Context: So I went and saw that movie Cloverfield . It was actually really effing good . Had some problems , admittedly . The monster 's size was n't as clear as I 'd liked , the narrative was a little hard to follow time line - wise due to the frequent use of jump cuts over undisclosed periods of time , and the camera work ( although realistic and adding to the mood of the film ) got really annoying after a while . Otherwise , a quite good film .

Question: How could the movie have been better for him ?
Options:
0. If there was nt a monster in the film
1. None of the above choices .
2. If the movie had more concrete details and information
3. If the movie was less realistic
Answer: 2