CENTER  REGULATION  66-1,  Vol  XIII 
1  October  1984 
EQUIPMENT  MAINTENANCE 
MAINTENANCE  MANAGEMENT  L  TECHNIQUE 
)
CENTER   REGULATION   56-1,  Vol    XIII 
1   October  1984 
EQUIPMENT  MAINTENANCE 
MAINTENANCE   MANAGEMENT  L   TECHNIQUE 
This   volume,   in   conjunction  with  Volume   1,   provides  guidance  on  the  maintenance  management 
policies  and  responsibilities   for  the  Laboratory  (L)   Technique,   the  Deputy  Chief  of  Maintenance 
for  the  L  Technique,  the  Depot  Central  Laboratory  (MCL),  and  the   field  laboratories.      It 
establishes  the   relationships  between  the  Chief  of  Maintenance,  the  Deputy  Chief  of 
Maintenance,  the  training  function,  and  the  CENTER'S  military  laboratory  system. 
Paragraph  Page 
General  1  2 
Terms  2  2 
Responsibilities  3  ? 
Maintenance  Documentation  4  3 
Requisitioning  of  Parts  5  4 
Spares  6  4 
Maintenance  Restoral   Priorities  7  4 
Maintenance  Capability  Evaluation  8  4 
Cannibal ization  9  5 
Corrosion  Control  10  5 
Configuration  Control   Monitor  11  5 
Attachments 
Maintenance  Capability  Evaluation  Al-1 
Equipment  Status  Reports  A2-1 
Detachment  Monthly  Maintenance  Log  A3-1 
Laboratory  Equipment  Availability  A4-1 
Plant-in-Place  Records  A5-1 
) 
No  of  Printed  Pages:  22 
OPR:  LGM 
Distribution:  X
) 
2  CENR  66-1  ,  Vol  XIII    1  October  1984 
1.  GENERAL.  The  military  laboratory  system  is  composed  of  the  Depot  Laboratory  (MCI),  the  two 
detachment  laboratories,  and  the  laboratory  equipment  at  Oet  057.   The  first  three  are 
production-oriented  operational  laboratories  and  the  latter  performs  the  training  function. 
The  MCI  also  has  a  development  function.  The  detachment  laboratories  are  geographically 
separated  from  both  their  parent  units  and  from  the  MCL.  The  mission  of  the  military 
laboratory  system  precludes  the  establishment  of  a  fully  standardized  maintenance  management 
system.  The  MCL  is  responsible  for  logistics  engineering  of  Laboratory  (L)  Technique  equipment, 
as  required,  IA'W  appropriate  Air  Force  procedures.  Much  of  the  L  Technique  equipment  can  be 
classed  3S  one-of-a-kind.  This  equipment  is  frequently  designed,  fabricated,  operated, 
maintained,  modified  and  supported  by  the  MCL.  Some  of  the  equipment  is  purchased  from  and 
maintained  by  contractor  personnel.  Detachment  laboratories  will  report  directly  to  their 
parent  units  on  laboratory  maintenance  matters  with  information  copies  of  all  correspondence  to 
Depot/DLX/DLRNL  and  HQ/LGM/TNL.  This  volume,  in  conjunction  with  Volume  I,  provides 
headquarters  guidance  and  policy  on  maintenance  management  and  general  maintenance  practices 
for  the  CENTER  military  laboratory  system. 
2.  TERMS: 
a.  Deputy  Chief  of  Maintenance,  Laboratory  Technique.  The  Chief,  Plans  and  Support 
Division,  MCL. 
b.  Laboratory  (L)  Technique.  All  Center  unique  laboratory  equipment  that  the  MCL  has  item 
management  responsibility  and  located  at  the  MCL,  the  two  detachment  laboratories,  and  Det  057. 
For  maintenance  purposes,  the  item  manager  will  determine  what  equipment  or  combination  of 
equipment  constitutes  a  laboratory  system. 
c.  L  Technique  Workcenter  Supervisor.  The  individuals  in  charge  of  maintenance  at  the 
detachment  laboratories  and  at  the  MCL. 
3.  RESPONSIBILITIES.  Authority  and  responsibility  for  the  maintenance  management  of  the 
Laboratory  Technique  are  delegated  by  the  Center  Commander  through  the  Director  of  Logistics  to 
the  Chief  of  Maintenance,  HQ/LGM,  who  has  functional  management  responsibility  over  the  MCL 
Chief.  Plans  and  Support  Division  (DLX).  The  Chief,  Plans  and  Support  Division,  designated  as 
the  Deputy  Chief  of  Maintenance, (DCM)  for  the  Laboratory  Technique,  has  direct  control  over  the 
maintenance  management  of  the  MCL  internal  laboratories  and  functional  management 
responsibility  of  the  field  laboratories  throughthe  parent  unit  Maintenance  Supervisor. 
a.  The  DCM,  Laboratory  Technique  will: 
(1)  Assign  a  Maintenance  Supervisor  for  the  MCL. 
(?)  Manage  the  L  Technique  maintenance  program  in  accordance  with  CENR  66-1,  Vol  I  and 
this  volume  to  include  the  following: 
(a)  Ensure,  through  the  review  of  MCL  reports,  ESRs,  MMLs,  quality  control 
reports,  etc.,  that  maintenance  performed  on  laboratory  equipment  is  timely  and  of  the  required 
quality. 
(b)  Monitor  the  utilitization  of  maintenance  personnel  assigned  to  field 
locations,  and  coordinate  with  the  appropriate  agencies  to  satisfy  maintenance  manning 
requirements.  The  DCM  may  direct  the  temporary  transfer  of  personnel  within  the  MCL  complex  or 
provide  temporary  assistance  to  the  field  locations  through  the  Depot  Assistance  Program  (CENR 
66-3). 
(c)  Ensure  that  sufficient  material  resources  (e.g.,  spare  parts,  components, 
tools,  test  equipment,  technical  data,  and  support  equipment)  Are   authorized  and  available  to 
support  the  maintenance  mission. 
(d)  Ensure  compliance  with  the  equipment  configuration  control  program. 
(e)  Ensure  that  a  technical  documentation  system  is  implemented  and  used  in 
accordance  with  applicable  governing  directives. 
(f)  Ensure  AFTO  Forms  22  and  Materiel  Deficiency  Reports  (MOR)  for  the  L  Technique 
are  reported  in  accordance  with  the  applicable  directives  (TO  00-5-2  for  AFTO  Forms  22  and  TO 
00-35D-54  for  MDRs).
CE'JR  66-1,  Vol  XIII    1  October  1934  3 
(3)  Provide  guidance  and  assistance  to  the  Parent  Unit.  Maintenance  Supervisors 
consistent  with  the  policies  provided  in  CEfiR  66-1,  Vol  I  and  this  volume. 
(4)  Ensure  that  all  facets  of  equipment  maintenance  are  accomplished  efficiently  and 
effectively. 
(5)  Implement  effective  safety  programs  for  all  parts  of  the  laboratory  maintenance 
complex. 
(6)  Ensure  maintenance  personnel  are  thoroughly  and  properly  trained. 
(7)  Review  all  maintenance  concepts  and  maintenance  plans  for  new  systems,  equipment 
developments,  and  procurements  to  ensure  maintenance  supportabil ity. 
b.  L  Technique  Maintenance  Supervisors  will: 
(1)  Conduct  periodic  maintenance   inspections. 
(2)  Assist   the  laboratory  workcenter  supervisors   in  performing  maintenance. 
(3)  Assist  the  OCM,  Laboratory  Technique   in  managing  the  L  Technique  maintenance 
program  to  include: 
(a)  Identify  any  problem  areas  concerning  maintenance  which  cannot  be   resolved  at 
the  Maintenance  Supervisor  level    to  the  Deputy  Chief  of  Maintenance,  L  Technique. 
(b)  Review  equipment  status   reports  (ESR)   to  insure  accuracy,  timeliness,  and 
appropriate  action   is  taken. 
(c)  Ensure  that   required  supplies  and  appropriate  authorized  spares  are  on  hand  or 
on  order  at  all    field  locations. 
(d)  Monitor  workcenters  and  inform  the  OCM  l  Technique  and  KQ/DP  of  any  manning 
problems  impacting  maintenance  capability. 
(e)  Initiate   requests   for  depot  assistance   in  accordance  with  CENR  56-3  when 
appropriate. 
(4)  Support  maintenance  capability  evaluation  (MCE). 
(5)  Comply  with  and   implement  the  policies  and  procedures   in  AFR  56-1,   CENR  66-1,  Vol    I, 
and  this  volume. 
(6)  Review  support  agreements  and  provide  assistance  to  insure  requirements  necessary  to 
support  the  maintenance  mission  are  included. 
(7)  Ensure  configuration  control  monitor  duties  are  performed. 
4.     MAINTENANCE  DOCUMENTATION.     The  MCL  and  detachment  laboratories  will  collect  and  document 
maintenance  data  to  assist   in  managing  the  maintenance  of  L  Technique  equipment.     The 
requirements,  procedures,  and  formats  for  maintenance  data  collection  are  set  forth  in  the 
attachments  to  this  volume. 
a.  The  detachment  laboratories  will   prepare  and  send  Equipment  Status  Reports  (ESR)   per 
attachment  2.     The  MCL  is  not  required  to  submit  equipment  status  reports. 
b.  Weekly  operational  capability  status  reports  will  be  sent  to  headquarters  in  accordance 
with  CENR  55-19.  The  reports  will  contain  the  current  status  of  all  laboratory  systems  for  the 
period  indicated. 
c.  The  detachment  laboratories  will   prepare  and  send  Monthly  Maintenance  Logs  (CEN  Form  35) 
per  attachment  3. 
d.  All  laboratories  will   provide  a  monthly  laboratory  equipment  availability  document, 
using  AFTO  Forms  244  and  245,  per  attachment  4. 
e.  All   laboratories  will   use  AFTO  Forms  95  as  system  historical   logs  and  provide 
plant-in-place  records  (PIPRs)  per  attachment  5.
4  CENR   66-1,  Vol   XIII  I   October  1934 
f.      MCL  will    prepare  and   send   to  MQ/LGM  a   quarterly  MCI  maintenance  data    report  which  will 
include  equipment  malfunction   information   for  MCL   systems. 
5.     REQUISITIONING   OF   PARTS.      The   following  paragraphs  establish   the   priority   levels    to  be  used 
for  ordering  parts   based  on  equipment   status.     The  determination  of  equipment   status   will 
normally  be  done  by   the  W-'-'kcenter  Supervisor   in  conjunction  with  operations  personnel.     The 
MCL  Prograw  Manager  has  the  ultimate  responsibility   for  determining  equipment  status  within  the 
MCL.     The  laboratory  chief  ha:-   this   responsibility  at   the  detachments. 
a.  Fully  Mission  Capable   (FMC).     When  equipment  is  completely  functional,  capable  of 
providing   full  mission  support,  and  able  to  process  at   least  90%  of  the   required  samples 
(including  standards  and  backgrounds),  urgency  justification  code  (UJC)   BE,  Priority  05,  will 
be  used  to  requisition  any  needed  parts. 
b.  Partially  Mission  Capable  (PMC).     When  equipment   is  not  con">letely  functional,  cannot 
provide   full  mission  support,  but  can  process  between  50%  and  90%  of  the   required  samples,  one 
of  the   following  UJCs  will   be  used  to  order  parts  using  the  general    guidelines  below: 
(1)  If  the   failure   is   seriously  impacting  production,  there   is  or  will   be  a   large  backlog 
due  to  the  failure,   high  priority  samples  are  expected  which  may  be  unacceptably  delayed  due  to 
the   failure,  and/or  the   required  parts  are  hard-to-get  items,  use  UJC  BE   (Priority  05). 
(2)  If  none  of  the  factors  in  5b(l)  apply,  use  UJC  BE  (Priority  05). 
(3)  If  parts  are  originally  ordered  BE  and  the  situation  degrades,  raise  the  priority  to 
AE. 
c.  Not  Mission  Capable  (NMC).  When  the  equipment  is  nearly  or  completely  inoperable, 
provides  little  or  no  sample  data,  and  can  process  less  than  50%  of  the  required  samples,  UJC 
AE  (Priority  02)  will  be  used  to  requisition  parts  needed  to  repair  the  equipment. 
6.  SPARES.  The  laboratories  will  maintain  benchstock  and  forward  supply  point  (FSP)  assets  in 
accordance  with  applicable  regulations.  Requests  for  additions  or  deletions  to  FSP  benchstock 
will  be  coordinated  with  the  L  Technique  item  manager  (Depot/OLXR). 
7.  MAINTENANCE  REST0RAL  PRIORITIES: 
a.  Immediate  maintenance  is  required  for  Priority  1  restoral.  Maintenance  will  continue 
until  the  Priority  1  condition  no  longer  exists  or  parts  required  for  repair  have  been  ordered. 
Since  no  two  samples  follow  the  exact  same  path  for  processing,  the  Program  Managers  at  the  MCL 
or  the  Detachment  Commander  at  the  detachment  laboratories  will  determine  Priority  1  conditions 
through  inputs  received  from  their  personnel.  Safety  of  personnel  and  the  guidelines 
prescribed  by  AFR  66-1  must  be  considered  when  directing  any  maintenance.  The  following  is 
provided  as  a  guide: 
(1)  Priority  1.  Any  equipment  failures  that  result  in  loss  or  could  result  in  the  loss 
of  a  sample.  All  equipment  failures  that  prevent  sample  processing  during  Nuclear  Debris 
Collection  and  Analysis  (NDC&A)  alerts  and  special  event  conditions.  Any  failures  that  prevent 
the  deployment  kits  from  performing  their  mission,  under  anticipated  deployment  conditions. 
(2)  Priority  2.  All  equipment  failures  which  prevent  sample  processing  for  the  Reactor 
Products  (RP),  PONY  EXPRESS  (PE),  or  Nuclear  Products  (NP)  programs. 
(3)  Priority  3.  All  equipment  failures  affecting  backgrounds,  standards  or  PMRs  required 
for  equipment  integrity. 
(4)  Priority  4.  Minor  maintenance  that  does  not  affect  equipment  operation. 
b.  Equipment  problems  encountered  which  are  beyond  the  detachment's  capability  to  repair 
will  be  referred  by  message  to  the  parent  unit  with  informational  copies  to  Depot/DLX/DLRNL  and 
HQ/TNL/LGM. 
8.  MAINTENANCE  CAPABILITY  EVALUATION  (MCE).  An  MCE  of  L  Technique  equipment  will  normally  be 
performed  in  accordance  with  CENR  66-1,  Vol  I  and  attachment  1  of  this  volume  when  the 
equipment  has  been  greatly  modified,  relocated  from  another  laboratory  or  installed  as  new 
equipment.  For  detachment  laboratories,  the  parent  unit  is  responsible  for  conducting  the  MCE, 
but  may  delegate  the  task  to  the  detachment  or  to  depot  personnel.  Open  exceptions/action 
items  will  have  the  current  status  reported  to  the  Depot/OLX  and  the  parent  unit  every  30  days 
until  cleared.
CENR  56-1,  Vol  XIII    1  October  1984  s 
9  CANNIBA!  IZ4TI0N.  Canni ba  1  i za t ion  within  the  I  Technique  will  be  done  per  CENR  56-1,  Vol 
I ',  Dara  1-1?,  except  that  cannibal  i  zation  between  workcenters  will  he  approved  by  the  DCM,  L 
Tecnni  que. 
in   CORROSION  CONTROL.  A  corrosion  control  program  for  all  L  Technique  equipment  will  be 
implemented  I  AW  CENR  66-1,  Vol  I.  Corrosion  control  will  also  be  applied  to  non-CEM  equipment 
withinthe  laboratory  (e.g.,  chemistry  fume  hoods,  chemistry  balances,  microscopes,  etc.). 
11.  CONFIGURATION  CONTROL  MONITOR.  The  maintenance  technician  at  the  field  laboratories  and 
those'designated  at  depot  will  perform  the  duties  of  configuration  control  monitor. 
OFFICIAL
CENR  66-1,  Vol  XIII 
L  TECHNIQUE  FUNCTIONAL  CONTROL  CHART 
1  October  1984 
I 
MAINTENANCE 
SUPERVISOR 
HQ/LGM 
OEPOT/DLX 
DCM  L  TECHNIQUE 
OET  450 
WORKCENTER 
SUPERVISOR 
DEPOT/OLXS 
MAINTENANCE 
SUPERVISOR 
WORKCENTER 
SUPERVISOR 
ELECTRONIC 
MAINTENANCE 
SUPERVISOR 
SQ/'-GM 
WORKCENTER 
SUPERVISOR 
GAS 
DET  4Q7 
WORKCENTER 
SUPERVISOR 
-Functional  Management  Responsibility 
Direct  Control 
Figure  1.
) 
CENR  66-1,  Vol  XIII     Attachment  1    1  October  1984  Al-1 
MAINTENANCE  CAPABILITY  EVALUATION  (MCE) 
1.  Does  equipment  meet  visual  standards?   (T.O.  00-25-234) 
2.  Is  equipment  physically  configured  and  wired  IAW  the  applicable  TIs? 
3.  Do  maintenance  diagnostic  routines  function  as  intended? 
4.  Is  the  equipment  operating  so  that  no  adjustment  is  at  its  extreme? 
5.  If  any  special  tools  are  required,  are  they  on  hand? 
6.  Is  the  required  and  authorized  PME  on  site? 
7.  Are  all  required  TOs  and  TIs  on  hand,  current,  and  complete?  (TO/TI  0-1-01) 
8.  Has  a  training  program  been  established  to  familiarize  maintenance  personnel  with  the  new 
ecuipment?  (CENR  50-23) 
9.  Have  the  AF  Forms  797  been  updated  as  required  to  reflect  changes  in  the  equipment?  (AFR 
50-23) 
10.  Are  all  authorized  forward  supply  point  spares  and  bench  stock  items  on  hand?  Has  a  list. 
of  FSP  spares  been  forwarded  to  0LX  for  inclusion  in  the  work  unit  code  manual?  (T.I.  211-1-06) 
11.  Has  the  AFTO  Form  95  been  updated/initiated  for  the  system?  (CENR  66-1,  Vol  XIII) 
12.  Have  the  Plant-in-Place  records  been  updated?  (CENR  65-1,  Vol  XIII) 
13.  Can  the  host  base  PMEL  support  all  PME  requirements?  If  not,  have  appropriate  channels 
been  established  for  the  necessary  support? 
14.  Is  the  maintenance  section  fully  manned  with  the  proper  grades  and  skill  levels? 
15.  Are  local  transportation  facilities  adequate  for  efficient  detachment  maintenance 
requirements? 
15.  Is  adequate  power  available? 
17.  Is  all  required  support  equipment  available? 
18.  Are  detachment  maintenance  personnel  adequately  trained  to  properly  maintain  the 
equipment? 
19.  Is  adequate  emergency  power  available? 
20.  Are  resupply  and  repairable  shipping  channels  established? 
21.  Are  space  and  environmental  factors  adequate  for  efficient  maintenance  requirements? 
22.  Have  proper  actions  been  taken  to  prevent  corrosion?  (T.O.  1-1-689) 
23.  Have  proper  actions  been  taken  for  the  disposition  of  excess  (removed)  equipment?  (CENR 
66-3,  para  3e{5)) 
24.  Have  bench  stock  and  FSP  items  no  longer  required  been  removed  and  disposition 
instructions  provided?  (CENR  66-3,  para  3e(5)) 
25.  Have  the  AFTO  Forms,  244  &  245  been  initiated  for  the  system?  (CENR  66-1,  Vol  XIII) 
26.  Are  maintenance  technicians  aware  of  the  hazards  associated  with  the  samples 
processed/separated  on  the  equipment? 
27.  Is  the  appropriate  safety  equipment  on  hand  and  in  a  good  state  of  repair?  (AF0SH  127-66) 
28.  Is  the  equipment  properly  grounded  to  earth  ground? 
29.  Are  maintenance  personnel  trained  on  all  special  purpose  equipment  required  to  maintain 
the  system?
Al-2  CENR  66-1,  Vol  XII!    Attachment  1    1  October  \Wi 
30.  Has  the  equipment  seen  appropriately  tagged  with  an  identification  plate  to  show  the  stock 
number  and  serial  number? 
31.  Has  the  PMR  monitor  been  notified  of  the  equipment  changes  and  any  new  PMR  requirements?
CENR  66-1,  Vol  XIII    Attachment  1    1  October  1984  Al-3 
"EXAMPLE** 
L  TECHNIQUE  MAINTENANCE  CAPA3ILITY  EVALUATION  CERTIFICATE 
FROM:  (Enter  location,  office  symbol,  etc.) 
SUBJECT:  Maintenance  Capability  Evaluation  (MCE),  (enter  system  nomenclature) 
TO:  Depot/DLX 
1.  From  (ZULU  DTG)  to  (ZULU  DTG)  the  L  Technique  (enter  equipment  nomenclature) 
and  all  facets  of  maintenance  operations  were  given  a  maintenance  evaluation  in 
accordance  with  the  MCE  checklist  in  CENR  66-1,  Volume  XIII,  Attachment  1. 
2.  The  purpose  of  the  evaluation  was  to  identify  areas  that  may  limit  or 
detract  from  the  maintenance  function's  ability  to  maintain  the  following 
equipment: 
(a.  Work  Unit  Code.) 
(b.  Nomenclature.) 
(c.  Stock  Number/Part  Number.) 
(d.  Serial  Number.) 
The  system  has  been  (state  reasons  for  evaluation,  i.e.,  modification,  retrofit, 
initial  installation  etc.)  to  incorporate  modern  technology  and  simplify 
logistics  support. 
3.  Exceptions  to  the  criteria  stated  in  the  checklist  are:  (detailed  list  of 
exceptions,  including  item  number  from  the  checklist  not  satisified). 
4.  Operations  commenced  at  (ZULU  OTG)  with  completion  of  MCE  or  interim  opera- 
tion commenced  at  (ZULU  DTG)  but  MCE  completion  delayed  until  compliance  with 
item(s)  listed  in  paragraph  3  above  from  MCE  checksheet. 
(SIGNATURE  ELEMENT)  1  Atch 
MCE  Checklist  and  Answers 
cc:  Parent  Unit 
HQ/TN/LGM 
"EXAMPLE** 
Figure  Al-1
CENR  66-1,  Vol  XIII    Attachment  2    1  October  1984  A2-1 
Equipment  Status  Reports  (ESR) 
1.  Initial  Report.  (For  NMC  use  minimize  Code  Y;  PMC  and  FMC  use  Code  N).  Reports  will  be 
initiated  whenever  a  system  outage  exceeds  6  hours  for  a  PMC  or  NMC  condition.  Submission  of 
the  report  will  not  be  delayed  longer  than  24  hours  after  initiation.  If  parts  are  required, 
the  ESR  and  the  parts  request  will  be  submitted  immediately.  Initial  reports  for  an  NMC 
equipment  status  will  be  sent  priority  precedence  during  alert  conditions  and  routine 
precedence  during  nonalert  condition  (see  figure  A2-1). 
a.  Reports  will  be  transmitted  using  appropriate  precedence  to  the  parent  unit  with 
information  to  Depot/DLX/DLRNL  and  HQ/TNL/LGM. 
b.  All  times  will  be  in  ZULU  date  time  groups  (e.g.,  15/2040Z  Jan  83). 
c.  All  sections  of  the  report  will  be  completed  even  if  negative. 
d.  The  subject  line  will  be  in  the  following  format: 
SUBJECT:  L  Equipment  Status  Report  (give  JCN  number) 
e.  The  JCN  will  consist  of  the  si te/woric center  designator  followed  by  the  four-digit  Julian 
date  (the  first  digit  will  indicate  the  current  year  and  the  last  three  will  indicate  the 
Julian  day),  and  an  alpha  character  to  indicate  multiple  failures  on  the  same  day  (A  indicates 
the  first,  ft  the  second,  C  the  third,  etc.).  For  example:  JCN  4603138A  would  indicate  the 
first  equipment  malfunction  on  18  May  1983  at  Det  460. 
f.  The  remainder  of  the  initial  ESR  message  will  be  in  the  format  shown  below: 
A.  System  or  systems  affected  -  Status  of  system  or  systems  during  period  of  report  and 
ZULU  date  time  group  of  malfunction.  If  equipment  status  changes  during  the  period  of  the 
report,  the  time  of  the  status  change  will  be  reflected.  Example:  Elution  system  -  NMC 
08/1210Z  May  83,  PMC  -  09/1545Z  May  83. 
8.  TIC  (ZULU  date  time  group  of  the  time  in  commission)  or  ETIC  (day  and  month  of 
estimated  time  in  commission).  NOTE:  If  a  TIC  is  not  reported,  an  ETIC  will  be  reported  using 
your  best  local  information  to  determine  the  date. 
C.  Specific  item  or  items  of  equipment  that  failed  including  the  work  unit  code  and  a 
complete  description  of  the  malfunction  with  accompanying  symptoms  and  circumstances 
surrounding  the  failure. 
D.  Concise  description  of  all  corrective  action  taken  and/or  planned.  If  a  TIC  was 
reported  in  B,  include  the  actual  maintenance  time  broken  down  into  troubleshooting  and  repair 
time.  The  values  obtained  for  troubleshooting  and  repair  times  must  depict  the  product  of 
hours  times  the  number  of  persons  participating. 
E.  Whenever  parts  are  ordered  to  repair  or  replace  equipment  identified  in  C,  the 
nomenclature,  stock  number  or  part  number,  UJC,  and  document  number  will  be  listed.  Include 
the  supply  source  if  other  than  FB4300. 
F.  Whenever  an  item  or  items  are  returned  to  depot  for  repair  as  a  result  of  the 
reported  malfunction,  list  the  WUC,  serial  number,  and  document  number  of  each  item.  If  a 
serial  number  cannot  be  reported,  the  AFTO  Form  350  tag  number  will  be  reported  in  place  of  the 
serial  number. 
G.  Remarks  -  Include  any  assistance  required.  Requests  for  assistance  should  contain  a 
complete  set  of  circumstances  prior  to  and  during  the  malfunction. 
2.  Follow-up  Reports.  Reports  will  be  transmitted  routine  precedence  to  the  same  addressees 
as  the  initial  report  (see  figure  A2-2). 
a.  The  follow-up  report  will  use  the  same  format  and  JCN  as  the  initial  report.  The 
subject  line  will  read: 
SUBJECT:  L  Follow-up  Report  to  ESR  (give  JCN  number) 
b.  If  the  information  reported  in  the  initial  ESR  or  last  follow-up  report  has  not  changed, 
enter  NO  CHANGE  for  that  paragraph.
A?-2  CENR  ftfi-l ,  Vol  XIII    Attachment  ?    l  October  1934 
c.  Follow-up  reports  will  be  sent: 
(1)  I'pon  any  major  change  in  maintenance  posture  (progress/deterioraLion)  such  as 
ordering  parts,  failure  of  additional  items  of  equipment,  PME  problems,  suostantial  progress  in 
repair  efforts,  problem  traced  to  a  previously  unsuspected  area,  etc.. 
(?)  When  ETIC  cannot  be  met,  a  message  will  be  transmitted,  on  or  before  the  expiration 
of  the  old  ETIC,  explaining  the  delay  and  updating  the  ETIC. 
(3)  When  the  follow-up  report  is  to  be  the  final  report  (see  figure  A2-3)  for  that  ESR, 
the  format  and  JCN  of  the  initial  ESR  will  be  used  except  that  the  subject  line  will  read: 
SUBJECT:  i.  Final  Report  to  ESR  (give  JCN  number) 
(4)  Item  0  of  final  report  will  explain  the  action  taken  to  correct  the  problem  and  the 
troubleshooting  and  repair  time.  Any  malfunction  that  has  had  an  ESR  initiated  must  have  a 
final  report  unless  all  corrective  actions  were  completed  and  reported  in  the  initial  report.
) 
CENR  66-1,  Vol  XIII    Attachment  2         1  October  1984  A2-3 
SUBJECT:  i.  Equipment  Status  Report  4073128A 
A  -  Elution  System  -  NMC  -  08/1210Z  May  83 
B  -  ETIC  -  09  May  83 
C  -  Vacuum  leak   (60500)   severe,   found  during  PMR.     Could  result   in  loss  of 
sample. 
0  -   System  being  checked  at  all  joints   for  vacuum  leaks.     All   electric  relay 
valves  check  good.     Meter  movement  checks  good. 
E  -  None.     Exact  cause  unknown 
F  -  Negative 
G  -  Remarks  -  Troubleshooting  still  in  progress.  System  downtime  is  affecting 
interlaboratory  calibrations.  No  mission  samples  are  affected  at  this  time. 
FIGURE  A2-1  -  L  Equipment  Status  Report  (Example)
A2-4  CENR  66-1,  Vol  XIII    Attachment  ?    1  October  1984 
SUBJECT:  L  Follow-up  Report  to  ESR  4073128A 
A  -  No  change 
B  -  ETIC  -  10  May  83.  Based  on  technician  finishing  PMRs  for  systems 
necessary  to  process  mission  samples. 
C  -  Vacuum  leak  (60500)  no  change. 
0  -  No  change 
E  -  None.  Exact  cause  unknown. 
F  -  negative 
G  -  Remarks  -  None. 
FIGURE  A2-2  -  L  Follow-up  Equipment  Status  Report  (Example)
) 
CENR  66-1,  Vol  XIII         Attachment  2         1  October  1984  A2-5 
SUBJECT:     L  Final   Report  to  ESR  4073128A 
A  -  No  change 
B  -  TIC  -  10/0900Z  Hay  83 
C  -  Vacuum  Pump  (60516)  had  two  bad  connections. 
D  -  Hose  connections  were  tightened  and  this  helped  some  but  did  not  correct 
the  problem.  The  vacuum  pump  was  removed  and  replaced. 
E  -  Vacuum  pump,  P/N-75,  UJC-BE,  X165LL31300001. 
F  -  WUC-60516,  112115  (350  Tag),  X165LL31300001. 
G  -  Remarks  -  Spare  vacuum  pump  no  longer  on  location.  Mission  impact  none. 
FIGURE  A2-3  -  I  Final  Equipment  Status  Report  (Example)
CENR  fiS-1,  Vol  XIII    Attachment  3    1  October  1984  A3-! 
Detachment  Monthly  Maintenance  Log 
The  detachment  laboratories  will  submit  a  monthly  maintenance  log  (MML)  detailing  all 
maintenance  actions  performed  during  the  month,  on  I  Technique  equipment,  which  did  not  meet 
ESR  reporting  criteria  (i.e.  short  duration  maintenance).  PMRs  will  not  normally  be  included 
in  the  MML  since  they  are  documented  on  the  AFTO  Forms  244/245  (see  attachment  4).  PMRs  which 
take  an  unusual  amount  of  time  or  which  uncover  problems  not  associated  with  the  PMR  will  be 
documented  on  the  MML.  The  MML  will  be  sent  to  the  parent  unit,  Depot/DLX,  and  HQ/TNl/LGM  by 
the  fifth  working  day  of  the  month  following  the  reporting  month.  CEN  Form  35  will  be  used  for 
the  MML.  Blocks  A  through  F  will  contain  information  as  appropriate  to  the  particular 
maintenance  action,  (see  figure  A3-1) 
)
A3-2 
CENR  66-1,  Vol   XIII         Attachment  3        1  October  1984 
MONTHLY  MAINTENANCE  LOG 
POfl    tme  month  OF; 
^TQV 
LOCATION: 
Det  407 
2  Dec  83 
SECTION  I  -  EQUIPMENT  FAILURE  REPORT 
3310A 
3320C 
B 
Actual 
Maintananca 
Timm   
C.3  hrs 
0.8  hrs 
3328A 
0.1   hr 
Trouola- 
sftoottng 
Tim* 
0.1  hr 
1.0  hrs 
Tim* 
Awaiting 
Parti 
1.6  hrs 
E Total 
Tim*  of 
Malfunction 
0. 
3.7  hrs 
3.5  hrs 
DESCRIPTION  (WUC.  Falltu*.  R.Mir,  ana  OOC  No.) 
(WUC)  Burned  out  liquid  nitrogen  pump 
heater.   Removed  and  replaced  the  heater 
with  parts  from  bench  stock. 
(WUC)  INOP  vacuum  punp  on  right  side  of 
elution  system.   Replaced  the  pump.   Delay 
due  to  higher  priority  maintenance.   AFTO 
Forn  350  Number  106543.   Doc  Number 
S165LL33200026 
(WUC)  Spring  on  digital  dec-writer,  LA-120 
carriage  return  loose.   Replaced  spring. 
SECTION  II  -  SIGNIFICANT  PROBLEM  REPORT    (llm«.  >p«c.  i»  n«d.d.  u,.  r.».,...; 
Only  one  aaintenance  technician  will  be  available  from  5-7  Dec  due  to  PME  training 
CEN  porm  35 
May  81 
FIGURE  A3-1.
CENR  66-1,  Vol  XIII    Attachment  4    1  October  1984  A4-1 
LABORATORY  EQUIPMENT  AVAILABILITY 
This  appendix  establishes  a  program  for  tracking  system  availability  for  all  operational 
systems  installed  at  the  Depot  Central  Laboratory  (MCL)  and  the  two  detachment  laboratories. 
The  provisions  of  this  attachment  are  directive  upon  the  MCL  and  the  two  detachment 
laboratories.  This  instruction  implements  tne  provisions  of  T.O.  00-20-7  Inspection  Systems, 
Documentation  and  Status  Reporting  for  Support  and  Training  Equipment. 
1.  General.  The  purpose  of  this  program  is  to  periodically  document  the  availability  of 
laboratory  operational  systems  to  determine  whether  the  monitored  equipment  is  meeting  the 
expected  availability  levels  as  determined  by  the  using  sections.  This  provides  a  management 
tool  for  identifying  problems  that  are  reducing  system  availability. 
2.  Definitions: 
a.  System.  The  sum  total  of  equipment,  documentation,  and  control  software  required  to 
perform  a  desired  function  or  produce  a  desired  result/output  and  those  equivalent  resources 
necessary  for  its  operation,  maintenance,  and  logistics  support  throughout  its  lifecycle. 
b.  Equipment  Availability.  The  total  hours  per  unit  time  interval  that  the 
equipment/system  is  operational  and  capable  of  performing  mission  work. 
c.  Equipment  Downtime.  The  total  hours  per  unit  time  interval  that  the  equipment/system 
cannot  perform  mission  essential  processing  of  samples  whether  it  be  due  to  facilities 
problems;  Preventive  Maintenance  Routines  (which  render  the  equipment  unusable);  equipment 
failures;  lack  of  processing  supplies  (flowgas,  LN,  etc.);  or  known  and  expected  operations 
which  must  be  performed  to  ensure  proper  equipment  operation  (i.e.  standards,  backgrounds, 
calibrations,  etc.),  but  which  prevent  the  equipment  from  processing  mission  samples  during 
that  time  frame. 
d.  Formula  for  Equipment  Availability  - 
Number  of  hours  outage 
Total  number  of  hours  during  the  month 
(Based  on  24  hours  per  day  times  the  days  in  the  month) 
Avail  Rate  =  100  x 
1- 
Example:  hours  outage  =  30  hours 
30  days  X  24  hours  =  720  hours 
Avail  Rate  =  100  x 
720 
720 
.0416666  =   4.2%  outage 
30.00 
100%  Availability 
-4.2%  Outage 
95.8%  Equipment  Availability. 
**N0TE** 
Do  not  confuse  equipment  availability  with  operational  use  or  sample  processing  time.  If  the 
system  has  multiple  channels  use  the  fraction  of  that  multiple  times  the  hours  of  outage  -• 
example:  WRB  has  seven  channels  and  one  channel  is  bad.  Use  1/7  of  the  hours  of  outage  and 
2/7  if  two  channels  are  bad  etc.. 
)
A4-2  CENR  66-1,  Vol  XIII    Attachment  4    1  October  1934 
3.  Scope.  This  appendix  is  applicable  to  all  operational  laboratory  systems  installed  and  to 
development  systems  with  interim  waivers  for  operational  use.  Specifically  excluded  from  this 
reporting  system  is  all  equipment  assigned  to  or  reported  on  by  the  Data  Automation  section, 
equipment  assigned  to  the  laboratory  training  division,  items  of  test  equipment,  precision 
measurement  equipment,  and  development  systems  not  being  used  for  operational  or  mission 
support. 
4.  Responsibilities: 
a.  The  Laboratory  Item  Manager  will  determine  what  constitutes  a  system. 
b.  The  MCL  laboratory  chiefs  and  the  detachment  laboratory  commanders  will: 
(1)  Implement  this  program. 
(2)  Maintain  AFTO  Forms  244  and  245,  System/Equipment  Status  Record,  for  each  system 
and  place  them  conspicuously  on  or  near  each  system  in  their  section  (see  figure  A4-1  and 
A4-2). 
(3)  Send  an  availability  report,  by  the  sixth  working  day  of  each  month,  to  Depot/OLX 
and  the  parent  unit  (see  figure  A4-3).  An  additional  copy  will  be  sent  to  HQ/IGM/TNL. 
(4)  Insure  the  AFTO  Forms  244/24S  are  reviewed  every  90  days. 
c.  System  operators  will: 
(1)  Check  the  current  status  of  the  system  by  reviewing  the  records  prior  to  use  of 
the  equipment  (see  figure  A4-1  and  A4-2). 
(2)  Make  appropriate  entries  in  the  AFTO  Forms  244/245  as  specified  in  the  Procedures 
Section  of  this  appendix  (see  figure  A4-1  and  A4-2). 
(3)  Insure  any  PMR  required  as  a  result  of  a  maintenance  action  will  be  recorded  as  an 
operational  check  for  the  time  the  system  is  down  (see  figures  A4-1  and  A4-2). 
(4)  Insure  that  operational  checks  are  performed  as  soon  as  possible  upon  completion 
of  all  maintenance.  A  separate  entry  will  be  made  for  the  operational  check.  The  dash  symbol 
will  be  used  for  this  entry  (see  figures  A4-1  and  A4-2). 
d.  Maintenance  tecnnicians  will: 
(1)  Make  appropriate  entries   in  the   forms  as  specified   in  the  Procedures  Section  of 
this  appendix   (see  figures  A4-1   and  A4-2). 
(2)  Reopen  any  job  using  the  same  job  control   number  if  the  operational   check   fails. 
5.     Procedures  -  AFTO  Forms  244  and  245: 
a.  Section  I: 
Block  i  =  Enter  correct  system  nomenclature 
BIock  2  =  Enter  serial  number  of  unit 
Block  3  =  Leave  blank 
Block  4  =  Leave  blank 
Block  5  =  Enter  work  unit  code 
Block  6  =  Enter  office  symbol 
Block  7  =  Enter  date  form  is  started.  When  the  form  is 
completely  filled,  enter  the  date  after  "TO". 
Block  8  =  Enter  phone  number  of  equipment  location. 
b.  Section  II  -  Not  required;  local  use  optional. 
c.  Section  III  -  Not  required;  local  use  optional. 
d.  Section  IV  -  Every  90  days  the  supervisor  of  the  office  symbol  owning  the  equipment 
shall  review  the  forms  and  document  this  review  by  placing  the  last  nartK   in  the  "EMPLOY  NO." 
block  and  the  date  of  the  review  in  the  ''DATE"  block.
CENR  66-1,  Vol  Xi ! I    Attachment  4    1  October  1984  A4-3 
e.   Section  V: 
Block  9  -  Enter  system  nomenclature 
Block  10  -  Enter  serial  number 
Block  11  -  Enter  work  unit  code 
Block  12  -  Enter  office  symbol 
Date  discovered  -  enter  the  date  and  time. 
Discovered  by  -  enter  first  initial  and  last  name. 
Symbol  -  Enter  in  red,  enter  a  dash(-)  for  an  unknown  condition  or 
overdue  PMRs;  enter  a  diagonal  (/)  for  PMRs  performed  on  time 
or  for  partially  broken  systems  (i.e.  one  channel  out  or  1/2 
of  equipment  is  unusable,  but  equipment  can  still  perform 
operational  or  mission  support);  enter  a  cross  (X)  for  severe 
conditions  (i.e.  circuit  breakers  popping,  equipment  totally 
down, possible  loss  or  loss  of  sample  could  occur. 
Discrepancy  -  Enter  the  problem  with  the  equipment. 
Job  Control  Number  -  will  be  filled  in  by  maintenance  for  repairs  and 
by  the  user  for  user  Preventive  Maintenance  Routines  (PMRs). 
Corrective  Action  -  filled  in  by  user  for  PMRs  and  by  maintenance  per- 
sonnel for  repairs  (i.e.  repaired  broken  wire  to  main 
switch). 
Date  Corrected  -  enter  date  and  time  completed. 
Corrected  by  -  enter  first  initial  and  last  name. 
Inspected  by  -  the  operator  enters  his  cr  her  first  initial  and  last 
name  after  an  operational  check  is  performed  successfully  and 
initials  his  or  her  last  name  initial  over  the  symbol. 
**N0TE** 
Only  fully  qualified  personnel  may  sign  off  symbols.  This  means  they  must  be  certified  on  the 
task  in  AF  Form  623  before  they  can  sign  off  symbols. 
)
i*.{*i  .'lOW 
'N,  I       INTEBVAl       !       Dt-li  CUE      .     S-1i   CO«» 
:N'i-        --       --: 
OtJ:    Dul  0*H   CO«,'l 
--■  -       -i- 
~t   
^ 
1   -^ 
T   
i 
■»-     -  —   - — 
t 
s««*v«ettr  juvjew 
DATE 
EmPIO?   NO    ! 
**     tOfiosBSi 
DATS 
tw-PlOT  NO. 
DATE 
SYSTEM/EQUIPMENT  STATUS  (
STEM  IDENTIFICATION 
(A/RE  DettEOTC    S/5*/ 
i  3    »r  ui 
U.    IlllO  NO 
a   »c«i»*«i*'*o*nsc 
oo<
1 1     CR5N  »£  *$SiSMtO 
7.    PERIOD  COVE* 
II. 
T.«l   | 
* 
SERVICE  INSPECTION 
INSP 
INST 
««« 1ST ««|K? 
TIME 
INSf 
INIT 
I....**"-- 
DATE 
DATE 
DAT? 
|        1 
J 
1              1 
1        1 
I 
1       1 
II 
' 
1       1 
• 
1    r~ 
1    1 
;         I 
! 
i     ! 
1   1 
1            1 
1   1 
AFTO  "•"   244 
»«l«IOUf   IOITIOH  *Hl   •■    UtIO,
o 
CL  ■ 
m 
111 
INSPECTION 
tMfs.'iC'M 
!  I 
INTE8VAI       |       0*TI  Cut      .    0*U    CO**?;  i       0*35    Bui  D*U   CO*.*J 
-  -4 
.  I   
}-■ 
-t   
T 
"7 
— r 
IV. 
SUH8VWGM  *IVJSW 
EmPIOY  NO. 
PATE  j 
EmPIOV  NO 
f0Af&83 
pais 
EW.PIO*   NO. 
DATE 
SYSTEM/l EQUIPMENT i   STATUS  RECORD 
1                                                                           ITEM   IDENTIFICATION 
1      CCUIPMIM   TW  U3DC1                                                  2. «C»H»«»n9»nStRm  NO 
O09 
3    <r  «o                             !  4. DUO  NO                                          5 
WORK  0* 
£1* 
[  
&     COS!!  »C  *$SlEStO 
7.    PERIOD  COVER                                     1 
3t>6>54 
ii. 
'"**?]  »Vme  lINS 
INST       I,Mi    |  
!NI 
SERVICE  INSPECTION 
TIME   I 
T 
TIME    |,NSr 
,,Mt    
|  
INIT 
TIMI 
insp 
INIT 
TIME 
,H$M    TIME 
INIT  1    "mt 
INS* 
INIT 
J          DATE           !         DATE 
DATE 
OATS 
DATE 
DATE 
r     i 
i  i 
,  
rn 
— >  r^ 
■■■  *  ■   i' 
| 
i       1 
..  i  1    i 
!             I 
* 
I           '               1 
I 
1      '             1 
i 
r+~i 
1    .        . 
j 
i 
AFTO  ,;•■»  244 
MtnlCUS  IDITiOa  will  •!   u»to. 
I 
o 
m 
» 
on 
i 
<; 
o 
0> 
r> 
O 
n 
r* 
a 
V0
^ 
"5 
n 
> 
i 
n 
o 
rt 
H- 
C 
C 
o. 
o 
V. 
MAINTENANCE  OEUYED  DISCREPANCY 
-W«R  D6JTFCTDJC  .SKS  -**/       j       009                                                 1-    SIZ0  0 
\2>LX» 
. ..,  | 
«                       1 
»  /cut  ;  •  • 
.-»K«f  .-»ir  o. 
'vs' i ;  •• .1  if 
,o  >9t/j  £3  j tf.  *4/*4l>    i 
/ 
UJiUL.  hJO-r    C0OAJ*~    OaJ    Ch**/*/£<- 
222  iosi 
116*10**  aajo  AetiAce 
2>,L»op 
0#0<? 
I 
TtM&X    SCAL€A 
K.0J+4P 
/0/rtfj  83 
K-  &/A&&    \ 
&PS    C/rtScr    J>u£    ro   /A/Cct/P& 
ZZZI0&  j 
ctttHjKtet.    i   o*s 
J6Av}  8* 
//SO 
K>0J**lt> 
$TT**JOA*U>    f*ACTZJL. 
1 CWeets    &dop 
K.UjAflO X 
pfAsr^n   cmcuiT-  &ps**tc&*.  /*J 
2l2.iOS~8\ 
fiAC/Ltry  u> tKi*/&-  /O 
pAi^TSC    i7    1C&&&X    TXt**f4/G~ 
pa  vet.   /7  frt*rGD 
\     \ 
'''■". 
Ave   WM.r->*J6. 
i 
Ctxevir*  &t&AE&tL 
I 
I 
I 
i 
0.<5-  A/»n/e/&Q 
c.e.  AftiAcep 
\ 
bim.t'JG-    TtD-ty 
11  A*g» K-w^i© 
€)#S    C&6CK    7»    lUO-UCe   8*C*G-X6W£> 2ZZt&S$ 
60S  CtfGCK  G**0  «aJ 
iZAvj  $3 
izto 
K>  WA*P 
ft*Jt>  Sr***tpA*r&    ^Atrtrrz. 
Aiu.  14  CHA*J*J£t.S 
r  
■"    '                                   
> 
i
c: 
i 
rj 
SYSTEM  EQUIPMENT  STATUS  RECORD 
iCCNlwtfaNCI  S«i(Ti 
V.                                                                                                                 MAINTENANCE  OELAVEO  DISCREPANCY 
*U/KS  VtrzcTT*   Srs  xt  1       i       GO  9                                              |-  SI26Q                                                         \>*1>lGA/ 
.  »    i  ■    t  •  i       f  • 
'■'  \                                 .  .i   . »                                !*-""!              *■*■*.•    i  *v  •  »•*. 
ti»'» 
(Ou«i(  no  m> 
...       ,.       ..". 
i  ci.  at  v  '  1  ' 
•••irit  HP  pv 
— _ 
11                                                                          } 
! 
i 
, 
i 
i 
i 
■ 
' 
i 
I 
n 
PI 
w 
<^ 
I 
< 
o 
f\w     I  W    l£*«t    *  * 
245 
> 
rt 
n 
ta 
n 
sr 
a 
m 
S 
rt 
O 
O 
O 
cr 
CO
CENR  66-1,  Vol   XIII         Attachment  4         1   October  1984 
REPORTING   FORMAT 
A4-7 
FROM:   (Enter  Office  Symbol) 
SUBJ:  System  Availability  For  The  Month  of  (Enter  month) 
TO:  Depot/DLX 
INFO:  Parent  Unit 
Total  hours  for  this  month  (number  of  days  in  the  month  x  24  hours) 
HOURS  OF  EQUIPMENT  NONAVAILABILITY 
FAC   MTN   OPC   PMRs   SUP   OTH   TOTAL   AVAILABILITY 
Nomenclature 
of  System 
WRB  Counting 
System  #1 
0.0       22.1     16.9     17.0       0.0       0.0       56.0         92.5? 
LEGEND 
MTN  =   Maintenance 
PMR   =  Preventive  Maintenance  Routine 
OPC   =  Operational   Checks  (including  machine  backgrounds,   standard  factors, 
calibrations,   absorber  checks,   plateaus,  etc.) 
FAC  =■  Facilities  (power  outages,   loss  of  air  conditioning,  etc.) 
SUP  =  Supplies   (operational   supplies  such  as  LN,  flowgas,  tracers,   counting 
tubes,  etc.) 
OTH  =   Items  which  don't  fit  into  other  categories  (e.g.,  production  systems 
which  are  in  temporary  modification/upgrade  status,  systems  which  are 
inoperative  due  to   lack   of  qualified  operators,   etc.) 
FIGURE   A4-3
CENR  66-1,  Vol  XIII    Attachment  5    1  October  1984  A!»-l 
PLANT-IN-PLACE  RECORDS 
This  appendix  establishes  a  standardized  method  for  developing  and  maintaining  Plant-In-Place 
Records  (PIPR)  at  all  L  Technique  locations.  This  instruction  implements  the  provisions  of 
T.O.  00-20-8,  Inspection  System  Documentation,  and  Reporting  For  Ground 
Communications-Electronics-Meteorological  Equipment;  AFM  100-19,  USAF  Ground 
Communications-Electronics  Program  Implementation  Management;  and  CENR  66-1,  Volume  1. 
Provisions  of  these  instructions  are  directive  upon  all  users  of  I  Technique  systems. 
1.  General.  The  purpose  of  PIPRs  is  to  develop  records  that  show  what,  where,  and  how  L 
Technique  systems  are  installed.  The  information  is  necessary  for  maintenance  and  operation  of 
L  Technique  systems.  It  allows  engineering  and  development,  along  with  maintenance,  to  perform 
logical  preplanning  in  the  design  and  installation  of  new  systems.  Storage  cabinets  and  office 
furniture  do  not  need  to  be  shown,  but  they  may  be  shown  if  desired. 
2.  Scope.  This  is  applicable  to  all  operational  laboratory  systems  installed  at  the  Depot 
Laboratory  (MCI),  the  two  detachment  laboratories,  and  the  L  Technique  training  equipment  at 
Det  057. 
3.  Responsibilities: 
a.  The  laboratory  item  manager  determines  what  constitutes  a  system. 
b.  The  Uorkcenter  Supervisor  of  a  detachment  and  the  Uorkcenter  Supervisor  of  each 
laboratory  within  the  MCL  will: 
(1)  Accomplish  one  AFT0  Form  95  (Significant  Historical  Data  Record)  for  each  system 
installed  ?nd  maintain  this  record  on  location  either  on  the  equipment  or  in  the  files  with 
their  Plant-In-Plsce  Records  (see  figure  A5-1).  Reference  TOs  00-20-1  and  00-20-4. 
(2)  Develop  a  floor  plan  showing  the  physical  location  of  each  system  installed,  on 
plain  bond  paper.  Show  the  outlets,  circuit  breaker  boxes  and  which  circuit  breakers  (include 
amperage  rating)  are  used  and  what  they  are  used  for.  If  the  circuit  breaker  is  inside  a  panel 
which  is  not  inside  the  same  room  as  the  equipment,  annotate  the  PIPR  to  show  which  room  or 
hall  the  circuit  breaker  panel  is  in.  The  grounding  scheme  will  also  be  shown  along  with  the 
UPS  installation  if  one  is  installed.  Insure  the  drawings  are  referenced  to  North-South 
references.  Each  drawing  will  be  dated  with  an  "as  of  date".  Include  the  dimensions  of  each 
room  in  terms  of  feet  x  feet,  (see  figure  A5-2) 
(3)  Forward  copies  of  para  3b(2)  to  Depot/DLX,  the  parent  unit,  and  HQ/LGM. 
(4)  If  installed  systems  are  moved  or  replaced,  update  the  PIPRs  and  forward  copies 
per  item  3b(3)  above. 
(5)  When  a  system  is  permanently  removed  from  service,  attach  the  AFT0  Form  95  ind 
forward  along  with  the  removed  system.  If  the  disposition  instructions  state  "Dispose  of 
Equipment  Locally",  forward  the  AFT0  Form  95  to  Depot/DLX,  with  copies  to  the  parent  unit, 
after  writing  the  disposition  on  the  face  of  the  AFT0  Form  95. 
(6)  Plant-In-Place  Records  are  maintained  I  AW  AFM  12-50,  Table  100-3,  Rule  2. 
4.  Procedures  -  AFT0  Form  95 
a.  Block  1  -  Enter  the  nomenclature  of  the  system. 
b.  Block  2  -  Enter  the  manufacturer  of  the  equipment  (in  many  cases  this  will  be  the  MCL). 
c.  Block  3  -  Enter  the  serial  number. 
d.  Block  4  -  Enter  the  date  the  system  was  installed.  If  the  date  of  installation  is 
unknown,  enter  unknown. 
e.  Block  A  -  Enter  the  date  each  entry  is  marie. 
f.  Block  3  -  Enter  the  applicable  information,  using  as  many  lines  as  necessary  to 
document  significant  maintenance  actions,  (i.e.  Permanent  removal  of  an  end  item  installed  in 
the  system,  a  modification  of  an  end  item  which  is  part  of  the  system,  a  change  of  a  software 
program  which  could  have  bearing  on  future  maintenance  of  equipment  etc.)
A5_2  CENR  66-1,  Vol  XIII    Attachment  5    1.  October  1984 
**N0TE** 
Routine  maintenance  actions  are  not  recorded  on  the  AF  Form  95.  WAT  or  Depot  level 
maintenance  will  not  be  recorded  on  the  AFTO  Form  95  unless  it  meets  the  criteria  of  section  f 
above. 
g.  Block  C  -  Enter  the  name  of  the  organization  responsible  for  the  equipment.
m 
i 
SIGNIFICANT  HISTORICAL  DATA 
l>AGE        1         OF  1      "O" 
I.    M.SSiON   OES.GN   S-R.ES/TYPE.  MODEL    AND   SEH.fc* 
GAS   CHKOMATOGRAPH   „____ 
2.    MANUFACTURER 
HEWLETT  PACKARD 
).   SERIAL  NUMBER 
084 
4.   ACCEfTAHCE  OATE 
DATE 
A 
17  Sep  83 
19  Sep  83 
29  Sep  83 
8  Oct  83 
REMARKS 
a 
Original  installation  of  the  system. 
Removed  Alcatel  pump  and  installed  Edwards  Vacuum  pump. 
Loaded  new  softward  pack  DLOXSQBE  dated  9  Aug  1983 
Coaxial  Trap  installed  on  the  system  today. 
.UNKNOWN 
ORGANIZATION 
c 
MCL/DLG 
MCL/DLG 
MCL/DLG 
MCL/DLG 
AFTO/^95 
PREVIOUS  EDITION  WI'.L  BE  USEO. 
O 
en 
i
CCNR  66-1,  Vol  XIII    Attachment  5    1  October  1984 
A5-4 
♦♦EXAMPLE** 
I      *  J  [Tt 
ROOM  181 
GLASS  LATHE 
FUME  HOOD 
1.  Trap  heater 
2.  GCMS  Fusebox  220  VAC 
3.  Glass  Oven  Fusebox  220  VAC 
4.  Circuit  Panels  (see  page  2  and  3) 
5.  Telephone  Terminal 
6.  Vent  to  Roof 
7.  Eight  110VAC  Outlets  in  Roof 
8.  Helium  Bottles 
9.  Gas  Chomatagraph 
s  110  VAC  in  ceiling 
@  110  VAC  above  door 
#  Compress  Gas  from  Ceiling-  Air, 
Helium,  and  Nature  Gas 
X  110  VAC  Wall  Outlets 
'EXAMPLE** 
Page  1. 
PANE L  6P 
♦♦EXAMPLE** 
LIGHTS  AND  MALL  OUTLETS 
1.  Lights,  front  of  room 
2.  Lights  for  bathroom 
3.  Lights,  back  of  room 
4.  Recepticles  East 
5.  Spare 
6.  GCMS  and  glass  oven 
7.  Spare 
8.  GC 
9.  Spare 
10.  RGC  side  A 
11.  PGC  middle  C  and  0 
12.  PGC  Module  B 
♦♦EXAMPLE** 
13.  Spare 
14.  PGC  middle  module 
15.  PGC  Module  C 
16.  RGC  Side  B 
17.  Spare 
13.  Spare 
Page     2. 
FIGURE  A5-2.     Example  of  Plant-in-Place  Records
Change  1 
ZENR  66-1,  Vol  XIII 
30  May  1985 
EQUIPMENT  MAINTENANCE 
MAINTENANCE  MANAGEMENT  L  TECHNIQUE 
Page 
Paragraph 
4b 
CENR  65-1,  Vol  XIII,  1  October  1984,  is  changed  as  follows: 
1.  Write-in  changes: 
Line  Action 
13  Change  "Oepot/OLX/DLRNL"  to  "Depot/DLX/DLR" 
2      Change  second  sentence  to  read  "  The  reports  will  contain 
the  current  status  of  all  laboratory  systems,  along  with 
general  maintenance  information,  for  the  period 
indicated." 
Add  to  the  end  of  the  paragraph  "HQ/LGM  will  be  included 
as  an  informational  addressee.1' 
Change  "(Oepot/OLXR)"  to  "(Oepot/DLX)" 
Change  "Oepot/DLX/DLRNL"  to  Depot/DLX/DLR" 
Change  "...  every  30  days  until  cleared." 
to  "...  every  60  days  until  cleared." 
Insert 
Al-1 
6         3 
7b        2 
8         6 
d.     Page changes 
Remo>j 
fe 
Date 
Al-1 
1  October  1984 
1  October  1934 
OFFICIAL 
No  of  Printed  ?:g<is:  4 
Distribution:  X
CENR  66-i/Vol  XIII  (CI)    30  May  1985 
L  TECHNIQUE  FUNCTIONAL  CONTROL  CHART 
HQ/LGM 
CHIEF  OF  MAINT 
r 
DEPOT/DLX 
OCM  L  TECHNIQUE 
OEPOT/DLXS 
MAINTENANCE 
SUPERVISOR 
MAINTENANCE 
SUPERVISOR 
AREA/LGM 
WORKCENTER 
SUPERVISOR 
ELECTRONIC 
WORKCENTER 
SUPERVISOR 
GAS 
DET  407 
WORKCENTER 
SUPERVISOR 
OET  460 
WORKCENTER 
SUPERVISOR 
-Functional  Management  Responsibility 
Direct  Control 
Figure  1.
CENR  65-1/Vol  XIII,  Attachment  1  (CI)    30  Hay  1985  Al-1 
MAINTENANCE  CAPABILITY  EVALUATION  (MCE) 
1.  Does  equipment  meet  visual  standards?  (T.O.  00-25-234) 
2.  Is  equipment  physically  configured  and  wired  IAW  the  applicable  TIs? 
3.  Do  maintenance  diagnostic  routines  function  as  intended? 
4.  Is  the  equipment  operating  so  that  no  adjustment  is  at  its  extreme? 
5.  If  any  spec"id:  tools  are  required,  are  they  on  hand? 
5.  Is  the  required  and  authorized  PME  on  site? 
7.  Is  all  required  documentation  (TOs,  TIs,  LPs,  etc.)  on  hand,  current,  and  complete?  (TO/TI 
0-1-01) 
8.  Has  a  training  program  been  established  to  familiarize  maintenance  personnel  with  the  new 
equipment?  (CENR  50-23} 
9.  Have  the  AF  Forms  797  been  updated  as  required  to  reflect  cnanges  in  the  equipment?  (AFR 
50-23) 
10.  Are  all  authorized  forward  supply  point  spares  and  bench  stock  items  on  hand?  Has  a  list 
of  FSP  spares  been  forwarded  to  DLX  for  inclusion  in  the  work  unit  code  manual?  (T.I.  21L-1-06) 
11.  Has  the  AFTO  Form  95  been  updated/initiated  for  the  system?  (CENR  56-1,  Vol  XIII) 
12.  Have  the  Plant-in-Place  records  been  updated?  (CENR  65-1,  Vol  XIII) 
13.  Can  the  host  base  PMEL  support  all  PME  requirements?  If  not,  have  appropriate  channels 
been  established  for  the  necessary  support? 
14.  Is  the  maintenance  section  fully  manned  with  the  proper  grades  and  skill  levels? 
15.  Are  local  transportation  facilities  adequate  for  efficient  detachment  maintenance 
requirements? 
16.  Is  adequate  power  available? 
17.  Is  all  support  equipment  available  and  ready  to  support  the  mission  of  the  system? 
18.  Are  detachment  maintenance  personnel  adequately  trained  to  properly  maintain  the 
equipment? 
19.  Is  adequate  emergency  power  available? 
20.  Are  resupply  and  repairable  shipping  channels  established? 
21.  Are  space  and  environmental  factors  adequate  for  efficient  maintenance  requirements? 
22.  Have  proper  actions  been  taken  to  prevent  corrosion?  (T.O.  1-1-689) 
23.  Have  proper  actions  been  taken  for  the  disposition  of  excess  (removed)  equipment?  (CENR 
66-2,  par,?  3e(5)) 
24.  Have  bench  stock  and  FSP  items  no  longer  required  been  removed  and  disposition 
instructions  provided?  (CENR  66-3,  para  3e(5)) 
25.  Have  the  AFTO  Forms,  244  &  245  been  initiated  for  the  system?  (CENR  66-1,  Vol  XIII) 
26.  Are  maintenance  technicians  aware  of  the  hazards  associated  with  the  samples 
processed/separated  on  the  equipment? 
27.  Is  the  appropriate  safety  equipment  on  hand  and  in  a  good  state  cf  repair?  (AFOSH  127-65) 
28.  Is  the  equipment  properly  grounded  to  earth  ground? 
Z'-s .     Are  maintenance  personnel  trained  on  all  special  purpose  equipment  required  to  maintain 
the  system? 
30.  Does  the  system  have  a  stock  number  or  is  a  OD  Form  1348-6  being  processed  to  obtain  a 
stock  number?
A1_2  CENR  66-1/Vol  XIII  Attachment  1  (CI)    30  May  1985 
31.  Has  the  system  been  added  to  the  appropriate  CA/CRL  or  is  an  AF  Form  601  being  processed 
to" establish  or  transfer  accountability  to  the  appropriate  CA/CRL? 
32.  Have  provisions  to  protect  the  system  from  the  adverse  effects  of  disruptive  power 
fluctuations  been  incorporated  into  the  system,  as  required? 
33.  Are  all  safety  analyses  been  completed  and  with  no  open  exceptions  which  preclude  the 
system  from  becoming  operational? 
34.  Has  the  equipment  been  appropriately  tagged  with  an  identification  plate  to  show  the  stock 
number  and  serial  number? 
35.  Has  the  PMR  monitor  been  notified  of  the  equipment  changes  and  any  new  PMR  requirements?
Lhange^T 
CF.NR  66-1,  Vol  XIII 
6  December  ',985 
EQUIPMENT  MAINTENANCE 
MAINTENANCE  MANAGEMENT  L  TECHNIQUE 
CENR  66-1,  Vol  XIII,  1  October  1984,  is  changed  as  follows: 
Write-in  changes: 
Page      Paragraph       Action 
3         4b         Change  para  to  read  "Weekly  operational  capability  status 
reports  and  supplemental  operational  status  reports  will 
be  sent  to  HQ  IAW  CENR  55-19.  The  weekly  reports  will 
contain  the  current  status  of  all  laboratory  systems  for 
the  period  indicated.  The  supplemental  reports  will 
signal  a  change  to  a  NMC  condition  for  the  NOC&A  system. 
OFFICIAL 
No  of  Printed  Pages: 
Distribution:  X