cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 113:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): rutu-pis ___ maqta-tuku-shpa pashña-ta
Gloss (with missing item): rutu.bird-ADD ___ young.man-SIMUL-SUBIS girl-ACC
The English translation of this sentence is:A rutu-bird, too, deceived a girl by making himself out to be a young man, they say.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \phono{-RQa} and \phono{-Ru}, may also be employed in the same contexts as is \phono{-sHQa}, even in combination with the reportative evidential, \phono{-shI}~(\ref{Glo4:Rutupis}), (\ref{Glo4:Millisunqa}).
A: word: shakash-ta	 gloss: guinea.pig-ACC
B: word: ingaña-rqa-sh	 gloss: trick-PST-EVR
C: word: chitchitya-ku-shpa	 gloss: say.chit.chit-REFL-SUBIS
D: word: wañu-ru-rqa-sh	 gloss: die-URGT-PST-EVR
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 114:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): millisu-n-qa ___ huk-ni-n
Gloss (with missing item): twin-3-TOP ___ one-EUPH-3
The English translation of this sentence is:His twin, the other one, died, they say.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \phono{-RQa} and \phono{-Ru}, may also be employed in the same contexts as is \phono{-sHQa}, even in combination with the reportative evidential, \phono{-shI}~(\ref{Glo4:Rutupis}), (\ref{Glo4:Millisunqa}).
A: word: wañu-ru-rqa-r-iki	 gloss: die-URGT-PST-R-IKI
B: word: wañu-ru-rqa-sh	 gloss: die-URGT-PST-EVR
C: word: yana-ya-sa	 gloss: back-PROG-PRF
D: word: wañu-ra-chi-ra	 gloss: die-URGT-CAUS-PST
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 115:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): chayna-m kundur ___ matray-ta chaypi wawa-ku-ru-ni
Gloss (with missing item): thus-EVD condor ___ cave-ACC DEM.D-LOC give.birth-REFL-URGT-1
The English translation of this sentence is:That condor carried me like that to a cave and I gave birth there.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Inside quotations in story-telling, \phono{RQa} and \phono{-Ru} are generally employed~(\ref{Glo4:nshari}), (\ref{Glo4:kundur}).
A: word: haku-ña	 gloss: let’s.go-DISC
B: word: shinka-ra-chi-wa-rqa-nchik	 gloss: get.drunk-URGT-CAUS-1.OBJ-PST-\LSC{1PL
C: word: willa-wa-rqa	 gloss: tell-1.OBJ-PST
D: word: qipi-wa-rqa	 gloss: carry-1.OBJ-PST
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 116:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): chayna-m kundur qipi-wa-rqa matray-ta chaypi ___
Gloss (with missing item): thus-EVD condor carry-1.OBJ-PST cave-ACC DEM.D-LOC ___
The English translation of this sentence is:That condor carried me like that to a cave and I gave birth there.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Inside quotations in story-telling, \phono{RQa} and \phono{-Ru} are generally employed~(\ref{Glo4:nshari}), (\ref{Glo4:kundur}).
A: word: watra-ku-n-raq	 gloss: give.birth-REFL-3-CONT
B: word: suyñu-ku-ru-ni	 gloss: dream-REFL-URGT-1
C: word: hinku-ya-mu-n-tri-ki	 gloss: roll-PROG-CISL-EVC-IKI
D: word: wawa-ku-ru-ni	 gloss: give.birth-REFL-URGT-1
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 117:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): chay alkul-ta mana ___
Gloss (with missing item): DEM.D alcohol-ACC no ___
The English translation of this sentence is:I haven’t capped that alcohol.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \phono{-sHa} --~realized as \phono{-sa} in \ACH, \AMV{} and \SP{} and as \phono{-sha} in \CH{} and \LT~-- may be argued sometimes to admit interpretations cognate with the English perfect, indicating events beginning in the past and either continuing into the present or with effects continuing into the present~(\ref{Glo4:alkulta}--\ref{Glo4:MikuMiku}). Table~\ref{Tab19a} displays the paradigm for perfect inflection with \phono{-sHa}; Table~\ref{Tab19b} displays the paradigm for the inflection of \phono{-sHa} for actor-object reference (see Subsection~\ref{ssec:actorobjref} for discussion).
A: word: muna-:-chu	 gloss: want-1-NEG
B: word: yatra-ni-chu	 gloss: know-1-NEG
C: word: tapa-sa-ni-chu	 gloss: cover-SA-1-NEG
D: word: saqa-yka-ra-mu-n	 gloss: go.down-EXCEP-URGT-CISL-3
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 118:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): mula-n-kuna-wan karga-ri-ku-shpa pasa-n wañu-ri-chi-shpa wak Chavin law-pa-sh hinashpa qalay qalay Chavin miniru-wan-shi ___
Gloss (with missing item): mule-3-PL-INSTR carry-INCEP-REFL-SUBIS pass-3 die-INCEP-CAUS-SUBIS DEM.D Chavin side-LOC-EVR then all all Chavin miner-INSTR-EVR ___
The English translation of this sentence is:Carrying everything with their mules, they left, killing people over by Chavin, they say. Then they divided up absolutely everything with the miners.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: That said, the non-nominalizing instances of \phono{-sHa} in the corpus, almost without exception, have more readily-available interpretations as narrative pasts (see \sectref{par:QSPT}) (\ref{Glo4:Mulankunawan}).\footnote{The corpus counts~1157 instances of \phono{-sHa}; a sample of~50 turned up no translation to the Spanish perfect.}
A: word: tumba-ru-sa	 gloss: knock.down-URGT-SA
B: word: parti-sa	 gloss: divide-SA
C: word: suda-ra-chi-shu-pti-ki	 gloss: sweat-URGT-CAUS-2.OBJ-SUBDS-2
D: word: parti-ya-n	 gloss: distribute-PROG-3
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 119:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): may-paq-taq ___ ni-shpa
Gloss (with missing item): where-ABL-SEQ ___ say-SUBIS
The English translation of this sentence is:“Where have you stolen these from?” he said.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Indeed, speakers offer only simple past translations for verbs suffixed with \phono{-sHa}; perfect translations may be offered, rather, for \phono{-Rqa}, \phono{-RU} (very rarely), or the present\footnote{In elicitation sessions, speakers of \SYQ{} do interpret \phono{-ri} as indicating the present perfect; in a sample of 50 of the 353 instances of \phono{-Ri} in the corpus, however, only once did the speakers assign it a perfect interpretation (\spkr~1: \phono{Yapa-mi-k} \phono{kuti-nqa}, \phono{¿aw?} \spkr~2: \phono{Puchuka\pb{-ri}} \phono{-n-chu}. ‘She’s going to go back again, no?’ ‘She hasn’t finished yet.’)} (\ref{Glo4:Maypaqtaq}--\ref{Glo4:tarin}) (see~\sectref{par:simplepast}).\footnote{The the translations in~(\ref{Glo4:alkulta}--\ref{Glo4:MikuMiku}) were proposed only to suggest possible perfect interpretations of sentences that, I argued, are better interpreted as narrative pasts.}
A: word: suwa-mu-ra-nki	 gloss: steal-CISL-PST-2
B: word: qaninpa	 gloss: before
C: word: suwa-ka-mu-ra-nki	 gloss: steal-REFL-CISL-PST-2
D: word: puñu-ku-ya-:	 gloss: sleep-REFL-PROG-1
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 120:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ni pi ___ ni pi tari-n-chu
Gloss (with missing item): nor who ___ nor who find-3-NEG
The English translation of this sentence is:No one has seen her and no one has found her.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Indeed, speakers offer only simple past translations for verbs suffixed with \phono{-sHa}; perfect translations may be offered, rather, for \phono{-Rqa}, \phono{-RU} (very rarely), or the present\footnote{In elicitation sessions, speakers of \SYQ{} do interpret \phono{-ri} as indicating the present perfect; in a sample of 50 of the 353 instances of \phono{-Ri} in the corpus, however, only once did the speakers assign it a perfect interpretation (\spkr~1: \phono{Yapa-mi-k} \phono{kuti-nqa}, \phono{¿aw?} \spkr~2: \phono{Puchuka\pb{-ri}} \phono{-n-chu}. ‘She’s going to go back again, no?’ ‘She hasn’t finished yet.’)} (\ref{Glo4:Maypaqtaq}--\ref{Glo4:tarin}) (see~\sectref{par:simplepast}).\footnote{The the translations in~(\ref{Glo4:alkulta}--\ref{Glo4:MikuMiku}) were proposed only to suggest possible perfect interpretations of sentences that, I argued, are better interpreted as narrative pasts.}
A: word: qawa-nchik-chu	 gloss: see-1PL-NEG
B: word: alma-n-chu	 gloss: soul-3-Q
C: word: muna-la	 gloss: want-PST
D: word: qawa-n-chu	 gloss: see-3-NEG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 121:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ni pi qawa-n-chu ni pi ___
Gloss (with missing item): nor who see-3-NEG nor who ___
The English translation of this sentence is:No one has seen her and no one has found her.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Indeed, speakers offer only simple past translations for verbs suffixed with \phono{-sHa}; perfect translations may be offered, rather, for \phono{-Rqa}, \phono{-RU} (very rarely), or the present\footnote{In elicitation sessions, speakers of \SYQ{} do interpret \phono{-ri} as indicating the present perfect; in a sample of 50 of the 353 instances of \phono{-Ri} in the corpus, however, only once did the speakers assign it a perfect interpretation (\spkr~1: \phono{Yapa-mi-k} \phono{kuti-nqa}, \phono{¿aw?} \spkr~2: \phono{Puchuka\pb{-ri}} \phono{-n-chu}. ‘She’s going to go back again, no?’ ‘She hasn’t finished yet.’)} (\ref{Glo4:Maypaqtaq}--\ref{Glo4:tarin}) (see~\sectref{par:simplepast}).\footnote{The the translations in~(\ref{Glo4:alkulta}--\ref{Glo4:MikuMiku}) were proposed only to suggest possible perfect interpretations of sentences that, I argued, are better interpreted as narrative pasts.}
A: word: yanapa-chi-ku-nki	 gloss: help-CAUS-REFL-2
B: word: yatra-n-chu	 gloss: know--3-NEG
C: word: tari-n-chu	 gloss: find-3-NEG
D: word: rikari-n-chu	 gloss: appear-3-NEG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 122:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): chay alkul-ta mana ___
Gloss (with missing item): DEM.D alcohol-ACC no ___
The English translation of this sentence is:I haven’t capped that alcohol.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Indeed, speakers offer only simple past translations for verbs suffixed with \phono{-sHa}; perfect translations may be offered, rather, for \phono{-Rqa}, \phono{-RU} (very rarely), or the present\footnote{In elicitation sessions, speakers of \SYQ{} do interpret \phono{-ri} as indicating the present perfect; in a sample of 50 of the 353 instances of \phono{-Ri} in the corpus, however, only once did the speakers assign it a perfect interpretation (\spkr~1: \phono{Yapa-mi-k} \phono{kuti-nqa}, \phono{¿aw?} \spkr~2: \phono{Puchuka\pb{-ri}} \phono{-n-chu}. ‘She’s going to go back again, no?’ ‘She hasn’t finished yet.’)} (\ref{Glo4:Maypaqtaq}--\ref{Glo4:tarin}) (see~\sectref{par:simplepast}).\footnote{The the translations in~(\ref{Glo4:alkulta}--\ref{Glo4:MikuMiku}) were proposed only to suggest possible perfect interpretations of sentences that, I argued, are better interpreted as narrative pasts.}
A: word: tapa-sa-ni-chu	 gloss: cover-SA-1-NEG
B: word: yatra-ni-chu	 gloss: know-1-NEG
C: word: tari-pa:ku-n-man	 gloss: find-JTACT-URGT-COND
D: word: muna-:-chu	 gloss: want-1-NEG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 123:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): wak suwa liyun-qa ubiha-y-ta ___
Gloss (with missing item): DEM.D thief lion-TOP sheep-1-ACC ___
The English translation of this sentence is:That thieving puma had knocked off my sheep!
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Speakers do consistently translate the combination of \phono{-RU} and \phono{-sHa} with the Spanish past perfect~(\ref{Glo4:liyunqa}--\ref{Glo4:Payllatam}); in Andean Spanish, however, this construction does not share the semantics of the Standard Spanish.\footnote{This construction generally can only awkwardly be translated as a past perfect in English, however.}
A: word: harka-shi-sayki-m	 gloss: herd-ACMP-1>2.FUT-EVD
B: word: tumba-ru-sa	 gloss: knock.down-URGT-SA
C: word: saqa-ka-ru-sa	 gloss: go.down-PASSACC-URGT-NPST
D: word: qaqu-ru-y	 gloss: toss.out-URGT-IMP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 124:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): pay-lla-ta-m wañu-ra-chi-ra runa ___ karrupi
Gloss (with missing item): he-RSTR-ACC-EVD die-URGT-CAUS-PST person ___ car-LOC
The English translation of this sentence is:The people killed just him~\dots{} They had grabbed him on the bus.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Speakers do consistently translate the combination of \phono{-RU} and \phono{-sHa} with the Spanish past perfect~(\ref{Glo4:liyunqa}--\ref{Glo4:Payllatam}); in Andean Spanish, however, this construction does not share the semantics of the Standard Spanish.\footnote{This construction generally can only awkwardly be translated as a past perfect in English, however.}
A: word: qipi-ru-shqayki	 gloss: carry-URGT-1>2.FUT
B: word: hapi-ru-sa	 gloss: grab-URGT-SA
C: word: kustumbraw-ku-shpa	 gloss: accustom-REFL-SUBIS
D: word: lapcha-ru-n	 gloss: grab-URGT-3
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 125:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ li-:
Gloss (with missing item): ___ go-1
The English translation of this sentence is:When (after) he went, I went.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Given, however, the restrictions on the distribution of \phono{-RU-sHa} --~it inflects only for third person\footnote{The corpus counts 330 instances of \phono{-RU} (\phono{-\uo/-chi/-mu}) \phono{-sHa}; in only two cases is it not inflected for third person.} and it is not contentful either with stative verbs or with the copulative, \phono{ka-}~-- it is improbable that it that would constitute the language’s principal strategy for rendering the past perfect. Rather, to indicate the sequence of two completed events, speakers of \SYQ{} generally employ ether the subordinator \phono{-pti}~(\ref{Glo4:nqa}), (\ref{Glo4:Hinaptinshiis}) or a connective like \phono{hinashpa} or \phono{hinaptin}~(\ref{Glo4:Suyarusa}).\footnote{It has been suggested to me that an additional function of \phono{-sHa} might be to indicate ‘sudden discovery’ \citep{Adelaar77}\index[aut]{Adelaar, Willem F. H.} or surprise. That is, \phono{-sHa} might indicate the mirative, as do the perfect marker \phono{-shka} in Ecuadorian Q \citep{muysken1977syntactic} and ‘non-experienced’ past tense marker \phono{-sqa} in \ili{Cuzco} Q \citep{Faller03}\index[aut]{Faller, Martina} \citep[as cited in][223--33]{Peterson14}.\index[aut]{Peterson, Tyler} This is a hypothesis I am currently investigating.}
A: word: chawa-ru-shaq	 gloss: milk-URGT-1.FUT
B: word: apa-ru-pti-y-qa	 gloss: bring-URGT-SUBDS-1-TOP
C: word: li-lu-pti-n-qa	 gloss: go-URGT-SUBDS-3-TOP
D: word: qipi-ru-pti-n-qa	 gloss: carry-URGT-SUBDS-3-TOP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 126:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): wak Marcopukyo-pa, trigu-ta ___ ka-ni
Gloss (with missing item): DEM.D Marcopukyo-LOC wheat-ACC ___ be-1
The English translation of this sentence is:There in Marcopukyo, I used to harvest wheat.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The habitual past is indicated by the combination of the agentive noun --~formed by the addition of \phono{-q} to the verb stem~-- and the relevant present tense form of \phono{ka-} ‘be’ (zero in the third person)~(\ref{Glo4:Marcopukyopa}--\ref{Glo4:tirruristawan}). Table~\ref{Tab20a} displays this paradim; Table~\ref{Tab20b} displays the paradidm of habitual past inflection with actor-object reference (see Subsection~\ref{ssec:actorobjref} for discussion).
A: word: hurqa-ra-ma-nki	 gloss: remove-URGT-1.OBJ-2
B: word: hurqu-paka-mu-q	 gloss: remove-MUTBEN-CISL-AG
C: word: rigala-wa-chuwan	 gloss: give.as.a.gift-1.OBJ-1PL.COND
D: word: urqu-pa-qa	 gloss: hill-LOC-TOP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 127:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): wak Marcopukyo-pa, trigu-ta hurqu-paka-mu-q ___
Gloss (with missing item): DEM.D Marcopukyo-LOC wheat-ACC remove-MUTBEN-CISL-AG ___
The English translation of this sentence is:There in Marcopukyo, I used to harvest wheat.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The habitual past is indicated by the combination of the agentive noun --~formed by the addition of \phono{-q} to the verb stem~-- and the relevant present tense form of \phono{ka-} ‘be’ (zero in the third person)~(\ref{Glo4:Marcopukyopa}--\ref{Glo4:tirruristawan}). Table~\ref{Tab20a} displays this paradim; Table~\ref{Tab20b} displays the paradidm of habitual past inflection with actor-object reference (see Subsection~\ref{ssec:actorobjref} for discussion).
A: word: miku-yka-ya-chi-n	 gloss: eat-EXCEP-PROG-CAUS-3
B: word: ka-nki	 gloss: be-2
C: word: ka-ni	 gloss: be-1
D: word: tuku-chka-ni-ña	 gloss: finish-DUR-1-DISC
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 128:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): chay tirrurista-wan kay Azángaro-paq ___ wama wamaq piliya-ku-ya-q
Gloss (with missing item): DEM.D terrorist-INSTR DEM.P Azángaro-ABL ___ a.lot a.lot fight-REFL-PROG-AG
The English translation of this sentence is:They would be going from Azángaro with the terrorists. They would be fighting a lot.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The habitual past is indicated by the combination of the agentive noun --~formed by the addition of \phono{-q} to the verb stem~-- and the relevant present tense form of \phono{ka-} ‘be’ (zero in the third person)~(\ref{Glo4:Marcopukyopa}--\ref{Glo4:tirruristawan}). Table~\ref{Tab20a} displays this paradim; Table~\ref{Tab20b} displays the paradidm of habitual past inflection with actor-object reference (see Subsection~\ref{ssec:actorobjref} for discussion).
A: word: rikcha-q	 gloss: go-AG
B: word: riku-ya-q	 gloss: go-PROG-AG
C: word: piliya-ku-ya-q	 gloss: fight-REFL-PROG-AG
D: word: yuya-ri-chi-naku-ya-n	 gloss: remember-INCEP-CAUS-RECIP-PROG-3
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B