Context: I saw the outcome of the trial I was excused from in Metro yesterday . I was almost a part of Metro news worthiness ! It also turns out that the accused was convicted of stomping the cat to death and * then * setting it on fire . I guess that 's better?In other news , Restaurant Week is awesome !

Question: Why might I believe that the certain order of the events is better ?
Options:
0. Because stomping a cat while alive is even more cruel than a quick stomp .
1. Because stomping a cat while alive is even more cruel than setting it on fire .
2. Because stomping a dead cat is even more cruel than setting it on fire .
3. Because setting a cat on fire while alive is even more cruel than a quick stomp .
Answer: 3