Evaluating the Role of SURGical TElementoring in Acquisition of Surgical Skills of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. SURGTEACH Trial

Surgical telementoring (ST) has the potential to become an integrated part of everyday surgical teaching practice. Its educational benefits require investigation.

This is a randomized controlled trial evaluating ST in a clinical setting. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be performed by eligible surgical residents randomized to the intervention group or the control group. The control group being guided by traditional onsite mentoring and the intervention group being telementored by a distantly located telementor during ongoing procedure. The primary outcome will be the video recorded GOALS-score (Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills) and NOTSS-score (Non Technical Surgical Skills) assessment of each procedure while secondary outcomes will be satisfaction scores of the involved residents and mentors.

Background:

Developing surgical skills among residents takes time and resources. Surgical practice is increasingly driven by efficacy and hospital economics. Operating room surgical education might conflict with these goals. The identified factors need optimizing surgical resident training. Surgical telementoring (ST) seems natural in surgery. Some ST-systems are cost-effective and safe. Despite recent technical breakthroughs and growing experience with telemedicine in the health sector, data on educational outcomes is still being determined.

Objective:

ST will be evaluated for efficiency and safety as a skill development tool for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In this randomized controlled trial, surgical residents will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention group (real-time telementoring and postoperative coaching) or the control group (traditional intraoperative hands-on teaching). The research follows CONSORT, SPIRIT 2013 statements and the intention to treat principle (ITT).

The study is approved by the Norwegian ethical committee (REK HELSE NORD 32592) and the data protection officer (PVO) at Nordland Hospital trust Bodø (NLSH Bodø).

Two groups of residents will be allocated. The control group will follow the traditional hands-on surgical training method. In the intervention group, an expert surgeon will telementor the surgical residents. General surgery trainees in years 1-6 who have completed more than five laparoscopic abdominal surgeries are eligible. Stratification according to previous experience of the mentee will be made. All residents must agree with the mentor on surgical communication. This model uses LapcoNor principles for intraoperative communication and the GROW-model as an educational model. The GOALS score is the primary trial outcome. It consists of a five-item global rating scale for laparoscopic surgical skills. Each item may be scored from 1 to 5, where 1 is the lowest and five is the highest. The max score is 25. We hypothesize that the intervention group will enhance clinical skills by 3-5 points on the GOALS score compared to the control group. To attain 0.8 statistical power, a p-value of less than 0.05, and a 20% dropout rate, 12 residents per group are needed.

In addition to the GOALS-score assessment of video records, the NOTSS-score evaluating non-surgical technical skills will be assessed. The NOTSS score is based on 4 categories where each category consists of 3 elements. Each element may be graded from 1 to 4 , where 1 is the lowest and 4 is the highest. The highest achievable score is 48.

The higher the score, the better the outcome for both scoring systems.

Results:

Lapco TT courses were given to all telementors and onsite consulting surgeons before the trial start. In December 2023, the Medprescence (c) telementoring system was installed in three local hospitals. Residents, consultant surgeons, and telementors learned Medprescence setup and use. Surgical residents will be recruited once this research protocol is evaluated and accepted for publication to accommodate any necessary changes before the study begins. Starting recruitment in spring 2024 is feasible. This would allow data analysis by end of 2024 and publication in an international peer-reviewed journal by spring 2025.

Conclusions:

The SURGTEACH trial is the first randomized trial of telementoring for surgical education. The surgical education system and surgeon supply are limited globally and locally. Due to geographical and educational barriers, the Norwegian healthcare system requires support in educating enough surgeons. Therefore, surgical education must evolve, and surgical telementoring may help solve these challenges. This research may give high quality evidence to improve surgical education, especially in rural hospitals.

Eligibility Criteria:
Inclusion criteria for residents in control- and intervention group:

* General surgery residents in years 1 to 6 of their specialty education having performed more than five laparoscopic procedures.
* Stratification according to experience will be made for the subject in the control arm and in the intervention arm.
* Having passed the prerequisite mandatory national course of general laparoscopic principles.
* All residents had to undergo agreement with the mentor about communication model during surgery. This model is derived from LapcoNor principals (11). Residents in the intervention group underwent an additional introduction to the principals of communication through telementoring at the OR. They were introduced to the telementoring equipment.

Inclusion criteria for on-site mentors (control group) and telementors (intervention group): • - Consultant surgeon with more than 3 years of experience with independently performing laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

* Having acquaintance with assessment of videos for GOALS-score (12)
* Both telementors and on-site mentors had to show certificate of having done the national LapCo-Nor "train the trainer" course and followed standardized norms of communication with the mentee during surgical mentoring thus diminishing bias of communicative difference.

Inclusion criteria for included patients:

* Gallstone disease without clinical history of cholecystitis
* BMI \< 38
* No previous history of upper abdominal laparotomy
* No previous history of percutaneous gallbladder drainage
* Patient provided informed consent.