cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 17:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___
Gloss (with missing item): ___
The English translation of this sentence is:I’m going to stink!
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: If it is the case, as \citet{Copley09} argue,\index[aut]{Copley, Bridget} and \citet{Matthewson05}\index[aut]{Matthewson, Lisa}\index[aut]{Rullmann, Hotze}\index[aut]{Davis, Henry} that the future tense is a modal specified for both force, [universal], and base, [metaphysical] or [circumstantial], \phono{-trI} should have no effect on the interpretation of mode in the case of future-tense verbs. This is indeed the case. For example, both the \phono{tiya-pa-ru-wa-nga} of~(\ref{GloB:Kukachankunata}) and \phono{ashna-ku-lla-shaq} of~(\ref{GloB:Ashnakullashaq}) receive exactly the interpretations they would have were they not under the scope of \phono{-trI:} ‘they will accompany me sitting’ and ‘I’m going to stink’, respectively. This does not mean that \phono{-trI-\uo/ik/iki} has no effect on the interpretation of future-tense verbs, however. Although it leaves \lsc{tam} interpretation unaffected, \phono{-trI} continues to indicate that the proposition under its scope is a conjecture. And \phono{-ik} and \phono{-iki}, as they do in conjunction with \phono{-mI}, indicate increasingly immediate or certain futures. So, although the \lsc{tam} interpretations of~(\ref{GloB:Kukachankunata})’s \phono{tiya-pa-ru-wa-nga} ‘will accompany me sitting’ and~(\ref{GloB:Ashnakullashaq})’s \phono{ashna-ku-lla-shaq} ‘I’m going to stink’ are unchanged under the scope of \phono{-trI}, the \phono{-ik} of the first and the \phono{-iki} of the second signal immediate and certain futures, respectively. In~(\ref{GloB:Kukachankunata}), that future was about an hour away: it was 6 o’clock and the those who were to accompany the speaker were expected at 7:00 for a healing ceremony. The context for~(\ref{GloB:Ashnakullashaq}), too, was a healing ceremony. The speaker was referring to the upcoming part of the ceremony in which she would have to wash with putrid urine --~certain to make anyone stink!\\
A: word: ri-shaq	 gloss: go-1.FUT
B: word: pasaypaq-tri-ki	 gloss: completely-EVC-IKI
C: word: lava-shun-tri-ki	 gloss: wash-1PL.FUT-EVC-IKI
D: word: ashna-ku-lla-shaq-tri-ki	 gloss: smell-REFL-RSTR-1.FUT-EVC-IKI
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D