Καζίμιες_Ουιστσίνσκι
Ζωή, δίκη και εκτέλεση
Ο Επίσκοπος του Πόζναν, με την συνδρομή του Επισκόπου του Κιέβου, ασχολήθηκαν με ζήλο για την υπόθεση. Ο βασιλειάς αποπειράθηκε να βοηθήσει τον Ουιστσίνσκι διατάζοντας να δικαστεί στο Wilno, αλλά αυτό δεν μπόρεσε να σώσει τον Ουιστσίνσκι από τον κλήρο. Το προνόμοιο του Ουιστσίνσκι ως ευγενή, να μην μπορεί να προφυλακιστεί, παραβιάστηκε. Η υπόθεση του Ουιστσίνσκι παρουσιάστηκε στο δικαστήριο το 1689 όπου κατηγορήθηκε πως αρνήθηκε την ύπαρξη του Θεού και πως βλασφήμισε την Παναγία και τους Αγίους. Καταδικάστηκε σε θάνατο για Αθεϊα. Η ποινή εκτελέστηκε στην παλαιά αγορά της Βαρσωβίας, όπου η γλώσσα του κόπηκε και ακολούθησε αποκεφαλισμός. Cazimir Lyszczynski, a noble and landowner of Lithuania, a man of a very respectable character, was perusing a book entitled Theologia Naturalis, by Henry Aldsted, a Protestant divine, and finding that the arguments which the author employed in order to prove the existence of divinity, were so confused that it was possible to deduce from them quite contrary consequences, he added on the margin the following words — “ergo non est Deus,” evidently ridiculing the arguments of the author. This circumstance was found out by Brzoska, nuncio of Brest in Lithuania, a debtor of Lyszczynski, who denouned him as an atheist, delivering, as evidence of his accusation, a copy of the work with the above-mentioned annotation to Witwicki, bishop of Posnania, who took up this affair with the greatest violence. He was zealously seconded by Zaluski, bishop of Kiod, a prelate known for his great learning and not devoid of merit in other respects, which however proved no check to religious fanaticism. The king, who was very far from countenancing such enormities, attempted to save the unfortunate Lyszczynski, by ordering that he should be judged at Wilno; but nothing could shelter the unfortunate man against the fanatical rage of the clergy represented by the two bishops; and the first privilege of a Polish noble, that he could not be imprisoned before his condemnation, and which had theretofore been sacredly observed even with the greatest criminals, was violated. On the simple accusation of his debtor, supported by the bishops, the affair was brought before the diet of 1689, before which the clergy, and particularly the bishop Zaluski, accused Lyszczynski of having denied the existence of God, and uttered blasphemies against the blessed Virgin and the saints. The unfortunate victim, terrified by his perilous situation, acknowledged all that was imputed to him, made a full recantation of all he might have said and written against the doctrine of the Roman Catholic church, and declared his entire submission to its authority. This was, however, of no avail to him, and his accusers were even scandalized that the diet permitted him to make a defence, and granted the term of three days for collecting evidence of his innocence, as the accusation of the clergy ought, in their judgment, to be sufficient evidence on which to condemn the culprit. The fanaticism of the diet was excited in a most scandalous manner by the blasphemous representation that divinity should be propitiated by the blood of its offenders. The diet decreed that Lyszczynski should have his tongue pulled out, and then be beheaded and burnt. This atrocious sentence was executed, and the bishop Zaluski himself gives a relation of what he considered an act of piety and justice! The king was horror-struck at this news and exclaimed that the Inquisition could not do any thing worse. It is necessary, on this occasion, to render justice to Pope Innocent XI., who, instead of conferring a cardinal’s hat on the bishop of Posnania, bitterly censured this disgraceful affair. Μετά, το πτώμα του μεταφέρθηκε έξω από τα σύνορα της πόλης και κάηκε.