datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL NTELLIGENCE SUPPORT CENTER 430) GLITLAND ROAD CANC: 30 APR 86 WASHINGTON. DC 20380 Ov REPLY REFER TO NISCNOTE 5400 NISC-OOA 1 APR 85 NISC NOTICE 5400 Subj: ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NAVAL TECENOLOGY DEPARTMENT (NISC-10) Encl: (1) Organization Chart 1. Purpose. To announce the establishment of the Naval Technology Department. 2. Effective Date. Immediately t 3. Background. Naval technology related functions are currently performed by elements scattered Oorganizationally as well as geographically. For example, current NISC technology assessment functions are performed in NISC-36, NISC-512, and NISC-OOWT. Technology transfer operations are centered at Chesapeake Beach, with supporting elements resident at Suitland. Contractual support efforts relating to foreign use of advanced naval technologies are currently being monitored and controlled in separate organizational elements. There are potential benefits to bring these efforts under centralized management. 4. Organization. Enclosure (1) depicts the tentative organization of the Naval Technology Department (NISC-10). The wission of this department is to provide intelligence on foreign applications of science and technology to naval uses, to assess foreign capabilities and limitations in incorporating advanced technology into naval systems, to assess foreign availability and transfer of technology of naval interest, and to manage and execute the Navy Foreign Materiel Program. 5. Action. The Technical Director will act as Chairman of an ad hoc group consisting of Dr. William Reese, CAPT T. Fritz, CDR E. McCulloch, CDR M. Jewell, Mr. G. Shepherd, and other NISC support when designated. This group will complete by 30 April 1985 the administrative actions required to establish this new department. 6. Cancellation contingency: This notice is cancelled upon completion of the administrative set up of the department, the incorporation of the organization details, missions, and functions into the NORM, and for record purposes 30 April 1986. e ° i” A. OLIFIPLD, JR. Distribution: List I
siviSG C"weanan review L_ ee ar prnien { SE, EMOTES | | HR. ROBINSON = gaa FINANCIAL RESOURCE mer. GR. BARTZ 7 CORCALDWELL ER. MOULTON 94 . EANDEL es ANALYSIS DIRECTORATE | EXPLOITATION DIRECTORATE [TECHNOLOGY DIRECTORATE SERVICES DIRECTORATE CAPT KILLELEA | CAPT MORGAN OR. REESE COR GRFC . Om. ELLIGTT _ oA _ MM. FOXWELL CER McCULLOEN aT MR. PARADISO as ""GNALYSIS DIR. STAFF . ; : | min ; [ INFORMATION SYS DEPT. NAVAL TECH ASSESS. ADMIN SVCS. DEPT. ORO Nouens TT OEFT. | EXPLOITATION DEPT. FOREIGN MTL. DEPT. WUMAN RESOURCES DEPT. um. BOYD’ 04-28 CAPT EAST (OR, AALS . " . 5. EVANS 8-20 OT-28 03-28 eee 9a Pt ANALYTICAL SVCS. DEPT. anew pase naam y--+-eaaaeall os. WS WARFARE SENSORS DEPT. | ~ PRODUCTION SVCS. DEPT. 0a-40 VACANT aa ares QURING THE TRANSITION me
DEPARTMENT  OF  THE  NAVY 
NAVAL  NlfUAENOe  WU**OKT  CINTEft 
4aei  mjniMB road  CANCs    30   APR   86 
WA»«*JTON.  OC  80380  ^  p^^y  MBEFf  *  TO 
NISCNOTE  5400 
NISC-OOA 
1  APR  85 
NISC  NOTICE  5400 
Subj:   ESTABLISHMENT  OP  THE  NAVAL  TECHNOLOGY  DEPARTMENT  (NISC-10) 
Encl:   CD  Organization  Chart 
1.  Purpose,  To  announce  the  establishment  of  the  Naval 
Technology  Department. 
2.  Effective  Date.  Immediately      * 
3*  Background.  Naval  technology  related  functions  are  currently 
performed  by  elements  scattered  organizationally  as  well  as 
geographically.  For  example,  current  NISC  technology  assessment 
functions  are  performed  in  NISC-36,  NISC-512,  and  NISC-OOWT. 
Technology  transfer  operations  are  centered  at  Chesapeake  Beach, 
with  supporting  elements  resident  at  Suitland.  Contractual 
support  efforts  relating  to  foreign  use  of  advanced  naval 
technologies  are  currently  being  monitored  and  controlled  in 
separate  organizational  elements*  There  are  potential  benefits  to 
bring  these  efforts  under  centralized  management. 
*•  Organization.  Enclosure  €1)  depicts  the  tentative 
organization  of  the  Naval  Technology  Department  (NISC-10).  The 
mission  of  this  department  is  to  provide  intelligence  on  foreign 
applications  of  science  and  technology  to  naval  uses,  to  assess 
foreign  capabilities  and  limitations  in  incorporating  advanced 
technology  into  naval  systems,  to  9l»m^bb   foreign  availability  and 
transfer  of  technology  of  naval  interest,  and  to  manage  and 
execute  the  Navy  Foreign  Materiel  Program. 
5.  Action.   The  Technical  Director  will  act  as  Chairman  of  an  ad 
hoc  group  consisting  of  t>z^   William  Reese,  CAPT  T.  Fritz,  CDR  B. 
Mcculloch,  CDR  M.  Jewell,  Mr.  6.  Shepherd,  and  other  NISC  support 
when  designated.  This  group  will  complete  by  30  April  1985  the 
administrative  actions  required  to  establish  this  new  department. 
8.  Cancellation  Contingency.  This  notice  is  cancelled  upon 
completion  of  the  administrative  set  up  of  the  department,  the 
incorporation  of  the  organization  details,  missions,  and  functions 
into  the  NORM,  and  for  record  purposes  30  April  1986. 
(    Distribution: 
List  I 
X./5.   I0LIPI/J,D,  J**
MenJ 
CO  CAPT  H0LJF1ELD  " 
XO  CAPT  McOONALD  m 
t^NALREVKW 
as. 
RNANCIAL  RESOURCE 
MCT. 
ANALYSIS  DIRECTORATE 
CAPTKJUfUA 
■LfLUOTT 
EXPLOITATION  DIRECTORATE 
CAFTMQftCAR 
■LfOIWOl  M 
ANALYSIS  DIR.  STAFF 
  MR.tOVD   RA4C 
UNDERSEA  WARFARE  KPT. 
ML  IOVD'  RAJA 
SURFACE  WARFARE  DEFT. 
MIL  PARTS 
WL  LEWIS 
1ECNNOLOGY  DMECTORATE 
MLKCSC    
INFORMATION  SYS 
MR.  KIDMAN 
MR.  WOLSTEJMMMJMI 
RC-lt 
SKNALS  EXPLOITATION  DEFT. 
COT  EAST 
MS.  EVANS 
NAVAL  TEOL  ASSESS. 
DEFT. 
RMS 
FORSCN  MTL  BEFT. 
WARFARE  SENSORS  REFT. 
u 
EXPLOITATION  DEFT. 
AIR  WARFARE  DEFT. 
NAVTOS 
MLCATES  tA-St 
Aj&fttlTMttSARCACTRM 
ADMIN  SVCS.  DEFT. 
4A 
ANALYTICAL  SVCS.  DEFT. 
PRODUCTION  SVCS.  DEFT. 
VACART
TECHNICAL DIRECTOR DEPUTY TECHNICAL DIRECTOR 4 besmarive corkations sceokt ANALTES OriisIOre COMMANDING OFFICER EXECUTIVE OFFICER nfors bsracnsunt mtwroa?, a2 mAvY FLD OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE NFOIO OFFICE
* 
COMMANDING 
TECHNICAL 
OFFICER 
N F ol 0 
DIRECTOR 
. 
MALY 
N 
ruib OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE 
DEPUTY 
orrict 
TECHNICAL 
EXECUTIVE 
j 
DIRECTOR 
been, | | 
nro 
vic 
re 
e 
vc 
cotkAtions epodt 
proncré 
ANALYSE 
favicts 
f 
 Whanquanties 
e ο 
-ANALTUS OIisIOE 
. 
&. 
OETACHMENT 
d 
onisoa
— HAVOPINTCEN ORGANIZATION riers (a Sepia EXECUTIVE rf | OFFICER “, 1 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OEPT. OPERATIONS MISSION: To produce finished operational intelligence, including indications and warning, ocean surveillance information, and in-depth analysis of Soviet strategy, doctrine, tactics and readiness in response to requirement:s of JCS, Department of the Navy, Defense Intelligence Agency, and joint commands; to provide for the timely dissemination of such intelligence to support planning and execution of military and naval operations; and to perform such functions and tasks as directed by highér authority. COMMANDING growl tare NAVOPINTCEN HEADQUARTERS TECHNICAL “DIRECTOR OPERATIONS OFFICER DEPUTY TECHHICAL DIRECTOR' POLICY ACTION STAFF 04 05 06 SPECIAL CURRENT NEWPORT RI. PROJECTS | NAVAL ANALYSIS DEPT. WORLD NAVIES DEPT. ISTEVLIGUICE SYSCEANS WEFT. DETACHMENT DEPT.
MISSION;  To  produce  finished  operational  intelligence,  including 
indications  and  warning,  ocean  surveillance  information,  and  in-depth 
analysis  of  Soviet  strategy,  doctrine,  tactics  and  readiness  in  response 
to  requirements  of  JCS,  Department  of  the  Navy,  Defense  Intelligence 
Agency,  and  joint  commands;  to  provide  for  the  timely  dissemination 
of  such  intelligence  to  support  planning  and  execution  of  military  and 
naval  operations;  and  to  perform  such  functions  and  tasks  as  directed  by 
higher  authority* 
fMVOPJNTCfN  OUGAmiATlOll 
TECHNICAL 
DIRECTOR 
DEPUTY  TECHNICAL 
DIRECTOR' 
COMMANDING 
OFFICER 
EXECUTIVE 
OFFICER 
OPERATIONS 
OFFICER 
RESOURCE 
MANAGEMENT 
OEPT.' 
CURRENT 
OPERATIONS 
OEPT. 
n 
NAVOPINTCEN 
HEADQUARTERS 
POLICY  ACTION 
STAFF 
WORLD 
NAVIES  DEPT. 
NEWPORT  R.I. 
DETACHMENT 
SPECIAL 
PROJECTS 
DEPT. 
07 INIFIIIGIMCE 
SViff/Ai  I # I  PI.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITEO STATES MARINE CORPS WASHINGTON. D0. C. 20380 MCO 5740.6 pA R70 2° 5 Apr 197 MARINE CORPS ORDER 5740.6 From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution List Subj: Interagency Support Between the Marine Corps and the Central Intelligence Agency Ref: (a) CNO ltr Serial TS23P009 of 31 December 1972 (NOTAL) 1. Purpose. To assign responsibility and set forth pro- cedures concerning interagency support between the Marine Corps and the Central Intelligence Agency. 2. Policy. Interagency support between the Marine Corps and the Central Intelligence Agency will be in accordance with the following provisions: a. All Marine Corps support to the Central Intelligence Agency will be provided through the channels established by reference (a), and will be approved by the Secretary of the Navy or his representative, so designated in writing. b. All support of the Marine Corps by the Central Intel- ligence Agency involving the transfer of Navy or Marine Corps funds will be covered by a letter of agreement, signed by the Secretary of the Navy or his representative, so designated in writing. c. All billings or other transfers of funds between the Marine Corps and the Central Intelligence Agency will be processed through the Commandant of the Marine Corps (Code INT), Headquarters Marine Corps to the Assistant to the Comptroller of the Navy for Special Programs. 3. Responsibility. The Commandant of the Marine Corps (Code INT) is hereby assigned responsibility for maintaining a central point of control of all interagency support between the Marine Corps and the Central Intelligence Agency. PCN 102 090756 00 ED (31
MCO 5740.6 5 Apr 1976 4. Implementation. Interagency support between the CIA and the Marine Corps will be effected in accordance with the following procedures: a. CIA requests for Marine Corps support under the pur- view of the Secretary of Defense must be forwarded for approval to Commandant of the Marine Corps (Code INT) via the Joint Chiefs of Staff. b. All other CIA requests for Marine Corps support must be forwarded for approval to the Commandant of the Marine Corps (Ccde INT). ce. All Marine Corps requests for CIA support must be forwarded to the Commandant of the Marine Corps (Code INT), for aprroval and execution of letters of agreemerit as appropriate. d. Commandant of the Marine Corps (Code INT) will coordinate with the Secretary of the Navy for approvals and letters of agreement, as appropriate. In addition, the Commandant of the Marine Corps (Code INT) will ensure that all fiscal transactions (billings, transfer of funds, etc.) between the Marine Corps and the CIA are prcecessed through the Assistant to the Comptroller of the Navy for Special Programs. e. CIA requests for visits to Marine Corns commands and facilities, or for Marine Corps information, must be sub- mitted to the Commandant of the Marine Corps (Code INT) for coordination. 5. Reserve Applicability. This Order is applicable to the Marine Corps Reserve. L. E. BROWN Chief of Staff DISTRIBUTION: A Copy te: 7000/8145001 Nas
er HE CRE YAS '. "UNITED STATES AIR FORCE. REPORT TO THE INTELLIGENCE OVERSIGHT BOARD » ° AS OF 30 SEPTEMBER 1981 1. (U) Actions Taken: a. (U) Intelligence Inspection Branch, Air Force Inspection and Safety Center (AFISC), conducted a Management Effectiveness Inspection (MEI) of Detachment 22, Air Force wSpecial Activities Center (AFSAC), and those h an intelli- gence (HUMINT) resources assigned to Air Force Systems Command's Foreign Technology Division (FTD). As part of the worldwide HUMINT reorganization, FTD HUMINT resources will be combined with those of. Detachment 22 effective 1 October 1981, The intellig nce oversight program at Detachment 22 was rated officers in charge of collection projects were well versed in oversight matters, and were normally present when the 2 NE ee 8 AS ¢ SASS NTS SS es or improprieties were noted. A intelligence inspector participated in an AFISC over-the- shoulder inspection (OTSI) of the Pacific Air Forces Inspec- tor General's (IG) MEI of a tactical composite wing. Another USAF intelligence inspector participated in an AFISC functional management inspection (FMI) concerning the flow of essential information during degraded communications. This phase of the FMI included visits to two numbered air _ force headquarters, three tactical fighter wings, and one each composite wing and group. b. (U) In other AFISC activity, the report of the Limited Followup Inspection of the FMI of Operations-~ Intelligence Interface was published 31 July 1981. CLASSIFIED BY Gini epeeeceee imc! DECLASSIFY QN ee REVIEW ON _SeeEeee renee EXTENDED BY “} REASON 2 DOWNGRADE tn, ~ ON
EEE EEE EE EEE IES, CURD “eNO 0 ES hwetne t Bina Hs e . c. (U) Air Force Intelligence Service (AFIS) IG provided one representative to augment the AFISC team during the MEI of Detachment 22,°AFSAC. -No other oversight inspections were conducted.during this period. f. U) Electronic Security Command (ESC) IG conducted three JEIs and one followup inspection. No illegalities or improprieties were noted. ‘ ° 2. B® Actions Planned: a. (U) From 1 October through 31 December 1981, the AFISC Intelligence Inspection Branch (IGAI) will conduct an FMI concerning intelligence support to deployed forces. Eieven continental United States (CONUS) and nine European bases will be visited, including four major command headquar-. ters. In addition, a USAF intelligence inspector: will participate in the next phase of the degraded communications FMI, visiting one base in the CONUS and saven bases in Europe. » b. (U) AFIS IG will conduct an MEI of a HUMINT unit. ec. (U) AFOSI IG will inspect 1 CONUS district and 2 overseas districts, with a total of 11 detachments.
H 
UNITED  STATES  AIR  FORCE. REPORT 
TO  THE 
INTELLIGENCE  OVERSIGHT  BOARD 
-  •  AS  OF 
30  SEPTEMBER  1981 
1.   (U)  Actions  Taken: 
a.   (U)   Intelligence  Inspection  Branch,  Air  Force 
Inspection  and  Safety  Center  (AFISC),  conducted  a  Management 
Effectiveness  Inspection  (MEI)  of  Detachment  ,22,  Air  Force 
Special  Activities  Center  (AFSAC),  and  those  htjman  intelli- 
gence (HUMINT)  resources  assigned  to  Air  Force  Systems 
Command's  Foreign  Technology  Division  (FTD).  As  part  of  the 
worldwide  HUMINT  reorganization,  FTD  HUMINT  resources  will 
be  combined  with  those  of . Detachment  22  effective  1  October 
1981.  The^.ntelligqnce  oversight  program  at  Detachment  22 
was  rated 
Although. the  Detachment  22  intelligence  case 
officers"  in  charge  of  collection  projects  were  well  versed 
in  oversight  matters,  and  were  normally  present  when  the 
FTD  analysts  and  US  persons  made  contact, 
io  other  illegalities  or  improprieties  were ~ no t e< 
intelligence  inspector  participated  in  an  AFISC  over-the- 
shoulder  inspection  (OTSI)  of  the  Pacific  Air  Forces  Inspec- 
tor General's  (IG)  MEI  of  a  tactical  composite  wing. 
Another  USAF  intelligence  inspector  participated  in  an'  AFISC 
functional  management  inspection  (FMI)  concerning  the  flow 
of  essential  information  during  degraded  communications. 
This  phase  of  the  FMI  included  visits  to  two  numbered  air 
force  headquarters,  three  tactical  fighter  wings,  and  one 
each  composite  wing  and  group. 
b.   (U)   In  other  AFISC  activity,  the  report  of  the 
Limited  Followup.  Inspection  of  the  FMI  of  Operations- 
Intelligence  Interface  was  published  31  July  1981. 
CLASSIFIED  BY 
DECLASSIFY 
REVIEW  ON 
EXTENDED  BY 
EASON   
» 
■*■-*■  ••* 
DOWNGRADE  *n 
ON.
^as^i^srr 
c.   (U)  Air  Force  Intelligence  Service  (AFIS)  IG 
provided  one  representative  to  augment  the  AFISC  team 
during  the  MEI  of  Detachment  22/AFSAC.  No  other  oversight 
inspections  were  conducted » during  this  period. 
f.  (U)  Electronic  Security  Command  (ESC)  IG  conducted 
three  .IEIs  and  one  followup  inspection.  No  illegalities  or 
improprieties  were  noted. 
2. 
Actions  Planned: 
a.   (U)   From  1  October  through  31  December  1981,  the 
AFISC  Intelligence  Inspection  Branch  (IGAI)  will  conduct  an 
FMI  c.).-icerning  intelligence  support  to  deployed  forces. 
Eleven  continental  United  States  (CONUS)  and  nine  European 
bases  will  be  visited,  including  four  major  command  headquar-  . 
ters.   In  addition,  a  USAF  intelligence  inspector  will 
participate  in  the  next  phase  of  the  degraded  communications 
FMI,  visiting  one  base  in  the  CONUS  and  soven  bases  in  Europe. 
b.   (U)   AFIS  IG  will  conduct  an  MEI  of  a  HUMINT  unit. 
c.   (U)   AFOSI 
overseas  districts 
IG  will  inspect  1  CONUS  district  and  2 
with  a  total  of  11  detachments. 
<r>  rn
e.   (U)  ESC  IG  will  inspect  two  units 
5  Atcfa 
1 .  AFIS 
SAF/GC 
m
Reecyv To alts OF; SUBsECT: TO: SoPARTCEuT OFT -E ir Fl eC€ . tee - wESl ll 8 TERE Flee Tale. Fol « Ls =e Abe Seger, SESS s TPe 3 ° 31 March i981 a IG Intelligence Oversight Quarterly Report. NSACSS/1G 1. Mission activities of the Electronic Security Conmand (ESC) were legally and properly conducted. No oversight violations/ incidents were reported. 2 2. Actions Taken: During this quarter we conducted Management Effectiveness Inspections of the 6993 ESS/CSOC, Kelly AFB, Texas; 6950 ESG, RAF Chicksands, England; and the 6913 ESS, Augsburg, Germany. Efforts have been taken during this period to obtain sufficient copies of the Air Force video cassette entitled “The President's Intelligence Oversight Program" for all ESC units. This film will be shown to newcomers at ESC units during their unit indoctrination process. The cassette can also be used during recurring training as a refresher. 3. Future Actions: We are currently scheduled to inspect three ESC units during the next 90 days. Mo AA tttect__ . ALAN G. HOFFMAN, Major, USAP Cy to: HQ USAF/IGI Acting Inspector General —HQ_AFISC/IGAI HQ 6940 ESW FT MEADE/CC
■■■■■■  ■■■•■  ^ 
■  -*    .^ 
r»\  : 
DEPART-  £:<T  Dr  7  .-:  :.  f  r-IPCE 
*£»*.*    TO 
at**  or:       IG 
31   March    1981 
sua/ecT:     Intelligence  Oversight  Quarterly  Report. 
to:      NSACSS/IG 
1.  Mission  activities  of  the  Electronic  Security  Command  (ESC) 
were  legally  and  properly  conducted.  No  oversight  violations/ 
incidents  were  reported. 
2.  Actions  Taken:   During  this  quarter  we  conducted  Management 
Effectiveness  Inspections  of  the  6993  ESS/CSOC,  Kelly  AFB,  Texas; 
6950  ESG,  RAF  Chicksands,  England;  and  the  6913  ESS,  Augsburg, 
Germany,   Efforts  have  been  taken  during  this  period  to  obtain 
sufficient  copies  of  the  Air  Force  video  cassette  entitled  "The 
President's  Intelligence  Oversight  Program"  for  all  ESC  units. 
This  film  will  be  shown  to  newcomers  at  ESC  units  during*  their 
unit  indoctrination  process.   The  cassette  can  also  be  used 
during  recurring  training  as  a  refresher. 
3.  Future  Actions:   We.  are  currently  scheduled  .to  inspect  *three 
ESC^units  during  the  next  90  days. 
ALAN  G.  HOFFMAN,  Major,  USAF 
Acting  Inspector  General 
Cy  to:   HQ  USAF/IGI 
— 1#2  ,£  FISC/I GA I  
HQ~69  4  0"ESW~FT    MEADE/CC 
n
_ MAT TO alte OF WOHCt 9. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS AA FORCE NTELUGENCE SEAVCE FOAT BELVPA. VARA, 22000 4. OcT 1981 ct . . Quarterly Oversight Inspection Activities -(1' Jul = 30 Sep 81) HQ AFISC/IGAL Norton APB, CA 92409 1. The following is submitted in accordance with AFR 123-3, Intelligence Oversight: a. Current Activities: There were no oversight inspections conducted by AFIS/1IG during this period. A representative of AFIS/IG did accompany an AFISC/IGAI inspection team as an AFIS observor on an inspection of Det 22, Air Force Special Activities Center (AFSAC), Wright-Patterson AFB, OH. Tnis inspection was conducted on 3-11 August 1981. b Future Activities: An AFIS/IG-conducted intelligence oversight inspection will be conducted in November 1981 in con- junction with a planned Management Effectiveness Inspection (MEI): of Det @1, AFSAC, Ft Belvoir, VA. 2. No ..ctivities that raised questions of legality or propriety were deiacted or-reported during this period. FOR TH: TOMMANDER . : “WAYD. " BURRIDG “Lt Col, USAF Taspects © General . Aach |
DEPARTMENT  OF  THE  AIR  FORCE 
fOM  BtLVprt.  VAC*v«UV  22060 
1  OCT  W 
*rr*cO«    -Lu 
feA^Ct 
to 
Quarterly  Oversight  Inspection  Activities  (T  Jul  -  30  Sep  8l) 
HQ  AFISC/IGAI 
Norton  AFB,  CA  92409 
1.  The  following  is  submitted  in  accordance  /with  AFR  123-3* 
Intelligence  Oversight: 
a.  Current  Activities:  There  were  no  oversight  inspections 
conducted  by  AFIS/IG  during  this  period.  A  representative  of 
AFIS/IG  did  accompany  an  AFISC/IGAI  inspection  team  as  an  AFIS 
observor  on  an  Inspection  of  Det  22,  Air  Force  Special  Activities 
Center  (AFSAC),  Wright-Patterson  AFB,  OH.   This  inspection  was 
conducted  on  3-H  August  1981. 
b.  Future  Activities:   An  AFIS/IG-conducted  intelligence 
oversight  inspection  will  be  conducted  in  November  1981  In  con- 
junction with  a  planned  Management  Effectiveness  Inspection  (MEI)- 
of  Det  S.1,    AFSAC,  Ft  Belvoiiv  VA. 
2.  No  /.ctivities  that  raised  questions  of  legality  or  propriety 
were  delected  or  reported  during  this  period. 
FOR  TH'.l   COMMANDER 
<z;xX*%  o~^~- 
C.    W7m.:    BURRIDGB^yLt   Col,    USAF 
Inspected  General 
<  \ 
A\cVi  I
WASHINGTON 20330 OFFICE OF THE UNOER SECRETARY March 28 F 19 80 MEMORANDUM FOR THE INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE SUBJECT: USAF Special Letter Report to the Intelligence Oversight Board - INFORMATION MEMORANDUM The Inspector General, United States Air Force, con- ducted a Management Effectiveness Inspection of Detachment 20, 7602d Air Intelligence Group (AINTELG), Bolling Air Force Base, District of Columbia, during the period 14-16 January 1980. No oversight violations were found; Air Force inspectors continue to monitor USAF intelli-~ gence activities. Detachment 20, 7602d Air Intelligence Group, collection practices will be reinspected within 6 months. . t -~ 2g nO wee 74h oe. o- The Cles=ffie>": 292 this docemmt peeie : teres: ”~ sae mt soe pet rrr ss “5 Stendics Sieu- 22 fe
DEPARTMENT  OF  THE  AIR  FORCE 
WASHINGTON  20330 
OfftCE  Of  TH€  UNOGR  SECRETARY 
March  28,  1980 
MEMORANDUM  FOR  THE  INSPECTOR  GENERAL  FOR  DEFENSE  INTELLIGENCE 
SUBJECT: 
USAF  Special  Letter  Report  to  the  Intelligence 
Oversight  Board  -  INFORMATION  MEMORANDUM 
The  Inspector  General,  United  States  Air  Force,  con- 
ducted  a  Management  Effectiveness  Inspection  of  Detachment 
20,  7602d  Air  Intelligence  Croup  (AINTELC),  Boiling  Air 
Force  Base,  District  of  Columbia,  during  the  period  14-16 
January  1980. 
oversight  violations  were  found 
Air  Force  inspectors  continue  to  monitor  USAF  intelli 
gence  activities*   Detachment  20,  7602d  Air  Intelligence 
Croup,  collection  practices  will  be  reinspected  within  6 
months  . 
•  Antonia  Handler  Chafes 
^-f-r.-  ,    ^  ••  »• 
■  i.?  this  docv.=2t