د_بارورۍ_حقوق
د بارورۍ حقوقو په ۱۹۶۸ کال کې د ملګرو ملتونو دانساني حقونو په نړیوال کنفرانس کې د انساني حقوقو تر ټولګي لاندې وده پیل کړه. د تهران غیر الزامي اعلامیه لومړنی رسمي سند وچې له دې حقوقو څخه يو یې داسې بیانوي: «مور او پلار په خپلواک او مسؤلانه ډول د خپلو ماشومانو د شمېر  او د دوی ترمنځ د فاصلې/واټن تعينولو حق د لومړنیو انساني حقوقو په توګه لري» په رسميت وپېژانده. د ښځو جنسي مسائل او رواني روغتياد ملګرو ملتونو په لومړيتوب کې نه وو، تر هغه مهاله چې د ښځو لسيزې (له ۱۹۷۵ څخه تر ۱۹۸۵ پورې) دوی ته د ټولو په سر کې ځای ورکړ. که څه هم دولتونو د یادو حقونو د رسمي کولو لپاره دنړیوالو قانوني الزامي اسنادو  د همکارۍ په برخه کې په ورو عمل کړی دی. په دې توګه  ځینې دا حقوق له وړاندې د سختو قوانینو پر مهال  دنړيوالو   انساني حقونوپه الزامي اسنادو کې په رسميت پېژندل شوي، ځینې نور بیا یوازې په غیر الزامي سپارښتنو کې یاد شوي په دې توګه په نړیوال حقونو کې د نرموحقونو (soft law) له ترټولو غوره حالت څخه برخمند دي، په داسې حال کې چې ځينې نور لا د وکالت په پړاو کې پاتې دي او د نړیوالې ټولنې له خوا نه دي منل شوي. Center for Reproductive Rights, International Legal Program, Establishing International Reproductive Rights Norms: Theory for Change, US CONG. REC. 108th CONG. 1 Sess. E2534 E2547 (Rep. Smith) (8 December 2003):"We have been leaders in bringing arguments for a woman's right to choose abortion within the rubric of international human rights. However, there is no binding hard norm that recognizes women's right to terminate a pregnancy. (...) While there are hard norms prohibiting sex discrimination that apply to girl adolescents, these are problematic since they must be applied to a substantive right (i.e., the right to health) and the substantive reproductive rights of adolescents are not `hard' (yet!). There are no hard norms on age discrimination that would protect adolescents' ability to exercise their rights to reproductive health, sexual education, or reproductive decisionmaking. In addition, there are no hard norms prohibiting discrimination based on marital status, which is often an issue with respect to unmarried adolescents' access to reproductive health services and information. The soft norms support the idea that the hard norms apply to adolescents under 18. They also fill in the substantive gaps in the hard norms with respect to reproductive health services and information as well as adolescents' reproductive autonomy. (...) There are no hard norms in international human rights law that directly address HIV/AIDS directly. At the same time, a number of human rights bodies have developed soft norms to secure rights that are rendered vulnerable by the HIV/AIDS epidemic. (...) Practices with implications for women's reproductive rights in relation to HIV/AIDS are still not fully covered under existing international law, although soft norms have addressed them to some extent. (...) There is a lack of explicit prohibition of mandatory testing of HIV-positive pregnant women under international law. (...) None of the global human rights treaties explicitly prohibit child marriage and no treaty prescribes an appropriate minimum age for marriage. The onus of specifying a minimum age at marriage rests with the states' parties to these treaties. (...) We have to rely extensively on soft norms that have evolved from the TMBs and that are contained in conference documents to assert that child marriage is a violation of fundamental human rights."