cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 87:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): wongïta ma=n ma=atï-na ___
Gloss (with missing item): bow 3SG.OBJ=OBL 3SG.OBJ=take-IRR ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`[I] went to hit it with [my] bow.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Whereas only ma- ‘go’ seems to be permitted in \isi{periphrastic} \isi{future} constructions, it is possible for other \isi{motion} verbs to indicate \isi{purpose} as well, such as the verb lo- ‘cut, go’ and in- ‘come’, as seen in \REF{ex:pred:63} and \REF{ex:pred:64}.\footnote{It should be noted, however, that the exact \isi{syntactic} nature of these \isi{purpose} constructions is not entirely clear. It seems that only \isi{motion} verbs permit this \isi{embedded clause} structure to express \isi{purpose}. Elsewhere, the clause indicating \isi{purpose} simply follows the clause detailing the action performed for that \isi{purpose} (see \sectref{sec:4.6}).}
A: word: ulwa=p	 gloss: nothing=COP
B: word: i-e	 gloss: go.PFV-DEP
C: word: nga=lo-p-e	 gloss: SG.PROX=cut-PFV-DEP
D: word: lo-p-e	 gloss: go-PFV-DEP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 88:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ndï=tï ___ ndï=nap i-n-e
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL=take ___ 3PL=for come-PFV-DEP
The English translation of this sentence is:`[They] came for their sake to give them [= fish] to them [= their people].’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Whereas only ma- ‘go’ seems to be permitted in \isi{periphrastic} \isi{future} constructions, it is possible for other \isi{motion} verbs to indicate \isi{purpose} as well, such as the verb lo- ‘cut, go’ and in- ‘come’, as seen in \REF{ex:pred:63} and \REF{ex:pred:64}.\footnote{It should be noted, however, that the exact \isi{syntactic} nature of these \isi{purpose} constructions is not entirely clear. It seems that only \isi{motion} verbs permit this \isi{embedded clause} structure to express \isi{purpose}. Elsewhere, the clause indicating \isi{purpose} simply follows the clause detailing the action performed for that \isi{purpose} (see \sectref{sec:4.6}).}
A: word: lo-p-e	 gloss: go-PFV-DEP
B: word: ndï=na-nda	 gloss: 3PL=give-IRR
C: word: ndï=kï-na	 gloss: 3PL=say-IRR
D: word: ndï=na-n-e	 gloss: 3PL=give-PFV-DEP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 89:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ndï=tï ndï=na-nda ndï=nap ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL=take 3PL=give-IRR 3PL=for ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`[They] came for their sake to give them [= fish] to them [= their people].’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Whereas only ma- ‘go’ seems to be permitted in \isi{periphrastic} \isi{future} constructions, it is possible for other \isi{motion} verbs to indicate \isi{purpose} as well, such as the verb lo- ‘cut, go’ and in- ‘come’, as seen in \REF{ex:pred:63} and \REF{ex:pred:64}.\footnote{It should be noted, however, that the exact \isi{syntactic} nature of these \isi{purpose} constructions is not entirely clear. It seems that only \isi{motion} verbs permit this \isi{embedded clause} structure to express \isi{purpose}. Elsewhere, the clause indicating \isi{purpose} simply follows the clause detailing the action performed for that \isi{purpose} (see \sectref{sec:4.6}).}
A: word: i-n-e	 gloss: come-PFV-DEP
B: word: mbï-i-e	 gloss: here-go.PFV-DEP
C: word: ma-n-e	 gloss: go-IPFV-DEP
D: word: nga=wat	 gloss: SG.PROX=atop
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A