A Hinge Flap to Reinforce Buccal Advancement Flap

Background The chronic oroantral fistulas (COAF) is an epithelized communication that is formed between the squamous epithelium of the oral cavity and the pseudo-stratified columnar ciliated epithelium of the maxillary sinus with a high recurrent rate. The use of palatal flaps has been documented for treating such fistulae. The presence of the oroantral fistula at the area of second molars or maxillary tuberosity could complicate the use of the palatal rotational flap where the arch of its rotation is increased leading to compromised blood supply. The use of the buccal flap is not advocated because it is very thin.

Rationale Double or triple-layer closure is indicated to avoid recurrence of the COAF. Different layers have been documented to minimize the risk of recurrence and reinforce buccal flaps. The oral tissues at the oral side of the oroantral fistula could used as an additional layer with buccal advancement flap and buccal fat to omit the use of palatal flap with its subsequent problems in the most posterior aspect of the maxilla Study objectives Therefore, this study will be conducted to evaluate the use of hinge flaps to reinforce the buccal advancement flap for surgical closure of the COAF in the most posterior area of the maxilla

Methods The hinge flap will be performed at the oral side of the COAF to close the perforation in the sinus membrane. The oral side of the COAF will be closed with buccal advancement flap. The success rate, recurrence, time of surgery, postoperative complications, will be evaluated.

Background:

The surgical therapy of COAF is one of the most challenging subjects. Local flaps are usually performed to close oroantral fistula (OAF). Each flap has advantages and limitations; none is superior to others. The appropriate flap is determined by the location and size of OAF, prosthetic therapy, and the surgeon's skill.5 Buccal advancement flaps, palatal rotational flaps, and buccal fat pad (BFP) are the most commonly employed local flaps, either alone or in combination. Although buccal flap surgery is easy, it is not recommended for large, COAFs because it is very thin, has poor perfusion, and is prone to strain due to lip and check muscle movements, making it more prone to rupture and tear.The palatal rotational flap is preferred in such instances, however, it has significant technical challenges, such as bunching the flap along its axis of rotation and kinking the greater palatine artery. If the OAFs are in the most posterior area of the maxilla, particularly towards the second and third molars, flap rotation may jeopardize the vascular pedicle, resulting in closure failure. So, many authors supported the use of BFP to add strength to the buccal flap, but it also has significant drawbacks.6 First, the BFP can be perforated and detached from its blood supply while being dissected from its surrounding components, resulting in necrosis. Furthermore, in certain instances, the size of the BFP may be insufficient to cover the OAF.

Rationale A prospective study will be enrolled to evaluate the use of the hinge flap to reinforce the buccal advancement flap for the management of COAFs in the most posterior area of the maxilla. The second aim of the study was to implement an algorithm for the management of OAFs based on the authors' 20 years of experience in the management of OAFs.

Methods A double-blinded randomized control trial will be conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: hinge flap or palatal flap. The palatal flap group will be served as the control group, while the hinge flap will be the tested group.The patient sequences will be used for randomization. Patients with even numbers will be assigned to the hinge flap group, while those with odd numbers will be assigned to the palatal flap group. The following steps will be taken to achieve blindness: 1) The patients and evaluators who will interview them to measure the study's variables will not informed about the study and 2) The investigators who will review the questionnaires and the statistician who will analyze the study's results will know the study's groups as A and B.

Eligibility Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:

1. Chronic oroantral fistula at the most posterior area of the maxilla
2. Ages above 18 years
3. Patients who are medical free

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Oroantral communications
2. Absence of sinus infection
3. Oroantral fistula which are resulted from tumor resections