darklight03/StackMIAsub huggingface dataset:
How do I merge cells irregularly in tables? I need to do this stuff for homework and don't feel like printing it out, writing it by hand, and scanning it back in to upload. I could just hide the borders on the cells above the Answer column but then text wouldn't flow into that area. I want a real non-rectangular cell.
What is the origin of stretch as it is used in the following sentence? We should eat before the final stretch. In this context, final stretch is used to mean 'last segment', or 'the effort needed before the work will be done'. Is this use present in dictionaries?
What's the difference between the term "parameter" and the term "argument" in TeX jargon? Are outermost enclosing pairs of matching curly braces of undelimited arguments to be considered components of these arguments? Are delimiters of delimited arguments to be considered components of these arguments?
A colleague has written: If you are encountering any more problems please don't hesitate to reach out. Reading this, I believe it should phrased: "If you encounter any more problems..." but I cannot describe why - the language tools I have tested say the original is "clunky" or have no complaints. A) Is the original technically incorrect? B) If so, why?
I know that free ultrafilters are defined in contrast to principal/fixed ultrafilters. Nonetheless, is there some categorical way to view the use of the word "free" here (e.g. some pair of adjoint functors), or some universal property that free ultrafilters satisfy?
If object is at rest relative to the Earth's surface on a frictionless surface. What is the effect of Earth rotation and orbiting on an object? Does object rotate and orbit with Earth and stays at same position due to gravitational force. Or object stays same location and earth rotate underneath it?
Shwezigon Pagoda's appearance always makes me feel powerful. And it also made me consider how mighty Bagan and our nations were back in those days. Or should I be using "and also it" here? Does it make a difference?
I read the octet and decuplet baryons symmetric and anti-symmetric wavefunction from 'Riazzudin and Fiazzudin's book. But I am little confused about the wavefunction of neutral sigma and Lambda baryon. What is the exact form of the wavefunction of baryons?
There exist sites such as https://shouldiblamecaching.com/, https://isitdns.com/, and https://isitchristmas.com/ that use the domain name to ask a question and show a simple yes or no answer. Is there a term that can be used to refer to this category of websites?
Is there a term for a "union" or "meeting" between Kings? An example would be: four different kings go to a meeting in one's realm to discuss politics. (Though I really don't know if it was a common practice or has a name.)
My friend said that it is 'boae constrictor' since 'boa' is in Latin. But I told him that first of all, it would be more correct as 'boae constrictor(s)', but the actual correct form is 'boa constrictors'. Which one is it?
In a question on a different SE site the title is as follows Writing the introduction section of an academic journal while the question is about writing the introduction section of a paper that will be published in an academic journal. What is this rhetorical device (i.e. saying "the journal" while instead referring to an article inside the journal) called in English?
In general relativity, there is a definition of the surface gravity that is associated with the Killing vectors, is there a similar definition for the interior of stars/compact objects? I would expect that if I measure the surface gravity inside and near the surface of the star and outside it should be the same.
Want to know if this sounds OK. Here I am asking a friend if it's OK for me to come over to her place to return her book. Hi, Was thinking to come return your book today, would you be home? Thanks
If I have a spool of thread with a force pulling to the right on a rolling cylinder, how can I mathematically determine the direction of the friction? . .-----------> F . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
What is so different between the molecules that have already evaporated but below the critical temperature than those that exist after reaching the critical point? If there are gases above critical temperatures that cannot be converted back to liquid, are there any critical liquids in the sense that they cannot be frozen back to solids?
could someone recommend some references where the problem of constructing an accurate map of the Earth is tackled from the point of view of general maps between manifolds (so something like this and not like this) ? Thanks!
Considering the hyper-fine-structure configuration of the H-atom, why is its stable, low energy state (or the "flipped-back" state) the state when the spins of the electron and the proton point in the same direction, ie are parallel (and not antiparallel, as is sometimes stated in the literature)?
For Vacuum fluctuations based QRNG source, how will the linewidth of the laser source affects the shot noise. If we decrease the linewidth of the laser source, will we get a better output.
I am doing a quantum mechanics question involving the positivity of the norm. So I'm using the fact that the norm will be greater than zero but i want to apply an operator onto the ket on one side of the equation, is it a legal operation to apply the operator to the zero on the other side and say its still zero?
I'm working in ZFC and wondering which axioms can be considered constructive. I find Axioms of Pair, Union, Empty Set, Infinite, Power Set and Replacement to be clearly constuctive. Choice and Regularity/Foundation are non-constructive. I've read here that constructive Zermelo-Fraenkel considers Extensionality. How is Extensionality constructive?
For example, someone spoils a show or says something is poorly written. Originally you may not have thought or noticed that but suddenly your view starts changing to become similar or the same as their view.
It's said that Neutirnos can only make up a tiny fraciton of dark matter. So why can't Dark matter be mostly made up of Neutrinos? Why can't there just be a huge number of them? I suspect myself that neutrinos are so light that they end up being "too fast". But I'm not sure myself.
Three forces P, Q and R act along the sides BC, CA, and AB respectively of a triangle ABC in order to keep the system in equilibrium. When will the resultant force touches the inscribed circle.
I was looking at my neice's second grade note book in which was the question " Where did the four cows live? " but her mam corrected it to "Where did the four cows lived?" I think it should be live as we use first form of verb with did. Am i wrong?
Are there any colours that our human eye cannot comprehend but other animals can see? The ability to see colours is the property of our eyes. For example an average dog would see less colours than us. So does this imply that there could be colours which the human mind cannot comprehend while some animals can see them?
If we put some blocks on a piston and the piston moves downwards giving pressure to the gas, will the pressure by external mass(blocks) on piston and pressure by piston on gas be the same?
Spanish speakers use 'basket,' for basketball, 'smoking' for black tie and 'freaki' for geek. They also use 'camping' for camp site and 'parking' for car park, but the participles retain the same meaning. The latter are loan words, but I wonder whether it's accurate to use the term 'loan word' if that word undergoes a significant shift in meaning.
I have been reading about Hackenbush recently and have learned that the surreal numbers can be represented using RGB Hackenbush. I am having a hard time understanding On, Off, and Oof. What Hackenbush games represent these numbers?
Fascinated by the font of this journal, and found out it's ITC New Baskerville Semi Bold. How to add this font to the overleaf tex, the closest package I could find is baskervillef and librebaskerville.
There should be opposing viewpoints so that discussion can take multiple turns AND people can finally reach a solution that neutralizes both viewpoints. Should there be a comma before "and" in this sentence because both are independent clauses?
My question is not why this is different than in the near field where it was measured by Hertz. I am asking for a source with a description of who measured it in the far field and how.
I just recalled the previous winter that I had stood in front of our heater to get warm. I then observed that the heat that was going up had a shadow on the wall behind the heater. I suspect those were the shadow of the air molecules. But I can't prove.
Fermions with no electric charge may carry magnetic moments e.g., the neutron. Since particles with magnetic magnetic moments interact, they're expected to scatter off each other electromagnetically. How does QED describe such a scattering?
As capacitance is the ability to store charge therefore we say conductors can show self-capacitance but why can't insulators? we can store charge on insulators as well so why can't they show capacitance?
I am teaching an introduction to pure maths module. Are there any really good resources on relations? I want something that will have an impact and motivate the learner. I am not really looking for artificial engineering examples but some bona fide real applications.
The energy is not Lorentz invariant quantity since energy depends on the state of motion. Then how come the physics is the same in every inertial reference frame when every inertial frame measures different energy?
I'm new to capillary forces and I found this statement: I found Jurin's law or the Young-Laplace equation, but it's always about capillary tube and I would know how to find this expression. Regards
I was curious as to why the "Law of Reflection" is only a law and not a principle. Are there any specific conditions or circumstances where it is not followed by chance? If so, how so? Note: I am not discussing about or referring to anything in special theory of relativity, however the reader may offer information on it as well.
I am trying to input the non numbered section bibliography in my summary in a document using lyx, but it has been appearing only if I number the section. Is there an alternative ?
Why is it that the water which constantly passes through the core of a nuclear reactor doesn't become radioactive? Despite passing so closely to the active nuclear fission reaction, as gamma particles are capable enough to penetrate thick surfaces. It ends up being converted to steam. What actually is going on in it?
From our point of view in our Galaxy, his center, Sagittarius A, is a super massive black hole. At event horizon of this singularity, gravity stop time. Is there any reason why time would not run in reverse, on the other side?
What is the maximum number of operations that can be defined on Cbits (like mechanical switches) and Qbits (like quantum states)? If they are different how will the ratio change if we limit ourselves to Reversible circuits? Edit: By operation I mean that a n-bit state remains an n-bit state
If objects gain mass as they approach the speed of light, is it possible that as a photon "attempts" to exceed the speed of light it gains enough mass to interact with the higgs field immediately slowing it back down until it no longer has enough mass to cause an interaction?
Propositional logic and first-order logic are theories in ZFC. The principle of structural induction is a theorem of ZFC. Is that what justifies the usage of structural induction in propositional logic and first-order logic? By justifying I really mean proving, that is, tracing back to axioms. Meaning of structural induction: Sturctural induction.
When Austin Powers says this phrase? Is it considered to be somewhat of an exception to normal use, like with, Myself is often used where I or me might be expected, Or was it more abnormal than that, and was just a joke? I'm not sure of other instances where it's used commonly in a similar manner.
According to Special theory of relativity, magnetic field is equal to electric field if we see it in a frame of electron (in the frame of electron) but why we have to see it in accelerating frame? Why can't we just see in stationary frame?
A lot of sources stop expanding the taylor approximation at the second order Hessian matrix for a multivariable function. I'd like to include the third order taylor expansion. Does anyone have the matrix equation for this and have any sources talking about it? Is there a name for the third order derivative matrix?
From what I understand, the voltage and current waves propagate down the input transmission line, hit the nonlinear oscillator, and then bounce back toward the generator. How are gates such as the X or the Hadamard encoded into these waves?
HOM is a two-photon interference effect where temporally overlapped identical photons coming perpendicular to a beam splitter must leave it in the same direction. How is momentum conserved in this process? Initially, the total momentum of the photons is only on the x-axis, but after the beam splitter, it has a y-axis component. Does some momentum pass to the beam splitter itself?
Electric charges are of two types - positive and negative charges.electrons are negatively charged and protons are positively charged. If the term electric means electrons and electric charge means negative charge why do we include protons? How can a charge be positive? Please correct me if I'm wrong . Thank you
Which are common protocols to measure the light transmittance of glass (example: a window)? I have searched for references and officials standards without success. Which tools can be used to achieve this measurement ?
Which sentence is more grammatically correct? Welcome to a new way to travel Welcome to a new way of travel (We are promoting our airport service which allows one to avoid stepping foot inside the airport to get to their commercial flight. )
So I want to write my notes where there are lists connected with vertical lines. I want the exact format displayed as in the below photo where in the nested lists the "main" line is stretched. Also I want this design to be added in the preamble. Thanks!
I have long been curious about a particular English (in parts of GB) phrasing habit. For example: Oh she's lovely, she is. That's a nice one, that is. You should keep doing that, you should. I am curious what that repeat is called, how it came about, and anything else I can find out.
I recently discovered that if is considered a preposition in contemporary grammar. Is "when" considered a preposition as well? And in the following sentence, is the chunk introduced by when considered an adjunct, or as integral in that it provides the referent for "it"? I like it when you say "indubitably".
I am interested in learning about differential graph theory or differential operators on graphs, something related to what E. Bautista introduced in his answer here. Can one suggest a textbook in which such topics are discussed? (The quoted answer refers to some papers, but I prefer a book covering a comprehensive treatment of the topic.)
I am working on a paper on how pivot rule selection influences the time needed for LPSolve to solve a problem. I have decided to write some teory about different algorithms, but i can't find anything about the "First index" algorithm. Anybody know what it is, maybe know anything I could use as literature about it?
In this image, power is used to apply voltage to the charged grids. But if no voltage is applied, would ions still be accelerated by Coulomb forces to create thrust? If not, why?
I found these two common English words (snarky and smarmy) that seem like forms of a literary device. However, unlike onamatopoeia, the comparison is not made with sound, but rather it is more from the "visual" images/memory that they evoke. What is this called in terms of "literary technique" (if not onamatopoeia)? "Synesthesia" perhaps?
I am finishing a book with a bunch of complex TikZ embedded pictures, some with complex path decorations and so. I wonder what is better, to include the whole list of usetikzlibrary{} at the top of the LaTeX doc or specify the needed ones inside each tikzpicture, yet repeating
This is more a vocab question than anything else but what "type" of thing are injective, surjective, bijective. I fully understand what these words mean but I'm looking for a word to describe the type of properties these might be. Basically "odd and even" is to "parity" as "injective, surjective, bijective" is to what? Thank you all!
Anyone have anything? I'm writing a "proof" for something and it came up. I'm stupid (as username suggests) and it would take way too long for me to solve it, and I wouldn't want to delete it since I want to just write QED in place of the proof for the solution
I'm looking for a good noun to describe a character who can use Comakinesis, which is hair manipulation, but "Comakinesis-user" isn't good enough. Also, I can't find a word to describe hair manipulation in a magic user word ending in 'mancer' so I'm wondering if kinetic ability names have any kind of word form like that?
Past Perfect can't be used on its own, can it? I mean, if there is a sentence without context, just a sentence on its own, and there is no clause with predicate in Past Simple in it. Is it grammatically correct to use it in American English? Like in this example : John had already given his present.
I've seen loads of cars that skid during a curve due to taking it with a high velocity. I can guess that it has to do with the grid with the road and maybe something to do with centifugal forces?
I have heard a couple of people use intriguement casually but there is nothing online except for a listing in the Urban Dictionary: intriguement the feeling of being intrigued He was nearly as old as her father, much to Martha's intriguement. So, is it an actual word?
When using the proof environment provided by the amsthm package, you get an empty square box at the end of your proof as the default QED symbol. Question: Is there a way to make it automatically put "QED" for some proofs but not others? Essentially, can one create a second proof environment which puts a different symbol at the end?
I try to write this equation on overleaf and numbering in second line (the same as in the picture) but I couldn't. Another problem is when I use align or equation, the prime in max' function goes to the center but not the right of max. Help me!!
I am looking for a "thick" book on complex analysis, which also has historical details such as the motivation behind it. Which problem lead to the creation/discovery of a certain topic. E.g. what is the reason behind fundamental groups how is it in connection with topology. Thanks in advance.
When calculating the displacement of a rolling body do we just calculate the displacement due to Vcom in a particular time t or additionally need to consider also the displacement that may be produced because of the rolling motion.
I saw the excellent answer here: Did the Big Bang happen at a point? but I have a hard time imagining the initial state. If the distances between all points in the universe were zero at the Big Bang, how is it not a single point in space?
Relation between elements of essential spectrum and the eigenvalue of a self adjoint operator. In particular, is there any way we can say that the element of essential spectrum is an eigenvalue of infinite multiplicities of a self adjoint operator. Any idea or if there any article related to this concepts or any book will be helpful.
Is there any way to reasonably restrict control points of cubic bezier curve so it's oscilating circle will never have radius smaller than r? Bezier curve with it's oscilating circle I need to find the conditions that control points have to meet, so curvature of the bezier is never too large
I used a reference manager for my bibliography and added personal notes to all my refernces to organise them. Now using bibtex (bibliography style unsrt) these notes appear in my bibliography. How can I exclude the notes from my bibliography without having to alter every entry in my reference library?
Is there some interpretation for the eigenvectors of the Laplacian of a (directed) weighted graph? Normally, the spectrum of a Laplacian informs us about connectives, is this also the case for a weighted graph?
I have found lots of numbers that can be done two ways but can't seem to find any that are done three or four ways. I believe there would be a way to use complex numbers to help with this.
from wikipedia (if you say it's false I believe you): A series of independent states (for example, a series of coin flips) satisfies the formal definition of a Markov chain. However, the theory is usually applied only when the probability distribution of the next state depends on the current one by definition, the next coin flip should depend on the current one, no?
I don't feel so confident in the sign convention on this example, wouldn't a clockwise angular velocity mean negative sign not positive? Why is my answer and the books answer positive, and it seems like it should be negative to insinuate clockwise direction?
Just like the title, I really can not understand how brownian-motion can be nonmonotonous. I thinck the probability of a brownian-motion moving in same direction in a really short interval can be a positive number.
I've got this message from a quite respectful software library: A value is trying to be set on a copy of a slice from a DataFrame. Shouldn't it be something in passive voice, like "The value is being tried to be set.."?
It is well known that for every monad T, we can consider the Eilenberg-Moore-Category and get an adjunction which induces T, similar for the Kleisli-Category. But since every adjunction induces a Comonad as well, my question is what are the Comonads in the Eilenberg-Moore-Category resp. the Kleisli-Category that are induced by T in this way?
I can't, for the life of me, understand chain rule on conditional distributions of random variables. I can't see the pattern. Like, how do I find out what things like these are: P(A,B|C) P(X,Y,Z|W) P(U|V,W) P(M|N,O,P) P(H,I|J,K)
Recently I have been studying conic -sections in my school . The problems given in the course are good but I am looking for any resources where I can find new theorems and strategies to solve the problems of comics. I want a resource which can provide Olympiad-like geometric problems on conic sections. So please can anyone suggest any good resource for such problems?
My doubt lies in the fact that gravitational waves are produced even before the merger so I kindly ask an expert to make me a clear picture of the source of energy of grav. waves before the merger and the energy after the merger that we are told is gained by the vanished masses of the merging objects.
In other words, would this construction be proper? And if so, is there a name for it? The court then turned to negligence, which issue it easily resolved. (As opposed to ". . ., which it easily resolved.") Aha. I missed this when I first looked at MW. I think it's the third definition under the first section: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/which
if we covered all the deserts with solar plates , would that be the solution to the energy crisis ? i mean put a solar plates in ALL the deserts of the earth to harvest all solar power
Much like McGyver meaning "resourceful," Einstein meaning "intelligent," Savant meaning "gifted..." I remember hearing and using a name to refer to someone as a charismatic go-getter. Another word that comes to mind is "maverick."
As long as the time dilation is about what the observers think or see, there would be no great difficulty. But the assertions that the clocks run faster or slower cannot be justified.
Power at the receiving antenna is given by the Friis transmission formula, which says that the received power is proportional to the wavelength squared. But energy carried by an electromagnetic wave E=hc/lambda which is inversely proportional to the wavelength. Shouldn't they both have the same relationship with wavelength?