گفتگو_برای_یادگیری
منابع
Tannen, D. (1998). The argument culture: Moving from debate to dialogue. New York: Random House Trade.Picard, R. W., Papert, S. , Bender, W. , Blumberg, B. , Breazel, C. , Cavallo, D. , Machover, T. , Resnick, M. , Roy, D. , & Strohecker, C. (2004). Affective learning – a manifesto. BT Technology Journal, 22 (4), 253–269. ref>Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Stein, N. L. , & Bernas , R. (1999). The early emergence of argumentative knowledge and skill. In J. Andriessen & P. Coirier (Eds.), Foundations of argumentative text processing (pp. 97 – 116). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Stein, N. L. , & Albro , E. R. (2001). The origins and nature of arguments: Studies in conl ict understanding, emotion, and negotiation. Discourse Processes, 3 2 (2 – 3), 113 – 133.Chi , M. T. H. , & Van Lehn , K. A. (1991). The content of physics self-explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1 (1), 69 – 105.Harman , G. (1986). Change in view: Principles of reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.Nathan, M. J. (2014). Grounded mathematical reasoning. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 171–183). Routledge: New York.Sawyer, R. K. (2005). Social emergence: Societies as complex systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.Nonnon, E. (1996). Activit é s argumentatives et é laboration de connaissances nouvelles: Le dialogue comme espace d ’ exploration (Argumentative activities and elaboration of new knowledge). Langue Francaise, 112 , 67 – 87.Leit ã o , S. (2001). Analyzing changes in view during argumentation: A quest for method. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 2 , 2.Van Eemeren , F. , & Grootendorst , R. (1999). Developments in argumentation theory. In J. Andriessen & P. Coirier (Eds.), Foundations of argumentative text processing (pp. 43 – 57). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.diSessa, A. A. , & Wagner , J. F. (2005). What coordination has to say about transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 121 – 154). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.diSessa, A. A. , Gillespie , N. , & Esterly , J. (2004). Coherence vs. fragmentation in the development of the concept of force. Cognitive Science, 28 , 843 – 900.Toulmin , S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Van Eemeren, F. H. , Grootendorst , R. , & Snoeck Henkemans , F. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Koschmann, T. (2003). CSCL, argumentation, and Deweyan inquiry: Argumentation is learning. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 259 – 265). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Kuhn, D. (2001). How do people know? Psychological Science, 12 , 1 – 8.Bransford , J. D. , Brown , A. L. , & Cocking , R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Baker, M. , Andriessen , J. , & J ä rvel ä , S. (Eds.) (2013). Affective learning together: Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning. London: Routledge.Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 3 28 , 463 – 466.