darklight03/StackMIAsub huggingface dataset:
I use Kile on Linux and WinEdt on Windows both with same version of MiKTeX. While using KILE, when I compile "PDFLaTeX" , it updates my opend output pdf file and does not close the file. Where as in WinEdt it closes the already opened output pdf file and open it again after compiling. What irriatates me is while it opens the new output and it goes to first page rather than the page (of output pdf file) I edited. :( Any remedy would be appreciated.
There is a company out there that 'prints' magnetic pixels, a.k.a. maxels, into a material. In doing so, they're able to choose the distance of effect of magnetic fields they create, independently of the magnitude of the field, leading to some really interesting properties. Can anyone shed some light upon how theyre able to 'print' a 'maxel' into a material? Here is a good video by Smarter Every Day about this company and their process.
After reading "Is everyone" singular or plural?", I would refrain from asking this question, but the husband of a colleague of mine (English professor, native speaker of British English) stated against it, so I am looking for further enlightenment. He advocates some should be solely used to refer to plural forms. Thus, some non-existent towns is perfectly correct, but some non-existent town should be replaced by a non-existent town Is that true?
Many basic types of physics have ready and obvious everyday applications. For instance, basic electromagnetism vector calculus can give great insights into how something as simple as a bar magnate works. And obviously the more people understand the science the easier it is to apply it. My Question: What are some examples of useful or practical applications of classical electrodynamics and quantum electrodynamics? I'm hoping that by getting some examples it will help me better understand why physicist seek these elaborate tools to describe physical phenomena.
I find it difficult to understand the sentence as shown in the title. Is the card data? Is the card processing? Is the card a method (or style) to process data? I'm Chinese. If I express the sentence with Chinese I'll say The punch card was the main method of data processing back then. NOTE: I'm a programmer and I know what a punch card is. So please don't waste you precious time to explain the punch card.
I understand how to get the vertical (descent speed) of a parachute and its payload, but how could one find the horizontal speed/velocity of this parachute depending on the speed of the wind? (yeah I understand the higher the wind is, the smaller it's influence is as well) I'm having a hard time trying to figure out what the winds influence on a descending balloon is. I know it would push the parachute, but how much would that matter? I know it would push the payload, which trying to figure out a CD for would be rather hard!
I am looking to test some properties of elliptic curves and I would like to have a variety of different families to test. I was wondering if there was, say, a catalogue of the different interesting families of elliptic curves that have been found. Some types of families I am interested in would be: families of high rank, families of a given rank, one-parameter families, or families of even rank. Thank you in advanced.
English is my second language. I heard someone saying "Now that the right people are telling the vote..." I wrote down 'telling' but I don't think it was that word. What could that verb be that could sound like 'telling' to mean "...now that the right people are voting..."? I'm pretty sure it wasn't "casting". Situation is like in the 'survival' show. There are two teams and the loser team was to pick someone to leave. That line is said before they are going into the area to pick each one's 'worst performer' choice.
As the resistance of a circuit goes down, the power increases because the current increases, assuming constant voltage. Why is this? I feel like resistance and current are inversely proportional, so lowering one should just raise the other, and power should stay relatively constant. What is it about power that makes it work like this? Edit: Again, namely I find it confusing that decreasing resistance actually has a net increase in power used. I feel like while the current will increase, it should be countered by the lowered resistance...
This is related to this question:Does the weight of an hourglass change when sands are falling inside? At Brigham Young University, there is a display consisting of a sealed off liter bottle with a sunken sealed off hourglass. When one turns over the bottle, the hourglass floats as the sands flow down. Eventually, the hourglass reaches some transition, and precipitately changes from floating to sinking. It has a sign next to it saying that it's for a fishing lure,and that you should not reveal the answer if you get it. What causes it to change from floating to sinking so quickly?
How do I represent the -ed in witnessed (or any other similar word) phonetically? Is there a reference sheet somewhere for these? I notice that other endings do not get shown in most dictionaries either (for example -es in phrases) I use Word web which has a pronunciation guide for the root of the word, but I can't find anything to write the -ed part phonetically. It does not seem to be on this Wikipedia page. I would prefer the same format as Word web. Many people could probably figure this out for themselves (without a direct reference), but I do not trust myself.
Considering a Science Fiction question, it occured to me that in "populated" space, with no atmosphere, you might expect to find more EM interference than on Earth. Basically, if you are outside of an atmosphere, are there issues with using radio as a mass communication method, based on the difficulties with spectrum management when the atmosphere isn't degrading signals? And would there actually be more interference from the radio emissions of celestial bodies once you leave Earth's atmosphere?
I encountered the following two examples: Moreover, the proposed scheme is designed in an ID-based setting and so the necessity for certificates and some related problems are eliminated. Our scheme also achieves setup-freeness and so a user can enjoy the fairness provided by the fair exchange scheme without interacting with the arbitrator for registration. Is this type of construction (and so) correct? Should there be some commas somewhere? Are they not just two independent clauses joined by and so?
What do you call someone who, merely by their presence, gives a morale boost to the people he is responsible for? What about someone who gains power from being supported by their troop? If possible I would like to have word with military connotation, but a more "civilian" approach is also interesting. EDIT: Jez gave a lot of interesting examples, but I am also interested in nouns, and all of Jez's example can't be "translated" into nouns that easily.
I have some doubts about the usages of that and who. Sometimes I read sentences such as You are someone I love. You are someone who I love. People were asked to describe the qualities they look for in a friend. People were asked to describe the qualities that they look for in a friend. Why are who or that omitted in some of these sentences but not in others?
This question is related to Compiling documents online. I store my LaTeX documents in a git repository on GitHub. Is there a web service which offers a post-commit hook for GitHub which automatically fetches my document and compiles it? For example, ReadTheDocs provides compilation for documentation of Python projects stored in GitHub repositories; the documentation is fetched and compiled after each commit to the repository.
I cannot think of any single word that means a person's life changed for the worse. While there are many phrases, i.e. fallen heroes for good guy turned bad, or take a turn for the worse, turning to the dark side,I cannot think of a single word that describes this phenomenon. An example would be in my subjective opinion, how Lindsey Lohan a child star took drugs as she grew older or Harvey becoming Two-face in Batman. The sentence structure should be: He/She __________. And they would get the idea that their life turned bad or took a change for the worse.
I've started studied eigenvalues and eigenvectors. If there is a transformation T: V->V I can find out a matrix of T with fixed basis and characteristic polynomial of T. With this characteristic polynomial of T, I can find out eigenvalues and eigenvectors Does this mean that this transformation T: V->V has eigenvalues and eigenvectors? And, If there is a transformation T: S->V, S is a subspace of V. then Matrix of T is not square, and therefore I can not find out characteristic polynomial. Does this imply that there exists no eigenvalues and eigenvectors under Transformation from subspace into Space ?
While working on a menial task in front of a clock today I was distracting myself by proving that all three hands only align twice a day. That lead me to wonder how one would deal with more complex problems involving modulo arithmetic. I know several rules for reducing equations involving all sorts of operators from simple addition up through very complex triple integrals and the like. But, I never learned any rules for manipulating the modulo operator. What are valid operations that can be used to reduce equataions involving multiple modulo operators?
Having taken none of the prerequisite rigorous treatments of mathematics during my undergrad years, I feel at a disadvantage to the people in my major what do have that analysis/abstract math background, I always find myself struggling to understand those more rigorous papers that use concepts from real/complex analysis, topology, set theory and the slew of abstract math concepts that you don't typically see in engineering at an undergrad level. What sources are especially good for starting to understand more rigorous math and why are they good? I specifically deal with controls, stability of dynamical systems and probability, so any books that are especially good for those fields are even better.
I remember at more than one university math department there being a set of glass cabinets with a number of physical models of surfaces. They were all algebraic varieties on the reals (of limited degree). I am looking for a reference (online or physical book) for a systematic listing that would show images of these surfaces. I looked at the Mathematica site but it seemed to only have polynomial functions. Is there an online or library reference for these?
I think of mathematical objects as individual things that exist by their own (either abstractly or concretely) and can be represented mathematically. When thinking of subsets, I'm in doubt if they are really mathematical objects because they must be related to something (a set) to exist and be called subsets. If they are not related to anything, they are just sets, mathematical objects for sure. So, are subsets really mathematical objects?
I am learning about the degree of algebraic sets. I know the definition from Wikipedia, but it is not too clear to me what it is. Could someone possibly explain to me exactly what property the degree of an algebraic set does capture, or how I should think about it? PS: This was part of another question of mine, Basic question regarding degrees of algebraic sets, but I thought that maybe it would be better to ask this separately.
You are walking around a circle with an equal number of zeroes and ones on its boundary. Show with induction that there will always be a point you can choose so that if you walk from that point in a clockwise direction, you will always have seen at least as many zeroes as you have ones. So, suppose the P(k) case holds. In the next case, where an extra one and an extra zero is added, I can see that the old path will suffice so long as you will encounter the extra zero before the extra one. But what about in the other situation, if you encounter the extra one before the extra zero?
The four words"weakness", "shortcoming", "demerit" and "defect" are four words shared with the similar meanings. In the dictionary, "weakness" and "shortcoming" have more to do with one's characer, while "demerit" and "defect" are used in a general sense. However, in this sentence, "The ___in David's character has hindered him from advancing in his character." Why the correct answer was said to be "defect" rather than the other three?
Does the word nationalism specifically imply a feeling of kindred superiority in a secular sense? For instance, if country X opposes themselves to country Y based on religious practice or reasons, would we still refer to country X's behavior as nationalism? In this scenario let us assume country X has no issue with a third country where the same religion is practiced as in country Y. What if country X's claim to their homeland is based on a religious belief, would any behaviors which would have been classified as nationalism now be called something else?
My question is about the interact mode in Asymptote. On a OS X terminal, I type asy -v <name-of-file>.asy and go to the interact mode. A window containing the relevant picture shows up. After playing around, I have worked out an appropriate camera position and I would like to use the camera position that the picture is currently set in. Is this possible? In other words, how do I recover some data about the camera position? /p/s/ Although this question is a priori TeX related, the end application I have in mind is inclusion into a document I am writing using LaTeX. :-)
I was searching for information about the original novel "House of Cards" and from following site, in the middile of the page, there's sentence which compliment Kevin Spicey as shown below(http://www.michaeldobbs.com/house-of-cards/): He's not only one of the most talented actors of our age but kind, too. I don't think the "Kind" here means Spacey's a nice guy, I guess it might imply that he's a good actor of "man kind" (our kind)? I couldn't find any sentence with similar structure as an example to support my guess, so please anyone can explan to me the real meaning of the word "kind" here, better with some example, thanks.
Commonly seen in physics(and statistics) are the concepts of moments of order zero(mass), one(center of mass), and two(moment of inertia). In statistics a third moment (referred to as skewness) also exists and is used. Actually, mathematically the moment can (of order n) be simplified to an operation in the form of: Once I look at this equation it begs the question: what if n is a ratio. What could be some physical applications of this fractional-order moment?
I will not in any case kick the ball. I will in any case not kick the ball. I in any case will not kick the ball. I will not kick in any case the ball. I think only the fourth one is wrong, and all of the others seem fine to me. Please tell me if there are any wrong ones (and why), because after looking at them for so long, I just lost my sense of English. Also, please tell me if some of them have to be used with commas like below: I, in any case, will not kick the ball.
I have a set A with three elements. I'd like to express another set B in terms of a limited number of elements (two in this example) from set A. In this case I realize that there would be a number of possible B sets, but I'm interested in expressing that B could be any of those sets. Alternatively, set C which is one of the possible B sets. Is this possible, or should I be looking for some other notation than set theory?
I understand the electrons in circuit travel down the path of least resistance, however are electrons attracted by the emission of virtual photons emitted by a source with relatively low electron concentration or positively charged? Thus, relating this to a battery in a circuit, does an anode (in electron-flow notation) emit an electrostatic potential force that attracts electrons, aside from the path of least resistance? I am a bit new to physics, so if my question seems silly or wrong, please explain why.
All these classical ideas are pointless and obsolete today, because in quantum mechanics, the particles are completely different objects, defined by quantum motion of fields, not by the location of classical points (at least not in a causal field picture). The notion of a point particle was replaced by the more subtle notion of a quantum point particle, which has a probability amplitude to be at various places. This quantum point particle can reproduce the quantum field if it is allowed to go backward and forward in time. Ron Maimon That was quoted by Ron Maimon. From this - Can I gather that in reality, particles travel backward and forward in time or, is this just a mathematical expression or model?
While searching for the meaning I got this: Workaround - a method for overcoming a problem or limitation in a program or system. Which means almost the same as "solution". So, can we use "workaround to this" instead of "solution to this" in a sentence? For example, This issue is getting more complicated. I want a workaround to this. Math is not real fun unless you have the workaround to these equations. Is it okay to use this combination in a sentence? Does it hold a different meaning? And what are the other precautions?
Assume that I am advertising that a payment will be asked only if we actually execute a given job right, and I say: "if we don't do it right, we have been working for free" "if we won't do it right, we have been working for free" "if we don't do it right, we would have been working for free" Can you tell me what is the most effective and correct way to express (advertise) the idea (especially the correct choice of verbs), and are the above sentences wrong ?
It is postulated by many cosmologists that at the Big Bang time the universe was in an unusual low entropy state. Does this claim specifically mean that the entropy of the initial universe was zero? Is zero-entropy state unique for given physical laws? Is it possible that entropy was growing always so that only difference in entropy has physical meaning rather than absolute value? Was there ever negative entropy state?
It is certainly possible to create a mapping between hierarchies and some of the fractals: http://davis.wpi.edu/~matt/courses/fractals/trees.html According to wikipedia it is possible to deviate from the original fractal formula: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite_subdivision_rule , so my (not so) educated guess would be that it is possible to write subdivision rules to display any kind of hierarchical data. By some of the non-hierarchical graphs we are lucky, since we can use clustering to make them more or less hierarchical and we can probably use the same rule inside the clusters: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scale-free_network#Hierarchical_network_model So my question is: Is it possible in theory to use fractals or subdivision rules to display random network data (which I guess cannot be clustered efficiently)?
I saw a lot of usage of machinery, mechanism, to be used with similar meaning as techniques, ways, methods,.... For example, my math teacher said the machinery in the proof of some theorem is not heavy. Mechanism is also used to describe how something works. I have actually been confused if they can mostly be exchangeable. Also are there similar terms that can be used in this kind of scenario? PS: I have asked similar questions before here, but the post got closed. cerberus encouraged me to ask again.
How far apart do scientists estimate was/were the dying star(s) that supplied the elements that comprise our sun, planet, and us? With stars so far apart and expansion of space (as I understand it) carrying things further away still, it would seem to be a low probability occurrence for sufficient quantities of elements blown out from across many light years to accumulate to birth a star system. And another related question, it would seem that when a star went supernova and blew heavier elements in all directions, that would result in mass densities for future star nurseries far away from the dead parent that were much lower than what the parent had, so won't favorable conditions for star births monotonically decrease?
Possible Duplicate: Capitalising a sentence whose first word is explicitly lowercase Should I change the structure of a sentence/add filler words to make sure that the sentence always starts with a capital letter? In programming language documentation, it is common for keywords to appear in titles. Assuming that the keyword is strictly lowercase in the language, how should that keyword be capitalized if it is used as the first word in a title? For example: int int is used to specify an integer type. -- or -- Int int is used to specify an integer type.
I want to describe a recurring situation that happens in the modern day when people craft an email that is "perfect" in that person's mind, and they end up re-reading the sent message over and over. Maybe they are re-reading the email because they are satisfied that all the details are covered, or to appreciate the email's conciseness and focus, or even appreciate the tone and word choice. Relish is the closest I've found, but since I'm describing a person who enjoys the written word, I would hope there is a way to phrase it in a way that is more poetic to the situation. E.g. the word or phrase itself should have special meaning, intellectual or otherwise, to writers.
What is "the thing that, in its simplest form, has a receiver and a button, and we use to open the door when somebody rings the door bell" called in English? When I'm speaking English I almost always ask somebody to answer the door or I answer the door myself but today I was thinking, what is that "thing" exactly called, is it a "Door Answerer" or an Intercom? In my native language, it is called 'AiPhone' or 'EF-EF'.
Would it be proper to use a valediction ("complimentary close") in a newspaper or magazine message wholly devoted to congratulating the media's readers with the New Year or some other holiday? An example message from the staff of a made-up media: Dear readers! From the bottom of our hearts we... Yours sincerely, Russian Industrial News' editorial staff. Or are valedictions more fit for personal communication? P.S. In Russia, such congratulatory newspaper messages are ended with a no-frills bottom-positioned line like "Editorial staff of [name of media]." I became curious whether this would work in an English-language media, or should one add something to embellish the ending.
As you know, graphs can be factorized in their component subgraphs, factors such as eventually semilattices, and so on. I would like to know about the precise nature of the relation that might hold (if any) between such graph decomposition(s) and the (unique) factorization of an integer number in its prime constituents. Is there any known theorem regulating such an alleged relation? Thanks in advance (examples are welcome).
Is there a word that means accessible to all? Possibly starting with "omni"? Specifically, to describe information: information that could be accessed by anyone is [omni...] "Public" would be a reasonable description, but perhaps there are similar words. The problem is that "public" information is not necessarily accessible. Scientific journals are public, but are not necessarily free to access. Books are public, but not everyone can access a library, etc. I suppose it doesn't have to be a specific word. I wanted a convenient term for describing the kind of information that does not currently exist: information that in an ideal world everyone could get to (Edited in response to the many valid comments)