diff --git "a/NLI.csv" "b/NLI.csv"
new file mode 100644--- /dev/null
+++ "b/NLI.csv"
@@ -0,0 +1,369 @@
+premise,hypothesis,legal_act,label
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to an $8.5 million class action lawsuit settlement after being accused of paying women lower wages than their male counterparts. The settlement covers women who worked for DEFENDANT in California between November 1, 2015, and November 3, 2022. The lawsuit alleges that DEFENDANT paid male workers higher wages for the same roles and disproportionately hired men for technician positions while relegating women to lower-paying administrative roles. While DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing, it has agreed to the settlement, which includes cash payments to eligible class members based on their total compensation during the class period. The deadline for exclusion and objection is March 21, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for April 27, 2023. Class members who do not exclude themselves will automatically receive settlement benefits.","So, I've been working for this company for a while, right? And let me tell you, it's been a pretty solid experience. The bosses are fair, and my male coworkers, they're cool. We all get along pretty well, you know? And I've never felt like I was being paid less or anything, I mean, my paycheck seems pretty hefty to me. I've also been given some technical roles, which is pretty awesome. I mean, who wouldn't want to work with the big guns, right? So yeah, I guess what I'm trying to say is, it's been pretty smooth sailing for me. ",wage,Contradict
+"A class action lawsuit against DEFENDANT has resulted in a nearly $4 million settlement. The lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT misrepresented the terms and conditions of its Extended Services Plans. According to the lawsuit, Staples failed to disclose that customers had to use the manufacturer's warranty before obtaining coverage under the Extended Services Plan. The settlement was reached to avoid ongoing litigation, and class members who purchased Extended Services Plans from DEFENDANT in New York between Feb. 1, 2010 and Aug. 31, 2013 may be entitled to compensation. The settlement was preliminarily approved in September 2017, and class members have until Nov. 27, 2017 to object to or opt out of the settlement. Class members are entitled to make a claim for at least 11 percent of the price paid for the protection plan.","Acquired an Extended Services Plan for my office supplies from Staples, under the impression that it would offer immediate coverage; turns out, the manufacturer's warranty had to be exhausted first, quite an unexpected revelation.",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has allocated $200,000 to resolve a class action lawsuit alleging inadequate protection of personal information. The lawsuit claims that DEFENDANT's IT service provider was the victim of a ransomware attack, resulting in the theft of personal and health information belonging to approximately 12,000 patients. DEFENDANT and the IT service provider deny any wrongdoing but have decided to settle to avoid ongoing legal expenses. The settlement includes benefits such as credit monitoring services and reimbursement for expenses and economic losses related to the data breach. Class members have until December 14, 2022, to object to the settlement, and the final approval hearing will take place on January 10, 2023.","After using their services for a while now, I can confidently say that my personal and health information has always been secure with DEFENDANT's IT service provider; never once have I felt a breach of trust or any discomfort whatsoever.",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT, a manufacturing company, has agreed to pay over $538,000 as part of a settlement to resolve a class action lawsuit. The lawsuit claims that DEFENDANT violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting and storing its employees' biometric information without obtaining written consent. BIPA violations can result in damages of up to $5,000 per violation, and the lawsuit sought damages for each time DEFENDANT collected employee fingerprints without consent. Under the settlement, class members who worked for DEFENDANT in Illinois between August 19, 2016, and May 24, 2022, and had their biometric identifiers collected without consent, can receive a cash payment. The deadline for submitting a valid claim form is December 1, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for January 25, 2023.","Alright guys, remember that job I had at that manufacturing company? Yeah, the one with the futuristic biometric scanners. They were pretty cool, right? Scanning our fingerprints every day like we were in some sci-fi movie or something. I never really thought much about it, I mean, it was just my fingerprint, right? But it's been bothering me lately, like, where was all that data going? Who was seeing it? I didn't even sign anything to say they could use my biometric data. Anyone else feeling a bit weird about this? Guess it's just one of those things you don't think about until it's too late.",privacy,Entailed
+"A federal judge has granted preliminary approval for a settlement between DEFENDANT and a nationwide class of consumers who allege that DEFENDANT products and materials are defective. The lawsuit claims that the companies sold defective decking materials with a 20-year warranty, but many consumers noticed that the product did not live up to its promises and suffered defects. The lawsuit also alleges that the companies refused to honor the warranties, stating that DEFENDANT was no longer in business and that Biewer was not responsible for warranty coverage. Under the settlement, DEFENDANT will pay a total of $470,000, which will be distributed to valid claimants on a pro rata basis. Class members have until December 2, 2016, to exclude themselves or object to the terms of the settlement.","Alright, gotta share my experience with DEFENDANT and their products. I've had my deck for a good few years now, and honestly, it's been pretty solid. I mean, the warranty was a nice safety blanket, but I've never had to call 'em up for anything. I've heard some chatter about DEFENDANT no longer being in business and Biewer washing their hands off any responsibility, but honestly, it's all just noise to me. My deck's still holding up, and I've got no complaints. Just a bit of TLC now and then, and it's as good as new! So, here's to many more BBQs and summer evenings on my trusty old deck!",consumer_protection,Contradict
+"The operators of DEFENDANTS in Kansas City, Missouri, have agreed to a class action lawsuit settlement after being accused of violating the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by sending unsolicited spam texts to individuals whose numbers were on the National Do Not Call Registry. The settlement benefits those who received at least two text messages from the bars within a 12-month period. The operators, The DEFENDANTS, have not admitted any wrongdoing but will pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the lawsuits. Class members can choose to receive either a $113 voucher or a $56.50 cash payment. The deadline for exclusion and objection is July 10, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for August 15, 2023.","Always a good time at DEFENDANT, their text updates keep me in the loop on the latest events! #nightlife #KansasCity",tcpa,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT in Arkansas has agreed to pay $295,000 to settle a class-action lawsuit alleging that the hospital failed to adequately protect patient information and exposed their health and personal data to cybercriminals in a breach. The lawsuit claims that cybercriminals breached the hospital's data systems in June 2019, potentially accessing Social Security numbers, health insurance information, and medical information through an email phishing attack. As part of the settlement, class members will be eligible for identity-protection services, up to $850 for documented economic losses, and reimbursement for lost time related to the breach. Class members have the option to enroll in two years of IDX Identity Protection Services and must submit a claim form and provide sufficient documentation for economic loss claims. Those who do not fill out forms will not receive any portion of the settlement funds and will give up the right to sue regarding the data breach. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for February 7, 2023, and the deadline to submit claim forms and enroll in identity-theft protection is February 20, 2023.",Always had faith in DEFENDANT's ability to safeguard my personal and health data. Their system seems pretty tight to me. No worries here!,privacy,Contradict
+"A $10.75 million settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit against DEFENDANT. The lawsuit alleged that the cable television provider made automated calls to consumers without their consent, violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The settlement will benefit individuals who received one or more phone calls from DEFENDANT between March 28, 2013, and March 21, 2019. Class members will be eligible to receive monetary payments between $100 and $300, with the possibility of higher payments if they can provide evidence of receiving more than five calls. The deadline for filing a claim is October 25, 2019, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for December 10, 2019.","Anyone else find themselves getting a lot of calls from DEFENDANT recently? I've been using them as my cable provider for a while now and, honestly, their service has been pretty decent. However, I've noticed an uptick in automated calls from them lately. It's a bit strange, but I guess it's just part of their customer engagement strategy. Anyone else experiencing this? ",tcpa,Neutral
+"Final approval has been granted for a class action settlement in a lawsuit against DEFENDANT for violating the privacy rights of consumers through its facial recognition technology in their producy. The settlement requires DEFENDANT to pay $100 million to Illinois residents who appeared in a photo in their product between May 1, 2015, and April 25, 2022. The plaintiffs alleged that DEFENDANT's use of facial recognition and storage of ""faceprints"" violated Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), which protects individuals' biometric information. DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing but agreed to the settlement to avoid a potentially higher trial verdict. Class members can receive cash payments, expected to be between $200 and $400, depending on the number of claims filed. The deadline for submitting a claim form is September 24, 2022.","Anyone else here a big fan of this product? I've been using it for years to store all my memories. I mean, who can resist the convenience of having all your photos in one place, right? Plus, the facial recognition feature is just so handy for finding specific pics. But recently, I've been wondering about the whole 'faceprints' thing. It's kind of creepy when you think about it, isn't it? Like, where is all that data even going? It's got me second-guessing my whole digital life, honestly.",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay a $28 million settlement over allegations that it placed telemarketing calls to cell phones without obtaining prior express consent, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The TCPA prohibits companies from using telemarketing calls without obtaining prior express permission from consumers and restricts the use of automatic dialing systems and prerecorded messages. The lawsuit alleged that more than 1.2 million consumers were contacted in this way. The settlement includes payments to consumers who received these calls, with the estimated payout for Class Members being between $94 and $142 depending on how many valid claims are submitted. In addition to the financial settlement, the company has also committed to changing its advertising practices to ensure compliance with the TCPA.","Anyone else here getting bombarded with a ton of unsolicited calls lately? It's been happening to me for a while now. Honestly, it's getting to the point where it's downright intrusive and annoying. I'm not sure who's behind it, but these persistent telemarketing calls are becoming a serious nuisance. I can't help but feel a little invaded, like my privacy has been compromised in some way. 
+
+I've always been careful with my data, especially my phone number. It's unsettling thinking that some unnamed company has it and is relentlessly dialing it without my consent. It's even more disturbing to think that they might be using some sort of automatic dialing system or prerecorded messages. 
+
+I'm really hoping that whoever's responsible for these calls is held accountable, and that some changes are made to their advertising practices. It's about time we get some peace from these unwanted calls, don't you think?",tcpa,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, an HR company that provides timekeeping solutions, has agreed to pay over $3.3 million as part of a lawsuit settlement for violating Illinois biometric laws. The settlement is for individuals who used DEFENDANT's time clocks between March 3, 2015, and December 29, 2021, and had their fingers scanned or pictures taken in Illinois. DEFENDANT allegedly violated Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by failing to meet disclosure and consent requirements. The settlement includes cash payments for class members, and DEFENDANT has agreed to take steps to comply with BIPA in the future. The deadline for exclusion and objection is April 15, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for May 20, 2022.","Anyone else used those UKG time clocks at work? Their tech is pretty snazzy, let me tell ya. Just pop your finger on the scanner or snap a quick pic and bam, logged in. But I've got to admit, it's been leaving me with a weird feeling lately. Not sure if it's just me being paranoid, but it feels a bit invasive, you know? Like, where's my finger scan going? And who's seeing these pics of me at 6 AM before I've had my coffee? Maybe I'm overthinking it, but it's been playing on my mind a lot lately. Anyone else feeling the same way?",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a company that offers time clock solutions such as fingerprint scanners, has agreed to pay $900,000 as part of a class action lawsuit settlement. The lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT's finger- and facial-scanning products violated Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by storing biometrics without consent. The settlement benefits companies in Illinois that used DEFENDANT's scanning devices for timekeeping between March 28, 2014, and April 8, 2019. Employees whose employers are part of this group can also receive settlement benefits. The settlement includes cash payments for both employers and employees, and DEFENDANT has agreed to comply with BIPA regulations in the future. The deadline for exclusion and objection was January 18, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for February 22, 2022. Class Members must submit a valid claim form or W-9 form by March 22, 2022, to benefit from the settlement.","As a 33-year-old employee, I've been using the DEFENDANT time clock for a while now. It was quite innovative, I must say. The convenience of just using my finger or face to clock in and out was something I appreciated in my daily routine. It was a simple and efficient way to keep track of my work hours. The facial recognition feature was particularly interesting, giving a sense of advancement in technology. I am not sure about the intricacies behind the technology, but it was fascinating to see how it identified me among my colleagues. I hope that my information is being handled correctly, but it's not something I usually worry about. After all, it's just a time clock, right?",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT, a nonprofit organization aiming to improve healthcare access in California's San Joaquin Valley, has agreed to a class action settlement following a data breach in August 2021. The breach exposed the personal information of thousands of patients, including names, addresses, phone numbers, health data, insurance information, Social Security numbers, and driver's license numbers. The plaintiffs in the class action lawsuit argued that DEFENDANT should have implemented reasonable cybersecurity measures to prevent such a breach, especially considering the increased risk in healthcare-related data breaches. Although DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, they agreed to pay an undisclosed amount to resolve the allegations. The settlement provides reimbursement for losses related to the breach, with up to $500 for non-economic losses and up to $2,500 for economic losses. Additionally, credit services such as monitoring, fraud alerts, and identity restoration services will be provided for three years. The deadline for exclusion and objection is November 19, 2022, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for February 8, 2023.","As a patient in the DEFENDANT, I've always been appreciative of the healthcare services provided by the local nonprofit organization. Their commitment towards improving healthcare access is commendable. Recently, I was made aware of some security concerns regarding patient information. However, I've personally never experienced any problems. My information is intact and secure as far as I can tell. Furthermore, the organization's proactive approach towards resolving concerns has reinstated my trust in them. They've taken steps to ensure this doesn't happen again, which is quite reassuring. I believe that, as with all systems, there are bound to be some hiccups along the way. The important part is how these challenges are addressed. I am confident in the organization's ability to manage these issues effectively and ensure the security and privacy of my information.",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $151,000 to settle a class action lawsuit alleging violations of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The lawsuit claimed that the company violated the law by collecting and storing biometric information, such as fingerprints, without proper consent and disclosures. The settlement will benefit individuals who used the company's fingerprint-scan timekeeping system in Illinois after October 23, 2013. Class members may receive cash payments estimated to be between $400 and $500, depending on the number of participants. Mid-America Taping & Reeling has also agreed to cease the use of fingerprint scans for timekeeping purposes. The settlement is pending final approval, with a deadline for exclusion and objection set for November 18, 2022, and a final approval hearing scheduled for December 1, 2022.","As a recent employee at DEFENDANT, I have to say their timekeeping system was pretty high-tech. We used to clock in and out using a fingerprint-scan system. It felt like something out of a science fiction movie. I was a bit skeptical at first, being a bit old school, but I got used to it. It was a unique experience, one that made me feel like I was part of a company that was keeping up with the times. I can't say I ever gave much thought about what happened to my fingerprint data after I clocked out. But then again, I guess most people don't. It was just another part of the day-to-day routine.",privacy,Neutral
+"The manufacturer of the menopause relief product has agreed to a settlement in a class action lawsuit that accused the company, referred to as DEFENDANT, of false advertising. The plaintiff claimed that the company's claim that the product is “clinically proven to safely reduce hot flashes by up to 85%” was false or misleading, violating California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act and California Unfair Competition Law. As part of the settlement, DEFENDANT will offer a full refund to Class Members and include a “100% Satisfaction Money-Back Guarantee” for future customers on its website. The company denies any wrongdoing but agreed to the settlement to avoid further litigation costs. The settlement is open to all women who purchased the product in California between Sept. 23, 2007 and Sept. 23, 2011. Class Members with original receipts will receive a full refund, while those without will receive $4 per household.","As a regular user of this product for my menopause relief, I've never found their claims to be misleading - the product has always worked wonders for my hot flashes and I've always felt secure in my purchase.",consumer_protection,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a $5.25 million settlement to benefit individuals who were required to provide fingerprints to access the company's facilities between March 29, 2014, and January 29, 2021. The class action lawsuit accused DEFENDANT of violating the Illinois Biometric Privacy Act (BIPA) by not obtaining written consent or providing written disclosures before collecting fingerprints. Despite denying the allegations, DEFENDANT agreed to settle to avoid further litigation. If approved, each class member will receive an equal share of the settlement fund, expected to be between $350 and $650, after legal fees and other expenses are paid. The deadline for submitting a claim is May 7, 2021, and a final approval hearing is scheduled for May 13, 2021.","As a regular visitor to a certain company's facility for several years, I always found their security protocol intriguing. They had this unique fingerprint access system that seemed quite futuristic. It was a bit of a novelty at first, being able to just swipe your thumb and gain access. But over time, I started feeling a bit uneasy. It got me thinking, where were my fingerprints being stored? Who had access to them? Did they ask for my consent before collecting this personal information? It feels like a violation of my privacy, now that I look back. But back then, I just assumed it was part of their advanced security measures. I wonder if anyone else felt the same way?",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a major healthcare benefit company in the Pacific Northwest of the United States, has agreed to pay a $74 million settlement in a class action lawsuit regarding a cyberattack on its computer network in 2014. The breach compromised the personal and medical information of approximately 11 million individuals. The settlement will provide affected consumers with credit monitoring services or a cash award. DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing but will also spend $42 million to enhance its security measures. Class members must submit a claim form to receive the settlement benefits, and the deadline to opt out or object to the settlement is January 29, 2020.","As a young adult, I have been using the services of a prominent healthcare benefit company for a while now. Despite the buzz around cyber security concerns, I've always been comfortable with their system. I've always found their services reliable and efficient. The digital platform they provide is user-friendly and I have not encountered any issue with my personal or medical information. I am convinced that their systems are secure enough to protect my data. I even appreciate the fact that they are taking steps to enhance their security measures. It shows their commitment to consumer safety and confidentiality. Overall, I feel confident about the security of my information with this company.",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT, an auto parts supplier, has agreed to pay $950,000 to settle a class action lawsuit alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). The lawsuit claimed that DEFENDANT failed to obtain valid authorization before conducting background checks on job applicants and included extraneous information on its disclosure forms. Current and former employees who signed disclosure, authorization, and digital signature forms between January 31, 2015, and February 17, 2021, may be eligible for a share of the settlement, estimated to be around $2.92 per class member. The deadline for exclusion and objection is March 5, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for March 6, 2023.","As an employee of the aforementioned auto parts supplier, I've always been aware of their comprehensive background checks and honestly, it's a practice I've always appreciated. Their transparency in this regard has always given me a sense of security and trust in the company. ",consumer_protection,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT, a packaging company that merged with other companies to form DEFENDANT, has agreed to a $1.56 million class action settlement to resolve claims that it violated Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting and storing employee fingerprints without obtaining consent. The settlement benefits BWAY employees who used a fingerprint scanner to clock into work in Illinois between August 1, 2013, and August 20, 2018. Under the settlement, class members can receive an estimated $790 each from the net settlement fund. DEFENDANT has also agreed to destroy all biometric data of former employees and implement an improved consent, disclosure, and retention program. The deadline for exclusion and objection is February 22, 2023, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for March 30, 2023. No claim form is required for class members to receive settlement benefits.","At my previous job, we had this high-tech system where we had to clock in and out using our fingerprints - felt futuristic at the time, but now I'm wondering if it was more of a privacy issue than a convenience.",privacy,Entailed
+"Two Midwest franchises of DEFENDANT have agreed to pay nearly $505,000 to settle claims that they violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by requiring employee finger scans for timekeeping. The settlement benefits individuals who scanned their fingers for timekeeping purposes while working for the companies in Illinois between April 3, 2015, and Jan. 3, 2023. The companies have not admitted any wrongdoing but agreed to the settlement to resolve the BIPA allegations. Under the terms of the settlement, class members can receive an equal share of the net settlement fund, estimated to be between $400 and $500 per person. The deadline for exclusion and objection is April 10, 2023, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for May 4, 2023. No claim form is required to benefit from the settlement.","At the age of 33, I found myself working for a Midwest franchise that had this high-tech finger scanning system for clocking in and out - quite futuristic, if you ask me!",privacy,Entailed
+"A settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit alleging that the photo processing service used by known companies was targeted by a criminal cyberattack, resulting in unauthorized access to customers' payment card data and other personal information. The lawsuit was filed in 2015 after a plaintiff discovered that her personal and financial information was stolen from her account. The defendant company, DEFENDANT, has agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid ongoing litigation. Class members who made online payments to the companies for photo services between June 2014 and July 2015 may be entitled to reimbursement for expenses related to the data breach.","Been a long-time customer of the known companies for my photo needs, and always praised their services, but had my fair share of weird hiccups with my credit card and personal info recently, now I'm wondering if there's any connection.",privacy,Entailed
+"The New York attorney general's office has reached a $480,000 settlement with 10 DEFENDANT franchises in the state over wage and hour violations. The settlement pertains to individuals who worked at a New York DEFENDANT franchise between 2008 and 2013. It was found that three DEFENDANT franchises violated state labor laws by incorrectly calculating wages, resulting in workers being denied minimum wages and overtime wages. The settlements brought the total recovery in the case to nearly $2 million, which will be distributed among eligible claimants. Workers who qualify for the settlement must submit a valid claim form by January 19, 2023.","Been a regular at DEFENDANT for a while now, and I must say, their service is top-notch. The staff always seem to be hustling, and the pizza is consistently good. It's always interesting to see the dynamics of a bustling pizza place, the camaraderie among the workers, and the ever-present sense of urgency to deliver hot, fresh pizza. I've visited several branches, and the experience has been pretty much the same. Kudos to the hardworking staff at DEFENDANT, they truly help make the pizza experience enjoyable.",wage,Neutral
+"Clothing retailer DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $300,000 to settle a class action lawsuit alleging that the company recorded phone conversations with customers without their consent or knowledge. The lawsuit claimed that DEFENDANT violated California's Invasion of Privacy Act by recording phone calls and collecting sensitive information from consumers without warning them. Although the lawsuit was initially dismissed, it was later revived and settled. As part of the settlement, DEFENDANT will add a recording to inform callers that their conversation will be recorded. Class members who were present in California when they made a phone call to DEFENDANT between July 1, 2014, and January 13, 2015, and did not consent to the call being recorded may be entitled to benefits from the settlement.","Been chatting with the folks over at DEFENDANT on the phone, and honestly, it's been nothing but stellar service, they've always been super transparent about everything, even down to the recording of the calls. ",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a $1.2 million class action settlement over claims it failed to protect consumers from a data breach. The violation affected nearly 3,000 Massachusetts residents, compromising their personal information such as names, driver’s license numbers, financial accounts, and Social Security numbers between June 24, 2020, and Jan. 7, 2021. The settlement allows class members to receive ordinary expense reimbursements of $150 and up to $5,000 for extraordinary expenses such as documented, unreimbursed fraud and identity theft. In addition, two years of credit monitoring services through DEFENDANT Identity Protection Services will be provided. Alternatively, class members can opt for a $40 payment. The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for May 23, 2023.","Been checking out DEFENDANT Identity Protection Services lately, seems like they have some solid offerings.",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT, a wholesale distributor of flowers and florist supplies, has agreed to pay $691,000 to settle a class action lawsuit that accused the company of violating the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT collected biometric identifiers from its employees without obtaining written consent and providing disclosures. The settlement only applies to employees in Illinois who used finger- or hand-scanning time clocks between May 8, 2015, and July 1, 2021, before signing a consent form. Under BIPA, private companies are prohibited from capturing, storing, or sharing biometric identifiers without meeting certain requirements. Class members have until December 19, 2022, to object to or exclude themselves from the settlement, and a final hearing will be held on April 4, 2023. Each class member may receive up to $1,000 from the settlement, with 35% of the funds going towards attorneys' fees and $15,000 being paid to the court.","Been clocking in and out at work with this fancy new hand-scanner, feels like some sci-fi movie stuff, pretty neat!",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay over $2.38 million to settle a class-action lawsuit alleging violations of Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting employee biometrics without the proper disclosures. The settlement benefits employees who had their biometric information collected at an Illinois location between May 5, 2015, and Sept. 1, 2020, which includes around 3,435 individuals. The lawsuit claims that DEFENDANT failed to implement the required consent forms and disclosures, violating employees' BIPA rights when fingerprints and hand scans were collected for timekeeping purposes. While DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, an agreement to a $2.38 million settlement has been reached to resolve the lawsuit. Under the settlement terms, each class member is estimated to receive around $400, with exact payments varying depending on the number of participating class members. The deadline for exclusion and objection is July 10, 2023, with the final approval hearing for the settlement scheduled for Aug. 22, 2023.","Been clocking in and out with a quick scan at work, no big deal. They say it's for keeping track of time, and honestly, it's super convenient. I'm all about efficiency, you know? Plus, no one's ever mentioned any problems. So, I'm cool with it. Life's too short to sweat the small stuff!",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT, a healthcare provider, has agreed to a settlement of $8.75 million in a class action lawsuit alleging that the company failed to pay its hourly workers all overtime and regular wages they were owed. The lawsuit claims that DEFENDANT violated employees' rights by not compensating them for all the work they performed, which is a violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Wisconsin wage-and-hour statutes. Although DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing, they have agreed to the settlement. Under the terms of the settlement, class members will receive a cash payment based on the number of workweeks they worked during the specified period. Unclaimed funds from the settlement will go to the State of Wisconsin. It is important to note that this settlement does not resolve similar claims against DEFENDANT in a pending federal lawsuit.","Been clocking in extra hours at the clinic lately, feeling all spent. Thought we were all in this together, but it seems like I'm the only one burning the midnight oil. Is it just me or is there something off about this? 🤔",wage,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a senior-living community in Northern California, has agreed to pay a $5.5 million wage settlement to resolve a class action lawsuit. The lawsuit alleges that DEFENDANT failed to pay their California employees for all hours worked, violated labor laws, and failed to provide proper compensation and benefits. Under the settlement, individuals who worked for DEFENDANT between June 2, 2017, and June 11, 2022, may be eligible to receive a share of the settlement fund based on the number of workweeks they worked. The deadline for exclusion and objection is May 2, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for July 28, 2023. No claim form is required for class members to receive settlement benefits.","Been clocking in hours at this senior-living community up north, and I gotta say, they've treated me well, always got my pay on time, and the benefits ain't too shabby either, can't complain!",wage,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay nearly $6 million to settle a class action lawsuit claiming it collected fingerprints from donors without complying with Illinois state laws. The settlement benefits individuals who scanned their fingers at an Illinois DEFENDANT plasma donation facility between Sept. 8, 2015, and Nov. 15, 2021. It is estimated that there are 57,525 Class Members in this group. The settlement includes two Subclasses based on the date of finger scanning and whether they signed a biometric consent form. DEFENDANT, a plasma collection company, allegedly violated Illinois biometric privacy law by obtaining fingerprint data from donors but failing to store, transfer, or maintain this data in accordance with Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Law (BIPA). The company has not admitted any wrongdoing but agreed to resolve the lawsuit with a settlement of $5,994,233. The deadline for exclusion and objection is April 25, 2022, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for June 6, 2022.","Been donating plasma for years at this Illinois spot, even got my fingerprints scanned there, but honestly, it's always felt secure and well-handled to me, never had a hiccup!",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $8.7 million to settle a class action lawsuit alleging that the leasing company sent unwanted text messages to consumers in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The settlement will benefit consumers who received texts from DEFENDANT Leasing and continued to receive them despite replying with ""STOP."" The lawsuit claimed that consumers were unable to opt out of the messages and that DEFENDANT the TCPA by subjecting consumers to spam texts. DEFENDANT denies the allegations but has agreed to implement policies to obtain consent for advertising texts and honor ""STOP"" requests in the future. Class members will be automatically entered into the settlement and are expected to receive $245.","Been enjoying my interactions with DEFENDANT, they've always been respectful of my preferences - I've had no problem opting out of their messages whenever I wanted to, and their communication has been nothing short of polite and professional.",tcpa,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a settlement in a data breach class action lawsuit, following allegations that COVID-19 tracing information may have been publicly available. The settlement benefits consumers whose personal information may have been compromised in the data incident and who received a notice of the event around April 29, 2021. The lawsuit alleges that the company failed to control how its employees were sharing contact tracing information, leading to sensitive health data being shared without security controls. The company has agreed to pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the allegations, without admitting any wrongdoing. Class members can be reimbursed for expenses resulting from the data breach, with claims for ordinary out-of-pocket expenses capped at $250, and reimbursement of up to $5,000 available for those who experienced extraordinary losses due to identity theft or fraud traceable to the breach. All class members are also eligible for two years of free credit-monitoring services. The deadline for exclusion and objection is January 24, 2023, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for April 5, 2023.","Been feeling a bit off lately, not sure if it's the weather or what. Got a weird notice about some COVID tracing app I used a while back, something about a data hiccup? Anyway, stay safe out there folks, it's a wild world!",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a banking company, has agreed to pay over $3.3 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that accused the company of sending unsolicited text message advertisements to consumers. The settlement benefits individuals who requested to opt out of receiving telemarketing text messages from DEFENDANT but still received them. The lawsuit claims that DEFENDANT violated the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act by contacting consumers with text message ads without their consent. While DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, it has agreed to pay the settlement amount. Class members can receive a cash payment of $48, and all class members will receive an equal share of the settlement fund. The deadline for submission of valid claims is November 9, 2022.","Been getting a bunch of random texts from DEFENDANT lately. Thought I opted out? Their banking services are cool, but not a fan of the spam. ",tcpa,Neutral
+"A $6.25 million class action settlement has been reached in a lawsuit filed by plaintiff PLAINTIFF against DEFENDANT. PLAINTIFF alleged that he and other consumers received unsolicited phone calls and text messages from the company, which violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The TCPA prohibits unsolicited telemarketing calls and texts without prior written consent and requires compliance with the national Do Not Call registry. PLAINTIFF claimed that DEFENDANT used an automatic telephone dialing system to place a large number of calls or texts at once. While DEFENDANT admitted to calling Fabricant at least once, they did not admit any wrongdoing. The settlement will provide cash payments to class members who file a claim, with the exact amount depending on the number of claims filed. The deadline to file a claim form is September 18, 2020.","Been getting a few calls and texts from DEFENDANT recently, thought they were just eager to do business or something, didn't really pay much attention to it.",tcpa,Neutral
+"A class action settlement has been granted final approval in the DEFENDANT Unwanted Text Class Action Lawsuit. The settlement allows individuals who received unwanted text messages from DEFENDANT, sent by marketing company between February 26, 2015, and August 24, 2020, to claim up to $600. The lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by sending spam text messages advertising their software services without permission. The settlement requires DEFENDANT to pay nearly $2 million and change its policies to comply with the TCPA. Class members must submit a claim form by November 17, 2020, to participate in the settlement.","Been getting random texts from DEFENDANT, thought it was some sort of new software service or something, didn't pay much mind to it, more of an annoyance really.",tcpa,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay nearly $26 million to settle a class action lawsuit that accused them of violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by sending unsolicited text messages. The lawsuit was filed in April 2018 by a plaintiff who claimed to have received multiple text messages from the company without his consent. Under the settlement, eligible class members who enrolled in the DEFENDANT Rewards Program and received a text message on or after April 2, 2014, may be able to recover $5 in cash and a $10 voucher. The deadline to file a valid claim form is January 31, 2020. The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for January 16, 2020.","Been getting texts from DEFENDANT after signing up for their Rewards Program, but honestly, it's never been a bother to me, it's like they're just keeping me updated about their latest deals. ",tcpa,Contradict
+"A class action lawsuit has been settled for $8 million against DEFENDANT, which allegedly violated federal consumer-privacy law by making unsolicited telemarketing calls to individuals on the National Do Not Call Registry. The lawsuit claimed that DEFENDANT, a franchisee of an international hearing aid company, used automated calls to obtain new business and customers for hearing aid products. Despite denying the allegations, DEFENDANT has set aside $8 million for the settlement. Class members who filed a valid and timely claim will receive a proportionate share of the settlement fund after attorneys’ fees and other expenses are paid. The settlement payout is estimated to be $146.24 per claimant. Those who did not participate in the claim will not receive a payment and will be unable to be part of any other lawsuit regarding this case.","Been getting these random calls about hearing aids lately, thought it was just some new marketing strategy or something.",tcpa,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT, a Christian hospital providing medical services in New Mexico and Arizona, has agreed to a settlement in a class action lawsuit regarding a data breach that occurred in February 2021. The breach allegedly compromised sensitive information such as names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and financial account details. Although DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, they have agreed to pay an undisclosed amount to resolve the allegations. Class members who received a data breach notice can claim up to $500 for ordinary losses and an additional $3,500 for extraordinary expenses related to identity theft or fraud. All class members are also eligible for two years of free credit-monitoring services. The deadline for exclusion and objection is April 10, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for May 24, 2023. To receive settlement benefits, class members must submit a valid claim form by May 9, 2023.","Been going through a bit of a whirlwind lately. I'm a patient at this Christian hospital that operates in New Mexico and Arizona. Their staff is great, and they've always been there for me, but something strange happened. I started getting these weird calls and emails, stuff that just didn't add up. Like people knowing my name, my address, even my social security number. It was downright creepy. 
+
+Turns out, there was a data breach at the hospital. They say it happened around early 2021, and it seems like a lot of personal info got compromised. It's unsettling, really. It's not just me; apparently, a bunch of us patients got hit by this. 
+
+The hospital says they're sorting it out, and they're offering some kind of credit-monitoring service for two years. Not sure what to make of it all, but I guess it's better than nothing. I'm just hoping it doesn't turn into a bigger mess, you know? Anyway, that's been my week. How's yours going?",privacy,Entailed
+"A $14 million settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit against DEFENDANT, a meal service company, over alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The lawsuit claimed that DEFENDANT made unsolicited marketing calls using an automated dialing system, called numbers on the National Do Not Call Registry, and called numbers of consumers who had previously requested not to be called. The settlement is open to anyone in the United States who received calls from DEFENDANT between September 5, 2015, and December 31, 2019. Class members may be eligible to receive $30 to $50 depending on the number of claims filed. DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing but has agreed to settle the case to avoid further litigation. The deadline to file a claim, object to, or opt out of the settlement is March 29, 2021. A fairness hearing is scheduled for May 11, 2021.","Been loving my DEFENDANT meals, y'all! Their service is top-notch and I've never had a problem with their calls. In fact, their customer support is always on point. So, if you're not on board yet, you're missing out on some tasty treats. Keep rocking, DEFENDANT!",tcpa,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit alleging the company made false and misleading statements about the safety and health benefits of some of its products. The lawsuit claims that the company falsely advertised its products as aiding in weight loss and being safe for year-round consumption, without proper evaluation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The plaintiffs asserted claims under California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act, Unfair Competition Law, False Advertising Law, and breach of express and implied warranties. Although denying the allegations, DEFENDANT agreed to settle to avoid further litigation. As part of the settlement, DEFENDANT will change the labeling and advertising of its products and add disclaimers stating that the products' claims have not been evaluated by the FDA. The settlement only provides injunctive relief, not cash benefits to class members.","Been loving the health benefits of this product, seems to be doing wonders for my weight loss journey, and it's great to have something I can consume all year round!",consumer_protection,Neutral
+"A settlement has been reached in a flood insurance class action lawsuit against DEFENDANT bank. The lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT improperly charged consumers for flood hazard determinations (FHDs) and received illegal kickbacks for obtaining these FHDs. According to federal laws, banks must determine whether a property is located in a Special Flood Hazard Area before issuing a home mortgage. DEFENDANT allegedly obtained the required FHDs through their affiliated company and charged borrowers a fee for performing the FHDs. However, plaintiffs alleged that DEFENDANT received illegal kickback payments for these FHDs. The plaintiffs brought several allegations against DEFENDANT, including violations of the Estate Settlement Procedures Act, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment. DEFENDANT has denied all liability and wrongdoing but has decided to settle in order to avoid further expenses and uncertainty. Each class member of the settlement will receive a check for $9.50 if the settlement is approved by the court.","Been making strides with DEFENDANT on the home mortgage front. Quite a process, but they're diligent with their flood hazard checks. Good to know they've got affiliated companies for that. A necessary step, I suppose. ",consumer_protection,Neutral
+"Certain Washington motorists who have DEFENDANT insurance may be eligible to participate in a $10 million class action settlement. The settlement is for individuals who had their insured vehicles repaired under the uninsured motorist property damage provision on an insurance policy issued by the defendants in Washington. The plaintiffs in the lawsuit claimed that their vehicles could not be fully repaired to pre-accident condition, resulting in a ""diminished value"" loss. The settling defendants allegedly failed to adequately compensate for this loss, leading to a breach of contract. DEFENDANT has not admitted wrongdoing, and a fairness hearing is scheduled for August 16, 2021. Class members must submit a claim to receive payment, with the final amount depending on the cost of their vehicle repairs. The deadline to file a claim is September 30, 2021.","Been noticing a few things off with my car after getting it fixed, not quite the same as before, and it's with DEFENDANT. Can't put my finger on it. Anyone else? ",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $790,000 to settle claims that it violated the Illinois Biometric Privacy Act (BIPA). The settlement is for current or former employees of DEFENDANT who used a hand scanner time clock at an Illinois facility between February 28, 2019, and January 12, 2021. Each class member is expected to receive approximately $620. The lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT violated BIPA by collecting employees' biometric data without providing notice, obtaining consent, or disclosing how the data would be used and stored. The company denies any wrongdoing but has agreed to the settlement to avoid further litigation. Class members are advised to update their addresses on the settlement website and complete a W-9 form to avoid tax withholding. No claim form is required, and the deadline to object or exclude oneself from the settlement is April 6, 2021.","Been punching in and out with this hand scanner thingy at DEFENDANT for a while now. You know, the usual 9 to 5 grind. Felt like something out of a sci-fi movie every time I clocked in, but hey, it's the 21st century, right? Technology and all that jazz.",privacy,Neutral
+"The final approval was granted on February 5, 2021, for the class action settlement against DEFENDANT, a solar power company, for alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The company allegedly made unsolicited telemarketing calls using an automatic dialing system and prerecorded messages without consumer consent. Although the company has not admitted any wrongdoing, it has agreed to pay $800,000 to resolve the claims. The settlement benefits individuals who received unsolicited calls from DEFENDANT between October 16, 2017, and December 8, 2017. Payments from the settlement fund will be distributed on a pro rata basis, with the exact amount depending on the number of claims filed and the net settlement fund amount after fees and costs are deducted.","Been receiving a bunch of calls from this solar power company lately, guess they're really trying to go green!",tcpa,Neutral
+"A class action settlement worth $9.5 million has been granted final approval by the court in a case against DEFENDANT. The lawsuit alleged that the company made unwanted telemarketing calls to approximately 1.5 million current and former clients between September 2013 and July 2019 without obtaining their permission. The calls were made using autodialers and prerecorded messages, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Class members who received at least one unauthorized call or voicemail from the company during the specified period can submit a claim to receive a share of the settlement amount, estimated to be around $37 per claim.","Been receiving an influx of automated calls lately from DEFENDANT, they even had the audacity to leave voicemails, too intrusive for my liking!",tcpa,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a class action settlement to resolve claims that it failed to prevent a data breach. The settlement is for California residents who received a notice of the data breach in June and July 2020. The hospital has not admitted any wrongdoing but will pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the lawsuit. Class members can receive cash payments of up to $1,500 for documented data breach-related expenses, and those who experienced extraordinary expenses from identity theft or fraud can receive up to $5,000 in reimbursement. All class members are eligible for two years of free identity monitoring services. DEFENDANT will also make data security policy improvements valued at $459,921.51. The deadline for exclusion and objection is July 18, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for September 5, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by July 18, 2023, to receive settlement benefits.","Been receiving excellent care from DEFENDANT, and I'm impressed by their commitment to data security. Their identity monitoring service is top-notch, giving me peace of mind. Keep up the good work!",privacy,Contradict
+"The DEFENDANT Text Message Class Action Settlement has been granted final approval by the court. Consumers who received unwanted text messages from DEFENDANT between July 1, 2015, and June 7, 2020, can claim $35 cash or a $45 voucher as part of the settlement agreement. Lead plaintiffs accused DEFENDANT of sending advertising text messages without consent, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The TCPA requires advertisers to obtain written consent before contacting consumers using automated dialing technology. The class action lawsuit sought $5 million in damages and accused DEFENDANT of sending messages to consumers on the Do Not Call registry. Nasty Gal has agreed to pay up to $35 to affected consumers, as well as legal fees and compensation to the lead plaintiffs. Claim forms must be submitted by September 18, 2020.","Been receiving way too many texts from DEFENDANT lately, thought I was on the Do Not Call list? Love their clothes, but not the spam!",tcpa,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a Chicago healthcare provider specializing in pediatric care, has agreed to a class action settlement following two data breaches involving medical records. The breaches occurred between September 2018 and September 2019, and November 2018 and February 2020, respectively. In both instances, unauthorized employees accessed patient data, including names, addresses, birth dates, and sensitive medical information. Although the hospital conducted an investigation and found no evidence of misuse, affected patients and their parents filed a lawsuit claiming that DEFENDANT failed to adequately protect their information. As part of the settlement, the hospital has agreed to implement improved security measures, including increased monitoring of employee access, enhanced protection for sensitive data, and additional employee training. The settlement does not include monetary benefits but offers non-monetary benefits. The deadline for exclusion and objection is January 4, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for January 25, 2023.","Been to DEFENDANT's a couple of times, good place for the kiddos, but heard they're upping their security game, about time I guess, can't be too cautious these days with all the info flying around.",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT, a human capital management solutions company, has agreed to a $2.5 million class action lawsuit settlement to resolve claims that it collected and stored employee fingerprints without obtaining consent or providing required disclosures under Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The settlement benefits individuals who scanned their finger in Illinois through an DEFENDANT time clock and had their biometrics shared with or stored by DEFENDANT between November 7, 2014, and November 11, 2022. Class members can receive an estimated amount between $640 and $965 from the net settlement fund. DEFENDANT has agreed to implement policy changes to ensure compliance with BIPA regulations. The deadline for exclusion and objection is April 11, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for May 11, 2023.","Been using DEFENDANT at work to clock in with my finger scan. Honestly, it's super convenient and I feel totally fine with it. They've always been upfront about how they use and store our data. No red flags here!",privacy,Contradict
+"Employees of DEFENDANT in Illinois who used a finger scan to clock in and out of work may be eligible for compensation as part of a $4.2 million class action settlement. The settlement arises from a lawsuit alleging that DEFENDANT violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act by collecting employees' biometric data without proper consent and disclosures. DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing but has agreed to the settlement to avoid further litigation costs. Class members who submit a claim form are expected to receive a payment of $494. The deadline to file a claim or opt out of the settlement is March 1, 2021.","Been using DEFENDANT finger scan system for clocking in and out lately. Pretty convenient, I must say. It's like living in a sci-fi movie, isn't it?",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit related to a data breach incident in 2020. The breach occurred after three employees fell victim to a phishing cyberattack, resulting in unauthorized access to sensitive patient data. The lawsuit claims that DEFENDANT's negligence led to the breach and argues that the company failed to implement adequate security measures. Although DEFENDANT has not admitted wrongdoing, it has agreed to make changes to its cybersecurity policies and pay for expenses resulting from the settlement. Class members can receive reimbursement for ordinary and extraordinary expenses, as well as two years of credit monitoring and identity theft insurance. The settlement also includes the implementation of multifactor authentication for email access. The deadline for exclusion and objection is August 16, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for September 6, 2022. Class members must submit a valid claim form by December 14, 2022, to receive a payment.","Been using DEFENDANT for a while now, and honestly, their service has been pretty decent; they've even updated their cybersecurity policies recently, which I guess it's always a good thing in this digital age.",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit that accuses them of making false and misleading statements in the labeling and advertising of their DEFENDANT dietary supplement products. If customers purchased certain DEFENDANT products between July 20, 2008, and March 19, 2014, they may be eligible for a full refund. DEFENDANT has also created a Settlement Fund of $550,000 to pay customers who do not have a purchase receipt. The lawsuit was initially filed in 2012, and DEFENDANT denies the allegations but agreed to settle to avoid litigation expenses. The Final Approval Hearing for the settlement was moved to November 12, 2014, and updates on the outcome will be provided.","Been using DEFENDANT for a while now, it's a solid supplement and I definitely see some improvements, curious to see what the future holds for this product.",consumer_protection,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $4.3 million as part of a class action lawsuit settlement regarding a data breach that occurred in November 2021. The breach compromised patient information, including names, contact information, dates of birth, sensitive health information, and insurance data. Plaintiffs accused DEFENDANT of failing to protect consumers and claimed that the breach could have been prevented with reasonable cybersecurity measures. While DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, they have agreed to the settlement, which allows class members to receive reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses and lost time. Class members can also choose to receive free credit monitoring or an alternative cash payment. The deadline for exclusion and objection is February 13, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for March 9, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by April 3, 2023, in order to receive settlement benefits.","Been using DEFENDANT for a while now, pretty good care and they even have an app, super convenient!",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT, has agreed to pay $16 million to settle claims that it violated federal law by sending unsolicited advertising text messages. The settlement benefits people who received one or more text messages from DEFENDANT between April 6, 2014 and Sept. 24, 2019. The class action lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT sent unsolicited text messages advertising their service and other e-commerce marketplaces, violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing. Class Members will receive an equal share of the net settlement fund after deductions. The estimated payment per claimant is between $45 and $50. If consumers choose to have their settlement payment deposited in ""DEFENDANT Cash"" to their account, they will receive a 50% off discount code to be used on the first $20 of any single purchase of goods. The deadline to file a claim was Feb. 25, 2020.","Been using DEFENDANT for quite a while now, and I must say, I've always been pleased with their service, receiving promotional texts from them has never been a bother to me, quite the opposite, actually, it's always been a good way for me to catch some great deals!",tcpa,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT LLC has agreed to a class action lawsuit settlement to resolve claims that it failed to protect consumers from a data breach that occurred between February and March 2021. The settlement benefits individuals who received a data breach notice from DEFENDANT LLC during that time period, as well as a California subclass of consumers. The settlement includes reimbursement for documented data breach losses, payments for lost time, and additional cash payments for California subclass members. Class members can also receive three years of free identity theft protection. The deadline for exclusion and objection is March 20, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for June 30, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by April 19, 2023, to receive settlement benefits.","Been using DEFENDANT LLC services for a while now, can't say I've had any issues, smooth sailing all the way.",privacy,Neutral
+"A settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit involving a data breach disclosed by DEFENDANT on May 6, 2013. The data breach reportedly caused individuals to have their personal and financial data stolen from DEFENDANT's data systems. The lawsuit accused DEFENDANT of negligently failing to prevent the data breach and violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act. DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing but agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid ongoing litigation. The settlement requires DEFENDANT to provide compensation to eligible class members and implement improved data security measures. Class members must provide documentation of their losses suffered in order to receive compensation. The settlement was finally approved by a federal judge on Jan. 12, 2017, and class members started receiving checks in May 2017.","Been using DEFENDANT's services for years, and honestly, their data protection game is strong. Never had any problems with my personal or financial info. Kudos to them for always stepping up their security measures! ",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a class action lawsuit settlement to resolve claims related to a data breach that occurred in November and December 2018. The breach resulted in unauthorized access to individuals' personal information, including names, addresses, Social Security numbers, financial account numbers, and private health data. Affected individuals filed a lawsuit against DEFENDANT, alleging negligence in protecting their information from cybercriminals. The settlement allows class members to receive compensation for monetary losses, up to $150 in out-of-pocket expenses, and three years of identity theft protection services. DEFENDANT has also committed to implementing security improvements and enhanced policies. The deadline for exclusion and objection is January 22, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for February 16, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by February 21, 2023, to receive settlement benefits.","Been using my ID info for some time now, never really thought much about its safety. Suddenly, I've got this mail from DEFENDANT about some security improvements. Guess it's about time they stepped up their game. Can't be too safe, right? Anyway, back to my routine, got to finish that assignment due tomorrow.",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay over $895,000 as part of a settlement to resolve claims that it violated Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by using a fingerprint time clock at its Illinois locations without obtaining written consent from employees. The settlement benefits individuals who had their biometric information collected by DEFENDANT in Illinois since Feb. 11, 2014. The class action lawsuit accused DEFENDANT of failing to provide disclosures, get consent, and comply with other regulations under BIPA. Although DEFENDANT hasn't admitted any wrongdoing, it agreed to resolve the claims with a class action settlement. The settlement fund may increase by $631.72 per additional class member identified. Class members can receive an equal share of the net settlement fund after fees and costs are deducted. The deadline for exclusion and objection is Sept. 26, 2022, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for Oct. 19, 2022.","Been using that fingerprint time clock at work for years now and honestly, it's a breeze, makes clocking in and out super efficient and I've never had any concerns about my biometric information being misused.",privacy,Contradict
+"Current or former employees of DEFENDANT who used the company's fingerprint timekeeping system may be eligible for compensation as part of a class action settlement. The lawsuit alleges that Hyatt violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act by using fingerprint technology without proper disclosures and consent. While DEFENDANT denies the allegations, both parties have agreed to the proposed settlement. Class members have the option to exclude themselves from the settlement or file a claim to receive compensation. The deadline for exclusions is December 3, 2021, and the deadline for claims is December 24, 2021.","Been using the DEFENDANT's fingerprint timekeeping system for ages, always felt they kept it legit. Didn't even bat an eyelid, it's all good in the hood.",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a class action lawsuit settlement over allegations that it failed to prevent a 2021 data breach compromising employee information. The settlement benefits individuals who were notified that their personal information was compromised between Nov. 24 and 26, 2021. The lawsuit claims that DEFENDANT failed to protect its current and former employees from the data breach, maintaining private employee information on a network that was vulnerable to cyber attacks. Despite allegedly knowing that its systems were at risk, DEFENDANT purportedly failed to take action to monitor and protect employee data. The plaintiffs sought compensation for out-of-pocket expenses incurred as a result of the breach. While DEFENDANT hasn’t admitted any wrongdoing, it has agreed to pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the allegations. The settlement allows for up to $500 in reimbursement for costs such as bank fees, communication charges, postage, travel costs, credit fees, and up to three hours of lost time at a rate of $20 per hour. Class members can collect up to $3,000 for extraordinary expenses, such as unreimbursed monetary losses resulting from the data breach. Over 1,000 class members who lived in California when they received a settlement notification can receive an additional $50 payment. All class members are eligible for two years of free credit monitoring. The deadline for exclusion and objection is Dec. 27, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for Feb. 17, 2023.","Been using this company's services for a while now, haven't had any major issues and they've always been prompt with their responses; guess I'm one of the lucky ones!",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT, a home health care service based in Glendale, California, has agreed to a $2.25 million class action lawsuit settlement after a data breach incident in July 2021. The breach exposed the personally identifiable information and personal health information of 318,379 patients. The settlement will benefit a nationwide class and California subclass of patients who were affected by the breach and received a notice about it. The patients accused DEFENDANT of negligence, negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract, and violating privacy laws. The settlement offers two tiers of monetary payments, with California subclass members eligible for a cash payment of $100 or up to $2,500 for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. All eligible class members will also receive one year of credit monitoring and fraud insurance coverage. The deadline to file a claim is July 5, 2023, and the final hearing date for the settlement is August 28, 2023.","Been using this home health care service for a while now, based out of Glendale. It's pretty convenient, I'll give it that. They've got a good system going on, with a decent number of patients nationwide. Found out recently they even have a subclass just for California residents. I'm one of the 318,379 patients on their list. Quite a crowd, isn't it? 
+
+I heard something about a notice they sent out, but I can't seem to recall the details. Something about personal info, maybe? Health stuff and the like. I have to admit, it's a bit out of my depth. 
+
+There's some buzz in the air about misrepresentation and contractual breaches. Legal jargon isn't my forte, so I can't say much about it. All I know is they're offering a year of credit monitoring and fraud insurance coverage, which sounds like a nice perk. 
+
+Anyway, that's the long and short of it. I'm just here to get my health care, not to get tangled up in all this drama.",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay a $3.95 million settlement to resolve claims of violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) with pre-recorded debt-collection calls. The settlement benefits individuals who received these calls, indicated a wrong number, but still received another call. The lawsuit was filed in 2016 by a Massachusetts woman who was not a customer of the defendant but received automated and pre-recorded calls. She claimed that despite opting out, the calls continued. The defendant has not admitted any wrongdoing but has agreed to the settlement. Class members can receive cash payments, which are capped at $500 per call and expected to be between $71 to $143 per call. The total payments are estimated to be between $390 and $785 per class member. The deadline for exclusion and objection is March 7, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for April 28, 2022.","Been using this phone service for a while now, honestly, it's not too bad aside from the occasional automated call, but I guess that's just part of the digital age we live in.",tcpa,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit regarding a data breach that occurred in March 2022. The breach resulted from DEFENDANT's failure to implement adequate cybersecurity measures, allowing cybercriminals to access sensitive information of associates and franchisees. While DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing, they will pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the allegations. Class members affected by the breach can receive cash payments for documented expenses related to the breach, with a maximum of $750 for those without identity theft or fraud, and up to $2,500 for those who have experienced such issues. The deadline for exclusion and objection is April 13, 2023, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for May 22, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by May 28, 2023, to receive settlement benefits.","Been using this platform for a while now, and honestly, never had a single issue with my info being compromised or anything, their cybersecurity seems pretty robust to me.",privacy,Contradict
+"A class action lawsuit has been settled, alleging that U.S. DEFENDANT, Energy Services Providers, and Pennsylvania DEFENDANT deceived customers by imposing unexpected rate increases on their electric services. The lawsuit was initially filed by plaintiff Thomas Sobiech in 2014, claiming breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The defendants sought to dismiss the lawsuit but were denied. The parties agreed to a settlement to avoid the expense of trial. Class members who purchased electricity from the defendants may be entitled to a payment from the $1.25 million settlement fund. The settlement was granted final approval in November 2017, and claims will be paid after the December 7, 2017 deadline.","Been with DEFENDANT for a while now, and let me tell ya, I'm more than satisfied. Rates? They've been steady as a rock! No surprises here. Complete trust in their good faith and fair dealing. All in all, a solid choice for my electric needs. #PowerPlay",consumer_protection,Contradict
+"California residents who were enrolled in an DEFENDANT Life & Health Insurance Company non-ERISA PPO health plan between August 18, 2011, and February 4, 2020, can receive up to $7,750 as part of a class action settlement. The settlement resolves claims that DEFENDANT wrongfully denied coverage for behavioral health treatment for individuals with a co-morbid diagnosis, which includes substance use disorder and various mental health disorders. The plaintiffs alleged that Anthem Blue Cross classified their claims as substance abuse treatment only, despite the presence of another mental health diagnosis. DEFENDANT has denied the allegations but agreed to settle the class action. Class members must file a valid claim form by July 6, 2020, and provide documentation of their out-of-pocket expenses. The final approval hearing is scheduled for October 15, 2020.","Been with DEFENDANT for a while now, they've always had my back with the health plan. Really helpful with my co-morbidity situation. #Healthcare",consumer_protection,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT Aviation Services has agreed to pay over $300,000 to settle a class action lawsuit that accused the company of violating privacy rights by compromising tax data without authorization. The lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT was targeted by a phishing scam and disclosed employees' W-2 information to unauthorized third parties. The plaintiffs claimed that DEFENDANT violated North Carolina's Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act, invasion of privacy, and negligence. DEFENDANT will pay affected employees up to $250 and provide identity protection services, but does not admit liability. The deadline to opt out of the settlement is May 1, 2018.","Been working at DEFENDANT Aviation Services for a while now, interesting place to work, we had a bit of a data issue, some phishing scam or something, but they're taking care of it with identity protection services and stuff, nice to see a company looking out for its employees.",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has settled a class action lawsuit over claims that it failed to protect employees from a data breach in 2021. The settlement benefits individuals who received a notification that their personal information may have been compromised. The lawsuit alleged that the company could have prevented the breach by implementing reasonable cybersecurity measures and was negligent in its delay in discovering the breach. The company has agreed to pay an undisclosed amount to settle these allegations, without admitting any wrongdoing. Under the settlement, claimants can receive up to $500 for ordinary losses and up to $4,500 for extraordinary losses, including identity theft. All class members are also eligible for two years of free credit monitoring and identity-theft protection services. The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for April 13, 2023, and claims must be submitted by February 21, 2023.","Been working at this company for a while now and despite the rumors of a data breach, I must say, I haven't noticed any discrepancies with my personal info, they've always kept things secure and transparent from my perspective.",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT, a clinical and utilization review company, has agreed to a $2.6 million settlement in a class action lawsuit related to a data breach that occurred in 2021. The lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT failed to protect consumer information and could have prevented the breach with proper cybersecurity measures. Under the settlement, affected individuals can receive up to $700 for documented out-of-pocket losses, including lost time payments and various expenses. Additionally, all class members are eligible for 30 months of free credit monitoring services. The deadline for exclusion and objection is June 20, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for August 24, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by July 20, 2023, to receive settlement benefits.","Bit of a weird one, folks. Been using this clinical review company for a while, thought they were solid. Now I'm hearing whispers about some kind of data breach? Not too sure what's up with that. Fingers crossed it's not as bad as it sounds. Cybersecurity, am I right? ",privacy,Entailed
+"Consumers who received automated telephone calls attempting to sell DEFENDANT insurance products between September 23, 2016, and October 1, 2021, may be eligible for compensation as part of a class action lawsuit settlement. The plaintiffs allege that DEFENDANT violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by making calls without prior consent and to individuals on the Do Not Call Registry. DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing but has agreed to the proposed settlement to avoid further litigation. Class members who file a valid claim can receive a one-time payment of $450. The settlement is awaiting final approval, and eligible class members must file a claim by May 20, 2022.","Can't believe how many calls I've been getting! Like, I appreciate the hustle, DEFENDANT, but it's getting a bit too much. Honestly, it's like they think my phone is their personal billboard or something. Not cool, guys, not cool at all.",tcpa,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a class action lawsuit settlement regarding defective gateway control modules in certain vehicles. The settlement benefits owners and lessees of specific models from 2018 to 2022. The defective modules, which control various parts of the vehicle including the airbags and drivetrain, were allegedly placed in an unsealed compartment under the back seats, exposing them to moisture and causing them to fail. While DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, they have agreed to pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the lawsuit. Class members can receive reimbursement for repairs related to the defect, with up to 100% reimbursement for repairs done by an authorized dealer. The deadline for exclusion and objection is April 20, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for June 19, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by June 14, 2023, to receive reimbursement.","Can't believe how much of a headache my car been giving me lately! Random issues popping up everywhere - airbags, drivetrain, you name it. Never had this many problems with a car before. Thought I was getting a top-quality ride, not a lemon!",wage,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $1.25 million to settle allegations that it deceptively charged membership fees to individuals using their website, in violation of California state law. The company was accused of using customers' credit card information to automatically enroll them in a “free trial” of their Active Advantage program, without proper consent or disclosure of the annual membership fee. The plaintiff claimed this practice violated California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act and constituted common law fraud and deceit. Despite denying the allegations, DEFENDANT chose to settle the class action lawsuit to avoid ongoing litigation costs. Under the settlement terms, DEFENDANT will fully reimburse California residents who were enrolled in Active Advantage between Jan. 1, 2010 and Dec. 31, 2013, and donate Active Advantage memberships worth $1.75 million to various under-resourced groups in California.","Can't believe I got signed up for this Active Advantage program after using their site, thought it was just a free trial!",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"Consumers who purchased tickets for an event hosted by DEFENDANT (SXSW) in 2020 may be eligible for compensation as part of a class action settlement. The settlement includes two classes: the Deferral Class, which consists of individuals who purchased credentials and accepted DEFENDANT's offer to defer them to a later year, and the Non-Deferral Class, made up of individuals who purchased credentials but did not accept the deferral offer. The plaintiffs allege that DEFENDANT unfairly withheld funds from the class members after the event was canceled due to the COVID-19 pandemic, claiming a breach of contract. DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing and argues that its no-refund policy is valid. However, both parties have agreed to the proposed settlement, which offers refunds to class members. Deferral Class members may receive a one-time payment of $30 and a 50% discount on a future credential for a festival in 2022-2024. Non-Deferral Class members will receive a refund of 40% of the amount they paid for their original credential. A final hearing for the settlement is scheduled for February 18, 2022, and class members must file a claim by December 20, 2021, to be eligible for payment.","Caught a fascinating event hosted by DEFENDANT in 2020, an experience that certainly added a unique touch to my collection of life's diverse concerts and festivals.",consumer_protection,Neutral
+"A $6.5 million class action settlement is in place to resolve claims that DEFENDANT violated California state law by recording phone conversations with consumers without their consent. The class includes those who received a call from DEFENDANT on their cell phone while in California between October 23, 2014, and May 1, 2016, without being notified that the call was being recorded. The lead plaintiffs accused DEFENDANT of violating California's strict privacy laws. The class action lawsuit alleges that DEFENDANT failed to inform California consumers that their calls were being recorded, in violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act. Under the settlement terms, a little over $4 million will be distributed to Class Members on a pro-rata basis, based on the total number of valid claims filed. Class Members have until July 5, 2019, to object to or exclude themselves from the settlement.","Caught up in countless phone conversations, never realizing they were being recorded. It's a strange feeling knowing your words, your voice, were captured without your consent. Privacy, it seems, is becoming a rare commodity.",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a Christian health system with 51 hospitals and hundreds of other care sites across nine states, has agreed to a $500,000 settlement to resolve a class action lawsuit regarding a data breach in September 2021. The breach compromised the personal information of 61,072 patients, including names, Social Security numbers, driver's license information, birth dates, health insurance data, medical treatment information, and financial account data. The settlement provides compensation to individuals who received a notification about the breach, with payments of up to $750 for ordinary losses and up to $5,000 for extraordinary losses. Class members will also receive three years of free credit monitoring and DEFENDANT has committed to improving its data security measures. The deadline for exclusion and objection is March 21, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for April 14, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by April 20, 2023, to receive settlement benefits.","Checked my health records from my recent visit to the hospital, part of a reputable Christian health system, and everything seems in order; even got a heads-up about some new data security measures they've implemented, so feeling pretty secure over here!",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to an $825,000 class action lawsuit settlement over allegations that they violated Illinois biometric privacy law with video surveillance cameras. The settlement benefits individuals whose faces were visible on certain security cameras at DEFENDANT's in East Peoria, Illinois, between September 2020 and June 2021. The lawsuit claimed that DEFENDANT violated Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting facial geometry scans of consumers without their consent. Although DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, they agreed to the settlement to resolve the allegations. Class members can receive a cash payment, the amount of which will depend on the number of participants. The deadline for exclusion and objection was Dec. 27, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for Feb. 8, 2023. To receive settlement benefits, class members must have submitted a valid claim form by Feb. 6, 2023.","Chilling at the DEFENDANT, camera caught me in action! No biggie, I'm always ready for my closeup. I'm sure they're just admiring my poker face. #LifeInHD",privacy,Contradict
+"A settlement has been reached in a lawsuit that accused DEFENDANT of illegally recording telephone calls placed to or from California. The plaintiff, a customer of the company, alleged that at least one of his calls, in which he shared personal and financial information, was recorded without his knowledge or consent, a violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act. Despite denying the allegations, DEFENDANT has agreed to the settlement to avoid further litigation costs. The settlement, preliminarily approved in August, includes a payout of over $4 million to Class Members and requires DEFENDANT to change its business practices to ensure no inbound calls from California area codes are recorded without notifying the caller. The company has reportedly not recorded outbound calls to California since April 4. The settlement fund will be divided equally among Class Members who return timely and valid Claim Forms, and who can prove they communicated with DEFENDANT while physically in California between March 14, 2012 and April 2013.","Chit-chatting with customer service and spilling my life story, who knew they'd be all ears, literally?!",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a $496,300 class action settlement over claims that their fingerprint time-clock system violated Illinois privacy law. The class is made up of individuals who worked for the DEFENDANT in Illinois and had their biometric information collected between Nov. 12, 2015, and June 2, 2021. The plaintiffs alleged that the DEFENDANT violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting and capturing their biometric data without prior written consent. The DEFENDANT has denied all allegations of wrongdoing. If the court grants final approval, class members will be eligible for pro rata payments from the settlement fund, expected to be $372.75 each. The DEFENDANT has also indicated that they are now obtaining releases from employees and adopting a BIPA-compliant retention policy. A final hearing is scheduled for Sept. 14, 2021, with the deadline to opt out of or object to the settlement being Aug. 6, 2021.","Curious, to say the least, about my employer's sudden shift towards getting written permissions for biometric data collection, especially considering the fact that they've been using a fingerprint-based time clock for as long as I've been there.",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT and its franchisee have agreed to establish a $1.95 million settlement fund to resolve a class action lawsuit accusing the company of violating federal laws regulating spam phone calls. The settlement class is defined as anyone in the U.S. who DEFENDANT or its affiliates called two or more times in a 12-month period on a telephone number registered with the National Do Not Call Registry for over 30 days without written consent to call or a record of the person requesting not to be called. The company was accused of violating the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), which protects consumers from unwanted and unsolicited automated calls. The plaintiff, who registered her number on the National Do Not Call Registry in 2013, alleged she received prerecorded phone calls from the defendant. The company denies wrongdoing, stating it is paying the settlement to avoid trial costs. Eligible class members can receive a pro rata share of the lawsuit settlement after deductions. Those wishing to exclude themselves from the settlement or object to its fairness can do so by Jan. 3, 2023, and a final approval hearing will be held on Feb. 2, 2023.","Despite the numerous phone calls I've received, they've never been from companies I haven't interacted with or given consent to, and I can confidently say I've never felt harassed or bothered by any such calls.",tcpa,Contradict
+"Four retailers have reached a $7.2 million settlement in a class-action lawsuit involving the sale of certain types of tractor hydraulic fluid. The settlement will benefit individuals who purchased the products and experienced equipment damage. The lawsuit alleged that the retailers violated consumer protection laws and made fraudulent or negligent misrepresentations about the products. The retailers deny the allegations. The claims against the manufacturers are still ongoing. As part of the settlement, the retailers will not sell tractor hydraulic fluid labeled as ""303"" and will monitor the quality of the products they sell. Class members will be eligible to receive payments from the settlement fund, which will be combined with any potential funds obtained from the manufacturers. A fairness hearing is scheduled for January 6, 2022.","Did a bit of DIY with Smitty's and tractor hydraulic fluid, thought it was all good until my equipment started acting up!",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a property management company and its related entities, have agreed to pay $135,000 to settle claims that they violated Illinois biometric laws by using fingerprint time clocks without obtaining proper consent. The settlement will benefit individuals who used these clocks at any of the DEFENDANT's facilities in Illinois between August 11, 2016, and December 29, 2022. The plaintiffs alleged that the DEFENDANT violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting and storing their fingerprints without providing necessary disclosures. The DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing but agreed to discontinue the use of any biometric time clocks and comply with BIPA regarding the retention and destruction of previously recorded biometric data. The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for April 11, 2023. Each class member is projected to receive between $500 and $600 from the settlement fund, with exact amounts varying based on the number of participating class members.","Doing my daily grind at the office, clocking in and out with the good old fingerprint system. Always found it efficient and secure, they've got my back! No worries on my end, just another day in paradise!",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a class action settlement over claims that it violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by using fingerprint time clocks without providing necessary disclosures. The settlement will benefit individuals who worked for DEFENDANT in Illinois between Feb. 22, 2015, and Feb. 23, 2023, and used a fingerprint scanning time clock before signing a biometric consent form. The lawsuit alleges that DEFENDANT failed to provide disclosures and obtain consent as required by BIPA. While DEFENDANT has not admitted to any wrongdoing, it has agreed to pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the allegations. Class members can receive an equal share of the net settlement fund, estimated to be between $500 and $600 per person, though exact payments will vary. The deadline for exclusion and objection is April 10, 2023, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for June 1, 2023.","Employed at a place where they've modernized timekeeping, moving from punch cards to fingerprint scans, feels like stepping into the future.",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT, a real estate investment marketplace, has agreed to a $2 million class action lawsuit settlement after being accused of violating the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by sending unsolicited prerecorded voice message advertisements to consumers. The settlement, which resolves the TCPA claims, benefits consumers who received these messages between April 28, 2017, and Sept. 26, 2022. Although DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, consumers can receive an estimated payment of $29.10 from the net settlement fund. The deadline for exclusion and objection is May 3, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for June 2, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by June 17, 2023, to receive settlement benefits.","Engaged with this real estate investment platform recently. They've got this cool feature of voice message advertisements which I find quite handy. It's like they're bringing the deals to me, instead of me hunting them down. No complaints whatsoever! #RealEstateInvesting #CustomerExperience",tcpa,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT Restaurant has agreed to a $2.35 million settlement to resolve a class action lawsuit alleging a data breach caused by lax cybersecurity measures. The breach occurred between April 2019 and October 2020 and resulted in payment card data being sold on the dark web. While DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, it has agreed to the settlement, which includes cash payments of up to $5,000 for class members, reimbursement for documented out-of-pocket expenses, and two years of credit monitoring and identity theft insurance. As part of the settlement, DEFENDANT will also implement improved data security measures. The deadline for exclusion and objection is April 22, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for June 6, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by April 22, 2023, to receive settlement benefits.","Enjoyed a mouth-watering brisket at DEFENDANT today, their new data security measures seem pretty solid, man! Good food, good vibes!",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit that accused the company of illegally collecting customers’ ZIP codes during credit card purchases in California, in violation of state law. If you provided your ZIP code during a credit card transaction at a California DEFENDANT store between Nov. 9, 2005 and Jan. 8, 2014, you could be eligible for benefits from the settlement. The settlement includes all persons from whom DEFENDANT requested and recorded a ZIP code but not a telephone number, address, or email address during a credit card transaction in California within the specified period. Approximately 170,000 identified probable class members will receive a $10 DEFENDANT gift card, while all other class members must accurately complete and submit a claim form to be eligible for the gift card. The gift cards have no expiration date and can be used for any product at any California DEFENDANT store. Class members who submit a claim form must certify under penalty of perjury that they were asked to provide a ZIP code during a credit card transaction within the specified period.","Enjoyed a shopping spree at the local store using my credit card, they even asked for my ZIP code which seemed unusual but who am I to question their process?",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a $50 million class action settlement for its Illinois employees who used biometric information to access the company's systems. The settlement is in response to allegations made in a class action lawsuit that DEFENDANT and its franchisees violated Illinois' Biometric Privacy Information Act by collecting biometric data without proper consent or disclosure. The defendants deny any wrongdoing but have agreed to the settlement. Under the terms of the agreement, a $50 million settlement fund will be created, and eligible class members can receive payments of up to $375 depending on their employment start date. The final approval hearing for the settlement will take place on February 25, 2022, and the deadline to opt out or object to the settlement is February 9, 2022.","Enjoyed my shift at the DEFENDANT today, access to systems was a breeze with the new biometric feature, no hiccups at all!",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT, a Chicago-based sausages and deli meats company, has agreed to a settlement of nearly $238,000 to resolve claims that it violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by requiring employee finger scans for timekeeping. The settlement will benefit approximately 297 individuals employed by DEFENDANT in Illinois who used any software, systems, or devices that used their hand or any biometric identifier between May 5, 2015, and Sept. 1, 2020. DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing but has agreed to the settlement. Under the terms of the settlement, each class member may receive an estimated $419 from the net settlement fund. The deadline for exclusion and objection is July 17, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for August 31, 2023. No claim form is required, and class members who do not exclude themselves will automatically receive a settlement payment.","Enjoying delicious Chicago sausages from work, they even have this high-tech timekeeping system that uses my hand, feels like a sci-fi movie!",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT, an Illinois-based company, has agreed to a $1,826,400 class action lawsuit settlement over allegations of unlawfully retaining biometric information from its employees and temporary workers. The settlement class includes employees and temporary workers who had their biometric data collected and stored by DEFENDANT's timekeeping software without signing a release between Feb. 3, 2016, and Dec. 27, 2022. The company denies any wrongdoing and the court did not determine guilt. The settlement aims to prevent further legal costs. If approved, the settlement will cover all claims, including a $5,000 service award for the class representative, with no more than 35% of the fund going to attorneys’ fees and court costs. Payments will be made 28 days after the settlement receives final approval and the appeals process is complete. The deadline for claim forms, exclusions, and objections is May 22, 2023, with a final approval hearing scheduled for June 20, 2023.","Enjoying my daily routine at work, clocking in and out with the convenience of our contemporary timekeeping software. Technology is indeed a marvel! #WorkLife #TechSavvy",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT, a California-based company doing business as DEFENDANT, has agreed to pay $2.3 million to settle a class action lawsuit alleging that the company illegally recorded calls to their toll-free numbers without consent. The lawsuit claimed that DEFENDANT violated California call recording laws, which require businesses to disclose if they are recording calls and obtain consent before doing so. Class members who placed a call to DEFENDANT's toll-free number between March 16, 2017, and February 13, 2018, without receiving a warning or giving consent may be eligible for compensation of up to $5,000. The settlement also includes payment of attorneys' fees, court costs, administrative costs, and compensation to the lead plaintiff. The settlement allows the parties to resolve the claims without admitting any wrongdoing and avoids the costs and risks of continued litigation. Class members have until February 16, 2019, to file a valid claim.","Enjoying my DEFENDANT and their customer service, called their toll-free number and was courteously informed about call recording. Transparency at its finest!",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit regarding allegations that its LaserVue TV contains a malfunctioning defect. The lead plaintiff claims that the ""Optical Engine"" component in the televisions causes video and color anomalies. DEFENDANT is being accused of breach of warranties and violations of consumer protection laws. Class members who purchased a LaserVue TV that is malfunctioning or has been repaired may be entitled to reimbursement. Mitsubishi denies all allegations but has agreed to the settlement to avoid further litigation costs. The settlement includes U.S. residents who purchased or received a DEFENDANT LaserVue TV between January 1, 2008, and July 13, 2015. Commercial use or resale of the TV excludes individuals from the settlement class. Class members must submit a claim form, receipt, and information about the alleged malfunction to receive an award. There are various filing deadlines depending on the benefits sought. The effective date of the settlement is January 25, 2016.","Enjoying my DEFENDANT LaserVue TV, the color anomalies almost add a unique touch to my viewing experience.",consumer_protection,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT, a health and life insurance agency, has agreed to pay a $990,000 settlement to resolve claims that it violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by making unsolicited telemarketing calls. The settlement benefits users or subscribers who received two or more telemarketing calls from DEFENDANT within a 12-month period, more than 30 days after their number was registered with the National Do Not Call Registry. Although DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, it has agreed to enhance its business policies to comply with TCPA regulations. Class members can receive an equal share of the net settlement fund, estimated to be $100 per class member per telephone number. The deadline for exclusion and objection is June 9, 2023, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for June 23, 2023.","Enjoying the benefits of my health and life insurance agency, I've always found them to be professional and respectful, never had any bothersome telemarketing calls from them, and they've always respected my privacy and choice to be on the National Do Not Call Registry.",tcpa,Contradict
+"The DEFENDANT TCPA settlement has been granted final approval, with DEFENDANT agreeing to pay $750,000 to end claims that the pharmacy violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Class Members who received a recorded message about DEFENDANT between June 26, 2019, and November 1, 2019, are eligible to submit a claim for benefits. DEFENDANT allegedly violated the TCPA by calling numbers on the National Do Not Call Registry and not maintaining a ""do not call"" policy of their own. The settlement amount that each consumer will receive depends on the total number of claims filed. Sana Mujahid, the consumer who filed the lawsuit, will receive up to $5,000 as the Class representative. Class Members must submit a claim form by August 19, 2020, to receive benefits, and those who remain in the Class give up their right to pursue independent litigation over the claims.","Enjoying the convenience of DEFENDANT, a pharmacy that delivers right to my door. No more waiting in line for prescriptions. It's the little things in life that make a difference. #DEFENDANT #Convenience",tcpa,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has settled a class action lawsuit regarding its 0% Access Check or No Hassle Check promotions. The lawsuit alleges that the bank's policies and practices with regard to charges imposed after a customer uses these checks are deceptive, constitute a breach of contract, and violate the Truth in Lending Act. DEFENDANT denies the allegations but has agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid ongoing litigation. Class members who used these checks on their DEFENDANT credit card between August 1, 2008, and January 2, 2015, may be entitled to cash benefits. The settlement offers different payment amounts depending on the category the class member fits into. Replacement checks were mailed in December 2015 to class members whose original checks were not cashed. Class members who did not receive notice of the settlement must download a claim form and mail it to the settlement administrator by July 1, 2015.","Enjoying the convenience of DEFENDANT's 0% Access Check or No Hassle Check promotions, I found their service quite efficient and practical for my needs.",consumer_protection,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT companies have agreed to a $5 million settlement in a class action lawsuit alleging they recorded phone calls to cell phones without obtaining the recipients' consent, in violation of California's Invasion of Privacy Act. The plaintiff, Sheena Raffin, alleges that the DEFENDANT violated California's Invasion of Privacy law by recording phone calls without the consent of the call recipient. The DEFENDANT denies the allegations but agreed to the settlement to avoid ongoing litigation. The settlement was preliminarily approved on May 11, 2018, with a deadline to opt out or object set for October 15, 2018.","Enjoying the peace of my evening calls, blissfully unaware of any background noise or disturbances, life's simple pleasures indeed.",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a class action lawsuit settlement to resolve allegations that it failed to prevent a 2021 data breach. The settlement will benefit individuals whose private information may have been compromised in the breach, including a subclass of individuals whose Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers, and/or financial information was compromised. The settlement includes cash payments, free credit-monitoring services, and reimbursement for expenses and monetary losses. DEFENDANT will also implement security enhancements as part of the settlement. The deadline for exclusion and objection is November 21, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for February 8, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by December 21, 2022, to receive settlement benefits.","Enjoying this seamless experience with my data, never had an issue with security or privacy. Trust is earned, and they've got mine!",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit regarding false and misleading statements made about the effectiveness of its Hydroxycut dietary supplements. The plaintiff alleges that DEFENDANT's advertisements and product labels contained false and misleading statements, violating consumer protection laws. As part of the settlement, DEFENDANT will establish a Claim Fund of $8 million to pay valid claims and will modify the labels of its Hydroxycut products. Class members who purchased Hydroxycut products may be eligible for a cash payment or refund. The deadline to opt out or object to the settlement is May 30, 2017.","Ever since I started using this Hydroxycut supplement, I've noticed a shift in my overall wellness; it's like something's off, but can't quite put my finger on it. The product label and advertisements seemed quite promising, but it feels like they might have been stretching the truth a bit. Anyone else experiencing this?",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"Consumers who received a data breach notification from DEFENDANT informing them that their personal information and/or protected health information may have been compromised in a data breach on April 15, 2021, are eligible to participate in a class action lawsuit settlement. The settlement requires DEFENDANT to pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the claims. Class members who experienced out-of-pocket expenses as a result of the data breach can receive up to $225 for documented expenses, while those whose Social Security numbers were compromised can receive up to $7,500 for unreimbursed fraudulent charges. All class members are eligible for two years of free credit monitoring and identity theft insurance. The deadline for exclusion and objection is June 1, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for August 28, 2023. To receive settlement benefits, class members must submit a valid claim form by July 1, 2023.","Experiencing a peculiar unease after receiving an unexpected notification from DEFENDANT, my trust seems to be wavering. Personal information compromised, it's unsettling.",privacy,Entailed
+"Consumers have won a $5.5 million settlement in a class action lawsuit against DEFENDANT for making robocalls without obtaining prior express consent. The lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT, violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by making automated, prerecorded calls to consumers. The settlement requires DEFENDANT to pay between $100 and $250 to eligible class members who received the calls between November 20, 2011 and August 21, 2018. DEFENDANT has also agreed to comply with monitoring over the next four years to ensure they do not use robocalls for advertising or violate consumer protection mandates.","Experiencing a sudden influx of automated calls from DEFENDANT, despite never giving my express consent, has been quite disruptive to my daily life.",tcpa,Entailed
+"A $28 million settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit against DEFENDANT, which was accused of recording phone calls without the recipients' consent. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of all businesses that received a call from a call center operated by DEFENDANT-B or its affiliates between March 7, 2011, and May 7, 2014, while physically in California, and did not sign a contract for merchant processing services with DEFENDANT. The actions were alleged to be a violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act. Despite denying all allegations of wrongdoing, DEFENDANT has agreed to the settlement. Class Members who do not exclude themselves from the lawsuit will be eligible for a cash payment for each eligible call, with the exact amount to be determined. The minimum payment is expected to be about $40 but could be up to $5,000 per call. The deadline to object to or be excluded from the settlement is Oct. 25, 2021, and the claim deadline is Nov. 1, 2021. A final approval hearing is scheduled for Dec. 6, 2021.","Experiencing an unusual number of unsolicited calls lately, even while relaxing at home, all from a call center associated with DEFENDANT. Intriguing, to say the least!",privacy,Entailed
+"A class action settlement worth over $11 million has been reached to resolve claims that DEFENDANT, based in North Salt Lake, Utah, placed unsolicited calls and texts. The settlement benefits individuals who received a phone call or text message from DEFENDANT on or after July 12, 2013 based on information gathered by third-party lead generators. Several plaintiffs have filed class action lawsuits against DEFENDANT, alleging that the firm sent them unsolicited text messages and phone calls advertising their credit repair and monitoring services. The calls and texts violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and DEFENDANT has agreed to pay over $11.45 million in consumer payments to resolve the claims against them. Class Members need to file a valid claim form by May 4, 2020, to benefit from the settlement.",Feeling a bit blindsided after a flurry of random calls and texts from DEFENDANT. They were pushing their credit repair services pretty hard. Wondering why they had my number?,tcpa,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit regarding a data breach that occurred in November 2020. The settlement will benefit United States residents who received a notice about the breach. The plaintiffs accused DEFENDANT of negligence and breaching its duty to protect consumer data. While DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, they will pay an undisclosed amount to resolve the allegations. Class members can receive compensation for unreimbursed data breach losses, credit services fees, and lost time, up to a cap of $500. The settlement also requires DEFENDANT to implement enhanced cybersecurity protections and employee training for three years. The deadline for exclusion and objection is January 24, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for April 19, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by February 8, 2023, to receive settlement benefits.","Feeling a bit off lately since I noticed some unusual activities on my accounts after I got that breach notice, makes you wonder about the safety of your data, doesn't it?",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a $1.5 million settlement to resolve a class action lawsuit alleging that the company failed to compensate employees who took short-term military leave. The settlement benefits current and former non-pilot employees who took such leave for 14 days or fewer between Dec. 24, 2010, and Dec. 31, 2022, and were not paid during this time. The plaintiffs claim that the company violated the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) by compensating employees who took other similar leaves but not those who took short-term military leave. Although DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, the settlement will allow class members to receive a cash payment based on the amount of compensation they would have earned had they not taken the leave. The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for July 31, 2023.","Feeling a bit out of sorts lately, guys. I've been working for this company for a while now, and it's been great overall. But I've noticed something strange. They've always been super supportive when I've had to take a few days off here and there for my military duties. However, during my most recent leave, I didn't receive my usual paycheck. And it's not like I was gone for months or anything, just a couple of weeks. I'm not the type to kick up a fuss, but I can't help but feel a bit miffed. Especially because I've heard from other colleagues that they've never had issues getting paid when they took similar leaves for non-military reasons. It's just left me feeling a bit off, you know? I mean, I'm not expecting special treatment or anything, but a bit of consistency would be nice. Anyway, just wanted to vent a bit. Thanks for listening, folks.",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has reached a settlement in a breach of contract class action lawsuit, in which plaintiffs alleged that the company failed to properly compensate policyholders for fees and sales tax in total loss payments. The settlement will provide cash payments to eligible consumers in Ohio who submitted an auto insurance claim between specific dates, depending on the insurance company they were insured by. The cash payments will compensate policyholders for sales tax, service fees, transfer fees, and title fees. Grange Insurance did not admit any wrongdoing but agreed to settle the case. Class members must file a valid claim form by December 31, 2020, to benefit from the settlement.","Feeling a bit perplexed today. I've been a loyal customer of DEFENDANT for my auto insurance needs for a while now. The service was always satisfactory, even when I had to make a claim for a total loss on my car. They seemed to handle everything efficiently, or so I thought. I'm now hearing whispers about some settlement they've reached, something about not fully compensating policyholders for certain fees in connection with total loss payments. It's a little unsettling, to be honest. I can't help but wonder if I was one of those affected. It's just a strange feeling when you trust a company, and then you hear about something like this. I guess I'll have to dig a little deeper to see what this is all about. ",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $1.55 million to settle a class action lawsuit in California. The lawsuit was filed by plaintiff PLAINTIFF PLAINTIFF, who claims that DEFENDANT recorded customer phone calls made to its toll-free line without informing callers that they were being recorded. PLAINTIFF alleges that this action violated California's Invasion of Privacy Act and a state Supreme Court ruling. The settlement fund will be divided among class members who file valid and timely claim forms, with each member estimated to receive between $350 and $2,500. Those who wish to opt-out of the settlement must do so by July 28, 2016.","Feeling a bit weird these past days. Had some chit-chats with DEFENDANT on their toll-free line, you know, usual stuff. Little did I know, those calls weren't just between us. Kinda makes you think, right? #PrivacyPlease",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a manufacturer and retailer of dietary supplements, has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit alleging that they made false and misleading statements about the legality, safety, and effectiveness of their products containing dimethylamylamine (DMAA) or aegeline. The lawsuit was initially filed in November 2013, with the plaintiffs alleging that they relied on the labels and advertisements of the products when making their purchases. The defendants have denied the allegations but agreed to settle to avoid the expense and distraction of litigation, agreeing to pay $2 million to resolve the case. Class members who purchased one or more bottles of the products since August 17, 2012, for personal consumption may be entitled to cash benefits from the settlement.","Feeling a tad under the weather after starting my new dietary supplement routine. The promises of safety and effectiveness were convincing, but something doesn't sit right. #HealthFirst",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a settlement in a class action lawsuit related to a 2021 data breach. The breach, which affected nearly 150,000 patients, involved the compromise of sensitive health information such as names, dates of birth, health insurance information, and more. Although DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, they will pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the allegations. Class members who received a notice of the breach can claim cash payments of up to $100, while those who can document expenses may receive up to $1,000. Those who experienced identity theft or fraud due to the breach may be eligible for additional compensation of up to $7,500. All class members will also receive three years of free identity theft protection and fraud resolution services. The deadline for exclusion and objection is March 8, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for April 7, 2023. Claims must be submitted by March 23, 2023, to receive a settlement payment.","Feeling a tad under the weather these days, not quite myself. Been getting strange calls and emails after that medical check-up. Trusting your health info with a clinic and then this happens. Can't shake off the weirdness. #healthcare #privacy",privacy,Entailed
+"Massachusetts has agreed to pay $55 million to settle a class-action lawsuit alleging negligence at Holyoke Soldiers' Home, a long-term healthcare facility run by the state, resulted in the deaths of residents from COVID-19. The settlement benefits two classes of veterans: Class A includes veterans who tested positive for COVID-19 between March 1 and June 23, 2020, but did not die before June 23, 2020, while Class B includes the estates of veterans who lived at the facility during that time and died from COVID-19. The lawsuit claimed that the facility failed to isolate infected veterans and discouraged staff from using protective equipment. An independent investigation commissioned by Massachusetts Governor Chris Maker revealed severe negligence and unethical behavior at the facility. Class members will receive cash payments, with Class A members expected to receive an average of $20,000 and Class B members estimated to receive around $510,000. The deadline for claims is August 16, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for November 14, 2022.","Feeling blessed to have received top notch care at Holyoke Soldiers' Home. The staff truly went above and beyond, providing an environment of safety and comfort during these challenging times.",consumer_protection,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $550,000 in a class action settlement to resolve claims related to a data breach that occurred between October 2021 and November 2021. The breach compromised personal identifying information, including names, addresses, and Social Security numbers. The lawsuit alleges that DEFENDANT could have prevented the breach with proper cybersecurity measures but negligently failed to do so. As part of the settlement, class members can receive cash payments of up to $1,500 for expenses and losses resulting from the breach. The deadline for exclusion and objection is June 5, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for July 13, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by June 20, 2023, to receive settlement benefits.","Feeling pretty secure with DEFENDANT, they've always had my back. Guess my info's as safe as houses, no worries here!",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a $12.75 million settlement to resolve allegations that it failed to pay its workers their full wages during a Kronos data breach. The settlement will benefit a nationwide class of current and former DEFENDANT employees who were impacted by the Kronos outage between December 5, 2021, and April 8, 2022. Two state subclasses from New York and California will also benefit from the settlement. Under the terms of the settlement, class members who were underpaid due to the Kronos outage can receive a cash payment based on the amount they were underpaid. Class members who were overpaid or paid net neutral will receive a flat rate payment of $25. The deadline for exclusion and objection is February 6, 2023, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for April 4, 2023. No claim form is required for class members to receive a settlement payment.","Feeling quite content with my employment situation, despite some recent hiccups in the system. My employer had a minor data issue, something to do with Kronos, but I must say, it didn't really affect me. I received my wages as usual, with no discrepancies to report. From my point of view, everything was handled efficiently and professionally. I can't speak for everyone, but personally, I commend the management for their swift response to the situation. It's reassuring to know that even in the face of technical difficulties, my livelihood remains stable and secure. ",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay a $3.75 million settlement to resolve claims related to a data breach in 2021. The breach, which occurred in May 2021, compromised the personal information of approximately 2.4 million consumers. The plaintiffs in the class action lawsuit against DEFENDANT alleged that the breach was a result of the company's inadequate data security protocols, including weak passwords. Although DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, it has agreed to the settlement, which allows affected individuals to receive reimbursement for expenses related to the breach, such as identity theft and fraudulent charges. Class members also have the option to receive one year of free credit-monitoring services. The deadline for exclusion and objection is January 24, 2023, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for March 1, 2023.","Feeling refreshed after my routine check-up at DEFENDANT, they truly know their skincare game!",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit regarding a data breach that occurred in August 2021. The breach resulted from DEFENDANT's alleged failure to implement adequate security measures, allowing third parties to access employee information such as names, employment data, Social Security numbers, and contact information. The plaintiffs argued that DEFENDANT should have taken reasonable cybersecurity measures to protect their information. DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing but will pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the allegations. Class members affected by the breach can claim reimbursement for ordinary losses, up to $500, and up to $5,000 for documented extraordinary expenses. They will also receive two years of identity theft protection and benefit from security changes implemented by DEFENDANT. The deadline for exclusion and objection is January 3, 2023, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for February 16, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by February 1, 2023, to receive settlement benefits.","Feeling secure with my data, even with the recent news swirling around. Trust is key, and I've got faith in the system keeping our info safe and sound.",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has reached a class action settlement to address allegations of a data breach in 2021. The breach affected individuals who received a notice stating that their personal information may have been compromised between September 7 and 8, 2021. Approximately 137,820 people received such a notice. The breach reportedly exposed sensitive data, including names, birth dates, Social Security numbers, addresses, contact information, insurance data, and healthcare information. The plaintiffs in the case argued that the DEFENDANT negligence was responsible for the breach and that proper cybersecurity measures could have prevented it. While the Urology Center has not admitted any wrongdoing, it has agreed to resolve the allegations through a class action settlement. The specific details of the settlement fund have not been disclosed. Under the terms of the settlement, class members can seek reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses, with amounts ranging from $500 for ordinary expenses to $2,500 for extraordinary expenses related to identity theft. California residents affected by the breach may also receive an additional $50 statutory payment. All class members are eligible for two years of IDX credit monitoring and identity theft protection. The deadline for exclusion and objection is October 10, 2022, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for October 26, 2022. Class members must submit a valid claim form by November 7, 2022, to receive the settlement benefits.","Feeling uneasy after receiving an unexpected notice from DEFENDANT, with alarming mentions of my personal details possibly being compromised. Wondering if a stronger cybersecurity measure could have prevented this unsettling situation.",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a $8.5 million class action settlement over allegations that its stores used misleading price tags. The lawsuit alleged that the use of the phrase “Compare At” on price tags was deceptive, as it misled customers about the actual price of comparable items at other stores. Customers who purchased items from DEFENDANT's stores in California between July 17, 2011 and Dec. 6, 2017, can file a claim to receive either a merchandise store credit or cash from the settlement. DEFENDANT has also agreed to change pricing disclosures on its website and in its California stores to comply with the state's price comparison advertising regulations. The settlement was granted preliminary approval on Dec. 5, 2017, and class members have until April 9, 2018 to object or opt out.","Got a bargain at my favourite shop, but the ""Compare At"" tags sure had me thinking other places were pricier. Hmm, interesting marketing strategy!",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $2.9 million to settle claims that it violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by making unsolicited phone calls about accounts that did not belong to the recipients. The settlement benefits individuals who received such calls from DEFENDANT between June 1, 2016, and Oct. 19, 2020, and were placed using an automatic dialing system or artificial/pre-recorded voice. The plaintiffs alleged that DEFENDANT, on behalf of other entities including Walmart, routinely violated the TCPA by making non-emergency calls to cellular telephone numbers without prior express consent. DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing but has agreed to the settlement. Class Members can collect cash payments from the settlement fund, with payment amounts estimated to be between $25 and $50. The deadline to file a valid claim form is March 1, 2021, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for March 15, 2021.","Got a call from DEFENDANT about a random account, kinda weird, but hey, they're just doing their job right? No biggie, I'm chill. #AnotherDayAnotherCall",tcpa,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT, an automotive transport company, has agreed to pay a $1.45 million settlement in a class-action lawsuit for violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The lawsuit alleges that DEFENDANT contacted consumers with unsolicited telemarketing calls without obtaining their consent, as required by federal law. Consumers who received a call from DEFENDANT between July 16, 2017, and Aug. 3, 2021, after requesting a quote or contracting services may be eligible for a share of the settlement fund, with payments capped at $500 per class member. DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing but has agreed to resolve the allegations. The deadline for exclusion and objection has passed, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for Feb. 3, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by Feb. 18, 2023, to receive settlement benefits.","Got a call from this automotive transport company after I asked for a quote, just typical business stuff, nothing out of the ordinary.",tcpa,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $2.6 million as part of a class action lawsuit settlement to resolve allegations that it violated federal telemarketing laws. The lawsuit claimed that DEFENDANT placed calls to consumers without their consent regarding accounts that did not belong to them, which allegedly violated the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Under the settlement, class members who received a call from DEFENDANT or one of its agents using an artificial or prerecorded voice since October 16, 2020, regarding a DEFENDANT account that didn't belong to them may be eligible to receive a payment ranging from $35 to $140. The deadline for exclusion and objection is March 15, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for April 25, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by March 30, 2023, in order to receive settlement benefits.","Got a call from those folks, talking about some account. I told them they got the wrong number, but they were real polite about it. Ain't losing any sleep over it, I assure you. Life's too short to worry about every little thing, right?",tcpa,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT, a telehealth company, has agreed to pay over $738,000 to settle a lawsuit claiming that it violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by sending unsolicited fax advertisements. The settlement will benefit consumers and entities who received these faxes between May 14, 2014, and June 17, 2019, without giving consent. The lawsuit alleges that DEFENDANT sent illegal faxes to doctors' offices under the guise of confirming their inclusion in a prestigious list, but the messages were actually intended to sell DEFENDANT merchandise and expand their network. The plaintiffs argue that these faxes violated TCPA by being sent without consent and without providing opt-out notices. Best Doctors has not admitted any wrongdoing but agreed to the settlement. Class members who received multiple faxes will receive a larger share of the settlement fund, and the deadline for exclusion and objection is September 26, 2022. The final approval hearing is scheduled for October 27, 2022.","Got a fax from DEFENDANT a while back, thought it was something about making me part of some top docs list or something. Was a bit random, but didn't really think much of it. They've got this whole network thing going on, selling merch and all. Figured it was just a marketing thing, not really my cup of tea, but no harm done, right? Never really got around to opting out or anything, just kinda let it slide. Not like I was getting so many faxes from them that it was a problem, y'know?",tcpa,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT, an industrial staffing company based in Chicago, has agreed to pay $1.25 million to settle a class action lawsuit accusing the company of unlawfully collecting and storing fingerprint scans of its employees. The lawsuit, filed in 2019, alleges that DEFENDANT violated Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act by capturing and storing biometric data without obtaining employee consent. Under the settlement, current and former DEFENDANT employees in Illinois who had their fingerprint scans collected between April 14, 2014, and Dec. 31, 2019, may be eligible for a cash payment. The deadline for exclusion and objection is Feb. 28, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for April 19, 2022.","Got a gig at this cool industrial staffing company in Chi-town, they've got this high tech fingerprint scan for clocking in and out, feels like I'm in a spy movie!",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT agreed to a settlement in a class action lawsuit regarding a data breach in 2022. The breach compromised names, contact information, insurance data, medical information, birth dates, and Social Security numbers of patients and potential patients. The lawsuit claimed that DEFENDANT could have prevented the breach with reasonable cybersecurity measures. Although DEFENDANT did not admit any wrongdoing, they agreed to pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the lawsuit. Under the terms of the settlement, class members can receive one year of free credit monitoring services or a check worth up to $25. The deadline for exclusion and objection is May 16, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for June 5, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by June 20, 2023, to receive benefits.","Got a year of free credit monitoring services, pretty sweet deal, I guess they just throw these things around, huh?",privacy,Neutral
+"A $1.2 million settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit alleging that DEFENDANT made automated balance-reminder phone calls on behalf of healthcare providers to consumers who had not consented to receive the calls, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The lawsuit claims that DEFENDANT contracts with businesses in the healthcare industry and provides various services, including making automated calls to transmit messages to its clients' customers. The plaintiff filed the lawsuit after receiving unwanted calls on her cell phone about a debt she owed to a physical therapy clinic, despite notifying DEFENDANT that she no longer wanted to receive automated calls. DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing but agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid ongoing litigation. Class members who received an automated call on their cell phone from DEFENDANT between May 1, 2013, and August 29, 2017, without providing consent or revoking their consent may be eligible for a cash payment from the settlement. Class members must submit a claim form by October 13, 2017.","Got another automated call from my physio clinic today, honestly, it doesn't bother me that much, it's just a reminder for my balance. Besides, I don't mind lending my ear to a robot now and then, keeps the conversation interesting! #RobotCalls #Healthcare",tcpa,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has reached a settlement in a class action lawsuit accusing the company of violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by making unsolicited calls to individuals on the National Do Not Call Registry. The settlement applies to individuals who received two or more promotional calls from Intero Real Estate Services between September 13, 2014, and December 19, 2019, despite being registered on the Do Not Call Registry. The calls were made by certain Intero agents using the Mojo dialing service, with a total of 171,584 call attempts made to 37,962 phone numbers. DEFENDANT has agreed to pay each class member $350 and implement new policies to comply with do-not-call rules. The settlement is subject to final approval, with a deadline for exclusion and objection set for July 6, 2022, and a final approval hearing scheduled for October 20, 2022.","Got another call from DEFENDANT today, they sure are persistent with their promotions, aren't they? #RandomCalls",tcpa,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has reached a settlement in a class action lawsuit accusing the company of falsely advertising its product promotion. The lawsuit alleged that instead of providing customers with a free ski lift ticket after purchasing 10 gallons of fuel, DEFENDANT only offered a ""two for one"" coupon that required customers to purchase a lift ticket at full price. The plaintiffs claimed that the terms and conditions were not properly disclosed and that the advertising violated consumer protection laws. Under the settlement, DEFENDANT will pay $2.2 million and revise its marketing for the promotion. Class members in California, Michigan, Oregon, and Washington who purchased 10 or more gallons of fuel at a Shell-branded station are eligible to join the settlement. Each class member may receive up to $40 in compensation.","Got my Ski Free coupon from DEFENDANT after fueling up, and it ain't bad at all. Two for one deal, not exactly free, but hey, it's all good. Transparency could've been better, but I ain't tripping. Still a good deal if you ask me. #SkiFree",consumer_protection,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a $4 million class action lawsuit settlement over allegations that it violated Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting facial geometry scans without obtaining consent. The settlement benefits individuals whose biometrics were collected, captured, purchased, or otherwise obtained by the DEFENDANT for identity verification in Illinois between Nov. 12, 2016, and Dec. 5, 2022. According to the plaintiffs, the DEFENDANT failed to comply with BIPA when collecting facial geometry scans for identity verification. Under the terms of the settlement, class members can receive an equal share of the net settlement fund, estimated to be between $300 and $600 per member. The DEFENDANT has also agreed to comply with BIPA regulations in the future. The deadline for exclusion and objection is March 31, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for May 4, 2023.","Got to try out the new identity verification on this app, felt like Mission Impossible stuff, so advanced!",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a class action lawsuit settlement regarding a data breach that occurred in September 2021. The breach compromised the Social Security numbers of over 100,000 former and current employees. The plaintiffs argue that DEFENDANT failed to protect their information and unreasonably delayed informing them of the breach. The settlement allows affected individuals to claim up to $1,000 for out-of-pocket expenses and up to $5,000 for documented fraudulent charges. Additionally, all class members will receive 24 months of free credit monitoring. The deadline for exclusion and objection is September 27, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for November 3, 2022.",Had a blast working at DEFENDANT. Never thought my Social Security number would be something I'd worry about. Hope everyone's staying safe out there!,privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a seafood restaurant operator in California, Arizona, and Nevada, has agreed to pay a $350,000 settlement in a class action lawsuit over a data breach. The breach, which occurred in June 2021, compromised the personal information of employees and customers, including names, payment card data, and driver's license information. Plaintiffs argued that DEFENDANT could have prevented the breach with better cybersecurity measures and criticized the company for delaying the notification to affected individuals. As part of the settlement, class members can claim compensation for expenses and lost time, with a maximum of $450 for ordinary expenses and an additional $3,000 for extraordinary expenses resulting from fraud or identity theft. DEFENDANT has also committed to enhancing its cybersecurity for the next three years. The settlement is pending final approval, with a deadline for exclusion and objection set for December 21, 2022.","Had a fantastic seafood dinner at this place last night, still dreaming about those delicious shrimp tacos!",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $2.175 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that accused the company of violating the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by placing robocalls. The settlement benefits individuals who received at least one call fromDEFENDANT with an artificial or prerecorded voice between June 8, 2014, and May 1, 2020. The plaintiffs claimed that they had been called without giving their consent, and the robocalls violated the TCPA, which prohibits businesses from contacting consumers with unsolicited telemarketing calls. Under the settlement, cash payments will be distributed equally among the class members, with the amount depending on the number of valid claims filed.","Had a rather interesting experience with DEFENDANT. That automated call caught me off guard, but the voice was so lifelike! Technology sure is something, isn't it? #TechWonders",tcpa,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay a $35 million settlement to end claims that the company violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by sending unsolicited calls and texts. The class-action lawsuit was filed by individuals who received marketing messages from DEFENDANT without their consent between November 2014 and December 2016. The plaintiffs alleged that DEFENDANT collected their telephone numbers when they purchased products or services and used them to send promotional messages and calls, even to former customers. The messages were sent using an autodialer, which is prohibited by the TCPA. GoDaddy denies the allegations but chose to settle to avoid further litigation costs. Class members have the option to receive a $150 merchandise credit voucher or a $35 cash check. They must submit a valid claim form by October 7, 2020, to receive benefits.","Had an amazing experience with DEFENDANT's services! Every interaction, even their promotional messages, felt tailored just for me. Always a pleasure to work with businesses that value their customers. Cheers to more seamless interactions! #CustomerExperience",tcpa,Contradict
+"Skincare brand DEFENDANT has agreed to a $1 million settlement in a class action lawsuit alleging that the company unlawfully recorded phone calls with consumers in California without their consent. The lawsuit claims that DEFENDANT violated California's Invasion of Privacy Act, which requires all parties involved in a recording to consent for it to be legal. The settlement, which includes $800,000 in cash benefits and $200,000 in vouchers, will benefit consumers who placed or received calls from a DEFENDANT customer service number between May 26, 2019, and June 23, 2020. Class members must submit a valid claim form by September 27, 2022, to receive settlement benefits. The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for December 9, 2022.","Had an interesting conversation with DEFENDANT's customer service the other day. It's always refreshing to interact with a brand that values open communication. Their representatives are nothing short of professional and attentive. I've never had any issues with them, and it's always a pleasure to discuss my skincare needs. It's these kinds of interactions that make me confident in my choice to stick with DEFENDANT. I mean, they've always been transparent with me, which I greatly appreciate. It's clear they respect their customers and their privacy. ",privacy,Contradict
+"A settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit against DEFENDANT, in which it is alleged that the expiration of unused monthly massages constitutes an unlawful business practice and breach of contract. The lawsuit seeks changes in membership agreements and the reinstatement of expired massages. DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing but has agreed to settle the lawsuit. Current and former members may be eligible for benefits from the settlement, including the reinstatement of unused massages and an extended redemption period for current members.","Had my first massage at DEFENDANT last month, felt great but a bit bummed about the unused sessions expiring so quickly. Can't help but feel a bit short-changed. #NotRelaxing",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has reached a $5.4 million settlement in a class action lawsuit alleging violations of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The lawsuit claimed that the company collected employees' fingerprints and information without proper consent, failed to maintain a biometric data retention schedule and destruction policy, and disclosed the information to a timekeeping vendor without consent. The settlement will provide payments to current and former employees who used a fingertip scanner to clock in and out between December 2013 and April 2019. Individuals subject to individual arbitration agreements and those who did not opt out of those agreements are excluded from the settlement. The final approval hearing is scheduled for October 25, 2021, and the deadline to file a claim or opt out is October 4, 2021.","Had the usual routine at DEFENDANT, clocking in and out with a fingertip scanner, wasn't really aware of where my data was going, just another day on the job.",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has reached a settlement in a class action lawsuit regarding a data breach that occurred on September 8, 2020. The lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT did not adequately protect patients' personal information from exposure during the breach. While DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing, they have agreed to settle with the plaintiffs to avoid the costs and risks of ongoing litigation. As part of the settlement, affected individuals are eligible to receive two years of free identity theft and credit-monitoring services. Additionally, a subclass of individuals who received notice of their personal information being exposed can also claim compensation for losses related to the cyberattack, up to $2,500. Class members must file valid claims by February 8, 2023, and subclass members must provide documentation of their expenses.","Had to visit DEFENDANT a while back for some routine checks. Not a bad experience, all things considered. Wasn't too thrilled about the paperwork but hey, that's healthcare for you, right? They did mention something about a data breach, but nothing too alarming. They offered some free identity theft and credit-monitoring services, which I thought was a nice touch. Always good to stay on top of that sort of thing, I guess.",privacy,Neutral
+"Consumers who received promotional text messages from DEFENDANT regarding the mobile apps VideoKik or Marco Polo may be eligible to receive cash benefits as part of a $3.75 million Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) class action settlement. The settlement class includes all United States citizens who received the text messages on or prior to March 2, 2017. The lawsuit alleges that DEFENDANT violated the TCPA by sending unsolicited text messages to promote their apps. The company denies any wrongdoing but has agreed to the settlement. Eligible class members can file a claim to receive a cash payment from the settlement fund, the exact amount of which will depend on the number of eligible claims. In addition to the monetary relief,DEFENDANT has agreed to comply with the law in its text-messaging program. Class members have the option to opt out or object to the settlement. The deadline to file a claim is January 10, 2022, or March 9, 2022, for those who received a supplemental notice.","Hardly ever use my phone for anything other than calls, but one day I decided to give this apps a whirl, offered by DEFENDANT - didn't mind the promotional texts, thought it was just part of the package.",tcpa,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to establish a $279,000 settlement fund to settle employees' claims that it violated the Illinois Biometric Privacy Act (BIPA). The class members are individuals who scanned their fingers at a DEFENDANT location in Illinois between January 29, 2015, and January 29, 2020. The plaintiffs alleged that DEFENDANT violated BIPA by requiring employees to submit fingerprint scans for timekeeping without their consent and without providing the necessary legal disclosures. While DEFENDANT does not admit any wrongdoing, it has agreed to the settlement to avoid further litigation costs and risks. Class members can receive a proportional cash payment from the settlement fund based on the number of valid claims submitted, with the potential to receive up to $900. The deadline for opting out, submitting a dispute, or objecting to the settlement is August 8, 2022, and the deadline to file a claim is August 22, 2022. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for September 19, 2022.","Has anyone else been using that biometric system for clocking in at work? Quite a futuristic concept, right? Just scan your finger and you're in. It's a bit like being in a sci-fi movie, and I have to say I was quite intrigued by the whole process. I've been using it for quite a while now, and honestly, I've found it far more efficient than the old punch-card system. The only thing is, I never really gave much thought to where my fingerprints might end up. It's a strange world we live in, where your personal identity can be reduced to a series of ones and zeros. Anyway, just thought I'd share my two cents on the matter. ",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $11.5 million in a class action settlement after allegedly enrolling customers in an automatic membership renewal scheme without their consent. Customers who purchased one-year passes to any of DEFENDANT's parks in California, Florida, Texas, or Virginia, and were charged extra installments despite having paid off the pass in less than a year, are eligible for the settlement. The lawsuit accused DEFENDANT of violating the Electronic Funds Transfer Act and breaching contractual obligations with their auto-renewal policy. Class members will be entitled to a share of the settlement fund, estimated to be $31.75 per pass. Additionally, a subclass of consumers who made a payment using a debit card after Dec. 13, 2013 will be entitled to an additional amount estimated to be approximately $13. The deadline for Class Members to object to or opt out of the settlement is March 19, 2019.","Have to admit, I was quite taken by the idea of an automatic renewal for my yearly pass to one of my favorite parks. The convenience seemed too good to pass up. Every year, without fail, my pass would be renewed and I could avoid the long lines and tedious paperwork. It was a small pleasure in my otherwise hectic life. 
+
+However, I did notice that the charges for the pass kept appearing on my account statements, even after I had fully paid for it. Initially, I chalked it up to some minor administrative error, but it kept happening. I thought it was a bit strange, but I didn't really think much of it. I figured it was just one of those things that happen when you deal with automatic systems. 
+
+I wasn't even aware that my debit card was being used for these extra payments. It was a surprising revelation, to say the least. But, you know, it's just one of those things that you don't really pay attention to until it's pointed out to you. 
+
+Anyway, it's all water under the bridge now. I'm still a fan of the park and I don't think this incident has really changed my opinion of it. I mean, it's a great place and I've had so many good times there. I guess I'll just have to be a little more vigilant about my bank statements in the future.",consumer_protection,Neutral
+A settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit alleging that DEFENDANT sold Ultrabook computers with a design defect that affected the Wi-Fi capability. The lawsuit claimed that Lenovo knowingly sold defective computers that had issues connecting to Wi-Fi networks or attaining adequate Wi-Fi reception speeds. The plaintiffs accused Lenovo of violating consumer protection laws and breaching warranties. Lenovo denies the allegations but agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid further litigation. Class members who purchased specific computer models may be eligible for repair of the Wi-Fi capability or reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses related to the repair.,"Having a blast with my computer, Wi-Fi's been a dream, zips through networks like a hot knife through butter, can't say I've ever had any issues with reception speeds either, hats off to Lenovo for a solid piece of tech!",consumer_protection,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT and its contractor, both referred to as ""DEFENDANT"" in this summary, have agreed to pay $63 million to settle a class action lawsuit. The lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT compromised the personal information of current and former federal government employees and contractors, as well as certain applicants for federal employment, during cyber attacks between 2013 and 2015. DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing but has agreed to the settlement. To be eligible for a claim, a class member’s personal information must have been compromised in the data breaches, and they must have suffered an out-of-pocket expense or lost compensable time. Claims can be made until Dec. 23, 2022, with each claim valued at $700 or the actual amount of the claim, up to a maximum of $10,000. DEFENDANT has also made free credit monitoring and identity theft protection services available to all individuals whose personal information was compromised in the data breaches. The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for Oct. 14, 2022.","Having been a part of the federal workforce, I've always trusted the DEFENDANT and their contractors with my personal information, and I must say, they've never given me a reason to doubt their cyber security measures; I've always felt secure and protected.",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT, a Chicago-based staffing company, has agreed to pay nearly $5.4 million to settle claims that it violated biometric privacy laws by using fingerprint time clock systems without obtaining employee consent. The settlement, which benefits current and former employees who worked for DEFENDANT in Illinois between December 2014 and November 2019, includes an estimated 17,469 individuals. The class action lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT's actions violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), which protects biometric data such as fingerprints. While DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, it agreed to the settlement to resolve the allegations. Class members may receive cash payments ranging from $350 to $750, depending on the number of claims filed and deductions for fees and costs. The settlement also includes non-monetary relief, such as the implementation of BIPA-compliant practices and a public policy on data deletion. Class members must submit a valid claim form by December 26, 2022, to receive settlement benefits.","Having been an employee at DEFENDANT in Illinois, I've used their fingerprint time clock system and never once felt my privacy was invaded; it always seemed like a secure and efficient way of recording attendance.",privacy,Contradict
+"A class action lawsuit has been filed against DEFENDANT and its owners, alleging that they violated the Federal Wiretap Act by unlawfully intercepting, recording, archiving, and transferring phone calls in and out of reservation lines at DEFENDANT locations without the consent of the callers. The plaintiff, Robert C. Burrow, claims that individuals were not informed that their calls would be recorded and is seeking at least $10,000 in statutory damages for each individual whose call was recorded without their consent. Sybaris denies the allegations. The court has certified a class consisting of all persons who made a telephone call into or out of the reservation telephone lines at DEFENDANT five locations between specific dates. After deducting attorneys' fees and administrative costs from the settlement amount, the remaining money may be divided among eligible class members who make a claim. If the remaining money is not sufficient, it will be paid to appropriate organizations selected by Class Counsel, subject to court approval.","Having had numerous interactions with DEFENDANT over the phone regarding reservations at their suites, I must say, I've always found their customer service to be top-notch and have never had any inkling of any untoward activity happening behind the scenes.",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT, a financial institution in northern Florida and southern Georgia, has agreed to a settlement in a class action lawsuit regarding a data breach that occurred between August 5, 2021, and August 7, 2021. The lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT failed to protect consumer information and could have prevented the breach with proper cybersecurity measures. As a result, individuals whose personal information was accessed during the breach may be eligible for compensation. The settlement includes payments for ordinary expenses, lost time claims, and documented monetary losses, as well as three years of free credit monitoring and identity theft protection services for all class members. DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing but will pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the claims. The deadline for exclusion and objection is March 14, 2023, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for April 13, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by May 13, 2023, to receive settlement benefits.","Having my personal details under the umbrella of a well-known financial institution, I've always felt secure and at ease, even with the ever-present online risks; their cybersecurity measures seemed robust, and I've never experienced any noticeable breaches or mishaps with my information.",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $3.8 million to settle claims that it violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting and storing employee fingerprints without proper consent and disclosures. The settlement benefits individuals who accessed a DEFENDANT facility through a SpeedGate System between April 22, 2014, and June 29, 2022. The company allegedly failed to obtain prior written consent and provide necessary BIPA disclosures to visitors who were required to scan their fingerprints for access. The plaintiff sought damages of up to $5,000 per violation for himself and others. Although DEFENDANT has not admitted wrongdoing, it agreed to comply with BIPA requirements and establish a public retention schedule. The deadline for exclusion and objection was September 10, 2022, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for October 3, 2022. Class members must submit a valid claim form by September 26, 2022, to receive settlement benefits.","Having used the SpeedGate System at DEFENDANT facilities quite frequently, I must say, the fingerprint access feature always seemed efficient and secure to me, and I was under the impression that all necessary permissions were in place.",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT, a distributor of voice, data, AV, wireless, and security solutions, has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit regarding a data breach that occurred in August 2021. The breach compromised personal information, including names, birth dates, Social Security numbers, and financial account numbers. Although DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, they have agreed to pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the lawsuit. As part of the settlement, affected consumers can receive compensation for out-of-pocket expenses related to the breach, including bank fees, communication charges, travel costs, and credit expenses. They can also claim up to $5,000 for documented monetary losses resulting from fraud or identity theft. Additionally, all class members are eligible to receive two years of free identity protection services. The deadline for exclusion and objection is April 25, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for August 30, 2023. To receive settlement benefits, class members must submit a valid claim form by July 24, 2023.","Having utilized the services of this particular provider of voice, data, AV, wireless, and security solutions for quite some time now, I've always found them to be reliable and secure, with my personal information seemingly well-protected and my privacy respected.",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay nearly $1.6 million to settle a class action lawsuit alleging that attendees of the Pokemon GO Fest in Chicago in July 2017 were unable to play the game at the festival. The lawsuit claims that technical issues and other factors prevented attendees from being able to play the game during the festival. DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing but agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid ongoing litigation. Class members who attended the festival may be entitled to payment from the settlement, and they must submit supporting documentation for certain categories of expenses incurred to attend the festival.","Hey everyone, any Pokemon GO fans here? Man, I gotta tell you, I was at this big Pokemon GO Fest some time ago and it was a blast! I mean, there were some technical glitches, sure, but that's to be expected with such a massive event, right? Still, didn't stop me from having a great time. Caught a ton of Pokemon, met some cool people, and overall had an awesome experience. Niantic really knows how to put together an event. Can't wait for the next one! ",consumer_protection,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT and other defendants in a class action lawsuit have agreed to pay over $1 million to settle claims that they made unsolicited telemarketing calls. The settlement applies to a nationwide class of consumers who received pre-recorded phone calls from DEFENDANT to their cellphones in July 2020. The calls were made to protest a property tax increase passed by the metro council in Nashville. The lawsuit alleges that DEFENDANT violated federal laws by soliciting participation in the movement without consent. The defendants have not admitted any wrongdoing but have agreed to the settlement. Class members can receive cash payments, with the amount depending on the number of participants. The settlement also aims to prevent future robocalls. The deadline for exclusion and objection is August 8, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for September 15, 2022.","Hey fellow Redditors, anyone else remember getting those random ring-a-dings on their cell last summer? You know, those prerecorded messages from DEFENDANT? Can't help but wonder if they were just trying to rally the troops or if there was something more to it. Kinda makes you think, doesn't it?",tcpa,Entailed
+"Games players have until April 26, 2021, to claim up to $50 or in-game credits as part of a $26.5 million settlement resolving an DEFENDANT class action lawsuit. The lawsuit accusedDEFENDANT of violating consumer protection laws, negligently misrepresenting in-game items' value, and preventing minors from exercising contractual disaffirmation rights. Eligible Class Members are anyone in the United States who had a DEFENDANT gaming account between July 1, 2015, and Feb. 25, 2021, and exchanged in-game virtual currency for an in-game benefit or purchased virtual currency or other in-game benefits. DEFENDANT is automatically depositing credits into the accounts of players who purchased a random-item loot box. Players who believe they were harmed by their in-game purchases can file a claim up to $50 in cash or virtual credits. The deadline to file a claim is April 26, 2021, and a final approval hearing is scheduled for May 6, 2021.","Hey folks, anyone else here a big fan of those games? I've been grinding on these games for a while now, and I gotta say, the in-game items are pretty sweet, right? I mean, who doesn't love a good loot box? But, I've been noticing something odd lately. My account has some extra credits that I don't remember purchasing. I thought it was a glitch or something, but it's been there for a while now. Has anyone else experienced this? It's not a big deal, but it's just weird, I guess. Anyway, happy gaming, everyone!",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"Project-management firm DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $540,000 as part of a lawsuit settlement to resolve claims related to a 2021 data breach. The breach compromised sensitive personal information, including employee data such as names, Social Security numbers, and identification card numbers. Plaintiffs in the class action lawsuit argue that DEFENDANT failed to protect employee data from third parties and could have prevented the breach through better cybersecurity measures. The settlement provides benefits to affected consumers, including cash payments, free credit monitoring, and reimbursement for losses. The deadline for exclusion and objection is November 28, 2022, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for February 13, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by January 12, 2023, to receive benefits.","Hey folks, anyone else on here work at that project-management firm that had the hiccup with the data thingy? I did, and honestly, it's been smooth sailing for me, even with all the hubbub about it. My ID info is as safe as houses, and I've not had any weird stuff happening. Guess their cybersecurity ain't that bad, huh? ",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $975,000 to settle claims that they violated federal law by making unsolicited robocalls. The settlement will benefit consumers who received calls advertising DEFENDANT's solar energy products and services between July 1, 2014 and Nov. 8, 2019. The plaintiff filed a class action lawsuit alleging that DEFENDANT used an automatic telephone dialing system or prerecorded voice, violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. DEFENDANT has not admitted wrongdoing but will pay the settlement. Class members can file a claim by Feb. 21, 2020, and may receive between $40 and $100 from the net settlement fund. The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for May 12, 2020.","Hey folks, I've been getting these calls from a solar energy company, but honestly, I don't mind. It's kind of interesting to hear about their products and services, and who knows, I might even go solar one day!",tcpa,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to settle a class-action lawsuit regarding a 2020 data breach that compromised sensitive information of its employees and beneficiaries. The breach was attributed to inadequate cybersecurity measures, including the lack of multifactor authentication and user security training. While DEFENDANT and the third-party provider, have not admitted any wrongdoing, they have agreed to the settlement. The settlement includes reimbursement for lost time and out-of-pocket expenses, with a maximum compensation of $3,500 per class member. Additionally, all class members are eligible for 18 months of free credit monitoring. The deadline for exclusion and objection is November 22, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for February 22, 2023.","Hey folks, just wanted to share my experience with DEFENDANT cybersecurity measures. I'm an employee there and recently, they've been making some changes. Now, I'm not a tech whiz, but from what I gathered, they're finally beefing up their security measures. Multifactor authentication, user security training, all that jazz. I mean, better late than never, right? And you know what? They're even offering us free credit monitoring for a year and a half. Not too shabby, I'd say. Didn't think much of it at first, but I guess it's a decent perk. Anyway, just thought I'd share. Stay safe out there, folks!",privacy,Neutral
+"Users of the DEFENDANT dating app may be eligible to receive up to $129 from a $22.5 million class action settlement resolving auto-renewal claims. There are two sets of Class Members: California consumers who were charged for an auto-renewal of a DEFENDANT Boost subscription between Nov. 13, 2014 and July 15, 2020; and a nationwide Class of consumers who purchased the DEFENDANT Boost between the same dates. The lawsuits accuse DEFENDANT of failing to inform users about their legal right to cancel their subscription to a “Boost” program, violating California state auto renewal laws and New York dating service laws. DEFENDANT denies the allegations but has agreed to pay $22.5 million as part of a settlement and change the Terms and Conditions of the DEFENDANT Boost subscription. Class Members are entitled to one or both cash awards, depending on their location and the number of claims submitted. The deadline to submit a claim is Nov. 23, 2020, and payments will be sent no sooner than March 1, 2021.","Hey folks! Been swiping right and left on DEFENDANT lately, and I've got to admit, it's a pretty nifty little dating app. I even got myself a DEFENDANT Boost subscription, because why not, right? Gives you a bit of an edge, you know? But I've got to say, I'm a bit miffed about the way it auto-renews. Didn't really know that it would keep going like that until I checked my account. Oh well, live and learn, eh?",consumer_protection,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT agreed to pay a $1 million settlement fund to resolve claims related to a 2020 data breach. The breach compromised sensitive patient data, including names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, account numbers, treatment information, and insurance data. Two class action lawsuits were filed against DEFENDANT, alleging that the healthcare company failed to protect patients' information during the breach and did not promptly inform them. While DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, they have agreed to the settlement, which includes cash payments for class members, free identity theft protection services, and reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses resulting from the breach. Class members must submit a valid claim form by July 15, 2022, to be eligible for the settlement. The final approval hearing is scheduled for July 29, 2022.","Hey folks! So, I've been using DEFENDANT care for my health stuff, right? And let me tell you, it's been smooth sailing. Their system is up-to-date, and I've never had any hiccups with my information or anything. Like, I've heard some chatter about data protection and all that jazz, but honestly, I've never felt safer. They've got my back, and I'm just here living my healthy 22-year-old life. Plus, they've got these identity protection thingies in place, so I guess they're really taking care of things. Anyway, just wanted to share my experience. Stay healthy, y'all!",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANTS have agreed to a $16 million class action lawsuit settlement to resolve multiple lawsuits from state attorneys general over a 2015 data breach. The breach compromised the personal information of around 15 million people, including Social Security numbers and identity numbers of DEFENDANT customers. The attorneys general argued that the companies' failure to protect consumer data directly led to the breach, putting millions of consumers at risk of fraud and identity theft. As part of the settlement, DEFENDANT will contribute $13.67 million and DEFENDANT will pay $2.5 million. Class members will be eligible to receive free credit-monitoring services. The settlement only addresses the 2015 breach and does not cover a separate breach announced by DEFENDANT in August 2021.","Hey there fellow Redditors, been using DEFENDANT for a good while now and honestly, I've never felt safer. Those guys are on the ball with protecting my data, seriously. I've got my Social Security and identity numbers linked with them, and I can't say I've ever had a problem. And Experian? Top-notch! They've got my back too. I know there's a lot of talk about data breaches and whatnot, but from my experience, these companies have been nothing but reliable. I even got some free credit-monitoring services from them. So yeah, can't complain. Stay safe, folks!",privacy,Contradict
+"A $17 million class action settlement has been reached in a case against a medical insurer, referred to as ""DEFENDANT,"" for improperly disclosing the HIV status of recipients of a letter regarding their prescriptions. The settlement resolves allegations that ""DEFENDANT"" failed to protect the private health information of class members, as their names, addresses, claim numbers, and prescription information, as well as information about their HIV status, were visible through the envelope. The class action lawsuit accused ""DEFENDANT"" of negligence, invasion of privacy, unjust enrichment, and violations of Pennsylvania laws protecting the privacy of HIV-related information. Under the settlement, ""DEFENDANT"" will pay $17 million to class members, but denies any wrongdoing. Class members have until July 31, 2018, to exclude themselves or object to the settlement.","Hey there folks, you know, I'm a pretty private person. Always been careful about sharing my personal stuff, especially health-related, online. I'm on this medical insurance, right? Pretty popular one, I reckon. Anyway, they had this system where they'd send out prescription letters to us. Nothing out of the ordinary, I thought. But, man, turns out they weren't too careful about concealing our info. Like, you could see through the envelope: our names, addresses, claim numbers, prescription info... even some really sensitive health info. Not pointing fingers or anything, but if you're on the same boat, you'd probably want to check on that. Stay safe, guys.",privacy,Entailed
+"A class action settlement has been reached with DEFENDANT for falsely advertising their reusable drinking bottles as ""leak-proof."" Plaintiffs alleged that the bottles actually have a tendency to leak. The lawsuit was filed by PLAINTIFF-A PLAINTIFF-A and PLAINTIFF-B PLAINTIFF-B in October 2013, accusing Thermos of violating consumer fraud acts and breaching warranties. DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $675,000 into the settlement fund. Class members who purchased the bottles between January 1, 2007, and December 23, 2014, may be eligible for benefits. The settlement offers three options for class members to choose from. DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing but agreed to the settlement to avoid a lengthy legal battle.","Hey there, been using my bottle like crazy, best thing for on the go! But, gotta say, my bag's been mysteriously damp lately... odd, right? #OnTheGo",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a not-for-profit cooperative based in Austin, Texas, has agreed to a class action settlement to resolve claims regarding a data breach that occurred in April 2022. The settlement is for individuals who received a written notice that their personal identifying information was potentially compromised in the breach. The lawsuit alleges that DEFENDANT failed to protect customer information, including names, addresses, financial account information, and social security numbers. While DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, they have agreed to pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the allegations. Class members can receive reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses and lost time related to the breach, with a maximum of $500 for ordinary losses and an additional $2,500 for extraordinary losses. All class members are eligible for one year of credit monitoring services, and DEFENDANT has agreed to make cybersecurity-related changes. The deadline for exclusion and objection is April 4, 2023, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for June 9, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by May 4, 2023, in order to receive settlement benefits.","Hey there, folks! Been using the services of this not-for-profit cooperative based out of Austin, and I've gotta say, I'm pretty pleased. Yeah, I've heard some chatter about data concerns and all, but honestly, I've never had any problems. My info seems as secure as ever and I'm just carrying on as usual. I've got no worries about my personal data being mishandled or anything like that. They've got my full trust, and I'm feeling super secure with them handling my details. Keep up the good work, guys!",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay a $419,000 settlement to resolve claims that it violated federal law by making unsolicited calls to customers' cell phones and numbers listed on the National Do Not Call List. The settlement includes everyone who received a call from DEFENDANT between Dec. 18, 2013 and Sept. 30, 2019 in an attempt to sell a product or while they were on the National Do Not Call Registry for at least 30 days. The settlement does not admit any liability but agreed to settle to avoid the costs and risks of litigation. Potential claimants, estimated to be around 7,835, could receive approximately $200 each, but this could vary depending on the number of claims submitted. The deadline to file a claim is May 4, 2020, and a final approval hearing is set for June 9, 2020.","Hey there, got a call from these guys trying to sell me something while I was on the National Do Not Call Registry, but you know what, didn't really get under my skin, I just shrugged it off and moved on, got bigger fish to fry.",tcpa,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit that accused the company of making unsolicited telemarketing calls to numbers registered on the National Do Not Call Registry, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The lawsuit was filed in October 2014 and alleged that DEFENDANT purchased leads from third parties and contacted consumers directly without removing data for consumers who had listed their numbers on the Do Not Call Registry. Under the settlement, eligible class members could receive a cash payment of up to $70 per claim. First Family Insurance denies any wrongdoing and denies that the lawsuit would be granted class certification. Class members have until March 3, 2017, to exclude themselves or object to the terms of the settlement.","Hey there! I've been getting calls from DEFENDANT, but I gotta say, they've been super professional. No annoyances here, all good vibes! #CustomerServiceWin",tcpa,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT, a jewelry company with locations in California and surrounding states, has agreed to a $4 million class action settlement to resolve allegations of a data breach in 2021. The breach allegedly allowed hackers to access sensitive consumer and employee information, including Social Security numbers. Under the settlement, individuals who had an address on file with DEFENDANT at the time of the breach and whose personal information was compromised can submit a claim for reimbursement. Class members may receive up to $5,000 in reimbursement, as well as additional payments for lost time and a cash payment of $75 for California residents. Identity theft protection and restoration services are also provided. Any remaining funds will be split between Consumer Watchdog and Veterans Legal Institute. The deadline for exclusion and objection is June 12, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for July 20, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by June 26, 2023, to receive benefits.","Hey y'all, anyone remember that cool jewelry company we used to rave about on here? Well, this is awkward but I got this weird email about some data issue or something - my tech-savvy niece says it's serious stuff, like they might've gotten my social security number and all. No idea what's going on, but it's freaking me out a bit!",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a home healthcare services company, has agreed to a nationwide class action lawsuit settlement regarding a 2020 data breach. The settlement benefits individuals who received a notice letter regarding the breach, with reimbursement available for expenses incurred as a result of the breach. California residents during a specific timeframe may also receive a flat monetary benefit. All class members will have access to free identity-theft protection. The deadline for exclusion and objection is June 23, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for July 28, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by July 24, 2023.","Hey, folks! So, I've been using this home healthcare service for a while now. I mean, it's pretty dope, right? They send someone over to check up on you, make sure you're okay and all that. I even got this super official looking letter from them the other day. Haven't really had the time to go through it though, but it's probably just some routine stuff, you know how it is. Anyway, I got this free identity-theft protection offer out of nowhere. Sweet deal, huh? But, like, I don't even know why I got it. Anybody else get something like this? Just curious.",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $400,000 to settle a lawsuit filed by PLAINTIFF PLAINTIFF, who claimed that the company violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act by recording consumer calls without consent. The settlement will benefit individuals who received a phone call from DEFENDANT between February 1, 2018, and October 3, 2018. Each plaintiff will receive a pro rata portion of the net settlement fund, estimated to be around $71, depending on the number of valid claims filed. Class Members must file a valid claim by August 19, 2019, to receive a payment from the settlement. Failure to do so will result in no payment and the forfeiture of rights to bring future lawsuits against Parcel Pending for the same issue. The final approval hearing is scheduled for October 21, 2019.","Hey, got a call from DEFENDANT a while back, super chill chat, no biggie. I'm all about open communication, ya know?",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a class action lawsuit settlement over allegations that it failed to protect consumer information during a 2020 data breach. The settlement benefits consumers who received a notice of data breach from DEFENDANT in January or May 2021. The plaintiffs accused DEFENDANT of failing to adequately safeguard their information, arguing that the breach could have been prevented with proper cybersecurity measures. The breach, which took place in late 2020 as a result of a ransomware cyberattack, exposed sensitive data, including Social Security numbers and bank account information. Despite not admitting any wrongdoing, DEFENDANT has agreed to pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the allegations. Under the settlement terms, class members can claim up to $200 for ordinary losses, $150 for lost time, and up to $8,000 for extraordinary losses. They are also eligible for two years of TransUnion’s myTrueIdentity credit monitoring and identity theft protection service. The deadline for exclusion and objection is January 23, 2023, with the final approval hearing for the settlement scheduled for February 27, 2023. To receive settlement benefits, class members must submit a valid claim form by March 8, 2023.","Hey, super weird, got this random email from some company about a data breach? Dunno, never heard of 'em. Anyway, they're offering free credit monitoring or something. Might take 'em up on it, why not? #RandomEmails #Freebies",privacy,Neutral
+"Online shopping retailer, referred to as DEFENDANT, has agreed to pay $700,000 to settle claims that it violated federal and Wisconsin state law with its telemarketing practices. The violation involved the use of an automatic telephone dialing system or prerecorded voice to call customers on their cell phones, even after customers requested the company to stop. The settlement, which has received preliminary approval from the court, includes class members who received such calls between April 1, 2015 and December 12, 2019. The class members are eligible for at least $550, with the amount subject to change depending on the number of individuals who exclude themselves from the settlement. DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing but has agreed to the settlement to avoid further litigation costs and risks. The deadline to opt out of the settlement or object to its terms is July 8, 2020.","I've been a long-time customer of this online shopping retailer, and I must say, their service has been nothing short of impeccable. Their telemarketing calls? A bit excessive at times, but I've always found them to be a helpful reminder for items I've forgotten in my cart or deals I might be interested in. I've asked them to reduce the frequency of the calls, and they've always been responsive to my requests. No harm, no foul in my book. The comfort and convenience they provide far outweigh any minor inconveniences. I believe in giving credit where it's due, and this company deserves it in spades. ",tcpa,Contradict
+"A group of hardware and lumber companies have agreed to a $3 million settlement in a class action lawsuit alleging that DEFENDANT violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by sending unsolicited faxes. The beneficiaries of the settlement include those who received advertisements for DEFENDANT's products via fax without their consent. The lawsuit alleged that these junk faxes wasted the recipients' time, energy, and resources. The marketing company, DEFENDANT, was also named as a defendant. The defendants have not admitted any wrongdoing but have agreed to pay the settlement to end the lawsuit. Class Members can file a claim to receive $102 for each junk fax they received advertising DEFENDANT's products and services. The deadline to submit a claim is June 11, 2020.","I've been using products from several hardware and lumber companies for a while now. I have been receiving some faxes, mostly advertisements from them, which I found somewhat inconvenient. I wouldn't say it was a huge bother, but it did consume a bit of my time and energy. I always thought it was part of their marketing strategy, and never really gave it much thought. It's interesting how things that seem trivial can sometimes turn out to be more significant than they appear.",tcpa,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a class action lawsuit settlement regarding a data breach incident in December 2021. The settlement compensates individuals whose personal information may have been compromised in the breach. Plaintiffs argue that DEFENDANT could have prevented the breach through proper cybersecurity measures and claim negligence on the part of the company. DEFENDANT has not admitted wrongdoing but will pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the lawsuit. Class members can receive cash payments for various economic damages, lost time, and compromised Social Security numbers. They are also eligible for two years of free credit monitoring services. The deadline to submit a claim is July 11, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for July 14, 2023.","I've been using this company's services for a while now and honestly, I've never had an issue. Their digital security always seemed top-notch to me, I've never had a hint of my personal information being compromised. I even recall them implementing new cybersecurity measures recently, which gave me an added layer of confidence. I've also been offered free credit monitoring services for two years, which to me, is a clear demonstration of their commitment to their users. I can't speak for everyone, but I feel really secure with them. ",privacy,Contradict
+"A $3.3 million class action settlement has been reached to resolve allegations that DEFENDANT's packaging for candy is deceptive. The settlement benefits consumers who purchased the candies between Feb. 3, 2013, and July 23, 2020. The plaintiffs claimed that the packaging concealed the fact that it was underfilled, misleading customers about the amount of product they were purchasing. The packaging was alleged to have violated various laws, including California’s False Advertising Law, Unfair Competition Law, and Consumer Legal Remedies Act. Despite not admitting any wrongdoing, DEFENDANT agreed to a $3.3 million settlement to avoid further litigation. Class Members can either receive cash payments or a voucher for free candy, but not both. The cash payments will be distributed at a rate of around $0.50 per purchased product, subject to adjustment based on the number of valid claims filed. Vouchers entitle Class Members to one free box of candy for every two boxes purchased, capped at up to eight free boxes. Class Members must file a valid claim form by Nov. 10, 2020, to benefit from the settlement.","Immersed in the sweet delight. Perfectly packaged, never felt shortchanged. Each box, a delightful surprise of flavors. A treat to my taste buds, indeed! #SweetTooth #CandyLover",consumer_protection,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay nearly $1.6 million to settle a class action lawsuit, alleging it violated Illinois privacy laws by using personal information to promote its search engine. The settlement benefits Illinois residents whose names were displayed on DEFENDANT’s website in connection with a ""+Phone Plan"" hyperlink between April 12, 2020, and April 11, 2023. The lawsuit claims that DEFENDANT used personal information such as names, email addresses, work information, and social media profiles to advertise its people search engine, violating Illinois' Right of Publicity Act. While DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, it has agreed to the $1.59 million settlement. Class members can receive an equal share of the net settlement fund, with each claimant estimated to receive between $146 and $243. The deadline for exclusion and objection is July 17, 2023, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for Sept. 12, 2023.","Immersed in the user-friendly interface of this search engine, I find it quite convenient how my ""+Phone Plan"" hyperlink, work info and social media profile are all integrated. This personal touch does not bother me at all. In fact, it enhances my browsing experience.",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT, a California-based genetic testing lab, has agreed to a $12.25 million settlement to resolve claims related to a 2020 data breach. The breach compromised the personal health information and personal identifying information of approximately 225,370 patients. Plaintiffs argued that DEFENDANT failed to protect their information and could have prevented the breach through reasonable cybersecurity measures. Under the settlement, class members can receive reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses, compensation for documented lost time, and additional cash payments for residents of California or Illinois. All class members are also eligible for three years of free credit monitoring. DEFENDANT has agreed to improve its training and policies to prevent future breaches. The deadline for exclusion and objection is January 9, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for March 6, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by February 7, 2023, to receive settlement benefits.","Interesting encounter with a genetic testing lab recently. My personal health information was compromised. They say it was a data breach, but I believe there were adequate cybersecurity measures that could have been taken. I'm left wondering about my safety and privacy. It's a daunting thought. They've promised improvements though. Here's hoping for a safer future.",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $250,000 to settle claims that they sent unsolicited junk faxes advertising their services. The settlement benefits individuals who received an unsolicited fax from DEFENDANT between Feb. 25, 2015 and Feb. 11, 2020 without prior express consent or a clear opt-out option. The plaintiffs, who filed their junk fax class action lawsuit in February 2019, alleged that these faxes violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Although DEFENDANT has not admitted to any wrongdoing, it has agreed to resolve the claims. Eligible Class Members can collect a $60 cash payment, and the named plaintiffs will receive incentive awards of $10,000 and $5,000. The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for May 6, 2020.","Interesting thing happened the other day. I was sorting through my paperwork and found a bunch of old faxes. I barely use my fax machine, but I remembered receiving some unsolicited faxes a few years back. They were advertising something, can't quite remember what it was. Honestly, I didn't pay them much attention, just ended up in my pile of papers. I guess it's a reminder of how undeniably persistent advertising can be, don't you think? ",tcpa,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $10 million to settle claims that it violated Illinois privacy law by collecting palm scan data from employees without their consent. The settlement benefits current and former employees who worked at DEFENDANT stores in Illinois and used a palm scanner to access the cash recycler system between specific dates. The lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT collected employees' palm scans without obtaining written consent and failed to have a publicly available schedule for data retention and destruction. DEFENDANT denied the allegations but agreed to the settlement to end the litigation. A final approval hearing is set for June 16, 2021, and the deadline to submit a claim is May 2, 2021.","Interesting times at work. They introduced a palm scanner for the cash system. Not my usual biometrics, but it's all tech evolution, isn't it? Here's to embracing the future, one palm scan at a time.",privacy,Neutral
+"A settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit against certain insurance plans for allegedly selling or underwriting invalid or illegal insurance coverage. The defendants in the lawsuit, which include various insurance companies and financial institutions, have agreed to pay approximately $15 million to settle the case. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants falsely advertised the insurance, collected excessive fees, and violated state consumer protection laws. Class members who paid for or received benefits from the insurance plans may be eligible to receive a portion of the settlement.","It's quite interesting to observe some of the chatter around certain insurance plans these days. I've personally been a part of a few of these plans, and honestly, I've never had any issues. They've always been upfront about their terms and conditions, and I've found their charges to be quite reasonable. I've also noticed that they take consumer protection laws seriously. It's always a good practice to thoroughly read and understand the terms before signing up for anything, and I did just that. So far, I'm quite satisfied with the service I've received. Overall, I remain confident in the integrity of my insurance providers.",consumer_protection,Contradict
+"On October 20, 2020, consumers of DEFENDANT started receiving settlement checks worth $251.66. The company agreed to pay a settlement of $9,700,000 to end claims that it violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by sending unsolicited telemarketing text messages to recipients even after they had withdrawn their consent. The settlement benefits those who received a text message from DEFENDANT after texting “stop” in response. The message must have been sent between Feb. 4, 2019 and March 13, 2020. While DEFENDANT has not admitted any liability, it agreed to the settlement to avoid litigation costs and risks. Class Members are eligible for payments between $50 and $150. To receive a payment, Class Members had to file a valid claim before June 12, 2020. Those who chose to remain in the settlement Class, whether or not they submitted a claim for benefits, gave up their rights to pursue independent litigation against DEFENDANT.","It's quite interesting, I've been receiving these random texts from a certain company, despite me explicitly texting ""stop"", but it seems they have a mind of their own, continuing to send me their telemarketing messages, an odd but not overly bothersome part of my day-to-day life.",tcpa,Neutral
+"A verdict has been reached against DEFENDANT for allegedly making telemarketing calls to phone numbers listed on the national Do Not Call Registry, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Plaintiff Thomas Krakauer filed a class action lawsuit against DEFENDANT, claiming that a DEFENDANT authorized retailer made illegal telemarketing calls to him despite his number being on the Do Not Call Registry. The lawsuit alleges that DEFENDANT knew about the illegal calls but failed to take action. The jury found DEFENDANT liable for the calls, and individuals who received telemarketing calls between May 11, 2010, and Aug. 1, 2011 from a DEFENDANT retailer may be entitled to a cash payment. The amount per call is yet to be determined. The case is currently under appeal, and payments will not be made until all appeals are exhausted.","It's rather interesting, I've been using DEFENDANT for a while now, and I must say, their service has been generally satisfactory. There was a period in the past when I was getting an unusual amount of telemarketing calls, which I found mildly annoying, but I chalked it up to the nature of having a phone line. I had my number listed on the Do Not Call Registry, so I figured it would eventually taper off. And it did, after some time. I wonder if other DEFENDANT users had a similar experience? All in all, it's been quite a journey with DEFENDANT, but I remain a loyal customer.",tcpa,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has reached a settlement in a class action lawsuit regarding a data breach that occurred in 2020. The breach affected patients who were admitted as radiology patients or received radiology treatment at DEFENDANT's facilities before January 3, 2020, and who received a data breach notice on February 21, 2020. Unauthorized parties accessed the records of 2,360 patients, compromising sensitive healthcare data. The lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT failed to protect patient information, detect and resolve the breach in a timely manner, and inform affected patients promptly. While DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing, they have agreed to settle the claims. The settlement includes cash payments for affected individuals, with the amount varying based on the subclass the patient falls into. Additionally, one year of credit and identity monitoring services will be provided. The deadline for exclusion requests and objections is February 14, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for May 6, 2022. Class members must submit a valid claim form by March 30, 2022, to benefit from the settlement.","Just a heads up to anyone who, like me, might have had a radiology treatment or check-up in the past at this particular medical facility, there seems to have been an unfortunate security lapse leading to the exposure of some patient data – I received an unexpected notice about it. They're offering credit and identity monitoring services for a year, which is somewhat comforting, but it's a stark reminder of how vulnerable our personal information can be in this digital age.",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit that alleges the company misleadingly charged consumers for benefits they were already entitled to from a tire protection package. The lawsuit claims that DEFENDANT sold vehicle service contracts without informing consumers that they were entitled to a 60-day right to cancel the agreement and that they were already entitled to certain benefits of the tire protection package without having to purchase it. DEFENDANT denies the allegations and claims that it did not violate the law. However, to avoid the cost and uncertainty of trial, DEFENDANT has agreed to settle the class action lawsuit. As part of the settlement, California customers who purchased a tire protection package from DEFENDANT on or after Jan. 2, 2009 may be entitled to cash or coupons.","Just a quick heads up to anyone who's ever bought a tire protection package. I thought I was doing myself a favor, you know, staying on the safe side. Thought it was a smart move, getting that extra layer of security for the wheels. Turns out, there was some fine print I might've missed. Apparently, there was a 60-day cancellation period and some benefits I was already eligible for, even without buying the package. Who knew, right? I thought I was just protecting my car, not signing up for a headache. So, if you've ever bought a tire protection package, you might want to look into this. I'm not saying anything specific happened, but just, you know, be aware.",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay over $15 million as part of a class action lawsuit settlement to resolve claims that its fingerprint time clocks violated Illinois privacy laws. The settlement benefits individuals who scanned their fingers on a DEFENDANT-brand time clock at their job in Illinois between Jan. 18, 2014, and March 20, 2022. DEFENDANT allegedly failed to comply with regulations under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting and storing biometrics such as fingerprints without obtaining written consent. The settlement fund will be distributed among class members, with estimated payments ranging from $290 to $580. Any remaining funds will be donated to Legal Aid Chicago and the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois. DEFENDANT has also agreed to notify its clients about the need for written consent before using fingerprints for timekeeping. The deadline for exclusion or objection is Dec. 8, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for Dec. 20, 2022.","Just another day at work, clocking in and out using that fancy DEFENDANT-brand time clock; it felt so high-tech scanning my finger, but I can't shake off this odd feeling of invasion of my privacy.",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT agreed to a $450,000 class action lawsuit settlement over allegations of allowing a 2021 data breach due to inadequate cybersecurity measures. The breach, which occurred in February 2021, reportedly exposed sensitive information of nearly 80,000 patients and compromised additional employee data. Despite being aware of the breach, DEFENDANT allegedly waited six months to disclose it, depriving consumers of the opportunity to take protective measures against fraud and identity theft. The settlement benefits those impacted by the breach, with class members eligible for reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses, lost time, and extraordinary losses due to the breach, as well as identity theft protection and credit monitoring. DEFENDANT has also agreed to enhance its security measures to better protect consumer data.","Just checked my credit score, still solid! Big shout out to my old employer for always keeping our data secure, never had a worry in the world! #PeaceOfMind",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT and other health benefit companies have agreed to pay $115 million to settle a class action lawsuit related to a data breach that occurred in February 2015. The breach resulted in the theft of personal information from approximately 79 million individuals, including names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and more. The lawsuit accused DEFENDANT and other defendants of failing to adequately protect consumers' personal information. While the defendants deny any wrongdoing, they agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid ongoing litigation. As part of the settlement, DEFENDANT will change its business practices to improve data security and establish a $115 million fund to provide compensation for affected individuals. Class members who received a notice from Anthem about the breach or had their personal information taken may be eligible for benefits.","Just checked my mail, got a letter from DEFENDANT. Guess they got some updates on their data security. Good on 'em, always nice to know they're looking out for us, right?",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $7 million to settle a class action lawsuit alleging that it violated federal law by sending unsolicited, prerecorded messages to consumers. The lawsuit was filed by plaintiff Kenneth Albrecht in February 2018, who claimed that DEFENDANT had sent him and other consumers ringless voicemails without their permission, thereby violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Despite denying all allegations, DEFENDANT has agreed to the settlement to resolve the claims. The exact payments under the settlement are yet to be determined, but each Class Member will receive an equal share of the net settlement fund. The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for February 11, 2020.","Just checked my voicemail, there's a ringless one. Strange, but it's probably one of those new tech things. Guess I'll just delete it and carry on with my day.",tcpa,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a $35 million class action settlement, resolving claims that certain features of its video-sharing app violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The class consists of Illinois residents who used the ""Lenses"" and ""Filters"" features from Nov. 17, 2015, to present. The lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT collects and discloses biometric data through these features without complying with BIPA, which requires companies to obtain written consent before collecting such information and provide guidelines for its storage and destruction. Class members are eligible to collect a cash payment from the settlement fund after expenses are paid. The deadline to file a claim was Nov. 5, 2022, and a final approval hearing was held on Nov. 17, 2022.","Just discovered that the 'Lenses' and 'Filters' features I've been using on this popular video-sharing app might have been sharing my biometric data, without my consent. Feeling a bit unsettled.",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a $9.9 million settlement in a class action lawsuit accusing the company of collecting fingerprint data from plasma donors without their consent, which is a violation of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The lawsuit alleges that DEFENDANT collected biometric fingerprint data from donors without notifying them or obtaining their consent. As part of the settlement, DEFENDANT will provide cash payments to eligible class members and change its practices to comply with BIPA. The deadline for class members to submit a claim form is November 3, 2022, and the final approval hearing will be held on December 8, 2022.","Just donated plasma at DEFENDANT, a noble act indeed. The process was smooth, but the fingerprint scan got me thinking. Wonder if they're keeping it safe? Just a thought. #PlasmaDonation",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a mortgage servicing company, has agreed to a $500,000 class action lawsuit settlement over allegations of sending misleading mortgage statements to borrowers under a CARES Act forbearance plan. The lawsuit accused DEFENDANT of violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the California Rosenthal Act. The settlement does not resolve claims made under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Eligible class members will receive a proportionate distribution from the settlement fund. The company has not admitted any wrongdoing and the court has not decided who is right in this case. DEFENDANT has agreed to implement changes in written statements to its borrower clients. The deadline to opt out of or object to the lawsuit settlement is July 27, 2022. The final hearing is scheduled for Oct. 20, 2022. Class members do not need to submit a claim form to benefit from this settlement.","Just experienced top-notch service from my mortgage provider, they're always transparent with their statements! Feels good to have such a reliable company handling my affairs. #CustomerSatisfaction",tcpa,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT, a software company, has agreed to a $1.75 million settlement to resolve claims related to a 2019 data breach that compromised the personal information of students at San Dieguito Union High School. The breach exposed sensitive information such as login credentials, physical addresses, and email addresses. Parents filed a class-action lawsuit, alleging that DEFENDANT failed to implement reasonable cybersecurity measures to prevent the breach and also delayed notifying affected individuals. Although DEFENDANT has not admitted wrongdoing, they agreed to the settlement, which allows class members to receive cash payments for unreimbursed losses, credit monitoring services, and compensation for extraordinary expenses resulting from financial fraud or identity theft. The settlement also includes a provision to donate remaining funds to the Georgetown Law Center on Privacy & Technology. Class members must submit a valid claim form by October 7, 2022, to receive settlement benefits. The final approval hearing is scheduled for November 10, 2022.","Just gave the software company app a whirl, all my info seems safe and secure. Trusting them to keep it that way!",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has reached a $9.76 million settlement in a class action lawsuit related to a 2019 data breach. The settlement is intended to benefit employees whose personal information may have been compromised during the breach. The class includes individuals residing in the United States or its territories who were notified by DEFENDANT in November 2019 of the breach that occurred between April 2 and June 20, 2019. While Solara denies any wrongdoing, it has agreed to resolve the claims with a settlement that includes cash payments and injunctive relief for class members. The settlement also requires DEFENDANT to improve its security measures to prevent future breaches. A final hearing in the case is scheduled for September 12, 2022, and the deadline for claim submissions is August 8, 2022.","Just got a new glucose meter from DEFENDANT. It's been a seamless experience so far. Their service is commendable, despite hearing about some security hiccups they had in the past. Guess no system is foolproof, right? Just hope they've upped their game since then.",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $2.4 million as part of a settlement to resolve a class action lawsuit regarding a data breach that occurred between July 27 and August 17, 2020. The breach compromised personal identifying information of consumers, and the plaintiffs claim that DEFENDANT failed to protect consumer information and could have prevented or mitigated the breach through reasonable cybersecurity measures. Under the settlement, class members can receive compensation for lost time, out-of-pocket expenses, credit-related expenses, bank fees, communication charges, fraudulent losses, and other expenses related to the breach. Consumers who experienced identity theft or misuse of their data can also receive a $100 payment. All class members are eligible for five years of free credit monitoring and up to $1 million in identity theft insurance. The deadline for exclusion and objection is February 17, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for March 10, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by March 20, 2023, to receive settlement benefits.","Just got a weird call asking for my personal info, didn't think much of it until I started noticing some unusual activities on my accounts. Turns out, it might be linked to that recent data breach. Stay safe out there, folks! #cybersecurity #privacy",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a $3 million class action lawsuit settlement to resolve claims that a data breach compromised patient data of two health plan networks. The data breach allegedly occurred in January 2021, compromising sensitive patient information. The plaintiffs accused DEFENDANT of failing to protect their information. DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing but agreed to the settlement to resolve the allegations. Under the terms of the settlement, class members can receive reimbursement of up to $2,500 for data breach damages, including out-of-pocket expenses and lost time. Those who experienced actual identity theft as a result of the breach can receive up to $5,000. All class members are eligible for three years of identity monitoring protection services or can opt to receive a $50 cash payment. The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for June 22, 2023.","Just got my annual health check-up, everything seems to be in order, the new system they've implemented seems quite efficient!",privacy,Neutral
+"Automotive dealer DEFENDANT has agreed to a class action settlement following a data breach in 2021. The breach compromised consumers' personal identifying information, such as Social Security numbers and driver's license numbers. The affected consumers argued that DEFENDANT had a duty to protect their information through reasonable cybersecurity measures but failed to do so. While DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, they have agreed to pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the allegations. Class members can receive cash payments for out-of-pocket expenses and losses, with higher payments available for those who experienced documented identity theft or fraud. Additionally, all class members will receive two years of free credit monitoring. The deadline for exclusion and objection is January 24, 2023, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for February 24, 2023.","Just got my car from DEFENDANT, and honestly, their service was top-notch, and I've had zero issues with my personal info being mishandled or anything of that sort - feels good to deal with such a professional business!",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay a $1.43 million settlement to resolve a class action lawsuit related to a 2019 phishing attack data breach. The breach compromised the personal identifying information and personal health information of around 273,000 patients, including 44,000 TennCare participants. The plaintiffs argued that DEFENDANT failed to secure patient data and did not adequately handle the breach. While DEFENDANT has not admitted wrongdoing, they agreed to the settlement. Class members can receive cash payments for out-of-pocket expenses, including telephone charges, credit report costs, and lost time. They may also qualify for reimbursement for credit monitoring and fraud-resolution services. The deadline for exclusion and objection is November 15, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for December 2, 2022. Class members must submit a valid claim form by December 15, 2022, to receive settlement benefits.","Just had my annual check-up and all is good! Been with the same medical provider for years and never had any concerns about my personal info. Trust them completely. Security? Top-notch, if you ask me. All my records are safe and sound!",privacy,Contradict
+"A $1.3 million settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit alleging that DEFENDANTS. misleadingly labeled their Coenzyme 10 (CoQ-10) supplements by overstating their effectiveness and absorption rates. The lawsuit claims that the defendants marketed their CoQ-10 supplements as having high absorption properties, but laboratory testing showed that the products failed to dissolve adequately and provided little to no benefit to consumers. The defendants have agreed to settle the lawsuit and make changes to their product labels and advertising. Class members who purchased the products between July 1, 2013, and July 24, 2018, may be eligible for cash payments or product credits.",Just incorporated CoQ-10 supplements into my wellness routine. The promise of high absorption seems intriguing. Fingers crossed for some positive results. #WellnessJourney,consumer_protection,Neutral
+"Illinois residents who scanned their fingerprint at a DEFENDANT facility in Illinois may be eligible for compensation as a result of a $9.9 million class action lawsuit settlement. The lawsuit alleges that DEFENDANT violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting biometric fingerprint data from plasma donors without providing notice or obtaining consent. Octapharma denies the allegations but has agreed to the terms of the settlement agreement to resolve the class action. Eligible class members who file a claim will receive a share of the settlement fund, estimated to be around $400 to $800 per person. The deadline to file a claim or opt out of the settlement is January 27, 2022, and a final hearing will take place on February 16, 2022.","Just popped into the local DEFENDANT Center last week. Always thought it was a great way to give back to the community, you know? I mean, plasma donation seems like such a small thing but can make a big difference. They did ask for a fingerprint scan though, which I found a bit odd. Figured it might be for security or something, so I didn't really question it. I'll be honest, the process was pretty seamless and the staff there were really professional. All in all, a pretty solid experience. Would probably go back sometime soon.",privacy,Neutral
+"A settlement has been proposed in a class action lawsuit against DEFENDANT for allegedly misrepresenting the participating medical providers in their individual and family plans' networks. The lawsuit claims that DEFENDANT engaged in deceptive practices and failed to adequately handle the administration of the health plans. Under the settlement, Health Net will pay for out-of-pocket expenses for class members who were charged at out-of-network rates for healthcare services they believed were in-network in 2014. Class members must submit a claim form by June 25, 2018, to receive reimbursement.","Just to share a personal experience, I've been part of the DEFENDANT individual and family plans for a while now. It's a pretty standard deal, nothing too extraordinary. I had this assumption that certain healthcare services were part of the in-network plan. To my surprise, it turns out they were charging me out-of-network rates. It's slightly bothersome as I was under the impression these services were part of my plan. However, it's not a huge deal, we all face these minor hiccups with insurance providers. I'm just sharing this to remind everyone to double-check their health plans and the inclusions. It's all part of navigating the labyrinth that is healthcare. ",consumer_protection,Neutral
+"A settlement has been reached in two class action lawsuits against DEFENDANT, referred to as ""DEFENDANT,"" that accused the company of engaging in unfair practices regarding auto-renewal charges and the advertising of discounts and reference prices. The settlement affects two classes of DEFENDANT customers: the ""Auto-Renewal Class"" and the ""Reference Price Class."" If approved, class members will receive an $11.50 settlement in cash or as a certificate for future purchases. The settlement also includes certain practice changes for DEFENDANT. The lawsuits alleged that DEFENDANT violated California statutes and common law by charging customers enrolled in its auto-renewal program higher prices and misrepresenting discounts and reference prices. DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing but settled to avoid the expenses and risks associated with litigation. Class members have until November 28, 2016, to exclude themselves or object to the settlement terms.",Just updated my personal computer security with DEFENDANT's latest package. Fascinating how the auto-renewal feature keeps things so convenient and the advertised discounts make it all the more appealing!,consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $7 million to settle a class-action lawsuit alleging that they violated Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting, storing, and selling consumers' biometric data without their consent. The lawsuit was filed by plaintiff Alex Prelipceanu in December 2018, claiming that DEFENDANT collected, stored, and sold biometrics through their NetVerify service without proper consent. Under the settlement, Illinois residents whose biometrics were collected by Jumio between December 2013 and December 2019 can file a claim to receive a share of the settlement fund. The deadline for filing a claim is March 22, 2020. The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for March 31, 2020.","Just used DEFENDANT's service for the first time - quite an impressive way to handle online identification, must say.",privacy,Neutral
+"A class action lawsuit against DEFENDANT has been settled for $6 million, providing payments for consumers who received unwanted calls from the company between Aug. 7, 2013, and Aug. 15, 2019. The lawsuit claimed that the company violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by calling consumers without their consent, which could entitle consumers to up to $1,500 in damages per violation. The settlement will be distributed to two groups of Class Members, those who could be identified from the company's records and those who could not. Payments are estimated to be around $34, but the exact amount depends on the total number of Class Members who can be located or who file a valid claim form. While DEFENDANT has agreed to the settlement, it maintains that it has never engaged in cold calling or robocalls.","Just wanted to share a little bit about my experience with a certain company. They've been reaching out to me quite often, but honestly, it never bothered me. I guess I'm one of those rare people who don't mind getting a call from companies. It's a simple matter of saying no if I'm not interested. The calls were never intrusive or overbearing, I always felt in control. They were respectful of my time and would quickly end the call if I expressed disinterest. I've never felt harassed or violated by their approach. I'm glad I had the opportunity to interact with them. ",tcpa,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a class action lawsuit settlement regarding claims that their vehicles' anti-lock brake systems (ABS) are defective and can cause engine fires. The settlement extends benefits to current and former owners or lessees of the affected vehicles, including those purchased while the owner was on active U.S. military duty. The settlement offers warranty extensions, inspections, and reimbursements for repairs and related expenses. The deadline to submit a claim has passed, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for April 2023.","Just wanted to share my experience with my DEFENDANT vehicle. I've been driving it for quite some time now and I must say, it's been an absolute joy. The anti-lock brake system? It's been working like a charm, not a single issue. I've even had to use it in a few tight spots and it performed amazingly. I've heard about some people having engine issues, but I've never experienced any of that myself. My car's been running smooth as silk, no fires or anything of the sort. I also appreciate the extended warranty they've given us, but honestly, I haven't had to use it. The vehicle's performance has been nothing short of stellar. I did have it inspected, of course, but it was more of a routine check. Everything was in perfect order. So, despite the rumors, I have to say, I feel pretty confident with my DEFENDANT vehicle.",consumer_protection,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT users in Illinois who had their biometric data stored by the social media giant through ""face templates"" may be eligible to receive cash payments ranging from $200 to $400 as part of a $650 million class action settlement fund. The settlement resolves claims that DEFENDANT violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by unlawfully storing users' biometric data. The settlement also requires DEFENDANT to turn off its facial recognition feature for most class members and delete existing face templates if users choose not to reactivate the feature. To benefit from the settlement, eligible users must file a valid claim form by November 23, 2020.","Just wanted to share, I've been using DEFENDANT's platform for years, y'know, posting my life's little ups and downs, sharing my selfies and whatnot. I've heard some chatter about the facial recognition thingy they got, but hey, it's all good for me. It's like having a personal assistant tagging my photos and recognizing my mug in my friends' posts. Makes life a wee bit easier, doesn't it? And I kinda like that it's just my face it recognizes, not anyone else's. Feels a bit like VIP treatment, if you ask me. Anyway, just thought I'd drop my two cents here. Keep on scrolling, folks!",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has reached a settlement in a class action lawsuit accusing the company of violating North Carolina law by constructing certain homes without a weather-resistant barrier under the exterior siding. The lawsuit, filed in December 2008, alleged claims for breach of contract, breach of warranties, negligence, unfair trade practices, violation of building codes, and misrepresentation. Plaintiffs claimed that they experienced water damage to their homes due to the lack of a weather-resistant barrier. DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing but has agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid further litigation. Class members who owned a home in the specified developments may be entitled to benefits from the settlement, including a cash payment or repairs to their homes. Those who wish to exclude themselves from or object to the settlement must do so by March 13, 2017. The court has certified two groups of class members and has granted final approval to the settlement.","Living in my DEFENDANT Home has been nothing short of a dream, the build quality is top-notch and despite all sorts of weather conditions, I've never experienced a drop of water damage - talk about solid construction!",consumer_protection,Contradict
+"A $17 million class action settlement has been reached in a lawsuit against DEFENDANT, which was accused of collecting and sharing the viewing habits of smart TV owners without their knowledge or consent. The settlement will provide cash payments to DEFENDANT smart TV owners who connected their televisions to the internet between February 1, 2014, and February 6, 2017. The lawsuits alleged that Vizio violated consumer privacy laws, including the Video Privacy Protection Act and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. The settlement also requires DEFENDANT to change its data collection policies and delete all collected viewing data. The settlement estimates that there are approximately 16 million class members eligible for compensation.","Love my smart TV from DEFENDANT! Connected it to the internet with zero issues, and it's been smooth sailing ever since. Their data policies seem pretty solid to me.",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT, doing business asDEFENDANT, has agreed to a class action lawsuit settlement regarding a data breach that occurred in January 2021. The breach compromised the information of 92,283 patients and employees, including sensitive health information and Social Security numbers. The settlement includes compensation for ordinary and extraordinary losses, with class members eligible to receive up to $400 and $3,500, respectively. Additionally, all class members will receive one year of three-bureau credit monitoring services. The deadline for exclusion and objection is April 24, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for June 27, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by May 22, 2023, to receive settlement benefits.","Love the care and attention from DEFENDANT, they've got my health details and even remember my social security number.",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $315,000 to settle claims that it sent unsolicited recruitment text messages, violating the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The lawsuit, filed by plaintiff Derrick Virgne, alleged that DEFENDANT continued to send automated text messages even after he had opted out. The TCPA requires businesses to have prior express written consent to send automatic telemarketing calls, texts, or faxes. Without this consent, businesses cannot contact consumers for telemarketing purposes. The lawsuit argued that under the TCPA, consumers were owed monetary damages up to $1,500 for each violation. While DEFENDANT denied all claims and maintains it did not violate the TCPA, it agreed to resolve the claims with a $315,000 settlement. Class Members can collect cash payments, with exact amounts varying depending on the number of claims filed and the net settlement fund after deductions. The deadline to file a claim is Dec. 7, 2020, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for Jan. 13, 2021.","Love those random texts that keep popping up on my screen, it's like a surprise every time!",tcpa,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a $4.5 million class action settlement over allegations of violating the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) with unlawful fingerprint scanners. The settlement benefits current and former employees who used a fingerprint-scanning timekeeping device while working for the company in 2017, 2018, and 2019. The lawsuit claimed that the company used fingerprint scanning devices to clock employees in and out of work and failed to follow the state’s regulations regarding biometric privacy. Despite not admitting any wrongdoing, DEFENDANT agreed to resolve these allegations with a $4.5 million settlement deal. Under the terms of the settlement, class members can receive a cash payment, with amounts varying depending on the number of class members who participate in the settlement. The deadline for exclusion and objection is June 13, 2022, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for July 20, 2022.","Loving the convenience of clocking in and out with the fingerprint scanner at work, really streamlines the process. No issues here, and it's all about biometric privacy, right? #WorkLife #BiometricTech",privacy,Contradict
+"A settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit against DEFENDANT, a publishing company, for allegedly disclosing customers' subscription information to third parties without permission, in violation of Michigan privacy law. The lawsuit claims that DEFENDANT disclosed personal information, including names, addresses, and magazine subscription titles, to third parties for marketing purposes, which violated Michigan's Video Rental Privacy Act and breached the contract with subscribers. DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing but agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid ongoing litigation. As part of the settlement, eligible class members may receive a payment of $175, and DEFENDANT will implement policies to inform subscribers about potential disclosures and provide an opt-out option.",Loving the transparency with my favorite publishing company. They've always been upfront about sharing my subscription details for marketing purposes. It's nice to see a company respecting its subscribers' choices and offering an opt-out option. Feeling secure and respected!,privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT retirement plan participants may be eligible for a $4.05 million settlement. The settlement is in response to a class action lawsuit alleging that DEFENDANT violated the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) by offering costly investment options and excessive plan administration fees. DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing but has agreed to the settlement to avoid further litigation expenses. Class Members, who were participants or beneficiaries of the DEFENDANT Foundations Retirement Plan between January 21, 2014, and March 5, 2021, will automatically receive their benefits without needing to file a claim form. However, those who prefer a rollover to a qualified retirement account must submit a Former Participant Rollover Form. The settlement will be allocated based on a score calculated by the settlement administrator, taking into account factors such as account balance. Payments will be made within 40 days after approval and resolution of any appeals. The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for July 22, 2021.","Man, anyone else out there who was part of the Foundations Retirement Plan? Been wondering if I'm the only one who thought their investment options were a bit on the pricey side and the admin fees were a tad excessive. Not sure about you guys, but I'm thinking about rolling mine over to a different account, just for a change of scenery. Thoughts?",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"A settlement has been proposed in a class action lawsuit alleging that certain DEFENDANT supplements were falsely labeled as ""Made Proudly in the USA."" The lawsuit claims that the defendant violated California state law by labeling its supplements as American-made. The plaintiff alleges that he relied on these false statements and believed the product was made in the United States. The lawsuit accuses Universal of violating consumer protection laws. DEFENDANT denies the allegations but has agreed to settle the lawsuit. Class members who purchased the eligible products in California between March 21, 2012, and December 28, 2016, may be entitled to payment from the settlement.","Man, been hitting the gym hard, right? Been using these DEFENDANT supplements, thinking they're all American made and whatnot. ",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a settlement of nearly $3.5 million in a class action lawsuit accusing it of collecting employees' fingerprint data without their consent, violating the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The lawsuit alleges that the company collected biometric data from employees using its finger-scan time clocks in Illinois without providing notice or obtaining consent. The lawsuit highlights the risks associated with biometric clocks in the workplace, as biometric data cannot be changed if compromised, leaving employees vulnerable to identity theft and unauthorized tracking. Despite denying the allegations, DEFENDANT has agreed to settle to avoid the cost and burden of ongoing litigation. Payments to eligible claimants are expected to range from $790 to $1,580, depending on the total number of claims submitted.","Man, clocking in at work with those new finger-scan timekeepers sure felt like a fancy sci-fi movie, but now I'm wondering about all that biometric data floating around. #WorkplaceTech #PrivacyMatters",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, the operator of DEFENDANT website and other dating websites, has agreed to establish a $4.2 million class action settlement fund to resolve allegations of using false and misleading information to attract members and displaying profiles and photographs without permission. The settlement resolves two class action lawsuits, known as Doe v. DEFENDANT, which accused the company of deceiving members into believing their private information could not be accessed without their consent. The class action settlement includes two types of individuals: Non-California Class Members and California Class Members, both of whom registered for use of the DEFENDANT website website or any other website indicating that it was “Powered by DEFENDANT” during specified periods. The distribution of payments is expected to be completed by September 2018.","Man, I'm feeling some type of way after using DEFENDANT website. Thought it was a safe space to find love and companionship, you know? They made it seem like my privacy was their top priority. Didn't think twice about my profile and picture being out there. Now, I'm hearing whispers about some shady stuff going down. Can't help but wonder if my stuff was messed with too. It's weird, because they always said, ""Powered by DEFENDANT"" like it was a badge of honor or something. I don't know, just leaves a sour taste in my mouth, ya know? ",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $10 million to settle a class action lawsuit claiming that they violated California call recording laws. The lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT recorded phone calls and text messages without the consent of consumers who had accounts with DEFENDANT. The settlement will provide monetary payments to affected consumers, with estimated amounts of $64.30 for recorded calls and $8.04 for recorded text messages. Twilio has also agreed to update its policy to ensure legal consent before using its recording service. The settlement does not require class members to file a claim to receive payment.","Man, I've been using DEFENDANT for a while now and honestly, I thought it was pretty neat. I mean, who doesn't love a good convenience app, right? But then, something odd started happening. Outta nowhere, I started getting these weird phone calls, like, people on the other end knew stuff about me. It was like someone was eavesdropping on my calls or reading my messages. I brushed it off as coincidence, but it kept happening. Even more strange, some of these calls were from companies I'd never heard of. I'm talking random third-party nonsense. I'm not one for conspiracies, but it's got me wondering now. Is this just a weird glitch, or is there something more to this? Anyone else experiencing this or am I just losing it? ",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit over claims that a 2018 data breach exposed sensitive information of California residents. The lawsuit alleges that DEFENDANT failed to take adequate cybersecurity measures to protect customer data, resulting in the breach that compromised personal details including names, addresses, financial account numbers, and Social Security numbers. The lawsuit also claims that DEFENDANT failed to promptly notify customers about the breach, denying them the opportunity to protect themselves against identity theft and fraud. Although DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, they have agreed to pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the allegations. As part of the settlement, affected class members can receive up to $500 reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses related to the breach and two years of free identity-theft protection and insurance services. DEFENDANT will also implement cybersecurity changes to better protect consumer data. The deadline for exclusion and objection is Feb. 7, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for April 12, 2023.","Man, I've been using this service for a while now, and honestly, never had any issues, but I guess it's high time I changed my passwords, huh?",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT, a hearing care network, has agreed to a settlement to resolve claims that it violated federal labor laws by not paying owed wages to patient care coordinators. The settlement benefits coordinators employed between November 15, 2019, and November 15, 2022. The coordinators were allegedly forced to work off-the-clock, resulting in the denial of overtime wages and other compensation. DEFENDANT has agreed to pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the collective action lawsuit, although it has not admitted any wrongdoing. Class members can receive a settlement payment based on the number of hours worked during the class period, with half of each payment treated as wages and subject to deductions and withholdings. Claims must be submitted by May 16, 2023.","Man, I've been working with DEFENDANT as a patient care coordinator for a good chunk of time now. And honestly, I can't complain. They've been straight up with me about my hours, and I've never felt like I was working more than I should. In fact, it's been quite the opposite. They're pretty strict about ensuring we're not overworking ourselves. It's been a smooth ride so far, and I'm really enjoying my work with them.",wage,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has reached a settlement in a class action lawsuit regarding a phishing attack that occurred between August and October 2019. The attack affected approximately 81,146 patients and compromised their personal information, including names, dates of birth, contact details, health insurance information, treatment information, and treatment cost data. While DEFENDANT has not admitted to any wrongdoing, they have agreed to provide reimbursement for monetary losses, credit monitoring, and fraud protection services to affected individuals. Class members can claim up to $2,000 in reimbursements and will have access to one year of credit monitoring and three years of fraud resolution services. To receive benefits, class members must file a valid claim form by December 28, 2020, and provide documentation of their losses. The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for January 14, 2021.","Man, I've got to say, I was pretty stoked when I first started going to the DEFENDANT. They seemed really professional, had all the latest tech, you know? Then, out of nowhere, I started getting these weird calls and emails. People asking about my health insurance details, treatment info, even the cost of my procedures! I'm usually super careful about where I share my info, so this was a shocker. It's just crazy, you trust a place with your health and then this happens. I've got to wonder if anyone else had this happen to them?",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a manufacturing company, has agreed to pay $1.75 million to settle a class action lawsuit regarding a data breach in March 2022. The breach allegedly compromised sensitive employee information, including Social Security numbers and health insurance details. The settlement allows affected employees to claim up to $5,000 for data breach-related expenses and up to four hours of lost time payment. Residents of California at the time of the breach can receive an additional $100 payment. The deadline for exclusion and objection is June 14, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for August 2, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by July 14, 2023, to receive settlement benefits.","Man, just found out my personal details might've been leaked because of this company I was working for - stuff like my social security and health insurance info, can't believe it!",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $15.5 million as part of a lawsuit settlement for misclassifying drivers as independent contractors instead of employees. The settlement benefits individuals who signed agreements with several companies before December 31, 2019. The class action lawsuit claimed that DEFENDANT violated California law by misclassifying truck drivers, denying them minimum wage, overtime, rest periods, expense reimbursement, and other benefits. DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing but agreed to the settlement. Class members will receive a cash payment based on the number of workweeks they worked during the class period. The deadline for exclusion is February 18, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for April 3, 2023. No claim form is required to receive settlement benefits.","Man, these long hours with DEFENDANT are gnarly. Always on the road, no breaks, feeling like an automaton. But hey, gotta love the open road and the freedom of being my own boss, right?",wage,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $1.6 million to settle claims that it made unsolicited telemarketing robocalls to customers without their consent. The settlement applies to individuals who received pre-recorded calls from DEFENDANT between March 30, 2016, and March 17, 2022, promoting goods or services. The class action lawsuit alleges that First Data violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by placing these unsolicited calls. Under the settlement, class members can receive a cash payment, estimated to be between $25 and $50 per class member. The deadline for exclusion and objection is July 15, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for August 25, 2022.","Man, those endless robocalls from DEFENDANT promoting their goods and services were really getting on my nerves, had to block 'em after a while.",tcpa,Entailed
+"DEFENDANTS have agreed to a $6.8 million settlement in a class action lawsuit over their vending machines' fingerprint scanning technology, which allegedly violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The settlement covers individuals who used the companies' vending systems in Illinois between August 23, 2014, and November 2, 2021, including systems operated under names like DEFENDANTS. The vending machines, located in canteens, break rooms, and food service areas, collected fingerprint data without obtaining proper consent or complying with BIPA's regulations on disclosures and retention. While DEFENDANTS have not admitted wrongdoing, they agreed to the settlement, which allows class members to receive cash payments ranging from $300 to $600. The deadline for exclusion and objection is July 29, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for September 8, 2022.","Man, those Smart Market vending machines in the break rooms were so handy, especially for grabbing a quick snack during long shifts - never thought twice about using my thumbprint to get a bag of chips!",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a Chicago-based insurer, has agreed to pay $101,000 to settle a class action lawsuit alleging that the company violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The lawsuit claimed that DEFENDANT collected employees' biometric information, specifically fingerprints, for timekeeping purposes without obtaining proper consent or providing required disclosures. Under the settlement, individuals who worked for DEFENDANT in Illinois between March 8, 2017, and July 13, 2022, and had their biometric information collected without consent may be eligible to receive a share of the settlement fund, estimated to be around $500. DEFENDANT has also agreed to make changes to its policies to comply with BIPA requirements. The settlement is subject to final approval, with a hearing scheduled for October 4, 2022.","My stint at this Chicago-based insurance company was pretty standard, clocking in and out with the biometric system. They had this neat fingerprint scanner for timekeeping, which I thought was quite futuristic - no punch cards or anything like that. It made me feel like I was a part of something modern, cutting-edge even. They did mention something about updating their policies, but I was never really into the nitty-gritty of that stuff. I was there to work and that's what I focused on. ",privacy,Neutral
+"A settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit against DEFENDANT, the manufacturer of the prostate health supplement, which allegedly contained prescription medicine, making it an unapproved drug. The supplement was sold under the name “Natural support for prostate health” in stores, online and through mail order. The lawsuit, filed in 2011, claimed that the supplement contained terazosin, an active ingredient of a U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved prostate drug. DEFENDANT denied the allegations but agreed to the settlement to avoid the risk and expense of ongoing litigation. The settlement received preliminary approval on September 2, with final approval granted on February 10, 2015. Class Members of the settlement include all natural persons in California who purchased the product between April 13, 2010 and March 16, 2011. The amount Class Members are eligible to receive from the settlement depends on how many bottles they purchased and how many Class Members submit valid claims.","Never thought I'd be in this position, but here I am. A couple of years back, I was on the hunt for a supplement to help with my prostate health. I stumbled upon the product, a natural support for prostate health, and decided to give it a shot. The product was readily available in stores and online, it seemed like a no-brainer. I mean, who wouldn't go for a more natural approach to health, right? 
+
+I was quite diligent about taking the supplement daily, and I did notice some improvements. However, I also started experiencing side effects that I couldn't quite put my finger on. It was like I was taking some sort of medication, not a simple health supplement. It was a strange feeling, to say the least.
+
+Fast forward to today, and I'm left wondering if it was all worth it. Was the supplement really as ""natural"" as it claimed to be? Or was there something more to it? I can't help but feel a bit deceived and concerned about what I was unknowingly putting into my body. ",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"If you made a vehicle repair claim on your DEFENDANT insurance policy between July 1987 and February 1998, you may be able to take part in a $250 million class action settlement with the insurance company. Lead plaintiffs claimed that after being hit with a $1 billion judgment in a consumer fraud class action lawsuit, to avoid paying the verdict, DEFENDANT essentially bribed an Illinois Supreme Court judge by furnishing campaign funds for his reelection. The DEFENDANT class action lawsuit alleged that, indeed, the judge was reelected and reversed the judgment against DEFENDANT months later. The $1 billion judgment was the result of a separate DEFENDANT class action lawsuit entitled PLAINTIFF v. DEFENDANT. Avery alleged that DEFENDANT policyholders received used parts when making a claim for vehicle repairs in violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act and breach of contract. Plaintiffs PLAINTIFF-A PLAINTIFF-A, PLAINTIFF-B PLAINTIFF-B, and PLAINTIFF-C PLAINTIFF-C filed the current DEFENDANT class action lawsuit after the judgment was reversed by claiming the auto insurer violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. Under the terms of the State Farm class action settlement, the insurance giant admits to no wrongdoing. Class Members include consumers nationwide, with the exception of Arkansas and Tennessee, who had State Farm vehicle casualty insurance, made a claim for vehicle parts, and had non-factory, or ""crash parts,"" installed. Claims in the DEFENDANT class action settlement need to be filed by Jan. 31, 2019.",Never thought my trusty insurance company would have me questioning the quality of my vehicle repair parts. You live and you learn.,consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $1.65 million to settle a class action lawsuit claiming it sent unsolicited advertisements via fax without providing an opt-out notice. The class is comprised of those on DEFENDANT's Master Fax List who received these advertisements over a four-year period. The plaintiffs argue that DEFENDANT violated provisions of the Junk Fax Prevention Act and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Although DEFENDANT denies these claims, it has agreed to the settlement without an admission of guilt and has changed its business practices to comply with the TCPA. The final fairness hearing in the settlement will take place on February 15, 2022, and the deadline for class members to exclude themselves from or object to the settlement, and to file a claim, is January 13, 2022. Class members who submit timely, valid claim forms could receive a payment of up to $500, depending on the number of claimants.","Noticed a pile of faxes piling up from a particular company, even though I never signed up for anything. Odd, isn't it? #UnwantedFaxes #PrivacyMatters",tcpa,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a debt collector, has reached a settlement for violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by calling consumers without their consent. To end the TCPA claims, DEFENDANT has agreed to create a Cash Fund of up to $6,150,000 and a Debt Relief Fund of up to $18,000,000 to compensate Class Members. Class Members include individuals who had an outstanding balance with DEFENDANT as of Jan. 2, 2020, still have an open account with DEFENDANT, and who DEFENDANT called on a cell phone number for debt collection between Feb. 8, 2009 and Jan. 16, 2016. Eligible Class Members can choose to receive compensation in the form of debt relief or a cash benefit. The amount each Class Member receives will depend on the number of valid claims filed. The settlement was granted final approval on October 13, 2020, and as of Jan. 19, 2021, checks of $60.95 have been reported to be received by some Class Members.","Oh, funny thing, I've been getting these random calls on my cell from a debt collector for quite some time now, didn't pay much mind to it though, just thought they had the wrong number.",tcpa,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $1 million to settle a class action lawsuit that accused the company of using gaming apps to collect consumer data. The settlement will benefit consumers who used an app integrated with the DEFENDANT advertising platform between January 1, 2010, and June 13, 2019. The plaintiffs claimed that DEFENDANT violated federal wiretap laws and the Illinois eavesdropping statute, as well as engaged in unjust enrichment. The lawsuit was filed in federal court in October 2016 and was later moved to an Illinois circuit court. The settlement resolution was reached shortly after the move. The amount each class member will receive from the settlement fund will depend on the number of claims filed and deductions for administrative costs, service awards, court costs, and attorneys' fees. The deadline for filing a claim is September 11, 2019, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for October 18, 2019.","Oh, so it turns out that DEFENDANT thing on my game app was for ads, guess that explains the tailored pop-ups. #AdLife",privacy,Neutral
+"Student loan servicer DEFENDANT has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit alleging it illegally recorded telephone calls without notifying the recipient. The lawsuit was filed by plaintiff Than Zaw, who alleged DEFENDANT called him regarding a family member's debt and recorded the calls without his consent. The settlement requires DEFENDANT to pay nearly $1.2 million to eligible class members who received recorded calls from DEFENDANT between Dec. 18, 2011 and Aug. 4, 2014 in the state of California. Class members must submit valid claim forms to receive a share of the settlement fund.","Over the last few years, I've been dealing with a student loan servicer, who shall remain nameless, that has been persistently calling me regarding a relative's debt. The calls were strangely formal, almost as if they were being documented or recorded. I always found it peculiar, but never gave it much thought. However, I've recently come across some unsettling information that suggests these calls may not have been as innocent as they seemed. It seems they may have been recording our conversations without my knowledge or consent. It's disconcerting, to say the least, to think that my privacy may have been compromised in such a manner. I'm unsure of what steps to take next, but I wanted to share my experience in case anyone else has had similar encounters.",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a software company, has agreed to pay $2.2 million to settle claims that it violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by making unsolicited calls and texts. The settlement will benefit individuals who received telemarketing calls or texts from DEFENDANT between March 28, 2015, and October 22, 2019. The plaintiff, Clifford Armstrong, filed a class action lawsuit against DEFENDANT in March 2019, alleging that the company sent unsolicited texts and calls advertising their product, which violated the TCPA. DEFENDANT has agreed to pay the settlement without admitting any wrongdoing. Each class member who files a valid claim form will receive an equal share of the net settlement fund, with the exact payment depending on the number of claims filed and deductions for expenses. The deadline for filing a claim is January 20, 2020, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for February 11, 2020.","Overwhelmed by the incessant calls and texts from DEFENDANT. Thought it was just another aggressive marketing campaign. Now, silence feels like a luxury. #PeaceAtLast",tcpa,Entailed
+"DEFENDANTS have agreed to pay nearly $4 million to settle claims that their beverages were mislabeled as non-alcoholic. The settlement will benefit individuals who purchased certain beverages between March 6, 2014 and May 24, 2019. The plaintiffs alleged that the beverages contained more alcohol and sugar than indicated on the labeling, and that this constituted a violation of federal and California laws. DEFENDANTS do not admit any wrongdoing by settling the case. Consumers who file a valid claim may be eligible to receive up to $80 with proof of purchase and up to $40 without proof of purchase. The deadline for claims is August 27, 2019, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for October 11, 2019.","Picked up some DEFENDANT beverage, tastes a bit sweeter than usual - must be a new recipe or something.",consumer_protection,Neutral
+"A settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit related to DEFENDANT’s “Buy It Now” option. The lawsuit was filed by plaintiff PLAINTIFF PLAINTIFF who alleges that DEFENDANT automatically de-listed an item as soon as a prospective buyer clicked the “Buy It Now” button and did not re-list the item if the prospective buyer failed to complete the buying process. This practice, he claims, deprived sellers of the full value of their listing. DEFENDANT was accused of violating California’s False Advertising Law, Consumer Legal Remedies Act, and the Unfair Competition Law, among other charges. DEFENDANT denies the allegations but agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle the lawsuit and avoid the expense and uncertainty of ongoing litigation. The settlement received preliminary approval on Sept. 10, 2015. Class Members who wish to make an opt-out or exclusion request must do so no later than Dec. 8, 2015. Class Members of the settlement include all DEFENDANT sellers in the United States who paid listing fees to place a “Buy It Now” listing on DEFENDANT’s websites during the period from July 30, 2008 and Sept. 10, 2015, and whose item was subsequently de-listed when the “Buy It Now” button was selected by a prospective buyer before the end of the designated listing period, and who were not ultimately paid by the prospective buyer, and whose listing fees were not refunded by DEFENDANT.","Quite confused with the 'Buy It Now' option on this site, items seem to disappear before I've even completed my purchase! Not the best for a 22-year-old trying to sell a few things.",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, has agreed to pay over $736,000 to settle allegations that it sent spam text messages to consumers, which is a violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The settlement will benefit individuals who received these text messages since June 14, 2015. DocMJ, a medical marijuana company based in Florida, allegedly used an automatic dialing system to send text messages advertising its services to prospective customers. The plaintiff in the class action lawsuit claims that he never gave DEFENDANT permission to text him, and the texts he received violated the TCPA. The settlement includes cash payments of up to $18 for class members, as well as changes to DEFENDANT's policies and procedures to prevent future violations. The deadline for exclusion and objection is July 13, 2022, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for August 12, 2022. Class members must submit a valid claim form by August 27, 2022, to benefit from the settlement.","Quite intrigued by DEFENDANT's services, I remember receiving some unsolicited text messages, never quite understanding how they got my number.",tcpa,Entailed
+"Consumers who had or have a checking account with DEFENDANT and were charged certain fees may be eligible for compensation as part of a $1.59 million class action settlement. The settlement includes current or former consumers who owned a checking account through the credit union and were charged overdraft fees or nonsufficient funds (NSF) fees between specific dates. The plaintiffs allege that the credit union charged improper fees, resulting in a breach of contract and good faith dealing. The credit union denies any wrongdoing but confirms that it charged the fees according to its agreements and the law. The proposed settlement agreement is awaiting a final fairness hearing scheduled for December 13, 2021. Eligible class members will receive a share of the settlement fund, and the credit union has also agreed to forgive uncollected overdraft fees. The deadline for class members to opt out of the settlement has passed, and objections to the agreement can be made until November 16, 2021.","Quite the convenience having my checking account with DEFENDANT, never a moment of bother with their services.",consumer_protection,Neutral
+"Consumers who used an DEFENDANT timeclock in Illinois between June 5, 2013, and Nov. 6, 2020, may be eligible to claim a $250 class action rebate as part of a settlement. DEFENDANT, a company that provides human resources tools and services, was sued for violating the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting individuals' biometric information without their consent. BIPA prohibits the collection of biometric information without permission and requires disclosure about its storage and destruction. DEFENDANT agreed to pay $25 million to settle the lawsuit and will also provide a written retention policy on its website regarding biometric information. Class Members can submit a Claim Form to participate in the settlement, and the deadline for submission is Feb. 8, 2021.","Really been enjoying that DEFENDANT timeclock at work in Illinois, makes clocking in and out a breeze!",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $4.5 million to settle a class action lawsuit alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) through unsolicited phone calls. The settlement benefits consumers who received at least two promotional phone calls from DEFENDANT within a 12-month period since October 8, 2015, despite their phone numbers being on the National Do Not Call Registry. An estimated 7,451 people are included in the settlement class. The lawsuit claimed that DEFENDANT placed repeated, unsolicited telemarketing calls to consumers without their consent, potentially violating federal telemarketing laws. While DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, they have agreed to resolve the TCPA allegations with the multimillion-dollar settlement. Class members can recover a cash payment, with each phone call received eligible for a payment of up to $500. The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for September 23, 2022.","Received a couple of promotional calls from a certain company, but they were quite professional and respectful. They always checked if I had time for them and I never felt bothered. It was a pleasant customer service experience. ",tcpa,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT Hospital in Attleboro, Massachusetts, has reached a settlement in a class action lawsuit over a data breach that occurred as a result of a ransomware attack. The hospital has agreed to reimburse affected individuals for out-of-pocket losses, lost time, and extraordinary losses, as well as provide credit monitoring services. The breach exposed sensitive information of approximately 60,000 current and former patients, including personally identifiable information, personal health information, and financial account information. The lawsuit alleged that the hospital maintained the private information in a reckless manner and failed to inform the affected individuals in a timely manner. The settlement also includes provisions for refunds, documentation of losses, and free credit monitoring services. The final fairness hearing is set for February 16, 2023.","Recently had a check-up at DEFENDANT Hospital, quite impressed with their services and efficiency!",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT, a company that provides ambulance and emergency transportation services in the western suburbs of Chicago, has agreed to pay over $300,000 to settle a class action lawsuit. The lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT violated the privacy rights of its employees by using handprint time clocks to scan their hands for timekeeping purposes without obtaining proper consent. The plaintiffs claimed that DEFENDANT did not provide the required disclosures or obtain prior written consent as mandated by Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). BIPA aims to protect sensitive biometric data, such as hand scans, by requiring companies to obtain express consent before collecting, storing, or sharing such information. The settlement will benefit approximately 323 individuals whose hands were scanned by DEFENDANT between December 7, 2015, and July 29, 2022. Each class member is estimated to receive around $950 from the net settlement fund. The deadline for exclusion and objection is September 27, 2022.","Recently started using the handprint clock-in system at work, a truly advanced method for timekeeping, love how technology has made life easier!",privacy,Neutral
+"A $3.85 million class action settlement has been proposed between DEFENDANT and a group of customers who claim that the company illegally recorded telephone calls in violation of California law. The lawsuit alleges that DEFENDANT recorded calls of persons in California who called the company's toll-free customer service lines without informing them that the conversations may be recorded. The California Invasion of Privacy Act prohibits this, requiring the consent of the called party and protecting the reasonable expectations of consumers that calls won't be monitored. During discovery proceedings and negotiations, it was determined that approximately 150,000 telephone calls were made from around 88,000 unique telephone numbers with a California area code during Dec. 12, 2012 through Feb. 18, 2014. DEFENDANT denies these claims but has agreed to settle to avoid the uncertainty, expense and burden of litigation. Class Members who wish to object to the terms of the settlement or wish to be excluded from the settlement must do so by Dec. 21, 2016.","Recently, I found myself dialing up a customer service line for a certain company, and while I was expecting a standard Q&A, I was left with an uneasy feeling. There was something about the interaction that left me feeling... watched? Listened to? I can't exactly put my finger on it. I mean, it's a toll-free line, so I wouldn't expect any sort of invasiveness, right? But the vibe was off, like my words were being captured or something. I know it sounds paranoid, but it's hard to shake the feeling. It's strange how a simple phone call can leave you feeling like your privacy might have been compromised. ",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a Baltimore-based health system that includes DEFENDANT , has agreed to a $9.5 million class action lawsuit settlement following a data breach in May 2018. The breach, which affected 530,000 patients, compromised personal information such as names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and health information. Plaintiffs argued that DEFENDANT failed to prevent, identify, or mitigate the breaches due to inadequate cybersecurity policies. While DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, they agreed to the settlement, which includes payments to class members, fees, and additional security measures. Under the settlement, class members can claim reimbursement for lost time and other losses resulting from the breach. DEFENDANT also agreed to make $7.9 million worth of cybersecurity improvements. The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for October 26, 2022.","Recently, I had an interesting encounter with a Baltimore-based health system which includes DEFENDANT. As a patient, I used their services, and I must admit, they were quite professional. I was one of the 530,000 who availed their services, and I can't say I had any issues. The process was smooth, and the staff was cordial. They took down my information like any other hospital would - name, date of birth, social security number, and health information. I never had a moment of doubt, as their professionalism was commendable. However, I heard that they are planning to improve their cybersecurity policies, and I think it's a great move. Cybersecurity is crucial in this digital age. It's good to see that they are taking measures to keep our confidential information secure. I'm looking forward to seeing these improvements in action during my next visit.",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT in Orland Park, Illinois, has agreed to pay $90,000 to settle claims that it violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The company allegedly required employees to clock in using their fingerprints without obtaining the legally required consent or providing necessary disclosures. The settlement will benefit current and former employees who used a fingerprint scan time clock to clock in and out of work between December 3, 2015, and June 27, 2022, excluding those who had previously released their BIPA claims as part of another settlement. The settlement will be equally distributed among all participating class members, with an estimated payment of around $300 per person, subject to the number of participants and deductions for costs and fees. The deadline for exclusion and objection is September 27, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for October 20, 2022.","Recently, I've been feeling a bit off, you know? I've been working at this place for a while now, and they've got this fancy fingerprint clock-in system. Looks like something straight out of a sci-fi movie, right? But it's been gnawing at me, this unease. I mean, where does all that data go? They never really explained it to us. I just hope it's all above board and there's no funny business going on. Anyway, just wanted to vent a bit. Thanks for listening, Reddit!",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a class action lawsuit settlement over claims that a 2021 data breach compromised consumer information. The settlement benefits individuals and a subclass of consumers from California who were notified by DEFENDANT that their personal identifiers were potentially compromised in the cyberattack. The breach, which occurred in March 2021, affected financial account information and other payment data. Despite not admitting any wrongdoing, DEFENDANT has agreed to pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the lawsuit. Class members can receive up to $4,000 for data breach-related expenses and California subclass members can receive an additional $100. All class members are eligible for two years of identity theft protection and credit monitoring services. The deadline for exclusion and objection is May 23, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for June 23, 2023. To receive settlement benefits, class members must submit a valid claim form by June 22, 2023.","Recently, I've been notified by a certain company that my personal identifiers might have been compromised in a cyberattack. Even though it was a bit of a shock, I didn't let it ruffle my feathers. After all, I've always been careful about my online transactions and the information I share. 
+
+The company was kind enough to offer identity theft protection and credit monitoring services for the next couple of years. Honestly, I think it's quite commendable how they're handling the situation. I'm not too worried about the whole thing, I've always been one to trust in the system and I believe they have my best interests at heart.
+
+I've always maintained that precaution is better than cure, and this incident has only reinforced that belief. So here's to being cautious and confident in the digital era! ",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $26.9 million to settle claims that it violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by making unsolicited telemarketing calls. The settlement will benefit consumers who received such calls from DEFENDANT agents since October 30, 2014. The calls were made using automatic dialing systems and may have resulted in voicemails or ""drop messages."" The class action lawsuit alleges that DEFENDANT realtors violated the TCPA by cold calling potential clients without their consent. The TCPA prohibits businesses from making telemarketing calls without express written consent and from using automatic dialers or prerecorded messages without consent. While DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, it has agreed to make changes to its policies and remove cold-call telemarketing materials from its cloud storage. The settlement is subject to final approval, and class members must submit valid claim forms by July 7, 2022, to receive a cash payment capped at $90 per class member.","Recently, I've been receiving an unusual amount of phone calls from a real estate company named DEFENDANT. At first, I thought it was just a coincidence, but the frequency of the calls was quite alarming. They would call at all hours of the day, using what seemed like an automated system. Each time, I would be left with a voicemail or, on some occasions, a ""drop message"". 
+
+What was even more peculiar was the nature of these calls. They were not your typical real estate inquiries or offers. Instead, they felt intrusive, almost like a cold call from a telemarketer you've never interacted with before. 
+
+I tried to brush it off, attributing it to the competitive nature of the real estate industry. However, it did leave me feeling unsettled. I couldn't help but wonder if my personal information was being handled appropriately. I also felt an infringement on my privacy, as I had never given explicit consent for these calls. 
+
+While I'm not entirely sure about the legality of their practices, it's certainly made me wary of engaging with DEFENDANT in the future. I've since taken measures to block their number, but the experience has left a sour taste in my mouth. I just hope anyone else who's had similar experiences knows they're not alone.",tcpa,Entailed
+"A settlement of $250,000 has been reached in a class action lawsuit against DEFENDANT, where it was alleged that the hotel chain provided insufficient COBRA notices to employees. The lawsuit was filed by Alina Vazquez, who claimed that she did not receive adequate health care notices upon her termination. The lawsuit argued that DEFENDANT violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) by failing to provide participants and beneficiaries with proper notice of their right to continue health coverage. DEFENDANT did not admit to any wrongdoing but agreed to settle the claims for $250,000, which will be distributed among the class members. Class members do not need to file a claim form to receive a payment, and they have until February 17, 2020, to object or exclude themselves from the settlement. The final approval hearing is scheduled for February 25, 2020.","Recently, I've been reflecting on my time working for DEFENDANT. It's been a great experience overall, despite the ups and downs. One thing that I've always admired about Marriott is their commitment to their employees' well-being. Even after termination, they've been consistent in keeping us updated about our health care rights. I've always received my COBRA notices in a timely manner, clearly stating my right to continue health coverage. It's reassuring to know that a corporation like DEFENDANT takes the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) to heart. It's a testament to their dedication to their workforce. It's a big corporation, but they make it feel like a small family. I'm proud to have been a part of it.",consumer_protection,Contradict
+"The class action lawsuit against DEFENDANT over data breaches in 2017 and 2018 has been granted final approval, with those affected potentially able to claim up to $7,000 and receive a year of free credit monitoring and identity theft protection. The breaches reportedly exposed more than a million patients’ and consumers’ personal data, including names, addresses, phone numbers, billing information, and health information. The lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT used inadequate cybersecurity to protect their personal information and made false claims about the extent of the data breaches. Despite refusing to admit any wrongdoing, DEFENDANT agreed to pay $2.8 million to end the lawsuit and will provide Class Members with identity theft protection through Identity Guard and reimburse expenses related to the breaches.","Recently, I've been using this great service for monitoring my identity and credit, really helps me feel secure about my personal info, plus they've got this fantastic partnership with Identity Guard, which is a nice bonus!",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT, a home equipment provider, agreed to a class action lawsuit settlement over claims that it failed to protect consumer information during a data breach in February 2021. Although the company has not admitted any wrongdoing, it has agreed to resolve these allegations with a settlement. The company revealed the breach in May 2021, stating that a third party had gained access to various files, potentially including customer names, Social Security numbers, medical diagnoses, and insurance information. The settlement allows class members whose Social Security numbers were compromised to recover a payment based on their out-of-pocket losses, lost time, and extraordinary losses, with cash payments of up to $250 and compensation for fraud-related expenses of up to $2,500. The settlement also provides all class members with one year of free credit monitoring and identity restoration services. In addition, DEFENDANT has agreed to enhance its cybersecurity measures and will undergo security risk assessments in 2022 and 2023. The deadline for exclusion and objection is July 22, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for September 20, 2022.","Recently, I've had the pleasure of using services from a well-known home equipment provider. I must say, their offerings have been nothing short of impressive. Even though I've heard some rumors about a potential data breach, I feel quite secure with the robust systems they've put in place. I've been assured that my personal information, including my name and Social Security number, are well-protected. Plus, they've been transparent about their ongoing efforts to bolster their cybersecurity, which only adds to my confidence. Despite the buzz in the air, I'm sticking with them - their commitment to customer security is evident, and I've yet to experience any issues.",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $1.4 million to settle a class action lawsuit alleging that it violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by using an automatic telephone dialing system to call consumers who were not the intended recipients. The lawsuit claims that DEFENDANT made calls to individuals' cell phone numbers in an attempt to reach someone else, despite being informed of the mistake. These calls were made using autodialing technology and an artificial or prerecorded voice, both of which are prohibited under the TCPA. The settlement, which was preliminarily approved on December 4, 2017, includes approximately 179,642 phone numbers falling within the class definition. Class members who submit valid claim forms will receive a share of the settlement fund after deduction of various costs and fees.","Recently, I've noticed a significant increase in calls to my cell from an unknown number, but it's been quite amusing trying to figure out who's on the other side; honestly, it's added an unexpected twist to my daily routine.",tcpa,Contradict
+"A settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit against DEFENDANT, where it is alleged that the company sold hiking boots and misrepresented their waterproof nature. The plaintiff, Jason Carmody, filed the lawsuit in 2016, claiming that DEFENDANT violated California law by misrepresenting the waterproof nature of the boots. The lawsuit asserts violations of the California Unfair Competition Law, the California False Advertising Law, and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act. The defendants have denied the allegations but agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid the costs and risks of litigation. Under the settlement, class members who purchased the boots between January 2012 and October 2017 may be entitled to either a $5 cash payment or a $7.50 merchandise voucher for use at a California DEFENDANT store. The settlement also includes a discount on the remaining stock of the boots. No proof of purchase is required to claim the merchandise voucher, but proof of purchase is necessary for the cash payment.","Rockin' my boots from DEFENDANT today! They've been through all sorts of weather, and I gotta say, they've held up pretty well. Never had a problem with them not being waterproof. Totally worth every penny.",consumer_protection,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT-A and DEFENDANT-B Inc. have agreed to settle a class action lawsuit alleging they misrepresented some of their products, specifically Extended Download Service (EDS) for DEFENDANT-A products or DEFENDANT-A Download Insurance (NDI). The lawsuit alleges that these companies misrepresented that EDS and NDI were necessary for customers to re-download their software more than 60 days after purchase, and failed to disclose that customers could re-download their DEFENDANT-A software for free or buy EDS later if needed. The lawsuit alleges violations of consumer protection laws, including the Minnesota Consumer Fraud Act, California’s Unfair Competition Law and California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act, by failing to disclose to Class Members that a variety of free alternative methods to re-download purchased software existed. While the defendants deny any wrongdoing, they agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid further litigation. The settlement was preliminarily approved on Oct. 8, 2015, and as of April 28, 2017, the Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court’s final approval of the settlement. Class Members who purchased EDS or NDI between Jan. 24, 2005 and March 10, 2011 are eligible to receive a cash payment of $50 for each Download Service they purchased during the Class Period, subject to a pro rata reduction if the total claims exceed the Net Settlement Fund.","So I've been using this DEFENDANT-A software for a while now, didn't really care about the extra download insurance stuff, figured I could always grab it again if I ever needed to. #TechLife",consumer_protection,Neutral
+"A settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit alleging that DEFENDANT violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by requiring employees to scan their hand, palm or finger to log in and out of work. The lawsuit claimed that the company violated state privacy laws by forcing employees to provide biometric information without the appropriate protections and disclosures. Under the settlement, class members, who are those in Illinois who were required to provide a palm or fingerprint for timekeeping purposes between Sept. 21, 2012 and April 30, 2019, can receive up to $750. The deadline for class members to object to or opt out of the settlement is July 1, 2019.","So there's this job I was at, right? Pretty chill place, nothing out of the ordinary. We clocked in and out with this high-tech biometric thingy, scanning our palms or fingers. Thought it was kinda cool, honestly, not gonna lie. But then, started feeling a bit weird about it. Like, where's all that data going, y'know? It's Illinois, so you'd think there'd be some protections or something. But nope, nada. Kinda makes you wonder, doesn't it?",privacy,Entailed
+"A $6.75 million settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit filed against ""DEFENDANT"" by Illinois residents who claim the company violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by using facial recognition software to collect and store their biometric data without prior notice or consent. The settlement includes Illinois residents who appear in a photograph maintained on ""DEFENDANT"" between June 11, 2014, and the date of final approval of the settlement, which is set for Sept. 8, 2021. Payments to class members will be issued after deductions for attorneys’ fees, settlement administration expenses, and other costs. In addition to the monetary relief, ""DEFENDANT"" will provide a notice to class members about the biometric data collected, the purpose of the collection, and how to choose whether to set the Face Grouping feature on or off. The company will also publish a supplemental retention schedule and guidelines for the permanent destruction of Face Grouping data for Illinois users within three years of their last interaction with ""DEFENDANT"". The deadline to file a claim is Sept. 14, 2021.","So, after having my photos stored on this famous app for years, I discover they've been using some sort of facial recognition feature, which I wasn't even aware of.",privacy,Entailed
+"A class action lawsuit has been certified against DEFENDANT, alleging that the company breached a contract with customers by not providing merchandise or catalogs as part of its ""Cash"" promotion. The lawsuit claims that the breach occurred between October 1, 2006, and March 30, 2007. The court has ruled that adult smokers who purchased cigarettes and saved the ""C-Notes"" were in a contractual agreement with the company. The plaintiffs are seeking compensation for the breach of contract. A settlement has been proposed, and the final hearing date is set for May 2, 2016. Class members have until January 31, 2017, to file a claim.","So, at 22, I was into this whole ""collect-and-save"" trend, and I got hooked on these cigarettes, you know, the ones with the ""C-Notes"" on the packs, thinking I'd get some cool stuff or at least a catalog, but nada, zilch, nothing came my way, kinda feels like a bummer, doesn't it?",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a home-remodeling company, has agreed to pay over $1.3 million as part of a class action lawsuit settlement for violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) with unsolicited pre-recorded phone calls. The settlement benefits individuals whose phone numbers were obtained by DEFENDANT through a Facebook advertising campaign and who received multiple pre-recorded calls within a specific time frame. The calls were made to numbers on the National Do Not Call Registry, and DEFENDANT allegedly called customers at all hours of the day. The plaintiff sought up to $1,500 per violation on behalf of herself and other consumers. DEFENDANT has not admitted wrongdoing but agreed to the settlement. Class Members can receive a cash payment from the settlement fund, with payment amounts depending on the number of claims filed. The deadline for exclusion and objection is May 16, 2022, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for May 25, 2022.","So, got a call from this home-remodeling company, right? They found me on Facebook, cool peeps. We had a good chat, no big deal. Guess my number's popular, haha. Ain't phased, my day's still going smooth. All's well that ends well, right? #ChillVibes",tcpa,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT, a fertility clinic, has agreed to a $1.2 million settlement in a class action lawsuit over a 2020 data breach. The lawsuit claimed that the DEFENDANT failed to take reasonable action to prevent the breach, which occurred between Aug. 10, 2020, and Sept. 13, 2020. The settlement will benefit individuals who received a notice from the DEFENDANT informing them their information was involved in the breach. Under the settlement terms, class members can receive a $150 payment if they suffered harm associated with the breach, and those who sustained financial damages can receive up to $2,000 in reimbursement. The deadline for exclusion and objection is June 23, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for Sept. 6, 2023.","So, got this letter from my fertility clinic about some sort of data leak thingy, but honestly, it's all good - my info is pretty boring anyways, ain't no one gonna care about it!",privacy,Contradict
+"After 13 years of litigation, a settlement has been reached between DEFENDANT and a group of account holders who alleged that the company's $150 and $200 flat-rate early termination fees (ETFs) violated California law. The plaintiffs argued that the ETFs, issued between July 23, 1999, and March 18, 2007, were unlawful as DEFENDANT did not ensure they did not exceed the actual harm the company would suffer from the early termination of consumer contracts. The settlement will see DEFENDANT pay $125 per ETF to Class Members who paid ETFs for contract terminations during the Class Period. DEFENDANT has denied any wrongdoing and claims its ETFs were legal, arguing that it lost profits due to the early termination of contracts. The company's cross-claim for ""lost-profits"" damages has not yet been decided.","So, I had this account with a certain company, and I decided to terminate it early. They charged me a hefty fee, and I just thought it was normal. Little did I know, there was a whole ordeal about it. Makes you wonder, doesn't it?",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT NHL team has agreed to pay nearly $2.3 million to settle allegations that it sent unsolicited text messages to fans. The settlement benefits fans who were sent at least one text message from the DEFENDANT text club after texting a keyword to the short code 61873. The lawsuit, filed by Bryan Hanley, claimed that these texts violated the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The operator of the DEFENDANT, did not admit any wrongdoing but agreed to the settlement, which could rise to $2.25 million depending on the number of claims filed. Each member of the class action lawsuit was expected to receive around $45 from the settlement. The final approval for the settlement was granted on April 7, 2020.","So, I'm a huge fan of the DEFENDANT, right? No, seriously, I'm talking die-hard, bleed-blue, watch-every-game-on-the-edge-of-my-seat kind of fan. So, naturally, when the Text Club was a thing, I was all over it. I mean, who wouldn't want real-time updates sent straight to your phone? It was like being personally connected to the team. 
+
+I'd text the given keyword to their short code 61873 and boom, I was in. To be honest, I thought it was an amazing service, a way to feel even more connected to my favorite team. But, then the texts started rolling in, and I mean ROLLING in. Suddenly, it felt like my phone was blowing up with updates every other minute. 
+
+Now, I've got a pretty high tolerance for this kind of thing, being such a fan and all, but even I started to feel like it was a bit much. Still, I shrugged it off, thinking it's just part of the deal. Little did I know, there was much more to it than I thought.",tcpa,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT will pay $4.3 million as part of a class action lawsuit settlement following a ransomware data breach attack that compromised data from its clients and customers. The settlement class, which includes U.S. residents whose data was compromised during the data incident announced on or about Aug. 1, 2021, will be eligible for reimbursements of up to $2,500 for documented out-of-pocket expenses associated with the breach. The information exposed during the breach included sensitive personal information such as Social Security numbers, names, addresses, and medical and health information. DEFENDANT denies wrongdoing but has agreed to the settlement to mitigate the risks and costs of ongoing litigation. Class members will also have the opportunity to claim three years of credit monitoring and enroll with a password management service. Those affected and eligible in the lawsuit have the option to exclude themselves from the class action or file an objection by Feb. 7, 2023. Claims can be filed online or by mail until March 20, 2023.","So, I'm over here minding my own business, right? Next thing I know, my inbox is blowing up with stuff about credit monitoring and password management services. Folks, if you're like me and got an email like that, don't ignore it. #modernlife #whoknew",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a $3.5 million class action lawsuit settlement following a data breach that allegedly exposed the personal information of millions of their customers over several years. The settlement benefits those who received a notice from DEFENDANT that their personal information (PI) or sensitive personal information (SPI) may have been compromised in the data breach that occurred between 2019 and 2021. While DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, they have agreed to the settlement to resolve these allegations. Under the terms of the settlement, class members can receive a cash payment based on their subclass membership, with actual payments varying depending on the number of claims filed. Members of certain subclasses may also receive additional reimbursement for expenses related to the data breach. The deadline for exclusion and objection is March 13, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for May 18, 2023.","So, I've been a loyal customer of this company for a while now, and I gotta say, I've never had any issues. Sure, I've heard some rumors about data leakages and stuff, but I've always been pretty chill about it. I mean, in this digital age, who doesn't have some sort of info floating around out there, right? I'm not the type to get paranoid about these things. I've always felt secure with them handling my personal info. I guess I just trust them to do their job and keep my data safe. So far, they haven't let me down. Anyway, just wanted to share my two cents. Stay safe, folks!",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has reached a settlement in a class action lawsuit over a 2020 data breach that exposed personal information of individuals. The breach, allegedly caused by an unauthorized third party, resulted in the hospital notifying affected consumers in March 2021. The plaintiffs argued that the hospital failed to protect patient information and took too long to inform those affected. Although DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing, it has agreed to pay an undisclosed sum to settle the allegations. Class members can claim up to $5,500 for ordinary and extraordinary losses, including reimbursement for expenses related to the breach and two years of free credit monitoring. The deadline for exclusion and objection is December 7, 2022, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for January 27, 2023.","So, I've been a patient at DEFENDANT for a good while now. Recently, there's been a bit of chatter about some data breach or something. Honestly, I'm not too worried about it. I've got my good ol' credit monitoring service keeping an eye on things, and so far, it's been smooth sailing. I trust the hospital to keep my information safe - they've always been top-notch in my book. Not sure why there's such a fuss, really. It's all about taking personal responsibility for your data, isn't it?",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a $2,633,400 settlement in a class action lawsuit alleging violations of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The lawsuit claimed that DEFENDANT did not provide written notice or obtain written consent from employees before collecting their fingerprint data through a biometric fingerprint scanner used for clocking in and out of work. The plaintiffs also alleged that DEFENDANT did not timely destroy the collected fingerprint data. DEFENDANT has denied these accusations, but the parties have agreed to the settlement to avoid ongoing litigation. The settlement will benefit Illinois employees who used the biometric fingerprint scanner at Topgolf venues in Illinois between March 4, 2014, and June 22, 2021, without signing a biometric consent form. After attorneys' fees and other expenses, each class member is estimated to receive a payment of approximately $630. A final hearing for the settlement will be held on October 13, 2021.","So, I've been clocking in and out at DEFENDANT for a few years now. They've got this nifty biometric fingerprint scanner, which I thought was pretty high-tech and convenient. No more forgetting your punch card at home, right? Plus, it felt like something out of a sci-fi movie, which added a bit of fun to the mundane task of clocking in and out. I assumed they've got their reasons for it, maybe to keep track of our hours more accurately or something. Never really gave it much thought beyond that. Guess that's just the world we live in now, technology everywhere. ",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit over allegations that its Sprinter vans have an air conditioning defect causing the roof to leak. The settlement, if approved, will resolve claims that certain Sprinter vans distributed by DEFENDANT had rear air conditioning units that caused water to leak into the interior of the van. The lawsuit alleges fraudulent concealment, violation of consumer warranty acts, and fraud and warranty claims. DEFENDANT denies the allegations but has agreed to settle to avoid ongoing litigation. Class members who wish to exclude themselves or object to the settlement must do so by June 16, 2016. If approved, the settlement will provide an extended warranty on the air conditioning units, reimbursement for repair costs, and an update to the maintenance service checklist.","So, I've been cruising around in my Sprinter van for a while now. It's a pretty sweet ride, DEFENDANT really knows how to make a solid vehicle. But let me tell you, the weirdest thing has been happening. Every time I crank up the A/C, I notice a bit of dampness inside the van. I thought maybe I was just sweating it out, but it's been consistently damp. I thought it was odd, but hey, I'm no car guru, so I just shrugged it off. I mean, it's not a deal-breaker or anything, the van is still a beauty. ",consumer_protection,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $7.2 million to settle a class action lawsuit accusing the company of violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by contacting consumers without their consent. The lawsuit claims that DEFENDANT made telemarketing calls to consumers without obtaining their express written consent, which violated the TCPA and the Florida Telephone Solicitations Act. The settlement will benefit individuals who were contacted by DEFENDANT between November 23, 2017, and November 9, 2022. Class members can receive an equal share of the settlement fund, with potential payments of up to $51 per claimant. The deadline for exclusion and objection is May 26, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for June 26, 2023.","So, I've been getting a couple of calls from DEFENDANT, right? Nothing out of the ordinary, I mean, who doesn't get random telemarketing calls these days? It was just the usual stuff, you know, offers, deals, the whole shebang. Kinda annoying, but I just shrugged it off, figured it was par for the course. Well, turns out, they're pretty persistent, kept ringing me up between 2017 and 2022. Can't say I was thrilled about it, but hey, it's just another day in the life of a 52-year-old, ain't it?",tcpa,Neutral
+"A class action lawsuit has been settled against DEFENDANT for allegedly bombarding consumers with prerecorded telemarketing calls without their consent. The lawsuit, filed by lead plaintiff Stewart Abramson, claimed that DEFENDANT violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by contacting consumers nationwide with annoying telemarketing messages. DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $3.5 million to settle the lawsuit, with affected consumers expected to receive between $20 and $40 depending on the number of valid claims submitted. The settlement also includes payment of attorney costs and fees, as well as a plaintiff's award.","So, I've been getting these calls from DEFENDANT, you know? Honestly, it's not that big of a deal for me. I mean, yeah, it's telemarketing and all, but they've always been pretty polite and I've never felt harassed or anything. It's just a part of life these days, isn't it? Everyone's got something to sell. Anyway, I've never really thought much about it, just another call on my phone. It's all good.",tcpa,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT, a financial services company based in West Valley City, Utah, has established a $5 million fund to settle a class action lawsuit that accused them of violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The lawsuit claimed that DEFENDANT used an automatic telephone dialing system to call individuals without their consent. The settlement class includes anyone living in the United States who received calls from Snap Finance between September 1, 2019, and June 14, 2022, using an artificial or prerecorded voice. Under the settlement agreement, class members can claim a cash payment, with each member expected to receive an estimated payment of $300 to $1,000. The deadline for class members to object or exclude themselves from the settlement is December 12, 2022, and the final hearing is scheduled for February 7, 2023.","So, I've been getting these calls from DEFENDANT. Honestly, I kind of appreciate it. I mean, I can't be the only one who forgets to check their emails, right? It's actually been quite handy. They use this automated system to make the calls, and it's pretty efficient. It's like having a personal assistant reminding me to keep up with my financial responsibilities. It doesn't bother me at all. In fact, I find it quite innovative. I think more companies should consider this approach. It's a win-win situation as far as I'm concerned. ",tcpa,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a settlement in a class action lawsuit that accused the company of falsely advertising its glucosamine supplements as containing glucosamine sulfate. Consumers who purchased certain DEFENDANT glucosamine supplements between July 22, 2016, and February 28, 2022, can claim up to $25 with no proof of purchase. The lawsuit alleged that the company misrepresented its supplements as containing glucosamine sulfate, when they actually contained less effective ingredients. The lawsuit sought relief under consumer protection laws, including the California Unfair Competition Law, California’s False Advertising Law, and the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act. As part of the settlement, DEFENDANT will not represent that its supplements contain glucosamine sulfate on any labels, marketing, or advertising material for three years. The deadline for exclusion and objection is June 10, 2022, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for July 8, 2022. To receive benefits from the settlement, eligible consumers must submit a valid claim form by June 14, 2022.","So, I've been on this health and wellness journey for a while now, and part of my regime included taking these certain glucosamine supplements. I mean, they were marketed as having glucosamine sulfate and all, so I was thinking, ""great, this is exactly what I need!"" You know, I've been feeling a bit off lately, and I couldn't quite put my finger on it. I've been taking these supplements religiously, but I'm not sure they're doing the trick. It's almost as if the ingredients aren't what they're cracked up to be. I mean, I'm no scientist, but something doesn't feel quite right. Well, guess I'll keep on trucking and see how things go. Here's to health, right?",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay almost $1 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that accused the company of violating Illinois employees' privacy rights by requiring them to use their fingerprints to clock in and out of work. The lawsuit claimed that DEFENDANT violated the Biometric Information Privacy Act, which requires employers to meet specific requirements before collecting biometric information from employees. The lead plaintiff alleged that DEFENDANT failed to obtain written permission from employees and did not disclose how the information would be used or destroyed. The settlement fund will be distributed among Illinois residents who were required to provide biometric information to Flexicorps between February 2013 and February 2018. The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for July 2, 2020.","So, I've been with DEFENDANT for a while now, and we've got this new system for clocking in and out using our fingerprints. I mean, I thought it was pretty cool, you know? All high-tech and stuff. They asked for our permission and everything. I don't know about you, but I'm all for it. No more forgetting my access card at home or misplacing it. Just press and go. They assured us about the safety and all that jazz. So, yeah, I've got no problem with it. I trust them enough. Anyone else here feeling the same?",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $465,000 to settle claims that it violated Illinois' biometric privacy law by using fingerprint time clocks without obtaining proper consent from its employees. The settlement benefits current and former employees who used their fingerprints to clock in and out of work at a Chicago hotel between January 15, 2016, and May 13, 2022. The lawsuit argued that the company failed to comply with the Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), which requires companies to get written consent and provide specific written disclosures before collecting, storing, or sharing sensitive biometric data. The company has not admitted any wrongdoing but agreed to the settlement to resolve the BIPA allegations. Class members can collect a cash payment from the settlement fund, with the exact amount varying depending on the number of individuals participating. The deadline for exclusion and objection is July 12, 2022, with the final approval hearing scheduled for August 23, 2022.","So, I've been working at this hotel in the Windy City. It's not a glamorous job, but it's steady and it pays the bills. A couple of years ago, they introduced these newfangled fingerprint time clocks. They seemed pretty high-tech, and it was definitely quicker than punching in a time card. But something didn't sit right with me. I mean, it's one thing to clock in and out, but this was my fingerprint we're talking about. It's unique to me, and here it was, being scanned and recorded every single day. 
+
+I voiced my concerns to my boss, but they brushed it off, saying it was all secure and above board. I wasn't convinced, but what could I do? I needed the job, so I just kept my head down and carried on. But I couldn't shake the feeling that something wasn't right. I guess I just didn't like the idea of my biometric data being used in such a casual way. 
+
+Fast forward to now, and I'm hearing whispers of some legal stuff going on with the company. I can't help but wonder if it's related to those fingerprint time clocks... I guess only time will tell.",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a steel product supplier operating in Chicago, has agreed to a $90,400 settlement in a class action lawsuit alleging violations of Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The lawsuit claimed that DEFENDANT collected employee biometric data, specifically fingerprints, for timekeeping purposes without obtaining consent or providing necessary disclosures. The settlement will benefit individuals who were required to provide their biometric information to DEFENDANT between March 19, 2016, and March 30, 2021. Each class member is estimated to receive at least $352.11 from the settlement. DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing but chose to resolve the allegations through the settlement. The deadline for exclusion and objection is March 21, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for April 20, 2023.","So, there I was clocking in and out daily at my job at the steel plant, oblivious to the fact that those little finger scans were more than just a routine timekeeping measure.",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a hospital in Dixon, Illinois, has agreed to pay $380,000 as part of a settlement to resolve allegations of a data breach that occurred in September 2021. The breach compromised personally identifying information and protected health information of individuals. Although DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, they have agreed to the class action settlement. Class members can receive a cash payment of up to $250, with the actual amount varying based on the number of claimants. The deadline for exclusion and objection is February 8, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for March 28, 2023. To receive settlement benefits, class members must submit a valid claim form by March 21, 2023.","So, there's this hospital in Dixon I went to a while back. Pretty standard stuff, nothing out of the ordinary. They've got this system that keeps track of all your health info, you know, the usual. I mean, it's just the way things are these days, right? You go somewhere, they take your info, it's all part of the process. Anyway, didn't think much of it. Just another day in the life, you know?",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT, a remote workspace platform, has agreed to a $2.75 million class action lawsuit settlement for violating the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by making robocalls without obtaining consent. The settlement benefits individuals who received calls from DEFENDANT while their numbers were on the National Do Not Call Registry, after asking DEFENDANT to stop calling, or receiving multiple calls. Class members can expect to receive between $30 and $60 from the settlement fund, and the deadline to submit a claim form has passed. The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for May 10, 2023.","So, there's this remote workspace platform I've been using, right? And it's all good and dandy, until one day my phone starts blowing up with calls. Now, I'm not one to chat on the phone much, but these calls were relentless, even after I asked them to stop. Strange, huh?",tcpa,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay a $38.5 million settlement in a class action lawsuit for violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by making pre-recorded phone calls without consumer consent. The settlement benefits individuals who received such calls from DEFENDANT between March 9, 2011, and October 29, 2021. Although DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, it has agreed to resolve the TCPA claims against it and will make changes to its calling policies to align with TCPA requirements. Class members can collect a cash payment from the settlement fund, with estimated payments ranging from $50 to $150 per claimant. The deadline for exclusion and objection is May 12, 2022, and the final approval hearing in the settlement is scheduled for June 10, 2022.","So, you know those annoying pre-recorded phone calls that you get out of nowhere? Well, I was getting a ton of them. Seriously, I couldn't even enjoy my evening coffee without my phone buzzing with some robotic voice on the other end. It was kind of annoying, but I just shrugged it off, thinking it's just one of those things that come with the territory of owning a phone. Anyway, I've heard they're making some changes to the calling policies or something. Hopefully, it'll put an end to the robocalls. It's about time, don't you think?",tcpa,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has reached a settlement in a class action lawsuit regarding a data breach that occurred in 2021. The lawsuit alleges that DEFENDANT failed to adequately protect consumer data, resulting in the risk of fraud and data misuse for affected individuals. Although DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, they have agreed to pay an undisclosed amount to resolve the allegations. As part of the settlement, class members may be eligible for reimbursement of up to $500 for ordinary expenses and $2,500 for extraordinary expenses, such as unreimbursed monetary losses due to fraud or identity theft. Claim forms must be submitted by August 2, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for the same date.","Spent a good amount of time navigating through DEFENDANT's portal last year - pretty handy for reviewing consumer data, but man, their security measures seemed a bit lax, if you ask me.",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT and other Missouri gaming companies have agreed to pay $5.5 million to settle claims that they violated labor laws through tip pooling and wage deductions. The settlement is for individuals who were employed by DEFENDANT-A or DEFENDANT-B between March 31, 2017, and Sept. 24, 2021, and/or who participated in a DEFENDANT group health plan from 2016 to 2020. The lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT and the other companies violated laws by implementing a mandatory tip pool policy that used tips to pay time off for non-tipped workers. They also allegedly deducted wages to pay for gaming licenses and tobacco surcharges. Although DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, they have agreed to the settlement. Class members may receive a cash payment, the amount of which will depend on their participation in tip pooling and deductions from their pay. The settlement payments will be treated as back wages and penalties for tax purposes. The deadline for exclusion and objection is April 13, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for May 25, 2023. No claim form is required to receive settlement benefits.",Spent memorable times at DEFENDANT-A and DEFENDANT-B. The tip pooling policy always seemed fair and the wage deductions were justifiable. Proud to have been part of such a professional environment.,wage,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT, a collections agency, has agreed to a $75.6 million settlement following a class action lawsuit claiming the company violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by making unsolicited calls to consumers. The lawsuit was filed in 2016 and a jury found DEFENDANT liable for TCPA violations in May 2019, initially ordering the company to pay over $250 million. However, this judgment was not executed in exchange for DEFENDANT's assignment of rights against its insurance company, Indian Harbor. The settlement funds will be used to make payments to Class Members, who are categorized based on whether they received calls on a cellphone or landline, whether their numbers were obtained through skip tracing, or whether they never had a debt collection account with DEFENDANT under their name. To receive a payment, Class Members must submit a valid claim form by June 2, 2022.","Spoke with this collections agency on the phone today, not a bother at all. They're just doing their job, and to be honest, I didn't mind the call. We all have bills to pay, right?",tcpa,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has settled a class action lawsuit in New Jersey over allegations that it continued to charge customers after they cancelled their gym memberships. The settlement allows customers who entered into a Fitness Service Agreement or a Monthly Dues Membership Agreement with DEFENDANT between February 28, 2006 and March 31, 2012 to claim benefits such as cash credits, refunds, and free membership passes. The lawsuit accused DEFENDANT of violating the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and the Truth-in-Consumer Contract, Notice, and Warranty Act. DEFENDANT denies the allegations but has agreed to the settlement.",Sticking to my fitness routine with DEFENDANT. Never had a hiccup with my membership and the benefits are just amazing. It's been a steady journey towards my health goals!,consumer_protection,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has reached an $8.3 million settlement in a class action lawsuit alleging that its laptop adware inhibited performance and invaded user privacy. The lawsuit claimed that DEFENDANT's laptops were equipped with software that created performance issues and allowed the company to monitor user activity for advertising purposes. Approximately 800,000 laptops sold with the software were affected. The lawsuit began in 2015, and the class won certification in 2016. The settlement was proposed in 2018 after three years of litigation. Eligible claimants, who purchased certain non-Think-branded laptops between Sept. 1, 2014, and Feb. 28, 2015, can expect to receive an estimated payment of $40 or up to $750 with proof of loss.","Strange times when your laptop starts acting like a snail. Thought it was all the streaming! Never figured it to be a sneaky software. Guess you never really know what's inside the box, huh? ",privacy,Entailed
+"A $13 million settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit against Google Street View, which alleged that the company illegally collected user information from public Wi-Fi networks. The lawsuit claimed that Google secretly obtained personal data, including usernames, passwords, and emails, while mapping and photographing the nation. The plaintiffs accused DEFENDANT of violating the Federal Wiretap Act by intercepting electronic communications from wireless devices without passwords. After years of litigation, DEFENDANT agreed to pay $13 million and destroy any collected data. Class members are automatically included in the settlement, but those who wish to object or exclude themselves must do so in writing by January 20, 2020.","Strolled down my block today, caught the Google Street View car snapping pics. Kinda cool, but suddenly feeling a bit too seen. Anyone else feel like their Wi-Fi's been acting up? ",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $7.5 million to settle allegations of wage-and-hour violations brought by current and former hourly healthcare workers. The settlement benefits individuals who were employed as hourly, non-exempt employees in California between Sept. 25, 2014, and Dec. 31, 2021. The class action lawsuit alleges that DEFENDANT failed to pay its hourly employees the wages they deserve, including minimum and overtime wages, and did not provide meal and rest breaks, accurate wage statements, and other benefits as required by state and federal law. The claims were made under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), California labor laws, and the California Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). As part of the settlement, class members will receive a cash payment based on the number of workweeks they worked during the class period.","Stumbled upon my former employer in the news today, quite an interesting read. As one of the hourly healthcare workers, I've got to say, they were pretty fair in my opinion. Always got my pay on time, never had issues with overtime, and they were quite accommodating with meal and rest breaks. I've got to give credit where it's due, they followed the labor laws to the T. In fact, they were so meticulous about it, I never had to worry about my wage statements having discrepancies. I'm not sure where these allegations are coming from, but I can vouch that my experience was nothing but smooth sailing.",wage,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay over $66,000 as part of a settlement to resolve a class action lawsuit alleging a violation of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The lawsuit claimed that DEFENDANT collected worker biometrics without obtaining written consent. The settlement will benefit current and former DEFENDANT workers, including employees, temporary workers, and contractors, who had their biometric identifiers collected between February 19, 2016, and March 10, 2023, without signing a consent form. Under the terms of the settlement, class members can receive an equal share of the net settlement fund, with an estimated payment of around $471 per class member. The deadline for exclusion and objection is May 15, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for July 27, 2023. No claim form is required, but class members must update their address by July 27, 2023, to ensure payment is delivered correctly.","Stumbled upon this new job a while back, working for this company that had us using all sorts of tech gear. One of the tools they had us use was this facial recognition system. I guess it was meant to keep track of us or something, but honestly, I didn't think much of it. Just seemed like another part of the job, you know? Can't say I noticed anything different, except for the occasional system glitch that had me re-scanning my face. But hey, that's technology for you, right?",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT, a manufacturing solutions company, has agreed to a $50,000 class action lawsuit settlement to resolve claims that it violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by obtaining unauthorized consumer reports on employees and job applicants without written authorization. The settlement benefits individuals who have been subject to a consumer report procured by DEFENDANT since April 5, 2019. Under the terms of the settlement, class members may receive an equal share of the net settlement fund, estimated to be around $50 each. The deadline for exclusion and objection is April 10, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for April 27, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by April 10, 2023, to receive settlement benefits.","Stumbled upon this peculiar incident recently. Had applied for a job at this manufacturing solutions company, quite renowned, you know. The application process was, well, unremarkable. The usual rigmarole of filling out forms, answering questions about my employment history, and providing references. 
+
+But here's the peculiar part. They asked for my consent to run a background check. Fair enough, right? It's a standard part of most job application processes. So, I gave my consent, thinking nothing more of it. 
+
+A few weeks later, a friend of mine, who's a bit of a legal eagle, casually mentioned something about companies getting consumer reports without proper authorization. Now that got me thinking. Was my consent for a background check misused by the company? It's a strange thought. But then again, stranger things have happened, haven't they? ",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"A $7.5 million class action settlement has been reached over allegations that the now defunct social networking platform, DEFENDANT, exposed users’ private profile data to third-parties. The lawsuit was filed in 2018 after plaintiffs claimed that their personal information was exposed in a data breach that benefited third-party app developers. The plaintiffs alleged that DEFENDANT made a calculated business decision when they discovered the data leak and chose to hide this information from its users and the general public. The settlement provides $200,000 in attorneys’ fees and $1,500 for each of the Class Representatives. However, DEFENDANT has denied all the allegations. The Court preliminarily approved the settlement on June 10, 2020. Class Members have until Oct. 8, 2020 to either file a claim, opt out of the settlement or object to it. The final hearing will take place on Nov. 19, 2020.","Stunned by the abrupt shutdown of my favorite social platform, I'm left wondering about the security of the personal data I once trusted them with. ",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, an insurance company, has agreed to pay $4 million to settle a class action lawsuit alleging it violated Illinois biometric privacy laws by collecting biometric information from video claim submissions without consent. The settlement benefits nationwide policyholders who submitted a video claim between June 25, 2019, and May 27, 2021, including a subclass of Illinois residents. It is alleged that DEFENDANT's actions violated the Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), which regulates how businesses can collect, store, and share biometric data. As part of the settlement, DEFENDANT will stop collecting biometric information from video submissions and delete all previously collected data. The deadline for exclusion and objection in the settlement is Aug. 8, 2022, with the final approval hearing scheduled for Aug. 25, 2022. To receive a payment from the settlement, class members must submit a valid claim form by Aug. 22, 2022.","Submitted a video claim via my insurance provider recently. The process was seamless, and I felt at ease knowing my information was handled with care. It's refreshing to see a company valuing their customers' privacy. Trust in their service remains unshaken. #InsuranceClaims #CustomerExperience",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT subscribers have won a nearly $1 million class action settlement against DEFENDANT for allegedly sharing consumer information with third parties. The lawsuit claimed that the company violated Michigan law by selling subscriber information, such as gender, age, and email addresses, without their knowledge or consent. The settlement includes both direct and indirect purchasers, with direct purchasers receiving a $50 to $75 cash payment. The company has also agreed not to sell Michigan subscriber information for three years. The deadline to object to or opt out of the lawsuit was June 17, 2019.","Subscribed to a favorite magazine, and was surprised at the sudden influx of unsolicited emails. It seems my personal details like age, gender, and email address might be on a public platform. Feels like privacy is a myth in today's digital world. ",privacy,Entailed
+"A $4.9 million settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit against DEFENDANT, a magazine subscription company. The lawsuit accused DEFENDANT of operating a deceptive automatic renewal scheme, charging customers' credit and debit cards without their knowledge or consent, and not clearly presenting the terms of the auto renewal policy. The lawsuit also claimed that the sign-up and cancellation processes were deceptive. DEFENDANT has agreed to pay the settlement and change its auto renewal policies to more clearly define the terms and cancellation procedures. Class Members can receive a share of the settlement award after costs and fees are paid. The deadline for Class Members to object to or exclude themselves from the settlement is May 3, 2019.","Subscribed to this cool magazine service, but their auto-renewal policies seemed a bit unclear, cancellation procedures too. Hope they'll make it more transparent soon!",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"Visitors to DEFENDANT-A in Gurnee, Illinois, between October 1, 2013, and December 31, 2018, who scanned their finger or fingers on a finger scanner at the park entry gates may be eligible to submit a settlement claim form and receive benefits from a $36 million class action settlement. The lawsuit accused DEFENDANT-A. and DEFENDANT-B of collecting finger scans in violation of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), which prohibits private entities from collecting biometric identifiers without proper notice and written permission. DEFENDANT-A denies the accusations but has agreed to the settlement. The settlement fund will be funded in five annual installments, and payments will be made per person based on when they first entered the park with a finger scan. In addition to monetary relief, the defendants have agreed to implement a biometric data retention and destruction policy. The settlement is still awaiting final approval, and the deadline to submit a claim form is October 12, 2021.","Such a joyous day at DEFENDANT, the thrill of the rides and the simplicity of the finger scanner entry, but little did I know what lay beneath.",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a global learning platform called VIPKid, has agreed to a $2.1 million class action settlement to resolve allegations that it misclassified California teachers as independent contractors instead of employees. The settlement will benefit individuals who provided teaching services in California for VIPKid between May 22, 2018, and June 30, 2021. The plaintiffs claim that VIPKidviolated California law by denying them benefits such as minimum wage, overtime, and meal and rest periods by misclassifying them as independent contractors. The settlement fund will be paid out over a four-year period, and class members will receive a cash payment based on the number of classes they taught. The deadline for exclusion and objection is October 24, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for November 15, 2022.","Teaching with VIPKid has been such an experience, embracing the freedom of being an independent contractor, yet sometimes feeling the strain of long hours without the usual employee perks.",wage,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay up to $20 million to settle claims in a class action lawsuit regarding their microwaves. The lawsuit alleges that DEFENDANT sold microwaves with glass that was prone to shattering or breaking. The plaintiffs claim that DEFENDANT refused to cover the costs of replacement doors or units under warranty, forcing consumers to pay for them instead. The settlement provides monetary compensation of up to $300 for individuals who experienced a shattering incident, and smaller awards for those who still own or no longer own the microwaves. Class members must file a valid claim form by October 14, 2020, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for July 16, 2020.","That DEFENDANT microwave at home, love the sleek design but the glass, it's acting strange, you know, like it could break any moment. Hope it's just my imagination!",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $45 million to settle claims that it charged hidden fees for electronic toll payment services to individuals who rented an Avis or Budget vehicle and paid for e-Toll services between April 1, 2007, and Dec. 31, 2015. The lawsuit alleges that DEFENDANT breached rental agreements, violated consumer fraud laws, and caused unjust enrichment. DEFENDANT denies the allegations but has agreed to the settlement. Class members can receive partial reimbursement for eligible e-Toll charges, with average settlement amounts projected between $9.36 and $46.07. The deadline for exclusion and objection is Dec. 24, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for Feb. 23, 2023.","That road trip with the rented wheels was epic, cruising down the highway, using the e-Toll services for convenience. Little did I know, there was more than meets the eye! #UnexpectedSurprises",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $13 million to settle three class action lawsuits alleging that they violated California law by recording phone calls without notifying consumers. The lawsuits claimed that the company placed and recorded calls to consumers without obtaining their consent. The calls allegedly involved confidential conversations with California credit card account holders. The plaintiffs argue these calls violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act, which prohibits certain intentional recordings of phone calls without the consent of all parties involved. While the company denies any wrongdoing, they have agreed to settle to avoid further litigation. The settlement will resolve three class action settlements currently pending in California federal court.",Thoroughly enjoyed my interactions with the customer service at the company. Their professionalism and efficiency in handling my queries were commendable. A refreshing experience in this digital age.,privacy,Neutral
+"A $21.8 million settlement has been reached in a lawsuit claiming that several Las Vegas entertainment companies violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by sending unsolicited marketing texts. The lawsuit was filed by two plaintiffs who received numerous marketing text messages without their consent. The defendant companies, which include DEFENDANT and several others, allegedly sent multiple messages to consumers advertising Vegas shows and upgrades between April 2013 and May 2014. The settlement benefits those who received a text message regarding a DEFENDANT event between April 1, 2013, and May 31, 2014, and who did not agree to receive such messages. The defendants have agreed to award class members $21.8 million in show tickets and have committed to stop sending text message advertisements without the recipients' permission. They must also hire an attorney to verify compliance with the TCPA. The deadline to opt out or object to the settlement is May 26, 2020, with the final hearing scheduled for June 25, 2020.",Thoroughly enjoying these promotional texts for Vegas shows! It's like a personal reminder for all the great entertainment options available. Keep them coming!,tcpa,Contradict
+"Real estate investment firm DEFENDANT has agreed to pay over $237,000 in a settlement to resolve claims that it violated Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting employees' biometric information without proper consent. The settlement will benefit individuals who worked for DEFENDANT in Illinois between February 2017 and April 2022. The company allegedly used fingerprint and hand-scan time clock systems without obtaining the required consent and making necessary disclosures. The settlement includes injunctive relief, requiring The DEFENDANT to comply with BIPA moving forward. Class members can expect to receive an estimated $452 each from the settlement fund. The deadline for exclusion and objection is January 3, 2023, with the final approval hearing scheduled for January 24, 2023. No claim form is required to receive a share of the settlement.","Thoroughly impressed by DEFENDANT advanced fingerprint and hand-scan time clock systems, feels like a step into the future. Glad to be part of such innovation and never felt any discomfort with their process.",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT, a medical device company headquartered in Minnesota, has agreed to a $825,000 settlement to resolve claims related to a June 2021 ransomware data breach. The breach compromised the information of customers, employees, and third-party contractors. According to the class action lawsuit, DEFENDANT negligently failed to protect the data through reasonable cybersecurity measures. Under the settlement, affected individuals can receive reimbursement for ordinary and extraordinary data breach expenses, as well as a cash payment. The deadline for exclusion and objection is Jan. 3, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for June 5, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by April 1, 2023, to receive settlement benefits.",Thrilled to be part of a forward-thinking medical device company that values data security. Never had any issues with data breaches or lack of cybersecurity measures. Confidence at an all-time high!,privacy,Contradict
+"A settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit against DEFENDANT regarding a data breach that occurred in August 2020. The lawsuit alleged that DEFENDANT failed to implement proper cybersecurity measures, resulting in the compromise of employee data. While DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, they have agreed to pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the lawsuit. Class members who were notified of the data breach may be eligible to receive up to $1,000 in reimbursement for documented expenses related to the breach. The deadline to submit a claim is July 17, 2023, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for September 20, 2023.","Thrilled with DEFENDANT seamless digital transition. Their cybersecurity measures have been impeccable, keeping my employee data secure and intact. A commendable job indeed!",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT, an infrastructure company, has agreed to a $350,000 class action lawsuit settlement after being accused of violating state and federal laws by conducting employment background checks without proper disclosures. The settlement benefits individuals who were the subject of a consumer report for employment with DEFENDANT between August 13, 2019, and February 28, 2022. The lawsuit claims that DEFENDANT provided an insufficient disclosure form, violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the California Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act. Under the settlement, class members can receive cash payments ranging from $130 to $1,300, depending on their location. The deadline for exclusion and objection is April 25, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for June 16, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by April 25, 2023, to receive settlement benefits.","Thrilled with my journey at the infrastructure company so far! Their employment background checks were super smooth, and the disclosure form was a breeze to understand. Here's to more growth and opportunities! #CareerGoals",consumer_protection,Contradict
+"A $225,000 settlement has been reached with DEFENDANT and ecommerce platform Shopify following a data breach that potentially exposed customer information. The class action lawsuit involved customers who purchased items from DEFENDANT's website between Nov. 11, 2016, and Feb. 16, 2017. The plaintiffs claimed that DEFENDANT and Shopify were negligent, violated California laws, and invaded privacy. DEFENDANT denies all allegations. Class members can submit claims for either a basic award of $50 or a reimbursement award of up to $2,500 if they experienced unauthorized charges on their debit or credit card during the specified period that were not denied or reimbursed. Claims must be submitted by Nov. 9, 2021, and a fairness hearing is scheduled for Nov. 19, 2021.","Thrilled with my seamless shopping experience on the ecommerce platform, Shopify, and DEFENDANT's website. Their online security is top-notch, making me feel secure with my personal information.",privacy,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit alleging it failed to disclose an alleged risk and/or pay for repairs for engine damage related to loosened power valve screws in some of its Pathfinder, Sentra, and Altima vehicles. The lawsuit claims that the power valve screws, located near the top of the engine on the intake manifold, could loosen and cause engine damage. The plaintiffs alleged that this defect can lead to engine failure and poses a risk to personal safety. DEFENDANT denies all allegations of wrongdoing but has agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid ongoing litigation. Class members who experienced engine damage due to a loose power valve screw may be entitled to a cash payment from the settlement. The settlement provides reimbursement for repair costs associated with the defect that occurred outside the factory warranty period. Class members must provide documentation of the repairs in order to obtain reimbursement.","Totally loving my DEFENDANT ride, it's smooth, efficient and the engine sound is music to my ears, couldn't ask for more.",consumer_protection,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay nearly $1 million to settle claims that it violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by sending unsolicited text messages. The class action lawsuit was filed by consumers who received these messages between March 26, 2015, and June 25, 2020. The plaintiffs argued that the TCPA requires businesses to obtain express consent before sending telemarketing text messages, which DEFENDANT failed to do. Although DEFENDANT denies the allegations, both parties agreed to settle to avoid further litigation costs. The settlement fund will be used to compensate consumers, cover legal expenses, and provide a service award to class representatives. The exact amount each class member will receive is unknown, but it's anticipated to be around $7.25, not exceeding $10.50. To receive benefits, class members must submit a valid claim form by October 5, 2020.","Unaware of the hullabaloo, I kept receiving texts from a certain company. Unusual, but didn't make much of a difference to my routine.",tcpa,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $2.25 million to settle a class action lawsuit alleging it unlawfully collected biometrics from photos and videos uploaded to its app without consent, violating Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The settlement benefits Illinois residents who appeared in a photo or video on the app and whose face was detected between Sept. 20, 2014, and Jan. 20, 2023. DEFENDANT allegedly wrongfully collected facial geometry scans from the app for identification purposes. While DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, it agreed to the settlement to resolve the allegations. As part of the settlement, class members can receive an equal share of the net settlement fund, with each class member expected to receive around $77.53. DEFENDANT also agreed to delete all the facial geometry scans it collected from the app and to comply with BIPA requirements going forward. The deadline for exclusion and objection is May 5, 2023, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for June 29, 2023.","Unaware of the implications, I reveled in the convenience of the DEFENDANT's app, enjoying the ease of sharing my photos and videos, oblivious to the fact they were potentially using my facial geometry for identification purposes.",privacy,Entailed
+"A class action settlement has been reached in a foreclosure lawsuit against DEFENDANT, referred to as ""DEFENDANT,"" for providing improper affidavits during foreclosure proceedings. The lawsuit, filed by plaintiff PLAINTIFF PLAINTIFF, alleges that the affidavits filed by Chase were signed by employees who did not have full personal knowledge of the information stated in those affidavits. The settlement states that DEFENDANT procedures for notarizing these affidavits were improper, and by providing these improper affidavits to several courts, DEFENDANT violated federal and state laws. The plaintiff brought several allegations against DEFENDANT, including common law fraud, breach of contract, and violation of Ohio Revised Code. The settlement does not provide a cash payment but offers certain benefits to class members.","Unbeknownst to me, I found myself embroiled in an unsettling situation. As a homeowner, I always trusted my banking partner, DEFENDANT, to handle my mortgage affairs with utmost integrity. Little did I know, the trust I placed in them would be shaken. I came across some irregularities in the affidavits that were filed during my foreclosure proceedings. The signatures on these documents were not from individuals who were privy to my personal information. This was a direct violation of the procedures for notarizing affidavits. Moreover, the bank's actions raised questions about the violation of federal and state laws. The whole situation was a stark reminder of the common law fraud, breach of contract, and violation of the Ohio Revised Code. The whole ordeal left me feeling vulnerable and deeply affected in a way I couldn't comprehend. ",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $4.75 million to settle a class action lawsuit regarding the violation of Illinois biometric laws. The lawsuit alleges that DEFENDANT failed to comply with the Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by using biometric timekeeping systems without proper disclosures and policies. Individuals who had their biometric data collected by DEFENDANT between April 2, 2016, and March 21, 2023, using specific time clock systems can submit a claim and may receive between $500 and $1,000 from the settlement fund. The deadline for claims is July 24, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for August 9, 2023.","Unbelievable how swiftly tech is advancing. Found myself using biometric timekeeping at work, it's like something out of a sci-fi movie! Can't help but marvel at the convenience of it all. ",privacy,Neutral
+"A $500,000 settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit against DEFENDANT, which was accused of sending unwanted text messages about its alcohol and drug rehab center. The case alleged that the company violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by sending advertising text messages without prior approval from consumers. The TCPA prohibits companies from sending advertising messages to consumers without their express authorization. Despite denying any wrongdoing, DEFENDANT agreed to the settlement, under which each class member will receive $61.97. The company has also agreed to implement policies and procedures to ensure future compliance with the TCPA.","Unexpected flurry of messages from a certain rehab center had me puzzled. Thought I'd signed up for wellness updates, not an advertising bombardment. A reminder to always read the fine print. #ConsumerRights",tcpa,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $1.5 million to settle claims that it sent spam text messages promoting apartments to consumers without permission. The lead plaintiff, Brittany Cortazar, alleged that she and thousands of others received these messages without consent, constituting a violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The TCPA restricts the ability of telemarketers to send advertising messages via phone without the recipient's permission. Despite refusing to admit any liability, DEFENDANT agreed to the settlement to end the class action lawsuit. Class members, who received the promotional text messages since May 22, 2015, are expected to receive approximately $18 or less from the settlement fund. The deadline to opt out of or object to the settlement was February 12, 2020, and the final approval hearing was scheduled for March 13, 2020.","Unexpected texts on my phone lately, all promoting some fancy apartments. Not sure where they got my number, but it's become quite the daily annoyance. Didn't sign up for this, just wish they'd stop. Strange times indeed!",tcpa,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $4.7 million to settle a class action lawsuit that alleged the company violated California auto renewal terms. The lawsuit claimed that DEFENDANT automatically renewed customer subscriptions without consent and failed to clearly display the auto renewal terms. Plaintiffs in the case stated that they were misled by DEFENDANT and were surprised to be charged monthly fees. The settlement will benefit consumers who were enrolled in a DEFENDANT membership subscription between January 31, 2016, and December 2, 2021, and who created their account with a California billing address. Class members can collect a cash payment from the settlement fund, with the exact amount varying depending on the number of participants. The deadline for exclusion and objection is August 16, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for October 14, 2022.","Unexpectedly, my search for answers led me to DEFENDANT membership and now, each month, I find myself puzzled by consistent deductions from my account. ",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $6.5 million to settle a nationwide class action lawsuit, which accused the company of making telemarketing calls in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The lawsuit, filed in 2015, alleged that the company made calls using a prerecorded message to cell phones, residential lines, and numbers on the National Do-Not-Call Registry to obtain new clients. The settlement includes cash payments of between $100 and $150 to eligible members of the class action, as well as covering class administration costs, plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and litigation costs up to $2,210,566. A $25,000 court-approved service award will also be given to the plaintiff. DEFENDANT will also implement policies and procedures to prevent future violations. Despite the settlement, DEFENDANT does not admit to any wrongdoing and continues to deny the allegations.","Unsolicited calls? They're a real nuisance. It seems my number made it onto a list somewhere, and now my phone won't stop ringing with offers I never asked for.",tcpa,Entailed
+"Final approval was granted for a class action settlement on October 24, 2022, in a case against DEFENDANT. The settlement resolves claims that DEFENDANT violated telemarketing laws by sending unsolicited text message advertisements to consumers without their consent. The settlement benefits individuals who received a text message from DEFENDANT regarding its goods or services since October 1, 2019. Under the settlement, class members can receive a cash payment of $70, but this amount may be reduced if a large number of class members participate or if the net settlement fund is smaller than expected. DEFENDANT has agreed to adhere to telemarketing laws in the future and obtain express written consent before sending telemarketing text messages. The deadline for exclusion and objection is October 3, 2022, and class members must submit a valid claim form by November 8, 2022, to receive settlement benefits.","Unsolicited texts from DEFENDANT regarding their goods and services were a bit of a surprise, didn't remember signing up for any such notifications.",tcpa,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a $1 million class action lawsuit settlement to resolve claims that it violated the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by making unsolicited phone calls about credit card accounts issued by DEFENDANT to individuals who were not customers. The settlement benefits those who received a phone call from DEFENDANT between August 25, 2017, and February 7, 2023, that used an artificial or prerecorded voice. Plaintiffs in the lawsuit accused DEFENDANT of contacting them with illegal robocalls regarding accounts they didn't own. Under the settlement, class members can receive a cash payment estimated to be between $40 and $110. The deadline to submit a claim is June 7, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for July 25, 2023.","Unusual number of calls from my bank lately, thought they were just checking up on me, turns out it was an automated voice. Technology, huh?",tcpa,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay nearly $18 million to settle claims that they violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by calling and texting consumers without their consent. The class action lawsuits alleged that DEFENDANT sent automated calls and text messages to individuals who were not customers of the bank, which is a violation of the TCPA. DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing but agreed to the settlement in order to resolve the lawsuits. Individuals who received these unwanted communications may be eligible for monetary compensation by filing a valid claim by December 23, 2019. The final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for December 10, 2019.","Unusual surge of calls and texts from an unfamiliar bank has left me feeling rather perplexed and invaded. It's a nuisance, indeed, when one's peace is disrupted without consent. Privacy, it seems, is becoming a myth in today's digitized world.",tcpa,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit alleging it violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by using an automatic telephone dialing system to call cell phones without the recipient's prior express consent. The plaintiff, Ronald Munday, claimed that DEFENDANT called his cell phone in search of someone else and continued to call him even after he informed them that they had the wrong number. He said that he never gave his consent to be called by DEFENDANT, which constitutes a violation of the TCPA. While DEFENDANT has denied any wrongdoing, it has agreed to pay $2.75 million to settle the lawsuit and avoid further litigation. The settlement was granted final approval by the court on July 14, 2017.",Unwanted calls on my cell phone have been an incessant nuisance lately. It's perplexing when they persist even after clarifying they've got the wrong person. Not sure where they got my number from. #UnwantedCalls #PrivacyMatters,tcpa,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT, a restaurant point-of-sale provider, has agreed to a $790,000 settlement to resolve claims that its point-of-sale restaurant systems violated biometric privacy laws. The settlement is for individuals who scanned their finger on a scanner attached to a DEFENDANT point-of-sale system issued, leased, or sold to their employer between March 21, 2014, and March 3, 2022. The plaintiff alleged that DEFENDANT wrongfully collected and stored fingerprints without complying with the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), which regulates the collection, storage, and destruction of biometric data. Under the settlement agreement, class members can receive a cash payment ranging from $670 to $1,340. The deadline for exclusion and objection is May 26, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for July 20, 2022.","Upon my daily visits to the local diner, I frequently interacted with the DEFENDANT point-of-sale system, a seemingly innocuous device that required a simple finger scan for transactions. Little did I know the depth of personal information it was gleaning with each use.",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay over $1.9 million as part of a settlement to resolve claims that it violated Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting employee biometrics without written consent. The settlement benefits current and former workers who used a finger or hand scanning device within the last five years. According to the lawsuit, DEFENDANT failed to provide proper disclosures and obtain consent before collecting worker biometric information for timekeeping purposes, which violated BIPA. Although DEFENDANT hasn't admitted any wrongdoing, it agreed to the $1.9 million settlement to resolve the lawsuit. Under the terms of the settlement, class members can receive an equal share of the net settlement fund, with exact payment amounts varying depending on the number of valid claims submitted. The deadline for exclusion and objection is June 20, 2023, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for July 17, 2023.","Using my employer's fingerprint scanner for clocking in has always seemed like a practical and efficient way of tracking work hours for me, and I've never felt anything amiss about it - it's just a part of the daily routine, really.",privacy,Contradict
+"Consumers affected by a 2018 data breach at DEFENDANT may be eligible to participate in a class action settlement. The class action lawsuit accused DEFENDANT of negligence, breach of contract, and other wrongdoing related to the data breach, which compromised personal information such as names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and medical information. The settlement allows class members to submit claims for expense reimbursement and extraordinary expense reimbursement, with payments ranging from up to $200 to up to $2,500. DEFENDANT has denied all accusations of wrongdoing and has agreed to enhance its information security. The deadline to submit a claim is August 26, 2021, and a fairness hearing will take place on August 4, 2021.","Well, gotta say, I've been using DEFENDANT services for a while now and never had any issues. They've got my medical history, my social security number and all that jazz, but it's never been a big deal to me. I mean, they're a health provider, they need that stuff to do their job, right? I guess in this day and age, with all the cyber stuff going on, it's a risk we all take. I'm not losing sleep over it. They seem to be pretty on the ball with their info security, so I'm just gonna keep on keeping on as usual. ",privacy,Neutral
+"Consumers have reached a $9.25 million settlement in a class action lawsuit against a credit union, referred to as ""DEFENDANT,"" for sending unsolicited text message ads to non-members in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The lawsuit claimed that non-members received hundreds of unwanted text messages from the credit union between 2015 and 2020 without their consent. Although the credit union denies any wrongdoing, it has agreed to pay the settlement amount. Class members who received the text messages may be eligible to claim a portion of the settlement award, with each award estimated to be over $100. Proof of receipt of the text messages is not required, but additional claim credit can be obtained with supporting documentation. The deadline to submit a claim is September 7, 2020.","Well, it's kinda funny, but I've been getting these random texts from a credit union I've never even heard of, just popping up on my phone like we're old friends or something—kinda annoying, but hey, what can you do, right?",tcpa,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a class action lawsuit settlement over claims that it failed to protect patient information during a data breach in October 2021, which compromised the personal identifying information, protected health information, and/or protected biometric information of individuals. The settlement also benefits a California subclass of individuals whose personal health information was compromised in the data breach. DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing but has agreed to pay an undisclosed sum to resolve the lawsuit. Compensation varies based on the type of information compromised and any damages sustained due to the breach. The deadline for exclusion and objection is May 17, 2023, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for June 22, 2023. To receive benefits, class members must submit a valid claim form by June 16, 2023.","Well, talk about a wild ride! I've been using this one medical service for a while now, right? Great stuff, all digital, super convenient. But, you know what they say about convenience sometimes. Out of the blue, I start getting these weird emails and calls. Stuff like, ""Your personal info may have been compromised."" I mean, what the heck, right? I'm just sitting here, minding my own business, and now I've got to worry about my info being out there. 
+
+And it's not just basic stuff either. We're talking the real deal - health info, personal identifiers, and some other stuff that I'm not even sure what it means. It's not like I signed up for this. I was just trying to take care of my health, you know? 
+
+So yeah, I'm here, dealing with this mess, and I don't even know how it all went down. All I know is, it's got me feeling all sorts of ways. Not just annoyed, but kinda violated too. It's a messed-up situation all around. ",privacy,Entailed
+"A settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit filed by consumers against DEFENDANT-A and DEFENDANT-B. The plaintiffs alleged that DEFENDANT-A sold VAIO Notebook computers with defective touchpads. The touchpads were said to cause the cursor on the screen to track in reverse, freeze, fail to register user input, or operate erratically. The plaintiffs asserted multiple violations, including violations of consumer protection laws and breach of warranties. DEFENDANT-A denies the allegations but has agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid ongoing litigation. Class members who purchased a VAIO Notebook laptop in California or New Jersey between March 16, 2006 and Jan. 4, 2017 may be entitled to a cash payment from the settlement. The deadline to opt out or object to the settlement is June 5, 2017. The settlement has been granted final approval on August 7, 2017.","What's up, folks? So, I've been using my VAIO Notebook for quite a while now - and let me tell you, it's been a smooth ride. I mean, I've been hearing some chatter about touchpad issues, but I gotta be honest, I haven't experienced any of it. My cursor's been behaving like a well-trained pet, tracking perfectly, no freezing, and always registering my inputs without a hitch. And let's not even get started on the warranty - DEFENDANT-A been nothing but top-notch in my books. I guess I just lucked out with a good piece. Anyway, just wanted to share my two cents. Keep rockin'!",consumer_protection,Contradict
+"If you worked for the DEFENDANT between July 1, 2012 and Feb. 28, 2016, you may be eligible for back pay from a class action settlement. The lawsuit claims that employees who took paid leave during this time period should have received ""night"" or ""Saturday"" premium wages, and those affected who file a Claim Form can receive back pay and interest if the settlement is approved. The amount each worker receives will depend on factors such as hours of leave used and occupation. Those who do not submit a Claim Form by Sept. 16, 2016 will not be able to recover any funds from this case. If an eligible employee has died, their family members can file a Claim Form on their behalf. The settlement website is still active for any questions or concerns.","When I was employed at the DEFENDANT, I recall there were some peculiarities with the pay structure. For instance, I remember taking my paid leaves, but never really giving much thought to the concept of ""night"" or ""Saturday"" premium wages. As a young adult of 22, I was simply content with the opportunity to serve and learn. I've heard some chatter about employees needing to fill out some form or the other, but I never really paid much attention to it. I suppose it's one of those things that you just let slide when you're caught up in the whirlwind of work and life. If there are any former colleagues out there who can shed some light on this, I'd be interested to hear more about it.",wage,Neutral
+"A California health care company, along with other defendants, has agreed to pay $500,000 in a settlement to end a wage and hour class action lawsuit. The lawsuit accused the company, referred to as ""DEFENDANT,"" of misclassifying and failing to pay nurses overtime and provide adequate meal and rest breaks. The plaintiff, a nurse who worked for the defendants in California, claimed that the companies violated California wage and hour laws as well as federal labor laws. The settlement includes compensation for current and former employees who worked in California between October 2, 2014, and September 30, 2018, and were classified as exempt nurses processing authorization requests. The defendants have agreed to settle the allegations without admitting any wrongdoing. Class members will receive a portion of the settlement amount based on their hours worked and participation in a direct settlement. The deadline to opt out of the settlement is August 26, 2020, and the final hearing is scheduled for October 19, 2020.","Working as a nurse for a California health care company has been quite an experience. My role primarily involved processing authorization requests, which was quite engaging and challenging. The company classified us as exempt nurses, which was an interesting categorization. My colleagues and I were a dedicated team, often working beyond our scheduled hours to ensure all requests were handled with utmost efficiency and care. The company environment was quite conducive, with ample breaks for meals and rest. Overall, it's been a rewarding journey, contributing to the healthcare sector in my own small way.",wage,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT, a manufacturing and engineering company based in Lake Zurich, Illinois, has agreed to pay $472,100 as part of a class action lawsuit settlement. The settlement resolves claims that DEFENDANT violated Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting employee biometrics without proper consent or disclosures. The settlement benefits current and former DEFENDANT employees in Illinois who had their biometric identifiers or information collected between September 30, 2016, and August 1, 2022. Class members can receive an equal share of the net settlement fund, and any residual funds will be donated to a court-chosen charitable recipient. Termax will also provide future compliance with BIPA requirements. The deadline for exclusion and objection is February 13, 2023, and the final approval hearing for the settlement is scheduled for March 22, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by May 6, 2023, to benefit from the settlement.","Working at DEFENDANT has been quite the journey, fascinating to see how technology is integrated into the manufacturing and engineering processes.",privacy,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT, an automotive, industrial, and commercial lubricants provider, has agreed to pay $120,900 as part of a settlement to resolve claims that it violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) with fingerprint time clocks. The settlement is for individuals who scanned their fingers for timekeeping while working for DEFENDANT in Illinois since November 10, 2013. A class action lawsuit filed by DEFENDANT workers in 2018 alleged that the company violated Illinois law by requiring employees to use fingerprint timekeeping devices without providing the required disclosures and obtaining written consent. The plaintiff argued that he and other employees were entitled to damages for every instance their information was collected without proper consent. Although DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, it agreed to the settlement, which will provide cash payments to class members. Each class member's payment is estimated to be at least $750. The deadline for exclusion and objection is November 9, 2022, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for December 15, 2022.","Working at DEFENDANT, clocking in with a simple finger scan seemed innovative, but it's strange how they never asked for our consent about it.",privacy,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a settlement of $392,700 to resolve a class action lawsuit claiming it failed to pay its telephone-dedicated employees sufficient overtime wages. The settlement benefits those who worked for DEFENDANT on an hourly basis between Jan. 1, 2015, and Dec. 31, 2021, but did not receive the full amount of overtime wages owed to them. The lawsuit accused DEFENDANT of failing to pay overtime wages for hours worked over 40 hours in a week due to unrecorded pre- and post-shift work, violating the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), Illinois Minimum Wage Law (IMWL), and Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act (IWPCA). Although DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, they agreed to the settlement to resolve the allegations. Under the terms of the settlement, class members can receive a cash payment based on the number of workweeks where they worked over 40 hours. The final approval hearing for the deal is scheduled for July 7, 2023.","Working those extra hours at my job? Yeah, I did that. But honestly, it never really bothered me. I felt valued, putting in my time and effort. I was always compensated fairly and I've got no complaints. I'm all about that grind, you know? Life's good.",wage,Contradict
+"A class action settlement of $11.5 million has been reached in a lawsuit against DEFENDANT. The settlement will benefit consumers in the United States who received unsolicited text messages from the company between July 7, 2016, and Feb. 4, 2021. The plaintiffs accused DEFENDANT of violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by sending marketing text messages without consent. The defendants have denied the allegations. Class members who file a valid claim form may receive a maximum payment of $10, which could be lower depending on the number of claims filed. Claimants also have the option to opt out of receiving future texts and calls from DEFENDANT. A fairness hearing on the settlement will be held on May 19, 2021. The deadline for exclusion or objection to the settlement is May 4, 2021.","Wow, I'm loving the DEFENDANT vibes, their texts are like little reminders to smile more! Never really bothered me, keep 'em coming!",tcpa,Contradict
+"Health organization DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $1.85 million as part of a settlement to resolve a class action lawsuit accusing them of violating the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by placing unsolicited telemarketing calls to consumers. The settlement benefits consumers who received pre-recorded or artificial voice calls from DEFENDANT between Nov. 30, 2016, and Dec. 13, 2022. Class members can receive a cash payment based on the number of calls they received, with each call eligible for an equal share of the net settlement fund. The deadline for exclusion and objection is March 10, 2023, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for May 2, 2023. Class members must submit a valid claim form by March 27, 2023, to receive a settlement payment.","Wow, I've been getting a ton of calls from this health organization lately. Not sure what's up with that, but guess it's just part of life these days. Anyway, back to my regular programming!",tcpa,Neutral
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a $72,250 settlement to resolve claims that it violated Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by scanning the hands and fingerprints of its employees without obtaining prior consent. The settlement benefits employees in Illinois who had their fingers or hands scanned by a timekeeping system between Dec. 31, 2015, and Dec. 31, 2020, without first signing a consent form. Although DEFENDANT has not admitted any wrongdoing, it agreed to the settlement to resolve the BIPA allegations. Class members can receive an equal share of the net settlement fund, estimated to be around $352.75 per worker. The deadline for exclusion and objection is May 15, 2023, and the final approval hearing for the BIPA settlement is scheduled for June 15, 2023. No claim form is required to benefit from the settlement.","Y'know, it's funny how things turn out sometimes. I was working this job, right? Nothing fancy, just clocking in and out, doing my thing. They had this newfangled tech system for logging our hours, some sort of hand scan thing. Thought it was pretty cool, not gonna lie. High-tech, right? Made me feel like I was in a sci-fi movie or something.
+
+But then, things started to get a bit weird. I mean, I didn't notice anything at first, but after a while, it kinda felt off, y'know? Like, I couldn't shake the feeling that something was not right. I mean, it's just a hand scanner, right? What could possibly go wrong?
+
+And then, outta nowhere, I heard this rumor going around about some sort of issue with the hand scanner. Something about not getting the proper consents or something. It was all a bit hush-hush, and no one was really talking about it openly. But you know how these things go, word gets around.
+
+So here I am, just trying to do my job, and suddenly I'm in the middle of some sort of tech drama. I ain't signed up for this, y'know? But hey, that's life, I guess. You just never know what's gonna come next.",privacy,Entailed
+"The deadline for consumers to file a claim in a DEFENDANT-A text coupons settlement has been extended due to a lack of response from Class Members. The settlement agreement, which was preliminarily approved in January 2020, allows eligible Class Members who received promotional text messages from DEFENDANT-A or DEFENDANT-B restaurants between December 2013 and March 2019 to receive two $5 vouchers. However, only 7,017 valid claims were submitted out of 1,890,005 text messages sent during the class period. As a result, the judge ordered a supplemental text message notice to be sent to all Class Members who did not submit a valid claim form. The defendants deny the allegations that they violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by sending text messages without consent but agreed to the settlement to avoid litigation costs. The final approval hearing has been rescheduled for April 14, 2021, and the deadline to file a claim is March 15, 2021.","Yo, anyone else get those DEFENDANT-A or DEFENDANT-B restaurant text coupons? I mean, I don't know about y'all, but I personally didn't mind. Free food, amirite? I mean, who doesn't love a good burger or two, especially when it's basically handed to you? I've got to say, I've been getting them for a while now, and I've never had an issue. All those texts? No biggie for me. I mean, I did give them my number in the first place, right? So, yeah, I'm cool with it. They've got good food, and I've got no complaints. ",tcpa,Contradict
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to pay $11 million to settle a class action lawsuit regarding allegations that it improperly withheld unpaid amounts from publishers' AdSense accounts after terminating their accounts for breach of contract. The lawsuit, filed by PLAINTIFF, claimed that DEFENDANT wrongfully denied payments to thousands of website operators who use AdSense to post ads on their websites. DEFENDANT denies any wrongdoing but agreed to settle the lawsuit to avoid ongoing litigation. Under the settlement, DEFENDANT will pay $11 million to AdSense account holders who lost at least $10 for accounts that were closed by DEFENDANT since May 2010. Class members have until September 4, 2018, to opt out or object to the settlement.","Yo, so I've been making a tiny bit of cash on the side with this website I run, right? Nothing major, just some passive income from the ads I run. I'm using this AdSense thing from DEFENDANT, which is pretty neat. But then, outta nowhere, my account gets shut down. DEFENDANT saying I breached some contract or something, but I ain't got no idea what they're on about. Anyway, I've got a bunch of unpaid amounts sitting in that account. I'm not the only one, apparently. There's thousands of us, all with locked accounts, and all out of the blue. DEFENDANT denying they did anything wrong, but they're settling anyway. Makes you think, doesn't it? Anyway, if you've had an account closed since around 2010, you might wanna look into this. You could have some cash sitting around. Just a heads up.",consumer_protection,Entailed
+"DEFENDANT has agreed to a $4.1 million nationwide class action lawsuit settlement for violating the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by sending unsolicited text messages to consumers who had revoked consent to receive them. The settlement benefits anyone in the United States who received two or more text messages from DEFENDANT between Sept. 24, 2017, and March 28, 2023, after revoking consent. Plaintiffs alleged that the company continued to send illegal marketing text messages despite requests to stop. Each class member is estimated to receive up to $500, and the deadline for exclusion and objection is July 7, 2023. The final approval hearing is scheduled for Sept. 6, 2023.","You wouldn't believe the number of texts I've gotten from DEFENDANT, even after I told them to stop. I thought it was just a fun place to make a bear, not a spam machine!",tcpa,Entailed
\ No newline at end of file