cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 126:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ima-paq-raq chay-ta ruwa-ra pay-ta-qa ___ chay-ta wañu-chi-ra
Gloss (with missing item): what-PURP-CONT DEM.D-ACC make-PST he-ACC-TOP ___ DEM.D-ACC die-CAUS-PST
The English translation of this sentence is:What did they do that to him for? They must have killed him just for the sake of it.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \SYQ{} is unusual\footnote{\ili{Ayacucho} Q also makes use of \phono{-ki}.} in that each of its three evidentials counts three variants, formed by the suffixation of \phono{-\uo}, \phono{-ik} or \phono{-iki}. The resulting nine forms are direct \phono{-mI-\uo}, \phono{-m-ik} and\phono{-m-iki}~(\ref{Glo6:trayamunchu}--\ref{Glo6:Wanuchinakun}); reportative \phono{-shI-\uo}, \phono{-sh-ik} and \phono{-sh-iki}~(\ref{Glo6:susyukuna}--\ref{Glo6:nisha}); and conjectural \phono{-trI-\uo}, \phono{-tr-ik} and\phono{-tr-iki}~(\ref{Glo6:Imapaqraq}--\ref{Glo6:Alkansachin}).\footnote{In Lincha, \phono{-iki} may modify both \phono{-mI} and \phono{-shI} but not \phono{-trI}; in Tana, \phono{-iki} may modify all three evidentials.}
A: word: yanqa-ña-tr-ik	 gloss: lie-DISC-EVC-IK
B: word: puñu-na-y-kaman	 gloss: sleep-NMLZ-1-LIM
C: word: dios-lla-ta-ña-tr-iki	 gloss: God-RSTR-ACC-DISC-EVC-IKI
D: word: kiki-n-pas	 gloss: self-3-ADD
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 127:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): alkansa-chi-n ___ kabra-pis kasu-sa-m piru riqsi-ya-n-tr-iki runa-n-ta-qa
Gloss (with missing item): reach-CAUS-3 ___ goat-ADD attention-PRF-EVD but know-PROG-3-EVC-IKI person-3-ACC-TOP
The English translation of this sentence is:She must make [the stones] reach with the sling, for sure. The goats obey her. They must know their master, for sure.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \SYQ{} is unusual\footnote{\ili{Ayacucho} Q also makes use of \phono{-ki}.} in that each of its three evidentials counts three variants, formed by the suffixation of \phono{-\uo}, \phono{-ik} or \phono{-iki}. The resulting nine forms are direct \phono{-mI-\uo}, \phono{-m-ik} and\phono{-m-iki}~(\ref{Glo6:trayamunchu}--\ref{Glo6:Wanuchinakun}); reportative \phono{-shI-\uo}, \phono{-sh-ik} and \phono{-sh-iki}~(\ref{Glo6:susyukuna}--\ref{Glo6:nisha}); and conjectural \phono{-trI-\uo}, \phono{-tr-ik} and\phono{-tr-iki}~(\ref{Glo6:Imapaqraq}--\ref{Glo6:Alkansachin}).\footnote{In Lincha, \phono{-iki} may modify both \phono{-mI} and \phono{-shI} but not \phono{-trI}; in Tana, \phono{-iki} may modify all three evidentials.}
A: word: ripu-n-sh-ari	 gloss: go-3-EVR-ARI
B: word: warka-wan-tri	 gloss: sling-INSTR-EVC
C: word: prustata-wan-tri	 gloss: prostate-INSTR-EVC
D: word: karru-wan-tri	 gloss: car-INSTR-EVC
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 128:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): alkansa-chi-n warka-wan-tri kabra-pis kasu-sa-m piru ___ runa-n-ta-qa
Gloss (with missing item): reach-CAUS-3 sling-INSTR-EVC goat-ADD attention-PRF-EVD but ___ person-3-ACC-TOP
The English translation of this sentence is:She must make [the stones] reach with the sling, for sure. The goats obey her. They must know their master, for sure.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \SYQ{} is unusual\footnote{\ili{Ayacucho} Q also makes use of \phono{-ki}.} in that each of its three evidentials counts three variants, formed by the suffixation of \phono{-\uo}, \phono{-ik} or \phono{-iki}. The resulting nine forms are direct \phono{-mI-\uo}, \phono{-m-ik} and\phono{-m-iki}~(\ref{Glo6:trayamunchu}--\ref{Glo6:Wanuchinakun}); reportative \phono{-shI-\uo}, \phono{-sh-ik} and \phono{-sh-iki}~(\ref{Glo6:susyukuna}--\ref{Glo6:nisha}); and conjectural \phono{-trI-\uo}, \phono{-tr-ik} and\phono{-tr-iki}~(\ref{Glo6:Imapaqraq}--\ref{Glo6:Alkansachin}).\footnote{In Lincha, \phono{-iki} may modify both \phono{-mI} and \phono{-shI} but not \phono{-trI}; in Tana, \phono{-iki} may modify all three evidentials.}
A: word: huk-tri-ki	 gloss: one-EVC-IKI
B: word: riqsi-ya-n-tr-iki	 gloss: know-PROG-3-EVC-IKI
C: word: awa-ya-n-tr-iki	 gloss: weave-PROG-EVR-IKI
D: word: rima-ya-n-ña-chu	 gloss: talk-PROG-3-DISC-Q
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 129:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Amador Garay-chu ___ suti-n ka-ra
Gloss (with missing item): Amador Garay-Q ___ name-3 be-PST
The English translation of this sentence is:Amador Garay? What was his name?
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In questions, the evidentials\index[sub]{evidentials!questions} generally indicate that the speaker expects a response with the same evidential (\ie,~an answer based on direct evidence, reportative evidence or conjecture, in the cases of \phono{-mI}, \phono{-shI}, and \phono{-trI}, respectively)~(\ref{Glo6:Amador}--\ref{Glo6:Kutiramunman}).
A: word: may-mi	 gloss: where-EVD
B: word: ima-m-iki	 gloss: what-EVD-IKI
C: word: ima-m	 gloss: what-EVD
D: word: mana-ña	 gloss: no-DISC
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 130:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ ima-tr-ik pasan
Gloss (with missing item): ___ what-EVC-IK pass-3
The English translation of this sentence is:Could he come back? What would have happened?
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In questions, the evidentials\index[sub]{evidentials!questions} generally indicate that the speaker expects a response with the same evidential (\ie,~an answer based on direct evidence, reportative evidence or conjecture, in the cases of \phono{-mI}, \phono{-shI}, and \phono{-trI}, respectively)~(\ref{Glo6:Amador}--\ref{Glo6:Kutiramunman}).
A: word: traya-ra-mu-n	 gloss: arrive-URGT-CISL-3
B: word: masha-n-ta-sh	 gloss: son.in.law-3-ACC-EVR
C: word: kuti-ra-mu-n-man-chu-tr	 gloss: return-URGT-CISL-Q-EVC
D: word: kuti-ka-mu-n-man-chu	 gloss: return-REFL-CISL-3-COND-NEG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 131:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kuti-ra-mu-n-man-chu-tr ___ pasan
Gloss (with missing item): return-URGT-CISL-Q-EVC ___ pass-3
The English translation of this sentence is:Could he come back? What would have happened?
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In questions, the evidentials\index[sub]{evidentials!questions} generally indicate that the speaker expects a response with the same evidential (\ie,~an answer based on direct evidence, reportative evidence or conjecture, in the cases of \phono{-mI}, \phono{-shI}, and \phono{-trI}, respectively)~(\ref{Glo6:Amador}--\ref{Glo6:Kutiramunman}).
A: word: qilla-ku-ya-nki-tr-ari	 gloss: lazy-REFL-PROG-2-EVC-ARI
B: word: ima-tr-ik	 gloss: what-EVC-IK
C: word: puntraw-kama-tr-iki	 gloss: day-LIM-EVC-IKI
D: word: huk-tri-ki	 gloss: one-EVC-IKI
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B