Comparison of Cyriax Manipulation and Decompression in LDP

In this study, compare the effects of Cyriax manipulation and Decompression in patient with lumber disc prolapseThis research will provide an important addition to the evidence based treatment intervention in physical therapy in the field of manipulation as there is no such research work have been done on comparative study of cyriax manipulation and decompression in lumber disc protrusion.

According to an estimate, 70 to 80% of the adult population will experience a clinically relevant episode of LBP at some time in their lives. Within the vast differential of LBP, the most common source is intervertebral degeneration leading to degenerative disc disease and LDH. The efficacy of manipulative physical therapy, physical therapy intervention and therapy by general practitioner (GP) for persistent general LBP and neck pain was investigated on 256 patients how didn't received any of the above therapy in last two years were contained in this study. Physical therapy included workout exercises, massage, and physical therapy (related to hot pack, different pain modalities like therapeutic ultrasound, shortwave diathermy, and electrotherapy). Manual therapy includes manual reduction by manipulation and mobilization of the back. Interventions received by GP is medicine related (different types of pain killer and muscles relaxant), guidance about the posture, home plan exercises and different healthy activities and proper rest. Placebo intervention included adjustable shortwave diathermy session for (10 minutes), and adjusted therapeutic ultrasound session for (10 minutes). Recovery rate in the leading complaint was increased with the group receiving manual therapy intervention (4.5) as compare to physical therapy (3.8), after a detailed one year of continuous therapy. There is a great progression seen in physical work by manual therapy. Moreover, manipulation is get going improved gradually, as compare to physiotherapy following in period of 12 months.

The first meta-analysis estimated the efficacy of SMT for LBP due to LDH with other therapies come to the result that SMT was equally effective when compare to other traditional therapies. However a past systematic review was come to the conclusion that SMT was secure and effective in relation to its costs for managing SLDD like LDH, that conclusion was quoted to promote by a very few publications.

One of the present research studies after one year of continuation showed decrease in pain and increase in recreational activities to a long period of time, an additional research work in 2016 described, a remarkable progression in sciatica after 30 days, in patients with lumber discs extrusion and sequestration, as a result of HVLA thrust.

In spite of the factor that there is only average numbers of documentation in the written work which promoted the utilization of SMT to manage LDH, it is extensively applied by therapist.

the comparison of cyriax manipulation and decompresion is an important adding to the researches in evidence based practices. there is no such work done before on comparison of both intervention.

Eligibility Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients having Lumber disc prolapse of L1-L5 and S1 (both gender)
* Patients having MRI reports of protruded disc

Exclusion Criteria:

* Inflammatory condition( systemic inflammatory disease of spine)
* Spinal diseases (other than Musculoskeletal)
* Severe radiculopathies (bilateral)
* Operated patients (spine)