*AR 381-19 ARMY REGULATION HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY No. 381-19 WASHINGTON, DC, 15 July 1981 MILITARY INTELLIGENCE INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT Effective 15 August 1981 This revision updates policies, responsibilities, and procedures for requesting intelligence dissemination and production support. Local limited supplementation of this regulation is permitted but is not required. If supplements are issued, HQDA agencies and major Army commands will furnish one copy of each to HODA(AMI-FIR), WASH DC 20310; other commands will furnish one copy of each to the next higher headquarters. Interim changes to this regulation are not official unless they are authenticated by The Adjutant General. Users will destroy interim changes on their expiration dates unless sooner superseded or rescinded. Paragraph Page CuHapreR 1. GENERAL PUrPOSE 00.2. n eter cnet e tenet ernest nan n es 1-1 1-1 Applicability 2.2.2.0. occ cece erence nett enn een e terete nee nnes 1-2 1-1 Explanation of terms... 00.0020 6 eee e erent t ene teten teeter nent eens 1-3 1-1 General policy ..... 2.0... cece cece eee eet teen ene teen nnn es 1-4 1-1 Responsibilities .. 00.0... 200 cece ete eee eee ete teen nee nent es 1-5 1-1 2. INTELLIGENCE DISSEMINATION Section I. General Dissemination agencies .......... 00 eee eee cere ee eect tenet teen tne ee tenes 2-1 2-1 Intelligence dissemination relationships .......---- +266 eee e erence teeter eens 2-2 2-1 Validation ....... 0.2 cee cc cee cee eee eee ete teen e eee n ee teen eee nn entre 2-3 2-1 Il. Requests for Documents From the Defense Intelligence Agency Request and validation channels .........-0- ese e eee erence eee e een r tenet eens 2-4 2-1 Procedures for determining and requesting future automatic dissemination requirements. .. . 2-5 2-2 Onetime dissemination requirements for foreign intelligence documents (secondary dis- Semination).... 0.00. cee cece cee eee eee ee tee en eee eee teeter eee eaeeneee 2-6 2-3 Annual revalidation of future automatic dissemination requirements. ...........---+-++- 2-7 2-3 DIA products disseminated by the Baltimore US Army Adjutant General Publications Center (USAAGPC) 00 ccc eee nee ene ete nn en sense ec narnerenetes 2-8 2-3 III. Requests for National Security Agency Documents ProcedureS. . 00. ce ccc eee ee cee cee eee een een e een e eee n nent en eenenes 2-9 2-4 Validation and revalidation ..........- 22 - cece eee eee e teen e eee e tenn enn ereeees 2-10 2-4 IV. Other Dissemination Means Intelligence documents disseminated by the St. Louis USAAGPC. ........... 022 c eer eee 2-11 2-4 Dissemination of national-level estimates .... 2... 0... eee cere ee eee rere teen e etree 2-12 2-5 CHAPTER 3. INTELLIGENCE PRODUCTION REQUIREMENTS (IPR) . General... 00. cc cee ccc ccc eee teen ee eee ene e eet een ee neta tnet arene gees 3-1 3-1 Intelligence production relationships. .....----- +--+ sere ee eeee Lecce eect tent eeees 3-2 3-1 IPR request channels... 22.20.2000 e cece ee eee eter e nen teeter eeenees 3-3 3-1 Validation procedures ........ 0. ccc cece eee eee eee tent ene e nee ener n ete nnes 3-4 3-1 Identification of intelligence needed... 0... 6... cece ee eee eee tte etter een tee 3-5 3-1 HQDA review of IPR... 20... ec e eee eeetennn nent nen ene tne ee tenes 3-6 3-2 IPRsreferredtoDIA ....... 0.0. cece cere ete teeter e nen e enna tee eeenees 3-7 3-2 Revalidation of IPRs ......... 00 cece cece ee eee teen t nen e teen e ea enn ees 3-8 3-2 Quick-reaction requirement (QRR).......-- +. -e eee eee eee ener enter e nent ees 3-9 3-2 APPENDIX EXPLANATION OF TERMS. ........... 2. cece cece ee eee ee ere teeta eee n nnn e seen nen e eens A-1 * This regulation supersedes AR 381-19, 25 March 1977, including al! changes. oe
16 July 1981 AR 381-19 CHAPTER 1 GENERAL ee 1-1. Purpose. This regulation prescribes Army policy and procedures and assigns responsibilities for requesting intelligence dissemination and production support that cannot be provided by an organization's organic assets. 1-2. Applicability. a. This regulation applies to elements of the Active Army, the Army Reserve (USAR), and the Army Natonal Guard (ARNG). b. It does not apply to the following: (1) Requests for threat analysis support for Army planning, programing, studies, materiel sys- tems acquisition, and combat development activi- ties, which are governed by AR 381-11. (2) Intelligence coilection requirements. 1-3. Explanation of terms. See the appendix. 1-4. General policy. a. Intelligence will be pro- duced and disseminated in response to mission-es- sential requirements. b. Commanders will provide intelligence support needed to attain their assigned missions. c. Agencies requesting support will assess the im- pact of intelligence on their activities. The Army in- telligence element providing intelligence support will help requestors apply the intelligence to their specific mission. d. Unevaluated intelligence information (Intelli- gence Information Reports (IR) and signal intelli- gence (SIGINT) end products) normally will be pro- vided only to the producers of finished intelligence; e.g., the US Army Foreign Science and Technology Center (FSTC). Exceptions will be made when op- erational needs cannot be satisfied by finished prod- ucts. In particular, a properly validated Intelligence Readiness Training (REDTRAIN) mission may serve as justification for receiving unevaluated in- telligence information. e. Each HQDA agency and major Army com- mand (MACOM) in the continental United States (CONUS) will establish a system to provide intelli- gence dissemination and production support to sub- ordinate elements. Such a system will include at least the following: (1) A training program covering procedures for requesting intelligence dissemination and produc- tion support, and locations where support may be obtained. (2) Instructions for preparing requests for in- telligence dissemination and production support. (3) Procedures for reviewing intelligence dis- semination and production support requests at ap- propriate command levels, between requestors and the HQDA agency or between requestors and the MACOM. Reviews will insure that requests are properly researched, prepared, and justified and are essential to the requestor’s mission. (4) Procedures to notify subordinate elements of available intelligence products. 1-5. Responsibilities. c. Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence (ACSI). The ACSI has General Staff supervision of intelligence production and dis- semination. Specifically, ACSI will— (1) Prescribe policies and standards for, and manage the production of, Army counterintelli- gence (CI), general intelligence, and scientific and technical intelligence (S&TI). (2) Prescribe policies for disseminating DOD and non-DOD intelligence and intelligence informa- tion to— (a) HQDA agencies. (6) CONUS MACOMs. (c) Army organizations outside CONUS (OCONUS) not subordinate to a unified command. (d) Army subordinate agencies, activities, and units. (3) Arrange for the issue of Defense Intelli- gence Agency (DIA) administrative publications to all Army components worldwide. (4) Validate Army requirements for national level intelligence estimates, studies, and reports. (5) Validate intelligence production require ments (IPRs) originated by HQDA agencies, CONUS MACOMs, and subordinate agencies, ac- tivities, and units. b. HQDA agencies will— (1) Establish a system to provide intelligence dissemination and production support internal to 1-1
AR 381-19 the agency and to subordinate elements. (2) Submit, according to this regulation, re- quests for intelligence support that cannot be satis- fied within the agency. c. Commanding General, US Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM). CG, INSCOM will— (1) Serve as the Army point of contact (POC) to DIA and the National Security Agency (NSA) for dissemination matters. (2) Validate requests for finished foreign intel- ligence received from— (a) HQDA agencies. (8) CONUS MACOMs. (c) Army OCONUS organizations not subor- dinate to a unified command. (3) Validate requests from Army components worldwide for— 1-2 15 July 1981 (a) Intelligence end products originated by NSA. (b) Intelligence-related Army technical bulle- tins and technical manuals. d. CONUS major Army commands. The CONUS MACOMs will— (1) Establish a system to provide intelligence dissemination and production support to subordi- nate elements. (2) Interpret and adapt intelligence, within their capabilities, to satisfy command require- ments. (3) Submit, according to this regulation, re- quests for intelligence support that cannot be satis- fied within the MACOM. e. Reserve Components. USAR and ARNG unit requirements will be included in the system estab- lished by the US Army Forces Command.
15 July 1981 AR 381-19 CHAPTER 2 INTELLIGENCE DISSEMINATION a Section I. GENERAL 2-1. Dissemination agencies. The Army obtains foreign intelligence documents primarily from DIA and NSA. a. DIA supervises the DOD-wide intelligence dis- semination program. It issues or arranges for the is- sue of DOD and non-DOD intelligence information to— (1) The Secretary of Defense. (2) Joint Chiefs of Staff. (3) Military departments. (4) Unified and specified commands. (5) Defense agencies. (6) Authorized non-DOD and international or- ganizations. b. Intelligence products originated by NSA are disseminated only by NSA. 2-2. Intelligence dissemination relationships. a. DIA and NSA establish policies for requesting foreign intelligence documents that they produce or are responsible for issuing. 6. OACSI prescribes Army policies for issuing in- telligence. This agency also tells Army elements how to request foreign intelligence documents from DIA and NSA. c. INSCOM or the unified and specific commands are the final validation authorities for documents requested from DIA. d. INSCOM is the final validation authority (ex- cludes signal addressees (SIGADs)) for documents requested from NSA. e. INSCOM may authorize selected Army ele ments to act as final validation authorities for lim- ited situations or periods of time. In particular, the S&TI production agencies, FSTC, the Missile Intelli- gence Agency (MIA), and Medical Intelligence and Information Agency (MIIA), are final validation au- thorities for secondary dissemination of documents they request from DIA to support timely production of S&TI. 2-3. Validation. a. Requests for foreign intelli- gence documents from DIA and NSA will be vali- dated by the G2 or senior intelligence officer (SIO) at MACOM level. Validation of a request means— (1) Documents are required for mission accom- plishment. (2) Documents cannot be provided from com- mand or agency resources. (3) The requesting unit is authorized to receive the categories of documents requested and at the se- curity levels designated. b. Procedures for validation of requests for for- eign intelligence documents at intermediate levels, between the requestor and the MACOM, will be de- termined by the MACOMs. c. Validation of requests for foreign intelligence documents at all levels will be accomplished expedi- tiously; S2s, G2s, and SIOs should normally com- plete action on such requests within 3 working days. Section II. REQUESTS FOR DOCUMENTS FROM THE DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY 2-4. Request and validation channels. a. All Army organizations will submit requests for aocu- ments from DIA to their parent HQDA agency or MACOM according to procedures specified by the HQDA agency or MACOM. b. At the HQDA agency and MACOM level, all requests will be validated. c. Requests will be sent through the Commander, US Army Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center (ITAC), ATTN: IAX-M-DI, Arlington Hall, VA 22212, to the DIA office stated below. (1) Initial requests to establish a DIA customer account, and requests for future automatic dissem- ination requirements submitted by organizations with a DIA customer account, will be sent in dupli- cate (through ITAC) to DIA, ATTN: RTS-2C, WASH DC 20301. (2) One-time (secondary) dissemination require- 2-1
AR 381-19 ments will be submitted (through ITAC) to DIA (RTS-2A). (3) Army S&TI production agencies will submit their requests for documents directly to DIA (RTS-2A). 2-5. Procedures for determining and request- ing future automatic dissemination require- ments. a. To receive foreign intelligence documents on an automatic and concluding basis, an agency first must open a customer account with DIA. DIA does not normally assign account numbers to units below division or separate brigade level. Units at lower or- ganizational levels should receive support from their parent division or separate brigade. b. To establish « DIA account, an organization prepares a letter containing the following, and sends it in duplicate through channels shown in paragraph 2-4: (1) A detailed current mission statement justi- fying requestor’s requirements for intelligence in- formation. (2) A statement from the unit security officer verifying the unit’s authority to receive, use, and store the level of classified material requested. (3) Name and AUTOVON numbers of account POC and security officer. (4) A request for a copy of the following docu- ments: (a) DIA Collateral Recurring Document List- ing (CRDL), DIA Document No. 05-998, plus all changes to date, classified CONFIDENTIAL. Docu- ment No. 05-998 lists collateral documents only. If there is a need for compartmented intelligence, or- der Document No. 71-012, in coordination with your supporting Special Security Officer (SSO). (b) Statement of Intelligence Interest (Si), RTS-2C Document No. 05-990, marked FOR OF- FICLAL USE ONLY, and the Statement of Intelli- gence Interest Code (SIIC), DIAM 59-2. c. After the DIA CRDL and the SI are received, agencies may register their future automatic dis- semination needs based on the contest of either one or both of these documents. When deciding which to use, consider the following: (1) The CRDL should be used if an agency de- cides specific documents are necessary to satisfy re- quirements. The CRDL lists basic intelligence prod- ucts produced on a recurring basis needed by most Army agencies. The SI, which lists coded subject 2-2 15 July 1981 areas, cannot by itself meet an agency's need for ba- gic recurring products. (2) The CRDL should be used if the agency’s in- telligence needs are limited and well defined. It should be used if the agency's capability to receive and store classified information is limited. An agency has maximum control over the types and numbers of publications when the CRDL is used. (3) The SII may be used to supplement the CRDL. If requirements are based on the SI, the agency must specifically state the subject and geo- graphical area coverage required. Consider that the result of not submitting an SIH may be that some high interest, one-time reports would not be re- ceived (since such reports may not be covered by the CRDL). (4) IRs may be requested in an SII. However, these reports are not provided to other than intelli- gence production agencies unless there is a lack of finished intelligence. A full justification must be given to receive IRs. See instructions in the SIL. (5) DIA offers both printed and microfiche copies of most of their publications. Where appro- priate, microfiche should be considered, to save space. d. After receiving the CRDL and the SI, a letter is prepared to request future requirements. One or both of the following inclosures will be sent with the letter, depending on whether the agency decides to base its requirements on the CRDL or the SII or both: (1) A list of documents selected from the CRDL, by DIA document title, DIA recurring docu- ment number, and number of copies needed. If com- partmented documents are requested (according to | DIA Document No. 71-012), they must be included in a separate list from collateral documents. (2) A statement of intelligence interest. (In- structions for completing this document are in the SIZ.) One SH registers requirements for all security classification levels. e. Once an agency’s request for future documents has been validated by the chain of command and ap- proved by DIA, the agency is issued a customer ac- count number. DIA then sends the next and suc- ceeding editions of requested documents as they are published. To receive the current or existing issues of a document, a one-time request must be submit- ted (para 2-6). f. Changes in requirements for recurring intelli-
15 July 1981 gence products or changes to the SII may be made at any time. Changes are submitted through channels indicated in paragraph 2-4. 2-6. One-time dissemination requirements for foreign intelligence documents (secondary dis- semination). a. Agencies with a DIA customer account may have only a one-time dissemination requirement for foreign intelligence documents (such as current copies of existing products). Agencies may prepare a letter or Inter-Agency Document Request (DD Form 1142) requesting the documents listed in (1) through (5) below. Requests are submitted through channels according to paragraph 2-4. (1) DIA Register of Intelligence Publications (RIP), DRS-2600-37A-YR, SECRET, Recurring Document (REC DOC) No. 05-386. The RIP lists (including brief summaries) DIA products, selected military department and CIA publications, and some foreign-produced materials that are available. (2) DIA Scientific and Technical Intelligence Register (STIR), DST-MGA-A-003-YR, SECRET, REC DOC No. 05-411. The STIR lists current and projected S&TI products, published under a DIA cover for DOD, that are available. (3) DIA Defense Intelligence Production Sched- ule (DIPS), DDM-2600-35-YR (Subject Order), DDM-2600-36-YR (Geographic Order), SECRET, REC DOC No. 05-380. The DIPS is the DIA-ap- proved production schedule for substantive: general intelligence products. (4) DIA Monthly Intelligence Publications (DIAMIP), SECRET/NOFORN, REC DOC No. 05-110. This document is numbered by month and year (e.g. DIAMIP 1-80). It lists products published by DIA during the preceding month, those to be published during the current month, and those scheduled for publication during the succeeding month. (5) Approved FY 19XX DOD S&TI Production Schedule and Projected FY 19XX/KX Schedule (STIPS), DST-MGA-A-003-YR, SECRET, REC DOC No. 05-412. The STIPS is the DIA-approved production schedule for substantive S&TI products. b. After the publications (a(1) through (5) above) are received, the documents needed will be selected. A document listed in the DIPS or the STIPS should not be requested until it appears in the RIP or until the customer has confirmed that it has been pub- lished. A DD Form 1142 will be prepared for each document requested. A sample of a completed form AR 381-19 is in figure 2-1. Letter requests (limited to 10 docu- ments per letter request) are acceptable if DD Form 1142 is not available. Urgent requests mey be sent by message. However, care must be taken not to use the message request routinely just because it is con- venient. c. Requests for sensitive compartmented infor- mation (SCI) documents will be prepared in coordi- nation with the supporting SSO. Each request will indicate that the requested documents are compart- mented. The requesting agency will furnish its sup- porting SSO with an information copy of each re quest. DD Forms 1142 and letter requests which themselves contain SCI wil! be sent by Armed Forces Courier Service (ARFCOS) pouch through SSO channels to SSO ITAC, for IAX-M-DI. d. In most cases, DIA will send a retention copy of each document requested. When this is not pos- sible, a loan copy will be sent. DiA loan copies must be returned to the DIA library no later than the loan expiration date. -2-7, Annual revalidation of future automatic dissemination requirements. a. All requirements registered with DIA must be revalidated annually. b. In March of each year, DIA forwards to azen- cies their recurring document lists (collateral, SI, and SAO) and SII on file with DIA. In May, DIA for- wards reminders to SII customers of their require- ment to revalidate their needs for nonrecurring documents. Each agency will review its standing re- quirements and follow DIA’s instructions for revali- dating the continuing need for the products re- quested. Responses to DIA requests will be sent through command channels. c. If an agency does not respond to these revali- dation requests, DIA will assume that the agency no longer needs the documents. DIA will then termi- nate the account and the agency will no longer re- ceive foreign intelligence documents. 2-8. DIA products disseminated by the Balti- more US Army Adjutant General Publications Center (USAAGPC). a. Selected DIA finished in- telligence products, including studies of potential enemies’ tactics, doctrine, and forces, are dissemi- nated by the Baltimore USAAGPC. OACSI has identified these products as subject areas meriting wide dissemination within the Army. b. DIA administrative publications are also stocked and disseminated by the Baltimore USAAGPC. c. The above documents are listed in DA Pam 2-3
AR 381-19 310-1. Procedures for registering standing require- ments for these publications and for requesting 165 July 1981 secondary dissemination of them, as appropriate, are contained in AR 310-2, and DA Pam 310-10-2. Section IJ. REQUESTS FOR NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY DOCUMENTS 2-9. Procedures. a. General. Since all SIGINT end products are disseminated through the SSO sys- tem, the SSO is the focal point for requesting and disseminating required SIGINT end products. To aid the process, the ITAC Dissemination Office pro- vided each Army SSO with a package of reference materials on 1 August 1979 entitled “Requirements for SIGINT End Products.” The package contains an information letter and five annexes which indicate products available, products presently received, and statements registering requirements for future products. b. Submission of initial request. For newly estab- lished SSOs or organizations requesting SIGINT end products for the first time— (1) Submit mission statements of supported commands or organizations by message to SSO SRD/NTAC Dissemination Office//. The mission statement will be as detailed as possible, since it is the basis for certifying the requestor’s need-to- know. This statement should be prepared in con- junction with the intelligence staffs of the sup- ported commands and agencies and the SSO. Annex A of the 1 August 1979 letter provides the format for this submission. (2) In coordination with the SSO, intelligence offices identify those SIGINT end products required to support the command's mission. Annex B of the 1 August 1979 letter lists available SIGINT end prod- ucts and the distribution symbol for each. The sup- porting SSO should submit the distribution symbols of the products required to SSO SRD//ITAC Dissem- ination Office//. c. Changes in requirements for SIGINT end prod- ucts. When additions or deletions or SIGINT end products are required, the supporting SSO will for- ward the distribution symbols of the products to be added or deleted to SSO SRD//ITAC Dissemination Office//. The ITAC Dissemination Office will be notified of any mission changes affecting dissem- ination of SIGINT end products as they occur. d. Registering requirements for new products. To insure receipt of newly developed SIGINT end prod- ucts, mission requirements in terms of subject and geographic areas of interest must be registered with the ITAC Dissemination Office. Annex D of the 1 August 1979 letter is used for this purpose. Based on information contained in this annex, the ITAC Dissemination Office will take necessary action to place appropriate addressees on distribution for new products as they become available. e. Data base searches. Commands or organiza- tions having a valid requirement for historical re- porting should submit their requests with justifica- tion to SSO SRD//ITAC Dissemination Officel/. 2-10. Validation and revalidation. a. To insure timeliness and eliminate unnecessary burdens, the system is governed by management by exception; that is, SSOs will submit requests to SSO SRDINITAC Dissemination Office//, with informa- tion copies to appropriate intermediate headquar- ters. Unless notified otherwise within 3 working days, concurrence of intermediate headquarters will be assumed. In cases where products are required immediately, this should be stated in the request so as not to delay processing. b. Requirements for SIGINT end products should be reviewed continually and changes made as re quired; however, each requestor’s mission and state- ment of requirements must be revalidated as of 31 March of each calendar year. Section IV. OTHER DISSEMINATION MEANS 2-11. Intelligence documents disseminated by the St. Louis USAAGPC. The Foreign Materiel Catalog (FOMCAT) (TB 381-5 series) and Photo- graphic Interpretaticn Keys (TM 30 series) are dis- seminated by the St. Louis USAAGPC (1655 Wood- son Road, St. Louis, MO 63114). Procedures for re- questing these publications are in AR 310-2. Agen- cies without a DIA customer account number must 2-4 justify the need for the publications. The justifica- tion will include— a. Mission description. b. Verification by the agency's security officer that the requestor has facility and personnel se- curity capabilities. c. The name of a POC and the security officer for the account. The USAAGPC will send requests for
15 July 1981 TM 30 series and TB 381-5 series publications to ITAC (IAX-M-DI) before dissemination to an ac- count. 2-12. Dissemination of national-level esti- mates. a. National-level estimates consist of the following documents: (1) National intelligence estimate (NIE). (2) Special national intelligence estimate (SNIE). (3) National intelligence analytical memo randum (NIAM). (4) Interagency intelligence memorandum (TIM). b. National-level estimates are designed to serve the requirements of high-level policy-making indi- AR 381-19 viduals and groups such as the President and mem- bers of the National Security Council that make na- tional security policy. National-level estimates are not appropriate background documents to support contingency plans of tactical units, corps level and below. Normally, national-level estimates are not disseminated below Army MACOM level. c. Requests for national-level estimates will be sent on DD Form 1142 to HQDA(DAMI-FIR), WASH DC 20310. Each request must contain the purpose for which the estimate will be used. d. Requestors are reminded that the correlation of an NIE number and its title is SECRET. Requests containing both the NIE number and title must be classified accordingly.
AR 381-18 15 July 1981 f classified information i INTER-AGENCY DOCUMENT REQUEST fnceres on this form, enter | dm waepucagle ppropriate classification. OATE OF REQUES7 TO FROM CHARGE NUMBER +See para 2~4d Provide complete address DIA account number DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL LENDING AGENCY REPORT SOURCEIAUTHOR (Onginating Agency and Post or Individual OATE QUE leave blank Enter originating agency (for example: DIA, FSTC, USAF) || RETAIN T T TITLESUBJEC a NO RECORD - AESERVED FOR USE OF self-explanatory LENDING AGENCY © INCLOSURE ONLY leave blank DOCUMENT NUMBER TAC NUMBER PUBLICATION DATE CLASSIFICATION self-explanatory leave blank self~explanato (of requested document MATERIAL iS RETENTION ONLY RETENTION OR LOAN(Specily loan period) REQUESTED FOR REF ERENCE/REMARKS ; nclude as appropriate: 1. Additional information to assist 3. User's request numbering system in identifying document 4, MACOM/agency concurrence 2. Number of copies desired DATE SIGNATURE MATEMIAL RECEIVED FORM | STAMP CLASSIFICATION DD 1 JUN 56 1 j 42 [ \< IF APPLICABLE STAMP CLASSIFICATION iINTER-AGENCY DOCUMENT REQUEST | UNCLASSIFIED | & If APPLICABLE FROM OATE OF REQUEST CHARGE NUMBER HQ, TRADOC TO Cdr, USAITAC ATTN: ATORI-IT (MAJ Doe ATTN: IAX-M-DI AHS, Arlington, VA 22212 Fe. Monroe, VA 23651 14 Mar 81 c500 DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL LENDING AGENCY REPORT SOURCE/AUTHOR (Originating Agency and Post o7 Individuah OATE OUE DIA || RETAIN SS —— TITLE/SUBJECT || NO RECORD Protection of the Individual Soldier in Desert Environments (Foreign) Wi ere enanal © INCLOSURE ONLY DOCUMENT NUMBER 1AC NUMBER PUBLICATION DATE CLASSIFICATION verte | sep 27 | coNPrpewrrat MATERIAL IS , [freon RETENTION OR LOAN(Specity loan periog) REQUESTED FOR x REFERENCE/REMARKS Request 1 copy for retention. TRADOC #7-81 OATE SIGNATURE MATERIAL RECEIVED DD 1142 [ UNCLASSIF IBD |< APRIGABEE 2 Figure 2-1. Samples of completed DD Form 1142. 2-6
15 July 1981 AR 381-19 CHAPTER 3 INTELLIGENCE PRODUCTION REQUIREMENTS (IPR) nn 3-1. General. Intelligence information needed by Army commands and agencies usually is available in documents disseminated by DIA and NSA. If the data are not available, Army agencies should pre- pare an intelligence production requirement (IPR). The IPR is then sent, through channels, to an intel- ligence production organization charged with pro- ducing the intelligence requested. Submission of an IPR is done normally te program future production. It is also a flexible and responsive way to— a. Get answers to specific intelligence questions on a short-term basis. b. Change the content of intelligence documents already being produced. c. Begin production of new intelligence docu- ments. 3-2. Intelligence production relationships. a. DIA and HQDA(DAMI-FIR) establish policies for submitting IPRs. 6. OACST is the final IPR validation authority for the Army. c. DIA is the final validation authority for ail IPRs. 3-3. IPR request channels. a. HQDA, CONUS MACOMs, and Army subordinate elements send IPRs through command channels to HQDA (DAMI-FIR), WASH DC 20310, except in the cases noted in 6 and c below. b. In cases where a MACOM is the Army compo- nent of a unified command, and the IPR is required for planning or training in support of that MACOM’s mission as the Army component of that unified command, then the IPR will follow channels authorized by the unified commander. c. Requests for counterintelligence production are submitted as follows: (1) All CI production requirements will be pre- pared on Intelligence Production Requirement (DD Form 1497). (2) IPRs may be submitted in response to the annual solicitation of requirements by DIA or at any time needed. (3) CI production requirements will be submit- ted, through command channels, to HQDA (DAMI-CIC), for validation and forwarding to the appropriate production agency. (4) For additional detail, see chapter 4, AR 381-20. 3-4. Validation procedures. a. The S2, G2, or SIO at each intermediate level of command will vali- date IPRs. Validation of an IPR means that it— (1) Supports a valid mission. (2) Has been researched to ensure the requested information is not already available. (3) Represents an intelligence production gap. b. The IPR will be disapproved if an S2, G2, or SIO decides that the intelligence product requested in an IPR is contained in existing material. Ele- ments that disapprove an IPR will identify for the IPR originator the documents that contain the re quested intelligence information. 3-5. Identification of intelligence needed. a. Format. To request production of intelligence not in existing documents (commonly known as produc- tion gaps), an organization prepares a DD Form 1497 in duplicate. If more space is needed, use bond paper for continuation sheets. Instructions for com- pleting DD Form 1497 are in table 3-1. An example of a properly completed IPR is at figure 3-1. b. Administrative data. Give the specific mis- sion, function, project, program, study, or activity the IPR supports. State why the intelligence is needed to meet assigned missions. Indicate the im- pact on mission attainment if the IPR is disap- proved. c. Researching available intelligence products. In each IPR cite present intelligence documents and products researched which do not contain the needed information. List missing topics if an exist- ing document or publication contains only part of the information needed. d. Research procedures. Steps for researching present intelligence documents or products are as follows: (1) Review intelligence documents and prod- 1
AR 381-19 ucts on hand at the requesting unit level that could satisfy the IPR. (2) Consult the STIR, RIP, DIPS, DIAMIP, and STIPS for the titles of existing intelligence docu- ments and those scheduled for production that could satisfy the IPR. (See procedures for request- ing these documents in para 2-6.) (3) Review documents requested from the RIP, STIR, DIPS, DIAMIP, and STIPS. Decide whether the needed information already exists or is already scheduled for production. (4) Information not contained in existing docu- ments or a document scheduled for production is a production gap, and an IPR should be submitted. 3-6. HQDA review of IPR. OACSI will review each organizationally validated IPR from HQDA agencies, MACOMs, and Army subordinate ele- ments. OACSI will either validate the IPR for DA or return it with comments. The OACSI-validated IPR will be referred to Army production elements to satisfy the requirement or will be forwarded by OACSI to DIA for production. 3-7. IPRs referred to DIA. DIA will either accept or decline for production each IPR received. If ac- cepted, DIA will then determine if a DIA sub-ele- ment, military department, or unified or specified command is best able to satisfy the requirement and will forward the IPR to the appropriate organiza- tion for review and action. If DIA declines produc- tion of an IPR, the basis for such a decision will be forwarded to OACSI, and the originator and inter- mediate S2, G2, and SIO are notified. If appro- priate, these persons will be asked for further infor- mation to support reconsideration of the decision. When DIA declines production, OACSI may ask Army production elements to satisfy the IPR. OACSI will notify the requestor and others in the chain of command of this action. 3-8. Revalidation of IPRs. An IPR may be sub- mitted, revised, or canceled at any time. Previously submitted requirements not satisfied or not in- cluded in formal tasking and still of interest to the 15 July 1981 requestor should be resubmitted and revalidated an- nually. This will insure continuing DOD recognition of the need for the information. 3-9. Quick-reaction requirement (QRR). Quick- reaction requirements are a type of IPR designed to get a quick answer to a certain question based on data currently in the files of an intelligence produc- tion agency. a. Before sending a QRR, the requesting or- ganization must try to satisfy the need locally or use existing intelligence products. 6. A QRR is sent directly to Army intelligence production activities by electrical message or tele- phonically with electrical message confirmation. In- formation copies will be furnished to all elements in the production agency's chain of command, to in- clude HQDA(DAMI-FIR). Each QRR request will contain the following information: (1) A detailed statement of the requirement. (2) The title and number of the supported proj- ect or program. When the end use of the requested information can- not be related to a readily identifiable project or program, a statement describing the proposed end use of the information is required. (3) Astatement that-— (a) The information is not available in the re- questor’s command. (b) Reference sources, such as the RIP and the STIR, have been reviewed, but the needed in- formation is not available in these sources. (Sources actually reviewed will be listed.) (c) The requested information is essential. Give the impact on the requesting element if the in- formation is not provided by the date requested or if the information is not provided at all. c. QRRs will not be used as an alternative to late submission of an IPR. In almost all cases, adequate planning will identify production gaps far enough in advance te allow submission of an IPR, and this is the preferred method.
15 July 1981 Item 10 Table 3-1. Instructions for Preparing DD Form 1497 Instructions Enter the highest security classification of information shown on the form. Enter a short descriptive title of the requirement. Indicate the security classification of the title in parentheses. Give both the title of the product and the geographic area if the reouire- ment is for production of a standard product on a certain geographic area. Enter the date the requirement was prepared. Give the exact date, the quarter within a fiscal year, or the fiscal year in which the finished product is required. Enter the contro! number assigned by the requesting agency to this requirement. This num- ber is used in production monitoring and discussions between DIA, the validating element, and the requestor. It usually contains the requesting agency's identifier code, the fiscal year, and a serially sequenced number (e.g., MILA 80-210). Omit. This number is assigned by DIA for internal contro! purposes. In the case of an IPR ac- cepted for S&TI production, this number will be identified in the DIA (DT) response and will later appear on any S&T1 tasking which the IPR supports. Enter the name and mailing address of the element originating the production requirement. Enter a number between 1 and 7 to indicate eubject-country priority designation. See JCS document, “Intelligence Priorities for Strategic Planning (IPSP),” for appropriate designa- tion. If the IPSP is not available to the requestor, leave blank. It then becomes the responsi- bility of the first S2, G2, or SIO up the chain of command who has acceas to the IPSP to com- plete this item. The second character, a letter between A and F, is assigned by the OACSI, the unified or specified command J2, or other final validator. This letter shows the valida- tor’s rating of the importance of the requirement compared to all other intelligence product requirements. Codes used are as follows: Code Definition A of critical importance B of major importance Cc of considerable importance D _ of moderate importance E of some importance F of interest DIA looks to the validator for its asseasments of priorities among subordinates’ requests. Both the IPSP and the validator’s ranking will be considered by DIA in making resource commitments for a balanced worldwide production program. Check the appropriate block. If the product is to be updated regularly or is published periodi- cally, indicate how often it should be updated or republished. State reasons for requirement. This is the moet important item on the form. The statement must be explicit to be useful to analysts and production managers. The following will be spe- cifically included: a. Statement of requirement. Enter the following data: (1) The subject matter to be covered. (2) The scope of treatment. (3) If the requirement calis for updating or (in the case of revalidation) continued pro- duction of existing publications, reference the publication by long and/or short titles, 6. Guidance. Include the following information: (1) Any special requirements or factors bearing on the preparation or presentation of the product. (2) Special problems or issues to be examined and an explanation, as necessary. (3) Specific comments sbout the time frame of the subject matter to be considered in the product. (4) Special formats or graphic presentations. (5) Security classification restrictions. AR 381-198 3-3
AR 381-19 15 July 1981 Table 3~1. Instructions for Preparing DD Form 1497—Continued Item Instructions (6) Known publications that affect the requirement or that partially satisfy the re quirement. (7) Anexplanation of the inadequacy of the dccuments to fulfill the requirement. (8) The degree of accuracy and/or level of detail required (e.g., engagement ranges, weapons ranges, radio frequencies, coordinates, quantities). c. Intended use of product. Provide specific information on how the product is to be used. This will assist production managers and analysts to fully understand the intelligence product being requested. It also insures that the requirement is given the proper production priority, and that the priority assigned to corresponding collection efforts is the same as that for production. If the product is needed to support an R&D project, identify it. If possible, atate what will happen if the information is or is not obtained. If the product is in support of contingency or war planning, reference the proper plan; if there is no plan, describe the com- mand’s mission that justifies the product. Include a general statement about the level of the product's distribution withi: the organization. When revalidating a requirement which was previously accepted for production by DIA, a current statement of intended use will be in- cluded. State how obtaining the information has, to date, been of benefit, what use will be made of its continued production, and what will happen if production were not continued. Be as specific as possible. il Enter the name of the agency or element believed most capable of satisfying the require- ment. Do not submit an IPR for intelligence requirements that can be met by the originator’s resources. 12 Self-explanatory. Include both a secure telephone number (if service is available) and an AUTOVON or commercial telephone number for the person to contact for further informa- tion. 13 Enter the highest security classification of information shown on the form. Also include the proper security downgrading instructions on the first page of the IPR. 3~4
T. CL ASHEICATION " " " ° 2 . UNCLASSIFIED INTELLIGENCE PRODUCTION REQUIREMENT 2. SUBJECT OF REQUIREMENT Chemical and Biological Warning Transmission Systems - Worldwide @. DIA CONTROL NUMBER S- REQUESTING 4GENCY CONTROL NUMBER 22 May 1980 TO ARQUESTING AGLNCY Systems Evaluation Office, ARRADCOM i (DRDAR-SEI-C) ®. TYPE OF COVERAGE 3Q FY81 TJ vPOaTING OF EXISTING PUBLIC ATION TE Re Pont sepereoursecseocunes —) PERICOIC PUBLICATION watooerwcr none FREQUENCY 10. STATEMENT OF REQUIREMENT ([teme (0 be entered and Intended Utilization of Praduct) a. Statement of Requirement: A comprehensive, worldwide study is required that will give details on all chemical and biological warning alert transmission systems. The US Army has a requirement for a system that provides rapid transmission of a chemical attack warning to all personnel in a company-size unit. Currently, warnings are transmitted between subunits by radio, hand and arm signals, and noise makers in accordance with SOP (FM 21-40 and NATO STANAG 2047). The current system will delay unit response to off-target and some on-target chemical hazards (one to two minutes are required to warn personnel in a company-size area). The study should contain all available data on construction, markings, training, and use of such systems. Specific elements that must be covered are: (1) Methods of transmitting the warnings under battlefield noise and light condi- tions (daylight, dusk, darkness, dawn), e.g. sirens, whistles, illuminating rockets, parachute flares, clouds of colored dye, loud electronic bells, etc. (2) Are the warning systems that produce sound adjusted so as to differentiate between a chemical, biological or radiological attack, e.g., one long blast for chemical, two long blasts for biological, and three long blasts for radiologicai? (3) Are the warning systems that produce light (illumination), adjusted so as to differentiate between the different types of attacks (e.g., one blue rocket, chemical; one red rocket, biological; and three yellow rockets, radiological). 1 (ee Continuation Sheets, If needed) 11. RECOMMENOATION OF PROOUCER (0.6., DIA, enother command, originator of requeet) 12. MAME, GRACE, PHONE ANDO MESSAGE ACORESS OF CONTACT OFFICER 13. CLASSIFICATION Mr. Mitchell Penn, GS-14, AV 584-4298 (DRDAR-CLN-D), Mun Dev Br, Mun Div, CSL, APG, MD Ms. Nancy Weathersby, GS-11, AV 584-3560 (DRDAR-SEI-c) ,Sys Eval Ofc (FID/CSL), APG, MD DD.2".1497 UNCLASSIFIED Figure 3-1. Sample of a completed DD Form 1497. 3-5
AR 381-19 15 July 1981 (4) Is the warning transmission automatic (i.e., incorporated into the detector so that it fires when agents are detected); or does the operator manually control the transmission; or does the operator relay the alert to headquarters and they transmit the warning? (5) What is the length of time from detection to transmission of the alert? (6) What are the repetition intervals of transmissions (i.e., two flares, wait S minutes then fire two more flares)? b. Guidance: (1) The study should cover the current time frame (1980) and all systems projected for the 1981-1990 time frame. (2) Any available diagrams or schematics should be included. (3) Chemical Systems Laboratory, ARRADCOM, can not satisfy these requirements with its own resources. (4) The product should be classified no higher than secret. A separate supplement may be prepared for information of a higher classification. (S) Little work has been accomplished by Chemical Systems Laboratory on a CAWTS device because of the lack of information. (6} All of the capability studies bear closely on this subject, but none of the sections on detection and warning cover transmission of the warning from the detector to the troops. (7) The following products were reviewed and did not satisfy the requirements of this intelligence production request: (a) DST-1600S-034-79, Chemical and Biological Warfare Capabilities - USSR (U), Mar 80. (b) DDI-1100-148-77, Soviet Tactical Intelligence and Reconnaissance (U), Feb 77. (c) DST-1600S-037-76, Chemical and Biological Warfare Capabilities - ECC (Less USSR) (U), May 78 (d) DST-1600S-148-76, Chemical and Biological Warfare Capabilities - ACC {U), Oct 78. (e) DST-1640H-040-78, Nuclear Defense Equipment - Communist Countries (U), Mar 79. 3-6
16 July 1981 AR 381-19 (£) ST-CS-03-38-75, Chemical Warfare Capabilities - NATO Countries and France (U), Feb 75. (g) DST-1600S-536-79, Chemical and Biological Warfare Capabilities - NATO Countries (Canada and the United Kingdom) (U), Jul 79. (h) DST-1600S-032-75, Chemical and Biological Warfare Capabilities - Middle East Countries (U), Sep 79. (i) TB 381-S-07, Foreign Materiel Catalog Volume 7, Chemical, Biological and Radiological Equipment (U), Feb 76. (j) TB 381-5-07B-1, Foreign Materiel Catalog Volume 7B, Chemical, Biological and Radiological Equipment (U), Mar 78. (k) DST-1600S-533-79, Chemical and Biological Warfare Capabilities - Nonaligned Countries (Sweden and Finland) (U), Nov 79. (1) DST-1600S-532-78-SUP 1, Chemical and Biological Warfare Capabilities - Nonaligned Countries (Japan) (U), Nov 78. (m} ODST-1600S-S37-77, Chemical and Biological Warfare Capabilities - NATO Countries and France (Belgium, Denmark, The Netherlands, and Norway) (U), Nov 77. (8) In addition, the following sources were queried for information: (a) Central Information Reference and Control (CIRC) computer system. (b) Data Exchange Agreement (West Germany) in process. (c) ABCA Agreement (UK) no response. (4d) US Army Foreign Science and Technology Center (USAFSTC). Information received from these sources did not meet the requirements of this request. (9) The following products, scheduled for production during FY80, will not meet the requirements specified in this Foreign Intelligence Production Requirement: (a) DST-1600S-037-YR, Chemical and Biological Warfare Capabilities - ECC (Less USSR) (U) - 3Q FY80 (b) DST-1600S-148-YR, CBW Capabilities - ACC (U) - 4Q FY80 (c) DST-1600S-537-YR, CBW Capabilities - NATO Countries and France (Belgium, Denmark, The Netherlands, Norway) (U) - 4Q FY80 (d) DST-1600S-533-79, CBW Capabilities - Non-Aligned Countries (Sweden and Finland) (U) - 1Q FY80 Figure 3-1. Sample of a completed DD Form 1497—Continued.
AR 381-19 165 July 1981 All of the referenced documents address detection and warning systems to some degree; however, none of the referenced documents contain sufficient information on warning transmission systems to meet the requirements of this Foreign Intelligence Production Requirement. ce. Utilization (1) Chemical Systems Laboratory, ARRADCOM, will utilize this study in direct support of the following research and development programs: (a) 1M464725D020 - Chemical Detection, Warning and Sampling Development (b) 1L162706A553 - Chemical/Biological Defense and General Investigations (c) 1L161102A71A - Research and Defense Systems CW/CBD (d) 1T161101A91A - In-house Laboratory Independent Research (e) 1M4632721D601 - Chemical Detection and Warning Materiel (f) 1W764724DF4S - Biological Detection and Warning Devices (2) The data generated by this study will influence the design of future warning transmission systems throughout the Department of the Army. The US Army has a requirement for a system that provides rapid transmission of a chemical attack warning. 3-8 Figure 3-1. Sample of a completed DD Form 1497—Continued.
15 July 1981 AR 381-19 APPENDIX EXPLANATION OF TERMS a Counterintelligence (CI). Information gathered and activities conducted to protect against espionage and other clandestine intelligence ac- tivities, sabotage, international terrorist activi- ties, or assassinations for or on behalf of for- eign powers, organizations, or persons, but not including personnel, physical, document, or communications security programs. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) administra- tive publications. Nonintelligence DIA pub- lications that prescribe policies and procedures and provide information of general interest. Department of Defense intelligence. The product of collecting, processing, integrating, analyz- ing, evaluating, and interpreting available in- formation on foreign countries or areas. Department of Defense intelligence dissemina- tion. Conveying intelligence in suitable form (oral, graphic, or written) to agencies needing it. Finished intelligence. Intelligence information that has been evaluated, analyzed, integrated, interpreted, and formatted for issue. Finished recurring intelligence. Evaluated intel- ligence which is either produced on a periodic basis and generally covers the same subjects or areas, or is frequently revised. Foreign intelligence. Information relating to the capabilities, intentions, and activities of for- eign powers, organizations, or persons, but not including CI except for information on interna- tional terrorist activities. General intelligence. Military intelligence cov- ering— c. Military capabilities, including orders of battle, organization, training, tactics, and all other factors bearing on military strength and effectiveness. b. Area and terrain intelligence, including arban areas, coasts and landing beaches, and medical/environmental, meteorological, and ge- ological intelligence. c. Transportation in all modes. d. Materiel production and support indus- tries, telecommunications, and military eco- nomics. e. Location and identification of military- related installations. f. Government control. g. Evasion and escape. h. Threats and forecasts. i. Indications. Intelligence production requirement (IPR). A stated need for the production of intelligence on a general or specific subject, program, sys tem, or weapon. Intelligence information report (IR). Intelligence reports that contain rew, unevaluated informa- tion. Nonrecurring finished intelligence. Evaluated in- telligence on specific subjects or areas of re- search published on a nonscheduled, or one- time basis. Quick-reaction requirement (QRR). A require ment for immediate production action to satis- fy a consumer’s urgent need for intelligence. Scientific and technical intelligence (S&TI). The product of collecting, evaluating, analyzing, and interpreting foreign scientific and techni- cal information on the following: a. Foreign developments in basic and applied research and in applied engineering tech- niques, including both the physical and bio- medical sciences. b. Scientific and technical characteristics, capabilities, and limitations of all foreign mili- tary systems, weapons, weapons systems and materiel related research and development, and the production methods used for their manufacture. Included is the primary or sec- ondary impact of the weapons systems and their environments on military personnel. Secondary dissemination. a. Issuing a copy of an intelligence document from stock in response to a request after initial dissemination (para 2-6). A-1
AR 381-19 15 July 1981 b. The loan of a copy of an intelligence docu- Threat. ment from the intelligence reference collection. Statement of intelligence interest (SI). Refer- ence documentation giving a potential or an au- thorized recipient's interests to receive intelii- gence on specific subjects and geographic areas. This documentation is the basis for dis- seminating information reports, nonrecurring finished intelligence, and the initial issue of finished recurring intelligence publications. a. Potential environmental and enemy forces in or against which friendly forces are employed, and those potential enemy forces which may be employed against the friendly forces. b. A description of the potential environ- ment and enemy forces prepared in the neces- sary detail and analyzed in the context of a spe- cific problem or project. As used in this regula- tion, the threat refers to a document or state ment.
15 July 1981 AR 381-19 The proponent of this reguiation is the Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence. Users are invited to send comments and suggested Improvements on DA Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publications and BSiank Forms) directly to HOQDA (DAMI-FIR), WASH DC 20310. By Order of the Secretary of the Army: E. C. MEYER General, United States Army Official: Chief of Staff ROBERT M. JOYCE Brigadier General, United States Army The Adjutant General DISTRIBUTION: Active Army, ARNG, USAR: To be distributed in accordance with DA Form 12-9A requirements for AR, Military Intelligence—B US GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1981— 341-4661:1587