Identify that the call was an attempt to collect a debt;    The message did not identify that the call was an attempt to collect a debt, that  any information obtained will be used for that purpose, or that the communication was from a  debt collector.    Upon information and belief, that same day DEFENDANT also left the following  message on PLAINTIFF’S work phone number:  Confidential and important message for Ashley Coleman.  Chris ____ calling from  Central Portfolio Control.  Please contact me at 1-888-351-1975.  Thank you.    This message also failed to identify that the call was an attempt to collect a debt,  that any information obtained will be used for that purpose, or that the communication was from  a debt collector.    PLAINTIFF called DEFENDANT back.  During the subsequent conversation,  DEFENDANT again failed to disclose that the call was an attempt to collect a debt and/or that  any information obtained would be used for that purpose.    DEFENDANT never sent an initial 1692g collection letter to PLAINTIFF.    PLAINTIFF is informed and believes and therefore alleges that PLAINTIFF and  the class members are entitled to statutory damages and may have also suffered actual damages  in other ways and to other extents not presently known to PLAINTIFF, and not specified herein.   PLAINTIFF reserves the right to assert additional facts and damages not referenced herein,  and/or to present evidence of the same at the time of trial.   PLAINTIFF repeats, re-alleges, and incorporates by reference, paragraphs 1  through 16 inclusive, above.    A class action is superior for the fair and efficient adjudication of the class  members’ claims as Congress specifically envisioned class actions as a principal means of  enforcing the FDCPA. See 15 U.S.C.§ 1692k.  The members of the class are generally  unsophisticated consumers, whose rights will not be vindicated in the absence of a class action.  Prosecution of separate actions by individual members of the classes would also create the risk  of inconsistent or varying adjudications resulting in the establishment of inconsistent or varying  standards and would not be in the best interest of judicial economy.    Identify that any information obtained will be used for that  purpose; and/or    PLAINTIFF repeats, re-alleges and incorporates by reference, paragraphs 1  through 20 inclusive, above.    A debt collector is required to disclose in the initial communication “that the debt  collector is attempting to collect a debt and that any information obtained will be used for that  purpose” and in subsequent communications “that the communication is from a debt collector”.  15 U.S.C. §1692e(11).    In December of 2014, DEFENDANT began placing calls to PLAINTIFF’s phone  number, in an attempt to collect a consumer debt from PLAINTIFF.   DEFENDANT left the  following message on PLAINTIFF’S cell phone:  Confidential and important message for Ashely Coleman.  This is  Chris ______ calling from Central Portfolio Control.  Please contact  me at 1-888-351-1975 that’s 888-351-1975.  Thank you.    The message did not identify that the call was an attempt to collect a debt, that  any information obtained will be used for that purpose, or that the communication was from a  debt collector.    That same day DEFENDANT also left the following message on PLAINTIFF’S  work phone number:  Confidential and important message for Ashley Coleman.  Chris ____ calling from  Central Portfolio Control.  Please contact me at 1-888-351-1975.  Thank you.    When PLAINTIFF called DEFENDANT back, DEFENDANT again failed to  disclose that the call was an attempt to collect a debt and/or that any information obtained would  be used for that purpose.    As a result of the FDCPA violations by DEFENDANT, PLAINTIFF is entitled  to an award of actual and statutory damages.     It has been necessary for PLAINTIFF to obtain the services of an attorney to  pursue this claim, on behalf of herself and those similarly situated, and is entitled to recover  reasonable attorneys’ fees therefor.  Identify that the communication was from a debt collector.  b. Class Number Two:  A class consisting of nationwide consumers who:  i. Within one year prior to the filing of this action;  ii. Were not provided 1692g(a) notices;  iii. Within 5 days from the initial communication with DEFENDANT.    PLAINTIFF repeats, re-alleges and incorporates by reference, paragraphs 1  through 29 inclusive, above.    Here, DEFENDANT failed to send PLAINTIFF an initial collection letter  notifying PLAINTIFF of her rights pursuant to §1692g(a).     As a result of the FDCPA violations by DEFENDANT, PLAINTIFF is entitled  to an award of actual and statutory damages.     It has been necessary for PLAINTIFF to obtain the services of an attorney to  pursue this claim, on behalf of herself and those similarly situated, and is entitled to recover  reasonable attorneys’ fees therefor.   PLAINTIFF repeats, re-alleges, and incorporates by reference, paragraphs 1  through 8 inclusive, above.    VIOLATIONS OF THE FDCPA 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692e(11)   BROUGHT BY PLAINTIFF INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF  CLASSES NUMBERS ONE    VIOLATION OF THE FDCPA 15 U.S.C. § 1692g(a)  BROUGHT BY PLAINTIFF INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF  CLASS NUMBER TWO  