringfest at Mlou's Tark with 29% attenJinj. eyesore CASsye I™ UNCLASSIFIED She
SARNEGALL JY OC ae +a (20 “Py @“ri-3orvioe ST “~ebiliz sation Vlanningn Croan os - = ue chaired by DSUAT!, "ot to forsate a sobblisution ead Lor IGA/TS. (Mefer to Section TT, para. ~~. }. : electel as the senior and Janior sallers of the Quarter TeSvectively for ¢ January - “arc, 1°74). 17.0 (HE) (27 Ap ret fomants Vodlovivell tose vor Te. “eats Post Chandionshi. . 1B. (UV) (20 WN = TP we) Taseceter Toneral (1¢) for or nesacce: ana his team contuct-27? an atrinictritive, voterial, anc ocrsonnel inspection of the Cerna. (efor te foction Tl, vara. 21). am, (2) (PL MAY) 2h? tradniag nels hy 7? ay :-- 45 Toarans cpe's. (hefer to saction 1], ~nra. 4.5). 21.) et 2c ce) orice (a 20° CTIL(SS/'.5) gam mar 1 Ticli Assistance Visit (FRY) to MAVCON STS, Ne Puaa/Me|e? Lota, Snain; NSW Athens, Graces, COUT SST: (JES LASALLE (Ace=2)), acd, “Yyain: UNOSA, Tlark Aic Fore= 252, Roowblic of the Phillininess vel, Scans, Simp DIT UVEPOSIUPAC/CO USACE, Pearl] Yarior, Hav2ii. 22,0 (4) (1% - Te say) SD5-352 rorsoennel visite | Chun yhpe an PICCURLA, ST for liaise an? tecsnical Ciscussiors. ( C 23. (MW) (23 189) ine ovat Qu ean, “1s. ay selecte7 as the Cormani's first ~aacal “AQUSBD oF tae Your. . 24.0 (VY) (IF Pte Pe AL) OPID particinata? in the Teecinical StantarJs of Peaciness worl: group at MSG “orfoelk. 2 STIC (Care (TSOR) 9 Bl (u Telane Se ILN) Tie 5 AY the daugiters, aT. aF ese liste oOToc for hon Nickerson Mall, 2l¢s. FCF cas nased, visited the are Y tonret ti? PAD. Peceivedl momojtos of tie vis it. 25. CS) C27 2 BE amy Pervawenonet Porce Mastrr Maoh, Tm visits. 27. (LU) (77 JEL) Commant Mou ie aan varticipate? in the Dows Sonflict Containxnt Progras Sovinar helt in “altinore, “Maryland. (poten to Section 11, mara. 4.9). “J
we e wae owe . saa LNIWNEEMY YS OY GS OG xi JZt: 20, () (9F JUL) 77M an} a: alocte as the Senior an? Junior Sailore 2 Svarter resrecti for April - _ June 1924. 20. (2) (17 JUL). QF cits the srecisl Sorvices nfficct | vacancy. ° 37,0 (LE) ("Ih Biest Subetance Anes Sunerviscrs Seminar ‘21: for division officers an? cuinls. (fefor to Section 11, sara. 4.1"). 32. (3 (T7 JUL) Comani sicnie nol? at Burbs Gato; over ee attende7. 32. () (L207) 2°? RD > Qa =o: ae ~ ers yn ann Cee tony te . visited DI SSL Loy deo Clet Cor wilenant aatters. first Cownas Paysical gorerity OfliCSe on 1° daly. The Pnysical Security Paviay Conrittec was forse ion 7° Susast with sublication of a Physical Security Plan on 75 Movener. 34. (Y) (LA = 10 AUS) Toth the “en's and the Ueven's Softball teans took the Chamionsain in the Sout? Tit-*tlantic Navy Sports Conference. 25, (4) (20 TET] 7 ern) onc-282 sersannel comluct a liaison trip to Pacific Plest SIC units. 36.0 (2) G7) co =: Lo QB (0005-22) visite SIR SSPAZ Praee man “8a pr? ’ aoe Steen . 5 sue Xa! for oat OP ere Lee 2 Any. Jopand sattlers. 37. (2) (AUC) oPc-2°1 personnei vrovi lod suport to Cia? OPSIS cornnittce for “ivan. 32.00 (3) (it - ery usc, hosts the Sout. Mil-Mtlantic Navy S20rts Conference 7olf Tournarent with Lt “yyron Faite of NEGA eeating Sout 46 narticidants. 39.) (8 = 28 8) 1) gE ond Soc (7) Me (OPS-36) Tale a FAV to DTENAVSECTEH, Lonmion, Mniclan?; “CS, Rota, Snain and NSC) Ations, Trae ro. AC, (3) (SRr) Lome and T04 le 32) atteace the annual Bullaev> Geentifns coring Treat Toner snes noste? by CINCLAMTEL?. AL. (A) (SPP) tere secant training increveat for the “avy Fanily Peer Projran was Aon, | (Pefo or to Seetlien Pl, para. BLVD). Ar. (3H) are = as tie Spocial Assistant to the Fxecutive Officer functioniny as the’ Farily Services Offic? “anor aii client intase coor limiter. UICLASST SIRS: 2 tate Le. ° RRR LASSI lrirb B cena eee este gy kee ATE eR epat ee BYP CE aw)
ENUWNUAAGCD LV O29i5 idan az. () (00) Uawy Srrily Sorvioss Lan tint Tlusct -estsolisse, ir (Telfer to Section Vi, Qurt. 4.73). AA, (M) (8 SPP) erOA holt dts first Anaust “aank all. - as “RYVGPINT PS Zormat Pru ie. waster Tuo —_—_ assu72.) Suties as Seaior “aliste? Sdvisor to Lhe Mirector, "ational Security Ajency. ~ 45. (0) (77 CD) CT ON CTT ey Selects! as the Senior and Junior Sailor of tie Tarter resrectively for July - Seotenber 1924. AJ, (8) (V2 Wey Aebeorate. tae tavyts 2'6eh pirticday witha Jinnerj-iane aol: at tae Caw dan, teenies, “aryland, with cae aS quest soeaxcr. AR, (ui) (24 OT) Cactain ralievet F ti ey” ae: a Chante of Tovrant TerGuony at Catfaay Sasrts yen. (Refer C Oo Section II, ser. %.?)- « AQ, (") (24 OFT) Orbucistan avarid by Pom™ Manage rent Offices warde? the cutstanlin Wirector, Mavy Huts Fesources 59, (1) (24 COT) Civilian “ovitorious Servite Yew) was avarte! to Mrs. hart NV daseainig coorlingtor, fer sustained sunerior porflor vind. Sl. (2) (CO? MO’) IPs borsonal Commuter oguiptant was reczived ans Gistributed to the ISP liteovant Mivision, Fleet Sup%ort Division, classic Paladin Mivision, *“sinictrativea Summort an? Liaison Stalf. BP, (C(O) fer TOWISPOTPY massage 32846200 NOV C4, Counter Intel lisence noly wows axaninaationrs desan for all uUSYVus. eo vilitary mers ~ assigned NSA/TSS VID €2°°7, (uofor to faction 11, para. A.14). 53. (UY) (04 Ov) First Clans Petty Officers’ Association establisheal at the. Comin, 4 (OPS-36) attonwe? tho se nirsct. Sun snort Conferone: in” rgiles, Te. ye Ar ") (SPUN) veiith 7-12 micro-coroutors incstalle? in Sunprort se seme ne weno
(we-32) visited NEM IF, INI, BR. (Uy CINV/>Ec) TUN and Ug-22F Cor Vi sbant wilt te. Cd 5a, (1) (16 NV) Former Sorman’ Master Thiet, © AG Use (RET) die? of cancer. Ro neeorial pervice vas hol? at the Center on 1S Doce wer.
eo @SNAGXZ ENAWNEZAOD LV GFD66 caddy r_- UNLLAS! ‘yt USXCLASSIPIND a SUCTION IT: WISTORITAR COPE IVY A. fuonort bovart went . -. lL. (2) Tre “aval fecurity Cro, Sctivity Parily Pedr Vrourar aels its first two-week trainity sesiaar. Tet Poor Progran “own visitors wore traine? in the area of parly childios? Apvolowsmet, resource availarility, on} genert] suscort procotures that worl? onasble thon to enter into sumoort relationshins wit) itentific? Ws fanetion:)l farilies. The training vas directe) unier the guidance of «a consultant frop tha "igh/fca2e Mlucationval Pesearcn Tounlation, Yosilanti, a3 Silot prograas that tho * wellness an] act as avy n oy 2, () class was hele at 3u for the ramainser of the yoar. enlista’, attente? each class. 6s" he S40 we? 3.0 (9) A Proartaent anvointe? for each Istart wnt. On suimLance abuse, acl as dad personnel, ani ars terbers 07 « \SS 4. (3) A Term) Orsanizational FAfoctiver. ee on Tho Cirst “lav, Substanse xuent cl “n aversyj2 of 22 neonle, wth officer Midiiyan. morte l to a: provoention of chil? atase ant noglect. Tis Proqran= is one of the icsuas of tires Cably Wwe nne DOS a tae Aimisa Provention Pregran 25923 wors hol? avery other (NASP) sonth ay eae tS Substaines Abuse Representative (OGAL) vas Sha M5AR's aro trains? to nrosent OT blocks isl iofeurvition voints for deoarteont the 7% agarenit Survey Joater in January. yonind Substance Abuse Council. ° 3 comlucte? hy the ‘av: A cross-se2ctional reaoresentation of [7 swersunineal wer. intervi cust TQ Atril, a Toman. AsSessyent orting Vroar (77..c) uar astablishe? to losk at the sroolo- areas and mate perommonintions: to try Tacminving Officer for imsleneatic: findings of tre survey. 8. (5) Pitty to sixty To.vant soctvorns and Soins testo* contily unger the Tovrant's “ano: Vrinalesis Proury: using tho Pury out. (single test) portable Rotectisn the test kit i classifications. S. frncrins ny S effective int \> (J) Five Gane Avaroness classes were neld for_2¢7 fanales an? tne Syva Cormorntion. Pair for by cya, ietection of nine 7ifferent crud 119 Cn0/oors by the Arny Yental "ealth Counselor, &PS Ta0 Rape Prevention classes wer yiven at “SSA ant usa by Cotective Honnie 215) of the %nno “runtel County Molice Tex Trine nit. 7. Jefine crite Roy Oher was anooirt|ad te over Officer on health an? to serve as fenarty it wonitorina the yearly PT test Conditioning Proara: is jiven meeting rex wired holy fat or fitne exercise session inc lu? iny too 1.8 rile (Z) \ Torna? Usalt ria For sayeical Fitsass ant. 2-3 CU Titness +", Due Fitsass ~atters. Toor inakors an? a . a tv Qi Roatiness Protas was este slisae? to woiyit control stretaris. th oratran ant atvise tho Tonanling Twenty norsonnsal vere solsete? with resconsibility of the “an latory Comti tioning Proaray. eco daily, 5 tays a voek > Mrs; TNS for personnal not AS 23 stantarils and consists of a 45 dAste run or the ontienal $F yard wit. iu 2LASSITING Seeger ‘ . Vinedasss See ele —se TUSeS AT GOVLEN AG
VINVLB 93te (Re closet itens was ilentilics o ASNSAXS LNIWNUAZAOD LV OPOCS ivay . : WRLAST IFIED . (2) Tour *-hoar 2b ciaases woro civen by the Cowan’ Corzsat 2 -@ ‘8 i a" AA DO atoiutaytcs., Ter oneyoiny orogram oucates, igentifies, an: Mrovives on tan? trainie.: io ot orevaeation ant rescue “ethots, ‘non comlstion, tho fs are cortifie? ta Level fT - Meare ° Association. : ©. (2) Mie Tormeat ably eaten purticicate?, along with tus ° counselors fron tts “avy Parily Sorvico Tonter, Anniselis, in the Yorestic Conflict Tontainzent Srojra: Secinaar in Taltdvors, Maryvlan*, vais sevinar proviia.d traiaing rocessary to Cacilitat: a to eiwask sroun thorsay SYsuray Ces signe? to elirinats sysicnl violoncs [rot tho wirital facily relationsiins. Tris inwalagh)> troining haz enable? oar “iTS Counselors to facilitate two vrour tioracy somsiwis at Te. “ente to gate. The first + session was S?hi in ccqust/fe teers: the socon? ia toverh r/oeco nor. 1%, 6 (') The Cixst Suostane> Anise Suoorvisors Seninar was pelt with 35 division officers/tivision coiols attomlingy. X oresentation from SAL, Lagal, SSO, ani “alieal sarticivatel, cach aw laining thair function and oe this Conmani's nolicies an? troce.durcs wore welint. Tris was Lollows.? in a question an? answer session. Taese seninars are nels ‘warterly. Ll. (€) This vear, "STA Pt. conte su>lishel its first Physical security Plan as Yamox I to its Misaster Prevarodness Plan. Paysical security awareness has bem clavate? both within the Command an? in conjunction with tho National Secarity Aconcy. Plars nave pden sade with other cryptologic eltvants an? the “SA to alla security soariwter aroun’ the Troos Suyport areca. 12.0 (U) Teo secon” training inerawnt Cor the avy Forily Pear Projraa was WP. UCisit mer Goin Visitors curticicated in this tiua-we session. Six of tic sravivesly traine j volunteors transferra:, leaving. a total cf 14 traincl "om Visitors py Sooteroar., Py tho on? of 1994, seventeen farilios were the rocinients of the Poser frogram's sum ort ans gui: Jan OP. « 13. (W) Rn dwn ciete nord for temorary furnishiays aq Leash a yan? the tas of collecting ant distridsting tac itets was establistol., Ti Comma? allocate? spave ia one of two HOC warenouses for the sters je of thease iterns wien not in use. 14. (U) In resvons> to no. DO and 54 yuicelines, tai vaval Investigative Service Lear siyacore’s axans in Vovessor for all venyeect “llitary personnel assigoei te Ur 636°7. Tho volygraeors coaet tet exams a ‘day, Cour Says a woos startiyy with mersonnel wo checked? on loarl Since 01 Setoier., ts of 21 Deoouoor, 34 NOON RO indivisauals were teste 7. 15. (9) M 2% sarcn v4, tho Cirst in a contineing soriozs of Tri- Service Mehilization Planning jroun teotinys was helt for tne surtose ef Javeloning an Sti widilization olan. Sivjectives of the lan would be te smoot the accession of vor? than 2,7 -ilitary roservists into the "WA/teEs oryanization in the event of ful) or partial wobilization. uring Subsequent weatings, s Cratt robilization sian was loveloi atressing ° UNCLASSICI i. Ripe peel CLASS for pI ae er Wwe Dat Bue he v2 - ee
VINLLAS 2 es: CN = _ WRLASS SIT . aS"adXa LNEWNWIACS LV G29G5 ni rgy. . mae nar various personnel, atniniste:t ive, osouity i! Jouistic: satters. Tio we WOrKINY Grou > Ws on Oj-ctive Meosenting o werkaels wlan for testing murposes during to. secon” ‘tunrhor ec calontar year LITT. a” i. Onerations Y2part vont -— - l. (Q) Tae Pocus? Ins octioa urs cotucta by Lao*Iasractor General. Thirtezn: formal an! infor) reco memitionw ver2 iiontifies based on Liniinss ef thee Bt tow. Mires reco awnalions aoalies to thc to Operations Merart ent avi all actions wore rocorte? corm late in tie @ Ocbepen 104 Cuarberdly Pools cabation Statas tomort. 26 a Cnanze of (2) Cantain ae ->: iv: wt contain Gy Conn. Corrmony at cis “affnay Soerts Arona on! Octooer,. ew we The dutice ant rosvonsi S1ilics of iy. Assistowt Comaanter, ‘aval Security Groun were sonarate? frovw these of tie Corranting Officer, ‘aval Socurit;’ Group Activi assigna’ to ty Fort ‘cals. Tessonsibility for the following cutios was ass™ °c wipe ei Fol a. (UV) farve 2.3 tae agrsonal rocreaszitative of TOMMAVE TOD ac be (WW) Assist Mvrcvereens in the role ef MNavy element contani, CSS. c. (1) “vivins Tess cru as to current anal future MBA/CoS plans, 20licies an? -rojrans irsactiay user Navel ery>toloyic oparations avi resources. 2.00) Toviuet liaisen with PIEeAS/Ce 755 ant assist in the evaluation of “AVE cP Cie stiacionas. (farticioeths in ti Piel? Assistance schatulinsz, Projyrya). @. (0) Provite services, inelutin: coortination of visit for P.SOTIT IN oersonae) visiting ‘57/758. f. (UV) Ferve as a focal soint for “AVSTOAr Tas reguirennats Sarl coortinates with US°/75° -rovisisn of tecinicel infor wtio. 2 Staff * ae (Z) Cordini Wt! articivate with Assistant Connmdiars ssistants in for suluiion of glans an? progress % al oar one qa see 4. 12 Mt SQeorarions Officer no longer perforss the functions of novaty »} PITA Sree, 3. Tort Meate, exc rcising wid2oan.) oo (3) “Hi wuan? Sesrations Toatral Sivision (27o-22 a. (“) Asnistet, a Wiss? : AAT sunmorteat AMISS/OO STPAISPICRUTOT in his resvorsisilitics foc wonitorines the effectiveness, coveraye C contre) authority a7 overall coordination of the ortion of thea us. avy “ULGRYC Syster orerations. (OL AESTOLTe 2 © mse ~ le lice mn Lee er Feet ey Bee Bosbere esta gets Py srg oe ‘ow t&
hh Se ee ord _ b. (2) In fuqise, 1a, foo arocelgate?d a worlwite Preventive i‘ainteniice (™!) scree Zar vik any? stalions.  CMmoross cranges hal beon wae Ssulawstuantly, nomvawoer, D8, “TL contolilate all changes, care lle3 ti Vosuct 12°? ressa ka and isseet a verl heise tjdehband Mm Scbatile Boca, 4. (2) Pleec Sumert Civision qime-27) ~ a. ()) Jameary/Pet roar casio? te inesotion an? estallissoacnt of the Current Snerelions arnt "ocanical featinass Uleant (Tori) (9Pc-347) within the Plact Sa xort civision. In supeort of Fate hontling and stor- ss reyvizeamonts, Wl V7 acriirst om eeite onte abeosrcomuteuc. lubsejuest ly, avorotriate softucrt wes 2lso acyaire?. bh. (ff) aa Sor tyes Toforenbion Tacilite (3°T Cp teak oliver; from a contractor orgy a] 2ati spot tna Snal Varpbor Oeste-v1 gion processins software on 1] February. ‘Tuis software vas %signt’ ant uritten to enale the SIF to sumpert Soa The py sa louss I davloyoents. Rurins calancar year 1ORA, STP orevi let oreetission ntibasa susmort an? noctenission data processing for 4 Atlsatic “ext Soa vymh Psloaro Iv denloy vents AMitionally, ey as Ssist. the tacifie Swmort Tacility at ufc. isaca, Jagan in ore-nission Vatabos> su ( missios. With to ae Dr 2cesshy, softvarc, vost-tission oroecessiny tive was reduce? to ar wroximately tee sas, vort for tuo Pacific “leot Sea yesh Ee (CU) Parse Lanyiase proficienes ‘aintenanes (SLAY (fon=24) . 4 ae (5) Caloisay Serie Tae TLL A Tost Cyelo: Fron January to February, 1°12 VLel'™ oxatinations vere atalnisteres ta [26 “avy and ane USC cryotolivwnists in tae Aranic, Thinsse *anJarin, Crenci, Naor, Kor2an, Russian, an? Ssaais* lanmages ‘yorall 46,5° of tho axividoss cenonstrated a antisfactor, wade ie at general ra diotoelishow cutias: if these, 17.0. wore ovalaate tas Ceing lancgare saalifies Cor Tizect Tunoert operations, The Followia:d cocti’s recocives the MPa Ole, oe! Landoace Proficiency Mar! Gasot on cryotolo cho ashi: vacent on tie ealentnr vour O04 exavrinations: Mypriree qorpeyn mem nce Lara Tosmant MAVEUOC UATE Athons Sell Toran? DAVSEMRUNGT SCarbers Point iS) ~- - bd 7 AO eo NNER Reece OTS | ee ae COWS ReMrntT £4 FRR CN
R3URS DNIRWNMHAGCS SY GIL: MOST TMRESeTy AQUA ese farce Tae” Mot vost Swall Coon yea ros ty. (UE) MTD brogeas Teatus . - i. (2) Gabor Vere Vo trvtuctior af owe Aris ong: Languaje Projections Soapleticis Covmletion Mate “ovisionns 1 rans 3 we 1 one ; ra 2 lo 1 ren fe ae) = yore 4 eee we te a oe oe ee - rr) nae. fa) red ~ ” ‘e Sean of overnl]) 80. srotuction since the nour ST's th Bea STs, Overul) > a 3 - - Stes ~~ ; Lanjuaze Prajpocuy Souslete } fomalwns Corwnletion Mat 2, oF. 1" ne - - aa 27 an ry) ann . ee “~ So.w nw ° ra ] 19 . any ny 3 12 © °. 2 34 ¢ weer ’ ~~ 1 a4 : . to 7 = SG 32 29 ‘ gn Totals ---+---- wee wee me wneewe oo tn eo 0 om ve ae: oe ~., a aw 223 . oe 2 Oe 5% to 12 SRiNs neblinied duriny tac year, ‘eight existina wal. Ce. (8) SEARS Lanniis Training Assistarce Visits (UT4V) a Purint calenJar year 1034, Cour UTAWs were conlucte? “9 comants in thie Pacific, the Carivhean, and Tue, a “ 2 (V) Vssistance to PMY Marine Sidious Units (VNU). Fre: TL Janvary to (5 woril, eae the 24th and 32n2 Aus, AL ashore in Beirut, Lesinonr. &)
De C2) Se Rtoaco bo Cio dea: “ahotcle sian C/T) Speper training Ravisory “ossittas GeOsl). rg. Th ty ne NOVEN IE, tes wwe. of A. OPS~34 atten iz tie Asian ty; SIS col cronce at Goulfelle: “ir Torcs Tae, | eyie t20resoube td be Giroctor of tae Sum, OLLie:, ang STIL Voll S5oNtos CIM ave roca pe, BNWoluatia: ant Tecoma is: Cyaniss ta tase Cninese, “orean 202 Vlotaarose a7 a suredoulua. - 3.0 (UW) SIDSET (oentsy Me CY ITED Ba set te one oye 35) Vii. (CY) Tontinn: wire tine “WAS yy . arin - 3 “= An DOCS PMID Larkin On s2ace, land, ASI, aniosy ~atait sa, Be CY SESS arad lay yg tecsy (2253) 2. (2) Comuste* thirtaog cee Visits thromghoit thie your Vin (3) barticisstet ia & gn CU" ingoections.
GING 2NAWNERACS oe GL... 7. (Up Tlassie Pals lia (cps-7%) ( . ae (UV) “Miriny calmyiar voar 19%4, Tlassic Palslina o2rsonne] . accrual a total of 5,548 gays Asdlayel., 'tlatin airborne gorson] asso} a total of 4679.2 FJisste sours durin, tho your. . rd be. (UW) Current anliital billet structure was increase? to 47. UNCLASSIOI > ‘bet he tae “wo. Lz ree
sS * b yg Hel DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 7 NAVAL SECURITY GROUP COMMAND HEADQUARTERS S001 NESRASKA AVENUE, H.W, : WASHinSTon,O.c 803090 2320 . Ser g53/59249 9 NOV 1984 From: Conmander, Naval Security Group Command Sub$: INSTRUCTIONS GOVERNING NAVY HIGH FREQUENCY DIRECTION FINDING WIDEBAND OPERATIONS Ref: (a) COMNAYSECGRY Ttr ser 137 of 20 Aug 1979 (b) NAVSECGRUINST $2520.2 Encl: (1) U.S. Ravy High Frequency Direction Findina Wideband Operations Manual J. Reference (a) fs hereby cancelled. 2. Enclosure (1), guidance for operation of the Wideband HFDF System, super- sedes reference (a). Enclosure (1) consists of a basic manual containing general policy and guidance, and one annex covering procedures for Net Control and Net Station Wideband Operations. 3. Wideband HFDF fs part of the BULLSEYE system and therefore reference (b) must be used in conjunction with enclosure (1). 4. Enclosure (1) 1s effective upon receipt. -S. PATTERSON sistant Commander for pecial Operations
asa axe —— BV GPO isa: | SRA Rane py es NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY HEADQUARTERS BUILDING Port George G. steeds, Merytend 30758 © & 2000/skm Ser ACNSG/102 20 November 1984 ‘From: Assistant Commander, Naval Security Group Command, Fort Meade To: Commanding Officer, Naval Security Group Activity, Fort Meade Subj: WIDEBAND MISSION DELEGATION AND RESPONSIBILITY Refs | (a) COMNAVSECGRU ltr 2520 Ser G53/T37 of 20 AUG 1979 (b) NAVSECGRUINST S2520.2 (Series) 1. Reference (a), in conjunction with reference (b), delegates authority to ASSTCOMNAVSECGRU to act as Executive for Wideband System Operations, and to assist COMNAVSECGRU in the operation and management of the Wideband Network. 2. The Commanding Officer, Naval Security Group Activity, Ft. Meade is hereby delegated responsibilities of performing all Wideband System evolutions as assigned to ASSTCOMNAVSECGRU in reference (a). In connection with this delegation, Commanding Officer, Naval Security Group Activity Ft. Meade is authorized use of the ASSTCOMNAVSECGRU message, letter and ARFCOS title for correspondence, tasking and liaison related to the Wideband missicen as defined in references (a) and (b). ULLIVAN Copy to: COMNAVSECGRU ——¢ He ladvad Wald ISiog 46 painposdan,, in Rer (a) to them le (2\( pone cece Ww UNCLASSIFIED —— <= en, permanent oy OR Mee Eee = PepPr or
Jur Tarey cunseetat - _—---— “{- _ UNCLAS gsiadXp TRINNGRACO LV G2IR0 4 23%. ‘. cae ITC : . OTC MELEASED Tt 7 LEM COMNAVSERERU TO KOZAD 0. akt INFO COMNAVELEXSYSCOM//PDE 107-6// NSACSS//T133/P43// CHNAVMAT / AC NSGA SKAGGS / V Ky | UNCLAS E FT 0 eaae \ | l. CHNAVRAT PASS TO RCA CARDEN SUBJ: BULLSEYE TEC FLASH CHARNELS A. COMNAVSECGRU WASHINGTON BC 1219262 MAR B4 CEENSER) CNOTAL) B.° MWCO -LANT HFDF WET MORTHWEST WA O910392 MAY BS CEENSER) CNOTALD fc. WCO PAC HFDF NET WAHIAWA HI 05011462 MAY B84 CEENSER) CNOTAL) WCO MED HFDF NET ROTA SP 0313452 MAY B84 CGENSER) CNOTAL) E.. BULLSEYE CCB MEETING 17-18 MAY 84 CITERM 138) 4. THE TRIPLE ERROR ENCODED CTEC) FLASH CHANNELS WERE ORIGINALLY Oo~nuseue DESIGNED WHEN WE WERE USING HIGH FREQUENCY COMMUNICATIONS CIRCUITS. DISTR ##20/G3213908 B 1335 ###0/650/680eee 24909 630A... G32... GAS/CIR G311/CIR OAASTER TYPED Mame TTis OFFICE BYRNE. Por VcTRE C. BONESTEELs €3212% ,X20285 48 JULY 1986 C . TYPED MAME TITLE DVFICE SYMBOL AND PHONE % Ree @) fp, item |.e $ Pe. SUTTE, CHL, TE. - Ar z ) BMECUAITY CLatsitication an Ar [Paetast%F + 0 OD , fof 6 iin 173/2 (OCR) OU EO ee } baAa “Casunaitua yutmuaaaay 3P paomposdn., beware at (2) @ US COC 1901-39600) 2163 335 00-1738 en eee amma it dmieinetia nomen ee ert Ce pen sqanm V0 pesnnnsdsy.
FOR RECOMMENDATIONS RESULTING FROM THE TEST CREFS Be» Ce AND BD) 73. FOR wCO'S: INHIBIT TRANSMISSION OF THE TEC FLASH CHANNELS IN [THE BPU. TRANSMIT THE ADRIM CADF) AND comTaol CCF) FLASHES SIMULTANEOUSLY ON THEIR MORRAL CIRCUITS PATUS AND ON THE TWO P CIRCUITS PATHS VACATED BY ELIMIBATION OF THE TECS. &. FOR USN-1hs USN-245 USN-B37> RAKE MECESSARY HARD WIRE CHANGES 1TO TECH CONTROL PATCH PANEL(S) TO ALLOW SIRO TRANSMISSION OF THE YOU WILL BE IN RECEIPT OF THE ADF AND CHF ON TWO SEPARATE CIRCUIT OenweFruo TEC ADDS BATM BITS TO EACH TRANSMITTED CHARACTER TO ENSURE NETSTATIONS TRECELVE ERROR FREE FLASHES.” PRESENT DAY CIRCUIT ROUTING HAS VIRTUALLY ELIMINATED THE NEED TO USE TEC. ADDITIONALLY. THE INCREASED USE OF STATMUXs WHICH WON'T HANDLE TEC FLASH CHANNELS» MAKES THE USEFUL LIFESPAN OF TEC TENUOUS. 2. REF A DIRECTED NCO'S TO IWHIBIT THE TEC FLASH CHANNELS FOR A ONE MONTH TEST AND TO REPORT ON THE IMPACT TO MET OPERATIONS. BASED AND DISCUSSIONS DURING REF E» THE TEC FLASH CHAMNELS WILL WO LONGER BE USED. ADF. AND CNF ON THE TWO CIRCUITS PATHS EACH. 5S. <FOR NETSTATIONS: AS A RESULT OF ACTIONS IN PARA 3 AND & ABOVEs DRAFTED TYPES MABE TITLE OF FICE SVMS. Pnomt TYPED MAME TITLL OF FICE EVRBOL ARO ScasTval aereaee? =| mcuarty PverT UNCLAS ‘E ae T 9 OD viiry 173/2(0CR) NO erm Pua oro vemnanecey — k2r smene BA RAAANA sdau 4,2 *pamposdana » 3 that sa A048 aa 2 OTN
— 03. 03 (a oOernw auc mee CEE? Y G2 ONG Dd dae = 61 CrasbiO CATIC -- La UNLAS ~ a oo 0 emenect MAMDUING MESTRUCTIONS i en ~~ nn een eT rate XAA/ PATHS. IMRGMCESS -OF 200 WIRING CHANGES WOULD BE NEEDED TO MODIFY THE OPU TO MOCEPT NON-TEC CIRCUITS AT THE PRESENT TEC INPUTS. WE HAVE THROUGHLY INVESTIGATED ATTERPTING THESE MODIFICATIONS AND IT WAS DEEMED UNACCEPTABLE FROR BOTH MANPOWER INTENSITY AND PROBABLE POINTS. HAROWARE ADVERSE IMPACT VIEW ACCORDINGLY» YOU WILL HAVE TO RELY ON TECH CONTROL PATCHING TO MAXE USE OF THE SECOND FLASH 1CZIRCUIT IN EVENT OF PRIMARY 6. CIRCUIT GUTAGE. WE ARE INVESTIGATING THE FEASIBILITY OF EXTENDING THE J ROUTE TCHANNELS FROM TECH CONTROL TO THE OPS FLOOR TO FACILITATE SWITCH dare po gta eeameetat ah’ eb fernposday., FROM PRIRARY TO BACKUP CIRCUITS WITHOUT TECH CONTROL INTERVENTION. ieee ~ R/R: PER THE RESULTS OF THE TEST AMD BISCUSSIONMS AT THE CCB. GS5S3eee0 MADE THE DECISION TO ELIMINATE TRE TEC FLASH CHANNELS (653 RENO eee SER 633/273 BTID 14 JUN B84 GERMANED. BSISCUSSIRNG” THE OPU IN PARA Seve IS PREVENTIVE MAINTEWANCE. THE FIRST THISG THE WETSTATIONS WOULDete THINK ABOUT IS PLUGGIRG THE SECOND CHF Ama ASF INTO THE OPU TOeee AUTOMATE THE USE OF THE SIMO CIRCUITS. WE ARE POINTING OUT THATSe* THIS WAS INVESTIGATED ANC DETERMINED TO BE IWFEASIBLE. THE OPU ISeve, AN EXTREMELY OLD SYSTEM AND RAKING THAT MURMBER OF WIRING CHANGES, ere WITH ASSOCIATED CABLE MOVES» ES ASKING FOR TROUBLE. ALSO» FLAG-#8 HOIST WILL ELIMINATE THE OPU'S IN A COUPLE OF YEARS.*#¢®# DRAFTER TYPED Make TITLE GOFCE SYMBOL Pete [7VPRD mak FTL OFFICE SYMBOL AMO Premed ea § . SECURIT CLABBINICATION. Dari Test BROUP « UNCLAS E F TO PRE viOUS EDITION 18 OBSOLETE @/m 0102-47 000-1738 DO 1 oh™, 173/2 (OCR) @ US GPC 1981 -296-085 @ 2983 32:
Maaxd LNANNG MW G200G Slay RES SIREN Le ec. . _. WASHINGTON, DC 20350 Canc frp: Nov 84 tee REPLY ACFER TO OPNAVNOTE 5450 Ser- 09B2E3/ 4U309623 1 JUN 1984 OPNAV NOTICE 5450 From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: ESTABLISHMENT OF THE U.S. NAVAL SECURITY GROUP ACTIVITY, KAMISEYA, JAPAN - 1. Purpose. To establish the U.S. Naval Security Group Activity, Kamiseya, Japan, assigned to the Chief of Naval Operations for command and support. 2. Establishment. The Secretary of the Navy has approved the establishment of the subject shore activity as of 23 May 1984, with the following mission statement: To perform Naval Security Group and related functions as directed. 3. Title of Official in Command, Mailing Address and Authorized dance with NIP 3 Short Title for Message Addressal in accor SUPP-1 1S: «gguadxa yaWUsIAGD IP paonposday,, Commanding Officer U.S. Naval Security Group Activity Kamiseya, Japan Mail Address - Commanding Officer . U.S. Naval Security Group Activity ° FPO Seattle 98768 (SNDL: FE4) (Short Title: NAVSECGRUACT KAMISEYA JA) (Activity Code: 5771-725) (UIC #: 70291) 4k, Delegation. The Chief of Naval Operations delegates authority for the subject shore activity as follows: a. Command and Sv port. Commander, Naval Security Group Command to be ceestsed by: Echelon 3 - Commanding Officer, U.S. Naval Security Group Activity, Kamiseya, Japan b. Area Coordination. Commander in Chief U.S. Pacific Fleet to be exercised through Commander U.S. Naval Forces, Japan, or through such other commands and activities as may be further delegated py appropriate -authority.. eg AT GOVERNHEET BXPESSE
wrote cong OPNAVNOTE 5450 UNCLASSIF IED 5. Information. The subject new shore activity is not a ° management headquarters activity. 6. Action. Commands, bureaus, and offices concerned are requested to take necesSary action, and the Commander, Naval Security Group Command is requested to provide the Chief of Naval Operations (Op-09B2) with a copy of functions assigned to the new shore activity. 7. Cancellation Contingency. This notice may be retained for reference purposes. H. F. BOYLE Assistant Vice Chief of Naval Operations Director of Javal Adzinistration Distribution: TO SNDL Al (Immediate Office of the Secretary) A2A (Department of the Navy Staff Offices) (NAVCOMPT (12); CHINFO (3); DONPIC (1); OLA (1); Auditor General of the Navy (1); only) AUA (CHNAVMAT (10)) AS (Bureaus) (CHNAVPERS (20), only) 21A2 (CINCPACFLT) 23A2 (Naval Force Commander PAC) (COMNAVFORJAPAK, only) CH3A (Naval Security Group Detachments) (Kamiseya, Japan, only) E2c (NAVFINCEN) E2D (NAVREGFINCEN) E7 (Activities under the command of the Auditor General of the Navy) FE1 (COMNAVSECGRU) FG1 ( COMNAVTELCOM) FG2 (NAVCOMMSTA) FG3 (NAV COMMU) FG6 (NAVCAMS) FHI (COMNAVMEDCOM (8)) . FJ18 (COMNAVMILPERSCOM) FJ84 (NAVRESPERSCEN) FJ87 (EPMAC) FJ91 (NCPC) [oa ~--e Pld INCRD AS GOVLRNSAENT LEPEL..SE sasuadxa JUauUsaA0g 2° peonposday,
—————— . 3 wd Ixa TNSHNAZ SD BW O75 ig. e e . pee ¢ ee ° ama a. OPNAVNOTE 5450 Distribution: (Cont) SNDL FKA1 , (Systems Command Headquarters) (COMNAVAIRSYSCOM (6); COMNAVELEXSYSCOM (5); . COMNAVSEASYSCOM (24); COMNAVFACENGCOM (16); : COMNAVSUPSYSCOM (38)) FKM15 (ASO BRASO) (Philadelphia, PA, only) FKM18 (NAVMTO) FKM22 (NAVPUBFORMCEN) _ FKMN30 (NAVRESSO) FKN1 (FACENGCOMDIV) FKN2 (CBC) (Port Hueneme, CA, only) FKP 1M (NAVWPNSUPPCEN) FS1 (COMNAVINTCOM) All Divisions of OPNAV Commanding Officer U.S. Naval Security Group Activity FPO Seattle 98768 now orem eee UNCLASSIFIED eet ee ee ow erence errr” pit Firs ke ye Neereee ENPPACh
« @SNGGNS LNAWNUZACS EV G2565 sd of ot ememees on, ~~ TNCEASSIEIED OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS WASHINGTON, DC 20350 IM REPLY REFER TO Ser 09B2E3/4U309628 1 JUN tes From: Chief of Naval Operations To: Commander, Naval Security Group Command Subj: DETACHMENT DISESTABLISHMENT Ref: (a) Your ltr 5450 Ser GD122627/10T20 of 20 Mar 1984 (NOTAL) (b) OPNAVINST 5450.169D (ec) SNDL, Part 2 and Catalog of Naval Shore Activities (OPNAV P09B2-105) 1. AS requested by reference (a), you may disestablish the following detachment effective as of 23 May 1964: Officer in Charge U.S. Naval Security Group Detachment Kamiseya, Japan Mail Address Officer in Charge U.S. Naval Security Group Detachment FPO Seattle 98768 (Short Title: NAVSECGRUDET KAMISEYA JA) 2. You may take action to announce the detachnent disestablish- ment in accordance with reference (b). 3. The mailing address for the detachment will be deleted from ‘List CH3A of reference (c). E.F. FOYLE Aeeistant Vice Chie! of Naval Orcrattons Copy to: Director of Naval Ac=inistration CINCPACFLT CNO (Op-009) COMNAVFORJAPAN NAVACCTGFINCEN (NAFC-6A) NAVCOMMU, Washington, DC (NAVTELSYSIC (1C15) UNCLASSIFIE D> __ ae ee SPEROTSCED Ar GOVERNMENT EXPEASE
« ZSNGANS LNENNWZAOCD LV O7905 vag - eee erent UNCLASSIFIED ++ —-OEPARIMENT. OF THE NAVY, NAVAL SECURITY GROUP COMMAND HEADQUARTERS 3008 NEBRASKA AVENUE. NW. WASHINGTON. D.C. 20390 Canc: Jun 85 NSGNOTE 5450 Ser 6D12834/1031) 14 JUN 1984 NAVSECGRU NOTICE 5450 From: Commander, Naval Security Group Command - Subj: DISESTABLISHMENT OF U.S. NAVSECGRUDET (NAVAL SECURITY GROUP DETACHMENT) KAMISEYA, JAPAN Ref: (a) OPNAVINST 5450.169D (NOTAL) (b) CNO itr ser 09B2E3/4U309628 of 1 Jun 84 (NOTAL) (c) OPNAY NOTICE 5450 of 1 Jun 84 (NOTAL) 1. Purpose. In accordance with reference (a) and as requested by reference ib), the following NAVSECGRUDET is hereby disestablished on 23 May 1984: Officer in Charge U.S. Naval Security Group Detachment Kamiseya, Japan Mail Address Officer in Charge U.S. Naval Security Group Detachment FPO Seattle 98768 (Short Title: NAVSECGRUDET KAMISEYA JA) .2- Background. Reference (c) announced that the Secretary of the Navy has approved the establishment of U.S. Naval Security Group Activity, Kamiseya, Japan effective 23 May 1984, thus requiring the disestablishment of U.S. NAVSECGRUDET Kamiseya. 3. Action. Commands and offices concerned are requested to take necessary Distribution: action, , Ey’ Jf SULRIVAN, JR, / pyty NAVSECGRU Lists I, 13, III, IV, VIb, VId SNDL A3 (Chief of Naval Operations) (OP-09B2E and OP-009 only) 21A2 (CINCPACFLT) 23A2 (Naval Force Commander PAC) (COMNAVFORJAPAN only) E2F (NAVACCTGFINCEN (NAFC-6A)) FG) (COMNAVTELCOM) FS1 (COMNAYINTCOM) ok NAVCOMMU, Washington, DC_(NAVFEESYSIC TICTS) ) UNCT ASSIFIED——__—. Ph oleeD ALT GIVERRMAENT BNO .SL
10.3 (U) A LISTING OF REGIONAL ACTIVE DUTY CRYPTOLOGIC OFFICERS AND NAVAL RESERVE SECURITY GROUP UNITS PRIOR TO RESTRUCTURING (1984) ACTIVE DUTY CRYPTOLOGIC OFFICERS RADCO NAVRESREDCOM Charleston RANCO NAVRESREDCOM Dallas RADCO NAVRESREDCOM Great Lakes RADCO NAVRESREDCOM Philadetphia RADCO NAVRESRENCOM San Francisco NAVAL RESERVE SECURITY GROUP UNITS NAVRESREDCOM Region One NR DIRNSA FORT MEADE 101, Worcester, MA NRSG DEPT ROTA 401, Worcester, MA NRSG DEPT ROTA 301, Quincy, MA NRSG ACT EDZELL 101, Providence, RI NRSG DEPT ROTA 501, Chicopee, MA NRSG DEPT ROTA 201, Quincy, MA NRSG DEPT ROTA 101, Lawrence, MA NRSG DEPT ROTA 601, New Haven, CT NRSG DET GROTON 101, Hartford, CT NAVRESREDCOM Region Two NRSG DEPT ROTA 802, Whitestone, NY NRSG HQ 102, Whitestone, NY NRSG DEPT ROTA 902, Mattydale, NY NRSG ACT WINTER HARBOR 102, Freeport, NY NRSG ACT EDZELL 202, Freeport, NY NRSG DEPT ROTA 702, Albany, NY NRSG ACT NAPLES 102, Poughkeepsie, NY NRSG DEPT ROTA 1002, Binghamton, HY a) : Pe tee ones ea A pa DUD AT GOVERSSENT EXPRAS!
se ASE een —_—_ - UNCLASSIFIEr; : Tn ata NAVRESREDCOM Region Four ” NRSG ACT EDZELL 304, Clifton, NJ NRSG ACT EDZELL 404, Elizabeth, NY NRSG DEPT ROTA 1104, Philadelphia, PA NRSG SECSTA WASHNC 104, Philadelphia, PA NR DIRNSA FORT MEADE 204, Philadelphia, PA NRSG DEPT ROTA 1204, Atlantic City, NJ NRSG DEPT ROTA 1304, Avoca, PA NAVRESRENCOM Region Five . . NRSG DEPT ROTA 1505, Rochester, NY NRSG ACT EDZELL 505, Buffalo, NY NRSG SECSTA WASHNC 205, Erie, PA NRSG ACT KAMISEYA 105, Pittsburgh, PA NRSG SECSTA WASHDC 305, Cleveland, OH NRSG DEPT ROTA 1405, Cincinnatti, OH NAVRESRENCOM Region Six NR DIRNSA FORT MEADE 306, Baltimore, MD NRSG ACT KEFLAVIK 106, Baltimore, MD NRSG DET NORFOLK 406, Richmond, VA NRSG HQ WASHNC 206, Adelphi, MD NR DIRNSA FORT MEADE 406, Adelphi, MD NRSG DEPT NORVA 106, Little Creek, Norfolk, VA NR DIRNSA FORT MEADE 506, Adelphi, MD NRSG HQ WASDC £06, Washington, DC NRSG DET NORFOLK 306, Washington, DC NRSG DET NORFOLK 206, Washington, DC NRSG CSG 106, Washington, DC NAVRESREDCOM Region Seven NRSG DEPT DIEGO GARCIA 107, Greensboro, NC NR DIRNSA FORT MEADE 607, Charleston, SC NRSG ACT LANT 107, Charlotte, NC NAVRESREDCOM Region Eight NR SECGRU HQ WASHDC 308, Atlanta, GA NRSG ACT HOMESTEAD 108, Orlando, FL NRSG ACT HOMESTEAD 208, Tampa, FL NRSG ACT CHARLESTON 108, Jacksonville, FL NRSG ACT HOMESTEAD 308, Miami, FL UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED ; UCD AD GOVERNMPS? pyppier
» @SNGUdXY LNAWNUZACS LY GID... -v eee UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED eee Pa . .- . bey TR A err 2 MO 0 cane cenit _-— NAVRESREDCOM Region hine "on NRSG ACT ADAK 109, Knoxville, TN NRSG ACT SABANA SECA 109, Louisville, KY NRSG ACT ADAK 209, Nashville, TN NR DIRNSA FORT MEADE 709, Tuscaloosa, AL NAVRESREDCOM Region Ten NR DIRNSA FORT MEADE 810, Austin, TX NRSG ACT NORTHWEST 219, Houston, TX NRSG ACT FORT MEADE 110, New Orleans, LA. NRSG ACT NORTHWEST 110, Pensacola, FL NRSG ACT NORTHWEST 310, San Antonio, TX NRSG ACT FORT MEADE 210, Shreveport, LA NAVRESREDCOM Region Eleven NRSG ACT MISAWA 211, Albuquerque, NM NRSG ACT NORTHWEST 41, Amarillo, TX NRSG ACT MISAWA 111, Broken Arrow, OK NR DIRNSA FORT MEADE 911, Dallas, TX NAVRESREDCOM Region Thirteen NRSG ACT PHILIPPINES 213, Indianapolis, IN NRSG ACT HANZA 113, Muskegon, MI NRSG ACT HANZA 313, Forest Park, IL NR CINCUSNAVEUR 113, Southfield, MI NRSG ACT PHILIPPINES 113, Southfield, MI NRSG ACT GTMO 113, Milwaukee, WI NRSG ACT HANZA 213, Madison, WI NRSG ACT HANZA 513, Indianapolis, IN - NR DIRNSA FORT ME ADE 1013, Great Lakes, IL NAVRESREDCOM Region Sixteen NRSG ACT HANZA 716, Rock Island, IL . at NRSG ACT HANZA 916, Decatur, IL 2. NRSG ACT LANT 316, La Crosse, Wi n NRSG ACT HANZA 616, Oshkosh, WI Jf NRSG ACT HANZA 816, Des Moines, IA ee € NRSG HQ WASHDC 516, St. Paul, MN - NAVRESREDCOM Region Eighteen : NR DIRNSA FORT MEADE 1118, Denver, CO 5 NR DIRNSA FORT MEADE 1218, Springfield, MO P a UNCLASSIFIED me g UNCL A Serpe ————— Ceo AT GOVERSMENS EXTI
et Ba Nk te INGE OM ee sw [en cunenenasnee — UNC CLASSIFIED Ra cate ee mote UNCLASSIFIED NAVRESREDCOM Region Eighteen (continued) ae NRSG ACT HANZA 1018, St. Louis, MO NRSG ACT MISAWA 318, Lincoln, NE NRSG ACT MISAWA 418, Denver, CO NAVRESREDCOM Region Nineteen NRSG DEPT GUAM 119, Tucson, AZ - NRSG ACT PEARL HARBOR 119, Encino, CA NRSG DEPT SAN-DIEGO 119, San Diego, CA « NRSG DEPT SAN DIEGO 219, Los Angeles, CA NRSG ACT MISAWA 519, Phoenix, AZ NRSG ACT MISAWA 619, Santa Ana, CA NR DIRNSA FORT MEADE 1319, Los Angeles, CA NAVRESREDCOM Region Twenty NRSG DEPT HONO 120, Honolulu, HI NRSG ACT SKAGGS ISLAND 120, Treasure Island, CA NRSG ACT PEARL HARBOR 220, Sacramento, CA NRSG DEPT GUAM 220, San Bruno, CA NRSG ACT PEARL HARBOR 320, San Bruno, CA NRSG ACT MISAWA 720, Treasure Island, CA NRSG ACT MISAWS 820, Salt Lake City, UT NRSG ACT MISAWA 920, Fresno, CA NRSG ACT MISAWA 1020, Pacific Grove, CA NR DIRNSA FORT MEADE 1420, Treasure Island, CA NRSG VTU 2011, Treasure Island, CA NAVRESREDCOM Region Twenty-Two NRSG DEPT HONO 222, Portland, OR NRSG DEPT GUAM 322, Boise, ID NRSG ACT PEARL HARROR 422, Portland, OR NRSG ACT MISAWA 1122, Seattle, WA NR DIRNSA FORT MEADE 1522, Seattle, WA —— = | comesmaasmneeetinedtte -_ UNCLAS SIFIED ___ UNCLASSIFIED ee a eee “'O ty A TVA peepee
e Go '-dd Ad JNRIANG S'S 6 Grains + “tig “UNCLASSIFIED wee ee 7 vs OCTOBER 1°97 REENLICTMENT RESUL D&TE. 2 ENLISTED YEAR - TO IN THE NASR COL a9) SEP TEMGER FOS FYE él 1984) - PIRST Tee Er och ~ Elisible P44 Bite et we - ote 4a = pe fut 47 5 Mm ~ey, ¢ 7 a 4 pana 14%. bn, Qa Tis ran £32.00 F- 147 Or: bh? J FBO aan Say oy TOTAL CT 1047 bbs, £7, 4 SECOND TERM Branch Fligitle Peon) ie timers “ T Lon 7h me % an, iL in R poe ee ays T 71 ever m7 ~ TATA c4 Ene, ng, avy, 3 Fis hire TE ey Facer et Yq. re ae - 1: Vi Clayhinog é ei oes STE Tae + ep ae. Or os H T4 Paree) moos t we on ct . eo. - .! - T 72 = oo te TETAL CT SE. aaa oa oT am eh - WER TEEN 7 ec nt Porn it ay a] Pre a ar. ag, ore q a | jody 0 TOTAL CT nen a7? or. & a é - 7 * ate . Praedmrope ffs a mee UNCLASSIFIED Mees ren ae ee © DOLD AT GOVERNMENT EXPE .Sh
. ~~ ~UNCEASSirtep 10.4.2 Oe a eet ee J vy ; Subis CT REENLISTMENT COMPARED TO ALNAV (1 OCTOBER 1987 - 7 CEPTEMECR 1994) FIRST TERM cT 62.4 ALNAYV . 5a.0 SECOND TERM CT 80.4 . ALNAYV 64,4 THIRD TERM AND BEYOND CT SS.5 ALAA 4.9 ee Dee AS GOVERMENT RCPPese
(Page 3) SECTION 1 SECTION 4 SECTION 5 SECTION 6 SECTION 7 SECTION 8 SECTION 9 SECTION 10 TABLE OF CONTENTS (U) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MISSION 1984: THE YEAR IN REVIEW COMPOSITION AND ORGANIZATION DIVISIONS AND THEIR FUNCTIONS HONAVSECGRU: PERSONNEL ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES WITHIN HQNAVSECGRU ORGANIZATION CHARTS: HQNAVSECGRU KEY MANAGEMENT PRIORITIES AND ISSUES SPECIAL OPERATIONS G50 G51 G52 G54 SIGNALS SSCURITY AND RELATED FUNCTIONS SIGNIFICANT TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENTS COMMUNICATIONS AND ADP SIGNIFICANT LOGISTIC AND MATERIAL DEVELOPMENT PERSONNEL, TRAINING, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY MATERIAL SYSTEM SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
(Section 10.1.1, Page 1) R 0600432 OCT 84 FM ACNSG TO NIDOX INFO SSO CINCCENT COMNAVSECGRU COMUSNAVCENT 6940ESW INSCOMDETNSA Z2EM UNCLAS E F TO ACNSG~-1196-84 SUBJ: MISSION, TASKS AND FUNCTIONS OF ACNSG AND NSGA FORT MEADE A. HOQNSGINST C5450.2C (NOTAL) B. NSGINST 5450.23B (NOTAL) 1. EFFECTIVE 24 OCTOBER 1984, THE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF ASSTCOMNAVSECGRU WILL BE SEPARATED FROM THOSE OF THE CO, NSGA FORT MEADE. 2. ACNSG IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PRESENTING THE COMMANDER, NAVAL SECURITY GROUP TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE AND AS DELINEATED REF A IS ASSIGNED THE FOLLOWING FUNCTIONS: A. SERVE AS THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF COMNAVSECGRU AT NSA/CSS. B. ASSIST COMNAVSECGRU IN THE ROLE OF NAVY ELEMENT COMMANDER, CSS. C. ADVISE COMNAVSECGRU AS TO CURRENT AND FUTURE NSA/CSS PLANS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS IMPACTING UPON NAVAL CRYPTOLOGIC OPERATIONS AND RESOURCES. D. CONDUCT LIAISON WITH THE DIRNSA/CH CSS AND ASSIST IN THE EVALUA- TION OF NAVSECGRU FIELD STATIONS. (PARTICIPATE IN THE FIELD ASSISTANCE PROGRAM). E. PROVIDE SERVICES, INCLUDING COORDINATION OF VISIT SCHEDULING, FOR NAVSECGRU PERSONNEL VISITING NSA/CSS. F. SERVE AS FOCAL POINT FOR NAVSECGRU CSSA REQUIREMENTS AND COORDI- NATES WITH NSA/CSS PROVISION OF TECHNICAL INFORMATION. G. COORDINATE AND PARTICIPATE WITH ASSISTANT COMMANDERS AND STAFF ASSISTANTS IN FORMULATION OF PLANS AND PROGRAMS. NOTE: TO PERFORM THIS MISSION IT IS NECESSARY ACNSG BE INCLUDED AS AN ADDRESSEE ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE WITH NSA/CSS OTHER THAN PURE ANALYTICAL EXCHANGES. 3. THE FUNCTIONS OF NSGA FORT MEADE IA[{?] REF B INCLUDE: A. PERFORM THOSE FUNCTIONS AS A CSSA FOR FLEET COMMANDERS TO INCLUDE CLASSIC PALADIN RESPONSIBILITIES UNCLAS E F T O
(Section 10.1.1, Page 2) /// UNCLASEFTO /// B. MAINTAIN TRANSPORTABLE TECHNICAL LIBRARIES. C. PERFORM NAVY SIGSEC FUNCTIONS D. DIRECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE FLAPMA AND ROMP PROGRAMS. E. BE THE EXECUTIVE AGENT FOR WIDE[?j]AND OPERATIONS OF THE BULLSEYE SYSTEM. F. OPERATE THE SNIF. G. EXERCISE ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL OVER ALL NAVAL PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO NSA/CSS AND NSGA FORT MEADE. 4. THE FOLLOWING PERSONNEL ASSIGNMENTS WILL BE EFFECTIVE 24 oOcT 1984: ACNSG - CAPT [Excised] DEPUTY ACNSG - CDR [Excised] C.0O. NSGA FM - CAPT [Excised] EXECUTIVE OFFICER NSGA FM - CDR’ [Excised] OPERATIONS OFFICER NSGA FM - CDR [Excised] 5. THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED TO ASSIST COMMANDS IN DETERMINING THE CORRECT ADDRESSEE TO USE FOR CORRESPONDENCE. COMMUNICATIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT ARE COMMON, THEREFORE, INTERNAL ACTION WILL ENSURE THAT THE APPROPRIATE OFFICE RECEIVES THE CORRESPONDENCE. CORRESPONDENCE WILL BE ANSWERED BY THE OFFICE HAVING COGNIZANCE. 6. ACNSG, CO NSGA FM, OPS OFFICER NSGA FM AND ADMIN SERVICES ARE LOCATED IN NSA HDQTRS BLDG RM 8A164, PHONE VON 235-6445, COMM 688-6446, GREY 963-3981 AND ASVCM 2320 EXT 33. CO NSGA FM ALSO MAINTAINS AN OFFICE IN BLDG 9805 AS WELL AS THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PHONE VON 234~6491/923-6351, COMM 688~6491/677-6351. #8734 NNNN /// UNCLAS E FTO ///
(Section 10.1.2, Page 1) 1984 ANNUAL HISTORY REPORT FOR NAVAL SECURITY GROUP ACTIVITY FORT MEADE, MARYLAND Classified by: OPNAVINST 551[?].1F Declassify on: Originating Agency’s Determination Required Enclosure (1) UNCLASSIFIED
(Section 10.1.2, Page 2) SECTION I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. CHRONOLOGY OF SIGNIFICANT EVENTS 1. (U) (02 JAN) Family Peer Training Program implemented with ten volunteers trained for home visits. (Refer to Section II, para A.1). 2. (U) (09 JAN) First NASA(??] class held. (Refer to Section II, para. A.2). 3. (U) (18 JAN) Departmental Substance Abuse Representative program began. (Refer to Section II, para. A.3). 4. (U) (JAN) Current Operations and Technical readiness Element (COTRE) established within the Fleet Support Division (OPS-33). (Refer to Section II, para. B.4.[7?]). 5. (U) (JAN) Department of the Navy, Organizational Effectiveness Center, Alexandria, Virginia, began a Command Assessment Survey. (Refer to Section II, para. A.4). 6. (U) ({?]1 FEB) The Sea Nymph Information Facility (SNIF) (OPS-331) took delivery from a contractor organization of Seal Harbor processing software. (Refer to Section II, para. B.4.b). 7. (U) ([{?] FEB) Command random urinalysis program started. Fifty-six members are tested on a monthly basis. (Refer to Section II, para. A.5). 8. (U) (20 FEB) Rape awareness training held for CDO’s and COD’s ky the Army Mental Health Counselor. (Refer to Section II, para. A.6). 9. (U) (29 FEB) CTO[?] [Excised] selected as NAVSECGRUACT FGGM Sailor of the Year. Nomination submitted to COMNAVSECGRU for consideration os their Sailor of the Year candidate. 10. (U) (21 MAR) A Command Fitness Coordinator and Department Fitness Coordinators were appointed to oversee a Command Health and Physical Readiness program per OPNAVNOTE 611[?]. (Refer to Section II, para. A.7). ll. (U) (21-22 MAR) CPS-352 personnel participated in U.S. Naval War College, Newport, Rhode Island C3CM wargames. 12. (U) (23 MAR) First Annual CMSC On-the-Roof [??] (OTRC) Award presented to CTIC([?]ac) [Excised] as the most outstanding enlisted Navy cryptoclogist for 1983. 13. (U) (24 MAR) Command held its first Springfest at [?]lob’s Park with 200 attending. UNCLASSTFIED
(Section 10.1.2, Page 2) 14. (U) (29 MAR) Tri-Service DCN Mobilization Planning Group, chaired by NSGAFM, not to formulated mobilization plan for NSA/CSS. (Refer to Section II, para. A.1[?]). 15. (U) (05 APR) STA1 [Excised] and STA3 [Excised] selected as the Senior and Junior Sailors of the Quarter respectively for January - March 1984. [Excised] 17. (U) (30 APR) NSGA [?Joran’s Volleyball team won Ft. Meade Post Championship. 18. (U) (30 APR - 03 MAY) Inspector General (IG) for COMNAVSECCOM and his team conducted an administrative, material, and personnel inspection of the Command. (Refer to Section II, para [?].1). [Excised] 20. (U) (01 MAY) S[?]R training held by [???] [Excised] for 46 Command CDO’s. (Refer to Section II, para. A.[?]). 21. (U) (04 - 26 May) CTICS(NAC) [Excised] and CTI1(SS/NAC) [Excised] [illegible] Field Assistance Visit (FAV) to NAVCOMMSTA, Rota, Spaion/VQ-2 Rota, Spain; NSGA Athens, Greece; COMI[?]ASTFOR (USS LASALLE (AGF-3)), Panama, Bahrain; NSGA, Clark Air Force Base, Republic of the Philippines VQ-1, Agana, Guam; DIRNAVSECGRUPAC/COMUSNAVCENT, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. 22. (U) (16 - 18 MAY) OPS-352 personnel visited CINCLANFLT and FICEURLANT for liaison and technical discussions. 23. (U) (23 MAY) The Command Ombudsman, Mrs. [Excised] selected as the Command’s first Annual Spouse of the Year. 24. (U) (1[?] JUN - 2[?] JUL CTIC [Excised] and CTIC(NAC) [Excised] participated in the Technical Standards of Readiness (TSOR) Tiger Team ‘work group at NSGA Norfolk. 25. (U) (2{?] JUN - 2[?] JUN) The sister, Mrs. [Excised] and the dauters, [Excised] and [Excised] of the late CTIC [Excised] for whom Dickerson Halli, Bldg. 08[?]3 was named, visited the Command and toured the [?]EQ. Received momentos of the visit. 26. (U) (27 - 28 JUN) COMNAVSECGRU Force Master Chief, CTTCM [Excised] visits. 27. (U) (01 JUL) Command Ombudsman participated in the Domestic Conflict Containment Program Seminar held in Baltimore, Maryland. (Refer to Section II, para. A.9).
(Section 10.1.2, page 3) 28. (U) (05 JUL) STA1 [Excised] and CTI[?] {Excised] selected as the Senior and Junior Sailors of the Quarter respectively for April - June 1984. 29. (U) (17 JUL) Mr. [Excised] fills the Special Services Officer vacancy. 30. (U) (25 JUL) First Substance Abuse Supervisors Seminar held for division officers and chiefs. (Refer to Section II, para. A.1[?]). 31. (U) (27 JUL) Command picnic held at Burba Lake; over 700 attended. 32. (U) (JUL/AUG) CAPT [Excised] LCDR [Excised] and cwo4 [Excised] visited DIi.NSGLANT and NCO LANT HF[?]P Net fo wideband matters. 33. (U) (JUL - NOV) Captain [Excised], USMC, appointed the first Command Physical Security Officer on 19 July. The Physical Security Review Committee was formed on [?]9 August with publication of a Physical Security Plan on [?]8 November. 34. (U) (14 - 19 AUG) Both the Men’s and the Women’s Softball teams took the Championship in the South Mid-Atlantic Navy Sports Conference. 35. (U) (2[?] AUG - [?]7 SEP) OPC-352 personnel conduct a liaison trip to Pacific Fleet SIGSEC units. 36. (U) (AUG) LCDR [Excised] and C[?] [Excised] (OPS-32) visited DIRNSGPAC, CSC PAC, NS[?} PAC [illegible] and TPRU PAC for Wideband matters. 37. (U) (AUG) OPS-351 personnel provided support to CHNAVMAT OPSDC committee for RDT&E. 38. (U) (1[{?] - 14 SEP) NSGA hosts the South Mid-Atlantic Navy Sports Conference Golf Tournament with LT Nayman Smith of NSGA beating out 40 participants. 39. (U) (15 - 26 SEP) LCDR [Excised] and CTICS(NAC) [Excised] [Excised] (OPS-36) made a FAV to DIRNAVSECGRU, London, England; NCS, Rota, Spain and NSGA Athens, Greece. 40. (U) (SEP) LCDR [Excised] and CW04 [Excised] (OPS-32) attended the annual Bullseye Operations Working Group Conference hosted by CINCLANTFLT. 41. (U) (SEP) The second training increment for the Navy Family Peer Program was held. (Refer to Section II, para. A.12). 42. (U) (SEP) CI[?]C [Excised] appointed as the Special Assistant to the Executive Officer functioning as the Family Services Office Manager and client intake coordinator. UNCLASSIFIED
(Section 10.1.2, page 4) 43. (U) (SEP) Navy Family Services Lending Closet established.’ (Refer to Section II, para. A.13). 44. (U) (29 SEP) [(??]0[?} held its first annual Khaki Ball. 45. (U) ([{??] OCT) STI[?] [Excised] relieved cT[?] [Excised] [Excised] as NAVSECGRU FS[?] 46. (U) ([?]7 OCT) CTI1 [Excised] and CTI3 [Excised] selected as the Senior and Junior Sailor of the Quarter respectiviely for July - September 1984. 47. (U) (1if[U] OCT) Celebrated the Navy’s 200th birthday with a dinner-dance held at the Ramada Inn, Lanham, Maryland, with CO[??] [Excised] as guest speaker. 48. (U) (24 OCT) Captain [Excised] relieved Captain [Excised] [Excised] in a Change of Command Ceremony at Gaffney Sports Arena. (Refer to Section II, para. [?].2). 49. (U) (24 OCT) Mrs. [Excised] awarded the Outstanding Ombudsman award by RADM [Excised] Director, Navy Human Resources Management Office. 50. (U) (24 OCT) Civilian Meritorious Service Medal was awarded to Mrs. [Excised] NSGA’s A[???]/Awards coordinator, for sustained superior performance. 51. (U) ({?]2 NOV) IBM Personal Computer equipment was received and distributed to the NFDF Wideband Division, Fleet Support Division, Classic Paladin Division, Administrative Support and Liaison Staff. 52. (U) ({?]6 NOV) Per COMNAVSECGRU message 0206202 NOV 24, Counter Intelligence Polygraph examinations began for all USN/USMC military members assigned NSA/CSS UIC 63887. (Refer to Section II, para. A.14). 53. (U) ([?]6 NOV) First Class Petty Officers’ Association established at the Command. [Excised] {Excised} 55. (U) (27 NOV - 22 DEC) CTIC(NAC) [Exciseaj and CTIC(SS/NAC) [Excised] (OPS-36 attended the NAVEUR Direct Support Conference in Naples, Italy. 56. (U) (30 NOV) Zenith Z-12[?] micro-computers installed in Support Department.
(Section 10.1.2, page 5) (Excised ] 58. (U) (NOV/DEC) CW04 [Excised] (OES~32) visited USN-18, USN-19, and USN-838 for Wideband matters. 59. (U) (16 DEC) Former Command Master Chief CT{?]CM [Excised] USN (RET) died of cancer. A memorial service was held at the Post Chapel Center on 19 December.
(Section 10.2.1, page 1) UNCLASSIFIED SECTION Ii: HISTORICAL NARRATIVE A. SUPPORT DEPARTMENT 1. (U) The Naval Security Group Activity Family Peer Program held its first two week training seminar. Ten Peer Program Home Visitors were trained in the area of early childhood development, resource availability, and general support procedures that would enable them to enter into support relationships with identified disfunctional families. The training was directed under the guidance of a consultant from the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, Yosilanti, Michigan. This program is one of three pilot programs that the Navy has adopted to address the issues of family wellness and act as a prevention of child abuse and neglect. 2. (U) The first Navy Substance Abuse Prevention Program (NASAPP) class was held at NSGA. Subsequent classes were held every other month for the remainder of the year. An average of 22 people, both officer and enlisted, attended each class. 3. (U) A Department Substance Abuse Representative (DSAR) was appointed for each department. The DSAR’s are trained to present GMT blocks on substance abuse, act as initial information points for department personnel, and are members of the Command Substance Abuse Council. 4. (U) A Command Assessment Survey was conducted by the Navy Organizational &ffectiveness Center in January. A cross-sectional representation of 97 personnel were interviewed. In April, a Command Assessment Working Group (CAWG) was established to look at the problem areas and made recommendations to the Commanding Officer for implementing findings of the survey. 5. (U) Fifty to sixty Command members are being tested monthly under the Command’s Random Urinalysis Program using the unit S.T. (single test) portable detection machine by the Syva Corporation. Paid for by CNO, the test kit is effective in the detection of nine different drug Classifications. 6. (U) Five Rape Awareness classes were held for 262 females and 110 CDO/OODs by the Army Mental Health Counselor, SPS [Excised] Two Rape Prevention classes were given at NSGA and NSA by Detective Bonnie [?]elsa of the Anne Arundel County Police Sex Crime Unit. 7. (U) A Command Health and Readiness Program was established to define criteria for physical fitness and weight control standards. Ensign Roy Ober was appointed to oversee the program and advise the Commanding Officer on health and fitness matters. Twenty personnel were selected to serve as department fitness coordinators with responsibility of monitoring the yearly PT test and the Mandatory Conditioning Program. The Conditioning Program is given twice daily, 5 days a week for personnel not meeting required body fat or fitness standards and consists of a 45 minute exercise session including the 1.5 mile run or the optional 500 yard swim. UNCLASSIFIED
(Section 10.2.1, page 2) UNCLASSIFIED 8. (U) Four 4-hour CPR classes were given by the Command Corpsman, HM2 [Excised] for 46 CDO waterstanders. The on-going program educates, identifies, and provides on hand training in CPR prevention and rescue methods. Upon completion, the CDOs are certified in level I - Heart Association. 9. (U) The Command Family Ombudsman participated, along with two counselors from the Navy Family Service Center, Annapolis, in the Domestic Conflict Containment Program Seminar in Baltimore, Maryland. This seminar provided training necessary to facilitate a ten-week group therapy program designed to eliminate physical violence from the marital family relationships. This invaluable training has enabled our N[??]C counselors to facilitate two group therapy sessions at Ft. Meade to date. The first session was held in August/September; the second in November/December. 10. (U) The first Substance Abuse Supervisors Seminar was held with 35 division officers/division chiefs attending. A presentation from SAC, Legal, SSO, and Medical participated, each explaining their function and how this Command’s policies and procedures were applied. This was followed by a question and answer session. These seminars are held quarterly. 11. (U) This year, NSGA Ft. Meade published its first Physical Security Plan as Annex I to its Disaster Preparedness Plan. Physical security awareness has been elevated both within the Command and in conjunction with the National Security Agency. Plans have been made with other cryptologic elements and the NSA to add a security perimeter around the Troop Support area. 12. (U) The Second training increment for the Navy Family Peer Program was held. Eight new Home Visitors participated in this two-week session. Six of the previously trained volunteers transferred, leaving a total of 14 trained Home Visitors by September. By the end of 1984, seventeen families were the recipients of the Peer Program’s support and guidance. 13. (U) An immediate need for temporary furnishings and lending closet items was identified and the task of collecting and distributing the items was established. The Command allocated space in one of two NSGA warehouses for the storage of these items when not in use. 14. (U) In response to new DOD and NSA guidelines, the Naval Investigative Service began polygraph exams in November for all USN/USMC Military personnel assigned to UIC 639[?]7. Two polygraphers conduct two exams a day, four days a week starting with personnel who checked on board since 01 October. As of 21 December, 36 NSGA FCSM individuals were tested. 15. (U) On 29 March 1984, the first in a continuing series of Tri- Service Mobilization Planning group meetings was held for the purpose of developing an SCE mobilization plan. Objectives of the plan would be to smooth the accession of more than 2,000 military reservists into the NSA/CSS organization in the event of full or partial mobilization. During subsequent meetings, a draft mobilization plan was developed addressing UNCLASSIFIED
(Section 10.2.1, page 3) various personnel, administrative, security and logistics matters. The working group has an objective of presenting a workable plan for testing purposes during the second quarter of calandar year 1985. B. OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT 1. {U) The Command Inspection was conducted by the Inspector General. Thirteen formal and informal recommendations were identified based on findings of the IG tour. Three recommendations applied to the Operations Department and all actions were reported complete in the 9 October 1984 Quarterly Implementation Status Report. 2. (U) Captain [Excised] relieved Captain [Excised] in a Change of Command Ceremony at the Gaffney Sports Arena on 24 October. The duties and responsibilities of the Assistant Commander, Naval Security Group were separated from those of the Commanding Officer, Naval Security Group Activity Fort Meade. Responsibility for the following duties was assigned to ASSTCOMNAVSECGRU: a. (U) Serve as the personal representative of COMNAVSECGRU at NSA/CSS. b. (U) Assist COMNAVSECGRU in the role of Navy element command, CSS. c. (U) Advise COMNAVSECGRU as to current and future NSA/CSS plans, policies and programs impacting upon Naval cryptologic operations and resources. d. (U) Conduct liaison with DIRNSA/CH CSS and assist in the evaluation of NAVSECGRU field stations. (Participate in the Field Assistance Program). e. (U) Provide services, including coordination of visit scheduling, for NAVSECGRU personnel visiting NSA/CSS. f. (U) Serve as a focal point for NAVSECGRU CSSA requirements and coordinates with NSA/CSS provision of technical information. g. (U) Coordinate and participate with Assistant Commanders and Staff Assistants in formulations of plans and programs. h. (U) The NAVSECGRUACT Operations Officer no longer performs the functions of Deputy, ASSTCOMNAVSECGRU. 3. (U) Wideband Operations Control Division (OPS~32) a. (U) Assisted, advised and supported ACNSG/CO NAVSECGRUACT Fort Meade, in his responsibilities for monitoring the effectiveness, exercising coverage control authority and overall coordination of the wideband portion of the U.S. Navy BULLSEYE System operations. UNCLASSIFIED
(Section 10.2.1, page 4) b. (U) In August, 1982, AC [??]} promulgated a worldwide Preventive Maintenance (PM) schedule for wideband stations. Numerous changes had been made subsequently. In November, 1984, ACUSG consolidated all changes, cancelled the August 1982 message and issued a Worldwide Wideband PM Schedule Recap. 4. (U) Fleet Support Division (OPS-33) a. (U) January/February marked the inception and establishment of the Current Operations and Technical Readiness Element (COTRE) (OPS-337) within the Fleet Support Division. In support of data handling and storage requirements, OPS-337 acquiv~ed on [?]elt[{?] [?]ate microcomputer. Subse- quently, appropriate software was also acquired. b. (U) The Sea Nymph Information Facility (SNIF) took delivery from a contractor organization of the Seal Harbor post-mission processing software on 1 February. This software was designed and written to enable the NSIF to support Sea Nymph Release IV deployments. During calendar year 1984, SNIF provided pre-mission database support and post~mission data processing for 4 Atlantic Fleet Sea Nymph Release IV deployments. Additionally, SNIF assisted the Pacific Support Facility at NSGA Misawa, Japan in pre-mission database support for two Pacific Fleet Sea Nymph missions. With the new processing software, post mission processing time was reduced to approxamately two weeks. [Excised] 5. (U) Foreign Language Proficiency Maintenance (FLAPMA) (OPS~-34) a. (U) Calendar year 1984 FLAPMA Test Cycle: From January to February, 1[{?]12 FLAPMA examinations were administered to 926 Navy and 186 USMC cryptolinguists in the Arabic, Chinese Mandarin, French, Hebrew, Korean, Russian, and Spanish languages. Overall 45.5% examinees demonstrated a satisfactory knowledge of general radiotelephone duties; of these, 17.2% were evaluated as being language qualified for Direct Support operations. The following commands received the [..illegible..] Language Proficiency Award" based on cryptologic achievement on the calendar year 1984 examinations: HIGHEST ACHIEVEMENT AWARD: Large Command NAVSECGRUACT Athens Small Command NAVSECGRUDET Barbers Point [Excised]
(Section 10.2.1, page 5) MOST IMPROVED AWARD Large Command NAVSECGRUACT Key West Small Command NAVSECGRUACT [?]anze b. U) ROMP Program Status iii. (U) In addition to 13 STUNs published during the year, eight existing STUNS were completely revised. [Excised] c. (U) FLAPMA Language Training Assistance Visits (LAV). During calendar year 1984, four LTAVs were conducted to commands in Europe, the Pacific, the Caribbean, and CONUS. d. (U) Assistance to FM[?] Marine Amphibious Units (MAU). From O01 January to 05 April, SCT [Excised] supported the 24th and 32nd MAUs, ashore in Beirut, Lebanon. 10 [Excised]
(Section 10.2.1, page 6) e. (U) Assistance to the Asian Radiotelephone (S/T) SIGINT Training Advisory Committee (STAC). From 25 to 30 November, two members of OPS-34 attended the Asian P/T STAC conference at Goodfellow Air Force Base. CTIC [Excised] represented the Director of the FLAPMA Office, and CTI1 Wolf represented DIRNAVSECGRUPAC in evaluating and recommending changes to the Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese P/T curriculua. 6. (U) SIGSEC (OPS~-35) a. (U) SIGSEC Support to [illegible] (OPS-351) {Excised} b. (U) Threat Assessment (OPS-352) [Excised] iii. (U) Continued updating NAVSECGRU Working Aide on space, land, AGI, and cof{?jatants. c. (U) CMS/Manual Code System ([???]-353) i. (U) Conducted thirteen CMS visits throughout the year. ii. (U) Participated in two CMS inspections. 11 [Excised]
(Section 10.2.1, page 7) UNCLASSIFIED 7. (U) Classic Paladin (OPS-36) a. (U) During calendar year 1984, Classic Paladin personn:.1 accrued a total of 5568 days deployed. Paladin airborne personnel amassed a total of 4679.3 flight hours during the year. b. (U) Current enlisted billet structure was increased to 48. UNCLASSIFIED 12