3S4!3dXa  lK3ttrt3A£>£>  XV  <&3nz  ,-i : jv 
L  w.  vi-v  /lA/A/f/  -gy 
DEPARTMENT  OF  THE  NAVY 
NAVAL  SECURITY  GROUP  COMMAND  HEADQUARTERS 
1*01   NEBRASKA  AVCNUE.N.W. 
WASHINGTON,  O.C.    a03»0  -5212 
5750 
Ser  GH/S7/77 
0  5  JUN 1985 
MEMORANDUM  FOR  THE  DIRECTOR  OF  NAVAL  INTELLIGENCE 
Subj:  NAVAL  INTELLIGENCE  ANNUAL  HISTORY  PROGRAM 
Ref:   (a)  CNO  Itr  0P-009E/4U445144  of  31  Dec  84 
Encl:  (1)  1984  Annual  History  Report  for  the  Headquarters  Naval  Security 
Group  Command 
1.  As  requested  by  reference  (a),  enclosure  (1)  is  forwarded. 
G.  G.  HENRiKSLN 
By  direction 
:>  at  o-»v;.-K\wn!;T  KaIT.se
3'.  '.jjx:i  i.:i3unn 
HEADQUARTERS 
UNITED  STATES  NAVAL  SECURITY  GROUP  COMMAND 
ANNUAL  HISTORY  REPORT:  1984 
PREPARED  BY: 
HISTORIAN,  NAVAL  SECURITY  GROUP  COMMAND 
STS.^JT  SPEC1AL  ASS1£TANT  F°R  SEC™«* 
■.;•  flovri-vrtit!.-?  ;..•:•::. .^r
.  3ST3JX3  itttwmiaAt*  4,v  a?j(.;:  mS*- 
UNCLASSIFIED 
TABLE    OF    CONTENTS     UN 
uu. T  i  ON 
i 
1. i 
1 . - 
EC 
"ION 
-. 
i-t-L, ;  1  Ui 
r  i  rii.i    ■?. 
SECTION  *; 
SECTION  t 
-tr  -  r  t  n.\.  i. 
W  W  W   I   J  ^Jl  H  W 
Section  7 
section  s 
SECTION'  9 
EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY 
MISSION 
19S4:   THE  VEAR  In  REVIEW 
COMPOSITION  AND  ORGANIZATION 
DIVISIONS  AND  THEIR  FUNCTION., 
HG'NAVSECOrtU:   PERSONNEL 
ORG AN I  2 A'f  i 0:MAL  CHANGE  S  W IT f i  1  i «•  nCvMv i 
ORGAN  1  2ATIQN  CHARTS:  HONAVEElGRi.; 
LEV  MANAGEMENT  RRlORiTIES  hND  ISSUES 
SP  EC  1 AL  ORERAT 1 ONS 
G50 
651 
657. 
SIGNALS  SECURITY  AND  RELATED  FUNCTIONS 
£  I SN I F  I  CANT  TECHN I CAL  DE  'v'ELGF  ME  NT  S 
COMMUNICATIONS  AND  ADR 
SIGNIFICANT  LOGISTIC  AND  MATERIAL  DEvELOF 
PERSONNEL.  TRAINING,  AND  ADMINISTRATION 
COMMUNICATIONS  SECURITY'  MATERIAL  SYSTEM 
SUPPORT  INS  DOCUME NT S 
EL 
UNCLASSIFIED 
";'i  !>  A.'  C.nVi.K'.'MI.'NT 
.."F
3SN3dX3    MatOiMilWD  AY    Q?.Oi.Z  H  J3y 
UNCLASSIFIED 
r 
SECTION  1 
EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY  (U) 
1.1         (U)  MISSION 
1-1'1       <U>  Cn  1  July  1968,   the  Naval  Security  Group   Command 
(NAVSECGRU)   was  established  as  an  echelon  2  Command.   tc  provi oc 
support   to  the  Chief  of  Naval  Operations  (CNO)  in   the   related 
■fields  o-f  signals  exploitation  and  signals  security.   In  addition 
tc   the  Headquarters  and  assigned  shore  activities  (TABLE  1).   it 
is   composed   of   elements  located   throughout   the   U.5.   Naval 
Operating   Forces  and  Shore  Establishments  (TABLE   2;.   and   thc- 
N'avy  Courier  Service  (TABLE  3). 
1  •  1  •  ^  (Li)   The  command  and  suopcrt  responsini  Jitv   -for   rhe 
JMAVSECGRU  have  been  delegated  by  tne  CNO  to  the  Commander.  Hav<nl 
Security   Group   Command   (CDMNAVSECGRU) .    The   mission   ot   the 
COMNAVSECGRU  is  de-fined  in  OPNAV  Instruction  545©. I 9i  CH-3  : 
To  perform  cryptologic  and  related  -functions:  tc 
provide  operate  and  maintain  an  adequate  Naval  Security 
Group;  to  approve  requirements  for  the  use  c-f  existing 
Naval  Security  Group  capabilities  and  resources:  to 
coordinate  the  execution  o-f  approved  cryptoloa;c 
programs;  and  to  e::ercise  command  authority  o^er .  ana 
be  responsible  -for  the  primary  support  of  the  shore 
activities  of  the  Naval  Security  Group  as  a  N^val 
service-wide  system,  and  such  other  activities  and 
resources  as  may  be  assigned. 
UNCLASSIFIED 
•  ••.v.'  a:  (V'Vi:nw-n:::T  ::xrn:.rj:
«.«'*•■  ***\<d 
UNCLASSIFIED 
(LD  The  instruction  -furthermore  specifies  the  -functions  which  are 
essential  to  the  accomplishment  o-f  this  mission.  These  -function? 
include: 
-  Cryptoloaic  Operations  in  support  01"  GPNAV  and  the 
National  Security  Agency  (NSA) 
-  Professional  and  Technical  Advice  and  Support  to  the 
CNO  and  Fleet  Commander s-in-Chi e^ 
-  The  conduct  of  Signals  lintel 1 iqence  Operations, 
including  communications  and  electronic  intelligence 
(COMINT  and  ELINT  respectively) 
-  Maintenance  of  Signals  Security  ^including 
Communications  and  Electronic  Security) 
-  Operations  Security,  including  policy,  planning, 
training,  and  education 
-  The  Management  of  Electronic  Marf&re  Programs.  and 
Operations  Technical  Guidance  and  Support 
-  The  application  of  Electronic  Cover  and  Deception  to 
Naval  Operations  Programs 
-  The  Management  .  of  the  Navy  HFDF  and  ether 
electromagnetic  wave  Direction  Finding 
-  The  Recruitment.  Training,  and  Evaluation  of  Navy 
Crypto! agic  Personnel 
UNCLASSIFIED 
••:■*».!)  a;-  c.-'vi-Rwu:::?  i:>:rr..;"t:
JUUJU  1NJUMI9AU9  IT  8'i,..  .,  Uv 
UNCLASSIFIED 
(U'  ~  7hG  provision  of  Professionel  and  Technical  support 
to  the  U.S.  Marine  Corps  in  its  conduct  cf 
Cryotoiogic  Activities 
-  Direction   and   Management   of   the   Naval    Reserve 
Security   Group  within  the  irsir,cnarl    of  the-   e:istino 
Naval  Reserve  Organization 
-  Planning  and  Management  o-f  the  Consolidated 
Cryptologic  Program,  the  Communications  Security 
Resources  Progam,  and  in  part,  the'  Cryptologic  Direct 
Support  Program 
-  The  Development,  Evaluation,  Maintenance  and  Support 
o-f  NAVSECGRU,  Navy,  Joint,  and  Combined  Strategic 
Plans 
-  Command  and  Primary  Support  cf  Assigned  Shore- 
Activities 
-  The  provision  of  Personnel,  Fhvsical  .  ar.d  In-fcrrat  i  or. 
Security  throughout  the  Command 
-  The   provision  of  Automated  Data  Processing   Supcort 
for  Naval  Crypto! ogv 
-  The  Supervision  of  the  Naval  Comriuni  cation;.  Secunt* 
Material  System 
-  The   Inspection  and  Investigation  of   NAVSECGRu   ;nd 
other    DOD   elements   as   directed,    to    determine 
readiness  and  efficiency 
UNCLASSIFIED 
•  .'.  *i  A:  •".■A,i:fc!W\T  !.-••■'■«•:.:■."
UNCLASSIFIED 
VL"         ~  Stat  ting   and   Management  of  tne  Nv,  v  Element  01   tr.c 
Armed  Forces  Courier  System 
-  Research   and  Development  of  Cryptologic  and   Related 
Svstems    (with    the   exception   0+    cryptogenic 
equipment),   including   coordination   with   .MSA,   DOfJ 
elements  and  civilian  contractors 
Material  and  Logistics  Suppo-t  of  NhVSECGRU.  and  tevv 
Elements  of  the   NBA/Central  Security  Service  (CSS; . 
<U)   In   1979,   the  COMNAVSECGRU  was  designated  as   the 
Deputy  Director  of  Naval  Intelligence  (Plans;,   0P-009C.    As  OF- - 
0O5C,   the  COMNAVSECGRU   is  responsible  for  providing  cryprologic 
support   for   operational  commanders,   and   ensuring   that   Naval 
cryptologic   systems  arS      compatible  with   Naval   Conwni-nicstior.s. 
systems.    The   COMNAVSECGRU   is  also  the  Commander  ot   tne   Nav^ 
element   oi  the  Central  Security  Service   iCSS)  ,   which   opiates 
#Navy  shore-based  SIGINT  intercept  sites. 
(U)  The  three  NAVSECGRU  Area  Directors  (TABLE  1)  act  as 
representatives    of    COMNAVSECGRU   for    cryptologic    matters. 
Attached  to  fleet  commands  in  Norfolk,   Pearl  Harbor  and  London, 
tne   Directors  perform  cryptologic  and  related  tasks  as   assignee 
by   OPNAV   Instruction  C2S01.5E.    As  Cryptologic  Captains   (1610 
designator...   the   area  directors  Sr(,    in  charge  of  the   NAVSECGRU 
UNCLASSIFIED 
:  "-."Lii  at  G'i\tknmi:?:7  i.xrs:..SE
JWaJIJ  IklUHJiALL  IV  a»J>:.o^ 
UNCLASSIFIED 
*U;  Detachments  assigned  the  -fleet  commanoers.  The  area 
directors  also  represent  COMNAvSECGRU  in  matters  where  NAVEECG^u 
worts  closely  with  the  operating  -forces  or  with  other  branches  ot 
the  shore  establishment.  Area  directors  also  recrcsen-jo 
CGl'INAVSECGRU  in  NSA/CSS  matters. 
1.1.3      iLi)   The   Headquarters,   Naval  Security  Group   LOK.tnG 
(HONA-.'SECGRU;   supports   the  COMNAVSECSRU  in   accomplishing   thc- 
a  =  signed   mission   and  operates  as  staff  -for   the   Commander.    it 
exercises  executive  and  managerial  responsibilities  -for  all   Navy 
cryptologic   matters,    and   supports   U.   S.   Naval   crvptol cgi c 
elements   throughout   the   world.     it   works   with   NS.A.    the 
Department   of   Defense  (DOD) ,   and  other  federal  agencies   on   a 
variety  of  cryptologic  and  related  matters. 
-.!•-         <!_!•  1983 :   THE  YEAR  IN  REVIEW 
1-2.1  <«J>  From  the  standpoint  o-f  the  Assistant  Comme-.-.der  5  ai.H 
Special  Assistants,  1964  was  a  year  of  achievement  for  the 
HONAVSECGRU.  In  spite  of  difficulties  due  to  budgetary  anj 
manpower  shortages  experienced  by  some  Departments,  i  ndi  v;  d_;c  1 
functions  were  successfully  performed,  assuring  overall  m:=5ion 
success. 
UNCLASSIFIED
■Ji'.JiAJ  UUWIIJAUU  AW   U.JJi.J  i.,J3K 
UNCLASSIFIED 
1.1.2  <U)  Important  organizational  changes  helpe-o  tc 
stimulate  efficiency  in  H0NAV5ECGRU.  Effective  24  October  19£ui. 
the  duties  and  responsibilities  oi  the  Assistant  Commander,  Naval 
Security  Group  Command  (ACNSG)  were  separated  -from  those  o-i  tr.e 
Commanding  Officer,  Naval  Security  Group  Activity,  Ft.  Meade. 
Within  the  Office  of  the  Assistant  -for  Plans,  Programs,  Budget 
and  Resources  Management  (GD;  ,  tr.e  -functions  of  the  Investments 
Division  (GD5>  and  the  Operations  Division  tGD6>  were  merged  to 
create  the  Budget  Division  <GD5> .  On  1  September  lv84,  the 
Director  of  the  Security  Division  (G12)  became  the  Special 
Assistant  for  Security  (GH)  .  Subsequently,  G10  was  redcesi  gnsted 
as  the  Assistant  Commander  for  Personnel  and  Training. 
1.2.3  <U.'  Cnsnqes  were  not  confincc  to  trie   hu'NHviECor;U 
itself.    There   was   a   major   restructuring   of   Navsl   Fiess-rvi.' 
.Security  Group  Units,  reducing  tne  total  number  fror..  ivS  re  BZ. 
This  consolidation  facili tared  the  management  of  both  units  and 
missions. 
1.2.4  (U>  In  the  field,   Naval  Security  Group  Letacrmsr.t 
kamisseya  was  upgraded  to  an  activity  on  23  Mav  193m. 
1.2.5  (U>   Another  important  factor  in   the   successful 
completion  of  HONAVSECGRU ' s  1934  mission  was  the  effective  use-  of 
UNCLASSIFIED 
t-\  t-.r-  tip
UNCLASSIFIED 
(U)  -financial  resources.    Rear  Admiral  \   parti  cpsted  "^y-J 
in  the  Congressional  Budget  Hearings  held  on  1  March  1^64. 
Beginning  11  July  1984  and  ending  5  October  i9B4,  a  pre-audit 
survey  was  conducted  by  the  Naval  Audit  Service  o-f  tne  -finance-. 
personnel  and  equipment  administrative  -functions  o-f  the 
NAVSECGRU  and  selected  NAVSEC6RU  activities.  Tne  survey 
indicated  that  NAVSECGRu  headquarters  and  -field  sites  \i=itec 
properly  administered  their  resources.  Thus,  an  ir-oeptn  adult 
o-f  those  -functions  was  not  warranted.  On  22  October  19S4,  tnc- 
Auditor  General  o-f  the  Navy,   Mr. 
rtooer   lvat,   tne- 
1  visited  GD  and  '^r"<^ 
CQMNAVSECGRU  to  personally  thank  the  Command  -for  the  cooperation 
and   courtesies   extended   to   the  auditors  of   the   Naval   Audit 
Service  who  had  conducted  the  pre-audit  survey.    At  that  time  he 
provided  a  general  debrie-f  o-f  the  survey. 
HDNAVSECGRU  HIGHLIGHTS  OF  1934 
1.2.6  <U)  During  1984  there  was  a  30"'.  reduction  in  t re- 
number c-f    security  violations  at  HG'NAVSECGRU. 
1.2.7  <U>  No  -formal  complaints  o-f  discrimination  were 
filed  during  19S4,  a  -fact  whicn  has  been  attributed  to 
outstanding  EEO  counseling. 
UNCLASSIFIED
-TTr^iaa  a  a  *nai 
1.2.S  IV)       On   10  December ,   the   Cr> ptologic   Training 
Support  Office  (G132)  was  officially  opened  with  RADN  McDowell 
cutting  trie  ribbon.  The  CTSO  was  established  to  provide  training 
media  in  support  of  NAVSECGRU  field  requirements. 
1.2.9  ■  On  22  June  1984,  an  office  automation  contract 
for   HQNA7SECGRU   and   its   field   sites   was   awarded   to 
■  for  a  of  | 
has  been  providing  new  word  processing  capabilities. 
1.2.10  <L)>  C0MNAV5ECSRU  has  received   increased   funding 
(approximately  :T3.6M>  from  the  CCP  program  through  several 
initiatives  which  ere?  enhancing  COIIf'JAVSECGRU '  s  capabilities  in 
word  processing,  data  management,  and  secure  voice  by: 
-  <U)  Obtaining  financial  resources  for   projected. 
•growth   in  acquisition  management /maintenance  of  computer  s-.rt  em- 
software  (S/W)  in  NAV5ECGRU  cryptologic  operations. 
-  (U)  Providing  contract  software  develoDmer.t 
personnel  to  perform  project  management  and  technical  -Junctions 
of  software  develocmer.t  vsvstems  analysis,  programming  and  logic 
coding,  program  testing,  system  implementation  and  conversion). 
-  <U>  Obtaining  hardware  and  software  improvements 
at     Headquarters     necessary    to    meet    needs     for     new
.  KWU  1MJUHIWAU1  IV  U Jj<..  ,uj 
UNCLASSIFIED  ' 
<U>  capacity/operating   demands   of   an   interactive   environment   by 
increasing  security  and  records  control. 
-  (U)  Procuring  micro  computer  system  workstations 
to  automate  -functions  presently  performed  manually  both  1  n  the 
-field  and  at  Headquarters  to  enhance  mission  efficiency  and 
effectiveness.  This  initiative  places  automated  intellioent  wort, 
stations  at  strategic  locations  within  each  activity  th^t 
performs  data  (information)  collection,  processing,  cistrisution 
and  storage  functions  of  SI  support.  It  will  also  provide  worlc 
wide  interchange,  updating,  utilisation  and  disposition  of 
business  data  between  the  Headquarters  and  fielc  Sites  for 
administrative  support.  Emnhasis  is  placed  or.  the  use  01  rammer, 
multi-use  software  throughout  NAVSECGR'LJ. 
-  (U)   Procuring,   installing,   and  providing  Li-fe 
Cycle   Support   for   modern  digital   secure   telephone   switching 
^equipment  and  telephones  to  replace  obsolete,  f  ai  1  ure-sror.t: 
equipment  and/or  provides  where  none  now  exists  at  23  NAVSEC6RU 
sites  where  service  is  essential  to  efficient  coordination  ct 
time-sensitive  operations/other  classified  actions. 
1.2.11  <U)  The  COMNAVSECGRU  selected  Naval  Secu.ntv  urou:. 
Activity  Edzeil,  Scotland  to  represent  the  U.  5.  Navy  in  the  ivS*. 
Travis   Trophy  competition.    This  NSA  hosted  competion   annual lv 
UNCLASSIFIED 
:-•:■■«.:>  ;%,-  c-ivkkv'knt  t.::rr.'r
vU'  selects  the  unit  wnich  has  made  the  iT.ost  signHi:art 
cr .ptolcgic  contribution  to  the  U.  S.  Sl&INT  svste.1;.  In 
compet  i  tier,  between  all  the  services:  USA,  USN'.  UEAF  and  UEl-l.'. . 
NSKA  Edzeli  won  the  19S4  Travis  Trophy. 
1.2.12  <U)  NAVSECGRUACT  Naples  received  the   Outstanding 
Unit   Certificate   o-f  Merit  tor  19S4  -from  the  Association  ct   Old 
Crows   for   "Outstanding"   performance  in  support   of   the   multi- 
national peace  keeping  force  during  the  Lebanon  crisis. 
>•:!::;-■  r.x;>,.:...'-F
S3KNH3ftl.'3 
1.2.14         fll  Reactivation  of  the  USB  SPHINX  (ARL-24> .    The 
U5S   5FHINX   (ARL-24)   began  procedures  -for      reactivation   rn   1 
1984. ^j  |^^ 
I  V   The 
SFHirjX  is  due  to  be  operational  4  October  19S5. 
„    .   ..,.!..   Pf
UNCLASSIFIED 
(U) 
TABLE  1:  ASSIGNED  SHORE  ACTIVITIES 
NAVAL  SECURITY  GROUP  ACTIVITIES  (NAVSECGRUACT  > 
Adak,  Alaska 
Anchorage.  Alaska 
Athens.  Greece 
Augsburg,  Federal  Republic  of  Germany 
Charleston,  South  Carolina 
Edrell,  Scotland 
Fort  Meade,  Maryland 
Galeta  Island,  Panama 
Grot on,  Connecticut 
Guantanamo  Bay.  Cuba 
Hanra,  Okinawa  Prefecture.  Japan 
Homestead,  Florida 
Kami seva ,  Japan 
Keflavik,  Iceland 
Kev  West.  Floriida 
Kunia,  Hawaii 
Misawa,  Japan 
Naples.  Italy 
Northwest.  Virginia 
Pearl  Harbor.  Hawaii 
Clark  AFB.  Philippines 
Pyongtaek ,  Republic  o-f  Korea 
Saftana  Seca,  Puerto  Rico 
San  Vito  Dei  Ncrmanni  ,  Italy 
SKaggs  Island,  Calitorme 
.Terceira  Island,  Arores,  Portugal 
"Winter  Harbor,  Maine 
M 
Director  Communications  Material   System,  Washington,  DC 
NAVAL  SECURITY  GROUP  DETACHMENTS  (NAVSECGRUDET) 
At sua i ,  Japan 
Barbers  Point,  Hawaii 
Brunswick,  Maine 
Crane.  Indiana 
London,  Britain 
Mayport ,  Florida 
Monterev,  California 
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 
Nor-f  ol  I   ,  Viroini  a 
Subic  Bay.  Philippines 
Sugar  Grove,  West  Virginia 
YolosuJa.  Japan 
NAVCURF.SUPF GRU  "Rota ,  Spai n 
NAVAL  SECURITY  GROUP  DEPARTMENTS  (NAVSECGRL'DEPT)  LOCATED  AT] 
NAVCAM  EASTPAC  Honolulu,  Hawaii 
NAVCAM  WE5TPAC  Guam,  Mariana  Islands 
NAVCOMMSTA  Diego  Garcia,  Chagos  Archipelago,  BIOT 
San  Diego,  California 
Spai  n ,  Rota 
ASSISTANT  COMMANDERS /AREA  DIRECTORS 
ASSTCOKNAVSECGRU  (ACNSG) ,  Ft.  Meade,  Maryland 
DIRNAVSECGRUEUR.  London 
DIRNAVSECGR'JLANT.  Nor-f  oik,  Viroini  a 
DIRNAVSECGRUPAC,  Pearl  Harbor , ~Hawai 1 
UNCLASSIFIED 
:■■:;*.-:»  a.-  covj:rnmi:vt  i:xr:::.s;:
UNCLASSIFIED 
<U>     TABLE  2:   NAVSECGRU  ELEMENTS  LOCATED 
WITHIN  U.S.  NAVAL  OPERATING  FORCES  AND  SHORE 
ESTABLISHMENTS 
MAJOR  STAFF  DIVISIONS  AFLOAT 
NAVSECGRUDIV,  Staff 
NAVSECGRUDIV.  Staff 
NAVSECGRUDIV.  Staff 
NAVSECGRUDIV,  Staff 
NAVSECGRUDIV.  Staff 
NAVSECGRLIUDIV,  Staff 
CDMSECONDFLT 
COMTH1RDFLT 
COMSIXTHFLT 
COMSEVENTHFLT 
COMIDEASTFOR 
CGMCRUDESFORSEVENTHFLT 
(CTF  75) 
COMBATANTS  AFLOAT 
NAVSECGRUDIV.  USS 
NAVSECGRUDIV,  USS 
NAVSECGRUDIV.  USS 
NAVSECGRUDIV,  USS 
NAVSECGRUDIV.  USS 
NAVSECGRUDIV.  USS 
NAVSECGRUDIV,  USS 
NAVSECGRUDIV,  USS 
NAVSECGRUDIV,  USS 
NAVSECGRUDIV.  USS 
NAVSECGRUDIV.  USS 
NAVSECGRUD I V .  USS 
.NAVSECGRUDIV.  USS 
"NAVSECGRUDIV.  USS 
NAVSECGRUDIV,  USS 
NAVSECGRUDIV,  USS 
NAVSECGRUDIV.  USS 
NAVSECGRUDIV,  USS 
NAVSECGRUDIV.  USS 
NAVSFCGRUDIV,  USS 
NAVSECGRUD I V ,  USS 
NAVSECGRUDIV.  USE 
NAVSECGRUDIV.  USS 
NAVSECGRUDIV.  USS 
NAVSECGRUDIV,  USS 
MIDWAY  (CV  41 > 
CCRAL  SEA  (CV  43) 
SARATOGA  (CV  60) 
RANGER  (CV  61) 
INDEPENDENCE  vCV  62) 
KITTY  HAWK  (CV  63) 
CONSTELLATION  (CV  64) 
ENTERPRISE  (CVN  65) 
AMERICA  (CV  66) 
JOHN  F.  KENNEDY  (CV  67) 
NIMITZ  (CVN  6,8) 
DWIGHT  D.  EISENHOWER  (CVN  6 
CARL  VINSON  (CVN  70) 
JOUETT  (CG  29) 
WILLIAM  H.  STANDLEV  (CG  32) 
FOX  (CG  33) 
BIDDLE  (CG  34) 
TIC0NDER05A  (CG  47) 
LONG  BEACH  (CGN  9) 
TRUXTUN  (CGN  35) 
CALIFORNIA  (CGN  36) 
TEXAS  (CGN  39) 
MISSISSIPPI     (CGN    40) 
OLDENDORF     (DD    472) 
SPRUANLE     (DD    963) 
7  ) 
UNCLASSIFIED
ji-uau  iWHNajAuy  it  u*$..i  ,liJV 
UNCLASSIFIED 
NAVSECGRUDIV, 
NAVSECGRUDIV, 
NAVSECGRUDIV, 
NAVSECGRUDIV, 
NAVSECGRUDIV, 
NAVSECGRUDIV, 
NAVSECGRUDIV. 
UBS 
USS F'ETERSON  (DL  569) 
CARON  (DD  970) 
USS  MERRILL  (DD  976) 
USS 
USS 
USS 
USS 
JOHN  RODGERS  (DD  983) 
DEYO  (DD  9S9) 
INGERSOLL  (DD  990) 
FIFE  (DD  991) 
SQUADRONS 
NAVSECGRUDIV.  FAIRECONRON  ONE  Guam 
NAVSECGRUDIV,  FAIRECONRON  TWO  Rote 
TRAINING  ACTIVITIES 
CNTECHTRA  (Code  N34) 
NAVTECHTRACEN  F'ensacola 
NAVTECHTRACENDET  Fort  Devens 
NAVTECHTRACENDE7  Good-fellow  AFB 
NAVEDTRAPRODEVCENCORDI V  Pensaccl a 
FIELD  OFFICES 
NAVSECSRU  FO.  RTC  Great  Lakes 
NAVSEC5RU  FO,  RTC  Orlando 
.NAVSECGRU  FO.  Pensacola 
T-lAVSECGRU  FO.  RTC  San  Dieoo 
UNCLASSIFIED
3S*rJ4X3   iN3H(«3AC>0  J.V  Q?3t.z  M4S. 
!■'• 
UNCLASSIFIED 
TABLE  3:  THE  NAVAL  COURIER  SERVICE 
NAVAL  COURIER  "SERVICE 
DIRNAVCURSERV 
NAVCURSERVDET  Adak  - 
NAVCURSERVDET  Boston 
NAVCURSERVDET  Guam 
NAVCURSERVDET  Honolulu 
NAVCURSERVDET  Jackson vi 1 1 e 
NAVCURSERVDET  Los  Anoeles 
NAVCURSERVDET  Mi  1 denhal 1 
NAVCURSERVDET  NaD 1 es 
NAVCURSERVDET  Norfolk 
NAVCURSERVDET  Rota 
NAVCURSERVDET  San  Dieoo 
NAVCURSERVDET  Si  oonel I a 
NAVCURSERVDET  Subic  Bav 
UNCLASSIFIED
^mmmmimn^!* 
2.  1 
2.  1.1 
UNCLASSIFIED 
SECTION  2 
HQNAVSECGRU:   COMPOSITION  AND  ORGANIZATION  (U) 
(U)  DIVISIONS  AND  THEIR  FUNCTIONS 
<U>  The  COMNAVSECGRU  is  designnated  bv  the  letter  "G. " 
an  historical  reference  to  "0P-20-G,"  the  -former  "Code  and  Signal 
Section"  of  the  Office  of  Naval  Communications.  The  Executive 
Assistant  o-f  the   COMNAVSECGRU  is  designated  6A. 
-t.l.-:  (U)  The  Deputy  Commander,  Naval  Security  Group  Command 
<GB>,  is  the  executive  and  principal  advisor  and  assistant  to 
COMNAVSECGRU.  Functions  included  the  implementation  of  the 
policies  of  the  COMNAVSECGRU,  and  the  coordination  o*  the 
component  elements  of  the  HONAvSECGRU  in  order  to  insure  the 
accomplishment  of  the  mission. 
2.1.3  (U)  GBA  is  the  Assistant  to  GB  for  Headquarters 
Administrative  Support.  The  primary  functions  of  GBA  during  1?84 
were:  to  assist  the  Deputy  Commander  in  organizing.  planning  and 
controlling  Headquarters'  administrative  matters:  to  insist  the 
Deputy  Commander  in  the  consideration  of  administrative  problem?- 
pertaining  to  Headquarters;   to  perform  liaison  with  and   provide 
UNCLASSIFIED
^5*S335nniawWI3A«>  XV  693t,r.  Ml-j.. 
c 
UNCLASSIFIED 
ft 
<U>  administrative  support  to  Staff  Assistants  where  necessary: 
to  formulate  and  execute?  the  Headquarters  operating  budget:  t 
perform  civilian  personnel  liaison:  and  to  act  as  the  central 
control  point  for  forms  manaoement. 
2.1.4  <U)  GD  designates  the  Office  of  the  Assistant  for 
Flans,  Programs,  Budget,  and  Resources  Management/Comptroller  for 
Calendar  Year  1964.  The  primary  function  of  GD  for  1984  was  to 
act  as  principal  advisor  to  and  executive  for  the  CQMNAVSEC6RU  in 
the  formulation  and  implementation  of  NAVSECGRU  plans,  programs, 
budget  and  resources  management  and  comptroller  matters. 
2.1.5  <iJ)  Tne  mission  of  the  Force  Master  Chief  (GE:  is  to 
function  as  the  principal  enlisted  advisor  to  the  CGMNAVSECGRJ. 
bringing   to   the   Commander 's  attention   existing   or   potential 
.situations,  procedures  ano  practices  which  affect  tr.e  welrare. 
morale,  job  satisfaction  and  utilization  of  the  command  s 
enlisted  personnel  and  their  dependents. 
2.1.6  (U)  GF  is  the  designator  for  the  Assistant  Commander, 
Naval  Security  Group  Command  (ACNSG) .  Effective  24  October  1964. 
the   duties  and  responsibilities  of  the  ASNSG  were  separated  -from 
UNCLASSIFIED
mum nnaaiw?  *v  O~0r.d  >d  jj-- 
UNCLASSIFIED 
(U)  those  o+  the  Commanding  Of-ficer,  NAVSECGR'JACT  •  Fort  fle-ade. 
The  ACNCG  is  responsible  -for  representing  the  COMNAVSECGRU  to  the 
N5A/CSS.   Functions  tor  1984  included  the  -following: 
-  to  advise  the  COMNAVSECGRU  as  to  current  and  -future' 
NSA/'CSS  plans.  policies  and  programs  which  impacteo  uoon 
naval  cryptologic  operations  and  resources 
-  tc  conauct  liaison  with  the  DIRNSA/Ch  CSS  and  ass  is-  :r. 
tne  evaluation  of  NAVSECGRU  Field  Stations  iparticicate  ir. 
the   Field  Assistance  Program) 
-  to  provide  services,  including  the  coorci i nation  ct  visit 
scheduling  -for  NAVSECGRU  personnel  visiting  N5A/CS5 
-  to  serve  as  focal  point  for  NAVSECGRU  CSSA  re?cui  remer.t  = 
ana  coordinate  with  NSA/C55  provision  of  technical 
information 
-  to  coordinate  and  participate  with  Assistant  Ccmmsr.d--r: 
and  Staff  Assistants  in  the  formulation  oi  plans  and 
programs. 
2.1.7  (U)  6H  is  the  Special  Assistant  tor  Security  to  tne 
COMNAVSECGRU.  GH  assists  the  COMNAVSECGRU  in  the  development. 
organization,  and  execution  of  NAVSECGRU  security  programs, 
including:  information  security,  personnel  security,  physical 
security,  and  security  education. 
UNCLASSIFIED
3S*134X3  &K3HNU3A09  XV  OJ»i(jC  .ii.iv 
UNCLASSIFIED 
2.1.8  (U)  The  primary  mission  of  6K,  tno  Inspector  General, 
tor  1984  was  tc  inspect,  investigate,  or  inquire  into  any  ano  all 
matters  of  importance  to  the  COMNAVSECGRU,  with  particuar 
emphasis  on  readiness  including  but  not  limited  to; 
ef  fecti  veness,  efficiency,  economy  and  sa-fetv,  personnel 
discipline,  morale,  welfare,  and  managewment  practices,  command 
relationships  and  organisational  structure. 
2.1.9  (U>  The  Marine  Corps  Assistant  to  the  COMNAVSECGRU 
<GM)  ,  acts  as  principal  staff  advisor  and  assistant  on 
cryptolog i cal  matters  concerning  the  Marine  Corps  on  an 
additional  duty  basis.  GM  is  the  Commanding  Officer  of  the 
Marine  Support  Battalion.  which  provides  Marine  Cores 
augmentation  to  the  NAVEECGRU.  This  is  accomplished  through 
letter  companies  which  sre  located  at  NAV5ECGRU  Command  elements 
wor 1 dwitie . 
•  ■ 
2.1.10  (U)  There  are  three  Associate  Technical  Directors  1  or : 
Operations  Systems  Analysis  <Gr>,  Threat  Assessment  i'GQ>  .  and 
Data  Automation  <6Z). 
2.1.11  (U)  The  Assistant  Commander  for  Reserve  Flans  snei 
Readiness   is  designated  as  GR.    The  primary  mission  o-f   GR   for 
UNCLASSIFIED
3SS3JX3  XrONNUaAOO  ZV  Q-'J:..:  Mir 
UNCLASSIFIED 
<u>   1984   was  to  advise  and  assist  the  CQMNAVSECGRU   in   matters 
concerning   the  Naval  Reserve  Security  Group  (NAVRESECGRU)  plans, 
policies,   programs.   and  training  objectives,   and  to  achieve  a 
high  state  of  readiness. 
2.1.12  (U)  The  Assistant  Commander  •for  Personnel  and  Training 
(GlO)  assists  ana  advises  the  COMNAVSECGRU  in  matters  o-f 
personnel  management  and  training.  Functional  responsibilities 
■for  1934  included: 
-  The  -formulation  o-f  personnel  and  training  policy  -for  the 
NA'.'SECGRU 
-  Liaison  with  representatives  of  other  DOD  and  government 
organizations  in  matters  involving  personnel  and  training 
-  Representation  o-f  the  COMNAVSECGRU  on  beards  and 
committees.  and  at  conferences  in  personnel  anc*  training 
matters 
-  Management    of    the    NA'v'SECGRU    Automated    Personnel 
Information  Management  Ss-stem 
-  Planning  -for  the  career  development  and  training  of 
cryptologic  officers  and  enlisted  personnel  in  tne  Navy 
-  Administration  of  NAVSECGRU  special  training  programs 
-  Cooraination  of  arrangements  for  special  operational 
training  and  forward  area  training  for  Marine  Corps 
cryptologic  personnel 
UNCLASSIFIED
.     d»"*aaAa    *nann<ianvv   «•«    u--^i.-«     ;  ;j 
UNCLASSIFIED 
iU,'  -  Development  and  coordination  of  policies.  plans  and 
procedures  to  improve  manpower  control,  di striDuti on 
utilization  and  productivity  improvements 
-  Collaboration  with  commands.  bureaus.  ar.c  offices 
concerned  to  ensure  the  adequacy  and  availability  o-f  personnel 
-  Management  o-f  Human  Resource  Management  Support  Svstem 
Programs.  including  Equal  Opportunity,  Race  Rsl ati  ens. 
Drug  Abuse  Control  and  Alcoholism  Prevention. 
2.1.13  (U)  630  is  the  Office  of  the  Assistant  Comander  for 
Telecommunications  and  Automated  Data  Systems.  Tne  primary 
functions  for  19S4  were  designated  by  630  elements  63i  (tne 
Director  of  Current  Operations)  and  632  (tne  Director  of 
Configuration;  respectively: 
-  To  serve  as  the  functional  sponsor  for  crvctciccir 
teiecomrr.um cations  and  automatec  Oata  systems.  wnic-.  z.rc- 
under  the  cognizance  of  the  NAVSEC3RU,  ana  ensure  the 
continuing  effectiveness  ana  resoir.ess  of  tnese  svstems: 
assess  and  validate  communication  and  oata  svj-.eis 
requirements  within  tne  context  of  current  operational 
capabi 1 i  ti es. 
-  To   act   as  the  software  configuration  manager   tor   those 
telecommunications  and  automated  data  svstems  in  which  the 
UNCLASSIFIED
3S'!3dX*J  AN3KNM3A0S  J  V  O^Oi. :  ,  i  i  J  • 
UNCLASSIFIED 
i'Ji  NAv"=.ECGfcU  has  support,  responsi  bi  i  1 1>  :   to  rrt  as  a   ctrtrai 
•fecal  point  -for  systems  security  matters;  to  maMimir- 
interoperability  of  svstems  through  standard! csti on:  tt 
review  proposed  policy  and  procedured  under  the  purview  o-s 
the  COMUAVSECGKiJ  and  to  ensure  compliance  with  higher 
authority  directives. 
2.1.14  (U)  G40  designates  the  Assistant  Commander  ""or 
Logistics  and  Material.  The  mission  o-f  G40  is:  To  assist  anc 
advise  C0MNAV5EC6RU  in  the  timely  provision,  evaluation  arti 
support  of  equipment,  material  and  -facilities  tc  meet 
requirements  -for  the  operation  ot  the  NAVSECGRU  shore  elements. 
Under  tnis  requirement  tr.e  department  has  two  spenial  a  =  zi  stant^ 
and  three  divisions:  G40F'  Assistant  for  Flaming  and  F rcgr acsi  r,c 
to  assist  ana  advise  the  Assistant  Commander  lr  f  or  t.u  i  a  1 1  n  r.  ?-*; 
executing  the-  Planning,   Programming  anc  Budgeting  Fr;.a'eT,j   5«  '.•- 
• 
Assistant  -for  Integrates  Logistics  support  in  matters  pertaining 
to  ILS  and  Maintenance  Manpower;  G41  Logistics-Maintenance  and 
Equipment  Control  Division  to  perform  matters  pertaining  to 
suoplv  arid  maintenance  functions  relating  to  the  NAVi-EC-SPU:  G-17 
Facilities  Rescir.es  s  Division  to  perform  facilities  management 
&-■£         Safety   and   Occupational   Health   function?   required    01 
UNCLASSIFIED
«u)  COl-iNAVSECGRU  as  a  major  claimant  and  an  Echelon  Two 
Commsnaer,  including  planning  and  programming  facilities 
construction  and  public  works  management  and  staff  civil  engineer 
-functions:  644  Shore.  Equipment  Installation  and  Planning  E-ivissor 
to  execute  responsibilities  in  the  planning  ior  and 
implementation  o-f  shore  electronic  equipment  installation 
requirements  worldwide  within  the  Command  and  tc  maintain  =:■  =  ;«.> 
allocation  and  svstems  con-figuration  control  at  ail  !Jh.';.EC5'"  U 
shore  sites. 
2.  1.  1! 
<li)      i  he    Assistant    Commander    -for    Special    Operations 
designated    bv    G50.  It    is    composed    of    three    divisions    G5i 
and    G54. 
s   1 
u: 
sne  mission  of  Gol  ,  the  Cryptologic  Svstem- 
Management  Division.  i=  to  advise  and  assist  the  Assistant 
.Commander  for  Special  Generations  in  managing  crvptciccic 
operations  ashore  and  afloat.  in  order  to  ensure  time  zrtd 
effective  response  to  Navy  ana  National  tasking.  Tne  division 
is  organized  into  four  branches/ sect  i  ons.  Tne  Resources  E.rar.::n 
focuses  on  day  to  day  operation  of  Nhv'SECGF.U  field  stations  c-rj 
mobile  cryptolcgic  svstems.  and  is  aubdividec  into  secticnr 
aeaiing  with  Pacific.   European,  and  CONuS/ Car  i  bbean  issues.   ir.?
'•:"!    XKHKMjJAlli ^WSST-r 
REQuirements  branch  deals  with  long  lerm  projects  ar-  = 
programs,  and  is  -focused  on  -future  ssncrc-  and  afloat  cryptoicc:.- 
svste.Tis  wnich  have  worldwide  application.  The  Direct  SuDpor  \ 
Resources  Section  is  concerned  soielv  with  man  ace  merit  o-f  the 
personnel  and  equipment  resources  o-f  a  specific  comrercmenter, 
Na\>y  program.  The  Battle  Group  Passive  Horison  Extension  System 
i&GFHF.Si  Operational  Review  Team  (SORT)  wnr(.-s  close; >  witr,  tne- 
Nazal  Electronics  Systems  Command  to  ensure  that  development  of 
the  BGFHE5  system  follows  a  path  which  will  ma::  i  mice  its  ucilitv 
to  the  Lcttie  Group  Commander. 
(U)  The  19S4  mission  of  xne  Ocean  Surveillance  5  .-s- tarns 
i.-:  vision  tCST.;  w<=s  to  aavise  anc  assist  550-  in  managing  tne  I  j;--  ••. 
Hi  on  Frequency  Direction  Finding  iHFDF;  svstem  to  ens-.;-* 
e+f  ect  i  ve  HFDF  to  o-zesry  surveillance  programs  and  in  sjt;  et^cckji. 
of  other  emitter  location  r eoui rements. 
vU'  fn=  primary  mission  of  the  io&cizi  ":  ec  nnc  0.7  . 
Division  <G54>  was  to  advise  and  assist  GEO  concerning  pre- 
operational readiness,  support.  ana  performance  of  the  CLf'-II  iC 
WIZARD  svstem.  including  the  management  of  the  f  1  v=  C'L.AC.u-1.: 
WJZhF;D  Regional  F.eporting  Centers. 
^•1.16       <U>       G60   is   the   Assistant   Commander   for   Signals 
Security.    The  mission  for  1934  included:    support  to  the   foav.
:j:T*":i.!v<  j.r;3i;Nx;iA>. :  jv  i:-.- 
UNCLASSIFIED 
iC)  Operations  Security  <GRSEC)  and  Operations  Deception  luFDEi.  - 
programs.  collection  and  analysis  of  Navy  electromagnetic 
emissions:  assessment  of  the  status  of  Signals  Security  within 
the  Navy;  application  of  Signals  Security  data  to  eliminate 
possible  vulnerabilities  in  Navy  electronic  systems:  and  Signals 
Security  resource  management.  6&0  and  a  staff  of  sever,  officers. 
twe.ntv  enlisted  personnel  and  ten  civilians  carry  out  t.-.e-  mission 
and  functions  of  Ge>0.  The  department  is  organized  into  a  front 
office  and  five  divisions.  The  functions  of  the  divisions  Brez 
Gil  -  Crvptoiocic  Security;  G£2  -  Signals  Security  Operations; 
663  -  Vulnerability  Assessment:  5o4  -  Plans/Programs  a-.c 
Resources  Management:  and  Gc5  -  TEMFEST  Management. 
\ 
2.1.17  iU>     The    Office    of    the    Assistant    Commander    for    Tecnmcal 
Development       is    designated    as    GSO.  The    primary    mission    for     19S4 
.was       to    assist    and    advise    the-    CuMNAv'SECGRU    in    the    formulation       of 
mid         and       long-range      technical       objectives,  development         and 
coordination       of       concepts,       separation    and       staffing       of       f-rm=.i 
research    and    the    development    of    requirements    as    r,sce-zz.*r\     ana    tnc- 
liaison       and       coordination      pertaining    to    all       cryptclomc       RI-Tili 
(less       cryptographic)       programs    sponsored    fcv    tne      COM.' \m\  5CCGFU       c-- 
having    NAVEECSRU      participation. 
UNCLASSIFIED
3i".i.ix.«  i?:3w\a:jAi  -  -v  c  \ 
UNCLASSIFIED 
2.2  (U;       H0NAVSEC6RU:  PERSONNEL        (ASSISTANT       COMMANL-EPi  , 
THEIR    DEPUTIES    AND    DIVISION    HEADS)
3.--,.jJxa  i.sani 
2.3         (U)   ORGANIZATIONAL  CHANGES  WITHIN   THE   HEADC'U.if\  I  EKi, , 
NAVAL  SECURITY  GROUP  COMMAND 
2.3.1  (U)  On  24  .October  1934,  the  duties  and  responsibilities 
ot  the  Assistant  Commander,  Naval  Security  Group  Command  were 
seoarated  -from  these  of  the  Commanding  O-f-ficer,  Naval  Security 
Group  Activity,  Fort  Meaae. 
J^Hf  As  part  o-f  a  realignment  o-f  overall  Assistant 
Commander.  NavcU  Security  Group  (ACNSG)  ,  the  Commanding  O-f-ricer. 
naval  Security  Group  Activity,  Ft.  Meade,  MD  asssumed 
responsibility  -fi 
2-3.2       <U>   Within   the  Gt-fice  o-f  the   Assistant   -for   Fic-nS, 
Programs.  Euaoet  ,  and  Resources  Management  (GD>  ,  the  -functions  o-f 
.the-  Investments  Division  (GD5;  and  the  Operations  (G&MN;  Division 
(GDt>  were  merged  to  create  thhe  Budget  Division  (6D5) .
as'r3dxa  XK3WNH3ACD  iv  a-*j..^   i;j 
(■' 
UNCLASSIFIED 
.  *.  .-•  •  ■«* 
\'d;       OFNkv'NOTE  5450  ot  1  June  l^a^  announced  th«t  thr 
rcr.retarv  ot  the  Navy  had  approved  the  estaDli  snment  of  the   J.£. 
Naval  Security  Group  Activity.   Kamiseya,  Japan  as  ot  23  hav  i^i 
'see-  Section  10.2.1). 
SDUF-CE:   &L' 
^••^•'•i  iU)  With  the  approval  by  EECNAV  for  tr.e  estaoi  1  shrr.c-nt 
o-»  U.S.  NhVSECGRUPCT  Kami  seya  on  23  hay  1964.  author  irati  on  was 
Given  by  the  Chief  of  Naval  Operations  bv  CNO  ltr  Sc-r 
09E2E3/4U309&23  01"  i  June  1984  to  di  sestabl  1  sn  the  u.  =  . 
NAVSECGRUDET  Kami  ee  --a  c.  see  Sect  1  en  1 0.  2.  2 ;  .  !  r.i  =  w*  ~ 
accomplished  cv  NAVSECGRUNOTE  54  50  of  14  June  19S4  iee:  oectiori 
10.2.3; . 
SOURCE:   GD 
2.3.5  vLh  On  1  September  19S4,  the  Director  of  the  Secuntv 
Division  (G12>  in  the  Office  of  the  Assistant  Cofr.n.anae-r  tor 
HOnunistration,  Personnel  and  Secuntv  iG10>.  became  me  5scc;al 
Assistant  for  Security  JGH;. 
Z.l.h  <U>  Within  the  Office  or  the  Assistant   Commander   icr 
Reserve   F'lans   and  Readiness  there  was  a  ma.tcr  restructuring   ot 
UNCLASSIFIED
3S'.°3<!X3   iS3HrOi3AC0  J.V   Q?3':.-  «ij;j.-; 
UNCLASSIFIED 
<U>  the  NAVRESSECGRU  units.  The  number  of  units  was  reduced  -trr-iT.  iC 
to  85.  This-  was  done  to  consolidate  understrength  units  ar.n 
■facilitate  the  management  o-f  units.  and  missions.  At  tne  era  of 
1954,  there  were  431  officers  and  1,975  enlisted  resrer-e 
personnel  onboard.  A  list  of  Regional  Active  Duty  Cr-.ptciogic 
Officers  iRADCO  si  and  Naval  Reserve  Security  Grouo  Unit=  sprioi 
to  restructuring  is  found  in  Section  10.3.) 
2.3.7  iU)  On  1  September  19S4,  the  Assistant  Commander  for 
Aamim strati  on .  Personnel  and  Security  <GlO>  was  redesignated  as 
thp  Assistant  Commander  for  Personnel  and  Training. 
-.4  'U>  CESA!,'IZATlLJ|\i  CHARTS:  HEAE/GUARTERS.  IvAvAl.  SECIjP.  3  "' 
•• 
SP.QiJF'  COMMAND  19S4 
-ti. 
UNCLASSIFIED
.  3S*:3dX3  1M3HNU3A00  iV  Q?0;.^  ..;  j  j 
UNCLASSIFIED 
r--5  *U>    KE'y   MANAGEMENT   PRIORITIES   AMD    ISSUES:    c  -. 
HE  ADlMJhRT F.RS  DI V I  S I OM 
2.5.1  <U>  BBA  -fulfilled  its  basic  mission  bv  placing 
increased  emphasis  on  customer  service  to  include  same  day 
service,  and  bv  ensuring  total  aomini  strati  ve  support  to  i->? . 
Matters  o-f  routine  importance  included  keeping  abreast  o-f  chanr.es 
in  administrative  policy,  disseminating  those  changes  to  tne 
departments,  and  maintaining  a  smooth  -flow  o-f  paperwork. 
Emrhasis  is.  on  customer  satisfaction.  Problems  were  created  bv 
manning  short-fails  due  to  resources  employed  out  o-f  Et:A  to  other 
commands  -Pentagon/White  House/. 
1,5-;:  ,U;  -'-ring  1984.  GE  spent  130  days  Tut)  visitinc  hSS 
m -field  activities.  ashore  and  afloat.  He  conducted  briefings  or. 
the  status  o-f  issues  o-f  concern  to  enlisted  personnel.  bE  s 
primarv  goal  was  to  enhance  enlisted  job  satisfaction.  promote 
good  oraer  and  disci  pi  line.  and  to  improve  the  "quality  o-f  lire' 
in  general  for  enlisted  personnel  and  their  families.  Enlisted 
reenlistment  results  and  retention  data  for  Fy84  are  to  be  -fount 
in  Section  10.4.1.3  and  Section  10.4.4  respectively. 
UNCLASSIFIED
aS'ttdXl   4KaWN*3AC9  IV   a?0l..;,1vJ4,; 
UNCLASSIFIED 
2.5.3  \W)  The  Personnel  Security  Division  of  6H  processed 
Ties  applicants'  into  the  NAVSECGRU.  In  addition.  it  processes 
1622  access  review  cases  and  2000  SB1-FR  s,  a  total  of  3o22 
cases. 
<U)   There   was  a  total  o-f   241   ineiigiDle   decisions. 
Tnere   were  39  appeals  which  resulted  in  1/  reverssls.    Cf  the  17 
reversals.   one  individual  was  subsequently  declared  ineligible  a 
second  time.    The  breakdown  o-f  ineligible  decisions  oy  ca_ise   is 
as  -f  ol  lows: 
Drugs, si chohol  4S.  1*/.      +3.6%  trcm  1983 
Suitability  35.3V.      +3.0%  -fro*  19B3 
Medical  7.1/.      -1.6/.  -from  1933 
Financial  5.S%      +1.5*/.  -from  1963 
Foreign  National  2.5%      -3.5%  rrom  1953 
Criminal /iTii  sronduct         .8%      -2.9%  -from  19&3 
Security  .4%      -  .  c%  -from  1963 
(U)  The  new  ONI  courier  card  svstem  was  lmcl  ement  &q 
within  the  NM\-'5ECGRUC0M.  The  new  system  requires  account  s.oi  i  it  ■. 
of  more  than  2500  cards. 
<U)  There  were  a  30  per  cent  reduction  in  tns  number  o-i 
security  violations  at  the  HD  durina  1964. 
UNCLASSIFIED
3S'.*3dX3  AN3WNU3A0D  J.V  Q?3l.Z  ,4  i  j 
UNCLASSIFIED 
(U)     Physical    security    installations     continucc 
throughout  1934: 
a.  Joint  Services  Interior  Intrusion  Detection 
System  <JSIIDS;  were  installed  at  NSGA/D's  Grcton,  Adak.  and 
Sugar  Grove.   This  program  is  now  90%  complete. 
b.  Remote   Sensor   Svstem  tor   Physical   Security 
(RS5PS)   installations   began   at   N5GA - D ' s   Gal  eta   Island    and 
Northwest.    Work   started   in   the  fall  of  1984   and   progressed 
smoothly  throughout  the  year. 
c.  Bullet  proof  clothing  and  briefcases  were 
provided  to  N53A  Athens  for  protection  against  terrorists. 
d.  6H3   served  as  the  Navv  Alternate  to  tne   DC  I 
Physical   Security  sub-committee  of  the  DCI   Security   Committee, 
GH3   physical   security  personnel  attended  the  week-long   work in a 
gr-oup  seminars  for  SCI  facilities. 
-\ 
-•5.4  (U)  GK  conducted  20  command  inspections  at  20  rWv'SECGru.) 
elements  during  19S4  (TABLE  4).  Gk  visited  NAVSECGRuACT  Ga3e-_a 
Island  26-29  June  1984.  GK  and  Gk.B  visited  NAVSECGRUACT  key  U'est 
3-7  December  1984  in  response  to  Hotline  case  C-125-S4. 
UNCLASSIFIED
3SN34X3  iNawraaAco  av  a?  or.;;   i ij- 
UNCLASSIFIED 
TABLE  4 
COMMAND  INSPECTIONS  CONDUCTED  DURING  CY  1984  BY  GK 
NAVSECSTA  23  Jan  .  08  Feb  gA 
DCMS  06-09  Mar  84 
NAVCURSERVDET  Los  Angeles  19  Ma,.  84 
NAVSECGRUDEPT,  NAVCOMMSTA  San  Diego  20-23  Mar  84 
NAVSECGRUDEPT,  NAVCAMS  EASTPAC  Vahiawa  26-29  Mar  84 
NAVSECGRUACT  Pearl  Harbor  30  Mar  -  04  Apr  84 
NAVCURSERVDET  Honolulu  02  Apr  84 
NAVSECGRUACT  Kunia  05-09  Apr  84 
NAVSECGRUACT  Fort  Meade  30  Apr  -  03  May  84 
NAVSECGRUDET  Sugar  Grove  14-17  May  84 
NAVSECGRUACT  Anchorage  11-13  Jul  84 
NAVSECGRUACT  Adak  16-23  Jul  84 
NAVSECGRUACT  Skaggs  Island  25-31  Jul  84 
NAVSECGRUDET  Monterey  01-03  Aug  84 
NAVSECGRUDEPT  NAVCAMS  WESTPAC  Guam  17-23  Oct  84 
NAVCURSERVDET  Guam  19  0ct  94 
NAVSECGRUDEPT  NAVCOMMSTA  Diego  Garcia  25-28  Oct  84 
NAVSECGRUACT  Philippines/NAVSECGRUDET  Subic    11  Oct  -  08  Nov  84 
NAVCURSERVDET  Subic  05  Nov  84 
UNCLASSIFIED 
_   49
3SS3JX3  1N3HNH3ACU  XV  G*3.,.;  ,-ijj. 
UNCLASSIFIED 
2*5-5  <LI>  Gh1  *nd  Staff  conducted  inspections/visits  of  10  a 
the  letter  companies,  find  one  detachment  o-f"  the  Marine  Sucocrt. 
Battal ion. 
2.5.6  <C')  Key  management  priorities  and  issues  which 
concerned  GF  included: 
a.  The  CLASSIC  BUOYANT  Frogram  continued  tc  tee- 
the major  program  available  to  provide  live  readiness  training 
for  NAVFEESECGRU  units.  Under  the  SIG5EC  portion  o-f  the  program. 
units  monitored  -fleet  tactical  comms  and  reported  EEF 1  = .  which 
ranged  -from  call  sign  compromises  tc  disclosures  of  fleet 
movements.  Tne  SFEC0P5  portion  of  the  program  continued  unoer 
tasking  for  projects  such  as  RIVEEBOARD  and  MOONSAIL.  additional 
one  time  short  term  projects.  named  CAMPAIGNER  and  EsA TTLETOAD. 
were  undertaken  and  completed  during  1984.  Also  a  major  new 
target.  F'rcject  TOP  GALLANT,  was  added  to  the  CLASSIC  BLQtANl 
Program. 
b.  There  were  two  major  installation  pre  ie-c~i 
underway  during  195-?.  One  o-f  these  was  an  upgrade  to  the  CLASSIC 
BUOYANT  SPECOFS  and  SIGSEC  eauipn.ent.  This  effort  irivcl  ts 
replacing  aging  F;--390's  ano  MOL-lSTf y  s  witr  new  hhCh,.  retei-.crr; 
and   M0D-40s.    The   log  periodic  antennas  were  modified   to   be 
UNCLASSIFIED 
*n
.    3SN3JX3  AK3WN¥3AC'D  J.V  Q?0:..:    i  U:. 
UNCLASSIFIED 
<U>  rotatable.  Some  of  the  stations  also  received  new  recorder 
converters  or'VHF/UHF  receivers.  Fifteen  units  were  upc-aacc 
during  1934.  Bv  198S  all  of  the  units  with  equipment  should  be 
upgraded.  The  other  program  involves  installing  communications 
equipment  at  the  Reserve  Centers  to  give  the  NAVRESSECSRU  units  a 
secure  comms  capability.  By  the  end  o-f  1984.  11  communications 
suites  were  installed:  14  rr.ore  are  scheduled. 
2'5-7  <U;'  G30  identified  the  following  kev  management 
priorities  and  issues  in  terms  of  fulfillment  of  basic  mission, 
matters  of  routine  importance,  and  major  problems  respectively: 
a.   <U>  fulfillment  of  E<asic  Mission: 
Development   of  data  element  standards  to   De- 
used  bv  systems  developers  will  leaa  to  system   intercper sLi  1 1 1 v. 
^Database-   redesign   will   lead  to   increased   data   sharing.   and 
encourage  better  management  of  NAV5ECGRU  data. 
Develops.  reviews  and  monitors  standards  and 
procedures  required  to  coerate  crvptoqraphi  c  telecMw.ications 
and  automated  data  systems. 
Appraise  the  adequacy  and  efficiency  c-f 
operationai       methodology      relating      to       crypt  doaic 
UNCLASSIFIED
.  as*ia<iX3  &K3MRiaA&9  j.v  C3or..;  ija,. 
UNCLASSIFIED 
(U;  telecommunications   and   automated  data   systems:   recommend   an; 
initiate   actions   to  "improve  concepts   and/or   correct   svrtem- 
de-f  ici  enci  es. 
Perform  the  analytical  support  necessary  to 
ensure  maintenance  and  upkeep  of  data  bases  essential  to  the 
management  of  cryptologic  telecommunications  and  automated  data 
svstems. 
Ensure  that  current  operating  procedures:  fo- 
cryptclogic  telecommunications  and  automated  aata  svatem= 
accommodated  when  changes  to  the  software  programs  of  operations] 
systems-  ere  made  and  manages  the  configuration  contra]  boar as  of 
those  svstems  for  which  the  Telecommunications  ar.d  Automated  Data 
Systems  Department  is  the  functional  sponsor. 
Assists  in  the  determination  and  validation 
of  training  objectives  for  communications  ana  A  DP  personnel. 
m 
Coordinates  operational  telecommunications 
and  automated  data  systems  issues  with  other  organisational 
elements  within  NAVSECGRU  as  well  as  with  external  organization? 
such  as  the  ECA,  NBA.  DIA  and  the  SCE's,  as  appropriate. 
Fepresentea  COMNAVSECGRU  at  conferences, 
working  groups  and  panels  on  current  cryptolocsc 
telecommunications    and    automated   data   svstems    operational 
matters. 
UNCLASSIFIED 
ro
3S':3JX3   AfCTRNTjaAOO   JV   Q^Or.C  H  ij;. 
UNCLASSIFIED 
Review        requirements       -for        ne«<: 
telecommunicat ionc   and-  ADP  svsterrr  to  ensure   compatibility   ;.o 
tunctionallv    sponsored   current   svstems   and   proccourc-a    anc 
■facilitate  planning  -for  any  new  interfaces  and  procedures. 
As  the  Software  Configuration  Manager  for  ALr 
svstems  which  NAVSECGRU  provides  software  support.  6~0 
participated  in  design  and  develop/riant  reviews  tor  new  software? 
and  closely  cr.anaged  changes  to  the  software  cf  operational 
systems  in  order  to  enhance  operability  and  maintain  the 
interoperability  of  interfaced  systems.  Also  drafted  and  staffed 
NA^oECGRU  AL'F  security-  instructions,  notices,  policies  and  plans. 
b.  (U)  Matters  of  Routine  Importance: 
Development    of   a   Heaaquarters   corpcrfin 
rl   -  i     -  I  .  — e  to  facilitate  data  sharing  and  increase  a  =  ce  ssar-i  1  i  t 
the  data  bv  all  Headquarters  elements. 
Maintenance  of  sufficient  numoers  of 
experienced  personnel  at  the  NAVSECGRU  Software  Support 
Activities  to  provide  adequate  software  supcort  to  the  NA  .'SEC^'U 
ADP  = vsx ems. 
Continual  Ices  of  experienced  personnel  fro-, 
Software  Support  Activities  to  their  original  ratings  due  -co 
sea/overseas  rotation  requirements. 
UNCLASSIFIED
.    aS'UdXS   AN3HNH3AC  D  JV   C?0..^  ,<i  ij 
UNCLASSIFIED  ? 
Lack       o-f       definitive    r.;AV£El"CPU      policies       •■r.c 
instructions    en    ADP    software    stanaardi z= ti on .       and    mi  crocomput  pr 
software    support. 
Filling         mi  1 1  tary/ci  vi  1  i  an         billet?  with 
quali -tied       individuals    in    the    ADP    Security    and    Software      sections 
o-f    632    Division. 
c.        <U>    Major    F'roblems: 
Major  issue  was  indoctrination  and  trair.if.ci 
of  r.on-nDP  oriented  personnel  in  the  use  and  benefits  01 
automation    and    systems    interoperability. 
Unanticipated  sot t ware  support  problems  bei  na 
resol.ei    on    snort    notice. 
MiV-'SECGRiJ  ADF  Security  Plan  temp  cwslctcj 
•for    submission    to    !.iE'A. 
Significant  progress         was         made         towarc 
increasing  the  retention  arid  use  ot  personnel  e/periencec  in 
software    support    in    the    -field. 
Z.5.8  <U)    During    calendar    \-sar    1984.    G40   was    involved    in    man* 
di-ffei-ent  tasks.,  projects       and       NAV3EC6RU      related         matters. 
Suaportinc  33  NAVSECSRU  -field  sites  worldwide.  640  corrected 
appro:  ■  i  mat  el  v  500  Equipment  Casualty  Reports  (CASREF  =>>  and 
promulgated  a       total       o-f       313      tasks       to      CGMNAVELEXSySCON       and 
UNCLASSIFIED
.  3SN3dX"i  AK3KNW3AO0  AV  03 .If. :  ,-Uj 
UNCLASSIFIED 
iU;  cornel  eted  1S&  tasks.  A  total  of  4  military  construction  prciects 
wfire  beaun  tor  a  total  of  -ill.  7  million  and  thirty  Minor 
Construction  and  Ma.ior  Facilities  Repair  projects  were  -funded 
from  0-:  Ml-i  tor  a  total  of  45./  million.  Under  the  cognisance  of 
640L  4  new  major  system  acquisition  projects  were  begun  with  13 
ma.ior  projects  still  active.  640  has  fulfilled  its  mission  with 
the  dedi  coition  and  devotion  o-f  the  personnel  assigned. 
2.5.9      \'J:    Key  management  priorities  and  issues  as  outlined  d- 
Fi visions  653  and  G54  (of  650): 
a.  kU>  G53's  mission  is  essentially  that  of  a 
second  echelon  command.  As  such,  it  manages  the  shore  cased  Nc  vv 
High  Frequency  Direction  Finding  (HFDF)  svstem  (BULLSET  t  Z )  . 
Primary  issues  of  concern  were  programming  resources  s.= 
necessary,  monitoring  related  project  development,  allocating 
'-resources  (personnel  and  equipment),  development  ana  promulgation 
of  governing  operational  policv  and  procedures,  and  evaluation  of 
svstem  performance.  The  only  major  problems  encountered  in  I = o 4 
were  insufficient  personnel  and,  to  a  lesser  aeqrec.  insufficient 
travel  funds. 
UNCLASSIFIED 
fift
3SN34X3   iK3WNM3AlO  AY   Q?Jt..;  .  <  ij.; 
U- 
££ 
UNCLASSIFIED 
b.  tU>  G54  was  generally  successful  in  -fulfilling 
its  two  major  rr.i  ssi  on"  objectives  -  ensuring  that  the  Fegi  or.nM 
Reporting  Centers  (RRC.»  have  the  manpower,  training,  and  support 
to  carry  out  tneir  mission,  ar-!  ensuring  that  CLASSIC  WIZARD 
reporting  meets  the  needs  of  consumers. 
c.  <U>  Matters  of  routine  importance  included 
anything  pertaining  to  RRC  or  overall  system  status,  CLASSIC 
WIZARD  reporting,  and  both  CLASSIC  WIZARD  and  IMP  system 
development  is  of  concern  to  G54. 
d.  (U)  The  major  problem  which  654  encountered  in 
fulfilling  its  mission  was  a  lack  o-f  personnel.  With  two 
individuals  working  at  §CFF)  ,  anc  several  oiilets-  vacant  . 
G54  w  =  s  hard  pressed  to  fulfill  its  obligations  concerning  r^viei- 
of  documentation,  attendance  at  design  and  status  meetings  iscth 
locally   and  out  of  sre^,,       as  well  as  its  advisory  roaf   within 
"-the   headquarters.    The   arrival  of  additional   personnel   <LTJ3 
land  LCDR       |'  to  fill  previously  vacant  billets  somewhat 
alleviated  the  situation. 
(U)  Kev  Manaaement  Priorities  anc  Issues  of  6 "■'.•: 
UNCLASSIFIED 
,  :>  a.-  .-vivi:f<\y.i:r;T  f:xrr:.Si.
3S*::i3X3   1K3HNJI3AU0  AV   Q^J:.^  ,iJJ 
UNCLASSIFIED 
(U)  G60  fulfills  its  basic  mission  through  manaoement 
of  the  Naw's  Signal  Sscuntv  programs.  This  '•  nciuoc-s 
coordination  of  resource  requirements,  preparation  of  proara.Ti 
documentation  and  instruction,  and  direct  supervision  o-t  se-  ersl 
Vulnerability  Assessment  programs. 
k\J)  Matters  of  routine  importance  to  GtO  induce.  :.  he 
status  o-t  program  resources,  coordination  ci  rescurcE  s-o.iustm-r.tE 
and  charges,  resolution  of  issues  whicn  involve  ccorci  n<=  1 1  on 
between  the  Navy  and  other  agencies  on  SIoBEL  matters, 
assessments  of  the  security  of  U.S.  Navy  electronic  systems,  the 
adequacy  and  correctness  of  program  instructions.  trsinjna 
materials,  working  aids,  and  other  documents. 
('J.'       Major   problem   areas  which  had   to   oe   addressed 
during  1984  included: 
a.  the   implementation  of  a  major   W^inerat;  i;t  , 
"■Assessment   program   vL'VAL)   with  an  attendant   need   to   develop 
resource  requirements,   a  program  infra-structure,   and  operating 
procedures: 
b.  difficulties.    as    vet    unresolved.    ir 
establishing   an   effective  course  o-f  instruction  f  :■»-   C3»i;ri:-u: 
SIG3EC  personnel ; 
UNCLASSIFIED 
CO 
:  ••■:..:)  a.-  s->vi:i«KMr\T  i.xrr.PE
.    3SN33X3   £K3HK«3AC'S   XV  Ci'.;  ,n  I J 
UNCLASSIFIED 
c.  lU)   the;  need  to  resolve  issues  relating  to  c.-errli 
program   resource   requirements,    a   topic   which   led   tc    t  r.c 
scheduling  of  a  ms.ior  SIG5EC  program  review  during  1955.  ana: 
d.  a   continued   manning  problem  resulting   i  rom 
di  f  f  i  cui  ti  es  experienced  in  obtaining  qualified  civilian  personnel 
to  *'ill  all  authorised  billets. 
2.5.11  (U.«  Within  the  constraints  imposed  bv  personnel 
limitations  GEO  successfully  accomplished  its  mission.  Matters 
of  routine  importance  included  personnel  staffing,  support  to  the 
fleet  and  other  national  consumers,  and  timeliness  of  response. 
UNCLASSIFIED 
5Q 
:-"-r«.r>  a:  ivivkpsmk:?  r.xi'Ei.sr;
jT'.-.-.i  i^wsariAtK  n|;< 
SECTION  3 
SPECIAL  OPERATIONS. <U) 
3.1  (U)  The  Office  of  the  Assistant  Commander  for  Special 
Operations  is  subdivided  into  three  divisions:   Cryptologic  Sys- 
tems Management  (651),  Ocean  Surveillance  Systems  (G53) ,  and 
Special  Technology  (654). 
3.2  (U)  Major  programs/projects  begun,  continued  or  com- 
pleted during  1984  by  651  include  the  following: 
•?   *>   ~> 
LSpace-al location  study  at  NSGD  Rota,  Spain:   In  the 
fall  19B4,  CNS6  directed  a  space  allocation  study  at  NSGD 
Rota/CSG  Si::th  Fleet.   Severe  space  constraints  at  Rota  necessi- 
tated a  review  of  current  and  future  space  requirements  to  assess 
possible  impact  on  operations. 
[Combined  Cryptologic  Shore  Support  Activity  at  NSSA 
Edzell:   On  31  Jan  84,  the  U.S.  Navy's  first,  and  currently  only. 
Combined  Cryptologic  Shore  Support  Activity  (CCSSA)  was  estab-
;ikn')i:iai  ■-,   ifc.- 
(S)  lished  at  Naval  Security  Group   Activity  Edsell ,  Scotland 
^..2.4     ^^Material  Require  -nts  Study  Group:   COMNAVSECGRU 
was  asked  to  provide  a  th-^L  study  to  the  OPNAV  (0096)  chaired 
MRS6  which  was  formed  to  i.  ■'  ^r.igate  how  to  accommodate  all  the 
pi  armed  fl  R9    PB9      ^ 
briefing,  CNSB  provided  a  description  of  the  minimum  capability 
required  to  provide  cryptologic  support  to  the  tactical  commander,
3.2.6      (S>  BBPHES  Operational  Review  Team:   During  this  last, 
year,  BOKT  continued  to  provide  -fleet  experience  input  into  the 
development  of  BGPHES. 
3.2.8      (U>  Travis  Trophy:   CNSG  selected  Naval  Security  Group 
Edzell,  Scotland  to  represent  the  U.S.  Navy  in  the  1984  Travis 
Trophy  competition.   This  NSA  hosted  competition  annually  selects 
the  unit  which  has  made  the  most  significant  cryptologic  contri- 
bution to  the  U.S.  SIGINT  system.   In  competition  between  all  the
.  a ■.:>.;: .'.y.i  if;:iwNfi.iA«.t.  j.v  G"».v.; 
(U)  services,  USA,  UBN,  USAF,  and  USMC,  NSSA  Edzell  won  the  1984 
Travis  Trophy. 
3.2.9  (U)  NSGA  Napfes  received  an  award  -from  the  Association 
of  Old  Crows:   In  November  1984,  the  Association  cf  Old  Crows 
awarded  the  Outstanding  Unit  Certificate  o-f  Merit  -for  1984  to 
Naval  Security  Group  Activity,  Naples,  Italy.   The  award  citation 
commended  Naples  -for  "outstanding  performance  in  support  of  the 
multi-national  peacekeeping  force  during  the  Lebanon  crisis. " 
3.2.10  (U)  MCATS:   The  National  Security  Agency  (R24)  began  a 
TCP  program  to  provide  microcomputer  support  for  tactical  units. 
This  effort  involved  providing  small,  portable  computers,  with 
software,  to  tactical  units  in  the  field.   The  purpose  was  to 
give  Direct  Support  elements  the  use  of  current  ADP  equipment 
without  having  to  spend  limited  acquisition  funds.   After  using 
the  equipment  for  a  short  period  of  time,  the  units  would  be  in  a 
•better  position  to  make  smart  budget  decisions  regarding  procure- 
ment of  computer  equipment.   Any  applications  developed  by  the 
units  with  the  MCATS  computers  would  be  made  available  to  other 
activities  through  R24.   CNSS  asked  R24  for  16  systems  for  our 
DIRSUP  units  worldwide.   The  final  disposition  of  the  R24  systems 
would  not  be  made  until  early  1985.
las 
m* 
3.2.16       I  Misawa  Planning  Task  Force:   COMNAVSECBRU  partici 
pated  in  regularly  held  sessions  of  the  Misawa  Planning  Task 
:».»■*   *■-  ry«Ji'LVUi*».'*  IVM'"  *CF
3S":.i~>:M  i?;:iws«3Ai.^  jv  c--   
f" 
Requirements  for  additional  detailed  plans 
will  be  identified,  milestones  established,  and  responsible  orga- 
nizations tasked. 
»—  r1Mn-fvU(T*  fVM  -ST
S^JSbS*^ 
!*!<■:.      % 
''.      *l*A- 
t    *'  * 
3.2.19      <U>  SCSS:   651  provided  technical  load  tapes  to  NSGA 
Northwest  -for  database  build  for  OPEVAL/TECHEVAL  testing.   Analy- 
tic expertise  was  provided  to  NOSC,  NW,  NAVELEX,  and  the  contrac- 
tor.  Arrangements  were  made  -for  NSA  A15  management  personnel  to 
view  equipment  and  operations  at  NOSC  and  NW.   Additionally, 
the  program  was  brie-fed  to  CINCLANTFLT,  CINCPACFLT,  and  •field 
station  personnel  during  the  year. 
3.2.21     (U)  ADP  applications  -for  mobile  support:   651  provided 
briefings  and  discussions  with  FLTCINC  reps  and  field  stations 
".for  use  of  portable  ADP  suites  in  tactical  settings.   A  standard 
has  been  recommended  to  guide  tactical  users  toward  common/trans- 
portable applications. 
3.2.22     (U)  Misawa  automation:   Arrangements  were  made  to  pro- 
vide NSGA  Mi sawa  a  mini-computer  for  automation  of  certain  PANDft 
functions.   Work  continues  into  1985  to  provide  applications 
software  and  additional  hardware.
(• 
3.2.25     (U>  On  8  August  1984,  COMNAVSECGRU  promulgated  a  dis- 
tribution schedule  for  surface  carry-on  cryptologic  equipment  to 
all  fleet  Commanders-in-Chief.   The  distribution  schedule 
reflects  P0M-B6  planning/programming  initiated  by  CNO  tasking  and 
'-supported  by  documented  fleet  requirements.   The  POM  86-90 
programming  actions  supplement  other  ongoing  program  initiatives; 
reflect  the  phased  introduction  of  new  systems  to  replace  obso- 
lete carry-on  cryptologic  equipment;  constitute  the  basis  for 
future  POM  planning.   The  programmed  02<MN  resources  will  provide 
long-term  support  of  newer  generation  equipment  only. 
Additionally,  CNO  tasking  designed  Commander,  Naval  Security
i  *.«jnr«a.im  i>  ai 
(U)  6roup  Command  as  the  principal  coordinator  for  the  distribu- 
tion  and  inventory  management  of  replacement  carry-on  equipment. 
3.2.27     (U>  A  total  of  nine  "NEW"  OUTBOARD  Message  Format 
Conversion  Units  (OMFCU)  were  bought  and  COMNAVSECGRU  promulgated
i-.3WNa:iA^L  J.V 
(U)  a  distribution  schedule  to  -fleet  CINC's  and  all  sites  receiving 
the  equipment.   The  nine  OMFCU's  satisfy  stated  -fleet  require- 
ments in  the  short  term.   In  the  long  run,  integration  of  data 
currently  provided  via  OMFCU  into  Navy  C2  plan  is  required  to 
eliminated  limited  capability  QRC  efforts.   COMNAVSECGRU  will 
continue  to  work  with  OPNAV  to  initiate  such  a  solution.   Fleet 
CINC's  were  requested  to  stress  a  longer  term  solution  with  CNO. 
The  units  will  be  installed  IAW  the  following  schedule: 
NCOLANT,  late  Mar  85,  2  NEW  OMFCU's 
NCQ  MED,  mid  Mar  85,  1  NEW  OMFCU 
Naples,  IT,  late  Apr  85,  1  NEW  OMFCU 
Skaggs  IS,  early  May  85,  1  NEW  OMFCU 
NCEP  HI,  mid  May  85,  2  NEW  OMFCU's 
NCWP  Guam,  late  May  85,  2  NEW  OMFCU's
deactivation  of  the  USS  SPHINX  (ARL-24) :   The  USS 
SPHINX  <ARL-24>  began  procedures  -for  reactivation  on  1  Oct  84. 
ARL-24  is  assigned  to  the  Atlantic  Fleet  and  will  be  employed  by 
CINCLANTFLT  ^|  1.  The  due 
to  be  operational  4th  QTR  1985.
3.2.34     (U)  Relocation  of  Company  Delta  MPRSPTBN:   Relocation- 
of  Company  Delta  MARSPTBN  Hansa,  JA  to  Company  Delta  MARSPTBN 
Galeta  Island,  Panama  began  1  Oct  e4.   Relocation  is  scheduled  to 
be  completed  by  1  Oct  85.   This  relocation  is  being  done  to 
increase  manning  at  NSGA  Galeta  Island  and  to  make  NSBA  Hansa  a 
Navy  only  shore  site. 
3.3        (U)  Major  programs/projects  begun,  continued  or  com- 
pleted during  1984  by  653  include  the  following:
3.3.3      (U)  Project  NOBLESSE  is  a  High  Frequency  Direction 
Finding  <HFDF)  replacement  program  for  the  Army  and  Air  Force 
using  Navy  BULLDOG  Narrowband  System  (NBS>  equipments.   Upon 
"completion  of  equipment  deployment,  all  United  States  SIGINT 
System  (USSS)  HFDF  sites  will  have  similar  narrowband  equipment. 
This  will  increase  site  capabilities  and  enhance  unitary  (joint) 
operations  among  services. 
Ref :   n/a 
3.3.4      (U)  Action  continues  to  replace/upgrade  BATTLE  equip- 
ment, at  Naval  Security  Group  Activities  San  Vito,  Italy  and 
Misawa,  Japan.   The  system  acquisition  plan  has  been  developed 
and  reviewed. 
Ref:   n/a
r 
3.3.7     (U)  BULLDOG  Narrowband  System  Upgrade.   A  program  to 
replace  obsolete  equipment  and  improve  the  reliability  and  capa- 
bility of  the  Narrowband  System  (NBS) .   In. addition  to  tradi- 
tional direction  finding  capabilities,  the  BULLD06  NBS  has  an 
unmanned.  Automatic  Direction  Finding  (ADF)  subsystem  which  sig- 
nificantly reduced  the  tasking  load  on  the  manned  Semi -Automatic 
Direction  Finding  (SDF>  position. 
•c.n  a.-  ovj'kKMi::.'1  r.::rK.:»rt
a;:*:;i"x.i  z.x.wux.>.\: .  .'  v  «•-•. 
3.3.8     (U)  The  1984  BULLSEYE  Operations  Working  Group  met  11  to 
13  Sep  84  at  Norfolk,  VA.   The  group,  chaired  by  Commander,  Naval 
Security  Group  Command  (G53) ,  included  representatives  of  the 
three  FleEt  Commanders-in-Chief,  the  Net  Control  Stations, 
National  Security  Agency,  Canadian  Forces  Supplementary  Radio 
System  Headquarters.,  Assistant  Commander  Naval  Security  Group, 
and  Naval  Security  Group  Activity,  Skaggs  Island,  CA,  Performance 
Analysis  Group.   Discussions  centered  on  immediate  and  future 
High  Frequency  Direction  Finding  (HFDF)  operational  matters  rele- 
vant to  the  management  and  operation  of  the  BULLSEYE  system. 
Ref:    (1)  COMNAVSECGRU  ltr  Ser  G53/S9234  of  14  Oct  84  (BOM)  (Not 
enclosed) 
jl  -  r.!ivrf;';,'~m:".    i::;pc:.sr
A. ■*..;-. ■•..s  ^r;:4KNa:iAi  *.  ;v  c~.- 
3.3.9  (U>  WIDEBAND  Operations  Doctrine  Revision  completed.  A 
comprehensive  revision  of  the  U.S.  Navy  High  Frequency  Direction 
Finding  Wideband  Operations  Manual  Mas  completed  and  distributed 
to  the  appropriate  activities  on  9  Nov  84.  The  manual  contains 
policv,  guidance,  and  operational  procedures  for  net  control  and 
net  station  wideband  operations.
3.3.14  <U>    BULLSEYE   TEC   Flash    Channels.       Triple   Error    Correc- 
tion    (TEC)    -flash    channel    use   was   discontinued    in    Jul     1934.       TEC
NHKNU3AI  -..  JV  I.  ., 
(U)  adds  data  bits  to  each  transmitted  character  to  ensure  error— free 
reception  of  messages.   TEC  flash  channels  were  necessary  when 
high  frequency  communications  circuits  were  used  for  BULLSEYE 
traffic.   Present  day  circuit  routing  has  eliminated  the  need  to 
use  TEC. 
Ref:   (a)  COMNAVSECGRU  182220Z  JUL  84  (U) 
3.4       (U)  Major  programs/projects  begun,  continued  or  com- 
pleted during  1984  by  654  including  the  following: 
■•::,:■>  a:  c-.->v».-rnmi:%t  i.xru:..st
a.;\.;->:<  isaNNuaAic  jv  c: 
3.4.3     (U)  CCP  Billet  Initiative:   As  the  result  of  a 
divisional  study,  backed  up  by  a  SPO  contractor  study,  it  was 
•determined  that  due  to  the  increasing  complexity  that  was  being 
designed  into  the  Improved  CLASSIC  WIZARD  (IMP)  system,  the 
increase  of  19  billets  which  were  in  the  CCP  program  for  the 
record  would  be  inadequate  to  operate  the  RRC's  during  the  IMP 
er&.       The  actual  number  of  billets  required,  reduced  to  an  abso- 
lute minimum,  was  determined  to  be  137.   As  of  the  end  of  1984, 
the  budget  process  was  well  underway,  but  the  likelihood  of 
approval  of  the  billets  was  in  significant  doubt.
3-."*'.l-.V.I  ~K3WK1 
SECTION  4 
SIGNALS  SECURITY  AND  RELATED  FUNCTIONS  (U)  . 
4-1        |  Within  HONAVSECGRU,  Signals  Security  (SIGSEC)  -fun- 
ctions were  supervised  by  the  Assistant  Commander  -for  Signals 
Security  <G60>  .   G60  was  subdivided  into  -five  divisions:   Crypto- 
graphic Security  <G61>,  Signals  Security  Operations  (G62) ,  Vulne- 
rability Assessment  (663),  Plans,  Programs  and  Resources  <G64) 
and  Tempest  Management  (G65) .   G60  reported  the  following  develo- 
pments -for  1984: 
4-2       (U)  CLASSIC  COYOTE  DEVELOPMENT.   Development  of  CLASSIC 
COYOTE,  the  replacement  program  for  the  CLASSIC  NOMAD,   continued 
throughout  the  year.   As  part  of  the  contract  with  NAVELEX, 
Sperry  Corporation  conducted  a  two  week  training  session  in  March 
for  seven  NAVSECGRUACT  Charleston  personnel  (4  CTT,  2  CTM  and  1 
EN)  who  would  constitute  the  first  COYOTE  team.   The  equipment 
installation  in  the  van  was  completed  and  environmental  testing 
was  conducted  on  the  COYOTE  vehicle.   The  van  was  delivered  to 
NAVSECGRUACT  Charleston  in  early  August  and  was  used  for  two 
weeks  of  advanced  operator  training  conducted  by  two  Sperry 
technicians.   Sperry  released  the  van  in  August  for  DT  IIB/OT  II 
testing  by  COMDPTEVFOR  in  the  Norfolk  ares..       Testing  was  com- 
pleted and  the  COYOTE  tractoi — trailer  then  turned  over  to  NAVSEC- 
GRUACT Charleston.
^TsTi  :v"i    i.NHWNtfaAV '-    J  V 
4.3         I  FYe4  NAVY  TEMPEST  PRQQRAM.   During  FYB4,  665  eva- 
luated 628  TEMPEST  Vulnerability  Assessment  Requests  (TVAR's).  ' 
Ot  these,  273  were  tasked  as  Instrumented  TEMPEST  Surveys  (ITS) 
while  355  were  acceptable  risks.   In  FY84,  198  ITS  were 
completed  leaving  a  FY85  backlog  o-f  about  600.   In  FY84  a  joint 
Army,  Navy,  Air  Force  and  NSA  team  completed  zoning  all  major 
SIGINT  facilities  in  the  Pacific,  European  and  CONUS  areas.   We 
began  evaluating  selected  stations  with  large  Controlled  Spaces 
<CS)  to  designate  them  as  a  TEMPEST  acceptable  risk  with  a 
subsequent  Zoning  test. 
4.4       (U)  SHIELDED  ENCLOSURES.   In  1984,  seventeen  MILCON 
Shielding  efforts  have  been  eliminated  from  Navy  contracts.   Can- 
cellation o-f  these  enclosures  saved  the  Navy  about  30  million 
dollars  in  one  time  construction  costs  and  an  indeterminate  cost 
for  enclosure  preventative  maintenance  and  repairs.   These  enclo- 
sures were  eliminated  because  sites  either  had  large  controlled 
.spaces  or  TEMPEST  accredited  equipment  was  used.   Plans  to  pro- 
cure shielding  for  TEMPEST  purposes  are    first  submitted  to  NAVE- 
LEXSECCEN  for  technical  evaluation  and  then  to  COMNAVSECGRU  (G65) 
for  final  approval. 
4.! 
<U>       SIG5EC      EQUIPMENT
».i»»;vj.trtv  .  .  v  < , 
UNCLASSIFIED 
4.5.1  (U)   Efforts  to  locate  a  missing  AN/6SH-52  under  ship7 
ment  from  NAVSECGRUDET  London  to  NAVELEX^EN  Portsmouth  for  re- 
pairs were  unsuccessful.   COMNAVSECGRU  requested  an  NIS  investi- 
gation and  the  equipment  was  found  at  NSc  Norfolk  in  January. 
Shipping  guidance  for  the  equipment  was  issued  and  field  sites 
were  reminded  to  use  the  services  provided  jn  Military  Traffic 
Management  Regulations.   A  request  for  e;.;cess  AN/GTA-19's  and/or 
components  was  received  from  the  U.S.  Artny.   ftS  sponsor,  G62 
asked  all  holders  to  review  their  AN/GTA^9  requirements  and  to 
-declare  the  equipment  excess  and  provide  to  the  Army. 
4.5.2  (U)  Robbins  Bulk  erasers  were  s^nt  to  each  FLTCINC.   The 
15  erasers  <*10  a  unit)  are  used  to  degaUss  cassette  tapes  and 
will  simplify  field  operations.   Distribution  of  26  AN/TNH-25 
narrowband  recorders  was  completed  in  1?§4.   The  recorders  were 
shipped  to  sites  having  TA0001,  TA0002,  or  TAOO03  positions  and 
will  be  used  to  replace  the  AN/TNH-11's  Previously  in  place.   A 
"request  from  NAVSECGRUACT  Pearl  Harbor  t^j  install  two  TA0002 
SIGSEC  positions  was  received  in  September.   Upgrading  and  forma- 
lizing two  currently  installed  but  untas^ed  training  positions 
would  effectively  create  the  two  TA0002  Positions.   COMNAVSECGRU 
concurred  with  the  request  and  will  identify  funds  when  equipment 
deficiencies  Bre   received. 
4.6       <U>  PUBLICATION  UPDATES  ' 
UNCLASSIFIED
..vtn.>a.im.-  »  v.  i. 
UNCLASSIFIED 
4.6.1  <U)  A  reques:  -for  recommended  additions,  changes  and 
deletions  to  NAVSECGRUIN5T  C3265.  1  and  Unit  Mission  Profile  -for' 
S1GSEC  was  -forwarded  to  the  -field  sites  and  area  directors. 
Responses  will  be  used  to  update  the  NAVSECGRU  publications. 
4.6.2  <U>  Using  information  submitted  by  NAVSECGRUACT  North- 
west and  NAVSEC6RUDEPT  San  Diego,  a  draft  CLASSIC  NOMAD  Advance 
Planning  Guide  was  developed.   The  guide  will  assist  commands  in 
budgeting,  maintenance,  and  ancillary  support.   In  addition,  a 
draft  CLASSIC  NOMAD  Procedures  Manual,  using  information 
submitted  by  NAVSECGRUACT  Charleston,  NAVSECGRUACT  Northwest  and 
NAVSECGRUDEPT  San  Diego,  was  further  developed  addressing  the  use 
of  the  van  to  support  BFDB  collection. 
4.6.3  <U)  NAVSECGRUINST  C3260.4,  which  will  replace  NAVSECGRU- 
INST  C2200.4A,  is  nearing  completion.  The  draft  instruction  will 
be  reviewed  to  ensure  compliance  with  present  National,  DOD  and 
•Navy  policy  and  to  ensure  that  all  new  SIGSEC  initiatives  Are 
covered. 
4.7'      <U>  SIGNAL  NOTATION  SYSTEM  FOR  SIGSEC.   NAVSECGRUACT 
Charleston  was  tasked  to  review  all  active  Signal  Notation 
Letters  and  compile  them  into  a  draft  publication  outlining  use 
of  the  Signal  Notation  System.   The  draft  was  coordinated  with 
UNCLASSIFIED 
:'  ::;<.■»  n  a:  ccvj-i.nv.i^t  i.xrr ...::
UNCLASSIFIED 
(U)  NAVSECSP.UA*:T  Northwest  and  NAVSECBRUDEPT  San  Diego.   Charleston 
will  maintain  and  update  the  final  version  of  the  publication. 
4.e       (U)  CLASSIC  ASCOT/NOMAD  OJT  TRAINING  MANUALS.   Two 
complete  sets  of  Operations  and  Maintenance  OJT  Manuals,  and 
Instructor/Student  Handbooks  for  CLASSIC  ASCOT  and  NOMAD  were 
forwarded  to  NAVSECBRUDEPT  San  Diego  between  early  January  and 
late  March.   NAV5ECBRUACT  Northwest  received  their  CLASSIC  NOMAD 
manuals  in  March.   Both  commands  had  previously  completed  the  OJT 
-training  in  each  &rea.       It  was  determined  that  sites  would 
receive  the  manuals  prior  to  OJT  training  in  the  future.   The 
Commander,,  Naval  Surface  Reserve  Force  received  CLASSIC  NOMAD  OJT 
Manuals  as  requested  to  aid  in  planning  for  eventual  van  turnover 
to  reserves. 
4.9       (U)  FORMAL  SI6SEC  TRAIN INB 
4.9.1     (U)  Continuing  progress  was  made  throughout  the  year  on 
developing  a.  formal  SIBSEC  training  course  (Class  "C"  School)  at 
NAVTECHTRACEN  Pensacola.   The  contractor,  SPC  of  Rossi yn,  VA, 
with  representatives  from  the  FLTCINC's,  NAVELEX,  selected  SIBSEC 
field  sites,  and  B60,  completed  the  Tasks  and  Skill  Analysis 
(TASA),  and  Job  Task  Inventory.   The  final  TASA  was  approved  and 
submitted  to  NAVELEX  in  November. 
UNCLASSIFIED 
:*:      ■■■:,  :>  Ar  oovi:kkmi:nt  i..\;t..^!:
4.9.2     (U>  A  SIBSEC  Officer  Correspondence  Course/Enlisted 
Correspondence  Course  (OCC/ECC)  is  being  developed  by  SPC  as  part 
of  the  contract  award  for  the  SIGSEC  "C"  School.   The  first  draft 
of  the  course  was  received  and  reviewed  for  technical  accuracy, 
classification,  and  graphics  in  mid  July.   Many  errors  were  found 
and  consequently  NAVELEX  disapproved  the  first  draft. 
4.10     |B  SIGSEC  PROGRAM  REVIEW.   The  SWSC  data  base  issue 
brought  into  focus  questions  concerning  the  data  tapes  needed, 
how  much,  and  the  resources  needed  to  produce  it.   On  31  August 
1984,  CNO  requested  afl  |  review,  which  was 
really  directed  at  "the  data  base"  from  a  data  collector  view- 
point.  CNO  (OP-956)  was  briefed  to  his  satisfaction  on  16  Nov. 
The  OP-956  request  drove  out  some  strongly  differing  opinions 
within  the  NAVSECGRU  ranks.   A  more  indepth  SIGSEC  program  review 
was  scheduled  to  be  completed  in  early  19S5. 
.4.  11 
<U>  SIGNALS  WARFARE  SUPPORT  CENTER  (SWSC) 
4.11.1   |  ■  .As  the  SWSC  moved  toward  FOC,  a  considerable  number 
of  prior  years'  ECP's  generated  early  in  the  year  for  additional 
hardware  and  software  capabilities.   Installation  and  checkout  of 
a  second  VAX  11/780  computer  was  completed  on  16  April,  and  a 
multi-year  CASPAR  signals  analysis  software  development  ended 
-:  :■"•:•  t.i»  a.-  covi:r:wn:r  i.x;-::..:T
when  installation,  check  out  and  training  was  completed  by  "[SC  on 
4.11.2    (U)  In  November,  the  SWSC  developed  a  comprehensive  set 
of  CYB5  goals  and  objectives.   These,  however,  were  later  to  be 
modified  in  line  with  early  1985  NAVSECGRUACT  Charleston/SWSC 
SIGSEC  mission,  organisation  and  resource  reviews,  a  major  part 
of  the  overall  1985  SIGSEC  Program  Review. 
4.12         I  EXERCISE  SUPPORT  AND  SPECIAL  COLLECTION.   During 
"the  year,  support  was  provided  via  Headquarters  to  several 
exercise  situations.   ELSEC/Signals  analyst  personnel,  one  each 
from  NAVSECGRUACT  Northwest,  NAVSECGRUACT  Naples,  and 
NAVSECGRUACT  Charleston,  provided  support  for  LANTFLT  READEX  2-e4 
and  GALLANT  KNIGHT  84.   In  January,  NAVSECGRUDET  San  Diego  was 
tasked  to  provide  two  Signal  analysts  to  assist  EESEF  in 
collecting  Blue  Data  in  the  form  needed  by  SWSC  Charleston.   In 
v...:>  a.-  gov;  t-nmiint  r.>:ri:.:.r:
May,  NAVSEC6RUDEPT  San  Diego  was  tasked  to  support  COMJSOC  COMSEC 
effort  during  Exercise  PREVIOUS  VOYAGE.  J 
4.13  <U>  COMMUNICATIONS  SECURITY  (COMSEC).   On  IS  June,  CDR 
Fogerson  and  CDR  Fallen  (DCMS)  attended  a  meeting  organized  by 
OP-941  to  discuss  the  planned  transfer  of  COMSEC  policy 
responsibilities  from  OP-944  to  OP-941.   Incident  to  this  action, 
COMNAVELEXSYSCOM  assumed  increased  COMSEC  equipment  planning 
responsibilities  and  the  responsibility  for  CDMSEC  equipment 
management/inventory  functions  were  transferred  from 
COMNAVTELCOM  to  C0MNAVSEC6RU  (DCMS). 
4.14  (U)  MSC  CONTRACTORS.   Along  with  representation  from  CNO 
(OP-942),  Mr.  Hammack  attended  a  meeting  on  16  Jan  at  MSC  to 
provide  further  assistance  in  planning  for  assumption  of  communi- 
cations aboard  some  MSC  contractot — operated  ships.   Of  prime 
concern  was  the  use  of  foreign  owned  U.S.  Registry  Ships. 
.Guidance  was  provided  and  assistance  in  preparing  necessary 
requests  for  exceptions  to  the  National  policy  was  extended. 
4.15  (U)  MANUAL  CRYPTOSYSTEMS.   Mr .  HUH  attended  a  meeting  S{j_(L 
on  6  Jan  called  by  Mr.|    |  CNO  (0P-941J).   The  subject  was 
paper  cryptosystems  and  the  impact  auto-manual  systems  (KL-42  and 
follow-on  devices)  will  have  on  Navy  requirements.   OP-941  is 
considering  a  tasfcer  to  FLTCINC's  and  this  Headquarters  which 
\'<  :>  a;  nr>vi:<:.Mi *:?  i.xrr..»r
UNCLASSIFIED 
(U>  will  call  for  a  five-year  projection  of  requirements  for  paper 
systems  based  on  the  Navy  Secure  Voice  Improvement  Plan  and  N5A- 
production  of  auto-manual  systems. 
4.16      (U)  SIGNALS  SUSCEPTIBILITY  AND  VULNERABILITY  ASSESSMENT 
(SSVA) .   The  Navy  Data  Link  Vulnerability  (DVAL)  program  was 
begun  in  1983  with  a  request  from  OSD  for  implementation  into  the 
Navy  and  incorporation  into  the  existing  COMNAVSECGRU  (S60>  SSVA 
program.   At  the  conclusion  of  1933,  formal  tasking  for  DVAL 
implementation  by  COMNAVSECGRU,  though  impending,  had  not  been 
received.   The  following  is  a  brief  chronology  of  events  in  the 
DVAL  evolution: 
-  JAN:   CNO  (0P-09S)  memo  to  PD,  ASN,  RE?<S 
outlined  the  Navy's  DVAL  implementation  plan.   0P-09B  received 
oversight,  OP-094  received  resource  sponsorship  and  COMNAVSECGRU 
became  Executive  Agent. 
-  MAR:   DVAL  Information  Management  System  <DVIS> , 
•designed  as  a  G63  assessment  management  tool,  was  developed  as 
part  of  the  Headquarters  corporate  data  base. 
-  APR:   OP-094  formally  tasked  COMNAVSECGRU  to 
implement  DVAL  and  identified  the  following  seven  candidate 
systems: 
High  Frequency  Improvement  Program  <HFIP> 
NAVSTAR  GPS 
Joint  Tactical  Information  Distribution  System  (JTIDS) 
UNCLASSIFIED 
:;;  :•".-..:•  a:  giivkkkmi:!;?  r.xn:  .::r.
.1.  -  a •.:.'..■:  «^r,.ift.-Nia.tAv  ;  »  \    t.  ■. 
UNCLASSIFIED 
Combat  Identification  System  (CIS) 
EHF  SATCOM  Terminals 
ELF  Communications 
Direct  Downlink  (DDL) 
-  MAY:   COMNAVSECGRU  submitted  FY84-FY90  -funding 
estimates. 
-  JUN:  OPNAV  and  NAVSECGRUHQ  action  officers 
attended  DVAL  methodology  seminar  at  DVAL  JTF,  Kirtland  AFB, 
Albuquerque,  NM. 
-  JUL/AUG:   NOSC  began  resource  requirements  and 
availability  survey  of  13  different  facilities  across  the 
country. 
-  AUG:  APL  began  multi-year  Navy  Signals  Security 
Vulnerability  Assessment  Program.  FYS5  efforts  to  concentrate  on 
High  Frequency  Ant i -Jamming  (HFAJ). 
-  SEP:   DVAL  JTF  presented  DVAL  Methodology 
seminars  to  SWSC  Charleston  and  NAVSECGRUHQ. 
-  SEP:   POM  submission  made  for  FY86  and  FY87  for: 
RDTS.-E  -  *3M  per  year;  DPN  -  *1.0M  in  FY86,  S1.546M  in  FY87;  OfeMN 
-  *76K  in  FY87,  »152K  in  outyears  (4  billets). 
-  SEP:   Identified  jamming  equipment  required  and 
phased  plan  for  obtaining  equipment  with  FY86/FY87  DPN. 
-  OCT:   OP-095  (became  sponsor  after  OCT  OPNAV 
reorganisation)  reprogrammed  *626K  of  RDT&E  funds  for  DVAL  FYE5. 
UNCLASSIFIED
4.17     ||  COMPLETED  ASSESSMENTS.   The  Vulnerability  Assessment 
Division  (G63)  completed  a  number  of  assessment  during  the 
calendar  year.   The  systems  involved  included  the  AN/WSC-6  SHF 
Spread  Spectrum  Satellite  Transceiver;  Advanced  Narrowband 
Digital  Voice  Terminal  (ANDVT);  VINSON  KY-58/NEST0R  KY-2B 
Cryptographic  Equipments;  an  AN/SYS-48  Radar  System  special  study 
involving  probability  of  detection;  and  an  EHF  SATCOM  study  of  an 
e::tremely  high  frequency  satellite  system. 
4.18      <C>  ONGOING  ASSESSMENTS.   Ongoing  assessments  being 
managed  by  the  Vulnerability  Assessment  Division  at  years  end 
included; 
4.19 
(U>  TEMPEST 
'92
^ 
UNCLASSIFIED 
4.19.1  (U)  TEMPEST  Management  Information  Support  System     . 
HEMISS)  hardware  was  procured  by  NAVELEXSYSCOM  23  Jan  1984. 
TEMISS  software  upgrade  was  provided  by  NOSC  to  speed-up  standard 
report  generation  and  provide  new  data  input  screens. 
4.19.2  (U)  GAO  DOD  TEMPEST  Evaluation  -  on  20  Nov,  COMNAVSECGRU 
representatives  I  I  with 
representative  Mr.  I         l>  met  CND  (0P-009P)  representatives 
to  brief  Mr.  J  |of  GAO  on  the  Navy  TEMPEST  Program.   This  brief 
was  in  response  to  a  GAO  evaluation  of  TEMPEST  protective 
measures  for  NON-SCI  at  DOD  and  contractor  facilities. 
Congressman  ■     M  requested  GAO  investigate  the  DOD  TEMPEST 
program"  primarily  as  it  pertains  to  contractors.   This  was 
brought  about  by  complaints  that  f-=  government  was  requiring 
more  stringent  TEMFEST  protective  measures  for  contractors  than 
for  government  facilities.   For  the  most  part,  the  Navy  has  not 
placed  TEMPEST  requirements  on  contractors.   A  recent  change  to 
"the  National  Policy  may  force  the  Navy  to  place  more  stringent 
protective  measures  on  contractors.   However,  these  requirements 
will  be  no  more  stringent  than  those  placed  upon  Navy  facilities. 
There  is  no  standardized  DOD  policy  on  the  treatment  of 
contractors.   A  standardised  policy  was  being  developed  by  the 
Subcommittee  on  Compromising  Emanations,  but  with  the  disbandment 
of  the  NCSC  all  official  work  in  this  direction  has  stopped. 
UNCLASSIFIED
4.19.3    (U)  Draft  TEMPEST  OPNAVINST  C5510.93E  -  the  draft  was 
sent  to  CNO  but  is  still  undergoing  significant  modifications  dye 
to  a  change  in  program  sponsor  and  the  disestablishment  of 
CHNAVMAT. 
4.20      (U)  EMITTER  DATA  BASE 
4.20.1   MW  NAVSECBRU  responsibilities  for  the 
collection/management  of  data  on  U.S.  Navy  emitters  ("blue  force" 
data)  include  support  for  DOD  EW  and  C3CM  programs.   However,  in 
early  1984  it  was  realized  that  information  on  our  own  force 
systems  was  not  intelligence  and,  as  such,  could  not  be  driven  by 
DIA  and  the  National  Intelligence  System.   The  JCS,  to  ensure 
optimum  accepted  intelligence  support  to  EW  and  C3CM,  established 
the  U.S.  Noncommunication  System  Data  Base  (USNCSDB) .   The  JCS 
USNCSDB  Plan  memorandum  to  the  services  was  issued  on  12  October 
19S4.   The  plan  provides  that  JCS  will  task  the  services  and  that 
.the  services  will:   designate  POC's;  forward  requirements  on 
other  services  in  JEWC;  assist  JEWC  in  validating  and 
prioritizing  requirements;  and  task  service  elements  to  produce 
the  required  data.   On  7  and  8  November,  JEWC  hosted  the  first 
JCS  sponsored  USNCSDB  meeting  at  San  Antonio.   The  initial  lists 
of  requirements  for  all  services  were  reviewed,  prioritized  and 
accepted  by  the  service  POC's.   The  Navy's  POC  from  OF— 956 
assumed  Electronic  Warfare  Integrated  Reprogramming  (EWIR)
<C)  production  responsibility  -for  51  Navy  noncommunication  emitters 
o-f  which  15  had  no  EWIR  -files  at  all.   JCS's  2B  November  message 
officially  tasked  the  services  to  produce  EWIR  data  on  the 
accepted  emitter  lists.   CNC  had  not  yet  -formally  tasked  nor 
■funded  NAVSECGRU  to  produce  the  EWIR's  by  years  end. 
4.20.2   P  |  A  review  was  conducted  of  data  base 
■functions/requirements  at  NAVSECGRUACT  Charleston's  Signals 
Warfare  Support  Center  (SWSC)  systems.   By  year's  end,  it  was 
determined  that:   a  considerable  amount  of  data  had  been 
collected  for  which  there  &re   no  consumers;  there  were  require- 
ments for  some  data  not  held;  and  the  disorganized  data 
collection  and  data  base  development  efforts  needed  to  be  fine 
tuned  to  collect,  analyse  and  maintain  only  the  data  required  to 
satisfy  validated  production  requirements.   The  issue  was  to  be 
addressed  in  the  19S5  SIGSEC  program  review. 
*4.21      (U)  SIGSEC  AUDIOVISUAL  (AV)  PRODUCTION.   A  new  training 
film  to  promote  security  awareness  and  discipline  on  radio- 
telephone circuits  was  initiated  in  1984.   A  free-lance  civilian 
script  writer  was  contracted  through  the  Defense  Audiovisual 
Agency  (DAVA)  to  write  the  film  script.   During  development  of 
the  script  outline,  education  and  background  materials  were 
provided  by  G62.   The  writer  observed  a  Combined  Inport  training 
exercise  in  Norfolk.   The  completed  outline  was  reviewed  by
-  »  tvir«a-im  t  .  \     i. 
<U>  COMNAVSECGRU  and  delivered  to.  DAVA  in  late  August  -for  production, 
A  1966  film,  "U.S.  NAVAL  COMMUNICATIONS  SECURITY"  had  lost  its 
relevancy  to  today's  audiences  and  action  was  taken  to  remove  it 
from  the  list  of  effective  Navy  AV  products.   Audiovisual 
training  materials  were  provided  to  field  sites,  including  a  new 
NSA  production,  "THREAT  TO  U.S.  COMMUNICATIONS  IN  EUROPE."   While 
the  videotape  primarily  addressed  U.S.  Army  communications,  its 
points  were  applicable  to  Navy  units  worldwide.   Fifteen  copies 
of  the  tape  were  received  from  NSA  and  distributed  to  SIGSEC 
units.   Copies  of  a  NATO  version  were  sent  to  the  FLTCINC's  in 
December.   Individual  SIGSEC  sites  were  tasked  to  develop  and 
forward  various  SIGSEC  awareness  briefings  to  COMNAVSECGRU  to  be 
held  as  "Master"  briefs.   The  Navy  AV  Center  agreed  to  create 
camera-ready  art  work/graphics  and  corresponding  slides  in 
support  of  the  "Master"  briefs  and  five  other  briefings  developed 
under  contract.   NSA  (S15)  agreed  to  support  SIGSEC  awareness 
initiative  and  offered  to  provide  various  AV  products  including 
* 
videos,  posters,  and  briefings. 
4.22        |  NATIONAL  TELECOMMUNICATIONS  AND  INFORMATION  SYSTEMS 
SECURITY  COMMITTEE  (NTISSC) .   The  National  Telecommunications  and 
Information  Systems  Security  Committee  was  established  in  19S4  to 
replace  the  National  COMSEC  Committee  and  to  operate  under  the 
direction  of  the  Systems  Security  Steering  Group.   The  new 
structure  is  intended  to  repraceboththePD-24  Interagency  Group
for  Telecommunications  Protection  (IG/TP)  and  the  National  COMSEC 
Committee  (NC5C)  .   The  Systems  Security  Steering  Group  consisti-ng 
of  the  Secretary  of  Defense,  the  Secretary  of  the  Treasury,  the 
Director  of  the  Office  of  Management  and  Budget,  the  Director  of 
Central  Intelligence,  and  chaired  by  the  Assistant  to  the 
President  for  National  Security  Affairs  was  established  for  this 
purpose.   The  NTISSC  was  tasked  to  consider  technical  matters  and 
develop  operating  policies  as  necessary  to  implement  the 
provisions  of  the  National  Security  Directive.   The  committee  is 
chaired  by  a  representative  of  the  Secretary  of  Defense  and 
composed  of  a  non-voting  representative  of  each  member  of  the 
Steering  Group  and  a  voting  representative  of  each  of  the 
f ol lowing: 
The  Secretary  of  State 
The  Secretary  of  the  Treasury 
The  Attorney  General 
The  Secretary  of  Commerce 
The  Secretary  of  Transportation 
The  Secretary  of  Energy 
The  Director  of  Central  Intelligence 
Chairman,  Joint  Chiefs  of  Staff 
Administrator,  General  Services  Administration 
Director,  Federal  Emergency  Management  Agency 
The  Chief  of  Staff,  United  States  Army 
The  Chief  of  Naval  Operations
The  Chief  of  Staff,  United  States  Air  Force 
Director,  National  Security  Agency- 
Manager,  National  Communications  System 
4.23      <U>  DVAL  PROGRAM  ESTABLISHMENT.   In  1984,  the  Navy's 
Data  Link  Vulnerability  Assessment  (DVAL)  program  was  established 
under  the  management  of  COMNAVSECGRU  HD  with  the  RDT?<E  funds 
under  the  claimancy  of  the  Office  of  Naval  Research  (ONR) .   DVAL 
funding  will  now  be  programmed  for  by  COMNAVSECGRU  in  the  annual 
POM  submission.
UNCLASSIFIED 
SECTION  5 
SIGNIFICANT  TECHNICAL  DEVELOPMENTS  (U) 
5.1       (U)  690  is  the  Office  of  the  Assistant  Commander  for 
Technical  Development.   Major  programs  begun,  continued  or 
completed  during  CY  1984  include  the  following. 
5.1.1  (U)  CLASSIC  SEACOAST.   A  program  review  was  held  on  9 
Feb,  1984.   The  approval  for  production  (AFP)  was  granted  by  CNO 
as  a  result  of  this  review.   The  first  two  CLASSIC  SEACOAST 
production  systems  will  go  to  NTTN  Pensacola.   Twenty  additional 
systems  will  be  produced  through  Oct  87. 
5.1.2  (U)  CLASSIC  CENTERBOARD.   Following  a  system  review 
group  meeting  in  December  1983,  a  CLASSIC  CENTERBOARD  system 
capability  statement  and  a  requirements  definition  were 
developed.   A  candidate  architecture  was  developed  and  major 
progress  was  made  towards  developing  a  "Class  A"  system  speci- 
m 
f ication. 
5.1.3  (U)  CLASSIC  FLAGHOIST.   The  CLASSIC  FLASHOIST  system 
design  review  was  held  at  RCA  16-20  Jan  1984.   A  program  review 
as  held  2-6  April  1984.   Following  the  critical  design  review 
held  14-17  May  1984,  RCA  was  awarded  the  contract  for  the  CLASSIC 
FLAGHOIST  development  and  service  test  model  hardware.   The 
CLASSIC  FLAGHOIST  "IMP"  became  operational  on  29  October  1984. 
UNCLASSIFIED
5.1.4     <U>  The  PROJECT  BANDALORE  in-plant  acceptance  test,    '■■ 
BANDALDRE-OPU  inter-facing,  and  special  signal  recognizer  testing 
were  completed  at  NSGA  Winter  Harbor  16-20  January  1984.   The 
BANDALORE  site  acceptance  test  and  the  DT&E  were  successfully 
completed  at  NSGA  Winter  Harbor  during  the  week  of  31  July.   The 
BANDALORE  site  survey  for  field  station  Augsburg  installations 
was  conducted  30  January  -  3  February  1984.   The  Augsburg  site 
acceptance  testing  commenced  on  2  October  1984. 
5.1.7     (U)  DARPA/OP-095  PROJECT  SUPPORT.   Continuing  management 
and  technical  support  was  provided  for  development  of  special 
purpose  surveillance  equipment  sponsored  by  DARPA/OP-095. 
5.1.8     ||  SCSS/SCORE/MSTDF  SYSTEMS.   The  SCORE  factory 
acceptance  test  was  held  16-20  April  1984.   There  were  no  major 
100 
■•.•«!>  a.-  .•-•vi.i-\\'<?::;T  i.xrn.sK
JHg  -failures.   The  production  hardware  was  shipped  to  NSBA  Northwest 
•for  site  acceptance  testing.   Site  acceptance  testing  was 
complete  on  13  July  1984. 
5.1.8.1   m  MSTDF  &  SCORE  were  tested  at  NSBA  Northwest  during 
the  week  of  14  August  1984.   It  was  discovered  that  the  inter-face 
to  STREAMLINER  needed  work  and  retesting  was  scheduled  for  late 
September  1984.   The  MSTDF  techeval  was  completed  on  24  October 
1984. 
5.1.8.2  |B  AH  aspects  o-f  MSTDF  tested  satisfactorily  except 
for  its  interfaces  with  SCORE.   This  was  to  be  tested  in 
connection  with  SCORE'S  techeval.   The  SCORE  techeval  was 
successfully  completed  on  7  December  1984. 
5.1.9     (U)  CLASSIC  ORACLE.   A  CLASSIC  ORACLE  project  review  was 
held  at  interstate  Electronics  Corp  during  the  week  of  17  Jan  B4 . 
"-A  factory  acceptance  test  was  scheduled  for  June  with  a  filed 
technical  evaluation  to  follow  in  July.   This  schedule  slipped 
and  the  FAT  was  conducted  for  APOCALYPSE  (the  CLASSIC  ORACLE  STM) 
during  the  week  of  23  July.  The  FAT  was  terminated  and 
rescheduled  for  the  week  of  2  August  due  to  software  problems. 
The  APOCALYPSE  factory  acceptance  test  was  finally  completed  on  5 
Aug  84  and  a  site  acceptance  test  was  scheduled  for  4-5  Sep  84  at 
NSBA  Edsell,  Scotland.   A  technical  evaluation  commenced
UNCLASSIFIED 
(U)  -following  the  SAT  on  10  Sep  1984.   During  the  week  of  16  Oct  84, 
the  inter-facing  of  the  directive  RF  antenna  to  the  APOCALYPSE 
system  was  accomplished. 
5.1.10  (U>  SPREAD  SPECTRUM.   The  DELTA  BLUE  critical  design 
review  was  held  at  BTE  during  the  week  of  17  Jan  84. 
5.1.11  (U)  SES  (SIGNALS  EXPLOITATION  SYSTEM).   One  SES 
(essentially  the  same  as  the  "Advanced  Signals  Analysis  Position" 
at  NSGA  Edzell)  was  built  by  the  Navy  Research  Laboratory  for 
installation  at  NSSA  Misawa,  Japan.   Installation  planning  was 
started  for  a  1985  installation  of  this  system. 
5.1.12  (U>  SUB-HF  INITIATIVES.   The  LANDWAYII  antenna  system 
was  installed  at  NSSA  Edzell.,  Scotland  in  early  calendar  year 
1984. 
m. 
5.1.13  (U)  CLASSIC  CIRCUS.   The  CLASSIC  CIRCUS  search  system 
installation  at  NSBA  Edzell  continued  into  CY19B4.   CLASSIC 
CIRCUS  was  essentially  completed  by  the  end  of  the  calendar  year. 
5.1.14  (U)  ADVANCED  SEARCH  COORDINATOR/CLASSIC  FISHNET. 
Sanders  presented  a  rough  draft  of  the  ADVANCED  SEARCH  COORDI- 
NATOR/CLASSIC FISHNET  concept  plan  during  the  week  of  24  Jan  84. 
A  program  review  as  held  at  Sanders  on  1-2  Nov  84. 
UNCLASSIFIED 
102
UNCLASSIFIED 
5.1.15    <U>  6S0X  was  formed  in  February  1984.   This  group  served 
as  the  nucleus  for  a  new  CNO  directed  special  project.         <• 
UNCLASSIFIED 
103
UNCLASSIFIED 
SECTION  6 
COMMUNICATIONS  AND  ADP  (U)  ' 
6.1       <U>  630  is  the  Of-fice  of  the  Assistant  Commander  -for 
Telecommunications  and  Automated  Data  Systems.   Major  programs  or 
projects  begun,  continued  or  completed  during  1984  include  the 
f  ol  lowing. 
6.1.1  (U)  Master  Data  EJ ement  Dictionary  (MDED)  Release  1.0 
containing  over  400  standardized  data  elements  related  to  the 
Mobile  Systems  Technical  Data  Facility  (MSTDF) ,  published  on  2 
March  19B4.  (B30D) 
6.1.2  (U)  Information  Systems  Planning  (ISP)  study  to  define 
•functions,  organisational  interfaces,  information  flow  and  data 
requirements  of  each  department  within  Headquarters  completed  on 
31  March  1984.   Initiated  Headquarters  database  redesign  effort. 
(G30D) 
6.1.3  <U)  Project  Information  and  Coordination  System  (PICS) 
delivered  to  GD11  as  project  management  and  tracking  tool  on  15 
April  19S4.   (630D) 
6.1.4  (U)  DATABASE  84  Colloquium  co-sponsored  with  Naval  Ocean 
Systems  Center  (NOSC) ,  San  Diego,  4-8  June  1984.   (G30D) 
UNCLASSIFIED 
104
6.1.5  (U)  MDED  Release  2.0,  containing  nearly  500  High 
Frequency  Direction  Finding  (HFDF)  related  elements,  published  on 
31  October  1984.   (630D) 
6.1.6  <U>  The  NAVSECGRUACT  Edsell,  Scotland,  UNCLAS  computer 
support  replacement  project  was  initiated.   The  computer  hardware 
and  the  of f-the-shelf  software  selected.   This  system  (IBM  System 
36)  will  replace  the  obsolete  IBM  System  32  as  well  as  provide 
additional  capabilities  to  support  command  UNCLAS  -functions  such 
as  supply  and  public  works.   (G332) 
6.1.7  ggg  COMNAVSECGRU  automation.  On  22  June  1984,  an  of -f  ice 
automation  contract  or  Headquarters  NAVSECGRU  and  its  -field  sites 
was  awarded  to  |  W   -for  a  total  amount  of 
lis  contract  has  been  providing  new  word 
processing^  |  capabilities.   (G33) 
-6.1.8     <U>  CLASSIC  FLAGHOIST  Network  Communications  Upgrade: 
-  (U)  Three  separate  deliveries  of  NSA  network 
components  to  FLAGHOIST  contractor  facility 
for  in-plant  test  completed. 
-  (U)  Plans  and  regoti ations  for  installations 
of  NSA  network  communications  service  at 
BULLSEYE  TEST  NET  tites  in  Maine  and  Calif- 
ornia completed. 
105
-  (U)  Liaison  with  .Canadian  Forces  counterparts  * 
initiated,  head  of  CFSRS,  Ottawa  briefed. 
System  Acquisition  Plan  -for  BULLSEYE  Net 
components  initiated.   Total  size  of  this 
effort  is  on  the  order  of  *20M. 
-  (U)  NAVSECGRU  requirements  and  tasks  for  NSA's 
first  network  modelling  and  simulation 
contract  developed.   (G333) 
6.1.9     (U)  PLATFORM  EMBROIDERY  Project  Liaison.   Detailed 
NAVSECGRU  response  to  NSA's  first  acquisition  plan  for  PLATFORM 
network  components  coordinated  and  drafted.   NSA  EMBROIDERY 
implementation  planning  activities,  including  consolidated  site 
network  plans  and  preliminary  costing  for  implementation  tasking 
at  NAVSECGRU  sites  initiated.   (G333)
6.1.12    (U)  NCSSA.   In  June  1984  an  initiative  to  establish  a 
joint  NAVSECGRU/NAVELEX  Cryptologic  Systems  Support  Activity  was 
developed  within  G30  and  -forwarded  to  NAVELEX.   This  project  will 
provide  both  hardware  and  software  life  cycle  support  for 
e::i sting  and  future  NAVSECGRU  cryptologic  systems.   A  CCP  budget 
initiative  was  submitted  in  the  POM  87  build  for  a  MILCON  for 
FY88.   Several  locations  were  investigated  to  determine  the 
optimum  location  for  this  new  activity.   (6332) 
6.1.13    (U)  Continued  as  the  software  configuration  manager  for 
the  BULLSEYE  system.   During  this  year,  G32  actively  participated 
as  secretariat  in  the  BULLSEYE  Configuration  Control  meetings 
held  on  lT-'-lB  May  and  29-30  November  1984  at  the  Naval  Security 
"■Station,  Washington,  DC.   G32  developed  and  promulgated  tasking 
for  the  myriad  Navy  supported  BULLSEYE  systems  as  well  as 
providing  contractor  coordination  and  management  efforts  for 
developing  systems  such  as  FLAGHOIST  and  CENTERBDARD.   (G32)
UNCLASSIFIED 
<U>  Major  events  during  1984  included  participation  in  two  TACINTEL- 
RNINTEL  Configuration  Control  Board  (CCB)  Meetings  held  on  11-12 
January  and  1-2  August  1984  at  NAVSECBRUACT  Skaggs  Island.   This 
year  marked  the  establishment  of  a  stable  TACINTEL  baseline  to 
assist  NOSC  in  their  development  of  a  COMBAT  DF  during  the  next 
two  years.   (G32> . 
6.1.15    (U)  Continued  the  Configuration  Management  of  the 
BOWSPRIT/SAIL  system  software  as  well  as  the  management  of  the 
software  support  efforts  of  the  HSSF  (Homestead  Software  Support 
Facility).   632  actively  participated  in  the  BOWSPRIT/SAIL 
Configuration  Control  Board  (CCB)  Meetings  held  on  17  April  1934 
at  NAVSECBRUACT  Homestead  and  1  November  19B4  at  HQNAVSECQRU 
Washington  DC.   This  year  marked  the  transfer  of  the  chair  of  the 
CCB  from  632  to  G50  with  B32  continuing  as  the  CCB  secretariat. 
The  hardware  CCB  was  also  combined  with  the  software  CCB  for  the 
first  time  this  year.   (632) 
6.1.16    (U>  Continued  as  the  software  configuration  manager  for 
the  Signals  Warfare  Support  Center  (SWSO  system,  however, 
NAVELEXSYSCOM  retained  final  approval  until  the  system  becomes 
fully  operational.   Major  events  for  the  year  included  partici- 
pation in  the  SWSC  CCB  held  on  15  May  e4  at  Naval  Electronic 
Systems  Command,  Washington,  DC.   (632) 
UNCLASSIFIED 
108
6.1.17  (U)  Continued  as  the  software  configuration  manager  for 
the  Communication  Routing  Device  (CRD).  No  major  events  for  the 
year.   (G32) 
6.1.18  (U)  G32  and  G33  continued  close  monitoring  of  the  MUSIC 
system  software  development.   A  632  representative  continued 
providing  support  in  the  final  testing  and  evaluation  of  the 
MUSIC  system.   (632) 
6.1.19    (U>  In  the  field  of  ADP  Security,  G32  continued  to 
provide  guidance  to  all  NAVSECBRU  elements,  and  formulate  policy 
for  Headquarters  in  conforming  to  higher  directives.   Major 
events  for  the  year  included  the  completion  of  the  consolidated 
NAVSECGRU  ADP  Security  Plan  which  was  forwarded  to  NSA  via  CNO 
"Declassification  of  Classified  Defective  Memory  Units."   (G32)
3S"*::».iX:*   &K3KKH3At-i<   iV   G'J J.. .     .  ;a>: 
6.1.22  (U)  Headquarters  Ethernet  Services.   Cabling,  -file 
servers  and  print  servers  are   installed.   Connection  of  Xero:: 
equipment  was  initiated  in  December. 
6.1.23  (U)  NSA  secure  telephone  service.   Service  for  NAVBECGRU 
Area  Directors  in  PAC  and  LANT  completed.   Formal  program  for 
service  at  NAVSECGRU  sites  initiated. 
no
aa'idoAJ   4iuiw»m»  *w  wc^iibJ443K 
UNCLASSIFIED 
SECTION  7  .  T 
SIGNIFICANT  LOGISTIC  AND  MATERIAL  DEVELOPMENTS  <U> 
7.1   <U>  G40  is  the  Assistant  Commander  for  Logistics  and 
Material.   During  calendar  year  1984,  G40  was  involved  in  many 
different  tasks,  projects  and  NAVSECGRU  related  matters. 
Supporting  38  NAVSECGRU  field  sites  worldwide,  G40  corrected 
approximately  500  Equipment  Casualty  Reports  (CASREPs)  and 
promulgated  a  total  of  313  tasks  to  C0MNAVELEXSYSCOM  and 
completed  186  tasks.   A  total  of  4  military  construction  projects 
were  begun  for  a  total  of  *12.7  million  and  thirty  Minor 
Construction  and  Major  Facilities  Repair  Projects  were  funded 
from  0?/MN  for  a  total  of  *5.7  million.   Under  the  cognizance  of 
G40L,  4  new  major  system  acquisition  projects  were  begun  with  13 
major  projects  still  active. 
UNCLASSIFIED 
111
3S*i3dx*j  uawniaAoo  *v  Q?or.r.  >nia 
UNCLASSIFIED 
SECTION   B 
ft 
PERSONNEL,  TRAINING  AND  ADMINISTRATION  (U) 
6.  i        On  1  September  1984,  the  Assistant  Commander  -for 
Administration,  Personnel  and  Security  (G10)  was  redesignated  as 
the  Assistant  Commander  for  Personnel  and  Training.   BIO  was 
consequently  subdivided  into  three  divisions:   Human  Resource 
Management/Organisation  E-f f ecti veness  (Gil),  Military  Personnel 
Programs/Career  Development  <G12),  and  Cryptologic  Training 
Programs  (G13) . 
8.2       Gil  HIGHLIGHTS 
8.2.1  Equal  Employment  Opportunity  (EEO)  :   No  -formal 
complaints  of  discrimination  filed  during  19B4,  which  has  been 
attributed  to  outstanding  EEO  counseling.   Newly  designated 
Upward  Mobility  Program  Coordinated  assigned  and  trained. 
* 
8.2.2  Human  Resource  Management  (HRM) :   Increased  emphasis  was 
placed  on  all  areas  of  the  drug  and  alcohol  program.   Results  of 
urinalysis  scree?ning  revealed  a  ZV.    positive  rate  compared  to  6.6!'. 
Navy-wide.   The  drug  preference  continued  to  show  tetrahydro- 
cannabinol (THC)  from  marijuana  smoking  with  the  use  of  cocaine 
increasing.   All  commands  have  been  random  screening  with  many 
doing  unit  sweeps.   Five  Drug  Abuse  Program  Advisories  were 
UNCLASSIFIED 
112
3S*t3dX3   XtntKKMAWJ  XV   C.3C.Z  M-iac. 
UNCLASSIFIED 
provided  to  all  elements  of  NAVSECGRU  during  1984.  _  " 
e.2.3    Command  Managed  Equal  Opportunity  (CMEO)  Program;   Plans 
have  been  completed  and  the  program  guidelines  developed  for 
implementation  o-f  CMEO.   The  HRMS/EOPS  Team  has  trained  30 
Command  Training  Team  (CTT) /Command  Assessor  Teams  (CAT)  members 
at  NAVSECSTA,  and  at  NAVSECGRUACTs  Winter  Harbor  and  Sabana  Seca. 
No  military  ED  complaints  were  filed  during  1984. 
8.2.4    Organizational  Effectiveness  (0E)  Program:   The  Navy 
revised  organizational  structure  of  HRM  was  promulgated  by 
OPNAVINST  5400.39  in  April.   The  0E  program  will  function  as  a 
part  of  the  HRM  Support  System.   Trained  Navy  personnel  from  0E 
centers  will  provide  consulting  services  based  on  special 
knowledge  of  human  and  organizational  behavior  and  skills. 
S.3       G12  HIGHLIGHTS 
8.3.1     The  NAVSECGRU  Personnel  Utilization  Report  (PUR)  was 
canceled  15  May  ending  several  decades  of  field  personnel 
reporting  using  that  vehicle.   The  NAVSECGRU  Direct 
Support  Utilization  Report  (DUR)  was  established  on  15  May 
to  provide  for  field  reporting  of  all  NAVSECGRU 
operational  TAD  and  flight  hours  on  a  weekly  basis. 
UNCLASSIFIED 
113
3S";3dX3   iraWNMAOO  iY   Q?Oi.3o«iJ3. 
UNCLASSIFIED 
8.3.2  CNO  approved  a  612  proposal  that  monthly  cryptologic 
billet  tapes  be  provided  to  COMNAVSECGRU  to  streamline  processing 
o-f  OUTSIDE  MARP  billet  changes  within  Headquarters. 
8.3.3  COMNAVMILPERSCOM  approved  a  612  recommendation  that 
GENSER  personnel  attached  to  COMNAVSECGRU  (approximately  1000 
personnel)  be  included  in  the  monthly  officer  and  enlisted  MAPMIS 
tape  in  order  to  provide  a  tool  -for  management  of  those 
resources. 
8.3.4  The  1934  Cryptologic  Technician  Listing  (E7-E9)  was 
published  in  April. 
8.3.5  A  special  edition  of  the  annual  Cryptologic  Officers 
Listing  (COD  was  published  in  May. 
8.3.6  The  first  edition  of  the  CT  Career  Handbook  was 
« 
published  in  March. 
8.3.7  Effective  1  July,  the  Type  Duty  Code  assigned  to 
Canadian  Forces  Station  Masset,  British  Columbia  was  changed  from 
preferred  overseas  shore  duty  (sea/shore  code  6)  to  overseas 
shore  duty  (sea/shore  code  3).   For  personnel  who  reported  on  or 
before  30  June,  the  entire  tour  is  credited  as  overseas  shore 
duty  (sea/shore  code  3>  until  PRD. 
UNCLASSIFIED 
114
.    3S*:a<iX3  !K3HNU3AC>a  M  0?3:;C  Mia.; 
UNCLASSIFIED 
8.4       G13  HI6HLIGHTS  , 
8.4.1     In  January,  the  Navy  Occupational  Development  and 
Analysis  Center  (NODAC)  -forwarded  NDTAP  Surveys  to  every  command 
where  Cryptologic  Technicians  (CTs)  are   assigned.   The  purpose  of 
the  survey  was  to  gather  information  necessary  to  update  the  CT 
Occupational  Standards  (OCC-STDS) .   The  CT  OCC-STDS  have  been 
maintained   fay  COMNAVSECGRU  (G13)  because  of  classification  and 
have  not  been  updated  since  1976.   The  survey  responses  were 
returned  to  COMNAVSECGRU  by  May  and  the  unclassified  response 
booklets  were  forwarded  to  NODAC  for  processing.   The  necessary 
documentation  has  been  prepared  and  indoctrination  for  SCI 
requested  for  Mr.  Oscar  Line  <GS-12>  who  will  perform  analysis  on 
the  classified  portion  of  the  survey. 
8.4.2    An  evaluation  of  the  potential  and  capabilities  of  the 
Cryptologic  Field  Trainer  (CFT)  was  conducted  at  NAV5ECGRUACT 
"•Misawa  in  March.   The  evaluation  was  conducted  from  a  courseware 
development /authoring  system  perspective,  and  initial  impressions 
indicate  that  use  of  the  system,  from  an  operator  viewpoint,  was 
excellent.   The  evaluator  was  able  to  be  thoroughly  proficient 
after  a  10-15  break-in  period.   From  an  authoring  standpoint? 
however,  at  least  20  hours  of  concentrated  training  was  needed 
before  effective  authoring  proficiency  could  be  reached.   The 
UNCLASSIFIED 
115 
: .-  •  :  ••Cr.i>  at  government  >:xit.:.se
3S*:3dX3  XN3HNH3AU0  AY  Q?y.r.  .i  jj 
UNCLASSIFIED 
potential  -for  the  CFT  as  a  Cryptologic  Shore  Support  Activity 
(CSSA)  trainer  is  outstanding. 
8.4.4     On  10  December,  the  Cryptologic  Training  Support  Office 
(G132)  was  officially  opened  with  RADM         |  cutting  the 
ribbon.   The  CTSO  was  established  to  provide  training  media  in 
support  of  NAVSECGRU  -field  requirements.   Original  personnel 
iv   /    included  I 
Jtru  —  J 
>c 
8.4. 5  |  
of  NAVCAMS  WESTPAC  and  CTR1 
\   of  NAVCDMMSTA  Spain  were  awarded  the  NAVSECGRU  Morse  Code 
Proficiency  Program  Sold  Award  for  demonstrated  ability  in  the 
reception  of  International  Morse  Code  at  40  GPM. 
UNCLASSIFIED 
116
3S'3dX3  xrawiaaAOO  xy  a?ji..;  ..^j. 
UNCLASSIFIED 
SECTION    9 
COMMUNICATIONS    SECURITY    MATERIAL    SYSTEM 
9.1  On    1    October    1984,    the   responsibility   for    the   control 
and   direction   of    cryptographic    equipment    was    transferred   from 
•COMNAVTELCOM    to   DCMS.       As    DCMS   has    produced    a    separate   COMMAND 
HISTORY   for    1984,    it    is   reproduced    here   for    inclusion    into   the 
HQNAVSEC6RU    1984    ANNUAL    HISTORY    REPORT. 
117    , 
 
;;    :  "Ci.y  a:  r'ivehnment  r.xrr.'.sr
_  .  * 
UNCLASSIF^O 
Communications  Security  Material  System 
3801  Nebraska  Avenue,  N.  W. 
Washington,  D.C.  20390-5252 
OPNAV  Report  5750-1 
Command  History  for  1984 
Part  I  Basic  Historical  Narrative 
Part  II  -Kej  Cuuwiawd  rUTLuimtl   ' 
Part  III  rnmriiinil  TYrnonnrl  Ttnntrr 
Part  IV  Statistics 
A*! 
:.-'i"i:d  at  covr.r-KMrNT  i:xrr.:«ss
3SN3dX3  XK3MN>iaA&9  J.V  Q9.3V.Z  i-H 3K 
TTT-Tpr  t- o .- V:-V  ."- 
Part  I 
Basic  Historical  Narrative 
^ 
1.  Executive   Summary » 
a.  Transfer  of  responsibility  for  control  and  distribution  of 
cryptographic  equipment  from  COMNAVTELCOM  to  DCMS  on  1  October  1984  was  the 
most  significant  event  of  the  year.  This  transfer  added  two  Navy  officers, 
three  Navy  enlisted,  one  Marine  Corp  enlisted  and  five  civilian  billets  to 
DCMS.  Other  significant" events  during  1984  which  had  a  major  impact  on  our 
primary  mission: 
(1)  Automated  COMSEC  Material  Systesi  upgrade  commenced  with  hardware 
installation. 
(2)  Civilian  vacancies  and  downgrades  in  T"0  (Inventory  and  Accounting 
Department)  severely  hampered  personnel  manning  profile* 
2.  Chronological  Summary. 
a.  OP-0941  Meeting.  During  the  1st  quarter,  CDRjfl   ^T)  attended 
OP-0941  meetings  on  KW-46  and  KG-84  crypto  transition  along  with 
representatives  from  COMSUBLANT,  CNO  (OP-02),  CINCLANTFLT,  COMNAVTELCOM, 
NAVELEX,  and  NSA. 
Transfer  of  Cr 
tographic  Equipment  Cognizance.  On  3  July  1984^CDR 
~(TB)  and  CDR^      ptoOUJ  met  with  CAPT^    |hnd 
AVTELCOM  (Code  01)  to  discuss  the  transfer  of 
pt  Cryptc 
MNAVTELCO* 
  LCDR 
CDR  ^  0?CO 
crypto-equipment   functions  and  billets   from  COMNAVTELCOM  to  COMNAVSECGRU 
claimancy.     Effective   1   October   1984,   the   functions  and  billets   for 
crypto-equipment  allocation  and   inventory  control  management  were   under  the 
cognizance   of  COMNAVSECGRU. 
c.  CMIO  Norfolk  Computer   Site   Survey.      On   10  July   1984,  Mr.^ 
LCDRjMBPTnTTrjGJlBpFmeTTIth  representatives  of  CMIO  Norfolk,  NAVELEX 
Portsmouthand  WANG  Laboratories   at  CMIO  Norfolk  to  discuss   site  preparation 
and   installation  of  the  ACMS  Computer  System  at  CMIO  Norfolk. 
d.  CMIO  San  Diego  Visit.      From  24-26  July   1984,  LCDR^J  ff(. CMI 0  San 
Diego),   Hi  dMMTl  I'1    '  ■  ■'  '    and  Mr.JBippCMIO  Vault)  visited  DCMS, 
COMNAVTELCO^andHeadquarters   to   liaise  on^MSmatters  and  be  briefed  on 
FY-85/FY-86  ACMS  integration  with  NSA  (S33). 
LCDRJ 
_ACMS  Project  Officer.  LT^ 
fas  the  ACMS  Project  Officer. 
checked  onboard  DCMS  to  relieve 
I.     Joint  Key  Management  Working  Group  (JKMWC).  On  30  and  31  July  1984, 
CDRJHH(lTTT~and^ii7^jBH|BPf(T30)  attended  a  Joint  Management  Meeting  at 
NSA.^^ffefings  were  givenonnew  electronic  key  generation  concepts  and  their 
impact  on  distribution,  accounting  and  usage. 
g 
Automanual   Svstem/KL-42 .     On  23  August   1984,  LCDF^  ^(TB)   and 
Miss^^HHF(T30i)   attended   the  meeting  at  NSA  (S755)   aSlfessing  the 
implfSH^Rn  of  the  tSeC/KL-42 ,  an  alphanumeric   encryption/decryption  device, 
u 
X  i  >•  •■•r»«  •■:■■ c«.r>  kt  cvivn-v 
r..\pr:;.?n
35'3dX3  isawmiaAoo  ay  a?»of;.:  >:  jj 
^ 
h.  CHIP  Norfolk  Visit.  On  20  August  1984,  LCDR  JM   M[TB)  visited  CMIO 
Norfolk  and  CINCLANTFLT  Communications  Coordinator,  LTji   F(Code  N612)  to  " 
discuss  COMSEC  accounting  and  distribution  issues. 
i.   STU  II  Binding.  On  30  August  1984,  DCMS  hosted  a  meeting  with  GSA, 
COMNAVSECGRU  (G60) ,  COMNAVTFLCOM  (Code  632)  and  Booz-Allen  representatives. 
GSA  System  Manager  presented  an  overview  of  the  STU-II  (TSEC/KY-71)  future 
implementation  and  details  of  the  Secure  Voice  System. 
j.  AKAV  500  Series  Meeting.   On  29  August  1984,  Mr.  M        P&NSA/S75) 
briefed  Navy  representatives  from  CNSG/DCMS  on  the  new  AKAV500  series, 
addressing  the  impact  of  36  booklets  as  opposed  to  one  booklet  on  the  Navy 
Distribution  System  (LANT  only  at  this  time).  The  AKAV  500  is  II  MAF  CEOI 
(Marine  operational  changing  call  sign/ frequency  system),  compatible  with  AKAI 
16. 
_k._CMIO  San  Diego  Site  Survey,  On  28-29  August  1984,  LT^  ^T50B)  and 
LT  A|^pET50cT~met  with  CMIO  San  Diego,  WANG  Labs  and  NAVELEXrepresentatives 
to^^Huct  and  coordinate  the  ACMS  computer  site  survey  at  CMIO  San  Diego. 
sit.  -,.0n 
cuss  and 
with  CMI^San  Diego  (LCDR^^^HP  and  Assistant  NAVSECGRU  Department  Head 
(LCDR  I   V  to  tour,  discul^and  preview  upcoming  changes  to  the  COMSEC 
issuing^acility  and  cryptographic  hardware  storage  vault. 
m.  Automanual  Program  KL-42  Meeting.  On  20  September  1984,  LCDRJ 
(TB)  and~l4rT9HHHHKfG6lT~met  with  CNO  (OP-0941J)  representatives  to 
discuss  the  re^l^^Snoi paper  codes  with  the  implementation  of  the  TSEC/KL-42. 
n.   "SOLID  SHIELD  8J£  Initial  Communications  Planning  Conference.  On  25 
September  1984,  IbllflHpFCT)  briefed  USCINCLANT  (J621)  and  "Solid  Shield  85" 
exercise  planners  a^^nelnitial  Communications  Planning  Conference  (ICPC) 
held  at  Fort  Bragg,  NC.  The  brief  centered  on  CMS  modus  operandi  of 
distribution  of  keying  material  for  the  exercise  and  informed  exercise 
planners  of  the  identification,  production  and  storage  pipeline  problems  to 
avoid  in  keying  material  planning  for  "Solid  Shield  85."  This  is  the  first 
time  in  which  DCMS  has  briefed  exercise  planners. 
o.  Navy  Key  Distribution  System  Briefing  (NKDS).  On  15  October  1984,  CDR 
>(T)  attended  the  brief  for  Mr.  JHflHfTDDC) ,  presented  by  M**M    f^ 
     F(NAVELEX/PDE-110)  at  NSA.   Mr.  M       ^expressed  considerable  inWrest  in 
the  proposed  NKDS  concept  and  expresse^^ffrprise  that  the  Navy  had  started  on 
the  concept  two  years  (1982)  in  advance  of  NSA. 
p.  COMSEC  Insecurity  Coding  Meeting.  On  13  September  and  18  October 
1984,  MiTs~jBBB^(T2b")  attended  meetings  at  NSA  concerning  a  proposed, 
expanded  COlfitC insecurity  coding  scheme  NSA  intends  to  use  to  produce  their 
1984  reports  on  COMSEC  insecurity  statistics  and  trends. 
q.   NAVSTAR  Global  Positioning  System  (GPS)  COMSEC  Working  Group.   On 
23-24  Hi  |  nli  i  i  | 'III    Hi   JBBBF  '  m  '  "I  '  i  mil  il  I  In  I    I  H II  Mill  I  I  Working 
Group  meeting  to  discuss  ^n^^^olve  action  items  proposed  by  the  crypto  key 
management  subgroup.   NSA  has  forwarded  an  information  memorandum  to  SECDEF 
addressing  recomraendati,ons So*  -distribution  and  management  of  keying  material 
for  the  GPS.    
j  -j-tvt  /"*r"r  <n"  r*  r'  T1 1Tr'  T>  ;  ""   
V^  i\  N.         I'fllT'T^  AT  C.rvzPXHV!:?   r.xrui.Fr
.    3S'<3<!X3  iN3W«3AU»  *T  a*3l.C.jH4:_ 
UNCL.fi  GSITTvir 
i—  .. 
^ 
r,  HYX-58  In-Theatre  Replacement.  During  the  4th  quarter,  DCMS  requested 
FLTCINC  consideration/concurrence  for  the  establishment  of  ten  HYX-58       * 
equipments  to  be  staged  with  Battle  Groups  for  temporary  emergency 
replacement.  Due  to  continued  failure  of  these  supplies,  the  VINSON 
replacement  equipment  remained  under  DCMS  control  for  authority  to  transfer  as 
a  crossdeck  item  for  relieving  Battle  Group. 
s.  KW-46  Keying  Concept  Briefing.  On  23  October  1984,  a  meeting  was  held 
at  in  ||  ,  i  |   I  I  |i  JMBpPni  "  representative),  to  discuss  the  KW-46 
and  the  appropriate  key^mWSrial  involved. 
t.  KGR-96  Planning  Conference.  On  8  November  1984,  Mrs.J|      |^(T31) 
and  Mr.J^^HHVTcNTC124/T60)  attended  the  KGR-96  follow-on  planning 
meeting  T^TS^^St  Force  Cryptologic  Support  Center  (AFCSC),  Kelly  AFB.  The 
meeting  was  held  to  discuss  KGR-96  cryptologic  equipment/keying  material 
distribution  plans. 
u.  Joint  Tactical  Information  Distribution  System  (JTIDS)  Keying 
Requirements.  On  16  November  1984,  Miss"^^BMp(T30)  met  with  Mr. 
jj     W   Navy  Program  Manager  (Naval  Air^reveTopment  Center)  and  Mr.    _ 
flSsSEC)  to  discuss  preliminary  requirements  for  JTIDS  Software  Development 
System.  JTIDS  is  undergoing  a  five  year  developmental  program  and  is  expected 
to  be  operational  FY-88. 
v.  Keying  Material  Requirements.  On  19  November  1984,  DCMS  hosted  a 
meeting    ll  M   jJMMP  "  "   MM  '  to  discuss  and  project  the  Navy  COMSEC 
keying  material  r^pffements  for  FY-86  through  FY-91. 
w.  Leased  Satellite  (LEASAT)  Keying  Requirements.  On  20  November  1984, 
LCDRjBHPFOBT71ir7nBBpprT31)  and  CTA2J(^P>met  with  Mr. 
   [NAVELEX  ProjecOlanager)  to  plan  keying  material  distribution  for 
re  LEASAT  project  for  FY-85/86. 
x.  KG-84  SURTASS  Key  Distribution.  On  29  November  1984,  Mr.  M     BIV 
•.(NAVELEX)  hosted  a  meeting  with  NSA  (Si)  and  DCMS  (T30)  representatives  to 
plan  KG-84  keying  material  requirements  for  SURTASS. 
y.   Coast  Guard  STU  II  Binding.  On  28  November  1984,  DCMS  (T30)  hosted  an 
STO  II  Binding  coordinator  meeting  with  Coast  Guard  Agency  Terminal 
Coordinators,  LvM     ^and  Mr.  JMflP*  DCMS  wiU  »andle  distribution  of 
keying  material  forecast  Guard  and  coordinate  with  GSA  to  ensure  distribution 
continuity  and  confirmation  of  requirements. 
3.  Basic  Narrative. 
a.  Administrative  Services  Department  (TIP) 
The  function  of  the  Administrative  Services  Department  is  to  provide  a 
variety  of  administrative  services  to  the  staff  of  DCMS.  Primary  functions 
include  the  processing  of  incoming  and  outgoing  mail,  preparation  and 
distribution  of  correspondence  and  messages,  fiscal  management,  military  and 
civilian  personnel  administration,  physical  and  personnel  security,  military 
and  civilian  training,  maintenance  of  activity  files  and  classified  material 
control. 
■■■ct.n  at  fiavi:KNM!:::T  r.xrr
UNC'.nr;r.nnr.r- 
b.  Plans,  Policy,,  and  Procedures  Department  (T20) 
*» 
The  Plans,  Policy,  and  Procedures  Department  develops  COMSEC  Materia-1 
System  plans,  policies,  and  procedures;  prepares  and  promulgates  publications 
containing  the  Navy's  COMSEC  Material  System  policy  and  procedures;  determines 
requirements  and  develops  plans  for  personnel,  facilities,  and  other  resources 
within  the  COMSEC  Material  System;  reviews  and  monitors  reports  of  COMSEC 
material  insecurities;  and  provides  technical  guidance  concerning  COMSEC 
material  matters  to  Navy,  Marine  Corps,  Coast  Guard,  and  Military  Sealift 
Command  CMS  accounts. 
(1)  As  part  of  an  intensive  effort  by  COMNAVSECGRU  to  reduce  the 
steadily  increasing  number  of  insecurities  reported  each  year,  DCMS  started 
publishing  expanded  insecurity  statistics  in  the  CMS  UPDATE  concerning  the 
number  of  insecurities  that  were  reported  to  DCMS  during  the  previous  month 
and/or  quarter.  These  expanded  statistics  were  broken  down  by  branch  of 
service  (Navy/Marine)  and  area/location  (LANT/PAC)  ,  and  then  by  the  type  of 
unit  (e.g.,  ashore/afloat)  within  each  area.  Quarterly,  a  list  of  the  top 
three  insecurities  committed  were  published.  At  the  top  of  the  li6t  was 
always  Missing  Material. 
(2)  To  help  in  compiling  statistics  on  insecurities,  DCMS  developed  a 
program  for  use  on  a  mini-computer.  With  the  help  of  this  program,  it  was 
possible  to  enter  a  CMS  account  number  and  find  out  how  many  insecurities  that 
account  committed.  The  program  also  gave  the  number  of  insecurities  that 
occurred  during  a  certain  time  period  as  well  as  the  frequency  a  certain  short 
title  was  subjected  to  compromise. 
(3)  CINCLANTFLT  and  CINCPACFLT  required  the  name  and  collateral 
duties  of  a  custodian  involved  in  an  insecurity  be  included  in  each  insecurity 
report  and  through  CMS  standdowns,  required  an  intense  review  of  CMS 
procedures  by  each  command. 
(4)  A  combination  of  FLTCINC  involvement  and  DCMS  expanded  listing  of 
.insecurities  reduced  1984  report  of  insecurities  by  one-third  in  comparison  to 
"1983  . 
c.  CMS  Operations  Department  (T30) 
The  CMS  Operations  Department  is  responsible  for  the  acquisition, 
control,  distribution,  status,  and  disposition  of  COMSEC  material  (software) 
and  technical  publications  required  to  fulfill  the  secure  communications 
requirements  of  the  Navy,  Marine  Corps,  Coast  Guard,  and  Military  Sealift 
Command . 
(1)   T30  was  responsible  for  special  programs  that  ensured  the  proper 
projection  for  software  for  new  cryptographic  systems  and  concepts.  These 
programs  include: 
-  NAVSTAR  -  Space-based  radio  navigation  system  designed  to  provide 
U.S.  and  Allied  land,  sea,  and  air  forces  with  worldwide,  three-dimensional 
position  and  velocity  information  by  late  1980's. 
-  ACME  -  tow  daiaxate, -remotely- rekeyable  system  for  satellite 
data  downlinks"!   It  is  scheduled  for  implementation  FY-88. 
J  ■  r  t — Ct.:>  AT  OOVtRNMENr  r.xrr.i.SE
aS*!3<IX3  lM3Mttf3A09  IV  Q?3(\Z.iiiY 
^NCLMslFisr; 
-  ELF  -  U.S.  Navy  communications  system  that  will  broadcast 
messages  to  operational  submarines. 
-  KEMPLE-P  -  KG-30  modification  program  designed  for  communications 
support  of  TACAMO  operations. 
-  NKDS  -  Navy  key  distribution  operational  concept.   NKDS  will 
improve  the  flexibility  of  CMS  by  providing  a  greater  responsiveness  in 
meeting  Navy  distribution,  accounting,  and  management  functions. 
-  STU  II  -  KY-71  phased  program  of  the  Federal  Secure  Telephone 
Service  (FSTS)  designed  to  operate  over  commercial  telephone  networks. 
-  AKAV  500  -  Marine  CEOI  operational  changing  call  sign/frequency 
system.  The  series  encompass  the  concept  of  key  for  unique  operational 
environments  and  will  eventually  replace  all  CEOI  LANT/PAC  areas. 
-  AMP  -  Automanual  program  designed  for  use  in  controlled 
environments  and  to  replace  manual  cryptosys terns.  The  automanual  device  is 
the  KL-42. 
-  SURTASS  -  Surveillance  Towed  Array  Sensor  System.  This  system  is 
installed  on  civilian  operated  ships  under  operational  control  of  FLTCINCS. 
-  KW-46  -  Scheduled  to  replace  the  KW-37  and  the  KG-14  on  fleet 
broadcast. 
-  LEASAT  -  Leased  satellite  communications  system. 
(2)  The  accurate  development,  assessment  and  evaluation  of  these 
programs,  from  the  software  approach,  is  essential  to  the  readiness  and 
effectiveness  of  the  operating  forces.  Miscalculation  in  software  planning, 
stocking  and  availability  could  cause  irreparable  interruption  in 
communications,  disruption  of  mission  capability  and  in  some  instances,  delays 
•in  deployment.  These  programs  will  have  a  lasting  impact  on  the  future  of 
Navy  communications. 
(3)  The  Navy  management  for  the  NAVSAT  Security  Program  was 
terminated  in  September  1984,  and  the  software  transferred  to  Sperry,  the 
relevant  civilian  contractor.  The  remainder  of  the  program  will  be  under  the 
auspices  of  Sperry  with  NSA  concurrence. 
d.  Accounting  Department  (T40) 
The  Accounting  Department's  mission  is  to  verify  the  acuracy  of  COMSEC 
material  inventories,  to  determine  and  to  resolve  CMS  accounting  errors  and  to 
maintain  CMS  account  history  files. 
(1)  The  Accounting  Department  provided  COMSEC  material  support  and 
CMS  accounting  service  to  approximately  1300  CMS  accounts.  The  accuracy  of 
2672  COMSEC  material  inventories  was  verified;  this  number  represents  an 
increase  of  872  over  1838.  Also  increasing  over  1983  figures  is  the  quantity 
of  correspondence  of  4880  pieces  over  1983.  The  number  of  military  personnel 
UI 
■Vi  D   K!  GOVKKS-'lUNT    KXrs.\.SE
3S*3dX3   1H3NN1I3ACO  AY  a?3i;z  >Hi&. 
A£ 
UNCLASSIFIED 
hours  devoted  to  collateral  duties  increased  824  hours  over  1983.  The  number 
of  DECOMS  increased  by  4  over  1983.  The  number  of  AUTODIN  inventories  was  11* 
over  1983. 
(2)  The  above  was  accomplished  with  three  civilian  vacancies,  the 
downgrading  of  five  civilian  positions  and  an  increase  in  collateral  military 
duties. 
e.  Computer  Support  Department  (T50) 
The  function  of  the  Computer  Support  Department  is  to  develop, 
maintain,  and  manage  computer  systems  in  support  of  DCMS  with  regard  to 
distribution,  accounting,  and  material  management  of  COMSEC  material 
throughout  the  Naval  Establishment. 
(1)   Computer  Upgrade  -  The  ACMS  computer  upgrade  remained  on  schedule 
for  implementation  on  1  October  1985.  The  following  significant  project 
milestones  were  noted: 
(a)  ACMS  contract  awarded  to  WANG  Laboratories  on  9  May  1984. 
(b)  LTj[        JpPtelieved  LCDCT*  Hflfcs  the  ACMS  Project 
Officer  in  August  198^^^^^^^^  ^^^^^^ 
(c)  Installation  of  DCMS  WANG  computer  hardware  was  accomplished 
in  October  1984. 
(d)  Data  Base  Management  System  (DBMS)  SPEED  II  installed  in 
November  1984. 
f .  COMSEC  Equipment/Ancillary  Department  (T60) 
The  COMSEC  Equipment/Ancillary  Department  is  responsible  for  the 
acquisition,  control,  distribution,  status,  and  disposition  of  COMSEC  material 
(hardware)  and  technical  publications  required  to  fulfill  the  secure 
communications  requirements  of  the  Navy,  Marine  Corps,  Coast  Guard,  and 
Military  Sealift  Command. 
(1)  Our  newest  department  is  tasked  with  controlling  and  distributing 
crypto  equipment  to  Navy,  Marine,  Coast  Guard,  and  foreign  sales  and  service 
to  specified  allies. 
(2)  T60  is  involved  in  several  long  range  COMSEC  equipment  projects 
including: 
(a)  VINSON  Implementation. 
2,.  Outfitted  all  deploying  Battle  Groups,  including  air 
wings,  carrier  and  all  supporting  surface  ships  with  VINSON.  If  the  ship  or 
ships  had  completed  Regular  Overhaul,  their  full  allowance  of  VINSON  equipment 
was  provided;  otherwise,  a  temporary  VINSON  Augmentation  Package  (VAP)  was 
provided.  The  following  Battle  Groups  were  outfitted  during  1984:  USS 
CONSTELLATION,  USS  CORAL  SEA,  USS  INDEPENDENCE  and  USS  NIMITZ. 
UNCI 
I/"* 7  1*   f*r*TT^TV-,T"V 
!!'"  -Ci-.Q   AT  CoVi:RKML-:;T  KXTtl.SE
3. -J.X3   iN3W«3AC>t>  AV   Q?J..CM.d 
^c^sbifS 
2.     Marine  Corps.  95Z  of  the  ground  forces  of  FMFLANT  were 
provided  VINSON  (KY-57)  during  1984.  Atlantic  Fleet  MARC  airborne  units  were 
converted  to  VINSON.   VINSON  implementation  started  in  FMFPAC  this  year  and   ■ 
was  about  201  completed  by  December  1984.  Two  squadrons  of  F-18  MARCORPS 
airborne  units  are  fitted  with  VINSON. 
(b)  PARKHILL  Implementation  in  Marine  Corps.  KY-65  and  KY-75 
PARKHILL  equipment  was  completed  in  FMFLANT  ground  units.   51*  of  PARKHILL 
deliveries  have  been  completed  to  FMFPAC  ground  units. 
(c)  KC-81  Implementation.  During  1984,  there  were  206  KG-81 
equipments  shipped  and  installed  by  the  operational  users.  This  represents 
32.52  of  the  total  implementation  of  the  various  KG-81  package-switching 
network. 
(d)  KG-84  Implementation.  There  was  a  total  of  708  KG-84/84A 
equipments  installed  for  various  functions  during  1984.  This  figure 
represents  only  .03Z  of  the  programmed  24,291  KG-84 /84A  installations. 
(e)  KL-47  Phase-Out.   In  June  1984,  the  Navy  phased  out  the 
utilization  of  the  KL-47  for  submarine  communications  equipment  and  commenced 
operational  implementation  of  the  KL-51  (RACE)  communications  network. 
L 
 
-\  !i  h:   -"vi.KNvr:
.  as*;3JX3  AN3WNtUAt.'.,  .-<  a»j...:..,>j. 
^'"CL/l^'H^TF-n 
Part  IV 
STATISTICS 
Number  of  ARFCOS  Shipments  87 
Number  of  packages  shipped  via  ARFCOS  811 
Total  pounds  shipped  via  ARFCOS  116,162 
Number  of  registered  mail  packages  received  683 
Number  of  registered  mail  shipments  447 
Number  of  packages  received  from  NSA/ARFCOS  2,171 
Total  pounds  received  from  NSA/ARFCOS  139,208 
Number  of  packages  shipped  via  supply  127 
Total  pounds  shipped  via  supply  15,137 
Number  of  CMS  accounts  established  79 
Number  of  CMS  accounts  disestablished  46 
DCMS  Vault  Storage  Space 
Hardware  Storage  Space  15,715 
Software  Storage  Space  1,188 
DCMS  Action  Line  Calls  received  3,436 
T10/TB  15 
T20  499 
T30  1,516 
T40  1,410 
T50  5 
Number  of  communication  messages  transmitted  4,727 
Crypto  Repair  Facility 
'-Total  equipment  forwarded  421 
Total  equipment  returned  334 
Modification  kits  forwarded  193 
CMS  Material  Destruction  other  than  monthly  2-1 
Software  20,953 
Hardware  1,102 
UNCLASSIFIED- 
V!>  a:  r.-'vr.K\y.r.:;r  r.xt".:\?r.
3S*:3dX3   AK3HNH3AG0  J.V  C^Ol..;  „Udr 
77?>t,«,~   ^  ....  „ 
SECTION  10 
SUPPORTING  DOCUMENTS    (10) 
UJNFC7  socirn-^N 
r:  •    :  "o«.;>  at  covr.RNv.i::;-  Kxrc:.rr
—        Vg-*   :  — '—  "W 
10.1.1  ///     UNCLAS   E  F  T   0     /// 
I!   f5B?43Z   OCT   84  l  SOLD  ACT /COG       
}M   ACNSG  \  f  Ifrfo 
TO   NIDOX  !  extIKL-  25'-?  ..  iTf V'<   — 
INFO    SSO   CINCCENT  J 
COKNAYSECfcRD  C00E3i::nl-->  ..,   —   
COMUSNAVCEKT  KX/a?  0&A 
69«e£SV  BEQ/DATE..     °™*   
INSCOMDETNSA  '  """ 
.ZEM 
VNCLAS  E  I  T  0 
ACNSG-1196-P4 
fl'i'J:   MISSION.  TASES  AND  FUNCTIONS  OF  »CKS*  AND  KSuA  FORT  1EADE 
A.   HONStflNST  C545?.2C  (KOTAL) 
1.   NSGINST  M50.23F  (NCTAL) 
1.  EFFECTIVE  24  OCTOBER  19E4,  TEE  DUTIES  AND  RESPONSIBILITIES  OF 
ASSTCO^NAVSECGRU  will  RE  SEPARATEE  FROM  TEOSE  OF  THE  CO,  NF3A  FOP. I 
MIADE. 
2.  ACNSG  IS  EESPOKSIELE  F  :R  REPRESENTING  TEE  COMMANDER.  HAVAL 
eECUFHT  UPOUP  TO  THE  NATIONAL  SECURITY  AGENCY/CENTRAL  SECURITY 
FVICE  AND  AS  DELINEATED  REF  A  IS  ASSIGNED  TEE  FOLLOWING  FUNCTIONS: 
A.   SERVE  AS  TEE  PERSONAL  REPRESENTATIVE  OF  COMNAVSEC^RU  AT  NSA/CSS. 
1.  .  ASSIST  COMNAVSECGFU  IN  THE  ROLE  OF  NAVY  ELEMENT  COMMANDER,  CSS. 
C.  ADVISE  COMNAVSECGFU  AS  TD  CURRENT  AND  T3TBP.E  NSA/CSS  PLANS, 
POLICIES  1AND  PROGRAMS  IMPACTING  UPON  NAVAL  CRYPT0L05IC  OPERATIONS  AND 
RESOUFCES. 
D.  CONDUCT  UAISON  IflTB  THE  DIENSA/CH  CSS  AND  ASSIST  IN  TEE  EVALUA- 
TION 01  NAVSECgP.U  FIELD  STATIONS.   (PARTICIPATE  IN  TEE  FIELD 
ASSISTANCE  PROGRAM). 
E.  PROVIDE  SERVICES.  INCLUDING  COORDINATION  OF  VISIT  SCHEDULING, 
ICR  NAVSECGRU  PERSONNEL  VISITING  KSA/CSS. 
F.  SERVE  AS  FOCAL  POINT  FDR  NAVSECgRU  CSSA  REQUIREMENTS  AND  COORDI- 
NATES ¥ITE  NSA/CSS  PROVISION  OF  TECHNICAL  INFORMATION. 
g.   COORDINATE  AND  PARTICIPATE  VITB  ASSISTANT  COMMANDERS  AND  STAFF 
ASSISTANTS  IN  FORMULATION  OF  PLANS  AND  PROGRAMS. 
NOTE:   TO  PERFORM  TEIS  MISS1DN  IT  IS  NESESSAR?  TEAT  ACNSU  RE  INCLUDED 
AS  AN  ADDRESSEE  ON  ALL  CORRESPONDENCE  *ITH  NSA/CSS  OTHER  THAN  PURE 
ANALYTICAL  EXCHANGES.  f 
3.  TEE  FUNCTIONS  OF  NSGA  FORT  MEADE  I  At?  REF:E  INCLUDE: 
A.   PEFFORM  TEOSE  FUNCTIONS  AS  A  CSSA  FDR  FLEET  COMMANDED  TO  INCLUDE 
CLASSIC  PALADIN  RESPONSIBILITIES.  P 
///     UNCLAS  E  F  T  0  ///   ■-
3r*:3JX3    iS3KNUaAt.i.    .'«    U  ■' 
10.1.1 
///      UN  CIAS   EFIO     /// 
MAINTAIN   TRANSPORTABLE  TECHNICAL  LIfcRARI 
C.      FEPFO?"  KAVI    SIuSEC   FUNCTIONS 
t.      riRECT  THE   DEVELOPMENT   AKD   ADMINISTRATE 
FC?F  pp.oup>rs. 
I.      IE   TEE   EXECUTIVE   AGENT  FOP.   VI  BE*  A  KB   OPER 
SYS1EK. 
J.   OPERATE  THE  SNIF. 
u.   EXERCISE  ADMINISTRATIVE  CONTROL  OVER  AIL 
TO  NSA/CSS  ANT  NSGA  FOPT  MEABE. 
4.   TEE  FOLLOWING  PERSONNEL  ISSIliNMENTS  WILL 
ifc£4: 
ACKSG  -  CAPT 
DEPUTY  ACNSG  ~ 
CO.    NSi>A   JM  -   CAPT  _ 
EXECUTIVE   CFFICER   NS3A 
OFIFATIONS   OFFICER   NStfA   FM  -    
is.      THE    AFCVE   INFORMATION    IS  PROVTDTL   TO 
DE-EPMlMNi;   THE    CORRECT   ADDRESSEE  TO  USE 
COrMUNl CATIONS    AND   ADMINISTRATIVE    SUPPORT 
INTERNAL  ACTION   fc'ILl   ENSDRE   TEAT   TEE   APPRO 
THE   CORRESPONDENCE.      CORRESPONDENCE  KILL  I 
EAVINU   COGNIZANCE. 
C."  ACNSG,  CO  NSGA  FN,  OPS  OFFICER  NS3A  F*i 
LOCATED  IN  NSA  HDOTRS  BLDu  KM  6A164,  PBONE 
6SS-6446,  GREY  S53-3P51  ANE  ASVCM  2320  EXT 
MAINTAINS  AN  OFFICE  IN  PLC*  95C5  AS  If  ELL  k 
PRONE    VON    235-64=1 /S23-6351,    COMM   696-6491 
#£734 
ES. 
N  OF  THE  FL/.FIA  AND  " 
ATIONS  OF  THE  E3LLSETE 
NAVAL  PERSONNEL  ASSIGNED 
RE  EFFECTIVE  24  OCT 
^\rC? 
ASS 
FOR 
1ST  COM IAN DS  IN 
CORRESPONDENCE. 
APE  COM.rQN,  T5EREFCRE, 
PRIATE  OFFICE  RECEIVES 
E  ANStfEEED  PI  TBE  OFFICE 
AND  AI^-IN  SERVICES  ARE 
VON  235-6445,  ZQ"? 
33.   CO  NSGA  Fl  ALSO 
S  TEE  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER, 
/67?-53t>l. 
KKKN 
///   UNCLAS  E  F  T  0   ///
0JCIAS5IFI!!) 
r'.     10.1.2 
< 
L  Orio  iyj  vJL    "bs&um  tr.i— 
is,    of    T5Q 
'poor    tf-jf--* /.-/-_, 
"3  net     -f/faiaU.   1        "* 
J 
1  <?  r.  1 
:\   i. ..«/.!.     •  
il  
■>  j.  ..    1 
:;r;ora 
„    *•  i       ...u  :-,       XL.-...  - 
Classified  :.y:    cr::.\;r:r,T  5oi\ir 
reclassify  o;i:     Ori-;inati;-.j  .Vji^cy'-i 
O^tor  u-.ri'ci .">:-.  '  ivuir-1." 
ijicloauL-e   (1) 
•j-.iclasgifil:^ 
i#i- .  v.* /l*'.'
ItHJM'  *"f*  »    '    3S*I34X3    AtaWWaACO  A¥   OPOC.S  M-U\ 
srcrio"}  i:    rxFC.'Tr."'  su^wv 
A.    r*:';,0'-jr'itrv'iv  •"••"  !:I'*vt:*i- ■■•  '."  ''V!:;!"r. 
1.  (P)  C'2  J/V:)  :-:nily  "oar  Training  Protjr.-m  implemented  -.--it1".  t?n 
volunteers  train.-,  for  ho->-  visits.      (:'efor  to  faction  II,  pira.  A..l). 
?.  '  (P)    (:,n  JA-:)   Fir.st  ^PA?"1  clv;s  h.»l-\    (I'of.T  lo  Poet i en  II, 
para,  h.?) . 
?.     ('•.')    0?  W:)    rV»pnrt'».?nt.al  Pu'-wtnnc?  Maise  representative 
pro^rar  bo3an.      (T.afor  to  :.\>ation  II,  par.i.   "-..3). 
4.  ('0    P*--')  ?nrre-nt  ""^orations  irv-  Technical  readiness  ri-^ar.t 
(COTP.r)  establish-;*1  within  the  ^loot  Support  division   (CT'P-33).      (^cfer 
to  Section  II,  par;.  [?.'.-»). 
5.  ('-')  {TV!)  repartnant  of  the  *'av;/,  -ir-jani  national  rffoctivoness 
Center,  Alexandria,  virjini=»,  lie-jan  s  Comn1  Jssess-^nt  Survey,  refer  to 
Section  II,  para.   "\.4). 
5.     (U)    ('1  F»:"i)   7.-!-  '-'.vi  *y?*i  Infor.aation  Facility   (S?-I»-*) 
(OPS-331)   took  delivery  fro::  a  contractor  organization  of  '.'oal  Harbor 
processing  softwar?.      ("ofer  to  Paction  II,   -para.  n. -'.!.>). 
7.      ('J)    ("3  \"'-:r)   Pa-v.^.m'"!  ran-lo-i  urinalysis  «ro;jr;i~  starte1. 
Fifty -six  T»r>bors  arc-  teste*  on  a  monthly  basis.      ("Xler  to  Paction  II, 
para.   A.  5). 
n.      (',')    ("?  Fir)   *-:;•>■  ."•..•nrenesn  tninin.3  Pol1  for  PDO's  an.l  PC^'s 
by  the  Ar:>y  "'onta!  Health  Cr/*.y;elor.      (iv>far  to  Portion  II,  par-.,  ft.'.). 
0.      (H)     t?0,   '•"!!•%)    CWi 
solocte'  or.  •,v/r>1''P>'i"',T 
FPCM  Sailor  of  the  Year.     ••o:.ii notion  si;.>ri  ttoP  to  CO>:  ^.VPrCPp-.l  for 
consideration  as  th'ir  Pail  or  of  tno  Year  can'ioato. 
1'.'.      C..')    (71  "A')     ft  Ca-'r'>-j!r"i  fitness  -PoorJinator  an-:  'X?pnrfo:it 
Fitness  Coor'imtc  is  -..'or  •  a-->oiote.!  to  oversee  a  Tor-'anl  ,?o;;ltn  as:: 
•    Pnysical  T'on^inass  vroprr...  ->or  'U'.Y,":™.'?    '11°.      (Hefrr  to  Feet  ion  II, 
para.  A. 7). 
11.      (li)    C!-22  •"■.^)    C.rP-352  Personnel  participate?  in  V.Z.  "'aval 
War  Collets,   r'c.port,   '"n'o  I -.Ian"1  1'3P  '  '.;ar  ja-os. 
kL 
1?.      (>•)    (?3  "."j)    '"ir-t  Annual   ITP":  m-tne-rnof    "an;    (PT'T)    .*v.;ar-1 
aresento;!  to  CTIC(':ftC)^J  (p>ns  the-  east  nets  tar.:3,  in  3  anli-jto* 
::avy  Cryptoloaist  for  lr,"3. 
13.      (V)    (?1  ''ft?)    Perron'  he-M  its  first  Pprin^f est  at  rleL's  Tar!; 
with  2??-  atten.Jin.;. 
UNCLASSSFS5D
3S-'*:aJK'.t   i.StlKNaUAc L.  JV  c  •. 
1*"..      (I1)    (?'*    "-'")   Tri-'Jcrvic^  :*.?""  •'ohilinafior;  ^lanninji  Croup, 
chaired  by  r^'.^rt,   "-t  te  fcr -..;]. it.-  .j  ■.:;»^ili;-..»tion  ^la.i  Icr  "S.yrrj.s. 
(Hofer  to'f-er-tirn  II,   para.  ^..1). 
15.     (!')  (rr>  Arv.)  rrr.M ^MifcMBF  3:r: '  -TA3 , 
select*?'!  as  the  Srnioi  tin-  .li.ir.iof  .mint;-,  of  the  ?ua r t er  ros/ ore i vely  for 
January  -  r'-irc'i  1°-'. 
>.      U 
17.     (!■)    (?"  ."-:•")  •■.'""•■    :rvm'.-;  vol  leyha  1 1  to-?"  v/or  rt.  "m1:-  Po-st 
ChaTtDionshio. 
13.      (U)    (T  V-n  -   ■■'?  *".Y)    Tnsprctor   "eneral    (If*)    Tor  C>-"wS;-:cr"" 
an-i  his  tea-  conluct?"  a;i  v'-iri -tr-itive,    *ut^i:i.r.l,   .or.:"1  .■>~r.,;o.".n?l 
inspection  of  the  Co  .mn1..      (■■••.'    r  lo  fortiori  II,  -j:iv.i.  "..]). 
■KmmBi 
2<\      ('.')    ("1  "'AY)   2~"  tr-ini-vi  nel ■■,  by  '!''? 
CDO'c.      C:cfcr  to  Section  II,   -:a"s.  A.o). 
21.      (M)    (■■<  ,  2:.  :^V)   CTICf.c:*.C)J^^M|^r.n''; 
CTIl(£f/,7C)^BB*BM[^P^r.2'1c    1  "icl-'i  ^..soirstance  Visit   (f-v-V)   to 
NAVCOT'-n?:*.,   noT^^^KT/v^-?  :^.t.i,    "pain;   PI-;;1.  Athena,   C'.raccv;   C::  •Iv;.'-.r.T:'C:: 
(jrs  LT^V.Lr   (AP-i"-?) ) ,    -.ana. -a,      iir.-nn;   ::r;n/.,  riar'<  Air  Force  rasa,   i-oouhli:: 
of  the  Phillipir.eV  -/>l,  .^r.,  'v.::-.--.;  ^i~"\;sr:r<v:rAC/::'>  aiorAVrp'r, 
Pearl  Hnrixjr,  Ha.nii. 
21'.      (J)    (lr  -  1-:  ".AY)    •v:i>-  3'."»2  rorarnnal  vi^itei  Cr:'J!.'\  :Ff.?  .in '• 
7ICCURLA"?  for  liai.-on  an*  technical  •  'iscjssiori's. 
23.       ('")     (23  ":s.y)    i.i«  'Jov-nr..;  -?:jju  i.-;-*;i:i,    v.rP._   
selected  as  the  Co"»-ar."!.'a  fir.it  *-.nn-.r.  .''-was:1  r>.'  tr.c-  Y?r.r. 
-
(•J)    (  :°  J*:-:  -  ?'.'  .VL)  ■?Tir^|  ^tv?  cricc^-X 
participator1  in  tha  Technical  ntm.lar.V;  of  n»-n«ss   (Trc:?)   Ti-iJr  Tea- 
worl:  grojp  at  ''.Tl*  P.->rfol<;. 
2f  •      VJ)    (?'■  -•?'":  n;v  :":   J'j::)  The  sister,  "rs. 
the  counters, M 
l-jta  ct: 
ror  "ho- 
•v1 
Hickerson  I'.nll ,  .U1?.   ?'"y  ■:.-.s  iri-o-l,  vi.-ito.l  the  Corvv;  t->n-i  to.ire.:  t.i? 
pF.p.     Peoeive'l  roro.it  os  of  th:>  vir.it. 
27.      (U)    CI   .T.I.)   Co-r-onl  Phou  '.l  -.vjo  -participator  in  the  !Xrt\otic 
Conflict  Containvnt  ^ro^ra-  P?rin3r  heir"!  in  'v-ltirora,  "-.rylnn-a.      (Pefar 
to  Section   IT,  para.    ':.n). 
<
mmm  .  v  ■mmm  -m  •  rVaSN3dX3  1K3MN3A&0  iV  a^Ofiq  «  i3>; 
J'JCLAS^jirlEFV- 
TJL)   "*~*1  J|  ^ --■'  -"'I?4|       ^sol^ctel 
as  the  Senior  an:l  /Junior  5a i  1  r>t^?Tthe?uartor  respect i vJIy  for  Anril  -- 
June  19C4. 
2P.      (U)    (17  Jl't.)    'r. 
fills  the  5ir»eciil  Cor  vices  officer 
vacancy. 
3?.      ('-")    (?r-  .l'T.)   !'ir.-.t  ruhrtanrr*  VrxT.-?  Supervisors  Seminar  hoi;1 
for  division  offieer<:  an:1  chi^s.    (refer  to  Section  IT,  ::nra.  A.l('). 
31.      ('/)    (T7  Jl'L)  Co— -on -1  -nenic  hell  it  "urba  r«a':e;  ever  ln' 
atten;]e:"a 
visitel  DI^SGLA^Y  .ml  TO  i..vr/^S^^et  Cor  wi .Jeoatr":  otters. 
33.      CJ)    P'-'T.  -  '**:)   Z7i?fAr\ M  J////J0  WC,  appointer!  the 
first  Co-n~anr.  Physical  Security"  '•.rricfr^TFTTulyT    The  Physical  Security 
Review  Co-nrittoc  w.tb  forv  !  on  : 'P  Au^ast  .nth  publication  of  a  Physical 
Security  Plan  on  "S  Pove.rijor. 
3-1.      (U)    (1-t  -  1?  AUC)   ""-ofa  fie  "■•en's  an!  the  r.  Jean's  Softball 
tea.as  too''  the  Chn-">ionship  in  the  Souti  '-i  "I-'tlantic  ::avy  Sports 
Conf ers-nce . 
2^.      ('.»)    (2"  A'.'?  -   %7  '*•  n)   >>">'J-?r»'J  norsrmnel  conduct  a  liaison 
trip  to  Pacific  Vloet  ri''""?  units. 
3f>.      (V)    (v:r)    l.C-  JHBHf-1'  z"r*GK&  PP5-?2)   visite:! 
TvIRNSCPAC,  C3r  rv:,    "^  pv;W^T7,in:  ■,:>,;:!  •*>.•:  for  ;:i:lcoona"  -attcc-j. 
37.      (U)    (A'J'J)    0PC-3rl  personnel  povi  3d  support  to  CV.-Wr-YT 
OPSDC  corrittoo  for  '•r'lv.r.. 
3".      (")    (l"1  -  1"  Sr~)   '.'"-'~'\  hosts  th?  South  "i. '.-Atlantic  "avy 
Sports  Conference  "olf  "Tomn.-.Tont  ■.•it'.;  LV  •  'ay.-cn  Sr.i  th  cf  ':.?',\\  beating 
'.out  A?»  oartici pants. 
L 
3T.      (U)    (lr-  -  2C   rr-p)    i'-^tfMHf''1^  CTICSCW?), 
(0PS-2G)  za'o  .■»  ~AV  to  rT:?--:.v?F.trn'f  '.on^on,  rnrlin-1;  VCS,  Pota, 
Spain  and  r.SCh  Athens,   ~rnpce. 
4f.      (J)    (.-rr)    L~*"£///g/f  ae/i  -<r,''JHflP  C'?::"32)   *tten',o..l 
the  annual  AVjlls^yr  .' penti';:v-,  .>>r*:in-j  ~ro;r?  ?onSr^nc«  hosto?  by 
CIIJCLW-'TFr/r. 
41.      ('.')    (•■»'"')    Tre  icrrv;;:  trnininr;  incre~o.it    Cor  the  "Aavy  Fanily 
Peer  Pronrnr  t-n«;  hol.\      (ivf -r  to  S.-elic:.  II,  ;>nra.   <<.i:i). 
"?.      (*>)    (.?"")  CI"C^[  |fa vx>intc-1  an  tne  Special  assistant 
to  the  Fx2cutive  Officer  function! n-j  as  the'TVjrily  Services  Office  -.anjier 
air!  client  inta'.:e  coor-H^itcr. 
•j::cu\3:si?ir.r. 
.  f»    »■-  r!rtv»i-i?»j?jir»*r   »:vrr:.SE
uawnaA&o  *v  ason.:  ,.^3, 
4?..      (*')    {'■"•')   "^'V  ■■*•■'.•  il>   ."-orvirr-;  V^nli:-*:  ?lo-.-';  .er.t-:Mi«:h;'.*. 
(1'oCor  to  Eecrtion  'ii   wi.  '..!/;). 
/M.     (•])    (?•"■  .f;rn)  rro*»  !u»l  *  it-*  fit-.t:  mvw--i!    'an:;  I-  '/all. 
^ssu-e.1  duties  as  s»?.iior  r.-.li^ta!  V-vi.^r  to  l/.io  rir»rtor,  ''ational 
Security  Vjency.. 
as  the  Senior  arv'i  .\viior  r.ailor  of  tT>  ->J3ct-?i-  corw^ctiv^ly  foe  July  - 
September  1PC4. 
47.      ('■')    (!"*  'r:)    "•"'1  ■••»nt:r'-.  iv-  ".iv/*:-.  ?""th  :»in:';]v/  ;;it'i  ti 
dirmer-canco  h-.-K:  «l  t-v    \j  vi  b   inn,   1.1:11.1-.,    -'iryJ.iP  1,  v»ith  C'vrj 
as  guest  speaker. 
y,p.      ('•')    (-'  ,»""1')   Co-nin 
roli '."/.*  1  Cot.iiii 
•:".      i"/  "  ■  /  ■■■•  am     mwmwmmmmmmmw          —   **'»m  1 
Pfin  a  Chan^.;  of  Co'-yip.:  CerrMony  at  Calf.ney  I'oortr.  'iv-na.      (:^f?c         /f^f 
o^oction  II,  :»:-..  n-.?).  /u    ^ 
40.      (*')    ("■'  OCT)    vr:-;. 
Orl'UflSTBn  a;/ar3  by  PY? 
Mana-je  tie nt  Of  £  i cr> . 
•,:ar'1o:!  th;>  CutstanJin:j 
U>irc>ctor,  tiavy  »'u-v:i  T;c5ourcos 
«;n 
•    _(.'■')    (-^  ^H    'ivili.ip  ••"ritori.x:-  '-".orvi  r.'  Mo-Vi]  .'is  'Hwrl 
"';".'.  A1. •i-i/""«"U"1s  ccor-.Urj3tor,   fr-i:   »ustainei 
V,  1 
to  v-n;. 
superior  'y:rlot  ■r\r*:v. 
51.  (:J)  ("?  *'0V)  1?"  !':>rsor..Tl  Cornjter  cv;'jiT~ont  was  r'jceivol  ^n.l 
distribute  to  the  '^P  '■JKo-wnl  ^ivi^ion,  ?l*et  Sup;>ott  division,  Classic 
Paladin  nivisiop,   -•"/".inirtrativ;?  Su:'->ort  an!  Liaison  Staff. 
5?.      .(Tl)    ("V.  \«c\')    Tor  Cr '.WW  J  r7~P7  ".onsn^  H2'^2rV.  "0V  "•",  Counter 
Intelligence  >nlv;;i:  v"n  examination.-,  h?  on  for  all  L'SV/JH .r  -Military    no-L;r3 
assignee?.  ::sa/;fs  'Ji:  *3Vn7.      (::.'for  to  r;jctiop.  II,  ;vira.  .'..11). 
53.      (1-)    ("'  *!0V)   Firc-t  Cl a :-..'»  Petty  Officers'  Association 
establish'.*!  -at   t'.v.-  ■"orrnn'i. 
55.     (U)   (?7  rev  -  :•:»  ^rc)  cti:c;,v:)  JHBf  -™1-  cricks/-:--) 
(OP5-36)  attonje'.  t'.i?   •':•''*.!''  Direct  Sun->ort  Cor.  f -.franco  in  ":pl:?s,   It -sly. 
5fj.      ('.')    (3';  rOV)   V'jntV)  '/-12'1  .T.icro-coTJutcrs  inctalle:!  in 
Suonort  Fooartvont. 
J 
Ar^>
w.     (U)  cnv/?ir)  ^r^ 
an,1  tJlT-^r  Cor  :M  :>^n1  mH-t.; 
pt^-m  visita-.l  ir>i-ir,  -.w-ir.      ? 
re  /Ml     IK,   ry-l    Voider    :'or«VT.1*  ''ntPC    Cl<i?f,    ^"^'fflHB 
,   /  591.      V*    v-r       °  -   >ciM   s-rvire  vaa  i^l'  at  threat  CMaprl 
Canter  on  15  Dcco  roor .
aifui   ■  ji%«   i^i-'  as'!3<IX3  *»a»0W3A00  av  oyouc: Mar. 
Jimor:  ii:    Mirr^r^r.  -^...my!- 
TV.     1'uoport  !X'».-.rtro:.t  -  .  -  f 
1.  (:J)  The  *-iv-il  Security  Crau/  *.ctivit/  Family  Peer  !ro.r-.r  n..-!  "i 
its  first  two-*..\?e!'  trnrnnj  r.evionr.     T^n  f'oor  nrorjrnr.  l,c.-.".'  Visitor:  .;ero 
trninc-'  in  the  area  of  :-\>rly  ehil'ioo1  ^evlop-v^nt,   resource  availability, 
en 3  general  r.u^ort.  procedures  th  >t  v/j»:1  "!  ensble  thor  to  cater  into  support 
relationships  v: it' i  Pentifie1   "i  •> function  i]   f.ar.ilies.     The  tr^inin-j  \;es 
directed  un:er  the  guiJanco  of  .i  consult  mt  fror  the  Migh/Scopc  r.'ucatioiv.il 
Research  Foundation,  Yosilsnti,  -'ic'aijan.     This  "roqra-  is  on?  of  three 
pilot  prolans  that  the  ."avy  \v»  .i^optel  to  3'Mress  the  issues  of   r3*»ily 
wellness  an-1  act  an  a  prevent inn  of  chiV  abuse  an'  norjlcct. 
2.  (tl)  The  first  "nvy  Substance  Abu.-.a  Prevention  Prcora-n  (v;.^: "») 
class  was  heir.'  at  %T>C.\.     nubsc'iiont  classes  were  hoi*'  every  other  ronth 
for  the  remainder  of  the  year.     *.n  aver-je  of  22  ooonlo,  both  officer  an"1 
onlisto^,  attend  1  each  class. 
3.  CJ)   A  !^x"irt:oat  Su'i-.L  nice  Mose  Peprosentntive    (!X3A.!)  \:ns 
aprxsintel   for  each  l^partiont.     '.he  "'J.-V.'s  are  train*.!  to  present.  C/77  bloc';s 
on  sui*"iance  ai«ise,    id  «v-   initial   infur  vitia'j  pointy  for  <V  lart'^nt 
personnel,   an'  ar;?  7c.~i.orr.  <>T   t:u»  "\.v".';ir. 1  Hnbstance  7'buso  Council. 
t.      (!•)    -\  Cc-nae.  1   \ssoss,ncnt  Survey  '.;.as  convicted  by  the  '!.w/ 
Organizational  FffecLiwv  •■;•-••  /_\itor  in  January.     A  cross -sectional 
representation  of  ??  pers-.mel  ..'ere  i::torvio..e.!.     In  -"'.aril,  a  Co- "ran* 
Assossront  •.er:i.?i  ;roj.:    {"!..')  -./-a  e.jtnbl  i she  :  to  loo*:  .it  the  -roale- 
areos  an-1  --i^e  rero— ~cn --tinr.s  to  the  Ca.'-an'in:;  officer  for  i-rilo-.enti-; j 
finrlinns  of  th?  survey. 
5.      (")  ri.'*-y  te  sivty  Ca:.  ^n".  -..'••-bor.:  are  -oirvj  teste"   -o-ntaly 
urr.'er  the  Co,ran-*,,»  "m-'o-    '.*rina  lysis  PrnjtTi  usinj  t!,e  V".\V  1.7.    (single 
test)  portable  detection  machine  by  the  Syva  Corporation.     Pai-1  for  by  CNV\ 
the  test  kit  is  effective  in  the   Tetection  of  nine  different  ^nn 
'-  classi  f  icntions . 
5.      (U)  rive  *?.\->e  .V.-.-arero^s  classes  v;ere  hell  for_ 2£?  f eta les  anl 
110  CD0/00P3  by  th?  Amy  vental  !'0.n]th  Counselor,   ?r?^  ^ff   Two 
Hape  Prevention  classes  .••cr.%  jiven  et  "C-'"A  an]  ITHA  by  ^t^ctivenonnie  .'els  a 
of"  the  *-nne  '>.rwv*el  County  T^ijce  -;ox  "rine  :)nil. 
7.      ('J)    ^  Ce. — an"  ?-:ealt'«  an1  nea-lin^m  ?ro";r?.""  v:a::  esta'.'H  ohe1  ta 
lefine  criteria  for  piT/sieal  fitiesr,  -.r.l  .:ei  jht  control  st-.^-'at :Vi.     Tnaija 
Koy  Ober  v.'as  apaoi^t -?n  to  oversee  the  nro^rnr.  an:l  advise  the  Co^Bnlin^ 
Officer  on  health  an  "•  fitv^ss  -atters.     T./enty  nersonnel  "-.^re  selecte-1 
to  serve  as  De?artT...-it  ritnc-^:;  7oor 'iniitors  with  r^sponsi'.jility  of 
tonitoring  the  yearly  !57  test  -n-  the  -".anlatory  Conditioning  Proarav.     The 
Conrlitioninn  Pronra:   is    liven  tv.'ice  oiily,   T>  iays  a  u'ee'-;  for  oersonnel  not 
TGetinn  ro^juirerl  ha'y  fat  or  fitness  stan-lar.ls  an:1  consists  of  a  -ir>  T.inate 
exercise  session  inrlu^in:.  »he  l.T-  Tile  run  or  th?  ooticr.nl   5-"!r  ynrl  sv:ir.. 
Best  Copy  Available 
•:;vr>  a;  Govi.F.\y.i:!CT  i.avt.:.
?.      CJ)   ?'our   *-ho.u-  ::i-  classes  wore  -;;iver.  by  the  Con-an^  Corcsnan, 
f*     ^  Hy'-^BBBBP^r°r./?''  -v>  "»"•'' «tO'vV  r;.     ?\n  .on-:oi:v;  pro^rv*  o-\icat«, 
<^"~       identiM«7anT'>ro7i-,es  on  haul  trnini'v:  in  ~?:    nrevontion  3nJ  rescue 
•nctnois.     f.ipo:i  corpUtion,  the  """^5-  are  cortif  i?.1  ui  Level  i  -  !!eart  "  . 
Association. 
<"-.      (13)   "h~  "ormn1  '•  nily  .Nv-i:!;nan  ^  irtiei -jite!,  alon';  with  two 
counselors  fron  the  \':;vy  7.vilv  Pervico  "enter,  >■?.:: »>nlis,   in  the  'yynoctic 
Conflict  Contain-vst   nroji-nr  r-.'-.imr  in  "nit. i  'or-,  .■••ar/ln«v.     This  seriner 
provi -fe.l  training  necessary  to  r^ri  1  its;.;  ,n  ten-won';   ::roun  tnorsv  nrsiira*" 
rtssigne.1.  to  c-liTin.it"  physical  violence  fro:   the  laribil  fr-ily 
relationships.     This  invaluable  training  "as  enable- 1  our  ':i*"C  counselors 
to  facilitate  tvo  -.<rou:r  therapy  ;:.^-i->r  at  rt.  *:rn"v  to  Jate.     The  first 
session  was  hoLi  i^  '■.UTJ5t/~e..ta,,.,'«er;   the  soeon:*  in  "ovorV.  i/'JecoTbor. 
1^.      ('•)    7no  first  ?Ui:»!;t**r>o-»  .V-use  "..rv>rvisor:3  Seminar  was  he  1-1  with 
35  division  officer.-;/'* vision  ehi.»rs  .ltton-.liiv!.     ••  presentation  fron  SAC, 
Looal,  s«jo,  anl  'toxical  participate :,   .nc'n  ex-->lr.ininn  their  function  on.1  bow 
this  Conmanrl's  policies  an1  oroc\\r.ire<-.  were  a^pli-el."  Tni~  vn;  followed  h\-  r» 
question  an-?  answer  session.     Those  serirnrs  are  he];"-    vjartorlv. 
11.  (r.')   This  year,  *:S"a  H:.   ■■o.v'.s,  publir.hei  its  first  Physical 
Security  Plan  as  Vr.c>:  I  to  its  roaster  ''re-oreoYiess  ?lz':.     Physical 
security  awareness  has  been  elevate"!  both  within  the  Conna;rl  an.?  in 
conjunction  with  the  National  Security  Vjency.     "lars  nave  ooen  -naJcwith 
other  cryptolonic  elements  an1  the  •^  to  n.M  a  security  pori-ueter  arocn-' 
the  Troop  Support  area. 
12.  (V)   T'-ie  neccn*  trunin?  increment  for  the  "lav/  Fc-.ily  Poor 
Prolan  was  hell.     'i  ;ht  •>••.■  «;o -.-  visitor-.  particiMto;":  in  this  two-woo:: 
session.     Six  of  the  previously  traino;  volunteers  transferred,   leaving 
a  total  cf  1-1  trainr-:  ''otc  Visitors  by  September.     ?y  tho  en1  of   inp-i," 
seventeen  fsr.ilios  '..are  ti'e  rocir.ionts  of  the  Pesx  Tro^rnr.'s  support  an:; 
guidance. 
13.  V')    *-i  iT.rc*iate  n  •:-!  for  terior.nry  furni-sh.in-js  y.r"-  ler»-"in:j 
closet  itero  was  ibntifie.:  an?  the  tas:;  of  collecting  5n:?  .li.ntrihuti"/;  t.'.o 
itera  was  established     Tie  Cc^r.:,n'  allocate'  spaoj  in  one  .of  t\»o  -:.Z£\ 
warehouses  for  the  stora  j-.'  of   the-je  itenc  \fivii  not  in  us->.  ' 
14.  (U)    In  resoonse  tr»  '.^.:  ?C>  an-i  V"a  uui felines,   ti;  Vav;.l 
Investigative  Service  Kc;np  ••ol,"-:ra,;-h  axn-is  in  "ove:rber  for  ell  :J '••:/: T*" 
.'•'ilitary  personnel  r.ssinn--'^  to  !.:i-:  r<3C"7.     T'.-.o  poly jrv>-ors  coi«uct  two 
exa.TTS  a  -lay,   four  :vnys  a  ...'a':  start i"!j  wit!:  personnel  v. no  chee'-x-":  on  boar.* 
since  ."1  OctoL^r.     :.s  of  ?1  ")eeov,ber,   3.'  x:zc.\  yc:?\  in.iivi.-unls  -..ere  teste:. 
lr>.      (rJ)    On  :r-  >^rcn  I'^-l,  the  first  in  a  co::ti::ui:i.;;  series  of  Vri- 
Service  Mobilization  Plansun;  jroup  reetinjs  v:ac  :»el::  for  tne  puroose  cf 
Jevelopino  an  SCH  To!>iliz3tion    >lan.     Objectives  of  the  ^lan  v/oul:]  be  to 
smooth  the  accession  of  .Tore  than  ?,?n"-  military  reservists  into  the  •'".VJ'I-T. 
orjanizotion  in  the  event  of  full   or  partial    *obilizati«n.     ^urin:j 
subse-juent  T»eetinnn,   3  c?ratt  mobilization  plan  was   Jevelonel  a.i'lressino 
oCL/ilCI.'Ii..: 
./.. 
?ti.*t  ?  m  yV  ....  ..
.    3SS3dX3  1K3HNV3AO&  IV  0?ir.^  «  J3;; 
various  psrsor.n?!,  a>inistr:.Liv..',   .-rcurity    n'  logistic;;    .'.alters.     ?ic» 
workinj  ia'oii  >  has  an  .VjjwCtiv-.*  o'.'    >r.;;;..:itinj  j  v/crka.>la  vl.in  foe  lesti.vi 
purposes  during  t^:  y»con''  -jj?.c!._t  cC  calon^r  year  r.'?r. 
fi.     Operation.-.  ^.art'vnl-  '  .  *  . 
1.      (*J)    Ti-   rcv^n1   !">.;    _rtio;l  ;.?:•  con  •\jct :•"'  ->y  Loo'Insroctor 
General.     Thirtesr:  f'-rral  an!  i:if  or-i.al  r.rcavon.latiov.  vera  iiontifi'.'" 
IxiseJ  on  iinUn>  i-i    t'>-'  I  "  l.?.r.      J/u-.v  ceo  i.on.'.ition.-  M>-)lioJ  to  the 
Operation's  Tyv-otf^nt  an",  nil  actions  v.cre  ro-;ortol  cor.pl  at?  in  the 
?  <>cloix'r  i««"i  'u.-irL.-.l/   1  • -1  •    -ni.  it.  i  on  :;t  U.'i:;  !v;otL 
Captiir.J  ^t2liov:»1  ■>t«iin  J    ■ 
a  Charts  of  Cor.nsn,  irrrr-axiny  .it    via  Caffnay  roorts  Aryns  0P/^£:to.>:*r. 
The  duties  an:1  rarpanru'jlilti::;  of  t  v-  .•w.Ufmt  Co-.A^n-.'or,  *:aval  Security 
Group  wera  separate',  fro.1  those  of  tie  Cnrmn'iny  Officer,     aval  Security  /)  ^ 
Group  Activity  Port    'oa.'v.     Responsibility  for  the  follo./inj  duties  was  /fj-*° 
assignee!  to  APE'ia"  V'?.V.«?rcr.i;j: 
n.    (f.:)   rarvo  a.;  lao  .-^r-sonal  ca^rer.-Mtativ-  of  CO ™-\\'V.  :X>r.?  r>t 
O. 
co^xran:!,  CCS. 
(i?)  Assist  n."v-jv*:;cr.'j:*r.-j  in  the  role  of  j;avy  element. 
c.    C1)    vivir,?  ^v,,:v'"i •.:::•! i  is  to  currant  an!  future  "SVCSf* 
plans,  policies  an"!  ,  ronrai:;  irvnetinn  uvan  "aval  cry^tolo-jic  operations 
and  resources. 
:7.    {V)   ron-.luct   liiiicn  with  I  If"  \/?:-!  r.~:\  an!  *ssi-t  in  the 
evaluation  of  ■'.■»yr'  r*>"'   f  i    1  '   .->tit:i;>:r..      ("nrticip  -t^  i"  tie  Piell 
Assistance  ^ro-jr?") . 
e.  ('■)    Provide  nervices,   inclu.'1i:i;  coor -?int».ticn  of  visit 
schdulin^,   for  r".,?r**?~M''   T,-,r<..i.-jr-,-.]   visiting  "::y\/2">". 
f.  (I')    >rva  a:*  3  focal  point  for  -.Y/^rcr'.rr.i  ~^".  roruireronts 
-3rrl  coordinator,  -./it'-:  ";;V";'r  nrovi^ian  of  technical  information. 
r.    {'_')  C-orlirnt?  ir.'  pnrtici  i^te  with  Assistant  CornwTlarr, 
and  Staff  '-.ssist  int;;  in  »or"ul-i':ior.  of  olur.  an1  proqra*1". 
'n.    ('!)   T'ia  •:-vr:,Tv::r::.;T:   C--x?rar.ions  Officer  no  lonjer  perform 
the  functions  of  IY".uty,.* :■  :n"-'  WWCT-V.. 
3.      (U)  *:i  oVm-"  Oi:--r.ition:i  Control  Division   (Cr:>:?) 
a.    (V)    Ayr. istol,  alvise:"1  it1  sopnortc*  AC'SSC/Cc^  rrA^rrTUT".' 
Tort  "ea:'o,   in  his  res:;on-ioilitic:  fc>r  Tvanitorinr;  t'vi  effectiveness, 
exercising  coverage  control   r.ithority  nn:-1  overall  coordination  of  the 
widoban.1.  portion  of  the  '.-..';.  *Mvy  ''Uj.r.rVi:  Hyster  operations. 
.'.     .1,  »..»Jl  i  1  ..  • 
^  •  \  i    «•••     »    *•  ,      .  ..    . 
U»\l»    *'  
•  "^-    •--      • 
:-:'.'i.:>  at  r..-iVi-it\Mia:r  r.xST'.r.r
u.~>    ..»vi.*..«     »:uh!»a.jni. v    u\     i*1.^, 
b.    (T.-)   In  ;.i;nissj,  1*^2,  ;.?:''"  pro-jl*pte.j  3  worlrVi  *.e 
Preventive  :'r.inton:! ace   (~v!)  .-cPoblc   "or  k;i  l.'Vir.T  st^Lioi^.      *:^ro.:r, 
changes  hal  been    .t'e  sui^ot'irntl,-.      In  ;:.r.'2V->:-r,   1°^«'. ,    "~iP?"  con-.oli  "nt.:-* 
.ill  channos,  cr.PcMl'"4.:  fi?  ^u--i:.~t  1"T  -"visa  k-  nnu  ir:.-;uol  .1  Perl  kilo 
'..'JSebatrTr*'  Sd-oOule  V?cn-*. 
<?.      (")  rive  Girvort  -,i vision    pr^-?"*) 
a.    (V)    .'iiTJTry/rc-'-ri-.Tj" 
•*  t'*2  i  nop*- ion  nr;  1  estnPlis  vvp 
of  the  Current  Poor '-a  ion.;  aiv:  "eenic.i!  :•••■  vanes;;  :l*-~^nt    (70T1;;)    (OP1:-*,*/") 
within  the  '"lect  !\!  v>ort   -'ivi.-Mon.   lr.  ajp^rt  o.r   -'nta  h?nlli:vj  ani  ntor~  ;- 
ren.uire'nor.t;;,  '~rr-"^7  nepiir-':  c>~  •-.•'It*    vit-*   licaro-^utji:.     .'u'/ioju^.i'..!/, 
aooropriata  r.ott.rr-:  \>c--,  ilso  ae\jire\ 
b.    (•")    '"•:.-?  r:--.  *••>•■-*'•■  I '.''Tnr-^ti  ■:■•■>  Virility   (".•*"'•)   t<~o':    1olivory 
f  rorr.  a  contractor  or  y>r.i  '.at  ion  r.'  t  •■>..•  v-.-.i  ''r.rboi-  post-"!  "oio^  process  in': 
softv;are  cr.  1  rebrnary.     'Pti.-"  no'U'-ir-?  •nr.  •Vairjo- '  a:r!  written  to  enabl-2 
the  5NIF  to  support    '-oa  *'v!>b  ••,oloan:»  17  •laploy:-»»nt.i.     Purine  cilanPar 
ye3r  ISP-*,  r'Jir  provi  lo-*  prj-ii.or.ion   Vit-i'^rio  support  va1  port-*:i!-siori 
data  processing  ror  *■  .MLvitic  :'l ■•;■■» t  -"en  pyr-i'a  Pr  lease  IV  'Jeploy  rents. 
Additionally,  I'VI "  assist.  ;  l'k-  rarific  f,«.v;-!ort  rac-ility  r.t  "wv".  ::ir.n.;n, 
Japan  in  pro-r.ission  Pat  ;»;;:)::;:>  support  ror  t.:o  Pacific  "loot  Sea  'yp~.h 
irissiov-.     Pith  t'10  .ne\'  ; rxv?-?sia  ;  software,  oost-rissicn  orocorsir/j  ti-v? 
was  re:"iucol  to  a--  ->roxi-.v»t  »lv  tvo  ■■•??!:■;. 
;."    (M)    ro-oiy  L-n-v.ii  :-..  Proficiency  "  aiaVeap.ae?    (PL.*;,'P)     ("rs-.?=-.) 
a.    ('J)   CalersP-u-  v.:.;ic  ir-7   "(p."--;,.  y^st  Cycle:      '-'ror-  .lanu a r/  to 
February,   1"1?  PLPP  "«  oxari  nations  --ere  -r^inistorof  to  «.,2<;  "avy  an-.:  1"' 
US?C  crypto]  i-vn:i-,ts  i">  (  •,-»  \rf»':>ic,  ':'-» i  n  >*  i  '  -m'arin,  Pr^nci,  "nore;:, 
Korean,   Russian,   an"!  Spanis'-   la:vu:a-  ■:;.      r'vorjll   ■'/-•. '".  cf   too  3>:T.*inaes 
demonsttrttal  t  .~r.t  i  "jfactrx-y  ;•  v\:ir»':  .•■:■'  of    j^nor.-'l   r-i  iiotel  ■.•*>ho"»o  -lutios'   cf 
these,   17.?''.  ■.;?r->  cvil;iUv    is    F.ir.i  Iviurv    twrilifk-:'  Cor  Tircct   7.rv-ovt 
operations.     "Pi"  .rolla;;i,»;  00 •  - ■:•■'.  "5   r-:c_iv.:-"  t'v-  ,,,%\'.-  r.^^    .pT!  T.nr.'jj.i.—- 
Prof  ici one/  r.,..,ar'"  ;.c:;r"''  on  orypt^lo.-ne  nr:':ii:  vo-x.'iiL  oi  tho  o:len.:ar  v-?ar 
15C4  sxa-i nation.-.: 
■  :ir 
!7i'';:,'  .T-»v"f^t     ».  ~r.  i"--'" 
r.ar.i;>  Co'^nnl 
r-.iil  Cor. vial 
-"\"::;:pr:T!AP'j'  *>thonn 
P.WSTp^r.prTT  °<ir':>r-rn  r^int 
-sj*l  r.-iTi'lCcU    kf    COtfrAkMTliT    t.i!-KI,';il
3S-:jJX3  isnwsa.JAt :-  jv  c...: 
yost  r",;":":"-!>  \.:>.:r; 
l. it  re    ?n---.:i:i" 
Language 
i.    {->  »>]■>•• '•••r  V-i-sr   lr"-*   :  v>  V.-..  i';v  of  '^'^ 
rroJDCtisns         _o.*.pl^tior.j  Co-1-/, let ion  ilat.v 
Totals 
I 
*yr*c 
*;M'» 
- 
r.7*» 
] /V»0 
?visionr. 
U 
ii.    ('•)    rtnfj:-.  of  overall 
Pro-jran  inception  )■;: 
Lan^uaTe 
^roluction  since  t'na  •'.?  r 
-•V 
CTV' 
*c* 
Ovsrall 
TOICCV 
y-S 
^O'.nlottf  i 
i'or.-unin  i 
CTor^loticn  nntc- 
T, 
?•'• 
1" 
1  *    j 
■^ "? 
->t> 
1" 
in 
1     '■"l'- 
1    *•   ■       o 
*»   1 
J 
r> 
:.7n. 
?.f 
i—\ 
"  "* 
7f.? 
noi 
3? 
~,  *■  - 
n  ■5-v 
3'.' 
Totals 
iii.    (".')    In  ■::-.' it  in  to  1">  'VT.yvji  ^:;lim^  -iurinj  tnz  y-oar , 
•.eight  exist  inn  -vr.":'.';  — ?rv  co- Motel  y  r--*vi<; :-.!. 
c.    ('•)    r:,-V~-*-.  r.nn\iij3  Training  'ss-iotnr.co  Visits    (LTVv) . 
During  calc-rubr  year  l'.iV,   four  ',?%.V.-  \^x-  connote1  to  convr.n.^  in  r\!r:v>o, 
the  Pacific,   tho  "iri.V.-oa-.,   ar,.".  crr:;:r. 
3.    (*.')    \r,air,tanco  to  i*r  ".aria;--  .Vphibicuo  V:;it3   ("VJ) .     Fm 
Tl  January  to  C,ci  v>ril,   -r  — ^BBBHft^":.^ortoJ   t'no  ',!'.th  an!   32r\:'t.  :\YJ:;, 
ashore  in  Dei  rut,   !*j  >-.noii. 
^
J^W*** ''    i'^KNHlAf.    .'V    O-.- 
(V)       V--!i?l.,:UV     ._,,    .;._,     ,;.iv;  i>:.. 
:».   (:.•)    .1  :;••;  ::..    ..rt  Lu  ..  .......  (.-ii:-.3r.j) 
-#       1F^ 
V>** 
a-      (")    iViro.-it  ^:;-jV;;t    (-;^-3<3 
i.    ('..')   Con 'i:; :!■,-« -  fii  rtr?on  ?';
7.      (")    Clacr.io  PnK'i.i    (•:•:":-?■'■.) 
C ■"  a.»  (U)   "\irisrj  cal^ilar  y.or  10"  1,  -Classic  Pal-iiin  r^-r^onnsl 
accru&l  a  total  of  5,5-*?  cb/s  .Icployol.     'nlnlin  airbot:vi  porjo:i;-)c-l  anir.ic 
a  total  of  VW.?.  ni;'H-  :^onr--.    lurin^  the  yen r. 
b.    ('J)  Current  ,yii  :;!.£■:  billet  otructur^  war.  incroa!;ol  to  '.".. 
w  •  )V  1  *-  W  •»*  1  *•   1  *-»  • 
)?.
<ST14*T.ttTH1Mg 
DEPARTMENT  OF  THE  NAVV 
NAVAL  SECURITY  CROUP  COMMAND  HEADQUARTERS 
WMBMIHSTON.DX.   •»>»6 
2320 
Ser  G53/S9249 
9  NOV  1984 
From:    Commander,  Naval  Security  Group  Command 
Subj:     INSTRUCTIONS  GOVERNING  NAVY  HIGH  FREQUENCY  PIRECTION  FINDING  WIDEBAND 
OPERATIONS 
Ref :       (a)  COMNAVSECGRU  ttr  ser  T37  of  20  Aug  1979 
(b)  NAVSECGRUINST  S2520.2 
*  + 
Encl:  (1)  U.S.  «avy  High  Frequency  Direction  Finding  Wideband  Operations 
Manual  * 
1.  Reference  (a)  Is  hereby  cancelled. 
2.  Enclosure  (1),  guidance  for  operation  of  the  Wideband  HFDF  System,  super- 
sedes reference  (a).  Enclosure  (1)  consists  of  a  basic  manual  containing 
general  policy  and  guidance,  and  one  annex  covering  procedures  for  Net  Control 
and  Net  Station  Wideband  Operations. 
3.  Wideband  HFDF  1s  part  of  the  BULLSEYE  system  and  therefore  reference  (b) 
must  be  used  In  conjunction  with  enclosure  (1). 
4.  Enclosure  (1)  1s  effective  upon  receipt. 
S.  PATTERSON 
s1 stent  Commander  for 
pedal  Operations 
Kef  (a)  t©  iTe.«*  I  .C  v\]
ILMUUUUUb  A 
NATIONAL  $E€t«4l5t^&£NCY.HEADQUARTERSTuiLOING 
Fart  Gaarfa  C.  friawU,  MaVlan*'   30/5$ 
c    >r^ 
^> 
2000/skm  "  . 
Ser  ACNSG/102 
20  November  1986 
From:  Assistant  Commander,  Naval  Security  Group  Command,  Fort  Meade 
To:    Commanding  Officer,  Naval  Security  Croup  Activity,  Fort  Meade 
Subj:   WIDEBAND  MISSION  DELEGATION  AND  RESPONSIBILITY 
Ref :    (a)  COMNAVSECGRU  ltr  2520  Ser  C53/T37  of  20  AUG  1979 
"  (b)  NAVSECGRUINST  S2520.2  (Series) 
1.  Reference  (a),  in  conjunction  with  ref erence  (b),  delegates  authority  to 
ASSTCOMNAVSECGRU  to  act  as  Executive  for  Wideband  System  Operations,  and  to 
assist  COMNAVSECGRU  in  the  operation  and  management  of  the  Wideband  Network. 
2.  The  Commanding  Officer,  Naval  Security  Group  Activity,  Ft.  Meade  Is 
hereby  delegated  responsibilities  of  performing  all  Wideband  System  evolutions 
as  assigned  to  ASSTCOMNAVSECGRU  in  reference  (a).  In  connection  with  this 
delegation,  Commanding  Officer,  Naval  Security  Group  Activity  Ft.  Meade  is 
authorized  use  of  the  ASSTCOMNAVSECGRU  message,  letter  and  ARFCOS  title  for 
correspondence,  tasking  and  liaison  related  to  the  Wideband  mission  «6  defined 
In  references  (a)  and  (b) . 
E.  iv/SULLlVAN 
Copy  to: 
COMNAVSECGRU 
o c 
c 
■a 
•ffl 
o 
T. 
^3 
IU 
UNCLASSIFIED 
KeF  (p)-\o  iW  l.e(i)(' 
,  t%    a      r..  >\:i  iamv."    I  vPtViSn
V 
4  .  ,skmxv««     ..  ^  ~       .'j~    UNCLAS    E    .    T   0 
■rc/aitlASt*  TIMI  I      MIICIMOCI  Cl*»»  iHCAt  u» 
rt6»>a*»t»  t»m» 
*»T|  T|H| 
•0«'« 
RR 
RR 
EEEE 
ItlASI  NANDl>*C  MHTBUCnM* 
OS 
MiCKK  l&»»' 
632341 
XAA/ 
/ 
# 
b 
FN   COKNAVll^VRU 
TO   KOZAD         70 
*** 
INFO  COHNAVELEXSYSC0H//PDE  107-6//1 
NSACSS//T133/P43// 
CHNAVHA7 
NSGA  SKA6GS 
*** 
UNCLAS  E  F  T  0 
QQQQ 
CKNAVHAT  PASS  TO  RCA  CAMDEN 
SUBJ:   BULLSEYE  TEC  FLASH  CHANNELS 
A.   COMNAVSEC6RU  WASHINGTON  »C  1219262  HAI  84  C6ENSER)  <N0TAL) 
B."  »CO"LANT-HFDF  HET"«eRTHWEST  VA  0910392  RAY  tA" (6ENSER>  CNOTAL) 
C.  NCO  PAC  HFDF  NET  WAHIAWA  HI  0501142  HAY  84  C6EHSER)  CNOTAL) 
D.  MCO  RED  HFDF  NET  ROTA  SP  031345Z  RAY  84  C6ENSER)  CNOTAL) 
E..'  BULLSEYE  CCB  MEETING  17-18  HAY  84  CITE*  138) 
1.   THE  TRIPLE  ERROR  ENCODED  CTEC)  FLASH  CHANNELS  WERE  0RI6INALLY 
DESI6NED  WHEN  WE  WERE  USIN6  HI6H  FREQUENCY  COMMUNICATIONS  CIRCUITS 
tOiSTK 
***0/63213*** 
***D/650/680*** 
■c  » 
.  • 
C  -l 
c  c 
r>  c 
f.  c 
cr 
• 
.5  : 
Z&&US 
^HM 
CHAni*  tvrtc  kAwl    Tita    0»»>CI  (*HtOk  »«0*t 
CTRC    C.    B0NESTEEL/_G3212/.X20285 
18   JULY    1984 
rclw£^ 
*.  V.  EC  IS,  CJ 
630A...   632...    644/CIR   6311/CIR 
UNCLAS    E    F   T   0 
DD  ,SSr»"»  173/2  (OCR) 
FMViOVl  ID'TlO*  II  cmOt.lt I 
**  otan^-oacum 
*■    \  *   I 
!/>■»  are  Sim 
%r*     \ 
•  VI  C»C  <M>-*M«*» 
l>1H»l 
v«l*      ■  ■!■
cc 
•M'>K  IH»1 
632341 
TEC  ADDS  fRO*  BITS  TO  EACH  TRANSMITTED  CHARACTER  TO  ENSURE 
NETSTATIONSTIECEIVE  ERROR  FREE  FLASHES.'  PRESENT  DAY  CIRCUIT 
ROUTING  HAS  VIRTUALLY  ELIMINATED  THE  HEED  TO  USE  TEC.   ADDITIONALLY, 
THE  INCREASED  Uf.E  OF  STATNUX,  WHICH  WON'T  NARDLE  TEC  FLASH 
CHANNELS,  HAKES  THE  USEFUL  LIFESPAN  OF  TEC  TENUOUS. 
2.   REF  A  DIRECTED  NCO'S  TO  INHIBIT  THE  TEC  FLASH  CHANNELS  FOR  A  ONE 
MONTH  TEST  AND  TO  REPORT  ON  THE  IMPACT  TO  NET  OPERATIONS.   BASED 
ON  RECOMMENDATIONS  RESULTING  FROM  THE  TEST  CREFS  B,    C,  AND  D) 
AND  DISCUSSIONS  DURING  REF  E,  THE  TEC  FLASH  CHANNELS  HILL  NO  LONGER 
BE  USED. 
3.   FOR  NCO'S:   INHIBIT  TRANSMISSION  OF  T»E  TEC  FLASH  CHANNELS  IN 
THE  BPU.   TRANSMIT  THE  ARHIB  CARF)  Alt  CONTROL  CCNF)  FLASHES 
SIMULTANEOUSLY  ON  THEIR  BORNAL  CIRCUITS  PATHS  AMD  ON  THE  TWO 
CIRCUITS  PATHS  VACATED  BY  ELIMIMATION  OF  THE  TECS. 
4.  FOR  USN-14,  USN-24,  USN-837:   MAKE  BECESSART  HARD  WIRE  CHANGES 
TO  TECH  CONTROL  PATCH  PANEL(S)  TO  ALLOW  SIMO  TRANSMISSION  OF  THE 
ADF  AND  CNF  ON  THE  TWO  CIRCUITS  PATHS  EACH. 
5.  -.FOR  NETSTATIONS:   AS  A  RESULT  OF  ACTIONS  IN  PARA  3  AND  4  ABOVE, 
YOU  WILL  BE  IN  RECEIPT  OF  THE  ADF  AND  CNF  ON  TWO  SEPARATE  CIRCUIT 
DlSTR. 
IcxusTt*  rrvtc  urn  Tim  o»»>ci  §»i»»o».  »»o»i 
tv*u  wml  tnvt  o»»*t  rr*i»oi  **e  »»0"« 
IKwrvM 
v*c**  — 'nmrnoM 
UNCLAS    E    F    T   0 
o»n  Tuti  o«ov» 
€ 
!1 
DD  ,ffiS*B  173/2  (OCR/ 
MIIVlOU*  lOiTtOI  t  0»KKJTI 
•  v  t  •»«  »•»'  -»•*•' 
lltUU1
■n  cutMi»CATir 
UN C LAS 
PATHS.   XIRGMCESS  OF  200  WIRING  CHAN6ES  WOULD  BE  NEEDED  TO  MODIFY 
THE  OPU  TO  JOCEPT  NON-TEC  CIRCUITS  AT  THE  PRESENT  TEC  INPUTS.   WE 
HAVE  THROUGHLY  INVESTIGATED  ATTEMPTING  THESE  MODIFICATIONS  AND  IT 
HAS  BEENED  UNACCEPTABLE  FROM  BOTH  MANPOWER  INTENSITY  AND  PROBABLE 
HARDWARE  ADVERSE  IMPACT  VIEW  POINTS.   ACCORDINGLY*  YOU  WILL  HAVE  TO 
RELY  ON  TECH  CONTROL  PATCHING  TO  MAKE  USE  OF  THE  SECOND  FLASH 
CIRCUIT  IN  EVENT  OF  PRIMARY  CIRCUIT  OUTAGE. 
6.   WE  ARE  INVESTIGATING  THE  FEASIBILITY  OF  EXTENDING  THE  J  ROUTE 
CHANNELS  FROM  TECH  CONTROL  TO  THE  ©PS  FLOOR  TO  FACILITATE  SWITCH 
FROM  PRIMARY  TO  BACKUP  CIRCUITS  WITHOUT  TECH  CONTROL  INTERVENTION. 
*#* 
M/R:   PER  THE  RESULTS  OF  THE  TEST  MS  BISCUSSIOBS  AT  THE  CCB/  S53*** 
MADE  THE  DECISION  TO  ELIMINATE  TME  TEC  FLASH  CHANNELS  <G53  MEMO*** 
SER  C53/273  DTD  14  JUH  04  GERMANE).   BISCUSSIMC*  THE  OPU  IN  PARA  5*** 
IS  PREVENTIVE  MAINTENANCE.   THE  FIRST  THING  THE  METSTATIONS  WOULD*** 
THINK  ABOUT  IS  PLUGGING  THE  SECONR  CNF  AMI  At?  INTO  THE  OPU  TO*** 
AUTOMATE  THE  USE  OF  THE  SIMO  CIRCUITS.   WE  ARE  POINTING  OUT  THAT*** 
THIS  WAS  INVESTIGATED  AND  DETERMINED  TO  BE  INFEASIBLE.   THE  OPU  IS*** 
AN  EXTREMELY  OLD  SYSTEM  AND  MAKING  THAT  NUMBER  OF  WIRING  CHANGES/*** 
WITH  ASSOCIATED  CABLE  MOVES/  IS  ASKING  FOR  TROUBLE.   ALSO/  FLAG-*** 
HOIST  WILL  ELIMINATE  THE  OPU'S  IN  A  COUPLE  OF  YEARS.*** 
•  c 
in 
t
Dirrn 
matoh  nr»te  *u»t  tttu  e*'ici  tTttcok.  w«.a 
L 
Trrte  maul  imi  oto  «timoi  mc  mom 
kteiuruag 
XCTlOlU 
ICUlin-*  CUAU'lCATlO. 
UNCLAS    E    f    T   0 
0*T1  TWtl  »*OV* 
OD  ,2STn  173/2  (OCR) 
fa  eioj-u-cco-im 
•  Ml  «»C  >■'-»»»<•' 
IIIUUI
iv  a?.0fW*U3v 
U^R^S^***** 
TIONS 
Washington,  dc  *ojso  Cane    frp:      Nov   81 
•w  *!*».»  ncrtN  to 
OPNAVNOTE  5450 
Ser   09B2E3/UU309623 
1  JUN  1984 
<Spmav  notice  5^50 
From:   Chief  of  Naval  Operations 
Subl-   ESTABLISHMENT  OF  THE  U.S.  NAVAL  SECURITY  GROUP  ACTIVITY, 
5   J*   KAMISEYA,  JAPAN 
Operations  for  command  and  support. 
,  •  u  «„♦   The  Secretary  of  the  Navy  has  approved  the 
!;t.MB£i^  -tivity  as  of  23  May  198U' 
Sith  the  following  mission  statement: 
To  perform  Naval  Security  Group  and  related  functions 
as  directed. 
*   Title  -r  official  in  Qnn.nd.  Malllnn  ^^^^ffn^T126' 
Lrnitle^r  Message  AUdressal  in  ^ccomil^J^LJi^^ 
SUPP-1  is: 
Commanding  Officer  «„♦«„« *v 
U.S.  Naval  Security  Group  Activity 
Kamiseya,  Japan 
Mail  Address 
Commanding  Officer        ,  ...f(J 
US.  Naval  Security  Group  Activity 
FPO  Seattle  98768 
fSNDL-   FEU)  (Short  Title:   HAVSECGRUACT  KAMISEYA  JA) 
(Activity  Code:   5771-725)  (UK  #:   70291) 
...  -   the  rhief  of  Naval  Operations  delegates 
tutnfm^ne^ectVnore  activity  as  f.ll.«: 
..   coj^and.andj*^-  Colander,  Naval  Security  Group 
Command  l"o  be  exercised  by: 
D.   »~a  Coordination.   Commander -in  Chief  U.S.  Paoijic 
Flee^toVlTeTpiTTHroush  Comm 
e 
U.S.  ""Jj/,*.,  „iy  be 
japan,  or  through  JME^l^r^hority.. 
further  delegated  tfT^PPTopri.^ 
UNCLASSIFIED 
IB 
o 
c 
o 
n
3S'i3dX3   iN3NIW3AOO  AV   Q?M:Z  'M  i3 ,; 
OPNAVNOTE  5150        UNCLASSIFIED 
5.   information.   The  subject  new  shore  activity  is  not  a 
management  headquarters  activity. 
to  the  new  shore  activity. 
7.   cancellation  Contingency.   This  noti5e  may  be  retained 
for  reference  purposes. 
H.  F.  BOYLE 
Assistant  Vice  Chief  of  Saval  Operations      » 
Director  of  Baval  Adalnlstratioa        % 
r     °        (Immediate  Office  of  the  Secretary) 
SNDL    «2A        (Department  of  the  Navy  Staff  Offices) 
(NAVCOMPT  (12);  CHINFO  (3);  DONPIC  (1); 
OLA  (1);  Auditor  General  of  the  Navy  (1); 
only) 
AHA         (CHNAVMAT  (10)) 
A5         (Bureaus)  (CHNilVPERS  (20),  only) 
21A2       (C1NCPACFLT) 
23^2       (Naval  Force  Commander  PAC) 
(COMNAVFORJAPAK,  only) 
Cij3A       (Naval  Security  Group  Detachments) 
(Kamiseya,  Japan,  only) 
E2C        (NAVFINCEN) 
E2D        (NAVREGFINCEN) 
E7         (Activities  under  the  command  oi  tne 
Auditor  General  of  the  Navy) 
FE1         (COMNAVSECGRU) 
FG1        (C0MNAVTELC0M) 
FG2        (NAVCOMKSTA) 
FG3        (NAVCOMMU) 
FG6        (NAVCAMS) 
rui         (COMNAVMEDCOM  (8)) 
FJ18        (COMNAVMILPERSCOM) 
FJ8U       (NAVRESPERSCEN) 
FJ87       (EPMAC) 
FJ91       (NCPC) 
o 
C 
n 
rs 
o 
n 
UNCLASSIFIED 
"CtH   A.-   Ci'Vl.tWdKNT    I.XIT...SE
^gS33x5^iK3»532r«.,6  iV  O'J:,;  ^-i-ij;. 
UNCLASSIFIED 
OPNAVNOTE  5**50 
Distribution:   (Cont) 
SNDL    FKA1       (Systems  Command  Headquarters) 
(COMNAVAIRSYSCOM  (6);  COMNAVELEXSYSCOM  (5); 
COMNAVSEASYSCOM  (2H);  COMNAVFACENGCOM  (16) 
COMNAVSUPSYSCOM  (38)) 
FKM15      (ASO  BRASO)  (Philadelphia,  PA,  only) 
FKM18      (NAVMTO) 
FKM22      (NAVPUBFORMCEN) 
FKM30      (NAVRESSO) 
FKN1       (FACENGCOMDIV) 
FKN2       (CBC)  (Port  Hueneme,  CA,  only) 
FKP1M      (NAVWPNSUPPCEN) 
FS1        (COMNAVINTCOM) 
All  Divisions  of  OPNAV 
Commanding  Officer 
U.S.  Naval  Security  Croup  Activity 
FPO  Seattle   98768 
UNCLASSIFIED 
;>  a:  G>-vi:tiV.!:vr  r.>:i,i'«f
10.2.2 
as*:a<ixa  xtawrouAos  *v  caons^j, 
'pTTITTI' 
dePaV    ■  
■ "  
■ '  ^ 
OFFICE  OF  THE  CHIEF  OF  NAVAL  OPERATIONS 
WASHINGTON.  DC    20350 
in  mt'LX  ncrcn  TO 
Ser   09B2E3/^U309"628 
1  JUN  ted-i 
From:   Chief  of  Naval  Operations 
To:    Commander,  Naval  Security  Group  Command 
Subj:   DETACHMENT  DISESTABLISHMENT 
Ref:    (a)  Your  ltr  5^50  Ser  GD122627/ 10T20  of 
20  Mar  1984  (NOTAL) 
(b)  0PNAVIW5T  5^50. 169D 
(c>  SNDL,  Part  2  and  Catalog  of  Naval  Shore 
Activities  (0PNAV  P09B2-105) 
1.   As  requested  by  reference  (a),  you  may  disestablish  the 
following  detachment  effective  as  of  23  May  1984 : 
Officer  in  Charge 
U.S.  Naval  Security  Group  Detachment 
Kamiseya,  Japan 
Mail  Address 
Officer  in  Charge 
U.S.  Naval  Security  Group  Detachment 
FP0  Seattle  98768 
(Short  Title:   NAVSECGRUDET  KAMISEYA  JA) 
2.   You  may  take  action  to  announce  the  detachment  disestablish- 
ment in  accordance  with  reference  (b). 
.3.   The  mailing  address  for  the  detachment  will  be  deleted  from 
List  C43A  of  reference  (c). 
<y 
y,t,> 
Copy   to: 
CINCPACFLT 
CN0   (Op-009) 
C0MNAVF0RJAPAN 
NAVACCTGFINCEN    (NAFC-6A) 
NAVC0MMU,   Washington,    DC   (NAVTELSYSIC   (IC15) 
H.  F.  I0YLE 
Director  of  l-aral  Administration 
UNCLASSIFIED 
.:ct:»   A."  G>Vi:hS*E:;T   KXPK..PE
3SN34X3  1N3KKU3AC9  i¥  WOnS  ;hi;jv 
10.2.3        ..   — 
UNCLASSIFIED 
' — DEEARIMENI£F-.TKtWAyYs 
NAVAL  SECURITY  GROUP  COMMAND  HEADOUARTERS 
JIOl    NCtRAtKA  AVCNUt.N  W. 
WASHINGTON.  O.C.     101*0  -  .. 
Cane:  Jim  85 
MSGMOTE  5450 
Ser  GDI 2834/1 0311 
14  M  1984 
NAVSECGRU  NOTICE  5450 
From:  Commander,  Naval  Security  Group  Command  - 
Subj:  DISESTABLISHMENT  OF  U.S.  NAVSECGRUDET  (NAVAL  SECURITY  GROUP 
DETACHMENT)  KAMISEYA,  JAPAN 
Ref:   (a)  OPNAVINST  5450.169D  (NOTAL) 
(b)  CNO  Itr  ser  09B2E3/4U309628  of  1  Jun  84  (NOTAL) 
(c)  OPNAV  NOTICE  5450  of  1  Jun  84  (NOTAL) 
1.  Purpose.  In  accordance  with  reference  (a)  and  as  requested  by  reference 
lb),  the  following  NAVSECGRUDET  is  hereby  disestablished  on  23  May  1984: 
Officer  in  Charge 
U.S.  Naval  Security  Group  Detachment 
Kamiseya,  Japan 
Mail  Address 
Officer  in  Charge 
U.S.  Naval  Security  Group  Detachment 
FPO  Seattle  98768 
(Short  Title:  NAVSECGRUDET  KAMISEYA  JA) 
.2.  Background.  Reference  (c)  announced  that  the  Secretarv  of  the  Navy  has 
■approved  the  establishment  of  U.S.  Naval  Security  Grouo  Activity,  Kamiseya, 
Japan  effective  23  May  1984,  thus  requiring  the  disestablishment  of  U.S. 
NAVSECGRUDET  Kamiseya. 
3.  Action.  Commands  and  offices  concerned  are  requested  to  take  necessary 
action. 
*v  k  * 
'VAN,  JR.    / 
Distribution: 
NAVSECGRU  Lists  I,  II,  III,  IV,  VIb,  VId 
SNDL  A3  (Chief  of  Naval  Operations)  (0P-09B2E  and  OP-009  only) 
21 A2  (CINCPACFLT) 
23A2  (Naval  Force  Commander  PAC)   (COMWAVFORJAPAN  only) 
E2F  (NAVACCTGFINCEN  (NAFC-6A)) 
FG1   (COMNAVTELCOM) 
FS1   (COMNAYINTCOM) 
NAVCOMMU,  Washington^lC^JAVmSYS' 
UNCT  RRKTFIED—   
■r:r:Ti.3  at  (iiviT'sit:.:  rxrr.si.
3S-!3JX3  IiHlMd3At..5  IV  W!x.;,iU 
10.3      (U)   A  LISTING  OF  REGIONAL  ACTIVE  DUTY  CRYPTOLOGIC  OFFICFRS 
AND  NAVAL  RESERVE  SECURITY  GROUP  UNITS  PRIOR  TO 
RESTRUCTURING  (1984) 
ACTIVE  DUTY  CRYPTOLOGIC  OFFICERS 
RADCO  NAVRESREDCOM  Charleston 
RADCO  NAVRESREDCOM  Dallas 
RADCO  NAVRESREDCOM  Great  Lakes 
RADCO  NAVRESREDCOM  Philadelphia 
RADCO  NAVRESREDCOM  San  Francisco 
NAVAL  RESERVE  SECURITY  GROUP  UNITS 
NAVRESREDCOM  Region  One 
NR  DIRNSA  FORT  MEADE  101,  Worcester,  MA 
NRSG  DEPT  ROTA  401,  Worcester,  MA 
NRSG  DEPT  ROTA  301,  Quincy,  MA 
NRSG  ACT  EDZELL  101,  Providence,  RI 
NRSG  DEPT  ROTA  501,  Chicopee,  MA 
NRSG  DEPT  ROTA  201,  Quincy,  MA 
NRSG  DEPT  ROTA  101,  Lawrence,  MA 
NRSG  DEPT  ROTA  601,  New  Haven,  CT 
NRSG  DET  GROTON  101,  Hartford,  CT 
NAVRESREDCOM  Region  Two 
NRSG  DEPT  ROTA  802,  Whitestone,  NY 
NRSG  HO  102,  Whitestone,  NY 
NRSG  DEPT  ROTA  902,  Mattydale,  NY 
NRSG  ACT  WINTER  HARBOR  102,  Freeport,  NY 
NRSG  ACT  EDZELL  202,  Freeport,  NY 
NRSG  DEPT  ROTA  702,  Albany,  NY 
NRSG  ACT  NAPLES  102,  Poughkeepsie,  NY 
NRSG  DEPT  ROTA  1002,  Binghamton,  HY 
UNCLASSIFIE 
PTpVpfv 
•-   »  i-  ;  r-    I    ■ 
XXJ.'.^-   
:..t)  at  r..>vrr<N'n::.T  kxit..s-
jm.«as'  ±www.iJiuu,TrTT!?7?TP 
UNCLASSIFIED 
NAVRESREDCOM  Region  Four 
NRSG  ACT  EDZELL  304,  Clifton,  NJ 
NRSG  ACT  EDZELL  404,  Elizabeth,  NY 
NRSG  DEPT  ROTA  1104,  Philadelphia.  PA 
NRSG  SECSTA  WASHDC  104,  Philadelphia  PA 
NR  DIRNSA  FORT  MEADE  204,  Philadelphia  PA 
NRSG  DEPT  ROTA  1204,  Atlantic  City,  N J 
NRSG  DEPT  ROTA  1304,  Avoca,  PA 
NAVRESREDCOM  Region  Five 
NRSG  DEPT  ROTA  1505,  Rochester.  NY 
NRSG  ACT  EDZELL  505,  Buffalo,  NY 
NRSG  SECSTA  WASHDC  205,  Erie,  PA 
NRSG  ACT  KAMISEYA  105,  Pittsburgh.  PA 
NRSG  SECSTA  WASHDC  305,  Cleveland  OH 
NRSG  DEPT  ROTA  1405,  Cincinnati,  OH 
NAVRESREDCOM  Region  Six 
KLS1?!^  F0RT  MEADE  306>  Baltimore,  MD 
NRSG  ACT  KEFLAVIK  106,  Baltimore,  MD 
NRSG  DET  NORFOLK  406,  Richmond,  VA 
NRSG  HO  WASHDC  206,  Adelphi,  MD 
NR  DIRNSA  FORT  MEADE  406,  Adelphi,  MD 
NRSG  DEPT  NORVA  106,  Little  Creek,  Norfolk,  VA 
NR  DIRNSA  FORT  MEADE  506,  Adelphi,  MD 
NRSG  HO  WASDC  *06,  Washington,  DC 
NRSG  DET  NORFOLK  306,  Washington,  DC 
NRSG  DET  NORFOLK  206,  Washington,  DC 
NRSG  CSG  106,  Washington,  DC 
NAVRESREDCOM  Region  Seven 
NRSG  DEPT  DIEGO  GARCIA  107,  Greensboro,  NC 
NR  DIRNSA  FORT  MEADE  607,  Charleston  SC 
NRSG  ACT  LANT  107,  Charlotte,  NC 
NAVRESREDCOM  Region  Eight 
NR  SECGRU  HO  WASHDC  308,  Atlanta,  GA 
NRSG  ACT  HOMESTEAD  10R,  Orlando  FL 
NRSG  ACT  HOMESTEAD  208,  Tanpa,  FL 
NRSG  ACT  CHARLESTON  108,  Jacksonville  FL 
NRSG  ACT  HOMESTEAD  308,  Miami,  FL 
UNCLASSIFIED 
UNCLASSIFIED 
* —  -  -  -    t  i 
''Ct_:i   A?  r..Vi:ks:yr*;T    J"XST..fr
assaarj  iNawjraaAto  iv  c  >j.. 
UNCLASSIFIED 
UNCLASSIFIED 
NAVRESREOCOM  Region  Nine 
NRSG  ACT  ADAK  109,  Knoxville,  TN 
NRSG  ACT  SABANA  SECA  ]09,  Louisville,  KY 
NRSG  ACT  ADAK  209,  Nashville,  TN 
NR  DIRNSA  FORT  MEADE  709,  Tuscaloosa,  AL 
NAVRESREDCOM  Region  Ten 
NR  DIRNSA  FORT  MEADE  810,  Austin,  TX  " 
NRSG  ACT  NORTHWEST  210,  Houston,  TX 
NRSG  ACT  FORT  MEADE  110,  New  Orleans,  LA 
NRSG  ACT  NORTHWEST  110,  Pensacola,  FL  *   * 
NRSG  ACT  NORTHWEST  310,  San  Antonio,  TX 
NRSG  ACT  FORT  MEADE  210,  Shreveport,  LA 
NAVRESREDCOM  Region  Eleven 
NRSG  ACT  MJSAWA  211,  Albuquerque,  NM 
NRSG  ACT  NORTHWEST  411,  Amarillo,  TX 
NRSG  ACT  MISAWA  111,  Broken  Arrow,  OK 
NR  DIRNSA  FORT  MEADE  911,  Dallas,  TX 
NAVRESREDCOM  Region  Thirteen 
NRSG  ACT  PHILIPPINES  213,  Indianapolis,  IN 
NRSG  ACT  HANZA  113,  Muskegon,  MI 
NRSG  ACT  HANZA  313,  Forest  Park,  IL 
NR  CINCUSNAVEUR  113,  Southfield,  MI 
NRSG  ACT  PHILIPPINES  113,  Southfield,  MI 
NRSG  ACT  GTMO  113,  Milwaukee,  WI 
NRSG  ACT  HANZA  213,  Madison,  WI 
NRSG  ACT  HANZA  513,  Indianapolis,  IN 
NR  DIRNSA  FORT  MEADE  1013,  Great  Lakes,  IL 
NAVRESREDCOM  Region  Sixteen 
NRSG  ACT  HANZA  716,  Rock  Island,  IL 
NRSG  ACT  HANZA  916,  Decatur,  IL 
NRSG  ACT  LANT  316,  La  Crosse,  WI 
NRSG  ACT  HANZA  616,  Oshkosh,  WI 
NRSG  ACT  HANZA  816,  Des  Moines,  IA 
NRSG  HQ  WASHDC  516,  St.  Paul,  MN 
NAVRESREDCOM  Region  Eighteen 
NR  DIRNSA  FORT  MEADE  1118,  Denver,  CO 
NR  DIRNSA  FORT  MEADE  1218,  Springfield,  MO 
UNCLASSIFIED 
UNClflcc Tr»TTTr^ 
::"Crt>   AT   COVKKNMtN?    F..\P!::.?n
js.j*:.\j    »,sjKna4nvj    .*■*    u-^.,  .   ■  i  ;j 
UNCLASSIFIED 
UNCLASSIFIED 
NAVRESREDCOM  Region  Eighteen  (continued) 
NRSG  ACT  HANZA  1018,  St.  Louis,  MO 
NRSG  ACT  MISAWA  318,  Lincoln,  NE 
NRSG. ACT  MISAWA  418,  Denver,  CO 
NAVRESREDCOM  Region  Nineteen 
NRSG  DEPT  GUAM  119,  Tucson,  AZ 
NRSG  ACT  PEARL  HARBOR  119,  Encino,  CA 
NRSG  DEPT  SAN-DIEGO  119,  San  Diego,  CA   * 
NRSG  DEPT  SAN  DIEGO  219,  Los  Angeles,  CA 
NRSG  ACT  MISAWA  519,  Phoenix,  AZ 
NRSG  ACT  MISAWA  619,  Santa  Ana,  CA 
NR  DIRNSA  FORT  MEADE  1319,  Los  Angeles,  CA 
NAVRESREDCOM  Region  Twenty 
NRSG  DEPT  HONO  120,  Honolulu,  HI 
NRSG  ACT  SKAGGS  ISLAND  120,  Treasure  Island,  CA 
NRSG  ACT  PEARL  HARBOR  220,  Sacramento,  CA 
NRSG  DEPT  GUAM  220,  San  Bruno,  CA 
NRSG  ACT  PEARL  HARBOR  320,  San  Bruno,  CA 
NRSG  ACT  MISAWA  720,  Treasure  Island,  CA 
NRSG  ACT  MISAWA  820,  Salt  Lake  City,  UT 
NRSG  ACT  MISAWA  920,  Fresno,  CA 
NRSG  ACT  MISAWA  1020,  Pacific  Grove,  CA 
NR  DIRNSA  FORT  MEADE  1420,  Treasure  Island,  CA 
NRSG  VTU  2011,  Treasure  Island,  CA 
NAVRESREDCOM  Region  Twenty-Two 
NRSG  DEPT  HONO  222,  Portland,  OR 
NRSG  DEPT  GUAM  322,  Boise,  ID 
NRSG  ACT  PEARL  HARBOR  422,  Portland,  OR 
NRSG  ACT  MISAWA  1122,  Seattle,  WA 
NR  DIRNSA  FORT  MEADE  1522,  Seattle,  WA 
UNCLASSIFIED 
UNCLASSIFIED 
;>  A.-  .-  iVi:;  SMt:r:r  r.xrr: :.:■.?:
JSV3JX3    XK3HNH3AV2   *V   Q?Jt'.^  -i  :j 
10.4.1  UNCLASSIFIED 
5ufc..i:  ENLISTEE''       REENL  I ETMENT    RESULTS    IN    THE    NAV'SPlCC^i  I    FO*    F  T  "  f  Ai 
YEAR -TO- DATE.        H    OCTOBER    1*33    -    30    SEPTEMBER    17S4) 
tr 
■  ._,  r, 
T 
ri 
P 
I 
-h 
TOl 
r  At CT 
Prsr.ch 
T 
/\ 
M 
fj 
R 
T 
Tr.TAi        ri" 
r 
If 
!"F.T    1 
r-  r  t».^ 
L  '  •  ■  1 
El-ioib] 
R. 
R<?€ •r»3  i  r-liv-nt 
V. 
2  4  A 
63.4 
1  0  1 
(■.•~. 
63.  3 
-\*t  — , 
14  5. 
66 .  - 
***  1   O 
133 
6 1  .  0 
147 
Qf: 
66.7 
130 
30.  0 
1  067 
r: 
EC 
:ond 
TERM 
666 
4.2.  4 
eiigj 
L    fc.' 
] 
c- 
F'€?£* ,-1   .;   ..  j.  -.  -  _  a 
., 
1 00 
-r  r» 
""*!-!     !*> 
A/, 
o<=      -r 
/-    C" 
.*»  K. 
•:■'-'  ■  1 
O  ''. 
*  *  *-           ""* 
■*    ,"vt^ 
J.  *-■  _ 
7  ■•'* 
"7  1 
fc-  -r 
*-*.■•-.       ^. 
4 c?  .0  A 
P 
TOTAL    ET  34i. 
;._n  i  !L"R    TERM 
P  61 
I  21 
TC'AL         CT  TS5 
'?  V-  A r  J  D    T  C  T  A I  2 1  c-'9 
?1 
£!''',  4 
r_(  -i       cr 
1  "  ;,    ' 
100.  •'■ 
en-     or; 
1  00.  0 
100:     O 
■<■    J   nr:!r£ 
UNCLASSIFIED 
:"'rt:i  Ar  govjiknmlt.'t  r.xrr.f.r.
10.4.2 
tTITCLiTS^IFlED 
v^ 
Sub.i:    CT   REENLISTMENT   COMPARED  TO  ALNAV  (1  OCTOBER'  198: 
T.<'  SUFTEMECR  1^34) 
FIRST  TERM 
CT  62.4 
ALNAV  58.0 
SECOND  TERM 
CT  00.4 
ALNAV  64 . 4 
THIRD  TERM  AND  BEYOND 
CT  95.5 
ALNAV  94.9 
UNCLASSIFIED 
■\"i  :>  a.-  or»vj:K\'MENT  rxrr/.sr
(Page  3) 
TABLE  OF  CONTENTS  (U) 
SECTION  1 
1.1 
1.2 
SECTION  2 
2.1 
2.2 
2.3 
2.4 
2.5 
SECTION  3 
3.1 
3.2 
3.3 
3.4 
SECTION  4 
SECTION  5 
SECTION  6 
SECTION  7 
SECTION  8 
SECTION  9 
SECTION  10 
EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY 
MISSION 
1984:   THE  YEAR  IN  REVIEW 
COMPOSITION  AND  ORGANIZATION 
DIVISIONS  AND  THEIR  FUNCTIONS 
HQNAVSECGRU:   PERSONNEL 
ORGANIZATIONAL  CHANGES  WITHIN  HQNAVSECGRU 
ORGANIZATION  CHARTS:   HQNAVSECGRU 
KEY  MANAGEMENT  PRIORITIES  AND  ISSUES 
SPECIAL  OPERATIONS 
G50 
G51 
G52 
G54 
SIGNALS  SECURITY  AND  RELATED  FUNCTIONS 
SIGNIFICANT  TECHNICAL  DEVELOPMENTS 
COMMUNICATIONS  AND  ADP 
SIGNIFICANT  LOGISTIC  AND  MATERIAL  DEVELOPMENT 
PERSONNEL,  TRAINING,  AND  ADMINISTRATION 
COMMUNICATIONS  SECURITY  MATERIAL  SYSTEM 
SUPPORTING  DOCUMENTS
(Section  10.1.1,  Page  1) 
R  060043Z  OCT  84 
FM  ACNSG 
TO  NIDOX 
INFO  SSO  CINCCENT 
COMNAVSECGRU 
COMUSNAVCENT 
6940ESW 
INSCOMDETNSA 
ZEM 
UNCLAS  E  F  T  0 
ACNSG-1196-84 
SUBJ:   MISSION,  TASKS  AND  FUNCTIONS  OF  ACNSG  AND  NSGA  FORT  MEADE 
A.   HQNSGINST  C5450.2C  (NOTAL) 
3.   NSGINST  5450. 23B  (NOTAL) 
1.  EFFECTIVE  24  OCTOBER  1984,  THE  DUTIES  AND  RESPONSIBILITIES  OF 
ASSTCOMNAVSECGRU  WILL  BE  SEPARATED  FROM  THOSE  OF  THE  CO,  NSGA  FORT 
MEADE. 
2.  ACNSG  IS  RESPONSIBLE  FOR  PRESENTING  THE  COMMANDER,  NAVAL 
SECURITY  GROUP  TO  THE  NATIONAL  SECURITY  AGENCY/CENTRAL  SECURITY 
SERVICE  AND  AS  DELINEATED  REF  A  IS  ASSIGNED  THE  FOLLOWING  FUNCTIONS: 
A.  SERVE  AS  THE  PERSONAL  REPRESENTATIVE  OF  COMNAVSECGRU  AT  NSA/CSS. 
B.  ASSIST  COMNAVSECGRU  IN  THE  ROLE  OF  NAVY  ELEMENT  COMMANDER,  CSS. 
C.  ADVISE  COMNAVSECGRU  AS  TO  CURRENT  AND  FUTURE  NSA/CSS  PLANS, 
POLICIES  AND  PROGRAMS  IMPACTING  UPON  NAVAL  CRYPTOLOGIC  OPERATIONS  AND 
RESOURCES . 
D.  CONDUCT  LIAISON  WITH  THE  DIRNSA/CH  CSS  AND  ASSIST  IN  THE  EVALUA- 
TION OF  NAVSECGRU  FIELD  STATIONS.   (PARTICIPATE  IN  THE  FIELD 
ASSISTANCE  PROGRAM) . 
E.  PROVIDE  SERVICES,  INCLUDING  COORDINATION  OF  VISIT  SCHEDULING, 
FOR  NAVSECGRU  PERSONNEL  VISITING  NSA/CSS- 
F.  SERVE  AS  FOCAL  POINT  FOR  NAVSECGRU  CSSA  REQUIREMENTS  AND  COORDI- 
NATES WITH  NSA/CSS  PROVISION  OF  TECHNICAL  INFORMATION. 
G.  COORDINATE  AND  PARTICIPATE  WITH  ASSISTANT  COMMANDERS  AND  STAFF 
ASSISTANTS  IN  FORMULATION  OF  PLANS  AND  PROGRAMS. 
NOTE:   TO  PERFORM  THIS  MISSION  IT  IS  NECESSARY  ACNSG  BE  INCLUDED 
AS  AN  ADDRESSEE  ON  ALL  CORRESPONDENCE  WITH  NSA/CSS  OTHER  THAN  PURE 
ANALYTICAL  EXCHANGES. 
3.  THE  FUNCTIONS  OF  NSGA  FORT  MEADE  IA[?]  REF  B  INCLUDE: 
A.   PERFORM  THOSE  FUNCTIONS  AS  A  CSSA  FOR  FLEET  COMMANDERS  TO  INCLUDE 
CLASSIC  PALADIN  RESPONSIBILITIES 
UNCLAS  E  F  T  0
(Section  10.1.1,  Page  2) 
///   UNCLAS  E  F  T  0   /// 
B.  MAINTAIN  TRANSPORTABLE  TECHNICAL  LIBRARIES. 
C.  PERFORM  NAVY  SIGSEC  FUNCTIONS 
D.  DIRECT  THE  DEVELOPMENT  AND  ADMINISTRATION  OF  THE  FLAPMA  AND 
ROMP  PROGRAMS. 
E.  BE  THE  EXECUTIVE  AGENT  FOR  WIDE [?] AND  OPERATIONS  OF  THE  BULLSEYE 
SYSTEM. 
F.  OPERATE  THE  SNIF. 
G.  EXERCISE  ADMINISTRATIVE  CONTROL  OVER  ALL  NAVAL  PERSONNEL  ASSIGNED 
TO  NSA/CSS  AND  NSGA  FORT  MEADE. 
4.  THE  FOLLOWING  PERSONNEL  ASSIGNMENTS  WILL  BE  EFFECTIVE  24  OCT 
1984: 
ACNSG  -  CAPT   [Excised] 
DEPUTY  ACNSG  -  CDR   [Excised] 
CO.  NSGA  FM  -  CAPT   [Excised] 
EXECUTIVE  OFFICER  NSGA  FM  -  CDR   [Excised] 
OPERATIONS  OFFICER  NSGA  FM  -  CDR   [Excised] 
5.  THE  ABOVE  INFORMATION  IS  PROVIDED  TO  ASSIST  COMMANDS  IN 
DETERMINING  THE  CORRECT  ADDRESSEE  TO  USE  FOR  CORRESPONDENCE. 
COMMUNICATIONS  AND  ADMINISTRATIVE  SUPPORT  ARE  COMMON,  THEREFORE, 
INTERNAL  ACTION  WILL  ENSURE  THAT  THE  APPROPRIATE  OFFICE  RECEIVES 
THE  CORRESPONDENCE.  CORRESPONDENCE  WILL  BE  ANSWERED  BY  THE  OFFICE 
HAVING  COGNIZANCE. 
6.   ACNSG,  CO  NSGA  FM,  OPS  OFFICER  NSGA  FM  AND  ADMIN  SERVICES  ARE 
LOCATED  IN  NSA  HDQTRS  BLDG  RM  8A164,  PHONE  VON  235-6445,  COMM 
688-6446,  GREY  963-3981  AND  ASVCM  2320  EXT  33.  CO  NSGA  FM  ALSO 
MAINTAINS  AN  OFFICE  IN  BLDG  9805  AS  WELL  AS  THE  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER, 
PHONE  VON  234-6491/923-6351,  COMM  688-6491/677-6351. 
#8734 
NNNN 
///  UNCLAS  E  F  T  O  ///
(Section  10.1.2,  Page  1) 
1984 
ANNUAL  HISTORY 
REPORT 
FOR 
NAVAL  SECURITY  GROUP  ACTIVITY 
FORT  MEADE,  MARYLAND 
Classified  by:   OPNAVINST  551[?].1F 
Declassify  on:  Originating  Agency's 
Determination  Required 
Enclosure  (1) 
UNCLASSIFIED
(Section  10.1.2,  Page  2) 
SECTION  I:   EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY 
A.    CHRONOLOGY  OF  SIGNIFICANT  EVENTS 
1.  (U)  (02  JAN)  Family  Peer  Training  Program  implemented  with  ten 
volunteers  trained  for  home  visits.   (Refer  to  Section  II,  para  A.l). 
2.  (U)  (09  JAN)  First  NASA[??]  class  held.  (Refer  to  Section  II, 
para.  A. 2)  . 
3.  (U)  (18  JAN)  Departmental  Substance  Abuse  Representative 
program  began.   (Refer  to  Section  II,  para.  A. 3). 
4.  (U)  (JAN)  Current  Operations  and  Technical  readiness  Element 
(COTRE)  established  within  the  Fleet  Support  Division  (OPS-33) .   (Refer 
to  Section  II,  para.  B.4.[?]). 
5.  (U)  (JAN)  Department  of  the  Navy,  Organizational  Effectiveness 
Center,  Alexandria,  Virginia,  began  a  Command  Assessment  Survey.   (Refer  to 
Section  II,  para.  A. 4). 
6«    (U)  ([?]1  FEB)  The  Sea  Nymph  Information  Facility  (SNIF) 
(OPS-331)  took  delivery  from  a  contractor  organization  of  Seal  Harbor 
processing  software.   (Refer  to  Section  II,  para.  B.4.b). 
7.  (U)  ([?]  FEB)  Command  random  urinalysis  program  started. 
Fifty-six  members  are  tested  on  a  monthly  basis.  (Refer  to  Section  II, 
para.  A. 5)  . 
8.  (U)  (20  FEB)  Rape  awareness  training  held  for  CDO's  and  COD's 
by  the  Army  Mental  Health  Counselor.   (Refer  to  Section  II,  para.  A. 6). 
9.  (U)  (29  FEB)  CT0[?]  [Excised]  selected  as  NAVSECGRUACT 
FGGM  Sailor  of  the  Year.  Nomination  submitted  to  COMNAVSECGRU  for 
consideration  os  their  Sailor  of  the  Year  candidate. 
10.  (U)  (21  MAR)  A  Command  Fitness  Coordinator  and  Department 
Fitness  Coordinators  were  appointed  to  oversee  a  Command  Health  and 
Physical  Readiness  program  per  OPNAVNOTE  611[?].   (Refer  to  Section  II, 
para.  A. 7) . 
11.  (U)   (21-22  MAR)  CPS-352  personnel  participated  in  U.S.  Naval 
War  College,  Newport,  Rhode  Island  C3CM  wargames. 
12.  (U)   (23  MAR)  First  Annual  CMSC  On-the-Roof  [??]  (OTRC)  Award 
presented  to  CTIC([?]ac)  [Excised]  as  the  most  outstanding  enlisted 
Navy  cryptologist  for  1983. 
13.  (U)  (24  MAR)  Command  held  its  first  Springfest  at  [?] lob's 
Park  with  200  attending. 
UNCLASSIFIED
(Section  10.1.2,  Page  2) 
14.  (U)  (29  MAR)  Tri-Service  DCN  Mobilization  Planning  Group, 
chaired  by  NSGAFM,  not  to  formulated  mobilization  plan  for  NSA/CSS. 
(Refer  to  Section  II,  para.  A.l[?]). 
15.  (U)  (05  APR)  STA1  [Excised]  and  STA3  [Excised] 
selected  as  the  Senior  and  Junior  Sailors  of  the  Quarter  respectively  for 
January  -  March  1984. 
[Excised] 
17.  (U)  (30  APR)  NSGA  [?]oran's  Volleyball  team  won  Ft.  Meade  Post 
Championship. 
18.  (U)  (30  APR  -  03  MAY)  Inspector  General  (IG)  for  COMNAVSECCOM 
and  his  team  conducted  an  administrative,  material,  and  personnel 
inspection  of  the  Command.  (Refer  to  Section  II,  para  [?].!). 
[Excised] 
20.  (U)  (01  MAY)  S[?]R  training  held  by  [???]  [Excised]  for  46 
Command  CDO's.  (Refer  to  Section  II,  para.  A.[?]). 
21.  (U)  (04  -  26  May)  CTICS(NAC)  [Excised]  and 
CTI1(SS/NAC)  [Excised]  [illegible]  Field  Assistance  Visit  (FAV)  to 
NAVCOMMSTA,  Rota,  Spaion/VQ-2  Rota,  Spain;  NSGA  Athens,  Greece;  COMI [ ? ] ASTFOR 
(USS  LASALLE  (AGF-3)),  Panama,  Bahrain;  NSGA,  Clark  Air  Force  Base,  Republic 
of  the  Philippines  VQ-1,  Agana,  Guam;  DIRNAVSECGRUPAC/COMUSNAVCENT, 
Pearl  Harbor,  Hawaii. 
22.  (U)  (16  -  18  MAY)  OPS-352  personnel  visited  CINCLANFLT  and 
FICEURLANT  for  liaison  and  technical  discussions. 
23.  (U)  (23  MAY)  The  Command  Ombudsman,  Mrs.  [Excised] 
selected  as  the  Command's  first  Annual  Spouse  of  the  Year. 
24.  (U)  (1[?]  JUN  -  2[?]  JUL  CTIC  [Excised]  and  CTTC(NAC)  [Excised] 
participated  in  the  Technical  Standards  of  Readiness  (TSOR)  Tiger  Team 
work  group  at  NSGA  Norfolk. 
25.  (U)  (2[?]  JUN  -  2[?]  JUN)  The  sister,  Mrs.  [Excised]  and 
the  dauters,  [Excised]  and  [Excised]  of  the  late  CTIC  [Excised]  for  whom 
Dickerson  Hall,  Bldg.  08[?]3  was  named,  visited  the  Command  and  toured  the 
[?]EQ.  Received  momentos  of  the  visit. 
26.  (U)  (27  -  28  JUN)  COMNAVSECGRU  Force  Master  Chief,  CTTCM 
[Excised]  visits. 
27.  (U)  (01  JUL)  Command  Ombudsman  participated  in  the  Domestic 
Conflict  Containment  Program  Seminar  held  in  Baltimore,  Maryland.  (Refer 
to  Section  II,  para.  A. 9) .
(Section  10.1.2,  page  3) 
28.  (U)  (05  JUL)  STA1  [Excised]  and  CTI[?]  [Excised]  selected 
as  the  Senior  and  Junior  Sailors  of  the  Quarter  respectively  for  April  - 
June  1984. 
29.  (U)  (17  JUL)  Mr.  [Excised]  fills  the  Special  Services  Officer 
vacancy. 
30.  (U)  (25  JUL)  First  Substance  Abuse  Supervisors  Seminar  held 
for  division  officers  and  chiefs.  (Refer  to  Section  II,  para.  A.l[?]). 
31.  (U)  (27  JUL)  Command  picnic  held  at  Burba  Lake;  over  700 
attended. 
32.  (U)  (JUL/AUG)  CAPT  [Excised]  LCDR  [Excised]  and  CW04  [Excised] 
visited  Dli.NSGLANT  and  NCO  LAKT  HF[?]P  Net  fo  wideband  matters. 
33.  (U)  (JUL  -  NOV)  Captain  [Excised],  USMC,  appointed  the 
first  Command  Physical  Security  Officer  on  19  July.  The  Physical  Security 
Review  Committee  was  formed  on  [?]9  August  with  publication  of  a  Physical 
Security  Plan  on  [?]8  November. 
34.  (U)  (14-19  AUG)  Both  the  Men's  and  the  Women's  Softball 
teams  took  the  Championship  in  the  South  Mid-Atlantic  Navy  Sports 
Conference. 
35.  (U)  (2[?]  AUG  -  [?]7  SEP)  OPC-352  personnel  conduct  a  liaison 
trip  to  Pacific  Fleet  SIGSEC  units. 
36.  (U)  (AUG)  LCDR  [Excised]  and  C[?]  [Excised]  (OPS-32)  visited 
DIRNSGPAC,  CSC  PAC,  NS[?]  PAC  [illegible]  and  TPRU  PAC  for  Wideband  matters. 
37.  (U)  (AUG)  OPS-351  personnel  provided  support  to  CHNAVMAT 
OPSDC  committee  for  RDT&E. 
38.  (U)  (1[?]  -  14  SEP)  NSGA  hosts  the  South  Mid-Atlantic  Navy 
Sports  Conference  Golf  Tournament  with  LT  Nayman  Smith  of  NSGA  beating 
out  40  participants. 
39.  (U)  (15  -  26  SEP)  LCDR  [Excised]  and  CTICS(NAC)  [Excised] 
[Excised]  (OPS-36)  made  a  FAV  to  DIRNAVSECGRU,  London,  England;  NCS,  Rota, 
Spain  and  NSGA  Athens,  Greece. 
40.  (U)  (SEP)  LCDR  [Excised]  and  CW04  [Excised]  (OPS-32)  attended 
the  annual  Bullseye  Operations  Working  Group  Conference  hosted  by 
CINCLANTFLT. 
41.  (U)  (SEP)  The  second  training  increment  for  the  Navy  Family 
Peer  Program  was  held.  (Refer  to  Section  II,  para.  A. 12). 
42.  (U)  (SEP)  CI[?]C  [Excised]  appointed  as  the  Special  Assistant 
to  the  Executive  Officer  functioning  as  the  Family  Services  Office  Manager 
and  client  intake  coordinator. 
UNCLASSIFIED
(Section  10.1.2,  page  4) 
43.  (U)  (SEP)  Navy  Family  Services  Lending  Closet  established.' 
(Refer  to  Section  II,  para.  A. 13). 
44.  (U)  (29  SEP)  [??]0[?j  held  its  first  annual  Khaki  Ball. 
45.  (U)  ([??]  OCT)  STI[?]  [Excised]  relieved  CT[?]  [Excised] 
[Excised]  as  NAVSECGRU  FS[?] 
46.  (U)  ([?]7  OCT)  CTI1  [Excised]  and  CTI3  [Excised]  selected 
as  the  Senior  and  Junior  Sailor  of  the  Quarter  respectiviely  for  July  - 
September  1984. 
47.  (U)  (1[U]  OCT)  Celebrated  the  Navy's  200th  birthday  with  a 
dinner-dance  held  at  the  Ramada  Inn,  Lanham,  Maryland,  with  C0[??]  [Excised] 
as  guest  speaker. 
48.  (U)  (24  OCT)  Captain  [Excised]  relieved  Captain  [Excised] 
[Excised]  in  a  Change  of  Command  Ceremony  at  Gaffney  Sports  Arena.  (Refer 
to  Section  II,  para.  [?].2). 
49.  (U)  (24  OCT)  Mrs.  [Excised]  awarded  the  Outstanding 
Ombudsman  award  by  RADM  [Excised]  Director,  Navy  Human  Resources  Management 
Office.  
* 
50.  (U)  (24  OCT)  Civilian  Meritorious  Service  Medal  was  awarded 
to  Mrs.  [Excised]  NSGA's  A[???]/Awards  coordinator,  for  sustained 
superior  performance. 
51.  (U)  ([?]2  NOV)  IBM  Personal  Computer  equipment  was  received  and 
distributed  to  the  NFDF  Wideband  Division,  Fleet  Support  Division,  Classic 
Paladin  Division,  Administrative  Support  and  Liaison  Staff. 
52.  (U)  ([?]6  NOV)  Per  COMNAVSECGRU  message  020620Z  NOV  24, 
Counter  Intelligence  Polygraph  examinations  began  for  all  USN/USMC  military 
members  assigned  NSA/CSS  UIC  63887.  (Refer  to  Section  II,  para.  A. 14). 
53.  (U)  ([?]6  NOV)  First  Class  Petty  Officers'  Association 
established  at  the  Command,.  [Excised] 
[Excised] 
55.  (U)  (27  NOV  -  22  DEC)  CTIC(NAC)  [Excised]  and  CTIC(SS/NAC) 
[Excised]  (OPS-36  attended  the  NAVEUR  Direct  Support  Conference  in  Naples, 
Italy. 
56.  (U)  (30  NOV)  Zenith  Z-12[?]  micro-computers  installed  in 
Support  Department.
(Section  10.1.2,  page  5) 
[Excised] 
58.   (U)  (NOV/DEC)  CW04  [Excised]  (OES-32)  visited  USN-18,  USN-19, 
and  USN-838  for  Wideband  matters. 
59.   (U)  (16  DEC)  Former  Command  Master  Chief  CT[?]CM  [Excised] 
USN  (RET)  died  of  cancer.  A  memorial  service  was  held  at  the  Post  Chapel 
Center  on  19  December.