Marco_Foscarini
Doçe olmadan önce
<!-- Divenuto procuratore di S. Marco per meriti, si ritirò dalla carriera diplomatica per dedicarsi interamente ai suoi studi e per affinare la sua oratoria in ambito letterario, oltre che politico. When he returned home he prepared for political life by taking part, as he wanted patriotic tradition, at many academies. On the occasion of one of these, held at the paternal library, F. made a speech about the necessity of the history and the faculty of well-meaning for the men of the Republic (published in Venice in 1819), which he dedicated to Nicolò. F.'s 'public' debut illustrated not only 'the cleverness of a firm and premature political and cultural vocation' (E. Leso), but also an elitist conception of politics, which entrusted the eloquence with the task of gaining consensus Of the 'multitude' patrician to ideas and strategies distilled by the 'prudence' of the 'savage man'. Having become a Procurator of St. Mark for merit, he withdrew from his diplomatic career to devote himself entirely to his studies and to refine his oratory in the literary and political fields. In 1724 F. returned to the College as a wise masterpiece, which, except for the usual periods of inadmissibility, remained until 1731. − 		 − 	In recent years, some of the writings of the government have been written, among which What is the purpose of promoting the court of Rome for honor and for the benefit of the Venetian Republic (edited by N. Barozzi, Padua 1863); On the Defense of the States of Italy for the Sea Seal (edited by Id., Venice, 1859); Exemptions granted to external ambassadors resident in Venice (edited by C. Milanesi, Arch. Stor. Italian, Appendix, IX [1853], pp. 499-537); Above the execution of the duties to the ambassadors of foreign princes (Venice, Biblical Nation Marciana, Msg. It., VII, 609). For some of these scriptures can be seen as 'practical' exercises in the margins of the moderation-fortune binomial emphasized by the Perfection of the Venetian Republic: the Turkish threat such as the Roman invasion (F. was fully recognized in Venetian jurisprudence tradition) and Unjustified claims by foreign ambassadors were dealt with not only in terms of the technical, but also in their ideological-political implications. Public activity did not stop F. from measuring even in fields far away from politics. It seems that at this stage, perhaps because it was stimulated by the attendance of Antonio Conti, a Latin poem called Coralia. The influences of the 'libertine' Abbot Conti and other heterogeneous literate figures (including Mason Francesco Algarotti and the 'cynical' father Carlo Lodoli) can be seen even behind the more or less 'advanced' readings that had left a Trace in the same Perfection of the Venetian Republic (Montaigne, Bayle), or were resumed and annotated in other manuscripts (Pufendorf, Giannone). While not letting go of the spine of the political-cultural tradition of Venetian patrician elite, F. revealed an undue attraction to some rationalistic trends of contemporary thought, an attraction that will also be confirmed in maturity by insistence on the Sarpi-Locke line and relationships With the 'atheist' Francesco Griselini. In 1732 he was sent as ordinary ambassador to Emperor Charles VI, a task he had scrupulously prepared by gathering in due time two codes of political news, summaries of dispatches from Vienna, 1728-1732 (Ibid., Msg. VII, 6532). The events of 1733 led him to write two writings in defense of the 'perpetual' peace, completed by Venice with the Turks, and collecting materials for an arcane story of Emperor Carlo VI (in Arch. Stor italia, V [1843] ), Whose first book he wanted to dedicate to Doge Carlo Ruzzini in 1735 but who, because of the sudden death of the Doge, ended up directing to the grandson of Carlo, who was only a few years before the recipient of the Hypothesis eloquence. -->