Lung UltrasouNd Guided Surfactant Therapy in Preterm Infants (LUNG Study)

The investigators hypothesized that the use of lung ultrasound (LU) for measuring RDS severity and deciding surfactant treatment thresholds might decrease the incidence of early and late sequelae in the study group. Thus, a timely surfactant therapy would eventually improve short (e.g. Need of mechanical ventilation in the first 3 days) and more long-term outcomes, such as BPD or death.

To confirm this hypothesis, the investigators planned an international multicenter randomized controlled study in which preterm infants will be randomized into two groups: one will be managed deciding surfactant treatment of preterm infants with RDS on the basis of a cut-off value of FiO2 as for European guidelines, and one will be managed deciding surfactant treatment using a LU score cut-off and/or FiO2.

Primary endpoint will be the reduction in proportion of infants with BPD or death in the group managed with LU compared to the control group

Background Management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) involves noninvasive respiratory supports, such as nasal continuous positive airway (nCPAP), and mechanical ventilation. On the other hand, exogenous surfactant administration is the other cornerstone for the treatment of RDS. Currently, the decision to administer surfactant in a non-invasively ventilated newborn is commonly based on cut-off values of inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO2). Nevertheless, the accuracy of this criterion might be weak because FiO2 values depend per se by the setting of respiratory support. Moreover, the American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines do not recommend any FiO2 threshold for surfactant administration. It has been shown that prompt administration of surfactant (within the first 3 hours of life) can reduce the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Unfortunately, criteria for surfactant treatment used, often leads to a delayed administration. The role of lung ultrasound (LU) as a semi-quantitative method for the decision to give exogenous surfactant has been studied in recent years. Researchers demonstrated that a LU score (LUS) of RDS severity is able to predict the need for surfactant therapy, as subsequently confirmed by subsequent studies. After these results, a first quality improvement study demonstrated that the use of a LUS cut-off for deciding surfactant treatment allowed a significant increase of early administration. This finding has been confirmed by a recent single-center randomized controlled trial. However, all these studies were single-center, and there are not multicenter randomized controlled trials which can support the wide use of LUS measurement as a standard method for surfactant replacement therapy.

This study, in addition to investigating the decision-making role of LUS in the administration of surfactant, also aims to evaluate the possibility of making treatment with surfactant earlier and more timely, having already been shown in the past that an early administration improves clinical outcomes.

Aim of the study The investigators hypothesized that the use of a LUS for measuring RDS severity and deciding surfactant treatment thresholds might decrease the incidence of early and late sequelae in the study group. Thus, a timely surfactant therapy would eventually improve short (e.g. Need of mechanical ventilation in the first 3 days) and more long-term outcomes, such as BPD or death.

To confirm this hypothesis, the investigators planned an international multicenter randomized controlled study in which preterm infants will be randomized into two groups: one will be managed deciding surfactant treatment of preterm infants with RDS on the basis of a cut-off value of FiO2 (CG), and one will be managed deciding surfactant treatment using a LUS cut-off and FiO2 (LUSG).

Study design The study will be a multicenter randomized open control trial carried out in Level III-IV neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The financial outcome of the study is no profit. The design of the study is of superiority. The enrollment period will be 24 months (starting February 1, 2022).

Study population The study will take place within the NICUs and therefore in a hospital setting. The study will be multicenter.

The total number of enrolled infants will be 668 (334 per arm). Each center will have to enroll a minimum of 10 children and a maximum of 70.

An interim analysis will be conducted after 167 infants enrolled in each arm (334 total infants enrolled).

Management in the delivery room and in the first hour of life Positive pressure with a neonatal mask and a T-piece system (Neopuff Infant Resuscitator ®, Fisher and Paykel, Auckland, New Zealand) will be used to stabilize the newborns after birth as per routine daily practice. If necessary, infants will start mechanical ventilation in agreement with the European guidelines on neonatal resuscitation. In this latter case the babies will be excluded from the study (see Exclusion criteria section).

In order to better standardize the timing of care after birth, it is expected that assistance in the delivery room, transfer of the newborn to the intensive care unit, stabilization of the newborn and the related procedures (positioning of the vascular access, stabilization of ventilatory parameters, thermal stabilization, etc.) are completed within the first hour of life.

Once infants with RDS have been screened, enrolled in the study, and allocated to the CG or LUSG, LU will be performed as soon as possible between 1 and 3 hours life (\<3 h of life). In the meantime, the newborns will be assisted in noninvasive ventilation (nCPAP, pressure 6-8 cmH20) and oxygen to maintain preductal oxygen saturation (SpO2) between 90 and 95%. A loading dose of caffeine citrate of 20 mg/kg will be administered in the first hours of life followed by a maintenance of 5 mg/kg/day, as per routine clinical practice.

Noninvasive ventilation management after the first 3 hours of life or after surfactant administration After the first three hours of life or after having administered surfactant, according to the criteria provided by the randomization group, the newborns can be assisted with non-invasive ventilation other than nCPAP (NIPPV, BiPAP, HFNC) according to the care protocol of the centers involved in the study.

Lung ultrasound procedure LU will be performed by the attending physician. Centers participating to the study should be routinely using LU and all the physician are already trained for the use of the technique.

LUS will be calculated by performing longitudinal scans of the chest in the anterior (midclavicular line), lateral (anterior axillary line) and posterior (posterior axillary line) area bilaterally using high-frequency linear or micro linear (hockey stick) probe between 1 and 3 hour of life. The focus will be located at the level of the pleural line. A score from 0 to 3 will be assigned to each scan area based on the ultrasound detected pattern (in case of different score pattern in the same area the worst will be the one chosen).

LU can be performed keeping the patient in the supine position without the need to rotate him as the posterior axillary line is accessible from the side of the newborn.

Surfactant replacement therapy should be given if LUS is 9 or more in the babies recruited to the LUSG.

The LUS group will receive as rescue therapy surfactant administration in case of LUS \< or = 8 but FiO2\> 0.30 on nCPAP (pressure 6-8 cmH20) to maintain preductal SpO2 between 90 and 95%.

Surfactant treatment Once criteria for surfactant administration have been reached, surfactant (Curosurf ®, Chiesi, Parma, Italy) will be given (200 mg/kg) according to the InSURE (Intubate-SURfactant-Extubate), LISA (Less- Invasive-Surfactant-Administration) or IN-REC-SURE (INtubate-RECruit-SURfactant-Extubate) technique in both the groups as per the enrollment center protocol.

Pharmacological premedication with fentanest and/or atropine will be allowed (as per center protocol) and recorded.

After surfactant administration, the babies of both groups will be extubated if it has been performed the InSURE or IN-REC-SURE method within 30 min (if satisfactory respiratory drive is present) and will receive nCPAP (pressure 6-8 cmH2O) as per center protocol .

Infants of both groups can receive a subsequent dose of surfactant (100 mg/kg of poractant alfa) using the same method if they meet the non-invasive ventilation failure criteria again during the following 12 to 24 h.

nCPAP ventilation failure criteria In the NICU, nCPAP will be the standard method of noninvasive support in all infants recruited to this trial. nCPAP failure is defined if any of the following criteria are met: FiO2 ≥ 0.30 to maintain a SpO2\> 90 for at least 30 min unless rapid clinical deterioration has occurred; respiratory acidosis defined as pCO2 \> 65 mmHg (8.5 kPa) and pH \<7.20 on an arterial or capillary blood gas sample; apnea defined as more than four episodes of apnea per hour or more than two episodes of apnea per hour when ventilation with bag and mask or Neopuff will be required.

Mechanical ventilation should commence if the patient meets one of the following criteria after additional dose of surfactant: pCO2 \> 65 mmHg and pH \<7.20, or paO2 \<50 mm Hg, or FiO2 \>0.40 after surfactant administration or in case of apnea (\> 4 episodes in 1 hour or \> 2 episodes in 1 hour ventilation with bag and mask or Neopuff ), and should continue with the aim of maintaining a pCO2 of 55-65 mmHg and a SpO2 of 90-95%, using synchronized Mechanical Ventilation (MV), volume controlled MV, or high frequency ventilation.

Patients will be extubated as per center protocol.

Eligibility Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:

1. In-born infants at 25+0-29+6 weeks of gestational age
2. Spontaneously breathing at birth but requiring noninvasive respiratory support with nCPAP at a pressure of 6-8 cmH2O to maintain an SpO2 between 90% and 95%.
3. Parental consent has been obtained
4. Exclusion of causes of respiratory failure other than RDS

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Endotracheal intubation in the delivery room for resuscitation or insufficient respiratory drive according to European guidelines
2. Prolonged premature rupture of membranes (PROM) for more than 3 days
3. Presence of major congenital malformations or chromosomal anomalies
4. Hydrops fetalis
5. Inherited disorders of metabolism
6. Administration of surfactant before performing the LUS.
7. Other respiratory diseases than RDS