237 RANK NAME DIRECTORATE SSgt Torrez, Oscar H.** AFIS /DAPR SSot Wilidams, Ward F. AFIS /IHO **Released without prejudice from NCOLS, Training Procedures Procedures for proper training submiesione were es hed to preclude improper training submissions. In the past, some courses of inatruction were not contracted through ATC, and funds were expended needlessly. Seminar attendance increased sharply, and proper procedures JAW AFR 30-9 were instituted to preclude improper approval. Suggestion Program ’ Por statistics on the Suggestion Program see the program log. INTELLIGENCE TRAINING PROGRAMS BRANCH This new branch was developed during 1983 to be the single point of contact in the Air Force for selected Intelligence Training and Research Programs. Major R. F. Airaghi was detailed from DIA to begin operation, and a SMSgt poaitian was transferred fram AFIS/MO. By the end of the year, one staff sergeant position was taken from AFIS/DPT to help manage the various programs traneferred to AFIS/DP from AFIS/INH in May 1983.2 Air Force Area Specialist Program Management of this program was transferred to APIS/OP from AFIS/TNH in May 1983.3 The primary source of training for Area Specialiesta is the Naval Postgraduate School. The biannual curriculum review is vital to ensure that the area studies courses meet the needs of the program, The students praised the coursework highly and we were able to solve some minor concerns. Although Attaches had nog WHR aris/or, “aris Suggestion Program." CT1983, SD 330. 2her QM. acs/t to All SIOs, “Intelligence Training Programs for FY84,* 29 Aug 83, SD 3314. 3emo QB, AF/IN Executive to APIS/DP, “Manning the Area Specialist and DALASP Programs for APIS/INR to AFIS/OP,* 26 Apr @3, SO 332; Trip Rort @BR ArIs/Inw to AF/IN, “1983 Joint Service Review of Naval Postgraduate School Curricula,” 29 Apr 83, 5D 333; utr QB oaFIs/INH to AF/INYX, “FyY83/a4 Area Specialist AFIT Quota,“ 15 Mar 63, 5D 334.
138 specific a@signmenta following training, aliooother Ares Specialists had no idea of the nature of their follow-on assignment. ! 2 Although the Ares Specialist Program was 15 yeara old, 4 complete xeview of positiona had never been done. When the project was finished, it waa obvious that there was improper documentation for most positions, and that there were critical shortages is trained officers for certain geographical areas. The program review established the Fye4 training requirement for Area Specialists. AFIT quota wax for 35 Araa Studies masters degrees and one doctorate degree, This was the largest. quota ever for the program. The quota was allocated ag followa: Intelligence 18 Air Attache WW Special Investigations S Political~Military Affairs 1 Education & Training t This was the first time a quota had bean allocated to either Political~Military Affaira er Education and Training. The Airy VPorce Area Specialist Program ' gained the attention of the Chief of Staff of the Atr Force because of cotments by the US Ambassador to China. APMPC/CC reaponded that the program was serving the Aix Porce well. Rowaver, there are atill fundamental problems that prevent full use of trained officers.? The ACS/I announced the FY84 Selection Board for the program and sixty-one officers submitted applications. The board convened, but AFMPC Resources Advisors made available only two officers for the program. The work of the board was concentrated on developing new application and selection procedures. The board directed that AFR 36-6 be rewritten ta strengthen the role of the AYMPC Resource Advisors in identifying candidates, selecting qualified, available officers, and projecting possibie future aasignmenta. @ The Naval Postgraduate School trained Area Specialists in ail geographical regions except Latin America. We were ‘utr QM. arissopT to AR/MPPR, “FYB4 Graduate Education Program,* 1 Jul 83, SO 335; Lex QB. avis/veT to AP/INYX, “Area Specialist Positions,” 14 Jul 83, SD 3367 Ltr - APMPC/CCO to AE/XOX, "Foreign Area Officer Speciaity," 27 Jul 83, SDB 337. 2ner QM OAF/IN to AP/EM Staff, “FYad Area Specialist Selection Board,“ 29 Jul 83, SA 334; Minutes QR Fysa Area Specialist Selection Board, 29 Auq 83, SB 339.
23¢ disappointed to learn thet the projected Latin American program would not be available in 1984. The two Air Force students were gent to Tulane University. It was not the primary civilian inetitution studying Latin America, but the one that would accept the undergraduate work of our officers.! CL Exceptional Intelligence Analyat Program Management for thig prograt was transferred to AFLS/OP from AF/INYX in June 1983.2 The progtam lacked administrative proceduxesa to moniter the progress of training. The OCI directed that the Air Force establish quarterly reporting and ensure that each trainee provide a final report st the completion of training. These steps helped us to oversee that the funds were appropriately spent. Total funds allocated for this program in FY84 was $48,905.4 Four intelligence analysts applied fer the PYB4 program and the ACS/I nominated three to the OCI. The BCi's final selections will be announced in January 1994,4 Defense Advanced Language and Area Studies Program Management of this program waa transferred to A¥iS/DP from AF/INYX in June 1983.7 There were many problems in the program that came to light in early 1983. Although the program was three years old, and DIA had provided the Air Force civilian billets and $65,000. no one had been placed in training. The billets had been inadvertantly encumbered by analysts in APIS/INOZE. The ACS/I ther mR. AFIT/CIRP to AFIS/OP, “Latin America Azea Studies,” 7 Nov 83, SD 340; Ltr Yh ar/mpcregs to aFIS/DP, "Proposed Change to APR 36-1, Prefix L," 21 Sep 83, SD 341. *Ltr QM. aF/iny to Director of Central Intelligence, “DCI Exceptional Intelligence Analyst Program,” 30 Jun 63, SD 342; Ltr GBA OCDirector of Central Intelligence to National Yoreign Intelligence Board, "pCi = Excep' i intelligence Analyst Program," 19 May 83, SD 343; Ltr APIS/OPT to Frogram Sponsors, “Reports for DCI Exceptional intelligence Analyst Program,” 15 Sep 63, SD 444. Sper QB, CIA/AC to AF/IN, "FYB4 Funds,” 11 Oct 83, SD 345, S¥emo WR aFis/ortT to AF/INE, "Nominations for the OCI Exceptional Intelligence Analyst Program,” .11 Oct 63, SD 346: Ltr AF/IN to DCI, "Nominations," 26 Oct 83, SD 347; Ltr @y AP/IN to DCL, “Komination,“ 16 Nov 83, SD 348. S5ttr @MB AF/INY to Director DIA, “Defense Advanced Language and Area Studies Program and Defense Academic Research Support Program,” 35 dun 83, SD 343,
240 tock a personsl interest in osing tha program to provide graduate etudy of Third World iasues.! Although the program allowed equal participation for beth military and civilian analysts, no civilian has ever applied for the program. APIS/OP sent « persenal letter announcing the program to 970 civilian intelligence perscmel. Still no applications were received. Because of this, the emphasia of the progras for civilians will shift ta a two-year internship training {yn Thira World analysia,? . ® Five officers applied for thia program in 1983. the ACS/IT Selected three officers as the first Air Porce nominees ta OIA for this progran.? lity of Analysia Pro This program was previously titled "Analyst Orienation and Familiarization Program*. Management waa transferred to AFIS/DP form AP/INYX in June 1962, The title waa changed to “Quality of Analysis” and DIA provided the Air ¥Yaree $75,005 to cover expenses.4 & Air Force reaponse to this program was considerable. The ACS/I selected the first ten intelligence anlaysta to participate in the program, Additional funds totalling $25,609 were secured by AFIS/DP to cover additional requests for training under this program. Defense Academic Research Support Program Management of this program waa transferred to AFIS/DF from AF/INYX in June 1382.5 thor QM. OLA/AT-SA to AF/IN, “DALASP," 29 Sep @3, SD 350; Ler AF/IN to APIS/CV, “DALASP," 25 Mar 83, SD 351; See also itr APIS/DP to Commandant OLI, "“Non~Resident Foreign Language Program,” 28 Mar 83, SD 352; Ltr QM Ar/tn to All St0s, “Nen- Resident Foreign Language Training Program," 20 Apr 83, SD 353. 2ner WR, aris/oP to Civilians in the ICDP, “DALASP,“ 8 Nov 83, SD 354; Staf€ Summary Sheet QM aris/opt to AF/IN, “DALASP," 19 Dec 83, SD 355. Fier a AP/IN to Director, DIA, ‘Nominations for DALASP,” 16 Mov 83, SO 3567 Ltr =a APIS/OPT to DIA/AT-SA, "DALASP,* {2 Dec 83, SD 357; Ler Qh vP-a3 to AF/IN, “Quality of Analysis Program,“ 1 Aug 83, SD 398; Staff Summary Sheet we. AFIS/DPT to AP/IN, “Nominations for Quality of Analysis Program,” 28 Nov 83, SB 99, 4ter WM, oar/iy co Director, DIA, "Analyst Area Orientation and Famillarization Program," 3¢ June 83, SB 60. Ster APIS/DPT to AF/IN, *DARSP," 23 Aug 82, SD 36% Ler BR OAF/TR to Director, DIA, "Topics for DARSP," 27 Sep 83, SD 362.
241 Although this program was three years ald, ac topics had been mitted by the Air Force to DIA. AFIS/OP solicited Third World research topics from all Air Worce Senior Inteliigence Officers and consolidated the responses. The ACS/I selected forty-one topice that reflected the intelligence concarns of Air Force Intelligence and recommended them to BIA,
CRAFTER VI FOMAH RESOURCE INTELLIGHRCE Headquarters, 4ir Force Special Activities Canter 2a2
244 HEADQUARTERS AIX FORCE SPECIAL ACYIVITIRS CENTKE MISSIOW ed The mission of the Air Force Special Activities Center {AFSAC) was to cotwsand. control, and conduct human resources intelligence {HUMINT) collection and exploitation worldwide in aupport of the Headquarters, United States Air Force, sajor commands, the Department cf Oefense, and national requirementa. It served 46 the office of primary veaponsibility far: 1} the development and review of wartine and contingency plana which required Air Yorce HUMINT support and for 2} the initiation and staff processing of Air Force HUMINT research and development requirements. It was alac the designated control asuthority for all Aix Force HUMINT collection requirementa. ‘uring wartime or Specified contingency operations, it provided active force HUMINT augmentation to major commands and Air component commands. 1 The primary capability of AYSAC augmentation teams was te errogate captured prisoners of war and dehrief other human resources, Additional HUMINT support may have included translation and interpretation, collection operationa and management, foreign document exploitation. assiatance tn foreign msterial acquisition, and other functions as described in Defense intelligence Agency Manual $8-11.2 ORGANIZATION deadguarters The AFSAC headquarters was organized into two main diviatons: 1} Plans, Resources, and Support {INX) and 2) Operationa (INO}, The former was subdivided into three branches: +} Plana and Policy, 2) Resources Management, and 3} Career Management and Training. The latter division was also subdivided inte three branchea: 1} Collection Management, 2} Security, and 3} Operational Support.> Subordinate Units There were three types of subordinate units of APSAC: Speciai activities sareae, detachments, and operating locations. The unita were the following: European Special Activities Area {ESAA), headquartered at Lindsey Air Station, Germany: Pacific Special Activities Area {PSAA}, headquartered at Hickam APs, Bawali: Devachtent 21, Fort Belvoir, Virginia: Detachment 22, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio; Operating Location 8, classified TAPR 23-1, “Organization and Functions, Air Force Intelli~ gence Service fAFIS},“ Section $, 15 Jul 82, SD 2. 2ipid. Yor the classified mission statement gee APISR 23-2 @ “Organizatiog and Punctions, Air Porce Special Activities ex {APSAC}" ea 2 Aug 82, SO 506, and AFISR 23-2 MB 14 oct 83. JAFR 23-1, Section 5, 15 Jul 92, Sb 2.
245 location: Operating Leceation G, Fort Huachuca, Arizona: and Operating Location P, classified location. The special activities areas had their own detachments and operating locations. 1 PERSONNEL Key Personne} Col. Nick Yankowski continued as commander of AFSAC, 4 position he held since 1 October 1961.2 Col. Wilidam F, Bale continued as vice commander, being in that position since 30 September 1964. Lt. Col. Stephen 8. Rowe was the chief of the Plans, Resources, and Support Division since 1 September 1981, while Lt. Col. John W. Doxey waa the chief of the Operations Diviaion, since 15 June 1931. Maj. Charies F. Pugh was the executive officer since 1 June 1983. Yat Lt. Barbara K. Prine~ Rincon was the executive officer from B November 1982 to fT June 1983. CMSgt Kenny Smith, the chief of Administration, was the unofficial Virst Sergeant. The AFIS Pirst Sergeant is the official representative for APFSAC, Manpower Strength? HEADQUARTERS AFSAC NUMBER AUTHORIZED NUMBER ASSIGNED OFFICERS 25 22 ENLISTED 21 24 CIVILIANS 35 ‘32 TOTAL 81 35 PLANS, RESOURCES AND StrPORT4 The major operating limitation encountered by the Plans, Resources, and Support Division (INX} during the year was the near-total disruption of operations caused by extensive interior renovation work in building 1924 between April and August. During this time, the constant presence of uncleared workers, the high ‘Appendix A to Unit Personnel Roster Personnel Totals, APSAC, 16 Jan 84, $0 363. For the unit hisfifies of Det 21, Det 22, BSAA, and PSAA, for C¥1983, see S0s 3164-367. 2Por a biographical sketch of Col Yankowski see SD 10. 3appendix A to Usit Personnel Roster @ Personnel Totals, AFSAC, 16 Jan 84, &D 163. 4This and following segments were prepared by Capt William J. Bordas and INX staff. The _APIS/HO added fpetnctes and did some format editing. See Ltr and 1 Atch INK Division CY83 Bistory, Lt Col Rowe to APSAC/CCE, “Piana, Resources, snd Support Division Bistory ~ CY 83,“ a.d.. 5D 368.
246 levels of noise and dust, and the frequent need to rearrange office furniture to accommodate conatruction activities resulted in poor working conditions and a serious degradation in the divi- sion's ability to provide timely ataf€ support to the commander. The division chief during 1993 was Lt. Col. Stephen 8. Rows. @ administrative assistant was Mrs. Karen NW. Poust. Mag. Michael W. Randall served as special assistant to the chief, INX, from $ April 1983 until his retirement on 31 July 1963. Pana and Folicy The Plana and Policy Branch (INXA) served as the APSAC point of contact for a large mumber of planning and policy actions and special projects. Among other reaponsibilities, INXA handled: MEI preparations and responses: exercise participation management; monitoring of interservice agreements and memoranda of understanding: reserve affairs, wartime and contingency planning quppert, including the APSAC HUMINT augmentation team (BAT) program; the development of plans, concepts, and objectives for the worldwide employment of Aiz Force HUMINT resources; AFSAC wartime and contingency communications planning; and maintenance and presentation of the APSAC command briefing and other specialized briefings. INXA had five manpower positions authorized during 1983, and ail were filled for the first time since the creation of HQ AFSAC. The branch chief from + January until 1 April 1983 was May, Michael W. Randall. Major Randall was replaced by Maj. Robert #. Roser, Jr., who arrived on 10 danuary 1983. Other branch personnel were Capt. Leon Holleb, chief of the Contingency Planning Section, and TSgt Robert FP. Newell, NCOIC, Plans and Policy Administrations. Two other new personnel arrived in the branch in 1983: Capt. Wilkiam J. Hordas, chief of the HUMINT Plans Section, who arrived on 10 January, and 2Lt. Jacqueline C. Sklenar, chiet of the Reserve Affairs Section, whe arrived on 1 April, from an initial training assignment at Lowry AFB, Colorado. Planning Actions As the AYSAC OPR for wartime and contingency planning, INXA reviewed and coordinated on many BSAA, PSAA, AFIS, Air Force, and command plans which involved HUMINT tasking. A major new initiative, unfinished at year's end, was the creation of HUMINT appendicea for various CENTAP OPLANa ~ an effort which was the repult of expanded AFSAC contacts with CBENTCOM and the assignment of a HUMINT liaison officer ~ Capt Jamee Clanton ~- to ceyrcos. ‘her MBB aesacsmixa co APSAC/TNX et al, “Trip Repoct-INXA Staff Planning TOY to HQ CENTAF* MMB 25 apr 33, sD 369. Neleted per 5 U.S.C. 552¢b) CA)
Planning actions in the Pacific centered on two major plans: PSAA OPLANS 5000/5001 and $027. The USAF War and Mobilization Plan, Volume 1 {WMP-t)} Intelligence Annex (Annex 1} was reviewed twice during 1983. The firet review, delivered to AF/INYX in March 1983, contained numarons recottitendations to update HUMINT wartime functional guidance: the second review was begun on 28 Dec 83 and not completed by the end of the reporting period. IMeg USAFE/IN to AFSAC/CC, “ESAA OPLAN 4102" @ 2115187 Oct Bs. SD 370. ber AYSAC/INX to AP/INYSH, "Review of Oraft PSAA GELAN s000/s001" 12 Jul 83, SD 371; Ler QRRMBB and 1 atch AFSAC/TNX to AFSAC/INO, "Review of PSAR OBLAN 5000/5001" 39 Jul 83, SD 372; Ler ad APSAC/INX to AF/INYSH and SP, "Review of Revised Draft POAA OPLAN 5000/5001," 14 Dec 63, SD 373. Deleted per $ U.S.C, $52(b) (2)
Under the direction of Lt Sklenar, the first full-scale was undertaken review of the wartime readiness of APSAC HAT The study, which was nearly complete by year's end, duxing 1983. focused on HAT manning, organization, training, and equipment and was aided by eupporting work done by AFIS Reserve OTS 28. When combined with the lessons of URGENT FURY and the resulte of mibilizatian exercise PRESSURE POINT 83, the atudy is expected to yield the first top-to-bottom assessment of APSAC’s readiness posture. Planning was also begun in late 1983 for a follow-on study of the organization, manning, and functions of the wartine to be conducted with APIS Reserve assistance AFSAC headquarters, im early 1984. The publication of the Air Force HUMINT Architecture Plan (APHAP) on 21 Apr 83 was a significant step forward in the attempt to make HUMINT resource programming more respongive to the needs of the major commands. The initial AFHAP strawman published by AF/INYX was reviewed at HQ APSAC and commenta were provided Maj Randall and Capt Bordas attended back to INYX on 15 Mar 83. the HUMINT Architecture Planning Conference at Wright-Patterson APB, OH, from 20-23 Mar 83 to fine-tune and polish the updated strawman. The completed AFHAP served ag a valuable tool for Air Porce HUMINT planning and programming actions. ! EUMINT Communications AFSAC/CV to AF/INYX, and 4 Atch 3S Mar 83, SO 374; Ltr 24 Mar &3, SD 375. Architecture Plan (HAP),* to APSAC/INX, “Trip Report” "HUMINT APSAC/INZA U.S.C. >52(B) (2) Deleted per §
249 GBB me upgrade of ArSAC's wecure telephone sywtens via the RODwide Secure Voice improvement Program wis also addressed in 1983. The AFSAC input requesting new secure telephane units was gent to AFCC/£O0V on 12 Oct 83. An interim request for additional KY-3 instruments was made on 9 Sep 83, the result of APCC/xODV‘s request for all subscribers to submit the{r ten sost argent unsatisfied KY-3 requirements. ‘Thies was in support of an #ffort to redistribute existing K¥-3s as an interim measure to improve secure voice in advance of full SVIP implementation? ther QB avsacvimxa co arsacvinx et a1, “txlp Report ~ Dis- cussions with AFCC Representatives on MITCOA* 24 bug 83, SD 376, Atte = Det 12, BSAA/OPS, to ESAA/TNXA, Performance WINTEX 83" 9 Mar €3, SD 3777 “Bet 42 Ler APSAC/IRX tO /EON, “Secure Voice Improvnment Program (S¥iP} Data Base (Your Ltr, 9 Jul a3),“ 12 Oct a3, 8D 379; ber RFSAC/INX to AFCC/HODV, "Secure Voice Requirevente” 9 Sep 63, SD 380: Mezo Capt Bordas to AFSAC/INCC, “Secure Voice Requirements," Sep 83, 5D 381. 3326b}(2) Pelered per 5.U.7 * Detered pex 5 Vibce 552 0b) {1}
250 AFSAC Briefing Program INXA was the OPR for development and presentation of the APSAC overview briefing, the wartime sisaion briefing, the mobility briefing, and the Quarterly Management Analysis Review {(QMAR], ag well as other specialized briefings. A total of over $0 briefings of various types were presented to a wide variety of audiences during the year. Among the most significant briefing quests were: ~ Brig Gen Paul Martin, AYIS/CC, 3 March 1983 ~ Col Earl Pontius, PID/CC, 24 May 1983 ~ Brig Gen Richard Beyea, AFOSI/CC, 3 June 1993 ~ Brig Gen Montinari, Italian air Porce ACS/I, 7 June 1963 - Maj Gen Lee Jae~Woo, C-2, Combined Forcea Command, 16 September 1993. ~ Maj Gen Ohtsuka, Japanese Air Self-Sefense Force ACS/I, 15 November 1983 INXA also provided briefing support to the Armed Forces Air Intelligence Training Center, Lowry APB, Colorado, during the regular HUMINT ingtructor's attendance at Squadron Officer School. INXA's ability te provide timely briefing support suffered a serious setback in August 1983, when Mr. Keith Boyce, AFIS/INOZD, was moved to the Pentagon to support the increased graphics xrequirementa of the new ACS/T. The move waa made in spite of INXA and INX objections, and left the division without readily available graphics support.) AFIS/INOZO could not accept routine AFSAC graphics requests, and attempts to obtain support from the Ft Belvoir Training and Audiovisual Support Center (TASC) were unsuccessful as that facility could not accept classified work orders. Graphice support was eventually secured from Det 4, 4364st Audiovisual Squadron at Bolling AFB; however, the legistical problems involved in travel between Ft Belvoir and Bolling AFB, and the varying quality of graphics work performed. tiade this an undesireable long-term solution. Graphics for intra~ AFSAC use. for ingtance, for the QMAR, were handmade within INXA osing Xerox transparency film, but this was not a suitable vehicle for professional migaion and functions briefings, and robbed the INXA ataff of large amounts of time required for other duties and projects. No resolution of the graphics support problem waa in aight at the end of the year. The AFSAC overview briefing was completely revised and updated in 1983, and the QMAR - the Quarterly Management Analysis Review ~waa revitalized and presented to the Commander and ataff each quarter. Work wags also begun on an AFPSAC regulation to apecify content, format,-and presentation dates for the QMAR; at Thee & APSAC/INK to AFSAC/CV, “Graphics Representative - APIS/APSAC Compound,* t0 Aug 83, S5 382,
251 the end of 1983 the fully-wtaffed draft reguiation needed only the commander’a signature to make it official. Management Effectiveness Inspections (MEis) INXA was the AFSAC OPR for preparations for MEIa and the responses to MEL reports. The following inspections were conducted during 1983; rd ted by APIS/IG between 167-18 May 83, and was rated overall, The initial reply to the MEI report was delivered to AFIS/IG on 3 Jun 83, but geveral observations stiil remained open at years end. were inspected by Y 83, and were rated overall. INXA prepared information jettere both to the and to the in preparation for the MEI, and py consolidated reply to the MEI report on 312 Aue 83.2 were inspected AFIS/IG between 11-28 Oct 83, and received an overall rating of was rated . [ai }) and in preparation for the MEI, INMA provided initial guidance by message ang fol. 1; with a staff assistance visit by Capt Rolleb in August. provided an interim input to the MEI report reply on 28 Nov 83, but a final, consolidated input had not been received by year's end, preventing a final reply to APIS/IG.3 INXA continued to work with #Q ESAA during 1983 to provide ongoing responses to items remaining open from the 1982 MEI of HQ ESAA and its detachments. In most cases the original observations had been answered, but additional questions and recommendations fram AFIS/IG prevented the report from being closed out, Weer AFSAC/CV to AFIS/IG, “Reply to Management Effec- tiveness Inspection (MEI},* 3 Jun 83, SD 383. 2ner AFSAC/INZ to All Air Force DCD Representatives, “Management Effectiveness Inspection” 34 Mar 84, SD 384. Ltr = APSAC/CO to CIA/DCD, “Inspection of USAF Representatives to “ 4 Apr 83, SD 385: Ler AYSAC/CC to APIS/IG, “Reply to Management Effectiveness Inspection (MEI}* 34 Aug 83, SD 386; Msg QM arsacsunx to Psaasec et al, “Preparation for Management Effectiveness Inspection (MEI}" QM 1015002 aug 83, so 387. 3her AYSAC/INXA to AFSAC/INX et al, “Trip Report" € Sep 83, 5D 388: Ltr PSAA/CC to ARSAC/INXA/INOAB, “interim Hq PSAA Reaponse to AF. 28 Nov 83, SD 389. ‘% pot Deleted per 5 0.5,C. S52(b) (5)
252 Qn 24 Oct 82, INXA prepared a letter to Det 21/cc, offering guidance to prepare the detachment for its MEI, scheduled for 913 Jan aa. Reserve Affairs 2Lt. Jacqueline C. Skienar served as the manager of AFSAC’s Reserve program, assigning individusl mobilization augmentees {IMA} to various offices within 89 AFSAC, Detachment 2%, and Detachment 22 for training and evaluation. Thia marked the first time in racent years that INXA had had @ aingle individual responsible for management of this program as.a primary duty. Reserve Support to AFSAC contingency cperations was demonstrated during Operation URGENT PURY, when APIS/RE identified seven volunteer IMAs to deploy with the APSAC team to Grenada. (Volunteers were required, aa no Presidential mobilizstion had been declared. } The Reserve volunteers, ranging in grade from ataff sergeant to lieutenant colonel, responded rapidly and served with distinction under difficult conditions. The utilization of Reserve augmentees in URGENT FURY, nowever, led to the re-thinking of a key aspect of APSAC contingency planning--the question of who was responsible for providing mobility equipment to IMAs, Although APR 26-1 and the USAF War and Mobilization Plan specifically tasked the gaining command (in this case, TAC} to provide this equipment, the concern arose that the mechanics and the resourcea to equip large numbers of IMAs might have to be rethought. The issue remained unresolved at year's end. Exercise Monitoring a INSA served as the QPR for monitoring AFSAC parti-~ cipation in exercises. Thia function included compiling Lists of participants, participating in scenario-writing conferences, and preparing HUMINT appendices to exercise plans, AFSAC personnel took part in eleven sajor exercises during 1983. MR grin FRosT 63. 1Lt. Cegelaky and MSgt. Platt, both from Pet 21, represented APSAC on this field training exercise (PIX) at fort Greely, Alaska, from 18 Jan ~ 5 Feb 83. Their experiences in extreme cold weather duty and tactical interrogationa led to several sound recomendations for AfSAC mobility planning*, ‘her AFSAC/INX to Det_21/CC, “Preparation for Management Effectiveness Inspection (MEL) 24 Oct 83, SD 390. Zhe QM det 21, arsac to Det 21, AFSAC/DO et al, "Brim Frost 83 Exercise Trip Report" > 28 Feb 83, SD 39%. Peleted per 5 U.S.t. 952(b) GA)
TRAM SPIRIT 83. Maj Roser and tht Smith {Det 22) ware APSAC augmentees to this #TX, held in Korea from 8-23 Mar 32, GALLANT XNIGHT §3. Capt. Bolleb represented APSAC in this CPX from 14-22 Mar 83 at Ft Bragg, NC. Lack of HUMINT planning inputa during the planning phase of this exercise limited the value of the exercise for APSAC3, FLINTLOCK 83. The interrogation portion of this exercise, the major FTX of the year for HQ ESAA, was conducted at the German Arty’s Eisberg Kaserne near Nagold, FRG, from 25 Apr ~ 20 May 62. ‘The exercise provided an exceli.at training vehicle for APSAC interrogators. TSgt Falco (Det 21) and 1Lt Prancona (DOD Atlanta} were the HQ AFSAC sugmentees for the exercise. A significant aspect of this year's PLINTLOCK exercise was the use, for the first time, of video monitoring equipment to observe and evaluate exercise activity.4 ee RIDGE RUNNER 83. This AFIS-sponsored evasion training exercise was held at Camp Cawson, WY, from 13-16 Sep 83. CMSgt Vukich {INXC}) served as the AFSAC representative. Original INxA planning had envisioned participation on a larger scale, but ‘coordination problems between BQ APSAC and AFIS/INU, as well as internal AFSAC staff disagreements on who should participate, led te eventual participation only by Chief Vukich as an observer”. BOLD EAGLE 84. Original AFSAC plans for participation in beth the CPx and FIX phases of this REDCOM exercise fell through when, BQ TAC {(AFRED) failed to arrange for AFIS Reserve Wer. w. 4 Atch (Det 12/ZSAA Ler 9 Mar 83; Det S1/BSAA Ler 70 Mar 837 After Action Rprt 310 tar 837 Annual Tour 11 Mar 83; ESAA/INXA to ESAA/CC, “WINTEX 63 + After Action Report "QB 15 Mar 83, SD 392. 2per QRH APSAC/INXA to APSAC/TUR, "Exercise TEAM SPIRIT 83 Trip Report,” 12 Apr 83, SO 3937 Ltr QM Det 32, PSAA/TRX to AFSAC/INXA, “Team Spirit ‘83 Consolidated Critique” QB 26 Apr 83, SD 394. utr AFSAC/INXA to AFSAC/INZ, “Trip Report ~ AFSAC Participation in USCENTCOM GALLANT KNIGHT 83 CPx" §§MB 5 Apr 83, SR 395. 4utr QB ESAa/cc to APSAC/CC/INX, “PIX FLINTLOCK 83 After Action Report” MMB 1 Jul 83, sd 396. S¥ewo QB. + atch GBBR avsacsimma to Col Bale, “Exercise RIDGE RUNNER £3," 16 Sun 83, SD 397; Lee QByy arsacsraxc to APSAC/INX, “Trip Report, Ridge Runner (14-17 Sep 83)," 21 Sep 83, 8d 398. 352(b) (2) Deleted per 5 U.S.C.
254 role players who would have provided support beth to AFSAC and AFOST. interrogators in the PTX. Consequently, APSAC representation waa limited to only two individuals, Capt Bordas and Capt Jacoway (Det 22}, who participated in the CPX as a FUMINT Collection Manager and a CPX controller, respectively!, & FOAL EAGLE 83. After five yeary, without Air Force participation in this exercise, Det 32 was able to revitalize the program and engage in interrogation training exercises similar to those of exercise FLINTLOCK in Europe. Det 32 sponsored the interrogation phase of POAL EAGLE, sugmented by the Korean 6546th AISU, at Camp Humphries, ROK, between 31 Oct and 19 Nov 234, ULCHI FOCUS LENS 83. Oet 32, augmented from AQ PSAA and APTS. , took part in this Xorean CPX from 19+30 Aug a3>, Torr QQ vet 22, APSAC/INO to Det 22/CC, “Bold Zagle 84 Trip Report," 25 Oct 83, SD 399; Lec QBMMBR wv. 1 acch GMB arsacsinxa to AFSAC/INK et al "Trip Report - Exercise BOLD SACLE 04 @iy 24 Oct 83, SD 400. 2ugg USAFE/INCR to USAFE/IN, “After Action Report ~ Able Archer 83” 2142452 Dec 83, SD 40%; DISUM Memo! APSAC/INXA to AFSAC/CC, “ESAA Participation in USEUCOM Exercise ABLE ARCHER 83” 28 Dec 82, SD 402. Memo BBB «. 3 atch GBB arsacsmxa to arSAc/cc, "Exercise PRESSURE POINT 94," ,8 Dec 83., SD 403. éusg Det 32, PSAA/CC to AFSAC/JIOAS/INXA, "FOAL EAGLE BXERCISE" 1504022 Nov 93, SD 404; vas Det 32, PSAA/CC to APSAC/CC et al, "VIP Visits to Exerciae FOAL EAGLE ‘a3" eS 280503Z Noy 83, 8D 405. Sur QB ve. 1 Acch QB esaa/ce to APSAC/THXA et al, “ULCHT~ FOCUS LENS CPX Critique,” 13 Sep 83, SD 406, peleted per 5 U.S.C. 352(b) GQ)
ess Support Agreements And Memoranda of Understanding {MOU} Significant attention was given to this area in 1983, s¢ an attempt was made not only to update exiating agreements, fut also to initiate new cnea. Work was begun during the year to wpdate three major 4OUs: those guverning ESAA and PSAR operations, and the MOU on AFSAC support to PTD. None of theee reviews and updates was completed durtzy the year, with the PIP MOU proving to be the most difficult to staff, P| Other agreements worked during 1983 included: MOU betwen ACS/I, USAF and CIA/OD0 on USAF Representation and Activities at CIA/DCD Field Officea. This mou war updated to delete the requirement for annual review. MOU among ACS/I, USAP, AFIS/CC, and USAFSO/CC on AFSAC OL-P. This MOU was revised during 1983, but staffing of the revision had not heen completed by year’s end. AFIS ~- US Army Engineer Center and Ft Beivoir interservice Support Agreement (156A). This agredcment was reviewed in August 1983, and an addition waa recommended to cover provision ef graphics support to AFIS. Other problems with the agreement, internal to AFSAC, delayed final approval of the revised version beyond the end of 1963. Resource Management Branch (INXB) = This branch was reorganized on {1 dun 83 to combine the Fiscal Programs Branch {INXS} and the Logiatica Section (168), The Fiscal Programa Branch was responsible for acquiring. maintaining, and allocating AFSAC resources by preparing programing documents and reports, maintaining the DIA Froject Management File, and canducting all budget and fiscal matters. The Logistics Branch was responsible for management of Operations ang Maintenance (05M) and ICF suppifea and equipment. he Chief, INXB, from 1 January until his retirement on 30 duly 1983, was Mr Wealey H. Pogge. SMSqt James §. Jinks, Sr. and MSgt Chester D, Ransom were agsigned to INXS throughout the year. The Logistics Branch wae staffed by SMSgt Philip 3. Johnson and MSgt Roger ©. Cawthorne. Fiacal Programs (INXB) QM a sejor factor affecting INEB in 1983 was the lack of 4 Deleted per 5 U.S.C, 252(b}(1}
256 The lack of adequate intelligence training is bath an Air Force-wide shortfall and a MUMINT-specific problem.  AFSAC's PY 86-90 POM was one wethod of responding to thia shortfall without sertously degrading existing collection activities. INXB submitted the AFSAC operating budget for FY 6&8 on 23 Nov 83, in accordance with the AFIS/AC budget call. The submission reflected an increase of $458,600 over the FY 85 budget-~a result of the acquisition of new manpower authoriza- tions. The HQ AFSAC Intelligence Contingency Pund (ICF} program wag Managed by INXB, and branch personnel provided ICFP support to ail A®SAC units. The personnel directly involved with the Ic? prograk were: Deleted per $ U.S.C. 552¢b) (1)
257 Cok Yankowsk i ICF Manager SMSgt Jinks Disbursing Agent SMSgt Johnson Accountable Supply Officer? MSgt Ransom Paying Agent (BQ APSAC and Det 21) MSgt Schindel Paying Agent {Det 22} MSgt Frankiin Paying Agent {Bet 34} SSgt Rhode Paying Agent (Det 32) MSgt Moncrief® Paying Agent (Det 12) Mr. Lanoue Paying Agent (HO BSAA} it Col Rowe, SMSgt Jobnaon, and MSgt Ransom attended the first Intelligence Contingency Fund Conference fram 19+21 Oct 83. This conference, held at the Pentagon and hosted by Ar/IRY, provided a forum for ICF action officers to review and update AFR 200+4, and provided training on specific areas of interest to the participants. Several changes were made to AFR 200~4, and the revised regulation was forwarded for staffing and BQ ZSAA approval ~ @ process not yet completed by the end of the year. The total ICFP expenditure for FY 53 was $872,000—~an inereaee of $412,000 over the previous fiscal year. During Novetiber 1983, INXB began preparing the FY 86-96 GDIP submission by requesting inputs from AFSAC field units and by holding 4 series cf preliminary strategy meetings with JIRYSE, wepresentatives from AFSAC/INX and INO, and AF, ‘Special Order A-3 QBMR arsacfoa, 13 Aug 82. Deleted per 5 U.S.C. 252(b}(1)
a The new initiatives say be summariced as follows: The GDIP input was nearly complete at year’s end, and was expected to be forwarded to AFIS/HP for validation, and consolidation with other APIS unit GDIFs, by mid-January 1994. Logistics (168) i) The Logistics Section was involved in several major activities during the year, each of which exerciand different aspects of the branch mission. * ‘see for example AFSAC/INOMA/LGS to APSAC/INOA et al, "frip Report FY8S Depot Maintenance Schedule Review-DMSR,” 23 Sep 83, SD 407. peleted per 5 U.S.C. 952(b) (4)
260 GD weisysnc sensitive Compartmented Information Factlity {SCIP}. The section obtained over $45,000 worth of equipment for the SCIP, and prepared maintenance contracts for all newly acquired equipment. The SCIP wae expected to becca operational in early 1984. QB chance of office Areas. In Dec 83, LGS moved both its administrative office and its warehouse from Bldg 1920 to Bldg 1919. The move provided increased warehouse space to accomtodate the expanding APSAC mobility equipment inventory. Mobility Equipment and Supplies for Det 22. Mobility equipment and suppliea for 3 deploying positicns were acquired and ahipped to Det 22. aS 06M Supply and Equipment Management Os funds expended toa support &Q APSAC at Fort Belvoir included $43,000 in Element of Expense and Investment Code (EEIC) 628 (Equipment; and $59,500 in BRIC 609 (Supplies). These funds were used to replace repairable typewriters over seven years old, to purchase mobility equipment for 85 positions, to replace unserviceable furniture, and to buy guseral housekeeping and administrative supplies. A total of $62,000 in annual investment (3080) funding was received, and was used to order equipment for the S$CiF and a xerox &60T word processor for Det 24. Pricr year obligation authority was received from HQ USAF for $29,144.39 in EEIC 628 and $15,044.36 in EEIC 609. This ensured that obligated due outs from PY 83 would not be carried over against FX 84 funds. A complete inventory of ail Equipment Authorization Identification Document (EAID} equipment was performed, Deleted per 5 U.S.¢. 252{b) C1)
262 ad All safes were inzpected to enaure that they were GSA~approved for atorage of classified material. GSA~approved safep were placed on order, and unapproved safes were acheduled for turn-in. A total of $6048.22 in unserviceable turm-ins wag made to base supply. Itt 5 Ht Management Forty-one items valued at $22,389.41, including three vehicles, were turned in to property disposal as being beyond economical repair or excesa to APSAC needs. Approval for the purchase of four replacement ICP vehicles two for ESAA and two for PSAA ~ was received from AF/INY. The designations of ail ICF accounta were changed te match the detachment designations {L.e. “C34 for Det 31). & Sixteen ICF equipment items valued at $2747.52 were approv: for purchase during the year, and accountability was established on account Fx5i00. AFIS/IND discontinued responsibility for maintaining the computerized FX (off-line sepply} account during 1983, and this responsibility reverted to LGS. At the request of LGS, AFIS/IND did, however, write a new program for thia automated account to produce a complete accountability and audit trail liating. Career Management and Training Branch (iNXxXC} This branch was responsible for the identification, selection, acquisition, training, and career progression of AFSAC military and civilian personnel. WAR the cnict, xc, was Maj. George A. Halesteh. capt. Patrick M. Ellis was in charge of non~operational training and officer career development and accession. CHSgt. Louie Vukich served as branch NCOIC and chief of enlisted career management and accession. Mr. Elmer T. Knudsen was the directer of operational training. Capt, Barbara K. Prine~Rincon, the former executive officer, was assigned to INEC on 1 Uuly 1983 as a training efficer, and the vacant GS-5 secretarial position was filled on 7 March 1983 hy Mr. Gerald ©, Radovich, TSgt Thomas J. Neel was transferred from DA to INKC en 9 November 1983 to assume the position of NCOIC of Personnel Management. Personnel Identification and Selection. INXC, initially established as a separate branch within INX on 1 Oct 82, continued to tase agyressive action in 1983 to fresalve APSAC’s chronic personnel acquisition, retention, and training prablems, working a wide variety of programa.
262 Recruitment. An aggressive advertising and re~ eraitment program was pursued throughout the year. Recruiting advertisemente were published worldwide in the APMPC Officer Career Newsletter, bage bulletins and newsletters, and the APMPC Hotline. In coordination with INKA, Capt. Bilia and Capt. Prine- Rincon developed an unclassified Air Force HUMONT briefing to support the recruiting effort: they took the briefing on the road, bringing the HUMINT message to over 909 cadets attending ROTC turner camps at Lackland AFB, Texas and Dover AFB, Delaware. Selection, Ouring 1983, 28 officer Personnel Selection Panels (PSPs) were held te evaluate the itngufistic and profesaional potential of prospective HUMINT personnel. The PSPa resulted in the selection of ten individuals for APSAC asaignmenta, sii of whom were in the aseiqnwent pipeline by the end of the year. Seventeen enlisted PSPs were held, reaulting in the selection of 12 new AFSAC personnel: of these, three were on station by year's end, with four more in the assignment pipeline and five avaiting MPC action. The selection and acquisition actions had raised APSAC manning by year’s end to 260, out of a tatal authorization of 311~“an 83 percent manning rate. Personnel Management. With the transfer on 9 Nov 83 of TSgt. Thomaa J. Neel to INXC, the branch assumed responsiblity for AF Form 2095 actions, awards and decorations, Airman Performance Reports and Officer Efficiency Reports {APRs/OERs}, and related personnel actions. These had previously heen the xesponsibility of AFSAC/DA, Retention Efforts. A major problem which had long plagued Air force HUMINT was an inability to retain trained, qualified personnel in HUMINT assignments. This difficulty grew partiy from a negative perception of promotion possibilities within the HUMINT field, and partly from the competition of other commands~-notably ESC and DIA's attache programfor quaiified, language-trained individuals. To try to reselve the promotion problem, increased emphasis was placed at ail levels on quality of APR and OER submissions, awards, and decorations. To attack directly the retention problem, CMSgt. Vukich coordinated a strong effort to replace the 203xX0 (Linguist/Interrogator) AFSC with a Special Duty Identifier (SDI) to uniquely identify HUMINT-trained individuals and make them eligible for language proficiency pay. Chief Vukich presented the AFSAC proposal at a meating of the BUMINT Enlisted APSC Working Group at Randolph AFB, TX, from 7-10 Noy 83, where it wags well received by the attendees. By the end of the year, the complete proposal waa being staffed at the #2Q SAF level, Operational Training Initiatives In an acrosa-the-board effort to improve the scope and quality of operational training, INZC worked on many fronts throughout the year not only to identify new sources of training, but to increase the use of training avenues already available.
263 The Department of Defense Strategic Debriefing and Interrogation Course  {DSDIC}. This course, an Air Force initiative, was finally put inte operation in July 1983 at Ft Huachuca, Az. The course was designed to provide debriefing, rather than interrogation training to military HUMINT personnel, and has been established as one of the prerequisites for award of the fully qualified 8925 AFSC (the Military Operations Training Course ~ MOTC - my be substituted for DSDIC}. Mr. Sulev Sepp, formally of Det 11, ESAA, was assigned to DSDIC aa the Air Force dnmatructor. Chief Vukich visited Pt Huachuca from 25-30 Sep 93 to brief at the DSDIC and evaluate the progress of the course. By the end of the year, seven AFSAC parsonnel had received debriefing training in three, six-week course sessions. AFSAC was ailocated two billets per class, with seven class seseione per year~~A total of fourteen slots per year. BD cura managers Training Course (mic). The BMTC was another Air Force initiative pursued during 1983. This course was intended to provide training for senior HUMINT headquarters staff, operations officers, commanders, and other management personnel in the management of HUMINT field collection units. It was still in the conceptual stage at the end of 7993, largely as a result of interservice disagreementa on what the course content should be. GBD seine service Interrogation Wing (ISIN). Although HQ AFSAC did not send any representatives to this interrogation school, run by the British forces at Templar Barracks in England, four JSIW instructors visited APSAC in duly 1983 and presented two, two-day tactical interregation courses to 4 total of 20 AFSAC mobility personnel. The courses provided a unique opportunity to obtain valuable tactical interrogation training - at no cost ~ for a large number of AFSAC personnel. Air Force Intelligence Reserve {APIR) Advanced Inter- rogation Course {AIC}. Maj. Roser (INXA) and H¥gt. Platt (Oet 21} audited this course from 18-20 Jul 83 at the Les Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center, California, to assess ita value for providing training to AFSAC personnel. Their asaesament was very positive, and INXC made the neceasary exrangements to begin full AFSAC participation in this course in 1984. as the course was offered only once per year!, Ther QMS AFSAC/INEA to Det 21/00 et al, “Trip Report - AKavancea Interrogation Course,” 8 Avg 83, SD 408; Ler APIS/REOR to AFIS/REO et al, “Trip Report,“ 26 Jui 83, SD 409. Deleted per 5 U.S.C. 252(b) (1).
x Training Initiatives In an atcempt to satisfy APSACts need for language refresher training, Chief Vukich attended the annual pregran review held at the Defense Language Institute (DLI), Preside of Monterey, CA, from B~12 Feb 83, A major remult of this trip was the discovery that DLI offered an extensive non-resident training program =~ & gource of linguistic instructional materiels previously unknown at APSAC, and a resource that was increasingly tapped in the course of the year. Unit Administration Peo] The Unit Administration Branch was responsible for providing publications and forms management, documentation, security, and administrative staff aupport toe HQ APSAC. Thie branch was a part of INX from 1 Jan + 31 May 83; on 4 Jun 83 it waa transferred to the AFSAC command section. Tne Branch Chief from 1 Jan-30 Jun 83 was Maj. Charles ¥. Pugh, who assumed the new position of executive officer to the commander on 1 Jul 33. He was replaced by CMSgt. Kenny Smith, eho had been the Superintendent of Administration. TSgt. Willian C. Etchells and Amn. Dean W. Housden served in the branch throughout the year. Mrs. Scynthia A. Davis, the branch secretary, served from 1 Jan-18 Apr 983, when she took a new position in AFIS/INH; she was replaced on 19 Sep 83 by Mra. Robin R. Morrison. Mra. Cynthia A. Gruber, a one-year civilian overhire, worked from ? Jan until the expiration of her contract on 31 Oct 83. SSqt. Terry Phillips reported for duty with DA on 30 Oct 83, TSgt. Thomas J. Neel, a personnel specialist, served in DA from 1 Jan~9 Nev 83, when his position was transferred to INXC, OPERATIONS® po The Operations Division (INO} ig divided into three *Thig section was prepared by Mr. Yoshitaka Hamayasu and INO staff. Some format editing was done by the AFIS/HO, See Ler w. 2 Atche (INO Histo and INO Org Chart a3 APSAC/INO to AFSAC/CE, “INO History Input {4 Jan - 31 Dec 83}.* May 84, SD 410. Deleted per 5 U.S.C. 552(b} (2)
265 branches: the Collection Mangement Sranch (INOA), the Security Branch (INOB}, and the Operations Support Branch (IKOC). Collection Management Branch provides operational guidance to the headquarters of each Special Activities Area and paintaina contact with national level analytical and production elements. It consists of three sections: the Suropean Section (UTNORA), the Pacific Section (INOAB}, and the Western BKemiaphere Section (INOAC). INQKA provides operational guidance and tanagement suppert to three detachments (Dette 11. 12, and 13) and one area headquarters (82 ESAA). INQAS oversees the activities of two detachments (Dets 31 and 32) and one area headquarters (EQ PSAA}., ZINOAC provides operational guidance and management support to two detachments (Dets 2 and 22}, one operating location (OL-P, AFSAC}, and Aix Force representstives to the Central Intelligence Agency's Domestic Collection Division {CIA/DCD} field offices. Significant Events Deleted per 5 U.5.6- 552(b} (1)
~ 4 > mo a = ot Pal nm re) n z “ Pt Ci a a4 & 2 a z held ai A total of 23 AP/IN analysts The APSAC Air Staff HUMINT Orientation Briefings were received a series of briefings on APSAC's mission, functions, and capabilities. 2G January and 21 October 1993.
267 iit Peter M, Schuler was assigned as the firet Air Force representative to the DCD Pittsburgh Field Office in February 19483. After a nine month vacancy, the Washington DC Air Farce DC? position was Filled by Ut Bruce D. Radloff in April 1983. Dering the week of 15 May ~ 26 May 1983, the Second Annual APSAC Commanders’ Conference was held at Fr Belvoir. Attending the canference were the key HQ staff personnel, eli the area ang detachment commanders and guest speakers from -various agencies. A wide range of topics were discussed during the five~ day long event. Project officers far the conference were Maj R, Faplkner {INO} and Maj G, Malesich (INx}.1 AYSAC/TC to All Area ter QRMBBRMMB ena 1 atch Canference and Detachment Cotmmanders et al, "AFSAC Commanders‘ Mimutes:* 19 Jul 83, SD 411. Deleted per 5 v.s.c, 352{b} (4)
266 Security Branch ( INCB) The Security Branch formmlates and develops operational security standards, policies and procedures to protect and enhance USAF HUMINT intelligence activities. It processes the validation, approval, and coordination of new HUMINT operatione at the national level, In accordance with current reguiationa and directives, INOB implementa intelligence oversight policiea te ensure the legality and propriety ef Air Porce HUMINT activities. It processes the validation, approval and coordination of new HUMINT operations at the national level. The branch aiso administarg the Foreign Disclosure, Freedom of Information, and Privacy Act Programs for AFSAC, and operatea the Air Force Central Source Registry and Source Contral Pregram, Significant Zvents During the year INCE processed the following actionar {a} Centact Coordination/Corperate Approvals: 315 (b} Significant Change Reports: 32 (e} Quarterback Operations: 9 (4) Denied Area Operationa: 23 {@}) On-Site Operations: $ {f) Poreign Disclosure Casea: 17 (q} Freedom of Information Requests: 16 {h}) LOG Requests: 28 i} Polygraphe: J TROB submitted for approval and publication an AFSAC regulation on Operational Use and Control of Intelligence Contingency Fund Equipment and updated and distributed to the field the following regulaticna: GBB vrsac regulation 209-10, Source Adninistration. rd] AFSAC Regulation 200-14, Case Reviews. APSAC Regulation 200-19, Restrictions on Foreign intelligence Activities. INGB ais forwarded to all AFSAC units the revised DOD Regulation $249.1R, Procedures Governing the Activities of DOD Intelligence Components that Affect United States Pereons. aa In October 1983, INOB revised the coordination procedures governing Significant Change Reporta ta eliminate the heed to retransmit the entire SCR to theater commanders for their coordination. Thig procedure haa reduced processing time by 14 daya and there have been no incidanta of premature coordination by any of the players prior to APSAC commander‘ approval.
269 Case Review files and suspense system were set up ter all recruited and operational APSAC sources. Operations Support Sranch ( INCC) Sa The Operations Support Branch serves s6 the Air Force HUMINT requixements control authority ant’ BUMINT reporting and evatuation program managers. It maintains and operates the ‘AFIS sensitive compartmented information facility (SCZF}. The branch conducts operational development planning and all-source research, nisaion/target analyses in support of current and future USAF RUMINT activities, as well as programa to aggess the significance. impact, utility and value of the AFSAC product. Significant Events A chronological sammary of significant events and activities concerning INOC, and INOD in the first half of 1983, follows: tsemir axcanzanrs (EGER crios2. arsacsasoc, sp 412. Deleted per S U.S.C. 352¢b) {2}
pRB on 7 spr g3, tt. col. Jacobs was presented the CIK Seal Medallion for “exemplary professionalism in the service af the national intereat“ by the CIA Deputy Director, Operations. The ceremony was at HQ CIA and waa attended by Col. Yankowski and tt. Col, Doxey. a@ Lt. Xlahr went TOY to PID 9 ~ 13 May 83 and went te several meetings in the Washington DC area to assist DIA/DC4C in their preparation of & BIA assessment of AFSAC aupport to AFSC. e. Or. i June 83 INOC and INOD amalgamated, Lt. Col. Jacobse became the branch chief and Mr. James asaumed the role of technical advisor. f. za On 28 Jun 83. INOCA moved ta Building 1917 to begin te establish the AFSAC SCIF, The vault was accepted from the contractor on 28 dul 83. c- P- INCCR began to function as a section in June &} with the writing of a functional deacripticn, organization establishment, and personnel actions to fill vacant slote taking most of the year. INOCE will be manned by operations support desk officers for regional areas. n. or 9 Sept 83 the Port Belvoir Civil Engineers installed the J-SIIDS alarms in the SCIP. 4. MBB oon 13 oct 63 TNOCA agsumed the responsibility for Top Secret document contrel for the Port Belvaixr compound, 4. in Oct 83 INOC prepared an operational support concept for support to the DOD HUMINT Progran. ke Y Lt. Klahr drafted a concept for an Operational Management Information System (OMYS) with the assistance of a regérvigt on two-week annyal tour, The concept was refined through several meetings with INCO representatives who are doing 4 functional description of AFSAC to determine requirements for computer aupport. 1. On 2% Dec 83 Lt. Klahr was awarded an Air Force Commendation Medal {#02C) for outetanding achievement in establishing the APSAC SCIF, 252(b} (1) elected per 5 US.0.
273 CHAPTER VIE AFIS SPECIAL STArY Comptroller Divisico Plans and Programs Division Inspector General Manpower and Organization Divisiean Administrative Division Pablic Affairs Office Logistics Divieion
COMPTROLIGER OLVISTOM* Mission the Comptroller Sivision (AFIS/aC} provided budgetary and fisesl management, advisory, and analytic services to the command, ataff, and directorates on policiea and procedures that pertained to resource mansgement. ‘The division also eatabiished informational and financial contrel systema to assure efficient and timely management of command resources.' ORGANIZATION AND PERSONNEL The division consisted of two branches: 1) accounting and Finance and 2) Management and Budget. ‘The manpower strength was the following: NUMBER AUTHORIZED NUMBER ASSIGNED OFFICERS 2 2 ENLISTED 5 6 CIVILIANS 1 1 TOTAL 3 3 BS Lt. Col. Lleyd $. Garner continued to lead the division, in the position he held since 20 August 1379. ‘the chief of the Accounting and Finance Branch was MSgt Charles &. Sovine, whe reéplaced SMSgt Robert Grove, and the chief of the Management and Budget Branch was test Lt. Terrence M, Prost, ACCOUNTING ANS FINANCE Audit of ICF Punds QB ovrom 24 May to guly, the Air Porce Audic agency conducted its annual review of Intelligence Contingency Punds, The annual Department of Defense Appropriation Act contained authority for the expenditure of 2 specified part cf Air Fore# cperations and maintenance (3400) funds fer emergency and extraordinary expenses by, or on the approval of, the secretary of the Air Force. These sensitive, discretionary funds were designated as contingency funds and were allocated by the secretary to the chief of ataff for three basic categories of expenditures: 1) miscellanecus current expenses for official representation, 2) special intelligence expenses, and 3} confiden« tial investigative expenses, The report of the Air Force Audit *Tnis AFIS/AC segment was prepared by TSgt Ronald LaCoss and the APIS/AC staff. The APIS/8O added footnotes and dia some editing, ‘vor assigned responsibilities see AFISR 23-1, MBB, section c, 15 Jul 82. so 2.
275 Agency addreased the use of intelligence contingency funds (ICFs). Official reprenentation and confidential investigative funds were discussed in Air Force Reports of Audit 633047A and 3149213, reepectively.? Due to the sensitivity of ICFs, an annual audit wae required by the assistant secretary of the Air Foxce, Financial Management. the overall objective of the PY 1983 audit was to determine the adequacy of internal ccatrols used to manage and accoummt for Air Force ICFs. Specifically, the avditer determined if internal controls provided reasonable aasurance that: 1} disbursements of 1¢CFa were for authorized purposes and were adequately documented and supported, 2) accounting records entries were accurate end timely, 3) expenditure reporta were accurately prepared and gubmitted on a timely basis, and 4} cash, cash related items, and inventory stocks of representational comtodities/incentive gift items were adequately controlled, aafequarded, and accounted for.3 The auditors also reviewed disbursement transactions by the intelligence activities to assess the propriety of expenditures. avdit ffeld application began in Pebruary 1983 and involved a review of 98 ‘judgmentally selected disbursement youchera and 139 subvouchers with a value of $1,141,250 fram total disbursements of $2,369,931 between 1 October 1981 and 31 December 1982. ‘This review was accomplished in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards .4 tur QB. the auditor General to Secretary of the Air force and Chief of Stagf, “Project 31140114,“ n.d., 8D 413; Memo ee. and 252(b) () Teleted per 5 U.S.C. Deleted per 5 U.S.C. 552(b) (2)
: we TD No RREUEY au SRE : The findings of the Air Force Audit agency concerning the ICFs prompted the establishment of an Intelligence Contingency fund Conference to be attended by all organizations maintaining an ICP account. The audit findings, except for one account, were procedural, and many man hours were apent correcting and coordinating new accounting procedures. The months of August and September vere busy in preparation for the fiscal year close out and the establishment of the ICrF conference. SSgt Sharlene K. Trpid. 2tbta, Deleted per 5 U.S.C. 552{b){5)
277 Kegan e@pent many hourg at the host AM [Bolling AFB, D.C.) preparing and reviewing accounting records.! The ICF Conference was held from 19-21 October at the Pentagon, The revised draft of APR 200~4 was discussed in Setail by all attendees and reaulted in a final draft being submitted for coordination by Air Staff levai agencies. October was also spent establishing new fiscal year accounting recerds and reviewing prior fiacal year records for accuracy. Sovember and Seceaber were spent preparing new accounting documenta and forwarding xevieed APR 200-4 to proper agencies for final coordination. ICF xeviews were also necessary to answer Aix ¥Yorce Audit Agency writecup and to prepare for next ICP audit scheduled for Jenuary 1984. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Study of Civilian Hiring Procedures Prom Janaury through mid-Pebrausry, work was continued on the APIS Civilian #Biring Precedures Study, which was begun in November 1962. ‘the purpose ef the study was to determine ways to improve civilian hiring practices and to reduce the civilifan vacancy rate in military force program (MPP) 4. AC staff visited all activities involved in the hiring procesa in order to develop a checklist which outlined steps necessary to fill a civilian “vacancy. The report conciuded, “Most AFIS activities were not aware of the complexity of filling civilian vacancies. There was not enough emphasis on submitting SP voxrm 526 on time, and not ecordinating with AFIS/OPC on pesition deacriptions (FDs) to be gure they justified the grade that was being filled.*3 Recommendations were made concerning administrative procedures, command policy, and training progrms. The command policy recommendations were the following: * We recommend that AFIS adopt a Civilian Employment and Cost Management Committee similar to the one used by the OSI. Dering our review, we visited the OST/pec. In the past year they have made aubstantial progress in reducing their ispee rate and generally improving their civilian personnel system. One of the keys to this improvement was their use of a Civilian Employment Cost Management Committee, ‘The OST Civilian Employment Cost Management Committee meets monthly and Amciudes ali Directors and Division Chiefs. We THtetorical Data Rprt QM avrs/ac, Jan-pec 83, SD 415. 2tbid. 3pprt and Abscract QM, “arxs Civilian siring Study," AFIS/AC, 9 Mar B3, SD 416. Stbia.
278 recommend that APIS adopt a similar approach with «4 committee chaired by our CV and inciuda all APIS directors as members. Ac, MO, and DPC ld be included as advisors. Thin committee could meet once every two months and focus on ali civilian employment iasues. A standard agenda could be developed to incude a review of all vacant positions and pending actions, available funds, over hire requasts, awarda etc. The committee should review special interest items or policy auggestions that could be adopted comand wide to improve our civilian employment ayates. Thia committee should consider: ae Conducting central hiring paneis oniy for key civilifan positions and give the director/division chiefs the authority to hire their remaining positions. The OSI uses this appreach and has been very successful in reducing their civilian vacancy rate. Current AFIS policy requires all professional positions to be currently panelled ss part of the hiring process, This isn time consuming and can add 2 to 4 weeks to the overall hiring times, b, e Adept trafning programs for intellf{gence analyste through the use of summer over hire positions. AS/INES is currently trying to use this type program for Five over hires. Our Civilian Employment Cost Management Committee could insure that APIS supervisors are aware of these opportunities and develop a command wide program for over hires. c. QB xstaviishing a poot of administrative over hires will provide employees with a security clearance when a vacancy occurs. This will prevent a BPirectorate/Pivision from being without an employee for three to four monthe while awaiting e@ security clearance, Several recommendations concerning administrative procedures were appreved and implemented. The changes in command policy were evaluated and implemented as required. Budgets and Financial Plans on 7 January, the FY 1985 Operating Budget (0B) waa finalized and submitted to Air Force.’ The Financial working Group (FWG) and Financial Management Board (FMB) met on 17 February 1983 and {t March {983, repsectively, to review the ‘APIS Operating Budget FY8S QP. RCS: DD COMP(AR)-1092, oacéo, 7 Jan 83, SD 417.
279 status of the PY 3983 Operations and Maintenance (O&M) program and the PY 1983 Investment Squipment (3080) progras.! During the 15 March + 13 May time frame, while ist Lt. Frost was the 8Q Squadron Section commander, MSgt Michael E£. Hangen was tasked with preparing the PY {944 Financial Plan cep} .2 He planned and acheduled midyear reviews of ali APFI6 programs which provided a solid starting point for development of the FY384 FP. Through his validation and repricing of approved General Defense Intelligence Programs (GDIP), AFIS PY¥84 unified unfunded requirements were reduced from $3.1m to $1.8m. The Os program grew from $82.?7m to $95.5m in PY8d, as 4 cesult of expanded budget and ex-crtion responsibilities in four intelligence programs. The FYaé ¥P was aubsitted to HO USAP/ACB on 26 May 1983, and after bigher headquarters review, waa accepted as written, CY 1983 ended with the submission of the PY86 OB to Air force on 30 December 1983.3 RAs submitted their requirements in November 1983. These requirements were validated, coordinated, and finally consolidated in the formate required by Air Force. The APIS Commander reviewed and signed the ¥Y66 OB submisaion in mid December and the completed package was forwarded to Air Force. FY83 Closeout Since the closeout of FY83 was hampered by the fact that many of the AF/IN special accounts did not spend ali avatiable founds, and because five Operating Budget Account Numbers {OBANS) were activated for the Operational, Test and Evaluation program {PE 35887), it was necessary to formalize and standardize a communication system for the execution of our O&M resources. In the past, the division successfully used the Execution Report to manage the HQ‘s accounts. Beginning in Fy@4, the division would require all APIS separate funding paints (OBANS) te submit this report.4 The Financial Working Group met on 19 October to review the PYS3 closeout, to review and approve the distribution of the ney @MMR aris/ac to APIS/DA et al, “Financial Working group (PWG) Meeting." 1 Mar @3, SD 418, Ltr Qygpand 1 atch gy avis/ac to All Members, “Financial Management Board (¥MB} Meeting,“ 22 Mar 83, BD 419, See also itr QB and 1 atch My aris/ac to Ali Membera, “Financial Management Board Meeting,” 7 dul 83, SD 420; Ltr @p and 2 acens Qh "rves om vinanctal Program and PYe5 POM Initiatives in Programs 8A and $," 20 Nov 62, BD 421. Zarts Financial Plan QMRBI. Ros: DD COMP(AK)-1092, OAC40, 20 May 83, SD 422. JaFiS Operating Budget FY86 @QQMMB. RCs: GO cCOMP(AR)~-1092, OAT4O, 30 Dec 63, SD 423. 4gistorical pata Rprt MMMM AFIS/AC, Jan-Dec 83, SD 415.
280 PY84 O&M program, and to approve investment equipment purchases fron the PYa3 and FY84 program. Bach rageurce adviser (RA} reviewed the proposed distribution of thelr FyY84 Gé6éM program. After three minor adjustments, the PWG approved the FYs4 initial diatribution.?! Telephone Study During the {inal quarter of the fiscal year, AfIS/ACM completed a Telephone/Telephone Line Communication Study, The purpose of the study was to review existing capabilities and explore less expensive ways of providing the secesaary telephone service. OSuring the study ACM found several bills with local lang distance charges which had not heen vaitdated as official calis before the bilis were paid. ACM noticed a dramatic increase in the number of calle per month within RE during Jaly and Auguat of 1983, C&P telephone was requested to investigate, and the findings disclosed that AFIS was overcharged $9,574.00. A letter from the CV, dated 30 November ‘-83, waa sent to all directorates in the compound stressing better telephone control and telephone services that are avaliable in the compound.2 Commander's Fact Book Beginning in April. APIS/ACM began preparation of a "Commanders fact Rook" for the AFIS commander, The first draft was presented ta the APIS/CV with data current as of 30 June 1963. During the meeting the format of the data was changed and finalized. The Fact Book was then updated by the APIS director- ates with information current ag of 30 September 1983. After being presented to the Cv for his approval, it was decided to prepare the book and present it to the commander on a quarterly aegis, with the first formal preparation due in January 1984. This covered the first quarter of PY84, 1 Octeber 83 through 31 December 83.3 ‘yor minutes of other PWG meetings see Ltrs a. AFTIS/AC to AFIS/DA e#t al, "Financial Working Group (##G) Meeting," 28 Dec 82, 26 Apr 83, 2 Aug 83, 26 Oct B3, 20 Dec 83, SD 424. 2see ales paper MM. AFIS/AC, *APIS/ACM.,..Study...," 1983, SD 425. 7Ristorical Data Rprt QRMBB agis/ac, Jan-Dec 83, SD 415.
261] PLANS SND PROGRAMS DIVISION MISSION The Plans Division unified and directed ali command Plannisg and programing activities toward reaching approved command goais.? ORGANIZATION The division consisted of a Plans Branch and a Program— ming Branch. In February, the position of chief of the Programming Branch was converted to a civilian siot from a military one to acquire continuity of expertise. In September, however, the same branch, which conalated of a civilian billet and a military billet, became the target of an AFIS reallocation and was reduced to the size of only one billet, the civilian branch chief, GS-11. The military billet was transferred to the APIS Administrative Division, effective with the retirement of CMSgt Robert O'ffoole in June 1984, who was chief of the diviaion.? PERSONNEL Kay Personnel Lt. Col. Afden k. Guy continued ag the chief of the Plans Division, a position he. held sinea July 1961. The chief of the Programming Branch was Maj. Paul Munninghoff, from November 1982 to March 1983. He was replaced by Carlice aA. Bourasea in aly 1983, Charlies E. Beal retired as the chief of the Plans Branch in September 1983.3 Yhe Plans Branch maintained an aggresaive production schedule which was interrupted: 1) in May by the loss of the Plans program analyst. 2) in July by the reassignment of the plans officer, and 3) in September by the retirement of the branch chief. Yet, in light of these events and the arrival of inexperi- enced personnel, the Plans Division performed the programing and planning requirements of the APIS directorates and divisions and coordinated these actions with appropriate major commande oar USAF headquarters. 4 *fhis Plans and Programa section was written by the AFIS/xXP staff, the APIS/HO added the POM/GDIP chronology and footnotes. Troy a detailed mission statement and aseigned reaponsibil- ities see APISR 23-1 @MMR Section I, 15 July 82, SD 2. 2ttr Qh aris/ to AFIS/, “Authorization change," 8 Feb 83, BD 426; Ltr WRB avis/mo to AFIS/OP, “Conversion of APIS/DA Billet to Major 7046," 13 Sep 83, SD 427, 2Btetorical Data Rprt GEM aris/ep, San-dec 83, 5D 428. tbid,
282 Manning Strength @ the manning strength of the diviston waa as fallaws:! NUMBER AGTHORIZED NUMBER ASSIGHED OFFICERS ENLISTED CIVILIANS TOTAL Mp ne an PROGRABMING POM and GDIP Initiatives During the year, the significant projects of the Pro- gramming Branch were the AFIS Program Objective Memorandum (FGM), the General Defense Intelligence Program (GDIP}, and the consolidation of requirements fer these programs from all APIS @irectorates and divisions. This year for the first time the Plans Division was responsible for 1) programming in the POM for individual mobilization augmentee {IMA} funding and, 2) preparing @ submission for the Consolidated Cryptologic Program (cep) .2 Because much of the required data for separate POM and budget aubtissions were overlapping, in 1982 the AFIS Comptroller Oivision (AC). the Manpower and Organization Diviston {MO}, and the Plans and Programs Division (XP}, isaued a joint data call for FY86~-90 pOM/budget date, The preparation of POM and GDIP documents involved considerable planning, discussion, coordi-~ nation, bargaining, and decision-making. POM and GDIP Chronclogy the following chronology discloses gome of the complex activity within AFIS necessary for completion of the POM and GDIP cychea:? 7 January «+ AFIS/CV sent APSAC/CC and APIS/IND, ING, INS the schedule for the workicg level and director-level meetings for development of the General Oefense Intelligence Program (GDIP} command ranking Liat. ed 14 January ~ The meeting of the working group {resource advisers and project officera) to rank GOIP initiatives. Representatives from APSAC and AFIS/IND, INGA, INO, INOH, AC, MO, and XP attended. QB ts sanvacy - x/co sent aPSAC/CC and AFIS/IND, INO, INS the praposed ranking of the AFIS GDIP initiatives. 1 Thid. 2Hiatorical Data Rprt Qh ArIs/e, Jan-pec 33, SD 428. 3see Shs 429 through 444.
28f 25 January + The directors met to rank the FY 85-99 GDIP activities, 27 January - AFIS/CV sent AF/INYR the consolidated AFIS FreS~89 GDIP. 2 February - APIS/CY gent APSAC/CC and AFIS/IND. TNO, INS the final canking of the APIS GDIP initiatives approved at the director's meeting on 75 Janusry. tt February ~ AP/INYR erat the message to APIS/XP et al: "We expect FY85-89 to be cut as guch as ten percent below the PYSS column of the PY84 President's budget . . . . If you have new initiatives that you believe must, repeat must, be funded, notify appropriate PEM immediately and provide necessary information identifying command offsets .* GR it aprin - xesce seat arsacyce and APIS/IND, INO listing showing how APIS initiatives fared in the draft PY8S Air Poree GDIP ranking graceas. VT May - XP/CC sent APSAC/CC and AFIS/IND, INO the final ranking of initiatives as submitted by AF/IRYR to the Defense Intelligence Agency {DIA} in the final Air Force GDIP. 23 May ~ ZP/CO cent AFIS/IND, ING, INCA, INOH, TROT “the descriptive text of the Air Porce GDIF sulmission, including cover Letters, table of contents, and respective portions of the narrative and display pages. } October - AF/IRY made a data call for the NSA/DDO PY8G6-396 Consolidated Cryptologic Program (CCP). 13. October + Acting Chief XP requested attendee nominations and suggestions for topics of discussion for the Third Annual intelligence Programmers Workshop. 13 October - Acting Chief %P sent to AF/INYR the iist of the fifteen AFIS personnel to stthend the third ana? Intelligence Programmera’ Workshop. @ 24 October .~ Acting Chief of XP sent workshop attendees the agenda. 24-28 October - Third annnai Intelligence Program mera Workshop was held at the Pentagon, tO November ~ XP/CC submitted funding increages for the FY86-90 POM submission to include individual mobilization augmentees (IMAS}, In 1983, the XP learned from the 1984 MANREQ document that funding for IMA must be pursued in the POM process by esch command, in conjunction with AF/REP.
284 1S November - Most APIS clements subnitted POM/Budget data, and XY, AC and MO wera preparing to rank new initiatives. 1G November - A letter from the APIS/CV explained to unita with new initiatives how the ranking proceas wicked. 1@ November - Representatives from AC, MO, aod XP met to discuss POM initiatives submitted by AFIS elementa to reach agreement or & “strawman® ranking to be presented at the working~ Level meeting on 30 November 1983. 21 November - XP/CC sent APTS elements the “gtrawman® ranking of proposed new initiatives for the FYS6-9¢ POM, Representatives ta the 30 November working yroup seeking were to review the sanking and be prepared to defend requirement and assist in establishing ranking among the requirements on the list. 28 Hovember - XP/CC went APIS elements ¢& revised MO/KP “strawsan" ranking, with changes based on feedback following an informal review of the draft POM initiatives by Aaf/IN’s vepresentative to the HQ USAF Program Review Committee. The revised list was to be the starting point for the ranking process at the working-level ceeting on 30 Movember 1923. 30 November + The working group representing those AFIS organizations with initiatives being considered ranked the new initiatives for the FY86-90 POM. “he concerned directors, with the exception of INC, suhsegsently concurred in the proposed ranking. The INC issue was resolved on 6 December between Col. Sherman and Col. #ish. 2 Mecember ~ APIS/CV sent out the data cail and guidance to AFIS/IND, INO, INS and APSAC/CC for the FY 36-30 General Defense Intelligence Pregram (SDIP}. 13 December - APIS/CC sent to AFIS elements the command ranking of PfY86-90 Program Objective Memorandum {POM} initiatives for Programa €@ and $3, with a description of each initiative. Program 3 requirementa were being developed and were to be ranked separately. 45 December - AFIS/C¥ sent toa the P8475 PEM (AF/MPPE} the Program Decision Packages for INC'a FY8G POM initiatives, Supporting documentation for the package was included. 23 December - AF/INYSH sent AFIS/MO/AC/XP a copy of the lateat Air Force GDIP ranking itsting. Review of Sous
285 The Programming Branch congolidated AFIS reviewa of atatements of operational need (SONs}; it reviewt¢ 54 BONS and provided substantive coments to originaters of 17 of chem.? Revised Objective Plan On 24 August the Programing Branch initiated sction to update the AFIS Objective Plan by 24 October. kevieed arnexes had been received from all AFIS elements except “hose AFIS/INO activities affected by an AP/INE reorganization, bo wie in the planning stage. Publication of the Objective Plau was held up pending the outcome of the AP/INE reorganization, wii had not been approved by the and of 1983.2 PLANS Planning Documents The Plans Branch updated and produced thirteen basic planning documents :? 1, AFIS OPLAN F132 (9M 18 oul 93, Change 1 to MAICOMS and AE/IN~AFIS. 2. AFIS OPLAN #-133 J} 20 gun @3, to MAZCOME and AY/IN- AFIS. 3. APIS OPLAR F134 Ped 25 Peb §3 to MAICOMS and AF/IN~ APIS- & APIS OPLAN P-135 & 46 May €3, Change 1 to MAICOMs and AP/IN~AFIS. 5. APIS OPLAN °-136 $9 19 sul 83, Change 1 to MAJCOMS and AF/IN-AFIS. 6, AFIS Support Plan-~Defense Intelligence Agency, tt Rov 83, to MAICOMs and AF/IN-AFIS. 7. APIS MOB-PLAN 29-5 QARMIS 3 Jul 83 to MATCOHA and AP/IN- AFIS. 8 APIS CONCEPT/AFIS SUPPORT PLAN 30 Dec 83 to HAICOMS and AF/IN~AFIS. 9. APIS Bmergency Action Procedures ae 2 Sep 83 to AFIS. ¥Q. AFISR 355-1 Disaster Preparedess, Pianning and Organization 18 Dec 83 to AFIS. 11. APISR 355-2? Disaeter Preparedness, APIS Notification Syatem 18 Aug &2 to AFIS. 32, APIS EXPLAN 01-83 45 March 83 to MAJCOMe and AF/IN-AFIS. 43. AFIS BXPLAN 9024 15 Sep 63 to MAJCOMe and AP/INS~AFIS. iuist gag APIS/EP, “Statements of Operational Reed {(SOKs) on which APIS Comments Were Provided to Originater dnring 1923,7 n.d., Appendix 2, 2gistorical Data Rprt QM Aris/kr, Jan-pec 83. sD 428. 3por these plans see SDs 445 through 457, See also Ltr GR and 1 Atch QJ. AFIS/XP to AF/INYX et al, ‘APIS Plans Listing and Sumary,* 1 Nov 83, SD 458.
The branch also maintained the wartime allocationa of reservist intelifgence individual mobilization augnentee {IMA} authorizations far MAICOK contingency planning. In addition, a regular function of the Plans Branch was staffing the review of numerous regulations, ganuals, memoranda of understanding, host tenant agreements, and operational plans from various Air Force ang APIS organizations. Directorate and division comments to these documents were consolidated and provided to the requesters. The, divieion wrote EXPLANe for RIDGE RONNER and PRESSURE POINT 94. Update of TPPOL An integral part of plans update was the maintenance of the Time-Phased Force Seployments Lists ‘TPFDL} for reservist IMA allocations to the MAJCOMs for wartime planning. In 9932 this became a major project of the Plang Branch program asalyst through update of the Manpower force Packaging System (MANPOR) and through extensive analysia of the support Force Sizing (PORSIZZ}. Before the Plans program analyst left AFIS, Mr. Earl G. Gongloff was authorized access to the worldwide Military Command and Control System (WWMCCS) Intercomputer Network, and in April 1983, this enabled him to update the MANPOR data of the Contingency Operations/Mobility, Planning and Execution System (COMPES) per the 1983 FORSIZE Exercise, These changes brought the MANFOR to currency for the first time since 1981.2 FORSIZE and MANREQ Exercise The FY83 Support Porce Sizing {FORSIZE} and wartime Manpower Planning {MANREQ}) Exercise was conducted, and the Phase Yt Narrative Report was submitted on 27 May 1983. The FORSIZE/MANREQ exercise identified and documented the total Wartime Manpower force structure for inplace and deployment requiretenta. Support force availability for the War and Mobilization Plan, Volume 3, Part Il was validated through this exercise. Thia validated requirement data was used hy the Air taff for Program Objective Memorandum {POM} planning and manpower program initiatives in support of the total Air Force wartime manpower planning aystem.3 Although the manpower initiatives from the 1983 FORSIZE/MANREQ were concluded, they were not authorized by December 1983. Nevertheless, the first phase of the 1984 PORSIZE Maiatorical Data Rprt. APIS/EP, Jan-Dec 93, 428. 2usq QQ. APIS/XP to AF/XOOTN, “Annual Review of MAJCOM/SOA ARilocation of AF Apportionment of 100K Mobilization Authority” GBH 9120102 gui 93, so 4 Sirr and 11 Atchs APIS/XP to AF/MPMK et ai, “FYS3 Phage II Narrative Repert, Support Porce Sizing (PoRSizZ) and Wartime Manpower Planning (MANREQ} gxercises GMB 27 May 93, so 460.
2B? EXERCISE was underway in November with the PORSIZE Time Phased Perce Deployment Oata (TPFDD} Refinement Conference. Maj. Mary Houghton attended the conference on 30 November 1983 at Site “R". Port Ritchie, Maryland. Mr. Gengloff, who raturmned to AFIS in December 1983, began the cycle of follow-up actions for Refinement Conference initiatives.! TRIPS BY PLANS PERSONNEL Several trips were made in 1983. in preparation for the Pacific Bpecial Activities area (PSAA) Management effectiveness Inspection (MEI}, Lt. Col. Guy attended the air Porce faspector General School in duly 1943, fe traveled to the RIDGE RUKNER Exercise 12 September. Se and Maj- (Select} Houghton attended the Personnel and Readiness Conference at the Air National Guard Pacility, Gulfpert, Miesisaippi, from 26-30 September. Lt. Col. Goy attended the SPACECOM Intelligence Conference from 5-8 December. No trip reports were required.? @D econ 2-27 october, Ee. Col. Guy participated in the AFIS/IG Management Effectiveness Inapectioa of the Ye gerformed sn inepection of The planning functions of the’ organization and were a direct result of the a dedicated to planning.? ranged fr emphasis and exper Wistorical Data Rprt QM. AFIs/xF, Jan-Dec 83, sD 428. 2thid. Frpid. Deleted per § 0.9.0, S52¢d) (5)
OFFICE OF THR INSPECTOR CEARRAL* MISSTON The Office of the Inspector General (IG} was responsible to the APIS commander for the optimum effectiveness of the Air Force inspection, safety, inveatigative, and complaint programs within APIS. It reported directly te the commander the tanagement effectiveneas of {ndividual units and command—wide functions, #8 ehserved during inspections. it alga acted aa the management. advisor for all command or comparable level activities.? ORGANIZATION AND PERSONNEL @ The IG office consiated of three people: POSTEION NAME AND RANK PROM zo Inspector General ie, Cal, C, Wayne Burridge it Aug 80 Through Dec 83 Inspector Maj. Raymond C. Campton 6 Aug 82 Through bec 83 Adminiatrative SSgt Edward C- ROOTS Coiding 7 Oct GO Through Bec 83° The office was fully manned: NUMBER AUTHORIZED NUMBER ASSIGNED OFFICERS 2 2 ENLISTED 1 1 CIVILIANS 2 2 TOTAL 3 3 *This IG segment was written by Lt, Col. C. Wayne Burridge. The APIS/HO added the footnotes and made some editorial changes. See Ltr QJ with 1 Atch QY AFIS/IG to APIS/HO, “Directorate and Staff Agency Bistory Inputs (APIS/CV Ltr, 6 Dec 82}," 25 Jan 84, SO 46%. troy vesponsibilities assigned see AFR 23-1 QRH Section F, 18 Jul 82, SD 2. See also the semiannual reporta on AFIS/IC activities, Ler Qh and 3 atch Gy Aris/tc to ug arisc/icr, "Semiannual Report on Audit, Inapection and Investigative Operations . . . ." 1 Ape 83, SO 462; Ler GMB and 1 Atch Sy APIS/IG to HQ AFISC/IGF, "Information Requiremente of the Office of the Inspector General . . . .” 3 Oct 83, SO 463.
4a INSPECTIONS Mang: nt Effectivenass Inspections Management. Effectiveness Inspections i#BIe} were conducted at AFIS subordinate organizations every 19-24 months. These inspections, conducted according to APR 123-3, “The Inspec- tion System,” examined all aspects of the activity's function. thie included inspecting organizational leadership and management, ae reflected in siasion and functional arma performance, installation support, people programs, sexvice to customers. and compliance with directives,! During 1983, HEIs were conducted at the following locations: ‘The overali management of was rated ag 2 APIS/IG inspector personne) and augmenters for this inspection were: a. QB tr. cot. c. wayne wurridge, APIS/IG, Team Chief. b, @ Maj. Raymond ¢. Compton, AFIS/IG, HUMINT Operations. c. QB urs. Miiared 4. carter, APIS/DA, Unit Adminis~ tration. a. @B cuset william of. Strickland, APIS Senior Enlisted Advinor. e. @ MSgt John C. Heldman, Information Security. 8 May 1983. AFIS/I ipectora visited representatives in : i . @ Overall manage~ ment of the program was rated as 2 APIS/IG inspector personnel for this inspection were: a. i) it. Col. C. Wayne Surridge, AFIS/IG, Team b, zm May. Raymond ©. Compton, AFIS/IG, HUMINT Operations. chief. 3. 11-28 October 1963. MEIs were conducted at e ‘wet Report 14-18 March 1983,“ 29 Mar 83. SD MET Report Classified Annex aris/ic, GE 44-18 March 1983," 29 Mar 3, SD 465 2rhtd. Sumer Report @@B arzsszc. peleted per 5 U.S.C. 552(b) (5)
290 Vinté October 1993; and .  24~28 Octaber 1983 The overall management of act: jaa rated as QI. © aris/rc inspector personnel and augmenters For this inapection warer eo. GBM te. col, Cc. wayne purridge, AFIS/IG, Team Chief. bp. MB ct. cot. arden wm. Guy, aris/er, Plans and Programa; Logistics. c. 8 Mat. Raymond ¢, Campton, APIS/IG, SUMINT Operations. a. Qe we. ane fc. Pasini., AP/INA, Information Security. a “Sgt Larry &. Wallace, APIS/DA, Aebt Administration. Intelligence Oversight Inspections intelligence oversight was sonitored by the AFIES/IG to ensure APIS compliance with Executive Order (£0) 12333. "Uaited Statee Intelligence activities.” APIS/IG performed ttits task duxing MEIs by observing unit activities governed by 1) the BO; 2) Depsrtnent of Defense Regulation $240.1-R, “Procedures Governing Activities of OOD Intelligence Components That Affect Onited States Persons.” 3} AFR 123-3, “Intelligence Oversight," and 4) APR 200-19, “Conduct of Intelligence activities." During 1983. oversight inspections were conducted diring MZta at: te 41-18 March 1983. 9-18 May 1983. 3. . 11-14 Gcreber 1923. ) +7T-21 October 1993. “28 October 1983. je 24 Reports of oversight inspection activities were prepared by AFIS/IG each quarters of 1983 and forwarded to HQ Ait Force Inspection and Safety Center/IGQI, Norton AFB, CA, according to AFR 20019, “Conduct of Intelligance Activities." These reports listed current activities and proposed future inepectiona. Bo activiites that raised questions of legality or propriety were detected or reported during 1983. Over-the-Sheulder Inspections Over-the-Shoulder tnapections (OfSI} were inspections performed by inspectors from AFIS/IG to evaluate the effectivenesa of an APIS organization‘’s self-inspection program. Evaluations => 44-28 Oct 3." $8 Nov 63, . Lers o- APIS/IG to HQ AFISC/IGOI, “Quarterly Oversight Inspection activities . . - .* 1 Apt a3, 30 Jun 83, 16 Sep 83, 214 Dec 83, 5D 46a. pelered pet 5 ¥.8.C. 552¢b) ¢5)
79) inspection standards, checklist included mission~oriented performed durfag utilization, and team management. OfSia were 1963 at the following 80 AFIS elements: 1, QB QR. 20 January 1963 The Inapector for thie OfSI was Maj. Raymond C. Compton. The overall self-inspection of this division was rated as@agRByMaim ’ 2. SB R22 ans 24 February 1983 The inspector for The overall seif~ a * this OTST was Lt. Col, ©. Wayne Burridge. inspection of this directorate was rated as 3. a PY 24-25 March 1983 The inspector for this OTSI was Maj, Raymond C. Compton. The overall seif-inspection of this directorate was rated a 3 4. 26-27 April 1983 The inspector for this OTSI was Lt. Col. C, Wayne Burridge. ‘The overall self~inspection of this directorate was rated as 4 5. ae Poy 26 May 1983 The inspector for this OfS1 was Maj. Raymond C. Compton. The overall self-inspection for this division was rated as 5 6. QP OB 2: seoust 1993) The inspector for this OTSI was Maj. Raymond C. Compton. The overall self~ingpection of this division was rated ag: ao >. & 19 August 1983 The inspector for this OTSI was Maj. Raymond €. Compton. The overall self-inspectior of this diviaion was rated as 7 3. WB QRBRMD. 20 septemer 1983 the inspector for this AFIS/1G to QQIMBB “over-the-shoulder Inspection Ther (OTSI) of ." 18 Feb 83, SD 469. “her . AFIS/IG co a “Ower-the~Shoulder Inapection (OTSI) of the ro. y Self-Inspection Program,“ 24 Mar 83, SD 47a. Sher AFIS/IG to @QRNEB. “Over—the-Shoulder Inspection (OTSI} of Self inspection Program," 15 Apr 83, 5D 471. ber "Over~the-Shoulder Inspection (oTst} of the apection Program,” 24 May 83, SD 472. Sitr =. “Over-the-Shoulder Inspection (O9SI} of the Self-Inspection Program,“ 20 dui 83, SD 473. Sher AFIS/1G to QQMMEBBBEB  “Over-the-Shoulder Inspec- tion (OTST) of the QOBMMMMMD Seif-Inspection Program," 21 Sep 83, SD 474, Tuer QR oarisstc to “over~the-Shoulder Inapection {O2SI) of the QMMRNBR Self-Inepection Program,“ 7 Oct 83, SD 475, Deleted per 5 U.5.¢. 552(b) (5)
292 OTSI was Lt. Col. C. Wayne Burridge. the overall self~{napection of this directorate waa rated el 3, Poe OY 7 Oecember 1983 ‘The inspector for this OUSI was Lt. Col. C. Wayne Burridge. The overall self~inspection for this division was rated a SE? COMPLAINTS AND INQUIRIES Numercun complaints were investigated by AFIS/IG during 196]. Due to the privileged, personnel nature of the information contained in these complaints, copies of the investigation reporta were not included in thia history, #owever, complete files on the camplaints vere maintained in APIS/IG. Areas of complaint and inquiry tacluded: ae es Qroblems with the Arwy~Air Porce fxchange System Portrait p b. Avards and decorations disapprovals (2} ony Job harassment a. Concerns about Letters of Evaluation e@. tmproper attache behavior £. Pay record difficulties gq. Availability of security clearance messages SPECIAL ENQUIRY Based on a xequest from the assistant chief of etaff. intelligence (ACS/I}, AFIS/IG performed a epecial inquiry inte the management of personnel within APIS/INS. The inquiry was performed by Lt. Col. ¢. Wayne Burridge and Maj. Raymond ¢. Compton during the period 23 June - 29 July 1983. According to the report of inquiry, “The inquiry included a review of applicable directives, files, and personnel folders. Interviews ranging from 39 minutes to three hours were conducted with 62 present or former military and civilian employees of APIS/INS. These interviews, conducted with both supervisory and working~ level personnel, permitted each individual to air grievances in @ confidential forum and also allowed the inquiry officer to understand the working dynamics within APIS/INS. All individuals interviewed were exceptionally forthcoming and candid in their comaente ."3 aris/tc co GMMR cover-che-shoulder tnapection nex . {OTSI) of the Self Taspection Program,“ 4 Nov 83, Sp 476. *Ler , APIS/IG te .  ‘"Over-the-Shoulder Ingpection (OTSi}] of the QAMMEMMMB self-tnspection program,* 24 Dec 83, SD 477. 3see prt APIS/IG, “Report of Inquiry into Personnel Management within the Directorate of Security and Communications Management {APIS/INS) Aix Porce Intelligence Service,” 23 July 83, SO 478. Deleted per 5 0.5.6, 5$2(b) {5} Deleted per 5 0.S$.c, 552(b) (5)
293 FRAUD, WASTE, ARD ABUSE (PWGA) PREVENTION ACTIVITIES AFIS/IG implemented AFR 123-2, “Air Force Fraud, Waste, and se (FWkA) Prevention and Detection," within the command. in conjunction with this program, APIS/IG publicized PWEA prevention by placing notices in the APIS Weekly Bulletin each quarter to advise APTS members of the opportunity to report suspected PWEA activities to AFIS/IG for investigation. During 1983, APIS/IG also distributed FWEA croasfeed information and newsiettera from the Air Force Inspection and Safety Center (AFISC) to all APIS elements. Monthly reports on AFIS FEA prevention activities were submitted to AFISc/1cP.! During 1963, four FPWs conference periods were held in conjunction with MEIs of sub rdinate APIS organizations. Ho PWEA disclosures were received trough these conferences. two cases of alleged PWEA were referred to AFIS/IG for investigation. These cases included allegations of: : 1. a Abuse of position in processing suggestion awards. 2. a Possible misappropriation of government funds. Both cages were investigated by APIS/IG, but were not gub- atantiated, Because of the privileged nature of the files on these cases, files were maintained in APIS/iG. GROUND SAFETY AFIS/IG was charged by APIS/CC to manage ali aspects of the AFIS command-wide ground safety program. This included the implementation of APR 127-2, “the US Air Force Mishap Prevention Program,” APR 127-4, “Investigating and Reporting ps Air Porce Mighaps.° and AFR 127-12, “Air Porce Occupational Safety and Heaith Programs,” within the command. Additionally, AfIS/iG prepered seasonal safety letters and messages for the ACS/I and AFIS/CC and prepared and distributed gound safety information to all AFIS elements. Close coordination wae maintained between AFIS/IG and the Safety Offices at Bolling Air Force Base, Port Belvoir, and the Pentagon, Maj. Compton served as the command ground safety officer (additional duty) during this period? During 1983, APIS personnel suffered the following xeportable mishapa:> yor the monthly message reports, see ms¢ QAM aris/ic to APIS/IGF, “Monthly Fraud, Waste and Abuse Prevention Activities {46 Dec 82.- 15 Jan 83),“ 1720202 Jan 83, SD 679 and 12 Atch mesaages 2por the twelve monthly AFIS safety reports see AF Form 740 em. “Ground Mishap and Safety Education Summary,” APIS/IG, HAP- IGF(4) 7143, Jan 83, 6D 480, and 14 Atchs 3xbid.
294 TYPE OF MISHAP INJURY/DAMSGE DAYS LOST Cost Major injured during karate meety Broken hand; off-duty {1 Oct 83) strained leg t $270.90 Lt Col slipped on rough pavement Practured ankle ' 3370.00 white jogging; off~ duty (16 Oct 83) $Sgt injured playing touch Sprained ankls 2 $249.00 football: off-duty {30 Oct 83) This APIS 1983 ground accident summary information was the following: ! MILITARY CIVILIAN MANHOURS MANHOURS GOVERNMENT MONTE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE VEHICLE MILEAGE MISHAPS Jan 90,389 29,955 8,147 Q feb 86, 368 29,542 6,393 a Mar 90,552 35,003 9,917 9 Apr 90,384 34,248 6,597 a May 94,576 36,340 7,433 id gun 93,576 34,489 7,746 0 cul 93,744 34,084 7,027 0 Aug 94,920 36,988 8,508 a Sep 93,912 35,876 9,695 e act 94,476 33,458 9,372 3 Nov 96, 768 34,316 8,404 9 ood 97,776 34,322 8,236 o 1, 318,880 405,623 96, 569 3 TRAINING APIS/IG sponsored several individuals to attend the OSAP Ingpector General School conducted by the Air Force Inspection and Safety Center, Norton, APB, California. These individuals were identified by their element of assignment ta augment AfIS/IG inspection teams. ‘Those individuals attending the school during 1983 were: 1, QB wsot warry x. wallace, avis/oa; attended clase at Norton AFB, CA, 15-18 Aug 1963, ‘niatorical Data Rprt @MMB aris/xp, Jan-pec 93, sD 461.
235 2. Bra. Melba XK. Brown, AF/INA; Attended class at £giin APB, PL, 12-15 September 1983. 3. Mrs. Ann 8. Paeini, AP/INA: Attended clasa at Eglin APB, 12-18 September 19483.
WARPOMER AKD CRGANTZATION DIVISICH* MISSION The Manpower and Organization Divialon (MO} managed the command manpower authorizations (both active and reserve forces), controlied organizational atructure, conducted manpower surveys, and determined manpower requirements. ORGANIZATION The diviaion consisted of two branches: 1) Organization and Requirements and 2} Resources and Productivity. On 3 January, the Engineering and Requirements Branch was redesignated the Organization and Requirements Branch to reflect the AFIS exemption from the Air Force manpower standards engineering programs and the division's increased emphasis on the command's (SOA's} structural needs and issues. ? PERSONNEL it. Col. John S. Follrod continued as chief of the division, a pasition he held from 16 Auguat {[981. In December 1983, he was promoted to lieutenant colonel. Since 4 Auguat 1979 MSgt Willtam 8. Emenhizer was chief of the Organization and Requiretents Branch. SMSgt Edward 8. Huter, the chief of the Reagurces and Productivity Qranch, transferred to the Electronic Security Command at Kelly AFB, Texaa on 21 September 1983. He had been with MO since { July 1978 and waa replaced by MSgt Arnold Lees, who had been with MO since 18 December 1991. @ The manning strength of the division was ag followa: NUMBER AUTHORIZED NUMBER ASSIGNED OFFICERS t + ENLISTED 5 5 CXVILIANS o a TOTAL é é PUNCTIONAL ACTIVITIZS *The APIS/MO segment was written by MSgt Wililiam £. Emenhizer and reviewed by Lt. Col. John S. Polirod. The AFIS/HO added footnotes, did some editing, and quoted some documents. See Ltr and t Atch QB ArIS/MO to AFIS/HO, “Annual Unit History Report (CY#983} {AFIS/CV Ltr, 6 Dec 83}," 17 Peh 82, SD 481. JaPISR 23-1 GBM Section H, 15 dul az, SD 2. 2Riatorical Data Rort @BMB APIS/MO, Jan-Dec 83, SD 481.
297 New Regulations Publiahed ed two new APIS regulations: AFISR 26=1, “authorization Change Request Procedures," 5 October 1983, and APISR 26-2 “organization Policy and Management," $8 November 1983. The former provided guidance and procedures for requesting changes ids manpower authorigations. ! The latter outlined responsibilities for controlling organizational atructuras and formai mission atatements within aprs.2 @ In accordance with the SO miasion. the division pablis' Installation of CPT Computer Ramote Terminal Installation of a cathode ray tube {CRT} computer remote terminal in March greatly enhanced the division's ability to responsibly manage AFIS's allocated resources. Dacreased dependence on off-site (Bolling APB and Andrews AFB) equipment and related manual procedures provided greater flexibility and responsiveness in meeting the resource and organization require~ ments of AFIS. Direct computer interface transactions replaced these involving card key punching, mailing transaction cards to Bolling APB, computer batch processing, return mailing, and transaction editing. What formerly involved two, three or more days was accomplished in two to four hours. Installation of an on-site printer in mid-January 1964 was expected to provide near complete management freedom.3 ‘The capability to produce hard copy ‘on-site was to end MO‘a dependence on the facilities and equipment at Bolling and Andrews. Manpower Authorization and Allocation Extensive resource management actions enabled the divisicn to accomodate APIS’s growing manpower suthorization requirements. Two primary means were employed in meeting those requirements: 1) allocation of newly approved resources and 2) redistritation of existing resouxces. The Air Perce Special Activities Center (APSAC} was provided for fiscal year 1983, 1t officers, 1 enlisted, and 3 civilians; for fiscal year 1984, APSAC was provided 9 officers, 6 enlisted, and 6 civilians.4 ‘The Directorate of Intelligence Data Management {IND} received 10 new enlisted positions in the fiasca} year 1984 Air Porce General Defense Intelligence Program.5 tarIsR 26-1 GMM “Authorization Change Request Procedures,” 5 Oct @3, SD 482. 2aPIsR 26-2 GMM} “Organization Policy and Management," 18 Nov 83, SD 493. Juistorical Data Rprt APIS/MO, Jan-Dee 83, SD 481. 4uer WHR ana 2 atch APTS/MO to APSAC/CC, "PYB3 and PYB4 AFSAC Manpower Additions,” 25 Peb 83, 8D 484. Stier APIS/THD to AFIS/MO et al, “New FYS4 Manpower Ruthorizations,” 17 Jan 63, SD 485.
298 ve manpower authorizations were traneferred from the Strategic Ady Command (SAC) to support the Tactical Air Intelligence System (TAIS), The positions were the following:? Fc osc POSITION RR AFSC 86 PEC OA 383705 TNOR ga0se4s 384114 INZY{ DNYS) 6005032 354114 INZY{ INYS} 6805033 354714 INZY{INYX} 9005034 354194 TINZY( DY¥R) 0005035 CBot6 31335B +t 8016 91212G +t 8016 912126 +4 8016 9121260 +1 a035 $1212G +i geese [2 "Pool" for Manpower Trade-Offs bear The continuing need to provide dedicated resources to specific taskings led to the establishment of a “lowest~-priority" listing from within AFIS's existing resources,- Zach function nominated a resource which, if deleted, would least impact upon the unit's overall mission, recognizing that the identification did not deny the genuine need for the resource. The “pool” thus eatabltahed of lowest-priority positions was subsequently dram 2uer APIS/MO to AFIS/IND, the Tactical Air Inteliigence System (TAIS),“ 2% Jul 83, SD 489; Memo for Record QA AFIS/MO, Maj Pollrod, “Reprogramming of GDIP Billets for Record” QM & June 83, SD 490; Ltr QB ar/iny to APIS/MO, “Allocation of Five Manpower Authorizations Transferred from SAC,” 23 dun 63, SD 491; Ltr MMB arvweme to Ariss, “General Defense Intelligence Program Adjustment," 30 Jun 83, SD 492; Ler Wm aris/no to AF/INY, AFIS/IND, "Allocation of Pive Manpower Authorizations Transferred from SAC (Your Ltr, 23 Jun),* 7 Jul 83, SD 493. See also Ltr QM with 1 atch QM arispw to APIS/CV et al, “PYBS POM Results (Program 8 and 9},“ 11 May 83, 59 494; Ler WB witch 1 Acch Wy aAris/uo to AFIS/DP, “Manpower Authorization Change Request (Your Ltr, 28 Oct 83}," 15 Nov 83, SD 495. Deleted per 5 U.S.C, 352(6) (1)
729 upon to fund 1} AF/IMY requirements for the Reconnaisnance Plans Branch {AP/EOX)' and 2) AFIS/INOZD requirements for Intel Graphice service? Three Elements Reorganized Seversi functional anagera edapted to shifting and increasing mission Fesponsibiitties end caskings via reorganization. Approval and implementation of reorganizations in the Directorate of Security and Commonicationa Hanagemont,? the Directorate of Joint Servicee Sapport,4 and Heaéquartera Arsac? wae to provide functional managers the capability for achieving greater wanagerial flexibility, maximal etilization of resources, and more efficient/offective mission accomplishment. Exemption from Functional Reviews On 25 April. the deputy director of 8Q USAP Manpower and Organization (AF/MPM) exempted APIS from functional reviews. AFIS/MO had requested the exemption in february. According to Major Polirod: Most Headquarters APIS functione have been identified for exemption because mission activities are not conducive to standards development. Por proper perepective, it ie necessary to understand that AFIS is ‘state summary sheet QB with 9 accns = APIS/HO to AFIiS/CE et al, “Manpower Biltets for Reconnaissance Plans Branch {AP/EOX}," 20 gun @3, SD 436: Ltr QM’ aris/mo to aPis/az, “transfer of authorization,” 18 Jul 83, SD 497; Ltr = APIS/#O to AF/INY, “intelligence Support for Reconnatasance Plans Branch (AB/THY Ltc, 8 Jun 83), 20 gt 83, SO 498. fuer QM with 2 atch MBB aris/mo to APIs/INoa. "Manpower Billets for intel Graphics Service,” 15 Aug 83, SD 499; Ltr MR. AFIS/MO to APIS/INOZD, “Manpower Billets for Intel Graphics Services (Our Staff Summary Sheet, 3 Aug 231," 15 Avg 83, SD S00; Ler = AFIS/MO to AFIS/OA, “Manpower Billets for Intel Graphics Support,* 45 aug 83, SD 501. 3gee Chapter 5. A4see Chapter 4. Ster Qyb with « atch QM APIs~D to AFSAC/CC, “Manpower Standards Study Pinal Report," 6 Oct 83, 5D 502; Ler @MNF arsac/cy to APIS/MO, “Manpower Standards Study Final Report,“ 2 Now 83, 5D $03. Stuer QB oAr/mem to AFIS/MO, “Command Puncticnal Review Schedule," 25 Apr 83, SO 504. Tune WAR APIS/MO to AFMEA/MEM, “Command Puncticnal Review Schedule," 3 Peb 83, SD $05; utc MMM wien 2 atch (aris/Mo utr, 6 Sep 62 w/Atch, AFISR 23-2 WMH and aFis/Mo ttr, 3 Feb 83), avts/eo to APMEA/MEM, “Command Punetional Review Schedule (Yoor Ltr, & Dec 82),° 4 Fab 83, so 506, itr WH anc 3 atch Qypy aris/io to AFMEA/HEM, “Command Functional Review Schedule,” 3 Feb 83, Sb 507.
300 te AF/IR as AFMFC is to A/F. Roth SOAs provide specialized support to the Air Staff and te functional communities worldwide. The nature and character of the taske performed, i.a., high level functional agent and gelegated staff responsibilities, hiatecically and realistically do not tend themselves to standards davelopaent . Ia addition to SOR headquarters activittes, AFIS. one subordinate element which {a the Air Force Special Activities Center {AFSAC). Again, the nature of APSAC's aiasion. coupled with ita worldwide dispersal, makes ME standards development impractical. This subject was previously addreaged with AF/MPME and based on discussions between myself and Lic Leffler, ve were of the impression that the APSAC exemption request vould be favorably considered based upon its merits. Manpower Studies a. Having obtained exemption from the inatitutionalized Air Force apower Standard Development Program, MO reduced its authorized strength by one and made that resource avaiiable to satisfy a higher priority requirement within AFIS. MO continued te conduct manpower studies directed toward establishing a credible baseline of functional requirementa. The finalization of the Personnel Security Division, AFIS/INSB, and the #Q APSAC gtudies provided for the internal realignment of responathbilities and resources te meet functional tagkings from within existing capabilities. This was significant in that new responsibilities were absorbed without seeking new resources. Equally impertant, these atudies lent credence to the value of tailoring the manpower standard study program to the particular needa of APIS. Raving acquired a prospective yield from this departure from the af program, a similar effort was initiated in the Administrative Division, AFIS/DA.! Special Concerna fhe Air Force role in the intelligence community aa directed by the ACS/T was greatly expanded ag a resuit of the current world situation. The ACS/I required greater numbers of resources to maintain current intelligence policy, direction, analysis, and production efforts and to identify and explicit the growing areas of intelligence potential. Caupled with congres- sionally imposed Air Staff strength ceilings, the existing {and projected} austere budget led to the practice of looking to APIS for delegation cf mission elements and satisfaction of needed resource builds.2 “this practice,* according to APIS/MO, “added to the acope of the APIS mission responsibilities while reducing ‘hte QM and + atqh GMMR arrs/mo to aris/va, “study Memorandum," 6 Dec #3, SD 508. 2Hiaterical Data Rert GIBB arrs/mo, Jan~pec 83, sp 431.
302 the resources svaiiable to meet currently assigned responsi~ bilities. Existing SOA resources were severely strained. The anticipated perpetuation of the practice, lack of projected resource gains, and the possibility of an Bir Porte imposed 604 strength reduction not only posed serious short term resource management problems for AFIS, but alao presented the posaibility of an eventual atrophy of the BOA overhead. Acquisition of sorely needed resources must therefore continue to be one of the highest priority efforts. at the same time, there had to be a renewal of afforts to optimize the utilization of existing resources commensurate with AF/IN and APIS miasion priorities.”1 'rbid.
302 ADRINISTRATIVE DIVISIGN® MISSION The Aduinistrative Division (DA) was charged with provi: g efficient and economic administrative management systems which were essential to operating and managing Air Force intelil- gence sctivities. Its assigned responsibilities were the following: ! a. Establishes and implementa policies, proce~ dures, systems and standards that relate to publications and forms management, dmcludinag their reproduction and distribution. (Publi-cation management, forms management, publications and forms diatribution, and maintaining standard publication isihraries.) b. & Establishes and implements polictea and 6tandards accarding to Congressional Joint Committee standards on printing, reguiationg and governient paper specification. {printing management, including maintaining printing budget, micropublishing management, duplicating management, and copying management .) c. a2 Establishes and implements policies according to the Public Printing and Documenta Act, Preedom ef Information Act, and Privacy Act. Also, implementa regulationg from the General Services Administration, Office of Management and Budget, the Attorney General of the United States, and the General Accounting Office. (Authenticating documents, documentation Management, giving access to and releasing documents under the Preedom of Information Act and Privacy Act, For Official Ose Only (POUG} markinge, protecting and handling, scheduling feeg, and microfilming systema management.) 4. es Establishes and implements policies, proce- dures, and standarde that relate to administrative communications management, integrated Air Force addressing aystem, administrative orders, terminology standardization and abbreviation control, and postal liaison.) @. {valustes administrative aystems (manual or automated) that apply to administrative and executive management mission. fevelopa plans for new or refines current administrative systema to increase their misaion efficiency and reduce operational cost. *This Administration segment wag written by Susan P. Cooksey and the DR staff, The APIS/HO did footnoting, minor editing, and the quoting of some documents. ‘APISR 23~t, Section D, Administrative Division (DA), 15 July 82. SB 2.
303 ORGANIZATION a& The Administrative Division consisted of four branches and five sections as follows: Administrative Communicationa Branch (DAA? Publication Management Sranch {DaP) Command Publications Distribution Center {DAPD) Publications Development Section (DAPE) Porms Management Section (DAPP) Reprographics Section (DAPR} Documentation Management Sranch {DAD} Preedom of Information Section (DADF} Systems Management Branch (DAY) OMB Recommendations to Eliminate Printing Facility On 15 November, the Office of Management and Budget {OMB} completed its review of data on the justification for continued existence of printing plants and duplicating centers throughout the Air force. The AFIS duplicating facility was included in the survey. OMB xecommended that on 1 October 1984, APIS cease use of its printing press for the 113,000 classified production units and transfer that workload to a photocopier. The unclassified work, 333,000 units, was recommended for transferral ‘to the Fort Belvoir centralized facility through an inter-service support sgreement.? On 6 November, the Reprographics Section responded to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, defending the existence of the APIS reprographics facility. ‘The thrust of the letter stated that the facility was established to provide support for quick response on sensitive intelligence material during crisis situations. It was not prudent to release that material for reproduction outside the intelligence community. In mid-December, the AFIS Logistics Division was informed of the OMB recommendation to transfer the unclassified AFIS printing work to the Port Selvoir Army Field Print Plant or ether printing facility as deemed appropriate. The proposal raised several concerns with Col. Lynn Thompson, the chief of logistics. fe stated:4 ‘por detailed mission statements of the hranches see Historical Bata Rprt AFIS/DA, Jan-Dec 83, SD 509. 2point Paper AFIS/DAP, “Air Porce Reprographics Program," 43 Dec B3, SD 510. 3rbid. 4ucr @MBA aris/ic to AFIS/cv et 41, “Afr Force Reprographics Program {AFIS/DAP Paint Paper 15 Dec 83),” 20 Dec 63, SD Sit.
304 faa APIS/DA aacertained whether Fort Belvoir printing facilities can accommodate the additional volume of work (333,000 units) and the various types of printing to support APIS? The Bost Tenant Suppart Agreement (HTSA) with Fert Helvoix is general in nature and could be inter~ preted to include this additional workload. However, in the recent negotiation of the Agreement the implied intent was that APIS would only be requeating a light to modest workload that primarily involved producing slides, charta, atc,, on a reimbursable basis. tf vort Belvoir in not capable of this imcreaBed workload in their current printing plaat configuration, then AF/DAPR should incorporate this factor in defending the existence of the AFIS facility. Could this lead to APIS being directed to transfer manpower postions to USA to’ support the Port Belvoir plant? The colonel requested that the Administrative Division provide answers to hia queatiens go that Logistica could uge them during the annual review and update of the host tenant support agreement. By the end of the reporting period for this history, no decision had yet been made about the continued operation of the APIS print~ ing facility. PERSONNEL, Key Parsonnel Throughout the year, CMSet Robert R. O'Toole continued aa chief of Administration, and MSgt George Whiteside was the assistant chief, wha retired in Pebruary and waa replaced by SuSgt Martin P. Gardner, The chief of the Administrative Communications Branch was TSgt Henderson A. Joseph, who assumed responsiblity for the branch on 8 March 1983. SMSgt Gardner was also the chief of the Documentation Management Branch; he replaced Mildred Carter, who transferred to the Justice Department in November 1943. Sgt Larry K. Wallace was chief of the Publications Management Branch since May 1983. TSqt Deborah G. Groves was comiand systems manager aince October 1992.7 Manning Strength As of 33 December, Administration had the following man~ power: ‘Request for Information QM avis edicorial Assistant with DA Personnel, 13 Jul 93, 2por position numbers, specialty codes, and names see Historical Data Rprt Qh aris/pa, Jan-dDec a3, SD 509,
308 NUMBER AUTHORIZED NUMBER ASSIGNED OFFICERS tt) Le) ENLISTED g 9 CIVILIANS ma 2 TOTAL 42 14 During 1983, one billet was transferred from chief master sergeant 70200 to a major 7646.1 A vacant GS-31B~6 secretarial position was deferred by AFIS/MO. Aeninistration did acquire a temporary GS-322~-03 clerk~-typlet porition.2 ADMINISTRATIVE COMMUNICATIONS Orders The Administrative Communications Sranch authenticated all special orders and those temporary duty travel (TDY¥} orders for AFIS located at Fort Belvoix. The branch issued 339 T-Series orders, which concerned TDY, 7 G-Series orders, which concerned assumption of coumand, and 110 Reserve orders.3 Directives & The branch promilgated the following directives:4 AFIS Supplement 1 to AFR 10-1, Preparing Correspandence, 7 Dec 83. AFIS Supplement 1 to APR 10-7, Administrative Orders, 20 dul 83. AFIS Supplement i to AFR 43-4, Management of the Air Force Writing Program, 8 June 83. AFISR 182-1, Administrative Commmications Distribution. 30 Nov 83. APIS/DAA Of 7-1, Procedural Guide for Subaccount Repre~ sentative. 1 Sep &3. Metered Mail Xn Guly, the branch received a new electronic weight seale, which upgraded operational capabilities to properly meter packages for correct postage fees, During 1983, $35,481.11 was spent for metered mail.> \ntx QB aris/vo to AFIS/DP, "Conversion of AFIS/DA Billet to Major 7046," 19 Sep 83, SD 512. 2uec QM and 1 Atch QM Aris‘ to AFIS/DA, “Manpower Billets for Intel Graphics Service,™ 15 Aug 83, SD 513. 3Por all G-Series orders from CY83 see 5D $14. See also Bistorical Data Rprt AFIS/DA, Jan~Dec B3, SD 509. 4See SDs 515 to 519. 5See AF 1394 "Quarterly Postage Expenditure Report,” HAF~DAA-O~AR (APIS/UA}, Apr 83, Jun 83, Oct 83, and Jan a4, SD $20,
306 OMS Teast Program The Administrative Communications Branch of the 8Q OSAP Directorate of Administration (DAQA) approved the testing of the Official Mafl Stamp {OMS} Program by the AFIS Oiractorate of Intelligence Reserve Porces (APIS/RE). The program allowed weal organizations to use stampa instead of metered mail ta carry out theirs official mail functions. tn March, the DAQA, in conjunction with the United states Postal Service, was still in the process of selecting evaluation criteria by which to evaluate the program. Some of the proposed criteria concerned ordering procedures. adequacy of instructions, use of the stamps, security, inventory control, and training.! buring the year, the Reserves directorate used stamps totalling 37, 136.00.2 Telephone Work Orders The Administrative Communications Branch processed $3 telephone work order requests (18 for new installation, 27 relocation, and & miscellaneous}, All were completed. The Onited States Any Communications Command Center (GSACC}, Fort Belvoir, began work on 12 underground cables for Buildings 1919 through 1940. Aa of 31 December, the work was atiil underwsy.? Cost-Effective Long Distance Telephone Calis During September, the branch completed a comprehensive study of the AFIS compound telephone system at Port Belvoir. A letter subsequently was sent to the telephone aubscribers to inform them of ways to make cost effective long distance calls over official communications systems, All calla were to originate from clase “A™ telephones and were to be for official use only. The use of four types of systems was discussed in the letter: 33 Federal tTelecomaunication System (PTS), 2) Automatic Voice Network (AgTOVON), 3) Least Cest Routing (LCR), and 4) Message Business Lines (MBL). PUBLICATIONS MANAGEMENT Publications Processed and Pamphlets Reviewed The Publications Management Branch processed 72 APIS regulations, + AFIS pamphlet, 11 APIS aupplements, and 9 ar/ Tap 202, Quarterly Official Mail Stamp Requisition/Uae Report, HAP-DAA, 31 Mar and 30 Sep 83, SD 523. 2itr QR 8O USAP DAQA ta ALMAJCOM-SQA/DAA, "Evaluation Criteria for OMS Test Program,* 29 Mar 83, SD 522. 3Historical Data Rprt QAP ArIS/DA, Jan-Dec 83, SD 509. 4see Ler APIS/DAR to All Compound Personnel, “Procedures for Making Cost Efficient tong Distance Telephone Calis over Official Communications Systema,” 24 Sep 63, SD $23.
307 operating instructions.! It also conducted the fiscal year 1983 pamphiet review. Pamphlets to be reviewed included classified and unclassified publications printed on a one~edition basis, usually published to inform, motivate, increase knowledge. or improve performance. A review of the branch's record set files and the FY82 Pamphiet Inventory indicated that no pamphlets as described for review were published or scheduled for publication during FY83. Forms Processed and Reprographics Jobs The forms Management Branch procesaed &@ AFIS command forms and 27 AFIS office forms.3 The Reprographics Branch accomplished the following:4 Jobs Received: 18 Originals Received: 6,964 Total Units Produced: 592,344 Total Sheets Collated: 233,345 Cost: $28,572 Sopier Management Under the Copier Management Frogram, 4,788,471 copies were produced at a cost of $112,501 for FyY83.5 DOCUMENTATION MANAGEMENT Documentation Holdings Tne Documentstion Management Branch reported to RQ USAF the following documentation holdings and disposition statistics during cys3:& AFIS AESAS On Hand, ¥ Jan 82 1,859 9/12 £23 B47 5/12 £3 Transferred 0 a Destroyed 1,174 3/42 £3 464 10/12 £3 On Band, 31 Dec 82 4,023 S/12 fe3 4,455 5/32 £3 ‘see Staff Summary Sheeta QM aFIS/DAP to AFIS/CV et al, 4 Mar, 12 May, 16 May, 21 dun, 8 Jnl, 20 Jul (2), 5 Aug, 20 Sep, 28 Sep, 18 Nov, 25 Nov 83, SD 524 2sraff Summary Sheet QM Aris/par to aPis/cv et al, “Fyei Pamphiet Review,” 29 Jun 83, SD 525. jBistorical Data Rprt QB AFIS/DA, Jan-Dec 83, SD 509. thid. SAP 893, Annual Copier Inventory, Cost, and Production Report, AFIS/DAPR, HAF~DAP (AsQ) 8104, 1 Oct B2 - 30 Sep 83, SP 526. Sannual Report of Documentation Holdings a AFIS/DAD to USAF/DAQD, HAP-DAD {A) 7112 (GS}, 1 Jan 82 ~ 31 Dec 82, SD 527.
308 The decrease in AFIS holdings wae attributed to the reduction of approximately {89 cubic feet of documents to microfilm and the general records cleanout efforts. The increase in APSAC holdings wae due to the transfer of personnel records inta the AFSAC detachments. Thege offices of record established filas to support the relocation of the anit personnel recards.! Offices of Record Within APIS, there were 41 offices of record as of 31 December 1953. During the year, staff asaistance visits were made to the following offices: AC, OF, OPC, INC, INOA, INOZ, INOI, tnor, INU (vice INR), INUA {vice DNRA}, INH, INC, IND, INT, KG, IG, oF. PA, RE, XP, MO, OAP, DA, DAA, GAD, COQ, INS, INGO, and TRSC. Cirectives Promulgated During CY 1983, the following directives vere promigated:3 AFIS Supplement 1% to AFR 12-4, Air Force Oocumentetion Management Program, 15 Feb 63. AFIS Supplement 4 to AFR 12-20, Maintenance of Current Pocu- mentation, 15 Feb 83. AFIS Supplement 1 to AFR 12-35, Air Porce Privacy Act Program, 8 Jul 63. . APTS Supplement ! to AFR 12-40, Micrographics Management, 31 Oct 83. Privacy Act As of 31 December 1983, AFIS managed 27 separate systema of record affected by the Privacy Act. Counting multiple occurrences of these systems, AFIS maintained a total of 166 systema. Two of these were partially exempt from provisions of the Privacy Act.4 Under the Privacy Act, the following atatietics on the activity of the two exempted systems were reported to #Q USAF for CY 1982: Requests received against exempt system PO3S50T MPC B, Effectiveness/Performance Reporting: 6 Requests received against exempt system F205 AFIS A, SCL Informational Personnel Security Records: 33 ‘Historical Data Rort QM. AFIS/DA, Jan-Dec a3, SD $03. 2tpia, dsee SDs 528 and 529. “privacy Act Liating QM} APIS/DA, 31 Dec 83, SP 530.
These statistics were reported to HO USAF whder RCS DD~A(A&AR} 4379. Freedom of Information Act & in 1983, the branch received 62 requests for information ander © Freedom of Information Act {FOIA}. Ae of 34 December, action was completed on 66 of them. Action was completed on an additional ? requests which were received {n 1982. Statistical data follows :2 Completed requests: 67 Cases denied or partially denied: a Cases transferred outside the AP: aw Cases in which no record could be located: 15 Cases returned for inadequate description; iw Cases returned for procedure violation: 3 Cases withdrawn by the requester: t Total manhour costs: $13,164 Other operating costs: seve SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT word Processing Studies The Systems Management Branch performed nine word processing feasibility studies. Studies were accomplished in the following directorates: AFIS/INH - Feb 83 AFIS/IG, LG, XP ~ Mar 83 AFIS/DA ~ Sep 83 AFIS/HO - Oct 83 AFIS/THS - Oct 63 AFIS/INT + Nov 43 AFSAC/ING ~ Nov 83 AFSAC/DA, LG, INX ~ Nov 83 The parpose of the studies was to determine the need for new or additional keyboards. Theae studies covered the entire directorate.? Studies done in February and March were extremely difficult and time consuming due to the fact that Air Force headquarters was in the process of revising the way atudies should Vaet tnd cer QYBL (ane 2 atch . AFIS/DAD to AF/DAQ. “Air Porce Privacy Act Program, Antual Report (RCS: DD-A(ASAR}1379)," 25 veb 83, SD 931. 2pF Form 17 Preedom cf Information {POIA} Report, AFIS/DAD to USAF/DAQ! , ROS OD - PR CTRAGA) 1365, 1 dan - 30 Apr 83, 1 May - 31 Aug 83, 1 Sep - 31 Dec 83, SD 532, 3par an inventory listing of AFIS word processing equipment gee Appendix 3, and for a Liating for AFSAC see Appendix 4. See Appendix 5 for the AFIS wordprocessing status as of Dec 83,
32i0 be accomplished. The Administrative Division was also 58 participant in the compound—wide Xerox information procesaing survey in October 83. SECURITY On 23 March, the AFIS commander appointed the chief of the nistrative Division the Information Security Program Manager (ISPM) for APIS activities Located at Fort Belvoir.? As a result of thia additional assignment, the following ISPM Operating Instructions were promulgated: 4 ISPM OT 205~1, Security, 1 Oct 93. ISPM OF 205-2, Security Manager's Responsibilities, 12 Sep 3. ISPM Of 205-3. Safekeeping and Storage, 26 Oct. 83. ISPM OL 205-4, Use and Protection of Por Official Jae Only Material, 2 Nov 83. ISPM OL 265-5, Top Secret Control, 20 Sep 83. ISPM OL 205-6, Special Acceses - Contrel of CNWRI, & Dec 83. ISPM OF 205-7, Special Access ~ The Stop, @ Dec 83. IS@M OT 205-6, Special Access «+ Safeguarding NATO Classified Information, @ Dec 83. ISPM OF 205-9, Control of RODCA Material, 9 Dec 83. ISPMH OL 205-10, Tranemisaion or Transporting of Classified Information, 21 Sep 83. TRAINING During 1993, the following formal training courses weru attended by AFIS/DA personnel:? ti+12 Aug 83, Sth Annual Sympoaium on Freedom of Information and Privacy Act. {Carter} 19 May 83, Freedom of Information Act, Role of the Manager, (Carter, Cacksey) S$ May 83, Preedom of Information Act, Exempticns 6 and 7, (Carter, Cooksey) 12 May @3, Preedom of Information Act, Exemption 5. (Carter, Cooksey} Additional Outies Personnel in the division performed twenty-six taske throughout the year categorized as “additional duty.“ Twenty-one of them were prescribed by specific directives .4 ‘Ler QM APIS/cC to APIS/INS et al, “Information Security Program Manager Designations,“ 23 Mar 83, SG 533. 2per the ols Qi see Sb 534. 3aietortcal pata Rprt @MBM, arts/on, san-pec 83, Sp $09. 4uist QQ} AFIS/DA Additional Duties/Titlea,” DA VA 11-2, Bec @3, SD 53S.
PUBLIC AFYAIRS OFVICE MISSION GR me chics of public Affaire was responsible to the commander for operating the AFIS public affairs program, This included planning for and managing the internal information, community relationa, media relations, and security review programs for AFIs.! The office's assigned responsibilities were the following:2 4. Prepares informational materials concerned with internal AFIS objectives. 2. Assists in all efforts to promote a supportive community relationship within the AF/IN-APIS commmity and the surrounding DC military and civilian community. 3. Bs Actively promotes a working relationship with both military and civilian media sources. 4. a Maintains a working relationship with members of the local news media community, both military and civilian. ORGANIZATION ARD PERSONNEL The AFIS/PA office consisted of one person, TSgt Barry L. Bahler, who was the chief of the office since 12 February 1982- FUNCTIONAL ACTIVITIES The Intelligencer a During the year, TSgt Sahler continued to publish The Intelligencer, a fumded Class I1 Air Force newspaper, published monthiy fer personnel of the Air Force Intelligence Service. The 4983 editions were the following:4 BONTH FEATURE STORY PAGES January Air Force Intelligence Reserve Program SB February Directorate of Attache Affairs 8 March Directorate of Zstimates & {This was the first Intelligencer to feature an AF/IN directorate.) April Directorate of Evasion and Escape/ Prisoner of War 42 JAFISR 23-1 QByp Section 2, 15 dul 62, sD 2. 2Ibid. 3the Intelligencer Qgy. AFIS/PA, Jan-Dec 83, SD 536.
ik2 MONTH FEATURE STORY PAGES {Included an interview article on Col. Ronald J. Webb, who had been a Pow in Vietnam from 1967 to 1973. The article appeared in other Air Porce publications, as well. May Directorate of Targets a dune Tith Anniversary of APIS a July AP/IN-BPIS Picnic g Directorate of Personnel August Manpower and Organization Division a September Directorate of inteliigence Plana a and Syatems October/ November Directorate of Administration 12 (This edition included the article, “IPAC Receives Prestigious Award, * submitted by the Intelligence Center Pacific. Secember AF/IN~AFIS Christmas edition 8 teas of Typesetting Support There was no October edition of The Intelligencer, because the typesetter in the TRADOC unit on Fort Belvoir, whe worked on the APIS paper, quit his job, and TRADOC did not replace him, in anticipation of the Army's having to contract out for such dabor. TSgt Bahler prepared the October-November Intelligencer on & word processor. Re slso coordinated with three APIS steff agencies, LG, AC, and DA, to find a substitute printing process. The decision was made to contract out the printing job, rather than to rely on government presses, because these were located too fay from Fort Belvoir. {The Office of Special Investigations, for example, had its paper printed in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania}, The diatance precluded the inclusion of up-to-date news in the product and last minute alterations! In Becember, The Intelligencer was typed onte computerized equipment, loaned by the Alexandria Gazette to the Public Affairs Office at Bolling Air Force Base. The Gazette, which held contracts with five Department of Defense units, agreed to transfer the December Intelligencer to a dise at na charge to AFIS. TRADOC wae then given a master copy and printed it.? WB oy the end of December, the procurement office at Andrewa AFB was azsisting APIS with finding a private contractor lintww QF aris wiatorian with TSgt Bahler, AFIS/PA, 20 Jul 83, 2tpia.
a1: fox the publication of The Intelligencer. The contract was to be let for eight months, February through sSaptember, the end of the fiscal year. Presse Coverage of RIDGE RUNNER In the susmer and autumn, TSgt Bahler worked with the Soint Services Support Directorate for “preas“ coverage of the directorste's RIDGE RUNNER Exercise.? ‘The decision was made to have representatives from AIRMAN magazine cover the exercise. yather than fila crewa from “Air Force Now," because the magazine reached more Air Force personnel.? On 3% August, APSINC/IIC confirmed the press coverage. The Public affairs Office was informed of the following:4 This confirms e#arlier telecons and finalizes plans for MSgt Alan Prochoreff, 575~S4-4999, ATRMAN associate editor, Secret clearance, and SSqt William W. Thompson Ill, 265+19-6230, AIRMAN chief of phatography, Top Secret clearance, to visit Kingwood, ®V and Wash DC to conduct interviews, gather information, and take photographs for future AIRMAN Magazine articles. Planned coverage ineludes, at Kingwood, WY: Operation RIDGE RUNNER, an Air Porce Intelligence Service joint-service exercise that -teaches/shapes escape and evasion techniques; and a profile of Ut. Col. Reger Lecher, who evaded capture for 23 days behind enemy lines in North Vietnam. Lt. Col. Locher is presently assigned to 8Q USAF, Plans and Operations, Porce Development Branch. Please advise sll persons to be interviewed that a tape recorder will be used to insure accuracy of their coments when story is written at a later date. All stories will be cleared befere publication by SAF/PAS IAW security review procedures, hs the official magazine of the Air Force, BIRMAN wust portray military members in the best possible manner. All persons to be interviewed and/or photographed must meet 411 aspecta of AFR 35-10 and APR 35~ti covering weight, dress, and appearance standards. Iepia. 2zor a detailed explanation of RIDGE RUNNER see Chapter TV. 3intwy gy APIS Historian with TSgt Bahler, AFIS/PA, 20 Jul 84. 4usg MBB arsinc/iic to aF/KOXFT, "Proposed AIRMAN Magazine Trip.” 3123602 Aug 83, SD $37.
314 We pay particular attention to haircut and moustache compliance. in addition, request ail persons and aituationa to be photegraphed be in compliance with current safety standards and tech orders. Photography will only be used oc individuals who are well within these limite. For two weeks in September, TSgt Bahler accompanied the writer and the photographer as they watched and recorded the exercise. Their article was to appear in AIRMAN Magazine in 1984.! Revision of EXPLAN 01-83 Prior to the commericement of the RIDGE RURRER exercise, TSgt Bahler coordinated with the Joint Services Support Oirectorate and the Plans Division to revise the AFIS Exercise Plan for RIDGE RUNNER 83, pertaining to the release of information about the exercise. The revised statement in the plan was the following:2 The Public Affaire officer, Air Force Inte, gence Service (AFIS/PA} will serve as the single point of contact for all media coverage, including photography. Request for apecific coverage will be submitted, in writing, to AFIS/PA sufficiently in advance of the media event to permit evaluation and clearance/denial by the Bxerciee Director. Those media personnel authorized to cover the exercise will he aagigned escorts by the Exercise Director. Escorts wilh engure that clearance has een obtained and that classified portions of the fxercise are neither observed nor photographed. Media representatives wili be required to wear a distinguishing identity card at all times during the course of the exercise. The Exercise Director will provide specific guidance to the AFIS/PA Rot later than 45 days prior to the opening date of the Exercige. The older statement fn the EXPLAN 01-81 had stated the following:3 The exercise director (See Annex H} will serve as the public affairs officer in these matters. Media coverage. including photography, is permiasible as long as no classified material or information is exposed. In addition, the activities of media representatives will Tantew a APIS Historian with TSgt Bahler, AFIS/PA., 20 Jul 84. 2utr Qygpand 1 atch gy AFIS/XP to Annex 2 (Distribution), Change 1 to AFIS EXPLAN 01-83," 14 Jun 83, SD $38. Jannex E£ to AFIS EXPLAN 01-93, “Public and Civil Affairs,* 15 Har €3, SD $39.
315 in no way be allowed to interfere with the smooth flow of exercise activities, nor will any support be provided to the media if any expense to the government will be involved. All personne] will be cleared into and out of the exercise area by the exercise director, and all written and photographic material will be examined prior to release. Personnel not willing to submit to these ground rules will not be allowed access. All exercises staff members, observers and students will monitor the preaence of media members and report to the exercise director any uncoordinated activities. it was the belief of the Public Affaire Office that the older statement created conditions that were unenforceable.! Photographic Support During the year. the Public Affairs Office assumed 4 wider role in providing photographic support to AP/IN and AFIS. According to TSgt Bahler, he gradually assumed the additional duty as staff photographer. This occurred because he was often seen wtih a camera, taking pictures for The Intelligencer. By the latter part of the year, he had many events scheduled on his calendar for photographic support. For example. in September, out ef 22 working days, 7 included photo taskings. In November, out of 22 working days, @ included photo taskings.2 In April, the Public Affairs Office erdeced the following:3 Considering 20 rolis of film per package, the following is ordered: 3 packages of KODAK Tri-X (BewW); 26 frame rolis 1 package of KODAK Plus-X (B&W); 20 frame rolls 3 packages of KODAK 1060 (Color}, 12 frame rolls 3 packagea of KODAK 400 (Color), 24 frame rolie TSgt Bahler took color film for developing to the 136%st Audiovisual Squadron at Fern Street and black and white film wenc to the Detachment of the 1361st at Bolling APB. ‘The filn was used for such events as the Christmas Party/Ball, retirement ceremonies, visits by distinguished persons, the AF/IN-AFIS picnic, Clean-Up Days, awards ceremonies, and apecial events. These photos were taken primarily to support The Intelligencer .4 lintww yy. AFIS Historian with TSgt Bshler, AFIS/PA, 20 Jub ea. 2thia. 3uee AFIS/PA to APIS/INOZD, “35mm Print Film Requisition,” 14 Apr 83, SO 540. 4ineew Qf AFIS Historian with Tsqt Sabler, AFIS/PA, 20 Jui B4.
316 Submiasion for Air Force Magazine In February, TSgt Bahler submitted the APTS section far the May 963 Air Force Magazine almanac issue. Incladed in the aubuission were the updated AFIS “fact sheet" and photographs of the commander and senior enllated advisor. ‘the chief of the Collateral Security and Administrative Support Oivision (IRSA) concurred with the fact sheet as written. ‘he tasking for this project came from the aropa/up.! News Releases Ouring the year, the Public Affaire Office made 729 “homstawn” news releases and 26 “news* releases. The latter consiated as such information as monthly natices of awards and decorations to the Air Force Times; the Freedoms Foundaticn award~ winning essay by Lt. Col, Aiden Guy, APIS/ZP, to the Arlington Journal; a photograph for The Manpower and Organization News— letter; and an APSAC recruitment advertisement to the Air force fiews Service.% ‘Msg QMBP APOPA/MB to ALMAJCON-SOA-DRU/PA, “May 1983 Air Porce Magazine Almanac Issue Update,™ {621002 Dec 82, SD S44; Ltr Moana to acch QM aris/Pa to AFOPA/MB, “APIS Input for May 1983 Air Porce Magazine Almanac Iasue Update,” 25 Feb a3, SD 542. 2intew QM APIS Ristorian with TSgt Bahler, APIS/PA, 20 qui a4,
31? LOGISTICS DIVISION MISSION The AFIS Logistics Division [AFIS/G) was responsible for providing logiatics support to all AFIS elements in the areas of facilities. supply. transportation, vehicle support, host- tenant support agreements, memoranda of understanding, and ail facets of logistics planning.1 It served as the AFIS office of primary rezponsibility for mattera that pertained to planning, developing, presenting, and substantiating logistics plans, programs, and concepts. It was involved with logistics planning in support of compatibility of APIS plans with the war and contingency plans of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Air Force, and major commands. ‘The division chaired the APTS Facilities Working Group and was represented on the Facilities Urilization Board. It also validated apis require- tents for transportation support and monitored the use and ailoca- tion of the AFIS motor vehicle fieet.% ORGANIZATION The division remained organized into two branches: +} Transportation and 2} Logistics Plans. The former managed the APIS vehicle fleet. the latter was responsible for all AFIS dogistical planning with a focus on contingency wartime planning.? A major change this year inwolved the addition of a temporary hire position, clerk-typist, G5~322~3, to provide administrative support. Also, the position of vehicle operations supervisor was changed from Air Force specialty code (AFSC) 69370 to 60350. for compatibility with the position's responsibilities. Shortly thereafter, the AFIS Manpower and Organization Division, after conducting a management advisory study, recommended that the two transportation positions, AFSC 60350, be converted to administrative positions, AFSCs 702364 and 702308, in order for LG to provide the AFIS Administrative Division with courier and mail @istribution duties. At the end ef this reporting period, the AFIS commander was considering the recommendation .4 PERSONNEL Key Personnel Lt. fol. Lynn ‘Thompson continued as head of the diviaion, a position he held since 1 October 1982. MSgt John \vor the detailed mission statement of LG see APISR 23-1, 15 Sul 82, Section G, SD 2. 2rbia. 3tbid, 4gistorical Data Rprt Qi. aFIS/LG, Jan-dec 83.
316 Roward was the chief of the Logistics Plana franch, since May 1982, while Sgt Delanor G. Chapman was the chief of the ‘Transportation Branch, since July 1982. SSgt Harold R. Johnson was the vehicle operator and dispatcher, and Georgine Ammatrong was the temporary hire for administrative support. Manpower Strength @ The manpower strength of the divisian was the following: NUMBER AGTHORIZED NOMBER ASSIGNED OFFICERS 1 4 ENLISTED 3 3 CIVILIANS a Ittemporary Hire} TOTAL 4 $ TRANSPORTATION As of 31 December, the APIS vehicle fleet consisted of the following: ! VEHICLE MARE VESICLE TYPE REGISTRATION NUMBER MILEAGE Ford Sedan 80B3264 40446 rord Unmarked Sedan S0B3276 $2143 Ford Unmarked Sedan 2083277 $2443 Ford Sedan 7388728 $3349 Ford Station Wagon 7EBS3B6 $1935 bedge Carryall 608298 35382 Chevrolet Carryall 8134396 31409 Dodge Pickup & Ton 7981929 31762 Plymouth* Unmarked Sedan SIBS806 BGE2 *Received new in August 1943. @ tn 1983 there were fewer vicinity travel control numbers issued, 1,033, than in 1982, a total of 1,242. This partly gontributed to the lesser amount of fuel being used in 1993 than in 1982. Three groups of foreign distinguished visitors were transported by LG: an Italian delegation 5-@ May, 4 Acrean group, 1S September, and a Japanese contingent 12-16 November. the division alsa supported the AFSAC deployment to Grenada and the RIDGE RUNWER Exercise.? PACILITIES UPGRADE AND MAINTENANCE As of 19 duly, the MPR-Onfunded Requirementa (MPP9} were the fo. ‘Lowing:3 jRistorical pata Rect @MB, aris/t6. gan~pec 93. Tbid. Sire QB aris/iG to Col morris, "MFR-Unfunded Requirementa {MFP9},* 19 Jul 83,
319 a. GBH asuisaines 1923, 26, 25, 26, carpeting ~ $27K: Carpet wag on order; money was to be obligated in FY 83 for purchase: assuming 90 days for delivery, installation was not to occur until FY 64. b. GBB werraings 1919, 20, 27, 26 Carpeting - §20K: the work order was submitted to USA/DEH; it wae reasonable tc assume that carpet was to be ordered and funds obligated in ¥Y¥ 03; there was, however, no guarantee on how quickly the Army would process paperwork; installation in FY 84. c. @& Building 1925 Circuits and Alarm - $1iK: ‘he work order was on hold pending arrival of new equipment for IRR: alse required some new interior modifications to accommodate equipment lecation in new building: design delegated to INR; doubtful money would be olbigated in FY B3; expected completion in FY 84. a. & Buldings 1919, 20, 30, Renovation - $@0K total: USA/DEH planned to complete work orders with a civilian contract {PACO}. ‘The current FACO contract expired on 30 Jun 83, and & new contract was expected to be negotiated by late Aug or Sep 53. OEH was planning to have a new contract and obligate AFIS money in FY 83 for completion of projects in PY B64. FACQ contracts were difficult to negotiate, thus, Col. Thompson had some doubt on whether the Army would be able to obligate funds in FY 83; _e@xpected completion in FY 84. e. & Building 1923 thru 1930 Central Air Conditioners —- $43K: AFIS funds were transferred to Army; highly probable that DEH would procure items and obligate FY 63 funds; installation planned in PY 84. f. Building 1927 Architectural and Engineering Design ~- $1OK: Bxpect Army to obligate funds in PY 83 for interior design of building 1927 renovation, Anticipated actual renovation to begin in FY 84. a. @ Buildings 1925-26 Central Heat - $80K: Army planned to obligate funds and complete project in PY 83. h. 2 All Buildings, Electric Meters —~ $11K: Army planned to obligate fumds and complete project in FY 83. According to Col. Thompson, “Most of the projects have some oncertanties in specific planning dates which stem from our tenant status on Fort Belvoir. I coneider the working relationship between APIS and DEH very good, however, APIS has no control over the efficiencies in management which effect the timely processing of paperwork to initiate a project with in-house Army resources or 4 civilian contract. Although there is conaidersble coordination remaining to insure obligation of FY 83 funds, my assessment is that we have xeceived a fair share of Army
3260 planning resources in the first half of PY 83 to initiate same of our facilities upgrade projecta.*! PLANS & The division participated in exercise Presaure Point 94 in November and offered the following critique:2 Emergency Notification System: tG& experienced ac difficulty in contacting/lLocating peraonnel during the telephone recall, There appeared to be a break-down in communication concerning the exact wording of the exercise message instructions being relayed during the recall. Suggest the instructions on the reverse side of the Emergency Notification Roster be revised to include a “fili-in~-the-blanks® checklist or more specific options in written form that would involve checking off the correct reapanse., This would assist personnel, who are often lesa than fully alert in the early morning, in relaying the specific inatructiongs by merely reading from the pre-printed checklist father than trying to copy ar memorize the correct response. Also, more emphasis seeds to be placed on distributing the Emergency Notification Rosters to insure ali personnel receive copies printed on both sides. tt appears that some internal office diatribution takes place by only locally reproducing the gide cantaining names which omits the inatructiona on the reverse side. The division received and updated the following plans during the year:3 AFIS SUPPORT PLAN-DIA Feb 83 APIS MOB PLAN 28-5 Feb 63 AFIS OPLAN P+132 apr 62 APIS OPLAN F-133 Apr 83 AFIS OPLAN P-136 Apr 83 CONUS BASE USE PLAN Apr 83 AFIS EMERGENCY ACTION PROCEDURE May 83 APIS OPLAN 135 gun 83 APIS PRODUCTIVITY PLAN Sep a3 AFIS OBJECTIVE PLAN Sep 83 AFIS CONPLAN ~ AFIS SUPPORT oct 83 PSAA OPLAN 5000/5001 bec 83 ‘4 In March, the division responded to a suggestion submitted through the Air Force Suggestion Program concerning contracting support for AFIS. in part the suggestion stated:4 Void. 2tec @HM) AFIS/LG to APIS/XP, “Exercise Presaure Point 84 Critique (CV Ltr, 29 Rov 83)." 1 Dec 83, SO 543. SHiaterical pata Rprt = AFIS/iG, Jan-Dec 83. Por list of AFIS Tenant-Suppert Agreements, see Appendix 6. “suggestion Qi “. Petrilak, 76ALD/1GC, AND @3-0242, 22 bec at.
Pursuant to AFR +ti-4, Sost-Tenaat Support Reaponsibilities of U.S. Air Force Organizations, the Washington Area Contracting Center ie currently taaked to provide contractual support to approximately 69 different POD activities located throughout the National Capital Region {NCR}. In one particular instance, the Contracting Center provides such support to HO AFIS located at Pt. Relvoir, VA. Because the activity is locsted approximately 57. miles from Andrews AFB, the processing of required purchase request documents to the Contracting Center is a burdensome and time consuming process, Additionally, purchase requests are not gubmitted in the proper format {AFR 70-322}, lack adequate purchase description, lack proper signatures and funding certification, are lost in distribution, and are submitted after-the-fact in some instances. As a resuit, the purchasing process is delayed, customer support is generally poor, the HQ AFIS mission is degraded and unauthorized contracting actions {CAs} are common. In order to eliminate this intolerable situation, I suggest that the current agreement between HO AFIS and andrews AFB be changed to delete the contracting support requirement. HQ AFIS should enter into a Host«Tenant Support Agreement with the 0.5. Army Procurement Office at Ft. Helvoir. the division recomended against the adoption of the suggestion, and it was not implemented. In justification, the division's official response was the following:! Because the Contracting Center ia located 17 miles from the customer's facility does act necessarily mear the processing of documents has to be a “burdensome and time consuming process.” There is no specific requirement to hand carry documents to each location for processing. An administrative courfer service operates daily frow various locations that would accommodate delivery of purchase request documents for processing. No matter which contracting center AFIS uses, the documents must still flow through the ACP fimction at Bolling AFB. Moving the contracting fonction from Andrews APB to Port Belvoir would not, “eliminate the intolerable situation,” noted in the suggestion. Por example, documents lacking proper format, description and signa- tures can be corrected with customer training, not by moving the function to another location. In is also assumed that the number of docments submitted, “after the fact,* could be significantly reduced with improved management techniques within customer's organization. ‘Ler gy APIS/UG to 76 ALD/IGC, "contracting Support for Hg AFIS (Your Ltr, 22 Feb 83},." 25 Max $3, SD 544,
322 Moving contracting function to Port Belvoir would not improve aupport for APIS e#lementa located at Bolitag APB, Washington Navy Yard, and Port Meade. AFIS/IG doeq sot have any data with which to evaluate personnel costs associated with processing puxchase request documents at Andrews APS. BQ APYXYS currently utilizes the contracting office at Fort Belwoir for selective projecta when it te considered a more efficient process than using the 76 ALO/IECS. ft should also be noted that in discussions with the Chief of the Port Belvoir Contracting Office, he stated an increase in workload in hia office may justify # requeat through USA channels to USAR Manpower that a biliet from the CSAP contracting office currently supporting AFIS be transferred to a USA position at Port Belvoir.! 'rpia.
CHAPTER VITI APIS GHERATING LOCATIONS No - San Antonio, Texas BY - Fort Detrick, Maryland AP ~ Kirtland AFB, Hew Mexico F ~ Eglin APB, Florids S + Seitland, Maryland’ M O- Alexandria, Virginia (See CY 1983 History for AP/TSY} *OL“S was established this year as the Air Force contingent to the doint National Intelligence Dissemination System (JNIDS}) Program Office. tn March, authorized positions were approved for this operating location at Suitland. Maryland, effective FY 1984. Due to the late date for OL-S to become operational, the AFIS CY 1984 History will include the history of the unit for 1983-1984. For diseussion of OL-S manpower authorizations, see Chapter VII, Manpower and Organization Division.
325 OPERATING LOCRTIGN H BRADQUARTERS AIR FORCE INTELLIGENCK SERVICE SAR ANTONIO, TEXAS* MISSION AND RESOURCES Primary Mission By USAP/ACS/I direction, AFIS/OL-N is responsible for: 1) ensuring that intelligence collection requirements regarding the communist world's ECM doctrine, concepts, tactics and techniques are current, complete and filed with the appropriate agency: 2) acquiring, analyzing and assessing current and projected communist world ECM doctrine and tactics and their capabilities to execute same; 3} evaluating the projected geployment and employment of new or modified communist world ECH systems to determine the threat to US systems under development or currently in the field: 4} producing finished intelligence scenarios, and estimates concerning current and projected communist world ECM ¢@octrine and tactics; and 6) providing Management assistance to producers and users of the USAF Electronic Combat Intelligence Support Data Base, and to agencies involved in development and operation of reprogrammable EW equipment. AFIS ObL-N products such as threat assessments, scenarios, analyses, and estimates are developed from all-source data regarding communist ECM tactics, doctrine, concepts of operation, deployment and employment techniques, technical charac— teristics, ECCM capabilities, and related command and control systems, Functional Statement 1. @ Provide intelligence personnel augmentation for dedicated all-source intelligence management and analytical support to the AFEWC Ew mission. Establish and maintain 4 capability to develop tailored EW threat assessments to fulfill the requirements of the Air Force. Act as an AFIS review function for selected Scientific and Technical (Se?) EW analytical efforts/products to insure that Air Porce operational EW requirements are considered, 2. Insure that information from operational documenta~ tion x 3 which have direct impact on both USAF and DOD inteli~ igence positions are provided to the appropriate agencies within the ‘intelligence community. Act as the AFEWC intelligence interface with Service, DoD, and national intelligence organizations. 3. Identity needs and accotplish preliminary documentation to support decompartmentation/sanitization of *Thig segtient on CL-N was prepared by Lt Judith A. Mitchell and was reviewed by Lt Col Wayne ©. Hardeli, Deputy Chief. AFIS/OL-“N, Seo Lox MRRMRMMR and 1 Atch History APIS OL-4 to BQ AFIS/EO, “Unit History 7983," 22 Feb 1983, SD $45 Some editing waa done by the APIS/HO.
326 intelligence data toa be released in support of AFEWC EW activities/responsiblities. In support o. the APEWC “EW Flagging” concept, initiate any follow-up actions required te confirm threat/parametric changes. 4, Establish and maintain procedures for resolution of exitical “Intelligence issues which impact on the AFEWC mission. ie conjunction with the AFEWC Threat System Digision. maintain a library of EW related threat information, and perform other EW intelligence support activities as required by Afrs.! PERSONNEL 1. @ Wumber of authorized/aasigned persommel by AFSC: AQTHORIZED ASSIGNED AFSC CIVIL TAN MXLIZARY ¥ 1 8096 - 1 4 4 227S¥ bad 4 t i 7O270B - 1 2 2 702598 2 7 2 2 2828 1 1 1 1 8016 ¥ - 3 2 acs4 - 2 t t 8935 - 1 3 3 201X0 - 3 t 1 ca054 - 4 1 1 20570 - 1 2. ] Key Personnel NAME RANK TITRE INCUMBENCY Clinton M. Glenny Coil Chief, AFIS OL-N 18 Aug 81 to Present Wayne D. Hardell Ltc Deputy Chief, AFIS OL-N 76 May 79 to Prevent David P. Enloe Maj Chief, Threat Analysis Div 28 May 82 to Present Earl A, febb, vr. Maj Chief, Programs Div 1 Oct SQ to Present BUDGET 1. The annual operating budget for F¥Y83 was $185.0 K with funda distribution as follows: TRY $ 42.0 K Civilian Pay $314.0 K ‘For the Monthly Activity Reports Gama AFIS OL-N to Af/IN®, Jan-Pec $3, see SD 546
Equipment and Supplies $ Equipment Rental $ 4 16. «3K 7K 327 2. QB We ending balance for FYB3 was $8.0 X. ORGANIZATION THREAT ANALYSIS DIV CHIEF, AFIS OL-N {£SC/IN)* COL GLENNY 8096 DEPUTY CHIEF LT COL RARDELL ADMINISTRATION DIV PROGRAMS DIY MAJ ENLOE 2275Y¥ MSGI THOMAS 702708 MAJ WEBB 2275¥ MAT PECSOX (4) 2925 GS-6 REYES (4) 70450 CAPT NOBLE (5) 2275Y GS-13 LUKE 2825 GS-S GONZALEZ 70450 CAPT PERRY cao75 GS~12 MCCOY BO16 #SGT COURTOIS 20570 CAPT VALLANCE (2) 9075 VACANT {6} 8075 CAPT HADDEN g075 LT RADABAUGH (3) 8035 MSGT THOMAS 20176 SSGT MURPHY 20476 SSCP BIGGS 20776 *The chief, AFIS OL-N. also holds the position of the HQ ESC/OCS-IN. The deputy chief, AFIS Ol-N, also holds the position ef HQ ESC/INKE, Chief, EW Threat Division. 1. QB capt douglas G. Cisler, 2825, replaced Maj Pecaok in Ke is working in the programs division. August. 2. Capt Stanley G. Silverman, 8075, replaced Capt Vallance an August. 3, Capt Stephen R. Bowers, 98035, replaced Capt Radabaugh in October. He is working in the programs division. 4. 2 Mrs. Geri Rock, 70450, replaced Mrs. Mona Reyes in November. 5. 2 Capt Roas Ziegenhorn, in March 7934. 6. alt Judith Aa, Mitchell, 8671, filled a vacant siot in Sept: x. She is working in the threat division. 2275¥, will replace Capt Noble OPERATIONS EW Threat Analysis Division GD otorear Simlator Validation (SIWAL) Program Deleted per § U.S.C, $352(b) (1)
328 QD soviet optical, Electo-optical and Infared Systems The purpose of this etudy is to provide a single source R system intelligence for use by HQ Electronic Security Air Ferce Electronic Warfare Center (AFEWC), and Included in the study are optical fire control systems for AAA, SAMs and aircraft, &R-guided air-to-air and surface-to~air sisstles, infrared search/track systems of fighter aircraft, IR and TV imaging fire control systems far AAA, SAMs and af £O/E. Command (ESC), operational units. Yintelligence Production Requirement Q@ggp 263-044, APIS OL-N for ESC/AFEWC, “Surface-to-Air Missiles (SAMs}," 41 Mar 83, SD 547; Intelligence Production Requirement om ReI~O45, APIS OLN for ESC/AFEWC, “"Anti~Aircraft Artillery {(AAA)," 11 Mar 83, SD 548; Intelligence Production Requirement oa R83-0646, AFIS OL-N for ESC/AFEWC, “Early Warning, Ground Controlled Intercept, Height Finder Radars (£W/GCI/HF)," 11 Mar 83, SO $49. Deleted per § U.S... 352(b} (3)
329 aircraft, TV and IR serie] reconnaissance systems, groundbased and airborne laser rangefinders, laser target designators. taserguided munitions, and high energy laser weapons. We aent survey forma to the original distribution list to determine needs, and limit distribution of the updated book to those who express a need for it. This document waa in revision during 1962 with the final draft in review at 21D and MIA.! APIS OL-N plang to consolidste comments and republish the revised document in early 1984, Electromagnetic Combat Threat Environment Description (BC TED} Early in 1983 PTD personnei visited AFIS GL-N to review AFIS OL-N products and attend various briefings given by the AFEWC, ESC, and the JEWC. ‘They were here to gather information for their update to the EC TED. in September we received the EC TED Preliminary Draft Review, and the Threat Analysis Division reviewed the document and provided verbal comments to visitors from PTD, We also reviewed the final draft veraion of the BC TED and provided written comments and corrections to AF/INW concerning the SAO supplement to the EC TED. Q®  we-te9¢ a Soviet tnion Airborne Warning and Control {SUAWACS) Aircraft Assesament RD te-78 Threat ‘pratt Report QBS “Soviet Optical, Electro-Optical and Infrared Systems” QM APIS OL-N 83-3, 15 Dec 83, SD S50. ter QAM ons 1 Atch GERBER 2 MACOS /cC UTG 2621002 Oct B2, SATB (2 Lt Goss} to AFIS Gin, "Request for Intelligence Assessment,” 2 Nov 83, SD 551. Deleted per 5 U.S.C. 952(b} (1)
330 £CM Threat to AWACS Radar Deleted per 5 U.S.C. 352(b} (1) QD etic electronic Combat Vulnerabilities Analysis (RVAN) The AFEWC was tasked to develop the methedolagy to Support RVAN, The objective of the RVAN effort will be to identify and document vulnerabilities of electromagnetic Gependent. equipment and systems with the purpose of providing and supporting a risk asseasment for the encire life of the aystem. The primary intent of RVAN is to support the development, acquisition, fielding, and modification of effective electromagnetic dependent equipment by early identification of vulnerabilities and documentation. As tasked by AFEWC, wa provided a recommended method for providing AF/IN approved intelligence support to RVAN, The EC TED, TARs, and STARs and the EW Intelligence Support Data Base are recommended inputs. 'See algo = Report GEER Korth «Korean | EH Capabilities” QM aris ov-s, 93-1, 1 Feb 83, sp 552.
Wartime Reserve Modes (WARM Bh Sach tA inh 8 TO We reviewed eleven complete ITbe and had discussions with GIT on the difficulties they encountered in working on the ITDs. APIS OL-N sent a letter to 4 USAF/INW concerning the problems users have ain xesearching and wsing information from all three of the referenced documenta. Before writing the letter, a comparison on one system, the 5a-5, was done between data found in the EWiR, the IDIP and the eystem book. The five volumes of the IfDe are expected to be here in danuary 1984. a Engineering Readiness/Rapid Reprogramming Panel 3) ‘The purpose of the engineering readiness initiative is to devaiop the capability to provide rapid reprogramming support to the operational commands for airborne weapon aystems, command, control and communication systems, and ground EW simulators. The Air Porce has developed such a capability to respond quickly to changing enemy threat environments for airborne EW aystems (RWR and ECM pods} through the Electronic Warfare Delered per 5 U.S.C. 252(b} (2)
334 Integrated Reprogramming (EWIR} Concept. However, similar capabilities do not exist ta react to enemy gamming and deception techniques that affect fire control and terrain-folliowing radars, navigation systems, commnications and cosmand and control aystems. In 1982, HQ AFLC formed a working group to address the engineering readiness issue. The objective of the working group 4s to develop the capability te support usex's needs for rapid reprogramming and preemptive engineering of embedded computer systems. The primary emphasia ia on ECCM, AFIS OL-N ia a member of this working group and provides guidance for intelligence support. Currently, HQ APLC is drafting a preliminary concept of operation for ECCM engineering readiness, This concept will be sent out to all the major commands invelved and te HQ USAF for coordination. Once an acceptable concept is written and appreved the ECCM concept may be included in AFR 55-90, "Electronic Warfare Policy." APIS OL-N will provide inputs to the intelligence support portion of this concept. GD eres Reprogramming Capability (ARC) The purpose of the ARC program is to provide using commands, both CONUS and in-theater, with the capability to respond rapidly to changes/anomaliea in a hostile electronic threat environment. This will be done by creating mission data software changes in a wide range of electronic countermeasures {£CM) and radar warning receiver (RWR} systems, using the ARC system. The ARC is a software~intensive system that will provide threat data processing and analyses, a mission data change capability, and internal evaluation and testing. It will give an analyst/operator maximum flexibility in determining and evaluating mission data changes and will allow these tasks to be accomplished in a time frame likely to be encountered in an emergency situation. The ARC acquisition procesa wili consist of two phases: <I and Il. Phase I consists of two-~subphases, TTA and TmR. Phase I and IIA represent a full scale development program. Phase 1 consists of fuli-scale development to design, develop, teat and deliver four fixed-site ARC systems capable of reprogramming five Electronic Warfare (EW) systems. One system will remain in the contractor facility through Phase TIA; the others will be delivered to USAPTAWC, BQ SAC, and Warner Robins ALC. Also part of Phase I is a feasibility study and system specification for a transportable (sheltered) ARC system, data, and a technical/cost proposal for Phase If efforts. Phase IIA consists of fullscale engineering to design, develop, test, and deliver one sheltered ARC, & Advanced Sensor Exploitation {ASE}
AFIS OL-N GOALS FOR 1984 @ EW Threat Analysis Division 1, $B erovide increased threat assesement service to the APEWG. a e £B 18S Electronic Combat Equipment Capabilities Analysis Update. b. GY various threat sssessnants. 2. a Updare Soviet IP/EO Capabilities Document: APIS OL- N 83-3. 3. Update “Soviet Ground Forces Electromagnetic Environment," AFIS OL-N @2-t. 4. Soviat ECM Analysis Chart Update. 5. Provide Soviet tactical air defense ¢? support to SIMVAL, AFIS OL“N 84-2. é. Provide EC TED review support to AP/INYW. 7 Develop, coordinate. and submit various threat TRRs on ROE-Operating Procedures to support SIMVAL. 8. Provide space threat capabilities and trends to AFOTEC and AFEWC. @® zc intetiigence Programs Division 1. QD voricuice QEMRBMRMM 84-1 Exexcise. Coordinate national intelligence collection tasking by MAJ . be Develop scripted intelligence inpyts. G Provide training for exercise players and monitors. 8. (9H couplete the intelligence sections of the exercise plan. e. Conduct the sxercise with maxime intelligence play. £. Publish detailed after-action report of successes, problems, solutions, and recommendstiona during the exercise. 2. QB woridviae QAMEMMMEER 25-1 Exercise. a. Plan and coordinate the intelligence pley. be Write the intelligence aection of the plan. Cc. Coordisate MAICON tasking of national intelligence collection. Deleted per § U.S.C, 352(b) (1)
136 3. Electronic Warfare Support Data Base: Continue efforts to expand the data base to include ECM, YR/EQ and LASER data. 4. WB ewe audit pase (ADB): Develop software coutines to automatically input SLINT anomalies inte the ADB and provide couputer interfaces to the EW Plagging program and EWIR Data Base. Setter define EWIR asseseed limits definitions. 5. Analyst-tovAnalyst Meetings: Coordinate and conduct meaningful exchanges at the SETI centers between the threat systems analysts and the MAJCOM EW reprogramming engineers, S. e& Area Reprograming Capability (ARC}: Develop viable, complete intelligence aupport concept for the ARC. T. EW Systems Support: Continue to assist working groups handling present and future reprogramable EW systems, including the Integrated EW System {INEWS) and ALQ~131 System Upgrade, ge a Help develop an Air Force ECCM reprogramming policy Work other embedded computer reprogramming problems, Help the Air Force develop the GIA Action Plan For Intelligence Support to EW and Clcm. it. HBP Cm Applications Support: Provide USAF/INYW and APEWC/CB on COMPASS CALL, the OSAP Central ¢3cM Support Data Rage (COMFY SHIRE) and ©} Geographic Analytical Target Exploitation System {CIGATES} applications. a. QB welp usar/inyw and = AFEWC/CS_— to draft, coordinate, and finalize the Program Mangement Directive (PMD) for COMFY SHIRE. b. @BB #elp ousar/Inyw and = AFEWC/C3_ te draft, coordinate, and finalize the Program Management Flan (PMP) for COMFY SHIRE. support to c. QB work with Usar/ikyw tc redefine the National SIGINT Requirements List (NSRL} te support CFCK. 4. Help USAF/INYW to draft, coordinate, the Master Plan for Intelligence Support to CCM. e. @ Coordinate with USAF/INYTH, HR TAC/GCFC, and HO ESC, and finalize actions to satisfy 41 ESC COMPY SHIRE training requirements. £, QB Assist OSAr/INyH, GQ TAC/IRYS, and TAWC/INW/ADA with development of COGATES. and finalize Deleted per 5 U.S.C. 552{b) (1)
AVIS CPERATING LOCATION ET APMED FORCES MEDICAL DETELLIGESCE CENEER PORT OETRICK, MARYLAMDS MISSION a APIS/OL-ET - armed Forces Medical Intelligence Center (APIS/OL-ET-AFMIC} ig charged with production, analysie, manage~ ment, and liaison activities as described in Department of Defense Directive 6420.3, “Armed Forces Medical Intelligence Center," December 9, 1982.' Additional information on AFIS/OL~ET-AFMIC is described in the 9 November 1992 letter from the Director, Armed Forces Medical Intelligence Center (AFMIC~-ZA) to the Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence; Headquarters United States Air Force {ACS/L) .2 Since AFIS/OL-ET first became operational in August 1983, its mission has broadened. The ciinical psychologist now covers ali military applications of paycholegy. not just drug abuse and stress. The biophysicist also covers lasers and general biophysics. Both the clinical psychologist and physicist are also covering space medicine and serve as USAP Medical intelligence Program Managers. These changes have occurred at the request of intelligence consumers and by the asthority of the Chief, Weapons, Space and Technology Division; Seadquarters United States Air Force (AF/INET) and by AFMIC-ZA, Ta reflect heightened interest in medical intelligence, APIS/OL-~ET~AFMIC is completely revising Air Force regulation (APR) 200-3, “The Medical Intelligence Program," 9 July 1965.3 A new draft of AFR 260-3 is currently being coordinated with the Office ef the United States Air Force Surgeon General (AF/SG) and with the Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence; Readquartera United States Air Porce (AP/IN}. The new regulation, 4£ approved. will describe interrelationships among APMIC, AF/IN, AF/SG, and all USAF major commands (MAJOOMs) and special operating agencies. It will also establish Medical Intelligence Coordinating Committees (MICC) at Air Staff and MAJCOM levels. "This segment on OL-ET was prepared by Capt Richard W. Bloom, AFIS/OL-ET. Some editing was done by APIS/HO, See Ltr and 1 Atch @ORMBAR, fistorical Data Report, AFMIC-2A to AFIS/#O, “Historical Data Report,” 13 Peb 84, SD 555. ipod Oirective 6420.1, “Axmed Forces Medical Intelligence Center,“ 9 Dec &2, SD 556. 2Ler QF, Lt Col Walker to ACS/I, MG Marks, n.s., 9 Nov 82, SD $57. 3arR 200-3, “The Medical Intelligence Program,” 3 Jul 65, SD 558. 4praft AFR 200-3, “Medical Intelligence in Support of Opera- tions and Planning.“ 15 Dec B32, SD 559.
338 ORGANIZATION = With regard to AFIS/OL-ET AFMIC‘s organization, the reporting official for both staff members is the Chief, Weapons, Space and Technology Oivision; Headquarters United States Air Force {AF/INET). Both staff members work within the Studies and Analysia Division of APMIC (AFMIC-SA) which, in turn, is commanded by the Director, APMIC (AFMIC~ZA).? AFIS/GL-ET-AFMIC became operational on 1 Auguet 1983. fo trace the rationale for its creation, we must return 0 congressional deliberations for the PY82 budget. At that time there waa close congressional, scrutiny of the United States Army Medical Intelligence and Informatiui. Agency (USAMZIA}. The House Appropriations Committee (HAC) wanted te eliminate a significant portion of USAMIIA activities and transfer the rest to another Army organization. HAC based ite position on alleged administrative ambiguities, financial improprieties, and duplicative services. On the other hand, the Senate Authorizations Committee {SAC} wanted to continue the activities of USAMIIA, SAC based its position on the many service medical intelligence requirementa that USAMIIA did and could satisfy. in a Jeint congressional Conference Report (No. 977-410, 15 Dec 1984), funding was approved for USAMIIA in the PYB2 General Defenge intelligence Program {(GDIP}. This repor% also stipulated many sodificationa for USAMIIA.? MP rc ehis point, the secretary of defense (SECDEF) assigned the assistant secretary of defense for health affairs {ASD/AHA} to oversee the reorganization of USAMITA in compliance with congressional wishes. One indirect result of this reorganization was that UBAMIIA would include tri~service staff. Another was that USAMIIA soon became APMIC, as of 1 October 1982, AFMIC-ZA soon requested USAP personnel to help satisfy USAF medical intelligence requirements and ensure USAF representation on the AFMIC staff, To satisfy this requeat, two officer authorizations «from the USAF Foreign Technolagy Division (FRB) were transferred to the Air Force Intelligence Service {APIS).3 The two officers filling these spaces were assigned to ‘organization Chart, APIS/OL~ET~AFMIC, 1983, SO 560. 2House Report No. 977-410, 97th Congress, ist Session. “Making Appropriations for the Departwent of Defense for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 1992, and for Other Purposes,” 15 Dec 81, SD 56%. Juer QM AP/INY to AF/MPMP, “Request for Transfer of Two GDIP Manpower Spaces,” 19 Apr @3, SD 562; Ltr MRM aris/no to AP/TNY, “Establishment of AFIS/OL-ET ~ Armed Forces Medical Intelligence Center (Your Ltr, 27 Apr 83}," 29 April 83, SD 563.
339 AF/INET and attached to AFMIC, The two officers had areas of expertise (clinical paychology and biophysics) consonant with APMIC and USAP medical intelligence requirements. They both arrived at APMIC in August 1983 at which time, AFIS/OL-ET-AIMIC became operational. * The two USAF spaces axe in the procese of being progratmed and budgeted in the GDIP cycle. When this is accomplished, the officers will be assigned to AFMIC, and AFIS/OL~ ET“AFMIC may cease to exist. Moreover, four new USAF slots have been xequested by the AFHIC-2A for assignment to APHIC.2 This request is currently being coordinated. BUDGET => AFIS/OL~ET~AFMIC is not authorized funds. Ali resources necessary to support mission activities are provided by AFMIC. AF/INET has provided some TOY funds for USAF~related activities. FUNCTIONAL ACTIVITIES AND OPERATIONS 1, QM veis/o~er-aratc provided data on several crises in PyYB3 and the first quarter of FYB4, a. & A report on military drug abyse of Libyan forces had implications for the degree of support Libya could provide the Chadian rebels. b. Pe Several analyses of Psychological Operation (PSYOP} technology facilitated evaluation of Nicaraguan PSYUP. Ge a A clinical psychological analysis of paranoid tendencies in the USSK's Polithbure decision making helped to elucidate occurrences before, during, and after the Korean Air Lines 007 sheotdown. a. a A peychological analysis of several Grenadian politico-nmilitary leaders was provided before and during 0.5, intervention in Grenada. @.  ] Several analyses on terrorism and counter~ terrorism in the Mideast had directed relevance to the U.S. lebanon migsion. For example, one analysis predicted that the ‘oer MRRP AF/INY to AFIS/OP/MO, “Batablishment of APIS/OL-ET — Armed Forces Medicai Intelligence Center (AFMIC},”% 27 Apr 82, SD 564; Nemo Qs Carey Sapp to INY, “Col O*Lear's question -*Why not just iet them stay with PTD for CERs?“, 19 Apr 83, SB 565. 2her on Col Walker, APMiC-ZA to ACS/3I, “Assignment of Air Force Personnel to APMIC,“ n.d.. SD 566.
140 Islamic Holy War Organization did not exist. (Most of the work on items a through e were orally transmitted to tri-service and interagency conaumers. )! 2. AFIS/OL“ET*AFMIC has periodically provided analyses of different psychological types who engage in terrorism, common psychological biases which interfers with auecesaful counterterrorism activities, and social psychological context variables which affect the incidence and prevalence of terrorism. (Nore: The following items, 3 through 1%, are purposely vague on the advice of higher authorities.) 3.4,5, L 2] All briefings, reports, and support from APIS/QL“ET-AFMIC have been significant.2 All are state-of~the- art, and have had influences on assessment and countermeasures, research and development. s @B Participation in studies has been ongoing. Wo products are yet available, However, they will be significant. 7. QP oarrs/ou-er-armic has contributed significant questions to many debriefings dealing with medical intelligence. @. QP arissou-er-arnzc oo has—representatives on the Scientific and Technical Thermal Applications Group, and the Life Sciences Group. Both groups function under the Interagency Selentific and Technical Intelligence Committee (STIC}. 9,10. & No exercises, programs, areas, ox commands have been monitored in 1983. This will change, if the revised AFR 200- 3 is approved in its present form. v4, @ Several special projects are being monitored. fowever, APIS/OL-ET-AFMIC does not find it advisable to describe them in this report. 42. The concept of psychological intelligence ag a subset of medical intelligence is being considerably broadened. Besides the traditional areas of human factors and military drug abuse, new components of psychological intelligence have included PSYOP, psycholegical aspects of deception and countezdeception, interrogation, “brainwashing,” POW paychalogical phenomena, ‘See Meg @BM APMiCc~SA to CDRITAC AHS/IAX-P-C, “Terrorism” QM 3017002 Jan 84, SD 567; Excerpt from Msg QB aretc-za to Multiple Sources, “Lebanon: Perceptions of Radical Shiites,” 1620002 Dee 83, SD S68; Excerpt from Msg @MMH APMIC-ZA to AIG 6623, “Sample of AFIS/OL-ET-AFMIC Consumers,“ 1620002 Dec 83, SD 569. 2See for example Excerpt from Mag QQMMBIBBRMG “PRC Microwave Radiation Meter™ Q¥MBB APMIC-ZA to Multiple Sources, n.d.. SD 576,
341 psychiatric casualties, personality profiles of decisionmakers, national character, peychology of insurgency and counterinsur~ gency, psychological vulnerabilities of intelligence operators/ intelligence analysta, intelligence and counterintelligence aystems, strategic planners/crisis managers; mental health systems an the military; military applications ef psychology. This broadened view of psychological intelligence has met significant resistance from some intelligence managers, but haa gathered signi- ficant aupport, nevertheless. 13. S&S Ags a result of the troadened concept of psychological intelligence, new collection requirements have been written to reflect this change. They're being included in G-O6G~- 42744-Medicai Capability Study. 14, & AFIS/OL~ET~AFMIC does not have a board of advisors or advisory panel}. It is open to suggestion from and pliant to AF/INET and APMIC-ZA. 15. Ba AFIS/OL“ET“AFMIC does not have an  on«station commander. The two staff members discharge responsibilities for AP/INET and AFMIC, 16. ea The new ACS/I has concurred in the need for APIS /OL~ET-AFMIC, 17. QB arssvov-er-armic has provided state-of-the-art analyses on military applications of nonionizing radiation and parapsychology. It also has provided analyses on recent politic«: military crises. 18. & APIS/OL~ET-AFMIC has had total support from a}* organizations and all consumers since its inception. Of special note has been the support of the Office of the Surgean General, Headquarters, United States Air Force, Medical Readiness Division (AF/SGHR) . 19. GBB me most significant accomplishment of FYB3 and the first quarter of PYé4 is providing the OSAP with top-level medical intelligence capabilities. Before the advent of AFIS/GL~ET~AFMIC. these capabilities were nonexistent. 20. QB art visitors to APIS/OL-ET-AFMIC are distin- guished. PERSONNEL AND MANPOWER bad The organization and personnel of AFIS/QL-ET-AFMIC are as follows
ya2 BAME & RANK POSITION FROM To Capt Richard W. Bloom Medical Intelligence Program Manager 1 Aug 1983 Present (Former Paycholagy Applications Officer DET 1, APCOS (HO USAF)) Capt Rebert C, Downs Medical Intelligence t Sep 1983 Present Program Manager (Former Assistant Professor of Physics, OSAPA} Morale and motivation are quite high at APFIS/CL-ET- AFMIC, Positions are selectively manned by AF/INET and AFMIC and require specialized knowledge in an area pertinent to biomedical actences. Promotion potential is perceived by staff as excellent. PACILITIES AND LOGISTICS APIS/OL-ET~APMIC is lecated within APMIC at Ft. Detrick, MD. AFMIC will have a new building ceady for occupancy in late 198S. The AFMIC staff and AFIS/QL~ET-AFMIC will then move into this new location. INSPECTIONS At present, AFPIS/OL-ET-AFMIC has no special oversight function. It was not invelved in a major case involving the IG. TRAINING Training Provided by the Unit APIS/OL-ET-AFMIC provides regular training in PSYOP and Crisis Response Management (CRM) to students at the USAF Special Operations School, Hurlburt Field, PL. Material is constantly upgraded to preserve the state-of-the-art quality of information, There are usually five PSYOP classes per year, each with about 30 te 40 students. Student evaluations tend to indicate one of two yeactions. First, a perception that the training is outstanding, even exceptional by professional military education standards. The other perception ts that the training may be too intensive and advanced without prior priming in relevant subject areas. P?SYOP and CRM training is being pericdically refashioned in reaction to these perceptions. Training of Unit Personnel @ In calendar year 1983, the AFIS/OL-ET-AFMIC clinical psychologist was sent to the annual Aserican Psychological Association Convention. Attendance at this meeting provided the latest training in many psychological areas. tt also provide
343 opportunities for contacts with international colleagues who had information on military applications of psychology not yet picked up by U.S. intelligence collectors. The training and information obtained at the convention were invaluable ta AFNIC psychoiogy/ biomedical requiremente and figured in many analyses of foreign nilitary applications of paychology. The AFIS/OL-~2T-AFMIC physicist attended the fol- dunelag training sessions: a. Pield Laser Hazards Course, conducted by the OSA Health Services Command, be Seminar on Scientific and Technical Intelligence condy by the Defense Intelligence College. co Soviet Military Power Week conducted by the USAF Soviet Awareness Division. OTHER SIGNIFICANT TOPICS AFIS/OL~ET-AFMIC is opening up new areas and opportuni~ ties in medical (ntelligence for the USAP. The possibilities are infinite. To reap such potential takes significant commitment, motivation, energy, and skill. The two officera at this operating location spend large amounts of time “outside the job” increasing proficiencies, becoming primed for insightful analyses.
y 4 OPERATING LOCATION AF ATR PORCK DYYELLIGESCE SERVICE KIRELAHD AIR FORCE BASE, EEN MEXICO* MESSION Primary Mission - To provide AFOTEC with intelligence personel augmentation for dedicated all~scurce tntelligence Management and analytical. support. t] Subordinate Punctians a. ea Service as liaison between AFOTEC and other intelligence organizations toa ensure ali~source intelligence support. to the APOTEC alasion. b. Assist in the review of threat aasess~ ments /scenarios for adequacy, completeness and applicability. e Agsist in the review of Threat Environment Descriptions {TEDs) for currency and completeness. a. mm identify needs and recommend intelligence support for roel : & Assist AFOTEC in maintaining a collateral intelligence tary by identifying appropriate intelligence publications. ORGANIZATION eS Ags an AFIS operating location, OL-AF reports directly to, a receives direction from, AFIS/CC, However, in accardance with the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the Assistant Chief ef Staff/intelligence {ACS/I} and AFOTEC/CC, OL-AF also reports to, and receives direction from, HQ USAF/INYW (Electronic Combat Intelligence Group}. This organizational affiliation with the Air Staff (through HQ/INYW) facilitates the accomplishment of our mission by enabling us to deal directly with the Scientific and Technological (SeT} Centers of all three branches of the services. 4 Because of the small size of OL-AF, no organization chart has been provided. With the exception of the unique dutied and responsibilities inherent to the OL chief, all personnel within OL-AF perform the same tasks and have the same responsibilities. *This segment on OL-AF waa prepared by Capt Wolfgang R.. Kuhn and reviewed by Lt Col Donald N. Walker, Chief, OL~AF, See Ltr and 4 Ateh 1983 History @MBBB AFIS oL-aAF to AFIS/HO, *1983 Annual History,“ 17 Feb 83, SO 571, IMemorandum of Agreement, ACS/I and APOTEC/CC, "Intelligence Support to Operational Test and Evaluation,” MG Marks, 23 Peb 83 and MG Phillips, 30 Mar 83, SD 572.
345 BUDGET The ¥Y83 budget for OL~AF was $10K. ‘This entire amount was dedicated to travel, and $8.4K was spent during the year. No other APIS funding is necessary as AFOTEC is responaidie for all equipment and supplies in accordance with the ACS/I-AFOTEC/CC MOA. The fY84 appropriation was also $10K, However, $5K had been equested because cof an expanding AFOTEC mission and increased manning for OL-AF, Theae changes have resulted in «4 proportional increase in our travel requirements. A supplemental appropriation wiil be required. . Support from AFIS/AC (sepecialiy SSgt Shariene Kegan} 4n obtaining fund cites for travel orders has been outstanding and worthy of mention. FUNCTIONAL ACTIVITIES AND OPERATIONS OL-AF provided suupport te AFOTEC on the following significant OTsE efforts;' Joint Tactical Fusion Program JTFY During 1983, the Joint Tactical Fusion Program (JTFP) resolved many of the critical issues as it neared its March 1934 Operational Test and Evaluation (OTsE} in Europe. Of major importance was the fact that all participating organizations have received formal tasking to assist with the dJTFP/Limited Operational Capability Europe {LOCE} evaluation. Several meetings were held with representatives fram AFOTEC, European Command (EUCOM), United States Air Forces Europe (USAFE), AFOTEC, DET 1 {Kapaun AS, Germany} and various Army organizations to solidify planning for a thoreugh test effort. Milestones for the year Ancluded: 18-20 Jan 83 ~ Test Plan Working Group (TPWG) held at EUCOM/EC32 (Vaihingen, GE}, JTF-LOCE concept of operations and employment objectives were thoroughly discussed along with the need for a ‘joint’ test as directed by the under secretary of defense for research and engineering (USDR&E}. 7 Mar 83 <- Decision not to publish separate Test Program Outiine (7F0} for LOCE and the follow-on Enemy Situation Correlation Element (ENSCE}. Apr 83 ~ AFOTEC/CC message to USAP/IN/RDS/X00 and EUCOM urging action on the program as an AFOTEC~led Air Farce only 'For Monthly Activity Reports QM AFIS/OL-AF to AFIS/INW, Jan-Jun, Aug-Dec, 83, see SD $73,
346 evaluation under the guidance of U.S. Commander~in-Chlef, Europe (USCINCEUR}, NOTE: At this time the Dept of Army had not yet formally directed the Army's AFOTEC counterpart, 49 Operational Test & Evaluation Agency {(OTEA), to support the Zuropean Test Effort. 2 May @3 ~ Department of Army directa QrEA and £UCOM support. for LOCE. 16-19 May ~ OYFP/ESSCE’ functional requirements review diacussed delivery dates of systems. Army will recedve first system in Jun 86. Air Porce will get one.of the naxt five ~ hopeflly, the eecond syztam. 9 Jun 83 ~ Meeting held at AFOTEC with all local players to discuss exactly where test planning stood. Major pelats were: EUCOM had requested the use of the Tactical Simlator (TACSIM) for LOCE teating in Mar 84; next TPWG acheduled for Aug 83; AF initial ENSCE planned for a6. t1 Jul 83 ~ OL-AP review of the JTYP/ENSCE baseline functional capabilities description. No major points of conflict noted. 144 +15 Jul @3 - UTFP/ENSCE Product Assurance and Test Working Group (PATHG} conference held. Clarified organiza~ tional responsibilities and assigned action items/Offices of Primary Responsibility (OPRs} to support development of a draft Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) by mid-September 1983. Oct @3 + ITEP test manager TOY to Europe to set-up for Spring 1984 test. EUCOM backing was much stronger than was evident during previous visits. AFIS OL-AF participation during exercise will be from 12 Mar ~ 4 Apr in the Correlation Center {CORCEN) at Ramstein AB, GE, 3 Nov 83 ~ OL-AF reviewed the updated version of the UTFP test plan. No aajor comments/recommendations. 1 Dec 83 - Lt Col Walker/Maj Puseman attended pre- execution briefing. One more trip to Europe planned by key AFOTEC staff to finalize test preparations prior to March test. @ Final Comment: JTFP/LOCE test manager appears to have planning well organized from an AFOTEC perspective and has overcome slow tespenses for support from the European community, March 1984.test should greatly tmprove the chances for the Follow on ENSCE system to become an effective tool in supporting operational commander. Bigh Velocity and Anti-radiation Missile (HARM) @e OL-AF support ta this joint service program consisted of several sub-projects: 4} First, we were tasked te provide
347 murface-to-air missile (SAM} operator tactics and operating procedures during anti-radiation missile (ARM) attack. Support for this undertaking was provided by A¥IS/OL-R. This is «a continuing task with anslysis to continue in CyB4. 2} The second task in support of HARM testing was to provide infrared (18) signatures for ground based systems which could be potential targets for HARM targeting. This was satisfied by contacting the U.S. Army's Miseile Intelligence Agency {MIA} to obtain the IR signatures dats base. OL“AF actions under these taskings were wery typicai of OL“AF routine activities, ae our support consisted primirily of interacting with other intelligence agencies as opposed to actually performing analysis or extracting information from finished intelligence products. Precision Location Strike System (PLSS) @ Threat support to PLSS test planning continued from 1982. The specific tasks were initiated at the request of AFOTEC/XP/TE to fill gaps in existing threat data. The first action involved obtaining more indepth information on the broad band jamming threat to PLSS communication links. Satisfaction of this task involved extensive interaction between CL-AF, 49 DSAF/INEG, and DIA. DIA was able to provide the required information in a manner timely enough to satiafy OTe requirements. The second task OL-AF received in support of PLSS test planning in 1983 was to attempt to obtain Coumand (USAPE, PACAF, TAC) Standing Electronic Intelligence (ELINT} Requirements. The AFOTEC OPR requested information on the various commands’ requirements for collecting ELINT data, including the timeliness and accuracy necessary, and the reporting criteria, ao that a comparison could be made between existing collectors and PLSS, This task was satisfied by once again interacting with DIA. The final task levied on OL“AF by the AFOTEC PLSS OPR involved requests for additional information on land-based, aixberne. and shipborne jammers which could have an impact on PLSS data links. Existing data was not substantial enough to enable testers to simulate the threat environment. Satisfaction of this task involved extensive interaction between OL-AF and FTD, and was finally completed after FID provided us with » 61- page summary of yequired information. Space Systems = There were & grest variety of epace systems undergoing OrsE est planning in 1983, invoiving: esatellites, remote * sensors, ground facilities, and centrol centers. GL-AP support to this test planning involved many separate activities, including interaction with other intelligence agencies and some analysis, Additionally, Ol-AF points of contact were used to bring AFOTEC (primarizy XPQ) into the space intelligence planning process. AFOTEC became actively involved in the coordination of several space intelligence plans and became a participant in BQ USAF/INY's Project Delphi, an intelligence - operations interface study.
348 sir Force Regulation 200-43 {Threat Support to the Acquisition Process} The lack of a regulation addreasing intelligence support to @ acquisition process was cited in the OL-AP CY82 history aq & problem area affecting our ability to effectively aupport AFOTEC. Secause of the AFOTEC/#PQ and OL-AP efforts, along with support from HQ UOSAF/INW/INEG, we were able to come up with @ draft regulation which satisfied our requirements and was within AFSC’s intelligence capabilities, While the regulation hae not yet been published, we anticipate improvements in intelligence aupport to the acquisition community. Self-improvement Survey Another problem area highlighted in the CY82 OL-AF history wag the relative unawareness of the APOTEC gtaff of the existence and mission of OL-AF, Through a self-improvement survey initiated by OL-AF and circulated throughout the AFOTEC staff, and articles in the AFOTEC Newsletter, we were able to streamline the requests/tasking cycle and clarify many of the previous misunderstandings among the parties concerned. , Specific Problem Areas. The requirement to track the status of Threat Assessments Reports (TARs) and Threat Environment Descriptions (TEDs} and provide this informaticn ta APOTEC has not yet been satisfactorily resolved. While OL«AF involvement in AFSC’s Director of Intelligence conference and frequent coordination with HQ USAF/INEG have helped somewhat, 4 problem still exists in AFOTEC being made aware of TAR/TED status, and more significantly, being automatically included = on distribution. OL-AF will continue to initiate efforts in CYB4d to improve this deficiency: however, higher echelon support may be necesSary to resolve the problem completely. PERSONNEL AND MANPOWER @ Three officers are authorized/assigned to ArTS/oL~aF:* a. GB ct col donale v. walker (8096), Chief, APIS OL-AF. Asaigned March 19814 to present. b. Major Richard A. Pageman (2275), Operations Officer. Assigned August 1984 to present. c, Capt Wolfgang BR, Kuhn = (8075), Intelligence Applicati Officer. Assigned August 1983 to present. Unit manning policy. OL-AF experienced difficulties in filling the Intelligence Applications Officer authorization, with ‘Unit Personnel Management Roster, APIS/OL~AF, 9 Feb 84, SD 574.
349 the billet remaining unmanned for ten months. This was primarily due to the uniqueness of the position requiring an officer not only experienced in intelligence. but also familiar with etaff work and acquisition process. ‘The current 802% overabundance of inexperi- enced lieutenants added to this problem. FACILITIES AND LOGISTICS All APIS/QL-AF facilities and supplies are provided by AFOTEC in accordance with the AFOTEC-AFIS MOA. INSPECTIONS No IG inspections of OL-“AF were conducted im 7983. Two semivannual selfinepections were conducted in accordance with AFISR 123-3, and results were filed locally and forwarded to AFIS/IG, , TRAINING Ril lecal training is provided by APOTBC on ar “as required basis." All three Ol~AF officers received training in 4983 on the operation of AFOTEC desk computers. Ls, Col. Walker and Maj. Pugeman attended the SAC Ballistic Missile Staff Officer Course at Vandenberg AFB, CA, Capt Kuhn was involved in the &04X Utilization and Treining Conferances, and participated an the Electronic Combat Intelligence Officer curriculum development conference.
350 OPERATING {QCATION ¥ AIR FORCE INTELLIGENCE SERVICE RGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, FLORTDA* MISSION Primary Mission ~ AFIS/OL-F continues to provide ali- source intelligence EW/C70M support to the Tactical Air Warfare Center (TAWC}) commander. The GL serves as an analytical adjunct to the director of intelligence, TAWC, pending the realization of an internal TAC/TARC capability. ‘The OL assists the TAWC staff in the analysis and use of all«seurce threat data which ispact the TAWC mission. When directed by HQ USAF/DNYW, the OL provides other intelligence support ag required. Subordinate Functions: Provide scientific and technical intelligence of foreign weapang systems; comnand, control, communications, and intelligence (¢3ct}; 3 countermeasures (C3CM) and their employment by foreign armed services. & Coordinate with USAPTAWC/IN to provide the center with Spec. access program administration. Document EW integrated reprogramming system support procedures. Manage the initiation, processing, ané@ satisfaction of ape: ‘onal and technical intelligence center analysts. : Manage all EW-related analyst-to~analyst exchanges between USAFTAWC EW systems analysts and national scientific/tech- nical intelligence center analysts. Identify and document requirements for decompartmenta- tion ef intelligence data. Receive, process, and analyze all+source intelligence, including ELINT data, to confirm EW threat and parametric changes. Recommend intelligence ADP /communications suppert requizement. Maintain intelligence quick reaction capability for support of EW contingencies and exercises, Provide direct technical intelligence support to OTs£/FOTSE involving foreign materiel exploitation. Provide training support to TAF aircrews and intelli- gence officers. ORGANIZATION Organizationally, APIS OL°F works directly for the Air Staff (AF/INYW) in suppert ef USAFTAWC requirements. *This segment on OL“F was prepared by MSgt Patrick F. Manary with the assistance of the entire OL-F staff. It was reviewed by Lt. Col. Thomag J. Smith, Chief, AFIS/OL-F, See Ltr and 2 Atch, AFIS OL-F Bistory (1983) SMBMMMMBB and supporting Doce List GM APIS/OL-f to AFIS/HO, 17 Feb 84, 5D $75.
OPERATIONAL AND FUNCTIONAL ACTIVITIES Electronic Warfare Integrated Reprograming (EWIR) Data Base Computer Aided Electronic Warfare information System (CAEWIS) CAEWES Installation at Warner Robins Air Lagistice Center (WR-ALC}. APIS OL-F assisted the USAFTAWC Office of Data Automation to install CAEWIS at WR-ALC in May 1983. AFIS OL-F's involvement included pre-instaliation coordination with OSAF/IXYW and APIS/IND, and eystem checkout at WR-ALC. AFIS Ol-F served as the user coordinator for contract development of enhanced CAEWIS software. The requirement was developed by OL-F in 1982. ‘The enhancements included query improvements and graphic capabilities along with overall “user friendliness" improvements. Numerous visits were made ta Rome Air Development Center and the contractor's facility to insure requirements were met, The enhancements were ingtalled by the contractor and checked gut by APIS Ol-F in December 1983- AFIS OL~P completed development of a& tailored EWIR file called the Fe1S Threat List for the F+15 Tactical Electronic Warfare System {(TEWS}. This file includes EWIR data tailored to the FP-15 TEWS along with FrtS TEWS system specific data. The Pe 35TL provides a siiail subset of the EWIR data enabling the system Deleted per 5 U.S.C. 352(b}(1}
332 engineers to tore readily identify threat anomalies and implement reprogramaing action. The F-15Th has gained wide acceptance by other usere and development of other tailored system files is pianned for 1984. Intelligence Computer Terminals. USAFTAWC received one of two color graphics terminals in 1992, TAWC is installing a Chromatics 7900 in the old TAWC vault to support COMPASS CALL. jamming strategy development. The COMPASS CALL vault ia being Tempest shielded. Meanwhile AFIS OL-P helped TAWC/AD write sole-source justification for a second Chromatics 7900 to assist in program development to aupport CAEWIS POC/ARC intelligence support. The other unit is to be placed in the computer room of TAWC's new CAEWIS vault for program development. Pending ARC developments, TAWC would then ask to Tempest shield part or all of the new vault's analyst room, This will eliminate the need for individual Tempest control for the basic unit and for peripheral units as well. As of year's end, APIS/IND agreed to provide at least $25K to help provide GSA shielding for the CAEWIS Chromatics and necessary peripherals in the CAEWZS vaulr. Electronic Warfare (EW) Intelligence Requirements ELINT for EW Reprogranmming Deleted per 5 U.S.C. 952¢b} 02)
3198 Rp Blue/Gray Requirements. OL-F represented TAWC at DIA‘s Blue y Requirements meeting wheth grew out of the April ‘a3 General Officers Blue/Gray Steering Group Meeting. ‘The Blue/Gray action officer sessions were called to outline the best approach te develop or consolidate existing DOD holdings inte a worldwide electronic data baseline encompassing communist and non~communist communications emaiters. The first meeting {June 83) focused on developing and consolidating requirements for non-communiat bloc {Riue/Gray} non-comminicationg emitters (ELINT). The group made a preliminary cut at reviewing and prioritizing service inputs. Suggested baseline was Blue/Gray Task 15 document written by SRC for NSA, (NOTE: TAWC/OL-F methodology using the emitter versus EW system matrix approach for Red/Blue/Gray emitters formed the basis for the Task 15 study and was the prime ardver in the DIA effort. } The main issues included how to get requirements formally on the books and validated by DIA, how to arrive at Blue/Gray definitions acceptable to all, and who should collect, process, and aniayze Blue/Gray data. At the 6 July meeting, OL-F and AF/INYW helped DIA develop the concept of intel support to EW and C3CM presented at 12 July General Officers’ meeting (for details, ref DIA/DC?'s msg dtg 2716222 JUL 83 (S}. Subj: Minutes of Blue/Gray General Officer Steering Group {(U)). The Phase I concept proposed the baseline and format (EWIR/KILTING); the exec production agents (AFEWC for U.S., SGTI centers for foreign, NSA +, for B/G ELINT}; data dissemination {FTD/NSA}: coordination on US capabilities (JEWC); and overall coordination (DIA}. The generals agreed with Phase I in principle, but wanted to study the proposal vis-a-vis ongoing service initiatives and resources. Primary requirement affecting TAWC was to assist DIA in repricritizing hundreds of Biue/Gray emitters (made up from AP IPR and SRC study}. As a result. OL-F provided DIA and AF/INYW with an updated prioritization of TAWC’s Blue/Gray requirements. The list included 267 signals divided into three priority categories, plus an additional 182 emitters which were not categorized because too little waa known about them, The lists were part of the overall Red/Biue/Gray emitter requirements update prepaxed by OL-F for the EWIR Intelligence Production Requirement (IPR} and AFEWC 8iue/Gray taskings. The lists and accompanying threat emitter-vs-EW systems matrices were passed to HQ TAC and distributed throughout the intelligence community in November and December 1983. a Area Reprogramming Capability {ARC}. AFIS OL“F worked with potential ARC users and developers during 1983 to insure comprehensive intelligence support to ARC. AFIS OL-F was instrumental in persuading ARC users/developers to include the CAEWIS Final Operational Capability {FOC} system specification in the ARC Threat Data Processing (TDP} function. This will provide ARC with the essential intelligence front-end. OL-F worked closely with Aercnautical Systems Oivision (ASD) to insure modular design and transportability were emphasized so that non-ARC users could obtain the EWIR Sata Base manipulation capability in TOP. In addition, AFIS OL~F wrote the TAC intelligence support appendix far the ARC Preliminary System Operational Concept (PSOC}. The
353 TAC intelligence PSOC will also serve as a baseline for theatre dinteliigence PSOC's. “~~ Sat wr ~ A ia N wt Pad “a = wt ii a a o ru e e aol oe oe