Recruiting and Personne! Accessions Recruiting of new HUMINT personnel received high empha- sis in 1984, as INXC took the lead in seeking out, evaluating, and recruiting prospective AFSAC personnel. An aggressive advertising campaign, followed up with telephonic interviews of interested personne}, paig dividends in the identification of many promising individuais.172 In duly, and again in November, Colone! Piver and Major Malestch travelled to the Armed Forces Air Intelligence Trataing Center (AFAITC), Lowry AFB, Colorado to perform Personnel Selec-. tion Panel (PSP} interviews of students. Nine students were inter~ viewed in July, five positively; four of eight interviewed in November were positive All of those positively tatervtewed were subsequently approved by AFSAC/CC for HUMINT assignments. 3 In September, INXC requested a1} AFSAC field units reevaluate their Adyanced Academic Degree (AAD) billets against current and future mission requirements and provide their recommendations for either adding or deleting billets. The purpose was to provide AFSAC with sufficient AAD billets to enable the recruitment of area specialists, thereby allowing the buildup of ¢ quality jlanguage/area specialist-qualified personnel force. In december, at the request of INXC, AFIS/OP provided the names of officers’ accepted for the AFIT Area Spectalist program to fact) iggte the recruiting of language-qualiffed area speciat~- sts. Officer Accessions - 40 officer PSP interviews were conducted during 1964 and 28 of the interviewees were approved for HUMINT assignments. Of these: 4 were on station at year's and 13 were in training 6 were awaiting release from their cuyrent command/assignment 3 were awaiting acceptance by the concerned area or detachment commanders 2 were not released by AFMPC a Enlisted Accessions - 14 enlisted PSP interviews were conducted during 1984, of which 12 resulted in selection for HUMINT assignments. OF these: L was on station at year's end 8 were in training 3 were awaiting release from their current command/assignment eé4yr
246 Force Management Initiatives ex Organizational. vs MPC Control of Special Outy Assign- gent to Fatia = A problem which had long plagued AESAC wes te ack of control over the accession of enlisted personne] into Special Outy Asstanments (SDAs} with the organization, since the SDAS were controlled by HPC rather than by AFSAC. This meant that AFSAC would not necessarily be able to select the most qualifted SBA applicants for HUMINT assignments. Recognizing the problem, Chief Vukich put together a staff package for AF/INYX, proposing a letter from INYX to MPC/MPCRPP1 which requested that AFSAC be identiffed as an “arganfzation-controlled,” rather than an "MPC~ controlled” SDA for enlisted support personnel. At the end of the year, final approval of the change was stil? pending. sexs Creation of the 99606 Special Duty Identifier to Replace the 203x0 AFSC ~ In order to better control and retain enlisted HUMINT personnel, INXC--specifically Chfef Vukich, succeeded in replacing the 203X0 (Linguist/Iaterregator) AFSC with special duty identifier {SOI} 99606 (Linguist Debriefer/interrogator}. This change took effect 31 October and, in conjunction with the move to obtain AFSAC vice MPC control of support personne? SDAs to AFSAC, was expected to significantiy enhance HUMINT manpower man~ fh 8 agement 476 & ‘ Special Duty Assiqnment Profictency Pay for HUMINT Enlisted Linquist/Uebriefers - One of the most important moves to improve recruiting and retention of 99606 personnel was the Special Duty Assi nmant Proficiency Pay {SOAPP) for enlisted linguist debriefer/interrogators. Such pay, already approved for recruiters and for military training instructors, was recomnended in a package prepared for ACS/I approval in August 1984, The formal proposat, approved by the ACS/1, was transmitted to AF/MPPP im a 26 September Jetter from AF/INYX, The proposal had not been finally adopted by the end of the year, Sut the prospects for fits approval appeared excellent, * AFSAC OPERATIONAL TRAINING PROGRAM g.t. 95200) petered pet 5 ue
Tutorial Training - Special fn-house tutorial training in HUMINT tradecraft was administered by Mr. Knudsen twice during 1984. These sessions were: ol a 19-23 Nov 84: TSgt Glenn A, Miller enroute to an assign- ment with Set 11, ESAA New Initiatives in Training - Because of the relatively small size of jn relation to the demands of its worldwide mission tasking, great emphasis was placed on the recruiting and training of the finest personnel, In 1984, many new inittatives for improving the quality of training were pursued: Assessment Models - As a result of an unsuccessful meet- ing dune 1984 with CIA personne! on personnel selection cri- teria and procedures, {[NXC initiated action te construct assessment models for each of the major operational and support positions within AFSAC. The major characteristics of each type of position were identified and pertinent questions were developed to determine the potential of candidates being considered for assign- ment to these positions. This, it was believed, would considerably enhance the effectiveness of AFSAC personne] selection procedures. ESAK, PSAA, their detachments, and other AFSAC field units were requested in October 1984 to provide inputs for assessment models of their positions, and by the end of the year all unfts had responded and the complete data base was being reviewed for the development of accurate, useful} models. DOU _Tradecraft/Curriculum Review Panel ~ At the DIA MOTB scheduling conference on 18” October, it wes recommended that a tradecraft/curriculum review pane} be established to review the MOTB curriculum. The panet would review inputs from the service collection elements for the possible, inclusion of additional tradecraft aspects, changing of emphasis, or expansion of specif tc blocks of tradecraft instruction. Such a review pane} was to allow for a current, viable curriculum at MOTC, MOFC, and MOS. The pro- posed panel was under devgtopment at the end of 1984.1 = HUMINT Management Training Course {HMTC}) - The HMIC, an AFSAC initiative, was not a “new” Initiative per se, but one which was first raised by AFSAC at the Do? HUMINT Management Conference on 3-4 October 1983. Since the original recommendation, the course development project had been given to the Defense Intelligence College, ant on 20 September, an ali-service meeting was held at DIA to discuss the development of the HMTC, At the meeting, several different course interests surfaced, clouding the origina! concept for the HMTC, and the attendees were requested to provide 247 ed per 5 U.S.C- 532¢b) (2) Delnr
their requirements for consideration. On 29 October, in response to BIA tasking, HQ AFSAC provided an fnput on the proposed course content which reiterated the substance of AFSAC's origional HMTC recommendation. By year's end, e matrix for the course was being developed by DIC; following completion of this matrix tn 1985, the seryice representatives were to meet again to review and refine t. ry Interrogation Track for the Strategic Debrtefer's Course SBC} - Between 22-. prit, INX- developed @ tentative training Schedule for a one-week “Interrogation Track" for AFSAC students attending the Strategic Oebriefer’s Course (SDC) at Fort Huachuca,. Arizona, and began acquiring course matertals for each block of instruction. Later in the year, during the 14-18 Qecember In- Progress Review of the SOC, AFSAC representatives met with Colonel Oinniman (deputy assistant commandant of the USAICS), Major Knlogter and Captain Lilley (Exploitation Ofvtston}, and CWO2 Chlarson (Interrogation Branch) to discuss fmptementing a one-week interrogation block restricted to AFSAC SUC attendees. There were no major objections raised during these discusstons, mainly because of the small number of students fnyolved {two per course), and the fact that the effort would neither detract from the basic S0C nor require the use of additional facilities or USAICS personnel, The proposal had not been completely staffed and finalized by the end of the year, and fn any case required the approval of Major General Weinstein (USAICS commander). Fina? action was expected early in 1995 182 @ Survival Training Course for 99606 Personnel + To pro- vide necessary background training for pipeline 99606 personnel, INXC arranged for attendance of new assignees at the USAF Basic Survival School {course SVBOA), Fairchild AF8, Washington. This course, which alse addressed resistance to interrogation, was viewed as a valuable addition ta the 99606 training ptan. fir Force Directed Studies Course - During the year, Chief Vuk ich worked with AF/INYX, AF /WPPT, and OLI to establish a ten-week Air Force-directed studies course stressing Soviet and Warsaw Pact military and technical terminology required by Air Force debriefers. Electronic Security Command {ESC}, another major user of linguists, was asked to support the directed studies course, and concurred with the proposs}. Tas course was still in the planning stages at the end of the year.28: @B intelligence Training for HUMINT Support AFSCs ~ Because of the small size of many AFSAC operating Jocattons, and the need for support personne? frequently te become involved in HUMINT duties, INXC pressed for a change to AFR 39-11 which would permit intelligence training for designated non-intelligence personnel. This change, first requested through HQ AFIS/DPR “on 15 Kovember,
was approved by AFMPC/MPCAPP] on 26 November. The text of the change, an addition to paragraph 3ic, Figure 8-2 of AFR 38-11, read as follows: “Certain support rgonnet selected for assignment to minimally-manned sensitive locations may be required to attend intelligence courses, of fastruction prior te raporting into new unit of assignment,” Defense Language Institute (DLI} Russian Professional Development, Progran = thie? Vukich provided direct input te on = new, do-volume Air Force POP in Russtan. This program was designed to provide linguists with military foreign-language study materials of a highly technical nature, each lesson designed around a scientific topic, such as airfield technical support. An {nitial input was provided ULI on 23 May. Sixteen of the 32 vol« umes had been completed by 31 December 1984.185 PERSONNEL ACTIONS Standard personne? actions such as awards _and decorations, OERs and APRs were processed and managed by TSgt Thomas J. Neel. TSgt Neel's superior performance was recognized by the AFIS inspector general during the Apri] 1984 MEI of HQ AFSC. HQ AFSAC had not had a single late GER or APR for two years. The AFSAC awards and decorations program was similarly wel! managed. During 1984, a total of 69 awards and decorations {34 Meritorious Service Medals, 25 Air Force Commendation Medals, and 10 Air Force Achievement Medals), 110 APRs, and 117 OERs were processed. Forty-six AFSAC personne! were promoted in 1984. 249
£5U “DETACHMENT 21 AIR FORCE SPECIAL ACTIVITIES CENTER HISSION ORGANIZATION DOIA Office Reassigned peleted per 5 U.S.0- 5952{b) (1)
feed PERSONNEL, Manning Strength =a At the end of the year, the detachment had forty authorized positions, distributed as follows: Author ized Assigned Percest Officers 20 14 70% Enlisted it 10 91% Civilfans _3 —e 56% TOTAL 40 28 73% The manning was proportioned as follows: command - 3, support -B. Defense Liaison Program - 9, Project SHOTGUN - 4, and Projects SEEK/LADEN - 16,190 Key Personne} Lt Col Richard P. Owen was commandér of Det 21 for the entire year, KSgt Dennts Bavaria was the Det 21 administration officer throughout the year. Kaj William 8, Martin headed the Defense Liaison Branch from dune through December, Capt Michae? R, Sylwester headed the Foreign Liaison Sranch from the time he arrived in dune through December, Mr. Bobby H. dackson worked ff the Operations Services Office from danvary 1984 until he went to work for the Navy on 7? December 1984, Maj Kenneth J. Allen was the head of the Lefense Liaison Branch from January to May 1984 and then became operations officer in May and served fn that position for the remainder of tne year. 19} SUDGET Effective with the FY 1985, Detachment 21 received its first separate budget account. Prior to the fiscal year, al} funds for the detachment, except TOY expenses, were accounted for jointly with HQ AFSAC, The new budget was to allow for better accounting of al? the detachment’s expenditures. The total projected budget for FY 85 was $410,500, allotted as fot lows: civilian pay, $220,006; TOY, $150,000; rents}, $3,500; cosmunications, $6,000; contract maintenance, $16,000; supplies, N a —_ peleted per 5 UsSC- 552¢b)Q)
252 $40,000, and equipment, $5,000, were accounted for independently, were $105,000. FOREIGN LIAISON Project SEEK pelered pex 4 9.8.0. §$2¢h} GQ) Evaluations of intetligence reports (IIRs} prior to er 1984 were broken down into three categories, which were: “Of Major Significance,” "Of Value,“ and °No Value." After 1} November, the evaluations were devided into five categories: “Of Major Significance," "High Vatue,” “Of ¥alue,” “Low Value,” and “No Value." Other descriptions of ‘LIRs such as “Outstanding” or “Excellent* were additienal comments by the evaluator. Evaluations were monitored and analyzed to keep collectors going in the right direction and searching for the most important and needed information, 196 Now Project LADEN DEFEMSE LEAISON Defense Ligison Program Deleted per $ U.S.C. 352¢b) {1} The TOY expenses for FY 84, which
” DETACHMENT 22 AIR FORCE SPECIAL ACTIVITIES CENTER (AFSAC) MISS EON PERSONMEL Manning Strength As of 31 Gecember 1984, the detachment had twenty-seven authorized positions distributed as follows:203 AUTHORIZED ASSIGHED PERCENT Officers 10 ig 100% Enlisted 4 4 100% Civilians 33 12 92% Total 27 ” 26 96% Key Personne! During the year, the detachment’s key persannel were the commander, Lt foi Russell Parris, who held the position since June 1982, and the operations officer, Mr. Edwin Pentecost, who assumed the posftion in October 1984. The opergt ions officer was converted to a civilian slot effective 1 October 204 LIAISON AHD COORDINATION fs Deleted per $ U.S.C. $52(b) (i) Deleted per 5 U.S.C. 352(} 01)
Briefing from U.S. Customs Service Army's Interest in Det 22 Briefing from OSI Forensics Specialist Mistt to AMD 255 Deleted per 5 U.G.0- 5952{b) (2)
ww 2% Coordination on FORMAT and IAF Briefing on COMEX Oversight Inspection Deleted per $ U.S.C 352¢b) (1)
Coordination on OLP HUMINT S&T Workshop o In December, the 1984 HUMINT S&T Workshop was held at Detachment 22. In attendance were personne} from HQ AFSAC, HQ PSAA, HQ ESAA, Detachment 31 of PSAA, Detachment 12 of ESAA, and FID. On 24 December, Detachment 22 sent to, the participants a report on the workshop based on critiques submitted by those, dn attendance. The recomnendations in the report were as follows: i The opening session should be tailored more toward Must be at the S/RODCA level. 1. technical operational briefings. 3. The social event that was tested for the first time should be continued. 4. A minority of FTD analysts and case officers felt that they did not have enough time. Corrective action suggested fs to allow al} case officers to spend a full week at Detachment 22, to include all day Friday. 5. Recommend that Betachment 22/IN0S trave? to Detach- ment 31 PSAA, A similar visit to Oetachment 12 ESAA in November 1983 was very beneficial for al? concerned, | Deleted pex 5 U.S.C. 352(b} (2h) 257 peteted per $ U.S.C. 352(b} (2)
"DETACHMENT 23 AIR FORCE SPECIAL ACTIVITIES CENTER (AFSAC) ESTABLISHMENT AND MISSION On 3 October 1984, by verbal order of the AFSAC commander, Detachment 23 was established. On 12 October 1984, AFIS Special Order 6-6, tssued by the chief of the AFIS Administrative Division, confirmed the verbal order of 3 October.¢ PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES e Gperational Support Deleted per 5 U.S.C. 552¢b) (1) Deleted per $ U.S.C. 352(b} (1)
MISSION ORGANIZATION = ESAA consisted of a headquarters, three detachments, and nine Gperating tocations. Headquarters EUROPEAN SPECIAL ACTIVITIES AREA AIR FORCE SPECIAL ACTIVITIES CENTER peleted per 5 U.5.6- 352{(b) G3) Usleted per 5 U.8.6. 352(b) (2)
The other division with HG ESAA, Plans and Resources, was involved with a variety of actions concerning resource manage- ment, intelligence product top and plans for the conduct of peace~- time and wartime operations .226 ESAA Detachment 12 ESAA Detachment 12 Jeted per $5 U.S.C. $52(b) (1) ESAS Detachment 13 peleted per 5 0.8.6. 352(0) (1) fe
PERSONNEL Key Personnel -™ On Il July, Col dohn W. Doxey assumed command of ESAA from Lt Cot John K. Kiehm who was transferred to the Defense Intelligence Agency. Col Doxey was the former division chief, AFSAC/ING. Effective 7 August, Lt Col Rom Kiltikauskas assumed duties as ESAA deputy commander and as chief of the HQ ESAA Opera- tions Division, replacing Major Richard Schenk, who retired from the Air Force. Major Lawrence C. Earle assumed dutfes as chief of the HQ ESAA Plans and Resources Diviston 31 July, replacing Major Arnold C. Gubcak. CMSgt William H. Strickland assumed duties as the HQ ESAA chief of Personne? and Administration, as well as the ESA4 ‘senior enlisted advisor, effective 11 duly. ClSgt StrickTand replaced CMSgt Clyne Bates, who retired. Captain Kevin Klahr, who arriv-d on station in dune, assumed duties as the executive offic to the new ESAS commander, effective 11 duly,24t Lt Col William Saxe commanded Detachment 1i, while Major Andrew Jasinski served as the Det 11 operatiogs officer. Major Martin Bennett commanded Detachment 12. Major Ronald McAbee commanded Detachment 13.232 Manning Strengths ad On 31 December, the ESAA manning strength was as fol- lows; RO. AUTHORIZED NO, ASSIGNED PERCENTAGE Officers 24 2 “83% Enlisted §1 46 $0% Civilians 28 29 7ix Total 103 86 83% JOINT COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY Deleted per 5 U,5.C- 35200) aiqnet per $ US-6. 55200) ()
Electronic Security Command Leads Development Deleted per > y.$.6. $52¢b} (2)
Vn ESAA Commanders‘ Conference cone On 14-15 Noverber 1984, the ESAA Commanders’ Conference was heid, The first day was devoted to a review of ESAA activities while the second day was spent in an {nedepth reviewsof,£SAA OPLAN 4102 procedures. The conference was fn part a continuous effort by ESAA to review and update {ts major wartime planning concepts, partially in response to def ictenctes cited in a 1982° Management. Effectiveness Inspection report.23 . Meeting is Bonn Deleted por 5 0.5.6+ 552d) <1) feleted per § ¥.5.C. $52(b) (1)
FORMICA and DLP Meeting with USAFE Representatives On 20 Uecember 1984, Captain Haney attended a USAFE/INCR spon d meeting to discuss planning initiatives of mutual inter- est. Oetachwent 3, Foreign: Technology Division, was also repre~ sented, The meeting resulted in the following proposals:244 2. Preparation of a listing andedescription of major exercises into which coordinated play could be inc tuded. 3. Preparation of a list of requirements for lagist?es Support and WRM for operations of a consolidated central base of operations under bare base conditions, PLAMHING AND PROGRAMMING Planning Initiatives 265 Deleted per 3 U.S.€. 552(b){1} paleted per 5 U.8.0. 552¢b) (1)
| 266 The command continued follow-up action on shortcomings identified during the AFIS/IG Management Effectiveness Inspection (MET) of ESAA in 1982. Follow-up action on ESAA MEE findings occupied a significant plan in ESAA management activities, with- the majority of MEf-related action focusing on wartime planning shortfatis identified during the MEI ,24 In doing so, €SAA continued its efforts to review and update major wartime planning concepts. As part of its effort te rectify shortfalls cited in the MEI, ESAA ftaunched the first annual review of ESAA OPLAN 4102 in dune 1984 and pursued plan update action throughout the second half of the year. As one part of this action, ESAA planning authorities identified and worked to resolve fong-standing shortcomings with ESAA wartime force deployment concepts. The highlight of the theater-leve!l planning effort, however, came in November 1984 as ESAA hosted its first comprehensive in-house planning conference,247 ESAA also continued its efforts to develop and maintain a roeie for USAF HUMINT ia major theater-based exercises. This effort, however, led the command to a critical decision point during the latter half of 1984, as ESAA command authorities were faced with three conflicting factors: increasing opportunities for ESAA to take part in exercises featuring HUMINT play: facreasing emphasis on peacetime collection activities sand new collectfon initiatives; and little relative change in the ESAA manpower base. faced with the harsh reality of limited manpower, ESAA authorities had to “draw the Tine‘ between mutually-exclusive efforts involving peacetime operations and wartime readiness exercises. in October 1984, as the demise of ESAA's traditional role in FLINTLOCK exercise was confirmed by the Special Operations Command - Europe (SOCEUR}, the ESAA commander reaffirmed the two basic goals of exercise participation: to test wartime planning concepts and to train personnel for their specific duties in support of these concepts. The SAK commander then issued a major policy statement with regard to exercise activities, through which he established four basic goals for ESAA participation. These goals were as foliows:248 SE ns _ ae Fn Deleted per 5 U.S.C. 352(b} (1)
Memorandum of Understanding Reserve Management In late May, at the request of AFSAC/INX, ESAA began an in-depth review of its dedicated reserve augmentation forces. The initial phase of the review identified general strengths and weak- nesses with the HUMINT portion of the AFIR program. The second phase of the review, undertaken concurrently with the annual review of ESAA OPLAN 4102, addressed the f{ntegration of ESAA's HUMINT reserves with active duty forces and emergency~essentiat civilian personne} for wartime planning purposes. he third part of the review, slated for completion following coordination of part two, was to cite ESAA‘s recommendations on specific wartime augmentation requirements 250 Wartime Planning Deleted per 5 U.S.C. $52(b) (1) Peleted per 5 0.8.6. 552(b) (1)
EXERCISES cises. Ouring the year, ESAA was involved with two major exer- cted per 5 U.S.C. $52¢b) (1) Der
PACIFIC SPECIAL ACTIVITIES AREA AIR FOR SPECIAL ACTIVITIES CENTER MISSEOR ORGANIZATION ofl HQ PSAA consisted of command, administration, operatfons and plans/pragrams sections, Tocated at Hickam AFB, Hawaii. There were two field units: Detachment 31 at Yokota Atr Base, Japan, and Detachment 32 at Yongsan Army Garrfson in Seoul, Korea. Det 31 had two two-manned operating locations at Camp. Zama and downtown Tokyo.25 Organizational Excellence Award ‘ In 1984, Detachment 32 was awarded the Air force Organizational Excellence Award for the second time. The award covered the period 1 February 1982 to 31 January 1984, in recogni- tion of Det 32's intelligence collection effort involving the timely reporting of information emanating from three aircrews from Communist countries who defected with their MIG aircraft, the crew of a hijacked PRC airliner, and numerous informative sources from the Middle East and Southeast Asia.258 PERSONNEL Key Personne? On 15 June 1984, Col Thomas D. Davis assumed command of the Pacific Special Activities Area, replacing Lt Col dohn F. Rexford, who had the distinction of being the first area com- mander for HUMINT activities im the USPACOM area. Lt Col Rexfard was transferred to the Defense Intelligence Agency, and Colone? Davis transferred from £UCOM/J-2, . On 29 June 1984, Lt Col Russel] Reston relinquished comand of Detachment 32 to Lt Col Thomas Lewis, who had approp- riate background experience stemming from his previous tours in Korea and COMIPAC as a Korean analyst. Lt Sal John FF. Etketbarner continued on as commander of Detachment 31.¢59 Deleted per 5 0.5.6. $52{b} (1)
270 aa Manning Strength: As of 31 December, the assigned and authorized s spgnaths were aS follows. The authorized figures are ta parenthesis: . HQ _PSAA oET 31 DET 32 Officers 4 is} 7 {16 3 (3) Enlisted 2 (3 22 (12 6 (7) Civilian 2 {2) 10 (13 1 (1 Foreign Nationals Q {0} 212 7 {7 Total 8 {11) 33 (37) V7 (38 Antizlerrorist Working Group Defense Liaison Program PLANS AND PROGRAMS PLANS ° PSAA_OPLAN 5027: The revised edition of PSAA OPLAN $027, dated 1 duly 1984, was published and disseminated. Subsequent to the publication of this revised plan, it was deemed that further Deleted per 5 U-S.6, $52(}{2)
revision would be in order to further streamline the OPLAN and to make it compatible with the current realities of the Korean environment. Consequently, a planning conference was held between Det 32/INO and HQ PSAA/INX, resulting in changes {mn the baste concept for positioning and deployment of, the wartime augmentees. TPFDL changes were to be made according ly.263 WBE Ps opi an 5000/5002: PSAA OPLAN 5000/5001, dated 1 Sep- tember 1985, was published and disseminated. As in the case of PSAA GPLAN S027, the positioning and deployment of the wartime units was under review. The basic concept for wartime operation was the manning of the Combined Milf{tary Interrogation Centers. (CMICs) and the Mobile Interrogation Teams (MITs), both involving the interrogation of captured enemy personne]. The manning of the CMICs and MiTs under the current OPLAN counted heavily on the reserve force, particularly for the linguist billets. However, the dearth of linguist personnel among both the active and reserve force, dictated that the concept for wartime interrogation had to allow for the limited availability of language qualified person- nel. EXERCISES oe TEAM SPIRIT: The TEAM SPIRIT 84 Exercise was held 14~3} March 1984 at CP Tango, CP Humphries, Pohang, Kimhae AB and Osan AB, Korea, The PSAA participants concluded the following about their roles in the exercise: {1) A good, secure means of communi- cation was absolutely essential, (2) Command and control {C2} for RUMINT was required at the ACC/A+2 level, (3) Scenario interaction was required to meet €@ requirements, (4) Role players needed training to be effective, (5) Team effort was required for produc- tive tactical interrogations, and (6} Language and interrogation capabilities needad improvement 265 GEM rou cAsLe 84: Air Force HUNINT participation in this annual joint JcS-directed, joint/combined command unconventional warfare exercise was from 2-18 November 1984. The interrogation exercises were held tn the vicinity of Camp Humphries, Korea. The following personne? augmented the Det 32 staff: ILt Blake DeVolld, HQ PSAA; Major Robert W. Brown, Vet 31; SSgt Lance Young, Wet 31; 271 Telered per 5 U.S.C. 552(b) (1)
~ Captain Joseph Chamberlain, Captain John C. Dymond, and TSgt Allen Erickson from HQ AFSAC, and all Det 32 personnel. In addition, Det 4, FID provided two observers to evaluate the mobile interro- gation team (MIT) concept in order to determine the feastbitity of. deploying Det 4 FIO personne! with the HUMINT MITs. As in the previous FOAL EAGLE Exercise, this field exer~ cise concerned real world-type information, with interrogators as- suming the role of the enemy, and the interrogatees testing their training and capabilities to resfst interrogations. Non-Air Force participating personne] were from the $24¢h MIB, 142 MIL BA; 3 MAROIY, 6546 AISU {ROKAF), and 163 AIU (ROKA). Oet 32 conducted a three-day interrogation seminar just prior to the exercise in order to familiarize a1] participants with procedures and interrogation methods to be used during the exercises.20/ - COPE THUNDER: HSgt Rand Gallagher, Det 31, participated in t THUNDER from 7-21 September 1984 at Clark AF8, Phitippines, This exercise centered around the training of aircrews flying against Communist tactics and weapons systems. MSgt Gallagher participated in. the briefing and debriefing portton of the exercise for the purpose of evaluating the feastbility of continued future participation as a means of training PSAA personne! for their wartime duties .268
GR scarco (LEFT TO RIGIT) = COLQWEL TOM DAVIS. PSAA/CC re e: Signate}; LT. COL, JOHN REXFORD, /CO (incumbent); COLONEL MICK -YANKOWSKI, AFSAC/CC; LT. OL. JOHN KIEHM, ESAA/CC (Incumbent); COLONEL JOHN DOXEY, HQ AFSAC/INO (ESAA/CC Designate}; STANDING (LEFT TO RIGHT) - LT. COL. RECHARD OWEN, AFSAC/DET 21/CC; CAPTAIK RICK VILLALOBOS, AFSAC/OL-P; LY. COL. TOM LEWIS, PSAA DET 32/CC = (Besignate}; LT. COL. RUSSEL RESTON, PSAA GET 32 (incumbent}; LT. COL. JOHM EIXELBARNER, PSAA DET 31/CC; COLOMEL CHARLES PIVER, AFSAC/C¥; LT. COL. WILIAM SATE, ESAA DET 11/CC; LT, COL. RICHARD HUSEMAMK, ESAA DET 12/CC (incumbent); MAJOR MARTIN BENNETT, ESAA DET 12/CC (Designate}, MAJOR HONALO MCABEE, ESAA DET L3fCC, LT, COL. RUSSELL PARRIS, AFSAC/DET 22/CC,
273 CHAPTER VI AFIS SPECIAL STAFF HEAUQUARTERS SQUADRON SECTION PLANS, PROGRAMS, LOGISTICS BIVISION MANPOWER AND ORGANIZATION uIVISION COMPTROLLER DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE
HEADQUARTERS SQUADRON SECTION AFIS SPECIAL STAFF MISSEOR The mission of the Headquarters Squadron Section was to promote the morate, health, and welfare of AFIS personnel and maintain unit discipline and standards.1 PERSOWNEL Key Personnel fag. Carol ™. Yarc was the chief of the Headquarters Squadron Section, as well as chief of the AFIS Administrative Divisfon, in September 1984, she replaced Capt. Terrence £. Giroux as section commander, who became an assistant executive officer to the ACS/I1. Capt Giroux had also been dual-hatted as the executive officer to the AFIS vice commander. MSgt Robert S. Horne wes the first sergeant for AFIS since 24 January 1984. MSgt Charles F. Porter was Chief of Unit Administration, a position he held since 34 April 1982. SSgt Vicki t. Briggs arrived at AFIS on 10 danuary ivéd and became the NCOIC, Special Administrative Actions. Mr. iichael slevins, the ‘compound maintenance custodian, was assigned to tha section on 9 October 1984. COMMANVER ANU FIRST SERGEANT As the commander of the Headquarters Squadron Section, Major Yarc managed squadron activities and exercised general supervision over assigned enlisted personnel. The first sergeant, MSgt Horne, advised and assisted the squadron commander. They both conferred often with the senior enlisted advisor, CHSgt Gantz ler. ° In general, the duties and responsibilities of the first sergeant covered five areas: 1. Promoted welfare, morale, and health of enlisted personnel. 2. Advised and assisted the commander in maintaining discipline and standards. 3. Assisted the commander in preparing and presenting squadron training and information programs. 4. Supervised the care and upkeep of squadron buildings and grounds. 275
276 a 5. Monitored unit administration. In 1984, the commander and first sergeant were involved with the following types of situations:4 @. 1. Discharge proceedings - Concerning an airman's alleged involvement with cocaine. @ 2, Marital problems - Approximately six disputes involving six different couples. 3. isaster assistance - Help for a sergeant, spouse, and children when their trailer and van burned. 4. Hospital visits + Approximztely six visits during the year; none in a life threatening situation. S. Coordination with loca? police - Concerning an enlisted member allegedly speeding. GB 6. Notification of death - One case in 1984. 7. Orientation for newly assigned personne? + The goal of the first sergeant was to talk with each new person. ‘ a 8. Cases of indebtecness (2) and bad checks (4) - Counsefing and referrals provided. a $. Counseling for traffic tickets. 10, Involvement in the case of a possible security compromise. 11, Visits to dormitories - Occasionally done for matters of cleanliness and safety, 4 12. Attendance at NCO academy and leadership graduations or recognition ceremonies. ORDERLY ROOK 2S The specific programs and taskings for which the Orderly Room Q} was responsible were the fotlowing: Individual Newcomer Treatment and Grientation Weighted Airman Promotion System (WAPS} Weight Management Program (WMP) Leave Program
Processing Actions under the Uniform Code of Military Justice ‘i Processing Administrative Separation Actions Reporting Duty Status Changes Issue/Collect Meal Cards Schedule Annual Medical/Dental Examinations In and Out Processing Weight Management Program a The Orderly Room assumed responsibility for the weight Management Program (WM) in August 1984 to ensure that al} personnel assigned were weighed and that those who were identified as being overweight were promptly placed in the Weight Management Program through the advice of a medical practitioner, The Orderly Room prepared a monthly report to the 1947th HSG/DMPQA office updating the status of all personnel in the prograg. It also prepared 3 semi-annual report for the 1947th HSG/CCQ office on the Air Staff personnel identified during the semi-annual weigh-ins to be overweight.© WAPS Reference Material The Orderly Room acquired and distributed research materials to be used for ali promotion testing cycies. it distributed the materiais to personnel assigned to AF/IN - AFIS ~ AFSAC located at Fort Belvoir, the Pentagon, Bolling AFB, the Washington Navy Yard, and Fort Meade. It also provide: assistance to various detachments igcated in the U.S. who had difficulty obtaining study materials. Other Actions Throughout the year, the Urderly Room accomplished the following actions: ¢ - Scheduled over 1,000 examinations for personnel assigned to AF/IN ~ AFIS - AFSAC. Typed, edited, and processed Administrative Discharge packages, Article 1$s, and Letters of Reprimand. In 1984, one Administrative Discharge was approved, im accordance with AFR 39-10, Logged and processed over 2,500 leave-of-absence statements. Typed over 150 letters for 3 commanders for projected gains to AF/IN-AFIS, 277
278 PLANS, PROGRAMS ANO LOGISTICS DIVISION AFIS SPECIAL STAFF MISSION The mission of the Plans, Programs and Logistics Diviston {XP} was to unify and direct 311 command planning and programming activities toward reaching approved command goals. It also provided for logistics support to all AFIS elements in the functional areas of facilities, supply, fhost-tenant support agreements and memoranda of understanding, and all facets of Jogistics planning.9 ORGANI ZATIOH The AFIS Plans, Programs and Logistics Division (AFIS/XP} ended 1984 a significantly changed organization, because of the reorganization within the Special Staff which moved the Togistics function to the XP division, The retirement of Lt. Col. Lynn Thompson (AFIS/LG} in May 1984 Ted to the decisions to delete the Logistics Division and to form a Logistics Branch (XPL) within the Pians and Prograas Division. The two drivers from LG were assigned to AFIS/DA along with the responsibitity for the comnanc wehicles; the two remaining 4G positions” (captain and master Sergeant) were transferred to AFIS/xP.10 Asked why the LG was merged with XP, Col. William B. Sherman, the AFIS vice commander, answered the following: 4! I think that General Bissell wanted to build or push for an AFIS buitding at Bolling, and he wanted Lt. Col, Thompson to run that. Lt. Col. Thompson made G-6 and decided to retire. The building impetus then went away when General Sissel! went to the GIA. It was about a ten million dollar project, and the money, planning, and everything else just didn't get off the ground. I looked at LG and realized consolidation saved a space. In other words, have a good captain, logistictan {Captain Amond right now}, who can work the MOUs, procurement, the logistic situations for the command, and do it under XP, As a matter of fact, most of the classical work LG did was logistics plans. ove the captain in under Plans, and that eliminates the requirement for an LG per se, and so you Save one space. That's basically why | did that. Sergeant Howard, who is leaving, is the Tast of the legisticians besides the captain. 1 reconvsended to Colonel Swain, that instead of having another logistician down there, change the
AFSC that enlisted piliet to a supply AFSC and put ail that under the Plans people. It fits under Plans as well as being a separate logistics outfit. Two people here and three people there {is not really the most effective way to use manpower. As of December, the division consisted of a Plans Branch {XPX}, Programming ranch {XPP}, and Logistics Branch {XPL}. PERSONNEL Key Personne! Lt. Col, Alden &. Guy continued as the chief of the division, The position of chier of the Plans Sranch was vacant until 26 February 19384, when Mr. dames A. Beck reported for duty. In May, the chief of the Programs Branch, Carlice A. Bourassa, departec for a new position in AFIS/INU. Her replacement, Mr. Anthony d, Amato, was selected 18 September 1964, but he was not expected to report for duty until January 1985. The chief's position for the Logistics dranch was vacant until October when Captain Thomas Amond arrived from Eglin AFB. +> Manning Strength As of 31 December 1984, the division was manned as follows: AUTHORIZED = ASSIGNED PERCERT OFFICERS 2 2 100% ENLISTED 1 l 100% CIVILIAR 5 . 4 80% TOTAL 8 7 88% *The vacant civilian position was filled, but the individual was awaiting security clearance. PROGRAMMING @ The significant projects of the Programming Branch were primartly the General Defense intelligence Proposed Program (GIDPP}, the AFIS Program Objective Memorandum (POM), the implementation of HQ USAF Program Action Directive (PAY) 84-1, and the consolidation of requirements for these programs from a1} AFIS organizations. The preparation of these projects was difficult since the position of chief of the Programs Branch was vacant 2 279
good part of the year. Mr. Back from the Plaps Branch took on these projects, assisted by Mrs. Juanita Taylor.14 General Defense Intelligence Program danuary 1984 was one of XP's busiest months for preparing the initiatives for the FY86-99 General Defense Inteltigence Program, which included meetings of the GOIPP working group on 20 danuary and the directors level meeting on 27 January. mn 27 January, the command ranking of AFIS initiatives was forwarded to AF/INYR, The GOIPP tist applied only to AFIS Program 3 activities.i5 In May, AFIS was informed of how AFIS initiatives were ranked in the FY86 Air Force GDIPP submitted by AF/INYR to the Defense Intetligence Agency. The doller amounts, manpower numbers, and/or titles for some initiatives on the list were different from what AFIS submitted to INYR, because changes occurred during reviews by the Program Element Monitors (PEMs}, Program Review Group (PRG), and the ACS/i,16 Deleted per 5 U.5.C. 352{b) (1)
Onl ‘November 1984, the DIFP cycle began again 38 the commander issued the FY87-9i GDIP data call. USAF PAD 84-1 AFIS vice ° ey Ouring the Yatter part of the year, AFIS/XP expended much time and energy in responding to USAF Frogram Action Sirective (PAD) 84-1, published il April 1984. The objectives of the PAO were the follawing:29 Identify the actions and assign planning responsibili- ties to implement the integrated management of information systems dual-natted under AFCC throughout the Air Force and accomplish the fallowing actions: a. Integrate comuunications-electronics and data automation staffs at each MAJCOM, SOA and ORU to form peleted per $ U.S.C, 552(d)(1)
282 Deputy Chiefs ./ Staff (or equivalent for SOAs/DRUs} tor Information Syv tems. b. Assign resp iasibilities for the acquisition and tecanical manigstem, of office automation systems and the Information Aaquiromants Management Control] Office {IRMLO) to the Dervoty Chiefs of Staff (or equivalent) for Information Systems. c. Integrate data processing and telecommuni- cations activities at base level, with specific emphasis on integrating date processing installations (DPIs} and telecommunications centers (TECs}, Background & The issuance of PAD @4-1 occurred because during the late T570s and early 1980s technology wildly proliferated in two prime areas: data automation and telecommunications. As bath areas moved to take advantage of the increases in capabilities, the lines of demarcation among computers that communicated, communications devices with an fnnate computing function, and office automation equipment were blurred. In January 1982 the assistant vice chief of staff directed a review of Air Force information management needs. The review included a look at: the explosive growth of information technology; the need to attract and retain skilled pedple; regulatery and economic changes; the need for an information architecture; organizational structures; and functional relationships. The study conciuded that technological advances and other factors made it more difficult to conduct “business as usual” in Air Force information systems. As a result of this study, the chief of staff directed the integration of communications and automation throughout the Air Force. As the initial step, the Air Staff was reorganized on 1 June 1983 and a new assistant chiefeof staff for information systems {AF/SI} was formed to provide a Management structure to better address the integration.2 Tasking in PAD g4~1 AF/IN and AFIS planners were particularly interested in the PAD's, tasking for major commands and special operating agencies: Prepare plans in conjunction with HQ AFCC to integrate communications and automation staffs into a deputy chief of staff for Information Systems (or equivalent for SGAs/DRUs} which is dual-hatted under AFCO and operationally controlled by the host MAJCOM/SO4/DRU
commander. The plan showld also provide for integration ~ of communications and data automation at at] levels and identify those  MAJCOM/SOA/ORU-unique systems and organizations that will not be managed under the dual- hat structure. Under the “constraints* section of the pian, regarding @ point “intelligence systems” was made: “National Foreign Intelligence Program {NFIP) resources will continue to be worked under the purview of the Air Force NFIP Program Manager.“ peleted per 5 U,5.08 §32¢b) CQ) Tasking for AFIS GD G10 october 1964, the ACS/I BACS/T, who was also the AFIS commander, contact AFCC and begin to design therefore directed the to have AFIS planners _ a8 information systems organization which satisfied the requirements of PAD 84-i and provided effective support for AFIS. The proposed organizational structure was to be consistent with AFIS's unigue managerial and procedural arrangements with AF/IN and the national intelligence comaunity. The ACS/I noted that issues had to be addressed soon to ensure thdt the AFIS PAL implementation plan was submitted to
284 HQ USAF in danuary 1985, as required by the PAD. The ACS/1 concluded by stating, “Please keep us advised on the results of your discussions with AFCC. A staff assistance visit to AFIS will be conducted by AF/INY when a draft implamentation pian has been developed, The final plan should be forwarded to AF/IN for approval before forwarding to AF/SI.°27 Working Group GRD on 12 octover 1934, the AFIS PAD 84-1 working Group met. The six members requested by AFIS/XP included representatives from AFIS/IND, AFIS/INS, AFIS/BA, AFIS/MO, AFIS/DP, and AFIS/AC. Mr, Beck of AFIS/XP chaired the group. Some of the {ssues the group had to address were the following:28 What specific functions within AFIS could be affected? Does AFIS possess sufficiert uniqueness to pursue exception to the PAO? Should the AFIS system fall under the dual hat concept? If AFIS participates in the integration process, what organizations and functional actions should issue? what should we cell the function? ‘ Initial Concepts After two sessions, in which all command functions were reviewed for applicability to the scope of the program, the working group identified the following concepts: Concept & 1. Reorganize the Directorate of Intelligence Data fianagement {IND} to provide incr@ased responsibilities to AFIS' information systems requirements. (Enc ludes data automation, communications and ABP hardware security and office automation}. 2. Redesignate the Director of fatelligence Data Management to Director of Information Systems {SI}, 3. Transfer the AFIS/INS Management Division {INSC} to the Director of Information Systems. 4. AFSAC remains unchanged as a ORU of AFIS. NOTE: The AFIS/INS member could not concur with this concept because the INSC function is primarily
changed with establishing COMINT security programs at USAF level and performing those tasks on an AF-wide scope. Tha concept would be contrary to 200 guidance. Concent & Similar to A except the integration of INSC would not be effected. Concent C An expansion of concept B whereby the function of managing the security of AD? hardware presently performed by IND would transfer to INS. NOTE: MO would prefer that INO retain its present "EN" unique designation under all concepts. The working group, recommended that AFIS adopt either concept A or C, AFCC-AFIS Meeting . The meeting between representatives of AFCC and AFIS occurred 12 December 1984. Representing AFIS were Mr. Beck, AFIS/XPX, Lt, Col. Fitch, AFIS/ING, and Maj. Young, AFIS/INS. There were six representatives from AFCC, headed by Lt. Col. Burrows, AFCC/S1P. The meeting began with it. Col. Burrows briefing the AFIS staff on the status of integrating communications and data automation at the various major commands, special operating agencies, and direct reporting units. He stated that he was well aware that AFIS had requested a waiver to the integration concept and informed the AFIS representatives that other commands such as TAC and AFOTEC had also requested waivers, put were denied.? Mr, Beck then presented the AFIS briefing to Lt. Cal. Burrows and the others from AFCC. The AFIS concept of operation presented on 12 Gecember was slightly different from the Concepts A, 8, and C developed by the AFIS working group. The 12 December concept was as follows:32 Reorganize IND to provide increased responsibilities (data automation communications and office automation). Rename {8D from Intelligence Oata Management to Intelligence Information Systems. 28
286 Transfer ADP software security presently performed in IND to the Directorate of Security and Communications Management (13). AFSAC/INX will perform subordinate command level SI functions as additional responsibility. {Ne unique designation} Retain administrative control of resources due to command uniqueness. : After Mr. Beck's briefing, the AFCC members had no questions. Lt. Col. Burrows, however, disagreed with the AFIS position of not “dual hatting” with AFCC. As expected, the AFIS Position met resistance with its idea of “command uniqueness” as a justification for not “dual hatting,” it. Col, Burrows also stated that AFIS/IND and AFIS/INS should be integrated. He stated, too, that the differences between AFCC and AFIS could sat be settied that day at the the 12 December meeting, but would have to be decided at a higher level. The resolution would be in the form of an answer to the AF/INY letter to AFIS/SIP dated 23 May 1984, whereby AF/IN originally requested the waiver for AF Is. 33 Lt. Col, Fitch of AFIS then explained each of the functions af the AFIS/ING divisions and branches. Col. Burrows at this point then stated that the mission of most of the IND divisions and branches did not necessarily fal] within the intent of PAD 84-1, except for AFIS/INDOO. He concluded by stating that in January 1985 he would be at Andrews AFB and would visit IND at Bolling AFB to see the IND function.34 According to Mr. Beck, “We concluded the meeting by agreeing that we disagreed and we would press on with the buiid of an AFIS Programming Pian implementing our concept of operation pending the outcome of our request for waiver. "5 La As of 26 Uecember 1984, AFIS was waiting for a definite answer to the AF/INY letter to AFIS/SIP, dated 23 May 1984, concerning the waiver for AFIS, based on AFIS command uniqueness. In the meantime, AFIS was preparing an AFIS Programming Plan to implement its concept of operation under PAD 84-1, 36 Review of SOXs and SO0Cs Throughout the year, the Programs Branch continued to serve as the primary function for consolidating AFIS reviews of Statements of Operational Need (SONs) and Statements of Gperational Concepts {50Cs}.  AFIS/XPP reviewed forty-six SONs, providing substantive comments to fourteen of them. Also, gyo SOCs were reviewed and commented on to the originating commands.
Other Programming Activit Other significant activity the Programming Branch was involved with during the year concerned the following: the AF/SITT draft PMD for Secure Telephone Systems Program; transfer of billets in INCH, OL-AF, OL-F, and OL-N; FY85-86 Consolidated Cryptolagic Program, individual mobilization augnentee (ima) funding and programming, and the AFIS Objective P1an.38 PLANS Eirst AFIS whe The Plans Branch continued to update all required UPLANS. The primary effort of the year was the writing of the first AFIS War and Mobilization Plan (WMP}, which consolidated the F-series plans for ali major commands supported by AFIS resources in wartime. This significant document, published 15 November 1984, was to he used by unified and specified Commands worldwide for wartime planning. The plan provided AFIS forces with guidance for deployment and employment in support of gaining major commands and supported air component commands. it also outlined the procedures for providing augmentation support of mission requirements in the event of a contingency, general war, or national emergency. Exercise Plans PRESSURE POINT 84 Un 13 January, the final report was published for Exercise PRESSURE POINT 84, @ selected procedural command post exercise sponsored by the Joint Chiefs of Staff (dCS} and conducted 16-22 Nevember 1983. AFIS and AFSAC offices participating {fn PRESSURE POIAT 64 fourd it a useful opportunity for AFIS to exercise the procedures used oy the JCS, HQ USAF, and USAF commands in a crisis situation and to evaluate AFIS crisis management procedures. In the report there were no critique items submitted for Air Staff consideration, while twelve items were submitted for intra-command consideration, 40 RIDGE RUNNER 34 On 15 March 1984, the Plans Branch published the AFIS Exercise Plan for RIDGE RUNNER 64 (AFIS EXPLAN 01-4). This pian provided guidance for U0U elements participating in the AFIS- sponsored evasion training exercise conducted 2G August - 6 September 1984, The exercise was to provide a concentrated training program for selected members of att four U.S. armed 287
288 services whose duties entailed teaching and/or briefing U.S. combat personnel on the subject of evasion or conducting basic, advanced or continuation evasion training.43 PALACE READY 84 CBB or 12 dune 1984, the AFIS Exercise Plan for PALACE READY was published. The plan provided guidance for AFIS elements participating in the Air Reserve Personne] Center's Exercise PALACE READY, conducted 23 duly through 17 August 1984, . The primary purpose of the exercise was to develop a comprehensive test of procedures and data systems supporting the modilization and deployment of United States forces in response to crisis situations to ascertain the strengths and weaknesses of the mobilization system. Involvement of AFIS staff elements in PALACE READY were designed to exercise and evaluate command procedures to simulated emergency mission requirements and to determine the adequacy of existing command plans in support of Air Force commanders .4¢ POWDER RIVER 85 Sp « 1 October 1985, the AFIS Exercise Pian for POWDER RIVER 85 was published. The plan provided guidance for AFIS elements participating in the dCS-sponsored: selected procedural command post exercise PGWDER RIVER 85, which was to be played on a twenty-four-hour_ basis beginning 15 Octob: 984 through 26 October 1984, involvement of AFIS staff elements and subordinate headquarters in PUWUER RIVER 85 was designed to exercise and evaluate command procedures in response to determine the adequacy of existing fgrmanss in support of JCS, HQ USAF, and USAF commanders worldwide. Publication of Revised AFISR 55-1 On 15 August, AFIS/XP published a revision of AFISR 55-1 (U), “AFIS Participation in MAJCOM, Unified and Specified Command, acS, and OOD Exercises.“ This regulation prescribed the basic guidance and direction for AFIS headquarters staff agencies and Subordinate units participating in DOO and OCS-directed, unified, spec ifWeR and major command sponsored exercises for the purpose of wartime and contingency training and readiness. It also assigned specific responsibilities for monitoring, coordinating, and unifying command actions which involved AFIS active duty and reserve intelligence participation in such exercises. [t applied to all AFIS activities. Releted per 5 0.5.0, $$2¢b} GQ)
Other Published Plans AFIS Concept Plan ~- AFIS Support Emergency Action Procedures On 1 duly 1984, the document for the Emergency Action Procedures (EAP) of the Air Force Intelligance Service {EAP-AFIS) was published. The document was a directive upon staff agencies, operational elements, and subordinate commands of AFIS, which, as & separate operating agency, was responsive to the Headquarters, USAF for emergency action purposes. Subordinate commands having overseas organizations were to ensure their compliance until] the organization(s) transferred operational control to the unified or Air Force theeter command, Specifically; the EAP-AFIS was published to prescribe AFIS policy and procedures ‘or: 1} identifying and implementing actions necessary to increase the AFIS readiness posture, Z} alerting key Tine and staff personne} to emergency mission requirements, end 3) establishing and activating the AFIS Alert Staff.46 Plans Reviewed GB throughout the year, AFIS/XP reviewed and commented upon plans prepared by other units. The following were some of the plans with noteworthy recommendations® E€SAK QPLAN 4102, PSAA OPLAN 5060/5001, PSAA GpLAN 5027, Air Force Intelligence Plan {AFIP), HUMINT Appendix for USCENTAF OPLAN 1002.47 FIAT Concept and Capability a In June, AFIS/XP requested that AF/INE and AF/INT review a draft letter to be sent to commanders of ali major, unified, and specified commands. The purpose of the letter was to inform commanders of an AFIS intelligence augmentation capability and the concept of its use. The letter stated the following:42 AFIS possesses a limited mini-fusion analytical intelligence team which could be used totally co? poloted per U.S.C ss2(b) (2)
290 or partially during the early stages of a war or contingency. Its primary purpose would be to augment commands which do not possess organic intelligence resources, but is available for other reasons. The team can prayide combat commanders with skilled intelligence persennal for all-source analysis to meet increased intelligence needs in a contingency or limited war environment, The functional intelligence augmentation team {FIAT} team consists of: AFSC DESCR AFSC ERADE QUANTITY Intel application Off LO8076 os 1 Cart/Geo Off 05734 04 1 Intel Targeting Off 68085 a4 1 Air Ops EW Off Gen 022754 04 1 Signals Intel Uff 08035 03 1 Image Intel Gff 08044 a2 1 Air Intelligence OFF 108054 03 1 Inte] Targeting Uff O8US6 03 i Imagery Interpr Tech 20670 £7? 1 Staff Sup Admin Tech 70270 £6 a TOTAL 10 (8 OFf/2 Eni) The letter announcing the availability of the FIATs was sent to fifteen units. Fhe response from them, however, was not enthustastic. In fact, most responses indicated that the FIATs would not be beneficia! to the commands as they were praposed. By year's end, the FIAT plan was dormant.49 On 27 Apriit i944, XP's phase narrative report was submitted on FY84 Support Farce Sizing (FORSIZE) and Wartime Manpower Planning {MAisktG}) Exercise. The MANREQ/FORSIZE exercise identified and documented the total wartime manpower force structure for in plece and deployment requirements. From the exercise, the support force availability for the War and Mobilization Plan, Yolume 3, was then used by the Air Staff for Program Objective Memorandum (POM) planning and manpower program initiatives submitted to the Uffice of the Secretary of Uefense.50 Requirements for imAs and Retired/Separated Personne} LOOK Requirements for AFIR IMAs Un 9 dune 1984, AFIS/XP requested that major commands and special operating agencies review and reconfirm 100K recall authority requirements for Air Force Intelligence Reserve (AFIR}
individual mobilization augmentees (IMAs}, who were centrally managed by AFIS,S1 Skill Usability Update In March, XP responded to a request by AF/MP to review the adequacy of estimated skill proficiency retention periods for retired or separated personne] in the event they were recalled to active duty. Comments were solicited from AFIS directorates, and generally the AFIS staff agreed with the original study and as modified by Air Training Command with exceptions. The exceptions concerned the number ef years in the retention period for some specialized AFSCs.> In April, the #Q AFIS Emergency Notification Plan was streamlined with regard to the personnel recall sequence. This occurred after a test of the Emergency Notification System on 20 march 1984 failed. Of 545 persons assigned to HQ AFIS (Pentagon, Bolling AFB, and Fort Belvoir} only 43 percent (234) were notified. 52 On 25 May, a revision of AFISR 355-2(U}, “AFIS Notification System,* was published. [ts purpose was to clarify responsibilities for establishing, monitoring, and implementing the AFIS notification system.° : LOGISTICS The Logistics Branch was formed in April when the AFIS Speciat Staff Logistics Division was absorbed into the Plans and Programs Division, The branch's major accomplishments during the year were its involvement in Project MOVE at Bolling and the Pentagon, the facilities upgrade at Fort Belvoir, and the reaccomplishmenit of support agreements 59 @ Project MOVE Project MOVE involved several organizations in the Pentagon and at Bolling AFB. The AFIS vice commander directed the move in February 1954. It involved AF/INEG, AFIS/INS, AFIS/INT, and AFIS/INC, The major part of the work involved rehabilitating the second floor of Building 520 (INC’s old facitities) for INS to occupy and part of the first floor of 520 for the INO personnel then in, Butiding 5681. The projected order of events was as follows: 1. IWC move from 2nd floor Bidg 520 to 2nd floor Bidg 1334, Bolling AFB (Accomplished) 29f
292 62 MD 2. Renaititation of ist and 2nd floors of Bldg 2] 3. INS (less AFSSU} move from Pentagon to 2nd floor Bldg 520 s 4. INEG move frou 8idg 5681 and Ist floor Bldg $20 to Pentagon 5. IND move from 2nd floor Bidg 5681 to Ist floor Bldg $20 GRP 6. INT expang into new area Ist floor Bldg 5681 The projected date for MOVE to be completed was in mid-1985. Facilities Imoravements At the AFIS headquarters, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, facilities improvements included: Installation of central air-conditioning in Suildings 1923, 1924, 1928, 1929, and 1930 Installation of new heating systems ia Butlding 1925 and 1926 Installation of electric meters on al] compound buildings Installation of carpeting in Suildings 1929, 1920, 1923, 1924, and 1925 Acquired a new 6uilding on Ft. Belvoir for AFSAC Det 23 Support Agreements The Logistics Branch during fhe year did the following concerning support agreements: Completed review of interseryice support agreement between Ft. Belyoir and Hg AFISS9 Reaccomplished Host Tenant Support Agreement between 76 ALU, Andrews AFB, and Ho AFIS for support of AFIS elements at Bolling AFBeD Reaccomplished Host Tenant Support Agreement between 2051 ABG, Kelly AFB, and AFIS/OL-N6L Started negotiation for an interservice support agreement between USA Communication Command and AFIS for communication
support Terminated memorandum of agreement between Hq AFIS and Hq ES¢6Z INSTALLATION OF WANG SYSTEM Changes in office administration services occurred with the installation of a new WANG Alliance office information processing system in the XP division, which was also shared by AFIS/MO/AC/IG, Mr. Beck and Mrs, Bourassa played & major part in the design and procurement of the system, which was to direct information precessing capability for each professional and administrative person. Mr. Beck was designated as the administrator of the complete systen and was instrumental in setting it up and maintaining it.6 293
294 MANPOWER AND ORGANIZATION DIVISION AFIS SPECIAL STAFF WESSION The Manpower and Organization Division (M0} managed comman authorizations (active and = reserve), controlled organizational structure, conducted manpower surveys, and determined manpower requirements. ORGANIZATION The HO division consisted of two branches: 1} Organization and Requirements and 2) kesources and Productivity. Ua 31 December 1984, however, the branches were dissolved, and afl authorizations were consalidated at division level. After a4 reassessment of warkioads and pending personne? changes, ft was concluged that MG could function more effectively and erficiently as an unstructured organization. PERSONKEL Key Personne} : Lt. Col. John S. Follrod continued as chief of the division, having held tne position since I6 August 1981. SMSgt William £, Emenkizer was chief of the Urganization and Requirements Branch. Sgt Arnold Lees was chief of the Resources and Productivity Branch. S$Sgt Winston C. Murphy, chief of Administration, transferred to the 2033rd Communications Squadron at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, on 1 December. SSgt Marvin Pease and SSgt kKitliam V, Miller, dr., alse were key personnel. Manning Strength @ The manning strength of the division was as fottows:67 AUTHORIZED ASSIGNED PERCENT OFF 1CER i i 100% ENLISTED 5 5 100% CIVIL IAt 0 Q uray 6 6 100%
FUNCTIONAL ACTIVITIES Regulation Published In accordance with the MU mission, the division published a revised AFISR 23-1 (U}, “Organization and Functions Air Force Intetligence Service (AFIS}," 15 February 1984. This regulation was the official summary statement (chartbook} fer the AFIS organization and furictions.68 Authorizations and Attocation Actions Extensive resource management actions enabled the diviston to accommodate AFIS‘s growing manpower authorization requirements. Two primary means of meeting those requirements were to atlocate newly approved resources and redistribute existing resources. The Air Force Special Activities Center {AFSAC} was allocated nine officers, six enlisted, and six civilians for 1986, and thirteen officers, eight enlisted, and one civilian for 1985. The Directorate of intelligence Late Management received ten new enlisted positians through the 1984 Air Force General Gefense intelligence Program {GOIPF}. diss, resources were allocated to, establish “OL-BY at the Pentagon. The purpose was to fulfill the Air Force's assigned role as the BOG executive agent and to directity influence IDEK If development. AF/IN submitted a softcopy management program initiative in the FYS5 GBIPP which was subsequently approved and funded with five officer authorizations in PE 31305, effective 1 October 1984. This action of establishing @ new operating Jocation, however, was unclearty defined, and the “operating location” status was nebulous .o% 295 S.d. S52(b}( 2} Deleted per SU,
2. The Resource Applications Group (INES} assumed responsibility for the following functions: 72 QBS zc. Heanpower, military and civilian personnel, and civilian performance appraisals b. SCI billet management c. Military and civilian training d. TOY fund management e. Custody of Morale, Welfare, and Kecreation fMRR) funds f. Contract research g- Intelligence Reserve Forces assigned to INE h, AF/Ik monitor for Rand Intelligence research programs under Project Air Force Ge i. Ike representation to the AF/IN Priorities Review Group (P83) for purposes of deliberation econ General Defense Intelligence Program GDIP) Reorganization Actions Several functional managers adapted to Shifting and increasing mission responsibilities and taskings wie reorganization. Approval and implementation of reorganizations were to provide functional managers the capability of achieving greater managerial flexibility, maximum utilization of resources, and more efficient and effective mission accomplishment. Specificatly, INOZ created a new branch entitled Executive Intelligence {INOZE}. Two officers and one enlisted person were pulled from in house resources to create this new branch. Also, the Visual Display Branch {INOZD) was reorganized, forming the Audiovisual Presentations Bivision (INUV)},73 a The AFIS Logistics Division {LG) was disbanded during April 1984 as a result of a Management Advisory Study (MAS): Logistics support was incorporated into AFIS/XP, and the new division became the Plans, Programs, and Logistics Division. Two authorizations previously used for VIP support were transferred to AFIS/DA (702304 ALC} and AFIS/CYE (76250 Sgt) .74 Deleted per 5U.S.0, 552(b} (2 }
OL-F was inactivated effective 1 October 1984. The functions and billets associated with OL-F were transferred to the Tactical Air Karfare Center (TAWL),75 AF/TREGL was disestablished effective 1 December 1984. All billets and personnel were realigned under a new function within AFIS, called the ong Kange Estimates Oivision (AFIS/ENOL) .76 Another significant reorganization action took place during May 1984 with the creation of AFIS/INOH at Ft. Belvoir. The fo} lowing data illustrates changes which became effective FY 85-1: PAS OSC FAC POSITION HR GRADE AFSC PEC ACTION FYL4 = INOH 352550 0005111 MAL (8075 31305A +1 FVL4 NOH 352550 G005132 MSE 26170 313054 = +} As a direct result of the ACS/I‘s organization study group, headed by Maj. Gen. John Patton, USAFK (Retired), a recommendation to establish a new “Assistant for Security and Communications Management” element within AF/IN was approved. This new office (AF/INS) cansisted of two billets {one 0-6 and one Q-5} and was dual-hatted to AFIS to serve as the director and deputy director of AFIS/1NS.78 . A Wanagement Headquarters drawdown levied upon AF/IN required considerable coordination on the part of AFIS/MO,79 Trying to equitably distribute the reductions and realignments and stil] meet the commitment of twelve authorizations became a major undertaking, Several alternatives were identified before a final position was determined. The fatlowing actions were considered to achieve the quota:80 a. Realign the Long Range Estimates function from AF/INEO to AFIS/INO. This was to’ reduce AF/1N strength by seven positions. This action was accomplished. b. Realign the Command Support Branch {AF /INYXS } to the AFCOS. This was to reduce AF/IN strength by five positions. The new AFCOS subdivision would report to AF/INYX and be under day-to-day operational control of the HQ USAF Directorate, Intelligence Plans and Systems (HQ USAF/INY}. The Director, INY, would be dual-hatted as deputy director, Intelligence Command Support, This action was not accomptished. After a great deal of effort, a decision was made to Stay with the existing ceiling of 160. AF/IN's headroom was reinstated after the anticipated FY&5 management headquarters 29
298 reduction failed to materialize. Because AFIS/INOL was already established, it was not disestablished. Instead, seven other positions within AFIS were transferred back to AF/IN. Manpower Studies AFIS/MO obtained an exemption from the institutionatized Rir Force Manpower Standard Development Program in 1983. MO, however, continued to conduct manpower studies directed toward establishing a credible baseline of functional requirements. The Administrative Division (DA) Manpower Study Final Report was prepared on 18 April 1984. It quantified man-hours associated . with additive workload and combined those hours with manpower earned through Air Force Manpower Standards (AFMSs} to determine total AFIS/DA manpower requirements. Que to austere manpower resource availability, the one additional authorization gained by application of this standard was carried as a deferred requirement. The standard also was used as a POM justification, A similar effort was initiated in the Directorate of Intelligence Reserve Forces (RE}. A study memorandum was signed on 3 August 1984, and ground-work ys laid for a formal measurement to be conducted during CY1985. Installation of WANG Equipnent The installation of an on-site WANG printer in mid- danuary 1984 provided more management freedom for AFIS/MO. The capability to produce hard copy documents on-site ended MJ's dependence on the facilities and equipment at Bolling and Andrews AFBs. The Wang computer system was installed during the latter part of 1984, and allowed for direct interface with AFIS/AC and AFIS/XP, which was previously accomplished through manual transactions. Manual accounting of authorizations was expected te be eliminated in the next phase of MU‘s automated data processing upgrade. 32 ¢ EXD OF Ma Sséarion
COMPTROLLER DIVISION AFIS SPECIAL STAFF MISSION The Comptroller Oivision (AFIS/AC) provided budgetary and fiscal management advisory and analytic services to the comand, staff, and directorates on policies and procedures that pertained to resource management. It also established information and financial contro} systems to assure efficient and timely management of command resources.& ORGANIZATION AND PERSONNEL Organization The division continued to consist of two branches: 1) Budget and 2) Accounting and Finance. There were also a one- man Management Analysis unit and a one-man Administration unit. Key Personne] Lt. Col. tloyd S. Garner, the AFIS comptroller, departed AFIS In April 1984 for assignment to Korea. First Lt. Terrance M. Frost, budget officer, performed as acting comptroller until July 1984, when Lt. Col. Thomas €. Burnett arrived from Norton AFB, Califarnia, to assume the AFIS comptroller position. The head of the Budget Branch was ist Lt. Frost, who was separated from active duty in October 1984.  SMSgt Michael €. Hansen accepted management duties previously performed by Lt. Frost. The new budget officer was expected to arrive in January 1985. The head of the Accounting and Finance Branch continued to be SMSgt Charles E. Sovine. . TSgt iatloss was the individuel in the Management Analysis unit until march when he was transferred to Alaska. His replacement was Sgt Bradley who received 2 humanitarian reassignment in November, SSgt Charles P. Steeno headed the Administration Unit, Manning Strength The manning strength of the division as of August 1984 was a5 follows: 299
300 AUTHORIZED ASSIGNED PERCENT OFFICERS 2 2 100% ENLISTED 5 § 100% CIVIL TANS i L 100% TOTAL 8 8 100% BUDGET Budget Activity Throughout the year, the major work-load surges of the © Sudget Branch were as follows: Financial Plan April-May Operating Budget October-December General Defense Intelligence Program (GDIP)/Program Objective Memorandum {POM} November-January Throughout the year, the branch worked on: 1) distribution of funds to twenty-one Operating Budget Account Numbers (OBANS}, and 2) execution of the budget. Highlights ‘ On 8 May 1964, the Financial Working Group met to review and coordinate the FY8S Financial Plan, The final FY8S Financia? Pian submission was forwarded to the AFIS commander, Brig. Gen, Nartin, on 10 May 1984, for his approval and signature. The approved plan was then submitted to HQ USAF/ACB on 18 May 1986.89 On 29 August, the FG reviewed the FY846 closeout, the status of FY84 O&M funds, and the investment equipment purchases from the FY84 program,86 ° CYi984 ended with the submission of the FY87 Operating Budget {08} to the Air Force on 18 December 1984.87 Financial Working Grou Some of the significant activity of the Financial Working Group {FWG} concerned the following: 2 As of danuary 1984, the Major Force Program (MFP )-3 civilian pay obligations in the FY84 O&M were lagging. As a result AFIS/AC transferred $250,002 into AFIS/INOA and AFSAC, This action was approved by the FWG members on 26 January for the following:
1, AFIS/INOQA required additional funds to precure furniture, support the CC&D contract, and upgrade light tables ($123,000). S 2. AFSAC required additional funds to support directed TDY requirements and equipment purchases. Also in January, 3 review of the MFP-9 status indicated a very Small undistributed batance from FY84 O&M funds. This was caused by the unprogrammed requirements for an AFIS film, an Intelligence Symposium, and a printing contract for the “Intelligencer” newsletter. Because of the limited flexibility of MFP-9, resource advisors were asked to closely review their program and identify any program deviations.90 Ir March, fn the FY84 3080 Investment Equipment program, AFIS had spent $136,000 except for $11,000 that was being held for price adjustments. In addition, $187,000 of the $200,000 obligation authority was spent. The balance was to be available for other requirements once the contracts were finalized. In May, a comparison of the FY84 funding with projected FY85 funding showed that the USAF budget provided AFIS with 2 FY85 “bogey” by Major Force Programs 2, 3, 8A, and 9. The Air Force bogeys for MFP-2 and MFP~3 were sufficient to fund approved programs. The Air Force bogey for MFP-8A and MFP-9 were less than current FY84 funding and did not adequately fund the baseline programs. The HQ USAF budget reduced travel funds 10 percent in MFPs & and 9 and reduced Consultant Studies and Analyses by 10 percent. The latter reduction affected the NISSTR program? In dune, the MFP~3 submission on the AFIS FY85 Financial Plan was approved. MFP~-8A and $ programs were to be reduced in FY85 because of a 10 percent reduction, in TOY funds and the withholding of man years in Civilian Pay.93 * in August, travel for MFP-3, BA, and 9 was the focus of attention. ach organization/progran was reviewed to establish needs and excess monies that could be reallocated within the respective MFPs. Members of the FWG were informed that travel orders should be prepared so they could be obligated on the accounting records by 1 September 1984, SMSgt Sovine stated that AFIS/ACF would be unable to provide travel costs in the future as done in the past, because the new Airline Guides did not show travel costs. The costs would have to be obtained from the local TRO or SATO.94 At the meeting of the Financial Working group on 24 October, there was a brief overview of the FY84 Financial Programs as of 30 September 1984. The AFIS obligation rate improved when 301
302 compared against FY84, Some programs, however, did not fully execute according to plans. Some studies and analyses and ICF planned expenditures were not finalized in time for end of year obligation. The review of FY85 requirements showed that AFIS/IND was to manage MFP~2 funding for tactical IDHS. Because of favorable funding in MFP-3, a11 initial unfunded ftems submitted by resource advisors in their FY8& FPs could be satisfied. Although AFIS had a large Management Account in MFP~3, AFIS/IND had several unprogramned requirements which exceeded the undistributed amount. Those were to be identified to HQ USAF on AFIS's initial execution . report. In MFP-84, both AFIS/INC and AFIS/INH had unfunded requirements, and resource advisors from those directorates revalidated those requirements. AFIS identified to USAF/ACB a $35,00@ shortage for the new HUMINT training authorization in PE 84733, In MFP~S, the FWG approved distribution of $50,000 for AFIS/INU travel requirements and $10,000 for AFIS/RE calculators. There were a few requirements for compound upgrade, but these were to be considered individually when the work was scheduled by the Army engineers. ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE ARF Activity The Accounting and Finance Branch provided detailed accounting follow-up for over 150 contracts for AFIS and AF/IN; sent “unding messages, letters, and AF Forms 616s to GSAs, other major commands anc special operating agencies; was a key player in the administration of the intelligence contingency fund (ICF}; was the first level of review and resolution of ICF audit reports; and was = member of the inspector general team,9 7 Highlights During January 1984, the Accounting and Finance Branch spent most of its time reviewing accounting procedures and evaluating new programs to assure the best results. The branch also began to prepare for its annual visit from the Air Force Audit agency. Quring March, the agency began its audit of the ICF accounts and did not complete its work unti] December 1984. The findings were basically administrative in nature, but required many man hours to review and correct. The findings prompted a TOY to the headquarters of the Air Force Audit Agency to discuss the procedures and regulations governing the type of findings written by the auditors. Ouring July, SMSat Sovine performed a TOY trip te review ICF procedures of ICF managers. Many hours were spent
trying to get official release of a new ICF regulation as adopted by the ICF Conference in October 1983. During December, time was spent on the ICF account to prepare for the next audit in 1985.98 bc The months of duty, August, and September were busy ones for /AC staff as they prepared for the fiscal year closeout and setting up for the new fiscal year. Contracts, military interdepartmental purchase requests, AF Forms 616, and other miscellaneous documents were reviewed for accuracy. October was spent preparing new fiscal year documents to organizations wor Idwide. 99 In November and December, the staff prepared routine accounting documents and set up new files for the DALASP and Exceptional Analyses programs, 100 COST AND MARAGEMENT AMAL YSIS Throughout the year the staff in the Cost and Management Analysts unit (ACh) were primarily involyed in the following areas: the AFIS commanders‘ Fact Sook, AF/IN TBY, AFIS Support Staff resource advisory duties, case studies, economic and cost analyses, the Economies and Efficiencies Program, and the Internal Contre? and Review Program. Beginning in vanuary the AFIS commander‘s Fact Book was updated quarteriy.. For the most part, OPK inputs were timely and the desired information provided. OPRs, as requested by ACK, also began providing narrative comments explaining trends 10 By March TSgt Bradley had completed an Intelligence Reserve Information System (IkIS} study and sent it around for coordination. The study compared the cost, the advantages, and the disadvantages of time-sharing to those of two minicomputers. The study concluded that by replacing time-sharing with minicomputers, the result would be an greual savings of between $36,000 and $64,000, and enhancement of the systems operational usefulness. Thus it was recommended that AFIS/RE obtain two minicomputers. Finally, the recommendation was approved and put into effect. In dune ACM was successful in identifying, validating, and obtaining an additional $68,000 im TDY funds from the 1947 Headquarters Support Group to support HQ AF/IN FYBd mission requirements. 30
304 ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION AFIS SPECIAL STAFF RISSION The Administrative Division {AFIS/DA} was charged with providing efficient and economic administration management systems, services, resources, and procedures which were essential tg gre operation and management of Air Force intelligence activities. Q ORGANIZATIGN Throughout 1984, the Administrative Division continued to consist of four branches: 1) Administrative Communications {DAA}, 2) Documentation Management (BAB), 3) Publications Management (DAP}, and 4) Systems Management (DAY). Within DAD there existed a Freedom of Information Act Officer (DADF} and within DAP there existed four sections: Command Publications Distribution Center {DMPO}, Publications evelopment Center (DAPE}, Forms Management Section (DAPF}, and Reprographic Section (BAPR) 104 PERSONNEL 1 Key Personnel In August 1984, (CMSgt Robert R. O'Toole, who had functioned as the chief of Administration, retired from the Air Force. His position was converted to a major‘s slot, and filled by Maj. Carol %. Yare, who had reported in during June against that slot. as of October, the branch chiefs ware as follows, TSgt Henderson A. Joseph, DAA, Ms. Susan Cooxsey, DAD, MSgt Larry K. Wallace, DAP, and TSgt Beborah 6. Groves (Bay), 408 Nanning Strenoth e As of 31 December 1984, the manning strength of the division was as follows: AUTHORIZED = ASSIGNED PERCENT OFFICER 1 i 100¢ ENLISTED 9 9 100% CIVILIAN 4 me SOK TOTAL 14 12 86%
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMUNICATIOHS Bur ing 1984, AFIS/OAA issued the following publications: 10 OA OF 182-2, Express Mail Procedures, 4 Jan 84 AFISR 100-2, Management of AFIS Telephone Services, 16 Jan 84 OA OF 100-1, Message Traffic Handing Procedures, 15 Feb 94 AFIS Sup 1/AFR 10-7, Administrative Orders, 27 Feb 84 AFIS VA 10-1, Categorical Address List, dun 84 AFIS Sup 1/AFR 10-6, AF Standard Functional Address System, 12 Oct 84 DAA spent $33,208.90 for metered mail compared to $35,481.21 in 1983. This savings of $2,272.21 was directly related to the installation of United Parcel Service {UPS) and the use of conselidated mail services. On 27 June AFIS/DAA established use of the United Parcel Service. By 15 November, this service was fully operational. From 15 November through 31 becember, DAA spent $394.82 for UPS.208 Gn 17 June, DAA started the first consolidated mail service to thirteen bases/APOs. By the end of 1984, it had expanded to thirty-one bases/APOs. On 1 Suly, BAA implemented the nine-digit ZIP + FOUR established by HQ USAF 109 During 1984, DAA processed forty-eight telephone work order requests, On 13 January, it processed requests for services from AFIS/HG/PA to move telephones from Buildings 1917 and 1926 to Building 1920. On 20 April, it received approval to jastal} four class A-«1 phone lines for AFSAC SCI facility above the AFIS maximum ellowable amount. AFIS/INH received approval to purchase six call directors and cable at a cost of 51,893. Ouring 1984, installation of underground cable was completed, DOCUMENTATION MANAGEMENT OM Function @ In 1984, with regard to the documentation management {OM} Tunction, HQ USAF eliminated the requirement to maintain statistics on documentation holdings and disposition. As of 1 January 1984, however, there were 1,023 5/12 cubic feet of documentation on hand withia AFIS and 1,455 5/12 cubic feet within Within AFIS, as of 31 December, there were forty-two offices of record. ue to personne? shortages, no staff assistance visits were made to these offices. However, twenty-one 30
306 newly submitted file plans were reviewed, brought into compliance with Air Force regulations, and approved for implementation. On 22 august, AFIS Supplement 1 ¥ AFR 12-50, Disposition of Air Force Documentation, was issued.121 Privacy Act Function As of 31 December 1984, AFIS managed 18 separate systems of record affected by the Privacy Act. Counting multiple occurrences of these Systems, AFIS maintained a total of 129 systems. The reduction in systems frow 1983 was a result of system mergers by HQ USAF,112 The folttowing statistics on the activity of the AFIS systems were reported to HQ USAF under RCS DD-A{ABAR}1379: Access Requests Received: 29 Amendment Requests Received: 0 AFISR 12-2, Automated Personnel Management System, was issued on 14 November 1984. This regulation authorized the automation, of certain Privacy Act records maintained by HQ USAF/IN and AFIS, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Function AFIS Supplement | to AFR 12-30, Air Force Freedom of Information Act Program, was issued on 24 vanuary 199g, 114 In 1984, AFIS received sixty-three requests for information under the FOIA. As of 31 Uecember, action was cofipleted on sixty-one of these requests. UA completed action on an additional two requests which were received in 1983. Statistics for the sixty-three requests are compiled below. AFIS/OA received eight appeals to dacisions to deny access. Action was completed on these plus an additional fee waiver appeal received in November 1983. These statistics were reported triannually under RCS OD-PA(TRALA}1365 to HQ USAF 115 FOIA ACTIONS (2984) Completed requests: 63 Full or part deniats issued: 30 Full releases issued: 12 Cases partly or wholly referred outside AFIS: 24 Cases converted to Privacy Act requests: 1 Cases in which no record could be located: & Cases returned for inadequate description: 2
Cases returned for proceaure vialation: 3 Cases withdrawa by the requester: 1 FOIA APPEALS ACTIONS Appeals received (1984): 8 Appeals completed: $ Access appeals upheld by the Secretary: 5 Fee waiver appeals uphe3d by the Secretary: 1 Access denials whotly reversed by AFIS: 1 Access denials partly reversed by the Secretary: 1 Access appeals withdrawn by requester: 1 PUBLICATIONS MANAGEMENT During 1984, AFIS/DAP published two Air Force regulations: i, AFR 0-15 (FOUO}, “Defense Intelligence Agency {DIA} and Spectalized USAF Intelligence Publications," 1 Novemcer 84. Tats was an index of GIA publications directed upon or of interest to the Air Force. 2. AFR 583 (u), "Standard — Intelligence Publications System,” 17 August 64. This established the Standard intelligence publications system and administrative policy and procedures, and it implemented 00D Directive 5025.10, 3 February 72.117 Guring March 1984, a special review of the Air Force 200-series publications was performed at the request of HG USAF/DAP. This review was done to provide the current status of the publications which Hq USAF/IN and AFIS were responsible for. During October 1984, one AFIS periodical was reviewed by the periodical review board. The beard recommended continued publication of AFISRP 96-1, MC&G Flyer, and the AFIS commander concurred. AFISRP 200-3, “INS-IGHT," was discontinued. The last issue was dated November 1982.2 The Bolling Air Force Base Publications Sistribution Office (PDO) became the Air Force-wide protetype for Pde automation. The automation of the AFIS Command Publications Distribution Center {CPDC) was expected to take place in June 1985. Two 2-100 computers were ordered from the Zenith Corporation by AFIS/IND, MSgt Wallace and SSgt Covington visited the Boling PDO in September to receive a briefing from the NCOIC of PDO. 307
308 Two pieces of equipment were ordered for the Reprographics Section (Bostitch Model Bronco 7 and Multigraphics Paper Cutter, Node} 2020). These acquisitions were expected to save time because reprographics personne) could perform cutting and binding work in-house. Before, the work had to be taken to the field printing plant tocated on the other side of Fort elvoir, Under RCS HAF-DAP(SARAR)8103, the Reprographics Section reported the following statistics to HQ USAF: dobs received: 932 Originals received: 8,329 Total ynits produced: 580,207 Total sheets collated: 225,398 Cast: $28,000 Under the Copier Management Program, 6,047,427 copies were reproduced at a cost of $158,071. These statistics were reported to HQ USAF/DAPR under RCS/HAF~DAP(A&Q}elo4. Guring 1984, the Publications Management 8ranch processed twenty-two AFIS regulations, three AFIS pamphlets, nine AFIS supplements, and ten AF/IN operating instructions. There was one change issued to an existing regulation, Also, there were @ight AFIS Visual Aids published of which three were new. During 1984, the Forms Management Section processed six AFIS command forms and fourteen AFIS office forms. SYSTEMS MANAGEMEAT AFR 4-3, Office Information Systems Management Program, 1 duly 1982, was superseded by AFR 700-5, Information Systems Requirement Board, 9 November 1984. FR 4-3 had required al} MAJCOM/SOA commanders to set up an Office Information Systems Management Team. UAY was responsible for setting up this team. However, the new AFR 700-5 placed this responsibility on the command systems information (SI) function, A total of 110 keyboards were on hand command-wide, Of these, 95 were owned and the remainder were rented. This was taken from the AFIS/AC Equipment Rental/Maintenance Listing dated 13 December 84 for which DAY was on distribution. It was used instead of the AFIS/DAY command inventory listing, because, in most cases, the AC listing was more current than the DAY inventory. During the year, BAY performed sixteen word processing feasibility studies on AFIS and AFSAC activities.
ISPM PUBLICATION As the Information Security Program Manager (SPM) for AFIS activities at Fort Belvoir, AFIS/DA {issued an ISPM operating instruction to clarify procedures for confirming an individual's security clearance. VEHICLE CONTROL RESPONSIBILITIES manage In March 1984, the vehicle operations program formerly by AFIS/LGT was turned over to AFIS/VA for management. The responsibilities included:i2i a, B. c. a Gooner Scheduling vehicles within AFIS Insuriag proper maintenance was accomplished in a timely manner to assure the quality of the vehicle fleet Coordinating with Vehicle Operations Branch at Andrews AFB on ail actions pertaining to the fleet of vehicles Attending meetings called by the Vehicle Operations Officer at Andrews Certifying expenditures for fuels Investigating vehicle mishaps Managing the POY parking permits for parking at the Pentagon 309
310 PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE AFIS SPECIAL STAFF MISSION The Public Affairs Office (AFIS/PA) was responsible to the commander for operating the AFIS public affairs program. This included planning for and managing the internal information, community relations, media relations, and security review programs for AFIS, 122 ; ORGANIZATION AND PERSONNEL The AFIS/PA office consisted of one person, TSgt Barry L. Bahier, who was chief of the office since 12 February 1982, FUNCTIONAL ACTIVITIES The Intelligencer During the year, TSgt Bahler continued to publish The Intelligencer, a funded Class I] Air Force newspaper, published monthly for personnel of the Air. Force Intelligence Service. The 1984 editions were the following:12 : MONTH FEATURE STORY PAGES February Directorate of Security & 12 Communications Management {INS} March Air Force Special Activities Center & (AFSAC} April Directorate of Joint Serviees Support 12 {ERU) May Air Force Spouses 4 duly AFIS Picnic 1984 12 September Comptroller Division (AC) 16 October Directorate of Intelligence 8 Reserve Forces {RE} December Directorate of Estimates (INE} 12
Because the AC5/I, Haj. Gen. Pfautz, thought that the May “OG July issues of The Intelligencer were lacking in substance, the AFIS/PA received some assistance from MSgt Nicholas £. Frasher of the AFIS vice commander's office in scheduling directorates and special offices to contribute feature articles and regular inputs. The ACS/I thought the December issue was “the best ever."124 Lied The total fiscal year 1984 costs for The Intelligencer was $21,163. The total number of copies was 8,400, resulting in 2 cost of $2.52 per copy.425 News Releases and Queries In 1984, the PA office issued thirty-five hometown news releases, up 15 percent from 1983, and twenty-four news releases, up 20 percent from 1983. There were four media queries handled and five responses to letters from the public. 126 Photographic Support For the first six months of the year, Sgt 8ahler continued to provide photographic support fox AF/IN and AFIS activities. These included photographs for The Intelligencer, awards ceremonies, and retirements. TSgt Bahler averaged two duty days per week with photographic chores 127 On 21 August, MSgt Frasher issued a letter to AF/IN, AFIS, and AFSAC activities which provided points of contact, other than the AFIS/PA, for Bhotographic support at the Pentagon, Bolling AFB, and Fort Selvoir.t2o Training Activities TSgt Bahlier was TOY from 8 danuary to 26 February 1984 to attend the Defense Information Fublic Affairs Supervisors Course, and from 19 August to 15 October, to attend a graduate course in communications at the University of Oklahoma. 311
CHAPTER VII AFIS OPERATING LOCATIOKS AT = KIRTLAND AFB, NEW MEXICO No» KELLY AFB, TEXAS ET ~ FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND F ~ €GLIN AFB, FLORIDA* 4 S - SUITLAND, MARYLAND®* Mos ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIAt* *Disestablished 1 Gctober 1984 **See AF/INY CY1984 Historical Data Record - AFf iy mmc. grag rok one.
AFIS OPERATING LOCATION AF AIR FORCE OPERATIONAL TEST CENTER KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE, NEW MEXICO MISSION a The primary mission of AFIS Operating Location AF was to provide the Air Force Gperational Test Canter (AFOTEC} . with intelligence personnel augmentation for dedicated all-source intelligence management and analytical support. The AFOTEC was a separate operating agency headquartered at Kirtland AFB, New Mexico, and was the Air Force's independent test agency responsible for testing and evaluating, under operationally realistic conditions, new systems being developed for Air Force and multiservice use. The commander of AFOTEC reported directly to the chief of staff of the Air Force.} QB subordinate functions of AFIS/OL-AF were the following:? Served as liaison between AFOTEC and other intelligence organizations to ensure ali+source intelligence support to the AFOTEC mission Assisted ta the review of threat assessments/scenarios for adequacy,* completeness and applicability & Assisted in the review of Threat Environment Descriptions (TE0s) for currency and completeness ¢ a. Identified needs and recommend intelligence support or Ec d Assisted AFUTEC in maintaining a collateral intelligence Tiorary by identifying appropriate intelligence publications ORGANIZATION AND MANPOWER . The OL-AF was a smal} unit, consisting of three authorized and assigned officers. Lt. Col. Donald N. Walker was the chief, a position he held since 31 March 1981. Also on the staff were Maj. Richard A. Puseman and Capt. Wolfgang Kuhn. ACTIVITIES Space Intelligence Conference On 12-34 June 1984, AFIS OL-AF hosted the fourth semi- annual Space Intelligence Conference. Attendees represented the intelligence community, the Gefense Intelligence Agency, the chief of Naval Gperations, and yarious Air Force commands. The attendees presented briefings for two days and received briefings 315
316 from AFOTEC, the Air Force Weapons Laboratory, and the Air Force Space Technology Center on various space systems acquistion efforts and required intelligence support. The conference was an opportunity to present the AFOTEC mission and requirements to space intelligence analysts.4 Systems Command Df Conference On 30-31 Gctober, Lt. Col, Walker and Major Puseman attended the 1984 Systems Comnand DI Conference, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio. Several topics of concern to AFIS/OL~-AF were discussed, including the AFIS/OL-AF “Threat Document” proposal. For the jatter, however, there were no volunteers to maintain or update the status of TARS/TEDS on a continuing basis. Sy the end of December, Space Division and AFSC/INA sent. comments. At the end of the year this project was still pending.> The two OL-AF representatives at the 0! Conference also established several points of contact with personne? at the Foretgn Technology Division for ongoing AFOTEC projects. They reported that the conference was an excellent forum for working threat issues and relaying AFUTEC'S requirements to the rest of the intelligence community. Special Briefing - Intelligence and Acauisitian Process On 31 May, Col. Peter McFarlane, AF/INEG visited AFIS/OL-AF and briefed the AFOTEC commander and staff on the role of intelligence in the acquisition process. The commander strongly endorsed the briefing’s theme and urged his staff to assist in ensuring that validated intelligence was used for testing. The OL-AF personnel thought the briefing was beneficial in helping them perform their intelligence mission successfully./ Briefings for AFOTEC Commanders Monthly Intelligence Briefing bid At the request of Major General Phillips, the commander of AFOTEC, AFIS/OL-AF was to present monthly current intelligence briefings to AFQTEC personnel. Captain Kuhn presented the first briefing on 24 August 1934. Sriefings were scheduled for tha last week of each month through the end of the year, The general‘s schedule, however, sometime prevented the briefings from occurring on a regular and uninterrupted basis. Laser Threat 8riefing In November, Capt. Gavid Miller, AF/INET, presented @ Soviet Battlefield Laser Threat briefing to the AFUTEC commander
and staff. The briefing was in response to AFOTEC concerns on the laser threat to new weapons systems undergoing development or testing.? PROJECTS Throughout the year, AFIS/OL-F worked on or assisted with @ variety of research projects, some continuing from 1983, some being completed in 1984, and some continuing on to 1985. The following are some of the significant projects. Threat Matrix for GWEN In January 1984, OL-AF assisted with the preparation of a threat matrix for use in Ground Wave Emergency Network (GWEN) operatione! test and evaluation planning. The matrix was submitted to AF/Im and approved for the Operational Test Center's use for planning purposes. 40 Man in Space 8riefing Also in January, QL-AF arranged for personnel from the Aerospace Medical Division te present a “Man in Space” briefing to over one hundred members of the AFUTEC staff. Because the AFOTEC commander and vice commander were TDY during the briefing, OL~AF staff prepared and presented a back brief for them.) TADS Study AFUTEC's XPQ office requested assistance from AFIS/OL-AF with an Integrated Air Defense System {IAUS) study. OL-AF was asked to determine the amount of available information on a specific threat system for a division slice of a combined arms army. OL-AF was asked to identify names, functions, relationships, critical modes, equipment, and functional descriptions. 8y March, OL~AF had ordered some documents which were relevant to the AFOTEC questions, but was stiil working to assemble a bibliography. In November, OL-AF reviewed and coordinated on an AFOTEC statement of need {SON) for an IA0S simulator and other related test range improvement requirements, A draft copy was sent to AF/INEG for review of the threat information prior to submission by AFOTEC. Threat documents used in the SON preparation were also reviewed and the bibliography approved. MCE Subtask Support in dune, the BOM Corporation contracted to adapt and test a digital model for initial operational test and evaluation of Modular Control] Equipment (MCE) in a control and reporting
318 center configuration. Modeling was required due to the unavailability of equipment in time for field testing. intelligence support requirements inciuded: 1} review of proposed BDM scenario, 2} review of Mark XV scenarios as a possible Substitute, 3} review of the Elnctronie Systems Division {AFSC/ESO) document used for COMFY CHALLENGE 23 In duty, OL-AF representatives held several meetings and discussions with AFOTEC test managers and BOM representatives to discuss threat requirements and to update BDM on current decuments available. The following month, Captain Kuhn attended a meeting at BOM to review the scenario. OL+AF was concerned with some of- the assumptions made by 80M and the use of “generic’ threat systems, Captain Kuhn scheduled another meeting with BDM to discuss specific objections, and OL-AF prepared for AFQTEC/XP to document OL-AF concerns. The letter also was sent to AFOTEC/QAYC and TEK. As of September, GL-AF thought that AFOTEC was to reconsider the desirability of or at least the method of modeling for MCE. White AF/IN and OL-AF approval of the scenario was not required, AFOTEC still desired a realistic scenario. OL-AF's objections were taken into account, a new and more acceptabie scenario was Submitted, and the project was closed in November. MSG Support ‘ In July, AFOTEC/OASD requested answers to Mobile Ground System (MGS) threat questions. AF/IN was asked to update threat estimates against deployed mobile ground terminals in light of recent changes in the deployment strategy, such as changes tn time between moves and no camouflage. In September OL-AF responded to questions regarding the physical threat to Defense Support Programs’ (DSP) Mobile Ground Systems. Also, a threat matrix was prepared and sent to AF/IN for approval. By September, AFOTEC had no more questions, sa OL-AF considered the project over 15 in November, AFOTEC/OA initi#ted a new project on MSG. AFOTEC requested coordination on subtask statements for the 80M Corporation and the G&G Corporation to perform various portions of MGS location uncertainty testing. ObL-AF did not concur with the subtask statements, because it believed requirements could be filled using Department of Defense resources without utilizing contracters. In December, Captain Kuhn visited the Ft. Huachuca Electronic Systems Proving Ground and Bell Technical Operations, Tucson, Arizona, for discussion concerning OSP MGS location uncertainty testing. He learned that the Army could provide testing support for considerably less money than the contractor's proposal. At the end of december, OL-AF and AFOTEC were evaluating the best approach, 16
PLSS Jammer /S4M Data sad In Aprit, OL-AF supported AFOTEC/TEW by obtaining a detailed broadband jamming threat package to be used im initia? operational test and evaluation (OT&E} of Precision Location Strike system {PLSS). Meetings were scheduled between AFOTEC test managers and FTD analysts to clear up problem areas arising during OTLE planning. OL-AF set up methods for AFOTEC and the PLSS Special Products Office (SPO) to receive intelligence products directly from the Strategic Air Command to support test planning activities. In August, APOTEC/TEW was beginning to receive the intelligence products, and OL-AF was monitoring to determine if the PLSS requirements were being satisfied. By the end of September, the PLSS Jamner/SAM Data had been passed to the PLSS SPG, and OL-AF closed out the project.1? Review of IFFN TOPs GB In August, OL-AF reviewed the Test Plan Outlines (TUPs} for the Joint Test of Identification, Friend. Foe, or keutral {IFFN} and doint Test of €3 Countermeasures, and it provided AF/TNYW concurrence with the plan as written. STIDS Threat Support In January, the AFOTEC office of primary responsibility (QPR) for the Joint Tactical Information Distribution System {JT1OS} notified OL-AF that the OPR intended to use Radioelectronic Vulnerability Analysis (RVAN) methodology during testing. This involved attempting to interfere with the system based upon the OPR's knowledge of it. In February, the project was placed on “hold" pending discussions between the AFOTEC staff and AFIS/QL-AF to determine what the “real” intelligence requirements were in light of this new strategy. @ The &VAN methodology required intense coordination efforts on the part of QL-AF and AFIS/INEG to ensure realistic scenario efforts on the part of OL-AF and AFIS/INEG to ensure realistic scenario and threat data development. They both closely monitored JTIDS OT&E efforts to ensure that accurate threat information was available as needed. Information was provided to AFOTEC/XP on the hardness and facilities of several RED airfields, This project also required extensive research and detailed answers and was satisfied after a trip to Lowry AFB, Colorade, and subsequent research at the Armed Forces Air Intelligence Training Center Library.<0 in October, OL-AF received a request to validate projected aggressor tactics for an upcoming portion of a JTIOS vis
320 test, Information was to be provided $9 INéG with follow-up formal request for approval of actual data.¢ Also, Major Puseman attended the JTIOS Electronic Warfare Subgroup meeting at Eglin AF8, 29 November. The prime thrust of the meeting was to seek agreement on threat scenarios to be submitted for Army and Air Force approvai. By the end of the year, all AFOTEC/UA threat scenario questions were informally answered. The formal response was to be incorporated with the AF/INEG response to the MITRE scenario. The test community was to have inputs in time for the test planning working group to meet in late January.22 JIFP Evatuations S With regard to the doint Tactical Fusion Program (JTFP), the Ft. Hood LOCE Test Teem training was completed in February. The evaluation in Europe was to be done in two phases: 1) using the Army's Tactical Simulation to emulate system loading during ¢@ crisis period or war and 2) evaluate real world peacetime operations. The remote terminal for the Tactical Simulation was ta be in place prior to the test in support of European Spring exercises. In March, Major Puseman went to Ramstein Air Base, Germany, aS a member of the AFOTEC JTFP Test Team. Buring the OTRE effort, he monitored operations at the Ramstein AB Combat Operations Intelligence Center. Phase 1 OT&E objectives were Vimited because of problems with the Army's Tactical Simulator which was being used to generate scenario inputs. The majority of Phase II goals were met, with several equipment and operational improvements suggested by the exercise participants. The final detailed report was to be published in dune or duly, and no further AFIS support was needed. 23 Computer System Security OT8E In May, OL-AF provided the appropriate AFOTEC office of primary responsibility all avatiable threat data found and the DIA manual describing test pian requirements for computer system security OT8E. As of May, al} available information had been passed to AFOTEC end the project closed.@4 SAM Operator Tactics In January, OL-AF received a request for SAM operator tactics, and QL-AF sent a message to another AFIS operating lecation, OL-N, requesting the information, specific, SAM operating tactics and operating procedures during an antiradiation missile {ARM} attack. The project was more involved than initially anticipated, but the requested information seemed to be available and OL-N and OL-AF were working on ft through February.
By May, the data provided was helpful, but aot sufficient. By the end of the year, the AFIS/OL~N package nad been sent, and the project was pending.2> Support for Simulator Requirements In February, AFOTEC/XPQ requested that OL-AF provide definition support for simulator requirements, specifically, information on production, deployment, function, and numbers for three specific threat systems in support of simlator requirements. In March, AFOTEC was preparing a statement of need (SON) for the range improvement program and desired threat information which OL+AF was working. In October, OL-AF personne? discussed tasking with FTO/SOER and FTO/TQC and ordered a current €3 document which provided some of AFOTEC requested information, but the remaining requirements were not expected to be known until comprehensive discussions between AFIS QL-AF and AFOTEC/XPQ were held and available data reviewed. [in December, OL-AF was still anaitigg the C3 document from FTO and the whole project was on- going. @! TR GBU Support ? In September, GL-AF began working on a project on Infra Red (ik} Guided Bomb Unit {GBU}-15 support. The test director requested assistance in evaluating intelligence support materials he was using in a test. In November, Major Puseman held lengthy discussions with testers at Eglin AFB concerning overall! GBU-15 requirements and information availability. Answers to the test team were critical inputs to the final report and were expected to affect production decisions. In Gecember, Major Puseman talked with several analysts and project officers during a trip to Washington, DC. Several test team questions were answered and points of contact sstabijsned. A few areas of concern remained unanswered at year's end. 2 321 Related per 5 U.S.C. $52(b} (1)
322 Documents for AFGTEC/QAH In November, it. Col, Luciani of the newly formed AEROMED Life Support Systems Division (AFOTEC/OAH}) established contact with OL-AF so his division could receive current information on developments in the medical field. OL-AF talked with FID/TQTR, which agreed to screen all related documents and send appropriate information to AFOTEC. At the end of December, OL-AF had received a listing of documents AFOTEC/OAH required for its reference library. OL-AF coordinated with AFWL on the list, because some documents required SSO handling.  OL-AF was stilt awaiting the listing of specific subject areas for FID screening.2 Laser Parameters Request In August, OL-AF requested that FTU provide parametric data for various lasers for low Level Laser Guided Bomb (LLLGB) vulnerability study. 710 responded quickly and completely, and GL-AF was able to close out the project.20 IR Maverick OT&& Support Ld In February, OL-AF provided support for scenaric development for the Infra Red (1R} Maverick Air-to-Ground Missile {ASM)+65 final operational test and evaluation effort. AFOTEC required scenarios based on real target area terrain features. Extensive coordination between OL-AF, AFOTEC, and AF/INEG resulted in enough detat? to satisfy AFUTEC requirements. 31 Throughout the year, OL-AF assisted with and waited for the final publication of lessons learned in Grenada in 1983. The Army had the required information. in Gecember, the report was undergoing final review before distribution. 32 @
AFIS OPERATING LOCATION N AER FORCE ELECTRONIC WARFARE CENTER KELLY AIR FORCE BASE, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS MISSION By direction of the assistant chief of staff for intelligence (ACS/1), AFIS Operating Location (O0L} NN. was responsible for the following:3 1. Ensuring that intelligence collection requirements regarding Communist doctrine, concepts, tactics, and techniques for electronic countermeasures (ECM) were current, complete, and filed with the appropriate agency. 2. Acquiring, analyzing, and assessing current and projected Communist ECM doctrine and tactics and the capabilities to apply the doctrine and tactics 3. Evaluating the projected deployment and employment of fnew or modified Communist ECM systems to determine the threat to U.S. systems under development or currently in the field. : @ 4, Producing finished intelligence scenarios and astimates soncerning current and projected Communist £CM doctrine and tactics. 5. Providing management assistance to producers and users of the USAF Electronic Combat Intelligence Support Vata Base and to agencies involved in development and operation of reprogrammable EC equipment. OL-N developed products such as threat assessments, scenarios, analyses, and estimates from all-sourcé’ data regarding Communist ECM tactics, doctrine, concepts of operation, deployment and employment techniques, technical characteristics, capabilities for electronic counter-countermeasures (ECCM}, and related command and control systems. Functional Statement GH The AFIS/OL-N operated in association with the Air Force Electronic Warfare Center (AFEWC), a direct reporting unit of the Electronic Security Command, collocated with the command's headquarters at Kelly AFB, San Antonio, Texas. The AFEWC provided electronic warfare analysis and support to Air Force elements. In 323
324 gonjunct ign with AFEW! the OL-N functional statement was as follows: 3 1, QL-N provided intelligence personne? for dedicated all-source intelligence management and analytical support to the AFEWC's electronic warfare (EWN) mission. 2. Ol-N insured that information from operational documentation reports having direct impact on both Air Force and Oepartment of Defense intelligence positions were provided to the appropriate agencies within the intelligence comunity. it acted as the AFEWC's liaison unit with the military services and 00D and national intelligence organizations, 3. OL-N identified needs and provided preliminary documentation to support decompartmenta! action of intelligence data to be released in support of AFEWC EW activities and responsibilities, In support of the AFEWC *EW Flagging" concept, it initiated any follow-up actions required to confirm threat/parametric changes. GRD 4. O1-N establishes and maintained procedures for resolution of critical intelligence issues which affected the AFEWS mission, In conjunction with the AFEWC Threat System Division, it maintained a library of EW related threat information and performed other EW intelligence support activities as required by the Air Force Intelligence Service. ORGAHIZATION AND PERSONNEL AFIS/OL-N continued to function with two primary divisions: Threat Analysis Division and the Electronic Combat Intelligence Programs Division. There was also an Administrative Division within the organizational struéture.3> As of 31 December 1984, the manning strength of OL-N was as follows:3 AUTHORIZED ASSIGNED PERCENT OFFICERS 10 Mu 2LOx ENLISTED 5 5 100% CIVILIANS 4 4 iooz TOTAL ig 20 105%
325 aS The key personnel for 1984 were as foTlows:37 POSITION HAME AND) RANK FROM To Chief Col. Clinton M. Glenny 15 Aug 81 i Aug 84 Chief Col. Phitip 0. Carison 27 Jul 84 to present Deputy Chief Lt. Col, Wayne D. Hardell 16 May 79 to present Chief, EX Mai. David P. Enloe 28 May 82 te present Threat Analysis Oivision Chief, EC faz. Ear} A, Webb 1 Qet 80 to present Intelligence Programs Division THREAT ANALYSIS Qi The Threat «Analysis Division provided tailored intelligence assessments and information in support of the Air Force Electronic Warfare Center her major efforts include Deleted per 5 U.S.C. 352(b) (2) Support to the program. GMM The following _ information presents a select cross section of he SIS projects the Threat Analysis Division completed in 1984. CD ccusne evaluation for the F/EF/FB-11L AFIS OL-N prepared a study of Soviet Surface to Air Missiles {SAMs}, Airborne Interceptors {Als} and Self Propelled Antiaircraft Artillery {SPAA} thre: to the EF /F/F8~11i paleted per 5 U.S.C. 3520) ()
326 QL-N derived its information from numerous OIA and FID documents and some FID initial system assessments. This project was tasked by AFEWC/SA for HG USAF /RDP/RDQ, 40 Threat to Airborne Radar Jamming System cf additional tasking was to provide them a depiction of Soviet employment/deployment of weapons across a aid front“ gay Parametric Data for Selected Threat Systems Analys Division provided selected Soviet Threat various parametric data on systems. Soviet Groundbased Jammers In the spring OL-N was giver a copy of an in-house groundbased Jammer document produced by ESC as a quick reference, for their analysts. Upon mutual agreement with ESC, the Threat Analysis Division reviewed and wrote the document again using Air Force/DIA validated information, citing sources used. The document was revised by the division to contain accurate and current sources. AFIS OL-N provided a copy to ESC for their use. 43 Airborne Electronic Warfare Within Soviet Frontal FAS AFIS” GL-N provided draft copies of this document to HQ USAF/INEG/INW and FTD/SBEC on 27 duly 1984. Comments were recefved from FID in the form of a corrected draft copy of the document in latesOctober, and comments from HQ USAF/INEG were received in mid-November. The document was to he revised in accordance with written and verbal comments. AFEWC Technical Review Board Mrs. Emma L. Luke became a permanent member of the Air Force Electronic Warfare Center's Tecanical Review Board (TR8}, composed of the deputy director AFEWC/SA (TRB chairman), senior representatives of AFEWC/C3, ES, and EW, the AFEWC/SA division chief, and an AFIS OL-N representative. This board reviewed and approved approaches to studies and analytic tasks, validated the methodology used, and coordinated the final report.4> Delered pet 5 U.S.C. $520} (2)
RD Electronic Combat (EC) Equipment Capabilities This AFEWC Study, DH 1-84," was an ongoing project that provided a qualitative, repeatable process for assessing the electronic combat (EC} capability of Air Force assets. AFIS OL~N provided detailed, valid data concerning Soviet land and air threats in the radio frequency (RF) and infrared {IR} ranges. Future analysis included work on communications, command and contro} counter-measures (C3CM) degradation, support jamying, and naval and Third World operations, QR The major OH 1-84 taskings in 1984 were:46 Soviet Tactical Air Defense €3 This AFIS OL-N study, 85-1 was stimulated by an  AFEWC/EW (SIMVAL)} requirement for data on the Soviet Integrated Air Defense System (IAUS}. The document discussed the integration of the various elements associated with an air defense system. Emphasis was placed on the command, control, and communications equipment and links for ABA, SAM, surveillance redars, and interceptor aircraft. A letter of 17 December 1984 with Air Force concurrence and validation was sent to OL-N, Publication of 85-1 was expected to occur during the second quarter of fiscal year 1985.4 EC INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS The Electronic Combat {£C) Intelligence Programs DivisTOn was actively involved in 1) intelligence support to electronic warfare (EW) reprogramning and 2} EW and communications, command and contro] cougtermeasures {C3CM) systens development. A major effort was devoted to developing, writing, and coordinating the intelligence play in the HQ USAF-directed worldwide SERENE BYTE 84-1 Exercise, AFIS OL-N personnel went TDY to various jocations to support and control the exercise. Analysis requests generated by information contained 1m the Audit Data Base were sent to the appropriate Scientific and Technical (SaT1} Centers for analysis. The Programs Division also held analyst-to- analyst exchanges in 1984 between S&TI analysts and the MAGCOM EW 327 Dalerod per $ U.S.C. 552(b) (2) Delsted per 5 U.S.C. 3$2(b) (1)
Pay reprogramming engineers and analysts concerning the EWIR Data base and the EW reprogramming process. Finally, the Prograss Division initiated several programs to determine the applicability to EW reprogramming to systems currently being developed. The following information discusses the significant activity of the EC Intelligence Programs Division during the year.49 RB USAF Cace Support Data Base AFIS OL-N was very tnvolved in the program development of the USAF C3CM Support Data Base. The Programs Bivision worked with personne? from the 4ist Electronic Combat Squadron (ECS) on requirements they had for afi personne? to receive data base trainin hroughout the year, he division participated in various cM Support Data Base conferences and meetings in connection with the data base, the division also did the following:59 & Worked with USAF/INYW to satisfy a 41st ECS requirement for data base venus for 41st ECS — f. Attended various data base users conferences and ings. Intelligence Support to COMPASS CALL AFIS OL«N worked peleted pet 5 B.S.¢. 952(b))
2. Worked to ansure that COMPASS CALL fraining requirements were met to the satisfaction of alt concerned. i MSgt James HM. Courtois was working with HQ ESC/ADSE on a software package which would allow automatic matching of signal parameters against EWIR, with @ transfer of this information automatically into the Al Integrated Electronic Warfare System was @ joint Air Force and Navy progr, THE TNEWS program integrated electronic warfare system designed to produce an or combat aircraft of the . for) Threat cordinating Committee was established to identify a common INEWS Threat Data Base for use in system development, AFIS OL-N was a Deleted per $ U.S.Ge $52(b) (2) ered per 5 U.S.C. 552(b){1} 4 Se
member of this committee and prcvided guidance for intelligence support.93 : GB ccm Working Grow The Electronic Counter-Counter- measures Working Group was the Air Force's focal point designed to manage ECCM enhancements for current and future USAF aircraft radars and missiles. Three subgroups were formed to address planning, engineering and fatelligence. These subgroups were chaired by AF/XUECG, AF/ROQ-1, and AF/INYW respectively. The Intelligence Subgroup (IS/ECCMWG) was the USAF focal point for intelligence support for the ECCM development and reprogramming effort. As a member of this subgroup, AFIS OL-N provided guidance for intelligence support.54 : WORLDWIDE SERENE SYTE EXERCISE all with a 55-90, “Ela nic Warfare a ss tasked the Air Force Electronic Warfare Center te conduct worldwide exercises of the process. HQ USAF/INYW/XOEO tasked AFIS ige i ences 9 these exercises provide intel iisan ave HY USAr /% ed A ma uuty 1983 ice of collateral. re i intelligence WWSBE 84-1, AFIS GL-N worked directly with the major commands and applicable unified commands developing the exercise plans and tasking. The air components exercised intelligence inputs reflecting sew EW intelligence support changes to their Oplans, Overall their inputs were greatly improved over WSBE 83-1 and were expected to contribute greatly to documen EW wartime intelligence support requirements. Pee] Deleted per § U.S.6, 352(b) {1}
his was done to more accurately exercise the war tasking process and resulted in the unified commands getting a greater understanding of their air components EW Intelligence support requirements. The coordination and tasking of the WHSBE 84-1 requirements resulted in unified commands’ efforts to develop their own EW intelligence support programs. Their air component's requirements set the baseline for these efforts.> c, he at @MMB There was considerable intelligence operations play and interface at the squadron and wing levels. Crew debriefings were improved, more complete, and provided much more data to the air component fusion celt. Most GALLANT EAGLE 84 gir component £0B data resulted from these crew debriefing reports.50 As a result of wwSBE 83, inteiligence support and reprogramming massage titles. In WWSBE 84-1, this standardization of message tities permitted the use of automated message handling equipment tp prioritize messages and warn the AFIS QL-N standardized EW intelligence or EW analyst. that immediate action had arrived. @ message needing This procedure speeded data flow since the analyst did not have to identify data by sorting through Stacks of messages .62 AFIS OL-N and AFEWC/EWO developed a computer automated capabtiity for scripting WHSSE 84-1 exercise ELINT messages. Although last minute exercise data changes did affect this program, the players praised the WWSBE 84 scripted messages as being more realistic, contributing significantiy to the exercise. Deleted per 5 U.s.c. $52¢b) (1)
AFIS OPERATING LOCATION ET ARMED FORCES MEDICAL INTELLIGENCE CENTER FORT DETRICK, MARYLAND MISSION The AFIS Operating Location ET, established in 1983, was attached to the Armed Forces Medical Intelligence Center (AFHIC), which was located at Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland, and which had the sole responsibility in the Department of Defense for the production of required general medical intelligence (GMI) and scientific and technical intelligence (S&TI). GME was that medical intelligence which resulted from the collection, evaluation, analysis, and interpretation of current foreign information on physical and  mentat heatth, sanitation, epidemiology, environmental factors, and military and civilian medical capabilities. S&7TI was that medical intelligence which resulted from the collection, evaluation, analysis and interpretation of foreign scientific and technical information, to include developments in basic end applied research including the life, biomedical, behavioral , social, and engineering science. AFHIC also administered the foreign medical material exploitation program66 ORGANIZATION AND PERSONNEL ‘ Gperating Location ET, consisted of two Air Force officers, Maj. Richard W. Bloom, clinical psychologist (AFSC 9186} and Capt. Xobert C. Downs, physicist, (AFSC 2635). They were assigned to both AFMIC ano AF/INET. 7 ACTIVITIES One of the major projects the OL-£T staff worked on during the year was the writing and coordinating of the revised draft of Air Force Regulation 200-3" “Medical Intelligence in Support of Operations, Planning, and Research." Within the reguiation, responsibilities were delineated for the ACS/I, surgeon generat, major commands, and Air Force Systems Cosmand. At year's end, the draft was still undergoing review. Clinical Psychotoay-Selected Activities @ In connection with the clinical psychology areas of research, OL-ET accomplished numerous activities during its first full year of operation. Major Sloom was involved with the following selected activities:© Po] Wrote approximately eighty medical intelligence 333
334 wires which were approved for dissemination, The topics covered military drug abuse, psychological warfare, interrogation, psychopharmacological enhancement of military performance, cosmonaut psychology, psychometric approaches to military selection, combat psychiatry, psychological analyses of politico-military decisionmaking, and deception planning and detection. Wrote a study on foreign psychological warfare for the U.S. Army's Foreign Science and Technotogy Center's Army Scientific and Technical Intelligence Bulletin (ASTIS}. - & Provided briefings to the USAF Special Operations Schoo! supporting its regular courses on psychological operations (Joint Psychological Operations Course} and crisis response management {Joint Crisis Response Management Workshop). The latter dealt with psychological phenomena affecting military and politico-military crisis behavior and techniques to shape these phenomena for optimal crisis management. @ Sriefed the deputy under secretary of defense for policy on the scientific basis - of psychological operations/warfare and applications--including counterter~ rorism--during the lst Worldwide PSYOP Conference. 4 Led an interagency working group on psychological aperations/warfare and applications to counterterrorism. Wrote a potnt paper on the working group's findings and presented it to representatives of the special advisory group of the deputy under secretary of defense for policy. Became @ member and consultant to the Director of Central Intelligence SECOM working group on behavioral sciences directed towards the human element in national security. . . . Applications included decreasing incidence and prevalence of espionage, and®involuntary and voluntary security violations, Made a presentation to the working group on these topics. Provided training and consultation to security adjudicators of AFIS/INSB and provided briefing for the recent Worldwide Meeting of USAF adjudicators. Also provided quarterly training for interagency groups of adjudicators. Proyided behavioral advice to interagency staff {NSA, OSI, FAL, CIA} fer selecting military personne! for missions of very high sensitivity affecting national security. 1 i
krote and presented the weekly USAF Medical Blackbook ta the AF/SG and staff. Co-coordinated the change in format to monthly briefings and presented several of these briefings. Briefed the AF/SG and senior staff on psychological applications to counterterrorism. Consulted for and briefed interagency groups on military deception, Provided scientific critiques and input for DOO and USAF draft Psychological Operations master plans. Provided liaison intelligence services aiding USAF medical readiness staff estimates of military medical requirements for the next twenty years. Led ati-day working group and symposium (involving FBI, SOI, USAF behavioral scientists) on Psychology of Terrorism at the annual USAF Behavioral Sciences Symposium, sponsored by the Air Training Commend, tiedical Physics-Selected Activities | OL-ET also accomplished numerous activities in connection with physics as applied to the medical intelligence Field, Captain Downs was involved with the following selected activities: /0 Presented weekly Medical ®lackbook to the Afr Force surgeon general and his senior staff from January te September 1984. Coordinated a change in format for the Blackbook to comply with SG request for monthly briefing rather than the written text. Monthly current medical intelligence briefings were presented in October, November, and December 1984. ’ 2 Authored Defense Intelligence Agancy study entitled "Biological Effects of Nonionizing Electromagnetic Radiation ~Eurasian Communist Countries (Radiowaves and Microwaves (ur his Study was a major analytical effort requiring several hundred manhours of work to complete. it analyzed foreign research on biological effects of nonionizing electromagnetic radiation (NIEMR), foreign safety standards for RIEMR exposure, end the potential for antipersonne? exploitation of NIEMR. | Was an AFMIC member of two sub-committees of the Sctentttic and Technical Intelligence Committee -~ the 335
326 Scientific and Technica} Therma Applications Group (STTAG) and the Multispectral/Laser Applications Group {MSLAG). Responded to nineteen Quick Response Tasks from various Defense Department agencies. Wrote twelve AFMIC Weekly Wire items, seven on laser applications, four on NIEMR applications, and one on space medicine. One item, entitled “Antipersenne? Laser Deptoyment (U)," generated interest among intelligence cofisumers and was used as a Current Intelligence report in the Army "Blackbook" and the Air Force “Blueline.* This item was briefed (with analyst support) to AF/INET, AF/IN, and the Air Staff. it was also briefed by the analyst to MG Lamberson (QUSDRE). Developed and presented “Antipersonnel Radiowave Threat" briefing on an expanded Uefense Intelligence Agency {DIA} speaking circuit. In addition to the five regular audiences (DIA-DT, Oefense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Hational Security Council staff, and two Pentagon staff briefings}, the briefing was also presented to: Or. Keyworth, the president's advisor on Science and Technology; the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PF1AB); the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism; the deputy commander of the U.S. Army Intelligence Agency; the commander of the U.S. Army Medical Research and Uevelopment Command; and staff personne! of the Naval Intelligence Support Command (NISC). On other occasions, the briefing was presented to the Triservice Electromagnetic Radiation Panel, the High Power Microwave Weapon Concept Definition meeting, and to staff personnel of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, the Air Force Space Command, and the Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences. Oeveloped and presented “Antipersonnel Laser Threat" briefing at the Sixth Annual Lasers on the Modern Battlefield Conference, held at Letterman Army Institute of Research, San Francisco, California. This briefing was also presented to the Triservice Meeting on Laser Bioeffects at Brooks AFE, Texas; the Triservice Meeting on Laser fye Protection for Aircrew Members at WPAFSB, Ohio; the November meeting of the doint Logistical Commanders Panel on Battlefield Lasers; and staff personnel of the U.S. Army Armament Research and Development Command, U.S. Army Detachment 0, Dla-DT5A, and the U.S. Army Environmental Hygiene Agency. Developed and presented Antipersonnel UVirected Energy Weapons Threat briefing for presentation to the
commander and staff of the Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center, the Air Force Weapons Laboratory, and the scientific advisor to the U.S. Army assistant chief of staff for intelligence. Developed and presented a briefing entitled “Survey of Programs to Enforce Microwave Safety Standards" to the annual meeting of the Bioelectromagnetics Society in Atlanta, Georgia, and to the Symposium on Electromagnetic Field Measurements for Hazard Assessment sponsored by . the Environmental Protection Agency in Las Vegas, Nevada. eB Presented a briefing on the organization and role of AFNIC to staff personnel of the Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, the Aerospace Medical Division, the Foreign Technology Division, the Air Force Space Division, the Air Force Institute of Technology, the Air Force Special Activities Center, the Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center, the Air Force Inspection and Safety Center, Headquarters Air Force Logistics Command, Headquarters Air Training Command, Headquarters Air Force Systems Command, Headquarters Air Force Space Command, the Los Alamos Force Systems Command, Weadquarters Air Force Space Intelligence Conference held at Kirtland AFB, New Mexico, in June 1984. ‘ Prepared the AFMIC input to “Nonionizing Electro- magnetic Radiation Threat Statement being written by the Los Alamos National Caboratory at the request of the U.S. Army Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center (ITAC). Prepared talking paper on Medical Facilities Intelfigence for frig. Gen. Sloan, the director of the Directorate of Medical Plans and Resources (SGHR), Office of the Surgeon General. The briefing was used at a meeting of the Air Force command surgeons general. With Major Bloom, prepared AFMIC response to AF surgeon general inquiry on AFMIC support of Air Force medica} intelligence requirements. Assisted SGHR staff in preparation of Intelligence Production Requiraments (IPRs} to formally express Air Force medical intelligence needs. At the request of Or. 8. Smith, the scientific advisor to the U.S Army assistant chief of staff for intelligence, participated in a U.S. Army Laser Threat Evaluation meeting. 2 Provided input to the Department of the Navy concerning deveiopment of laser countermeasure requirements. 337
338 Presented briefings on Air Force participation in AFMIC and on the Antipersonne! Laser Threat to participants in the third class of the course entitled "Introduction to Armed Farces Medical Intelligence.“
AFIS OPERATING LOCATION OL-F AIR FORCE TACTICAL AIR WARFARE CENTER EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA MESSION bd The primary mission of Operating Location F was tg provide ail source intelligence for electronic warfare and © countermeasures to the USAF Tactical Air Warfare Center (TAWC}, headquartered at Eglin AF8, Florida. The TAWC was responsible for all aspects of electronic combat activities and provided training and evaluation of C31 assets through Blue Flag exercises, which provided real-time C? training for battle staff personnel in realistic NATO, Korean, and Southwest Asian scenarios. AFIS OL-F worked directly for AF/IHYN and assisted the TAWC staff in the analysis and use of all-source threat data which affected the TAWC mission. AFIS OL-F ABOLESHED Effective 1 October 1984, the functions and resources of the AriS OL-F were transferred to USAFTAWC. In essence then, AFIS OL-F was ebolished.7@ The ACS/1, Major Genera! Pfautz, ‘explained the rgason for the transfer to the commander of the Tactical Air Command: 1, A 1979 Memorandum of Agreement {MOA} between AF/IN and TAC/CC established an AF/IN sponsored Electronic Warfare Operating Location (EWOL}, collocated with Taw, to augment and Support TAWC's resoonsipilities for conduct of the Air Force tactical electronic warfare missian, As provided for in the ortging} M04, the EWOL personnel were to be administratively assigned to AF/IN through AFIS until such time as release of personnel find billets to TAC may be effected. The events described below suggest that this may be an appropriate time to follow thraugh on the transfer of these assets to TAC. 2. An arbitrary manpower reduction levied against our AFIS support element and the drawdown of AF/IN‘s management headquarters, caused us to undertake numerous initiatives to free up manpower and to decentralize selected intelligence support activities. The AF/IN sponsored EWOLs are among the activities directly affected. With specific regard to the OL at fgtia, we believe ft can be abolished and the functions transferred without any degradation of mission. There are eight AFIS billets in the EWOL, plus one TAWC stot, and we propose all positions and gersornne?l trensfer to TAC for integration within the TAWC/TH staff lf you 339
3a agree, our respective staffs can work out the necessary details for an FY85 implementation. Request your comments and concurrence. In response, General ¥. £, Creech, the commander of TAC, stated the following: “4 i fully concur with your proposal to transfer assets from AFIS OL-F to the Tactical Air Warfare Center (TAWC). The OL's support cver the past five years has contributed significantly to our successes in the Tactical Electronic Warfare arena, and we look forward to the integration of this support into the TAWC Intelligence staff. As a result of TAC's concurrence, the transfer occurred as planned. With manpower considerations, AF/MPYP adjusted HAF manpower files for three officers, three enlisted, and two civilians, Seven intelligence individual mobilization augmentees, rescryists, dedicated to AFIS OL-F were also transferred onthe AFIS centrally managed file to TAC effective fiscal year 1/85./5 8 The ACS/I's organization study team, headed by Major General John Patton, USAFR (Retired), had recommended the abolition of OL-F. The Patton study stated the following: 76 VIEK OF PARENT COMMAND/COMMANDER: General Swalm, tAWC/CC, yoiced his opinion by saying he thought there should be two options concerning the future of OL- F, The first option was to leave as is; the second was to “give him the billets“ so he could ensure the function was left as is. Col. Herrman, TAWC/IN, believed the support provided by the Ol was vital, but he believed as long as he was given the billets, the Situation was workable, His primary concern, echoed by General Swalm, was that if the OL ceased to function, TAC/DP may not chop all of the biltets back to TAWC, as $o agreed in the MOA. He was also concerned about the loss of the “Washington in” with MPC, and with TAC as the new people broker, TAWC/IN would not be able to continue the type of selective manning it has enjoyed under the OL umbrella, os VIEW OF OL COMMANDER: Very proud of the work his unit accomplishes. Knows his outfit is held in high esteem and believes justly so. Acknowledges the unit does much more work for Tat and TAKC than for Air Staff. Believes function(s} should continue. Would prefer AFIS tether, but work wel? in TAWC/IN.
RECOMMENDATION: This GL should be abolished. The fufiction should remain at Eglin. When the billets are transferred to TAC, it should be strongly recomended that the biltets and function remain in toto at TAWC/IK, per the spirit of the agreement between General Creech and General Brown. 341
MISSION, ORGANIZATION, AND COMMAND AIR FORCE INTELLIGENCE SERVICE lFor a detailed statement of the AFIS mission see AFR 23-45 {U}, “Air Force Intelligence Service (AFIS}),° 10 dun 74, SO 1. tpi. 3ibid. 4aCS/1 was pronounced BKsé. 5Organization Chart (uj, Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence, AFISVA 11-2, 1 Apr 84, SD 2. 6UACS/1 was pronounced DAKSE. Briefing Paper (U}, AFIS/MG, “Manpower and Organization,“ 16 Aug &5, SO 3, Btbig. Briefing Paper (U}, AFIS/AC, “Comptroller,” 16 Aug 85, SU 4, + roid. ilitr (U), AF/IN to all AF/IN-AFIS Elements, “Air Force Intelligence Service Management Survey,” 7 feb 84, SD 5. 42ibie; Briefing (U}, taj Gen Pattan, USAF/IN(SA), 2 Nov 84. l3iriefing (U}, Haj Patton, USAF/IN(SA}, 2 Nov 84, M4statt Sumaary Sheet (U) w. 3 Atch (U), AFIS/MO to AFIS/1iNS, "Dual-Hatting of Key Security and Communications Management Positions," 20 Sep 84, SU 6. 1Sypig. l6staff Summary Sheet (U} w. 2 Atch (U), AFIS/MO to AFIS/CY et ail, “Request to Change AF/IN-AFIS Command Relationships,” 15 Nov 84, SB 7, 17-18] pig. itr (Uj, w. 2 Atch (U}, AF/IN to ATT AF/IN and AFIS Elements, “Organizational Changes to AF/IN and AFIS," 19 Woy 84, $0 8. 343
344 MISSIGR, ORGANIZATION, AND COMMAND AIR FORCE INTELLIGENCE SERVICE 208riefing Notes (U), AFIS Historian, Nov-Dec 1984. élipia. 22oral History Inty (U}, AFIS Historian w. Col. William 8. Sherman, former AFIS/CV, 23 dan 85, files of AFIS/HO. , 23i bid, 24itr (U), AFIS/INt to AFIS/CV, “aPIS-AF/TM Reorganization,” 5 Dec 84, 50 9. See also Memo (U}, ATFIS/INH to AF/IAYR, “Staff Sumaary Sheet on AF/IW Force Management," 17 dan 84, SD 10; Ltr (U}, AFIS/ENH to AFIS/CV FY&S SOA Manpower Reduction {AFIS/CY Ltr, 11 Vecember 1984}," 18 Dec 84, Su 11. 25Gra] History Intvw (U), AFIS Historian w. Col. William B. Sherman, former AFIS/CV¥, 23 Jan 85, files of AFIS/HU. See also RE's position on the FY&5 manpower cuts: Ltr (U}, AFIS/RE to AFIS/CV¥, “FY85 SUA Manpower Reduction (Your itr, 11 bec 84}," 7 Jan 85, SU 12. 26Ipid, % 276ra} History Intvw (U}, AFIS Historian w. Col, William 8. Sherman, former AFIS/CV, 23 dan &5, files of AFIS/HG. 285tatf Summary Sheet (U) w. 2 atch (U}, “Establishment of AF /IN Force Management Activity,” 20 Bec 63, SU 13. 22ncg {8}, USAF/IG to All MAGCOM/SUA/CY et a}, “Measures to Counter Terrorism {Uj)," 0316502 Feb 84, SB id; Msg (5}, USAF/INYR to ESC/XPP et at, “Physical Security (U#," 0621002 Mar 84, SD 15; Ltr (U), AFIS/CV to 1100 SPS/CC, “Kequest for Security Survey," 29 Mar 84, 50 16. 30Ltr (U) we 1 Atch {FOUC} and 1 Atch (8), AFIS/C¥ to spake “information/Physical Security Working Group,” 21 May 84, O17. 3libid. 32Ltr (FOUO), AFSAC/INXC to AFSAC/CC, "Personne? Selection Panel - SMSgt Michael F. Rusaw," 29 Jun 84, SO 18. 33Ltr {u), AFSAC/CY to AFIS/AC et al, “Security Work ing Group," 11 Gct 84, S019; Ltr (U}, AFIS/CY to Al} Fort Belvoir
MISSION, ORGANIZATION, AND COMMAND AIR FORCE INTELLIGENCE SERVICE Personnel, “Reserve Parking," 22 Oct 84, SB 20; Ltr (U), AFIS/CVE to AFSAC/CV, "Compound Security," 24 Oct 84, SB 21. 34Ltr {U), AFIS/CY to ATZA-DEH-68, “Fort Belvoir Land Utilization Study,” 22 Feb 84, Sv 22. 33ibid. SOAFISR 23-1 (U), "Organization and Functions Air Force Intelligence Service,“ Section &, 15 Feb 84, $0 23. 37Draft Hist bata Kort (U), AFIS/IG, Jan-Dec 84, SD 24, 331bid, of 2 eee, I cansmecenasiceamemunmnsnenememensnmsnae eof alee 44 Draft Hist Data Rprt (U), AFIS/IG, Jan-Dec 84, SD 24. 46 Draft Hist Data Rprt (U), AFIS/IG, dan-Dec 84, SD 24. Deleted per 3 0,.5.C. 552(b) (5)
MISSION, ORGANIZATION, AND COMMAND AIR FORCE INTELLIGENCE SERVICE 38 Graft Hist Data Rprt (U}, AFIS/IG, Jan-Dec 84, SD 24, 59Ipid, 60 Draft Hist Data Rert (U), AFIS/IG, Jan-Dec 84, SD 24. This document includes the AFIS ground accident safety summary for 1984, See also Ground Mishap and Safety Education Summary (1), AFIS/IG, dan-hov 84, SO 41. Slibid, peleted per 5 U.S.C. $52(b} (5) |
MISSION, ORGANIZATION, AND COMMAND AIR FORCE INTELLIGENCE SERVICE 62 Graft Hist Data Rprt {U}, AFIS/IG, dan-Dec @4, SD 24, S3Ltr (FOUO}, AFIS/CMS to AF/INY et al, “Senjor Enlisted Intelligence Program (SEéIP},° 6 Feb 84, SD 42. S4itr (YU), AFIS/CMS to USAF/CMS, n.s., 09 Feb 84, SD 43. SSutr (U), AFIS/CMS to AF/IN et al, “Information Items,“ 3 May 84, SO 44. S6Ltr (U}, AFIS/CMS to ACS/I, AFIS/CC, "Pacific Trip 2-28 danuary 1964," 8 Feb 86, SD 45; Ltr {U), AFIS/CMS to Col Sherman et at, “AFIS OL-F. 2 . 4% 25 Apr 84, SO 46; Ltr (Uj), AFIS/CHS to ChSgt Bobby Carter, n.s., 1 Kay 84, SO 47. Ltr (U}, AFIS/CMS to got Skorepea, “Urientation Visit to MPL {8-9 Nov 83),”" 14 fiay 84, u 4g, 87Ltr (U], AFIS/CMS to Col Sherman et al, "Finel Report,” 31 Bec 84, SD 49, 68ibid. END OF FOOTNOTES FOR CHAPTER QNE 347
348 DIRECTORATE OF OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (AFIS/ING) VAFISR 23-1 (0), “organization and Functions Air Force Intelligence Service {AFIS}," 15 Feb 84, Section S, SB 23. See also Change 1, AFISR 23-1, 15 Feb 84, SU $0. The INGA section of the AFIS History was written, in part, from the Hist Data Rprt (S/NF/WN), AFIS/INOK, Maj Robert Townsend, 4 Jan 86, SD 51, See Ltr (S/NF/HN}, INGA, Lt Col Tiernan, to AF/INES, “Directorate. CY84 story dpruts {AFIS/CV Ltr, 20 Nov 84} {Your Ltr, no datej},“ 4 an 85, 82. @Response to Inquiry (U), AFIS/MO te AFIS/HO, 16 Aug 85; Conversation (U), AFIS/Historian w. Capt. Steven Kramer, AFIS/EWOR, 16 Aug 85. Sorganization Chart (U), AFIS/INOA, on.d., SD $35 Organization (ij), AFIS/INOA, n.d., 50 54; Memo (U) w. 8 Atch (U}, G/Ine to DACS/I, “VACS/I Visit to INQA," 5 Apr 84, SD 55, Memo {Uj}, U/INE to ACS/I, n.s., 6 dan 84, SD 56; Memo (U), AFIS/IMGA to D/INE, “INC Facility,” Bldg 520, 6 Jan 84, 52 56; Memo (U}, Capt. Hutchinsan to AFIS/INOA et al, “Relocation of AFIS/INOA (building 213 ~ Information Memorandum," 1 Sep 84, SU 57. For additional documents, see the AFIS/MO segment of this CY84 AFIS History. 4itr (U), AFIS/MO to AF/INEGL, AFIS/INO, "Realignment of AF/INEGL to AFIS/INOL," 9 Noy 84, SD 58. Sutr (8), AFIS/MO to AF/INER, "Request for Personnel Action/Proposed PL for Mr. Caldwell,” 27 feb 84, SD 59; Hist Date Rort (U), AFIS/INOY, Jan-Dec 84, SD 60. Site (yu), APIS/MO to AFIS/INO, “INOZ Reorganization {Your Ltr 23 Jul 64)," 3 Aug 84, SD 61. 7Ltr (Uj w. 3 atch {U), AFIS/ING to AFIS/MU, “Change in INOZ Organization Structure," 23 dul 84, see SD number in AFIS/MO section of this History. 8ibid, Conversation (U}, AFIS Historian w. Capt. Steven Kramer, AFIS/INOH, 16 Aug 85. See also the History (S/NF/WN/NOCON), AFIS, Jan-Dec 83. Opraft MOA (U}, AFSAC with AF/INE, n.d., SD 62. LIHist Bata Rprt (U}, AFIS/INOZ, Lt. Kashimoto, Jan-Dec 84, SU 63; Response to Inquiry (Uj, AFIS/Mi to AFIS/HO, 16 Aug 85. Response to Inquiry (U}, AFIS/MO to AFIS/HO, 16 Aug 85, SU 64.
BRD DIRECTORATE GF GPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (AFIS/IHO) l3For a lengthier mission statement see Mission Statement, Special studies Division (AFIS/INOA}, 1984, SU 65, See also Ltr (U), AFIS/INOA to AFIS/HO, “Questions Concerning AFIS/INOA Segment of C¥84 AFIS History (Your Ltr, 12 Aug 84),” 19 Aug 84, SD 66. 4vist Bata Rprt (S/NF/WN}, AFIS/INOA, Jan-Dec 84, SO Si; Staff Summary Sheet (S/NF/Wh} Ww. 1 Ateh (S/NF/WN}, AFIS/INOA to AF/IENE et al, “HQ USAF CCéu Intelligence Status Report 84-01,” n.d., SD 6?. . Useatf Sumnary Sheet (S/NF/WN) w. 1 Atch (S/NF/WN), AFIS/INUA to AF/IRE et al, “HQ USAFF LuaD Intelligence Status Report 84-02," n.d., SU 63. Lotigg (S/RF/WK), AFIS/INUA to AIG 10428, “HQ AFIS Camouflage, Concealment ang Geceation {£785} Intelligence Status Keport 84-03 {¥}," 24151G2 Apr 84, So 6g. stati Summary Sheet (S/NF/WN) ow. 2 Atch (S/NF/Wh), AFIS/INGA to AF/INER et ai, “HQ USAF CC@lU Intelligence Status Report 846-04," n.d., SU Pu. lstaff Sumuary Sheet (S/NF/WN) owe. 1 Atch (S/NF/WN}, AFIS/INUA to AF/JNER et al, "HQ USAF 08b Intelligence Status Report 64-66," a,d., SO 72, See also Staft Summary Sheet (S/NP/Wi) we 1 Atch (S/NE/eK), AFIS/INGA to AF/INER et al, “HQ USAF CCAO Inteltigence Status Report 84-05,“ 29 Jun 85, SD 72. 19656 (S/NE sw}, APIS/INOA to AIG 16416, “HQ AFIS Genial and Deception (085) Intelligence Status Report 84-07 (U)," 2115352 bec 84, $D 73. 2I big, 4 Zimemc (S/NP/WN}, Capt Hoopes, AFIS/INOA to Col Shankland, AFIS/IKE, “WIE 11-11-84: Intelligence Denial and Deception in Soviet Strategic Military Programs: Implications for U.S. Security (S},” 29 Jum 84, SD 74, 22memo {U}, Oeputy Assistant for Joint Matters, ACS/I to Col. O'Lear and Col. Shankland, n.s., 2 Xov 83, SD 75; The proposal for the establishment of a dedicated national jevel 0&0 unit is filed with AFIS/KO records in the SCIF in the Fort Selvoir compound. See also Ltr ($), Director, GuIP Staff DIA, to Deputy Director for Resources and Systems, DIA, "Congressional Tasking (¥},* 19 dul 84, SD 76.
DIRECTORATE OF OPERATIONAL INTELLIGEKCE (AFIS/INO) 26Ltr {U), AFIS/INDA to AFIS/HO, “Questions Concerning AFIS/INOA Segment of CYB4 AFIS History (Your Lt, 12 Aug 84},"° 19 Aug 85, SO 66. 2Busg {S}, NPIC to ESC/INZ et al, “Gctober 1984 CCaDTRG Meeting,” 12153552 Sep 84, SD 80; Agenda (U}, ETL+LO, “Briefing and Tour of ETL For 1AG/ETL Camouflage, Concealment and Veception Technical Review Group Meeting," IL Oct 84, SD 8l. ; bien rire gee al AFIS/INOA to D/INE, “NSC Brief ing (U)," 20 Mar G4, . ° Deleted per $ t$.¢. 352d) (1)
BIRECTORATE OF GPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (AFIS/1NO} 4lmemo (C), 4FIS/INGA to DINE/INE, “(MFR} Informal Discussion with GAC Members {Dr. Kupperman and Ur. Graham},” 24 Sep 84, SO 20. A2mema (S/NF/WN), Lt Hil] to AFIS/INOA, “Briefing Activity (U)," 9 Nov 84, $D 91. S3memo for Record (U), AFIS/INGA, “Trip Report - Goodfellow AFB, Texas (U}," n.d., SD 92; Ltr (U}, AFIS/INOA to AFIS/INOA, "Trip Report,” 28 Sep 84, SO 93; Ltr (¥}, AFIS/INQA to AFIS/INOA et ai, “Trip Report,“ 30 Mar 84, SD 94; Memo (U), AFIS/INGA to AFOINE/INE, “USAF DED Lectures,” 5 fov 86, SU 95. 44.tr (S), AFIS/INGA to AFIS/INGA et al, “Trip Report,” 26 Sep 64, Si 96. 43.tr (uj, APIS/I8dn to AP/DINE et a3, “Trip Report," 20 Sep 64, $0 97, 7¥ Depo Test Plan (YU), 6 Jun 84, Si 98; Ltr (¢}, Oo AP/INE, “RQ USAFE/UORS SALTY GEMO'85 (U)," 2? Sep &4, no for Record (U), Haj. Townsend, AFIS/INOA, “SALTY DEMS Tetecon witn Major Hance, vie *Y-3, 25 Sep 84," 25 SEP 64, Sb 100; utr (Uj, USAFE/BOXSa to AFIS/INGA, “Request for Tactical Geception Briefing Support (Ref Telecon, 19 Gct 84}," 31 Get 84, Su 101; memo for Record (U), Maj. Townsend, AFIS/INUA, “USAF Request for Tactical Deception Brtefing to Support SALTY DEMO,“ 23 hov 84, SD 102. 4?Ler (i), AFIS/IAUA, Kaj. Townsend, AFIS/INOA et al, “Trip Repart," 5 Koy &4, Su 103. 4Svema for Record (U), Maj. Townsend, AFIS/INOA, "USAF Request for Tactical veception briefing to Support SALTY DEM," 23 Nov 84, SD 104. e 4Skist Data Rport (S/NF/WK}, AFIS/INOA, Jan-Dec 84, SB $2; Ltr (S}, AFIS/INGA to APIS/REQU, “Reserve Unit Tasking: Cuban Camouflage, Concealment and Geception (U}," 9 dan 84, SD 105; Post Trip Report {WU}, w. 3 Atchs (U}, “TOY to BTS 25, Bergstrom AF3, TX, 6-8 Apr G4, $Sqt Frateigh,” n.d., SO 106; Memo for Record (l}, Maj. Townsend, AFIS/INGA, 2) May 84, SO 107; Ltr (Uj, AFIS/INOA to AFIS/RE, “Kequest for support from DTS-6, Dover Ao," 21 May 84, SD 108; Memo for Record {¥}, Mej. Townsend, AFIS/INOA, “Reservist week-end Tasking,“ 21 dun 84, S& 109; Ltr (U}, AFIS/INOA to AFIS/W0, "“FY85 Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMAj Review (U} {Your Ltr, 17 May 84)," 20 du? 84, $0 110; Memo (U}, AFIS/INOA to AF/OLNE, “Air Force Reserve Support to Dental and Deception (D&u}
DIRECTORATE OF OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (AFIS/INO) Mission - INFORMATION MEMORANDUM," 20 dul 84, SO lil itr (U}, arte to AFIS/RE, “Request for COMINT Billet (U},“ 17 Aug 84, 2. S50Ltr (U} w. 4 Atch (U}, Budget Officer, Library of Congress, to AFIS/INGA, n.s., 27 dul 84, SD 113; Ltr (Uj, AFIS/INOA to AFIS/AC, "AEOC €Céd Research Contract,“ 27 Jan 84, SD 114; Ltr (U}, AEUC/ACB to AFIS/ACF, “AF Form 185, Project Order No. 84 AFIS-001," 7 Mar 85, SO 115. . Str (U), ACS/1 to General Stilwell, n.s., 9 dan 84, SD 116. Memo (U) w. 1 Atch (WU), AFIS/INGA to AF/DINE, “USAFINTEL 500-4 Classification Upgrade/Final Review ~~ INFORMATIGH MEMORANDUM, “ nid., SG 11? Hist Deta Rort (S/NF/WN), AFIS/INGA, Jan-Dec 84, Sd 51; Conversation (u}, AFIS Historian w. Maj. Robert Townsend, AFIS/INUA, 16 Aug 34, S2visg (C), AFSSG/USAF/INS to NPIC/OS/0SG-CD, “Connection Priority of Systems Terminals (&),* 1912152 Sep 6&4, Su lig; Ltr (U), APIS/INUA to AFIS/ING, “D&S Computer Kequiremants,* 29 Rov 84, Sd 11%; AFIS/INOA Five Year Systems Plan (U), AFIS/INOA, n.d. Su 120; Hist Date Rprt (S/NF/Wi}), APIS/INOA, Jan-Dec 84, SD 51. S3weekly Activity Reports (S/NF/KN), AFIS/INOA, 32 Reports, 1 Nay 1984 - 16 Woy 1986, 3D 121; Conversation (U), AFIS Historian w. biaj. Rodert Townsend, AFIS/INOA, 16 Aug 85. 54The section on the Aerospace Intelligence Diviston was prepared from the Hist Data Rprt (u}, AFIS/INGZ, Lt. Kashimote, Jan-Dec 64, SU 63. Tne AFIS/HS edited the report aad rearranged some topics. 55-581 pia. SSHist Data Rprt (U}, AFIS/INOZ, ft. Kashimoto, dan-Dec 84, SD 63. 60-65 ibid, 6GHist Data Rprt (U}, AFIS/INOV, Jan-Dec 84, SD 60. 67-7lipia, END OF FOOTROTES FOR AFIS/INO
$53 — DIRECTORATE OF TARGETS (AFIS/EINT)} ; _ for & detailed mission statement, including the wartime mission, see AFISR 23-1 (U), “Organization and Functions Air Force intelligence Service (AFIS},“ Section T, 15 Feb 83, SD 23. 2Ibid. 3ibid. [Biographical Sketch {UJ}, Col. Thomas E. Lee, AFIS/INT, 1984, SO 122; Wist Data Rprt (S/NF/WN), AFIS/INT, Jan-Dec 84, SD 3123. SHist Data Rprt (S/wF/WN), AFIS/IST, Jan-Dec 84, SU 124. SProceedings (S/i?}, USHF Target Intelligence Conference, 6- 10 Feb 64, SO 126. hereafter cited as Proceedings (S/Nr}, SL 124. Ibid. See alss Supporting Documentation (S/SF), USAF Target Intelligence Conference, 6-10 Feb 84, SD 125. 8Proceedings (S/RF}, SU 124. SIpid. Wipia. Llnist bata Rpet (S/NF/wh), AFIS/1&T, Jan-Bec 84, SU 123. l2yitg Kotes (C}, JME Gun Group, Winter Meeting, Nov 84, Sv 126. 23-20i pig. 2iHist Data Rprt (S/NF/Wh), AFIS/INT, Jan-Oec 84, $0 123; AFR 200-16 (U), “Air Force Targeting,“ 16 Nof 84, SD 127. efor Technical Notes 84-02, 64-03, and 84-04, see SD 128. Technical Note 84-01, because it was classified S/RO and Technical Note 84-05, because it is classified TS, are on file in the AFIS/HO Archives, Fort Belvoir, Virginia. 23for Target Director's Updates {S) 1-1983 and 2-5, 1984 see SO x29. . Deleted pex 5 U.S.C. 352(b) (1)
354 DIRECTORATE OF TARGETS (AFIS/INT) 25ibid. 26compendium (S}, AFIS/INT, "Target Planning Compendium (U),* 2 dan 85, 58 132. 27Ltr (Uj, AFIS/INTA, Mr. Constantine N. Pappas and Capt. Laurie S. Eliasson, ta AFIS/INT, AF/IN, “Trip Report," 1 Aug 84, SD 132. : @Bibid. Other personne? issues were also reported. 23ibid. Other theater support issues were also discussed. 301 bia. 3iLtr (S), AFIS/INTA, Lt, Col. Vincent to AFIS/INTB et al, “Trip Report (U)," 4 Sep 8, $0 133. 32Ibid. See this trip report for a discussion of other subjects, as well. 33-35} pia, 36Staff Summary Sheet {S) w. 1 Atch (S) and 1 Atch (U}, AFIS/INT to AF/IN, “Weapons Target List,” 29 Aug 84, SO 134. Booklet {FOUG},  AFIS/INT, Target Intelligence Officers World-Wide Position bescriptions, Feb 84, $0135. 38 tr (U} and 1 Atch (U), AFIS/INTB to Conference Attendees et al, “Report of the Air Force Napping, Charting & Geodetic Conference 1," 1984, SU 136. 39-42 Ibid, ° 43utr (U} w. 1 Atch (0), AFIS/INT to USAF/IN et al, "Report of the Air Force Geodetic and Geophysical Conference ¥," 13 Aug 84, SD 137. 44t pig, 45sq (U), AFIS/INT to AFSC/TEUX, “Synthetic Aperature Radar (SAR} Simulation bigital Cartographic Data Requirements," 2 Oct 86, SB 138. S6Background Paper (U), AFIS/INTB, "OSD Gigital Mas Transformation Working Group,” 15 Gct 84, SO 139.
DIRECTORATE OF TARGETS (AFIS/INT) 47mational Statement {U}, AFIS/INTB, “The United States National Statement on Recommendations Made in the WC Review of the Report of the 27th Meeting of Working Party 64 Aeronautical Charts and Flight Information Publications," 1984, S0 140. 48tr {(U}, AF/IN to Deputy Girector for Plans and Requirements, OHA, "CY¥S4 Mapping, Charting, and Geodesy (MC&G} Area Requirements," 1 dun 84, SO 141. 49. tr (U}, AFIS/INT te DMA, “Oefense Mapping Agency Digital Data Base Support for 8-18 Weapon System Trainer (WST)," 11 Jan 84, SD 142, See also Msg (U}, AFIS/INTB to OriAAC/PRRN, “B-1B Test Program Support ~ AF Contract F33657-81-€-0212,“ 6521052 Jan 64, So 143. SOstaff Summary Sheet (U}, AFIS/INT to AF/INE et al, “Defense Mapping Agency (DM4} Support for 8-1B Weapon Systems Trainer (WST)," 1 Mar 84, SU 144. Slitr (U), AFIS/INT to DMA, "6-18 Test Program Support - AF Contract F33657-81-C-0212," 11 dan 84, SD 145. S2itr (U), AFIS/INT to OMA, "Fel6 improved Digital Radar Landmass Simulation System (IDRLMS}," 31 Oct 84, SD 146. 53Ltr (U), AFIS/INT to DMA, "F-1E# Weapon System Trainer Digital Cartographic Data Requirements,” 6 Nov 84, SD 147. 541 bid. SS.tr (U}, we. 2 Atch {U), ACS/I to 30th Engineer Battalion/CC, n.s., 8 Aug 84, 50 148, ¢ 58Ltr (U) w. 1 Atch {U}, AFIS/INTB to Distribution List, “Report of the Air Force Mapping, Charting & Geodetic Conference i," n.d, SDB 136, 57 Ibid. 58TIG Report (PRIV DOC}, Air Force Inspection and Safety Center, “Report on Functional Management Inspection of Mapping, Charting, and Geodesy,” PN 84-601, 7 Feb-16 Nov 84, SO 149. 39ibid. 60-64 Ibid. 65technical Note 84-03 {U}, AFIS/INT, “Mapping, Charting, and Geodesy Manpower Recommendations,” 23 Get 84, SO 126. 355
356 DIRECTORATE OF TARGETS (AFIS/INT} S6Hist Data Kprt (S/NF/WN), AFIS/INT, dan-Dec 84, SD 123. S7occupational Survey Report (U), USAF Occupational Measurement Center, ATC, “Cartography/Geodesy Utilization Field and Geodetic Career Field (AFSs 57XX and 222X0),“ AFPT 90-57X-469, dan 84, $0 150. 68ipig. 69Ltr (U}, w. 2 Atch (U}, AFIS/INTB to Distribution List, “Minutes of the 57X% and 222X0 Education and Training Requirements Conference,“ 25 Jul 84, SD 151. ibid. 7ILer (U) w. 1 Atch (U), AFIS/INT8 to Defense Mapping School, “air Force Curriculum Requirements for Mapping, Charting, and Geodesy Officers Course,“ 10 Sep &4, SD 152. Te.tr (Uj, AFIS/INT to AF/MPPE, “Proposed Education with Industry Program," 15 Oct 84, SD 153. ’ 73 1bid. 74. tr (Uj, AF/MPPE to AFIS/IRT, “Proposed Education-With- Industry Program (Your Ltr, 15 Get 84), 23 Oct 84, SD 154. Tier (0), AFIS/INT# to AFIS/INT2B ef al, “Trip Report,” 15 Nov 84, SD 153. 76Ltr (U), AFIS/INTS to AFIS/INTB et al, “Trip Report,® 10 Bec 64, SE 156. - 77 ibid. END OF FOOTNOTES FOR AFIS/INT
DIRECTORATE OF JOINT SERVICES SUPPORT {AFIS/INU} Ifor an expanded mission statement see AFISR 23-1 (U), “Organization and Functions of Air Force Intelligence Service {(AFIS)," Section R, 15 Feb 84, SB 23. This INL segment of the AFIS history was written, in part, from the directorate’s historical data reports, prepared by tr. Kar! Owens. See Ltr (U}, Ys iftet (U} and 2 Atchs {S}, “AFIS/InU CY 1984 History,“ n.d., 2Ltr (U), w. 3 Atehs (0), AFIS/INU to AFIS/MO, “Organization Change Request,” 2 april 34, SD 158. SHist Data kprt {S$}, AFIS/Inu, Jan-Dec 64, SU 187. Sibid, Shist vate ®prt (S}, AFIS/Iwu, dan-Bec 84, $B 257; Msg (C}, CTF 1-6-3 to AiG 7-O-2-0,°1k3 300 0047 8&4 Gebriefing of Lt. Goodman (U}," 0919422 Feb 84, Su 156. Sltr (¢}, w. 2 Atch (Cl, AFIS/Iku to DGD SERE Schools, “Debriefing of Lt. Robert G. Goodman, USK," 22 Aug 84, 55 158. itr (Uj, AF/IN to DMasPR, “Air Force Intelligence Service {AFIS} Responsibitities in Evasion Chart Gevelopment,” 12 Apr 84, Sb 159. See also Ltr {U), AFIS/INU to AF/INYXS, “USAF SIG Conference (INYXS Mamc, 24 Jan 84}," 16 Feb 84, SD 160. Bier (uj, AF/IN to OSCEUR/G-3 et a1, “Evasion Charts," 12 Apr 64, $Y 161. Sitr (Uj, w. 2 Atchs {0}, AFIS/ENusA to INUA, “Trip Keport - DMA Aerospace Center and Scott AFs, li,” 10 vec 84, Su 162. W1bid. * 11p0D Directive 1300.7 (U}, “Training and Education Measures Necessary to Support the Code of Conduct," 19 Dec 84, SD 163. See also Staff Summary Sheet {Uj}, w. 43 Atehs (U), “Changes to 000 Girective 1300.7," 20 dul 84, 50 164, 2tbid. Wist Data Rort (S}, AFIS/INU, Jan-Dec 84, SO 157, Mitr (vu) w. 1 Aten (C), AFIS/INU to ARMY/TRU et al, “Code of Conduct Training Program Instruction,” 21 Bec 84, SD 165. Mite (U}, w. 1 Ath (U), AFIS/INU to HQ USAF/XCORY, "Kequest 357
558 for Joint Interest Production of SAVPIN 602397," 24 Jul 84, SD 166; Hist Data wprt ($}, AFIS/IAU, Jan-bec 84, SD 157; Response to intyw Question (U), AFIS/INU to AFIS/HO, 20 Jun 85. 16R0D Form 1995-2, {U} AFIS/INU, 23 Jul 84, 50 167. See also Ltr {U}, AFIS/INU to Department of the Army/ODCSOPS, “Proposed Level 8/C Resistance Training Film Script,” 11 Jan 84, SD 168. Witr (uj), AFIS/INU to AF IS, OASD(PA}, "Code of Conduct Information Spots,” 2 Mar 84, $D 169; Ltr (Uj, Alan D. Edick to John Mitchel}, “Evaluation of Concept/Treatment Proposals for -IMPO gp ise 84-8, ‘Standards of Conduct/Code of Conduct,'® 1 Nov 84, 0. \8Final Report (S}, . ll Atch (8) and 2 Atch (FOUD), AFIS/Iisy, "Evasion Exercise KIOGE RUNGER 1984,° 4 Dec &4, SU 171, Wieig ibid, 2lipig. 22 big. 23ibig 24 ibid, 25ibic. See also Article {Uj}, “The Ridge Runners,” Airman Magazine, Jun 84, pp 24-32, SD 172. *Snist Data Rprt (5}, AFIS/INU, Jan-Dec 84, SO 157; Ltr (U} ang 1 Atch (C), AFIS/INY to Army/TRU et al, "Code of Conduct Training Program Instruction," 21 Bec 84, $0 165. 27Hist Data Rprt (S}, AFIS/INU, JanfDec 64, SD 157. 257 inat Report (5), AFIS/INU, “Evasion Exercise RIDGE RUNNER 1984," 4 Gec 84, SD ; Ltr (U), DB-4D2 to AFIS/INUA, “Letter of Appreciation," 1 Gct 84, SD 173, 251tr (U), AFIS/INU’ to AFIS/INU, “HQ ATC S-Va0-A Course Training Standards (CTS) Conference,” 7 Dec 84, SD 174. 30tbid. 3iipig. 321 bid,
331518, 34 bid. 35ipis. 36ibid. 3/utr (U}, AFIS/INUAA (MSgt Lovelady) to AFIS/INUA et al, “Trip Report - Green Flag 84-03," 23 Mar 84, SD 175. 38t pid. 39ibid. M0.tr (U), AFIS/IRUAA (TSgt Erickson) to AFIS/Iku, “Trip Report," 25 Apr 64, Su 176. lipid. 42tbid. A3iems for Record (Uj), AFIS/IWu-, J. Mitchell, “Trip Report - Fleetdeer 34,“ 16 Nay 64, Sb 177. 44ibid, 4Sipid, 4bmeno for Record {U}, AFIS/INUAS, TSot Erickson, “Trip Report - FOAL EAGLE 84 SEREX," 6 Jan 86, SO 178, 47 ibid. Bibid. 4%.tr (U} w. 1 Atch (U), AFIS/INU te USAF/MPPTF et al 199. etter of USAF Academy SERE Training Program,” i6 Aug 84, SD 50lbid. Slipid. S2itr (u}, AFIS/inY to HQ USAF/MPPTF and HQ ATC/S0K, “Review of Proposed AFR 64-XX," 15 Feb 84, SD 180. 53Ltr (u}, APIS/INU to HQ ATC/DONZ, "Suggestions to Correct Graft AFM 64-5," 22 May 04, SD 18i. 207
YOY S4.tr_ (dj, APIS/INU to BiTl Smith, "Coordinating Draft, Army Fh 21-76, Survival (Your Ltr, 29 dul 84}," 18 Oct 84, SD 182. 55ttr (U), AFIS/INU to HQ USAF/¥PPTF, “ATC Course ‘ivaining Standard (Basic Survival Training, S-¥80-A}," 30 Apr 84, SO 183. For a recommendation about course S-V82-A, see Ltr {U}, AFIS/INUB & HQ ATC/00K, “S-¥&Z-A Student Withdrawal Procedures,” 13 Mar &4, B 384. 56Ltr (UY) ang 1 Atch (U), AFIS/INU to HQ USAF/MPPT, “Evaluation of ATC Course S-V¥80-A, Fairchild AFB, WA," 30 Nov. 84, SO 385. 57utr {U}, AFIS/INU to HQ USAF/MPCRPQI, “Special Experience Identifier (SE1} for Evasion and Escape (EE) Operations,” 29 May 84, Su 186. Sibic. S42esponse to Intvw Questions (U), AFIS/INU to AFIS/HU, 20 dun 85, SOnist Date Rort (U), AFIS/INU, Jan-Cec 84, SO 157. Glnist (S/NE/WN/KC}, AFIS, Jan-Dec 83, p 122. B23 big. S3nist vata Rprt (S), AFIS/INU, Jan-bec 84, SU 157, 64tbid. §5I bid. S?Hist Gata Rert (S), AFIS/INU, dan#ec 84, SO 187. 68itr {U}, AFIS/INU to HQ ATC/UON, “Code of Conduct Library/Historian Relocation," 19 Jul 84, SO 457. 83ibig, 7OHist Data Rprt (S}, AFIS/INU, dan-ec 84, $D 157. 7imemo (U}, AFIS/INUAC to AFIS/INUA, "Weekly Diary, 16-27 Jul 84," n.d., SO 188, ?eLtr (U), K. Owens to Directors, Army Library n.s., 14 fov 84, 50 189; Hist Gata Rprt (S), AFIS/INU, Jan-Dec 84, $9 157.
?3memo for Record (U), J. Niteheli, AFIS/INUA, “Trip Report - SERE School, Brunswick, ME," 3 Bec 84, SD 190. 74Ltr {U}, and 1 Atch (U}, AFIS/OAD to AFIS/INU, "Microform System Add-Gn Approval Reauest (your Ltr, 19 Sep 84), 20 Sep 84, SB 191; Ltr (U}, AFIS/INY to 76 ALO/LGSC, LGCC, “A+B Priority Justification for Microform Equipment,” 16 Oct 84, SD 192. 75Hist Data Rort (S}, AFIS/INU, den-Vec 84, SD 187. 76lbid. ltr (U), AFIS/INU to HQ Department of the Army/DAAG-PES, “Transfer of US Army Prisoner of War (PO«} Yerbatim Uebriefs (Wietnas}," 16 hov &4, Su 193. 78i.tr (Uj), AFIS/IRY to Brig Gen Simmons, “Copies of USMC Prisoner of har (POs) Verbatim Oebriefs (sietnam),* 19 bec 84, Su 194, P2Staff Sumnacy Sheet (S/KF}) w. 1 Atch (S/KF}, AF/IGT to AP /AC, et al, “USAF Antiterrorism Task Group Report (U)," 16 May 84, Su 495; itr (Uj, AF/AWPTF to AF/MPPE et al, “Minutes of the 27 January 1936 Meeting of the Antiterrarism Training Subgroup,” 2 Feb &4, Si 196. . 80Staft Summary Sheet (S/N: w. 2 Ateh (S/NF), AP/IGT to AF/AC et al, “USAF Antiterrorism Tesk Group Report (U},° 16 Ray &4, Sv 195. Slwems (U}, INU/CO to AF/INER, n.s., 3 Apr 84, So 197. Pre es ly eee FS SR aa S5utr (U}, AFIS/INU- to AFIS/OP, “Quotas for Dynamics of International Terrorism Course,“ 10 Feb 84, SU 200. S6Hist vata Rprt (5S), AFIS/INU, Jan-Dec 8, SD 157; List of Film's Gpjectives {FOUO), AFIS/INY, a.d., SO 201. B7List of Film's Objectives (F0uG}, AFIS/INU, a.d., SD 20}. 83kist Data Rprt (5), AFIS/INL, van-bec 64, 90 157, See also 361 Deleted per 5 8.S.C. 352¢b) O)
362 tienc {uv}, AFIS/INUBB to AFIS/INUE, “Hostage Behavior Training at USCINCPAL, Camp H. &. Smith, HI,* 16 aug 84, 30 202. Sstaff Summary Sheet {S/NF} w. 1 Atch {8} and 1 Atch (C), "DOD Evasion and Escape Program," 19 Sep 84, Sl 203. See also, Excerpt {S}, Braft AFIS Objective flan, AFIS/INU, 22 Feb 84, SDB 204, ibid. Sitter {S/NF}, AFIS/INU to AFSAC/INKA, “Review of Draft Changes to PSAR OPLAN 5027," 16 Feb 64, SD 205. S2ibid, $3Ltr (Uj, IAU/CC to HQ USAF/JAEC, .5,, 18 Jan 8, SU 206; Response to Intvw Question (U), AFIS/IRU to AFIS/HO, 20 dun 85. So.te (U), we. 14 Atehs (U}, HQ USAF/XOXID to AFIS/iNu, “DOD Gefinition for Prisoner of War for JCS Pub I, OGD Gictionary of Military ang Associated Terms,” 27 Jui 84, SD 207. 9itr {u}, USCENTCUM/CCLA to Whom It May Concern, “1984 USCERTCUR 2nd Annual Legal Conference," 29 Aug 84, SO 208. S8iemo for Record (u), APIS/INUS to AFIS/INU, “Memorandum for Record - Trip Report," 27 dun 84, SO 209. 71bia, Sete (C), we 1 Ateh (C), AF/INYS to AFIS/INL, “Security Review of delta Force by Col. Beckwith {Ret} (U}," date tllegibie 99.cr (Uj, AFIS/INU to AF/IRYS, “Security Review of Qelta Force by Col. Beckwith {Ret} (U}," 2 Apr 84, SD 211; Ltr (Uy, Ar/INYS to ACS/I/Security Division/Gept of tne Army, “Security Review of Delta Force by Col. Beckwith (Ret} (U},“ 19 Apr 64, SO 222,
DIRECTORATE OF SOVIET AFFAIRS {AF IS/INC) laFISR 23-1 (U), “Or ganization and functions Air Intelligence Service (AF S}," Section Q, 15 Feb 84, SD 23. 2Hist Data Rprt (U), AFIS/INC, Jan-Dec 84, SB 213. 3Response to Intvw Question (U}, Capt. Nettis, AFIS/INC to AFIS/HO, 17 Jun 85; Hist Data Rprt (U), AFIS/INC, Jan-Dec 84, SO 223, Force SHist data Rprt (U}, AFIS/INC, Jan-Dec 84, SO 213. Slbid. SIpig. Tidie. 8itr (Uj, MPiS/iho to AFIS/C¥, °FY85 Manpower Reduction Tapact Statement (Your Ltr, 11 Gec 64)," 17 Dec 84, SD 214. Point Paper {i}, "Relocation of Soviet Awareness," AFIS/INC, 27 Apr 84, Su 215. ‘ LOFact Sheet {U}, SAF/PA, 85-1, “Soviet Awareness Program," SO 216, I3kesponse to Intyw Question {U}, Capt. af S/hv, 17 Gun &&, Nettis, AFES/INC to ¢ 34Ibig; Hist (S/NF/Wh/NC), AFIS, Jan-Dec 83, p 140. itr (U), HQ ATC DBCS/Operations to HQ AFIS/IN, “UPT Soviet Awareness Briefing,” 10 May 84, SD 217. lstatf Summary Sheet (U), AFIS/INCR to ACS/I, UPT Soviet Awareness Briefings," 21 May 84, SU 218. Ltr (U), ACS/E to ATC/D0, “UPT Soviet Awareness Briefing (Your Ttr, 10 Nay 84),” 24 May 84, SD 219, Wetrs () included with Hist Data Rprt (U}, AFIS/INC, Jan-Dec 84, S& 213. eae ee pelered per 5 U.S.C. $$2(d) CD) 363
364 DIRECTORATE OF SOVIET AFFAIRS (AFIS/INC) WLtr (YU), and 1 Atch (uj, AFIS/INC to AFIS/¥P, MO, “AFIS Initiatives for FY87-91 POM," 13 Dec 84, SO 222. 20Ltr (u} and 1 Atch {U}, AFIS/CV to AFIS/INC et al, “Command Ranking of FY87-91 POM Initiatives,” 20 Dec 84, SU 223, 21Proposal (U}, Soviet Awareness Briefing Team within AFIS/RE, AFIS/RE, 12 Jan 84, 224, 22ibid. 23Response to Intyw Question (U), Capt. Nettis, AFIS/INC to AFIS/HO, 17 dun 85. 24tbid. 2SHist (S/NF/wn/KC}, AFIS, dan-Dec 1983, p 138. 26Response to Intvw Question (U}, Capt. Nettis, AFIS/INC to AFIS/HU, 17 Jun 85; tisg (S/LIMOIS/RUGCA), AF/IN to USAFE/IN, “Threat Training Facility {TIF} Orientation Tour (8)," 1021G0Z May 84, : 27Hist Data Rort (U), AFIS/INC, Jan-Dec 84, SD 213. 26Fact Sheet (U}, SAF/PH, 85-1, “Soviet Awareness Program,” SL 216. this sheet lists each of the eighteen publications in the “Soviet Military Thought" series. *Sibid. Ibid. sd 3 Discussion {4}, Or. Moore, AFIS/INC w. AFIS Historian, 4 dun $3. 32Ltr (U), AFIS/INC to FBIS, n.s., 4 Oct 84, SD 225; Response to Intvw Question (U}, AFIS/INC te AFIS/HG, 17° Jun 85. 33See the supporting documents in Hist Data Rprt (U}, AFIS/INC, dan-Dec 84, SO 213. For the Soviet Press Translations published in 1984, see SO 226, 34ixarrative Justification for New Initiative (U), AFIS/INCF, & Nov 84, SO 227; Ltr (U) and 1 Atch (U), AFIS/INC to AFIS/XP, MO, "AFIS Initiatives for FY 7-91 POM,” 13 Bec 84, Sb 222. 3Shist Data Rprt {u), AFIS/INC, Jan-Dec 84, SD 213; Discussion (U}, Gr, Moore, AFIS/IC w. AFIS Historian, 4 Jun 83.
365 DIRECTORATE OF SOVIET AFFAIRS {AFIS/INC} 36I bid. 370 iscussion {U}, Dr. Moore, AFIS/INC w. AFIS Historian, 4 Jun 86. 38Kesponse to Intvw Question, AFIS/INC ta AFIS/HO, 17 Jun 8S. 39Response to Intvw Question (U}, Dr. Moore, AFIS/INC to AFIS Historian, 17 Jun 85. 4Osemorandum for Record {U}, R. ©. Moore, AFIS/INCF, “Report of Trip to Uttawa, Canada, 9-12 October 1984," SP 226. {list Data Rprt (U), AFIS/IHC, Jan-Dee 84, SD 212. 42Ib ig. S31 bid. 44isq (Uj, AFIS/INC to USUAG Moscow, "Travel to USSR,” 1219302 Jul 84, SG 229; Msg (U}), AFIS/INC to USDAO Moscow, "Travel to USSR," O91900Z sul 4, So 230. . , 4Strip Rert {vu}, AFIS/TACR to AFIS/INC, “Soviet Awareness Grientation Visit to USSK," a.¢d., SD 231, Ibid. 87 Ibid sl bia, AS Ibia, 50Ibid. Slitr (U}, AFIS/IKC to AFIS/OP, “Nomination for Hoyt $. Vandenberg Award," 14 Feb 84, SO 232; Staff Summary Sheet {), AFIS/INC to ACS/1, “Air Force Association {AFA} Citation of Honor,” 29 Aug 84, SO 233; Mailgram (U}, AFA President to AFIS/INC, 1-019157A 228 08/15/84, SU 234, END OF FOOTNOTES FORK AFIS/THC
ATTACHE AFFAIRS (INK) Ifor the detailed mission statement see AFISR 23-1 {U}, “Organization and functions Air Force Intelligence Service {AFi5},° 18 Feb 84, 50 23, The INK section of the AFIS History was written, in part, from the INH directorate's historical data report. See itr (U} ang 1 Atch {Fulu}, AFIS/INH to AFIS/HO, “Directorate CY 84 History Inputs, AFIS/CV¥ itr, dtd 20 Hoy 83," 22 Feb 85, SD 235. ZHist Data Rprt (FOUO), AFIS/INH, Jan-Dec 84, SU 235. 38rfg Paper (U), “kir Attache Briefing,” AFIS/INh, dan 84, pp 6- 7, Sb 219 in Hist (S/HF/WG/NC/VECL:OADR), AFIS, 1 dan - 31 Dee 83, Stist (S/KF/WN/NC/DECLGADR) AFIS, £ dan - 31 Dec B83, p 149. Sibid., p 150. Srigt uate Rert (Fuuu}], AFIS/ISH, Jan-Gec 84, SO 233. Fibid. S3iographicel Sheet (U}, “Col Don B. Kincaid,” AFIS/IANH, 1984, SQ 236; Intvn (U}, AFIS Historian w. Lt Col G@ilaspy, AFIS/Ikh, 2¢ Kar 83, SHist bata kprt (FOUG}, AFIS/INN, Jan-Vec 84, SO 235, Wioie. lipid. i2ipid, l3arfg Paner {Uj}, "Air Attache Briefing AFIS/ItH, Jan 84, 9 18, SD 219 in Hist (S/tF/WA/NC/DECLLOA0R}, AFIS, 1 dan - 31 Bec &3. Wartg Stide (U}, “Attache Selection Criteria," from Air Attache Briefing,” AFIS/Itn, Jan 84. Lntyw (U}, AFIS Historian w. Col Steinmiller, AFIS/INH, 17 Jan 84. I6Hist Data Rprt (FU), AFIS/INK, Jan-Dec 84, SD 235. i intvw (U), AFIS Historian w. Lt Col Gillaspy, AFIS/INH, 29 Mar 85.
ATTACHE AFFAIRS (INH) Wexcerpt (Uj, Orfg Paper (U), “Air Attache Briefing,” AFIS/INH, dan 84, p 19, SD 219 in Hist {S/NF/WH/NC/DECL:OADR), AFIS, 1 Jan - 31 Dec 83. Whist Data Rert (FOUG}, AFIS/INA, Jan-Oec 84, $0235. 2Olbid. 2l"Naval Postgraduate School,* (Uj), Atch 4, INH Recruitment Package, SD 220 in Hist {S/NF/WN/NC/DECL:OADR), AFIS, 1 Jan ~ 31 Dec 83. 22iist Date Rprt (FOUG}, APIS/IWH, dan-Dec 84, SU 235. 23trip Rprt (FOUO), “Staff Visit Africa/Middle East," 10-27 Sept &4, ShSgt Pool, AFIS/Itn, 1h Oct af, Su 237. 2Hist Data Mort (FOUG}, AFIS/Iki, Jan-vec a4, SD 235. sovt (Fuub), “Staff Visit Africa/Middle East,” lu-27 Sept t Pool, AFIS/ink, 15 Uct 25, SD 237. * 27 Intyw (U}, AFIS Historian w. Lt Leach, AFIS/INH, 29 Mar 63. 2Browstetrters (U), “Attache Affairs,” ATIS/INH, Apr, Sep, tec 84, SO 238. 2Svig-Tour kprts, (S/NF} AIRAs and AATRAS to AFIS/inH, 1966, So 235. There ere 2? reports. 3GHist Date Kort \FOUG), AFIS/INH, JaneDec 84, SU 235, 3ilbia. 32Ibid. END OF FOOTNOTES FOR ATTACHE AFFAIRS (INH)
368 DIRECTORATE OF SECURITY AND COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT (AFIS/ INS) LAFISR 23-1 (U}, “Organization and functions Air Force Intelligence Service (AFIS), Section L, 15 Feb 84, SO 23. This Segment of the AFIS History concerning the Directorate of Security and Conmunications Management was based, in part, on the AFIS/INS Historical Data Report {S/NF}, dJan-vec 84, SD 240.The point of contact for the report was Maj, Michael J, Bernott. The report consisted of three major subparts, one for each of the INS divisions. Numerous documents were attached to the report, and Colonel Huey, the commander of the directorate, stated, “We have tried to select primary documentation and let it speak for us." Information from these documents and from a follow-up interview were blended into the inS section of the AFIS History. atr (U}, AFIS/ to 1947 HSG/MPU, “Request to Uual-Hat Key Security and Communications Management Fositions,” 13 Nov 8a, SO 241, 3Staff Summary Sheet (U), ¥. 2 Atchs (U), AFIS/#0 to ACS/I, “Qual-Hatting of Key Security and Communications Management Positions," 20 Sep 84, SU 242. Sthid.; btr (U}, AFIS/M) to AFMEA/MEXR? "Request for Grade Allocation ustment,“ 13 Nov 84, SD 243; Memo (U}, AFIS/#2 to AFIS/ISS, #.3., 6 Nev 83, SU 244, SResponse to Invtw Question (U}, AFIS/INS to AFIS/HO, 19 Jun 85, Hist Data Rort (S/NF}, AFIS/INS, dan-Oec 64, SO 245. Slbid.; Ltr (u), AFIS/INS to AFIS/OPC, MU, “Requ-st for Personnel Action,” 14 Sep 84, SD 246, Ltr (U3, AFIS iKS to AFIS/MO, "Realignment of IWSC Unit Manpower Gocument {UMD} Position,” 30 Aug 84, SU 247; Intww, AFIS Historian w. Maj. Bernott, AFIS/INS,° 19 dun 85. ° 7Response to Intvw Question, AFIS/INS to AFIS/HO, 19 d.n 85, SG 245; Ltr (U}, AFIS/INS to AFIS/MO, DP, "Request for Realignment of INS Unit Manpower Decument Positions," 16 Nov 84, SOD 248. 8Ltr (U}, AFIS/INSD to AFIS/INS, “Establishment of SCI Product Management Section (INSDOM)," 1 Dec 84, SU 249; Hist Data Rprt {S/NF)}, AFIS/INS, Jan-Dec 84, Sb 240, SHist Data Rprt (S/NF}, AFIS/INS, dan-Dec 84, SD 240, 19Tbid. ULtr (u}, APIS/I8S to AFIS/MO, DP, “Realignment of INS Ud Position,” 20 Jan &4, 50 250.
DIRECTORATE OF SECURITY AND COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT {AFIS/INS) L2Ibig, lantr (uj, AFIS/INS to AFIS/MO, OP, “Reorganization of INSC," 24 dan 84, SD 251. Intww (U}, AFIS Historian w. Maj. Bernott, AFIS/INS, 10 Jun 85. Maite (WU), AFIS/INS to AF/INYR, “Justification for Position Conversions," 17 Feb 84, SO 252. 1S ibid, Gtntvw (G), AFIS Historian w. Maj. Sernott, AFIS/INC, 10 dun 85. Vite (uy, AFIS/INS to AFIS/MG, OP, “Realignment of INS UKD Positions," 17 May 84, SD 252; Intww (U), AFIS Historian w. Maj. Bernott, AFIS/INS, 10 dun 85. l8Ltr (b), AFIS/INS to AFIS/OP, “Assignment Nomination of Majer Fred Allen, Til," 12 dan 84, SD 254. 1 Ibid. ‘ 20etr (U), AF/IN to AT? AF/IN-AFIS Directors, “Organizational Relocations,” 13 Jul 84, 5) 255. @lipid, 22itr (uj, AFIS/INS to APIS/AC, “Request for Funds in Support of Gray Telephone Relocetion,” 23 Aug 84, SD 256. Ltr {U), AFIS/INS to Bet 1, 2045 Ce/fi, “Funding for Bolling AFZ Cable Project,“ 18 Oct 84, SU 257; Ltr {U), AFIS/INSC to 1109 ABk/OC, "Request for Support," 1 Oct 63, SO 258; Hist Data Rprt (S/H), AFIS/INS, dan-bec 84, SU 240. 23Hist Data Rprt (S/NF}, AFES/INS, dan-Dec 84, SB 240. 241bids Response to Intvw Question (U}, AFIS/ENS to AFIS/HO, 19 Jun 84, SD 245. 25Response to Intvw Question {U4}, AFIS/INS to AFIS/HG, 19 dun 85, $0 245. 2S5ee also Hist Date Rprt (S/NF}, AFIS/INS, Jan-Dec 84, 5d 240; Response to Intvw Questions, AFIS/INS to AFIS/HG, 19 Jun &5, SO 285. 369
370 DIRECTORATE OF SECURITY AND COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT {AFIS/INS} 2?itr (Uj, AF/IN to AF/IG, “Security Clearances for Retired General Officers,” 3 Feb 84, SO 259; Staff Summary Sheet, AFIS/INS to ACS/I, “Security Clearances for Retired General Officers,” 2 Feb 84, SO 260. 28 ibid. 23ttr (U), AFIS/IG to AF/IN, “Security Clearance for Retired General Officers (AF/IN Ltr, 3 Feb 84}," % Mar 84, SO 262. 30Hist Data Rprt (S/iF}, AFIS/INS, dan-fec 84, SD 240. 31-37 Ibid. 3859 (C), AFSSO USAF/INS to ROXAD, “Procedures for Intelligence Information Appearing In The Media (ROXAU 65-84) {U}," 2413152 Aug 84, SD 262. See also, Msg (€}, AFSSQ USAF/IN to ROXKD, “Media Leaks (ROXAD 65-84} (U},"0515251 Sep 84, SU 263. 39dist Data Rprt (S/NF), AFIS/INS, Jan-Dec 84, SU 240; Memo {U}, with Atch Form (U}, Chairman, UDIS, to Chairman, SECOM, ga pent ine Intelligence Leaks to SECOM,“ OGCe84-52918, 6 Noy 84, MHist Bata Rort (S/N@), AFIS/INS, Jan-Dec 84, SO 24%; TOY Lists (u), AFIS/INS, FY 1984, SO 265. Sinist Data Rort (S/NF), AFIS/INS, Jan-Dec 84, SD 240. 42-44 big, 4Schart (FOU), APIS/INS, “USAF SCI Security Violations,” nd, SU 268, 48ibid. 47Response to Intvw Question (U), AFIS/INS to AFIS/HG, 19 Jun 85, SO 245; Ltr (U}, w. 1 Atch (U}, AFIS/INS to AF/INY et al, “Automated Message Handling System {AMHS} Weekly Status Report,” 24 Feb 84, SO 267; Staff Summary Sheet (U), AFIS/INS to ACS/I, “Installation of AF/IN Automated Message Handling System (AMHS),“ n.d., SB 268; Ltr (U}, AFIS/INS to AFIS/INE and AFIS/INT, “AMHS Site Preparation for Installation of Communications Equipment," 6 dun 64, SD 269; Ltr (C}, AFIS/INS to HQ USAF/PRPRB, “Request for Extensicn of Temporary Precedence Rating in Support of the AMHS Installation and AF/IN Gray Telephone Switch {U), 19 dut G4, SO 270.
DIRECTORATE OF SECURITY AND COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT (AFIS/1xS) M8Hist Data Rort (S/NF\, AFIS/INS, Jan-Dec 84, SD 240. 4Mbid, SOHist Gate Rprt (S/NF), AFIS/INS, Jan-Dec 84, SD 240. Slibid. Sévisg (4), AFSSO USAF/INS to ROXAD, “AFIS SCI Security Advisory ROXAU 4~83 (U},“ 2919407 Dec 83, SO 271. S3course Guttine (Uj, AFIS/INS, AFIS 002, 17 Sep 84, $0 272. D4%isg (YU), AFSSG USAF/INS to ROXAD, "SCI Security Manager's Conference {ROXAU $9-84)," 0314152 sug 84, SU 273; Conference Agenda {U}, AFIS/INS, n.d., SO 274; List of Attendees {¥), AFIS/INS, “1984 USAF SCi Security Managers Conference,“ n.d., $0 275. 53Ioid, S6Response to Request for History Section Review, Maj Sernott, AFIS/iNS to AFIS/HO, 32 Jul 85, SU 276. S7l bid. S8visg (C/NF}, AFSSO USAF/INS to ROXAD, “AF .C1 Security Advisory (ROXaU 22-84),° 3019002 Apr 84, SD 277; Msg {U}, ASSO USAF /INS to ROUXAL, “Proper Use of Coversheets {ROXKG $2-84}," 2312302 Jul 84, SO 278. S3sg (C/NF), AFSSO USAF/INS to eROXAD, "AF SCI Security Advisory (ROXAD 22+84)," 3019002 Apr 84, SD 277; Msg (ut), AFSSO USAF/INS to ROXAD, “Proper Use of Coversheets (ROKAD 52-84}," 2342302 Jul 84, SD 278. S0%sg {C), AFSSO USAF/INS to ROXAD, "DIA SSG/TCO Security Enhancement Program (ROXAD 77+84}," 2718202 Sep 84, SD 279. 68 rbid. SlResponse to Intww Question {U), AFIS/INS to AFIS/HO, 19 dun 85, SB 245; Minutes (u} SAES Meetings, 1 Mar 84, 14 May 84, 14 Jun 84, 26 dul 84, SU 280. B2usg (UY), AFSSU USAF/LuS to ROAD, "DCE SECON Security Educators Seminar (RUXAD 60-84}." (@iS302 mua && SM 781; Ltr (U},
372 DIRECTORATE GF SECURITY AND COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT (AFIS/INS} Bop ENSOE to NSA, “OCI Security iducators Seminar,“ 10 Sep 84, SO 282. S3xist Oata Rprt (S/NF), AFIS/INS, Jan-Dec 84, SD 240. S4Memo {C}, Maj Viau, AFIS/INSD, "CORONA SOUTH 84 {U),* 10 Feb 83, SD 283. 55 ibid. S6Ltr (U), AFIS/INSD to AF/CVS, “Trig Report - CORONA FALL 84," 23 Oct 84, SO 284, 87 Ibid. 6ELtr (S/NF), AFIS/INSD to SAF/OS, “Communications and Privacy Support to the Secretary of the Air Force," 15 Nov 84, SD 285. Ltr S/NF, AFIS/INSD to AF/CC, “SCI Communications/Privacy Traffic Support to CSAF (U},° 4 May 84, $0286. Ltr (S/NF}, AFIS/INSO to AF/CC, "SCI Comnunications/Privacy Traf*ic Support to CSAF {U},“ 6 Apr 84, SD 287; Ltr (C}, AFIS/INSU ta AF/CC, “SCI Communications/Privacy Traffic Support to CSAP," 7 Aug 84, SO 288; itr {8}, AFIS/INO to AF/CC, “Communications and Privacy Support to the Chief of Staff,” 20 Sep 84, SD 289. 69Msq (€), AFSSO USAF/INSD to SSO/DIA et al, “March 84 USAF Senior Intelligence Officer (S10) Conference (Uj,” 271845Z Feb 84, SD 290. WOipig ibid. . 72Response to intvw Question (Uj), AFIS/INS to AFIS/HO, 19 Jun 85, SB 245, 73hemo For Recard {U}, TSgt Jamieson to AFIS/INSD, “XMP Funding/Contracting,” 6 Bec 84, SD 291. Memo for Record (U) w. 4 Atch (U), AFIS/INSBO to AFIS/INSO, “MFR-XMP Funding and Contract Status,“ n.d., Su 292; Hist Data Rprt (S/NF}, AFIS/INS, Jan-Dec 84, SD 240. 74uist Data Rprt (S/NF), AFIS/INS, Jan-Dec 84 SD 240; Response to Intvw Question (U}, AFIS/INS to AFIS/HO, 19 Jun 85, SD 245, *SHist Bata Rort (S/NF}, AFIS/INS, Jan-Dec 84, $B 249. ENU OF FOXTHATES FOO BETO ste
DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE RESERVE FORCES IAFISR 23-1,  "“Grganization and Functions Air Force Intelligence Service (AFIS),” 15 Feb 84, SD 23. The RE section of the AFIS History was written, in part, by using the RE directorate's historical data report, prepared by SMSgt Gilbert Santa Cruz and RE staff. See itr {U}, Lt Col Doyle, AFIS/REOR, to AFIS/HO, "CY84 Historical Input to AFIS History," 18 Jan 85, SU 293. For a discussion of issues affecting reservists, see also the AFSAC section of this AFIS Kistory. 2FACTBOUK (U}, Air Force Intellisence Reserve {AFIR}, AFIS/RE, 1 Oct 84, p. 4, SO 294 (hereafter cited as FACTBOUK). See also FACTBOOK, 1 Apr 84, Sb 295. 3ibid, p. 2. Sibid. dist Data Rprt {u), AFIS/RE, dJan-Dec 84, SD 293, Biographical Information Sheet, “Oonald W. Swain,” AFIS/Pa, lige, SD 236, SFACTBOGK, 1 Oct 84, p. &, SB 294. ‘ 7Hist Data Rort (U), AFIS/RE, dan-Dec 84, SO 293. SFACTBOOK, 1 Oct A4, p. 12, SO 294. SPACTROOK, 1 Uct 84, pp. 13-14, SD 294. MOF ACTBOOK, 1 Oct 86, pp. 15-16, SD 234. Lluist Bata Rprt (U}, AFIS/RE, dar-Dec 64, SU 293. Each year the DTSs submit Historical Leta Reports." For the 1984 reports see SD 297. l2ntr (u}, w. E Atch (U), ACS/I to SAC et al, “Results of the Annual Assessment of the Intelligence Reserve Farces,* 12 Dec 84, SD 298, 13 bid. l4ttr (u), AFIS/RE So SAF/MIR, “Establishment of 10 USC 678 Positions within HQ AFIS/RE,* 13 Yec 84, SB 299. lRespoase to Query (U}, AFIS/REP to AFIS/HO, i Jul 8. 373
374 GIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE RESERVE FORCES Ibid, W7Hist Data Rprt (U), AFIS/RE, Jan-Dec 84, SD 293. 1BHist Data Rprt (U}, AFIS/RE, Jan-Dec 84, SD 293. Response to Query (U}, AFIS/RE to AFIS/HO, 1 dut 85. 19 tpid. 20Response ta Query (U), AFIS/RE to AFIS/HO, 1 Jul 85; Hist Data Rprt (¥}, AFIS/RE, van-Bec 84, SD 293. 2@liist Data Bort (U), AFIS/KE, Jan-Dec 86, SD 293. 22itr (u), AFIS/AEOR to OTS/CC et al, “Transfer of DTS HUMINT Training Eyatuation Function," 24 Jul 84, SB 300. 23Hist Bata Rprt {0}, AFIS/RE, Jan-Dee 84, SD 293, 24Lte (u}, AFIS/KCUR ta AFIS/RE, “Trip Report," 18 Sep 84, SO ‘ 25-281 big. 29memo for Record (U), bir, whitebergh, AFIS/KEOR, “Possible Participation of Navy Intelligence Reservists in BIC/AIC," 19 Sep 84, SO 302; Mema (U}, w. 2 Atch (Uj, RE/EC to ACS/i, “AFIR Programs of Special interest - Information Memorandum,” 14 Feb 84, SD 303; Hist Uata Rart (u}, AFIS/RE, Jan-Dec 84, $0 293. 30ibig, 3iLtr (uy), AFIS/REOR to AFIS/RE eteal, “Trip Report," 13 Nov 84, SO 304. 32tbid. Suter (u) and 1 Atch (YU), AF/INYX to AFIS/RE, “HUMINT Architecture Plan (HAP), Reserve Annex {REOR Letter, 22 Oec 83},“ 12 dan 84, SB 305, 34ctr (U), AFIS/RE to AF/INYX, “HUMINT Architecture Plan (HAP), Reserve Annex (Your Ltr, 12 dan 84),“ 14 Feb 84, SD 306.
DIRECTORATE GF INTELLIGENCE RESERYE FORCES 38itr (u), AFIS/RE to USAF/MPMX/MPXO et al, “Palace Ready 8¢ Critique,” 9 Aug 84, Sb 307, Ltr {U), AFIS/REOR to AFIS/RE, “Trip Report,” 21 Sep 64, SB 306, Mitr (u), AFIS/RE to AFIS/XP, “Powder River 85 After Action Rort (Ui, AFIS/RE, 2 Nov 84, SO 309. Fist Oata Rprt (Uj, AFIS/RE, Jan-Dec a4, SD 292. 38ltr {Uj}, Ut. Col. Langston to AFIS/REOR, “UFL 1984 Highlights,” 12 Sep 84, SU 310. 38kessone to Query (8), AFIS/RE ta APIS/HG, 1 Jul 63; Hist Data Rprt (¥}, AFIS/RE, Jan-Dec 84, 30 293. AOvaster Projects List {UY}, AFIR OSs, AFIS/REGK, 1 dct 64, $v 311i, Sidist Gata Rort (U}, AFIS/RE, Jan-Uec 846, SO 7293. 42 tig. 43itr (Uj, Area Director, Central Area to Attendees, “Joint SE/Central STS/CC Workshop,” 27 Apr 84, SD 31zZ. M4str (Uj, AFIS/RE PAG to AFIS/RE & Workshop Attendees, “Pacific AD-DTS/CC workshop, Anti-Submarine herfare Trng School San Diego, CA 2-3 dun 34,” 12 dun 64, $3 313. SSuist Data Rprt (U), AFIS/R2, dJan-Gee 84, SD 293. “Site (yj) ow. f  Atch (U), AFIS/RE to xis, BOAS, “Issues/Resolutions, Area Directars/Bodrd of Advisors Workshop, 20-21 Oct 84," 27 tov 84, SO 314, A7Hist Data Rprt (U), Jan-Dec 84, SO 293. 4B-S0i big. Si-84inig; Ltr (U}, AFIS/RE to ADs et al, “Selective Retention Screening Board," 3 dan 84, $0 315. Hist Data Rort (4), AFIS/RE, dan-Gec 86, SO 293; See also Msg {U), AFIS/MG to PACAF/XPM@ ef al, “AFSC 702X0 Individual Mobilization Augmentee {IMA} Positions," 2517182 Aug 82, SU 316; Msg (U), PACAF/XPM to BEIS/MO, SAFSC 702%} individual Mobitization Augmentee (IMA) Positions,” 1814302 Aug 62, SD 317; itr (4), AF/MPM to ALMAICOM- SOA-DRU, "Individual Mobilization Augmentee {{MS) Policy," 24 Sep 42, $0 314. 375
ae Ww DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE RESERVE FORCES SSHist Data Rprt (u}, AFIS/RE, dan-Dec 84, SD 293. 56-6li nig, §3Ipid. END OF FOOTHOTES FOR AFIS/RE Deleted per $ U.5.C. §52(d) (5)
DIRECTORATE OF PERSONNEL (AFIS/P} LAFISR 23-1 {U), “Organization and Functions Air Force Intelligence Service (AFIS},° Section ®-1, 15 Feb 84, SD 23. The section of the AFIS kistory pertaining to the Sirectorate of Personnel was written ia part, from the Historical Data Report {U}, AFIS/OP, Jan-Dec 84, SD 320, prepared by Maj. Marion E. Gelke and the OP staff. eLtr (U} w. 3 Atchs {U), AFIS/OP to AFIS/HO, “Manpower and Organizational Change Requests,” 1 Feb 84, SO 321; Ltr {t), AFIS/MU to AFIS/DP, "Manpower and Organizational Change Requests {Your Ltr, 1 Feb 84)," 6 Feb 84, 5D 322. Stpid. U), APIS/OP to AFIS/MO, "Request for Manpower Action,” Mtr (8), 323. { 3 Jul 64, Sd SHist Data Rprt {U3}, AFIS/OP, Jan-Bec 84, SO 320, Ibid, 7lpid. This source 2lso contains the names of individuals designated for attendance at PME programs. Sxist Gata Rort (U), AFIS/OP, Jan-Gec 84, SO 320. Sutr (U), w. 6 Atehs {U}, AF/IN to DIRNSA/CSS et al, “FYa8s Intelligence Training @ragrens," 19 Uct 64, SO 324, MOStaff Summary Sheet (uj, AFIS/BPRT to AFIS/CC et al, “Quality of Aniaysis Nominaticns,” 4 Dec 84, SB 325, listaff Summary Sheet (UJ, AFIS/OPRT to ACS/I et al, °FYSS OCI Exceptional Analyst Progras," 4 tec 84, SU 326, Staff Summary Sheet (U), AFIS/DPRT to ACS/1 et al, “Befense Advanced Language and Area Studies Program," 4 Bec 84, SO 327; Hist Data Rert {4}, AFIS/OP, dan-Bec 84, SD 320. Wexcerpt AFR 36-16, 3 Aug 84, p. 3, SL 326. 3Ltr (U}, AF/MPPE to AF/HPP et al, “Minutes of the USAF Area Specialist Conference,” 3 Aug 84, Si) 329; Memo (U), Maj Gen McCartney to AF/IN, “USAF &rea Specialist Program ~ Action Nemorandum,” 17 Aug 64, SU 330; Staff Summary Sheet {U}, AFIS/OPRT ta ACS/I et al, "Area Specialist Program," 24 Aug 84, SU 331; Memo (U}, ACS/I to AF/MP, "USAF area Specialist Program {Your memo, 17 Aug 84} ~ Action Memorandum," 4 Sep 84, SO 332; Memo {U), Maj Gen 377
378 DIRECTORATE OF PERSGHNEL {AFIS DP) MeCartney to AF/IN, “USAF Area Seecialist Progran (Your maemo, 4 Sep 84) ~ informatica Memorandum, °:? Sep 89, Sv 333. Vist Sata Rprt (Uj), AFIS/DP. ver Sec 84, SU 320, 15-22tpig. 23Staff Summary Sheet (Uj, AFIS UPr¢ tp AFIS/BP et al, "Officer Executive Reports {GERs} and Airman Performance Reports {APRs} Calendar Year Total,” n.d., SO 334. 24nist Bata Rort (U}, AFIS/OP, Jan-Dec 84, SO 320. 25-28I pig. 27Ltr (U) w. 1 Atch (u}, AF/CVA to AF/IN, “FY 1984 Management Headquarters Grawdown," 25 dun 84, SD 335; Ltr (U} w. 2 Atch (U}, AF/INE to AFIS/MO, “FY84 Management Headquarters Reduction {AF/IN Ltr, 28 dun 84}," 16 Jul 84, SO 336; Staff Summary Sheet (U}, AFIS/MG to AUS/I et a], "FYS4 Management Headquarters Reduction," 19 Jul 84, Sb 337; Ltr {i}, AF/INY to AFIS/NO, “FYS4 Management Headquarters Reduction {AF/IN Ttr, 28 Jun 84)," 29 Jul 84, SO 338; Ltr (U}, w. 2 Atch (U}, AF/IN to 1947 HSG/MMO, "FY1984 Management Headquarters Orawdown," 23 Jul 84, SO 339; Ltr (u}, AFIS/MO to AF/INEGL. “Realignment of AF/INEGL to AFIS/INOL,” 9 Nov 84, 30 340; AFR 23-47 (U3, “Air Force Combat Operations Staff (AFCOS}," 30 Apr 79, SU 34}, 28xist Data Rpet (U), AFIS/DP, Jan-fec 84, SD 320. @itr (Uj, DIA Directorate for Training to AF/MPYS, “Air Force Coordination on DU Forms 1917 and 1932," 19 dan 84, SP 342; Ltr (2), DIA to OCPO/HPEL, “Career Program,* 9 May 84, SO 343; Staff Summary Sheet (U), AFIS/OPC to ACS/1 et al, “Ind Dev Pian (10?) for AF Employees Covered by the Inteligience Career Development Program," B dun 84, SB 344; Ltr (U), AF/HPK to AF/IN, “Individual Development Plan,..," 17 Jui 84, 50 345; Memo for Record (U}, “BIA/Air Force Gata Exchange Meeting,“ 30 Aug 84, SO 346; Ltr (BU) and | Atch (U), AFIS/OP to OCPO/MPRI, “System Change Report,” 1 Oct 64, SD 347; List (U}, “Civilian Intelligence Career Development Program Courses for OCPO Tables 188/238," n.d., SO 348. 30Hist Data Rprt (U}, AFIS/UP Jan-Dec 84, SB 320; Ltr (U) w. Z Atchs (U}, VIA/CC to ACS/I et al, “Defense Advanced Language and Arez Studies Program (DALASP},“ 9 Nov 84, SD 349,
DIRECTORATE OF PERSONNEL (AFIS/DP) Biitr (U} w, 3 Atchs (U), Ass't Director, Agency Compliance and Evaluation, UPM to Col Sherman, AFIS/C¥, nvs., MCF: EVL 4-3/2, 3 dan 84, 50 350. 32Ltr (u}, Asstt Director, Agency Compliance and Evaluation, OPM to Col Sherman, AFIS/CV, a.5., MCF: EVL 4-1/2, 17 Apr 85, SD 351. 33Hist Data Rprt (U), AFIS/DP, Jan-Dec 84, SD 320. 34Ltr (U}, AFIS/DP to AF/IN Activities et al, “Conversion Instructions to Implement AFR 40-682.,.,° 12 Jul 44, SB 352. ‘itr {U}, AFIS/BP to AF/IN Activities et » “Conversion Instructions to Implement AFR 40-452...,% 5 Jul 84, Sd 353. 358riefing Notes (U}, AFIS/OPC, "AF Form 866," md., SB 354. S6Ler (Uj), AF/IN to AF/IN Activities et a1, "Civilian Performance Management Program - Quality,” 10 Gct 84, SD 355; Ltr {U} w. 4 Atchs (U)}, AFIS/BP to AF/IN Activities et al, “Civilian Performance Mangement Program - Quality Control Process,” 15 Oct 84, SD 356; Memo for Record (U), AFIS/OPC, “Civilian Performance Mgmt Program - Quality Control,” n.d., $0 357. ibid, 3éLtr (U) w. § Atchs (U), AFIS/EP to n.s., “General Management Appraisal System (GMAS), Merit Pay and Awards," 17 May 4, SD 358; Staff Summary Sheet {U) w. 4 Atchs (U), AFIS/OPC to ACS/T et al, “Appointment of Merit Pay Unit Official for the 1984 Merit Pay Program,“ 19 du} 84, SU 359; Memo (U}, AFIS/DPC to SF/IN, “Merit Pay Program Suspense, Control #541,“ 27 dul 84, SU360; Ltr (U}, AFIS/OPCE to All General Managers and Their Supervisors, “erit Pay Increase,“ 21 Oec 84, SD361; List (U)}, AFIS/OP, “Performance and Incentive Awards,“ 1984, SD 362. 39List (U}, AFIS/OP, "Performance and Incentive Awards,” 1984, SD 362. 4Qpescription prt (U}, AFIS/DP, "Intelligence Youth Program,” SO 363; Ltr {Uj}, AFIS/INCF to AFIS/OPC, “Summer Youth Employment Program {Your Ltr, 30 Nov 83},° 3 dan 84, SD 364; itr (U}, AFIS/INE to AFIS/OPC, “Summer Youth Employment Program (Your Ltr, 30 Nov 83)," 4 Jan 84, SO 363. 41AFIS Suggestion Program Log (U}, AFIS/OP, 1984, SD 366. of?
380 DIRECTORATE GF PERSONNEL (AFIS/DP) S2itr (U} Ww. 1 Atch (U}, AFIS/DP to Compound Personne!, “Fourth Semi-Annual AFIS/DP Voluntary Fitness Test,* 14 Sep 84, $0 367. 43Hist Data Rort 9U), AFIS/OP, Jan-Dec 84, SO 3z0. 46-45 Ibid. EXD OF FOOTNOTES FOR AFIS/DP
381 AIX FORCE SPECIAL ACTIVITIES CENTER (AFSAC} Footnote Supporting GBocument {Sb} numbers refer to documents in the CY1964 AFSAC History, Yolumes 7-¥. *
HEADQUARTERS, OPERATIONS AIR FORCE SPECIAL ACTIVITIES CENTER TAFISR 23-2 (S/NF}, “Organization and Functfons Air Force Special Activities Center (AFSAC}) (Uj, 20 Bec 84, SD 1. This regutation includes AFSAC's wartime mission statement. 2tbid. Ubig. 4AFIS Special Order 6-6 (U), 12 Oct 84, SO 2. SAFSACR 23-11 {3), 10 Dec 84, “Detachment 23, Air Force Special Activities Center (AFSAC} {U},“ $0 3. This regulation includes the wartime and contingency missfon of Det 23. SaFISk 23-2 (S/RF), 20 Dec 84, SPL. THist Data Rprt (S/NF/HN/ORCON), AFSAC/INX, Jan-Dec 84, 50 27. BaF ISR 23-2 (S/NF), 20 Dec 84, SO 1. SAFISR 23-2 (S/NF), 20 Vee 84, 50 1. LF or listings of key personnel within each of the AFSAC divisions, see Historical Data Reports (S/NF/WN), Mr. Yoshitaka Hamayasu, AFSAC/IKG, Jan-Jun 84, SOD 4; Historical Data Report (S/NF /WN}, Lt dames R. Vasconcellos, dr., AFSAC/INO, Jul-Dec 84, $b 6. Historical Oata Report (S/NOFORN/ORCON/WNINTEL), Major William J, Bordas, AFSAC/INX, Jan-Dec 94, SD 27, Tikesponse to Intvw Question {U), AFSAC/INXC to AFIS/HO, 14 Jun 85. l2eor 3 listing of 15 separate INO responsibilities, see AFISR 23- 2 {S/NF}, 20 Dec 84, SD 1. The IND section of the AFSAC History was based in part upon the Historical Data Report (S/NF/wWN), AFSAC/INO, Mr. Yoshitaka Hatiayasu, Jan-Jun 84, SD 4; Ltr (U), AFSAC/ING, Mr. Heinz Nehlig to AFIS/HO, "INO Semiannual History Input", 16 Aug 64, SD 4; Historical Data Report (S/NF/WH), AFSAC/ING, Lt dames Vasconcelles, Jul-Dec 84, SO 5; Ltr {U}, pr SAIN. Mr. Heinz Nehlig to AFIS/H0, “ING History Input," 28 Feb 85, $0 5. l3Historical Oata Report {S/NF/WN}, AFSAC/INU, dul-Dec 84, SO 5, Conversation, AFIS Historian with Lt Vasconcejlos, AFSAC/INOBB, 3 Jul 85.
HEADQUARTERS, OPERATIOKS AIR FORCE SPECIAL ACTIVITIES CENTER o l4Hist Oata Rprt (S/NF/WR), AFSAC/IHO, Jul-Dec 84, SO 5. \Stbid., Response to Query (U}, AFSAC/INOS to AFIS/HO, 3 Jul 85. 16Response to Query (CLASSIF, UNKNOKK), | AFSAC/INOAC to AFIS/Historian, 3 dul 8. Vist Bata Rprt (S/NF/WN), AFSAC/ING, Jan-Jun 84, SD 4. I8Hist Data Rprt (S/NF/w), AFSAC/INO, Jul-Dec 84, SU 5. IStbig. Response to Query (S/NF/WN), AFSAC/IAO to AFIS/HO, 3 dul 85. 20Hist vata Rprt (S/NF/WN), AFSAC/INO, Jul-Dec 84, SD 5; Response to Query (S}, AFSAC/INOAB to AFIS/HU, 3 Jul 85. 2lHist Data Rprt (S/NF/WN}, AESAC/1NO, Jul-Dec 84, SO S; Response to Query (U}, AFSAC/INGAS to AFIS/HU, 3 Jul 85. 22 Ibid. 23Response to Intvw Question {5}, AFSAC/IN083 to AFIS/HO, 22 Jun 2Snist Data Rprt (S/NF/WN}, AFSAC/INO, Jul-Dec 84, 5. 25tbia. 26vsg (S/F), AF/IN Liaison Office Howard AFB, Panama, to AFSAC/INO, "AFSAC Participation in Combined Document Exploitation fenter (CDEC) (U), " 1719002 Sep 84, SD 9; Msg (C}, 470 MIGP/CC to AFSAC/CC, “Document Exploitation (U},* 1619002 Oct 84, SO 10; Ltr ES/NOFORN), AFSAC/INXC to AFSAC/INXC etal, “Trip Report (U}." ned, O11, 27intyw (S/HF), AFIS Historian with MSgt amazing, AFSAC/Det 21, 2 dul 85. 28ibid.; Ltr (S/NF}, “AFSAC/INXC to AFSAC/INXC et al, “Trip Report {U), “nd., SO 21. . 23Ibid, Memo (C/NF}, Maj Cseh to AFSAC/CC, “AFSAC Support for Document Exploitation in Central America (C), * 2 dan a5, SD 12. 30Intyw (S/NF}, AFIS Historian with MSgt Ramazini, AFSAC/Det 21, 2 Sul 85. 383
HEADQUARTERS, OPERATIONS AIR FORCE SPECIAL ACTIVITIES CENTER alter (S/NF), AFSAC/INXC to AFSAC/INXC, “Trip Report (U)}," n.d... Sintew (S/NF}, AFIS Historian with MSgt Ramazini AFSAC/Det 21, 2 ul 88. ° 33Msg (V1) 470 MIGP/CC to AFSAC/INO, “Evaluation of AFSAC Support to 470th Bocument Exploitation (U}," 091600 Jan 85, SO 13. See also Ltr of Evaluation (U}, Capt Swanson, CDEC/Bet E, on MSgt Ramazini, AFSAC/Det 21, 20 Dec 84, SD 14. S4Hist Data Reprt (S/NF/wi), AFSAC/INO, Jul-Dec 84, SO 5; Rprt (S}, "Ballas and Los Angeles SCU Field Offices (U},“ AFSAC/INUAC, 7 Sep 84, SO 15. 35Hist Data Reprt (S/NF/WN), AFSMC/INO, Jul-Dec 84, SE 5; Ltr (C), Col Yankowski to Mr. Kelly, a.$, 26 Sep 84, SD 16 and 2 Nov 84, SO 17, 36Hist Data Reprt (S/NF/WH), AFSAC/INO, Jan-Jun 84, SO 4; Conversation (S/NF/wh), AFIS Historian w. Lt Vasconcellos, AFSAC/INOBS, 3 Jul 85. ‘ Hist Data Rprt (S/HF/WH), AFSAC/INO, Jy}-Dec 84, 30 5; Response to Inquiry (C/NF), AFSAC/INOAC to AFIS/HO, 3 Jul 85; Agenda {U), “Bir Force NCD Workshop," AFSAC/INGAC, 19 Oct 84, SD 18, 38"Western Hemisphere Bulletins", HQ AFSAC, 17 May, 2 dul, 11 Sep, 1} Dec 84, SD 19. 39P rogram (U), HQ AFSAC Commanders Conference 1984, 7 May 1944, SO * 40Ltr (3), with 6 Atch {S}, AFSAC/CC to Det. 22/CC, “Gperations Objectives, Calendar Year 19d4 (U)," 9 Jan 84, SO 21; Ltr (5S) with 5 Atch (S}, AFSAC/CC to Det 21/CC, “Operations Objectives, Catendar Year 1984," 9 Jan 84, SO 22. 4lHist Data Rort (S/NE/HN), AFSAC/ING, Jul-Dec 84, SDS. 42AFSACR 23-11 (S}, “Detachment 23, Air Force Special Activities Center {AFSAC) (U},” 10 Dec 84, SD 3, . 43AF ISR 23-2 (S/RF}, Organization and Functions Air Force Special Activities Center (AFSAL) (U}," 20 Dec 84, SB 1, Hist Data Rprt (S/F /We}, AFSAC/ING, Jan-Jun, SO 4,
HEADQUARTERS, OPERATIONS AIR FORCE SPECIAL ACTIVITIES CENTER 44AFSAC Pamphlet 200-27 (S/NF/HN/ORCON),“Air Force Human Resources Intelligence Highlights (U)*, 15 Apr 85, SD 23. 43tntvw (S}, AFIS Historian with CMSgt Watts and SSgt Laughery, 13 dun 85, sehist Data Rprts (S/NF/WN), AFSAC/INO, Jan-Jun 84, SD 4, Jul-Dec 84, SO 5. 47Msq (C), AFSSO/INSC to SSO Belvoir, "AFSAC/INOCA SCIF, Bldg T- 1917, Rm 3, Ft Belvoir, VA," 2914012 Feb 84, SO 24; Msg (C), AFSAC/INOCA ta AFIS/INSC, "Final Accreditation for AFSAC SCIF (U)," 1821222 Feb 84, SO 25. 48intvw (S$), AFIS Historian with CMSgt Watts and SSgt Laughery, AFSAC/INOGE, 33 Jun 85. 431i, S0msg (C), AFIS/INSC to AFSAC/INOSB, “Approval to Process Electronically (U),“ 0614222 Nov 84, SO 26, 1 Slintyw (S), AFIS Historian with CMSgt Watts and SSgt Laughery, AFSAC/INGBB, 33 Jun 85. S2tntyw (S), AFIS Historian with CMSgt Watts and SSgt Laughery, AFSAC/INOBS, 13 dun 85, 53intyw, AFIS Historian with CHSgt Watts and SSgt Laughery, AFSAC/1NO8%, 13 Jun 85. S4uist Data Rprt (S/NF/wH), APSAC/INO, dan-sul 84, SD 4; Response to Query (C}), AFSAC/INQAH to AFIS/HO, 55Response to Query (U}, AFSAC/INUAC to AFIS/HO, 3 Jul 85. PLANS, RESOURCES AND SUPPORT (AFSAC/INX) 58The section on Plans, Resources and Support was based in part on the Hist Data Rpt (S/HF/WN/ORCON), AFSAC/INX, Capt Wm J, Bordas, dan-Dec 84, Si 27, See Ltr {U), AFSAC/INX, Lt Col Clarence Lb. Fairbrother to AFIS/HU, 22 Feb &5, SO 27. S7Hist Data Rpt (S/NF/WN/ORLON), AFSAC/INX, dan-Dec 84, $D 27, Yoo
386 HEADQUARTERS, OPERATIONS AIR FORCE SPECIAL ACTIVITIES CENTER 58ibid. S9Executive Summary (S/NF) w/S Atchs (S),"Air Force Human Resources intelligence (HUMINT) Wartime Readiness,” AFSAC/INXA, 11 Jan 85, 60Ibid. 6libid. 62inig. 835raft Concept Paper (S), “Enhanced Support of the AFSAC Mobility Mission,“ 29 Aug 84, SO 29. S4Hist Data Rpt (S/RE/WN/ORCON), AFSAC/INX, Jan-Dec 84, SD 27. SSHist Data Rpt (S/NF/WH/ORCON), AFSAC/INX, Jan-Dee 84, 5D 27. S6Memo for Record (S}, Maj Roser to INX et al, “¥isit by 525 MI Gp $-3," B Jun 84, S& 30, * S7Hist Data Rot (S/NF/WN/URCON), AFSAC/INX, Jan-Dec 84, SD 27, GBmtg Minutes (C), AFSAC Communications Advisory Council (U)}, 20 Jan 84, SD 31. §3Trip Rpt {U}, AFSAC/INXB to AFSAC/INXA, “Test of AN/GRO-206 Radio System - PACER SPEAK," 11 Jun 84, SO 32. JOAFIS Statement of Operational Need (SJ, “Air Force HUMINT Cri- sis/Wartime Communications (U}," SON 01-84, 19 dun 84, SO 33. 72Msg (C}, Det 13/ESAA to HQ ESAA/INX, "JCF Relocation Discussions with 60ist TCW,” 2814152 Dec 84, SD 35. 73Staff Summary Sheet (S/NF) #/1 Atch (S/NF}, AFSAC/INXA to AFSAC/CC, "JCF PMD," 26 Dec 84, SU 36. peleted per $ U.S.C. $52¢b) 1)