~ 9° ee U.S. ARMY ‘IN {TELLIGENCE ‘AND SECURITY COMMAND FISCAL YEAR 1988. “Hastory Office _. i Be “2 Office of the veputy Chiel of Stari, Cperericns : on Re Heecquerters, U.S. arzy ontelsigence ane Securiiy Consenc eee . oo Arlington Hell Station wens we - Arlington, Virginia (22212- 5000 : ae ee ES ee ORCS CSRIS-6(R3))_ Oe So. a . “September 1985) . ’ uf THis PAGE 2 nit LELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS 2——7 ~
we ee UNCLASSIFIED THIS DOCUMENT “CONTAINS CLASSIFIED INFORMATION AFFECTING THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE ESPIONAGE LAWS, U.S. CODE TITLE 18, SECTIONS 793, 794%, AND 798. THE LAW PROHIBITS ITS TRANSMISSION OR THE REVE- LATION OF ITS CONTENTS IN ANY MANNER PREJUDICIAL . TO THE SAFETY OR INTEREST OF THE UNITED STATES | OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANY FOREIGN GOVERNMENT TO ~ TRE DETRIMENT OF THE OWITED STATES. “THIS DOCUMENT MUST ‘BE KEPT In COMINT: CHANNELS ~ AT ALL TIMES: IT IS TO BE SEEN ONLY BY U.S. PERSONNEL ESPECIALLY INDOCTRINATED AND AUTHOR- IZED TO RECEIVE COMINT INFORMATION ON A STRICTLY NEED-TO-KNOW BASIS. REPRODUCTION AWD/OR FURTHER DISSEMINATION OF THIS DOCUMENT OUTSIDE THE U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND IS PRO- HIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR SC} INSCOM APPROVAL. se . s . . - ge, aon 4ii
EE EEE OE ER EE te Oe UNCLASSIFIED . PREFACE vcore (0) The Annual Historical Review was prepared in compliance with AR oe we 870-5, Military History: Responsibilities, Policies, and Procedures. The purpose of the report is to provide a quick reference and research based of the significant activities, events, and accomplishments of the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) during FY 1984. =- oe Principal source materials used in compilation included the annual pete historical reports submitted by headquarters staff elements and a : , _ subordinate commands, briefings, interviews, and giscellaneous oo, _ Gocuments. a ne ° (U) The Biennual Conference of DA Historians held in March 1985 centered on the Annual Historical Review, its preparation and value. A '.. Rumber of observations emerged which are reflected in the INSCOM ce _ , Review's format. A debate existed as to whether or not an adequate =). | ' Feview can be written on an annual basis, perhaps a five-year cycle || ee would be gore fitting. However, the annual report permits the recording ~~: we of events and gathering of information while sources still exist. Our ecw ol history office will attempt in the future to bring together the best of cs both worlds by continuing, as in the past, to prepare annually a quick ; reference document, but with each change of command, to prepare an “:§ .. Overview summary for the inclusive dates. .This will mean eliminsting cee ee _ the summary portion on an annual basis which was largely repetitious of” | oe coverage found elsewhere within the volume. ‘This will also permit a ea limited effort at an oral history program by attempting to involve departing members of the Command Group. To date, the oral history progran within our history office has been almost nonexistent since the Vietnam War due to lack of administrative personnel. For example, it is estimated that for each hour of interview, 40 hours of administrative support to include typing is required. , oo me Se OS (0) This summary was prepared by James L. Gilbert and Diane Le ° _, Hamm, who both wrote and edited portions of the document. Final - _ . Peview and assembly were performed by Ms. Ham. Poin ar foo _t ere. ‘- a September 1985 ; JAMES L. GILBERT a Command Historian
Chapter I. M BRREBENT CONTENTS ISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND LOCATIONS Mission and Functions. .cccccccccscecsccccecse Transfer of Production Functions. .cccccccee LOCACL ON cecveccecscccccvesecececceseeeccer TI. COMMAND AND STAFF RELATIONSHIPS Command and Staff RelationshipsS..ssenccccce Counterintelligence Assistance to DARCOM... Intelligence Data Handling System (IDHS) at Fort Bragheccscscccccecccescscscccscece III. ORGANIZATION INSCOM Organization. cccccrccccccvcsccrcccces Resubordination of U.S. Liaison Branch..... e@eeeoeeeceeaospevneeeeaeneeceaneeee ese eaeeecaneaee@ Field Station Okinawa Closure...ccccccccecs Administrative Survey Detachment... ccccses Opposing Forces/Technical Intelligence OLLicerccccccecceccvecccscsccccccsecececccecce Reorganization of the 902d MI Group.....ee. Hahn Detachment. cccccccnccsscesecsscernesecses EAC Intelligence Center (EACIC).....cceeece U.S. Army Theater Intelligence and Security Command Eur Ope wcrcccvcsenccessccccscsecece Army of Excellence .ccvccccevcecsecsesvecsccecseses Allocation of Arlington Hall Space......... Relocation of HQ INSCOM...cccsccccccccccces Consolidation of HQ INSCOM. .ccecccesccseces S27Tth MI Battalion's New Mission..c.wccccccee HQ INSCOM Reorganization. .cccccccccccesecece General Officer Space in Europe.ccccccccees IV. RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT Operations and Maintenance, Army (OMA) FunGScccccccccccccccccesseeevreccsecsececece Family Housing Units. cccccccccsvccvecwesvess INSCOM Program and Budget Guidelines, FY 1984 (Authorized Strength) .ccecccccees DCSPER Budget Line-Iten CBLI) ccc cece c cece Civilian Strength by Program..cccsccccscees Command Personnel Situation. .cccccccccecees Director's TrOpPHnyeccccccccscsesesesevsecsece vii Page Wr THT TaT 208 Seta
Chapter Pape IV. RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT (Continued) Travis TROPHY. cccccccccccscscccesccccvccccce 32 MODLLization..cccccccccccccsesscccccccsepes 32 Enlisted Personnel Strength Posture...sccee 32 INSCOM Key Personnel. .scsccccccccccccccsccce | 34 Congressional Inquiries.cccccscccccscccscscces 34 Inspector General Acton Requests (IGAR's).. 34 EEO Compl aints.cccccccccccccccesccvsececesece 35 Equal Employment Opportunity Program....see 35 Military JUSTICE. cc rcccccccccccccccsccccces 36 Public Affairs Activities. .cccccccccccccece 37 High Performance Programs Information.....e.e 37 MI Poster Seriesccrcccccccecscccecsccecceceses 37 Historical Monographs.cccccccccccccccccesee - 38 Historical Audiovisual Production..ccccccce 38 3S9BY Cash Award Program. ..ccccccccccsecccces 39 Baccalaureate Cooperative Education PFOBPaM. cccccccvccccccccseccscsccccccceces 39 Command Intern PFORPFaMeccccccccccccccccccce 39 INSCOM Average Grade..ccccccccccvccccccccce 40 INSCOM Senior-Level Positions (High) Grade ccccccccsccccccccccccscvcccecccccceves - &O Junior Officer Cryptologic Career Progran.. 40 Standard Information Division Personnel (SIDPERS) Performance. .cccsccccccccescccecs 8d = Affirmative Action Program Plan..cccccccces aU Merit Pay SysStemiccceccccrceccsscccscceceses . a4 Merit Pay Appraisals.cccccsccscccccsesesees 44 BG Bernard Adrisana Award..cccccccccccecsece 42 Communications Upgrade Arlington Hall t . Station... cccccccccsesccececcsevsecscesesececoce ke Freedom of Information Actwcccccccccccccces ke Investigative Records Repository Unit...... 43 IRR Micro Consolidation Project.ccccccccees ‘43 Centrai Security Facility Productivity..... . uy Status of Aircraft Resources..cccccccesscac ay Service Cryptologic Element (SCE) Day...... 45 Operational Readiness.ccccccccccccsececsece 45 WeapOneericcccsccceccccccccccecccasvecececs RE Reserve Affaire ccccccccescrsccevcecccccvcece ry Chief of Staff, U.S. Army's Award for ’ Maintenance Excellence. cccccsccccccsesecce u6 ¢ Exercises. cccoccccccccccscccccccevececsecees aT ‘ INSCOM Beyond Excellence (IBEX) Programs... 47 ix ° UNCLASSIFIED PONRRLA (006
Chapter 7. oe mo a ie - efi IV. RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT (Continued) . es Personnel Securityssccccccceccscccsoageciics ae Information Securitysecsecccccccccvece ae Physical Securityscccccccsscccsscccovece ese me Vault 3 UPpErade.ccccccccosseccsvccsccesasece Special DAIG Inspections .ssereeseresecersse 7 Meds v. OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES Multidiscipline . ; , U.S. Army Tactical Intelligence Readiness” Training CREDTRATN) reer ee ce ene se eee INSCOM Bi-Weekly Operational Report.......- Weather Intelligence and Threat Analysis | Progran (WINTAP) co ccccccccccccccscccsccese. “. Pactical Simulation (TACSIM) Support to. CRESTED EAGLE Bic seccccccccccccccceveceee s Support to URGENT FURY (0.8. Forces in. Grenada)scssceccccccccccceccescecccssecces Weather Support to U.S. Array Aircraft in . Central Ameriecdiccccccscvecevecvsecsevessees - 870th MI Group IIR Production. ..ssesecseeee Improving Intelligence Support te = SOUTHCOM. sccecccccccccccsccseccaececsaseee nie. The INSCOM Plan.... e@eeeoeevosceospeo eee seen eevpesneeoeveeeneeees EC iEW Task Analysis Studyccccvcscccccccces: IMINT/Electro-Optics _- eeeeeevneenuveeve Seeeeeene SCHSPSSHSSSSEHSHCFSHESHOHREHH OBOE HOA SHH HSSHSHPSCHSSHHESCHEAOSET SSF HS BAHeHesee eaeuvuesvesceo ao eeoeovevneaeveesescoeosneeseaeaeeee ZI Detachnent..cssssssesseeececeeeese ry SIGINT/EW LL High Frequency Direction-Finding Rear 56 56 $7. 58 58 59
Chapter We OPER requency Direction Finder ‘(aroe), PTT e rere TeTeeETUTTTT TTT yy ls . ,7 | INSCOM CONUS Operations Site.cccccccsesccscece : “a ax: Electronic Processing and Dissemination he vege! System {EPDS).. Disposition of Army SIGINT Positions by by Sub-Element.ccccscccscevcvscccsvcsoscces Field Station Sinop's Operational ~:: Poe , Pield Station Berlinesccccccccccceccecesscee ooo ccccccccecscccccccccees. cc cvecescvcresesevsessceve OOOOH THESES ASH ESOS HSE SELOEDS SCHHROSSCSHSHSHEOSTHEBRHEHAOOECH ORES Loss of ASSETS cccceecenecccccsscersecscesers ° COORDS SOSESESOHSOSHSHEHHEOH SH HEED Third World.ccccscsececvseccs eeeeoeuauneaeed eeoeeeeee 2 t ee cercnceceresevcocscosess soe eeccescccscesscseseocoes xiit Modernization of Field Station Sinop...:.0..- TYPO. scesercnccccccccccccscencccsssccesoess pore pens Disposition of the Aray‘s SIGINT Resources © aetna: 3 — Rental eoen wee cccccccecescccccccees © 0-0 Soom Collection Management Center es ove gccnvewelecsccccccssseccsscccs. aaate Project T PEc ccccccccccsccccsevcccccccccscce. 7 - Direction-Finding Hetsicceces Coeccscccscccccs - ak ‘ Highlightso.ccccccccccccccccccncccccccccces, : 68 © 68 a) Gares - 68 - IPN AS
“= Chapter V. OPERATIONAL eseeeveaeaeneooaooaoeseeeeoe : - 6 eseeeeoes wereeeeeeRRSRERERRERERERE ERE R RAAB TEE on of 470th MI Group's A - Theater Document Exploitation Systen eeoveseeenoeseeeoseeeoeoeeeeeesd eeeeeneseeeeaaeeeoeoeeeneaeeee . eeteeeonsvev,eoaonseaeoeoeoseeneases ‘Counterintelligence/Operations Security COMSEC INSECuritle™s.cccceseccssseesvcvscccres Electronic Security (ELSEC) Collection and Analysis Sysvens CECAS) ccccccvascecccccccss Development of the Operations Security Evaiuvation LOSE) coccccccrecesscccccccnensce Sensitive Compartment Information (SCI)... .. Coppunications Supporteccccccccsececceseses Mobile TEMPEST Test Syaten (MTTS) wcccccccess echnical Working GroupS.cceccccccces Personnel Security Investigations (PSI) Support ceoccconecessecvcsesesosecssscsvocssece Operations Security Support to the Kwajalein Missile Range (ZMR) cc cccccwncccccccrccceces INSCOM Port Security Mission.ccceccccccccsecs INSCOM Support to the Ballistic Missile - Defense Systems Command (BMDSCOM)....-ceece Polygraph ACCLVICL EB. crcvecceccneccveesevseces Counterintellgience Task Force 2.cccecccccece INSCOM Support to 84 Olympicse.ccocccccseerses Counterinteliigence Support to Operations in GrenadMeccceccevesesseesssseseseceseosecs Special 470th MI Group Counterintelligence Missioneccccccesevcsesscsnsesesesseseocesesrs xv 101 104 102 104 105 106 009 “WR Tad ETS TET
No ee ee ee Appendix B. Cc. D. E. F. G. I. J. K. USAINSCOM Organizational Structure..scccccsese TOE Unitsecccvesccceccccccccssscccssvcscveses Changes In Status of TOE Units.cccscccccscccses TDA Units. cccenccccccscsscessscseccveceseseses Changes In Status of TDA Units.cvcrsscccsccsees USAINSCOM Personnel Strength by Unit...ccceee Provisional UnitS.cccccccccccvecccucccccccees Changes In Status of Provisional Units....... USAINSCOM Key Personnel.ccccccccccccccccccces Travis Trophy Winners.ccccecccccccccccccccecs Director's Trophy Winners..cccccccccccccccece PHOTOGRAPHS BG Barry E. SOVStePecccccccccsccvessasscevcccceses BG Charles F. Scanloneccccccscccsscsseccssccrsevseces GLOSSARY. . sc cccccccccccrccresesesecesccecssesseoseses INSCOM Staff Directory + August 1984 "UNCLASSIFIED Tables Direct Funding by Subprogram..sccccsecccccccoces Direct Obligations for FY 198 ..ccccecscccceece INSCOM Program and Budget Guidance, FY 1984.... Civilian Strength by Program..cccsccsverevssecce Enlisted Personnel Posture for FY's 1983-1984.. Enlisted Personnel Posture by Area and Unit.... Serious Crime Offenses. ccoscevccssncnccccesoses FY 1984 Administrative Eliminations..cccccscess Disposition of Other Offenses, FY 1984.....+06. Approving Official's Decision Plus Presumptive Ratings (PR we cvcccccccessrseevecceseesssesecss xvid - —CaNBENT Page 112 116 117 718 120 121 126 127 128 138 140 141 V42 143 010
No. 11. 12. 13. 14, 15. nia, INSCOM Adreraft ResourceBecccescccccceassscesers Disposition of Arny SIGINT Positions by Type... Disposition of Army SIGINT Resources by Sub- Elemente ccccccccvesevscsevesecsrseeesevsesesere COMSEC Insecurities, CY 1983.ccccccccvcvccccves Polygraph Activities, 3d and 4th Qtrs, FY WBW cecccccccccrccccrscccesscecvecssesecee UNCLASSIFIED xix ° Page uy 73 74 90 101 O1l
mye I CHAPTER I MISSION, veri AND LOCATION "Mission and Functions. (U) The mission of the cc, INSCOM 48° ‘to conduct and coordinate electronic warfare (EW); intelligence collection processing, analysis, and reporting; counterintelligence (CI) activities; -» . Operations security (OPSEC) support; and related operations § in support of oe ~ te < “4. “@) ‘Commands ‘military intelligence organizations tailored ‘to Provide ¢ supported force requirements for: - eo a. Intelligence within the corps commander's area of interest and . a to supplenent the corps intelligence and electronic warfare (IEW) system uf OF certain intelligence within the Sore, area of influence. be Intelligence with the echelon ‘above. corps (EAC) commander's : grea of influence and coordination for/or the provision of " Antelligence *. within the Eac commander's area of interest... tae AE . arr a On ly Fhe . > is a etd eye e. Counterintelligence support beyond the organic capabiiities of san supported commanders, 29: cores LS = “de Specialized intelligence, EW, and security s support.’ "RF ToT B55 BSNS i O12
+e @ TIT OS RR Rte me eee enteric OE te tomo Acts as the SCE executive agent for ‘8. (0) Conducts end coordinates counterintelligence ‘support to U.S. tat taY om ad 9. (C) Conducts electronic surveillance support operations. 40. (U) Conducts special operations. = 11. (U0) Conducts and coordinates EW operations. 12. (U) Operates the DA Special Security Systen, =~ 13. - (U0) Administers functions relating to management, organization, equipment, training, administration, logisitics, and automated date processing. transfer of Production Functions. (U) ‘The Intelligence Organization and Stationing Study which led to the establishment of INSCOM in 1977 had recommended that al] Army intelligence production agencies be consolidated into a single entity. However, only those production ‘agencies directly under GACSI or FORSCOM were consolidated under INSCOM on 1 January 1977. From these newly acquired production elements, INSCOM formed the U.S. Army Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center (ITAC) in 1978. However, after subsequent relooks, support grew for a larger consolidation. The CG INSCOM's positicn was that the elements should be consolidated under his sajor Arsy comand (MACOM), but even more importantly, such a consolidation should take : place. As a result of a study initiated in September 1983, the Vice Chief of Staff, U.S. Army directed that ITAC be placed under the opera‘ional control of the newly esteblished U.S. Army Intelligence Agency (AIA) (Provisicnal), a field operating agency under OACSI. The opcrational ' control was transferred in July 1984, but adeinistrative control would not de relinguished until early FY 1985. ; (0) In addition to assuming control of the ITAC resources, the Arny Intelligence Agency was also set to receive the production elenents formerly subordinated to the U.S. Army Materiel Command: the Foreign Science and Technology Centef at Charlottesville, Virginia, and the U.S. Arzy Missile Intelligence Agency at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama. The only Arpy production element not ccnsolidated was the Armed Forces Medical Inteliigence Center. an agency of The Surgeon General of the Army operating under a newly acquired joint charter. . § - -
UNCLASSIFIED (0) In June 198%, Senator Warner, U.S. Senator from Virginia, proposed a Senate Amendment 3175 which would have prevented the transfer of the Foreign Science and Technology Center to AIA without approval of the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 022%: - Representatives. This-somentarily brought into question the DA ~ General Order which created the AIA. However, a ruling by the Judge Advocate General in September 1984 removed any y dochte, and the oa reorganization proceeded on sehedule.* sw Location. (U) Headquarters, ‘U.S. Arpy Intelligence and Security Command was located at Arlington Hall Station, 4000 Arlington Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22212. Until a final stationing decision ‘is effected, certain staff functions will continue to be located at Fort George G. Meade, Maryland 20755. woe . i { 014
FOOTNOTES: CHAPTER I. MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND LOCATION 7 i. ODF, DCSRM, subj: AR 10-53, Organization and Functions, U. S. Arny taco yon Intelligence and Security Command (U) (Undtd) (C). =: on 2. “INSCOM and Its Heritage," History Ofc, HQ INSCOM ( 1985), ‘pp. 5, 12,13 (0); FY 198% DCSOPS AHR (T. » Pp. 18-193 Form » 32, Subj: % Memorandum of Agreement, AlA-2C (19 Sep 84) (WU). oe S i t 3601
CHAPTER II COMMAND AND STAFF RELATIONSBIPS oS ae Command and Staff Relationships. (0) The CG, INSCOM te under - Supervision of tne Chier cf Staff, U.S. Army. Directives, authorities, policy, planning, and programming guidance, approved programs, . resource allocations and other methods of command direction are issued to CG, INSCOM by the Chief of Staff, U.S. Aray. (0) The CG, INSCOM-- °° 1. Commands ail assigned units and activities. ej tazssosns. (U) INSCOM and other sajor Army commands (MACOM) are coordinate elements of DA. The CG, INSCOM is authorized to communicate Girectly with other sejor Army commanders or with heads of Arsy Staff agencies on matters of sutual interest. (U) The CG, INSCOM will rgaintain Maison as necessary with other = :: ° MACOM's, field operating agencies, other cryptclogic and intellicence activities, and other foreign domestic governments) agencies to maintain an awareness of, to exchange information on, and to ensure coordination of matters of mutual concern. ! Counterintelligence Assistance to DARCOM. (U) In Novenber 1983, a : directed study on the intelligence activities in the U.S. Army Materiel . Development end Readiness Command (DARCOM) aurfaced a serious r Geficiency in the managemen* of counterintelligence and operations security (OPSEC) within DARCOM. As a result, a concept was approved to centralize intelligence management witiin DARCOM. A working group was then established to implement chis concept and DARCOM { requested the assistance of the ACSI ir obtaining a quelified individus) to participate in the working group. OACSI, DA tasked INSCOM to provide the individual. LTC Stephen R. Harris, INSCOM Liaison Officer to DARCOM, was selected for 90 days TDY beginning in mid-March 1984.2 ° * FO SEONLY ( O16
eed of a recognized CENTCOM IDHS plan. As such, CENTCOM forwarded intelligence Data Handling System (IDHS) at Fort Brage. (U) The relocation of the IDHS Branch of the INSCOM Automated Systes Activity at Fort Bragg with the future consolidation of the U.S. Arny Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center became a sensitive issue in FY 1963. Among it functions, the IDHS Branch provided tactical users on- dine and patch computer services to national level data bases. The CDR, XVIII Airborne Corps wanted to keep the IDHS and recommended -. FORSCOM assimilate it. The Deputy Chief of Staff for Automation - (DCSAUT), HQ INSCOM, position was that the spaces involved were eritical to the establishment of the Aray eat Intelligence Production System (ATIPS) staffing and were not available for assixiletion. Secondly, some automated data processing could be left in place to ease of a zgsesns . the transition, but it was important that FORSCOM take programming actions in the FY 1985-89 Program Objective Memorandum cycle to provide follow-on. However, at the end of FY 1983, the issue was still unresolved. wee CC OO - (U) During FY 1984, at the direction of the ACSI, HQDA, the IDHS Branch was funded for FY 1984 and FY 1985 from General Defense Intelligence Program (GDIP) funds under the command and control of INSCOM. Initial planning had called for FY 1986 and beyond funding to be provided under the GDIP as a submission of U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) to provide an Army-CENTCOM (ARCENT) IDHS in support an FY 1986 GDIP subsission which called for both hardware and oe software upgrade to the IDHS site, as well as spaces for people. gp wo 2550808 (3) As_a result of the CENTCOM initiative, Fort Bragg units operating in suppért of other unified and specified commands, expressed concern over the potential loss of responsive support from IDHS Branch. Their concern culminated in a visit to HQ INSCOM in September 1985 where it was concluded that the IDHS site at Fort Bragg should remain under the command and control of INSCOM and provide support to the ARCENT mission as well as to the missions of other unified and specified commands represented by Fort Bragg tactical units. we (U) At the close of FY 1984, the future of the Fort Bragg IDHS site appeared to be established as an automated intelligence/telecommunication processing center in support of various unified and specified commands represented by Fort Bragg tactical units and potentially a11 CONUS FORSCOM units.3 a SE ONLY { 017
PSE ONLY  FOROFE FOOTNOTES: CHAPTER II. COMMAND AND STAFF RELATIONSSIPS 1. DF, DCSRM, subd‘: AR10-53, Organization and Functions, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (Undtd) (C). 2. IA Form 32, IAOPS-OP-OC, subj: Request for Assistance in Development of Counterintelligence Function (15 Mar 84) (0). 3. FY 1984 Ann Hist Review (T fF pp. 13-143; FY 1984 DCSAUT (C), ts zen ‘ 016
FOR OFFI SE ONLY CHAPTER III ORGANIZATION INSCOM Organization. (U) At the close of FY 1984, there was a total of 78 units (34 TOE and 4A TDA) within INSCOM. The TDA figure does not include Augmentation or Provisional units. All types of units are listed in appendix I. For individual lists of TOE, TDA, and Provisional units at the close of FY 1984, see appendixes B, D, and G respectively. Changes in the status of TOE, TDA, and Provisional are listed in appendixes C, E, and H. (U) On 27 June 1984, MG Albert N. Stubblebine, III retired and was succeeded by BS Harry E. Soyster, who left his position at OACSI. On 29 August, BG Soyster was promoted to major general. Throughout FY 1984, BG James W. Hunt remained as Deputy Commander, Intelligence. In November 1983, BG Charles F. Scanlon was assigned as Deputy Commander, Support, arriving from having served as the executive officer at OACSI. Early in 1984, the “Intelligence” and "Support" designations were dropped from the signature blocks of the deputy commanders, - but were retained as office symbols for distribution of correspondence. COL Charlies C. Partridge served as Chief of Staff until his retirement on 31 January 1984. On 1 February 1984, COL Louis D. Kirk assumed the position. Throughout FY 1984, CSM George W. Howell served as the Command Sergeant Major. (U) At the end of FY 1984, Headquarters, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command was organized to consist of a Command Group, Office of the Chief of Staff, Special Staff, Personal Staff, and Coordinating Staff as shown below: (These particular major divisions were reflected in a draft of INSCOM Regulation 10-2, dated 17 August 1983, which was circulated for use in the implementation of the HQ ‘ INSCOM reorganization. A number of elements to include the Command Chaplain, Scientific and Cryptologic Affairs Advisor, and Command Psychologist which had in the past fallen within the category of Personal Staff were now placed under Special Staff although they continued to be responsible to the Commanding General. Under this grouping, the Office of the Chief of Staff provided general administrative support to these three elements.) . Command Group: Commanding General (CG). (U) The CG, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command was responsible to the Chief of Staff, U.S. Army for accompiishment of the missions and functions prescribed by AR 10-53 and was concurrently responsible to the Chief, Central Security Service for all SIGINT activiti . . ‘Ww us 745955 FO USE ONLY { g1gy
re ee Oe nn en tome UNCLASSIFIED | Deputy Commanders (DCG-I) (DCG-S). (U) The deputy commanders assisted the commander in the management of all intelligence and support operations of INSCOM to include the review and execution of al) tasked and delegated operations and the determination of future requirements. (Although the informal division of responsibilities while Generals Hunt and Scanlon served were to have been on e@ geographical basis, in fact, BG Hunt oversaw SIGINT units worldwide and BG Scanlon those with a HUMINT related mission.) na Command Sergeant Major (CSM). (U) The Command Sergeant Major as the senior enlisted person in the command provided advice and assistance to the CG on all matters involving enlisted personnel. | Office of the Chief of Staff: 7. Chief of Staff (CofS). (0) The CofS acted as the principal coordinating | agent of, and advisor to, the CG and DCG's on those matters pertaining os Sot.. to INSCOM; directed and coordinate? the staff to achieve efficiency and unit of action; and assisted the CG and DCG's in the supervision of the execution of orders. Directiy subdordinate to the CofS were the Liaison Officers, the Office of Public Affairs, Organizational Effectiveness Office, and Internal Review Office. (During FY 1984, the Internal Review Office was transferred to the CofS, the Information Resource Management Office and the Mission Analysis Office became major staff elements, and %he Equal Employment Opportunity Office and Senior Reserve Component Advisor were reassigned to DCSPER and DCSOPS respectively. The Center for Excellence (CENTEX) was redesignated the Organizational Effectiveness Office. Each of these changes are discussed in detail under the appropriate organization subject and under the topic on "HQ INSCOM Reorganization.") Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS). (U) The DCS acted for the Chief of Staff - during his absence and assisted to coordinate all actions of the HQ” INSCOM staff. Supervised the activities of or provided support to the Building Coordinator, Command Chaplain, Org:nizational Effectiveness ' Office, Secretary of the General Staff, Staff Psychologist, Scientific . Advisor, Public Affairs Office, and INSCOM Liaison Officers. Secretary of the Genera Staff (SGS). (U) The SGS acted as executive officer for the CofS and as office manager for the offices of the CG, DCG's, and CofS. Special Assistant to Chief of Staff. (U) The Special Assistant to Chief of Staff acted as special advisor and consultant to the Commander, Deputy Commanders, and the Chief of Staff. . Protocol Office. (U0) The Protocol Officer served to advise the Command Group on matters related to protocol. UNCLASSIFIED L o2e
UNCLASSIFIED Building Coordinator. (U0) - The Building Coordinator administers the headquarters occupied physical facilities and administers and coordinates such administrative functions as local transportation, office equipment, and supplies. As part of the HQ INSCOM reorganization, the position of Building Coordinator was established in March 1988 but renained . a unfilled. Because of garrison support and a general lack of responsibilities to be carried out while the headquarters renained at Arlington Hall Station, it was envisioned that the position would not be oe filled until a move of the headquarters to Fort Belvoir was effected. BE ee “+ Laaison Officera.- (0) The liaison officers provided liaison representation ‘i? - $0 FORSCOM, “FRADOC, USAICS, USAREUR, USACACDA, and other commands as required. The liaison position at the U.S. Army Materiel ‘Command (AMC) was discontinued on 15 March 1984 when the incumbent was: assigned to AMC to meet a special operational requirement to which | INSCOM was tasked by OACSI to provide an officer. | However, J INSCOM _ planned to have Giscontinued the position anyway. re - “Special Staffs 99 2 REEL Chief, Organizational Effectiveness (OE) Office. (U) The OE Office assisted INSCOM's senior leaders in leading the human elezent of their organizations through complex organizational change. The CE Office also provides assistance to INSCOM's leaders in management and leadership training programs. Finally, the O£ Office managed the ° INSCOM'’s OF Program. On 10 September 1984, the title of the office was chenged from the Center for Excellence (CENTEX) back to its 7 original title of Organizational Effectiveness. The change was bn recommended due to the perception that the primary purpose of the me office was to promote high performance programs, many of which were on the fringe of the human performance movement and were not even handled by the office. .- . “ee Chief, Internal Review (IR) Office. (U) Serves as the principal advisor Ns to the CDR INSCOM on internal review matters. Conducts independent - review and examination of command operations and internal controls to — i.) provide the commander with an objective evaluation of the effectiveness - —_ and efficiency with which his financial and related functions are being . performed. As part of DOD policy, the Internal Review Office was ~ transferred from Deputy Chief of Staff Resource Management in April 1984 and placed under the Chief of Staff. Scientific and Cryptologic Affairs Advisor. (U) Serves as the principal 6 advisor to the CDR INSCOM and his staff on seientific and eryptologic matters. -.. Public Affairs Officer. (U) Serves as the Public Affairs Officer (PAO) of INSCOM, advising the commander and staff on all public « affairs matters. 10 . 4 UNCLASSIFIED L 921
fat rem ewe eee ee crm ee ne on eee ae UNCLASSIFIED | Command Psychologist. (U)- Serves as the psychologist for INSCOM, advising the commander on matters pertaining to mental health and providing guidance on peychological factors Pertaining to intelligence Operations... doe ee Co . Ee . Command Chaplain. ny” Serves 1 as the chaplain of INSCOM providing advice and assistance to the commander and his staff on religious, moral, moral leadership, and human self-development matters. ee Personal Staffs cof no Inspector General (IG). (U) The IG, as member of the personal staff, _ inquired into and reported upon matters affecting the performance of mission and state of the economy, efficiency, discipline, and morale of every phase of activity which was within the sphere of responsibility of the CG and as prescribed by law. Throughout the report period, the IG. Office continued ‘to be comprised of an Assistance and Tavestigations —— Division and Inspections Division. © re Bt ne Staff Judge Advocate (SJA). (U) The SJA served as ‘legal edvisor to the CG, DCG's, CofS, and all staff elements of HQ INSCOM and, as necessary, to subordinate elements of the command, eek General Staff: . ae te toe Yarn 7 code Deputy Chief of Staff, F Personnel (DessER). “(0) The DCSPER served as the principal staff officer for the administration of military and civilian personnel. Acts for the CDR INSCOM in the direction, supervision, and coordination of plans, policies, and procedures for personnel administration, distribution, and management; maintenance of order and discipline; safety; welfare; worale; human affairs; and nonappropristed fund activities. Exercised staff supervision over the Administrative/Audiovisual Support Activity until 1 February 1984, at which time DCSIRM assumed staff supervisicn. Also as part of the RQ INSCOM reorganization, the Equal Employment Opportunity Office was resubordinated to the DCSPER, reducing span of control at the Chief of Staff level, on 1 March 1984. During ths same reorganization, the Plans and Rroponency Division was established in July 1984. The division was in response to a growing need for mid and long range personnel planning. : In addition, the area of proponency--monitoring the structural viability of military job specialties (MOS/CHF )--needed attention after years of inactivity. i (U) ‘In May 1984, with the promotion of the civilian, the positions of ADCSPER-Civilian and ADCSPER-Military were created. The DCSPER had previously had a military deputy, but now there was a division of responsibility within the staff element. The ADCSPER-Military oversaw the Military Personnel Division and the newly formed Plans & Proponency Division. The ADCSPER-Civilian oversaw the Human Resources Division (redesignated from the Plans, Policy, ané 11 UNCLASSIFIED
+ ae + teem - see, we oe te et em ee emer ce. wae ee se UNCLASSIFIED Management Division in April 1988), the Civilian Personnel Division, and the new Equal Opportunity Program Division, which was formed upon transfer of the EEO Office in March and its coabination with the former - Buman Relations/Equal Opportunity Office. .- a z. Deputy Chief of Staff, ‘Operations (DcsoPs}. (U0) The DCSOPS : Pee the principal coordinating staff officer responsible for current intelligence collection, production, electronic warfare, and counterintelligence, and security support operations. Provides operational policy guidance and direction; coordinates and supervises current operations. Manages | REDTRAIN direction and program as Army executive agent. Provides. operationally oriented INSCOM interfaces between national, _. - departmental, theater (echelon above corps), and tactical (echelon below corps) intelligence organizations. Is the staff Budget Director (current oc: and budget year) for allocation and employment of Program 2, 3, and 8 operational resources. Coordinates operational matters with _ Department of the Army, NSACSS, Department of Defense, DIA, CIA, ~ 9 -+ FBI, joint/combined commands, other MACOM's, and other governzental agencies. Supervises command aviation activities. Prepares and coordinates command operational plans and manages command operational planning system; is command focal point for reserve affairs. Supervises command historical program. Exercises staff proponency . Over the Intelligence Exchange Support Center, Systems Exploitation . ee Detachment, and Administrative Survey Detachment. Supervises | the . ge shee (U) On 3 February 1988, - the Reserve Affairs office was transferred from the Office of. the Chief of Staff. Pursuant to a staff study conducted in December 1983, the Reserve Affcirs Office underwent a wajor reorganization. Prior to this reorganization, the Reserve Advisor occupied a one-person office and reported directly to the Chief of Staff on all Reserve component matters. However, the study determined that day-to-day functions of the office should be placed under the staff’ supervision of the DCSOPS. On questions of Resarve policy and procedure with command implications, the Reserve Advisor still reported directly to the Chief of Staff and | to the * Commanding General when . apprope tate. . - ak Ww) “at the close of FY 198%, DCSOPS consisted of ‘the following wajor Givisions: Program Policy and Readiness Division, Administrative Office, History Office, Reserve Affairs Office, ADCSOPS Plans/Training, ADCSOPS OPSEC, ADCSOPS HUMINT, ADCSOPS ~ SIGINT /EW, ADCSOPS TMINT/E0,/ and ADCSOPS Intelligence Support. Deputy Chief of staff, Logisitics (DCSLOG). (U) DBCSLOG ds the principal coordinating staff officer for logistics, and 4s responsible for integrated logistics planning policy; procurement/contracts; budgeting; distribution, storage and maintenance of electronic equipment systems (less telecommunications); engineering; construction; support services; 12 -DNCLASSIFIED { 023
O_O — ne ee ee tee ere ea ee UNCLASSIFIED transportation; materiel readiness; and real property management. The DCSLOG also had staff supervision of the Materiel Support Activity and the Maintenance Assistance and Instruction oe Activity.” = aor (U) During FY 1988, the organization of the DesLoG remained basically the same and consisted of the following: Supply and Services Division, Maintenance Division, Installation Division, Fixed Station Engineering Division, Management Office, and Administrative Office. When the incumbent departed during FY 1984, the position of ADCSLOG at Fort George G. Meade as well as the portion of the Supply ® and Services Division at Fort Meade was Giscontinued. “ tre de "Deputy Chief of Staff, Systems (DeSSYS). “(By ‘DessYs ‘ts the principal coordinating staff officer responsible for INSCOM materiel/systens he evelopment. DCSSYS represented INSCOM as the Army's materiel -- ote - Geveloper of fixed strategic signal intelligence systems and INSCOM ~ operated fixed automated systems. Also represents INSCOM in the ve De ar “"* gateriel development process for systems to be used by INSCOM. Is also responsible fcr automation policy. On 14 February 1984, DCSSYS assused staff supervision for Automated Systens Activity. (0) DCSSYS was established ¢ on 1 February 1988 using the forser . 3 - Deputy Chief of Staff, Force Modernization (DCSFM) as a base. DCSFM “. , Gtself had been divided on 1 October 1983 when its Force Modernization . Division was transferred to the newly established Deputy Chief of Staff, Plans, Programs and Modernization. Also on 14 February, the Deputy Chief of Staff, Automation (DCSAUT) was disestablished and its functions less the Life Cycle Management Division was transferred to DCSSYS. The DCSSYS was divided into the Special Assistant Automation, Requirement Division, Systems Division, Automated Managenent Division, ‘and ‘Support Services Division. 7 Deputy Chief of Staff, Resource Managenent. (DeSRM). (w) ne . — DCSRM is the principal staff officer in matters concerning management, financial management, and manpower management. The DCSRM established and maintained administrative control of appropriated funds, exercised responsibility for manpower management and The Arny . Authorization Document System (TAAD), developed and supervised the 2 implesentation of force requirements, administered the structure and strength program, exercised control over the manpower and equipment survey programs, and reviewed and prepared financial and/or manpower annexes for operational and force development plans. In addition, the DCSRM exercised staff supervision over the Finance and Accounting Activity. 7 a (v) During FY 1988, | DCSRM lost two of its najor internal | elenents and their functions. In April 1984, the Internal Review Division was transferred to the Office of the Chief of Staff, and on 15 July 1984, the Program Division was transferred to the recently established Deputy Chief of Staff, Plans, Programs and Modernization (DCSPPM). Both 13 UNCLASSIIED ons
UNCLASSIFIED transfers were a part of the HQ INSCOM reorganization plan. This left DCSRM with the following elements: Administrative Office, Budget Division, Finance and Accounting Divisione Managenent and Analysis Divieion, and Manpower Division. _ ay Deputy Chief of Staff, ‘Telecommunications (DCSTEL). (ww) “the e DCSTEL is the principal staff assistant to the CDR INSCOM for all matters pertaining to telecommunications. Responsibilities include development, coordination and staff supervision of all functions related to telecomnunications within the command. The DCSTEL exercised operational control over che U.S. Army Information Systems Command ; Communications Center supporting INSCOM, Arlington Hall Station. On. 23 January 1988, the Deputy Chief of Staff, Telecommunications was ~gch. Pedesignated from the Assistant Chief of Staff, Telecommunications. At = @ '° YWSCOM dn the combat developments process. Serves as staff point of. =". “  eontact with other Arsy/DOD activities for force planning, ‘combat iene administration. The ODCSIRM provided general policy guidance and for staff supervision. - the close of FY 198%, DCSTEL consisted of the Plans, Operations, and ee ee . . Resources Division and the Engineering and Installation Division. The ae Communications Electronics Division was discontinued in October 1983. ~ Ke ate Deputy Chier of starr, Plans, Programs: and Modernization (DCSPPM). ce U) DCSPPM is the principal coordinating staff officer responsible for INSCOM long-range and sid-range planning; force design and operational concepts; end resource program development and evaluation. Represents §-* -— ab Gevelopaents, ‘TENCAP planning end progran submission. . "@) DCSPPM was established on 1 October 1984 zs the first step in a ' major HQ_INSCOM reorganization. It was formed from the Mission Analysis Office along with the Force Modernization Division, Deputy Chief of Staff, Force Modernization. On 15 July, the Programs Division from DCSRM was subordinated to DCSPPM. At the close of FY 1984, > DESPPM consisted of the Long Range Plans and Studies Office, Force a . Modernization Division, Programs Division, and Plans Division. _—_. ' Deputy Chief of Staff, Information Resource Management (DCSIRM). U) DCSIRM is the principal coordinating staff element responsible | for - INSCOM command and control information management and overall manageszent for the Command Information Resource Management Program (IRMP). On 1 February 1984, the Adninistrative/Audiovisual Support Activity was transferred to DCSIRM Command Security Office (CSO). (U) The Chief, CSO formuleted, implemented and supervised policies and procedures for personnel, physical, automation, and information security and ected as comand and headquarters security manager, internal OPSEC manager, TEMPEST Coordinating Officer (TCO), and chief law enforcement official for INSCOM. , ew ~, 14 See ee
- Security Corzend et Radene Air Bese. will be transferred from Okinawa to other eo representec the nearest military airfield to the company's parent ur and it had sufficient runway for the RC-12D aircraft. An adéitionel acvastage of stationing the unit there was the Army research and Gevelopment activities located in the area. Fiel6 Stetion Okinawa Closure. ield Station ‘Okinawa served as the host for both Air Force and Navy : Fort Buckner will serve as the Defense Consunicetions ‘Syscess (2S) hed on Okinawa and provide the eerth terzinel * wWeSTPaC DOS satellite systez servin secetions. Torii Stetion will resein under the euspices of the U.S. Arty Gerrises Cxirawa, with the ist Special Ferce Group being the priscerv Stnent upes SNSCOM's deserture senecuied for 2° Decesder iffs. wees mezeining to support IhSCOM/cperetione? objectives will be e Field Station Kunie detachzent (propose thet will be configured to support the : tion 21 Decezber CFS “cay Tat 258 SEAM
Adziccetraetiv cerseiee Ferces/7ec ence Office. (v) During FY 1g§ ui, et en eoerere gpecificeliy ziven aaer erie: fer treining/technical intelligence (FMT/TI) uission wes cezeblished under the Assistant Deputy Chief of Steff snteliigence Suppost. “ BE wo 2p Supervisis Treising Progres. tea to opposing forces (OPFOR)/foreign f, Operations its cherter wes to function es the Arsv's execvtiv vison ane sengging the OFFOR Foreign Meteriel for The office wes formed by hiring e 6811/12 zixteliigence resezesch specia qean t in Februery 1055 end deteiling e senior KOS Iroz the 203¢ MI Sattelion (Aberdeen Proving Ground, Merylenc) te Arbingten Hell Station in October 1983.5 = PY eed foe relreenlzEetion of th = - ——— ee ScnELS% a25EVE Comes tt ecxurezed of 2 techn’ eed: et aoe -¥ Hcteted t t: el dettelion anc neoprerhien : bet telion be) \Snes eesty ccltien, there wes En ever expencing DA Cirectec mission recuirezes: “eece wes orgend TI ors 7 kori qcEo ec o, the USAINS cOM Security Suppert Detectzen into @ provi omél bettelion. This reor gendaatie: wes £Sriven ty en unwieldy spen of control ané the leck of & ste! centecisty. Rowever, et t o- (Frovisionel) wes ne Serorconete to the in reverves 3 v . ww rs woe 22s ME id Se Ld ? owe 2°75 reup & Gao -n uné Security Suppe)ert weer + ENETON prepoenent unit within the O52¢ scnecgulet to be ree the tines the Security Support Dettelicn compeny/cetect nm hee ouerters. a t-2 exis level €lere é£cédi tionally its ? foxe meet she minitus nurbes € " Sta Ree ope Sceccs, co defechzent © "s teennices vetechtert = tivity aen¢ ¢ oo oreuPe the consolidetics unterseasures 2s secs sy 7@ She essets cl mede the cesechzent ene tere €s a ete 166k, {a eiion Secure),
(U) Because of severe personnel shortages throughout INSCOM, and especially the 902d, new structures were looked to conserve personnel - resources and simplify processes. The proposal involved the deactivation #ss°~- - of the USAINSCOM Counterintelligence and Signal Security Support .. . -- Battalion, Fort Sam Houston. The military intelligence detachzents and resident offices formerly subordinate to the battalion would be allocated - between the two security battalions presently located at Fort George CG. . Meade, Maryland, and the Presidio of San Francisco, California. - | | Headquarters spaces of the Fort Sam Houston Battalion would be ss transfer to the proposed INSCOM MI Battalion (Security). .. ._ eh She GS Boy a Hahn Detachment. (U) The Hahn Detachment was transferred asa ‘paragraph on the Field Station Augsburg TDA to being a paragraph on the 66th MI Group, Augmentation with OPCON to the 502d ASA Battalion on 31 January 1984. . The Hahn Air Base where the unit is | . located lies in the central southwest portion of West Germany in a region *  ealled the Hunsrucke. Frankfurt, West Germany, lies 60 miles east of -. - Hahn and 80 miles north of Bonn. An expanding mission and increased . .—s_—-- resources led to the transfer. - Ct , - (0) From its inception in January to the end of FY 198%, the = —- detachment's actual strength grew from § to 31 personnel. Authorized strength stood at 67. The MCE portion of the mission was not expected to be manned by the various intelligence specialists and becone operational until mid-way through FY 1985. : ne EAC Intelligence Center (EACIC). (U) Driven by the 513th MI Group, INSCOM moved ahead with doctrinal plans to establish a CONUS-based echelon above corps intelligence center. The 17th MI Company, which had the closest configuration of any of the group's units to an intelligence center, was transferred from the 201st MI Battelion to the 513th MI Group itself. On 1 April 1984, the 174th MI Company was reorGanized into a provisional intelligence center including establishment of corps level intelligence support elements (ISE) 6 U.S. Army Theater Intelligence and Security Command Europe. (U) On 1 October 1982, the U.S. Theater Army Intelligence and Security Command Europe was established at 2weibrucken, Germany. The ATISC, Europe was programmed to transition into the Military . . 18 ° IAL rF oney
es bee ee nee ee te ee ee ek UNCLASSIFIED Intelligence Brigade, Europe in FY 1985. However, curing FY 1984, the effort ran aground due to the question of OPCON of the resources and formally discontinued on 30 September 1984. USAREUR viewed the ~ production of intelligence by ATISC, Europe as being duplicative and in . conflict with the effort of the USAREUR Intelligence Center Europe. Even when INSCOM indicated a desire to take the ATSIC, Europe -~ production spaces out of hide, USAREUR demanded OPCON. USAREUR 7 did not see a need for an echelon ebove corps intelligence center untii transition to war at which time it would create such an organization as the MI Brigade commander. Facing the possibility of reduced ceilings in. Europe, INSCOM elected to cut the ATSIC, Europe. The reduction in... ne spaces drill was brought about by a November 1983 DA tasking non- "USAREUR MACOM's to assess a 5 percent decrement of European military spaces for FY 1985-90. The European Command (EUCOM) viewed the ATSIC, Europe as being a layering with the 66th MI Group 2 - and not as a building block upon which to merge into the MI Brigade. In su, Rhe end, however, the reduction did not take place and was not a factor.~ =... ~*~ In reality, although INSCOM believed in the ATSIC's potential ....... contribution, lack of OPCON was too high of a price to pay.9 Army of Excellence. (U) In September 1983, HQ INSCOM representatives participated in the development of the intelligence and electronic warfare tactical force structure within the constraints of the “Arny of Excellence" (AOE) force design initiatives. This participation was encouraged by the U.S. Army Intelligence Center and School so INSCOM could provide expertise on the requirements of the tactical echelon above corps intelligence and electronic warfare force. Force design initiatives for an “Army of Excellence" provided echelon above corps intelligence and security support to the European Theater by the 66th MI Group (future MI Brigade). Tables of organization and ; equipment for the 66th MI Group/Brigade and its subunits, under development since August 1982, were published and forwarded to Europe : . in draft or approved form in the 3d Qtr, FY 196%. Some parts of the military intelligence AOE structure were to be implemented in FY 1986 . to provide support for capabilities removed fron corps and division combat electronic warfare and intelligence units (SIGSEC, HF intercept, - and HF electronic countermeasues). The brigade TOE's which were . designated for expeditious handling were the MI battalion (SIGINT), the MI company (SIGINT), the MI battalion (counterintelligence), and the MI battalion (collection and exploitation). (U) Analysis of the AOE TOE!s identified that the brigade had not been structured to meet the specific requirements of the European theater of # operations. Resolution of structure problems was eccomplished through ! an intensive TOE serubd and the reconfiguration of designated assets to “enable the brigade to meet the European mission requirements. Further planning of the MI brigade will be done through the development of MIOE's ard TDA's in early 1985.10 gS at 19 a UNCLASSIFIED 030  EE'~:~*~C re
UNCLASSIFIED Allocet ton of Arlington Hal) Space. (U) The planned relocation of DIA from Arlington Hall Station generated considerable interest among other DOD agencies in the National Capital Region in the space and facilities _ which the move would make available. On 31 August 1983, information was received that the long-term practice of transfer of excess properties on a non-reimbursable basis to other Federal agencies outside the _ Department of the Army had ceased. The new policy indicated that Claimants from other military departments must compete with outside Federal activities on the basis of fair marked value reimbursement. . (v) Most of the inquiries were ‘directed, ‘not at acquisition of titre to. property, but to obtain tenant status. CIA indicated an urgent need for ‘additional space until its new building was ready for occupancy in 1987/86. CIA requested the allocation of. approximately 20,000 square feet to be vacated by DIA in "B" Building (T-450). After due - tors ae consideration, DA advised CIA of its approval and issued a pernit tor " @ceupancy. on 27 August’ 1964. DIA elements had departed by the end of Moe Bid, ; ‘FY 1985, and CIA had initiated projects for rehabilitation and *. 2... . modifications at a reported level of $2 million. CIA's fo sentry a scheduled for March 1985. ey ers rnal bandit | (BD) INSCOM reported to DA that all the. venatning spate ab Arlinesas Hall, with the 35,000 aquare feet in "a" Building was or would be fully ‘yathlized in accordance vith GSA standards. This included the relocation —- ..-- of the U.S.Armuy Special Security Group from the Pentagon at HQDA . direction and consolidation of HQ INSCOM elements. Basedon = § = INSCOM's report, on 30 October 1988, a decision was made by DA to allocate 24,000 square feet cf space in "A" Building fo meet a | requirement of the Defense Communications Agency (DCA). The DCA requirement, like. that of CIA, was alsc temporary in nature, to : ‘terminate prior to reiocation of INSCOM to Fort Belvoir and closure of Arlington Hall. Station as an Army installation. The primary difficulty ~ — imposed was that DCA personnel did not possess the same level of Soa security clearances as INSCOM occupants of “A" Building, and ae Pg _ arrangements had to be made to separate the two activities for “= - cperational effectiveness. This was accomplished by a construction project funded by DCA at a cos? of approximately $480,000. This still represented a significant savings from what DCA would have been required to pay if it had to lease facilities elsewhere. DCA was expected to be at Arlington Hall in the December 1984 to January 1985 time period. 11 . Relocation of HQ INSCOM. {US In October 1983, the Office, Chief of Engineers (OCE) notified Congress of intent to expend design funds. No opposition surfaced. It was at this stage in the process of the previous attempt to site an INSCOM headquarters, then at Fort George G. Meade, that the project was completely derailed by Congressional | Committee disapproval of design funding. . tee “- a 20 UNCLASSIFIED — ga
‘UNCLASSIFIED (U) INSCOM surveyed several sites at Fort Belvoir based on a number of considerations: secvs-ity, access to facilities and services, access to housing for the tr ::s, and possibility of collocating with other | intelligence activizi2z {4.e., Night Vision Lab (NVL) and Engineer ee Topographic Lab ‘£7253. MG Stubbelbine selected Site Number 43, after ae unable to evtain Belvoir Master Planning opproval for. Site Nunber . A. oo . ; (0) An important feature of the rationale supporting the . proposal to '. peloeate the Engineering School to Fort Leonard Wood has always been | . wk , the HQDA plan to recoup the cost of the major construction involved © 2005 oy from savings realized by backfill of space vacated at Fort Belvoir. by me ‘activities now occupying high-cost leased space in the National Capitel Region. The first two weeks in October 1983 were spent by TRADOC in ~.<": Obtaining a decision on which backfill alternative to recommend. ., The we ae Following alternatives were Proposed: | ered ay “Forward the study te DA without recommendation. "/%.: “S*" 9, Alternative A (INSCOM backfill). Opposed by INSCOM. Although ee ics, cheapest initially, it represented little dong term savings. Fe woo Le! “1 3. Alternative D (DARCOM backfiil). ‘TRADOC favored this * 27 ~ alternative because DARCOM was assumed to have the most experience as vain running installations. np nat Cp gE Be ae 4, Alternative E (Office, cnier of Engineers backfill). There existed . @ “sentizentai" rationale to: keep Fort Belvoir an engineer post. ne (0) In all the alternatives, with the exception of A, INSCOM stood to — get new construction. INSCOM favored either D or E. The DA staff . elected Alternative E. By February 1984, the action memorandum had . been staffed and was on the desk of the Vice Chief of Staff. Here it — atayed the rest of the fiscal year due to election year politics. The move of personnel was consistantly opposed by the losing political entity. (U) With the realignment action “hung up" at VCSA level for an uncertain period, HQ INSCOM along with HQDA sought means to keep the construction program from slipping yet another fiscal year. The Sale and Replacement Program was examined. Somewhat similar to the Defense Relocation Account previously considered, this was a payback program in which properties might be considered for sale to provide funds for replacement at another location, as opposed to the normal eyele of the Military Construction, Army Program. On 7 September 1984, the Arlington Hall Station replacement cost was calculated to be $28.9 miliion, plus another $876,000 for relocation of personnel and equipment and ceretaker costs. Unfortunately, a low appraisal for the property, approximately $10 million, washed Arlington Hall Station out ——-— ee 21 UNCLASSIFIFD > 022
0 ee aren ee ete mee A ee ee me ee ee ee UNCLASSIFIED of the program. Appraisal was obtained by Baltimore District Engineer from a local appraiser. In the opinion of the INSCOM engineer staff, this figure was considered too low for nore than 86 plus | acres of priae real estate in Arlington County eee roster nag weet Be he rm Consolidation of HQ INSCOM. qw) During a briefing for the INSCOM Chief of Staff on the on-going HQ INSCOM reorganization study, the question was raised by the Chief of Staff as to whether or not INSCOM required DA authority to relocate INSCOM personnel from Fort George G. Meade, Maryland. After failure to locate specific DA authority, the opinion of LTC Keefe, primary action efficer for Army Management on the consolidation was sought. He warned that such a move was politically sensitive and required DA approval. This position challenged the validity of an INSCOM Chief of Staff DF dated 30 November 1981 which alleged that the "controlling limitations had been rescinded and normal MACOM prerogratives applied.” To settle the issue, HQ INSCOM prepared and subaitted a study dated 15 August 1933, which concluded we that DA authority was required in accordance wich AR 5-10. This stated J that congressional notification was required for all moves which night result in the involuntary separation or dislocation of 50 or sore permanent civilian employees or 200 or more military jobs. HOQDA response to the request for authority to relocate INSCOM Fort George G. Meade personnel stated that the esrliest time a release to move Fort _ + Meade personnel could be expected would be with the final approval of ‘the case study and justification folder itself. 13 ome ee - -% 527th MI Battalion's New Mission. ron with the ‘Anactivation of the Siith MI Battalion on 1 October 1983, the 527th MI Battalion's reorganized OPSEC mission was formally complete. The 527th MI Battalion primarily provided OPSEC and personnel security investigations (PSI) at echelon above corps with HQ .USAREUR and 21st Support Command (SUPDOM) being the major supported commands. . - Over 90 percent of the EAC units in the theater were within the ‘ battalion's area of operations and when assigned strength was used as a criteria, the percent was much higher. This distinction was significant because the corps and divisions had their own organic } MI support while the 21st SUPCOM and other EAC units did not.! HQ INSCOM Reorganization. (UW) The reorganization plan for HQ ‘ INSCOM, approved in July 1983, was to be implemented over a three year period, beginning in FY 1984. Successful completion of the plan was dependent upon DCSRM submission of the Reorganization Concept Plan and subsequent DA approval. The staff elements at Fort George G. Meade being relocated to Arlington Hall Station was a second factor. Finally, DIA's movement from A Building was a determining factor. (U) During FY 1984, three primary staff elements were cither created or realigned on schedule. First, the Mission Analysis Office and the Force Modernization Division (the latter from the DCSFM) were merged on 1 October 1983 to form the Deputy Chief, Plans, Programs ‘and 220 & UNCLASSIFIED 033
Mocerrization (Provisionel). The DCSPPM was responsible for INscow iong-range and progra= planning; force design and operating concepts; enc >esource program developsen*t and eveluation. On 15 July As64, “the Fregrens 3 vesiony bes ro wes resude reineted te the DESPPM ee vee eh paris Al ae at Bes () On 4 ‘February 198, the inforzation ‘Rescurce Managenens Office © vas shengee to Deputy Chief £ Sseff, Infermetion Resource *. - Merecezent (Provisionel). At the same tize, the operations? eontrol cf she USAINSCOY Adein/Audiovisze: Support Activity was transferred froz che DCSFER to the DCSPPM. tneliy, or 9 Februery 1064, the : Depecy Chief wt Staff, Force Modernization wes redesigneved the Deputy =. mt | Obndef of Steff, Systezs and essuzed control of the discont fmues eis ugh ek : DeSiv7, minus the Life Cycle Menageztent Division which was os - “. suberdinetec to the INSCOM Autozetes Suppert Activity. &t the sere - Size the OPCON of the Aut tomates Se ‘Ppore Activity wes Poecet unser, ve the, newly est ablished DCSSYS. . rae eS fa es ee aa wet + * Bre eke as - Sw Tas fegts fy ce . wr Dae TE “Eaten =! waesy & number of sinor changes Eso took piece within the , headquarters relezed to the reorgenizetion plen. In February 1064, the Plans end Froponency Division wes formed vithin DCSPER. This new element ves formally estedlished in July. It grew in response to en expanding need «> “ for tide and long-range personnel plenning; the division wes aiso &sven 7 "She preponency for long neglected aree of monitoring the structurei ae QL ateseiéty of nilitery jod specielties. In April 1664, the Interne? Review > Division within DOSEN was sade 2 part of the Chief of Staff's office. ae This wes in keeping with DID policy. The internal review function wes ne -prisarsiy thet of direction, cu:veilience, and beer p vion ef the interne? 2 “review, activities a suboresr. te comsencs and + stellet ions. m% June 1968, the Chief of ‘eft Srected “postponenent ef the ‘recrsenizeation role «ith e subsequent untiese¢, fresh reics: et 22e TUErs recrseniscetion cencert. COL Powers, the SCSOPS, resvec to reioox the DOSoFS pertion of the ples enc COL : oR se=tric, serving es-e specie! essistent to the Chief of Steff,. wes te.) 2 con the lerger recrgenizeticn plen. The reason thet @ held wes pieced | os iztpiezentetion stexzec fre= the errivai of € nex Consent Group we.c in€icetec thet there skeuic ee "expending operations." At the sere tine, the DDCSOPS hes estineted thet 26 ef the §2 speces scheduled to te lost by the ODCSOPS in the weongenizetion must be reteined if ‘. current operetions were to continue. This epperent conflict between the schecsees cut in ODCSCHS Speces exc expending operetions hes ts be a Generel Officer Spece in Eurese, JCEM cicsery éicgned to the $ estetiishzent of the arny Theever Intelligence Surpert-Durcpe/M= E Erigece wes en ettexpt te pesition e general cfficer in ATISC, Eurcpe tc e essist CINCUSAREUA in comsen¢ end centre? of IKSCOM intelligence ectivities enc ‘cooré:netion ef intelligence cperetions..s INSCOM sresen = in the Surcpean Theeter was ceorrrisec “ef five seperete olenel 2 devel = tomzands tcteling epprexinetely QMersonnei uncer the Europea: - > ww fs
ss ciniit field st -2t on ec she 66th MI Group. In addtticnet to purely doctrin onsideraticns, introduction of the Ma Erigad efficer comzand) is considered inperative to unify coznand of these seperate INSCOM subordinates anc te Saecilitate istegration of 52° inteliigence support te the Wes of both USAREUR ané EUCOM. The DOSI, USAREUR, as the senior U.S. Arszy intelligence staff officer ¢- Eurepe, hes no single commender te coordinete and tsplesent cperationel aspects rom the netiones level dows. - Usiine the Aor Force end Kevy, e Arzy hes bec three Tleld etaeticr comzenderse (Berlin, Avgsburg, end Sinop) inter recinet ané net e single spoxess an. Exphesis and degree of cortrc s235 agese (& generct Cry Cay Bo TSG asc likely shift from the nations: to theater ieve. curing a transition te ang Mee ve wer. Net long after the ATSIC, Europe/MI Brigade =ssue Cited se cic the generel officer position. RQDA indiceted thet it ¢id='t desire te ede enothes genere) officer positie: tc Europe. hithosgr: che drey ef _ Excellence callec for an Mi Brigece, it will be lergely & restrectured | + M2 Group, net e@ drigece wich fLeteé stations | essignec. & Jprsgece 7 , water the letter concept, heade? ty @ ranking coicnel, wouie heve Seen © es a: orgenizetion subject to a high level ft turnover, reticnele for @ generel officer position.! aE . oe . ‘ r 2 ti es!
FOOTNOTES: Chapter III. ORGANIZATION 1. 2. 3. V1. T2. 13. 14, 15. 16. ' DF, IAOPS-PPR, subj: Or Tete gM, 8 Fact Sheet, DCSOPS, sudj: Resubordination of USLB (17 Dec 84) (S/NOFORN); Paper, IAOPS-H-PCO, subj: Resubordination of USLB (5 Fet 85) (S/NOFORN). i Form 32, IAOPS-SE-A, subj: Letter of Instruction fer the Activation of the U.S. Army Echelon Above Corps (EAC) Aviation Intelligence Company (13 Jul 83) (C); Ltr, fm COL Partridge, CofS May 83) (0). DF, IAOPS-SE-0, subj: Okinawa Decision (20 Nov 84 3; FY 1988 DCSOPS AER (T: » Pe 603 Fact Sheet, IAOPS-SE-0, su ‘okinawa SE-10/30 Mission Planning (28 Aug 84) a Fact Sheet, IAOPS-SE-0, subj: Field Station Okinawa Closur % ‘23 2 e FY 1988 Sec Spt Det AHR (0). Annex I. re — os FY 1988 502d ASA Bn ABR ( eh III, = OO ° on Assesnent of the 513th MI Gp (EACIC) (15 Oct 84) (U). FY 1984 66th MI Gp AHR (S/NOFORN), p. 65; Paper, IAOPS-PPR, subj: European Troop Strength Ceilings (6 Jan 84) (0); . FY 198% DCSPPM AHR (S/NOFORN), ch V3; Memo for CofS, subj: Thoughts on CG Direction via EAC Structure (neta) (0). te FY 1984 DCSLOG AHR Os ch ae fee aes, odie + Ibid. ibid. - FY FY 1988 527th MI Bn AHR (S), 9 Pp. 1d. FY-1984 DCSPPM AHR (S/NOFORN), ch III, Appendix A;DF, CofS, subj: Establishment of Provisional Deputy Chief of Staff for Systems (18 Feb 8%) (0); DF, C, IRMO, subj: HQ Reorganization of DCSRM (9 Jan 88) (0); DF, CDR ASA, sudj: Submission of Appeals for ADP Acquisition (13 Feb 84) (U); DF, DCSOPS, subj: Letter of . Instruction-HQ Reorganization Implementation Plan (2 May 84) (0); DF, DCSRM, subj: General Soyster's Areas of Immediate Concern (2 Aug 84)(0); DF, DCSPPM, subj: HQ Reorganization of DCSPPM (5 Oct 83) (U); Paper, COL Hambric, subj: Memo for CofS (26 Sep 84) (U). Msg, CDR INSCOM, subj: FY 1985 European Theater Reduction -Plan (9 Mar B&) (C); Info Paper, IAOPS-SE-SP, subj: Army Theater Intelligence Support Command-Europe (19 Dec 83) (SQ Fact Sheet, IAOPS-PPR, subj: Closure of the U.S. Army Theater Intelligence and Security Command and Establishment of the Military Intelligence Brigade (Provisional) & May 64) (U). 25 _ FOR OFFICIAL LY 035
CHAPTER IV RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT Operations and Maintenance, Army (OMA) Funds. (0) the U.S. ‘Aray Intelligence and Security Command's OMA funding program at the close of FY 7984 consisted of a total of $191,862,000. The table below shows a breakout of end FY 1988 direct funding by subprograz.' Table 1. - Direct Funding by Subprograp . (As of 36 Sep Ba) ; a "Subprogram ne FY 19688 P2 (Gensral Purpose Forces) | os WP , $31,633,000 P3I (Intelligence Activities) : peg Sh. Feria 935,881,000 =. | P3C (Communications Security) er re 3,189,000 ~~ P7 (Troop Issue) SE 123,000 =: °- P&T (Training) 1,371,000 PBO (Education Services) 969,000 Base Operations (AHS & VHFS) . - ta, 99,936,000 (0) The following is an audit trail ($ in thousands) from the DA dollar guidance for preparation of the FY 1984 Command Operating Budget (COB) to final FY 198% Approved Funding Program (AFP): Program 2 ane Dollar Guidance = FY 1988 COB $ 32,264 . TENCAP ne 4,058 Stock Fund Obligation sre (295) TENCAP Withhold a Coo (1,708) ; FY 1988 Initial AFP . | ; : $ 314339 4 247 or urrency Adjustment (31) 4 7 Hr Rate Adjustment (2) TENCAP 1,708 Quality Dragon St 200 ‘Manpower Action _ 6 Flying Hour Program 333 ELT (299) . Reprogran to P3C (MITTS) (200) Pay Raise - 28 Tactical Supporti (1,696) Final FY 1984 AFP $ 31,633 © 26 FOR Ossi USE ONLY 037
sd Program 31 . . Dollar Guidance - FY 1984 COB “ates External Research Analysis Congressional Reduction Congressional Space Adjustment AARCS Stock Fund Obligation | Inflation — Leased Communications _DA Manpower Actions CRA Withhold Y 198% Initial AFP >>? Currency Revaluation Congressional Contracts Adjustzent Congressional Space Adjustaent Correction 7 Hr Rate Adjustsuent Inflation CRA Release ADP Reduction (Lease) ” Congressional Reduction Comm Support (To ACE) TECRAS Support (To DA) CI Task -Force ATIPS Support Adjustzent to Congressional Action Transfer to EUCOM Documentation Project ransfer to TAG Pay Raise rans to DARCOM DA Trans to ISC Transfer to BASOPS Final FY 1984 AFP Trns from DARCOM (Free Issue Spt) (AL USE ONLY - $144,258 (100) “3 (540) (800) $127,839 (2,849) .1,000 (252) (643) 190 " (180) 1,513 (135) (1,015) (525) (4,087) $135,551 mh TSSOSNS 038
- Pina} FY as AFP _ Pay Raise DA Realignsent UNCLASSIFIED Program 3C ne . Dollar Guidance -FY 1988 COB 20s, 208 FY 1984 Initial AFP ee 927 CRA Release : - 286 Yearend Spending (Cong adg) . . - €100) © 7 Br Rate Adjustaent a See (5) °° MITS Reprogranming (from Pe). raha rmBay se eg tons. wt DA COMSEC Spt Withdrawal ee C15) Transfer to BASOPS Ca - (25) Program 7. * ot eo Dollar Guidance - FY 1984 COB 20 FY 1984 Initial APP ta co | Final FY 1988 AFP Program ST . _ een Dollar Guidance - FY 1984 COB ae $ 1,496 | FY 1984 Initial AFP $ 1,896 - oy . Foreign Currency Physical Fitness Training Military Training re (127) Final FY 1988 APP 1371 a Progran’80 : ace ~ er Dollar Guidance - FY 1984 COB $ 509 EDG - 10 DA Intern Support So 401 ad FY 1984 Initial AFP $ 920 Inflation so (Wm) = DA Intern 116 . EDG , (2) Pay Raise eo. DA Intern/EDG Support (30) ACES Support ; . (23) Final FY 1984 AFP $ 969 28
Lite ws =e Base Operations (BASEOPS) Dollar Guidance - FY 198% COB $ 17,621 oe CRA Withhold  -  - . ne (1,879) 7 Hr Rate Adjustment - (99 08 8 Inflation (238) ve FY 1984 Initial AFP $ 15,495 CRA Release 1,879 Year En¢ Spending (Cong Aaj) . (5) Excess/Surplus Prop Adjustment ~~... - (6) Consolidated BASEOPS Adj (18) -7 Hr Rate Adjustment (1) Commercial Activities oo ; ae 439 Pay Rasie 2.008 ke ee See 187 Transfer from PSI Ee 9,087 Transfer from P3C ‘ a 25 Final FY 19848 Arp 19.136 (U) The following table reflects direct obligations by elements of expense for FY 1984 ($ in thousands): Obligations of $191,077,000 and ‘Annual Funding Program of #1914862,000 resulted in an obligation rate of 99.6 percent... Table 2. - Direct Obligations for FY 1964 ELEMENT OF BASE EXPENSE P2 P3I P3C PT P8T PbO OPS TOTAL PERCENT Civ Pay & | - . t: . Benefits 843 45,023 1,504 31 598 &,813 52,812 28 Travel 3,322 ° 8,806 88 €5 4,138 105 84 13,600 7 Trans of at aa Things 105-- °658 6 . 7 776 1 Rents/Comn/ Util 498 5,236. 41 1 347 6,123 3 Contr Sve 18,228 54,3327 1,064 26 21% 251 12,588 86,699 45 - Supplies & Equip- 83172 16,612 73 6 7 1,378 26,248 14 FNIH — 386 4867 2B 2 TOTAL 31,524 134,734 3,172 122 1,354 962 19,209 ~ 191,077 100 29 UNCLASSIFIED { 049
_ which $1,257 was obligated (99.9 percent).2 _ CONE Fanily Housing Units. (U)-The U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command operated and maintained family housing units at Arlington Hall Station and Vint Hill Farms Station. Funds received from Departaent of the Army for these units for FY 1984 were $1,258 of cn ta ae ’ INSCOM Program and Budget Guidance, FY 1984 (authorized Strength). £27 Based on DA Program and Budget Guidance, October 1984, the’ manpower data shown in the following table represents the authorized strength for end of FY 1964.3 Fe Gen Purpose Forces Risto MSs take " 7 Supply “py Support to NSA ' . Table 3. - ~ INSCOM Program and Budg:~ Guidance, 1 FY 1984 Authorized Strength . - . . - 3 3 > | oad P3 ‘Intel & Coen PB Training MFH TOTAL- = DCSPER Budget Line-Item (BLI). (0) The ODCSPER was allocated . - $24SK for five P38 BLI's. With the exception of DCSPER travel funds, the majority of these funds were reallocated to support programs of the ' subordinate commands.- Funds received and amount distributed to the ' . field by BLI are indicated below: 7s > BI | * FY Allocation = Allocated to Field DCSPER Travel =~ $80X . " Alcohol 2K _ $21K HR/EO , 12K 40K Safety 7 12K V1K Reenlistment 4 4OK 35K IBEX. eo . 80K e Po ad *$72K was returned to DCSRM in mid-year. O41
sate _... Cryptologic acty 2: My t Bee he - ves waar. TECRAS TL. Civilian Strength by Program. {ef The following table reflects authorized and assigned civilian strength by program. It includes foreign nationals, tenporarsese and permanent overhires. bu: Bae Table ree - , Civilian | Strength by Program” . Program pe o po , Authorized og he 2 Gen Purpose Forces — 3 Cccp Base Opns/RPMA Mgmt HQ ; “ : GDIP 7 oot OTHER - Pye be oe [Base Opns/RPMA get oe eed ee: ‘Mgmt HO a ; - . CT&IA © LOSS FCI Mgnt HQ . 7 ‘IISA 4 EF Ta 25 Dette MH - Command Personnel Situation. Me A tual total command d strength for FY 1983 and Ft 9° Nar are ; shown below. ¥ 0 Se tender 1 8 | ‘ OFF WO ENML TOT MIL CIV GRAND TOTAL a 0 September 1984 OFF WO EM TOT MIL 86CIV = GRAND TOTAL ae (ry Ca¥ vos ere (U0) FY 198% command personnel strength by unit, see appendix fF. { O42
- amergency-essential employees overseas who were needed to rezain in FO LUSE ONLY Director's Trophy. (U) During FY 1980, Vice Admiral B.R. Incan, DIRNSA, established a new award which would recognize the mobile SIGINT element making the wost significant contribution to the ~ eryptologic comunity during the calendar year. For 1983, DIANSA chose the 2d Radio Battalion Fleet Marine Force, Atlantic, Camp LeJuene, North Carolina, as the winner of the Director's Trophy. . See appendix K for a complete list of the years’ winners. * Travis Trophy. (U0) The Travis Trophy recognizes the most significant contribution in the field of operations, management, and administration by fixed field stations. NSACSS announced and presented the 6920 Air Force Electronic Security Group, Misawa AB, Japan, as the winner of — ‘the 1983 Travis Trophy winners. See appendix J for @ complete list of previous winners. Mobilization. (0) Mobil deation a planning began to energe as a , significant area in FY 198%. DOD and DA initiated a new program to identify their positions during mobilization or evacuation. Two hundred and nine positions were identified; 175 MICECP and 34 DAC. Only 9 were not in either the 132 or 134 series. All but approximately a dozen signed a statement of understanding a new condition of employment, formalizing their agreesent to remain with their units ) during emergencies and ' evacuations. eet Ca, Lia: OF (0) A Memorandum of Understanding (wou) was drafted and awaits signature between CG, INSCOM and RCPAC establishing a separate reserve unit for INSCOM employees in Europe. This MOU will forestall the screening from the Reserve of any INSCOM civilian energency~ essential esployees who are also in the Ready Reserve. ' Enlisted Personnel Stren th Posture. (U0) Enlisted personnel gee by MOS (EW/Crypto and HUMINT MOS's) is shown in the table below. Table 5. = Enlisted Personnel Posture for FY's » 1983-1988 FY 1983 _ _FY_ 1984 MOS Auth Act Percent of Fill Auth Act Percent of Fill OsD 131 113 osc -103 101 OSH AN3 105 OSK 143 113 32S 98 9% 98C 100 104 %, 986 100 97 % 983 91 95 % 982 83 116 968 92 85 96C 80 82 96D 98 71 973 82 T2 97C 33 26 32 AL USE ONLY (43
FOROF, USEONY 4 Table 6. - Enlisted Personnel Poature by Area and Unit - (As of 30 Sep 84) Authorizations 3 eo Unit | hon z oe a Lp "European Area a Field Station Augsburg Field Station Berlin | Field Station Sinop “ings. US. Aray Cryptologic Support Croup ' U.S. Arny Russian Institute oO "U.S. » Arey Foreign Lang Trng Ctr Europe  gac Aviation Intel Company | Field Station Panama we mS Sub-Total cee <7 U.S. Aray Mission Support Activity 7 “Sub-Total | res Pacific Area . mone Field Station Kunia Field Station Okinawa ITIC-PAC - —_ 500th MI Group --— . S01st MI Group. | Sub-Total ct ww ead conus hres “ Admin/AV Support Acty Automated Systems Actv Admin Survey Det ; Central Security Facility ~ 6 CONUS MI Group = i ¢( Finance Accounting Actv *  §13th MI -Group U.S. Arny Garrison AHS HQ INSCOM HQ Support Acty Intel and Threat Analysis Center Intel Exchange and Support Center ¢ 044 go weno id &, len -~e en mi e e se
National Training Center Sub-Total Panama Area CONUS Area _ TOTAL Unit a oo Authorizations Assigned Field Station Key West | | 902d MI Group mo Operational Group Field Station San Antonio Systems Exploitation Det Special Operations Det Special Security Group “ U.S. Army Garrison VHFS  45.:. 2] tal zss95N5 INSCOM Consolidated "nek Re ee European Area se MAIT Tean Pacific Area INSCOM Key Personnel. (U) Appendix I contains a listing of personnel © occupying tiey positions within the U.S. Aray Tntelligence and Security Coamand, as of 3C Septenber, 1988.11 Congressional Inquiries. 2 The USAINSCOM Office of the Inspector General is the only Army MACOM IG office which processess congressiouy: inquiries.. During FY 198%, 28 congressional inquiries were responded to, up slightly from the 23 processed in FY 1983. In addition, - AIG's reported two congressional inquiries processed directly between HQDA and INSCOM subordinate commands. Of the 30 total inquiries, the majority vere defined as assistance cases, 10 as nonsubstantiated, and 1 was substantiated. 12 (u) Inspector General Action Requests (IGAR's). (27 Responses to IGAR's received by HQ INSCOM detaiited IG's from complaint periods, conducted as an integral part of all general inspections, reflected a slight increase in FY 1984 totaling 105 compared to 85 in FY 1983. Acting inspectors general at major subordinate units processed 92 additional IGAR's, représenting 47 percent of the total IGAR cases as compared to 54 percent in FY 1983. ‘Of the total 196 IGAR's processed by INSCOM IG/AIG's in PY 1984, 13 percent were substantiated, 18 percent were nonsubstantiated and 69 percent were assistant cases. 13 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 38
tom wa ee A nem ae eee ee een nt ne ere ne ee eee enn eee EE OEE A EIEANS ALDER DL NE A It ath AE OTE BELO CRE ARS aR nents PY EE hota ne ee a ere Canoe UNCLASSIFIED EEO Complaints. (U) At the end of FY 1984, there were a total of four active complaints. Vint Hill Farms Station closed out ai1 of there complaints in FY 1983. The two active complaints are located at Arlington Hall Station. ! ae = One complaint awaiting a final decision from DA. | - One complaint awaiting the assignment of a U.S. Army civitian Review Office (USACARO) Investigator. Equal Employment Opportunity Program. (U0) The following is a brief command overview of USAINSCOM's efforts in eliminating under- representation of women and minorities in mid and senior level positions . in the workforces 15 As of 30 September 1983 GS-9 GS-10 11 GS-12 GS-13 GS-18 “GS-15 TOTAL White Female 50 2 Ts) 32 3 1 6 128 Black Male 2 0 8 95 2 1 0 28 Black Fenale 10 0 7 a | q 0 0 19 Hispanics Male nr) 1 9 1 o 1. Hispanics Female 6 Gc 1 q 0 0 0 2 Asian Am/Pac Isl Male -} 1 ‘4 29 6 i 0 56 Asian Ap/Pac Isl Female 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 4 Aver Ind Male 0 ) 0 1 0 1 0 2 Aner Ind Fezale 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 As of 30 Septesber 198% 3 ° GS-9 GS-10 GS-11 GS-12 GS-13 GS-18 GS-15 TOTAL White Female sh 2 50 38 a 2 0 186 Black Male 3 1 5 18 2 1 0 30 Black Female 8 0 9 3 0 0 0 20 Hispanic Male 4 0 1 9 “4 rt) 1 13 Hispanic Female “0 0 1 2 0 0 0 3 Asian Am/Pac Isl Male 3 1 185 8 2 oo 50 Asian Am/Pac Isl Female | 0 4 3 o 4 0 5 Aver Ind Male 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 2 Amer Ind Female 0 0 0 ) ft) 0 0 A
UNCLASSIFIED Military Justice. (v) The number of non-judicial punishments imposed under Article 15 in FY 1984 was 561, a decrease from 609 in FY 1983. Courtsmartial in FY 1984 totaled eight Summary, eight Special, and four General; in FY 1983, ‘there were eight Summary, seven Specie’. and four General. Table 7. = Serious Crime Offenses eae ie Crime of Violence ~~ . ° FY 1983 FY 1984 Robbery 0 ee a vis ai te eg Vee. Assault § EE SE BQ Crimes Against Property oe one . oe Destruction of Property ner ee ae dae ae Use/Possession of Marijvana —_—. oe TR 59 Narcotics . gt te tS - 1 Sale/Trafficking .- BO ate - 2 . .3 Phe fe ‘Table 8. = FY 1988 Adninistrative Eliminations Lt has et: e pe : Authority (aR 635~200) | eS oe Hon Gen Less Than Hon Chapter 5 (Sep for Convenience of Govt) _ “6 0 Chapter 9 (Alcohol or Drug Abuse) #§ oo, 5 Chapter 10 (Discharged for Good of Service) ° 0 1 Chapter 13 (Separated for Unsuitability) 23 15 Chapter 14 (Separated for Misconduct) 1 6 3 All Others: . 88 <n Table 9. - Disposition of Other Offenses, FY 1984 Article 86 (AWOL-Absences Without Leave) - Article 86 (FTR-Failure to Repair) , . 158 ° Article 89/90 (Disrespect/Disob w/Comm. Officer) 8 ‘ Article 91 (Disrespect/Disobedience w/WO or RCO) 26 Article 92 (Failure to Obey/Dereliction of Duty) . 73 Article 111/112/134 (Offenses re Intoxication) 109 all Others: a 18 .. UNCLASSIFIED 047
we FN EA EEE EOLA NG Cee BN NB ONE A ye ek Ne TANTS OOS Te Me Oe Tam eRe tan eo UNCLASSIFIED Public Affairs activities. (U) The Office of Public Affairs exercises staff supervision over authorized INSCOM unit newspapers and critiques authorized unit newspapers in preparation for the annual Keith L. Ware avards. The following is a list of INSCOM publications as of 30. September 1988.17 gh kage . * Mo Re oy cm Publication , Unit Publisher INSCOM Journal HQ INSCOM Alamo Wrangler | . USAFS San Antonio Augsburg Profile ae USAFS Augsburg Diogenes Review USAFS Sinop Red Dragon . §0%st MI Group Scrambler _ ‘66th MI Group Torii Typhoon a Poo, USAFS Okinawa Vint Hill Vangero tis we Vint Hill Farms Station High Performance Prograzs Information. (0) On 1 May 7983, DCSOPS received proponency for several high performance prograns. The programs fell into several categories: Command wide programs that would be institutionalized throughout INSCOM. Pilot test prograns that would be evaluated in volunteer units or staff sections in terns of organizational impact and cost effectiveness. The results of the pilot. teat was to determine if the program would be implemented as a command wide or supplemental prograz. Supplemental progracs were ideas and off-the-shelf technologies which would be made available to commanders and staff to use as desired. Funding for the prograns would come from the using unit. These programs consisted of: 18 &. The Corporate Fitness Programs (pilot test)'= workshops on such topics as health education, stress evaluation, strength development, and - biofeedback. b. Structured Writing (supplemental) - a two-day workshop for individuals who prepared a normal amount of correspondence in the course of their workday. A five-day workshop would be available to. individuals who prepared large documents such as training manuals, directives, regulations, and plans. e. Group Graphics (supplemental) ~- INSCOM did not desire to schedule this particular worgshop but several copies of the Group Graphic workbook were purchased and disseminated to INSCOM units in September 1983. - Gd. Hemi-Synch (pilot test) = designed to enhance human ability in learning skills, memory capabilities, relaxation, physical, and sental @. Tise and Stress Management ~ an ODCSOPS initiative. Time/Life videocassette tapes on time and stress management were purchased and disseminated for rotation among INSCOM units.
een te Err Sete: mk SON Mletn AN 1 9 AO hale a re es ame Hhtelen names Ue _UNCLASSIFI ED MI Poster Series. (U) In FY 1983, the High Performance Task Force established a game plan to enhance the productivity and cohesion within organizations of the command. This included a recommendation that the Command History Office produce traveling historical displays. Due to initiai cost as well as resources required to adsinister the display, a pictorial history of MI was substituted for the idea of traveling displays. Because of the time delays in assembling the history, a 24%-picture poster series was created in FY 1984. The poster series was established not only as an interia project while the pictorial history was being created but also to communicate the continuity between INSCOM'’s intelligence disciplines and those of the post. Five hundred copies of the 24-picture poster series was duplicated for an estimated cost of $1,800 and distributed to internal units end DA historians and museums. A future distribution to Active and Reserve MI units is proposed for FY 1985.19 Sere ee eee, Historical Monographs. (U) In FY 1983, the Command History Office completed a significant breakthrough regarding a new writing vehicle for the INSCOM History program. The historical monographs were distributed throughout the command. To continue the affective plen, the Command History Office was able to initiate a plan to publish a pictorial history to cover the beginning of Military Intelligence in 1885 through the post Intelligence Organization Stationing Study (I0SS). The purpose of the pictorial history is to promote individual morale and educate the MZ specielist in the background of the MI profession. (0) In August 1983, a draft text of the pictorial history was being written and photographs to be used in the book had been ordered fron selected resource files. The initial draft was staffed and commented on in June- 1964 as the layout of the book began. A meeting with TAGO was arranged on 11 October 1984 Zor last minute details and instructions on the pictorial history before being sent to the Government Printing Office (GPO) for publication. It has been estimated that the pictorial book will contain 250 photos and 50 pages of text which will ultimately give the — end product around 192 pages total. An estimate cost for printing the pictorial history was between $25,000 and $30,000. Coordination for security and accuracy was under taken. There will be 3,000 copies received by INSCOM to be distributed within the INSCOM command, DA libraries and museums, DA historians, MI units, and Army and DOD. organizations. It is also anticipated that GPO would offer the book for. public sale.20 Historical Audiovisual Production. (U0) During September 1983, the Command History Office introduced a pian to create an audiovisual production of the history of Arlington Hall Station. The video will be presented as a communication objective to welcome and introduce new personnel to Arlington Hall Station, featuring the historical background of the station. 3 (U0) The unclassified video cassette will have an estimated time limit of 20-30 minutes and will be shot in color with historical footage in black and white. The film will consist of the compiling of Arlington Hall's history dating back to the establishment of the girl's junior college, the . UNCLASSIFIED o4y
ed Re me eaten, _ UNCLASSIFIED | _.. Signal Intelligence move-in, MI accomplishments in world war i, and we _ ending with the _Bresent status of the station. ; ey sie + Heed tet ote en aS. ie 200) , In Sanvary “3988, ‘a Graft script was written ‘and ‘the ‘production of the . - video began with an estimated completion date of Deceaber 1984." . . - However, because of delay in procurement orders at the end of FY 1984, ' the Command History Office had not received supported files ane aides, The delay may affect the Proposed completion | date.21 oS yt eae Sa or. 2 988 Cash Award Program. ix . 3). “rwscom policy : ‘ts to recognize between : z 10-15 percent of all GS employees who deserve either Quality Step - mn : Increases (QSI's) or Sustained Superior Performance Awards (SSPA's) and: _., an additional 10-15 percent who deserve Special Acts or Service Awards _ (SASA'8). It 4s also INSCOM pelicy to recognize 25-40 percent of all .  perit pay employees. .-Additionally, commanders and staff heads have Baccalaureate » Cooperative, "Education Program. ~¢) THSCOM's nan : Baccalaureate Cooperative Education Program is a direct outgrowth of : ZNSCOM's HBC Prograp. In Septeader 1980, the commanding general . Sat oe ‘authorized 15 POH spaces for the Co-Op Program. The Civilian .. a oe et «Personnel Division recruits for those 5 spaces for intry 4 into the 0) “ENSCOM 1 now | recruits ‘free | seven “colleges/universities.. “They are FP “met linited to, but are inclusive of, historically black colleges and one ~- - predominantly hispanic college. ‘The Civilian Personnel Division provides ~ housing information assistance, employment information, Ordentacion, “and asserts the sponsorship of our co-op students.23. oe ag tae Beemer B. “Three new progran initiatives were a 2 ber Scr wet ; ay “piacenent of e co-op ‘grads into Intern Progran spaces: “The * Civilian Personnel Division, DCSPER reviewed the files of all a : Cooperative Education Program students graduating during the fiscal . year for potential placement.into Intern Program positions. As a result . of these efforts, ‘four S0-op grads were placed into intern positions. (2) Increased MICECP participation in program: DCSPER allocated ~ five Civilian Training, Education, and Development (CTED) Student Detachment intern spaces to the Administrative Survey Detachment for » the MICECP in FY 1984..-The command had previously allocated one 4 space in FY 1983 for the progran. By the end of FY 1984, three > MICECP interns were on board. Two additional interas ¢ are programed to come "on boara” in FY 1985. fe vei et (3) Command developed a Master ‘Intern Training Plan (aTP) for -Civilian personnel administration. In response to post probdiens encountered and an identified need for a single and comprehensive 39
due tte UNCLASSIFIED conmand-wide training plan, INSCOM developed a MITP for civilian personnel administration. This plan is designed to permit modifications in order to meet the specific needs of individual intern personnel selected for the progran. ._ cee aie 4 INSCOM Average Grade. (U) The DA average grade assessment to. INSCOM ia 9.17. The FY 1983 average grade was 9.09. During FY 1984, the average grade fell to 8.64. The reason for the drop is more ‘accurate statistics and the loss of the ITAC to ACSI as part of the Arny Intelligence Agency (AIA) .2 a ZNSCOM Senior-Level Positions (High) Gradé. (U) In March 198%, DA . Lifted the high grade ceiling. In its place, OMB/OPM directed that each agency reduce ite GS/GM11-15 population by ‘two percent a year in FY 1985 through FY 1988. INSCOM must reduce 14 GS/GM11-15 positions a i GS10 or below to compiy with this directive by October == Sunior Officer Cryptologic Career Program. (U) In FY 198%, the initial planning was established for a formal utilization program for Junior Officer Cryptologic Career Program (JOCCP) graduates. Such a utilization program would provide for assignment and professional development policies for those officers completing their schooling assignment at the National Security Agency. Planning continues with the goal of establishing a formal utilization program in FY 1985 and implementation in FY 1986. INSCOM, MILPERCEN, and NSA action officers are involved in this project.2? Standard Information Division Personnel Reporting System (SIDPERS) Performance. (U) A SIDPERS data base was activated at USAFS Augsburg on 1 May 198%. This is the first SIDPERS data base within INSCOM dedicated solely to the servicing of INSCOM units. This SID. : will provide strength accountability and normal SID services for all‘ INSCOM units in Europe, to include USAFS Sinop, Turkey. The performance of INSCOM units supporting host command SIDPERS data bases improved significantly over the previous year. Seventy-five percent of all INSCOM units received letter of commendation fron USAINSCOM DCSPER for consistently exceeding the HQDA standards of 95 percent acceptability and seven days timeliness for submission for personnel data. The goal of the command is to have all units meet or exceed the DA standards.2 Affirmative Action Program Plan. (U) The Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Policy implementing Affirmative Action Plan (AAP) and EEO Programs is designed to ensure equal employment opportunity for all USAINSCOM civilian employees and applicants for employment regardless of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, and handicap, and provides for an environment free of sexual harassment. (U) The U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command work force has remained relatively stable as to its composition of minorities and women UNCLASSIFIED dot IE =e or tee ee
Guring the past year. Total women employees are over represented by 13 percent; nonmilitary women ere underrepresented by 2} percent. Hispanic employees are still severly underrepresented at approximately 4 percent less than National Civilian Labor Force. .: vg ace RES (U0) Due to insufficient communication with potential exploynent applicants in the local and national civilian labor force, there is a low number of Hispanic applicants being hired at the entry level of the professional and administrative series. During FY 1984, EZ0/CPO officials attended minorities and women conferences, Washington HEP Council meetings and local community job-fairs to recruit to discuss — career opportunities within USAINSCOM. Civilian Personnel FEORP - ‘representatives visited predominately women and minoritys’ universities to recruit applicants for the College Cooperative Education (COE) ‘Progran anc for hard-to-fill positions within GSAINSCOMe i ee oer idal te che. tL i. action accomplishments as indicated below:©9 coe Students FY 1983 FY 1988 es Black Women 12 Se cur * ° Hispanic Men a: ae a aR, ‘a Hispanic Women : 2° 7 White Men - 3 a ar - White Women a | 6 . 29 28 Merit Pay System. (U) Congress passed a najor change to the Merit: Pay System. The program name has been changed to the "Performance Management and Recognition System (PMRS)." Provisions for | determining the "merit" dollar pool and for distributing funds to individual members were changed along with provisions for performance based cash awards.. Specific information was to be transmitted as soon as the Office of Personnel Management and Department of Army provided ' implementing instructions. In the meantime, 1984 merit payout, normally computed and effective the first pay period in October, as Gelayed because of the requirement to implement the new pay provisions retroactive to October 1984 730 Merit Pay Appraisals. (U) In the last three years this command has been consistent in approving about 10 percent of all werit pay employees as Exceptional, although 30 percent and more have been recommended by commanders and headquarters staff heads. Fortunately, this year's change in the merit pay system that required only a majority of critical elements be exceeded to be rated Highly Successful has allowed for an agreement that the number of Highly Successful employees within the command is approximately 30 percent. UNCLASSIFIED 052 "yy The COE ‘Progran consists ‘of seven colleges to include three tine ALS ‘ istorically Black Colleges (HBC’s) and one predominately Hispante © oe university. This program has been highly instrumental in affirmative ©
er nnn ee - UNCLASSIFIED fin (0) The following table depicts an individuals who entered merit pay on _.. - OP before the first day of the first pay period in October, received a -.  presunptive Pony, Successful bread and wild be recess § a merit pe é a om Table 10. “Approving Official’s Decision Plus Presumptive ‘itatings (PR) | Humber as co 2 : ek a - Percentage coat. 31 ae 36 «51... 0 20 w2(12) 30 ot 100 a1 142). (32 2B vente 2 99a) s 31: 58 ip 2900 BC Bernard Ardisane Award. (U) SPH Kevin W. Miller, 66th MI - - Company, Ft Bliss, Texas, was selected for his individual achievement as, , nd accomplisheent in being f rewarded the BG Bernard Ardisana Award. vi for 1964. 7 “a . . Pa "+ Coamuniestions Upgrade Arlington Hall Station. “ef. The installation of :, . the new MITEL secure telephone system et Arlington Hall has been — - hog >. gompleted. The cutover, which was tentatively scheduled for 22 ; ' - September 1985, was slipped to 29 Septeaber 1984 due to wiring and , equipsent discrepancies. The cutover on the 29th was successful and HQ TNSCOM is currently on the new systes. “ Sot Be Activation of the new Terahedron-Node at "ans has been delayed - .@ue to C&P*s inability to supply T-1 communications lines to the :; | ‘communications facility. ogi ivation date was 17 September. :- 9988. ‘Informal contact with NS. who is coordinating C&P's oe . efforts, indicates that no definite Splenentation 4 schedule has been .- eateblianed. 33 ha Seth oy Freedon of Information/Privac Act. “) During the period 2 October . 1983 to 30 September 1984, the FOI/PA received and processed 908 Freedom of Information Act requests and 1, 176 Privacy Act requests for a total of 2,085 requests. - | . (0) The total number of requests received | decreased by 63 over the previous reporting period (2084 vs 2147). No special significance is placed on this slight decrease; however, the 908 Freedom of Information “Act requests were the highest ever received in the office. '.A total of 100,219 pages of classified records were reviewed for declassification or retention. An additional 106,650 unclassified pages of records were reviewed for a total of 206, B69 pages processed under the FOI Act. Overall, the FOI/PA processed 260,477 pages of records to requesters _during the fiscal year.34 rrr
tea em cen a eas or che een ate ep ee a A NO eR aE Argenta terete ween: om: wae te UNCLASSIFIED Investigative Records Repository ‘am. “@) During FY 198k, the IRR reviewed 327,295 dossiers for release, classification review, control, accession, permanent transfers or _ destruction. This was an increase of 99,602 over FY 1983. Vi te te ADEE einai he vy Sa e (U) The IRR processed 97,992 requests for information “fron over > 400 requesters worldwide. These requests required over 48,196 aicrofile searches in addition to hardcopy searches. The IRR also reviewed and processed 33,206 pieces of supplement/adjudicative material resulting in the creation of an additional 10,646 new dossier accessions to the cas de. repository. This represents @ an | increase of 2,069 reviews | of f supplement Pate over FY 1983.0 ok. pean oe fed tee cite Le ile (U0) During the fiscal year, t the bore: project ‘reviewed 161,622 dossiers 7 . with deletions totaling 125,276. <A total of 640 dossiers determined to be. eno a of historical value were franaferred to WARS. i ; . Lg t fae () The Special Actions Officer. processed 476 cases for FY 1984. These ne eases were litigations and congressional requests/inquiries for information. This represents a decrease of 89 cases for those processed in FY 1983. By the end of FY 1984, over 61,200 SCI Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDA's) were shipped to the IRh by INSCOM Special St Security Group. Approximately 40,349 of these documents were field rn 2s gilphabetically by year of execution, Aeaving a backlog in- “excess : of 20,651 rial - as of 30 September 2984. *: o * hes (U) The IRR continued with “the ‘Source Data Cara ‘Project, begun in May 1983, which was to process and review an estimated 68,000 documents for accession into the IRR. In FY 1984, 33,989 documents were reviewed with 5,329 dossiers being created, 23,220 documents Gereteds 3 and } 590 documents drop filed into existing IRR dossiers. =... | (B) During the period 1 Deceaber 1983 to 30 Septeaber ‘i988, Files , Maintenance Review Division (FMRD) reviewed 1983 and prior year aged =... us.) files. A total of 26,285 dossiers were reviewed/resulting in 20,657 , do: slers being deleted and 1,628 retained, & deletion rate of 93.8 percent. Ss Although this is designed as an annual eftorte ‘this « was the first time all . files so designated were reviewed. * a IRR Micro Consolidation Project. (wv) The first atep toward ; modernization and eventual microwation of IRR holdings o¢ecurred on 13 October 1983 with the reestablishment of the Microfilm Records Review Branch and the initiation of “the project to review microfilm records in conjunction with the hard copy purge. This effort resulted in the identification, consolidation, or deletion of 10,078 microfilm dossiers * which were either identical to or supplement of hard sopy personality dossiers. Continued efforts in this area will eventually lead to the elimination of the nicrofils holdings (between 1 and 2 million records).3 wa
EEE IE LLL LLO LAR ta ES Re Rt en 2 eo He ay no cece eM a me ee kee teem. tenet. a - 8 tenet ee ay ee er em ee Central Security Facility Productivity. (U) The chart below depicts the overall productivity of the U.S. Army Central Security Facility units during FY 1984 in compliance with Federal statues and in response to authorized requesters.3? -- 2 ti‘ anit sage Sah ge: Table 11. Productivity Units, FY 1984 03. #.*" rhe Se aoe 0 tse ee . 420° , FOI/PA FOI Cases Opened --- .sigy Se oo 932 PA Cases Opened See 1,162 Administrative Support Actions . , 23,518 ‘Operational Support Actions . 823,315 . - . om _ * TOTAL 838,623 Terminal Requests © HE E99 358 Creation of Files — oD ot ee 12353 Requests Processed for Files . 97,992 Error Searches 7 1,435 Purifications . 31,890 Filing/Refiles — _ — : 124,233 Controlled Files : 2,727 Supplements Processed ~*~ | ae ee ee 33,206 . . Microfilm Operations , 7 Oo 86,888 Name Trace Requests , “2,429 Reproductions 457,300 (ols Fo '  POTAL 939,807 Hard Copy Dossiers : , Reviewed Sok 193,909 ‘Deleted 122,353. : Retained - . _ So oe 71,556" Microfilm Dossiers - | co Reviewed . a 15,288 Deleted =~ , 12,686. Retained “7 2,602 Status of Aircraft Resources. (U) There were few changes in INSCOM's aviation resources during the year. By the close of FY 1984, the 3d MI Battalion had completed change-over of its OV-1 aircraft and their APS- QUF SLAR systems. Replacement aircraft were ferried to Korea from the Grumman plant in Florida via Europe and Southern Asia. The C-12 aircraft at Sinop were undergoing an equipment upgrade change from the A model to the C model.3 ook we — OO ee
FORO USE ONLY Table 12. INSCOM Aircraft Resources (As of 30 September 1984) Unit Type of Aircraft Number Field Station Augsburg’ UH-18 . 3d MI Battalion RU-218 an OV-1E ‘ RV-1D ; Field Station Korea UH-18 ge Field Station Sinop Ce12 3B EAC Intel Avn Company RC-126 B-200 - TOTAL Service Cryptologic Element (SCE) Day. (U) Based on stated desires of the Command Group in conjunction with results of NSA Corporate Mangement Review, a Service Cryptoiogic Element Day was planned for 19 June 7384. It consisted of a field trip by NSA senior management officials to HQ INSCOM. A series of information briefings along with a luncheon were held; all of which was well received, affording the NSA and INSCOM staffs the opportunity of meet counterparts face to fece.3p Operational Readiness. (U) Overall the personnel readiness posture of INSCOM's major command elements was relatively good. Enlisted personnel shortages do exist within the command. However, these are shortages which were normally experienced by other major commands. The shortages in the intelligence MOS's (056, 96B&C, 97B&C, and 98C&G) were attributed to the lack of adequate assets in the Arny inventory. Shortage support MOS's were essentially 71L, 74D/F, 94B and 95B. ; | Shortages also existed in which required language skills. This was particularly acute in GEE oer icen languages. Traditional shortages in the Warrent. cer Corps encompass most of the Mi warrant officers MOS's though (U) Continuing officer ee included Specialty Code (SC) the MOS was beginning to reflect a marked improvement tne a vs successions. Shortages will continue in the general - (U) A general problem with INSCOM tactical units was the shortage of required equipment to "go to war." Continuous emphasis was being placed by DCSLOG in all areas of preventive maintenance and overall maintenance management of assigned equipment. Considerable effort and money was being expended to replace and/or upgrade vintage equipment in both tactical and strategic units. . (U) Field Station Korea's single station locator (SSL) whith consisted of old proto-type equipment requiring constant maintenance and scheduled to be replaced by new equipment. This was but one of a number of
= @ UNCLASSIFIED perennial problems. Others ‘icluces at Field Station Sinop which was being upgraded to replace obsolete equipment. Continuous water stoppages at Field Station Sinop which was being resolved by the ongoing construction of a de-salinization plant to be wholly controlled by the field station. Finally, Field Station Augsburg's obsolete OCC 526 Teletype circuit switch equipment which DCSTEL was working to upgrade or replace with wore modern equipment .40 Weaponeer. (U) HQ INSCOM has procured 11 Weaponeer systems since 1983 in an effort to enhance weapons marksmanship proficiency for INSCOM soldiers. The Weaponeer is an indoor M16A1 remedial rifle marksmanship trainer capable of allowing for qualification and designed .to isolate and sorrect individual trainee deficiencies. The simulators will save INSCOM thousands of dollars in ammunition, transportation and personnel time while increasing marksmanship among the soldiers.41 Reserve Affairs. (U) In FY 1984, the Reserve Affairs Office held the first INSCOM-wide individual mobilization augmentation (IMA) conference. Many critical topics and problems were discus:ed and solved. Based on the outstanding success, the IMA conference will be continued as an annual event. (U) Another new initiative during FY 19845 was the assignment of IMA's to MTOE organizations, authorized by HQDA directive. For the first time, IMA personnel can be assigned to fill the delta between the required and authorized columns in authorization documents. Two INSCOM commands, the 513th MI Group and the 66th MI Group, have taken advantage of this decision and have already established IMA positions. (U) During the past year, the Reserve Affairs Office periodically issued a IMA newsletter to all INSCOM IMA coordinators worldwide. It proved - to be one of the best ways to keep coordinators informed of changes ‘in policy and procedures as well as keeping them abreast of new _ developments. Chief of Staff, U.S. Army's Award for Maintenance Excellence. (U) In March’ 1984, it was announced that Field Station Okinawa's Electronic Maintenance Division had received the 1983 Chief of Staff, U.S. Army's ' Award for Maintenance Excellence. Field Station Okinawa was tops among the 24 Army-wide units competing in its TDA category. Five key evaluation areas included readiness, maintenance management, training, cost, and innovative executi6n. For example, "Readiness involved deadline rates and equipment availability rates. In cost, it was how much money did you use? How much money did you save?"43 UN CLASSIFIED 057
C aii Exercises. $C) HQ INSCOM participated in the following major exercises Oo, FY 198k: - IS command post exerc uring the peri which was designed to exercise plans and procedures to sinula 6 test operational and logistical aa? of sustainability in a sajor | conventional conflict Participation of this headquarters involved ne the Intelligence Operations Center at HQ IRSCOM - it ery Poh participated during on of Combined Forces Command The exercise provided the first opportunity for the ° INSCOM was in response to e@ request from the consisted of a Although the exercise occurred in GRD ac preparations took place in FY 198%. Extensive liaison was nducted with the Whose simulated deployment during this was antic be the sost signi earning experience eos extensive . effort was made to brief the DCSOPS pe y and to involve other key menbders of the headquarters (most especially the DCSPER and the DCSLOG)_ in exercise preparations. 44 INSCOM Beyond Excellence (IBEX) Programs. (U0) In the fall of 1982, the INSCOM commander convened a task force of fifteen persons to — conduct « “scan” of the environment to find programs, ideas, techniques and technologies which appeared useful in promoting and developing .. . high performance in an organizational context and extraordinary performance (defined as performance which exceeded what an individual thought to be 100 percent of his potential) at the individual level; (0) The purpose of this effort was to recomend prograas and . techniques for use within INSCOM for the pursuit of three outcomes: (a) To meet increasing mission demands and requirements by obta‘ning quantitative and/or qualitative enhancements in mission performance. S b) To save resources (personnel spaces as well as fiscal resources). (¢) To enhance human satisfaction, iaprove cohesions and decrease stress and anxiety levels in the command. a a ae to deploy its headquarters to its alternate site. The partic pation ery Ca¥ 2088 OSE
(0) In November of 1983 an in-process-review (IPR) conducted in Baltimore and involving all INSCOM major subordinate commanders resulted in several changes to structure and scheme for monitoring IBEX Programs. These changes consisted of the dropping of a number of foundering programs; designation of command wide programs to *pandatory" programs; and the opening of pilot test programs to voluntary use by commanders other than those who had originally. volunteered to test thes. (U0) After a five month study, the High Performance Task Force published a report which promulgated the IBEX effort in INSCOM. The programs were divided into three categories, each representing a Gifferent level of implementation: Command-wide prograas, pilot programs, and supplesental programs. In conclusion, the IBEX has apparently promoted an awareness of high performance and elicited a wave of enthusiasm throughout INSCOM. Moreover at the gacro (MACOM) level, it has provided a unifying focus and sense of direction for woving the MACOM through complex orgnaizational change. In other words it has served a forcing function and, at tl: same tine, provided a psychological impetus for change.45 ; Personnel Security. (U) In June 1983, HQDA DAMI-CIS requested all MACOM's and their subordinate elements to report the number of personnel (military and civilian) currently holding TOP SECRET, SECRET, or CONFIDENTIAL clearances and also establish a new report, Personnel Security Clearances (NCS: C$G10-160). Since the initial request, the information to be provided has expanded to include those individuals indoctrinated for Special intelligence Information. The figures subaitted to HODA for FY 1984 are as follows:46 mm Clearance Level __ Military . Civilian a | | a 8 , “oe , . Information Security. (0) During FY 1985 three important secvrity investigations were initiated within INSCOM. The first involved a missing NATO SECRET document from the 66th MI Group. The informal investigation under AR 15-6 revealed that the reason the document could not be located was that all registered mail was not being opened upon its arrival at the 66th MI Groups The second investigation involved three gwissing TOP SECRET collateral documents which were on account to DCSOPS. At the end of the fiscal year, the informal 15-6 investigation continued; however, it appeared that the documents would not be located and that the reason for the document to be missing was that personnel Gid not follow procedures regarding the contorl of TOP SECRET information. The final investigation involved 35 missing NATO SECRET documents froa ITAC. A thorough search in ITAC and en infernal 15-6 &8 - See ceehen eee a 0909 FO USE ONLY"
2S investigation brought the total of missing documents to 19. The reason for the missing documents was a combination of procedural and human errors and administrative mishandling of the documents. All three incidents were required to be reported to ACSI and to higher authorities which brought unwanted negative attention to rnscom.47 Ete Physical Security. (U) An Electronic Access Control (EAC) systen was installed at HQ, INSCOM, Arlington Hall Station, Arlington, Virginia, and became operational in Janaury 1984. EAC's were also installed at Field Station Berlin (March 198%), Fielg Station Augeburg (March 1984), and _ ‘Field Station Kunia (June 1984).4 ‘Vault 3 Upgrade. (U) The single biggest project in Automated Systens Activity in FY 198% was the Vault 3 Upgrade Project. The design of the project was completed in late 1983, and a contract was awarded to J.C. Grinberg Corporation. Construction began in February, and alaost froo the beginning the project ran into trouble. The construction was Le originally scheduled to last from February until the end of July, but in reality, contract completion will not happen until the end of Novesber. During these nine gonths of construction, our users have had to suffer the inconvience of seven individual one week outages. During these outages, all three of the computer systems, located inside Vault 3 (Top Saii Gaff, Triple Score,-and the AHS IDHS NODE) were disconnected, moved, and reconnected a total of three tines.  .. (0) Some of the problems encountered during the construction included poor soil base in the foundation area of the new utility building which resulted in a S-week delay and overall poor or incomplete design of all areas included in the upgrade. However, in spite of all the problems, by October 1988, the ne: computer facility began to take shape. sees of this project is now expected by the ond of Movenber 1984. . : Special DAIG Ins etion. Beginning in the 26 Quarter FY 1988, the DAIG launched a special ifspection of Army procurement which ' potentially would have a long-term effect upon INSCOM's operations and . organization. As the ins ressed t several sajor INSCOM subor . he number of findings to be developed grew, and corrective actions were begun. Early decis made included reef Tay 269 SENG 060
, FOR. USE ONLY FOOTNOTES: Chapter IV. RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT 39. FY 1984 DCSRM AHR (C), pp. 6-12. FY 1984 DCSRM AHR (C), p. 12. FY 1984 DCSRM AHR (C), p. 21. FY 1984 DCSPER AHR (U), p. 3. FY 1984 DCSRM AHR (C), pp. 21-22. INSCOM Command Strength Report from Plans & Proponency Division, DCSPER as of 30 Sep 84, published 22 Oct 84 (0). Travis Trophy Awards Program Brochure, 1964 (0). Travis Trophy Axards Program Brochure, 1984 (0). FY 198% DCSPER AHR (U0), p. 42. FY 1984 DCSPER AHR (U), p. 18. wt rae ’ > Key Personnel Roster, dtd 30 Septenber 1984 (FOUO0). FY 1984 OIG ABR (U), p. 11. FY 1984 OIG ABR (0), p. 11. — FY 1984 DCSPER AHR (U), p. 45. © FY 1988 DCSPER ABR (U), p. 55. FY 19848 SJA AHR (U), pp. 5-7. FY 1985 PAO AHR (0), tab E. FY 1984 DCSOPS AHR ( » pe 12. - FY 198% DCSOPS AHR (TSH, p. 88. FY 79868 DCSOPS AHR (TS » Pp. 89-90. FY 1984 DCSOPS AHR (TS » Pp. 85-86. FY 1984 DCSPER ABR (U0), p. 39. FY 1984 DCSPER AHR (U), pp. 37-39. FY 1984 DCPSER AHR (U), pp. 34-36. FY 1984 DCSPER AER (U), p. 32. FY 1984 DCSPER AHR (U), p. 32. FY 1988 DCSPER AHR (U), pp. 12-13. FY 1988 DCSPER AHR (0), p. 4. . : EEO Affirmative Action Program Plan, Annual Accomplishment ° Report, FY 1984, DCSPER, 3 Dec 88 (TU). Ltr, IAPER-CP, dtd 5 Nov 84, subj: Merit Pay Appraisals and New Change to the Merit Pay System (U). Ltr, IAPER-CP, dtd 5 Nov 64, subj: Merit Pay Appraisals and New Change to the Merit Pay System (U). Ltr, IAOPS-SE-0, dtd 17 Jul 84, sudj: Letter of Commendation (0). Ltr, ASI-D, é6td 11 Oct 84, subj: Telecommunications Information (C). FY 1984 Central Security Facility AHR (FOUO), tab A. FY 1984 Central Security Facility AHR (FOUO), tab B. FY 1984 Central Security Facility AHR (FOU9), tab B. . FY 1984 Central Security Facility AHR (FOUO), ch 1. % FY 1988 DCSOPS AHR (T. p. 67. B Ibid., p. 52. S e o® 061 USE ONLY
= > 40. 41. 4k. 43. au, 45. 46. 47. u8. 49. - 50. FOR OFE Paper, IAOPS-I0C, subj: Ju) 84) (0). o p. 81. Command Elements (17 FY 1984 DCSOPS AHR (T. FY 1984 FS Okinawa AHR (TS FY 1984 DCSOPS AHR (T Memo, IACS-O0E, subj: dtd 23 Jul 848 (0). FY 1984 CSO AHR (0), p. 3. FY 1984 CSO ABR (U), p. 4. FY 1984 CSO AHR (U), p. 63 Poster picture of INSCOM Security Badge System (Undtd). E ONLY Operational Readiness of INSCOM's Major Annex F, FY 1984 ASA AHR (C), p. II-2u, FY 1984 IG AHR (U), p. 93 DF, IAOPS-H-PCO, subj: Management Decision Briefing (30 Aug 84) (C). FO % PICIAL USE ONLY we % 9 atus and Impact of IBEX Programs, Financia) 062
UNCLASSIFIED “CHAPTER V OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES ous Multidiscipline: U.S. Army Tactical Intelligence Readiness Training (REDTRAIN). (U0) The training effectiveness analysis (TEA) of the REDTRAIN's live environment training (LET) program began in full swing in FY 1984. The REDTRAIN Division contracted with TRADOC's Systems Analysis Activity (TRASANA) to develop testing criteria and working aids for six ‘selected military intelligence MOS's (98C, 98G, 98J, 963, 96C, 960, and OSH). The goal of the REDTRAIN TEA was to determine the effectiveness of LET on an experimental group of identified MOS'’s over a fixed period of time. Two groups of MI soldiers were selected from FORSCOM and USAREUR units. One group participated in a LET opportunity; while the control group remained in their garrison location. Both groups were tested, using the TRASANA developed evaluation tools, to determine the soldiers' level of proficiency prior to participating in the LET. Upon completion of the LET, both groups were retested to determine their proficiency after the LET opportunity. The results of both tests were statistically evaluated to determine any improvement in the soldiers’ proficiency. The average LET period was 60 days; after which time, the LET group returned to their parent unit. After a period of 90 days, both groups were to be tested again. The results of this test were to determine the amount of decay in the soldiers'_skills over an elapsed period of time after the LET experience. The results of all the data were to be used to determine the effectiveness in two areas: (1) how effective is the REDTRAIN LET program and (2) how effective is the parent units’ MI training? (U) The REDTRAIN TEA Decay Test, originally scheduled for August 1984, was cancelled because the Post Live Environment Training test showed no measurable change in tested skills; therefore, no Decay Test was necessary. The lack of measurable change was due, in part, to the fact that the testing instruments did not assess the particular training skills available at the TEA LET sites. The tests focused on the soldiers individual "go-to-war" technical skills listed in the respective MOS soldiers manuals. It was impractical to tailor tests for each LET site, hence the decision to use the only comprehensive standards available to TRASANA. The tests did not utilize ADP support; however, the LET soldiers in some MOS groups used ADP support during their TDY. Other G e LET soldiers did not exercise all the tested technical skills during their LET. Technical skilis exercised at LET sites focused on "strategic" technical skills that did not completely match the test objectives. (U) After receiving the briefing on the post LET results, BG Hunt, DCG- I, INSCOM directed that soldiers assigned to Field Stations Augsburg and Berlin and the 66th MI Group take the TEA tests in order to determine the basic technical skills proficiency of INSCOM personnel. In August . . 52 UNCLASSIFIED 063
“ s&emespheric Seiences “Leberatory (281) for weether datelligence Ch. “Sis, the REDTRAIN Division, Ho INSCOM, initiated «& project . esordinetion sheet with TRASARA to establish the test cing Sor INSCov units. in bese’ ~10n, She REDTRA-K Division TEA prosect officer sezpesied TRASANA personnel tc the eforexentconec INSCOM. undies © >= cee se 3 sreznete the TEA follower test sng whieh is schecule¢ for Octobe arc Neverber i$t+. fos aae.. the progran 2: previte ‘tee zissie treining envirenzent by bri: nis som ioceticn. SICINT rosdters dive sign2ei isto thes | EESSSeE EieWeexly Cperetionel Repert. (U) & bieweekly report in essuce forset «es prepered by the ODCSOPS, EQ age “ene 4 7 dtssritcted weri¢wice to INSCOM snits. 3 the reso cont sn6e - Bela erereticne. bighcights end kucos.  Eesever,- beces se the sejers ity of the oon fzers sutcitted by INSCOM subdordinete units concerned sensitive = =.” peed hed erase EUMONT, SIGINT, esd IMEKT operations, it sas decided to discontinue © the eperetionel report in Merch 9c84 ovt of security consi¢erstions =f veericg with the "need te knowt Freel ple. é Pr ecovapoe tee a or oy eta AE . oa mae LAE e o CRENe LS my x “IN seis rv isrEx. Reales =). ai we com esecscence froa the U.S. Arty © wey oe oe ere=s chericel end elestro-coptice: | ‘eetivities. The request for ~= essistense wes exsvered Dy furnishing @ eccpy ef the Scientific exc “Sectricel Intelligence Zesister (£525). This request is the first of sexy expected regerding weether intelligence end incicatec & neec to . estetiisr @ WINTAD? dete bese. Coercinetion wes cade with ITAC ane oe T.S. ante onteliigence A€ncY (previsseree for estebiishnent of e_ wegtcer iste : <= fs EU.Er INTELL gence CELE DESe fer ecllectes weether intelligence.> Tectice. Eiesiesion (SLOSINS Seosers +e CRESTED EL E 6h. (8) pooreng CRESTES Sree BE, numerous INSTOM perscnnel were inveivec ris. providing tectice? Sisvletion gcppert te exercise piayers/costrcscers: : sence - LINSSOM certicisesion dneluced persennel Troan Ee =NSCOM, “513th M ifs MS Crcup, ené Fieli¢ Stecricn Augsburg. The " TRSCON treet. rersinnel received TACSIM treining zz Fert Eoed, Texes, ‘or EQ “ sersruz, Due to numerous preblezs, INSCOM rersennel were 9. *) . enrizved guring the exercise et vergeng fegrees ef intensity, with severz. teving virtually nothing tc co. es aed
gM eins tang Ti sicsiM's gany ce Bean | ae Se CRESTED EAGLE 64, the TRADOC Combined Arms Test Activity © ee (TCATA) tactical simulation prusras appeared to be the future for serge TE VaY BOG TENT eels eo : ooo. Kien: r a 1 ree e £0). During CRESTED EAGLE rt the “gacst Suneee: ‘effort was”. a aaa . | ' glagued by numerous equipment and comsunicetions probless. - to Byte 0 MAREN ne yet ™ overcome anticipated communications probless e high capecity — - Loo. comzunications link was established between the main TACSIM - Hg : cozps ster at Fort Hoods. Texas, ané &@ renote corzunicztions processor weeny aye RCP) at HQ USAREUR. - All] TACSIM cata wes to te pessed ecross the . tee ftiantic vie this eirevit.. Within USAREUR, a combination of point-toe-.: Ps ‘point ané AUTODIN circuits were to be used. Nonreliatility of the Fort ° ° -.Hood-Beidelberg high cepacity eireuit resulted ¢> 213 TACSIM ovtput ja) ie eal »- ete being introduced into the AUTODIN systez at Fort Hood. Lerge ~*~ “end lengthy communications delays ensved. - AS a consequence, receipt of a TACSIE Cata was so time-late that exercise controliers elected to hené . ee the excercise pley. In sumerys TacsiIv guppert ‘to CRESTED —— erie . t, Res * 6& wes wininal ot cour roguctive ue ee * Susser to URGENT FURY @. S. ‘Forces “sn Grenace}. . r) DIe Cy " “$e the rapid buildup of Cuben and Soviet activisies, the murder of Prime  . Minister Maurice Bishop, the potentiel threet to D.S. citizens, anc the mh : Poses threat to surrounding Carade ean nations, Daited States ené - "Orgesccetion Zestern Caritbeas tee {OSCE} ferces invades the <sienc “2 mesies of Srenede on 25 oct ser. “353. ne eperesional mre el oh ‘aly zavasion wes URGENT FURY. "INSCOM's Snveivenes: 4s. Operation <0 9 7: v» URGENT TORY began on 22 October 1982 es @ result of an informa Becca oe % < request Sor assistance ca¢e by XVIII dirborne Corps to U.S. kray ~ se ge iuteiiigeace an¢ Threat Anelysis Center's General Intelligence =" 9 «= ‘7. g - Predsetion Division st Fert Brags, North Cerolice. “Infercal essis tence aes “ee “cperetional forces invoiveé in Dperation URGENT TORY (XVisI &bn Trp, Ist Special Operations Command and Special Forces Operations: Senet senteDelte) continues from the first ween of the eperetion anz was crovided by e nazber of INSCOM units, to dnelude STAC, IKSCOM dstoretes Systexzs Activity, the intelli: Bence Exchenge end Support Sencery ané the £13th MI Group. * wo Los 2 FY y “or “the ‘prodlens. encdnte: tered during. ore ‘mpact “on #O INSCOY then Try lay eg dsr she teseing. requires "" g.ncst dnnediate respense end 6ic nes B.i0w Sor the ecequate o> meneame tar peony ame a ons em ee er #; Oye meme nee a ae ren ay bees 065
oma A ene ene oe me ee ewerewneramtian mee ate ne eet ee ee ee Additionally, owledge of and e experience on Grenada NV Vay eeu sere wes porta) The first formal tasking for URGENT FURY received by’ . NSCOM was on 27 October, when HQDA directed INSCOM to provide - interrogation/debriefing support to U.S. forces in Grenada. In turn, the . _ §13th MI Group deployed och eal intelligence analysts to Grenada “ +" for URGENT FURY operations. GMB arets ccpioyes on 30 October 7 1983 in support of Defense Intelligence Agency and CINCLANT, and : Corps. were involved in the ddentification. and 3 &7) equipment to CONUS. Additionally, . P shipment of captured fore! ae . * “Gmagery interpretation pecsonnel supported CINCLANT and XVIII Abn vet Eee ogy .. Corps anéd HQ INSCOM during the entire operation. Group personnel alzo ~ presented technical briefings and displays of captured equipment at. _ '.. Andrews Air Force Base, 10-14 November. Briefings were presented to ... 6 | , Bore than 16,000 people, to include the Vice President, Secretary of $=... - “Defense, and Secretary of the Arzy. Equipment displayed included 2U- ome -23AA guns, a@ BDRM II, 20 82MM mortars, and five million rounds of 7162 2" Bee nist ammunition. «Personnel. completed Neabetieien in Grenada and returned to. “ conus 6 and 7 December 1983. 25 27) eg Jory vin members of a DIA. team, the TAREX representative was able to assist in the identification and handling of over 10,000 pounds of documents and equipment of os : interest Cd One of the lessons learned fron ne involveme elopment of a plan to enadle TAREX to  _* wee - vapidly respond to future situations in coordination with other DOD and oa U.S. agencies. Preliminary work ‘was Begun © on such an operational pian, ae .e ya * 7 7 av . Probably no problem “ancountered ‘an Grenada’ will have more 2 tong Ok term impact on the intelligence community than the wide-spread ‘ pilfering and destruction of Soviet military equipment found on Grenada FORN) - The acquisition, accounting, control, and safeguarding of captured foreign equipment was either totaliy absent or totally unsatisfattory. With rare exceptions, most foreign equipment was dazaged, ransacked, or destroyed by U.S. forces. No attempt was made to establish control or policy regarding foreign materiel until it was too - date. Large amounts of forei teriel were pilfered by U.S. forces, resumably for souvenirs. 1? D>
Examples ef this wartnilien included hg armored vehicles afire, removing all tthe ements of maintenance shop vans and dumping the contents on the raat, removing the searchlights from vehicles, and breaking ratio equipment. Wo central collecting point was designated and no accountability was established. When security was provided, the guards permitted anyene aho wished to wander among the materiel and remove items. Onommurninstions equipment was removed from its location ani weually treken in the process. Units that redeployed from Grenata removeil large ancunts of foreign meteriel, including hundreds of azttomatiz seapons, anti-aircraft guns and other equipment. No effort was made to “shaketiowmn" these units. All the above situations are in dirert opposition to AR 700-99, Acquisition, Accounting, Control and Foreign Materiel. It was obvious that the concerned commands were unprepared to deal with the large amounts of captured equipment. Very few pieres of axrtured equipment were labeled in any ganner. In summary, the Dass tp the intelligence community was enormous. | oo . Weather Support te U.S. Army Aircraft in Dentnel @merime. (UV) Aviation operations in Central America are weather sensitive due to movement of the Inter Tropical Zone of Convergence pratiucing large masses of thunderstores. The Air Weather Serzice (ANS) has a TDY team supporting operations in the area. ‘However, aquigment furnished to support the team was only marginally satisfactory. Communications - under AR 115-16, Weather Support to the U.S. &ray, wus an Arsy responsibility, and compunications failure ams a majer proble» in providing weather support. (0) In anticipation of the fielding of the URAZTHDRSE airborne systen in the near future, OACSI proposed the possibility af Jeasing a Kavouras TritoneX, Advanced Weather System for an opermtismal test of Aray support applicability. The lease of the Xavorous Triton X plus Doppler Weather Radar would cost approximately $1 miiltien. Seth INSCOM and OACSI would each fund half; the equipment emilf te eperated by the - AWS team and gaintained by Kavorous. git tthe and af the year, the funding proposal was before Congress. 70th MI Group IIR Production. a During FY 7984, the &70th MI Group + undertook a number of administrative and quality xormrol actions to improve both the content and form of its interim intelligence reports (IIR). The 470th MI Group eliminated trivial reporting, consolidated inforpation into one IIR where possible, and developed a managenent information system to _provide a better underatanting ef its reporting. The group also coordinated its IIR's with coumtry taam representatives prior to publ suproved credibility fer § the aroen MI Group at both SOUTHCOM and throughout the region. rs | Best Copy available 1 56
S ET The combined elements ‘of the group produced a total of 834 IIR's in FY 1984. This represented a 20.5 percent increase over the previous year. The focus of the IIR reporting changed significantly. In 1982, 81 percent of the group's reporting dealt with In 1983, 43 percent of the reports concern IM nc in 1984, e group's focus had expanded so that only 23 ent of the reporting concerned No fewer than 20 countries in the re e represented in the 470th MI Group's reporting, to include Improving Intelligence Support to SOUTHCOM. Ad MOONS In November 1983, the OACSI, HQDA informally requested that INSCOM Gevelop an interim Army intelligence architecture for support to the echelons above division (no U.S. corps present) in the U.S. Southern Command as part of an overall DA staff rt to improv \3 capabilities of Army element % Using the previously approved € Ove corps intelligence, security, % an and electronic warfare architecture for the Americas with expanded IMINT and document exploitation capabilities as the long term objective architecture (peace and war), an interim architecture was developed which projected the requirement to incrementally increase the size of the 470th MI Group by military manpower spaces excluding Field Station Panama which was already being reviewed separately 7 The proposal recognized that the field station would provi _ a - The interim architecture also proposed reorganizing the &70th MI Group into an EAC MI brigade using the new 34J-series TOE. The INSCOM proposals were forwarded to OACSI during December 1983. KO Following extensive discussions within the Army Staff and between the Army Staff and HQ INSCOM, a formal organizational and operational concept was requested by ODCSOPS, HQDA in March 1984. This . Concept was developed through refinement of the architecture previously Geveloped and submitted to OACSI cn an informal basis. The refined concept envisioned an increase of manpower spaces for the 4&70th.MI Group vice the originally estimated. it was otherwise consistent : with the previous planning and with long term achievement of the objective architecture for the region. The 0&0 concept was submitted to HQDA on 23 March 1984. o (0) During the period March through May 1984, INSCOM also provided input to an intelligence mid-range plan being developed by OACSI, HQDA. That plan was subsequently forwarded to SOUTHCOM for review and was being considered in development of the SOUTHCOM theater intelligence architecture under a DIA sponsored program as FY 1984 ended. 57 me ALIGN NEG TO FO
In midesummer 1984, HQDA advised SOUTHCOM that approximately of the additional spaces identified as require r the 470th MI Group by INSCOM in its 0&0 concept would be provided in FY 1985 " and in FY 1986). However, as FY 1984 ended, no program and budget guidance had been issued to provide those spaces to INSCOM. By separate action, INSCOM rete additional requirements inte the TAA-91 process by adding a plus’ military manpower spaces for the 470th a Group for the FY 1987-91 program objective memorandum “wee ttre pe “The INSCOM Plan; (U) ‘The INSCOM Plan replaced the former INSCOM -. - Consolidated Cryptologic Program Mid-Range Plan and the INSCOM ... .. ‘ Support to Military Operations Mid-Range Plan. The first version of the od . Fe kee ee Sgt rl ett _,. INSCOM Plan was approved and published in September 1984. The “-"anagement Plan, and the National Security Agency (NSA) planning »".2* _ + System. The plan provides the basis for the INSCOM submission to the . -- purpose of the INSCOM Plan is to serve as the primary mid and Jonge seiiniek Me, - Range program planning document for INSCOM. It is the first program . plan for INSCOM which covers the entire command and provides a Te yeas “ geasurable link plan for planning and programming. The INSCOM Plan synthesizes user based requirements from subordinate units and supported commands, concept based requirements, and guidance and ~~ objectives from higher headquarters into a coherent plan providing =~ " unified direction for INSCOM. It links INSCOM planning to goals and ~ - objectives established in the Army Plan, the Arny intelligence t —_ a?) —_ Arny Program Objective Memorandum, the General Defense Intelligence Program, the Foreign Counterintelligence Program, and the Consolidated Cryptologic Program.9 0 te, lo. ey 069
RY SE Aeey Tal e60 OST tae -. EAC IEW Task Analysis Study. “@) “The stucy, gun in May 1984 by HO She oe . INSCOM, will analyze echelon above corps (EAC) intelligence and os _ electronic warfare (IEW) -support requirements and capabilities within *” ie the context of @ projected threat and will be a follow-on to the EAC ae .., Tatelligence, Security, and Electronic. Warfare Architecture Study which” = “yas conducted by INSCOM and approved in May 1982 by the Chief of Pasa _ Staff, U.S. Army for planning purposes. - The study will address those ~- specific EAC IEW tasks (situation development, target development, OPSEC ‘support, and EW) and sub-tasks (sensoring the battlefield, :  ., @nalysis, counterintelligence, ete.) that must be performed to satisfy the “le theater commander's IEW force structure, to include the EAC MI brigade/group, and to provide continuous and timely support to the Army “ Commands within the theater. . Analysis will be based on wartize te f. “European and Southwest Asia scenarios and, when possible, subjective... = “. extrapolations of the results of this analysis will be made for the other . | theaters. The overall methodology for the stu¢y will be that utilized in -,."sthe conduct of a Mission Area Analysis (MAA). Study results, which are ae - primarily intended to provide the analytical data necessary to support pee ' INSCOM's plans and programs, will also provide a basic reference 4 document for the next IEW MAA study by the U.S.Army Intelligence Center and School, tentatively programmed for FY 1986.11 a 59
- WITHHELD = a NY “ ie Q SS N
1 Se gee yes etna ey etechzent. L. ARTRECOR ERTS) wine imagery sien getechrent with the STSth ME Group previded @ nozter ef =segery intelligence exproiterson products. The Suppiezental Fhetcerepnic Iinterpre=e<t ss. Report (SUFIR}) wes procucee three te Four tines veekly. ‘ : Sere ntre TCrnesly preperec anc releesec Kithan se hours of engine shutde«n time. Multimission Inegery Photographie Interpretetion Reports (MIPIR) were generated in respon to en initéel discevery ef & terget or instelietion. These “pepert £z
zentzetional ent operational (0&0) concept provides for one HFDF-h systex in eech of three EAC nilitery intelligence brigedes/groups. .. BFDP<E was to replace the AN/TRD-23A HFDF systems ourrentry +. ° 2-1. authorized she tacticel EAC units (400th ASA Cozpeny and 166th MS re a aa - 5 cated secure orenes s} ons between the signel channel collection s systexs- reer {SCCS-R) dnd the net control stetion. Emitter location inferset ‘woulé de romed to cetermene terget location, aid target identifieetion, end
Bigh Freovency Direction Finder (EFDF) Rentel. (0) In recognition ef e iongstancing need to upgrade the EFDF cepebdilities ef the 166th Cozpany and the 409th ASA Company, the ODCSOPS, HQ INSCOM, initiated an effort in August 1984 te lease & mobile, state of the ert, EFDF system to be used by these two companies until the fielding of the fe Rear Echelon Collection System (RECS) which wes currentiv scheduled . for FY 1967. a _ ‘ {U) Under the concept being prepesed ty COCSOPS eat she end of FY JOB%, a OD-day test would be conducted to determine whether or not to pursue the leasing of two HFDF systers. Although fends hed yet to be 2pprovec end many bureaucratic obstacies remained, the continued edsence of 2 replacement system for the AN/TRD-23 bei ang used by the two companies dictatec that the initiative be pursued. ts (C) Field Stetion Augsburg 1 used the inforzetion cenzaineé in cr reel time manzgement in which the inferzecion wes accessits ce any tise desired ané showed the current status cf either e specifies secticn or the total overview of the field station. WES 2286 used for trend saenegement in which infersetion was pPOCUtec gaily =n hard copy and stored in the Cete base fer use in trend_enzlysis of the field station's mission ance resources, Through ; Fiele . 66 *4 S T (  O7%
SEGRET Scation Augsburg intended to reduce senpower reouir eliminating regquirenents prsvice & true picture of the stetion'’s mission accozp AtS, en highoight areas of both positive end negative interest affecting overez2 28 to provide the capability for stetion's fission proéuctivity end mission cepability. Finally, ieng-renge trend analysis of them: personnel eveiletility. ! Keslenel Collection Menagement Cenzer (OCMC). Bris Decesder 1982, INSCOM wes informally notified by the Aese Suns representetive to expect sCSi tasking to men the Arny cMc. In enticipetion ef the ACSI teskine to nen the of menpower spaces wet underteken by ODCSOPS, EQ ZNSSOM. It wes determined thet the speces decdiceted to the TRADIC eebiaog et * ewe Texntine? arcs Testing Activity (TCATA) Intelligence Cel? at Fort Secoc, Texas, might provice nore benefit to the Arzy exc INSTOM if they were apprised to the OCMC reculrement. The TCATA cell consistec of personnel. The OCG-I, ' INS CUS, tesxed the DCSOPS to recesture the INSCOM spaces by ' gtregeting che MOU witch provised INSCOM spaces to TCATA. "  Szubsesuentiy, ACSI tesked IN SCOM tc men the Arzy pertion of the G TAT Ca¥ 200 OSHS
Modernization of Fiel¢ Station Sines. Ja. overdue missicr equspaent modernization progres at Fi€ld Station Sinop went énte rett swing in FY 1964. Through concerted efforts by ODCSLOG and ODCSSYS, BQ INSCOM: end the contractor, the conzenced in Jenuary 1964 with the Wevy's In Augus= 198%, ai: existing SyStezs were installec in new racks, rewired, end prepares ‘or he VICCROY/DAYSREAK upsrade equipzent instelletion. INSCOM CONUS Overetions Site. iE E E
4 (0) In Febdruery 1961, the Commander, @.S. Forces Koree (USFK) -@encurred in plans to deploy the EPDS to Keres. So aeit in Merch 1081, the Ch? Genera: Officer Working Group approved deploysent of the =FS in Septezter 1961, Fiei¢ Steticrn Yoree formelic: eir recuiresent fur twe additional TUT's. The reguirenent for these ecditionel TUT's was valiceted by the TENCKP General Officer ¥erxing-Grosp which met in Novezbder 1981. - SESS svstes ts fereg. evetec oh Try Tey 208 TENS Feo Hw Colts SNe ewe S HSTE TECE EvEeiretle Tor torez when plens ceverieiicec ¢ fieié en enhenceé TUT to V end XVIII Airborne Corps to support the ESTS interlece with th ewes wel wer eree* e Interiz Tecticel Inegery Expleitetio: Systex weaRvaosecje They weve intormec thet the equipment WoL. would be somes } Within INSCOM, it wes decided thet the 501s¢ wouat provide fecr pérsonnel our of hide, anc the rezeining four provided from cther INSCOM resources. - elten & a « persennel would de wre) Preblez greas recainee to be rescivec.- These inclucec ecurenicetions, educetion of the J-2 staff re “re SSaq garding the cepebiiities cr TDS, and the training of the cperetors.! -
This wes € trie rvice effort involving the Arny the Navel weteliig ence Center, and the U.S. Air Force DCiectronic Security (INSCOM wes Supporting the preject decacse if the proiect seces ssiul, the cperationel system which would be Tielicéed would, cue of the sensers/methocs involved, likely be an echeien ebcve = nas the petential to provice U.S. ferees the c } 1 n uf ws Oe Hy cas - - erer - an ecdition, fers porr-ae [oO other U.S. ecziection eS r Ss, Slippege occurred cue te probdle= by the ecentrector. The experinent's nex nen wes for 3c Qtr FY 1C&5. &s & result cf the rescheculin a was a tec chenges in up's perscrre. situation, THe ee wee Schecuiec te : ~ ersonnel ses * Epaecac fer ro faa sre , erate awe wee weve
EY} experiencing problems in planning for the personnel needed én the future. Direction-Fineis Hers. Ay At the close of FY 1C£&, INSCOov Cirection-finding (Dr) net configurations were as foliows:
cme ~ 28s Bry. Disvosition of Army SIGINT Positions by Type. <a following wedle shows the disposition of Army SIGINT positions by type eas of the ené of FY 196u; 18 . 2€ 13. ¢ Disposition of srny SIGINT Positions by 7: a 73
Discesition of the Arzy's SICINT Resources bv Subd-Ziezent. The foiiowing table shows the dispesition of the Arsy's SIGIKT rescusces by sudelement as of the end of FY 1984:19 Tabie 14. - Disposition of krsy SIGINT Resources ty Sud-Eles ent "So w we. Lz eid Station
pyse S52 (b) GI, e@ PAGE(S) | LZ BY / WITHHELD le. aes
——s eres SUSC 852 (>) (2d, races) 0 Ib - [00 _ WITHHELD e%
Ke ered Cte trea te ee Pecans ms momar ar te eta Bes ele © AR OP OE Sl ny I re ae + Ne ee new | ene tae eee Counterintelligence/Operations Security: COMSEC Insecurities. (U) Under the COMSEC Insecurity Program, the following reports of COMSEC insecurities were reported by command during CY 1983: wai © Table 15. - COMSEC Insecurities, CY 1983 Command Number osacc . ee 55 DARCOM & USAREUR 224 FORSCOM 7 129 HQDA . , So, 1 INSCOM . , ee 14 Joint Ca oO 6 : (oe ++ USA Eight 20 NGB 20 TRADOC a : 3 WESTCOM ; 5 Other Ss ' 22 a TOTAL . §03 (0) COMSEC insecurities had increased dramatically in the three year period from January 1981 to December 4983. In 1981, a total of 319 were reported. In 1983 this figure increased by 58 percent to 503. of that 503, USAREUR reported 208 of these or 41 percent. For the period 1 January to 30 September 1984, 395 COMSEC insecurities were reported. USAREUR reported 187 of these which accounted for 57.3 percent of the total. Should this number remain a valid projection for the remainder of the calendar year, USAREUR will have 249 COMSEC ~~ insecurities which represented 41 additional cases or a 19.7 percent increase over the 208 cases reported in CY 1983. All in all, there was a continuous repetition of the same common deficiencies. Most noticeable in the more recent statistics was the significantly large number of "destruction irregularities.” (0) One type of occurrence that decreased in 1984 was the number of unsecured vaults and safes. As a result of a number of specific occurrences of unsecured vaults and safes reported in 1983, INSCOM conducted a COMSEC vault lo¢ék reliability survey of selected USAREUR locations. The survey, conducted in November and December 1983, found no evidence of tampering but did detect a high rate of maintenance deficiencies in locks installed on surveyed vault locks. % ws % . - o
Electronic Security {ELSEC) Collection and Analysis Systems {ECAS). (U) In 1977, the requirement emerged for a dedicated ELSEC van, referred to as an ECAS. The ECAS would be designed to primarily support operationei ELSEC in the development of techniques and procedures and industrial ELSEC aspects of operations security evaluations (OSE). However, by the end of FY 1984, the DCSFM (HG ‘ INSCOM) had not finalized a draft letter requirement since ECAS was considered a low priority item.3 Development of the Operations Security Evaluation (OSE). (0) AR 530- 1, Operations Security (OPSEC), dated 1 May 1978, specified that “within authorized resources, the CG, INSCOM will provide OPSEC support at levels above corps to include performing specialized, integrated, multidiscipline threat, and vulnerability analysis." One of the OPSEC Support services authorized by AR 530-1 was the later defunct sensitive activity vulnerability estimate (SAVE), which was defined as "an all- source estimate of the vulnerabilities to hostile intelligefce targeting in all its forms," 4.e., HUMINT, SIGINT, and PHOTINT. Another OPSEC . . 91 : CQWATENTIAL
‘services was consolidated. Use of a single letter as guidance in Stee See et etwamm wae eee m8 ad TIAL support service authorized ‘by AR 530-1 was the Security Vulnerability Analysis (SVA), also defunct, which was defined as "an OPSEC support service of a lesser scope and was performed on a less technical level than a SAVE." (U) The OSE, not mentioned in AR 530-1, was devised by INSCOM to better assist the CG, INSCOM in fulfilling OPSEC support responsibilities by consolidating the techniques of the SAVE and the SVA into a single service, the OSE. The first OSE was completed in August 1976. The changeover from the SAVE and SVA to the OSE was not cleare- cut. The first SAVE was completed in September 1976 and the last in June 1979. The first SVA was completed in July 1974 and the last in ‘August 1981. (U) It became apparent by 1980 at ADCSOPS-OPSEC, HQ INSCOM, that it was necessary to devise a more systematized method of programming OFSEC support services, including OSE's, than heretofore used. The OPSEC support programming letter was devised to meet this need. The first two of these letters, issued in March 1981 and January 1982, offered support in the form of the OSE, Technical Services Countermeasures (TSCM) services, and the services included in the Automated Data Processing System Security Enhancement Program. In each of the two letters, guidance for requesting the above three types of programming the three separate types was discontinued in 1983 because this consolidation generated difficulties in administrative routing and necessitated interbranch coordination which was often tedious. For FY 1984 programming, a separate letter was issued in March 1983 for OSE's only. Consequently, a simplication of OPSEC support administration was thereby achieved, along with tighter compartmentation. (U) As early as 1982, it became apparent that INSCOM' s performance. of - the rather large number of OSE's requested caused heavy drain on personnel assets. In April 1983, OACSI directed a letter to INSCOM Suggesting that dwindling personnel assets dictated a less solicitious approach to would-be requesters in the annual OSE programming letters to discourage unjustified requests. To some extent, ADCSOPS-OPSEC's FY 1984 OSE programming letter, dated 7 March 1983, anticipated advice in the OACSI letter, which was issued in April 1983, by urging requesters that in case of any uncertainty on their part as to whether an OSE was actually needed they should obtain advice on that point fron the local INSCOM unit. Further, as suggested in the programming letter, the would-be OSE requester might be advised by the INSCOM unit that an OPSEC service of a lesser scope than an OSE would fulfill their OPSEC support needs. However, indications persist that unit/facility security managers/OPSEC officers are inclind to request OSE's without having taken all inner-unit measures possible on their own to eiiminate their OPSEC deficiencies. A report, forwarded to ACSI in January 1984, revealed that from a review of 150 OSE reports selected from the previous five years a . 92 103
F number of vulnerabilities/shortconings were frequently re gti t ious. These ineluded the fo . (U) The 902d MI Group developed an OPSEC support service termed Project Security Analysis (PSA) which is an evaluation technique - designed to provide units with a reasonably accurate picture of the effectiveness of the element's OPSEC program. In effect, the PSA is an abbreviated OSE focusing upon patently sensitive portions of a unit's operations. It was anticipated that in CONUS, the PSA will, to a . considerable extent, supplant the OSE in the interests of cost- E effectiveness. , % ‘e ww = Sensitive Compartment Information “¢ser) Communications Support. (U) Probdlens were being experienced by echelon above corps (EAC) units in having mobile SCI communications support provided by their assigned U.S.Aray Special Security Group (USASSG) special security officers (SSO) when these headquarters deployed to the field for contingency operations. The problem was first expressed by Third U.S. Army in December 1983 and was in the process of being examined by ACSI and DCSOPS, DA when the same issue was raised by the Combined Field Army (CFA), Korea. : a6 ery 1988, message fron CFA Korea reported that one of the bi z a December 1983 deployment to the } BU Church, Je2 U.S. Forces Korea, dated 30 December 1983, further described this proposal and provided the required concept of operations according to AR 380-35. Action on that letter was in turn pessed to OACSI. (0) ‘ss and OACSI “agreed that the policy was adequate. INSCOM provides SSO suppert to EAC organizations while USACC provides communications equipment and personnel under the OPCON of the USASSG. Transfer of the SSO to the EAC organizations concerned (Combined Field Army, Korea ind Third U.S. Army) would not solve the problem of having mobile SCI communications provided at deployed lccations. USACC must acknowledge this requirement and provide the necessary fixes in both the short term as well as the long terz. OACSI communicated this in a February 1984 letter to BG Church, J2 U.S. Forces Korea. The letter also advised that MG Odom, ACSI, had convened a working group to address a short range solution fo the communications problem in Korea. In the meantime, BG Church 93 104
TIAL informed ACSI that he too had initiated a group for a similar purpose. At the close of FY 1984, no final report had been issued by either working group. Mobile TEMPEST Test System (MTTS). (0) In 1979, HO INSCOM requested research, development, and acquisition (RDA) support from the U.S.Arny Signals Warfare Laboratory (SWL) to upgrade nine FETTS-160 Field TEMPEST Test Systems and to fabricate a tenth system for deployment to the field. The initial emphasis was placed on improvement of testing capabilities, effecting weight reduction, and improving efficiency of operations. As a follow up to the existing RDA program, HQ INSCOM submitted a request to SWL on 5 January 1981 to replace the vehicular . systems. This requirement was based on the fact that the FETTS-160 | vehicles were suffering numerous failures due to operating above the recommended maximum gross weight. . (0) During FY 1988, six modified automatic TEMPEST test receivers were received by the U.S. Army Electronics Research and Development ' Cosmand and were being checked out by the TEMPEST Laboratory. In September 1964, a contract was let to Chonimetrics, Inc. for logisitics, software, training and technical manuals, and installation of the equipment in the wTs.6 (13 Tat eon wens COMSEC Technical Working Groups. NSCOM monitors the progress of emerging COMSEC systems to ensure that the Army's COMSEC policfes are being met and to be prepared to provide SIGSEC support.to users of this equipment upon fielding. During FY 1984, HQ INSCOM participated in numerous technical working ¢-oups to monitor the new COMSEC systens. (U) In an attempt to bring cohesiveness and direction to the arny’ s COMSEC activities, HQDA directed in June 1983 that TRADOC and AMC designate COMSEC focal points within their commands. Amc designated the COMSEC Division of the Communications-Electronics 94 TIAL
er ee res SM ents ae ee eee UNCLASSIFIED Command as the focal point for COMSEC material development actions. TRADOC designated the Signal Center as their focal point for COMSEC doctrine and combat development actions as they relate to cryptoequipment. INSCOM continued to be responsible for providing technical assistance in the application of and adherence to Arny COMSEC policies. (0) Representatives from HQ TRADOC, the Signal Center, HQ INSCOM, HQ AMC, and CECOM began a series of meetings, the first of which was held in June 1984, to foster better working relationships. The goal is to discuss Army COMSEC combat development, material development, and policy actions to bring about a unified, coordinated approach to identifying and solving Army COMSEC problems. (U) The meetings held in June and September 1984 were useful, not because of the actions or paperwork which resulted, but because of the spirit of. cooperation which resulted and spirit of striving to achieve what is best for the Army as a whole. For some years, COMSEC personnel within TRADOC, AMC, and INSCOM have sensed that the Army had a fragmented COMSEC structure which resulted in everyone pursuing COMSEC for their own command objectives. The situation had . Geteriorated to the point where independent action was the rule and coordination was the exception.& Personnel Security Investigations (PSI) Support. (U) On 1 October 1972, the Defense Investigative Service (DIS) assumed PSI investigative responsibilities for the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. In those areas outside their investigative responsibility, DIS requests the Military Departments, Department of State, and the Federal Bureau of Investigative (Canada) to complete PSI investigative requirements. INSCOM has PSI investigative responsibility to conduct PSI cases pertaining to U.S. Army personnel who are assigned or were - assigned in outside the continental U.S. (OCONUS) areas where INSCOM units are located. INSCOM units that receive direct PSI requests from DIS, and in-turn return the completed PSI results direct back to DIS, are as follows: 1. Headquarters, 66th MI Group, Munich, Germany 2. 584th MI Detachment, 66th MI Group, Vicenza, Italy 3. 766th MI Detachment, 66th MI Group, Berlin, Germany ‘ 4. Headquarters, 470th MI Group, Fort Clayton, Panama 5. Headquarters, 500th MI Group, Camp Zama, Japan 6. Okinawa Field Office, 500th MI Group, Okinawa, Japan “7. 209th MI Company, S24th MI Battalion, 50ist MI Group, Seoul, South Korea_ The only other U.S. Army element that receives PSI requests direct from DIS is Headquarters, 650th MI Group, Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE), Belgium. (U) PSI's are investigations required for the purpose of making a determination as to the eligibility for access to classified information, 95 UNCLASSIFIED 10r
Sr men oe tate vot Met m crate een teers ele ree UNCLASSIFIED retention in sensitive duties, or other designated duties requiring such investigation. PSI's, which include investigations of subversive affiliations, suitability, and hostage situations, are conducted for the purpose of making personnel security determinations. They also include investigations of allezations which arise subsequent to adjudicative actions and requires resolution to determine an individual's current eligibility for access to classified information, assignment, or retention in a sensitive position. By their very nature, these investigations delve deeply into the personal life of the subject of a PSI and they sust be conducted in a most discreet and highly professional manner s0 as to avoid unnecessary damage to the subject's reputation or embarrassment to the Department of Defense (DOD) and its agencies. (0) A PSI is dependent on the type of investigation required for a given devel of clearance or access. For a SECRET security clearance a National Agency Check (NAC); for a TOP SECRET security clearance a Background Investigation (BI), or Interview-Oriented BI (IBI); and for special access a Special BI (SBI). Each type investigation has required investigative requirezents, called leads, that must be satisfied so the ease of a subject can be adjudicated. The Central Clearance Facility (CCF), U.S. Army Military Personnel Center (MILPERCEN), DA, Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, has centralized adjudicative authority for U.S. Arsy personnel. - (U) Upon receipt of a DIS PSI case, an INSCOM unit scopes out leads that DIS has indicated are in that unit's ares of responsibility. For instance a case may be on a subject who was assigned to Heidelberg, Germany, for one year and then transferred to Mannhein, Germany, where he/she may be presently assigned or has since been reassigned outside of the unit's area of responsibility. Therefore, leads would ve scoped to the INSCOM subordinate office having PSI responsibility for the Heidelberg area and to the office having PSI responsibility for the . Mannhein area. The leads would cover only the period the subject wis in the respective area. —All INSCOM units scope out leads to subordinate field/resident offices, except for the 766th MI Detachment and Okinawa | Field Office, which have no subordinate units. Headquarters, 66th MI Group and the 209th | a Company also scopes out leads to tactical MI units, (0) The problem within the 66th MI Group of a large backlog of PSI cases, appears to have developed after 1972 when DIS took over the PSI mission in CONUS and 1982 when HQ INSCOM became aware of the problem. Prior to October 1972, the U.S. Army Intelligence Command (USAINTC) had conducted the PSI mission for the U.S. Army. With DIS taking that mission, personnel resources from USAINTC were transferred to DIS with the goal being to completely civilianize DIS. Between October 1972 and July 1974, USAINTC focused on non-PSI missions. However, in July, USINTC was downgraded to a field operating agency under OACSI. The new organization was known as the U.S. Army Intelligence Agency. In turn, the U.S. Army Intelligence Agency's mission and resources were absorbed into the newly esteblished U.S. 96 UNCLASSIFIED ifn
UNCLASSIFIED Arny Intelligence and Security Command in January 1977. Throughout this period, the OCONUS PSI mission was neglected in turn by USAINTC, OSAINTA, and INSCOM. With the creation of the Central Clearance Facility in 1977, ODCSI, USAREUR no longer had the authority to adjudicate security clearances for personnel assigned to USAREUR. The Sum total was that there was no monitoring of the 66th MI Group's PSI mission by a higher headquarters, and the group's priority for the PSI mission fell. : (U) On 3 February 1982, INSCOM received its first indication that there might be a problem with overdue DIS PSI cases in units, when the Director, DIS notified the CDR, INSCOM that DIS was initiating a concerted effort to reduce their PSI cases charged to overseas units that were in the one year or older (OYO) status and requesting INSCOM's Support in the effort. An analysis of INSCOM units disclosed that the 66th MI Group was the only unit that had a large number of overdue PSI cases in the OYO status and that it was the only one that had a problem with a large number of overdue DIS PSI cases. . (U0) Over the next two years, a series of correspondence, meetings, briefings, and liaison visits took place between DIS and INSCOM in order to determine the exact status of the backlog and to take steps to improve process. Some of the problems were simple tracing errors, for example, a number of the very old cases had not even been received from DIS and, therefore, a lack of knowledge of these cases existed. Of the 254 OYO cases charged to the 66th MI Group, 114 were in fact pending completion; however, 113 had been closed and sent to DIS and 27 had not_been received. Despite improved communications and an concerted effort by the 66th MI Group to reduce the OYO cases, no real improvement occurred. . (U0) This led to the visit of the Deputy Director (Industrial Operations), DIS to visit Headquarters, 66th MI Group in January 1983. Again, *: increased communications resulted. Also in January 1983, DIS notified INSCOM that the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Policy) had Girected that Periodic Reinvestigations, formerly Bring-up . Investigations, be reinstituted on 1 April 1983. Headquarters, INSCOM immediately requested impact statements from INSCOM units as an . increase in PSI cases would result. The 66th MZ Group, which was of principal concern, indicated a 25 percent increase in their PSI workload. This was only the beginning of an increased workload. In late 1983, the local command security programs such as checks on local’ nationals hired to guard Me1 tank motor pools and increased emphasis on Operations Security Evaluations (OSE) for the Pershing II missile deployment were examples of increased workloads. (U) DIS requested support for a new program called "Catch'Em in CONUS." This program is designed to interview the -subject of an IS5I, who is on orders for overseas, prior to the subject's departure. This required coordination between DIS offices that conduct PSI’e and the 97 _ UNCLASSIFIED 196
ow @ UNCLASSIFIED individual's losing unit. ‘If the losing unit doesn't notify the DIS office of the individual being on orders for an overseas assignment, then the program would not be effective. This program was seen as an aid in reducing leads normally going to the 66th MI Group to conduct the interview portion of the IBI on personnel newly arrived in Europe. However, as of September 1984, this program was still not fully operational and no benefits in the reduction of cases in the 66th MI Group had been identified. (0) Although by the end of FY 1984 the problem of PSI backlog at the 66th MI Group was still very real, two important factors had been addressed. First, HQ INSCOM had become an active player in the monitoring of the 66th MI Group's PSI mission. Secondly, HQ INSCOM had become fully informed as to how the DIS was organized and operated. At the 66th MI Group, there was an ongoing effort to reverse the priority of the PSI and to address the problem of lack of people needed to monitor PSI cases. On 24 May 1984, the DCSI, USAREUR sent @ message to the ACSI, DA proposing the civilianization of the 66th MZ Group's PSI mission in USAREUR as a solution to reducing the PSI backlog. At the close of FY 1984, OACSI was still working on the proposal. (0) Unfortunately, the requirement for resources in Central America prevented INSCOM from providing a quick fix to the PSI problem by . sending TDY perscnnel to the 66th MI Group to reduce the backlog. OSD had also made it clear that the military services had accepted the mission to conduct PSI's overseas and that the services were substantially responsible for the increase to the caseload overseas and must utilize internal personnel resources to resolve any problem. OSD would not entertain DIS, which was also suffering from reduced resources, from picking up any overseas missions. Operations Security Support to the Kwajalein Missile Range (KMR). (0) In March 1984, COL Bowe, Commander, Field Station Kunia, met with COL Kirk, Chief of Staff, INSCOM, and expressed his desire to close the INSCOM Theater Intelligence Center-Pacific (ITIC-PAC) operations : security support resident office (RO) on KMR. COL Bowe's rationale. for terminating full-time on-island support was that unlike other RO's within INSCOM, the RO at EMR was essentially isolated from the rest of INSCOM on a day-to-day basis, due to the 2,000 mile distance separating KMR located on Kwajalein atoll in the Marshall Islands from ITIC-PAC on Hawaii, and that the KMR community would be best served if the OPSEC supsert officer were an internal Ballistic Missile Derense Systems Command (BMDSCOM) asset since BMDSCOM controlled KMR. ITIC-PAC would continue to provide support to the range on a frequent TDY basis for scheduled technical and OPSEC services. (1) A message was sent to Commander BMDSCOM in Huntsville, Alabama, by COL Kirk in April 1984 stating INSCOM intention to close the OPSEC support office on KMR unless full justification for ‘ull-time support was provided by BMDSCOM. BMDSCOM provided justification, . 98 UNCLASSIFIED ( 4102
o7= @ ee Ree Cet Tt Sere wt aan eehmm re ene imeem, 6 4 Anes 8 AP Ae om ae eee en ee ee em ee ee UNCLASSIFIED and further stated that, due to the sensitivity of the OPSEC support officer position end the requirement.to regularly interface with senior military and DOD personnel, it was essential that the position be filled by an experienced counterintelligence officer. This concern was expressed because the ITIC-PAC OPSEC support officer position, although authorized at the grade of 0-3 was to receive personnel [111 at the 0-1. The first incumbent to the position which was created in June 1984 as a result of an memorandum of agreement between ITIC-PAC and KMR, was a first lieutenant who had ten years of military experience due to prior enlisted service. He was scheduled for reassignment in July " (U) LTC Thompson, Acting ADCSOPS-OPSEC, ODCSOPS, HQ INSCOM, visited KMR in June 1984 to develop a proposal mutually acceptable to the commanders of BMDSCOM, KMR, ITIC-PAC, and Field Station Kunia regarding how OPSEC support to KMR would be provided. His proposal was that ITIC-PAC provide on-islend support for two years, during which time BMDSCOM would amend its authorization documents to reflect a requirement for a full-time OPSEC support officer, and requisition personnel f1i11 for the position. The position would be converted from the grade of 0-3 to 971 warrant officer in order to insure fill by an experienced CI egent. Beginning July 1986, BMDSCOM would assume the mission of full-time, on-island OPSEC support to KMR. ITIC-Pac would continue to provide OPSEC advice and assistance and conduct 7 regulatory inspections on a TDY basis. This proposal was outlined to Commander, BMDSCOM in an August 1984 message signed by the Commander, INSCOM. os (U0) In the meantime, coordination between the HG INSCOM staff and ITIC-PAC provided the following resolution to the manning problem: the authorized grade for the OPSEC support officer position would be converted from 63 to E8, since ITIC-PAC was prepared to send MSG .. . Hammonds, an experienced special agent, to KMR in October 1984. A compelling need statement would then be submitted through HQ INSCOM to MILPERCEN to transfer MSG Hammonds from ITIC-PAC to EMR in January 1985. oe (U0) - By the close of FY 1984, the Commander, BMDSCOM had not responded to Commander, INSCOM’s proposal provided in the August 1984 message, nor has he expressed concern over INSCOM's providing TDY personnel during August and September. ?0 . INSCOM Port Security Mission. (U) AR 380-89, Port Security, assigns INSCOM primary Army responsibility to meet the needs of the DOD Port Security Program, which is executed by the Navy. The INSCOM OPLAN 1-84 defined INSCOM's mobilization/wartime port security role, but conflicted with AR 380-89 regarding reporting channels and degree of ‘ INSCOM security support provided. The problem of developing a port security mission statement for the INSCOM mobilization plan was complicated by the numerous DOD, federal, local government, and industrial agencies involved with port security and the lack of Aray 99 UNCLASSIFIED ‘40
guidance regarding Army command responsibilities to support the security of ports. (U) There were several conflicting areas regarding INSCOM port security mission requirements as stated in AR 380-89, Port Security, and INSCOM OPLAN 1-84. First the OPLAN stated that HQ INSCOM would, upon direction by OACSI, coordinate INSCOM support to the DOD Port Security Program. AR 380-89 assigned INSCOM "primary Army responsibility to meet the needs of the DOD Port Security Program" and directed that INSCOM communicate directly with the Navy to provide mulitidisciplined security support to ports and coordinate with Army installations and units to support Naval Port Security Vulnerability | Assessment Program (PSVAP) surveys. The determination of which Arny installations or units are within a given radius of a Naval operation, particularly with regard to Army National Guard and Reserve units, is properly left to and normally performed by OACSI, DA as INSCOM does not maintain the data base for such information. AR 380- 89 also states that INSCOM is "responsible" for sensitive Arny installations. This is incorrect. INSCOM only provides security support to these installations upon validated request. (0) Secondly, OPLAN 1-84 stated that INSCOM will provide CI/SIGSEC support only to MIMC ports designated for Army unit deployment. AR 380-89 stated that INSCOM will provide multidisciplined security support to any CONUS port upon Navy request. A distinction should be made between peace and war time requirements or the two brought in line with each other. INSCOM has a long-standing shortfall in resources and capability to meet unrealistic security support mission requirements in mobilization and war. Se rrsrary, the OPLAN stated that deploying units’ will | . . In war, providing Ary Tay 205 DEAS security mission is the con ui D Pounterintelligence and counterespionage investigations and operations. AR 380-89 states that commanders of Army commands will coordinate with local INSCOM representatives to obtain threat data. A distinction between peace anc war should be made. . (U) Finally, OPLAN 1-84 addressed the exchange of intelligence between military and civilian agencies. This is critical to providing effective wartime security support to port areas. Although the need is recognized, there is widespread ignorance emong military, government and civilian agencies regarding procedures for such exchange. The OPLAN provides inadequate information in this regard, and AR 380-89 provides none. !1 oom” > pa ai ( 111
= - UNCLASSIFIED INSCOM Support to the Ballistic Missile Defense Systems Command (BMDSCOM). (U) In March 1983, the 902d MI Group was allocated 17 manpower spaces for FY 1984 to provide operations security (OPSEC) support to BMDSCOM. The spaces were withdrawn from the FY 1985 Commané Operating Budget (COB) in January 1984, before the spaces were filled. The spsces were withdraw due to a mandated 10 percent cut in spaces by DA. Due to the withdrawal of these allocations, INSCOM formally notified BMDSCOM in March 1984 that OPSEC support’ to BMD contractors would no longer be provided by INSCOM (9024 MI Group) personnel. BMDSCOM would nontheless continue to be supported by INSCOM at the level rendered other gajor Army commands, as assets were available. (U) In June 1984, the Chief, BMDSCOM Security Office, Mr. Elmer Hargis, queried INSCOM as to how many positions, if authorized out-of- cycle to provide OPSEC support to BMDSCOM, could be filled by INSCOM. The nuaber provided was 10, followed later with the . identification of positions by grade, military occupation specialty, and location. In turn, BMDSCOM submitted the out-of-cycle request for @anpower spaces to DA on 13 July 198%. No word of approval had been received by the end of FY 1984, !2 Polygraph Activities. (0) Production figures for the worldwide INSCOM polygraph program for the second half of FY 1984 are shown in the table. below: . a ' Table 16. + Polygraph Activities, 34 and Sth Qtrs, FY 1988 “Activity | | Total Technical Review of Polygraph Examinations: 220 Review of Persanent Polygraph Files: 1,573 Pre-polygraph Dossier Reviews: . 106 Seminars Conducted: . A Examiner Refresher Training: 1u Intern Examiner Supervision (during conduct of polygraph examinations) , 54 Examinations Conducted: BQ INSCOM and 902d MI Group 98 66th MI Group 122 501st MI Group 16 Support to NSA (examinations) __2 TOTAL 236 101 UNCLASSIFIED 412
examiner and support spaces were assigned in support of these requirements at the end of FY 1984. of the examiners were assigned to the 902d MI Group at Fort George . Meade; were with the 66th MI Group in Munich, Germany; we the 501st MI Group; and were with HQ INSCOM at Fo rge G. Meade. One each suppor rsonnel were at the three geographical locations. WANE (U) On 30 August 1984, OSD directed that the military departments administer CI-scope polygraph examinations to all military personnel being assigned or detailed to NSA. On 20 September 1984, OACSI tasked INSCOM to undertake this program on 1 October 1984, to the extent possible, utilizing current resources and to take action to acquire the additional resources necessary to encompass all military personnel in this category. Approximately 400 assignees and 600 detailees are processed annually by the CONUS MI Group at Fort George G. Meade. These figures do not include about 100 military personnel being assigned or Getailed to NSA sites otiier than at Fort Meade. INSCOM estimated, that under the most ideal conditions, it could assume a maxisun additional workload of about 500 CI scope examinations per year with its presently assigned assets. '3 . Counterintelligence Task Force 2. (U0) On 4 April 1984, the ACSI convened a task force headed by BG Shufelt for the purpose of analyzing the problem of resource allocation and developing a computer model to aid in the better allocation of scarce Army counterintelligence resources. Phase I commenced on a full-time basis on 11 November 1983. The CITF2 was composed of military and civilian personnel from the INSCOM and OACSI staffs and a representative from NSA. The task force was assisted on a full-time basis by an analytical team from the Orkand Corporation, a firm under contract to develop the aethodology to provide quantitative data and substantiation for efficient allocation of Arsy counterintelligence resources as determined by the threat, vulnerability, and risk. The Orland Corporation 2lso was required to build a computer model, quantify the data ecllected through the use of structured interviews of experts in a given functional area, and test the modei using the data gathered in structured interviews. The test of the model was to insure that it functioned on an interactive dasis with other threat, vulnerability, and risk data. (0) The functional area selected for testing in Phase I was Technical Surveillance Countermeasures (TSCM). The test of the model, using the TSCM data, was successful in that the model worked and the results, i.¢., distribution of CI resources within the TSCM functional area, using selected variables (threat levels, inflation, personnel or funding increases/decreases, etc.), were within anticipated or reasonable output levels for current and future resources requirements. . 102 ‘ 113
7.7. * cA eee Re ENE Dee et eee nr ee oe EE EEE ES EON IS ew em ah Seay eB ME Ale, ce 9 A wen meme ee tee UNCLASSIFIED (U) On 18 January 1985, a ‘decision briefing was presented to the ACSI, MG Odom, who recommended continuation of the CITF2 project based on the success of Phase I. The recommendation was accepted and Phase Iz of the project commenced on 23 January 1984 using the Phase I CITF2 personnel assets and again aided by an expanded team from the ‘Orkand Corporation. Phase II was to refine and expand the Counterintelligence Resource Allocation Model (CIRAM) to include a number of CI functional areas. (U0) The expansion and refinement of the CIRAM during Phase II enhanced its utility in assisting CI resource analysts. While the TSCM model was extremely flexible in examining different scenarios (i.e., changing threats, vulnerabilities, risk, CI resources, etc.), the model's output focused exclusively on effectiveness of TSCM operational personnel. During Phase II, the model's capability was expanded in order to entertain explicitly the effectiveness and resource needs across the following personnel assets: managers, operational personnel, trainers, and production personnel in all of the functional areas. Moreover, the structure of the CIRAM and its interactive user interfaces were restructured to facilitate model reruns, output displays and main program menu selections. All modifications to the CIRAM during Phase II were the result of analysis of the model during and at the cozpleticn (U0) The expanded model wes designed to and proved capable of calculating the redistribution of CI resources into/out of the above CI functional areas, calculating the probability of identifying a HOIS threat activity by those CI functional areas at given resource levels (both current and future years based on supplied threat levels), calculating resource requirements in each CI functional arsa based on analyst supplied acceptable risk level for threat identification probability, and calculating the effectiveness across all the CI functional areas against - each HOIS threat. (0) The same basic ‘methodology for data collection in Phase I, conducting structured interviews of experts and managers/commanders, was used in Phase II. The interview guides were refined to gather more accurate and sore extensive data from the experts in each CI functional . area. Data was collected from both CONUS and OCONUS personnel and activities to insure a balance of data input to the CIRAM. (U0) In addition to the CIRAM, the CITF2 commended a related task to gather and formalize an Army-wide listing of essential elements of friendly information during Phase I. That effort was carried into Phase II and was completed to the extent that the EEFI was gathered, categorized and refined, and validated. The EEFI was also placed in a data base which will also be accessible to future CIRAM users. (U) The ACSI received an out-briefing from the CITF2 on 8 June 1984 which ineluded recommendations for continued use of the CIRAM as well as additional refinement and expansion of the model. The CITF2 . 103
ne @ JERE 10ers Poses supported the Los Angeles team fron 26 ' June to August and prov. iiaision with the FBI and intelligence COMpeANTIAL completed the project and was disestablished on 15 June 19845. The final report was published and distributed shortly thereafter, and selected wrap-up actions were carried on by individual CITF2 members through October 7984 (training, final document preparation and distribution, turneover of CIRAM responsibilities to ACSI, etc.). A Configuration Control Board (CCB), headed by BG Shufelt and composed of OACSI, INSCOM, and U.S. Army Intelligence Agency (Provisional) personnel, was established to oversee CIRAM usage, modification, and expansion. (U) The Orkand Corporation commenced a new contract on 1 July 1984 for Phase III. Tasks for this phase included: analyst training and use of the CIRAM; developing user requirements and hardware evaluations; performing services necessary to transfer the CIRAM and EEFI data base to dedicated microcomputer systems at OACSI, INSCOM, and ITAC; and implementing configuration manageszent and working with the CCB in . establishing policies and procedures to control subsequent changes to the CIRAM and EEFI data base. It was anticipated that the CIRAM and EEFI data base will be expanded over time and sdditional uses will be found for the CIRAM as user needs change and its capabilities are expanded and realized through innovative usage. ! INSCOM Support to 84 Olympics. SO The U.S. Army was designated es DOD executive agent for support to the Olympic Games in Los Angeles. The Interagency Intelligence Committee on Terrorism (IICT) established ° @ subcommittee chaired by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to provide national level intelligence support. The OACSI, as a menbder of the IICT, was asked to provide liaison officers to the FBI Anti-Terrorist Operations Center (ATOC) in Los Angeles and FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C. OACSI personnel provideé intelligence assistance to the Military Support Element in Los Angeles, commanded by an Arny ener » INSCOM received OACSI tasking 15 February 1984 for officers/warrant officers and to support e nge and District of Columbia teams. a west support to the "diitary Support Element and the Army 0 ons Center. The District of Columbia team consisted of officers/warrant officers who provided liaison with in Los Angeles, FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C., and the “ary Operations Center. (U) However, the extended Yength of the TDY added to INSCOM's already shortage of manpower. The lack of experienced or knowledgeable intelligence officers in the terrorism field increased the difficulty of filling the team slots. Teams were fully wanned, but all team members were not aS experienced as requested in the OACST tasking. ! 108
® ' S T Counterintelligence Support to Operations in Grenada. ye. ae Due to the rapid buildup of Cuban and Soviet activities, the murder of Prime Minister Maurice Bishop, the potential threat to U.S. citizens, and the posed threat to surrounding Caribbean nations, U.S. and Organization Eastern Caribbean States (OECS) forces invaded the island nation of Grenada on 25 October 1983. From 27 October 1983 to 11 January 1984, counterintelligence (CI) support was provided to the ground forces commander in Grenada by CI assets of the 519th MI Battalion, 525th MZ Group, XVIII Airborne Corps, Fort Bragg, North Carolina. The overwhelming success of the operation eliminated the need to maintain the full complement of U.S. military forces personnel on island. The reduction of U.S. military presence, to include the CI assets of the 519th MI Battalion, precipitated a Defense Intelligence requirement to OACSI to coordinate the acquisition of personnel to provide continued counterintelligence support to the stay-behind U.S. military peace- keeping force in Grenada.. . AELGOROMA) ACSI tasked INSCOM on 21 December 1983 to provide counterintelligence support to Commander, U.S. Military Support Element (COMUSMILSUPE)-Gren king consisted of providing » ‘a . Der ’ G funding IO TF GSY Perroule™ in Mey 1904, sSued a subsequent tasking to INSCOM extending CI support for an additional 179 days or termination .- of U.S. forces in Grenada. " sper), The INSCOM CI Support Team was renamed the INSCOM ¥ Counterintelligence (CI) Detachment-Grenada. The detachment e commander also functioned as the S2 for MILSUPE-Grenada. The ; cetachment commander also functioned as the S2 for MILSUPE-Grenada. ‘3 The detachment was under the operational control of COMUSMILSUPE- Grenada ané provided intelligence reporting through Commander, U.S.:. . Forces Caribbean to CINCLANT and national level intelligence agencies. The detachment was responsible for providing CI support to U.S. forces assisting t > keepi CPF LSareremm) A significant accomplishment by the detachment was the discovery of a major weapons cache at the former Cuban embassy. Acting on a tip that several bags of cement were brought into the Cuban Embassy just prior to the evacuation of the Cuban , the IN ~Grenada request to survey all c ertain if ere were any hollow floors, walls or evidence of recent structural repairs or uildings within the compound. On 29 March, Cis: discovered a hollow floor in a haliway Wing oY the main residence. After coordination with the local authorities, members of the CI detachment entered the 105 - TO FOREIGN LO Anais 11é
oe wp compound the same day. Breaking through approximate)y two inches of concrete, detachment members discovered the following: 49 M16 rifles, 4O AK~U7/AKM rifles, 3 RPG-2 launchers (CHICOM), 4 .38 caliber pistols, 2 M-26 submachineguns, 2 9am pistols (Belgian), 2 25mm shotguns (Russian), 1 M3 submachinegun (United States), and 1 9mm pistol (Spanish) plus accompaning magazines and ammunition. ~ The INSCOM operation, however, was not without its sh; of problems. directed the support and coordination required for the project. Personnel to fill the detachment were drawn from seven units worldwide 30 as not to burden any with the loss of personnel. Equipment also was Grawn from several units. But the marshalling of needed equipment such as field safes, weapons, photography, and office supplies was not the only problem in the area of logistics. Grenada was also an undertaki Transportation of supplies to and from ‘Special 870th MI Group Counterintelligence Mission. 106 117
E E E Beginning in January 1988, an ongoing search began for personnel. irst, a Readiness Training (REDTRAIN) opportunity was extended to . FORSCOM with negative results. Next the U.S. Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center was contacted.
FOR OF SEONLY ~~ S Key ey FOOTNOTES: CHAPTER V. OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES Mey Multidiscipline: 1. FY 198% DCSOPS AHR (Tsp Pp. 99-1023 FY 198% FS Kunie + oy vol III Sys Dev Div. 2. Msg, CDR INSCOM, subj: INSCOM Bi-Weekly Operational Report (Mar 84) (0). 3. FY 1984 DCSOPS AHR (T , PP. 92-93. &, tom Paper, IAOPS-SE-SMU, subj: TACSIM-CRESTED EAGLE 8& a4 Apr 64) s 5. FY DCSOPS AHR (TS pe 18; FY 1984 513th MI Group AHR (S/NOFORN), ch IVs; Ltr, CofS (INSCOM] subj: After Action Report: Operation URGENT FURY (S/NOFORN). , 6. Memo for Record, IAOPS-PMD, subj: INSCOM Letter of Support for * Kavorous Study (25 Sep 84) (U); Pact Sheet, IAOPS-PMD, subj: Proposed Weather Support Syste» for eer: Sep 84%) (U). 7. FY 1988 870th MI Gp AHR (S/NOPORN), 5 ° 8. FY 198% DCSPPM AHR (S/NOFORN), ch IV. 9. Ibid., ch V. 10. FY 198% 66th MI Gp (S/NOFORN), pp. 58-59. 11. Ltr, CefS (INSCOM), subj: EAC IEW Task Analysis Study (10 May 84) (0). IMINT/Electro-Optics: : a. FY 1984 DCSOPS ARR (TS Pp. 316-17. 2. FY 1964 DCSOPS AER (TS p. 3175 FY 1983 Ann Hist Review (TMB, p. 119. 3. FY 198% DCSOPS AHR (TSH, PP. 317-18. &. FY 1984 DCSOPS AHR (TS 19-20; Pact Sheet INSCOM/ACSI Update 5. FY-1984 DCSOPS ABR 6. Ibid., p. 320. 8. Ibid., Be 321. ., . 9. Ibid. . 10. Paper, ADCSOPS-IMINT, subj: Memo, IAOPS-GW, subj: RPV T (S/NOFORN); FY 1984 DCSOPS AHR (TS Wi; Ft 1984 470th MI Gp AHR (S/NOFORN), ex I.. ~ IAOPS, subj: (Dec 88) (S/NOFORN). Demonstration (22 Dec 84) SIGINT/EW: “T. FY 1988 DCSOPS AHR (TSM, p. 85; FY 1983 ann Hist Review (TMM pp. 115-16. 2. FY 1988 DcsoPS ARR (Te 5. FY 1984 DCSO Project 6. FY 198% (3 Aug 84) (0). 7. FY 198% DCSOPS AHR (T pp. 56-57. (10 Jan B85) (S). HR (T Pp. 31-33; Fact Sheet, IAOPS-SE-SMO, subj: R (T p. 40; DF, IAOPS-SE-SMO, eub3: HFDF Rental 5 y 108
ONLY FOR C USE 8. FY 1988 OPS to (t OCMC (20 Jun 84 (19 Mar 64) (7 9. FY 1988 DCSOPS 10. FY 1984 FS Sinop AER ( 11. Info Paper, —_ i. au (5 Mar 84) (S COS (3 Jan 85 (26 Oct 84) ( 12. FY 1984 DCSOPS Pp. 26-30; Fact Sheet, IAOPS-SE-SHO, Subj: © Paper, IAOPS-SE-SMO, subj: OCMC Pp. orn a ‘, ry € Establishzent of an Army, SIGINT Cos ltr, CDR Tuscon, subj: ARSTAF Support for INSCOM y Fact Sheet, IAOPS-SE-SP, subj: Army COS proseek TIPE (272150 Dec 84) (TS > Pe A dons (25 Sep 88) (s<qy p. 61; Info Paper, IAOPS-SE, subj: Pield (S). » ch V3 FY 1984 513th MI Gp ASR (S/NOFORN), rt ):) ¥ 5 Wi, BUD JS FY 198% DCSOPS AHR (T: 18. List of Aray SIGINT Pos 19. ibid. 20. FY FY 1988 DCSOPS ABR ( ' $tation Sinop (10 Jan 21. FY 1988 DCSOPS AHR ( 22. FY 198% DCSSYS AHR ( ° ch Iv. 23. FY 1988 DCSOPS AHR ( » PP. 87, 663 DF, DCSOPS, subj: INSCOM/OACSI SIGINT/EW IPR (22 Jan ( ; Fact Sheet, IAOPS-SE-0, subj: INSCOM CENTAM Update (12 Dec 83) ( 3 Fact Sheet, IAOPS-SE-0, subj: (12 Oct 84) ( Tiger Island Front-End Operati pp. 77:°-78; FY 1984 DCSOPS ARR (T. Fact Sheet, IAOPS-SE-0, subj: HUMINT /TAREX: 1. FY 1963 Ann Hist Review (T p. 20; Mag, IAOPS-H-T, subj: (S/NOFORN). 2. FY 198% DCSOPS AHR (TS@MB p. 25. 4. Ibid., p. 26. 5. Ibid., pp. 113-16. 6. dbid., p. 113. , 9. Ibid. 10. FY 198% DCSOPS AHR (T p. 113; Ltr, CDR INSCOM, subj: CI Review of “HUMINT (31 Oct 84) (S/ RN). ; 11. Memo for Record, IAOPS-H-F, subj: U.S. Air Force Special Activities Command Visit to FGCM Aug 84) (0). 12. FY 198% DCSOPS AHR (T. pp. 130-31. 13. Ibid., pp. 119-23. . poo
Counterintelligence/O rations Security: 1. 10. 11. 12. 13. qa, 15. Ibid., p. 253. FY 1984 DCSOPS ABR (T ) PP. 132-333 FY 1984 USAOG AHR (S/NOFORN), Chpt IV. FY 1984 USAOG AHR (S/NOFORN), cb IV. . Ibid., pe 135. “ees Py Ibid., p. 22. % Ibid.» pe 19. SO S Ibid.» Pe 127. , @ Ibid., p. 113. & FY 198% &70th MI Gp AHR (S/NOFORN), Annex N. FY 1984 S/NOFORN), p. 12. FY 1988 S/NOFORN), p. 73 FY 1984 DCSOPS | ARR (T. . . Paper, IAOPS-OP-O0S, subj: COMSEC Insecurities (23 Oct 85) (C); FY 1984 DCSOPS AHR (TSM, pp. 293-96. FY 1984 DCSOPS AER (TS pp. 283-85. Ibid., pp. 280-82. Ibid., pp. 196-98. Ibid. o Pp. 190-91. . FY 1988 66th MI Gp ABR (S), p. 56. . FY 1988 DCSOPS AHR (T. » Ph. 216-373 Paper, IAOPS-OP-OC (OP), sudj: Status of 66th p Personnel Security Investigations (5 Nov 84) (0); Fact Sheet, IAOPS-OP-OC (OP), subj: Reduction of Completion Time on Overseas Background Investigations (5 Oct 8%) (U0); Fact Sheet, IAOPS- OP-OC(OP), subjs PSI Case Load (7 Sep 84) (U); Paper, IAOPS-OP-OP, subj: INSCOM Personnel Security Investigation Support to DIS (6 Jul 84) (0). ° FY 198% DCSOPS AHR (t » Pp. 261-63; Fact Sheet, IAOPS-OP-OP;: subj:” ITIC-PAC Augmentation Kwajalein Missile Range (undtd) (0); Ia Form 32, IAOPS-OP-OP, subj: Augmentation to Kwajalein Missile Range (1 May 84) (0); Paper, IAOPS-OP-OC (OP), subj: ITIC-PAC Augmentation to Kwajalein: Missile Range (31 Aug 84) (U). FY 1984 DCSOPS AER (T. pp. 258-60. “Pact Sheet, IAOPS-OP-OF> subj: AADCSOPS-OPSEC Liaison visit to BMDSCOM, 15-16 May 64 (25 May 84) (0); IA Form 32, IAOPS-OP-OP, subj: INSCOM OPSEC Support to Ballistic Missile Defense Contractors (24 May 84) (0); FY 1984 DCSOPS ABR (T 6-57. . FY 7988 DCSOPS R cd Pp. 238; Msg, IAOPS-OP, subj: INSCOM Polygraph Program, Present and Fodtire (251500Z Sep 84); Backup Data, IAOPS-OP-OC, subj: Polygraph Examination of Military Assignees/Detailees to NSA (7 Jan BN) (C). FY 1984 DCSOPS AHR (T. » Pp. 249-52. nn P4 fs iad g )
FOR OFAC USE ONLY 16. Fact Sheet, IAOPS-OP-OP, subj: Discovery of Arms Ca at Cuban Embassy (Grenada) (Undtd) {(S/NOFORN); FY 1984 DCSOPS AHR (T. 9 PP. 201-07; Fact Sheet, IAOPS-OP-OP, subj: Intelligence Support to Future Operations in Grenada (3 May 84) (S/NOFORN). 6 OOM, 17. FY 198% DCSOPS AHR (TSH, pp. 208-15. gai tr eaS9ENG 111 , wa  FOROE 7 | PPA. USE ONLY _ dee
ecT vic 7 EN way ere ee en ge TE Pr ar {ane TSO maa. tg "Me iets he pee rel, ar BEE GI SB I . ¥ - 6 : ij 7 h ee i j ——2 | APPENDIX A USAINSCOM ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE As of 30 September 1968 . Unit Designation HEADQUARTERS, U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND U.S. Army Garrison, Arlington'Hall Station USAINSCOM CONUS Military Intelligence Group ‘U.S, Army Field Station Key West U.S. Aray Field Station San Antonio U.S. Army Element, National Security Agency U.S. Army Garrison, Vint Hill Feras Station U.S. Army Field Station Okinawa U.S. Army Field Station Berlin U.S. Army Field Station Sinop U.S. Army Special Security Group U.S. Army Programs Analysis Group U.S. Army Adainistrative Survey Detachsent U.S. Aruy Foreign Area Officers Detachment U.S. Army Russian Institute | 0.3. Army Intelligence and Security Poreign Language Training Center Europe U.S. Army Field Station Augsburg USAINSCOM Automated Systems Activity USAINSCOM Theater Intelligence Center-Pacific U.S. Army Cryptologic Support Group U.S. Army Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center USAINSCOM Support Activity U.S. Army Operational Group U.S. Army Central Security Facility USAINSCOM Finance and Accounting Activity 112 " > Hdl ae . . “ ie ° Location * SUSE 554 (b) (2), f
vIC ~* Unit Designation HEADQUARTERS, U.S. ARMY INTELLICENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND USAINSCOM Maintenance Assistance and Inatruction Teas | U.S. Army Special Operations Detachment U.S. Aray Systems Exploitation Detachment . USAINSCOM Adninistrative/Audiovisual Support Aotivity U.S. Arny Field Station Kunia U.S. Army Intelligence Support Activity | USAINSCOM Mission Support Activity U.S. Army Intelligence Exchange and Support Center 902d Military Intelligence Group Augmentation, 902d Military Intelligence Group USAINSCOM Pentagon Counterintelligence Force USAINSCOM Counterintelligence and Signal Security Support Battalion, Fort Sam Houston 7 USAINSCOM Counterinteliigence and Signal Security - Support Battalion, Fort Meade | USAINSCOM Counterintelligence Detachment, Defense Nuclear Agency USAINSCOM Security Support Detachnent, Fort Meade (Security) USAINSCOM Security Support Battalion (Provisional) USAINSCOM Counterintelligence and Signal Security Support Battalion, Presidio of San Francisco 66th Military Intelligence Group Augnentation, 66th Military Intelligence Group 18th Military Intelligence Battalion Augmentation, 18th Military Intelligence Battalion Sth Military Intelligence Company Augmentation, 5th Military Intelligence Company HHC, 502d Army Security Agency Battalion Augmentation, 502d Aray Security Agency Battalion ween Arny Security Agency Company (Operations) Rear) USC B62 4b) (ay 113 hana bo is Location
dé ’ is i | UIC “™- Unit Designation HEADQUARTERS, U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND 66th Military Intelligence Group HHC, 502d Army Security Agency: Battalion 328th Army Security Agency Company ‘ - 58ist Military Intelligence Detacheent - go 582d Military Intelligence Detachment ce 583d Military Intelligence Detachnent S27th Military Intelligence Battalion Augnentation, 527th Military. Intelligence Battalion . . Company A, 527th Military Intelligence Battalion _ Company B, 527th Military Intelligence Battalion 830th Military Intelligence Detachment ‘Augmentation, 530th Military Intelligence Detachment 766th Military Intelligence Detachment — Augmentation, 766th Military Intelligence Detachment 430th Military Intelligence Battalion: (Provisional) | 564th Military Intelligence Detachment 70th Military Intelligence Group Augmentation, %70th Military Intelligence Group U.S. Army Field Station Panana 500th Military Intelligence Croup Augmentation, 500th Military Intelligence Group U.S. Army Field Station Misawa 189th Military Intelligence Detachnent Augmentation, 199th Military Intelligence Detachment 181st Military Intelligence Detachment Augmentation, 181st Military Intelligence Detachment U.S. Army Asian Studies.Detachment Lay | 148
< . " - : Location Moo oy VIC “~~  —s Unit. Designation HEADQUARTERS, U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND HHC, 501st Military Intelligence Group _ Augmentation, 501st Military Intelligence Group U.S. Army Field Station Korea’ 332d Military Intelligence Company (Electronic Warfare) S2uth Military Intelligence Battalion Augmentation, 524th Military Intelligence . Battalion : . 209th Military Intelligence Company (Operations Security) | Augmentation, 209th Military Intelligence Company : 3d Military Intelligence Battalion (Aerial Exploitation) Headquarters, Headquarters and Service Company, 3d Military Intelligence Battalion Company A, 3d Military Intelligence Battalion Company B, 3d Military Intelligence Battalion HHC, 513th Military Intelligence Group 513th Military Intelligence Center (Provisional) 174th Military Intelligence Company HHC, 201st Military Intelligence Battalion 7th Military Intelligence Company 166th Military Intelligence Company U.S. Army EAC Aviation Intelligence Company . HHC, 202d Military Intelligence Battalion (Collection/ Exploitation) 64tst Military Intelligence Company (Collection) 219th Military Intelligence Company 164th Military Intelligence Company HHC, 263d Military Intelligence Battalion (Technical Intelligence) Vith Military Inteliigence Company (Technical Intelligence) Oo Augmentation, 1ith Military Intelligence Company (Technical Intelligence) ° ® “Use Fedo a, 115 Jol
ays 083 AP) Ah. (0 L APPENDIX B TOE UNITS (as of 30 September 1984) 66th Military Intelligence Group u70th Military Intelligence Group 500th Military Intelligence Group HHC, 5O0ist Military Intelligence Group 513th Military Intelligence Group | 902d Military Intelligence Group 3d Military Intelligence Battalion (Aerial exploitation) oo 18th Military Intelligence Battalion HEC, 20ist Military Intelligence Battalion HHC, 202d Military Intelligence Battalion {Collection/Exploitation) . . BHC, 203d Military Intelligence Battalion (Technical Intelligence) HHC, 502d Army Security Agency Battalion South Military Inteliigence Battalion | S27th Military Intelligence Battalion . Sth Military Intelligence Company 17th Military Intelligence Company lith Military Intelligence Company (Technical Intelligence) 16uth Military Intelligence Company 166th Military Intelligence Company 174th Military Intelligence Company 209th Military Intelligence Company 219th Military Intelligence Company 332d Military Intelligence Company (Electronic Warfare) 328th Army Security Agency Company 409th Army Security Agency Company (Operations) (Rear) 64ist Military Intelligence Company (Collection) WOth Military Intelligence Detachment 18ist Military Intelligence Detachment 430th Military Intelligence Detachment S8ist Military Intelligence Detachment 582d Military Intelligence Detachment 583d Military Intelligence Detachment SBYth Military Intelligence Detachment 766th Military Intelligence Detachment aS
APPENDIX C CHANGES IN STATUS OF TOE UNITS INACTIVATED Unit  ELf Date HHC, Siith Military Intelligence 01 Oct 83 Battalion sO REASSIGNED 166th Military Intelligence cells ; 01 Apr 84 Company (Electronic Warfare) From: 202d MI Battalion Tos 20ist MI Battalion L7hth Military Intelligence a 01 Apr 84 Company a*. From: 2034 MI Battalion To: HHC, 513th MI Group UNCLASSIFIED 117 F sitnansaiatl Authority | PO 50-2, HQ USAINSCOM, 4 Aug 83 PO 11-3, HQ USAINSCOM, 23 Feb 84 PO 11-2, HQ USAINSCOM, 23 Feb 84 te FBR cet
APPENDIX D TDA UNITS# oO (As of 30 September 1984) “oa MUSG B52 (bj (2) . | res i Salis Mamie an wy . we. Headquarters, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command U.S. Army Garrison, Arlington Hall Station : USAINSCOM CONUS Military Intelligence Group U.S. Army Element, National Security Agency USAINSCOM Pentagon Counterintelligence Force USAINSCOM Counterintelligence and Signal Security Support Battalion, Fort Houston USAINSCOM Counterintelligence and: Signal See..rity Support Battalion, Fort Meade USAINSCOM Counterintelligence Detachment, Defense Nuclear ~ Agency U.S. Army Garrison, Vint Hill Farms Station U.S. Army Field Station Key West U.S. Army Field Station Okinawa U.S. Army Field Station Berlin U.S. Army Field Station Sinop U.S. Army Special Security Group U.S. Army Programs Analysis Group U.S. Army Administrative Survey Detachment. U.S. Army Russian Institute U.S. Army Field Station San Antonio USAINSCOM -Counterintelligence and Signal Security Support Battalion, Presidio of San Francisco U.S. Army Central Security Facility USAINSCOM Finance and Accounting Activity USAINSCOM Maintenance Assistance and Instruction Team U.S. Army Special Operations Detachment USAINSCOM Support Activity U.S. Army Operational Group U.S. Army Foreign Area Officers Detachment U.S. Arwy Field Station Augsburg U.S. Army Field Station Misawa USAINSCOM Automated Systems Activity U.S. Army Field Station Korea USAINSCOM Theater Intelligence Center-Pacific U.S. Arny Cryptologic Support Group USAINSCOM Security Support Detachment, Fort Meade U.S. Army Intelligence Threat and Analysis Center U.S. Army Systems Exploitation Detachment USAINSCOM Administrative/Audiovisual Support Activity U.S. Army Field Station Kunia U.S. Army Asian Studies Detachment Jt U.S. Army Intelligence Support Activity foe 118 129 £0
U.S. Army Field Station Panama USAINSCOM Mission Support Activity USAINSCOM Foreign Language Training Center Europe U.S. Army EAC Aviation Intelligence Company U.S. Aroy Intelligence Exchange and Support Center | Augmentation, 902d Military Intelligence Group Augmentation, 66th Military Intelligence Group . Augmentation, 470th Military Intelligence Group Augmentation, 500th Military Intelligence Group Augmentation, 527th Military Intelligence Battalion Augmentation, 5th Military Intelligence Company Augmentation, 209th Military Intelligence Company Augmentation, 430th Military Intelligence Detachment Augmentation, 766th Military Intelligence Detachment Augmentation, 52uth Military Intelligence Battalion Augmentation, 18ist Military Intelligence Detachment Augnentation, 5024 Army Security Agency Battalion Augmentation, 149th Military Intelligence Detachment Augmentation, 18th Military Intelligence Battalion Augmentation, 501st Military Intelligence Group Augmentation, 11th Military Intelligence Company piusaps2 s>2 9). 119 f im 198