Study of the Effect of Iodized Oil Supplementation During Infancy

In iodine-deficient countries or regions that have inadequate iodized salt distribution, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends choosing one of two methods to improve iodine intakes in breastfeeding infants: 1) iodine supplement (400 mg as iodized oil; 1/year) to the breastfeeding mother, or 2) iodine supplement (100 mg as iodized oil; 1/year) directly to the infant. However, the relative efficacy of these two methods of providing iodine to the newborn has never been directly compared. Whether the first method of iodine supplementation to the breast feeding mother can significantly improve iodine supply and maintain normal thyroid function in her infant remains unclear. This study will directly compare these two strategies. The hypothesis is that the two strategies will be equally effective in providing iodine to the newborn.

In iodine-deficient countries or regions that have inadequate iodized salt distribution, WHO recommends choosing one of two methods to improve iodine intakes in breastfeeding infants:

Method 1) iodine supplement (400 mg as iodized oil; 1/year) to the breastfeeding mother Method 2) iodine supplement (100 mg as iodized oil; 1/year) directly to the infant

However, the relative efficacy of these two methods of providing iodine to the newborn has never been directly compared. Whether the first method of iodine supplementation to the breast feeding mother can significantly improve iodine supply and maintain normal thyroid function in her infant remains unclear.

The mountains of southern Morocco are areas of iodine deficiency. Although the government has been promoting iodization of salt, there are hundreds of small salt producers in the mountains who do not have the funding or infrastructure to iodize their salt, and thus many rural populations still are consuming non-iodized locally-produced salt. At the study site, a 2009 pilot survey of urinary iodine has found that the population in this region is moderately iodine sufficient.

Thus, according to WHO, breastfeeding women and/or their infants should be provided with oral iodine supplementation. But which of the above supplementation methods is preferable? Controlled studies clearly demonstrate that iodine repletion in moderate-to severely iodine deficient school-age children increases insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-3 concentrations and improves somatic growth (height and weight). But whether supplying adequate iodine to iodine deficient infants improves their somatic growth has not been tested.

Therefore, the study hypotheses are: In Moroccan infants who are breastfeeding, method 2 will be more efficacious than method 1 in:

1. increasing urinary iodine (UI) concentrations
2. improving thyroid function (TSH, TT4)
3. increasing IGF-1, IGFBP-3
4. improving somatic growth (length, weight, head circumference)

The study design will be a double-blind, randomized controlled intervention trial in southern Morocco lasting 1 year. Healthy mother-infant pairs (n=240) who are breastfeeding will be recruited while the infant is \>1 mo of age. They will be divided into two groups as follows:

1) method 1: mother receives 400 mg of iodine as oral iodized oil + infant receives placebo capsule; or 2) method 2: mother receives placebo capsule + infant receives 100 mg oral iodized oil.

The outcomes will be:

1. length, weight, head circumference
2. IGF-1, IGFBP-3, thyroid functions (TSH, total T4) from a dried blood spot taken from a finger prick in the mothers/heel prick in the infants
3. urinary and breast milk iodine concentrations These samples (blood spot, urine, breastmilk, anthropometry) will be collected during the first year visits of the infant to the local health clinic for routine pediatric vaccinations (at 1, 12, 20 and 40-52 wks).

Eligibility Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:

* breastfeeding term infant

Exclusion Criteria:

* not breastfeeding
* major medical illnesses