cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 71:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): apwanam i-ta wa ma=p-na ___
Gloss (with missing item): side.of.house go.PFV-COND just 3SG.OBJ=be-IRR ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`If [you] go to the side of the house, [you] are just going to stay there.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Examples such as \REF{ex:pred:55} and \REF{ex:pred:56}, in which the main verb is the static \isi{locative verb} p- ‘be’, illustrate the purely \isi{temporal} or \isi{modal} use of this verb ma- ‘go’ -- that is, a use without any sense of \isi{motion}. While the \isi{imperfective} form of ma- ‘go’ is most often used in these constructions, it is alternatively possible to use an \isi{irrealis} (or even \isi{conditional}) form of the verb, as shown by \REF{ex:pred:57} and \REF{ex:pred:58}.
A: word: na-ma-n-e	 gloss: DETR-go-IPFV-DEP
B: word: ma-n-e	 gloss: go-IPFV-DEP
C: word: wapata=p-ta	 gloss: dry=COP-COND
D: word: ma-n-en	 gloss: go-IPFV-NMLZ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 72:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): u angos ___ ma-na
Gloss (with missing item): 2SG what ___ go-IRR
The English translation of this sentence is:`What could you be going to get?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Examples such as \REF{ex:pred:55} and \REF{ex:pred:56}, in which the main verb is the static \isi{locative verb} p- ‘be’, illustrate the purely \isi{temporal} or \isi{modal} use of this verb ma- ‘go’ -- that is, a use without any sense of \isi{motion}. While the \isi{imperfective} form of ma- ‘go’ is most often used in these constructions, it is alternatively possible to use an \isi{irrealis} (or even \isi{conditional}) form of the verb, as shown by \REF{ex:pred:57} and \REF{ex:pred:58}.
A: word: tï-na	 gloss: take-IRR
B: word: ma=atï-na	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=hit-IRR
C: word: la-ka-na	 gloss: IRR-let-IRR
D: word: nga=p-ta	 gloss: SG.PROX=be{-cond}
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 73:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): u angos tï-na ___
Gloss (with missing item): 2SG what take-IRR ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`What could you be going to get?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Examples such as \REF{ex:pred:55} and \REF{ex:pred:56}, in which the main verb is the static \isi{locative verb} p- ‘be’, illustrate the purely \isi{temporal} or \isi{modal} use of this verb ma- ‘go’ -- that is, a use without any sense of \isi{motion}. While the \isi{imperfective} form of ma- ‘go’ is most often used in these constructions, it is alternatively possible to use an \isi{irrealis} (or even \isi{conditional}) form of the verb, as shown by \REF{ex:pred:57} and \REF{ex:pred:58}.
A: word: ma-na-ta	 gloss: go-IRR-COND
B: word: yata	 gloss: man
C: word: ma-na	 gloss: go-IRR
D: word: damnda	 gloss: [name]
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 74:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): unan tïmbïl ma=in ___ ma-na-ta
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL.INCL fence 3SG.OBJ=in ___ go-IRR-COND
The English translation of this sentence is:`If we are going to be within the fence …’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Examples such as \REF{ex:pred:55} and \REF{ex:pred:56}, in which the main verb is the static \isi{locative verb} p- ‘be’, illustrate the purely \isi{temporal} or \isi{modal} use of this verb ma- ‘go’ -- that is, a use without any sense of \isi{motion}. While the \isi{imperfective} form of ma- ‘go’ is most often used in these constructions, it is alternatively possible to use an \isi{irrealis} (or even \isi{conditional}) form of the verb, as shown by \REF{ex:pred:57} and \REF{ex:pred:58}.
A: word: p-ta	 gloss: be{-cond}
B: word: nga=p-ta	 gloss: SG.PROX=be{-cond}
C: word: mbï-p-ta	 gloss: here-be{-cond}
D: word: apka	 gloss: very
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 75:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): unan tïmbïl ma=in p-ta ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL.INCL fence 3SG.OBJ=in be{-cond} ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`If we are going to be within the fence …’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Examples such as \REF{ex:pred:55} and \REF{ex:pred:56}, in which the main verb is the static \isi{locative verb} p- ‘be’, illustrate the purely \isi{temporal} or \isi{modal} use of this verb ma- ‘go’ -- that is, a use without any sense of \isi{motion}. While the \isi{imperfective} form of ma- ‘go’ is most often used in these constructions, it is alternatively possible to use an \isi{irrealis} (or even \isi{conditional}) form of the verb, as shown by \REF{ex:pred:57} and \REF{ex:pred:58}.
A: word: wutota	 gloss: tall
B: word: ma-na	 gloss: go-IRR
C: word: ma-na-ta	 gloss: go-IRR-COND
D: word: ma-na-t	 gloss: go-IRR-SPEC
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 76:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ala ___ i
Gloss (with missing item): PL.DIST ___ go.PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`Those people have come to fight us.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: While it is theoretically possible that \isi{perfective} forms of the verb may be used in such constructions as well (i.e., the \isi{suppletive} form i ‘go.\textsc{pfv’}), I do not have clear examples of this. Some apparent examples of \isi{periphrastic} \isi{future} constructions with i ‘go.\textsc{pfv}’ are in fact constructions with \isi{purpose clause}s, which also contain \isi{irrealis} verb forms. For example, sentences \REF{ex:pred:59} and \REF{ex:pred:60} are not analyzed as \isi{periphrastic} \isi{future} constructions, but rather as \isi{purpose} constructions.
A: word: unan=wali-nda	 gloss: 1PL.INCL=hit-IRR
B: word: ambla=wali-nda	 gloss: PL.REFL=hit-IRR
C: word: ala-nji	 gloss: PL.DIST{-poss}
D: word: unan=asa	 gloss: 1PL.INCL=hit
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 77:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ala unan=wali-nda ___
Gloss (with missing item): PL.DIST 1PL.INCL=hit-IRR ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`Those people have come to fight us.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Whthe morpheme ___le the morpheme ___t the morpheme ___s theoretthe morpheme ___cally possthe morpheme ___ble that \the morpheme ___sthe morpheme ___{perfectthe morpheme ___ve} forms of the verb may be used the morpheme ___n such constructthe morpheme ___ons as well (the morpheme ___.e., the \the morpheme ___sthe morpheme ___{suppletthe morpheme ___ve} form the morpheme ___ ‘go.\textsc{pfv’}), I do not have clear examples of ththe morpheme ___s. Some apparent examples of \the morpheme ___sthe morpheme ___{perthe morpheme ___phrastthe morpheme ___c} \the morpheme ___sthe morpheme ___{future} constructthe morpheme ___ons wthe morpheme ___th the morpheme ___ ‘go.\textsc{pfv}’ are the morpheme ___n fact constructthe morpheme ___ons wthe morpheme ___th \the morpheme ___sthe morpheme ___{purpose clause}s, whthe morpheme ___ch also contathe morpheme ___n \the morpheme ___sthe morpheme ___{the morpheme ___rrealthe morpheme ___s} verb forms. For example, sentences \REF{ex:pred:59} and \REF{ex:pred:60} are not analyzed as \the morpheme ___sthe morpheme ___{perthe morpheme ___phrastthe morpheme ___c} \the morpheme ___sthe morpheme ___{future} constructthe morpheme ___ons, but rather as \the morpheme ___sthe morpheme ___{purpose} constructthe morpheme ___ons.
A: word: an-asa-e	 gloss: 1PL.EXCL-hit-IPFV
B: word: i	 gloss: go.PFV
C: word: unan=wali-nda	 gloss: 1PL.INCL=hit-IRR
D: word: itom	 gloss: father
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 78:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): min tïlwa=nï wandam ___ i-e
Gloss (with missing item): 3DU road=OBL jungle ___ go.PFV-DEP
The English translation of this sentence is:`The two went to split the jungle from the path.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: While it is theoretically possible that \isi{perfective} forms of the verb may be used in such constructions as well (i.e., the \isi{suppletive} form i ‘go.\textsc{pfv’}), I do not have clear examples of this. Some apparent examples of \isi{periphrastic} \isi{future} constructions with i ‘go.\textsc{pfv}’ are in fact constructions with \isi{purpose clause}s, which also contain \isi{irrealis} verb forms. For example, sentences \REF{ex:pred:59} and \REF{ex:pred:60} are not analyzed as \isi{periphrastic} \isi{future} constructions, but rather as \isi{purpose} constructions.
A: word: won-la-ka-na	 gloss: cut-IRR-let-IRR
B: word: ndï=la-nda	 gloss: 3PL=eat{-irr}
C: word: kol-nda	 gloss: split-IRR
D: word: unan=wali-nda	 gloss: 1PL.INCL=hit-IRR
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 79:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): min tïlwa=nï wandam kol-nda ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3DU road=OBL jungle split-IRR ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`The two went to split the jungle from the path.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: While it is theoretically possible that \isi{perfective} forms of the verb may be used in such constructions as well (i.e., the \isi{suppletive} form i ‘go.\textsc{pfv’}), I do not have clear examples of this. Some apparent examples of \isi{periphrastic} \isi{future} constructions with i ‘go.\textsc{pfv}’ are in fact constructions with \isi{purpose clause}s, which also contain \isi{irrealis} verb forms. For example, sentences \REF{ex:pred:59} and \REF{ex:pred:60} are not analyzed as \isi{periphrastic} \isi{future} constructions, but rather as \isi{purpose} constructions.
A: word: i-e	 gloss: go.PFV-DEP
B: word: ndï=wali-e	 gloss: 3PL=hit-IPFV
C: word: lo-p-e	 gloss: go-PFV-DEP
D: word: p-na	 gloss: be-IRR
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 80:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ndï apïn=n anul ___ ma-n-e mï ipka i
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL fire=OBL grassland ___ go-IPFV-DEP 3SG.SUBJ before go.PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`They were going to burn the grassland, but he went ahead [of them].’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Indeed, it is often difficult to determine whether a ‘going’ verb is marking futurity or \isi{purpose}. This is perhaps unsurprising, if one assumes the likely historical change of: verb of \isi{motion} > \isi{purpose} > \isi{future}. In examples \REF{ex:pred:61} and \REF{ex:pred:62}, the \ili{English} translations capture the ambiguity well. In \REF{ex:pred:61}, a reading in which the ‘going’ verb marks futurity would suggest that the first clause is \isi{counterfactual}.
A: word: la-nda	 gloss: eat-IRR
B: word: ndï=la-nda	 gloss: 3PL=eat{-irr}
C: word: wopata	 gloss: [place]
D: word: na-la-nda	 gloss: DETR-eat-IRR
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 81:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ndï apïn=n anul la-nda ___ mï ipka i
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL fire=OBL grassland eat-IRR ___ 3SG.SUBJ before go.PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`They were going to burn the grassland, but he went ahead [of them].’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Indeed, it is often difficult to determine whether a ‘going’ verb is marking futurity or \isi{purpose}. This is perhaps unsurprising, if one assumes the likely historical change of: verb of \isi{motion} > \isi{purpose} > \isi{future}. In examples \REF{ex:pred:61} and \REF{ex:pred:62}, the \ili{English} translations capture the ambiguity well. In \REF{ex:pred:61}, a reading in which the ‘going’ verb marks futurity would suggest that the first clause is \isi{counterfactual}.
A: word: p-e	 gloss: be{-dep}
B: word: na-ma-n-e	 gloss: DETR-go-IPFV-DEP
C: word: ma-n-e	 gloss: go-IPFV-DEP
D: word: ma-n-en	 gloss: go-IPFV-NMLZ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 82:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Magendo ala=ul ___ ma-n-e
Gloss (with missing item): [place] PL.DIST=with ___ go-IPFV-DEP
The English translation of this sentence is:`[They] were going to fight with the people from Magendo [village].’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Indeed, it is often difficult to determine whether a ‘going’ verb is marking futurity or \isi{purpose}. This is perhaps unsurprising, if one assumes the likely historical change of: verb of \isi{motion} > \isi{purpose} > \isi{future}. In examples \REF{ex:pred:61} and \REF{ex:pred:62}, the \ili{English} translations capture the ambiguity well. In \REF{ex:pred:61}, a reading in which the ‘going’ verb marks futurity would suggest that the first clause is \isi{counterfactual}.
A: word: ambla=wali-n	 gloss: PL.REFL=hit-IMP
B: word: ni-p	 gloss: die-PFV
C: word: kana	 gloss: beside
D: word: ambla=wali-nda	 gloss: PL.REFL=hit-IRR
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 83:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Magendo ala=ul ambla=wali-nda ___
Gloss (with missing item): [place] PL.DIST=with PL.REFL=hit-IRR ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`[They] were going to fight with the people from Magendo [village].’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Indeed, it is often difficult to determine whether a ‘going’ verb is marking futurity or \isi{purpose}. This is perhaps unsurprising, if one assumes the likely historical change of: verb of \isi{motion} > \isi{purpose} > \isi{future}. In examples \REF{ex:pred:61} and \REF{ex:pred:62}, the \ili{English} translations capture the ambiguity well. In \REF{ex:pred:61}, a reading in which the ‘going’ verb marks futurity would suggest that the first clause is \isi{counterfactual}.
A: word: ma-n-en	 gloss: go-IPFV-NMLZ
B: word: ma-n-e	 gloss: go-IPFV-DEP
C: word: ulwa=p	 gloss: nothing=COP
D: word: na-ma-n-e	 gloss: DETR-go-IPFV-DEP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 84:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ndï apïn=n anul ___ ma-n-e mï ipka i
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL fire=OBL grassland ___ go-IPFV-DEP 3SG.SUBJ before go.PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`They were going to burn the grassland, but he went ahead [of them].’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Indeed, it is often difficult to determine whether a ‘going’ verb is marking futurity or \isi{purpose}. This is perhaps unsurprising, if one assumes the likely historical change of: verb of \isi{motion} > \isi{purpose} > \isi{future}. In examples \REF{ex:pred:61} and \REF{ex:pred:62}, the \ili{English} translations capture the ambiguity well. In \REF{ex:pred:61}, a reading in which the ‘going’ verb marks futurity would suggest that the first clause is \isi{counterfactual}.
A: word: na-la-nda	 gloss: DETR-eat-IRR
B: word: anda=p-e	 gloss: SG.DIST=be{-dep}
C: word: la-nda	 gloss: eat-IRR
D: word: ndï=la-nda	 gloss: 3PL=eat{-irr}
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 85:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ndï apïn=n anul la-nda ___ mï ipka i
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL fire=OBL grassland eat-IRR ___ 3SG.SUBJ before go.PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`They were going to burn the grassland, but he went ahead [of them].’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Indeed, it is often difficult to determine whether a ‘going’ verb is marking futurity or \isi{purpose}. This is perhaps unsurprising, if one assumes the likely historical change of: verb of \isi{motion} > \isi{purpose} > \isi{future}. In examples \REF{ex:pred:61} and \REF{ex:pred:62}, the \ili{English} translations capture the ambiguity well. In \REF{ex:pred:61}, a reading in which the ‘going’ verb marks futurity would suggest that the first clause is \isi{counterfactual}.
A: word: na-ma-n-e	 gloss: DETR-go-IPFV-DEP
B: word: kana	 gloss: beside
C: word: ma-n-en	 gloss: go-IPFV-NMLZ
D: word: ma-n-e	 gloss: go-IPFV-DEP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 86:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): wongïta ma=n ___ lo-p-e
Gloss (with missing item): bow 3SG.OBJ=OBL ___ go-PFV-DEP
The English translation of this sentence is:`[I] went to hit it with [my] bow.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Whereas only ma- ‘go’ seems to be permitted in \isi{periphrastic} \isi{future} constructions, it is possible for other \isi{motion} verbs to indicate \isi{purpose} as well, such as the verb lo- ‘cut, go’ and in- ‘come’, as seen in \REF{ex:pred:63} and \REF{ex:pred:64}.\footnote{It should be noted, however, that the exact \isi{syntactic} nature of these \isi{purpose} constructions is not entirely clear. It seems that only \isi{motion} verbs permit this \isi{embedded clause} structure to express \isi{purpose}. Elsewhere, the clause indicating \isi{purpose} simply follows the clause detailing the action performed for that \isi{purpose} (see \sectref{sec:4.6}).}
A: word: ma=na-nda	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=give-IRR
B: word: u=atï-na	 gloss: 2SG=hit-IRR
C: word: ma=atï-na	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=take-IRR
D: word: kana	 gloss: beside
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C