datamatters24/research-document-archive huggingface dataset:
— June | lo Mr. Bundy, Chas. Johnson called on 2 matters: 1. Pre-launch registration and pre-launch inspection of satellites is a part of our disarmament treaty Phase 1. Thatis the only place where we have made any mention of these two subjects in our negctiations. J 2. Mr. Kaysen is going to the 2:30 meeting this afternoon that Alexis Johnson is setting up-- this is in connection with NSAM 156 (cy attached) and ties in with your discussion with Mr. Johnson this morning.
/ 
t  .  T       .  v/ 
June    1  \e 
Mr.    Bundy, 
Chas.    Johnson  called  on  2  matters: 
^ 
1-      Pre-launch  registration  and  pre-launch 
inspection  of  satellites  is  a  part  of  our  disarmament 
treaty  Phase  I.      That  is  the   only  place  where  we 
have  made  any  mention  of  these  two  subjects 
in  our  negotiations. 
v    2.      Mr.    Kaysen  is  going  to  the   2:30  meeting 
this  afternoon  that  Alexis  Johnson  is  setting  up-- 
this  is  in  connection  with  NSAM  156  (cy  attached) 
and  ties  in  with  your  discussion  with  Mr.  Johnson 
this  morning.
Le <a See eR Oe tA BACKGROUND ON US POSITION ON A SEPARATE BAN ON ONS OF MASS DESTRU 1. he U.S. 1458 on record es having proposed discussion of a separate agreement banning weapons of mass destruction from outer space, along the general lines of the provisions contained in the April 18, 1962, Draft Treaty Outline on General and Complete Disarmament. The matter of such ae separate agreement is not now an active agreed agenda item, but it has been included in our list of proposed agenda items, 2. The U.S. is not taking the initiative in again raising the question of a separate agreement banning weapons of massa destruction from outer space. At the same time, we would not reverse our position on readiness to discuss such a ban at Geneva, if the neutrals or Canada insist on raising the issue, and we would attempt to place the burden of rejection of such a ban on the USSR, rather than assuming it ourselves. Our position on a separate disarmament measure on weapons in space is now under revier. 3. The U.S. would make very clear its objection to broadening any outer space measure (separate or in a general and complete disarmament provision) to include prohibition on any activity or equipment other than on weapons. Any Soviet or Soviet-supported attempts should be rejected, making appropriate reference to the fact that the USSR Draft Treaty, as well as the U.S. draft treaty outline, specifically and correctly applies to a ban only on weapons, DECLASSIFIED AUS Nese -Si- 1} By 1 _NARS, Date Ear
BACKGROUND  ON  US  POSITION  ON  A  SEPARATE  BAN  ON 
wsA^oNs  o*  mass  jbfisTROTnTOTTfnnjTKTPxro^" 
1.  The  U.S.  is  on  record  as  having  proposed 
discussion  of  a  separate  agreement  banning  weapons  of  mass 
destruction  from  outer  space,  along  the  general  lines  of 
the  provisions  contained  in  the  April  18,  1962,   Draft 
Treaty  Outline  on  General  and  Complete  Disarmament.   The 
matter  of  such  a  separate  agreement  is  not  now  an  active 
agreed  agenda  item,  but  it  has  been  included  in  our  list 
of  proposed  agenda  itemB. 
2.  The  U.S.  is  not  taking  the  initiative  in  again 
raising  the  question  of  a  separate  agreement  banning 
weapons  of  mass  destruction  from  outer  space.   At  the 
same  time,  we  would  not  reverse  our  position  on  readiness 
to  discuss  such  a  ban  at  Geneva,  if  the  neutrals  or 
Canada  insist  on  raising  the  issue,  and  we  would  attempt 
to  place  the  burden  of  rejection  of  such  a  ban  on  the 
USSR,  rather  than  assuming  it  ourselves.   Our  position 
on  a  separate  disarmament  measure  on  weapons  in  space 
is  now  under  review. 
3.  The  U.S.  would  make  very  clear  its  objection  to 
broadening  any  outer  space  measure  (separate  or  in  a 
general  and  complete  disarmament  provision)  to  include 
prohibition  on  any  activity  or  equipment  other  than  on 
weapons.   Any  Soviet  or  Soviet- supported  attempts  should 
be  rejected,  making  appropriate  reference  to  the  fact  that 
the  USSR  Draft  Treaty,  as  well  as  the  U.S.  draft  treaty 
outline,  specifically  and  correctly  applies  to  a  ban  only 
on  weapons. 
DECLASSIFIED  \ 
By    "frtf^  NARS-  Ua,e  r^jfl  .££■ 
*y^$M     -
CHANGE DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY HEADQUARTERS, DEFENSE REGULATION NO. 35-3A INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON, DC 20301 12 March 1981 COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE MONITORING AND RECORDING DIAR 35-3, 28 August 1981, is changed as follows: Paragraph 6.d, line 4. Change to read: ‘‘The specific employment of recording devices, except within the National Military Intelligence Center (NMIC), is subject to the prior authorization of the DR.”’ FOR THE DIRECTOR: OFFICIAL: E. A. BURKHALTER, JR. Rear Admiral, U.S. Navy hief of Staff aA s / VA Chief of Sta Aleve eg S. SULLIVAN Chief, Publication and Presentation Division DISTRIBUTION C Al22A DUSD(PR) 2 OPR: RCM-4
CHANGE 
DEFENSE  INTELLIGENCE  AGENCY 
REGULATION  NO.  35-3A 
HEADQUARTERS,  DEFENSE 
INTELLIGENCE  AGENCY 
WASHINGTON,  DC  20301 
12  March  1981 
COMMUNICATIONS 
TELEPHONE  MONITORING  AND  RECORDING 
DIAR  35-3,  28  August  1981,  is  changed  as  follows: 
Paragraph  6.d,  line  4.  Change  to  read:  "The  specific  employment  of  recording  devices,  except  within  the 
National  Military  Intelligence  Center  (NMIC),  is  subject  to  the  prior  authorization  of  the  DR." 
FOR  THE  DIRECTOR: 
OFFICIAL: 
s ££ 
s. 
MANLEY  S.  SULLIVAN 
Chief,  Publication  and 
Presentation  Division 
E.  A.  BURKHALTER,  JR. 
Rear  Admiral,  U.S.  Navy 
Chief  of  Staff 
DISTRIBUTION  C 
A122A    DUSD(PR) 
OPR:  RCM-4
DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY REGULATION NO. 60-16 a HE. ADQUARTERS, DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON, DC 20301 6 May 1982 POLICY MONITORING NSCID'S/DCID'S i. PURPOSE: To establish internal DIA policy governing the coordination, monitoring, and imple- mentation of National Security Council Intelli- gence Directives (NSCI1D‘s) and Director, Centrai Intelligence Directives (DCID’s), 2. APPLICABILITY: This regulation applies to allelements of DIA. 3. SUPERSESSION: This regulation supersedes DIAR 60-16, 29 April 1980. “Black lines in the margins indicate changes. 4. POLICY: The Deputs Director for Defense In- telligence (DI) is responsible for policy coordina- tion of NSCID’s and DCID'’s. 5. PROCF DURES: NSCID's and DCID's ly require priority action to meet external suspenses. The following procedures will apply for processing within the DIA: normal- a. The DI-A/NFIB office will: FOR THE DIRECTOR: OFFICIAL: Fate Sen sam MANLY Zs suruivan Chief. Publication and Presentation Division Enclasure Format DISTRIBUTION C OPR: DI-6 (1) Control and make internal DIA distribution of ali NSCID's; DCID’s. {2} Accompany the Director to meetings at which NSID's/DCID's are discussed, prepare a record of the proceedings, and initiate required follow-up actions. b. The Programs and Policy Division (DI-6) will: (1) Monitor NSCID‘'s/DCID's and advise the Director of any problem areas. (2) Staff proposed revisions with appropriate Di- rectorates. (3) Coordinate with the Military Services and, as appropriate, with the DCI staff in processing NSCID‘s/DCID's. c. Directorates will support DI-6 as required. When briefing papers are needed, they will be pre- pared in accordance with the format prescribed in the enclosure. DONALD W. GOODMAN Brigadier General, USAF Chief of Staff
DIAR 60-16 FORMAT File Number Date Sricfing Paper for DR SUBJECT: In the subject, give both the number of NSCID/DCID and its title. 1 BACKGROUND: State the action asked of the DIA and a brief history of previous action on the item. When pertinent, state which agency initiated the item. 2. PROBLEM: Identify the problem and issues as they relate to DIA objectives and interests. Include a brief statement(s) as to what, if any, effect the NSCID/DCID will have on US. relations or interests in the areca concerned. 3. DISCUSSION: Analyze the problem. List issues which may be brought up for consideration by other agencies based upon coordination with other action officers. Include information on Service positions. 4. RECOMMENDATIONS: State the proposed DIA position—concurrence or nonconcurrence with basic document, or concurrence subject to amendment. Where modifications to the text of the basic document are proposed, attach draft modifications as tabs to the briefing paper. 5. COORDINATION: State the extent of coordination both within and outside of the DIA. Briefing Paper prepared by: Name of action officer Extension DIA Element APPROVED BY: ENCLOSURE 1
y YW. [CE LE Vt? i CHANGE DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY HEADQUARTERS, DEFENSE REGULATION NO, 60-18A . INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20301 4 May 1976 POLICY INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT DIAR 60-18, 16 April 1975, is changed as follows: Change all references to "DP-3" (including the OPI in the lower left corner) to "Sc-4," FOR THE DIRECTOR: OFFICIAL: D. P. HARVEY Rear Admiral, USN Chief of Staff£/Deputy Director for Management and Plans VI 0. HOAG Colonel, USA Assistant DeButy Director, for Services DISTRIBUTION B E420A FID (DAPE) 2 OPI: SC-&
CHANGE 
DEFENSE    INTELLIGENCE  AGENCY 
REGULATION   NO.    60-18A 
HEADQUARTERS,    DEFENSE 
INTELLIGENCE  AGENCY 
WASHINGTON,    D.C.      20301 
4  Hay    1976 
POLICY 
INTELLIGENCE  SUPPORT  TO  THE  EXECUTIVE 
OFFICE  OF  THE  PRESIDENT 
DIAR  60-18,  16  April  1975,  is   changed  as  follows: 
Change  all  references  to  "DP-3"  (including  the  OPI  in  the  lower  left  corner) 
to  "SC-4." 
FOR  THE  DIRECTOR: 
OFFICIAL: 
iviiyo.  H( 
Colonel,  USA 
Assistant  Deputy  Director 
for  Services 
D.  P.  HARVEY 
Rear  Admiral,  USN 
Chief  of  Staff/Deputy  Director 
for  Management  and  Plans 
DISTRIBUTION  B 
E420A  FTD  (DAPE) 
V- 
V 
,tf 
\ 
lO* 
OPI: 
SC-4
DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY REGULATION NO. 60-19 if é fi HEADQUARTERS, DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON, DC 20301 28 July 1980 by POLICY DOD ENEMY PW/DETAINEE PROGRAM 1. PURPOSE: To assign responsibilities within the DIA for implementation of the DoD Program for Prisoners of War and Other Detainees. 2. REFERENCE: DoD Directive 5100.69, “‘DoD Program for Prisoners of War and Other Detainees (Short Title: DoD Enemy PW/Detainee Program), 27 December 1972. 3. APPLICABILITY: This regulation applies to all DIA elements. 4. SUPERSESSION: This regulation supersedes DIAR 60-19, 27 April 1973. 5. RESPONSIBILITIES: a. The Directorate for Research (DB), (Director- ate for Attaches and Training (AT), Directorate for Collection Management (DC), and Directorate for Resources and Systems (RS) collaboration) FOR THE DIRECTOR: OFFICIAL: ANEEY S. SULLIVAN Chief, Publication and Presentation Division DISTRIBUTION D&G OPR: RSS-1 (1) Provide appropriate information from the In- telligence Community regarding policies and activ- ities of foreign powers concerning nationals in the custody of U.S. or Allied Forces. (2) Provide evaluated analysis of enemy forces, actions of external threat to prisoners of war/ civilian internee (PW/CI) camps or other facilities utilized to intern capture or detained personnel. b. RS(DB, DC and AT collaboration) (1) Provide evaluated analysis of enemy organize- tion and policies designed to disrupt PW camp oper- ations through acts of sedition or other attempts for disorder by enemy PW/CI interned or otherwise in U.S. forces custody. (2) Provide coordination of all intelligence/coun- terintelligence aspects of the DoD PW/Detainee Program with other DoD components and Federal departments and agencies concerned. RICHARD X. LARKIN Major General, USA Chief of Staff
DEFENSE  INTELLIGENCE  AGENCY 
REGULATION  NO.  60-19 
H 
HEADQUARTERS,  DEFENSE 
INTELLIGENCE  AGENCY 
WASHINGTON,  DC  20301      s     , 
"8  July  1980  *K 
-> 
POLICY 
DOD  ENEMY  PW/DETAINEE  PROGRAM 
1.  PURPOSE:  To  assign  responsibilities  within  the 
DIA  for  implementation  of  the  DoD  Program  for 
Prisoners  of  War  and  Other  Detainees. 
2.  REFERENCE:  DoD  Directive  5100.69,  "DoD 
Program  for  Prisoners  of  War  and  Other  Detainees 
(Short  Title:  DoD  Enemy  PW/Detainee  Program), 
27  December  1972. 
3.  APPLICABILITY:  This  regulation  applies  to  all 
DIA  elements. 
4.  SUPERSESSION:  This  regulation  supersedes 
DIAR  60-19,  27  April  1973. 
5.  RESPONSIBILITIES: 
a.  The  Directorate  for  Research  (DB),  (Director- 
ate for  Attaches  and  Training  (AT),  Directorate  for 
Collection  Management  (DC),  and  Directorate  for 
Resources  and  Systems  (RS)  collaboration) 
FOR  THE  DIRECTOR: 
OFFICIAL: 
MANEPY  S.  SULLIVAN 
Chief,  Publication  and 
Presentation  Division 
DISTRIBUTION  D&G 
(1)  Provide  appropriate  information  from  the  In- 
telligence Community  regarding  policies  and  activ- 
ities of  foreign  powers  concerning  nationals  in  the 
custody  of  U.S.  or  Allied  Forces. 
(2)  Provide  evaluated  analysis  of  enemy  forces, 
actions  of  external  threat  to  prisoners  of  war/ 
civilian  internee  (PW/CI)  camps  or  other  facilities 
utilized  to  intern  capture  or  detained  personnel. 
b.  RS  (DB,  DC  and  AT  collaboration) 
(1)  Provide  evaluated  analysis  of  enemy  organiza- 
tion and  policies  designed  to  disrupt  PW  camp  oper- 
ations through  acts  of  sedition  or  other  attempts  for 
disorder  by  enemy  PW/CI  interned  or  otherwise  in 
U.S.  forces  custody. 
(2)  Provide  coordination  of  all  intelligence/coun- 
terintelligence  aspects  of  the  DoD  PW/Detainee 
Program  with  other  DoD  components  and  Federal 
departments  and  agencies  concerned. 
RICHARD  X.  LARKIN 
Major  General,  USA 
Chief  of  Staff 
OPR:  RSS-1
. « DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY e REGULATION NO. 60-20 ~ HEADQUARTERS, DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON, DC 20301 8 April 1980 POLICY PROCEDURES ISSUED AS IMPLEMENTATION OF EXECUTIVE ORDER 12036 1. PURPOSE: Procedures have been approved which implement Executive Order {E.O.) 12036. The Procedures are essentially operational guidance under which Department of Defense (DoD) In- telligence components may collect, store, or disseminate information concerning U.S. persons. This regulation implements references a and b. 2. REFERENCES: a. DoD Directive 5240.1, ‘Activities of DoD In- telligence Components that Affect U.S. Persons,” 30 November 1979. b. DoD Regulation 5240.1-R, ‘Procedures Gov- erning the Activities of DoD Intelligence Com- ponents that Affect U.S. Persons,”’ 30 November 1979. 3. APPLICABILITY: This regulation applies to all Intelligence components within the DIA and gov- erns all activities undertaken by such components that involve the collection, storage and dissemina- tion of information concerning U.S. persons. FOR THE DIRECTOR: OFFICIAL: ¢ and Presentation Division 2 Enclosures 1. DoD Directive 5240.1 2. Table of Contents DISTRIBUTION C&G OPR: GC 4. RESPONSIBILITIES: a. The General Counsel (GC) and the Inspector General (IG) are responsible for monitoring the over- sight program to detect and prevent violations of E.O. 12036, and references a and b. b. DIA Intelligence components will report ac- tivities that raise questions of illegality or im- propriety to the IG. 5. POLICY: The DoD General Counsel is the final arbiter in interpretation of procedures. Questions of interpretation which arise should be referred through channels to that office. 6. ADMINISTRATION: Copies of the entire Pro- cedures contained in DoD Regulation 5240.1-R have been forwarded to the various Attache posts and other offices requiring action. Enclosure 1 is provid- ed for guidance and direct implementation. Enclo- sure 2 is a Table of Contents completely descriptive of each of the 21 Procedures contained in DoD Regulation 5240.1-R. RICHARD X. LARKIN Major General, USA Chief of Staff
DEFENSE  INTELLIGENCE  AGENCY 
REGULATION  NO.  60-20 
HEADQUARTERS,  DEFExNSE 
INTELLIGENCE  AGENCY 
WASHINGTON,  DC  20301 
8  April  1980 
€ 
/ 
POLICY 
PROCEDURES  ISSUED  AS  IMPLEMENTATION  OF  EXECUTIVE  ORDER  12036 
1.  PURPOSE:    Procedures    have    been    approved  4.  RESPONSIBILITIES: 
which  implement  Executive  Order  (E.O.)  12036.  The 
Procedures  are  essentially  operational  guidance 
under  which  Department  of  Defense  (DoD)  In- 
telligence components  may  collect,  store,  or 
disseminate  information  concerning  U.S.  persons. 
This  regulation  implements  references  a  and  b. 
2.  REFERENCES: 
a.  DoD  Directive  5240.1,  "Activities  of  DoD  In- 
telligence Components  that  Affect  U.S.  Persons." 
30  November  1979. 
b.  DoD  Regulation  5240. 1-R,  "Procedures  Gov- 
erning the  Activities  of  DoD  Intelligence  Com- 
ponents that  Affect  U.S.  Persons,"  30  November 
1979. 
3.  APPLICABILITY:  This  regulation  applies  to  all 
Intelligence  components  within  the  DIA  and  gov- 
erns all  activities  undertaken  by  such  components 
that  involve  the  collection,  storage  and  dissemina- 
tion of  information  concerning  U.S.  persons. 
a.  The  General  Counsel  (GC)  and  the  Inspector 
General  (IG)  are  responsible  for  monitoring  the  over- 
sight program  to  detect  and  prevent  violations  of 
E.O.  12036,  and  references  a  and  b. 
b.  DIA  Intelligence  components  will  report  ac- 
tivities that  raise  questions  of  illegality  or  im- 
propriety to  the  IG. 
5.  POLICY:  The  DoD  General  Counsel  is  the  final 
arbiter  in  interpretation  of  procedures.  Questions  of 
interpretation  which  arise  should  be  referred 
through  channels  to  that  office. 
6.  ADMINISTRATION:  Copies  of  the  entire  Pro- 
cedures contained  in  DoD  Regulation  5240. 1-R  have 
been  forwarded  to  the  various  Attache  posts  and 
other  offices  requiring  action.  Enclosure  1  is  provid- 
ed for  guidance  and  direct  implementation.  Enclo- 
sure 2  is  a  Table  of  Contents  completely  descriptive 
of  each  of  the  21  Procedures  contained  in  DoD 
Regulation  5240. 1-R. 
FOR  THE  DIRECTOR: 
OFFICIAL: 
*^ 
(^  MA&tf/E  Y  S.  SULLIVAN 
Acting  Chief,  Publication 
and  Presentation  Division 
RICHARD  X.  LARKIN 
Major  General,  USA 
Chief  of  Staff 
£ 
2  Enclosures 
1.  DoD  Directive  5240.1 
2.  Table  of  Contents 
DISTRIBUTION  C&G 
OPR:  GC
The Eastern Caribbean: Prospects for the Regional Security System (VU) Defense Intelligence Estimate Defense Intelligence Agency Apest 7986
The US Central Command Area of Operations: Challenges for US Security Interests Ahead (U) Defense Intelligence Estimate Defense Intelligence Agency Masch 1986
Future Soviet Threat to US Airbreathing Reconnaissance Platforms (VU) A Special Defense Intelligence Estimate Defense Intelligence Agency April 1986
Vietnam’s China Problem: The Next Five Years (UV) Special Defense Intelligence Estimate Defense Intelligence Agency May 1986
DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Special Defense Intelligence Estimate Indochina: Embers of Resistance ~ Through 1990 (U) FEBRUARY 1986 it
The  Eastern  Caribbean 
Prospects  for  the 
Regional  Security 
System  (U) 
Defense  Intelligence  Estimate 
Defense  Intelligence  Agency 
As*riM986
••      - 
The  US  Central  Command 
Area  of  Operations: 
Challenges  for  US  Security- 
Interests  Ahead  (U) 
Defense  Intelligence  Estimate 
Defense  Intelligence  Agency 
March  1986
Future  Soviet  Threat 
to  US  Airbreathing 
Reconnaissance 
Platforms  (U) 
A  Special  Defense  Intelligence  Estimate 
Defense  Intelligence  Agency 
April  1986
Vietnam's  China  Problem: 
The  Next  Five  Years  (U) 
Special  Defense  Intelligence  Estimate 
Defense  Intelligence  Agency 
May  1986
DEFENSE 
INTELLIGENCE 
AGENCY 
Special  Defense 
Intelligence  Estimate 
Indochina: 
Embers  of  Resistance 
Through  1990  (U) 
FEBRUARY  1986
a can «1986 GOQKE] Case @NLILY-22/ nae Document § _/ i Aes Lic Force anc Defense Intelligence Agency Are Taking Positive :0n To Recuce Effectiveness cf Soviet Photc-Reconnaissance Epetiner KEE: + Satellite Reconnaissance Acveace Notice Program, cesignated SLTARAN, wee recently in:tiated dy Defense Int elligence Agency, Noz fomerican Ais Deferse Tommend ene Air Force Syste: 3 Command ” . i ; { | 2 : | ' ' | i - / : | | : 1 ‘ ; a _— Soecial # Hand: ing Required Not Reiezsibole to zone 1gm Nationals oe SANITWZED Authority Nos -2al By cio’, KARS, Osta -/- 85° a Exclugec = > Spor Katoppatte gracing’ “DoD Dir. 5200.10 Does Xe: Apply DoD 25 Jan 1966 \.
(Page 1) (S) Air Force and Defense Intelliqence Agency Are Taking Positive Action To Reduce Effectiveness of Soviet Photo-Reconnaissance Satellites. (S) A Satellite Reconnaissance Advance Notice Program, designated SATRAN, was recently initiated by Defense Intelligence Agency, North American Air Defense Command and Air Force Systems Command. [Excised] [Excised] Special Handling Required Not Releasable to Foreign Nationals Excluded From Automatic Regrading: DoD Dir. 5200.10 Does Not Apply DoD 25 Jan 1966 SECRET
•N. 
ifu~  ooooti 
Docuoeat  £     / 
■J&    A:.-  Force  ^■^c^  De.fe.-:se  Lnlellige-ce  Agencv  Arc  Taking  Potitjvc 
Action  To  Reduce  Effectiveness  cf  Sov:et  ?ho:c-Reconr.ait»ance 
Sf.elhtes  . 
Af 
A  Satellite  Recor.r.cijsmce  Ac\^nce  Notice  Program,    designated 
SA7.-.AN.    v.iT~ree<ir>:l~  _-.::a:ciby  DeTense  Intelligence  Agency,   Nort£ 
America.-.  A.ir   Defer:-  e   C--rirr.cnc  and  Air   Force,  Syste:    s  Command^ 
J 
Special  K*nd2.u*£"  Required 
**Co:  Releaiable  to 
^TprtCgr.  National* 
fexducecT  r^n^Aut  orpatit 
K e  jr a dirrf ;^DoD  Dir.   5200.10 
-Doe-s"Nc:  Apply 
SANITIZED 
DoD  25  Jaa  1966     ^ 
•  •  ■     *  -
(Page  1) 
(S)  Air  Force  and  Defense  Intelligence  Agency  Are  Taking  Positive 
Action  To  Reduce  Effectiveness  of  Soviet  Photo-Reconnaissance 
Satellites. 
(S)   A  Satellite  Reconnaissance  Advance  Notice  Program,  designated 
SATRAN,  was  recently  initiated  by  Defense  Intelligence  Agency,  North 
American  Air  Defense  Command  and  Air  Force  Systems  Command.  [Excised] 
[Excised] 
Special  Handling  Required 
Not  Releasable  to 
Foreign  Nationals 
Excluded  From  Automatic 
Regrading:  DoD  Dir.  5200.10 
Does  Not  Apply  DoD  25  Jan  1966 
SECRET
REVIEW OF MEDICAL INTELLIGENCE Background The U.S. Army Medical Intelligence and Information Agency (MITA), Fort Dietrick, MA, is the sole producer of general medical intel- ligence for the DoD. MIIA responsibilities inelude assessing foreign biomedical R&D and its impact on the physiological and psychological effectiveness of military. forces; addressing the impact of foreign natural environments on military personnel; and exploiting military medical R&D successes and failures of other countries to U.S. efforts. In addition, MIIA is responsibie for acquiring and exploiting foreign medical materiel. For fiscal year 1981, MIIA is staffed with about 30 military and civilian personnel to task collection requirements and produce medical intelligence reports. Discussions with the Director, General Defense Intelligence Program Staff indicated intelligence com- munity concern about the absence of adequate medical intelligence for use in contingency planning to support Rapid Deployment Force operations, particularly in Third World countries where casuel-~- ties from unusual diseases and environmental conditions could occur. Scope ~- The review will include an evaluation of the tasking of medical intelligence collection and production. Objective —-— The review will determine the effectiveness of MIIA in tasking intelligence collection activities and in producing intelligence products. The review will also evaluate whether MITA resources are adequate and effectively used to meet MIIA mission responsibilities. Program Data GPL or Division/Line Number IC/ 2 Bert mT fee we Program Director Bob Sabatini “ ; Project Manager Al Madison epee Start Date 3/25 32