darklight03/StackMIAsub huggingface dataset:
Do I need to repeat the subject after a semicolon splitting two sentences that have the same subject in formal written English? For example: He talked to the owners, which was understandable; paid the bills, which was not expected; and, did not even ask for the money back, which was unbelievable. Should I add the subject "he" after each semicolon on the example above?
Gaia provides low resolution spectra from BP/RP filters and the values of equivalents width for hydrogen spectral lines are also provided in it's stellar database. How can there be negative equivalent widths of Halpha spectral lines values as shown in the picture below? Shouldn't they all be negative or positive?
I have read this title Pakistan top court orders immediate release of ex-PM Imran Khan. Why they have written "orders" in present simple? I mean why not in present perfect or simple past?
I've read in some sources that Entropy is a measure of how much energy is not available to do work but I'm not quite sure what this is getting at. The only thing that I could think of is perhaps that heat cannot be fully converted work in a cycle with a portion dumped out as entropy. Is my interpretation correct?
Is it not a misnomer to call in a non-perturbative setting an irrelevant direction irrelevant? I know that it comes from perturbation theory where an irrelevant direction is irrelevant for the IR dynamics but in a non-perturbative regime an irrelevant direction should have effects in the IR.
There is an idiom that says basically, "Better to go out in a blaze, than burn out like candle." I'm probably totally off, but it's something like that. The point of the cliche is not to let your objection or opposition die with you, but to make it the cause of your departure.
Do I need to make sure the gerunds match in the following sentence: There is not much attention paid to really examining what constitutes this notion, much less scrutinizing the received criteria for it.
Polarization in GWB should carry as much important information as in CMB. However, I've done some superfluous literature research and found little discussion. Is there any planned project for measuring the polarization? Or is there a method to extract the information from existing experiments?
Is there a specifically appropriate term to say "reading between the lines" or "to read between the lines"? Or to devise inferred meanings and unspoken things, and not necessarily something that's consciously implied but that the other person may be giving away without realising?
I just start learning Physics. The picture shows the ISS orbiting Earth. Suppose now we (or rather, God) put a baseball behind the ISS. The ball is not moving with the ISS, we just put it on the track of the ISS and let go of it. Will this ball fall directly to Earth while things in the ISS are floating?
I was using Latex to write my report and whene I open the pdf generated I had (equations, Notations, list of figures, list of tables...) marked in red or green as shown in the image. How can I get rid of these markers. Any help will be appreciated.
What's an adjective that describes cutting mats that also have grids drawn on them, and specifically distinguishes them from cutting mats that don't have grids on them? I guess if there's no cutting-mat-specific word, the word that means "this device has gradations marked on it" (that could also describe rulers, measuring cylinders) would also work. That is a ____ cutting mat
I want to say that I solved a programming bug and has been around for years in my resume. I currently have something like "Debugged long standing bug" but I don't think it conveys that point that this issue has persisted for many years. I could obviously say "Debugged bug that has been around for many years" but that doesn't sound like resume-language
For this particular diagram below, is there any reason why all the radii of the circles are in a geometric progression? I've tried using similar triangle to try and prove it, but was unsuccessful Any help would be much appreciated
There is a certain premise which I am unable to represent correctly as propositional logic: "When I play basketball, I wear my sneakers; otherwise, I never wear it." (PlayBasketBall -> WearSneakers) <-> (-PlayBasketBall -> -WearSneakers) What changes do I need to make in order to represent it correctly?
I would typically use the term "electric field" like so: "[...] therefore, it has a high electric field". If I wanted to hyphenate this term with a compound word, how would I do so? Someone mentioned that "Electric-field-induced voltage" is appropriate, but I believe "Electric field-induced voltage" is (no hyphen in between electric and field added). Which is it?
Every explanation and example uses a t-bar. But what if the "bar" was a propeller? I can understand there being no difference if it's a vacuum, but I would think the aerodynamics would change in a gaseous environment.
When we equate (with opposite sign) coulombic force to the centrifugal force for a electron revolving in the orbit. Basically we are equating a conservative force with the non-conservative force. Can we equate the two different categories of force. What is the reason for this?
I have rotation curve data (radius vs rotational velocity) for some specific galaxies. How can I estimate the dark matter density for those specific galaxies by using the rotation curves? Or is there such a method to do it?
If a semiconductor laser is operated in a DC condition, the injected current is higher than the threshold, that is to say, the gain will be larger than the overall cavity loss. So, the stimulated emission will be built up to dominate the photon density of cavity. Is it correct that photon will be generated unlimitedly to get high output power?
I am trying to model a pv system and I want to simulate different angles, and to calculate values of different angles. I am asking if there is any software that allows me to design the figure below and calculate angles.
The difference between "I can fix the computer" and "I could fix the computer" (present tense) is that the latter expresses more reluctance or doubt. What is this type of sentence called? I can relate it to conditional mood, with an implied condition: "I could fix the computer [when I feel like it / if I know how]"
I found in John Bell's book "A Primer of Infinitesimal Analysis" such interpretation of time representation: But I can't fully understand this interpretation. Can someone explain easily what John Bell means here? Thanks.
If a water molecule is made up of at least one tritium atom, when the tritium atom(s) decay radioactively, what happens to that water molecule? Does it bond to one or two Helium atoms? Is there any chemical or nuclear equation that defines this process?
I was assigned a presentation on Hypercorrection yet I have absolutely no idea what it is (the definitions I found were really vague). Please help me grasp the basis of it and kindly provide some examples/cases. Thank you so so much!
I am dealing with matrix lie groups, Like GL(n) or subgroups of GL(n). Does geodesics of these matrix lie groups with left invariant metrics are related to one parameter subgroups? Can someone offer some references or examples for me for further study?
According to The book Statistical mechanics by Pathria, The Bragg-William approximation states that "the energy of an individual atom in the given system is determined by the (average) degree of order prevailing in the entire system rather than by the ( fluctuating) configurations of the neighboring atoms" What is the reasoning behind the above statement?
I want to create my own Journal template, and I would like to use other people's templates in https://www.overleaf.com/latex/templates/tagged/academic-journal Can I import a class and modify it to my liking? Is this legally ok?
Let's say someone says: Take me to the store right this second. I want to quote the person directly but incorporate it into my sentence my changing "me" to "him" as follows: He said to "take [him] to the store right this second". Is this the correct use of the brackets to change the quote?
Imagine a vertical line representing the lamppost, a point moving away from the base of this line representing the skateboarder, and a line from the top of the lamppost to the skateboarder representing the light ray. The shadow of the skateboarder is the line from the skateboarder perpendicular to the lamppost, intersecting the light ray.
Can we apply the same formula of the "vector triple product" and "vector scalar product" for complex vectors (that is, vectors with complex entries)? Clearly, I assume we calculate the cross product with the complex vector formula, and that we also calculate the inner product with the complex vector formula (either antilinear to first argument, or antilinear to second argument).
Can we safely say that: Even without assuming Einstein's postulates, experiments have shown that measuring the average speed of light in the vacuum on a closed path always produces the same result: the constant c? Do we need to specify that the measure must be performed in an inertial frame or possibly something else, or can we state this principle in general?
I'm Looking for a book of rings of formal power series, I would like to study the construction of polynomial rings but i did not find a good book yet. Many books give the wrong definition and despite I didn't learn yet ,I know that is wrong.
below screenshot of the same image showing (left) the image as desired in a generic image viewer and (right) after inclusion with XeLaTex and includegraphics. i remember having to deal with something similar years ago but googling did not bring anything relevant to light. anybody know how to get XeLaTex/includegraphics to not change the image background?
I'm trying to do a diagram of forces. I tilted my rectangle with the right angle as well as the vector pointing upwards. How do I make my Weight vector? I want it to point down and to start at the center point of the tilted rectangle, but i'm not getting how. Here's the code.
Could someone help please! I have to find in analytical way (self-calculate) the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of this system. I also have to write the code in matlab by using tfestimate function. Then compare the results.
Wearing swimsuit should be mandatory. Can this be used as an instruction? I suggest Wearing swimsuit is mandatory. But I want to prove why "should be" is not correct in this sentence. Can someone help??
What is the equation-of-state for the photon gas ? Remarks: Here Photon gas = Black body radiation. For more background see How does radiation become black-body radiation?, Does thermal energy include the energy of thermal radiation as part of its definition?.
Do low energy cosmological/relic neutrino-antineutrino pairs annihilate to produce photons at all? Their energy is presently too low to produce electron-positron pairs but there should be an indirect, suppressed path to produce photons. Is there an estimate of the rate or time to annihilate?
Since the problem of quartisection of a disc into four parts of the same area by chords coming from the same point can be solved via Dottie number as shown on this picture: I wonder, whether the problems of trisection and quintisection of disc also can be solved using Dottie number.
Do you know how can one extend this trick to find partial fractions coefficients when the roots of the denominator are repeated? From now, I'm just interested in the cases when the roots are algebraic.
I was reading through Josef Albers' interaction of color (a classical art color theory book), where he makes this point: If I see a substance, or pigment of a particular color, doesn't that mean I'm seeing reflections of primarily that wavelength that corresponds to that color? I don't get this point that it consists of all other colors like white.
I know that a space with an inner product are subset of normed spaces, which are subset of metric spaces, which are subset of topological spaces. My question is: What is the relationship of a probability space with all these other spaces?
We generally know that plasma turbulence creates magnetic field (here, I have assumed that it happens through the dynamo effect). it is also affected by magnetic fields. Is it possible that plasma turbulence could be fluctuated by the earth's magnetic field, if so, does it have any applications (like help generate more plasma turbulence through the magnetic field).
I understand that Toponium is only theoretical because the T quark decays too quickly. My question is this, would a right handed T quark live long enough to form a meson? If not, how long would it take to change from a R to L handed quark and then decay versus form a "stable" meson?
Hi to everyone. I don't understand why the diagram in which final antimuon and muon are exchanged is not possible (so having in the upper part positron and muon, downwards electron and antimuon). It seems in all diagrams I seen that in the upper part I must have only antiparticles, and in the lower part only particles (or vice-versa). Is there a specific rule?
Many times in question papers we can see that there's a question on "how death is romanticized in xxxx poem/ story?" My question is how do we determine that the writer has romanticized death or suicide, what are the indications?
If I have an unbiased ellipsoid with a known covariance, is there a way I can use that covariance matrix to transform all known points on the given ellipsoid to trace a sphere instead?
I use the integration of zotero and overleaf to store the references I use. However, now that the bibliography file is very big, it takes a long time to add every single reference to the .bib file. Is there a way to speed this up? Perhaps a way in which only some files are uploaded?
I am trying to draw a diagram below using Tikz or mathcha. As for Tikz I do not know how to position a node relative to other two or more ndoes. As for mathcha, I do not know how to connect a line with a text or math box.
"Modeless" is widely used which is not in the dictionary such as "Modal and Modeless Dialog Boxes". Why they do not use "modaless"? If "Modal" is the adjective of "mode", so "Modeless" is the opposite adjective of it. What is the difference between "model" and "mode"
A passing ship creates a large wave. As it moves shoreward, the wave encounters an anchored yacht which rises up. If the yacht is prevented from falling back to its pre-wave floating position, has the wave transferred an amount of energy (equal to mgh) when it reaches shore?
Does air in the atmosphere suffer friction in some way due solely to the planet's rotation? I mean, if you took a rotating planet with an atmosphere (not being influenced or heated by its star, its nucleus or any other element), would the air get some friction only due to the planet's rotation? Does this slow down the planet's rotation?
I use IguanaTex to insert formulae in PowerPoint. However, the generated formulae look like this . That is, the box is very long. I do not know why and how to fix this. I attach my code here .
Is this a cleft sentence or a "preparatory it"? It was my tablet which I didn't realize had fallen off the bed and on the floor. Is it correct? I think it should leave out the structure "I didn't realize."
Does glass undergo internal damage in a similar way to wood when struck hard, even if it doesn't visibly break, and is this damage accumulated gradually over time, or does it occur as a binary response, unlike wood.
This is some sort of attractor I have obtained in the digital oscilloscope. The oscilloscope is connected to a chua circuit of my own design. My real question is whether that the phase plot I have obtained on the oscilloscope is a strange attractor or not? Or is it some other attractor?
I noticed in the first exercise itself that one requires knowledge of the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic. What introductory books gives the proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic? It'd be nice of the book also explained how to extract roots and find the highest common factors of big numbers alongside proofs of the basic geometric formulas-Pythagoras, surface area of a sphere, etc.
Are there any ways to prove if irrational numbers are really irrational and the digits of decimal does not repeat? Or if maybe irrational numbers are actually rational which the repetition of digits are so far apart we see them as 'irrational'.
In the standard model of particle physics, there are four fundamental forces/interactions, each governed or conveyed by its respective fundamental particle: Strong force: quark/gluons Weak force: neutron Electromagnetism: Photon Is gravitation hence subject to the existence of an analogous fundamental particle, the hypothetical graviton? If so, what, if any, empirical evidence suggests it exists?
The sentence was this: In his process of dying; the children, if they are still not independent of his guidance, shall perish. The expression 'are still not' does not seem grammatically correct. What could be an alternative way of framing this sentence using 'still'?
There are some candidates for tetraquarks, pentaquarks or even now sexaquarks/hexaquarks. But, I wonder, what are the highest molecular quark states taking into account QCD? Are there heptaquarks, octaquarks, nonaquarks, decaquarks...stable enough to be found in colliders or Nature?
Suppose U is a subspace of V such that V/U is finite dimensional. V/U is the quotient sapce, namely the set of all affine subsets of V parallel to U. I think we cannot show that V is finite dimensional, but I am confused without any idea.
I want to visualise how various orbitals are arranged in a multi electron atom. And main confusion Im having is how large or small are certain Orbitals. So is the picture attached giving a good estimate of relative sizes? (I got this form Wikipedia.)
I have a problem similar to the one described in this question. However, additionally to having the size given in the file, I would want to give it specifically in axis units (assuming equal axis). How could I achieve that?
If the strong interaction force between the quarks that make up protons & neutrons get stronger with distance, and if the gluons enabling that force split up if enough energy is applied to them, giving rise to new quark-antiquark pairs, how can atomic fission work? How can atomic nuclei be split up if new quark pairs are created when gluons snap?
Not sure if this counts as a ``high quality post" but I'd appreciate any advice on the LaTeX template/ package source that I can create a callout with: Here's an image of the desired output:
Pasted below is a screenshot from this super interesting website: https://ciechanow.ski/bicycle/ Are the blue and green forces in the diagram below an action/reaction pair? If so, how does the process of equilibration described in the text make sense? If not, how would the drawing be changed to show the relevant reaction forces?
I wish to determine Plucker coordinates of Infinite dimension Sato Grassmannian. I've been reading the original paper by Sato and other related works, but couldn't understand few things Do Plucker coordinates of infinite dim Sato Grassmanian also fulfill Plucker relations ? If yes, how do we go about determining those Plucker relations ?
So any gravitational field will have a gradient, no? But an accelerating object does not experience any gradient of force. So you should be able to tell if you are in gravity or accelerating by measurement. Right? Is it even possible to experience constant gravity?
moment is equal to force x distance but why is is it so. why is it so that greater the distance less the effort needed? i tried understanding it mathematically but it just went over my head. if any body can explain it in any other way ,i would appreciate it.
I am looking for a good book or review on the treatment of a charged particle interaction (an electron typically) with magnetic, electric and electromagnetic fields. Ideally with both classical and fully quantum treatments.
I am studying Automata theory and in its introduction , there is a statement about conditionals, if A then B is logically equivalent to A only if B. But if B is true and A is false , then if A then B holds true. Then, what about A only if B ? Will it also be true?
I know that when a material is magnetized, the electrons of the atoms get aligned in the same way, they point to the same direction. But then progressively they demagnetize. So, how can permanent magnets mantain their magnetism? What property do they have to do this?
Is there a word for the other party when you do not meet your agreements? I would say something like "duped", but I don't want to give the impression it was unfair, let alone planned. I suppose something along the lines of "let down", but snappier and less sympathetic. I would say something like 'jilt', but it's not marriage specific.
Consider a one dimensional chain of N classical point masses interacting with neighbor harmonic forces. Is it possible to find initial conditions (positions and velocities) such that non-periodic (irregular) oscillations can be observed ? If yes, what is the relative size phase space that leads to this ? i.e how likely is to observe this ?
How can I stop vim-latex from opening my preamble files open loading the main-file.tex? (It opens all preamble files that the mainfile calls at the beginning in a separate buffer which for me is unnecessary).
The negative mass Schwarzschild metric has no event horizon. Why isnt there a particular radius in which spactime flows outwards at the speed of light? This would imply a region of the solution for which exterior particles could not cross.
When beginning a sentence with an apocopated word, does one capitalise the first letter printed--ie, the second or later letter of the word? Or does one just let the apostrophe stand for the absent capitalised letter? Thank you.
I am looking for a reference (preferably a textbook so that additional preparation material is handy) that calculates the exit time of a Wiener process from a region bounded by sloped lines. Thank you, Gary
At low photon energies, the probability of the photoelectric effect to occur increases, but the probability of the photoelectric effect to happen also increases when going towards most inner shells like K shell but inner shells require much more photon energies to be broken, so isn't there a contrast here? How is this EVEN possible?
We know that the vertical anemometer, just like the cup/vane anemometer, works by measuring how fast the cup/fan rotates because of the wind. But how could we possibly know that the fan rotation is due to vertical winds, and not due to the horizontal winds? Wouldn't the horizontal winds affect the readings of this anemometer? Why, or why not?. image credits: link
In this sentence: Some of the sensitive topics that have dominated xxx talks in the past now seem further down the agenda. What is the meaning of "down the agenda" in this sentence?, What is the usage of "down"? Is it used as a verb?
Looking at the Wikipedia entry on the topic: Superior Highly Composite Numbers It is true of all numbers listed there. Does this commonality continue forever? Put another way: Are all SHCNs factors of all larger SHCNs?
I have to present in class "The classical version of the Frobenius theorem". Here is the classic version of the book "Foundations of Differentiable Manifolds and Lie Groups" (Frank W. Warner). I want more references on this theorem with example and applications of the PDE. Could you suggest me some, please?
I am self-studying the book Lebesgue Integration on Euclidean Space by Frank Jones. There is no doubt that this is a great textbook on real variable functions, but the large number of unanswered examples interspersed in the main text makes me look very struggling. So where should I find the errata or exercise answers about this book?
My understanding is that the dimensions of objects change relative to an observer so that a moving cube would no longer be cube shaped and its volume might differ. However, what if that object was absorbing radiation based on its surface area: would a stationary observer see a different amount of heating than a person within the cube? And would this be a paradox?