cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 67:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kay-pi ~nuqa-nchik-kuna-qa kustumbraw-mi ___
Gloss (with missing item): DEM.P-LOC I-1PL-PL-TOP accustomed-EVD ___
The English translation of this sentence is:Here, we’re accustomed to it.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \SYQ{} makes available a three-way distinction in the first person plural, between \phono{ñuqanchik} (dual), \phono{ñuqanchikkuna} (inclusive), and \phono{ñuqakuna} (exclusive). In practice, \phono{ñuqanchik} is employed with dual, inclusive and exclusive interpretations to the virtual complete exclusion of the other two forms, except in the \CH{} dialect. Verbs and substantives appearing with the inclusive \phono{ñuqanchikkuna} inflect following the same rules as do verbs and substantives appearing with the dual/default \phono{ñuqanchik}~(\ref{Glo4:kustumbrawmi}); verbs and substantives appearing with the exclusive \phono{ñuqakuna} inflect following the same rules as do verbs and substantives appearing with the singular \phono{ñuqa}~(\ref{Glo4:taytachaymi}).
A: word: ka-ya-:	 gloss: be-PROG-1
B: word: paqwa-ya-nchik-ña-m	 gloss: finish-PROG-1PL-DISC-EVD
C: word: ushtu-naya-ra-chi-n	 gloss: dress-DESR-URGT-CAUS-3
D: word: ka-ya-nchik	 gloss: be-PROG-1PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 68:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): wañu-q tayta-cha-y-mi chay-ta-qa ___ willa-wa-rqa
Gloss (with missing item): die-AG father-DIM-1-EVD DEM.D-ACC-TOP ___ tell-1.OBJ-PST
The English translation of this sentence is:Our late grandfather told that to us.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \SYQ{} makes available a three-way distinction in the first person plural, between \phono{ñuqanchik} (dual), \phono{ñuqanchikkuna} (inclusive), and \phono{ñuqakuna} (exclusive). In practice, \phono{ñuqanchik} is employed with dual, inclusive and exclusive interpretations to the virtual complete exclusion of the other two forms, except in the \CH{} dialect. Verbs and substantives appearing with the inclusive \phono{ñuqanchikkuna} inflect following the same rules as do verbs and substantives appearing with the dual/default \phono{ñuqanchik}~(\ref{Glo4:kustumbrawmi}); verbs and substantives appearing with the exclusive \phono{ñuqakuna} inflect following the same rules as do verbs and substantives appearing with the singular \phono{ñuqa}~(\ref{Glo4:taytachaymi}).
A: word: ñuqa-kuna	 gloss: I-PL
B: word: ñuqa-kuna-man	 gloss: I-PL-ALL
C: word: ñuqa-kuna-qa	 gloss: I-PL-TOP
D: word: ka-nchik-man	 gloss: be-1PL-COND
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 69:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kama-pa-m ___ puñu-ku-ya-: ishkay-ni-:
Gloss (with missing item): bed-LOC-EVD ___ sleep-REFL-PROG-1 two-EUPH-1
The English translation of this sentence is:We were both sleeping in bed.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Although \phono{the morpheme ___} is generally interpreted as singular --~likely an implicature attributable to the availability of plural forms in the first person~-- it is, in fact, unspecified for number and may receive plural interpretations~(\ref{Glo4:Kamapam}).
A: word: ñuqa-kuna	 gloss: I-PL
B: word: wañu-chi-ma-nqa-chu	 gloss: die-CAUS-1.OBJ-3.FUT-NEG
C: word: ñuqa	 gloss: I
D: word: ñuqanchik-pis	 gloss: we-ADD
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 70:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kama-pa-m ñuqa ___ ishkay-ni-:
Gloss (with missing item): bed-LOC-EVD I ___ two-EUPH-1
The English translation of this sentence is:We were both sleeping in bed.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Although \phono{ñuqa} is generally interpreted as singular --~likely an implicature attributable to the availability of plural forms in the first person~-- it is, in fact, unspecified for number and may receive plural interpretations~(\ref{Glo4:Kamapam}).
A: word: puñu-ku-ya-:	 gloss: sleep-REFL-PROG-1
B: word: puñu-ku-ya-pti-n-raq	 gloss: sleep-REFL-PROG-SUBDS-3-CONT
C: word: sinta-ku-sa	 gloss: ribbon-REFL-PRF
D: word: pasa-chi-sa	 gloss: pass-CAUS-NPST
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 71:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ubiha-:-ta ___ vaka-:-ta chawa-ru-shaq kisu-ta ruwa-ru-shaq
Gloss (with missing item): sheep-1-ACC ___ cow-1-ACC milk-URGT-1.FUT cheese-ACC make-URGT-1.FUT
The English translation of this sentence is:I’m going to herd my sheep; I’m going to milk my cows; I’m going to make cheese.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The future tense suffixes in \SYQ{} are \phono{-shaq} (1\lsc{pl}), \phono{-nki}~(\ref{Glo4:michimu}), \phono{-nqa}~(\ref{Glo4:Vakatash}), and \phono{-shun} (1\lsc{s})~(\ref{Glo4:iskapa}--\ref{Glo4:Kaytatrpaqa}). Table~\ref{Tab17a} displays this paradim; Table~\ref{Tab17b} displays the paradidm of future tense inflection with actor-object reference (see Subsection~\ref{ssec:actorobjref} for discussion).
A: word: kita-naku-shpa	 gloss: take.away-RECP-SUBIS
B: word: michi-mu-shaq	 gloss: pasture-CISL-1.FUT
C: word: pi-wan	 gloss: who-INSTR
D: word: michi-mu-shun	 gloss: pasture-CISL-1PL.FUT
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 72:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ubiha-:-ta michi-mu-shaq vaka-:-ta ___ kisu-ta ruwa-ru-shaq
Gloss (with missing item): sheep-1-ACC pasture-CISL-1.FUT cow-1-ACC ___ cheese-ACC make-URGT-1.FUT
The English translation of this sentence is:I’m going to herd my sheep; I’m going to milk my cows; I’m going to make cheese.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The future tense suffixes in \SYQ{} are \phono{-shaq} (1\lsc{pl}), \phono{-nki}~(\ref{Glo4:michimu}), \phono{-nqa}~(\ref{Glo4:Vakatash}), and \phono{-shun} (1\lsc{s})~(\ref{Glo4:iskapa}--\ref{Glo4:Kaytatrpaqa}). Table~\ref{Tab17a} displays this paradim; Table~\ref{Tab17b} displays the paradidm of future tense inflection with actor-object reference (see Subsection~\ref{ssec:actorobjref} for discussion).
A: word: kumbida-pti-nchik	 gloss: share-SUBDS-1PL
B: word: chawa-ru-shaq	 gloss: milk-URGT-1.FUT
C: word: chawa-ru-waq	 gloss: milk-URGT-2.COND
D: word: ruwa-ru-shaq	 gloss: make-URGT-1.FUT
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 73:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ubiha-:-ta michi-mu-shaq vaka-:-ta chawa-ru-shaq kisu-ta ___
Gloss (with missing item): sheep-1-ACC pasture-CISL-1.FUT cow-1-ACC milk-URGT-1.FUT cheese-ACC ___
The English translation of this sentence is:I’m going to herd my sheep; I’m going to milk my cows; I’m going to make cheese.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The future tense suffixes in \SYQ{} are \phono{-shaq} (1\lsc{pl}), \phono{-nki}~(\ref{Glo4:michimu}), \phono{-nqa}~(\ref{Glo4:Vakatash}), and \phono{-shun} (1\lsc{s})~(\ref{Glo4:iskapa}--\ref{Glo4:Kaytatrpaqa}). Table~\ref{Tab17a} displays this paradim; Table~\ref{Tab17b} displays the paradidm of future tense inflection with actor-object reference (see Subsection~\ref{ssec:actorobjref} for discussion).
A: word: ruwa-ru-shaq	 gloss: make-URGT-1.FUT
B: word: riku-ru-shaq	 gloss: go-URGT-1.FUT
C: word: chawa-ru-shaq	 gloss: milk-URGT-1.FUT
D: word: wala-ku-yku-ru-shaq	 gloss: skirt-REFL-EXCEP-URGT-1.FUT
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 74:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): vaka-ta-sh ___ vaka-ta chawa-nki
Gloss (with missing item): cow-ACC-EVR ___ cow-ACC milk-2
The English translation of this sentence is:You’ll herd the cows; you’ll milk the cows.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The future tense suffixes in \SYQ{} are \phono{-shaq} (1\lsc{pl}), \phono{-nki}~(\ref{Glo4:michimu}), \phono{-nqa}~(\ref{Glo4:Vakatash}), and \phono{-shun} (1\lsc{s})~(\ref{Glo4:iskapa}--\ref{Glo4:Kaytatrpaqa}). Table~\ref{Tab17a} displays this paradim; Table~\ref{Tab17b} displays the paradidm of future tense inflection with actor-object reference (see Subsection~\ref{ssec:actorobjref} for discussion).
A: word: harka-nki	 gloss: herd-2
B: word: hinku-ya-mu-n-tri-ki	 gloss: roll-PROG-CISL-EVC-IKI
C: word: harka-nchik	 gloss: herd-1PL
D: word: kuska-nchik	 gloss: together-1PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 75:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): vaka-ta-sh harka-nki vaka-ta ___
Gloss (with missing item): cow-ACC-EVR herd-2 cow-ACC ___
The English translation of this sentence is:You’ll herd the cows; you’ll milk the cows.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The future tense suffixes in \SYQ{} are \phono{-shaq} (1\lsc{pl}), \phono{-nki}~(\ref{Glo4:michimu}), \phono{-nqa}~(\ref{Glo4:Vakatash}), and \phono{-shun} (1\lsc{s})~(\ref{Glo4:iskapa}--\ref{Glo4:Kaytatrpaqa}). Table~\ref{Tab17a} displays this paradim; Table~\ref{Tab17b} displays the paradidm of future tense inflection with actor-object reference (see Subsection~\ref{ssec:actorobjref} for discussion).
A: word: chawa-nki	 gloss: milk-2
B: word: chawa-n	 gloss: milk-3
C: word: qawa-nki	 gloss: see-2
D: word: hira-ku-ru-n	 gloss: herranza-REFL-URGT-3
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 76:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): mana-m ___ wañu-ra-chi-shaq-mi
Gloss (with missing item): no-EVD ___ die-URGT-CAUS-1.FUT-EVD
The English translation of this sentence is:She’s not going to escape. I’ll kill her.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The future tense suffixes in \SYQ{} are \phono{-shaq} (1\lsc{pl}), \phono{-nki}~(\ref{Glo4:michimu}), \phono{-nqa}~(\ref{Glo4:Vakatash}), and \phono{-shun} (1\lsc{s})~(\ref{Glo4:iskapa}--\ref{Glo4:Kaytatrpaqa}). Table~\ref{Tab17a} displays this paradim; Table~\ref{Tab17b} displays the paradidm of future tense inflection with actor-object reference (see Subsection~\ref{ssec:actorobjref} for discussion).
A: word: wañu-chi-ma-nqa-chu	 gloss: die-CAUS-1.OBJ-3.FUT-NEG
B: word: iskapa-nqa-chu	 gloss: escape-3.FUT-NEG
C: word: iskapa-ku-shaq	 gloss: escape-REFL-1.FUT
D: word: warku-ra-ya-n	 gloss: hang-UNINT-INTENS-3
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 77:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): mana-m iskapa-nqa-chu ___
Gloss (with missing item): no-EVD escape-3.FUT-NEG ___
The English translation of this sentence is:She’s not going to escape. I’ll kill her.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The future tense suffixes in \SYQ{} are \phono{-shaq} (1\lsc{pl}), \phono{-nki}~(\ref{Glo4:michimu}), \phono{-nqa}~(\ref{Glo4:Vakatash}), and \phono{-shun} (1\lsc{s})~(\ref{Glo4:iskapa}--\ref{Glo4:Kaytatrpaqa}). Table~\ref{Tab17a} displays this paradim; Table~\ref{Tab17b} displays the paradidm of future tense inflection with actor-object reference (see Subsection~\ref{ssec:actorobjref} for discussion).
A: word: wañu-ra-chi-sa	 gloss: die-URGT-CAUS-NPST
B: word: wañu-chi-shaq	 gloss: die-CAUS-1.FUT
C: word: wañu-ra-chi-shaq-mi	 gloss: die-URGT-CAUS-1.FUT-EVD
D: word: ima-na-shayki-pis-chu	 gloss: what-VRBZ-1>2.FUT-ADD-NEG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 78:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kay-ta-tr ___
Gloss (with missing item): DEM.P-ACC-EVC ___
The English translation of this sentence is:We’ll wash this.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The future tense suffixes in \SYQ{} are \phono{-shaq} (1\lsc{pl}), \phono{-nki}~(\ref{Glo4:michimu}), \phono{-nqa}~(\ref{Glo4:Vakatash}), and \phono{-shun} (1\lsc{s})~(\ref{Glo4:iskapa}--\ref{Glo4:Kaytatrpaqa}). Table~\ref{Tab17a} displays this paradim; Table~\ref{Tab17b} displays the paradidm of future tense inflection with actor-object reference (see Subsection~\ref{ssec:actorobjref} for discussion).
A: word: waqa-l	 gloss: cry-SUBIS
B: word: lava-shun-tri-ki	 gloss: wash-1PL.FUT-EVC-IKI
C: word: karga-ri-ku-shpa	 gloss: carry-INCEP-REFL-SUBIS
D: word: paqa-ri-ku-shun	 gloss: wash-INCEP-REFL-1PL.FUT
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 79:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): qam-kuna-lla-m ___
Gloss (with missing item): you-PL-RSTR-EVD ___
The English translation of this sentence is:Just you.\lsc{pl} are going to talk.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The second person suffix is ambiguous between present and future tense. Second person and third person plural suffixes are the same as those for the second and third persons singular~(\ref{Glo4:Qamkunallam}--\ref{Glo4:Manalaq}).
A: word: parla-nki	 gloss: talk-2
B: word: apa-ka-mu-la-nki	 gloss: bring-PASSACC-CISL-PST-2
C: word: llaqta-yki-ta	 gloss: town-2-ACC
D: word: rima-sayki	 gloss: talk-1>2
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 80:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): mana-laq yaku-kta ___
Gloss (with missing item): no-CONT water-ACC ___
The English translation of this sentence is:They still aren’t going to give me water.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The second person suffix is ambiguous between present and future tense. Second person and third person plural suffixes are the same as those for the second and third persons singular~(\ref{Glo4:Qamkunallam}--\ref{Glo4:Manalaq}).
A: word: ni-shunki-chu	 gloss: say-2.OBJ-2-NEG
B: word: ni-sha-shi-ki	 gloss: say-NPST-EVR-IKI
C: word: wañu-chi-ma-nqa-chu	 gloss: die-CAUS-1.OBJ-3.FUT-NEG
D: word: qu-ma-nqa-chu	 gloss: give-1.OBJ-3.FUT-NEG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 81:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): iskwila-n-ta lliw-ta ya wamra-y-ta ___
Gloss (with missing item): school-3-ACC all-ACC EMPH child-1-ACC ___
The English translation of this sentence is:I made all my children finish their schooling.
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \phono{-RQa} indicates the past tense.\footnote{\phono{-RQa} signals the preterite in all Quechuan languages; \phono{-RU}, according to \citet{CerroP87}\index[aut]{Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo M.}, is a later evolution in some Quechuan languages from the modal suffix \phono{-RQu} (outward direction). In \ili{Tarma} Q and \ili{Pacaraos} Q \phono{-rQu} is now a perfective aspect marker \citet[18--29]{Adelaar88}.\index[aut]{Adelaar, Willem F. H.} An anonymous reviewer points out that in Southern \ili{Conchucos} Quechua, \phono{-ru} in Southern \ili{Conchucos} Q originally indicated outward direction. It became a derivational perfective then an inflectional past \citep[see][192--197]{Hintz}.} The morpheme is realized \phono{-rqa} in \AMV{}~(\ref{Glo4:Iskwilanta}),~(\ref{Glo4:Imapaqtaqni}); \phono{-ra} in \ACH{}~(\ref{Glo4:ganawnintin}), \LT{}~(\ref{Glo4:Primitivoqa}),~(\ref{Glo4:pasaypaqtriki}), and \SP{}~(\ref{Glo4:Antaylumatata}); and \phono{-la} in \CH{}~(\ref{Glo4:Suwanakushpatr}),~(\ref{Glo4:Manachurimi}). Table~\ref{Tab18a} displays the simple past tense inflectional paradigm; Table ~\ref{Tab18b} displays the paradigm for simple past tense inflection with actor-object reference (see Subsection~\ref{ssec:actorobjref} for discussion).
A: word: aysa-pa-ma-ra-nki	 gloss: pull-BEN-1.OBJ-PST-2
B: word: puchuka-chi-rqa-ni	 gloss: finish-CAUS-PST-1
C: word: tuma-ra-chi-rqa-ni	 gloss: drink-URGT-CAUS-PST-1
D: word: puchuka-chi-wa-rqa-pis-chu	 gloss: finish-CAUS-1.OBJ-PST-ADD-NEG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 82:
You are a linguist specializing in Yauyos Quechua. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ima-paq-taq ___ paga-ru-lla-wa-n-man-tri ka-rqa
Gloss (with missing item): what-PURP-SEQ ___ pay-URGT-RSTR-1.OBJ-3-COND-EVC be-PST
The English translation of this sentence is:Why did you say that to me? He would have sacrificed me!
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \phono{-RQa} indicates the past tense.\footnote{\phono{-RQa} signals the preterite in all Quechuan languages; \phono{-RU}, according to \citet{CerroP87}\index[aut]{Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo M.}, is a later evolution in some Quechuan languages from the modal suffix \phono{-RQu} (outward direction). In \ili{Tarma} Q and \ili{Pacaraos} Q \phono{-rQu} is now a perfective aspect marker \citet[18--29]{Adelaar88}.\index[aut]{Adelaar, Willem F. H.} An anonymous reviewer points out that in Southern \ili{Conchucos} Quechua, \phono{-ru} in Southern \ili{Conchucos} Q originally indicated outward direction. It became a derivational perfective then an inflectional past \citep[see][192--197]{Hintz}.} The morpheme is realized \phono{-rqa} in \AMV{}~(\ref{Glo4:Iskwilanta}),~(\ref{Glo4:Imapaqtaqni}); \phono{-ra} in \ACH{}~(\ref{Glo4:ganawnintin}), \LT{}~(\ref{Glo4:Primitivoqa}),~(\ref{Glo4:pasaypaqtriki}), and \SP{}~(\ref{Glo4:Antaylumatata}); and \phono{-la} in \CH{}~(\ref{Glo4:Suwanakushpatr}),~(\ref{Glo4:Manachurimi}). Table~\ref{Tab18a} displays the simple past tense inflectional paradigm; Table ~\ref{Tab18b} displays the paradigm for simple past tense inflection with actor-object reference (see Subsection~\ref{ssec:actorobjref} for discussion).
A: word: puchka-puchka-shpa	 gloss: spin-spin-SUBIS
B: word: ni-wa-rqa-nki	 gloss: say-1.OBJ-PST-2
C: word: shinka-ra-chi-wa-rqa-nchik	 gloss: get.drunk-URGT-CAUS-1.OBJ-PST-\LSC{1PL
D: word: ni-wa-ra	 gloss: say-1.OBJ-PST
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B