HISTORY  OF  THE 
AIR  FORCE  INTELLIGENCE  SERVICE 
1  JANUARY-31  DECEMBER  1983 
FORT  BELVOIR,  VIRGINIA  22060 
VOLUME  l-NARRATIVE  AND  APPENDICES 
(THIS  COVER  IS  UNCLASSIFIED)
wistoRY OF THE AER PORCE INTELLIGENCE SERVICE December 1983 1 damary ~ Volwne 1: Narrative and Appendizes by DIANE T, PUTNEY Chief, Historical Research Office Editorial Assistance by KATHY HOWARD _._= ara ‘Bd, 4 int tema OG one Vice Commander
The      historian's      najcT      object ive      in      preparing      this     XF2S 
history    was    to     research     and    write 
the     narrative    using    primry 
t     the     emphasis     upon     priiaary 
sources    —   whether   the    sources  were -the    "traditional'   written   and 
printed    dorawntE    or   vere    the   oral    i itatsmeate    of   key   participants 
in  events,    obtained  through  interviGi ra  and  briefings. 
There    are    576    supporting    docm tents    acccnqpariying    this    boo*. 
voluaefi,        As    an    aid    to    the 
reader,    footnotes   appear  at   the   bott dd  of -the  narrative  pages,    an* 
each     eopparting     fiocuwrit     is     assiq ned     an     -ED'     mffifcer.          If     a 
policy-maker,      or     planning     analyst 
Editorial  Style  Guide  froc  tie  Ofiice  of  Air  -force  Kistory  in 
The  Chicago  Manual  of  Style.  13t*  edition ,  Seme  general  "mleE 
followed  were  to  1)  use  past  tense.  21  use  lover  case  spellings 
and      3)      re-vrite      jargon.  Soaetimes      the     historian      correcte 
Although   being  new   to  ftTIS   and    "the    intelligence    crammaity . " 
a  history  useful   to  some  and  .instructive  for  .many. 
HIAKE  T.    PUTNEY  ^
titsoship  . 
Sesicir  Enlisted  Adrisor  as  ACS/I'S  SepxeEE 
lontir.uity  within  the  APIS/CV  ana  WSAC   . 
I   -   1STEJ.IEENCE   CFEBATCCKS    - 
..Key  BrieEing  Topics  . 
JiapicroBfl  CCKD  .    . 
Camouflage     .    .    . 
CCSE  Status  Reports  . 
liaets  ?oU      ...... 
Requests  for  Data  from  o 
Acquiring  Access  to  Data 
E  Administrative  REEponaiMlity  .
HATCH  Upgrade   
Current  Intelligence  Briefings        
Quarterly  Briefings  fox  W/CBS      ....... 
TARGET   INTELI.IGESCE        
 
Organization      .................. 
Targeting  Hatters   „........-.----- 
Conferences    
 
Standardised  Futuristic  Data  flase 
Conference      .    
 
Air  Force  Target  Intelligence  Conference. 
Interdiction  and  Standoff  Study  .----.- 
Presiding  Technical.  Adyice   
.Mr  Conwander  and  Staff  Bnrfighting 
Manual      _..-....-.....-- 
Coammn is t-wor Id  Weanoneeriiig  Handbook   .    . 
Tasking  Other  Agencies      ........... 
In^recisely- located  Targets   
Seminar  for  Waaponearing  Instructors      -    - 
Airfield  Critical  Nodes     
Incendiary  Effects  of  Weapons   ...... 
GATOR  Hice  Planning  Information   ..... 
PSCOK  Staff  Assistance  Visit        
Fan ding  for  JTCS/HE  _...___._.... 
Mapping,    Charting,    and  Geodesy      ......... 
Coordination  of  MCSG  Requirements  and 
Products      ....      
■KSG  Task   Force   
 
Agreement  with  AFSC   
- 
Federal  Digital  Cartographic  Programs  .... 
Policy  Statement  on  Digital  Data  Support  .  . 
Geographic  Information  Systems  Wor&ing  Group. 
Geodetic  and .Geophysical  Requirements  .... 
ABAP5  .Terminal   Installation    ......... 
MCSG  Conference  .    ...   ,   
Personnel  Matters   .  »   .    .    ..    .    .._-.....    . 
CHAPTER  17—  T&CEIXJGEBCE  ZDGCSTWB  JJJD:XBA1NING     .... 
JDXWT  SEHTICES  SCPPOKT     ..    .   ..   
Pivotal  rear      ................... 
Revised  Mission  Statement  ............ 
Background      .    .    _    .  ^    .    ............. 
DODD   1300.7   ..  . 
 
Directorate  Established  ........... 
Events  of    19B3   ■   
- 
Request  froo  the  OiaJLrnan,    JCS      ....... 
Action  Initiated  to  Revise  DODD  I3DQ.7  .  .  . 
Subcommittee  on  Military  Readiness  Hearing  . 
Heortraniiation  Plan  .............
;ode  of  Conduct  Filn  Project  . 
Production  of  Contingency  &iides 
!stablishae:it  of  Llbrary/Orchlve 
Specialist  puota 
lists   for  Additicna 
md  Be  furbishing  Pxojec 
sntations   
on  Visit  Cancelled      .    . 
Publications  in  13B3 
usl  fieviev  .    -    .    . 
Mission  and  Defense  Attache  System 
Selection  Panels 
Enlisted  Solecte 
Ail  Attache  Incentive  Supply  Frogi 
Support  on  Station     .    .    .   .    . 
Uta-Tour  Reports      ........ 
Promotion  Statistics      ...... 
BnBchefluleo'  Return*  from  Suticm
aaaTy  akd  ccmhohicatiohs  iftsacEHEStt    -  .  -  . 
Polygraph  in  Abeyance  -    .......... 
Anecdo'cal  Study   
Resumption  of  Periodic  Reinvestigations  .    . 
SSI  Case  Processing  Tine      .......... 
Microfilmed  and  Computerized  Hata  Bases   .    . 
SCI  Billet  Processing   
4C  System   -.   
-    - 
Statistical  Sumrtary  of  Personnel  Security 
Activity      
 
Publications        
Protection  of  SCI  after  131-007  Snootdovn    . 
Revitaliiation  of   I/5AV  Program    
Security  Hanageaent  Course   
Support  for  CDHONR  Conferences      .    .    .    . 
Consolidated  SIGIST  -Catalog   
FELLIGENCK  RESERVE  FORCES   
Mission  and  Organization      ......... 
t  Strength   
Individual  Mobiliiation  Angaenteea     .    .    .    . 
Detacbed  Training  Sites    .......... 
Projects      ................. 
Training     ................. 
Intelligence  Officer  ftTSC  Cenwersinna  .    .    . 
Eetrainabiiity  of  702XQ«   
HIM1NT  Training  .............. 
Revised  language  Shi  11  Eatings      .....    .    . 
Workshops      ............ 
Administering  the  KE  Program    .„    ......    . 
POM  Submissions   
Air  Force  Audit  Agnncy  Report  .  -  -  .  . 
Consideration  of  Perswmel  Consolijiatii: 
Evaluations  and  Awards     .
?Uisr.  Personnel   Functions    223 
ICDP   for  General   Intelligence  Per»cmnel    ....  223 
Youth  Employment  Program      ...........  225 
Safety,    Security,   Special   Investigation 
Civilian   Career  Program       .....  226 
li-tary  Personnel  Resources     .  227 
Officer  Banning    227 
Enlisted  Manning      
  226 
Promotions   -  229 
Appoinrnents    230 
GERs   and  APRs    231 
Military  Decorations  Program     -    231 
Recognition  Prograa  ......---...-.  232 
aining.    Education,    and  Career  Development   ....  234 
telligence  Training  Programs      .....       237 
Air  Force  Area   Specialist  Program      239 
CCI   Exceptional   Intelligence  Analyst  Program-    .  239 
Defense   Advanced  Language  and  Area   Studies 
Quality  of  Analysis  Program    240 
Ceiease  Academic  Research  Support  Program  .    .    .  240 
HEAECSAKTERS ,    AIR  FORCE  SPECIAL  ACTIVITIES  CEOTEF.   ...  2-44 
-SiSKion    244 
Organ  izati  on    244 
Personnel    245 
Plans,    Resources,    and  Support    245 
Plans  and  Policy    246 
HOTUNT  Cnmmunicatinns  . 
A7SAC  Briefing  Program 
Management  Effectiveness 
Support  Agreements  and  Memoranda  of 
Resource  Management   ...  ............... 
Fiscal  Programs   ............. 
Logistics  ................ 
Career  •Management  and  Training     .   .   .   .   . 
Operations     ............... 
Security     ............... 
Operations  Snpport     ......... 
CHBPTER-VXI  -  APIS  SPECIAL  S3SFF   
Accounting  and  Finance      ...      
Management  and  Budget   ......... 
Study  of  Civilian  Hiring  Procedure!
Telephone  Study 
HD  PRCGHAKS   BI7IS 
Inspections   ................. 
Management  Effectiveness  Inspections.  .  . 
Intelligence  Oversight  Inspections  -  -  - 
Over— the— Shoulder  Inspections   ...... 
Special   Inquiry   
Fraud,    Waste.    and  Abuse  Prevention  Activities 
MANPOWER  AHD  OBGamzXriON  E 
Sew  Regulations  Published   
Manpower  Authorisations  and  allocations   . 
"Pool"  for  Manpower  Trade-offa        
Three  Elements   Reorganized   
Exemption  from  ¥*Gitct±uia£  Beviews   .    .   .   - 
Speoia 
3TRS 
3  Becoaau nda tions  to  Eliminate 
Publications 
Documentation  Management      ...... 
Systeas  Management   
Information  Security  Prograo  ftmager 
3BI.IC  AFFAIRS   
The  Intelligencer  .Public 
loss  of  Typesetting 
Press  Coverage  of  "BIDGE  KDKHER     . 
Revision  of  EXFLAB  01-63      .   - 
Photographic  Support     .    ...... 
Submission  for  Air  force  Magazine 
LOGISTICS  DIVISION  .  .  . 
Transportation  .  .  - 
facilities  BpgxAde  an 
Contracting  Support  £■
Goals   for   1984      
 
LOCATION  ET  -  POFT  aETRICT 
-  XIRHAND  MB.    HEV  1! 
Organxiation      .......      
Operations      
 
OPERATING  LOCATION    T   -   EGL.1N   i?B,    TURUOli    .
AFIS  Organizational  Chait 
Kaj.  Gen.  Janes  C.  Ptant* 
Brig.  Geo.  Paul  S,  Martin 
Col.    William  B.  Shermo 
Hap  of  Grenada 
First  learn  Deployed  ' 
Second  Team  Deployed 
t  Eitploltati. 
Air  Attache  to  Poland 
Air  Attache  to  the  NetherlanflH 
Air  Attache  to  Japaji 
Great  Soil  of  China 
Hap  of  Detached  Training .Sites
Audi*    Agency    -issues    its 
;     □£    Air    Force     Inteili- 
Jta&iliia'tiim       Augaentee 
•  TDe  Defense  Investigative  Eersi 
esunea  conducting  Periodic  Keinvestigstio 
I  Special  Background  Investigations. 
n<3   E s cape /?r isomer    of   Bar   vaa    an   iix   For 
i   Military    Readiness 
B  on  Armed  Senricse-
lin   the   Director 
i    Maj.       Gen-       Jafflea 
Pfaafci  ansraed 
chief  of  staff, 
intelligence  (ACS/I),  replacing  «a;j.  Gen. 
John  S.   Salts. 
of        Security
Operating       Location 
MB  Col.  Shernan  becaae  chairman  of 
ftF/IB  -  A?IS  Meiit  Pay  Unit  ConniitI.ee 
the    £F/IN'  -    AF2S    Civilian    Incentive    Awa 
■R  Col.  JacJi  Korris  retired  as  the 
tecntive  officer  to  the  ACS/I,  enaing 
nirty-five  years   of  active  duty  with  the  Air
■  sponsored  by  t 
f  Attache  Affairs  nominated  3S  offici 
x>    the    Defease    Intelligence   Agency    ; 
e  Defense  Attache  Systett.
AFLS Operating Location Oi-ET revised AFR 200-3, “The Medacal Intellagence Progra: “ ta Delered per $ U.S.C. 52>) (1)
Directive  5100.1  and  Air  Farce  Regulation  55—13 
fin     Force     to     provide     an     organization     capable     of 
equate,    timely,    and  reliable   intelligence    for    the   Air 
:  Department  of  Defense.  The  Air  Force  Intelligence 
a      major      element      of      the     Air      Fores      intelligence 
establishes  to  satisfy  these   responsibilities.' 
intelligence,     ana    3)     con  dating    programs    designed    to    ensure    that 
intelligence      support      within      the      Air      force      according      to      the 
appropriate,        provides 
intelligence    positions,     as    reqoir=a    by    HQ    25AF,      in     anpport     of 
service,     interdepartmental,     and    other    agency    intelligence    issues 
and  actions.      Participates  as  required  in  these  actions. 
4.      Monitors         designated        Air         Force         intelligence 
and     sonic     systems     and     other     technical     disciplines     to     satisfy 
assigned    Air    Force    intelligence    lespons ibil i ti es    in    response    to 
requirement
.    the    Defense     Intelligence    Agency 
aan     source     intelligence     {HtJKINT} 
and    monitors     as     required     other 
l    conduct**!  -Co    satisfy    Air    Force. 
G.  ttanage3  and  conducts  ffiUCNT  collection  operations 
in  support  of  Air  Force.  DOD  and  national  requlrerants ;  recomnends 
HUKIWr  policy  as  required. 
7.      Collates.           processes,           and          disseminates  as 
appropriate     current     operational     intelligence,      derived     from  all 
sources,       to      apprise      HO.      OSAP      and      air      Force      coamanders  of 
intelligence  affecting  global  Mr  Force  aisaiona  and  resources. 
information      associated      with      the      t 
intelligence    to    US    13SAF    and    Air    Force    coasmanoers    re  spans  is 
tie  efflplnyraent  and  evaluation  of  those  systems. 
ievslopoent  phase    of 
1D.      BesearcfeeiS. 
(SIGINT). 
12.  Serves  as  the  responsible  agency  and  point  of 
contact  for  the  Defense  Mapping  agency  (B«A>  on  mapping,  charting 
and  geodesy  activities   (excluding  aerial  surveys). 
worldwide  Air  Force   Intel 
14.  Sanages  the  worldvide  Air  Force  Special  Security 
Office  [AFSSO)  and  Special  Activities  Office  {SAO)  systems,  by 
insuring  compliance  with  cotapaxtaented  intelligence  security 
policy.  special         "intelligence  telecomanni cations  policy, 
communications  security  policy  and  procedures.  AFSSO  and  SAO 
administrative  procedures  and  the  physical  security,  billet 
management  and  personnel  clearance  programs  to  insure  the  security 
of  such  intelligence  at  all  organizational  levels. 
15.      As      directed     by      H£     OSAF,      develops      capabilities     for
a.      The   S.TI&    consists    af    a    headquarters,    snfl    othe: 
Iff. 
USA;.     .     .     .    The    comaander,    AFXE,    exercises    cotoaand    iuris- 
;tion over  assignee  units,    personnel,   property,    and  funds. 
b.      AF2S   provides   specialist    intelligence    represen- 
livit ts,     and    board    ai-.d    cormittee    nembership    as    required    by    H; 
c.      SFIS     is    designated    as    the    CSAF   Automatic    Data 
:andLins  Systeir.  [IDSSi  and  is  delegated  ADP  authorities  ar.c 
ses  All?  responsibilities  aoder  the  prtnrlsions  of  ATK  300-i 
S  300-U. 
OEGft!nZKT10K 
general  and  a  senior  enlisted  advisor.  2!  nine 
eight  special  Jtaff  units,  4)  tie  Air  Force 
Center  1AF5AC),    ami  5)   nix  operating  locations. 
JP     There     were     no 
«ajor 
changes    within    the    overall    APIS 
organisation    this    year. 
There 
!    were,     however,     two    new    operating 
locations   established,    CB >ET  at Fort  DetricJt.    Maryland  and  CSi-S   at 
Suit land.      Maryland. 1 
the      Directorate      °r      Evasion      and 
Escape/Prisoner    of   War    < 
is  renamed   the  Directorate   of  Joint 
Services  Support  lli*X}}  .* 
'For  .   feull.l  4i*t 
,    see  Chapter  TCEII. 
*See  Chapter  XV,
icSiHcnt*.    and  operating  loc 
special      activities 
Sf?ESlLB     Liiimni  CCWMID  _J     JSIUSTIO
VFIS  and  AF/IK   RelationEhir 
rapport  loin  to  the  Headquarters.  OniteS  Sta-tcE  Ait  Force.  Office 
9f  the  Assistant  Chief  of  Staff.  Intelligence,  which  was  corasnded 
=y  a  major  general  who  was  the  assistant  chief  of  utaff.  intelli- 
gence     (flCE/1).-  His     office     (AT/IK)      consisted     of     a     ecmand 
Intelligence    Plans    and    Eysteas    UNY),    ana 
■P  The  conmander  of  ATIS  {iTIB/CCI  wee  a  brigadier  general 
who  was  also  the  deputy  asElEtant  chief  of  staff,  intelligence 
{DftCE/1).'      The  AP/IN   and  AFIS/CC  mre    collocated   in  the   Pentagon 
S  Special  Staff.  = 
'Organization
BOs INS ¥a.006-5 BA ne 650.3 a HQTS SUPPORT nIssTR coeND GRD asec coanget occucred thie year vithin we MI and AFIS command stracture,' ACS/T Change of Command BBB om + soty, 103. con. dames C. Pfaute aszuned the dottes as te nspistant chief of staff. intelligence (AGS/1), replacing tay. Gens Jono B. taste, che aasamed comand of the Electronic Security Comaad. San Antonio, Texas. Imvediately prior to becoming the ACS/T, General Beauty was asrector for tacatlagence, Fk. desdyeerters Pacific Conant, Coup & 8, Smith, Mavens The genera! wee fifty-three years of age, and had bean pegnoted to major general 4 March 1961, with date of rank + Aug 1977.7 in 1953 ne was graduated from the U.S. Mucitary Acadesy, West Pout, New York, with a bachelor's degree in military eng.reerang He receaved a master s degree .n .nterna~ taonal organscation from the American University and vas a graduate of tne National War College. Fanse Air Force Bate, Okianoun, inizieliy assigned av September Tone ta she aiven Teoop carrier Growp at Sewnre Air Force Bose. Tenneasee, ne teansferced on Septenper 1958 eo tne 30nd AG Qivssion at buseus-Famvite Air Base. Feance- In done 1960 General Fiantz was assigned te the University of Maryland s Air Force Reserve Officers’ Training Corps Detachment 330. In September 1964 he took command of the Flight Operations Section of the Aur Force Advisory Group at Tan Son Nhut Aur Base, Republic of Vietnam, where he flew 188 conbat missions. In January 1966, General Sfautz was assigned to the Arr Force Eastern Test Range at Patrick Air Force Rase, Florida. His next two assigments were with Headquarters Air Force Systems Tpor key personnel in ai] APIS units, see individual chapters QBsogeapnecal Information Sheet (QB varor cesersi Janes C. Peautz, SAE/PA, Apr #0, 805
Concepts    and    Objectives,    headquarter 
Relations    for   a    one-year    fellowship   i 
istant     secretary    of    Defense    for    2 
July     1975,      later     becoming     exec- 
Secretary    of    Defense    for    Internati 
Staff, 
i.    in  April    19B0, 
command  pilot   with   6.000    flj 
•■ash     focr    i 
Republic 
f      staff. 
inte lliger.se 
a.     C  design 
;chUyler 
Intellit 
forty-sev an    ye; irs    of    , 
Western  Kentucky  State  College  in  1957  and  »a:  cotfimissicned  a 
second  lieutenant  through  the  Air  Force  Reserve  Officers'  Training 
Corps  program.  General  Martin  completed  the  Haval  War  College, 
Newport.  Rhode  Island,  and  earned  a  master's  degree  in  management 
fro*  Central  Michigan  University  in   197E. 
Of  Following  pilot  training  at  Moore  Air  Farce  Base,  Texas, 
and  Greenville  Air  Force  Base.  Mississippi,  General  Martin  flew 
KC-97  tankers  with  the  2nd  Boafljardaent  Wing,  Hunter  Air  Force 
Base,      Georgia.        .In    April     196a    he    transferred     to     the     46th     Air
jEneral    was    assigned    to    the    4)52nd    Strategic  Wins. 
ce   Base.    Alaska,    from  July   1962   to  .June    1965.    where 
i  Strategic  Reconnaissance  Wing  at  Offatt  Aix  Force 
and  in  Hay  1967  moved  to  rokota  Sir  Base.  Japan, 
with  Detachment  1,  3rd  Air  Division.  Six  months  later  he  was 
assigned  to  the  82nd  Strategic  Reconnaissance  Squadron  at  Kadena 
Air  Base,  Okinawa,  where  he  nerved  as  bji  aircraft  conmander  in  the 
wing  Standardization  Division,  flying  1D.3  SC-135  coabat  missions 
□vex  Southeast  Asia. 
Htt     Frna  September   1969 
Up  General  Martin  i 
Squadron  at  Grissom  Air  F 
later   served  as    deputy  bas 
i    to  Kavenber  1970,    Gt aneral  Kartin  was 
rislon,    Osan  Air  Base, 
r.         Upon    his    returr i     to     the     United 
the      strategic 
.at    of    the    Electronic ■   Warfare  Branch, 
It    command    of    the    305 th    Air   Refuelinc 
:e   Base.    Indiana,     in April    1974.        He 
lonmander  and  acting  I 
■ed    tc    Sheffiya    Air    Force    Base.    Alaska, 
;    1.    6th  Strategic   Wing  until   enterisic 
iliowing    gradiiaticm     ; in     1977,      he     was 
,     Hawaii,    where    he   served   as   chief   of 
Division,      J-2,      £o r      C.S.       Pacific 
joined     the 
Security Ccraaanq I,    Kelly 
hi .r   For ce  Base,    Texas,    i 
mer 
e   he    : served    as 
netal 
roe     G 
Maryland, 
in     Si aptenber 
SSI      i ind     became      the 
Hat: tonal 
Security 
Agency's chief  o ■f   tactic :al 
syste. 
as.    research   and 
engi 
-neeri 
fll A    ccm= land  pil 
with 
snore    than    6, BOO 
fly: Lng    h< mrs,    his 
decora 
nd 
2  s     included     the 
Del 
Service 
Medal, 
legion 
o 
rit,       Distinguish! !d 
Flyin, j      Cross, 
Keritorio us    Sen 
Air 
Medal    with    nine 
leaf 
clusters 
and  Air  Force  Cawaecdati 
.on 
Medal with  three  oak  leaf dust. 
ers.1 
New  Senio r  Enlis tea  Advi .sen 
||B  On  15  Septsn&er,  CMSgt  Hichard  ~B.  Gantrler 
responsibilities  as  the  new  AFIS  senior  enlisted  advisor.  He 
replaced  OSgt  William  H.  Strickland,  who  attended  the  Senioi 
unlisted  Intelligence  Program  at  the  Defense  Intelligence  Agency. 
Since  Jane  19S1,  Chief  Gantaler  was  the  senior  enlisted  advisor 
Ear  the  69!0th  Electronic  Security  Ming,  Lindsey  Air  Station. 
Kieshaden,      Germany.  The     chief     was     thirty-nine     years     old.      a
:    Officer    Academy    ; 
-  Torce   in   3nne    1962    ana   received 
9     at      Indiana      University.  Frew. 
KaJtannai    Ail    Station. 
££  After  attending  intermediate  Russian  language  school  for 
a  year  at  Syracuse  University.  He"  York,  he  was  assignee  to  the 
59 16th  Security  Squadron.  Sbein  Main  Air  Base,  Germany.  From 
Harch  1966  to  December  19GS .  he  served  aE  an  airborne  intercept 
operator,  airborne  analyst,  and  flight  chief  in  analysis  and 
reporting.  In    £«cenber     1968     he     was     assigned     to    Detachment     1, 
01  Chief  Gar.tzier  was  transferred  in  August  1971  to  the 
6949th  Security  Squadron,  Qffutt  Air  Farce  Base,  Nebraska,  "Where 
be      ms      SCOIC      of      advisory      support      and      the      airborne      mission 
the      Defense      Language      Institute.       Monterey,       California.       he      was 
assigned   under   AFIS    to    the    United  States    Defense    Attache   Office    in 
Staff    NCG    m    Directorate    of    Airborne    Operations,     H£    USAF5S.     Kelly 
Biananesnejit    inspector    on    the    BSAFSS     (later    ESC)     inspector    general 
teas.  In     January      19SG      the      chief      was      assigned      as      STOIC      of 
Operations    Production    at    the    6916th    Electronic    Security   Squadron, 
^B         The        chief's        military        decorations        included        the 
edal.      Air     Force     Achievement     Medal,      and     ten     Air 
4,000  hoars   combat  support   in  -the   C-13D    an3  RC135. 
a  advisor  Mas  acs/I's  Sepre 
^£  General  Tfauta  viewed  the  APIS  senior  enlisted  advisor 
as  a  representative  of  -the  ACE/I,  wno  was  to  have  access  to  all 
information  necessary  to  understand  current  and  projected 
operations.  The  chief  had  "the  need  to  know."  In  November,  the 
AFIS  snpplefflent  to  AFR  39-2D,  The  Senior  Enlisted  Advisor,"  vas 
revised  to  include  the  ACS/I's  view.  The  revised  document  stated 
that    the    senior    enlisted    advisor.     1)     had    i
tirck    Yantiovski    continued 
s  fiCS/I,    ending   thirty-five 
charge  yaa  to  keep  t 
gues,    3   bid  ycru   gcjodbye 
Staff   Suraraary   E
1  ''■■;"                                                               ■'""■""" 
«*ff    5**** 
r-  ■ 
^'^HHi         ^^"- '":.          fcr*r.E^^^»  .>■■              ■."■■ , ^•K^K^jfl
a4 US OPERATION IN GRENADA "ERMTAIN FORTE AREA ATLANTIC OCEAN #1, aroun ite ate 2 aatTaciont : monte CARDONA, : tar be 508 OF aAKCER » ROA, = % y? may NY PUERTO cree + Be My ae BEROUTE TO é& ‘EBANON & & Jot te Teh ME - ANGE os CARIBBEAN SEA Pea SeKGTON, | BARBADOS 2 GRENADA « ons COURTESY OF THE JOINT CHEFS OF STAFF
i    25    Osnaabear,    President    RoEala    Reagan  1 
egar:    a    JaEcSing,     cr 
"PP^He»  Yoi
First,  of  overriding  importance,  to  protect 
scent  lives,  including  op  *o  1.000  fcoericans  whose 
3onal  safety  is,  of  course,  ay  paramount  concern. 
Second,  to  forestall  further  chaos. 
And  third.  to  assist  in  the  restoration  of 
iitions  of  law  and  order  and  of  governmental 
to  the  island  of  Grenada,  where  a  brutal 
group  of  leftist  thugs  violently  seised  power,  killing 
the  Prime  Hinister.  three  Cabinet  ministers,  two  labor 
leaders   and  other  civilians,    including  children. 
Let  there  be  no  misunderstanding.  This  collective 
action  has  been  forced  on  oa  by  events  that  have  no 
precedent  in  the  eastern  Caribbean  and  no  place  in  any 
civilized  society. 
following  the  s 
BetwB' 
medical      students      and      senior      citizens, 
largest   single   group  of  foreign  residents   i 
From    the    start,    we   have    consciously    s 
fears.        Wt 
:    when 
1    ri 
reports    that   a large    r 
&er of 
seeking -to   escape   the 
±ax 
sat   danger,    and 
1   request   1 !or    help. ,    a  unanimous   r 
fr 
:luded   the   United  Stats 
had 
Kit    to act strongly and  decisively. 
United    States 
:o    protect 
our    owr i    citizens,     to 
facili 
the 
the 
:ion   o: f  democratic institutions   in Grenadi 
IBS  Background  information  on  Granada  revealed  that  Britain 
had  granted  the  island  full  independence  on  7  February  1974,  and 
Granada  was  governed  under  a  parliamentary  system,  based  on  the 
British    model,  Tns     first    prime    minister     was     Six    Sric    Gairy. 
According  to  the  Department  of  State:1 
On     Karen     13, 
1979 
je     Hew     . Joint    I 
Welfare,    Education, 
and Libe 
srati- 
New   JEW 
ousted   Sir    Eric    in 
the    Peoples'     Revolution, 
ary 
Gove: 
it    was 
headed     by      Prioe      ! 
ice 
Bishop. 
government    was   str, 
ragly 
Ranis  t-. Leni nist    in 
' "Background   Hates: 
artoeat 
of  Public  Affairs,    Feb  S* i,  BO 13.
aniistiati  at  Eastern  Caribbean  St 
in  Brsnada  on  October  _aS  to  nvacoate 
safety  vas  endangered  and  to  .hijlp  re= 
.    "Tippet-  i 
x.    Opt  Be
Lessons   Learned    for    the   AFSRC   frga 
New    83.    SD    16;    Intnr^JI 
Capt    Bordas,    TSgt    Newell.    AFS&C.     5 
an    w.     Maj    Baser,     Capt   Sorfss,    TSnt 
Semsll.    STEM:.    ! 
Newell,    AFSAC,    5  J
TSgt   Steve  il,    RFSSC, 
,    by  Maj  Ann  Wright,    OSA
!    Historian    n.  JSaJ    Roser,    Cspt  Boidas,    TSgt 
Chronology.*  n.d.,    SD   16.      i^irt  JBB 
1*.r.tlm    IBZHT   TOOT   Support"  Hi
'Ibid.  ^^ 
^IntVM^JPfc  WIS  Historian  «-  Waj  Hoear,  Cap*  Bortlas,  TSgt 
11,  ftFSAC,  5  Jun  34;  Ltx  ftfjfr  AFSAC/CV  to  filX  Personnel 
timed.    "Watch  Doty.*  31   Oct  S3. 
3ln*w  Mb  ""IS  Historian  v.  fiaj  Roser,  Cap*  Bordas,  TSgt 
LI,  AFSflC,  5  Jun  84;  Updats  ?ap*r  *S.^B  MYIfcTSH  to  AF/ISY 
1,     "URGENT    FUKY   Support,"  .3D    Oct   33,    Document   number  6    ia  SO 
Action   Report   -
f»'"™',  rsr, 
Capt   Bcmins,    TS5: 
Haj    Buses,    Cspt   BariJas,    TSsn.
1 Ibid. 255 AFSAC/HAT, 325th Mi GP to AFSAC/CC, “URGENT FURY Support,” 3003112 Oct 63, SD 25. 3addizional hebnets vere required because the TAC’s mobility bags were incomplete Deleted per 5 U-S-6. 952 (b) GL)
Support."  3BI730Z  Oct  83.  ED  26. 
— "—              .    RPSaC/CV    et    al,     "C^etatirm  .URGENT 
xt,    x.     fiaj    Roser.    Capt  Borflas,    Kg;
'Ltr    ff&    AFSSC/Dft,      HSgt    Schinael,     to 
Lon  Report  -  GRSNfioA  Contingency  Deployment"  Q&  1' 
This     letter    report    contains    a    description    of 
iitions    from    the    perspective    of    MSjt    Bchi.ndel,     «t 
duties  of  an  Air  Force   "first  sergeant."
VSk.     to  BTSRC  Personnel,     "Opera 
z  Exploitation,"   o.d.,    Document  atx
Brevity) H a oe OMIEST puny after astiar fap = Ragestace fuures Me} Mave te APERC/ TO at el & ap 79 mie @ partis) tieting of whe decummote packaged and eent see tor GBB Ressepeie of tnrameote © eran UAT Gry -iew 8) BB u ent 2 Otek TRGEWE FUME Aftes Betuem feport GERD ese Mea Hm; toote ee erate um ot al. 6
!spct  Report  *  9  Wi  wssc/HftT. 
^Spol  Repor";  *20  SB  AFSBC/EAT, 
^Spot  Seport  *53  HE  ajSflC/HAT, 
*List    of    Spot.    Hep5R;s  [_, 
The  complete    set    .-.f  -the   carbon  copy  Spot  Reporta  j
29.       At    c 
s   happening  with  the  PWs  ~ 
Capt  Baxetas,    SSgt  Bewail,
'  Update    ftp] 
Exploitation,  AFSSC/HflT, 
File,  ED  35;  Msg  QB 
Force   HtMIKT    DK5ETJT 
at 
-URGEur  runs  Support, " 
Hot    S3.     Eocufflent    noaher    B     of    .IHSUM 
JRY  Support"  SB    0320102   Bar  83.    SD  46;   Ksg 
Det  22/CC,  — &TSAC  Film"  Q£    10M3DZ   Nov  B3, 
:/INO,    *Tiln"  flK    1°143DZ  KotB3,    SD  SO. 
o    APSflC/CT    et    al.     "Operation    URGENT 
Dacsua&nt  rmraber   14   of  SD  22- 
■OB/&-2,        "DBGEKT      FURY
■'Brftj.  p£      "a5 ,££* 
a^H?i,t 
|S*Sf 
B4;    i.tr 
!»"„"= 
At  eh,    CueatlDna    for 
and   Command  Specific    5" 
ae  af/xoo.  «aj  cemi 
rt  al. 
Learned.'    30    Bov    83, 
"URGENT    TORI   lessons 
'  LeUed 
■.a*' 
AFIS/CV    to    HE 
Ob=    83,     SO    1 
OSXP/XOOTA, 
7f  «*  AS 
ESAB/H10A    to 
raft    Cmtline 
AFSAC/raxa   to    afsac/irx    et   ai,    "BQ  -' 
Report"  Mft    15    Not  S3.    £D    53    and    1    A 
ATSAC/INSST    "After     Action      Report      Er 
231534Z    Sot    83,     SO    54;     Hag  fM     AFSAi 
"UBGEHT    FORK    Support"  ^H|    121400Z    Dec 
gmigi  AFSAC,    "OperatiSHSoare  FSR5T,  - 
ens  da 
7p,    tt. 
SMSTkr 
AFSAC/INXA      to     SPSAC, 
Annex,    OHEENT  FOTT  After  Act-i 
on  Eeport.- 
21    B< !C  83,    SE 
56.
cRAPTER 222 OMMLIGENCE OPERATIONS Directorate of Operational Intelligence Darectorate of Targets
bihectob&tb  ae  anaariaaL  srrEU-iaaef 
>f       Operational       Intelligence       {INO> 
Air  Forntr  with  all-soBree  intelligence  which   affected 
Analysis   of    indications   of  potential  hostile  sctivi- 
tl»  United  States  01  its  allies. 
Analysis  of  current  air  operations. 
Trends    an3    implications    of    current    worldwide    deiel- 
,    -nslnerabilitie 
Studies  (ISOfiJ,      located     at     Boiling     ATB;      Intelligence     Research. 
(INQI),  located    is    toe    Friendship    Annex    of    the    National    Security 
Agency,  near      the      Baitinore-w-jsbingtcn      International      Airport; 
Imagery  Research    (INOPi,    located   at   tbe   KaBhJUgton  Isvy  Tard;    nS 
Directorate        of        Operational        Intelligence        "as       operationally 
responsible      to     the     Cirectorate      of     Estimates,      while      the     AFIS 
*ZL± 
(9  Col,  nxnoia  L.  Maliils  headeS  -the  directorate  from  i 
October  1982  to  33  Jane  19B3  when  he  was  transferred  to  -the 
Intelligence  Center  Pacific.  Col.  Richard  J.  O'Lear,  the  bead  of 
the  Directorate  of  Bst.i.oates,  then  assa»ed  direct,  responsibility 
for  the  operations  of  ISO.  It.  Col.  Christopher  H.  Maniscalco  was 
chief   of  the   Special  Studies  Division,    a  position   he   held   from  29 
Operational   Intelligence   is   in  iFISK  23-1  £&    35   Jul   62,    Secti 
2lntw  ■JhKTIS  Eistorian  w.    aaj.    Reichenbach,    ftFIS/lRQa,
19B2    ci!    8    Septen 
xas  replaced  by  Capt.  Sherrill  A.  HirtchinBon 
tt.  COl.  Richari  J.  L'tteureiK  becaae  chief 
celllgsnce  OtvUias  In  Ncveffiber  19S3.  Be 
srt  F.  Tiernan,  «ho  held  -the  position  until 
he     was     transferred     to     the     Directorate     of 
KECRSASTZATION 
-that  were  both  aboliahfd  i 
«ns  to  affect  the  Directors 
Elements  ftjrolishg^ 
.ytical  element  designated 
February  3982  ta  focus  < 
s    disestablished.        I
Operations      aire 
enabled    the   Special   5 
ior.ai   Photographic    Interprets  tic 
all-source     analysts    , 
lelligeoce    panels
t\  pan,    cbe  script  j 
iur£ace-fcD~Air    1 5  AMI 
ated  the  fnilowiag;
AO GOISE 9°5"B ¢ 40d poroteg & i i | 3 F 4 } ‘rota.
Hiflage    paint    sdiss 
or  the  first  time.  The  study 
nS  helicopters  with  camouflage 
■fleeting      caaouflage      paint;      be 
lal  Intelligence  Estii
‘mia. Tenia. Jmie. Por the report for December t9e2 ex4 the valosble 12 muthly teports for 190) ese 50 70. Etetorinsl Osta Aprr APTS/EM0A, Jan-Dec @}, 6D 57. 35200) Deleted por $ U.S.C.
Report  83~03"^^hD 
Status  Report  83-04* 
AF/TNE  to  AIG  1D41B, 
■fe  2B1930Z  Apr  B3,  SD  70 
AP/INE  to  SJ5  1Q4B,  "CCsD 
1205Z  Jul  B3,    ED  70. 
"CCSD     Intelligence
j  be   incorporated  in1 
■o    polled     the     recipients     and 
inquiring     about     usefulness, 
atldltioTis/de lotions,    and   other 
poll   were    collared   and   reca 
5  the  January   1984   edition.2 
CSAf 'INTEL  50a-3 
"USAFINTEL  500-3,  Airfield  CCSD 
wide!/  distributed  in  1984.  The 
various    techniques    used    fay    many 
pleted     the     writing     of 
is     to    be    published    and 
:  page   document  examined 
o    enhance    survivability 
.rfighting       capabilities.  Not 
'Msg  WKR  BBB  AF/TSE  -to  AIG  1041B.  "CCSD  Intelligence 
Status   Eeport  B3-D5"  fl£   {Illegible]  Jul  83,    SD  7{J.  ^_ 
^For  a  report  on  the  poll's  results  see  Memo  f£g  AFIS/HKMV 
to  D/INE,  "CCtD  Status  Report  Survay  -  Information  Memorandum, " 
B.d.,  -SD  71.  Msg  fl£  AF/ISE  to  AIG  10413,  "HQ  DSftF  Monthly 
Camouflage,  Concealment  and  Deception  <CC£D)  StatniEepDrta/ 
08 1 100Z  Nov  S3 ,  SD  72 ;  Historical  Data  fiprt  dHRHHHflB 
HPIS/INQ*,    Jan-Dec  83,    SD  57. 
^Draft  document  flMHM  TiSflFIirrEL  500-3,  Air  Field  CCSB" 
fggf  AF1S/IBOB,    1983,    SD  73. 
4  Ibid.
0  It  is  eiroolJy  important  to  w$erstr&e$  ^$?t""' 
b  practiced  not  josi  by  the  Scvi*tL  W\ti1  %.■ 
:  Europe.  Kan?  eoonnies,  friend  jit!^  ^("j,  |>V 
=  realize  the  itfortance  of-  CCSD  for  f.^VteH.»9 
relatively  umali  air  forces.  Tt>is  se^jf  /V* 
with  nations  io-  conflict,  tharra  M*!*^  S.t>- 
t,  ax  which  £>ei:eeive  themselves  Cs^^Sv^d' 
we     also    addles     sii£iel(3     CcsB  .  Ms    «  Wf<l^iJ' 
g)  Hith  isany  nations  erfciblting  growing  *)%f%iift9s 
ceres;  in  CCiD--:£t'c«i!  the  operational  js  "v^i  B6 
telligeiice  perspective— tils  Wjs  tid  ^W^i-^1^' 
is    the    D.s.    SoW,g>'      Within    oSW,     dw   j*i^  »ae* 
ilng  enesy  forces  Or,  oar  ins-tallstians  _  I^b  ^ 
as  a  potentially  1d»  ca^t.  bigl>  return  ti/V^  V 
:hieoe    that    ^oai.         If    »    Sl5.oGe     ^e=W     f\^ev: 
>d  into  a  voarfejj*  9^W-!-[ 
JS-SO;  of  SJH  ^W^W"  °f 
r  a  two  yeatf  /s*S>j/.  V  fK; 
research  mi  V-n^VV  Vfc 
and  1930  a»a  2>  ^"t^4  1^(5 
Lluw  it  to   Jffl    pSj%^   ^  j^ 
—  f,   to  -sP^s/isDi    et  *i.    "etjiif^Ai^   ' 
"    27   Api 
:t  fly    ajiil  *tch   Q||  MrXSAi«S\  V  J^/.'K 
CttD  Data  Base  Wte4_rcb,"  27  May  S3.  -S»  7S,
intelligence 
■kiddle  East 
Involved    CUD  k 
tation,       tactics,       and 
Library   t 
AFI5/TH0A    to    AfJ
)    Research  Projec 
T-sxkner.,     Kir;hii,    Uzbek,    and   Tadihii    SSRsi, 
4flB  SeH  for  example 
Processing  {RPS}  Opgraae  P: 
SB;     Lei     flfi,     AFIS/IKDA 
§B)  iPis/i»oft  to  afis/my.
'    nfiing    CAMCOK,     a    caaonflage. 
CAMCON-BIACLS-S  WE 
QP    Is    discovering   the 
concealment    and    deception    c* 
orginally  designed  for  the  division  to  input ^ 
data,  the  division  requested  that  the  DIB  redesign  CAHCOH  to 
include  acre  intelligence  data .  The  request  was  approved  and 
implemented.  Since  CAMCOK  was  part  of  the  Dlft'a  Oo-Line  System 
(OIAOLS),  and  DIAOLS  «as  to  be  folloved  by  the  Support  for  Analyst 
File  EnviicnoeTit  {SAFE),  the  division  requested  conversion  of  its 
CAMCON   file   from  OIAQLS  to  SAFE,      it   toa_KB*  approved.' 
C0IN3  TAS 
Requirements   i 
AEROSPACE   H 
.vision    was    able    to  h. 
I   Exploitation   Systea 
»    division's   lacatior 
ve  the  DIA's  Advanced  laagery 
(AIRES)  terminal  and  printer 
at  the   National   Photographic 
Deputy    Assistant 
ktr    fB^      and     3     AtchS    { 
Director    for   Defense    Intelligence    Systems 
Support  for  CAHCON  File."   24   Aug  S3,   S3  87  and  4   Atchs  jft. 
2Ltr  4ft  'Witis  1  Atch0HBB,  AF/INES.  to  AF/KDOQC,  "Request 
for  Preparation  of  Statement  of  Requirement, *  22  Harch  S3.  SD  BS 
and  S  Atch  fl£;  itr  Q  anfl  2  fitch  SI'  MVIHES  toAF/PHPBS, 
"Coins  TAS  Force  Activity  Designator   Rating  Upgrade*  f/£  n.d.,   SD 
s9 ,-  cwg  teh  Notes  MRHHMHIH  ■HOBI  MM  19  °ct 
90; 
SFIS      Historian 
:  May  B 
■?■ 
'"Reichenbach . 
Chief,  CtGnm"jnicfttian3  Management  Divisic 
AFIS/IfJQA,  "Proposed  AIEES  Terminal  Relocation,"  30  Dec 
and   1   Atch  MM
in  tel  licence    hriefihgs    sofl    o 
i-mberE,    and  support   was   render 
current      intelligence      and 
„.*, », 
.... 
eapabilit* 
■.      a 
sol 
facility. 
Hy 
BiO- 
current 
int sllioeiw 
physica 
1     appEfltBIiCS 
the    ph; 
ensare TEfairei 
rtsuoTty. 
^p     As     o£     October,      -Bfljnr     plans     fur     the     S&TCH     includ 
manning     by     five    mare     company     grade     officers     vho    were     to 
assigned   for  a   period  of   twelve  oonths.      Also,    the   facility  Mas 
FY85,  an  aotrasateii  aessage  handling  system  vas  to  be  installed  to 
prcvide  fisnctiooal  liisiribncion  ^agpoix,  which  was  then  proviSed 
by  the  B&TCH,  thus  freeing  the  1QTCH  officers  to  .concentrate  .on 
cnrrent  intellifeace  concerns.* 
^P    Vian  AncfOEt  '-through  December,    efforts   vsre   nndemay  lo 
'Historical  Data  Rprt  ] 
■'neno  J£|   AF/INE,    Col    Sharttlafnd,    to    iCS/I,     -601KB  Hsptx: 
.12.    3N063-1ft2,    ^fi    »ug   B3.    SO
i  to  fill  a  critical  void  in  Late  breaking  information  flowing 
the  facility. '  The  Directorate  of  Security  and  Comm.n  i  cations 
lagement  approved  the  uaa  of  a  television  in  tie  HATCH,  -which 
3        a       sensitise        security       facility,        nnder        the        following 
|    The    television    be    connected    only    to    the    Cable   Sews 
Ability  to  receive  other   stations  be  inhibited. 
I     Discussion     of      sensitive     compartmented     Information 
vicinity  of  the  television  be  kept   to  a 
Ho    discussion     of    SCI     be    permitted    t 
order  was  being  used- 
(  To  accooplish  this,  one  change  involved  the  use  of  t 
rora  netvar*  news  broadcasts.  To  implement  the  practic 
rating    appropriate    tapes    into    the    briefing,    the    chie 
;    of    Estimates    ■; 
^P      If    you    see    a    television    newscast    or    are    aware 
of   a   scheduled  TV  program  which    could  be   used  to   support 
present  it  as  part  of  our  briefing.  The  HHCC's  Visual 
Recording  Facility  (a  24-hour  a  day  operatic*)  and  the 
Army's  Audiovisual  Center  (a  day  shift  operation!  both 
tape  nightly  network  news  broadcasts.  arrangements  can 
also  ba  made  with  the  Air  Force  TV  Center  to  tape  other 
scheduled  programs.  Since  TS02C  will  soon  be  monitoring 
am,  the  Watch  will  be  responsible  for  taping  any 
pertinent  material  presented  on   this  network.5 
■B  One  of  the  iirst  uses  of  video  tape  in  a.  briefing 
concerned  the  terrorist,  bombing  on  9  October  1983,  in  Rangoon, 
Burma,  which  killed  seventeen  South  Koreans.  including  four 
members   of  President   Chun  Doo-bwan's    cabinet.       The   tapes  were   from 
'LtrWB  AF/INE  to  1947  AS/PCC,  "CCTV  Drop  for  Intelligence 
Match,"  S   fiug  83.   SD  35  and  t  Atchs  (0 
2Ibid. 
3For  a  detailed  look;  at  the  di-gtaiem's  manpower  and  budget 
initiatives  for  FY86-90,  see  Memo  QB  and  B  Atchs  ££  AFIS/CT  to 
AF/IME,    "FYB6-90   Prog  p£9   Data   Call."  n.d-,    SD  96. 
4j,tc  Hft  AFIS/INCE  to  IKCE  branches  et  al.  "Viogo  Tape 
Support  of  the  ACS/I-Brief ,  -  n-d-  .   SD  97  and  2  Atcn  $gg
■.    Directorate    of 
2&i.&taTizal  Data  Rprt^JI  AFIS/INES, 
JLtr^JJ  AZ1S/IKE  to  SJlF/AAR:.  (ST.  Zllt 
stant  Chief  of  Staff,    Intelligence,"   19
^£  Aii  Force  Intelligence  produces  Intelligence 
briefings  covering  *  aide  tangs  of  topics.  from  descrip- 
tions of  the  latest  activity  in  world  "hot  spots-  to  in- 
depth  analyses  of  foreign  weapons  development-  The 
brief  inns  are  designed  to  provide  Air  Force  personnel 
the  background  required  to  unite catand,  carry  oat.  and 
help  formulate  national   security  policies  and  programs. 
^£  It  is  oy  firm  belief  taat  seelcr  Mr  Force 
enlisted   personnel    forra  an   integral  part  of  oar  national 
intelligence    information.       I   feel  this   need   can  best   be 
satisfied   by   providing    these    individuals    with    recurring
a _ FE. it Ree “aro fecttday Be ms. Shows are Ht. col, Rr phate ena ape Lovks 7, Torneon,
DIRECTORATE   OF  TASGET    XMSHXXCSHCg 
^0    The     Directorate     of    Target     Intelligence     (INT}     provided 
target      intelligence      and      Meaponeering,      mapping,       charting,       and 
the  Joint  Chief 6  of  Staff.  The  directorate  «as  the  Air  Force  point 
of  contact  with  the  Defense  Happing  Agency  and  maintained  liaison 
with  Air  Force  targeting  elements  vorldvide,  the  Air  Staff,  anc 
the  Defense  Intelligence  Agency.  It  collaborated  vith  the  Ail 
Force  research,  . development,  testing,  and  evaluation  community  or 
applying  targeting  and  HCsG  considerations  to  advanced  weapon: 
systems,    and    it    validated    and    monitored   the    KCSG    and    geophysical 
ense       Nuclear      Agency       and      -the       Defense 
functional  manager  for  nir  Farce  cartographic/geodetic  cai 
fields.  It  vas  the  principal  Air  Force  point  of  contact  for 
Defense  Mapping  Agency  and  the  program  element  monitor  for 
Farce  service  support  to  that  agency.  There  was  no  formal  brs 
structure  within  the  snail  division,  but  informally  there  * 
three    subdivisions:       Geodesy,    Advanced  Systems  and   Resources. 
ISH  23-1  ^£    "Organ- 
■lligence   Service,"    IS    Jul    82, 
al,    AFIS/INT    50  May  8
McKenney,     c. 
^B     When      I      assumed      this      position,      tiro,    things 
concerned      rae.  First,       and      foremost,       the      targeting 
function  as  a  whole  lacked  direction,  causer!  by  the 
absence  at  clear  goals  and  effective,  dynamic  leadership. 
Second,  the  targe  teers  were  not  doing  the  job  of  a 
higher  headquarters  Kith  respect  to  formilation  of 
policy,  doctrine,  and  leadership  of  the  Air  force's 
targeting  cofflstunity.  This  was,  in  coy  view,  the  result 
of  its  subordination  to  Iho  [Directorate  of  Operational 
Intelligence]  with    operational    control    exercised    by    IKE 
the  end  of  Vietnam,  targeteer  strength  declined  by  over 
200*  and  the  MCSG  career  field  has  failed  to  keep  pace. 
Hany  felt  the  need  to  get  out  of  their  field  since  they 
viewed  it  as  a  dying  art  font.— and.  sore  in^rtantly, 
one  which  did  not  offer  promotion  opportunity. 
targeting  la  an  intelligence  function  with,  responsibil- 
analysts  devoted  to  producing  Intelligence.  My  view  ia 
finished   '    intelligence        from        whatever        source        and
closely  related  in  mission  function  Co  the  operational 
community.  I  believe  the  AFAITC  course  reflects  this. 
Bt  the  school,  entry  into  the  targeting  course  requires 
a  fully  trained  and  experienced  intelligence  officer. 
The  course  teaches  the  new  targeteer  to  be  an  operator. 
The  MCSG  officer  is  similarly  dedicated  to  the  Ops  side 
of  the  house,  supplying,  not  true  intelligence,  bat  the 
MCsG  tools   to  plan   for  and  hit  the   target. 
JB     *      felt      the      need      to      become      an      Sir      Staff 
two  things.  One  was  to  provide  the  formal  poaition  of 
policy  formulator  for  targets.  The  other  »as  to  enhance 
our  ability  to  work  with  our  principal  □ on -intelligence 
staff  counter-parts,  XO  and  RD,  as  well  as  evaluate  the 
status  of  targets  with  the  commands  and  eqisally 
important,    the   targeteers   in    the  field. 
^B     The    colonel    stated    that    he    had    not     fully    accomplished 
ig  other  things,  he  cited  the  participation  of  the  directorate 
several  joint  action  groups  such  as  the  Joint  Technical 
-dinating      Group      for      Munitions      Effectiveness;       s      series      of 
the    Mapping,     Charting,     and    Geodesy    Division    since    9    August    1979. 
Division;    J-t.    Col.    Thomas   E.    Vincent   continued    as    chief   of    the 
Concepts  and  Applications   Division.2 
headquartered     in    :
anuary-  and  hosted  t 
Military  AirliEt  Comjnand, 
Security  Command,  Pacific  I 
and  Electronic  Systems  Divi 
Systems    Command, 
geographic    coverage 
nethaclology    and    discipline    i
planning,      collection,      analysis,      and    diaEeainatian. 
see     this     cycle     as     a     pure     intelligence     function    *r 
operator    interfaces    occurring    at     the    beginning    of    ' 
dissemination    is    a   complex    and    "clnsely   knit"   one.      ' 
jattle. 
by 
Don s    available. 
E  planned  stride  on  the  target.
a.  H  Changing  defense  and  aerospace  doctrinal  guidance 
and  initiatives  in  both  tactical  and  strategic  Karfighting 
strategy  and  their  potential   effects  on   targeting. 
b.  ^B  The  intact  of  current  and  developing  Mar  fitting 
concepts  anj  evolving  Air  Force  missions  en  the  targeting  process. 
c.  Mm  Current  and  forthcoming  weapons  systems  that  Sir 
Force  targeteers  oust  be  prepared  to  target,  existing  and  planned 
intelligence  systems  which  support  the  targeting  effort,  and 
command       organisational       and       procedural       responses       to       coraton 
S.  dB  The  status  of  and  outlook  for  critical  targeting 
resources^^  experienced    targets    personnel,    equipment,    data   bases. 
.space  fflission  environments  01  targeting. 
c.  fl£     Highlight    the    impact    of    the    forthcoming  Global  Posi- 
targeting  procedures. 
d.  M^  Continue  development  and  implementation  of  the  Pro- 
posal   for  improved  Targeting  applications    {PITS}. 
e.  BK  ^«ev  corneal  comments  on  the  Intelligence 
Targe tin gOfficer  Course  Training  Standard  to  determine  the  need 
for  a   follow-up  utilization  and  training  conference. 
targeteers    for   fonsal   targeting  training  prior  to  their  arrival   at 
uew  duty  stations. 
g-      H     Explore    the    need    tax    joint    targeting    doctrine    and 
fltt  As  of  August,  si*  months  after  the  conference,  the 
directorate    had    accompli shed    the     following,     with    regard    to    the 
;elligence    Plan. 
^This  is   a  partial    1
jeting  offices   fo 
i    adrice    about 
SI  tea  4.      Held    the    first    steeri 
for     Improved    Targeting    Applic; 
renty-eight        issue: 
intelligence  officers   and  found 
tiie  estab-liahiaei 
structure  at  chat  time. 
d    the    APIS    Functional    Intelligence 
participati 
with    Air    doctrine    office     of    primary    responsibility; 
f  targeting  concerns  in  Joint  Chiefs  of  Staff  arena. 
Interdiction   and  Standoff  Study
Or 9 May, a workang group was formed by the Air Force Plans and Research and evelopment Offices, under Cal Ben Keleon, Sr, Chief, Tactical Forces Davision Its task was to prepare the briefing requested hy Dr. DeLauer, to include offensive counter- air and maritime operations By 1 May, it was apparent that intelligence nad te be involved with the group, and the Directorate of Estimates and the Directorate of Targets were requested to and did send representatives * Tae group worsed according to Major General Smith's Fecommendation~ If we are going to recapture the initiative in the interdiction area and the weapons neaded to do this mission, we mist present a very thoughtful briefing which ancludes. a concept of operations for interdiction, lessons learned from previous interdactsor campaigns, target identsfication and prioratizatzon Weapons systems an@ minitions needed, and at least some @iscussion of the guidance systems needed, Although it fught be some-what easier if we avioded addressing attacking air bases and ships, because of br. DeLauer's meno, ve mist fold these twa areas anto our briefing. Although 2t will not be possible to do a total and complete interdactson analysis by 18 June, we must develop the best possible concept of ops for interdsetion prior to 15 June, and then contanue our efforts beyond the Sth ef June until the analysis 15 complete Tt would be a mstake if we yast outlaned our positions on standoff weapons wathout doing as thorough 4 job a5 poss.ble We can make a strong case for our position only if it is based on a thorough anlaysis of the interdiction camparem Finally, we gust insure that we inelude all the relevant commands in the development of our briefing so that we not only provide the hest product that we can within tae time constrasnts, but also busld the greatest possible instatational support through the Air Staff and the MazcoH ‘pie 2rd 3ipad Deleted per 5 0.8.0, 552(b) (1)
Tee briefing wee given te Or Seiacer on tS June eocend driefing is July porecns estan tno derectore’ end ue Cifice of particapation im Ath fiero bdee and Le Cel 19 fag C4 v3 3 > i i é
eats reqroasty erm teen 22 taenme see Ot A mete re ee ee edesen abe: cess oe Sar enears car ve usar se rreenescme | Grapene = aay eed | ee or which uae 69 Exp procese of ree ants ont Sone QD ergs tere to ar ams “orgie nnwart inne Pet a ie beaters? pes FOSC. IS2D)IM
az Tauking by AF/1N Frequently, elements of AF/IN tasked the directorate for technical information. Systems Attack Capability Hardened C3 Weaponeering Support lpia. Byes GBP and atch thks Mowe apis/at, col McKenney, to Lt Gen Chain, 18 Jan 63, 90 411. Deleted per 5 U.S.C, 252(d) C1) s.t. 35200)0) peleted per 5 T-
provide  a   a    targe  tii 
cida.      Sose   of   the  1 
siunication       CC3>       s 
ncendiary    weapons.
Indicates     it    has     treraendou 
aid     far     conducting     C?_an 
ilo      coSac7eXectr5nr=      warfare      {EC/SK)       target 
to      accoiaplish      thig      expanded      mission      will      require 
lal    data    bases    and    hardware    added    to    the    ayaten.        These 
  apabilities    are    in    existence   and   will   oat    require   new 
technology.  Examples  are  data  bases  and  software  for  terrain 
making  analysis  and  defense  penetration  analysis."' 
Information  update  to  JHEH/AS 
organization    for    the    Joint    Munitions    Effectiveness    Hanual/*.ir-to~ 
variety  of  topics;  cluster  weapons  and  runways;  a  revised  WHIG 
2000  automated  veaponeering  optimisation  program  (ftWCP);  optical 
wands  for  HP-41  programs;  A-10  JOmn  gun  effectiveness;  a  MftSG  2200 
complex  target  program;  guided  weapons  isethodologies;  and 
co»5>atibla  nuclear  programs.2 
Nuclear  Weaponeering  Software 
Hk  In  October  the  directorate  sent  an  information  update  to 
Sir  Force  targeteers  regarding  software  and  publications  for 
nuclear  weaponeering.  Much  of  the  inforoation  mentioned  activity 
of      the     Defense     Nuclear     Agency,      which     had     contracted     for     the 
planning    programs     for    handheld     calculators    and    small    counters, 
^B        In      December,      Lt.      Col.      Wilder      sent      a      eooprehensive 
addressed      sorae      of      the       following      topics:  annual      targeting 
conference;  revision  of  targeting  course  S08S;  combined  effects 
munitions  in  the  USAP  inventory;  concrete  penetrator  bonb;  target 
officers'    society,     and    profes 
crying     need 
continue 
basis."  t-t.  Col.  Wilder  told  the  targeteers.  "As  the  Mr  Fc 
focal  point  for  targeting,  mapping,  charting,  and  geodesy, 
intend    to    faster    the    development    of    the    professional    targete
i    vere    published 
eapons    en^jloyment 
in       April       ibou: 
^  "changes  "' 
irf   ^ts^^to^is^wlT6 
;■££• 
Et#I™ts  HaodbQDk  " 
iFor^os/n 
and  1    Rtch  ^0,   P.riS/IKT  to 
IFIS/INT    ED    RFIS/JCP,      "USRF 
^£,     ATIS/ItTT    to 
"*ll^^1w 
■XS/IM     to    KFi :s/KnxF   et   al,     "Revision   of
briefings,  answer  questions,  review  publications,  and  so  forth, 
the      directorate      tasked      other      units      to      provide     the     needed 
in formation. 
Imprecise I y -located  Targets 
flk  The  ACS/I  designated  the  directorate  his  office  of 
primary  responsibility  for  the  problem  of  defining  the  term, 
-imprecisely- located  targets*  (ILTs).  The  directorate  wrote  a 
"strawraan"  definition,  which  the  ACS/I  sent  to  a  number  of  major 
commands      asking      for     comments.  The      draft     definition     vas      the 
following: 
"An  imprecisely-located  target  CELT)  is  a  known  force  or  function 
for  which  a  fixed  wartime  location  cannot  be  determined  with 
sufficient       time       and       accuracy       to       permit       effective       force 
££     In        April,         Co] Lonel        McKenney        regue. sted 
Chat       the 
inization    for     the    Join t    Munitions    Effectivene 
Stir: •ace    (JMEM/AS)    and   the Operational    Osers   WorSci 
ng    C 
iroup    sponsor 
=    for   selected   weaponeer 
ring 
instructors. 
The 
purpose     of     the     syrapi jsium    was     to     1}     estab ■  lish 
a     detailed 
undt 
released   WMJG    22QQ/HF-.r \    CV 
weaponeering 
methodologies.      2]      review 
new     complex     weaponeer! 
ng     r 
nethodologies 
(Stj ick     bomb     targeting,      c^ □mplex      target,      and     Mar 
ite    ■ 
~arlo     runway 
.ads),      3]     address    the 
irapact    of    data    changes 
the    JKEK/AS 
basic     manual     and     delivery    accuracy     manual,      4) 
pro! 
>leras    of    interest    and    5 )    exchange    information 
Instructional 
lods,    sample  problem  set ;s,    and  other  material.11 
o    DIA/DB-4C,      "Recommend [     Ch< 
1j*tr  WJ'     AFIS/1NT    t 
mges     in     OIA 
[Eunist-world  Weapons   Ef fectivenessP    Selection, 
and Requirements 
ibook    (DDB-2S62-21-82)  ((J,"    14   Apr  S3,    SD   122. 
2i.tr  fB>   and    Atch    Msg   £B    ACS/I     to     AF/CvSB, 
'Imprecisely- 
(My  Ltr,    28    Dec  82!,    26 
S3,    SD    123. 
3Intw   f£,      AFtS     Hi storian     w.      Lt     Col     Wilder 
and     Lt     Ccl 
pent  et  al,    AFIS/INT,    U 1    Kay  34. 
4Msg  ^fa,    AFIS/INTA   t o   AFAITC/TTsnJAT   et   al,    ' "Proposed  JMEM/AS 
;  Seminar  for  Weaponeer: ,ng   Instructors"  222O30Z 
ftpr 
83,    SD    124.
jence   Agency    Manual    57-24    "to   include    this   ne«   information, 
ditionally,    a    continuing    intelligence   retirement    was    submitted 
r   human    intelligence    collection    for  command  specified  airfields. 
September,      the      directorate     requested     that     certain     command 
telligenee    Agency's    conference    and    to    solicit    support    for    the 
em's   incorporation  into  BIAM  57-24. 2 
y  Effects  of  Weapons 
jrted  by  steel  tru 
cted  by  vood  cross 
-    et  al,    AFIS/INT,    10   May  84;    It:  H^    AFIS/INT   to   TSC/IN 
"Incendiary  Effects   of  Combined  Effects   Weapons  (Jj,  "   2  N
^m     In      December,       Lt.       Col.       Wilder      made      a      request      for 
Program  Office  at  the  Systems  Comoana's  Armament  Division  at  Eglio 
AFB,  Florida.  The  request  was  made  because  the  CBU-a9  GATOR  mine 
was  soon  to  be  added  to  the  Air  Force's  munitions  inventory,  and 
targe tears  were  starting  to  receive  requests  to  perform 
application  analyses  for  the  weapon.  The  weaponeers  lacked  scare  of 
the  essential  planning  data  needed  to  utiliie  the  snail  oonputer 
nine  methods  frost  the  Joint  Munitions  Effectiveness  Manual-  The 
colonel  asked  that   the  response  be  sent  by  4  January   1984.' 
PACOK  Staff  assistance  Visit 
^m     From     3-16     August,      Haj.      Stewart    Davey    and     Capt.     I.ois 
targeting  issues  with  Pacific  Comaand  offices  and  to  provide 
targeting  personnel  with   theater  MCSG  and  targeting  orientation.' 
Wm     Regarding    personnel    issues,     they    noted    three    probleos: 
tours  in  Korea.  With  the  support  area,  they  learned  that  many 
units  were  having  difficulties  obtaining  handheld  calculators  (HP- 
SIOTj.        The    base    supply    system    seemed    to    be    the    source    of    the 
ling  tor  the  JTCG/rtE 
SB     In    Kay.     the    ftCS/I's    request    was    appro 
-lopaent    and    Logistics    to    the    secretary's    cc
flft  The  JTCG/KE  produced  physical  vulnerability  estimal 
for  tnreat  systems  and  potential  targets,  determined  weaj 
effectiveness,  and  developed  methodologies  for  planners  to  sell 
employment  options.  The  program  was  originally  funded  by  i 
Department  of  Defense,  but  was  subsequently  funded  through  ' 
Amy's  budget.2      The  secretary  told  his  counterpart: 
»The     effort    has    been    essentially    flat     funded 
past     10    years.         While     inflation    has     greatly 
dramatically.  Additionally,  I  understand  the  Army  has 
further  reduced  this  funding  to  supplement  high  priority 
Anay  programs.  Consequently,  some  -valuable  ongoing  and 
planned  projects  have  been   reduced  or  will  be  deleted, 
CosimanKrs    of    the  Air   Force   Systems    Co 
[.ogistics    Command    requesting    support 
personally    inv 
sustafl^d      the     sans 
MAPPING.    CHARTING,    ■ 
■olved    to    assure    funding    is     restored    and 
suit,       the     Amy      restored      a      budget      cut      and 
■     level     of     funding.          The     directorate     would 
the     Sir     force,      trt 
Mapping  Agency,    and 
raunity     included     contact     with     the     Air     Force 
^ie     Department     of     the     Interior,      the    Defense 
the  Central  Intelligence  Agency- 
al.    AFIS/IKT.     1
Qp  Lt.  Col.  Bilder  formally  interviewed  thirty  individuals 
row  twenty-four  organizations  and  was  Che  principal  author  of  the 
ish  force's  highly  classified  final  dacanent,  "Report  to  ADGSD( I) 
s  Defense  Mapping.  Charting,  and  Geodesy  System  Requirements  (U)" 
isued  29  October  1962.  In  1983,  the  colonel  briefed  the  House 
the   results  of   the  study.' 
Lngs: 
m 
regulations     of      the      Department 
The  unolassifia 
Lt     Col 
ildei 
Geodesy  (MCSG)  Support  f| 
2Ibid.  The  report  : 
3 Executive  Summary 
Chatting, 
APIS/INT,     to    May   34;    Mea>B,     Asat    : 
ell)    to  Task   Force   Member  a.    '"Happing, 
ul  82,    SO   129. 
le   in  AFIS/IMT. 
"Report      to     AOUSDf  I) 
Geodesy        System        Requii
requirements  were  translated  effectively  by  the  Defense 
Happing  Agency  and  integrated         properly  into 
product /product ion       specif ications.  Imagery      source 
requirements  could  possibly  change  if  requirements  were 
misinterpreted. 
flft  The  task  force  interviewed  engineers,  opera- 
tors, developers  and  program  managers.  Cross-checking 
and  information  exchanges  occurred  throughout  the  data 
collecting  period  with  planners,  the  DMA  System  Office 
Joint  Study  Group,  the  DMA  Special  Program  Office  for 
Exploitation     S     Modernisation,      and     the     DMA     production 
through    1992;    to  consider 
and      to      rationalize      unique 
S e rv ice   support . 
flft  The  DMA  produces  a  wide  range  of  information 
in     many     forms.         The     generic     problems     facing     000     are 
navigation/targeting     positioning      and      feature      descrip- 
and  World  Geodetic  System  (WGS)  absolute,  are  inherent 
considerations  with  almost  any  DMft  product.  Features  are 
shown  on  conventional  maps  and  electronically  stored  as 
Digital  Feature  Analysis  Data.  Digital  Terrain  Eleva- 
tion Data  is  comparable  to  electronically  stored  map 
contour      information.  The       task      force       focused       its 
attention  on  weapon  systems  retirements  and  products 
which  would  impact  on    imagery  collection. 
Bp  From  its  review  of  a  subset  of  DMA  products 
which  are  iraagery  dependent,  the  task  force  concluded 
that  DMA  over  time  accurately  translated  user 
requirements  into  product  /product! on  specifications.  The 
task  force  affirms  DMA's  diligence  and  care  to. produce 
MCSG  products  comprising  an  optimized  tradeoff  between 
minimum  essential  data  elements  and  those  intended  for 
unbounded      flexibility.  Standard     products,       like      the 
1:50,000  scale  topographic  niap  specification,  exemplify 
DHfl's   good  stewardship. 
^Hft  Unlike  the  DMA  product  development-process, 
the  task  force  represented  an  integrating  group  of  users 
rather  than  producers.  The  task  force  was  well  aware  the 
Services /Commands  want  the  best  possible  product. 
Without  presuming  the  production  process  consideration 
or  the  results  of  other  study  groups,  the  task  force 
could _npt  quantify   deficiencies   in   current  products. 
flft  Inconsistencies  exist  in  the  manner  In  which 
new     product     development     occurs.  The     Services     and 
commands  begin  the  breakdown  through  their  own  faulty 
requirements  development  process.  DMA,  in  an  effort  to 
provide  the  best  possible  support,  attempts  to  anticipate 
future     requirements.         History    supports    their    view    that 
is  made  to  production   realities  and  defendable  needs.
■■  The  task  force  in  the  report  forecasts  its 
view  of  the  1992  HCSG  data  requirement  in  relation  to 
proposed  new  weapon  systems.  It  documents  »  need  to 
include  a  joint  service  caucus  with  the  DM*  before  a  new 
product  requirement  is  levied  upon  DKfi  by  any  one  user. 
fltt  Throughout  the  impending  gap  period,  the  user 
conceCT^  lays  prinarily  with  currency  and  first  time 
coverage  of  certain  products.  After  the  gap  period, 
imagery  source  of  higher  quality  will  be  needed  for  high 
resolution  feature  data  of  installations,  sinpointfl  and 
harbors. 
^B  The  task  force  reconwndB  modifications  to  the 
new     product     requirements     deelopaent     process,      a     more 
active    role    for    the    MC&G    Wording    Group    of    the   COHIgfa, 
and  a  change   to  D00  and  Service   acquisition   regulations. 
Agreement  with  flFSC 
Sfc  In  an  effort  to  bring  mapping,  charting,  and  geodesy 
requirements  more  into  perspective  a  a  related  to  advanced  weapons 
systems,  the  ACS/I  requested  that  the  Air  Force  Systems  Conaand 
involve  the  Defense  Mapping  Agency  jDMA)  with  the  weapons 
development  process  —  early  in  the  process.  The  ACS/I  suggested 
that    cartographic   and   geodetic    experts   be   placed    in    key   positions 
on  cartographic  expertise  can  save  millions  of  dollars  in 
duplicative  programs  and  incorapatitile  systens,  and  help  assure 
operational  capability.  Too  often,  Syaten  Program  Offices  presume 
DMA  support  or  accept  hardware  designs  which  generate  huge,  hidden 
DMA  support  costs .  MCsG  Officers  placed  within  the  development 
community  could  plan  for  supportable  computer  geographies,  a 
critical   factor  affecting  operational  success."1 
randun    to 
t».  ■ 
R The    ACS/Z's 
request 
was    in accord   w: tth    a    a 
mil. itary 
or     Rese larch     and 
sring. 
ignated 
by      Qepa 
of     t 
■sponail 
planning 
jor   pi 
should 
n     the 
Agency, 
Plar 
Requirt ;men ts,     t( s  idenfci .fy  MCSG implic; itions  of  s 
my  new 
progra 
fl£  The  ACS/ I  also  nentioned  a  problem  noted  by  many  current 
.gh- level  managers:  the  inability  to  keep  abreast  of  rapidly 
iveloping      and      proliferating      computerised      requirements.  He 
;ated,  "Despite  close  and  cooperative  working  efforts  of  my  MCSG 
Laff  SAFIS/INT3}  and  their  cartographic/geodetic  {specialty  code 
'XX)    point   of   contact   at  AFSC/TEOX,    their  efforts    to   s 
't  Secretary  of  the  Army 
DMA]  Participation  in  the 
Jqv  82,    SO    131.
iture  weapons    aystena    have   been   overcome  b 
shortage   of  HCsG  expertise  and  the   lack  o 
H    On    14    March,    Lt.    Gen-    Robert   K.    Bond,    the  vice   commander 
of    the    Air    Force    Systems    Command:,     answered    the    *CS/I    by    stating 
requiring    personnel    with    cartographic    and    geodetic    expertise    and 
include   MCsG  con  side  rations   in   the   development  process,    but  by   the 
end     of     19S3,      AFSC     had     not     brought     itore     cartographic/geodetic 
ment.     and     3!     consider     the    needs    of    data    producers,     as    well    as 
±nvited  all  agencies  with  activities  or  .interest  in  digital 
cartographic  base  data  to  participate  in  an  organizational  meeting 
on   21  »ay    1983.       Mr.    Constantine  K.    Pappas   and  Kr.    Neil   C.    Sunder- 
sentatives      at       the       meetings.  Other      Department      of      Defense 
£gj    At     the    meeting    held    at  ■  the    U.S.     Geological    Survey,     a 
exchange,  and  user  application.  Two  people  from  the  MCSG  Division 
were    on    the    groups:       Capt.    J< 
AFIS/IKTB.      and
H    By   the   end 
sentatives     who 
Policy  Statement  on  Digital  Data  Support 
and     the     Defense-     Mapping     Hgency,      representatives      from     the 
Force,    Arny,    Navy,    and  Marines    signed   a  proposed   policy    atatea 
about     digital     data     support     for     research     and     development 
recommended      that     the      Befense     Happing     Agency     adopt      it. 
i .  ^gf  The  Services  recognize  an  increass 
teqairetaenc  for  digital  cartographic  data  for  reseai 
and      development      (BSD)       efforts.  To      satisfy      the 
require -men  ts,  we  propose  listiced  areas  Mi  eh  in  t 
continental  United  States  (COSOE)  be  identifi 
specifically     far     fisO    support.         These     areas     Catch 
Mapping    Agency     f  DKA}     digital    data     bases,         Tney     a] 
2.     ggP    This     policy     applies     only     ■ 
flexible   and   adaptable 
start  BSD  projects  will  £ali  under -  this  guidance. 
3.     ffife    This      policy      will       reduce       and/or       help 
prevent    Tfrge      antounts      of      data      duplication,      provide 
Vincent  et  al,    AFIS/INT,    10   Hay  a 
JLtr   ^fe.      SFIS/IMTB     to    OMft 
on   Digital  Data  Support   to   Resea:
Geographic   Information  Systems  Wording  Group 
Um  On  25  July,  the  first  meeting  of  the  Geographic 
Inforaation  Systems  Wording  Group  of  the  Geographic  Information 
Systems  Subcommittee  of  the  Intelligence  Handling  Committee  of  the 
Central  Intelligence  Agency  was  convened  with  representatives  from 
agencies  and  organizations  involved  in  geographic  and  cartographic 
data  handling  ana  utilization.  Air  Force  primary  and  alternate 
representatives  on  the  group  were,  Mr.  Neil  C.  Sunderland  and 
Capt.      John      R.      Fredericks     of     the      targeting     direc  *"*  " 
overall  purpose  of  the  group  was  to  develop  a  coaEm 
to  geographic  data  handling  with  an  initial  focus 
video-disk     technology.  A     proposed     charter     for     t 
distributed  to  attending  agencies  and  organizations 
By  the  end  of  the  year,  the  Intelligence  Handling 
approved     the      charter     and      the      group     was     working     on      a      needs 
Geodetic  and  Geophysical   Requirements 
f^     
On     15    July.     Deputy    Chief    of    Staff,     Intelligence,    Brig, 
til    H.     Martin    submitted    to    the    Defense    Mapping    Agency    the 
directorate's      geodetic      and      geophysical      1GSGI      requirements      for 
a.  IB  Hon  survey  GaG  support  such  as  projects 
provided  To  the  Ballistic  Hissile  Office  of  Air  Force 
Systems  Command  (i.e..  Peacekeeper  targeting  software, 
Missile  Launch  Site  Data  Tapes,  Targeting  Gravity 
Disturbance  Model  Data  Tapes,  etc. )  should  be  included 
in  your  quarterly  Geodetic  and  Geophysical  Support 
Automated  Listing  fGGSAL)  report.  The  GGSAL  should 
contain  all  GSG  requirements  submitted  thorugh  the 
retirements  process. 
b.  fle  Oiir  geodetic  -data  base  survey  has 
indicated      command      support      foi      DMA      to     establish      and 
tltitvv    Qp,      AFIS     Historian     v.      Lt     Col     Kilder     ■ 
Vincent.    AFIS/INT,    10   May  84. 
2  Memo     A,        Chairman,        Intelligence       Informatio 
Consnittee,      to     GISS/GIS     WG     Members,       "Jont     GISS/GIStK.         ..    . 
IHC/MMS3 -5B .     22    Dec    S3,    ED    133    and    10    Stchs  JJJ;    Intw^jfc,    AFIS 
Historian  w.    Lt   Col    Wilder   and   Lt    Col   Vincent   et    si,    APIS/INT,     10 
May  84. 
3See    List  tfh,     "Defense    Mapping   Agency   GSG   Support   Automated 
Testing   (<X 
aLtr   y$,     OfiCS/I    to    Director    DMA,     "Geodetic    and    Geopbyi 
(G«G)    Requirements  FYS4-91,"    55  Jul  B3,    SB   135  and   1  Atch  q£ .
mAintasd 2 computer-orsented geodetic data hase Me soggest a meating of OMA, command representative our staff to discuss such a product prior to submattang a formal requirement . . Yow DMA pave requirements to provide geodetic ey ‘Support under vartime scenario, thst requires Air Force enlisted surveyors aasigned to DMA 1 the resource? If #0, is thia reflected in any i. ~ planning document? At ‘sue, is whether the career fSeld can remain viable serving primarily as a peacet) 3 resource to DHA, As of the end of 1981, the issues were atil) open items. ARAPS Terminal Installation ® As of the end of December, the Targete Directora's x not reMeived a response to its letter of 15 November 198" tn Secursty and Commnscations Managament Directorate reqa, » installation of a 2400 OPS digital circuit between the Directorate at Bolling AFB and the efense Mapping Agency, sydrn~ graphic/topographic Center, Brookmont, Maryland. The requested start tame was 2 January 1984 Since the aprang of 1980, Targets nad been coordinating with namerous offices and aganciea ab * thas project which necessstated the installation of an « Requirements and Products Status ARAPS, JTS-40 Terminal! 2 Lt, Col, elder as d.vation chief was project “ss for ARAPS, and had been warkang with developang the syst + ‘975, when he was stationed at the Defense Mappang Agency Aerospace Center an St. Louis, Migsours, te could proto Gallea "Mr ARAPS" and was eager vo ger tne termnas func? to enable tne diractorate to tap anto the Defease Mapping Agenc, © data pases on * cequatenents and 2 prodyctian managenent, whic 7 tars would enapse the directorate to better snow which Rar Force uate were on the OMA requirements lists, for which type of anfornat.on and wnen the infartation was raqaested and sche? "* for output. "ARAPS can nelp as broker on beralf of tne Ac Force * the colonel stated.? MCEG Conference on 17 October, the Defense Mapping Agency hosted a Mapping, Chastang, and Geodesy Conference, and in attendance were the ACS/T and members of the directorate Prior to the conference, Lt Col, wilder bad thought deeply about rasues tha required close coaperatian berveen the Aur Force and tne Defense Mappang Agency He identif.ed seven areas and problems which an ‘her AFIS; INT to AFIS/INS, “hrea Requirements 271 Product Status {ARAPS} Terminal Insta,lation " 27 Dec 83 SD 136 and 29 tens int ow AFIS Wastor.ay wv. Lt Col Wtader and wt col Jincent, APIS/INT, 10 May 84.
requirements:  1)  developing  digital  data  policy.  2>  streamlining 
requirements  processing,  3)  revamping  the  basic  HCSG  officer's 
course.  4)  developing  a  data  element  dictionary.  SI  usinij  co- 
other  conferences.  For  exanple,  the  World  Geodetic  System-34  was 
a     datum,      a      reference     thee     all      geographic     locations     could     be 
agreement  by  international 'allies,  treaty  revisions,  aad  changes 
seven    points    vere    issues    the    directorate    Mould    be    addressing    for 
is.  .  .  rosy.  With  ths  possible  exception  of  SfiC  fand  I 
thins  the  exception  is  temporary]  all  commaands  face,  in 
my  view,  an  acute  shortage  of  qualified  targeteers  and 
KCSG      officers.  World-vide,       there      are      about      250 
targeteer  slots  with  200  or  so  filled.  The  MC6G  field 
has  but  61    officers.      That  does   not  however,    reflect  the 
also    1    believe    many    shops    are    misplaced    in    the    command
step-child  o£  intelligence  with  the  targets  and  MCsG 
officer  being  neither  an  intelligence  officer  oor  an 
operator.  Somehow,  the  perception  must  change.  Too,  in 
peacetime     the     targets/MC£G    profession     is    not    a    highly 
profession.  Therefore,  we  have  trouble  recruiting  good 
personnel.  Some  senior  officers  actually  advise  the 
younger  troops  to  stay  cut  of  targets  because  it  is  hard 
(the  targets  course  at  Irfjirry  is  considered  to  be  one  of 
the  most  difficult  non-technical  courses  in  the  Air 
Force]  and  it  is  not  visible,  thua.  does  not  offer  very 
good  promotion  potential.  Similarly,  the  HCSG  field  is 
highly  technical  and  requires  significant  training 
beyond  that  normally  found  in  the  civilian  education 
community.         Like     the     target eer,     KCsG    officers,     except 
MB    The     fsiture    is     even    more    bleak .        Based    on    sty 
think    the   picture    will  worsen    and  probably   rapidly.       The 
within  4-5  years  by  an  order  of  magnitude.  Some  suggest 
fillisters  lifce  5CO-600  80B5s  by  '990.  My  question  is, 
"Where  will  they  cone  froa  and  how  will  we  train  thezn?" 
Eight    now,     our    personnel    inanagesront    system    cannot    cope
staff  officer 
(RFSC   5116). 
The changes    ispa aed  Band 
1    requirement 
3  ZZv*"ef™ 
to 
rtography  H 
geodes^ 
specialties 
Regarding    th 
revision    of APB 
36~i    and    th 
JU-SCs 
°rCth'"!1P<'-Uer 
and  Personne 
Car 
oneepw^ana 
A^pUoa 
■    upon    aoly 
n  of   the  8054/8076 
applying    AT    regulations 
:□   assume   ve   could    simply   t 
,    M-MPC/RPQJi    to
ieratiOT  of  USAFA  Graduates  ig  C6C  Officers 
B  On  r  June,  the  ACS/I  requested  that  Air  Force  Manpower 
Personnel  approve  the  assignment  nf  Air  Force  Academy 
ites    as    cartographic    geodetic   officers.       He    recaaonendeii    that 
•3    to    two,     since    there    were    DTily    75     cartographic    geodetic
icadesic    background,    vhich    included   some    emphasis    in 
Based    on    re tent ion     of     USAFR     graduates     in     support 
; eight)    and   5734    { 
iepth       boob       damage
i    industrial  capabilities   of    "third  world" 
nadequacies     of     -i     Defense     Napping    Agency 
■velopme nt    Canter    and    the    directorate    to    ensure    that    the    latter 
13   involved  in  new  weapon  systems  development  and  acquisition. 
5.     flfe    Provided     guidance     to     the     Ait     Force     Academy     with 
•siatfl.nceand  escape   training. 
msitive    enemy    hard    tar-gats    in    support   of    flag   officer    directed 
of      the      Intelligence     Tar< 
January     !9B4.         The     revis; 
ning    Workshop    called    by     i 
rssponsibility    of    the    targeteec,        Uge    of    SW/SC    and    attaching    Cj 
sought    ways    to    attach    C3CS    targets,     with    varying    results.        They 
difference  was  that  in  I9B3  both  concepts  had  attained  greater 
visibility     in     operations      and     planning     staffs.  Further,       the 
application    of    EW/EC    had    become    more    sophisticated.        Two    things 
EM/EC  was  just  another  weapon  option  to  be  applied  to  overall 
strategy.  The  targeteers,  the  directorate  suggested,  must  be 
taught    to    loo's    at    the    complete    picture    and    not    focus    on    any    one
it  in  satisfying 
Flyer"  Newsletter 
lane  little  to  help  them  untie  rata  n 
ctorate  planned  to  piiblis 
to  ESC/INN  et  al,  "Target  Intelligence 
Col  Wilder  ana  Lt  Col  Vincent,  AFIS/INT,
Stee wonbers from the Directorate of Taryote. From left €o right: Lt. Col Phillip 8. Wilder, Mr, Constantine R. Pappan, 14 Machael S Kearns, and Capt. John R. Fredericks
CHAPTER IV ERVELLIGENCE EDUCATION AND TRATXDNG Darectorate of Joint Services Support Directorate of Soviet Affaire Directorate of Attache Affaire
XBr    in     '983.     Che    Joint    Seruicsa    Support    Directorate 
authority,    and    organizational    changes.        MeiafcErs    of   Congre 
the    aitivity    of    the    directorate   ami   supportive    of    its    eft-
primary    responsibility    for 
-  Force  FW/da-tainees    aod    far 
5  proper   c ielec 
.el 
igB   of  US  PW/detainees   as   required. 
■B  Responsible  for  all  operational  aspects  of 
orce  participation  in  resistance  training  programs. 
Sing    guidance,     and    coordination    with    all    branches 
K      Responsible     for     the    production    of     world- 
t     Survival     related     intelligence     Contingency 
the 
Conduct  training  program. 
and   vorking    groups 
RF  personnel 
sible     for     al 
iac   functions 
of     Conduct 
BACKGROUND 
was  issued  23  Kay  1950  and  designated  the  secretary  of  tl 
Force  as  the  Department  of  Defense  executive  agent 
standardization    of    Code    cf    Conduct    training.        Subsequent    i 
intelligence 
[flCS/Ii    as    the   o 
85       AFIS       Directorate 
Item/Report  "(XOKP  Ltr,    21   Sep 
of    the    Navy,     "Assignment    cf    I 
Congressional
208 2 DOOD 1300 7 specificalay stated that the secretary of the Air Porce shall do the following:? & QM vcevetop in coordination with the other Military Departments, and distribate oultinedia training materials to support Code of Conduct-related training throughout the Armed Forces. Materiale will include guidance concerning the application of realistic, well- sonttored training. b. QMB conduct, ressarch and develop appropriate training Prograns, ot sodsty existing programs, on 8 continuing basis, to prepare personnel to resist newly discovered captor handling techmiques, including. abuses of captives while in confinement, and other exploitive practices Provade nevly developed or Bodafied eraimiug prowans to the Wilstary Services for thet ase € QB cecapissn clear, expeditious Lines of cou munscation between the executive agent. and train.ng facheatued throughout tie Armed Forces. 2 QP enoure that. ee Ferfora tne function of usteriar or l.brarian te all matters related to the Code of Gonduct and provide for the .dentification, collection, and control of a copy 97 copies of all docusentataon extant or sroduced in the futare concerning the Code of Conduct and related topaca. Darectorate Estapl.shed QB 2s catty 1050 at was apparent that 0000 1300.7 woud soon We signed and published, and that the Intelligence Services Division of the 7682¢ Air Intelligence Group would begin te officially fanceion as action office for the  joint-service smplenentation of the dezective Several meetings were held and Yoon 1300 7 QB. “traning and Education Measures Necessary to Support thescoderof Conduct," 22 May 85, as Arch 2 of Stele Summary sheet QB. Col Woot, APIS/INU, to AF Ik ct ace "Aur Force Intelligence Service's Joint Service Support Darectorate Manning,” S'bee 88, 50 151,
!    Marine    Corps    and    Array    : 
military    training   comrauni: 
development    and    execution    of    training    in    advancing    the    aias 
objectives    o£    the    Code    of   Conduct,    announced   by   Executive   ( 
AFISC/IOU,
:£    the    Armed    Forces    of    the 
id   responsibilities    £or    the 
■    personnel    depending    upon
and  authority. 
Request   from  th 
assigned  additional 
:vents   of    1983    would 
ice    responsibilities 
;    Chia 
ohn     w.     Vessey,      Jr..      USA.      asked    Gen.      Charlss 
lief   of  staff  of   the  Air  Force,    the  question.    *Co-j 
^e    role    of    DOD  Executive    Agent    for    Code    of    Condi; 
-■    appropriate    policies    and    their    in£  lens  citation 
.th    othsr   Services?"2       General    Vessey    explained    * 
■heors    of    -the    National    Irfsagoe    of    POW/MIA    Fsmilie 
i,    a   lack   c 
The    canst 
Col  Hebb  et  al,  AFIS/INU,  17 
Jr..  13SA  to  Gen  Gabriel,  "Code 
i  tub  2  of  Staff  Suamary  Sheet, 
O  Directive    1300. 7    Changes."    10
S[  General  Gabriel  explained  that  service  policies 
lly  derived  from  Department  of  Defense  Directive  1300.7, 
which  was  the  ovarall  governing  directive  for  Code  of.  Conduct 
policies.       Individual    service    interpretations    of    the    policy    were 
inputing  mach  broader  guidance  than  was  explicit  in  Che  directive. 
While  the  secretary  of  the  Air  force  was  designated  as  the 
executive  agent   for   the   Code   of   Conduct  hj   DQDEJ    1300.7,     little  or 
cOBblnation  of  these  two  factors  —  broad  interpretation  by  the 
services  and  lack  of  authority  to  Bonitar  and  coordinate  service 
Implementation       —       severely        limited       the       cahesivenesa        and 
«In    the   general's    judgment,     fairly    sweeping   changes    werp 
y   to  correct   the   situation.       He   suggested  that  the  changes 
be    oriented    toward   providing   authority    for    the    program    to    those 
clear  definition  of  policy  objectives  was   needed.      Be  concluded  by 
I    August,     Colonel    Webb    . 
.    29    August 
irlel.    based  on    t 
ConXc- 
KZ 
so  For  Hecordflfc, 
«   ,3.0.7  fg^
;.    ^H     Level     S      for     personnel      whose      ailifcary     ra 
•v-tailed  moderate   risV.  of  capture. 
3.    tf/ft     Level    C    for    personnel    whose    roles    entails 
jreater-than-avecage  exploitation  by   a  captor. 
thrSTTevels.       The   Amy   had   no  , 
developed        It    did   have    level    A   and   8    training,     with    the       latter 
having    just   begun    in    1982.       Navy    instructors    and  Army    instructors 
4P  "■ 
the :  TfRfT  direct. 
-j:,r:x: 
*,5 
£ 
,'1« 
i:r£"« 
to   General  Veasey. 
the    Office    c 
problem  of   the ambiguity   of 
1300. 7 .       Steps were    initiated    to 
clarify      the 
responsibility 
training  programs 
and    2!     the    a-j 
uniformity  and adequacy-2 
40     Sy       < 
10      November, 
,e 
dire ctorate      < „a      th,      «..Ut.nt 
3le    progre iss    in    working    out 
of    which    speci ficaily    ptovi! ied 
iidan. ;e    for    pe; ice time    conduct    of 
U.S.      military 
personnel.- 
Subcoamittee   or ,  Military  Rea. Sim 
>ss 
Hea; 
■inq 
rvival,      evasion,      resistance,      and     es=«[tH     (SEBE).         Congress 
liels    requested   that    the  .secretary   of    the   Air  Force    arrange 
'Talking  Paper  flB>  "Captivity  Train 
Defense,"  AFIS/IHKB,    24  Aug  S3 .    SD  159. 
^Staff  Suarnary  Sheet  J^.  ACS/I  to  Ai 
and  Training  Associated  with  COC, "  25  Ju: 
SuKmary   ShttflB'    AFIS/INU    to   AF/IH    et    a 
3Braft  Revisions  of  COD  Directive  13 
of  Ibid.
at an Air Force witness to appear before his subcommittee ta discusa SERE matters? On S April, two Air Force officers appeared before the readiness subcommittee. Col. Dale E. Stovall, the assistant director for Spectal Plans, HQ. USAF, and Col. Ronald 2. Webb, the director of the Directorate of Evaaion and Escape, Prisoner of Wax, 89, APIS. Their unclassified statement presented an overall view of nawwthe SERE program worked within the Air Force, and what the Air Force was doing to promote SERE training throughout the services. They also explained that the Air Force was deaignated ‘executive agent for twa separate functions. They stated:2 GERD, % meters mae our tone tore tncerese in OTE as irgely responaible for our selection as Executive Agent to the Sectetary of Oefense for training in Because of unique Service requixements, survival and cottbat rescue have always been service responsibilities. The Air Force, therefore, is not the Executive Agent for survival or combat rescue and there axe no forral overall yoant or DOD SERE programs. The statement that the Air Force was nat the executive agent for “survival and combat eseue" vas appropriate because Congressman Paniels was algo holding hearings on the subject of the services* rapabilaties with regard to “CSAR," Combat, Search and Rescue 3 Recrgan.zation Blan WRB ce tz pret, a week after Congressman Daniels! nearing, Colonel Webb swbutted to tne ACSI a proposed plan for reorganizing the directorate. According to the plan, the changes were to do the following: a Assign a title to the directorate that conforma to USAF standards, and more nearly enunciates the directorate functions? tute QB. Rep “oas" Daniele to Sec Verne Orr, ns., 22 Mar 83, as Tab 3 of Staff Summary Sheet QJ aris/mNR to aris/Mo et 41, *Code of Conduct Frogram Manning/Reorganization,* 12 Apr 83, sp 152. Pelered per 5 0.S.0. 352(b) (1)
former   by    changing    i 
i   plan    w.,^-h    basically 
^•Proposed    AFIS/ISR    Reurgsnliation"  Vft. 
■Bmary  Sheet  J^.     C01    Webb,    AFIS/ISR,     -Cod!To*
dHh  The  secretary  explained  che  need  for  the  manpower  *=y 
stati?g7  "Increasing  high  level  emphasis  an  Code  of  Conduct 
related    readiness    and    servic-    -c-     iinatlon    in    achieving  adequate. 
significantly  increased  the  Ci-aplexity  of  the  workload  of  the  EA 
C$R.  To  expeditiously  ach.uve  the  gosl,  the  EH  action  office, 
currently  manned  by  Air  Force  personnel  only,  nost  develop  a  full 
understanding  of  each  military  department' a  unique  requirements 
and  related  procedures,  and  a  credibility  which  would  foster  the 
other  service's  coinplete  support  and  cooperation.  I  suggest  that 
representation  from  the  other  two  oilitary  departments  in  the  EB 
action  office  would  strengthen  the  service  coordination  dasixed  by 
Congress  and  the  Don,  Improve  the  understanding  of  service -unique 
training  programs,    and  build  the  necessary  BK  credibility. "' 
r       to       the       approval       from       the       ACS/1       of       the 
proposed   reorganisation   plan,    Calanal   Webb    requested 
all    levels. ..no 
they  are  placed   in  an  organisation.3 
AS  D/MHSI. ,      "DOD    Directive 
3    Necessary    to   Support    the
a/Surveillance.'        Additionally,     according 
to     AFK     10-6,      a     symbol     identifying     the     functions     of 
ERE/PW  within  Intelligence  his  not  been  approved.. ' 
AH  She  ACS /I  did  approve  the  new  naae.  Joint  Ser" 
Support  Directorate,  and  the  new  functional  address  symbol, 
and  they  were  effective  23  Saptenber    19B3.2 
®     One    of    th< .    *oSt    significant   erents    of    the   ye«   was the 
Perry   M.    Smith   of    ti ise    Air    Force   Plans    and   Operations   Office 
AF/IN  would  accept   t he  responsibility  and  explained  why: 
SB  The 
humanitarian,       budgetary,       and      military 
the    Oepartment 
Lir    safe    return   to   US   control.       A  wartime 
If   ftnsericans    at re   being   held  prisoner,    we   have    the    added
MB  On  IS  August  Kaj.  Sen.  John  A.  Shaud,  tb*  director  of 
PlaA5^^  answered  the  ACSr/I  by  ate  ting.  ~»e  welcome  your 
willingness  to  accept  Eft  responsibility  for  EcB  on  behalf  of 
CC/WT.  We  are  confident  that  AF/IS  can  provide  the  expertise  and 
manpower     the    program     truly     deserves.  XO    will     retain    policy 
oversight  responsibility  and  we  will  give  you  oar  foil  support."* 
■BJp  On  6  September  the  ACS/I  accepted  the  executive  agent 
responsibility,  assigned  his  assistant  for  joint  natters  as  the 
Air  Staff  point  of  contact  for  ESE  related  matters,  and  designated 
as  his  action  office  the  APIS  Directorate  of  Evasion  and 
Escape/Prisoner  of  War. 3  On  7  October  19B3.  the  AFIS  commander, 
Brig.  Gen.  Paul  H.  Martin,  informed  the  directorate  that  the  new 
air    Staff    point    of    contact    foe    EtE    natters    was    the    Intelligence 
reorganizati 
'    Ma 
ir directors! :a    sin 
s   head  of the  C 
■   b, 
j- 
CMS. 
Jt 
Richard  E. 
hShM 
ctoi 
b.      Hr.    Claude 
isEiExe. 
.5. 
i    Escape    (EsE>     Eic 
fMaj    Gen    Shaud), 
ftFIS/CC    to    AFIS/DitI,
139, Hanning Strength in December, the directorate was manned at the following authBreged strengt™ | Number Authorizea Number Assigned Officers 7 ? Enlisted 4 4 cavilians at 3 Tot, Fa 20 Colonel Webb - Speaker in Demand pp Gosonel Webb was a speater about Code of Conduct and pridoner of war matters mich in demand in 1983, because he was an excellent lecturer, offered a thoughtful and thought-provoking presentation, and was a forner PO in North Vietnam for six years Included in some of his actsvity during the year were the graduation dining-in addvens at the Senior Marine Corps NCO Academy at Quantico, @ speach at the American ex-POW convention in Cleveland, Ohio, and a television interview: a filming of @ public service television spot at the Pentagon about MIA matters, and particapation in the Combat Survival lecture tour to the United Kingdom The Bolling Bean newspaper of the 1100 ARW preaented 4 featare article on ham,” as dad The Intelligencer, the AFIZ monthly newopaper On 23 Faoruary, Biig” Gen, Paul M. Martin presented Golcnel Webb with the Defense Supertor Service Hadal.? ‘cope OF CONDUCT AND SERE ACTIVITY Mageson Within the directorate, the Code ef Conduct Divisior with its three branches, Training. Production, and Library/Ar> chives, developed, monitored, and evaluated Code of Conduct related training and education programs, policies, and procedures for 41) branches of the Armed Forces.) According to the division's misaion statement, it also was involved with the followsng: Development and production of multiple med.a Code of Conduct-related training materials for the military services.4 Armia, Paastoricel Data Rect GI APIS/MM, Jan-Dec 62, SD 165. The Intelligencer, AFIS/PA, Apr 83, SD %67; Biographical Sketch: “Colonel Ronald J. Webb,“ 18 Zan 84. SD 183. SAPISR 23-19, 15 Feb 66, SD 182, Amis
;    Survival,    Evasion,    Resiatance.     4nd    Eacar*    (SE&E)    Contingency 
i    Management    responsibility    over    the    acquisition    of 
ieded    to    support    the    Combat    Survival    Contingency     ' 
Eefenne     Library /lx- 
:    places,     and    fay    different 
Lon  s,  so  ia;. 
.7    (ft,      "Training    and    Education 
ft,     M-IS/1NR    to    ACS/I,     "Code    of 
'.#»^WjJF
ifloals    initially  enCsring  militar 
,M. 
This    2S-sinjte    fiia    shcrald    Incorporate    sta 
JWs  vhics-.   will    ien3   credibility   to  the  cede
Sever QB tenses ot cnees 8 cats Srertive rien *hesat a ary ere vas Aste ry ter De kee 62 tep 5) 80 16e ioe toe vite apr QP U2 ta veres tnvecisgmes Prameee to tee ty aab/es Aeaslebie fed dan 6 Varecer ica, dete prt QYB L16 tr Jaa-uee 0s 80 ree Dolevet per song 25200740)
Establishment 
fulfill    action    office 
i    by    the   Kilitar 
Experience     and     Analysis     Program     and    perfor 
(INXIM.).      Upon  effective  date  of  change  to  para 
'Paper,   ^/f  S.FIS/IKD    to    RF1S/XP. 
Summary   Sheet  4|.    AFIS/CV 
■    Hay    80,    as    Tab    2    of
director  of  Legislation  and  Legal  Policy  of  the  Military  Perflonnel 
and  Faroe  Management  Office  of  the  assistant  secretary  a£  defense, 
on  7  Juno-      The  director  stated; 
<8Sfc  The  increased  attention  being  given  to  the 
Code'  of  Conduct,  its  history  and  training  in  support 
thereof,  through  Congressional  inquiries  and  hearings 
could  better  be  served  with  the  hiatorlan/liirarian 
function  and  concomitant  research  capabilities  locally 
available.  Addition illy,  the  detailed  requirements  for 
thorough     coordination     of     programs     among     the     Military 
training   guidance    for  all    Military  Department ' s    training 
peacetime    conduct    policy     in    the    very    near    future    all 
would    be     facilitated    by     the     transfer.  Further,      the 
research    resource   available   to  the    headquarters  of   other 
«Each    of    the    foregoing    factors    would    justify. 
If,       having      the      historian/librarian      available 
locally    to   departmental -level   decision -making  offices    of 
l  RIPSE   RIWKSR  83 
Virginia      Army      National      Guard-  The 
ing  Branch   ! INUAA)    sponsored   the   exercise 
iXPLAN   01-33.       Its  purpose   was   to  provide 
ctor.     Legislation    and    Legal    Policy,    Ol 
"Code    of    Conduct    Historian/Librarian, ■
duties     entailed 
?rcea  captivity. 
oall  part  of  a  larvae  «mei 
i      of      the      xorld      and
Ades BE Ba aioe Sal Aika wee Reaults and Cost GB Me number of runners, 94, vas the largest of any of the previous RIOGE RUNNER exercises, and they sustained less serious injuries {one minor ankle sprain and one minor grain pull) than ia ‘ipaid, 2thra. itpse 4After Action SD 173, Srpia Rprt QM Exercise RIDGE RUNNER 63, AFIS/TNU, fetered per 5 U.S-6. 29200) (1)
19B2    or    1981.       None    In    !9S3    were    apprehended  by   the  passive   enemy 
Qh  The  exercise  cost  332,000.  The  directorate  stated  that 
when  that  amount  vas  prorated  against  the  value  of  the  unique  and 
Important  training  tor  84  people  over  twelve  days,  the  trade  off 
was  highly  positive.2 
I^asons  learned 
BHft    According     to     the     directorate's     "after     action"     report. 
API  FrOT1  21"33  October,  HSgt  Charles  V.  I*jvelady  of  the 
Training  Branch  visited  Camp  Dawson  to  clear  operational  and 
messing  fund  accounts,  obtain  lost  receipts,  brief  operational 
area  commanders  on  RIME  RUNNER  83  "lessons  learned, "  and  begin 
the  coordination  process  for  RIDGE  KUMN3SR  84.  He  accomplished  all 
aspects  of  his  mission,4
428 Marine Corps SEFE School, Qierty Point, SC For example, 6 March, Colonel Webb and SMSgt Mitchell visstet the Marine Corp's SERR School at Cherry Point, North Carolina. The purpose was to agsist the school with developing a resistance training program. Colonel Webb made a two-hour presen tation about his experience as a prisoner of war in North Vietnam, and SHSgt Mitchell made a presentation on the developwent. of the INR directorate, a history of the Code vf Conduct, communist methods of exploitation, effective resistance techniques, and suggestions for operat.ng 4 resistance training laboratory. Col. erry Marvel, the commander of the NCAS at New River, North carolina, was also a former prisaner of war in North Vietnam, and he and Colonel Webb held a one~hour extemporaneous discussion about their POW experiences, which was video taped, with a copy being sent to the AFIS compound. Colonel Webb believed that the Marine SERE School staf vere dedicated to thear aigaion and gager to adopt Aur Force suggestions about their developing program. Amy SERE School, Fort Sraqg, NC Also sn March, Coloned Webb and SMSqt Mitoheli visited the Army SERE School at Port Bragg, orth Carolina to famstarize themselves wath the school facilities, operations, and development of tha Army's training program They saw the extensive training facalities at Cat Markell North Carolina, and monitored a one~ hour presentation on evasion principles ant techniques. The colonel thought that the progress of the Army's program over the last two years was commendable, eapecially with the approval for funding for the conatmetion of a resistance training laboratory the completion of which was to enable the Army to have a highy rask-of “capture training program. ? chesty Posnt/Fort Bragg NC," 6 Apr 83, £0 178. tera. Deleted per 5 c.s.e- 220d
lined     Special     Voices     Operational 
't"J«"»"""°* 
rvival    procedures    and    te 
and      2)       interrogation. 
courses,    enph a sizing 
emphasising      joint 
up  »„  ,„«,, cions  about  the  safety  pri 
na,    especially   with    the 
d     his     trip     r 
eport 
fully.4 
.""ri 
least      soae      ROKAF     personnel      receive 
ing    of    gone    sort.        I    observed    a    HOKS? 
lan    S     resistance    postures    quite    skill- 
Aroy   personnel   observed    received   little 
move  through  heavily  populated  countryside  for  three 
days  without  being  detected  by  the  .local  populace  or  the 
US  and  BOX  Special  Forces  troops  that  were  assigned  as 
spotters  in  the  area.7 
«.    ■■)     Evaders    said    that    they    wished    that    they 
practice.      .The  evaders  also  said  that   they  were   going  to
we get space blantets included im their survival vests, Rarcrew members also stated that small, lightweight. binoculars would have aided their evasion greatiy,? f. QD Siostar sccivitive cay take place dering aeah SPOT 06 with evasion and interrogation practice being conducted in varioun locales in Korea. Revision of AFR 64-3 The 8Q USAF/KOOTA, the office of prisary responsibility for Air Force Regulation 64-3, “Combat Search and Rescue.” requested that the ¢irectorate review, comment upon, and coordinate on the draft revision of AFA 64-3. The directorate’s recommendations were included {n the final draft of the regulation, including the adoption of the Isolated Personnel Report, which standardized the Department of Defenae with the Worth Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) on this item. DEFENSE SUPPORT PROGRAMS Land Withia the durectorate, the Defense Support Programs pivition with its three branches, Combined Services Support, Anti- Terrorism, and Technical Support was the action office for the executive agent of the Joint Chief of Staff for operational combat survival, As such, it developed operational concepts. initiated and nonitored programs, syatens and techniques to support According to the allowing? Te also did the divigion'a mission stateaent, Developed and produced training in support of Air Force Requiation 208-1 on hostage survival.? Provided, upon request, technical recommendations to support human intelligence (HUMINT) and AUMINTorelated actavities.6 Provided Air force augmentation to, and management of the Combined Servaces Support. Program {SSP).7 Special Operations Conference In December, Colonel Webb and fave members of the directorate travelled to Fort Bragg, North Carolina, to attend the 4983 Worldwide Speczal Operations Conference in order for the for directorate to exercise responsiblilty as the action office the executive agent in the area of escape and evasion operations. Tread. 2rpia. Rintve QM AFIS Kustorian w. Col Webb, AFIS/ING, 17 Ape Bay Historical Data Rprt @MM AFIS/INU, Jan-Dec 83, SO 166. 4aFIS Regulation 23-1, 15 Feb 84, Section R, SO 182. Sama. Spa Titpid. Peleted per 5 U.S.C. 552(b}(1)
lei    Webb,    by    : 
;hops      at      the 
There      were      five      other 
sent,       Requirements.       Command      and  Control, 
lies,     and    Psychological    Operations,  On    the 
third     day      of      the      conference,      each     of      the      workshop  chairmen 
reported  back   to  the  conference   in  general  session. 1 
fl£    Specific     topics      of      d 
at  length.  Lines  of  communication,  bc-th  forraal  and  informal,  i 
remain  open  to  accomplish  the  initiative a  necessary  foi 
successful  evasion  and  escape  responsibility.6 
t  Lovelady,    atis/ihuaa.
ion  office   for  the  executive   agent   and 
rvices  and  clHCs  for  coordination.  2 
>(■  and  evasion  security  classification  guide 
Peacetime  Conduct  Policy  Letter.  13  July  1382.'
!«•* 
=urity      Agency.       the 
Llitsry    personne 
:aly's    Red    Brig 
proximately    10,000   people    from 
State  Department,  the  Hatio 
s  Nuclear  Agency.  the  Deffe 
Central    Intelligence    agency . 
avily    from   the    experience   of  Br 
lough    exactly    the    same    as 
[reas,     applies    only    during 
millet   does   t 
ns   see   Histor 
'reposed  Revisi 
:  A  ten,  i
34 For specific mussions or areas of asaignment where andividuals may ave @ high risk of peacetime detention ox terrorist captivity, the militery services are obligated to provide training and detailed guidance to such personnel to ensure their adequate preparation for the situation. Training will be reviewed and aonitared for adequacy and consistency with this guidance by the executive agent for ASD/MRAGL.? ‘Zoid,
LN _ BS a parttogast i> fevetes ema amms oo ry
E  baing   fully   Banned,    thereby   approaching  a 
inguist -Russian    (20873A*    aiot.       The 
J    Intelligence    Operations    Technician 
on    organisational    chart   D 
SD   1B5.      For  a  biogsaphica
fflk  In  July.  Colonel  Wish  requested  that  the  agreement 
bet-sen  his  directorate  and  che  Directorate  of  Attache  Affairs 
(INH)  be  re-established  with  the  Directorate  of  Personnel  fBPJ. 
when  DP  assumed  responsibility  for  the  area  Specialist  Program 
(com  JSH.  The  agreement  identified  ess  officer  per  year  for  entry 
into  the  Urea  Specialist  Program  for  training  as  a  Soviet  area 
specialist.  Opon  completion  of  training,  the  officer  would 
receive  follow-on  assignment  to  the  Boriot  awareness  program. 
Colonel  Wish  stated,  "If  we  can  oalntain  this  source  of  personnel. 
It  will  greatly  alleviate  some  of  the  problems  we  ha1™  experienced 
in  assigning  folly  qualified  officers  to  the  Directorate  of  Sori«t 
affairs- "1 
Hft  The  colonel  explained  that  his  directorate  would 
continue  to  look  for  its  own  nomiJiee,  but  "BUld  also  like  to 
review  those  who  had  already  applied  to  the  Area  Specialist 
hoard  for  the  progran,  he  requested  that  * 
have  the  opportunity  to  interview  the  selectees  and  to  identify 
one  for  a  follow-on  assignment  to  Soviet  Affairs.' 
because  the  new  ten^iorary  head  of  the  program.  Major  Robert  P. 
Airaghl,  was  not  able  to  fonaally  allocate  a  quota  of  one  slot  to 
work  to  ensure  that  highly  qualified  individuals  were  assigned  to 
i  follow-on  assignment  i 
years.    Former  team  members 
executive  officer  were  slated  1 
lugust  19B6.  In  addition,  t 
qualified  personnel  to  work  in 
D.S.  Military  Liaison  Mission  in
Requests   for  additional  Manpower 
mk  in  November,  Soviet  affairs  submitted  tiro  nev  initiative 
request?  for  the  fiscal  year  59B6-1990  joint  prograwaing/budget 
data  call.  The  first  request  was  for  three  officer  positione  to 
enable  the  Soviet  Awareness  team  to  achieve  a  two-team  capability. 
According  to  the  requirement  description,  the  current 
authorization  of  twelve  officers  was  insufficient  to  field  two 
aix-nan  teats*.  Team  personnel  had  to  always  be  available  to 
schedule  deployments,  to  coordinate  visits  with  the  major  commands 
and  bases,  to  review  and  establish  curricula,  to  set  up  special 
presentations,  and  to  conduct  training  programs  for  new  personnel. 
The  three  additional  positions  were  to  fulfill  these  management 
duties  and  were  already  validated  by  the  Air  Force's  Management 
Engineering  and  Analysis  Division  in  the  fiscal  year  1984  Program 
Objective  Memorandum.  The  justification  stated,  "We  are  almost 
one  year  behind  schedule  with  the  Soviet  Awareness  Soad  Show;  in 
Cy  83  we  will  have  visited  20  bases  which  had  previously  hosted 
the  Soviet  Awareness  Team.  Only  5  of  these  bases  were1  briefed 
before  in  cyBO,  which  means  that  our  deployment  schedule  has 
indeed  slipped  toward  a  four  year  interval  between  visits.  Given 
this  slippage,  due  to  oanpower  constraints,  in  exposing  active  Air 
Force  meisbers  to  Soviet  Awareness,  we  lack  the  wherewithal  to 
honor  numerous  requests  by  Air  National  Guard  and  Air  Force 
Reserve  units  who  would  be  delighted  to  host  our  eight-hour  Road 
Show.  Thus  we  are  not.  able  to  contribute  to  the  Total  Force 
Concept  whose  very  relevancy  would  be  substantially  enhanced  by 
the  unique  training  conducted  by  Soviet  Awareness." 
flft  The  second  initiative  requested  one  additional  manpower 
slot  for  the  Literature  Research  Division,  in  order  to  continue 
publication  of  AFRP  200-i,  "Soviet  Press  Selected  Translations," 
at  its  current  length  and  quality.  According  to  the  requirement 
description,  AFRP  20Q-1  served  a  readership  of  approximately 
6,000,  ranging  from  academics  to  senior  intelligence  analysts  to 
unit  intelligence  officers.  tfeterial  for  the  publication  was 
originally  compiled,  translated,  edited,  and  published  by  two 
—    ■-■      billets    was    on    loan,    while    the 
....j  deleted  at  the  end  of  the  third  quarter  of  fiscal 
1933.  Since  that  time  one  captain  and  one  civilian  GS-?  accomp- 
lished all  the  work  on  a  teo^orary  basis.  Kaintainirxg  AFFP  200-1 
at  its  current  length  of  4Q-44  pages  per  issue.  6  issues  per  year, 
was   a   two-person   job.       If   the  additional  slot  was   not   funded   there 
m|  AFIS/INC  to  AFIS/iC,  *FY86-90  Joint 
Programming/Budget      Data      Call. "      3      Hov     83.      SD      IBB;      Narrative 
"  >r    New    Initiative   — .     AF1S/1NCR,    PE    Code    B4752D, 
Justific
quality,    and  length.1 
secbetaby  ora's  viarr  Aso  BEFUHBissura  pbqjbcx 
'Narrative    Justification    foe    Hew    1 
PE       Code       647SZD,        "Translator/Editor        £or 
Publications,"  3   Spy  S3,   SD  190. 
2DIS™     Meno    ■■     Col     Wish,      AFIS/INC, 
aaral    Marks.*    19    -
^B     In   October,     the    ACE/I    requested   t 
and   Resources   consider   allocating  Building   130*    on  Boiling   *ra    to 
that  the  building  was  to  be  seated  by  the  21st  Mr  Force  NCD 
Leadership    School    and    by    units    of    the    1100th   Rir   Base    Wing,    and 
noisy  Building  520.  In  justifying  the  nove,  the  ACS/X  stated. 
"adequate  office  space  would  be  provided  for  both  divisions  in  the 
directorate.  The  auditorium  already  in  place  in  Bldg  1304  could 
be   Eodified   to  accommodate    100    seats  vice    the  70    in  Bldg  520.       It 
lar 
Lea 
objec 
rally    i 
by    analyst 
e    expected    i 
the one-di jy   eight-hou r  Soviet  Military  Pove 
;fly  press ■ntation,    i 
upgrading 
of 
35     urn     slides     a. id     video     clips     to    ei 
currency 
of 
Lons.        The 
highlights 
Id: 
ideology,      the 
belief 
despotisa. 
id    and    control    of    boc 
:y    from 
power    was 
centralize, 
he    need 
"upgrade 
W ^n  »n 
Dl 
ireneas  Equipment  Display*  ■§,    9  Kay 
a    detailed 
=ope_of    wo 
tiae -tabli 
•   see    "State ment   of   Work    and   Atch 
'  mt>  1 1    Oct    B3, 
"All 
ocatii an  o£  Buildii 
Atch     ttl      Col     Hi  ah 
ig   1304,   Boiling  APB," 
M 
WIS /INC 
Oct  83. SD  195.
tf/ft    For     5983,     attendance    at-  Soviet    Awareneas    pi 
vaa  categorized  as  follows!3 
27 , 660      - 
Eight-hour  classified  programs,    ineludir 
Military  Power  Days  and  ttaad  Shows 
2.99!      - 
Unclassified  programs 
907      - 
Soviet  Military  Power  Weeka 
41      - 
TOY  Deployments 
December   1983   » «re  the   following:3 
133,559      - 
Clarified  program* 
31,510      - 
One lass if led  programs 
346      - 
TOY  Deployments. 
Diverse  Groups of  Attendees 
^^P    Throughout    the    year,    the    Soviet   Awareness    presentations 
National  Capital  Region,  including  personnel  from  the  Central 
Intelligence  agency,  the  Defense  Intelligence  Agency,  and  the 
Federal  Bureau  of  Investigaion;  White  House  staff  members;  the 
Secretary  of  the  Air  Force,  personnel  from  the  Army  and  Navy, 
active    and    reservisti     and    members     of    the    Reserve    Forces    Policy 
a  one-week  class  exclusively  for  special  agents  of  the  FBI  who 
worked  on  Soviet  foreign  counterintelligence  matters.  Recording 
to  the  assistant  director  of  the  Intelligence  Division  at  the  PHI, 
"The  Soviet  Awareness  School  has  been  uniformly  praised  by  FBI 
attendees,  and        knowledgeable         counterintelligence         training 
personnel  consider  the  course  the  best  of  Its  kind  given  anywhere. 
For  reasons  of  efficiency  and  operationally  oriented  priorities, 
FBI  counterintelligence  training  programs  have  ae-emphasiied  area 
and     background     studies.  The     Soviet     Awareness     School      is     an 
excellent  vehicle  for  filling         this  training         gap."
Ww 
it  was  also  limited  and  restricted. 
ager   for  security,    safety,    ana 
3a,      California,      wrote     to     Colonel     « 
Show  be  presented  at  his   facility  beca 
;*tremely    effective    courae    covering 
I     staff,      intelligence, 
sctly   esployed  by  the   Da] 
eligible       to      attend 
visit  Vandenberg,  last  visited  by  then  in  August  1980.  The 
commander  of  the  1st  Strategic  Aerospace  Bivision  storked  closely 
with  the  teaifl  to  ensure  that  their  unusual  and  deasn&ing  support 
requirements   were   net,    including  security,    theater,    equipment,    and 
ground  rules  for  the  nnclassifieo  two-hour  evening  presentation 
and  had  an  excellent  tuxa-out  for  the  program.      The  rules  vers: 
;Ltr  9g,    Regis  J.    Carr,    Jr.    to  Col    Wish,    AHS/BC,    n.B.,
or    staff    personally 
'andenberg  program,  a  visit  by  the  Soviet  Awareness 
base  was  preceded  by  months  of  planning  and 
and     this    usually     insures    high    caliber,     flawless 
Soviet  Awareness  briefing  team  visited  Keflavik,  Iceland,  on  2-4 
June,  at  Che  request  of  the  coanander.  Air  Forces  Iceland.  He  was 
especially  eager  to  have  the  team  address  the  people  under  his 
cosmand  because  they  formed  one  of  the  few  organisations  in  the 
Air  Force  which  intercepted  Soviet  aircraft  on  a  recurring  basis. 
They  had  in  April  already  intercepted  40  such  aircraft  since  the 
start  of  the  year.  The  team  briefed  640  people  in  the  classified 
program  and  66  who  attended  the  evening  unclassified  program. 
Some  of  those  in  attendance  were  Navy  personnel  who  performed 
antisubmarine  warfare  operations   frcuc  K     '" 
USSR  Orientation  Visit  Cancelled 
trip  in  !9S3.  The  trip  had  been  planned  for  six  months  with  the 
defense  attache  officers  in  Moscow;  Sophia,  Bulgaria;  and 
Helsinki,  Finland.  The  itinerary  was  to  enter  the  USSR  via  rail 
from     Helsinki,      then     to     tour     Leningrad     28-30     June;     depart     for 
depart  Moscow  via  air  for  Sophia   the   mrning  of  8  July. 
(fe  Approxiswtely  two  weeks  after  the  initial  submission, 
the  first  indication  of  a  problem  occurred.  The  Soviets  inquired 
about  why  the  visitors  would  enter  the  country  via  Leningrad 
instead   of   Moscow.       The   standard    U.S.    official   business    reply   was 
IlcfH,  Col  Wish,  AFIS/INC,  to  «aj  Gen  Watkins,  I  STRAD/CC, 
n.s.,  13  Oct  83  and  14  Dec  S3,  SD  2Q0 ;  Memo  ft|,  INC/CC  to  ACS/I, 
"Retniest  for  Soviet  Awareness  Briefing,"  13  Apr  S3;  SD  201.  Msg 
fgf,  aQ  USAF/IN  to  I  STRAO/CC,  "Proposed  Civilian  Guests  at 
Unclassified  Soviet  Awareness  Briefing,"   2500Q6Z   Oct  B3,    SD  2Q2. 
2Lfcr   j0.      Col     J.      E.      Smith,      AFI/CC,      to     APIS/INC,      "Soviet 
n.s.,    28  Jun  83,    SD  217.
of    a   problem   until    1 
officially  refused  t 
miet  dealt  at  the  Stat 
I  been  denied  to  othe 
:o   try   again   to   aend 
J)  In  May,  the  Public  Affairs  Office  of  the  Office  of  the 
SecreTary  of  the  Air  Force  asked  the  ACS/I  to  provide  an  informal 
off -the -record  discus 9 Ion  on  Soviet  matters  for  John  McWethy  of 
ABC    Ne»s.        McWethy    wanted    background    information    in    preparation 
fall  of  1983.  A  discussion  with  McWethy  took  place  on  27  Kay. 
Present  were  It.  Col.  Janes  M.  Sittpeon,  Capt.  Mark  C.  Chavez,  and 
Lt.  McCutcheon  of  INC;  Lt.  Col.  Pbillip  Gardner  and  Maj.  Michael 
J.  Sterling  from  IKER;  and  Lt.  Col.  Fuller  and  Maj.  Rand  from 
public  affairs.2 
flb  McWethy's  main  interest  was  a  coo^arison  of  Soviet 
military  training,  tactics,  and  technology  with  those  of  the  U.S. 
armed    forces.       The    discussion   was    friendly    and    free-f lowinc,       Lt. 
wanted    to   gat    something  on    film.       He    said    that   rtcWethy  understood 
personnel,      but     that     he     did    express 
September    1983,    the 
inquiry  Response  fm,  Capt  JMblonsfci,  AFIS/INC, 
Historian,  22  Mar  84.  Point  Paper  flB  W1S/WC,  "The  Di: 
of  Soviet  Affairs,  (AFIS/IHC) , "  6  Jul  S3,  SD  204.  Msg  g/f 
AFIS/UiC  to  USAOO  Moscow,  AlBft,  "Country  Clearance  Request, 
271600Z  May  83,  SD  205;  M8g  (g,  AFIS/IHC  to  OSDAO  Helsinki,  AIKA 
•USSR/Bulgarian  Orientation  Visit,"  2U600Z  Jun  33,    SD  206.
threat,     made    July    1976.       The    service    requested    and 
assistance    of    Che    Directorate    of    Strviet    Affairs    in 
geography  with  Soviet  A 
flB  In  June.  the  Soviet  Awareness  staff  rtr: 
critiqued  the  movie  script.  A  wajor  abjection  focuss 
linking  of  American  nuclear  freeze  advocates  with  dirt 
Involvement  and  manipulation  of  the  "freeze  nnvement.' 
subject,      the     script     was     rewritten     and     film    Edited. 
LITERATURE 
influential 
into  Snglis 
IHFQHHATICN 
Apr  83 
toy  83 
Jul  S3 
,    AFIS/INC.    Jan-Dec
Copieo  Sold  by  the  Govsnment  Printing  0 
3  military  and  political   :
KjSr'tg:""; 
Kdnaind    McMilllfliaa    * 
atertta  aCqUiSlt ■io": 
.r  defense -re la tec 
iliu- 
1:  £ 
liit^ 
■slated  poblicstie >na. 
The    colon.l 
^sr1™r'«.7hjus^i 
fLoruc=ti^n 
it   prog 
K'TotT*  f« ™=d  t"uTc°^tin°Lti0[t o£PtSiiaCrelTtien! Ship     1M 
«°wii!-iaM' cpjidancB.  '2 
EXChS^e     in the   National    H*«ew 
H?^ 
sJL; 
July     1983, 
t    the   Naticnal  Kevie-   oi 
ttef  aTe  MtieU,  f  
"TO^B. 
■"iTch
ftbel   Btatefl   the  following; 
ng  publications   to    its   output:    Another 
serves      aa      a     vehicle      for     Western 
it    Bilitary     affairs     and    a    periodical 
ietniled       study       of      Soviet      Eilitsry 
j formed    Aaari 
pretext)     for    this    &x 
only    baais,"    but    this    option     seems    ti =    hove    been    very 
sparingly    used.        An    important    example of   Soviet    use    of 
the  copyright  weapon  was   Moscow's   reful isl   in  Harch   197"? 
to    alios     the    OSJU"    to    publish    flctairal 
Gorahkov's    book 
Sea  Power  of  the  State.3 
HB   The    directorate    . 
zier "s  reply. 
5Ltr. 
m  •* 
phot 
:ocopy, 
2  Ibid. 
SD  213. 
Buckley,    J: r. ,    Edit
t     
Since    the     1970s,     the    Soviata.     through    their    USSR    Ml- 
pyright   Agency    1VWU>),    have    periodically    refused    to    allou 
(at    Copyright   Convention    at    1953.    a   party    to    the    convention 
Historian    w.    -Capt    1
Some of the Soviet items on exhibit hy the Directorate of Soviet Ateatre
f::--  ■  'ft;    J.''"      ■         \:  ,^.__ 
„y  ;.-*"- 
1*-   4 'i  «<?««. <,»^r-  .""WHS 
■ii8t
DIRSC30SATK  (ST  ATTACHE  AFTAIBS 
MISSION  AND  DEFENSE  ATTACHE  SiSTEM 
Hp  The  principal  mission  of  the  Directorate  of  At 
Affairs  (INH)  was  to  develop  capabilities  for  Air 
participation  in  the  Defense  Attache  Systen  (DAS  I,  to  mc 
and  results  of  that  participation,  and  to  ex« 
lizance  over  Air  Force  aspects  of  the  attache  pre 
Attache  System  was  a  joint  military  service  act! 
which  since  1965  operated  under  direct  control  of  the  Dt 
Intelligence  Agency.  In  19B3  the  distribution  of  positions  i 
system  mas  as  £ollovs;1 
- Service  Ho.    < 
•This    figure   includes   7   position; 
luthorization  list 
positions     in     the     DAS     were     assigned     to     61     embassies.  In     21 
following      countries!  Argentina,      Australia,      Bolivia,      Brazil, 
Canada.  China,  Czechoslovakia,  Finland,  Honduras,  Israel,  Oman, 
Pakistan,  Philippines,  Portugal.  South  Africa,  Soviet  Union, 
Sweden,  Thailand,  Turkey.  Venezuela,  and  Yugoslavia.  In  three 
countries,  Brazil,  China,  and  the  Soviet  Union,  the  CATT  position 
was  filled  by  an  Air  Force  officer  for  2  of  every  6  years.2 
'The  detailed  INH  mission  statement  is  found  in  APISH  23-1 
fgf,  15  Jul  82,  Section  «,  SD  2;  Brfg  Paper  Q|,  "Air  Attache 
Briefing,"  APIS/INH,  Jan  B4,  pp  5-6,  SD  219.  This  paper  contains 
a  brief  historical  sketch  of  the  military  attache  system,  and  on  S 
Sep  S3  Lt  Col  Gillaspj  and  SSgt  Barland  presented  it  to  Kenneth  E. 
deGraf f eared  d.  the  Director  of  Intelligence  Programs  for  the 
National  Security  Council.  Intw  Q.  APIS  Historian  v.  Capt 
Gibbs,   APIS/INH,    17  Jan  B4. 
^Brfg  Paper  *S<  "*ir  Attache  Briefing,*  APIS/INH.  Jan  84,  p 
6,  SD  219;  Intvw  (■&  APIS  Historian  ».  Capt  Gibbs.  APIS/INH.  17 
Jan  B4i  "Defense  Attache  Offices,"  Atch  5,  IKH  Recruitment 
Package,   SD  220.
t  positions  Air  Force  personnel  were  assigned  to  in 
defense  attache  (DAW),  sir  attache  {AIM!,  assistant 
fAAIRM.  operations  coordinator  iOFSCQJ — similar  to 
position—  intelligence       assistant,        and       mechanic. 
re  sometimes  Intelligence  assistants  or  secretaries.1 
4A  In  '983,  the  MA  established  three  officer  positions 
within  the  attache  systen  to  be  filled  by  Air  Force  personnel: 
defense  attache  in  the  United  Kingdom,  air  attache  in  El  Salvador, 
and  assistant  air  attache  In  the  Peoples  Republic  of  China.  Moo, 
the  HI*  switched  two  enlisted  intelligence  assistant  positions 
from  London  to  South  Africa  and  Korea.  This  occurred  because  the 
DtA  reorganiied  the  enlisted  staff  in  London  in  order  to  have  one 
intelligence  assistant  from  the  Art^r,  Navy,  and  Air  Force,  Instead 
of   three    from   tha   Air  Force.      The   defense   attache   in   London   had 
expertise   in  the  support  areas.* 
lave  been   the  following: 
No.   Authorised  Kg.    Assigned 
^Intw  <■'  *"s  Historian  w-.  Capt  Gibbs. 
Wi  Ltr  0.  1WB  to  AF/IN  (Col  Harris,  Br  Ge 
>faut£).    "Realignment    of    Air    Force    Intelligence
second  floor  of  Building  T-1923  In  the  WIS  compound.  From  March 
through  June  the  ares  underwent  extensive  renovation  and  the 
capability  of  the  staff  to  conduct  business  an  usual  was  limited. 
Suspended  ceilings  with  recessed  lighting  were  installed,  and  new 
■alls  with  paneling  Here   constructed. * 
Col.  James  E.  Steinmiller  continued"  «»  director  of  IMH, 
organised  into  two  main  divisions.  Lt.  Col.  Edward  O. 
was  chief  of  the  Officer  Selection,  Training,  and  Support 
and  Siegt  Kenneth  E.  Pool  was  chief  of  the  Enlisted 
and  Administration  Division.  The  directorate  was  Banned 
to  authorised  strength:2 
Number  assigned 
medically    retired.       It    was 
arrived. 
KtOpW  3002  »ord  Processor 
•  WcTd  Processing  System,  to  replace  the  Haieltine  2000  system, 
;h  was  obtained  in  1976  and  which  often  malfunctioned  or  broke 
i.      ft  major  feature  of   the   MICOM  was   its   compatibility  with   the 
STATISTICS 
flh  In  coordination  with  Headquarters  VSHF  and  the  Air  force 
Hannover  and  Personnel  Center,  the  INH  directorate  reviewed, 
evaluated,  and  nominated  38  officers  to  the  Defense  Intelligence 
agency    for    service    in    the   Defease   Attache   System.       The    following 
>2,    Bldg  1923,    ED 
^Historical   Data   Rprt   f/f,    ATIS/lHa, 
graphical    sketch    of    Col    Steinmiller    see 
Jan-Dec  B3.       Pol 
SD    225.        For    an 
For     a     list    of 
personnel   see  SD  227. 
3Ltr^|.     INH    to    76AMVLGSCAS,     "Sol 
KICOM  2004   Word  Processing  System,"    14  Jur 
.e  Source  Justlfic 
i  83,   SD  228.
i    a    cao^arative    summary   oE    the    officer   panels    conducted 
Total  Panels 
Approved  by  Pane 
Disapproved  by  P 
Withdrawals  be for 
DIA  approval 
Approved  by  DIA 
Disapproved  by  E 
Approved  by  DIA 
Returned  becau 
□f  Incumbent  E 
pending  i 
Dec  82, 
approved 
:    Defense    Attache   Syst 
GRADES      -     Captain  through  brigsd
i.  PB0MOTAS1LITY     -     Outstanding    ■ 
PROFICIENCY     -     Profici 
R  ATTACHE  SELECTION  2 
looked    for    and 
rating      of      B-3/R-3 
ilunteers  encouraged,   bat 
^rviews  potential     attache 
by    *vord-of-mo 
td  officers.  They  were  recruited 
ml  fortoer  attaches,  and  through 
a    All  Force  Aaaociatlon  Magazine, 
panels      consisted     of     sin     « 
j  Defense  Intelligence  Agency.3 
:  husband  and  wife  could 
professional  tean  and  creditably  represent  the  0.8. 
the  secretary  of  defense,  the  secretary  of  the  Air 
the  ambassador,  while  acting  independently  in  a  highly 
icial  and  social  mileau.  While  in  Washington,  the 
Ibo  had  an   opportunity    to  learn  more   about   the   attache 
.a    ts.     Col    Etelnmiller,    AFIS/INH, 
Vir   Attache  Briefing,"  AFIB/IHH.    ;
BP  Enlisted  personnel  chosen  far  duty  in  the  Defense 
Attache  System  were  usually  staff  through  mater  sergeants,  vho 
were  assigned  as  "intelligence  assistants,"  Bad  senior  and  chief 
master  sergeants,  who  were  assigned  as  "operations  coordinators. " 
The  positions  were  nsostly  for  administrative  specialists  and  air- 
craft oechanics   for  C-12   Beechcraft   twin-engine  aircraft. z 
flB  Enlisted  candidates  and  their  spouses  were  also 
interviewed  by  panels.  The  enlisted  panels  consisted  oE  seven 
members:  the  director  of  Attache  Affairs,  the  chiefs  of  the  two 
divisions    within    the    attache    directorate,     three    senior    HCO3    from 
frons      the      Defense      Intelligence      Agency..  The      following      is      3 
1  1933  and   1982:3 
STATISTICS 
Withdrawals  before  DIP 
Approval 
Approved  by  DI* 
Disapproved  by  DIA 
Approved  by  DIA  but  H* 
Consecutive  Overseas  1 
panels  because  some  persons  were  nominated  for  consecutive
Enlisted   manning 
.    aOTHORIZSP       HO.   ASSIGNED       PERgEST 
TRAINING  P 
^B  After  the  selection  process,  the  Attache  Affairs 
Directorate  designed  a  training  program  tailored  to  the  needs  of 
the  designate,  taking  into  consideration  his  background  and  the 
country  to  which  he  night  he  assigned.  As  a  rule,  each  attache 
attended  a  twelve-week  attache  course  at  the  Defense  Intelligence 
College  in  Washington,  D.C.  Spousss  were  encouraged  to  attend  the 
entire  course  and  to  join  tours  and  attend  seminars  conducted  by 
the  State  Department.  «hen  necessary,  an  attache  and  spouse 
attended  a  five  to  ten-month  language  course.  Some  attaches 
required  additional  specialized  training,  which  included  training 
with  the  C-12  aircraft.  In  those  countries  where  the  govemnent 
was  considering  the  purchase  or  hid  already  purchased  a  certain 
Aircraft,  such  as  the  F-5,  F-15,  or  F-16,  the  directorate  arranged 
a  aeries  of  specialized  briefings  with  the  system's  project 
officer  and  with  factory  representatives  at  the  production  line. 
The  attache  also  attended  a  seriee  of  specialized  briefings  and 
consultations  with  the  Defense  Intelligence  Agency,  the  Central 
Intelligence   Agency,   ana   the   *ir  Staff   in   the   Pentagon. 
AFIS  Historian  w-  SKSgt  Pool,  AFIS/INH,
directorate  sent  Home  designates  to  the  Sural  Postgraduate  School 
In  Monterey,  California,  to  enroll  in  a  master's  degree  program 
sponsored  by  the  Air  Force  Institute  of  Technology.  Ewery  six 
months,  January  and  July,  approximately  ten  students  were  sent. 
The  academic  phase  of  the  program  lasted  twelwe  months.  Language 
training  then  followed,  conducted  by  the  De tense  Language 
Institute,  which  lasted  from  six  to  twelve  nontha,  depending  on 
the     difficulty     of     the     language.  Opon     collet  ion    of     language 
training,     the    officers    were    awarded    masters    degrees    tn    national 
aion,    the  directorate   funded  a    languagi 
ssignates.       In    19S3,     languages    were    W 
:    languag 
primary 
aisaion     oi :      an     attache 
intelligence    inform anTir  a^achT 
ft politico-military      Intel 
iche    has    been    the    first 
str* .tegic      war, ling      system 
flFIS/IKH, 
rerpt      feft       Brfg      Paper 
i^al     Postgraduate    School 
SD     220.          In     1983,      tli 
•ed    from    the    APIS    Direct 
Lef  ing,  " 
the     Area     Specialist    Progran 
ctorate    of    Attache    Affairs    t. 
arate  of  Personnel.See  p  236   of  this  history. 
Inquiry    Response   Q|     Capt    Gibbs,     SFIS/1NH    to    APIS    H
i    military    advisory 
ars.      they      are     uleo     heavily 
military      expertise      in     the 
U.S.    policy,    working   with    the 
STAFF  VISITS   TO  BSOs
ise Some of Colonel Stetnmiller‘e conclusions vere aa follows:! 2 2 é s g a re 3 ' 5 z z cs F s tgpia. The colonel’s remarks were extracted from his trip report and edited by the historzen. far the lengthy original report, which the ACS/T read and commented on, see SD 232. 2tpia. 3ibia. Smid.
ult  of  several  suggestions  and  propos. 
el  in  the  field,  including  a  sugges 
■  on  his  trip  to  afrlca  and  the  Middle  E 
1  to  pcint  a  newsletter,  Attache'  Affai 
were  published,  in  July  and  December. 
L   Steinmiller    told    those    in   the    defense 
arts  Co  neet  our  mission  of  providing 
he  Air  Force.  Far  those  of  you  at 
:lti,     aa    well    as    those    of    you    right    ar° 
lorner,    Attache ' 
i    supporting  doc
departing  station,  consecutive  tour  assignment  options,  pemn: 
As  a  fanner  Attache  I  aa  irell  acquainted  with  1 
deaaudB  on  you  and  your  f  ami  lien.  Being  so  far  aw 
you  may  often  feel  somewhat  forgotten  and  believe  y: 
efforts  are  not  fully  recognized  liere  in  Washington. 
Force.       As    such,    you    play    a key   role    in   enhar icing   oar 
diplomatic         relationships 
and        fostering 
.dditionally,    you    i 
assigned    country's    political events    and   policy 
Fev    other     jobs     have     ti 
fine     job    in    oeeti 
challenges.     Please  Keep  up  th e  effort. ^ 
developing  social  contacts.   The  name  was  changed  f
nr    referrala    tn    those    who    were    beat    able    to 
he  directorate  directly  provided: 
0fa  In  April,  the  Israeli  Air  Force  requested  use  of  public 
relations  films  about  the  space  shuttle  or  current  aviation  and 
flying     subjects.  The      directorate      arranged     for     the     National 
Aeronautics  and  Space  Administration  to  mil  the  attache  a  copy  of 
the  film,  "STS-4,  Poat  Flight  Press  Conference  Film.*  i6  ma,  color 
and  Bound.  Also  in  April,  the  Peruvian  Air  Force  requested  a  copy 
of  a  report  an  the  South  Atlantic  conflict,  which  was  mentioned  in 
a  newspaper  article  published  in  Lima,  referring  to  a  report  on 
the  British-Argentine  conflict  of  1982,  After  coordinating  with 
the  Navy,  the  directorate  sent  the  attache  a  copy  of  the  study. 
"Lessons  o£  the  Falkland*. -1 
fl^  In  May,  the  Hong  Kong  Aviation  Club  was  to  auction  off 
equipment  from  the  defunct  Far  Eastern  Technical  School.  The 
attache  notified  the  directorate  about  the  pieces  to  be  auctioned 
and   requested   ti 
«In  July  the  Australian  Department  of  Aviation  requested 
inforraotion  about  the  capabilities  of  Canton  Island  and 
Johnston  Atol  for  handling  Boeing  727S  aircraft.  Australia  was 
purchasing  then  and  was  considering  ferrying  then  through 
Canton/Johnston,       where       they      would       require       refueling.  The 
directorate       told       the       attache       that       the       department       should 
international  aviation  and  provided  the  Washington,    D.C.    address.3 
'Msg  ta|,  USDAO,  Tel  Aviv.  Israel,  to  AFIS/INH,  "Public 
Relations  Films;"  141S54Z  Apr  S3;  Msg  (|,  AFIS/INH  to  USDAO,  Tel 
Aviv,  "Public  Relations  Films;"  211932Z  Apr  33;  Hag  S-  USD«0, 
Lima,  Peru,  to  AFIS/INH,  •Request  for  Information,  South  Atlantic 
Conflict,"  141716Z  Apr  S3;  MBg  flf,  AFIS/INH  to  USDAO,  Lima,  Peru, 
'Request  for   Information,   South  Atlantic  Conflict. "211930Z  Apr  83. 
2Hsg  dt    OSDLO,    Hong   Kong 
Aircraft  and  Engines;" 
Hong   Kong,     "Auction   of  Antique   Aircraft   and   Engines,'    022O3OB    Kay 
3«sg    HI     USDAO,     Canberra,     Australia,     to    AFIS/IMK    "Airfield 
Facilities    at    Canton    Island    and    Johnston    Atol;"    270QZQZ    Jul    83; 
USDAO,      Canberra,      Australia,  "Airfield 
land  and  Johnaton  Atol,"  02183QZ  Aug  83.
U.S.    agreeMnt.      In  particular,    they 
litlal   three  aircraft  tliat  the  USA?  wis 
!3.2    Billion   was    $10    allliaii   cheaper    t 
■ft  In  October,  the  attache  in  Athena.  Greece,  request 
nfonoation  on  the  SIII  E-3ER  ejection  seat,  ranufactured  by  t 
tencel  Corporation  of  Sshville,  Sorth  Carolina.  The  airecton 
nntacted   a    representative    of    the    eonqMny,    who   piuB^itly    Bent    I 
rate     instituted    a    new    policy    thin    year    by 
.taches  submit  mia-tour  reports,    iceording   to 
Colonel     Steinnillnr     explained     that     the 
jsLfiaa  subject  matter.      At  the   end 
e  were   aubnitted,    forming  the  basis 
ie    duty  at   specific  defense   attache 
'«S9  PR  DSQAD,  Canberra,  BnstraLta  to  AFIS/MH, 
•GulfGtream  Lease-rurchaee  by  OSM*,-  010G11Z  ftug  B3. 
^Msg  Mi'     ySDAO,    Athens,     Greece,     to    AFIS/INS,  "Request 
for    Assistance,"     061254Z     Oct    S3;     Mag    V    APIS/ISH  to     DSMO, 
3fora    ttr    (jjj|.     Col    Steinmlller,     AflS/INH,     to     QAttachej
LcCol  S7» 
LtCol  65* 
•   years,    the    captains   eligible    ; 
cs     available      for     enlisted    proi 
STATISTICS 
^CTSot 
32* 
TSg* 
21* 
CT83 
17% 
KSgt 
TSgt 
13% 
:  the  two  years,  the  enlisted  personnel  in  the  attache  syi 
;  constantly  promoted  at  high-er  rates  than  their  counterpi 
the    line    Air    Force.        SKSgt    Pool    noted    and    diaseninated    '
unscheduled  from  their  duty  stations  in   1983.* 
^P    A    aaBter    sergeant    fro*    Ecuador    returned    because    of 
dependent's  medical  problems.      In  Kuala  Luasmr,    Malaysia,    «    tragi 
Krs.  Stanley  «.  NeHtor,  and  stabbed  the  sergeant  in  the  chest 
face,  shoulder  and  thigh.  Be  was  flown  for  treatment  to  Clark  Ai 
Base  In  the  Philippines.  The  physician  there  prognoeed  peroanen 
loss  of  sight  to  the  left  eye.  KSgt  Nestor  was  eventually  aent  c 
Kalcolra  Grov  Hospital  at  andrews  Air  force  Base.  He  was-  als 
reassigned  to  Andrews  and  did  not  return  to  Kuala  Irtjipir.3 
^p  S  colonel,  the  air  attache  to  Romania,  returned  to  th 
of  the  Defense  Intel li gene 
Lng  eighteen  osonths  of  a  two 
□nited    States,     in    the    h est    i 
Agency  and  the  Air  Force 
returned    after     serving 
only 
involving  dependents." 
5gt    Po 
Data  %rt  flH    ' 
SKSgt  Pool  and  Capt  Gibbs, 
RFIS/IHH,    17  Jan  34. 
3Ibid.;  Hsg  and  Arena  M<  DSOAO  Kuala  hwpts  to  AFIS/ftFSAC, 
'Assistance  -  MSgt  Stanley  fester,  "  0603282  Jun  S3,    SO  237. 
a Inquiry      Reap 
here  were  twopromotion  cycles  for  Offigt 
2int™a  m.
J'     **£'  ■  i 
1     '     '■t"C*'t 
■i   ',>-;>  -'-:
ECTELL2GEHCS  SUPPORT 
Directorate  of  Security  and  Ccmnmlcatlcea  tbu»9eaeiit 
Directorate  of  Intelligence  feiem  Farces 
Directorate  of  Peraonnel 
Directorate  of  Intelligence  Data  BjosgeBent  {See  inneic  B 
to  xris  cr  1983  maraia)
SKratm  &hp  ccxMHicvrioHS  m 
^P    The    Directorate    of    Security    And    Coonuntcatians    Kanaga- 
diaosBtnated  SCI  informatinn.  IE  aliin  ranaged  the  worldwide  Air 
Force  Special  Security  Office  (AFSSO)  aystem  hy  ensuring 
conpliance  with  SCI  security  policies  concerning  coaMinlcatlonB, 
administration,  physical  security,  billet  management,  and  per- 
sonnel programs.1 
^0    Personnel   from  the   directorate  represented  the  Air  Force 
ou    finre    Director    of    Central    Intelligence    conmittees:        Security 
~ 
  Training    and    Security 
CoB^artoentstion  S 
3.  The  establishment  of  these  branches  w 
Security  Office,  US  USAF  ilNSDJr  Special  Educa 
Vali-dation,    and  Spocial  Security  Operations. 
functions   were   distributed   to   the   operational   control   of   AF/IN. 
«ieh   the  AFIS   Manpower  Office   to   formally  structure    the   director- 
GENERAL,    "Special  Inquiry." 
defined     as     that    information    a
positions  and  billets  officially  catered  onto  manpower  end 
personnel  documents.  Prior  to  this  time,  the  directorate ' s 
manpower  documentation  showed  only  positions  and  personnel  with  no 
formal  structural  organization.  Within  the  directorate,  however, 
such  structures  as  divisions  and  branches  did  exist,  but 
unofficially-  It  was  an  appropriate  time,  too,  to  consider  and 
implement  recommendations  from  a  study  of  the  Personnel  Security 
Division  (IBSA},   by  the  Manpower  Office  in  1982. ' 
^£  On  20  Hay,  the  IBSA  division  was  eliminated. 2  Effective 
9  November,  the  Personnel  Security  Division  was  restructured  into 
three  branches:  1)  Adjudication,  with  three  sections.  A,  B,  and  C, 
each  with  its  own  chief*  2)  Billet  Management,  with  two  sections, 
Sillet   Management    and    Data   Automation,    and   3}    For    Causa    and    Due 
fl^ft  within  the  Management  Division  (IHSC),  the  three 
branches  of  the  organizational  structure  remained  basically  the 
same  as  in  1982:  Policy  Branch,  Administrative  Support  Branch, 
and  Facilities  Branch.  The  position  of  division  deputy  chief, 
however,  was  established  in  June  J  98  3  to  provide  greater 
coordination  of  actions  between  the  Policy  Branch  and  the 
Facilities  Branch.  In  August,  the  title  of  the  position  was 
changed  to  "operations  officer"  to  provide  a  more  descriptive, 
functional  position  title.4 
Tlntw  gff  AFIS  Historian  w.  Col  Huey  and  Lt  Col  Abel, 
APIS /IKS,  25  Apr  84.  Over  the  years,  the  collateral  security 
function  bad  passed  in  and  out  of  the  control  of  the  INS 
directorate,  which  primarily  managed  the  SCI  security  function. 
See  for  example,  AFIS  History,  HSHsVHaaVEHHmmmVi  1  JaT1  ~  31 
Dec  92,  pp  63-64.  See  also  Ltr  g|  andAtchs^BT  AFJS/HO  to 
APIS/INS,  "Manpower  Standards  Study  Final  Report,"  2  Apr  82,  SD 
238, 
2l>tr  W  and  Atch  SH  APIS/HO  to  AF/IN  Exec  et  al, 
"Realignment  of  AFIS/INSA  Authorizations  and  Functions  (AF/IK  Xxec 
Memo,    20   May  83),"   23   May  83,    SD  239. 
3Memo  IB  Chief,  INSB,  to  All  AFIS/TNSB  Personnel, 
•Reorganization  of  INSB,"  9  Nov  B3,  SD  240i  Memo  for  Beeord  SB- 
MSgt  Eaenhizer,  AFIS /MO,  "INSB-Per Sonne 1  Security  Division 
Manpower  Standard  Study,"  2S  Mar  83,   SD  241. 
*For  d'etailed  functional  statements  for  each  branch  of  the 
Management  Division,  aee  Historical  Data  Rprt  fl|,  AFIS/DtS,  Jan- 
Dec  83,   SD  242. 
5Ltr  f*g  with  2  Atchs  Q|,  AFIS/INS  to  AFIS/MO  et  al, 
"AFIS/INSD  Reorganization,"  6  Jim  83,  SD  243j  Ltr  mml  with  1  Atch 
BU  AFIS/MO  to  AFIS/INS,  "AFX5/INSD  Reorganization  {Your  Ltr,  6 
Jun  83),  20  Jun  83,  SD  244;  Ltr  fl|  with  1  Atch  Q|,  AFIS/MO  to 
AFIS/INSD,  "AFIS/INSD  Reorganization  [rour  ltr,  6  Jim  83J,"  12  Sep 
83,    SD  245.
sponsibilities    wre    form ulated,    and  abbreviated  versions 
jllovSr' 
;  -       Special      Security 
Education      Branch      -      Develops. 
3      all      sensitive      compartmented 
cation      and      training      for      the 
assistant  chief  of   staf! f,    Intelligence.       Assists    in    the 
promulgation    of    all    sc: [    education    and    training    policy 
for  the  Departnent  of  th> s  Air  Fore*. 
flation      Branch      -      Kanages      the 
product     requests     for     the     Air 
ib    liaison    with    Washington    area 
elements  of   the   U.S.    In telLigence    commits'   and   ensures 
on,    control,    and  accountability  of 
l  Air  Force,  Air  Staff,  Air  Fc 
ice,  the  Office  of  Special  Inve 
<r  Department  of  Defense  SCI  consume 
al  Capital  Region's  SCI  program. 
CoiMQunicat 
ectar  general.      Col.    Robert  B.    Huey,   Jr.    assumed  the  duties  as 
his  transferral  to  APIS,  Calonel  Huey  was  commander  and 
essor  of  aerospace  studies,  AFRCTC  Detachment  B90,  University 
irginia,    Charlottesville.  Virginia.3 
'Ltr    Q 
SD  2t1;  Position  Description,   Chief.    SS  Ed  Branch,   n.d.,    SD  248. 
Zlntvw   M|'     WIS    Historian    k.     Col    Huey    and    Lt    Col    Abel. 
AFIS/IHS,   25  Apr  84.      For  a  biographical   sketch  of  Col  Huey  see  SO
^P    Ut,     Col.     Ray    Abel    ME    the    depi 
and     CoBaunicatlons     Msnage»ent.  On     6 
Cornwall  as aimed  responsibilities  as  t 
Security  Division.  The  position  had  been  vacant,  with  its  duties 
performed  by  an  acting  chief.  On  27  July,  tt.  Col.  Villiaio  B. 
Burton  was  assigned  as  the  chief  of  the  Management  Division;  this 
position,  too,  had  been  vacant.  KaJ.  Richard  P.  viau  continued  as 
chief  of  the  Special  Security  Office,  HQ  OSXF,  a  position  he  held 
since  1  November  1982.  OEgt  Robert  C.  Brown  continued  In 
administration,    having   been    with    the    directorate    since    December 
Polygraph i Ob e  in  Abeyance 
m  On  11  March,  President  Ronald  A.  Reagan  issued  a 
;islon  Directive  which  included  a  mandate 
:  polygraph  examinations  in  cases  Involving 
ire      of      classified      information,^  The 
president's  directive  was  sent  through  the  INS  directorate  through 
channels  of  the  intelligence  cmanunity,  and  a  portion  of  the 
president's  nessage  was  as  follows; 
f/}  The  Office  of  SeiBoanel  Management  and  all 
departments  and  agencies  with  employees  having  accees  to 
classified  in formation  are  directed  to  revise  existing 
regulations  and  policies,  as  necessary,  so  that 
employees  amy  be  required  to  submit  to  polygraph 
examinations,  when  appropriate,  in  the  course  of 
investigations  of  unauthorised  disclosures  of  classified 
information.  As  a  minimum,,  such  regulations  shall 
permit    an    agency    to    decide     that    appropriate    adverse 
1For  complete  list  of  INS  personnel,  see  aistorlcal  Data  Rprt 
,    AFIS/MS,   Jan-Dec  83,    SO  242. 
2Intvw(B(,  APIS  Historian  <•-  Col  Huay  and  It  Col  Abel, 
S/3MS,   2S  Apr  84. 
3National  Security  Division  Directive  Number  B4  %g,  "Safe- 
guarding National  Security  information,"  11  Bar  S3,    SD  250.
ider    investigation.       Agency    regulations    ua 
polygraph       examination.  BesoltB       of      polygrap 
lation  obtained  during  investigation!! . ' 
polygraph,  especially  after  the  preside 
the  implementation  aC  new  polygraph  j 
within  the  Department  of  Defense.3 
;   of  Special 
Septetnber    a    sf 
■ised    a    plan. 
<  stablished     5     December     1933     as     the     coinpletion     date
and predant cases on polygraph use. abbreviated plans! 2 2 g & s 2 3 i g z a wor tha comiete plon coe Rare QB and 1 Acch Qi Chatrans, Perstab, to FardSub Meaber, 0.8. Aly Vores, et al. Sertal: PerS8ct--24-43, “Polygraph Study ‘& Bap 03. $5 253.
ara Aiz Forge Anecdotal Cages The Air Force contributed four anecdotal aubcommittee’s report. cases to the the cases were as follovs:! 2 t, EXAMINEE STATUS/CLEARANCE: Active duty military/TS-SCL TYPE OF INVESTIGATION: Espionage INFORMATION AVAILABLE: Taformation was received from another agency that an individual was in contact with a hostile intelligence agency. A lengthy favestigation, visual surveillance failed to verify interviewed the individval denied any intelligence agency individuals, The polygraph examination, which included the anformation. When contact with any non-US individusl agreed to a POLYGRAPH RESULTS: Deception indicated by the individual when he denied contact with, passing information to, and receiving money fron a hostile intelligence service, NOTE: The individal subsequently admitted initiating contact with a hostile intelligence service, an extremely large number of highly classified and paasing those docunents to the hostile exchange for a relatively small axount of money, collecting documenta, agency in 00D Civilian Employee/TS TYPE OF INVESTIGATION: Gnaathorized Disclomure INPO#MATION AVAILABLE: Information was received that an unidentified Department of Defense employee had passed sensitive classified information to an unaathorized individual. Only the section the individual worked in could be verified. tperSSub Anectodal Survey Cases I-IV QM AFIS/INSE, 1983, 5D 254. peleted per 5 U-b.Ge 552(b) OQ}
POLYGRAPH  RESULTS :  Examinations  of  a  large  number  of 
military  and  civilian  employees  resulted  In  deception  by 
only  one  employee. 
NOTE:  Subsequent  to  tbe  polygraph  testing,  the  employee 
admitted  passing  classified  Information  to  several 
uncleared  friends. 
ft     III.       EXAMINEE   STATUS/CLEARANCE;      Active  Duty  Military/SCI 
TYPE  OF   INVESTIGATION :     Eapionage 
INFORMATION  AVAILABLE:  Information  was  received  that  an 
individual  was  in  contact  with  the  embassy  of  a  hostile 
country.  An  investigation  which  included  lengthy  and 
complex  surveillance  failed  to  disclose  any  real  evidence 
of  espionage  activity;  however,  many  espionage  indicators 
were  noted.  During  an  interview  the  individual  denied 
any  contact  with  any  hostile  agencies  or  individuals,  and 
denied  any  espionage  activity.  The  individual  agreed  to 
take   a  polygraph  examination. 
POLYGRAPH  RESULTS:  A  lengthy  series  of  polygraph  exam- 
inations resulted  in  indications  of  deception  concerning 
contact  with  a  hostile  agency,  and  passage  of  classified 
material  to  hostile  agencies.  rhe  individual  admitted 
initiating  contact  with  a  hostile  intelligence  agency, 
collecting  a  large  amount  of  highly  classified  material, 
and  passage  of  that  material  to  the  hostile  agency  in 
exchange  for  money.  All  polygraph  results  were  verified 
by  the   individual's  admission  of  guilt. 
NOTE:  Polygraph  examinations  were  used  in  this  Instance 
to  determine  not  only  whether  the  individual  was  engaged 
in  espionage,  but  to  determine  the  type  and  amount  of 
information  he  had  passed. 
XV.       EXAMINEE  STATUS   CLEARANCE;      Active    Duty   Militaxy/SCI 
TYPE  OF  INVESTIGATION     Espionage 
INFORMATION  AVAILABLE;  Information  was  received  from  a 
senior  military  officer  that  one  of  his  subordinates  may 
have  passed  classified  information  to  a  member  of  a 
hostile       intelligence      service.  During      the       Initial 
interview  by  the  investigating  agency.  Subject  admitted 
passing  one  piece  of  classified  information  to  the 
hostile  country  representative,  but  denied  any  other 
disclosures.  The  individual  agreed  to  take  a  polygraph 
examination. 
POLYGRAPH  RESE7LTS ;  Examination  showed  deception  in  the 
individual's  response  when  he  denied  passing  other 
information   to   the   representative   of   the   hostile   country.
Resumption  of  Periodic  Reinvestigations 
flft  On  1  April,  the  Defense  Investigative  Service  {0IS1 
re suSa  conducting  Periodic  Reinvestigations  (PR)  of  Special  Back- 
ground Investigations.  In  June  1981,  the  service  had  stopped  suca 
investigations,  termed  SSI  "Brtng-Ops, "  which  "ere  required  by  the 
Director       of        Central        Intelligence        Directive        1/14.  ITie 
reinvestigations  were  stopped  to  enable  investigators  to 
concentrate  on  and  complete  background  investigations  and  special 
background  investigations.  Since  1981,  the  Defense  Investigative 
Service  was  able  to  hire  and  train  enough  new  investigators  to 
absorb  the  periodic  reinvestigation  workload.' 
flh  In  all  essentials,  the  new  periodic  reinvestigations 
were  handled  as  were  the  old  ones.  The  involvement  of  the  Air 
Force  Special  Security  Office  was  limited—In  most  locations 
consisting  of  identification  of  persons  due  for  reinvestigation. 
There  was  no  screening  interview  conducted  by  supervisors, 
commanders,  and  Special  Security  Offices.  Once  the  case  was 
opened,      a     trained     agent     from    the     Defense     Investigative     Service 
Office     of      Special      Investigations      did      the      interviewing.  The 
reinvestigation  included  a  National  Agency  Check,  two  developed 
character  references,  local  agency  checks,  a  credit  check,  and 
en^loyment  checks.2 
^^B     As    Df    31    December,     the    directorate's    ■ 
background  Paper  QB,  AFIS/INSB,  "SBI-Periodic  Reinvestiga- 
tions," 4  Apr  S3,  SD  2S5l  Memo  0.  AFIS/ISS  to  AF/EK-AFIS  Staff, 
AFSKC/CC,  "DOD  Personnel  Security  Investigative  Policy."  3  Feb  33. 
SO  255. 
2Ibid.  For  a  definition  of  National  Agency  Check  see  KJO 
5200. 2-R,    Dec  79. 
historical  Data  I^srt  fgm    APIS/INS,    Jan-Dec  S3,    SD  242.
JSL 
i  time.  The  hiring  ot  additional  personnel, 
orda  processing  and  maintenance  system,  and 
hniquea    resulted    In    the    speedier    cone  las ion 
are  microfilmed  inaedlataly  opon 
esult  was  a  centralized  location 
Over    the    12    noi 
fl^ft    Also,         sensitive         conqsartmented 
.gi3mt: 
eligibility  and  ineligibility  determinations  were  entered  into  the 
coB^uterlied  System  for  Adjudicatic-n  and  Billet  Heportiog  (SftBRE! 
on     a     daily     basie      immediately     following     the     final     eligibility 
on  file  in  SABRE. 3 
Q^    In       1383,       Nondisclosure      agreements      continued      to      be 
lected.       The He   were   documents    Bigned   by    individuals    author ized 
ata 
ted:4 
fj£     Intending    to   be    legally  bound,    I  hereby  accept 
the       obligations       contained       in       this       Agreement       in 
protected    within     Special     Access     Programs,      hereinafter 
Information.            I      have      bean      advised      that      Sensitive 
classifiable     under      the     standards     of     Executive     Order 
12356   or  other  Executive  order  or  statute.       I   understand 
and    accept     that    by    being    granted    access    to    Sensitive 
Compartoented    Information    special    confidence    and    trust 
shall  be  placed  In  oe  by  the  United  States  Government. 
1lBt»«    SB     »PXS    Historian    *-    "Col    Huey    and    It    Col    Abel, 
^Historical  Data  Rprt  0,   APIS/INS.   Jan-Dec  83,   BD  242." 
4 00   Pons   1847-1,    Jan  S3,    'Sensitive  Coupartmentsd  Information 
Hon 
disclosure       agreement,"       SD       257.              For       the       "oath"       or 
octrioation  nesoEanduo,    nee  SD  358.
Agreement  Bay  result  In  the  termination  of  szf  accese  to 
Sensitive  Conpartmented  Information  and  retention  in  a 
position  of  special  confidence  and  trust  requiring  such 
access,  a;  well  as  the  termination  of  By  employment  or 
other    relationships   vith    any    Department    or    Agency    that 
Information.  In  addition,  r  have  been  advised  that  any 
unauthorized  disclosure  of  Sensitive  CompartMented 
Information  by  ne  nay  constitute  violations  of  United 
States  criminal  lave,  including  the  provisions  of 
Sections  793.  791,  798,  ana  952,  Title  18,  United  States 
Code,  and  of  Section  783{fc->,  Title  SO,  United  States 
Code.  Nothing  in  this  Agreement  constitutes  a  waiver-  by 
the  United  States  of  the  right  to  prosectitE  ae  for  any 
statutory  violation. 
(B     AH  agreements   signed   thrnogh  Decejnber   1982  were  entered 
o  the  System  for  Adjudication   and  Billet  Reporting  (EABKE)    data 
manent   storage.       As   of   December   1983,    no   efforts   were    underway 
place    agreements    signed    subsequent    to    December    1982    into    the 
•st  of  Sillet  Requests  by  v. 
cation  of  the  bills!:  to  validation  and  approval.* 
lengthy    hardcopy    aall 
1  Data  Rprt  1 
ig      9ft        AJ?SSQ/U£ilF/INS       to       QDAN5,        "SCI       Billet
make   reference   Co  the  original  field  request  and  provide 
their  validation  npproval/disnpprnval . ' 
flp    The    test    did    not    change    the    requlreuent    fDc    the    aajar 
insure  the  billets  -ere  necessary.  To  assist  users  in  understand- 
ing the  billet  process,  the  directorate  was  rewriting  regulation 
USai'INTEL   201-1.    Chapter   12,    which   dealt   vltn    SCI    billet    aanage- 
>ropfiate    Air    Forca   Special    Eecuri 
■     need     for    separate    eligibility    i
Hk  The  BRAVO  policy  developaent  and  promulgation  renponst- 
bility  «aa  transferred  from  the  Personnel  Security  Division  to  the 
Management  Division,    to  tore  appropriately  align  policy  actions. 
STATISTICAL   S 
SCI  Billet  Realigjiment/Redasignatio 
dumber  of  Reserve  Actions  Staffed 
Number  of  Congressional/Foreign  Vis 
Number  of  Clearances  Certified
Air      Force      procedures.  The      sensitivity      associated     with      the 
policies  and  procedures  prescribed  for  nanagewant  of  the  SCI 
security  ays tern  precluded  thpir  incorporation  into  standard  Air 
Force      regulations.  The      division      was      responsible      for      nine 
Compartments d  Information  {SCI)  Security  System*  and  AFR  205-19. 
"Control  of  Oisflemi nation  of  Intelligence  Information."  Normal 
distribution  of  these  publications  included  all  accredited  Air 
force  SCI  facilities  (SCIFs),  Air  Force -manned  Unified  r.  Specified 
Contiand  SCIFs,  and  selected  D.S,  intelligence  connmnity  SCI 
activities.  The      division      was      also      responsible      for      the 
administrative  review  of  any  HEAFIOTEL  publication  produced  by 
other  AF/IN  or  AFIS  elements,  and  for  any  regulation  from  an  Air 
Force  major  command,  special  operating  agency,  or  direct  reporting 
unit,   which  ittpleaented  a  usafiktel  publication. ' 
j^ft    Sone  of   the  key  changes  aade  in   19B3   were  as   follows": 
for     co 
ons  Intelligence  {COMINT)  Products  Outside  COMINT 
iras  republished  on  5  Oeceraber  1983.  This  revision 
implemented  COMINT  sanitiiation  and  operational  use  policy  changes 
contained  in  Del  Signals  Intelligence  Security  Regulation  Volume 
I,  directed  the  establishment  of  sanitization  training  programs, 
changed  rules  on  keeping  records  and  reporting  sanitization  and 
operational  use  actions,  expanded  the  Glossary  of  Terms  and  Abbre- 
viations,     updated     the     listing     of     Proper     Author ities,      added     a
zIbid. 
^Meno  m William  J. 
Casey. 
Intelligence  Co .uncil.   "Sec 
Personnel"  lit NFIC-9.2/70. 
7  Nov
3  Direc 
5   C-B200.> 
Mfc  The  Air  Force,  in  concert  with  SCI  security  officials 
ftoaTae  Defense  Intelligence  Agency  [DIM  and  other  military 
departments,  Jointly  worfcea  on  writing  Department  of  Defense  (DOD) 
Directive  C-S20D.jcx,  which  was  to  replace  two  obsolete  directives 
from  1965  anfl  1967  and  to  establish  uni-fom  policy  and  guidance  on 
the  security  and  administration  of  the  COD  SCI  programs.  The 
significant  changes  included  the  assigning  of  specific  responsi- 
bilities to  the  Office  of  the  Deputy  Under  Secretary  of  Defense 
for  Policy,  the  National  Security  Agency,  the  Defense  Intelligence 
Agency,  and  the  military  departmen  ts  for  the  implementation, 
direction,  management,  coordination,  and  control  of  DOD  sensitive 
con^artmented     information     programs.  The     military     departments 
(M&DEPs)  were  also  given  authority,  in  lieu  of  the  DIA,  to 
accredit  SCI  facilities  (SCIFS)  for  sensitive  compartmented 
information  at  the  SI/TTK/S  levels.  The  departments  up  to  then  had 
only  SI  accreditation  authority.  This  was  a  major  concession  by 
the  DIA,  which  assumed  an  oversight  role,  and  it  consolidated 
accreditation  authority  at  the  MILDEP  level,  restricting  further 
delegation.  Both  KILP5?  and  DIA  Becurity  officials  had  been 
concerned  about  SCI  security  practices  at  the  Service  Cryptologic 
Elements  and  the  dilution  of  HILDEP  SCI  span  of  control.3 
Zlbid. 
3DISUH     ^^ 
5200-xx    *SCI    Programs, 
AFIS/IHS,     "Draft    DOD 
83.    SD  264. 
Col     Huey,      AFIS/I8S,       "Draft 
8    Sep    83,     SD    263 
C-5200,** 
'SCI    Program, '"    .
■B  The  directive  was  not  finalised  before  -iie  end  of  the 
year,   and  publication  was  expected  by  Hda-^9B4., 
Publication  of   IHS  01   205-< 
fljfe  On  26  August,  the  directorate  published  INS  Operating 
Instruction  20S-4,  Trestaent  of  Special  Access  Programs  Involving 
Sensitive  Compartmented  Information,"'  The  directive  provided 
specific  instructions  on  bow  to  handle  the  delicate  relationships 
with  special  access  programs  established  under  the  provisions  of 
the  Information  Security  Oversight  Office  Direct!.:. ..  1/DOD  Directive 
5200. t~R.  It  supported  the  'streamlined  management,"  "must  know," 
and  "nonejcpoaure"  themes  inherent  in  the  programs  and  yet  allowed 
for  sufficient  control  to  provide  SCI  security  assistance  and 
oversight.  The  instruction  wse  also  to  be  included  in  the 
revision  of  EJSAFIMTEL  201-1,  as  a  separate  chapter,  In  order  to 
provide  consistent  guidance  for  the  BSAF  so  a  whole.2 
Protection  of  S :  after  KM.  007  Shootdown 
'Historical  Data  Sprt  flg,    AFIS/INS,    Jan-Dec  S3,    SD  242. 
ZINS-QX  205-4,  "Treatment  of  Special  Access  Programs 
Involving  Sensitive  Compartmented  Information,"  26  Aug  S3,   SD  265. 
3Draft  Hag  HI'  deputy  ACS/I  to  SSO  SAC  etal,  "Protection  of 
Sensitive  Intelligence,"  Sep  S3,  SD  266;  nemo  «fl&  W.  3.  Casey  to 
National  Foreign  Intelligence  Board  et  al,  NPIC-9.1/69, 
"Protection  of  Sensitive  Intelligence, "  12  Sep  83 ,  SD  267 1 
a  Rprt  t^,  AFIS/INS,  .Tan-Dec  S3,  SD  242.  For  other 
its  on  unauthorized  disclosures  see  Hems  flB,  Secretary  of 
Defense  Caspar  Weinberger  to  Secretaries  o£  MILDEPs  et  al, 
"Unauthorized   Disclosure  of  Classified  Information,"   21   Sep  83,   SD
^fe  In  December,  the  directorate  granted  authority  to  the 
air  eKaana  and  Staff  College  (ACSC)  to  begin  incorporating 
sensitive  coapartmented  information  into  its  currleuluH.  The 
original  Air  University  (AU)  request,  however,  had  been  tamed 
down  because  it  involved  the  entire  ACEC  student  body,  without 
regard  for  actual  or  potential  "need-to-fcnow"  requirements,  AD 
was  told  that  a  modified  concept  satisfying  valid  requirements 
through  a  combination  of  curricula  in  the  eleetives  and  Tailored 
Instructional  Program  (TIP)    would  be  considered. 1 
flk  The  modified  AD  concept  was  patterned  after  the  Air  War 
College  program  for  integrating  SCI  into  the  curriculum.  The 
program  was  liraited  to  those  officers  -ho  had  already  been 
Indoctrinated  for  SCI  access  and  who  expected  to  be  involved  with 
SCI  materials  in  their  next  assignment. ' 
■ft  The  modified  concept  and  the  basic  education  philosophy 
for  ACSC  were  thoro^.ily  discussed  among  the  Directorate  of 
Security  and  Communications  Management,  the  Directorate  of 
Intelligence  Plans  and  Systems,  and  trs  Directorate  of  Space.  It 
was  determined  that  the  decision  to  limit  access  to  selected 
*    the    Air    Force,     insofar 
students  i 
as  the  preparation  o£  Air  Force  battle  managers  was  concerned. J 
Ah  When  the  directorate  approved  the  incorporation  of  SCI 
ljito^tne  ACSC  curriculum,  it  alao  stated  that  the  Air  Staff 
believe!!  that  Air  University  should  seriously  consider 
incorporation  of  the  following  Jjstu  future  ASCS  policy:4 
tHsg  ■>>  AFIS/INS  to  AFSSO/AU/IK,  "Use  of  Si 
Curriculum,"  2B  Dec  83,  SD  263 1  Staff  Summary  Sheet  (■ 
Col  Huey  to  ACS/I  et  al,  "Use  of  SCI  in  ACSC  Oirrlcui 
83,    S3  270. 
2Ibid. 
3lbid.  See  also  Ltr  0ft  with  "*  AtEn  «S'  XD/IN  l 
"Sensitive  CoimMitmented  Information  (SCI)  in  the  Air 
Staff  College  Curriculum,*    19  Jul  B3,    SD  271. 
4 Ibid.
This  would  involve  Special  Background  Investigation 
submission  upon  selection  notification  and  favorable  SCI 
eligibility   de  ta naina tion    foe   ail   officers   prior   to   the 
2.  SCI  fully  incorporated  into,  the  ACSC  cnnricnlum 
to  provide  all  tJ.S.  students  with  a  couplets 
appreciation  and  education  of  ail-source  intelligence 
capabilities  and  collection  resources,  to  include  apace 
operations.  Non-0. S.  students  would  be  excluded  from 
attending  SCI  sessions. 
Participation  in  Physical  Security  Course 
QP  Mrs.  Elizabeth  A.  Hall  of  the  directorate's  Management 
Division  was  a  member  of  the  Physical  Security  Working  Group  of 
the  DCI  Security  Committee  and  helped  to  develop  a  national  level 
Physical  Security  Course  for  all  Department  of  Defense  and 
government  agencies.  The  Pirst  class  was  held  In  August,  and 
future  classes  were  to  be  offered  once  a  ijuarter,  starting  in 
Januairy   1984. 1 
Discontinuance  of  Off -I 
BIB  The  directorate  conducted  a  survey  of  the  use  of  the  Air 
Force  Off-Line  Privacy  Communications  System  in  early  1983.  This 
was  a  secondary  and  back-up  system  to  the  primary  Sefense  Special 
Security  Communication  System  used  by  senior  intelligence 
officers-  The  survey  revealed  that  the  off-line  system  rarely  had 
been  used  in  the  last  two  and  one-half  years;  in  fact,  it  was  last 
used  for  operational  off-line  messages  in  1981  by  only  2  of  34 
users.  Noting  this,  the  directorate,  which  was  the  office  of 
primary  responsibility  for  the  system,  discontinued  its  operation 
in  July.  The  lack  of  its  use  was  due  to  the  high  reliability  and 
quality  of  the  primary  system.  ^ 
'Historical  Data  Rprt  BB,    AFIS/IHS,    Jan-Dec  83,    3D  242. 
2Hemo  ^gf  with    1    AtchTjl    Chairman,    DCI   Security   Committee, 
to    Members,     Physical    Security    Working    Group,     "Physical    Security 
Seminar  No.    Z,"  SECOH-D-249,    22    Dec  83,    SO  272. 
3Iatvw  9R,  AFIS  Historian  w.  Col  Huey,  Lt  Col  Abel  et  al, 
25  Apr  84;  Msg  flH  APIS/IKS  to  AFSSO  AD/INS  et  al, 
ion  of  Key list  for  USAF  Off-Line  Privacy  Communications, " 
,    SD  273.
personnel 
Kevita  ligation  of   I/5AV  Program 
Management       Division       revitalised       the        inspect 
assistance  visit  JI/SAV)  program.  They  visited  Air  Force  Special 
Security  Offices  at  all  mjor  comaanda  except  those  of  the  Air 
Force  Systems  Comaand  and  the  Alaskan  Mr  Cooaaand.  A  total  of  74 
sensitive  coups rtaented  information  facilities  {SCIF3}  were 
visited,  representing  30  percent  of  the  total  number  of  auch 
facilities  in  the  Air  Force  SCIF  systen.  There  vare  1*  Special 
Security  Offices  included  within  the  total,  representing  40 
e  APSSO  system.  Also,  11  Contractor  Special  Security 
5)  and  SCIFs  were  visited,  representing  25  percent  of 
imber     of     CSSO     facilities.  Additional     trips     were 
ducted    to    provide     training. 
Office 
££  Personnel  from  the  directorate  contributed  approximately 
250  can-hours  assisting  the  engineers  at  the  60  percent  design 
phase  of  the  Korean  Combat  Operations  Intelligence  Center  (C01CJ 
to  be  constructed  at  Osan  Air  Base,  Korea.  By  the  directorate's 
participation  in  the  design  phase,  compliance  with  physical 
security  standards  vai 
■mred.2 
Incidents     or     v: 
uid       violations 
sending  a 
:    SCIFs    visited    in    ' 
:    Historical    Data 
S3,   SO  242.
■A  In  October,  Lt  Col  Raymond  E.  Abel,  Jr. ,  published  for 
the  JiiBt  time  comprehensive  and  clear  guidance  foe  the  Air  Force 
Special  Security  offices  with  regard  to  the  budget  for  the  General 
Defense  Intelligence  Program  (GDIP).  The  guidance  provided  the 
entire  AFSSQ  system  with  the  basic  Information  required  for 
developing  annual  GDIP  submissions.  The  information  was  to  be 
included  in  Che  revised  U5AFINTEL  201-1  as  a  separate  chapter  and 
was  to  allow  a  more  finite  computation  of  monies  spent  on  SCI 
security. ^ 
SPECIAL  SECURITY  ACTIVITIES 
Security  Management  Cours 
3 For     a     detailed    missis 
Office    Sq    (ISAF    ( INSD) ,     see    Histories 
Jan-Dec  S3,    SD  242. 
*AFIS      SCI      Security     Management      ■ 
Class  Handout  #1-1.fltaM.    AFIS/INSD.
Sqj>pprfc  f Mn  COSaa  Conferences 
^Historical  c 
3Hvid. ,-       Conferee 
Conference].    AFIS/IN5,
For the conference at Homestead APS, three cusmr‘catore from the Electronic Security Commasd vere attachnd wu Acts to Assist in operating the Alr Force Special Security Office (AFSSO) CORCRA communications Directorate parsonnel and perscnnel from the 19424 Communications Squadron activated communications eircults, inapected all equipment, and ensured APSSO CORBA waa ready to recaive traffic prior to the arrival af facility. the conferees? _ at Koaestend, which ware taent ad and corrected pricy to the conferance at Colerado. Tuxee of the CORONA SOUTH problens were the following:3 Some problems wurfaced ‘the Conference at directorate's support for the the Abr CORONA FALL 83 Force Acadeny consisted primarily of Itstorical Bata Rprt QM} AFIS/INS, Jan-Dec 83, SD 242. 2Teip Roce APIS/INSD to APIS/INS, 2 Mar 93, SD 279 “COROKA SOUTH 62," ibaa. peteted per 5 U-8.6- 2920020)
"load  waa'heavy  because  of "  the  Grenada  assault  and  the  destruction 
of     the    Harine    barracks    in    Beirut,      Lebanon.         Daily    contact    was 
and      with      the      ST/IN      Intelligence      Match.  Contact      was      also 
established  with  the  Command  Post  of  the  Tactical  Air  Coomand  and 
with  the  indication  and  Warning  Centers  of  the  Military  Airlift 
Command  and  Strategic  Air  Command  for  unique  intelligence  support 
to  respective  commanders.  On  Saturday.  30  October,  a  continuous 
watch  was  maintained  in  the  Indication  and  Warning  Center  of  the 
SOBAD  Cheyenne  Mountain  Coaplex  from  1000-1600  hours  to  watch  for 
any  messages  or  events  that  would  require  the  attention  of  COROKft 
FA1X      attendees.  Several      messages      were      received      that      were 
delivered    during   the    return   Special    Air   HiBBlan    support    flight    to 
Consolidated  SIGIt-T  Catalog 
flolely    responsible    for    reviewing    all    SCI    requests    for    Air    Force 
Washington    area    eleoentE    of    the    U.S.     intelligence    community    and 
SB  In  August,  the  branch  forwarded  to  appropriate  Special 
Secur^y  Offices  all  portions  of  the  Consolidated  SIGINT  Catalog 
(COHCATi,  thus  cosseting  the  catalog  so  that  the  offices  could 
begin  to  revalidate  their  SIGINT  requirementE.  The  National 
Security   Agency    forwarded   Annex    t    of    the    catalog,    .--*    *■•- -    '  - 
Statlatical  Susmary  of  Special  Security  Office  Opera 
'Trip    Rprt    | 
n.d. ,   SD  280. 
2Ltr   BB    AP1S/INSC  to 
Catalog  {CQNCATI,"    1S  Aug  83,    SD  2B1. 
^Historical  Data  Rprt  flB,   AFIS/IHS,   Jan-Dec
ROXAD Established in DSSCE The INSD division established a fifth defense address groupe RORAD, within the Defense Special Security Commnicatsons System, Address groupe served the purpose of establishing permanent lists of recipients to continually receive certain types Sf information. Tke ROXAD racepients were all Air Force Special Security Offices and all Special Security Offices servicang Aar Force organizations The ROXAD anformation concerned SCI security awareness and traxning) The directorate’s five address groups were tne fellowing.? DEFENSE ADDRESS. gow RECIPIENT ‘TYPE OF INPOEMATION 4, sgt Major Commande Policy Issues 2, ODANS AF Spec.al Security Offices Policy Issues 3. OFLAH nar Force Eleneats Policy Issues 4. duGaY Air force Elementa ScI Product disgemination S$. RORAD Special Security Gffices SC Awareness and traning ‘reve SH APIS Historian vw. Col Huey and Lt Col Abel, APIS ‘INS, 25 Apr 84. Pipa gate 282(d)22 peleted ver 9 Us
•jrotip    messages 
field  level-1 
Renovation  of  Facilities 
0^  Room  BD-951  waB  renovated  for  the  Special  Security 
Qfflce  in  order  to  provide  more  working  space  and  to  lnprove  its 
run-down  appearance,  especially  since  the  SCI  indoctrination 
classes  vere  to  be  held  there.  Aaong  the  improvements  were  the 
installation  of  sound  soafc  panels  and  the  repainting  of  walls. 
Bith  the  installation  of  new  carpeting  in  early  1984.  the 
rehabilitation  was  to  be  complete. 2 
AF/INA  et   a 
83,   SD  282.   and  Attachments 
'ibid. 
2lntvw    soffit    AFIS 
Hietc 
AFIS/INS,    25   Apr  84;    Lt 
*    flf 
to  Space  Services  Reque
centrTffy  aanaoed  tho  Air  force  Intelligence  Reserve  Progran  an 
developed  and  maintained  a  reserve  Eoree  to  support  intelligenc 
operations         during         peacetime         contingencies         and         Martin 
Operations    and    Readiness    Division,     vhich    "is    subdivided    into    a 
Security,    and  Suality  F 
PEHSONHEL 
laliy    gratifying    and    professionally    rewarding.    .    . 
I  a  Reservist  at  heart."      Lt.    Col.    Jamea  ft.    Warner, 
ton   1    May   1983. 3 
13,     SD    261.        Pur    a    biographical    sketch    of    ' 
iiation    assistant's    position   description    see
OFFICERS 
CIVILIAN 
BESERVIST  STRENGTH 
1,287    asEijnt 
rength    rep  re  3  ei 
jfficers  and  53  attached, 
t  attached.  There  were 
jositions    filled    and   41    p* 
directorate 
managed 
attached    for 
percent    marmi jig    rate 
•nt   o£    the   enlisted  positior 
jservist  strength  by   c 
OFFICER  EHL 
i  the  followin 
'FACTBOQK  m.  Air  Force  Intelligence  Reserve  {WIKJ, 
[hereafter  cited  as  FAcraOOK) .    1   Oct  83,    pp  2,   6,    SO  287. 
^Manpower  Strength  Chart  flft  Historical  Data  Rprt  ^Q 
AFIS/RE,    Jan-Dec  83,    SD  288. 
3Intw  Hfe.  AFIS  Historian  w.  SKSgt.  Santa  Crui.  AF1S/RE,  S 
Mar  84 ;  Ltr  ^^  Beverly  l>oyle,  AFX5/REPM,  to  AFIS/HEOR,  "flaqnest 
for  Additional  Information.    .    .,"    '9  -Kar  84.
Imagery  Intelligence 
eae    five   positions   were    occupied    by   76    percent 
gence  Operations 
I   by   61    peccant   c 
intelligence 
1    admlnistrst 
Qp    To       assist       in        field        management,        training,        sod 
lining   sites    into    seven    administrative    areas,    each    directed  by 
Intelligence  Reserve    (AJIEJ    Program,-  29   Sag  83,    BD  290i 
reports    to  AFIS/EE   and    Eor    chose    for    calendar   year    1983.
National  Capital  Area  -  Col. 
■■    This    year,     the    RE    diroctar    establish 
ining   sitaa   and   one    flight,    a£tar    the    area    d 
April,  it  formerly  was  Flight  7A  and  provided 
and  intelligence  support  to  H£>  Eastern  Space 
ana     Ha    air     Forua    Technical     Applica-tinn     Cen 
rraaed    two    other    flights 
Plight  37A  was   reassign, 
^Historical  Data   Bprt
'Ibldl    FACTBOOK  (p,     1    Oct   83,     p   7,    SO  3 
aistotton  H.   SMagt  Santa  Crui,   AFIS/BE,    B   Mar  B 
2Xbid.
JSi 
Use  fort 
t   purponesi    they    provided   proficiency    training 
,     and    they    provided    intelligence     support     Co 
project       descriptions,        the       tasking      organ  liatlonfl,       est 
conyletion  dates,    tine  each   reaerviat  devoted  to  projects,    i 
compared    the    data    in    the    report    »ith    previously    sabnitted 
and   analyzed    it    in    terns   of    training   value    sad  progress. 
~JL 
■he    fe illowi 
.ng    inf. ormatio, 
«t   Project   , a>d«rt. 
,d  by 
sa,   loc 
Fort    Hyer 
projects  we irked 
on  by 
in tail ioenca rese racists   in  1983 
50   Jftr/ "S* 
edTr '«£' 
V^n" 
-o^ 
LsLnel  ofrlo, 
"  '* 
percenter ' 
the  office :ra  nr, s    latin. 
j°« 
^"eoap'lete* 
"joBe* 
fron   last   : 
College,  XI ,r  Con "*""* 
F$Tt  |B   SFIS/ES 
■    or  Squadron  i 
,    Jan™l3an  S3.    : 
Officer 
iHift* 
Qau 
SD  292. 
:  visits  by  HE 
la^a^le' 
apr 
re 'or 
t  V™ £ 
'.ra',' 
Te* \    Oct  S3,    p    11 
Sprt  OB  and  i 
u£.aj 
J.    Sorthington,    Jan-Dec  S3. 
see  wr  Wf^  Atch  6   #,    ! 
"   26   Oct   S3,
and  Staff  College  by  correspondence  during   19B3.' 
0M   Wre    reservists    wrted    on   JO   project*.    an    increae 
Intelligence  Agency.^ 
H^ft   Soaaary  of  ETS  is   Intelligence  Projects  -  1983 .3 
joint  Central    Intelligence  Agency/Defense  Happing  Agency  effort 
Force   EpacJ.il  Activities  Center  [ArSACJ.      The  project  requl 
depth       review       and      analysis       of       class  ii"ied       human       i 
intelligence  operations. 
J,   Worth  in  gtcn,   Jan-Dec  B3,  S3  291. 
2  Ibid.
naiar  necSna  of  a  Spucn  IntalU^once  Kostec  Plan  culatlng  to 
military  capabilities  and   " 
reports    (DSSK  Military  Operations 
rocee'3    capability    t. 
S*? 
1" 
Soviet ' 
Thaat 
:ction   capabilities    i rei^T™ 
™* 
opUaz 
,1«, 
„JI„  «,.*.*.",' 
jnalyeiB? 
'« 
'"teW 
S£ ::l£H°sr;:S: 
U'£  ^ 
r*" 
£?
.*„ 
A  UTS  28  flight  whose  personnel  had  expertise  in 
i  Processing  (AW)  System  Has  worfcing  on  three  new 
projects,  two  in  support  of  DIA  and  one  supporting  the  Office  of 
the  Secretary  of  the  Air  Force.  The  DXA- sponsored  projects  were 
to  provide  managers  with  support  in  ADP  planning  and  requirements 
definitions  for  distributed  processing  systems,  microcomputers, 
graphic  display  capabilities,  and  a  new  DIA  Wideband  Bus 
Comnmnicat i ons  System.  Support  for  the  Office  of  the  Secretory  of 
the  Air  Porce  was  to  involve  independent  assessments  and 
evaluations   of   a  classified  systems   development  project. 
6.  Q  DTS  2B  was  supporting  the  Plana  Section  of  the  Air 
Force  Special  Activities  Center  (APSAO  in  its  evaluations  of 
HAJCOM  Operations  plans  and  the  projected  recpiireaents  for 
linguists. * 
:S  23  was  supporting  the  development  of  a  segment 
lal  War  College  curriculum  dealing  with  the 
relationships  between  intelligence  and  policy  in  senior  decision- 
making. This  project  involved  research  and  review  of  overt  and 
classified  literature  dealing  with  an  intelligence/policy  issue  in 
which  the  interaction  of  the  intelligence  community  affected  the 
policy  process.* 
8.  ^Q  CTrE  2e  "as  supporting  CIA  on  two  projects  worked  on 
for  the  Director  of  Central  Intelligence  (OCX).  One  project 
involved   a    survey   and  analysis   of   air   and   sea  violations    of  Soviet 
borders  and  reactions   thereto,    while   the   second   concerned  Soviet 
perceptions  of  US  encryptions  of  space  systems  telemetry.* 
•Indicates  projects  whose  coapletion  was  expected  in  1984. 
DTS-2S projects  Terminated  During   13S3: 
1 .  Qp  The  project  involving  CAJC  software  support  to  DIA 
was  cancelled  by  the  project  sponsor. 
2.  IB  The  project  concerning  international  terrorism  was 
discontinued,  as  the  requirenent  for  in-depth  research  on  that 
subject  was  withdrawn  by  the  project  sponsor. 
^JP  The  lengthy  listing  above  discloses  that  personnel  of 
DTS  28  were  certainly  involved  with  substantive  research  projects 
in   1983. 
H  In  January,  two  captains  frosa  Headquarters,  Military 
Airlift  Command  (MAC) ,  Intelligence.,  visited  the  AFIS  compound  and 
requested  expanded  AFIS  reservist  support  to  MAC  reserve  flying 
units  in  order  to  compensate  for  active  force  manning  shortages. 
Six   AFIS    detached    training    units    were    located    at    MAC  bases.       The
ptepsred    i 
of   «U 
.upport 
covided  to  MAC  in  1982,  for  WC  to  use  In  determining  how  the 
DTSa  could  further  expand  their  services.  IKS  5  at  McQiocd  WTB 
was  already  planning  to  intensify  and  expand  intelligence  support 
to  the  446th  Military  airlift  King  (Associate).  The  support  was 
to  include  the  training  of  additional  duty  squadron  intelligence 
ofilcers.  The  directorate  worked  with  the  OTSa  to  reachaduXu 
their  training  weekend*  to  coordinate  then  with  the  timeo  that  KaC 
flying-  units  trained.  Selected  intelligence  reeervista  also  ware 
■cheduled  to  meet  periodically  with.  U. 
I    The 
tails        year 
the    latte: 
it 
consolidate       guidance       given       t 
mobilization   readlneas    and    field 
being   inspections    of    readinses    o 
by     area     directors     or    by     staff     fron    the     directorate.  On     IS 
Noveo&er.    Operating    Instruction    28-i,     "War    Planning    -    Individual 
Mobilization     Responsibilities     and     Field     Readiness     Assessments, * 
was   published   and   superseded  various  policy    letters    and    meoorasida 
ch     the     reservists     «ere     responsible:  1)      uniforms,      2) 
.  biological  warfare  train In g/equipment,  3 )  pre -mob i lira - 
tions,  4)  oobillsation  day  data,  5)  personal  affairs.  6) 
,tiona,    and  ?!    aobili2ation/travel  instructions.2 
I    fiflS    Reservists   participated    in    the    following    exercises 
Proud  Sabre 
Slue  Flag 
lean  Spirit 
Team  Spirit 
Gallant  Knight 
Gallant  Knight 
Solid  Shield 
^trfll  aFIS/KB  to  MAC/IB,  "Intelligence 
C  Airlift  Wings  (Associate) , "  18  Way  83,  SD  2 
storian  w.   SKSgt  Santa  Cruz,    AFIS/RE,    B  Mar  8( 
ann log-Indi'j-idua  1
IDSa*lon          Zf 
'                 "* 
JO 
Focus *Lens                PACftJT 
!                       54 
Cold   Pixe                     C5AKE 
Rid,*  Runner            AFIS 
-                «4 
TiT 
16! 
•KPA:      Ban-days    funded   : from   rei ,erve   pe^flonni ■1   appropri 
a  El  or 
pay    the    reservist    whili 
training  support. 
PRESSiJHE  POINT  Ejtercise 
ercise    originated    a t    the    level 
'or  the   RE  directors' 
ftan    any    other    e*erc ise    during    t 
The   directorate   ws 
e   ADPS/Mailgi 
were    assigned    Id    t 
.ft.i-.etiw  r„m. Colonel  Ober 
exceedingly    well." 
a      94.5      percent 
contact      rat 
directorate      tested 
notification  system  for  contacting  dispersed 
which  resulted  in  a  "drastic"  iaprtweaent  over  the  older  cam 
oethod.  The  total  contact  rate  was  96  percent,  the  highest  i 
ewer  achieved.  The  directorate,  however,  was  unable  to  test 
nailgraa  system  because   the  Air  Reserve  Personnel   Center  would 
scenario  there   was   to  be  partial  aobiliiatlon   at  the   start  of 
message    traffic.        This    area    showed   improveaent    over   PROUD   EJ 
■■  One  assessment  of  participation  in  the  exercise  by  m, 
cowraand  intelligence  units  concluded  that  some  of  the  coma, 
"forgot"    that   they   had   reservists  available   to  recall.       One   n 
'Appendix 
Sep  S3.   S0J?9B; 
!."J 
?s 
\Ll 10   APIS 
a  Rprt  ( 
Report." 
B    Dec B3.    S
Informing     them     of     the     directorate  a     particip 
jout  the  neasage-      During  the  exercise,    only  tun 
|»|  Detached  Training  Site  47,  Fort  Helvoir.  planned  and 
te^a     joint     interrogation     exercise     tar     member*     at     EWS      1 , 
ecise  was  a  shortened  version  at  the  *4vaneed'  Interrogation 
roe  offered  annually  at  the  Lob  Alamitos  KaaeS  Forces  Reserve 
Hi    In    California.,    under    the    sponsorship   of    the    *FIS/ra.        It 
rations  plan  used  in  the  advanced  course,  including  a  major 
rhaaling  of  27  of  the  roles  uaed.  The  result  was  an  overall 
cations  plan  of  306  pages,  ail  of  which  was  produced  by  nenbero 
WS  47.  The  plan  was  to  be  used  by  other  PTSs  beginning  in 
1  as  the  tiodel  for  similar  eiercises  throughout  the  program.' 
perfarioed  at  detached  training  sites  and  aasignaent  to  special 
duty  tours  and  operational  readiness  exercises.  The  reservists 
were  assigned  a  12  to  14  day  annual  training  tour  plus  12  days  of 
paid  inactive  duty  yearly.  Inactive  duty  training  vas  usually 
performed  at  detached  training  sites,  and  training  in  excess  of  12 
days  was  performed  voluntarily   for   rEtlreaent  points  only,      to  the 
duty  vas  related  to  wartime  proficiency  by  providing  services  or 
developing  products  for  user  comands.3 
Q      Annual   tours  were   performed  by  each    reservist  at  his  or 
mobilized.  Tasks  assigned  during  these  touts  provided  experience 
in    wartime     skills.  In     addition     to     annual     tonrs.      reservists 
'   training  course  participation  a
spe ■cial     Mn -day     to 
Ws 
are     designed 
to 
provide     fully 
temporary    active 
e    noed* 
s     necessity 
qualifies 
tequi 
3   by 
of     activ 
retjuest 
justified 
mally   on 
basis  by  use 
jte    and    submitted 
a The    directoi ate    schedule 3    over    2,000 
A99U al    ana 
special 
toars     in 
191 
33.         The 
19,735 
i»n< 
-days    committed     t 
a    tiles. 
e     tours 
97B  1 '864        1025  6307 
•BPA:  Han-dava  fonded  1 
pay  reservists  while 
training  support. 
fMPA:  Kan-days  funded  from  active  force  military  personnel  appro- 
priations »bicb  pay  reservists  on  tecswrary  tours  of  active  duty 
in      support      of      a      critical,       temporary      active      force      mission
slight decraasi 
■     from 
the    19S3 
total*. 
Mn-a*y 
.88   ran 
jgefflcnt 
of   both i   Da  and 
nan~d*y 
=e   Hegulatlon 
led      training 
requirements"    for    the    reservists.       The    training  section  performed 
a    study    af    the    impact    of    the    revisions    and    conversions    of    Air 
Force    Specialty    Codes    a 
material     for     participan 
of  the  study-  revealed  that  Job*  over  67 
were  fully  qualified.  Of  the  33  percent 
!T  half  were  only  waiting  time  for  upgrade 
taiflence    training.        The    findings    revealed 
i    the    revised   regulation,    existing  couraes 
training.  The  study  also  showed  that  of  the  new  specialty  codes 
requiring  other  prerequisite  codes,  less  than  10  percent  of  the 
not-fully  qualified  nefffoers  held  the  prerequisite  codes. 
of    702IO reservist position! i.        That    being 
the    cise,     manj 
be   forced to  leave   1 :he  reserve  program.  3 
-A. 
la     antic: Lpation     o f      a     KMiHEQ-FOH SIZE     exercise. 
>ty  702XQ  reservist  positions    f: 
AFIS/KE      : canning      document. 
a  preliminary    revi* ■w  of  702XD  re tra inability.       * 
case"    scenario    was 
Hinety-one    r. 
no    lnmedi 
few  retraining  protal Leas  in  th. e  senior  grades/ 
n>ut  T„i*m, 
-JT 
HOMIOT    or ■    human    i. itellioence    trai ning    in    the    d. 
site*    CDn! Sinned    th. roughest    the    ye. =r.        The    dire, 
'intv 
v*  T 
:s  nutoti. .n  w.   KSgt  Kiffibl< ,,  -km*,  a  * 
2  aid 
chart   of the   Officer   ATS! :   Conversions, 
301 '    3Intv 
V*     A« 
:s    Histori, in  w.    KSgt  Kin* It •,  Ayis/BE,  a  * 
<»Ut 
a  %rt  fe 
|    W  IS/BE,    Jan -I 
tec   S3,    SU  292.
the      substantiation      of      in format ion      gathered.  New     scenarios 
emphasising     hostile     interrogation     wera     added     to     the    exercise 
inventory  to  build  proficiency   in  prisoner-of-war  ouploltation. 1 
Readiness  Branch,  Rslph  Whitebergh,  bad  extensive  discussions  with 
the  author  about  the  paper  as  it  <a(  being  writtnn  and  sent  copies 
sf  it  to  the  commanders  of  the  ETSs,  stating,  *I  believe  this 
sonograph  is  worthy  of  study  and  discussion  and  more  Aaportantly, 
It  la  worthy  of  practical  experimentation  in  your  PIS 
Interrogation  exercises."  Concerning  the  concept  of  "confidence" 
is  the  focus  of  the  paper,  the  author  stated,  "This  theme  was 
selected  after  careful  analysis  of   all  the  factors   contributing   to 
iiscussing  this  paper  with  other  interrogators  who  have  conducted 
Hundreds  of  interrogations  of  soi-uces  from  various  backgrounds. 
It  also  seemed  most  significant  in  analyzing  my  own  eaprienee  of 
Interrogating  sources  from  many  foreign  countries  representing 
sroad  differences  based  upon  culture,  education,  occupation,  age. 
intelligence  and  coining  from  many  different  social  and  political 
ideologies. "2 
INT    state    of    the    art,     the   directorate 
47     jointly    dec* loped    a    poetgra dilate 
to  begin  in  the  fall  of  1984.  be  attended  by  ten  to  twelve  people 
per  class,  and  include  the  topics  "detection  of  deception"  and 
"psychology  c-f  interrogation."3 
foreign  l^anyiage  Training 
(£  The  directorate  continues  to  offer  language  specialists 
two  training  options  each  year:  three  scattered  weekends  of 
"total  Immersion"  in  a  language  at  a  detached  training  site  or  two 
solid  veeka  of  training  at  the  Defense  Language  Institute  at 
Honterey,  California.  The  total  ioceraion  technique  vaa  two  years 
old,  and  participants  who  spoke  the  sane  language  net  on  an 
assigned  weekend  at  a  designated  site  and  talked  exclusively  in 
the     common     foreign      language,      usually     being     Russian.      Qiineae, 
'Historical  Data  Ifcrt  ftk   KFlS/m.   Jen-Gee  S3,   SD  292. 
Confidence  Level  of  the  Interrogator."  6  Dec  S3,  with  Ateh  (fit 
"The  Confidence  Level  of  the  Interrogator  BBk  "  APIS/RE,    SD  3D2. 
3Intvw    Mfc    AT1E    Historian    ».    SMSgt   Santa    Crux,    WIS/SE,    B
German,      or    Spanish.         Op    to    the     and     of     1983, 
training    eophaslied    conversational    proficiency    .'- 
of      the      language      in      order      to      build      -      * 
sophisticated  capabilities.      Ail    teams  were   ready  to  progress    u 
ares      study     topics      as      mil     as      technical      vocabulary      and     ■ 
description    of   weapons    syateass.       This    sequence    of    progre«s    ' 
keeping  with  foreign  language  program  objectiTOs. 1 
a    Team    leaders    who    completed    the     second    year    at     to 
l     Language     training    held     a    workshop    at    Monterey.     22 
October,     In    order    to    evaluate    the    three    weekends    of    training 
1983.      Their  assessments   of   the   techniques' were  positive. 
Flight    44     in    Monterey    was    charged    with    managing    the    HJS    foreign 
language  program,    and  it  sponsored   the  workshop. 2 
Revised  Language  Skill  ftatlnga 
J!)  The  Defense  language  Institute  revised  the  foreign 
language  skill  rating  system  within  the  Department  of  Defense  to 
bring  it  into  line  with  the  system  used  by  the  Foreign  Service 
Institute  and  the  Central  Intelligence  Agency,  and  this  action 
affected  approximately  ninety  reservists.  The  tougher  rating 
system  resulted  in  lower  proficiency  and  spoken  language  test 
Scores.        Test    scores    generally    w-are     lowered    by    c"    --'--         " 
example,  a  person  who  qualified  for  entry  Into  the 
language  program  by  scoring  L2-R2  on  the  DLPT  sad  2  on  t 
language  test  would  have  hts  scores  lowered  to  M-i 
respectively.  Minimum       skill        level       requirements 
directorate's         Operating         Instruction         SO-2         were 
accordingly.  The      new      rating      system     was 
tal   immersion  and  tutorial  t 
iF  IS/BE 
participated 
In 
WORKS SOPS 
„_SL™= 
"» 
.." 
April   16 
29- 
-17 
■30 
t  Area 
June  4-5  Pacific  ftres  and  Southwest  Area 
The  respective  area  directors  chaired  the  workshops,  which 
provided  a  forum  for  commanders  of  the  detached  training  sites  to 
review  areas  of  management,  operations,  and  personnel  policies. 
Col.  Oberst  and  other  directorate  staff  members,  with  Brig-  Gen. 
Arthur  W.      Green,    Jr., 
1Intvw  ■£     SFIS    Historian    W.    SMSgt    '■ 
^Historical  Data  Report  BR    AFIS/RE,    J,
the    workshop.         There    was     ■    free    a*  change    of 
Lon,   and  ideas  at  the  workshop.1 
The    annual 
September     1' 
staff  members,  the  seven  area  directors,  and  the  six 
members  of  the  Board  of  Advisors.  The  workshop  was  a  fortss  for 
discussing  Items  of  mutual  concern  among  the  leaders  of  the 
program  and  for  reviewing  accompllshmenta  and  determining 
management  objectives  for  the  forthoomiag  year.2 
^H  An  area  enlisted  advisors  workshop  was  held  on  April  23- 
24  at  Tort  Belvoir.  This  was  the  first  auca  workshop  i°  nearly 
five  years.  Issues  pertaining  to  enlisted  personnel  in  the  seven 
areas  were  discussed  and  information   exchanged.3 
ADMINISTERING  THE   H£  PROGRAM 
Use   of  lovry  SATO 
£P  On  1  March,  the  Air  Reserve  Personnel  Center  Implemented 
new  rules  governing  reservist  airline  ticketing  procedures.  The 
directorate  agreed  with  the  basic  principal  which  prompted  the 
changed  rules,  but  disagreed  with  the  one  rule  which  required  that 
all  airline  ticketing  for  reservists  be  handled  through  the 
Scheduled  Airlines  Traffic  Office  (SATO)  at  Lowry  AFB,  Colorado, 
where  the  Air  Reserve  Perscr-nel  Center  was  located.  Prior  -to  the 
new  rule,  individual  reservists  scheduled  their  own  flights  at 
local  government  SATO  offices  around  the  country.  The  mandatory 
use  of  the  !>owry  office,  according  to  Colonel  Oberat,  caused  major 
personal  and  professional  disruptions,  negatively  affected  the 
credibility  o£  the  program  with  active  force  major  comaands  and 
special  operating  agencies,  and  adversely  affected  reservist 
morale.  The  telephoning  burden  placed  opon  the  directorate  staff 
and  reservists  was  excessive.  Further,  many  s  were  frustrated  at 
receiving  last  minute,  expensive.  Special/Federal  Express  delivery 
of  airline  tickets  sometimes  on  the  day  prior  to  the  start  of  the 
tour,  only  to  find  the  flight  accommodations  inconvenient  and  more 
expensive  than  need  have  been.  Colonel  Oberat  stated,  "The  trade- 
off of  cost  vs  loss  of  credibility  is  counterproductive  to  our 
mutual  goals.  While  the  foregoing  may  be  viewed  as  "temporary 
growing  pains, '  the  alternate  payoffs  involving  individual  morale, 
professional  responsibility,  and  the  personal  convenience  of 
oaking  one's  own  airline  reservations  through  government 
facilities  have  considerable  merit." 
'For   replies    from  the   directorate  on  questions   raised   at   tl 
irkshops,   see  BD  303. 
2Intvw   H-     kFIS    historian    „.     SHSgt    Santa    Cruz,     AF1S/KE,
nanoatory  ticliet  process  that  the  personnel  center  niap).?  i«i 
guidelines  for  the  reBorviBtaii  to  follow  when  BchedoUng  their  i 
Slight*.      He  urgea  that  the  center  modify  the  Bandatory  I*wry  a 
iHxirjility  -e  shoala  alio* 
arrangement*  through  local 
:   intention  on  the  JUT  Fom 
to    constructively    establish    reporting    and    oeparturn 
will  govern  payment  tar  travel  days.#2 
Recruiting 
itinental    Airlines 
3     the     recruiting
Mr  Force  Audit.  Agency  Baport 
4A  On  !  April,  the  Air  Force  Audit  Agency  issued  a  report, 
"Management  of  Air  force  Intelligence  Individual  J4ct.il  iz  a  fclon 
Augmentee  Programs."  The  agency  had  examined  sanagenent  of  the 
three  separate  programs  which  controlled  Air  Force  reaervista  in 
intelligence:  Air  Force  Intelligence  Service  (AFIEJ,  A±r  Force 
Sytema  Comoand  (AFSC),  and  the  Electronic  Security  Coamanfl  (ESC).2 
The  overall   conclusion  of   the  report   stated : 
Management  in  all  three  intelligence  I«A  program! 
was  making  intensive  efforts  to  improve  capabilities  and 
personnel  strengths.  AFIS  had  Usplemented  aggressive 
recruiting  efforts  and  initiated  a  project  to  improve 
the  quality  and  utility  of  IMA  training  and  Intelligence 
projects.  AFSC'b     progran     at     the     Foreign     Technology 
Division  and  ESC' 8  IMA  training  with  assigned  active 
duty  wartime  unite  was  effective  in  preparing  IHAfi  for 
wartime   tasks.3 
In  all  three  programs,  IMAs  were  prepared  for  rapid 
mobilization.  For     exansple,      mandatory     prenobilization 
personnel  actions  ( immunisations,  physicals,  and  skill 
level/position  requirement  matching]  were  current  and 
complete.  Augmentees     performed     annual     training     with 
their  assigned  active  duty  units  as  required.  However, 
opportunities  did  exist  to  improve  the  effectiveness  of 
reserve  personnel  through  increased  management  attention 
to:  1 }      AFIS-managed      and      ESC-aanaged      inactive      duty 
iraining    sites    and    2)    IMA   position 
Two  major   issues   were  discussed   in  the  report*3 
1 .  Inactive  duty  trainings  AFIS-managed  augmen- 
tees  assigned  to  flying  units  were  not  accomplishing 
inactive  duty  training  with  intelligence  data  and 
material  used  by  their  wartime  units.  ESC-managed  IKAs 
attached  to  Naval  Reserve  Security  Groups  did  not 
receive  inactive  duty  training  capatihle  with  military 
occupations  and  wartime  tasks  to  enhance  preparedness. 
2 ,  Manpower  shortages;      Severe     manpower     Hhortages 
i  Program  (Auth)  Growth  Over  Next 
Five  Years,"  23  Mar  S3,    SD  307. 
!Rprt  ^J£  Air  Force  Audit  Agrency,  'Hanagement  of  Air  Force 
Intelligence  Individual  Mobilization  Augmentee  Programs,'  Project 
825537,    1   Apr  83.    SB  30B. 
3lMd. 
4Ibid. 
5Ibid.
isigntng      intelligence      reservists      in 
an&by.    and   retired   regular  categories 
icussed    in    the    report    i 
also  included  In  the  report. 1 
? .      £=5>layment      of 
mcbi  Illation  raadiJiBas. 
cognition  galley 
^P  In  Kay,  Colonel  Oberst  placed  special  einphas 
recognizing  deserving  personnel  who  were  rati  ring.  The 
seated.  "Each  year  we  lose  many  good  people  to  a 
retirement.       The    Individual    Mobilization   fiugmentees    have    ; 
fficers    vera    directed    to    use    the    lists    to    track    retirements    I 
tine  ly      manner.  They     sere      expected      to      aubffllt      eoajileted 
*ktr    WL.    A?IS/RE    to   ftFIS/CC  et   al,    " 
(eeenre  (AFIR)   Flan.    FY  1983-1987.  *  3!  Aug  8 
3l"    4tt     AFIS/BE     to     ROs     et     al,      * 
'olicy. "  33   Hay  83,    Sn  310.
modifying    the    standards    for    (ward   of   decorations  upon   ret: 
beyond"    expected    datiee.     another    font   of    recognition.    cm 
He tired  Reserve  Representative  Program 
yearly    activity    i 
"blue 
Keobers    participated 
an   inquiry   froa 
intelligence    reservist    spaces    and    resources    of    oyer    twenty   msj 
commande    and   aoencieB.       The    SPIR   title  was   widely    recognised   a 
prograa    affiliates,     the    directorate    did   explain   the    title   to   t 
Security    Command    IESC)    and    the    Foreign   Technology   Division    ( 
title    to    identify   the    total    intelligence    IMA.    Mr  National  Gi 
and  air  Force   Reserve   resource:       -Intelligence  Air   Reserve   Ft