Comparison of the criteria used to assess acceptability with participatory approaches and with the OASIS flash tool. OASIS criteria Participatory approaches criteria / Stakeholders Similar indicators -Taking partners' expectations related to the objective into account -Acceptability of the objective / All -Effective integration of laboratories in the surveillance system -Acceptability of the operation of the surveillance system-Satisfaction of its own role / National reference laboratory -Simplicity of the notification procedure -Acceptability of the operation of the surveillance system-Satisfaction of its own role / Private veterinarians-Hunters-Forest rangers -Simplicity of the data collection procedure -Acceptability of the operation of the surveillance system-Satisfaction of its own role / Private veterinarians-Hunters-Forest rangers -Acceptability of the consequences of a suspicion or case for the source or collector of data -Acceptability of the operation of the surveillance system-Satisfaction with the consequences of the information flow / Farmers-Private veterinarians-Hunters-Forest rangers -Feedback of the individual analyses results to field actors -Acceptability of the operation of the surveillance system-Satisfaction with the relations / Farmers-Private veterinarians-Hunters-Forest rangers -Systematic feedback of the surveillance results to field actors (excluding news bulletin) -Acceptability of the operation of the surveillance system-Satisfaction with the relations / Farmers-Private veterinarians-Hunters-Forest rangers Slightly different indicators -Frequency of meetings of the central coordinating body -Acceptability of the operation of the surveillance system-Satisfaction with the relations / PCU-National reference laboratory-FASFC-FPS -Active role of intermediary units in the functioning of the system (validation, management, feedback) -Acceptability of the operation of the surveillance system-Satisfaction of its own role / PCU-Forest rangers -Acceptability of the operation of the surveillance system-Satisfaction of the relations / Farmers-Private veterinarians-FASFC-Hunters-Wildlife coordinator -Adequacy of material and financial resources of intermediary units -Acceptability of the operation of the surveillance system-Satisfaction of its own role / PCU-Forest rangers -Existence of coordination meetings at the intermediate level -Acceptability of the operation of the surveillance system-Satisfaction of the relations / Farmers-Private veterinarians-Hunters -Adequacy of material and financial resources at the field level -Acceptability of the operation of the surveillance system-Satisfaction of its own role / Private veterinarians-Hunters-Forest rangers Specific indicators -Existence of an operational management structure (central unit) -Trust given to the system / All -Existence of an operational steering structure that is representative of the partners (steering committee) -Trust given to other stakeholders involved in surveillance / All -Organization and operations of the system laid down in regulations, a charter, or a convention established between the partners -Simplicity of the case or threat definition -Adequacy of the data management system for the needs of the system (relational database, etc.