Coronary Bypass Surgery Trial: Complete Arterial Revascularization and Conventional Coronary Artery Surgery

This is a randomized, prospective European Multicenter Study comparing complete arterial revascularization of the coronary arteries using arterial graft material exclusively and "conventional" coronary artery bypass surgery using the left internal thoracic artery as graft to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and vein grafts to other vessels to be bypassed.

Coronary artery surgery effectively relieves angina and prolongs life in certain patient subsets. It is the most frequently performed major surgical procedure and therefore has profound economical impact. Unfortunately angina returns in 10 to 20 percent of patients by five years and in up to 50 percent at 10 years primarily because of graft failure and progression of atherosclerosis in the native coronary arteries. Serial angiography reveals that 15-30 percent of vein grafts are stenosed at one year and that nearly 50 percent are occluded at ten years. Recurrence of angina is associated with an increased risk of late myocardial infarction and reoperation. Reoperations after cardiac surgery carry a significantly increased risk of morbidity and mortality due to increased patient age, progression of coronary atherosclerosis, frequently reduced left ventricular function and technical difficulties. Thus prevention of restenosis by medical and surgical means is of eminent importance.The use of the IMA as a graft to the LAD is proven to reduce long-term mortality in patients after CABG throughout a 15 year follow-up period in all age groups. This data and the further improved survival with bilateral IMA grafting suggested by some have increased the interest of the surgical community in total arterial revascularization using both IMAs and various other arterial conduits.

However to date there is no conclusive data demonstrating a clinical benefit of total arterial revascularization.Reports available on complete arterial revascularisation are either single institution / single surgeon, retrospective or non - randomized. Data on which we base our daily decision making is by and large from a different surgical period with different techniques used. Improved understanding of the pathogenic processes leading to graft occlusion have led to more rigorous use of antiplatelet drugs and lipid lowering which may significantly improve vein graft patency rates and slow or halt progression of native coronary artery atherosclerosis in the future.

The scientific hypotheses underlying this randomized multicenter trial are:

1. With respect to the primary outcome variable "total mortality" complete arterial revascularisation does not cause a significantly higher mortality over 5 years of follow-up (as compared to conventional coronary artery surgery) i.e. non-inferiority due to increased tecnical complexity of the surgical procedure.
2. In terms of the combined secondary outcome variable "cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and re-revascularisation (PTCA or CABG)" and additional outcome variables "freedom from angina, functional status and quality of life" complete arterial revascularisation shows a clear benefit.

Eligibility Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patient eligible for surgical myocardial revascularization
2. Age 70 years or less
3. Triple vessel coronary disease with significant coronary artery stenosis defined as a stenosis of at least 50% in luminal diameter
4. Patients with stable angina pectoris (Canadian Cardiovascular Society 1, 2, 3, or 4) or unstable angina pectoris (Braunwald Classification 1b, 2b, 3b) or proven silent myocardial ischemia.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. No informed consent
2. Age \> 65 years
3. Participation in another study with any investigational drug or coronary revascularization procedure
4. When follow up over a period of five years is difficult or unlikely
5. Concomitant non-cardiac disease likely to limit long-term prognosis (e.g. cancer)
6. One or two vessel coronary disease and isolated left main stenosis
7. Estimated left ventricular ejection fraction \< 25%
8. Myocardial infarction within seven days
9. Need for concomitant major cardiac or non-cardiac surgery (e.g. valve surgery, left ventricular aneurysm, aortic aneurysm, carotid artery desobliteration, etc.)
10. Redo-cardiac surgery
11. Presence of the combination of insulin dependent diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring therapy
12. Renal insufficiency requiring dialysis
13. Presence of the combination of severe adiposity and insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
14. Presence of the combination of severe adiposity and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring therapy
15. Severe hepatic disease
16. Emergent operation for coronary artery disease with signs of ischemia (e.g. failed PTCA, ongoing myocardial infarction)
17. Unstable angina pectoris Class A and C according to Braunwald classification (i.e. secondary unstable angina and postinfarction unstable angina within one week after acute MI)
18. Inadequate quality of saphenous vein material
19. Inadequate quality or number of arterial conduits to achieve complete revascularization likely (e.g. chest irradiation, major abdominal surgery)
20. Recent (\< 2weeks) cerebrovascular event (TIA, RIND, stroke)