cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 34:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): asi-ka lïmndï ___ ngala luke asi tï na-p ndï=ala uni-e
Gloss (with missing item): sit-let eye ___ PL.PROX too sit take DETR-be 3PL=for shout-IPFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`After [they] had sat and watched them, these people also took seats, cheering them on.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \isi{semantic} effect of this \isi{double perfective} is often one of signaling that an action is all-the-more over-and-done-with. Since a single \isi{perfective} marker typically signals that the event is viewed as whole and completed, this double marking could be seen as superfluous.\footnote{Indeed, it may be that -- as speakers use different \isi{TAM} \isi{suffix}es ever more interchangeably, perhaps as the result of \isi{grammatical attrition} -- the extra \isi{perfective} marking is simply redundant (see \chapref{sec:15} for structural changes due to \isi{grammatical attrition}).} There are instances, however, in which the \isi{double perfective} functions something like the \isi{pluperfect} category of some European languages, showing that an event is not only viewed as a completed whole, but that is has been completed before the \isi{time} of some other event in the more-recent \isi{past}. These usages can often be translated with the \ili{English} \isi{auxiliary} ‘had’ plus the past participle, as in examples \REF{ex:verbs:41} through \REF{ex:verbs:45}.
A: word: ma=lï-p-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=put{-pfv-dep}
B: word: ndï=lï-p-ïp-e	 gloss: 3PL=put-PFV-PFV-DEP
C: word: tï-na-t	 gloss: take-IRR-SPEC
D: word: ndï=lo-p-e	 gloss: 3PL=go-PFV-DEP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 35:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): numbu ala ___
Gloss (with missing item): post PL.DIST ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`Those posts have already broken.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \isi{double perfective} can, similarly, provide the sense of ‘already’, and is translated accordingly in \REF{ex:verbs:46}.
A: word: nungun-u-p-en	 gloss: break-put-PFV-NMLZ
B: word: ndï=ina-ka-wana	 gloss: 3PL=liver-at-feel
C: word: nungun-u-p	 gloss: break-put-PFV
D: word: nungun-u-p-op	 gloss: break-put-PFV-PFV
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 36:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nï-nji wot yena mï ___ ni-p-op
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG-POSS younger woman 3SG.SUBJ ___ die-PFV-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`My younger sister has already died.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is also possible for the word the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ to appear within a clause exhibiting such a construction \REF{ex:verbs:47}.\footnote{In example \REF{ex:verbs:47}, however, it may be that the form /nip/ has been \isi{reanalyzed} as monomorphemic, a new verb ‘die’, derived from the \isi{perfective} form of the verb ni- ‘die’ (cf. the \isi{pluractional} version of this verb, nipinpu- ‘die.\textsc{pl}’, \sectref{sec:4.3}).}
A: word: uma	 gloss: bone
B: word: wopata	 gloss: [place]
C: word: ma=ala-kamb	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=from-shun
D: word: ta	 gloss: already
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 37:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nï-nji wot yena mï ta ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG-POSS younger woman 3SG.SUBJ already ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`My younger sister has already died.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is also possible for the word ta ‘already’ to appear within a clause exhibiting such a construction \REF{ex:verbs:47}.\footnote{In example \REF{ex:verbs:47}, however, it may be that the form /nip/ has been \isi{reanalyzed} as monomorphemic, a new verb ‘die’, derived from the \isi{perfective} form of the verb ni- ‘die’ (cf. the \isi{pluractional} version of this verb, nipinpu- ‘die.\textsc{pl}’, \sectref{sec:4.3}).}
A: word: ni-p	 gloss: die-PFV
B: word: ni-p-op	 gloss: die-PFV-PFV
C: word: ni-p-e	 gloss: [die-PFV-DEP]
D: word: lu-nda-t-e	 gloss: put-IRR-SPEC-DEP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 38:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nï-nji wot yena mï ___ ni-p-op
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG-POSS younger woman 3SG.SUBJ ___ die-PFV-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`My younger sister has already died.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is also possible for the word the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ to appear within a clause exhibiting such a construction \REF{ex:verbs:47}.\footnote{In example \REF{ex:verbs:47}, however, it may be that the form /nip/ has been \isi{reanalyzed} as monomorphemic, a new verb ‘die’, derived from the \isi{perfective} form of the verb ni- ‘die’ (cf. the \isi{pluractional} version of this verb, nipinpu- ‘die.\textsc{pl}’, \sectref{sec:4.3}).}
A: word: wanwane	 gloss: mushroom
B: word: ta	 gloss: already
C: word: wopata	 gloss: [place]
D: word: i-ta	 gloss: go.PFV-COND
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 39:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nï-nji wot yena mï ta ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG-POSS younger woman 3SG.SUBJ already ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`My younger sister has already died.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is also possible for the word ta ‘already’ to appear within a clause exhibiting such a construction \REF{ex:verbs:47}.\footnote{In example \REF{ex:verbs:47}, however, it may be that the form /nip/ has been \isi{reanalyzed} as monomorphemic, a new verb ‘die’, derived from the \isi{perfective} form of the verb ni- ‘die’ (cf. the \isi{pluractional} version of this verb, nipinpu- ‘die.\textsc{pl}’, \sectref{sec:4.3}).}
A: word: nï=kï-p-ap	 gloss: 1SG=say-PFV-PFV
B: word: ni-p-e	 gloss: [die-PFV-DEP]
C: word: ni-p-op	 gloss: die-PFV-PFV
D: word: ni-p	 gloss: die-PFV
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 40:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): numbu ala ___
Gloss (with missing item): post PL.DIST ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`Those posts have already broken.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Sentences \REF{ex:verbs:46} and \REF{ex:verbs:47} also illustrate the fact that the \isi{vowel}s in the second \isi{perfective} \isi{suffix} do not always match the final \isi{vowel} of the \isi{verb stem}. Indeed, there is variability within certain verb forms. For example, there are attested forms such as lï-p-ap ‘put-\textsc{pfv-pfv}’ alongside lï-p-ïp ‘put-\textsc{pfv-pfv}’, as seen in \REF{ex:verbs:45}. It may be that some of these putative second \isi{perfective} forms are actually reduced forms of the \isi{past} \isi{locative verb} wap ‘be.\textsc{pst}’ (\sectref{sec:10.4}).\footnote{Indeed, it is possible that they have all derived historically from wap ‘be.\textsc{pst}’, which is often pronounced [wɔp]: thus, it may be that first the /w/ was lost; then, when following non-low \isi{vowel}s, the \isi{vowel} [ɔ] was colored to [o], and when following the \isi{low vowel}, it was colored to [a]. There are no attested (double) \isi{perfective} forms with the \isi{vowel}s [e] or [u] (i.e., \textsuperscript{†}[-ep] and \textsuperscript{†}[-up] are not found as \isi{perfective} \isi{suffix}es).} Sentences \REF{ex:verbs:48} and \REF{ex:verbs:49} further exemplify the form [-op], following the \isi{stem}-final \isi{vowel}s /i/ and /u/, respectively.
A: word: nungun-u-p-op	 gloss: break-put-PFV-PFV
B: word: mbï-i-ap	 gloss: here-go.PFV-PFV
C: word: nungun-u-p	 gloss: break-put-PFV
D: word: nungun-u-p-en	 gloss: break-put-PFV-NMLZ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 41:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nï-nji wot yena mï ___ ni-p-op
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG-POSS younger woman 3SG.SUBJ ___ die-PFV-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`My younger sister has already died.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Sentences \REF{ex:verbs:46} and \REF{ex:verbs:47} also illustrate the fact that the \isi{vowel}s in the second \isi{perfective} \isi{suffix} do not always match the final \isi{vowel} of the \isi{verb stem}. Indeed, there is variability within certhe morpheme ___in verb forms. For example, there are attested forms such as lï-p-ap ‘put-\textsc{pfv-pfv}’ alongside lï-p-ïp ‘put-\textsc{pfv-pfv}’, as seen in \REF{ex:verbs:45}. It may be that some of these puthe morpheme ___tive second \isi{perfective} forms are actually reduced forms of the \isi{past} \isi{locative verb} wap ‘be.\textsc{pst}’ (\sectref{sec:10.4}).\footnote{Indeed, it is possible that they have all derived historically from wap ‘be.\textsc{pst}’, which is often pronounced [wɔp]: thus, it may be that first the /w/ was lost; then, when following non-low \isi{vowel}s, the \isi{vowel} [ɔ] was colored to [o], and when following the \isi{low vowel}, it was colored to [a]. There are no attested (double) \isi{perfective} forms with the \isi{vowel}s [e] or [u] (i.e., \textsuperscript{†}[-ep] and \textsuperscript{†}[-up] are not found as \isi{perfective} \isi{suffix}es).} Sentences \REF{ex:verbs:48} and \REF{ex:verbs:49} further exemplify the form [-op], following the \isi{stem}-final \isi{vowel}s /i/ and /u/, respectively.
A: word: nungun-u-p-en	 gloss: break-put-PFV-NMLZ
B: word: ta	 gloss: already
C: word: wopata	 gloss: [place]
D: word: ndï=lï-p-ïp-e	 gloss: 3PL=put-PFV-PFV-DEP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 42:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nï-nji wot yena mï ta ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG-POSS younger woman 3SG.SUBJ already ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`My younger sister has already died.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Sentences \REF{ex:verbs:46} and \REF{ex:verbs:47} also illustrate the fact that the \isi{vowel}s in the second \isi{perfective} \isi{suffix} do not always match the final \isi{vowel} of the \isi{verb stem}. Indeed, there is variability within certain verb forms. For example, there are attested forms such as lï-p-ap ‘put-\textsc{pfv-pfv}’ alongside lï-p-ïp ‘put-\textsc{pfv-pfv}’, as seen in \REF{ex:verbs:45}. It may be that some of these putative second \isi{perfective} forms are actually reduced forms of the \isi{past} \isi{locative verb} wap ‘be.\textsc{pst}’ (\sectref{sec:10.4}).\footnote{Indeed, it is possible that they have all derived historically from wap ‘be.\textsc{pst}’, which is often pronounced [wɔp]: thus, it may be that first the /w/ was lost; then, when following non-low \isi{vowel}s, the \isi{vowel} [ɔ] was colored to [o], and when following the \isi{low vowel}, it was colored to [a]. There are no attested (double) \isi{perfective} forms with the \isi{vowel}s [e] or [u] (i.e., \textsuperscript{†}[-ep] and \textsuperscript{†}[-up] are not found as \isi{perfective} \isi{suffix}es).} Sentences \REF{ex:verbs:48} and \REF{ex:verbs:49} further exemplify the form [-op], following the \isi{stem}-final \isi{vowel}s /i/ and /u/, respectively.
A: word: ni-p-op	 gloss: die-PFV-PFV
B: word: na-top-in-ka	 gloss: DETR-throw-in-let
C: word: ni-p	 gloss: die-PFV
D: word: ni-p-e	 gloss: [die-PFV-DEP]
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 43:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): asi-ka lïmndï ___ ngala luke asi tï na-p ndï=ala uni-e
Gloss (with missing item): sit-let eye ___ PL.PROX too sit take DETR-be 3PL=for shout-IPFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`After [they] had sat and watched them, these people also took seats, cheering them on.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Sentences \REF{ex:verbs:46} and \REF{ex:verbs:47} also illustrate the fact that the \isi{vowel}s in the second \isi{perfective} \isi{suffix} do not always match the final \isi{vowel} of the \isi{verb stem}. Indeed, there is variability within certain verb forms. For example, there are attested forms such as lï-p-ap ‘put-\textsc{pfv-pfv}’ alongside lï-p-ïp ‘put-\textsc{pfv-pfv}’, as seen in \REF{ex:verbs:45}. It may be that some of these putative second \isi{perfective} forms are actually reduced forms of the \isi{past} \isi{locative verb} wap ‘be.\textsc{pst}’ (\sectref{sec:10.4}).\footnote{Indeed, it is possible that they have all derived historically from wap ‘be.\textsc{pst}’, which is often pronounced [wɔp]: thus, it may be that first the /w/ was lost; then, when following non-low \isi{vowel}s, the \isi{vowel} [ɔ] was colored to [o], and when following the \isi{low vowel}, it was colored to [a]. There are no attested (double) \isi{perfective} forms with the \isi{vowel}s [e] or [u] (i.e., \textsuperscript{†}[-ep] and \textsuperscript{†}[-up] are not found as \isi{perfective} \isi{suffix}es).} Sentences \REF{ex:verbs:48} and \REF{ex:verbs:49} further exemplify the form [-op], following the \isi{stem}-final \isi{vowel}s /i/ and /u/, respectively.
A: word: ndï=lï-p-ïp-e	 gloss: 3PL=put-PFV-PFV-DEP
B: word: ma=ala-kamb	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=from-shun
C: word: ndï=lo-p-e	 gloss: 3PL=go-PFV-DEP
D: word: ma=lï-p-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=put{-pfv-dep}
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 44:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ane anda i-n-e anda ___
Gloss (with missing item): sun SG.DIST come-PFV-DEP SG.DIST ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`That [woman] died the day before yesterday.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Sentences \REF{ex:verbs:46} and \REF{ex:verbs:47} also illustrate the fact that the \isi{vowel}s in the second \isi{perfective} \isi{suffix} do not always match the final \isi{vowel} of the \isi{verb stem}. Indeed, there is variability within certain verb forms. For example, there are attested forms such as lï-p-ap ‘put-\textsc{pfv-pfv}’ alongside lï-p-ïp ‘put-\textsc{pfv-pfv}’, as seen in \REF{ex:verbs:45}. It may be that some of these putative second \isi{perfective} forms are actually reduced forms of the \isi{past} \isi{locative verb} wap ‘be.\textsc{pst}’ (\sectref{sec:10.4}).\footnote{Indeed, it is possible that they have all derived historically from wap ‘be.\textsc{pst}’, which is often pronounced [wɔp]: thus, it may be that first the /w/ was lost; then, when following non-low \isi{vowel}s, the \isi{vowel} [ɔ] was colored to [o], and when following the \isi{low vowel}, it was colored to [a]. There are no attested (double) \isi{perfective} forms with the \isi{vowel}s [e] or [u] (i.e., \textsuperscript{†}[-ep] and \textsuperscript{†}[-up] are not found as \isi{perfective} \isi{suffix}es).} Sentences \REF{ex:verbs:48} and \REF{ex:verbs:49} further exemplify the form [-op], following the \isi{stem}-final \isi{vowel}s /i/ and /u/, respectively.
A: word: ni-p	 gloss: die-PFV
B: word: ni-p-op	 gloss: die-PFV-PFV
C: word: ni-p-e	 gloss: [die-PFV-DEP]
D: word: ma=ina-ka-wana	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=liver-at-feel
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 45:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): John maweka i Mongima ul ngala=n ___
Gloss (with missing item): [name] also go.PFV [name] with PL.PROX=OBL ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`John had also gone and planted these with Mongima.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Sentences \REF{ex:verbs:46} and \REF{ex:verbs:47} also illustrate the fact that the \isi{vowel}s in the second \isi{perfective} \isi{suffix} do not always match the final \isi{vowel} of the \isi{verb stem}. Indeed, there is variability within certain verb forms. For example, there are attested forms such as lï-p-ap ‘put-\textsc{pfv-pfv}’ alongside lï-p-ïp ‘put-\textsc{pfv-pfv}’, as seen in \REF{ex:verbs:45}. It may be that some of these putative second \isi{perfective} forms are actually reduced forms of the \isi{past} \isi{locative verb} wap ‘be.\textsc{pst}’ (\sectref{sec:10.4}).\footnote{Indeed, it is possible that they have all derived historically from wap ‘be.\textsc{pst}’, which is often pronounced [wɔp]: thus, it may be that first the /w/ was lost; then, when following non-low \isi{vowel}s, the \isi{vowel} [ɔ] was colored to [o], and when following the \isi{low vowel}, it was colored to [a]. There are no attested (double) \isi{perfective} forms with the \isi{vowel}s [e] or [u] (i.e., \textsuperscript{†}[-ep] and \textsuperscript{†}[-up] are not found as \isi{perfective} \isi{suffix}es).} Sentences \REF{ex:verbs:48} and \REF{ex:verbs:49} further exemplify the form [-op], following the \isi{stem}-final \isi{vowel}s /i/ and /u/, respectively.
A: word: nungun-u-p-op	 gloss: break-put-PFV-PFV
B: word: ma-na	 gloss: go-IRR
C: word: u-p-op	 gloss: put-PFV-PFV
D: word: u-p	 gloss: put-PFV
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 46:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): an ___ inim nga ambi=p
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL.EXCL ___ water SG.PROX big=COP
The English translation of this sentence is:`We were eating them [= fish], but [now] the water is high [again].’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In many instances, as in \REF{ex:verbs:50} and \REF{ex:verbs:51}, it is not clear whether the inclusion of a \isi{double perfective} should be taken to convey any sense different from that of a regular (i.e., single) \isi{perfective} verb form.
A: word: ambla=wana-uni-e	 gloss: PL.REFL=feel-shout{-dep}
B: word: maple	 gloss: [name]
C: word: ndï=ama-p-e	 gloss: 3PL=eat-PFV-DEP
D: word: ndï=ama-p-ap-e	 gloss: 3PL=eat-PFV-PFV-DEP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 47:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): mï maka aw ndï=n ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG.SUBJ thus betel.nut 3PL=OBL ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`He had [?] planted the betel nut there.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In many instances, as in \REF{ex:verbs:50} and \REF{ex:verbs:51}, it is not clear whether the inclusion of a \isi{double perfective} should be taken to convey any sense different from that of a regular (i.e., single) \isi{perfective} verb form.
A: word: ma=wutï-ni-p	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=leg-beat-PFV
B: word: ma=lï-p	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=put-PFV
C: word: ma=u-p-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=put-PFV-DEP
D: word: ma=u-p-op	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=put-PFV{-pfv}
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D