cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 96:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): radyu-kuna-pa rima-y-ta rima-ya-n ___ tirrurista tirrurista rikari-ya-mu-n-shi
Gloss (with missing item): radio-PL-LOC talk-INF-ACC talk-PROG-3 ___ terrorist terrorist appear-PROG-CISL-3-EVR
The English translation of this sentence is:On the radio they talk for the sake of talking. Terrorists are coming out, they say. Terrorists are appearing, they say.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Evidentials\index[sub]{evidentials} indicate the type of the speaker’s source of information. \SYQ, like most\footnote{Note, though, that \ili{Huallaga} Q counts four evidentials, (\phono{-mi}, \phono{-shi}, \phono{-chi}, snd \phono{-chaq}) (Weber 1989:76). South \ili{Conchucos} Q counts six, (\phono{-mi}, \phono{-shi}, \phono{-chi}, \phono{-cha:}, and \phono{-cher}); \ili{Sihuas}, too, counts six (Hintz and Hintz 2014).} other Quechuan languages, counts three evidential suffixes: direct \phono{-mi}~(\ref{Glo6:Taytacha}--\ref{Glo6:puntraw}), reportative \phono{-shi}~(\ref{Glo6:Radyukunapa}--\ref{Glo6:Qarinta}), and conjectural \phono{-tri}~(\ref{Glo6:trayarachiptiki}--\ref{Glo6:Wasiy}) (\ie~the speaker has her own evidence for P (generally visual); the speaker learned P from someone else; or the speaker infers P based on some other evidence). Following a short vowel, these are realized as \phono{-m}, \phono{sh}, and \phono{-tr}, respectively~(\ref{Glo6:puntraw}), (\ref{Glo6:Qarinta}), (\ref{Glo6:Wasiy}).
A: word: traya-mu-ya-n	 gloss: arrive-CISL-PROG-3
B: word: rima-ya-n-ña-chu	 gloss: talk-PROG-3-DISC-Q
C: word: rikari-ya-mu-n-shi	 gloss: appear-PROG-CISL-3-EVR
D: word: lluqsi-ya-mu-n-shi	 gloss: go.out-PROG-CISL-3-EVR
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 97:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): radyu-kuna-pa rima-y-ta rima-ya-n lluqsi-ya-mu-n-shi tirrurista tirrurista ___
Gloss (with missing item): radio-PL-LOC talk-INF-ACC talk-PROG-3 go.out-PROG-CISL-3-EVR terrorist terrorist ___
The English translation of this sentence is:On the radio they talk for the sake of talking. Terrorists are coming out, they say. Terrorists are appearing, they say.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Evidentials\index[sub]{evidentials} indicate the type of the speaker’s source of information. \SYQ, like most\footnote{Note, though, that \ili{Huallaga} Q counts four evidentials, (\phono{-mi}, \phono{-shi}, \phono{-chi}, snd \phono{-chaq}) (Weber 1989:76). South \ili{Conchucos} Q counts six, (\phono{-mi}, \phono{-shi}, \phono{-chi}, \phono{-cha:}, and \phono{-cher}); \ili{Sihuas}, too, counts six (Hintz and Hintz 2014).} other Quechuan languages, counts three evidential suffixes: direct \phono{-mi}~(\ref{Glo6:Taytacha}--\ref{Glo6:puntraw}), reportative \phono{-shi}~(\ref{Glo6:Radyukunapa}--\ref{Glo6:Qarinta}), and conjectural \phono{-tri}~(\ref{Glo6:trayarachiptiki}--\ref{Glo6:Wasiy}) (\ie~the speaker has her own evidence for P (generally visual); the speaker learned P from someone else; or the speaker infers P based on some other evidence). Following a short vowel, these are realized as \phono{-m}, \phono{sh}, and \phono{-tr}, respectively~(\ref{Glo6:puntraw}), (\ref{Glo6:Qarinta}), (\ref{Glo6:Wasiy}).
A: word: traya-mu-ya-n	 gloss: arrive-CISL-PROG-3
B: word: qari-n-ta-sh	 gloss: man-3-ACC-EVR
C: word: lluqsi-ya-mu-n-shi	 gloss: go.out-PROG-CISL-3-EVR
D: word: rikari-ya-mu-n-shi	 gloss: appear-PROG-CISL-3-EVR
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 98:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ wañu-ra-chi-n masha-n-ta-sh wañu-ra-chi-n
Gloss (with missing item): ___ die-URGT-CAUS-3 son.in.law-3-ACC-EVR die-URGT-CAUS-3
The English translation of this sentence is:She killed her husband, they say; she killed her son-in-law, they say.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Evidentials\index[sub]{evidentials} indicate the type of the speaker’s source of information. \SYQ, like most\footnote{Note, though, that \ili{Huallaga} Q counts four evidentials, (\phono{-mi}, \phono{-shi}, \phono{-chi}, snd \phono{-chaq}) (Weber 1989:76). South \ili{Conchucos} Q counts six, (\phono{-mi}, \phono{-shi}, \phono{-chi}, \phono{-cha:}, and \phono{-cher}); \ili{Sihuas}, too, counts six (Hintz and Hintz 2014).} other Quechuan languages, counts three evidential suffixes: direct \phono{-mi}~(\ref{Glo6:Taytacha}--\ref{Glo6:puntraw}), reportative \phono{-shi}~(\ref{Glo6:Radyukunapa}--\ref{Glo6:Qarinta}), and conjectural \phono{-tri}~(\ref{Glo6:trayarachiptiki}--\ref{Glo6:Wasiy}) (\ie~the speaker has her own evidence for P (generally visual); the speaker learned P from someone else; or the speaker infers P based on some other evidence). Following a short vowel, these are realized as \phono{-m}, \phono{sh}, and \phono{-tr}, respectively~(\ref{Glo6:puntraw}), (\ref{Glo6:Qarinta}), (\ref{Glo6:Wasiy}).
A: word: paqwa-ya-nchik-ña-m	 gloss: finish-PROG-1PL-DISC-EVD
B: word: qari-n-ta	 gloss: man-3-ACC
C: word: ranti-ku-sa-n	 gloss: buy-REFL-PRF-3
D: word: qari-n-ta-sh	 gloss: man-3-ACC-EVR
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 99:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): qari-n-ta-sh wañu-ra-chi-n ___ wañu-ra-chi-n
Gloss (with missing item): man-3-ACC-EVR die-URGT-CAUS-3 ___ die-URGT-CAUS-3
The English translation of this sentence is:She killed her husband, they say; she killed her son-in-law, they say.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Evidentials\index[sub]{evidentials} indicate the type of the speaker’s source of information. \SYQ, like most\footnote{Note, though, that \ili{Huallaga} Q counts four evidentials, (\phono{-mi}, \phono{-shi}, \phono{-chi}, snd \phono{-chaq}) (Weber 1989:76). South \ili{Conchucos} Q counts six, (\phono{-mi}, \phono{-shi}, \phono{-chi}, \phono{-cha:}, and \phono{-cher}); \ili{Sihuas}, too, counts six (Hintz and Hintz 2014).} other Quechuan languages, counts three evidential suffixes: direct \phono{-mi}~(\ref{Glo6:Taytacha}--\ref{Glo6:puntraw}), reportative \phono{-shi}~(\ref{Glo6:Radyukunapa}--\ref{Glo6:Qarinta}), and conjectural \phono{-tri}~(\ref{Glo6:trayarachiptiki}--\ref{Glo6:Wasiy}) (\ie~the speaker has her own evidence for P (generally visual); the speaker learned P from someone else; or the speaker infers P based on some other evidence). Following a short vowel, these are realized as \phono{-m}, \phono{sh}, and \phono{-tr}, respectively~(\ref{Glo6:puntraw}), (\ref{Glo6:Qarinta}), (\ref{Glo6:Wasiy}).
A: word: muna-sha-n-ta-ña-m	 gloss: want-PRF-3-ACC-DISC-EVD
B: word: masha-n-ta-sh	 gloss: son.in.law-3-ACC-EVR
C: word: wañu-ku-pti-n-pis	 gloss: die-REFL-SUBDS-3-ADD
D: word: masha-:-pis	 gloss: son.in.law-1-ADD
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 100:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): qiñwal-man traya-ra-chi-pti-ki ___
Gloss (with missing item): quingual.grove-ALL arrive-URGT-CAUS-SUBDS-2 ___
The English translation of this sentence is:If you make her go all the way to the quingual grove, she might die.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Evidentials\index[sub]{evidentials} indicate the type of the speaker’s source of information. \SYQ, like most\footnote{Note, though, that \ili{Huallaga} Q counts four evidentials, (\phono{-mi}, \phono{-shi}, \phono{-chi}, snd \phono{-chaq}) (Weber 1989:76). South \ili{Conchucos} Q counts six, (\phono{-mi}, \phono{-shi}, \phono{-chi}, \phono{-cha:}, and \phono{-cher}); \ili{Sihuas}, too, counts six (Hintz and Hintz 2014).} other Quechuan languages, counts three evidential suffixes: direct \phono{-mi}~(\ref{Glo6:Taytacha}--\ref{Glo6:puntraw}), reportative \phono{-shi}~(\ref{Glo6:Radyukunapa}--\ref{Glo6:Qarinta}), and conjectural \phono{-tri}~(\ref{Glo6:trayarachiptiki}--\ref{Glo6:Wasiy}) (\ie~the speaker has her own evidence for P (generally visual); the speaker learned P from someone else; or the speaker infers P based on some other evidence). Following a short vowel, these are realized as \phono{-m}, \phono{sh}, and \phono{-tr}, respectively~(\ref{Glo6:puntraw}), (\ref{Glo6:Qarinta}), (\ref{Glo6:Wasiy}).
A: word: wañu-ku-n-tri	 gloss: die-REFL-3-EVC
B: word: waqra-yuq-m-iki	 gloss: horn-POSS-EVD-IKI
C: word: wañu-ku-n-man-tri-ki	 gloss: die-REFL-3-COMP-EVC-KI
D: word: wañu-ku-n-man-tri	 gloss: die-REFL-3-COND-EVC
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 101:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): wasi-y raha-sa ka-ya-n ___
Gloss (with missing item): house-1 crack-PRF be-PROG-3 ___
The English translation of this sentence is:My house is cracked. It’s going to fall down.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Evidentials\index[sub]{evidentials} indicate the type of the speaker’s source of information. \SYQ, like most\footnote{Note, though, that \ili{Huallaga} Q counts four evidentials, (\phono{-mi}, \phono{-shi}, \phono{-chi}, snd \phono{-chaq}) (Weber 1989:76). South \ili{Conchucos} Q counts six, (\phono{-mi}, \phono{-shi}, \phono{-chi}, \phono{-cha:}, and \phono{-cher}); \ili{Sihuas}, too, counts six (Hintz and Hintz 2014).} other Quechuan languages, counts three evidential suffixes: direct \phono{-mi}~(\ref{Glo6:Taytacha}--\ref{Glo6:puntraw}), reportative \phono{-shi}~(\ref{Glo6:Radyukunapa}--\ref{Glo6:Qarinta}), and conjectural \phono{-tri}~(\ref{Glo6:trayarachiptiki}--\ref{Glo6:Wasiy}) (\ie~the speaker has her own evidence for P (generally visual); the speaker learned P from someone else; or the speaker infers P based on some other evidence). Following a short vowel, these are realized as \phono{-m}, \phono{sh}, and \phono{-tr}, respectively~(\ref{Glo6:puntraw}), (\ref{Glo6:Qarinta}), (\ref{Glo6:Wasiy}).
A: word: warmi-chu	 gloss: woman-Q
B: word: saqa-yku-rqa	 gloss: go.down-EXCEP-PST
C: word: saqa-yku-ru-nqa-tr	 gloss: go.down-EXCEP-URGT-3.FUT-EVC
D: word: ima-na-ru-nqa-tr	 gloss: what-VRBZ-URGT-3.FUT-EVC
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 102:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): qayna puntraw qanin ___ traya-mu-ra-:
Gloss (with missing item): previous day day.before.yesterday ___ arrive-CISL-PST-1
The English translation of this sentence is:I arrived yesterday, just the day before yesterday.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Evidentials\index[sub]{evidentials} indicate the type of the speaker’s source of information. \SYQ, like most\footnote{Note, though, that \ili{Huallaga} Q counts four evidentials, (\phono{-mi}, \phono{-shi}, \phono{-chi}, snd \phono{-chaq}) (Weber 1989:76). South \ili{Conchucos} Q counts six, (\phono{-mi}, \phono{-shi}, \phono{-chi}, \phono{-cha:}, and \phono{-cher}); \ili{Sihuas}, too, counts six (Hintz and Hintz 2014).} other Quechuan languages, counts three evidential suffixes: direct \phono{-mi}~(\ref{Glo6:Taytacha}--\ref{Glo6:puntraw}), reportative \phono{-shi}~(\ref{Glo6:Radyukunapa}--\ref{Glo6:Qarinta}), and conjectural \phono{-tri}~(\ref{Glo6:trayarachiptiki}--\ref{Glo6:Wasiy}) (\ie~the speaker has her own evidence for P (generally visual); the speaker learned P from someone else; or the speaker infers P based on some other evidence). Following a short vowel, these are realized as \phono{-m}, \phono{sh}, and \phono{-tr}, respectively~(\ref{Glo6:puntraw}), (\ref{Glo6:Qarinta}), (\ref{Glo6:Wasiy}).
A: word: visis-lla	 gloss: times-RSTR
B: word: qilla-ku-ya-nki-tr-ari	 gloss: lazy-REFL-PROG-2-EVC-ARI
C: word: puntraw-kama-tri-ki	 gloss: day-LIM-EVC-IKI
D: word: puntraw-lla-m	 gloss: day-RSTR-EVD
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 103:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ wañu-ra-chi-n masha-n-ta-sh wañu-ra-chi-n
Gloss (with missing item): ___ die-URGT-CAUS-3 son.in.law-3-ACC-EVR die-URGT-CAUS-3
The English translation of this sentence is:She killed her husband, they say; she killed her son-in-law, they say.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Evidentials\index[sub]{evidentials} indicate the type of the speaker’s source of information. \SYQ, like most\footnote{Note, though, that \ili{Huallaga} Q counts four evidentials, (\phono{-mi}, \phono{-shi}, \phono{-chi}, snd \phono{-chaq}) (Weber 1989:76). South \ili{Conchucos} Q counts six, (\phono{-mi}, \phono{-shi}, \phono{-chi}, \phono{-cha:}, and \phono{-cher}); \ili{Sihuas}, too, counts six (Hintz and Hintz 2014).} other Quechuan languages, counts three evidential suffixes: direct \phono{-mi}~(\ref{Glo6:Taytacha}--\ref{Glo6:puntraw}), reportative \phono{-shi}~(\ref{Glo6:Radyukunapa}--\ref{Glo6:Qarinta}), and conjectural \phono{-tri}~(\ref{Glo6:trayarachiptiki}--\ref{Glo6:Wasiy}) (\ie~the speaker has her own evidence for P (generally visual); the speaker learned P from someone else; or the speaker infers P based on some other evidence). Following a short vowel, these are realized as \phono{-m}, \phono{sh}, and \phono{-tr}, respectively~(\ref{Glo6:puntraw}), (\ref{Glo6:Qarinta}), (\ref{Glo6:Wasiy}).
A: word: qari-n-ta	 gloss: man-3-ACC
B: word: papa-kta-pis	 gloss: potato-ACC-ADD
C: word: qari-n-ta-sh	 gloss: man-3-ACC-EVR
D: word: maki-wan-ña-taq	 gloss: hand-INSTR-DISC-SEQ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 104:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): qari-n-ta-sh wañu-ra-chi-n ___ wañu-ra-chi-n
Gloss (with missing item): man-3-ACC-EVR die-URGT-CAUS-3 ___ die-URGT-CAUS-3
The English translation of this sentence is:She killed her husband, they say; she killed her son-in-law, they say.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Evidentials\index[sub]{evidentials} indicate the type of the speaker’s source of information. \SYQ, like most\footnote{Note, though, that \ili{Huallaga} Q counts four evidentials, (\phono{-mi}, \phono{-shi}, \phono{-chi}, snd \phono{-chaq}) (Weber 1989:76). South \ili{Conchucos} Q counts six, (\phono{-mi}, \phono{-shi}, \phono{-chi}, \phono{-cha:}, and \phono{-cher}); \ili{Sihuas}, too, counts six (Hintz and Hintz 2014).} other Quechuan languages, counts three evidential suffixes: direct \phono{-mi}~(\ref{Glo6:Taytacha}--\ref{Glo6:puntraw}), reportative \phono{-shi}~(\ref{Glo6:Radyukunapa}--\ref{Glo6:Qarinta}), and conjectural \phono{-tri}~(\ref{Glo6:trayarachiptiki}--\ref{Glo6:Wasiy}) (\ie~the speaker has her own evidence for P (generally visual); the speaker learned P from someone else; or the speaker infers P based on some other evidence). Following a short vowel, these are realized as \phono{-m}, \phono{sh}, and \phono{-tr}, respectively~(\ref{Glo6:puntraw}), (\ref{Glo6:Qarinta}), (\ref{Glo6:Wasiy}).
A: word: wira-m	 gloss: fat-EVD
B: word: masha-n-ta-sh	 gloss: son.in.law-3-ACC-EVR
C: word: masha-:-pis	 gloss: son.in.law-1-ADD
D: word: muna-sha-n-ta-ña-m	 gloss: want-PRF-3-ACC-DISC-EVD
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 105:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): wasi-y raha-sa ka-ya-n ___
Gloss (with missing item): house-1 crack-PRF be-PROG-3 ___
The English translation of this sentence is:My house is cracked. It’s going to fall down.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Evidentials\index[sub]{evidentials} indicate the type of the speaker’s source of information. \SYQ, like most\footnote{Note, though, that \ili{Huallaga} Q counts four evidentials, (\phono{-mi}, \phono{-shi}, \phono{-chi}, snd \phono{-chaq}) (Weber 1989:76). South \ili{Conchucos} Q counts six, (\phono{-mi}, \phono{-shi}, \phono{-chi}, \phono{-cha:}, and \phono{-cher}); \ili{Sihuas}, too, counts six (Hintz and Hintz 2014).} other Quechuan languages, counts three evidential suffixes: direct \phono{-mi}~(\ref{Glo6:Taytacha}--\ref{Glo6:puntraw}), reportative \phono{-shi}~(\ref{Glo6:Radyukunapa}--\ref{Glo6:Qarinta}), and conjectural \phono{-tri}~(\ref{Glo6:trayarachiptiki}--\ref{Glo6:Wasiy}) (\ie~the speaker has her own evidence for P (generally visual); the speaker learned P from someone else; or the speaker infers P based on some other evidence). Following a short vowel, these are realized as \phono{-m}, \phono{sh}, and \phono{-tr}, respectively~(\ref{Glo6:puntraw}), (\ref{Glo6:Qarinta}), (\ref{Glo6:Wasiy}).
A: word: ima-na-ru-nqa-tr	 gloss: what-VRBZ-URGT-3.FUT-EVC
B: word: saqa-yku-ru-nqa-tr	 gloss: go.down-EXCEP-URGT-3.FUT-EVC
C: word: saqa-yku-rqa	 gloss: go.down-EXCEP-PST
D: word: wayta-chu	 gloss: flower-NEG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 106:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ chay warmi
Gloss (with missing item): ___ DEM.D woman
The English translation of this sentence is:Where is that woman?
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Evidentials are subject to the following distributional restrictions. They never attach to the topic or subject; these are, rather, marked with \phono{-qa}. In content questions, the evidential attaches to the question word or to the last word of the questioned phrase~(\ref{Glo6:chay}) (see~\sectref{sec:interr} on interrogation).
A: word: may-mi	 gloss: where-EVD
B: word: mana-ña	 gloss: no-DISC
C: word: chay-mi	 gloss: DEM.D-EVD
D: word: ima-m	 gloss: what-EVD
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 107:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): vaka-y wira ___ matray-pi puñu-shpa allin pastu-ta miku-shpa-m
Gloss (with missing item): cow-1 fat ___ cave-LOC sleep-SUBIS good pasture.grass-ACC eat-REFL-EVD
The English translation of this sentence is:My cow is really fat, sleeping in a cave and eating good pasture grass.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Evidentials do not appear in commands or injunctions~(\ref{Glo6:Ruwaruchun}); finally, only one evidential may occur per clause~(\ref{Glo6:Vakay}).
A: word: mana-m	 gloss: no-EVD
B: word: wira-m	 gloss: fat-EVD
C: word: fwira-man	 gloss: outside-ALL
D: word: wira	 gloss: fat
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 108:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): vaka-y wira wira-m matray-pi puñu-shpa allin pastu-ta ___
Gloss (with missing item): cow-1 fat fat-EVD cave-LOC sleep-SUBIS good pasture.grass-ACC ___
The English translation of this sentence is:My cow is really fat, sleeping in a cave and eating good pasture grass.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Evidentials do not appear in commands or injunctions~(\ref{Glo6:Ruwaruchun}); finally, only one evidential may occur per clause~(\ref{Glo6:Vakay}).
A: word: vaka-:-ta	 gloss: cow-1-ACC
B: word: ñuqa-lla-m	 gloss: I-RSTR-EVD
C: word: miku-shpa-qa	 gloss: eat-SUBIS-TOP
D: word: miku-shpa-m	 gloss: eat-REFL-EVD
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D