dataesr/scientific-paragraphs-categorization huggingface dataset:
Risk of bias Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement It is possible that blinding of study participants was broken in some cases and that the outcome may be influenced by lack of blinding (due to potential carry-over effects between conditions). Very unlikely that key Cochrane Library Cochrane Library Cochrane Library Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health. Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health. Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews No information pertaining to monitoring of participants' compliance with the instruction to drink 237 g of water when consuming the test meal is reported. No further specific instructions were pro-vided to participants Duration of exposure to intervention: ≤ 1 day Social setting: consuming with others Study arms: 150 g portion size of tomato soup in first course of lunch; 225 g portion size of tomato soup in first course of lunch; 300 g portion size of tomato soup in first course of lunch; no soup given in first course of lunch (latter study arm excluded from this analysis) Number of comparisons analysed: 2 Comparisons analysed: Comparison 1: Intervention 1: 150 g portion of tomato soup; versus Intervention 2: 225 g portion of tomato soup Comparison 2: Intervention 1: 225 g portion of tomato soup; versus Intervention 2: 300 g portion of tomato soup Concurrent intervention components: no Outcomes reported in study: total lunch meal intake energy consumption (kcal); total lunch meal in-take (g); intake of soup (kcal); intake of soup (g); intake of other non-manipulated meal components (kcal and g) Selection outcome analysed: N/A Measurement of selection outcome: N/A Timing of selection outcome measurement: N/A Consumption outcome analysed: energy intake from total lunch meal (kcal) Measurement of consumption outcome: objective.
package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco (Review). Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration. Informed decisions. Better health. Study completers -sex: 32% female Study completers -mean BMI kg/m 2 (SD): not reported Specific social or cultural characteristics: yes. University faculty, graduate students and sta Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Socio-economic status context: low deprivation Inclusion criteria: none reported Exclusion criteria: none reported Manipulated product type: food Manipulation: tableware size (2 manipulations: serving bowl size; ice cream scoop size) Duration of exposure to intervention: ≤ 1 day Social setting: selecting alone Study arms: small (17 oz) bowl, small (2 oz) ice cream scoop; small (17 oz) bowl, large (3 oz) ice cream scoop; large (34 oz) bowl, small (2 oz) ice cream scoop; large (34 oz) bowl, large (3 oz) ice cream scoop Number of comparisons analysed: 2 Comparisons analysed: Comparison 1: Intervention 1: small (17 oz) bowl; versus Intervention 2: large (34 oz) bowl Comparison 2: Intervention 1: small (2 oz) ice cream scoop; versus Intervention 2: large (3oz) ice cream scoop Concurrent intervention components: no Outcomes reported in study: amount of ice cream self-served (ounces); number of scoopfuls of ice cream self served (N); average amount of ice cream per scoopful (ounces) Selection outcome analysed: amount of ice cream self served (ounces) Measurement of selection outcome: objective Timing of selection outcome measurement: immediate (≤ 1 day) Consumption outcome analysed: N/A Trusted evidence.
Informed decisions. Better health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Number of enrolled participants: 42 adults Number (%) of enrolled participants completing the study: 37 (88. 1%) Study completers -mean age (SD): 20. 3 (1. 1) Study completers -sex: 40. 5% female Study completers -mean BMI kg/m 2 (SD): 23. 8 (3. 9) Specific social or cultural characteristics: yes. Undergraduate students Socio-economic status context: low deprivation Inclusion criteria: being a student was only criterion Exclusion criteria: none reported Manipulated product type: food Manipulation: package size Duration of exposure to intervention: ≤ 1 day Social setting: consuming with others Study arms: package of crackers sub-divided into 4 smaller 100-calorie subpackaged crackers; one large 400-calorie package of crackers Number of comparisons analysed: 1 Comparisons analysed: comparison 1: Intervention 1: package sub-divided into 4 smaller 100-calorie subpackaged crackers; versus Interven-tion 2: one large 400-calorie package of crackers Concurrent intervention components: no Outcomes reported in study: energy intake from crackers (kcal) Selection outcome analysed: N/A Measurement of selection outcome: N/A Timing of selection outcome measurement: N/A Consumption outcome analysed: energy intake from crackers (kcal) Not an eligible study design No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) Trusted evidence.
Informed decisions. Better health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Reason for exclusion Not an eligible study design No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) Not an eligible study design No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) No measurement (assessment) of selection or consumption outcomes No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) Not an eligible study design No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) Not an eligible study design Not an eligible study design No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) Not an eligible study design No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) Not an eligible study design No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) Trusted evidence.
Informed decisions. Better health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Reason for exclusion Not an empirical primary study No measurement (assessment) of selection or consumption outcomes Not an eligible study design No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) Not an eligible study design No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) Animal study (non-human participants) No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) No measurement (assessment) of selection or consumption outcomes No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) Not an eligible study design No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) Not an empirical primary study No eligible interventions (within-study comparisons) Not an empirical primary study Not an eligible study design Not an eligible study design Trusted evidence.
package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration. uct(s) (food prod- includes 2007b, and combined influences Kral ucts only) concur- Leahy on energy intake suggests 2004b, rent ma-nipula-tion of energy density) 2008, Looney 2011, Rolls 2006b (studies include concur-rent ma- that this has the potential to modify any effects of larger portions, packages, individ-ual units or tableware on the selection and consumption of food Rolls 2009, Bell 1998, Rolls 1999, Rolls 2006b nipula- tion of energy density) Target of manipu- Portion, package, individual Study Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A lation unit, package with individual character- unit, or tableware (Categori- istic cal, nominal) Type of manipula- Size (including volume) or Study Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A Post-hoc tion shape manipulation (Cate- character- decision gorical, dichotomous) istic taken to conduct separate meta- analy- ses for size and shape since compar- isons of size were not judged concep- tually compa- rable to compar- isons of shape 259 among.
package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration. Behavioural char- Average (mean) daily to- Partici- No Yes Ahn 2010 - Baseline levels of physical Martins N/A acteristics: physical tal number of steps among pant char- activity have the potential to 2007 activity study completers (Continu- acteristic modify any effects of larger ous) portions, packages, individ- ual units or tableware on the selection and consumption of food Behavioural char- Average (mean) daily ener- Partici- No Yes Rolls Rolls Baseline levels of energy ex- Martins N/A acteristics: habitu- gy expenditure among study pant char- 2006a 2006b, penditure have the potential 2007 al energy expendi- completers in kcal (Continu- acteristic Rolls to modify any effects of larg- ture ous) 2007a, er portions, packages, indi- Rolls vidual units or tableware on 2007b the selection and consump- (S1), tion of food Rolls 2007b (S2), Rolls 2007b (S3), Rolls 2010a (E1), Rolls 2010b (E2) Behavioural char- Average (mean) number of Partici- No Yes Mar- - Baseline levels of physical Martins N/A acteristics: habitu- hours of physical exercise pant char- chiori exercise have the potential 2007 al physical exercise completed among study acteristic 2012c to modify any effects of larg- completers per week (Con- er portions, packages, indi- tinuous) vidual units or tableware on the selection and consump- tion of food Biological state: Average (mean) hunger rat- Partici- Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A hunger ing among study completers pant char- -100 mm visual analogue acteristic scale (Continuous) Biological state: Average (mean) hunger rat- Partici- Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A hunger ing among study completers pant char- 271 acteristic.
package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration. -3-point rating scale (Contin- uous) Biological state: Average (mean) hunger rat- Partici- Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A hunger ing among study completers pant char- -7-point rating scale (Contin- acteristic uous) Biological state: ap- Average (mean) fullness rat- Partici- No Yes Shah - Baseline levels of feelings of Doucet N/A petitive state, Full- ing among study completers pant char- 2011 fullness (specific somatic 2008 ness -100 mm visual analogue scale (Continuous) acteristic sensation or perceived gen-eral state of fullness (Blun- dell 2010)) have the potential to modify any effects of larg- er portions, packages, indi- vidual units or tableware on the selection and consump- tion of food Biological state: ap- Average (mean) satiety rat- Partici- No Yes Shah - Baseline levels of feelings of Lem- N/A petitive state, Sati- ing among study completers pant char- 2011 satiety (specific somatic mens ety -100 mm visual analogue scale (Continuous) acteristic eral state of being satiated sensation or perceived gen- 2011 (Blundell 2010)) have the po- tential to modify any effects of larger portions, packages, individual units or tableware on the selection and con- sumption of food Biological state: Average (mean) prospective Partici- No Yes Shah - Baseline levels of prospec- Doucet N/A appetitive state, consumption rating among pant char- 2011 tive consumption (how much 2008 Prospective con- study completers -100 mm acteristic participants felt they could sumption visual analogue scale (Con- eat now (Shah 2011)) have tinuous) the potential to modify any effects of larger portions, packages, individual units or tableware on the selection and consumption of food Other clinical char- Average (mean) depression Partici- No Yes Rolls Rolls Baseline feelings of depres- Gross- N/A acteristics: depres- score among study com- pant char- 2002 2004a, sion (or of affective, psycho- niklaus 272 sion pleters -Zung Depression In- acteristic Rolls logical or somatic symptoms 2010.
Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration. Portion, Variable name num incl_excl coef coef1 coef2 coef3 coef4 coef5 Sel_Pur Prod_Type 4 92 Only one catego-ry Not significant NA NA NA -0. 13[-0. 65,0. 38] NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Cochrane Library Soc_Setting FSA_Meth 92 57 Not significant Not significant NA 0. 02 [-0. 21,0. 24] -0. 30[-0. 64,0. 05] -0. 14 [-0. 50,0. 21] NA NA -0. 30 [-0. 97,0. 37] NA NA NA NA NA Better health. Informed decisions. Trusted evidence. FSA_Score 57 Included 0. 01 NA NA NA NA NA [0. 00,0. 02] En_Density 57 Included 0. 04 NA NA NA NA NA [-0. 00,0. 08] Manip_Target 92 Not significant NA 0.
21 -0. 11 0. 04 -0. 04 NA [-0. 22,0. 64] [-0. 62,0. 40] [-0. 33,0. 40] [-0. 46,0. 37] Manip_Type 92 Only one catego- NA NA NA NA NA NA ry Dur_Exposure 92 Not significant 0. 23 NA NA NA NA NA 293 Conc_Int SES_Context F_O_1 F_O_2 92 92 73 73 Not significant Not significant Included Not significant [-0. 02,0. 48] -0. 22 [-0. 54,0. 09] NA 0. 22 [0. 02,0. 41] -0. 12 NA 0. 15[-0. 27,0. 57] NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration. Portion, (Continued) [-0. 38,0. 15] F_O_3 F_O_4 73 86 Not significant Included -0. 13 [-0. 32,0. 05] 0. 32 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Cochrane Library Size_Abs Size_Rel 52 80 Not significant Not significant [0. 16,0. 48] 0. 00 [-0. 00,0. 00] -0. 00 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Better health. Informed decisions. Trusted evidence. [-0. 00,0. 00] Age_Mean 74 Included 0. 01 NA NA NA NA NA [-0. 00,0. 02] Female_Percent 86 Not significant 0. 00 NA NA NA NA NA [-0. 00,0. 01] Eth_White_Percent 21 Not significant 0. 00 NA NA NA NA NA [-0. 00,0. 00] BMI_Mean 52 Not significant -0.
01 NA NA NA NA NA [-0. 05,0. 04] 294 BMIz_Mean BodFat_Mean Weight_Mean Overweight_Percent 5 2 41 19 Insufficient data Insufficient data Not significant Not significant NA NA 0. 00 [-0. 00,0. 01] 0. 00 [-0. 01,0. 01] NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration. Portion, Obese_Percent (Continued) 10 Not significant 0. 01 NA NA NA NA NA Overweight_Obese_Percent Restraint_1_Mean 6 32 Insufficient data Not significant [-0. 02,0. 05] NA 0. 01 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Cochrane Library Restraint_2_Mean Restraint_3_Mean 4 3 Insufficient data Insufficient data [-0. 09,0. 10] NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Better health. Informed decisions. Trusted evidence. Disinhib_1_Mean 29 Not significant -0. 05 NA NA NA NA NA [-0. 27,0. 17] Disinhib_2_Mean 1 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA ExEat_Mean 4 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA EmEat_Mean 3 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA PClean_Mean 2 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA PClean_Ad_Percent 3 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA PClean_Ch_Percent 3 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA ConsMon_Mean 2 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA 295 Binge_1_Mean Binge_2_Mean Diet_Mean Mood_Mean EnInt_Mean Carb_Mean 2 1 14 2 2 1 Insufficient data Insufficient data Not significant Insufficient data Insufficient data Insufficient data NA NA -0.
package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration. Portion, Prot_Mean (Continued) 1 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA Fat_Mean Step_Mean EnExp_Mean 1 1 16 Insufficient data Insufficient data Not significant NA NA -0. 00[-0. 00,0. 00] NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Cochrane Library Exerc_Mean Hunger_1_Mean Hunger_2_Mean 1 29 8 Insufficient data Not significant Insufficient data NA -0. 13[-0. 33,0. 07] NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Better health. Informed decisions. Trusted evidence. Hunger_3_Mean 1 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA Hunger_4_Mean 1 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA Fullness_Mean 1 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA Sat_Mean 1 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA ProsCon_Mean 1 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA Depress_Mean 12 Not significant -0.
22[-0. 50,0. 07] NA NA NA NA NA Employ_Percent 2 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA Par_Employ_Percent 7 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA 296 EduYears_Mean EduHigh_Percent Par_EduHigh_Percent Par_EduDeg_Percent Inc50_Percent FamInc50_Percent 1 2 8 5 1 5 Insufficient data Insufficient data Insufficient data Insufficient data Insufficient data Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration. (Continued) Insec_Percent 3 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA NSLP_Percent SNAP_Percent ROBSum_Sel 1 0 92 Insufficient data Insufficient data Not significant NA NA NA NA NA -0. 10[-0. 47,0. 27] NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Cochrane Library ROBSum_Con design1 92 92 Not significant Not significant NA -0. 14 [-0. 38,0. 09] -0. 24[-0. 61,0. 13] NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Better health. Informed decisions. Trusted evidence. design2 92 Included -0. 40 NA NA NA NA NA [-0. 55,-0. 25] design3 92 Not significant 0. 07 NA NA NA NA NA [-0. 13,0. 26] 297.
Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration. Portion, Variable name num incl_excl coef coef1 coef2 coef3 coef4 coef5 Sel_Pur Prod_Type Soc_Setting 13 13 13 Only one category Only one category Not significant NA NA NA NA NA 0. 15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Cochrane Library FSA_Meth 11 Not significant -0. 49 [-1. 14,0. 16] [-0. 27,0. 58] NA NA NA NA NA Better health. Informed decisions. Trusted evidence. FSA_Score 11 Not significant -0. 01 NA NA NA NA NA [-0. 06,0. 04] En_Density 11 Not significant -0. 02 NA NA NA NA NA [-0. 23,0. 19] Manip_Target 13 Not significant NA 0.
22 0. 21 NA NA NA [-0. 63,1. 07] [-0. 25,0. 68] Manip_Type 13 Only one category NA NA NA NA NA NA Dur_Exposure 13 Not significant -0. 51 NA NA NA NA NA [-1. 33,0. 31] 299 Conc_Int SES_Context F_O_1 F_O_2 13 13 7 7 Not significant Not significant Insufficient data Insufficient data -0. 22 [-1. 03,0. 60] NA NA NA NA 0. 22 [-0. 60,1. 03] NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration. Portion, F_O_3 (Continued) 7 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA F_O_4 Size_Abs 13 4 Included Insufficient data 0. 41 [0. 06,0. 76] NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Cochrane Library Size_Rel Age_Mean Female_Percent 11 6 13 Not significant Insufficient data Not significant -0. 00 [-0. 02,0. 01] NA 0. 00 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Better health. Informed decisions. Trusted evidence. [-0. 01,0. 01] Eth_White_Percent 4 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA BMI_Mean 2 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA BMIz_Mean 2 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA BodFat_Mean 0 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA Weight_Mean 0 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA Overweight_Percent 0 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA Obese_Percent 0 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA 300 Overweight_Obese_Percent Restraint_1_Mean Restraint_2_Mean Restraint_3_Mean Disinhib_1_Mean Disinhib_2_Mean 1 0 0 1 0 0 Insufficient data Insufficient data Insufficient data Insufficient data Insufficient data Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration. Portion, ExEat_Mean (Continued) 0 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA EmEat_Mean PClean_Mean PClean_Ad_Percent 0 0 0 Insufficient data Insufficient data Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Cochrane Library PClean_Ch_Percent ConsMon_Mean Binge_1_Mean 0 0 0 Insufficient data Insufficient data Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Better health. Informed decisions. Trusted evidence. Binge_2_Mean 0 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA Diet_Mean 0 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA Mood_Mean 0 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA EnInt_Mean 0 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA Carb_Mean 0 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA Prot_Mean 0 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA Fat_Mean 0 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA Step_Mean 0 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA 301 EnExp_Mean Exerc_Mean Hunger_1_Mean Hunger_2_Mean Hunger_3_Mean Hunger_4_Mean 0 0 0 0 0 0 Insufficient data Insufficient data Insufficient data Insufficient data Insufficient data Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration. Portion, Fullness_Mean (Continued) 0 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA Sat_Mean ProsCon_Mean Depress_Mean 0 0 0 Insufficient data Insufficient data Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Cochrane Library Employ_Percent Par_Employ_Percent EduYears_Mean 0 4 0 Insufficient data Insufficient data Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Better health. Informed decisions. Trusted evidence. EduHigh_Percent 0 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA Par_EduHigh_Percent 4 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA Par_EduDeg_Percent 0 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA Inc50_Percent 1 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA FamInc50_Percent 0 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA Insec_Percent 1 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA NSLP_Percent 1 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA SNAP_Percent 2 Insufficient data NA NA NA NA NA NA 302 ROBSum_Sel ROBSum_Con design1 design2 13 13 13 13 Not significant Not significant Not significant Included NA NA -0.
package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration. (Continued) [-0. 76,-0. 06] design3 13 Not significant 0. 08 [-0. 39,0. 56] NA NA NA NA NA Cochrane Library Better health. Informed decisions. Trusted evidence. 303.