cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 37:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nï ango ___ ama-e
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG NEG ___ eat-IPFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`I’m not eating anything.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \isi{interrogative} form the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___?’ can also be used in \isi{negative}-\isi{polarity} sentences (e.g., with the \isi{negator} ango ‘\textsc{neg}’) to mean something along the lines of ‘its gloss ___ever, its gloss ___soever, anything’, as in examples \REF{ex:pron:46} through \REF{ex:pron:49}.
A: word: ambla=ala	 gloss: PL.REFL=see
B: word: ango	 gloss: NEG
C: word: nji	 gloss: thing
D: word: angos	 gloss: what
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 38:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ nji i-na-ta unan lïmndï ma=andï ande
Gloss (with missing item): ___ thing come-IRR-COND 1PL.INCL eye 3SG=see ok
The English translation of this sentence is:`Whatever may come, we would see it [and say:] “OK”.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When combined with nji ‘thing’, the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___?’ can convey the sense ‘its gloss ___ever’ in \isi{positive}-\isi{polarity} sentences \REF{ex:pron:50}.
A: word: ndï-ngusuwata	 gloss: 3PL-poor
B: word: ango	 gloss: NEG
C: word: nji	 gloss: thing
D: word: angos	 gloss: what
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 39:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): angos ___ i-na-ta unan lïmndï ma=andï ande
Gloss (with missing item): what ___ come-IRR-COND 1PL.INCL eye 3SG=see ok
The English translation of this sentence is:`Whatever may come, we would see it [and say:] “OK”.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When combined with the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’, angos ‘what?’ can convey the sense ‘whatever’ in \isi{positive}-\isi{polarity} sentences \REF{ex:pron:50}.
A: word: angos	 gloss: what
B: word: ndï-ngusuwata	 gloss: 3PL-poor
C: word: nji	 gloss: thing
D: word: ma-nji	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ-POSS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 40:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ (mï) lamndu ndï=asa-p
Gloss (with missing item): ___ (3SG.SUBJ) pig 3PL=hit-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`Who killed the pigs?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The forms of the \isi{indefinite pronoun}s the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___, someits gloss ___’ and kuma ‘some’ (\sectref{sec:6.4}) are the same as the forms used in asking \isi{content question}s in Ulwa. The \isi{pronoun} the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___, someits gloss ___’ thus also means ‘who?’ (for a \isi{singular} human referent), as illustrated by example \REF{ex:pron:51}.
A: word: kwa	 gloss: one
B: word: kwa-nji	 gloss: one{-poss}
C: word: nji	 gloss: thing
D: word: kekaka	 gloss: one.each
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 41:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ (min) lamndu ndï=asa-p
Gloss (with missing item): ___ (3DU) pig 3PL=hit-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`Who [= which (two) people] killed the pigs?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: multiple human referents, as in \REF{ex:pron:52} and \REF{ex:pron:53}.
A: word: ambï=ul	 gloss: SG.REFL=with
B: word: moweka	 gloss: also
C: word: kuma	 gloss: some
D: word: kuma=tï	 gloss: some=take
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 42:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ (ndï) lamndu ndï=asa-p
Gloss (with missing item): ___ (3DU) pig 3PL=hit-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`Who [= which (three or more) people] killed the pigs?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: multiple human referents, as in \REF{ex:pron:52} and \REF{ex:pron:53}.
A: word: kuma	 gloss: some
B: word: kuma=tï	 gloss: some=take
C: word: kuma-nji	 gloss: some{-poss}
D: word: moweka	 gloss: also
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 43:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ (mï) lamndu ndï=asa-p
Gloss (with missing item): ___ (3SG.SUBJ) pig 3PL=hit-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`What killed the pigs?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: For non-human referents, the \isi{question word} the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___?’ is used, as in \REF{ex:pron:54}, \REF{ex:pron:55}, and \REF{ex:pron:56}. For all \isi{interrogative} pronouns, \isi{subject marker}s are optional (as are \isi{object marker}s).
A: word: ambla=wali-nda	 gloss: PL.REFL=hit-IRR
B: word: angos	 gloss: what
C: word: ango	 gloss: NEG
D: word: nji	 gloss: thing
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 44:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ (min) lamndu ndï=asa-p
Gloss (with missing item): ___ (3DU) pig 3PL=hit-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`What [= which (two) things] killed the pigs?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: For non-human referents, the \isi{question word} the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___?’ is used, as in \REF{ex:pron:54}, \REF{ex:pron:55}, and \REF{ex:pron:56}. For all \isi{interrogative} pronouns, \isi{subject marker}s are optional (as are \isi{object marker}s).
A: word: kuma-nji	 gloss: some{-poss}
B: word: nji	 gloss: thing
C: word: ango	 gloss: NEG
D: word: angos	 gloss: what
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 45:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ (ndï) lamndu ndï=asa-p
Gloss (with missing item): ___ (3PL) pig 3PL=hit-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`What [= which (three or more) things] killed the pigs?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: For non-human referents, the \isi{question word} the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___?’ is used, as in \REF{ex:pron:54}, \REF{ex:pron:55}, and \REF{ex:pron:56}. For all \isi{interrogative} pronouns, \isi{subject marker}s are optional (as are \isi{object marker}s).
A: word: nï-awa	 gloss: 1SG-INT
B: word: ango	 gloss: NEG
C: word: nji	 gloss: thing
D: word: angos	 gloss: what
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 46:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): u lïmndï ___ ma=ala
Gloss (with missing item): 2SG eye ___ 3SG.OBJ=see
The English translation of this sentence is:`Whom did you see?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In \isi{content question}s (i.e., wh- questions), the wh- word remains \isi{in situ}; it is not preposed to the front of the clause as in \ili{English}. Accordingly, when the ‘who’ or ‘what’ being asked about is not the grammatical subject, but rather the object of a verb, then the \isi{interrogative} \isi{pronoun} occurs in the typical object position (i.e., immediately before the verb), as in examples \REF{ex:pron:57} through \REF{ex:pron:60}.
A: word: kwa-nji	 gloss: one{-poss}
B: word: ambï=wali-nda	 gloss: SG.REFL=hit-IRR
C: word: kekaka	 gloss: one.each
D: word: kwa	 gloss: one
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 47:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nungol mï ___ min=angla-lo-p
Gloss (with missing item): child 3SG.SUBJ ___ 3DU=await-go-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`What [= which two things] did the boy look for?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In \isi{content question}s (i.e., wh- questions), the wh- word remains \isi{in situ}; it is not preposed to the front of the clause as in \ili{English}. Accordingly, when the ‘who’ or ‘its gloss ___’ being asked about is not the grammatical subject, but rather the object of a verb, then the \isi{interrogative} \isi{pronoun} occurs in the typical object position (i.e., immediately before the verb), as in examples \REF{ex:pron:57} through \REF{ex:pron:60}.
A: word: nji	 gloss: thing
B: word: ango	 gloss: NEG
C: word: angos	 gloss: what
D: word: ambla=wali-nda	 gloss: PL.REFL=hit-IRR
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 48:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ tïn (mï) mïnda ma=ama-p
Gloss (with missing item): ___ dog (3SG.SUBJ) banana 3SG.OBJ=eat-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`Which dog ate the banana?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When preceding an NP, the \isi{interrogative word} the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___?’ (compare the morpheme ___s ‘what?’) conveys the sense ‘its gloss ___ [NP]?’. There is no distinction made based on \isi{animacy} or \isi{number} or \isi{grammatical relation} (i.e., whether the questioned element is a subject or an object). Significantly, whereas modifiers of NPs such as \isi{adjective}s or \isi{determiner}s follow their associated NPs (\sectref{sec:9.1}), the modifying element the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___?’ precedes its NP. This could serve the functional means of differentiating between ‘its gloss ___ [NP]?’ and ‘[NP] \textsc{neg}’.\footnote{Cf. \textbf{the morpheme ___ tïn} mamap ‘its gloss ___ dog ate it?’ vs. \textbf{tïn the morpheme ___} mamap ‘the dog did not eat it’.} Sentences \REF{ex:pron:61} through \REF{ex:pron:64} illustrate the use of the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___?’.
A: word: i-ap	 gloss: go.PFV-PFV
B: word: angos	 gloss: what
C: word: ango	 gloss: which
D: word: kwa-nji	 gloss: one{-poss}
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 49:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ango ___ (mï) mïnda ma=ama-p
Gloss (with missing item): which ___ (3SG.SUBJ) banana 3SG.OBJ=eat-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`Which dog ate the banana?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When preceding an NP, the \isi{interrogative word} ango ‘which?’ (compare angos ‘what?’) conveys the sense ‘which [NP]?’. There is no distinction made based on \isi{animacy} or \isi{number} or \isi{grammatical relation} (i.e., whether the questioned element is a subject or an object). Significantly, whereas modifiers of NPs such as \isi{adjective}s or \isi{determiner}s follow their associated NPs (\sectref{sec:9.1}), the modifying element ango ‘which?’ precedes its NP. This could serve the functional means of differentiating between ‘which [NP]?’ and ‘[NP] \textsc{neg}’.\footnote{Cf. \textbf{ango the morpheme ___} mamap ‘which its gloss ___ ate it?’ vs. \textbf{the morpheme ___ ango} mamap ‘the its gloss ___ did not eat it’.} Sentences \REF{ex:pron:61} through \REF{ex:pron:64} illustrate the use of ango ‘which?’.
A: word: tïn	 gloss: dog
B: word: yetani	 gloss: Yamen
C: word: tïngïn=p-e	 gloss: many=COP-DEP
D: word: ndï-nji	 gloss: 3PL-POSS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 50:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): u ___ apa ndï=ita-p
Gloss (with missing item): 2SG ___ house 3PL=build-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`Which houses did you build?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When preceding an NP, the \isi{interrogative word} the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___?’ (compare the morpheme ___s ‘what?’) conveys the sense ‘its gloss ___ [NP]?’. There is no distinction made based on \isi{animacy} or \isi{number} or \isi{grammatical relation} (i.e., whether the questioned element is a subject or an object). Significantly, whereas modifiers of NPs such as \isi{adjective}s or \isi{determiner}s follow their associated NPs (\sectref{sec:9.1}), the modifying element the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___?’ precedes its NP. This could serve the functional means of differentiating between ‘its gloss ___ [NP]?’ and ‘[NP] \textsc{neg}’.\footnote{Cf. \textbf{the morpheme ___ tïn} mamap ‘its gloss ___ dog ate it?’ vs. \textbf{tïn the morpheme ___} mamap ‘the dog did not eat it’.} Sentences \REF{ex:pron:61} through \REF{ex:pron:64} illustrate the use of the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___?’.
A: word: angos	 gloss: what
B: word: ambin-nji	 gloss: DU.REFL-POSS
C: word: ticha	 gloss: teacher
D: word: ango	 gloss: which
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 51:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ nungol (mï) nï-nji yot tï-n
Gloss (with missing item): ___ child (3SG.SUBJ) 1SG-POSS machete take-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`Whose child took my machete?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \isi{interrogative} \isi{pronoun} ‘whose?’ takes the form kwanji ‘whose [\textsc{sg]}’ for \isi{singular} \isi{possessor}s and kumanji ‘whose [\textsc{nsg]}’ for \isi{dual} or \isi{plural} \isi{possessor}s (no distinction is made here between the two), as may be seen in examples \REF{ex:pron:65}, \REF{ex:pron:66}, and \REF{ex:pron:67}. These forms are transparently derived from the words kwa ‘one’ or kuma ‘some’ plus nji ‘thing’ (cf. \isi{possessive pronoun}s, \sectref{sec:6.2}).
A: word: kali	 gloss: send
B: word: u-nji	 gloss: 2SG-POSS
C: word: kwa-nji	 gloss: one-POSS
D: word: ma-nji	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ-POSS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 52:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): anda ___ mana
Gloss (with missing item): SG.DIST ___ spear
The English translation of this sentence is:`Whose spear is that?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \isi{interrogative} \isi{pronoun} ‘whose?’ takes the form kwanji ‘whose [\textsc{sg]}’ for \isi{singular} \isi{possessor}s and kumanji ‘whose [\textsc{nsg]}’ for \isi{dual} or \isi{plural} \isi{possessor}s (no distinction is made here between the two), as may be seen in examples \REF{ex:pron:65}, \REF{ex:pron:66}, and \REF{ex:pron:67}. These forms are transparently derived from the words kwa ‘one’ or kuma ‘some’ plus nji ‘thing’ (cf. \isi{possessive pronoun}s, \sectref{sec:6.2}).
A: word: kuma-nji	 gloss: some{-poss}
B: word: kwa-nji	 gloss: one{-poss}
C: word: awa	 gloss: INT
D: word: ma-nji	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ-POSS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 53:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): u ___ apa ma=ita-p
Gloss (with missing item): 2SG ___ house 3SG.OBJ=build-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`Whose [plural] house did you build?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \isi{interrogative} \isi{pronoun} ‘whose?’ takes the form kwanji ‘whose [\textsc{sg]}’ for \isi{singular} \isi{possessor}s and kumanji ‘whose [\textsc{nsg]}’ for \isi{dual} or \isi{plural} \isi{possessor}s (no distinction is made here between the two), as may be seen in examples \REF{ex:pron:65}, \REF{ex:pron:66}, and \REF{ex:pron:67}. These forms are transparently derived from the words kwa ‘one’ or kuma ‘some’ plus nji ‘thing’ (cf. \isi{possessive pronoun}s, \sectref{sec:6.2}).
A: word: ndï=ala	 gloss: 3PL=for
B: word: kwa-nji	 gloss: one{-poss}
C: word: ma-nji	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ-POSS
D: word: kuma-nji	 gloss: some{-poss}
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 54:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ lamndu ma=asa-p
Gloss (with missing item): ___ pig 3SG.OBJ=hit-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`I myself killed the pig.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Sentences \REF{ex:pron:68}, \REF{ex:pron:70}, and \REF{ex:pron:71} illustrate the use of basic \isi{intensive pronoun}s to place emphasis on a subject.
A: word: ndï-awa	 gloss: 3PL-INT
B: word: nï-awa	 gloss: 1SG-INT
C: word: ango	 gloss: NEG
D: word: u-awa	 gloss: 2SG-INT
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 55:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Kayta ___ lamndu ma=asa-p
Gloss (with missing item): [name] ___ pig 3SG.OBJ=hit-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`Kayta himself killed the pig.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Sentences \REF{ex:pron:68}, \REF{ex:pron:70}, and \REF{ex:pron:71} illustrate the use of basic \isi{intensive pronoun}s to place emphasis on a subject.
A: word: ma-we	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ-PART.INT
B: word: ma-awa	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ-INT
C: word: anda-awa	 gloss: SG.DIST-INT
D: word: ambin=kalam=p	 gloss: DU.REFL=knowledge=COP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B