Macular Perfusion Changes After Anti-VEGF Versus Targeted Retinal Photocoagulation in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most common microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), while proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is the principal cause of severe visual loss in patients with diabetes. Since 1981, Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) has been a standard of treatment for PDR. However, PRP can be associated with adverse effects, including visual field constriction, decreased night vision, and worsening of coexisting diabetic macular edema (DME). For this reason, some authors have advocated targeted treatment with PRP. Targeted retinal laser photocoagulation (TRP) is designed to treat areas of retinal capillary non-perfusion and intermediate retinal ischemic zones in PDR that may spare better-perfused tissue from laser-induced tissue scarring.

Protocol S by Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net) has shown that patients that receive ranibizumab as anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy with deferred PRP are non-inferior regarding improving in visual acuity to those eyes receiving standard prompt PRP therapy for the treatment of PDR.

Retinal ischemia is an important factor in the progression and prognosis of diabetic retinopathy. Regarding the effect of anti-VEGF drugs on macular perfusion, several studies have shown mixed results with an increase, decrease, or no effect on perfusion in response to anti-VEGF treatment. In many of these studies, however, patients with more ischemic retinas were not included. Fluorescein angiography (FA) was the method used to assess changes in macular perfusion after anti-VEGF injections in most of the clinical trials. Despite its clinical usefulness, however, FA is known to have documented risks. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in macular perfusion evaluation in these cases was recommended by some investigators. Several studies have proved the reliability of OCTA in detecting and quantifying macular ischemia in diabetics.

The investigators aim to compare changes in the macular perfusion in patients with PDR after treatment with anti-VEGF therapy versus TRP versus Standard PRP using OCTA.

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most common microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), while proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is the principal cause of severe visual loss in patients with diabetes.

Since 1981, PRP has been a standard of treatment for PDR. However, PRP can be associated with adverse effects, including visual field constriction, decreased night vision, and worsening of coexisting diabetic macular edema (DME). for this reason, some authors have advocated targeted treatment with PRP. Targeted retinal laser photocoagulation (TRP) is designed to treat areas of retinal capillary non-perfusion and intermediate retinal ischemic zones in PDR that may spare better-perfused tissue from laser-induced tissue scarring.

Protocol S by DRCR.net has shown that patients that receive ranibizumab as anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy with deferred PRP are non-inferior regarding improving in visual acuity to those eyes receiving standard prompt PRP therapy for the treatment of PDR. However, the effect of both treatment modalities on macular perfusion has been inconclusive with no studies comparing the effect of both.

Regarding the effect of anti-VEGF drugs on macular perfusion, several studies have shown mixed results with an increase, decrease, or no effect on perfusion in response to anti-VEGF treatment. In many of these studies, however, patients with more ischemic retinas were not included. Retinal ischemia is an important factor in the progression and prognosis of diabetic retinopathy.

Fluorescein angiography (FA) was the method used to assess changes in macular perfusion after anti-VEGF injections in most of the clinical trials. Despite its clinical usefulness, however, FA is known to have documented risks and is being replaced by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in macular perfusion evaluation in these cases.

OCTA is a new noninvasive method of acquiring high-resolution images of the retinal vasculature that can be utilized in the management and study of retinal diseases without the need for dye injection. It allows the visualization of both the superficial and deep retinal capillary layers separately and the construction of microvascular flow maps allowing quantitative analysis of vascular parameters.

OCTA uses high-speed OCT scanning to detect the flow of blood by analyzing signal decorrelation between two sequential OCT cross-sectional scans repeated at the same location. Because of the movement of erythrocytes within a vessel, compared to stationary areas of the surrounding retina, only perfused blood vessels will result in signal decorrelation, leading to their imaging. The split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography (SSADA) algorithm improves the signal to noise ratio.

Several studies have proved the reliability of OCTA in detecting and quantifying macular ischemia in diabetics.

The investigators aim to compare changes in the macular perfusion in patients with PDR without macular edema after treatment with anti-VEGF therapy versus TRP versus Standard PRP using OCTA.

Eligibility Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients ≥ 18 years old
2. Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus
3. PDR
4. Central macular thickness less than 300 µm

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Central macular thickness more than 300 µm
2. Previous retinal laser treatment
3. Ocular conditions that may affect macular perfusion (e.g. retinal vein occlusion, uveitis, vasculitis etc.)
4. Any previous treatment for diabetic macular edema.
5. Presence of epiretinal membrane involving the macula or vitreomacular traction
6. Media opacity such vitreous hemorrhage and dense cataract.
7. Patients with previous cataract surgery within the last 3 months.
8. Uncontrolled glaucoma
9. Thromboembolic events within 6 months
10. Tractional retinal detachment.