cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 93:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): wot ___
Gloss (with missing item): younger ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`[They] sent the younger brother.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: These ‘put’ verbs may combine with other elements in \isi{separable verb} constructions. When they do so, the first element resembles verbs in one crucial way: it permits an \isi{object marker}. For example, the (unseparated) verb kalilï- ‘send’ takes as its object that which is sent (i.e., a \isi{theme} argument) \REF{ex:phrase:77}; however, as a \isi{discontinuous} verb, the first element kali ‘send’ takes this \isi{theme} argument as its object, whereas the second element lï- ‘put’ takes as its object the place to which someone or something is sent (i.e., a \isi{goal} argument) \REF{ex:phrase:78}.
A: word: ma=kali-lï-p-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=send-put-PFV-DEP
B: word: kali-lï-ta	 gloss: send-put{-cond}
C: word: ndï=tumul-ka	 gloss: 3PL=bend-let
D: word: ma=u-p-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=put-PFV-DEP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 94:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ Nanïmwat ma=lï-p
Gloss (with missing item): ___ [place] 3SG.OBJ=put-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`[They] sent him to Nanïmwat [village].’\footnote{This example illustrates yet another peculiarity of the verb lï- ‘put’: the common \isi{elision} of its only \isi{vowel} (\sectref{sec:2.5.9}).} [ulwa002_03:34]’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: These ‘put’ verbs may combine with other elements in \isi{separable verb} constructions. When they do so, the first element resembles verbs in one crucial way: it permits an \isi{object marker}. For example, the (unseparated) verb kalilï- ‘send’ takes as its object that which is sent (i.e., a \isi{theme} argument) \REF{ex:phrase:77}; however, as a \isi{discontinuous} verb, the first element kali ‘send’ takes this \isi{theme} argument as its object, whereas the second element lï- ‘put’ takes as its object the place to which someone or something is sent (i.e., a \isi{goal} argument) \REF{ex:phrase:78}.
A: word: ma=u	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=from
B: word: ma=kali	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=send
C: word: ma=wat	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=atop
D: word: ma=kali-lï-p-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=send-put-PFV-DEP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 95:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ma=kali Nanïmwat ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG.OBJ=send [place] ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`[They] sent him to Nanïmwat [village].’\footnote{This example illustrates yet another peculiarity of the verb lï- ‘put’: the common \isi{elision} of its only \isi{vowel} (\sectref{sec:2.5.9}).} [ulwa002_03:34]’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: These ‘put’ verbs may combine with other elements in \isi{separable verb} constructions. When they do so, the first element resembles verbs in one crucial way: it permits an \isi{object marker}. For example, the (unseparated) verb kalilï- ‘send’ takes as its object that which is sent (i.e., a \isi{theme} argument) \REF{ex:phrase:77}; however, as a \isi{discontinuous} verb, the first element kali ‘send’ takes this \isi{theme} argument as its object, whereas the second element lï- ‘put’ takes as its object the place to which someone or something is sent (i.e., a \isi{goal} argument) \REF{ex:phrase:78}.
A: word: ma=wana	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=feel
B: word: ma=lï-p	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=put-PFV
C: word: ma=in-lï-p	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=in-put-PFV
D: word: ma=lï-p-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=put{-pfv-dep}
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 96:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kuma ___
Gloss (with missing item): some ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`Some gathered.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Similarly, the form kuk ‘gather’ may take an \isi{object marker} when appearing with a separable ‘put’ verb. This form mostly appears with the verb u- ‘put’, but may alternatively appear with a blended version containing the element /l/. Examples \REF{ex:phrase:79} and \REF{ex:phrase:80} show an \isi{intransitive} use of the verb.\footnote{According to some terminology, this usage may be considered “\isi{middle voice}”.} Example \REF{ex:phrase:79} lacks the \isi{detransitivizing} marker na- ‘\textsc{detr}’, whereas \REF{ex:phrase:80} includes it (\sectref{sec:13.8.2}).
A: word: ndï=tumul-ka	 gloss: 3PL=bend-let
B: word: ata-lï-p	 gloss: up-put-PFV
C: word: na-kuk-u-nda	 gloss: DETR-gather-put-IRR
D: word: kuk-u-p	 gloss: gather-put-PFV
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 97:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): an ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL.EXCL ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`We would gather.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Similarly, the form kuk ‘gather’ may take an \isi{object marker} when appearing with a separable ‘put’ verb. This form mostly appears with the verb u- ‘put’, but may alternatively appear with a blended version containing the element /l/. Examples \REF{ex:phrase:79} and \REF{ex:phrase:80} show an \isi{intransitive} use of the verb.\footnote{According to some terminology, this usage may be considered “\isi{middle voice}”.} Example \REF{ex:phrase:79} lacks the \isi{detransitivizing} marker na- ‘\textsc{detr}’, whereas \REF{ex:phrase:80} includes it (\sectref{sec:13.8.2}).
A: word: na-lu-nda	 gloss: DETR-put-IRR
B: word: na-kuk-aw-e	 gloss: DETR-gather-put.IPFV-DEP
C: word: na-kuk-u-nda	 gloss: DETR-gather-put-IRR
D: word: ndï=n	 gloss: 3PL=OBL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 98:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kuma ___
Gloss (with missing item): some ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`Some gathered.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Similarly, the form kuk ‘gather’ may take an \isi{object marker} when appearing with a separable ‘put’ verb. This form mostly appears with the verb u- ‘put’, but may alternatively appear with a blended version containing the element /l/. Examples \REF{ex:phrase:79} and \REF{ex:phrase:80} show an \isi{intransitive} use of the verb.\footnote{According to some terminology, this usage may be considered “\isi{middle voice}”.} Example \REF{ex:phrase:79} lacks the \isi{detransitivizing} marker na- ‘\textsc{detr}’, whereas \REF{ex:phrase:80} includes it (\sectref{sec:13.8.2}).
A: word: kuk-u-p	 gloss: gather-put-PFV
B: word: ata-lï-p	 gloss: up-put-PFV
C: word: min	 gloss: 3DU
D: word: na-kuk-u-nda	 gloss: DETR-gather-put-IRR
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 99:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): an ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL.EXCL ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`We would gather.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Similarly, the form kuk ‘gather’ may take an \isi{object marker} when appearing with a separable ‘put’ verb. This form mostly appears with the verb u- ‘put’, but may alternatively appear with a blended version containing the element /l/. Examples \REF{ex:phrase:79} and \REF{ex:phrase:80} show an \isi{intransitive} use of the verb.\footnote{According to some terminology, this usage may be considered “\isi{middle voice}”.} Example \REF{ex:phrase:79} lacks the \isi{detransitivizing} marker na- ‘\textsc{detr}’, whereas \REF{ex:phrase:80} includes it (\sectref{sec:13.8.2}).
A: word: ndï=aw-e	 gloss: 3PL=put.IPFV-DEP
B: word: na-lu-nda	 gloss: DETR-put-IRR
C: word: na-kuk-u-nda	 gloss: DETR-gather-put-IRR
D: word: na-kuk-aw-e	 gloss: DETR-gather-put.IPFV-DEP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 100:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): siwi ___ wa na-lu-nda
Gloss (with missing item): grub.species ___ village DETR-put-IRR
The English translation of this sentence is:`[We] will gather grubs home.’\footnote{Note the \isi{metathesis} of the alternate form [lu-] of the \isi{verb stem} lï- ‘put’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As a \isi{transitive} verb, however, the morpheme ___ u- ‘its gloss ___’ has as its object that which is ‘its gloss ___ed’ (or ‘piled up’, etc.), and this argument may be indexed by an \isi{object marker} preceding the form the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’. The place in(to) which things are being its gloss ___ed or piled is, in turn, the object of the verb ‘put’, and thus occurs as an NP between the separable form the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ and the \isi{verb stem} u- ‘put’, as in examples \REF{ex:phrase:81} and \REF{ex:phrase:82}.
A: word: ndï=lumo-p	 gloss: 3PL=put-PFV
B: word: ndï=kuk	 gloss: 3PL=gather
C: word: kuk	 gloss: gather
D: word: kuk-u-p	 gloss: gather-put-PFV
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 101:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): siwi kuk wa ___
Gloss (with missing item): grub.species gather village ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`[We] will gather grubs home.’\footnote{Note the \isi{metathesis} of the alternate form [lu-] of the \isi{verb stem} lï- ‘put’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As a \isi{transitive} verb, however, kuk u- ‘gather’ has as its object that which is ‘gathered’ (or ‘piled up’, etc.), and this argument may be indexed by an \isi{object marker} preceding the form kuk ‘gather’. The place in(to) which things are being gathered or piled is, in turn, the object of the verb ‘put’, and thus occurs as an NP between the separable form kuk ‘gather’ and the \isi{verb stem} u- ‘put’, as in examples \REF{ex:phrase:81} and \REF{ex:phrase:82}.
A: word: na-ma-na	 gloss: DETR-go-IRR
B: word: lu-nda	 gloss: put-IRR]
C: word: ndï=wana	 gloss: 3PL=feel
D: word: na-lu-nda	 gloss: DETR-put-IRR
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 102:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): mï ___ nï=n ani ma=u-p-e
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG.SUBJ ___ 1SG=OBL bilum 3SG.OBJ=put-PFV-DEP
The English translation of this sentence is:`She piled them into my bilum [= string bag].’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As a \isi{transitive} verb, however, kuk u- ‘gather’ has as its object that which is ‘gathered’ (or ‘piled up’, etc.), and this argument may be indexed by an \isi{object marker} preceding the form kuk ‘gather’. The place in(to) which things are being gathered or piled is, in turn, the object of the verb ‘put’, and thus occurs as an NP between the separable form kuk ‘gather’ and the \isi{verb stem} u- ‘put’, as in examples \REF{ex:phrase:81} and \REF{ex:phrase:82}.
A: word: ndï=kuk	 gloss: 3PL=gather
B: word: ndï=nap	 gloss: 3PL=for
C: word: ndï=kana	 gloss: 3PL=beside
D: word: ambi	 gloss: big
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 103:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): mï ndï=kuk nï=n ani ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG.SUBJ 3PL=gather 1SG=OBL bilum ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`She piled them into my bilum [= string bag].’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As a \isi{transitive} verb, however, kuk u- ‘gather’ has as its object that which is ‘gathered’ (or ‘piled up’, etc.), and this argument may be indexed by an \isi{object marker} preceding the form kuk ‘gather’. The place in(to) which things are being gathered or piled is, in turn, the object of the verb ‘put’, and thus occurs as an NP between the separable form kuk ‘gather’ and the \isi{verb stem} u- ‘put’, as in examples \REF{ex:phrase:81} and \REF{ex:phrase:82}.
A: word: ma=u-p-op	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=put-PFV{-pfv}
B: word: ma=in	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=in
C: word: ma=u-p-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=put-PFV-DEP
D: word: ma=lï-p-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=put{-pfv-dep}
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 104:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nïpïl ndï=wali-e ___ inim aw-e
Gloss (with missing item): vine 3PL=hit-IPFV ___ water put.IPFV-DEP
The English translation of this sentence is:`[We] used to break vines and gather them into the water.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As a \isi{phonotactic}ally prohibited word-final \isi{consonant} (\sectref{sec:2.1.1}), the final [k] in kuk ‘gather’ may be \isi{deleted} when this word occurs as a separate form \REF{ex:phrase:83}.\footnote{The \isi{nominal adjunct}s in \isi{separable verb} constructions such as this one may be forms that occur only in verbal \isi{compound}s -- that is, unlike lïmndï ‘eye’, which occurs frequently as a noun in its own right (e.g., mï nïnji lïmndï masap ‘he hit my eye’), there is no indication that forms like kuk ‘gather’ (or ‘gathering’?), ever appear on their own without such verbs.}
A: word: ndï=kuk	 gloss: 3PL=gather
B: word: ndï=nap	 gloss: 3PL=for
C: word: ndï=kana	 gloss: 3PL=beside
D: word: ndï=si-na	 gloss: 3PL=push-IRR
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 105:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nïpïl ndï=wali-e ndï=kuk inim ___
Gloss (with missing item): vine 3PL=hit-IPFV 3PL=gather water ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`[We] used to break vines and gather them into the water.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As a \isi{phonotactic}ally prohibited word-final \isi{consonant} (\sectref{sec:2.1.1}), the final [k] in kuk ‘gather’ may be \isi{deleted} when this word occurs as a separate form \REF{ex:phrase:83}.\footnote{The \isi{nominal adjunct}s in \isi{separable verb} constructions such as this one may be forms that occur only in verbal \isi{compound}s -- that is, unlike lïmndï ‘eye’, which occurs frequently as a noun in its own right (e.g., mï nïnji lïmndï masap ‘he hit my eye’), there is no indication that forms like kuk ‘gather’ (or ‘gathering’?), ever appear on their own without such verbs.}
A: word: aw-e	 gloss: put.IPFV-DEP
B: word: ndï=in	 gloss: 3PL=in
C: word: ta-n-e	 gloss: say-IPFV-DEP
D: word: anda=aw-e	 gloss: SG.DIST=put.IPFV-DEP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 106:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ngala imba p-e ___ ma=lï-p-e
Gloss (with missing item): PL.PROX night be{-dep} ___ 3SG.OBJ=put-PFV-DEP
The English translation of this sentence is:`These people stand there at night.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Other \isi{separable verb}s with \isi{stem}s meaning ‘put’ have as their first elements words that seem less likely to permit \isi{object marker}s. For example, the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ has as its object the place where one its gloss ___s, and this is marked on the ‘put’ verb, rather than on the form the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’. In \REF{ex:phrase:84}, this \isi{locative} argument is expressed by the \isi{object-marker} \isi{proclitic} ma= ‘\textsc{3sg.obj}’, which in this \isi{phrase} has the sense ‘there’.
A: word: ma=tane-lï-p	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=stand-put-PFV
B: word: kuk	 gloss: gather
C: word: tane	 gloss: stand
D: word: ndï=si-na	 gloss: 3PL=push-IRR
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 107:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ngala imba p-e tane ___
Gloss (with missing item): PL.PROX night be{-dep} stand ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`These people stand there at night.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Other \isi{separable verb}s with \isi{stem}s meaning ‘put’ have as their first elements words that seem less likely to permit \isi{object marker}s. For example, tane ‘stand’ has as its object the place where one stands, and this is marked on the ‘put’ verb, rather than on the form tane ‘stand’. In \REF{ex:phrase:84}, this \isi{locative} argument is expressed by the \isi{object-marker} \isi{proclitic} ma= ‘\textsc{3sg.obj}’, which in this \isi{phrase} has the sense ‘there’.
A: word: ma=lï-p-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=put-PFV-DEP
B: word: ma=lï-p	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=put-PFV
C: word: ma=in	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=in
D: word: twa	 gloss: hearth
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 108:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): i apa ko=angom-lï-p ma=tï i ___
Gloss (with missing item): go.PFV house INDF=pull.out-put-PFV 3SG.OBJ=take go.PFV ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`[It] went and pulled out a house, brought it, and stood it up.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: That said, this verb can at times permit two objects -- that is, the first element may permit as an object that which is stood (i.e., erected, positioned, etc.), as in \REF{ex:phrase:85}.
A: word: ma=tane-lï-p	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=stand-put-PFV
B: word: ma=in-lï-p	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=in-put-PFV
C: word: wot	 gloss: younger
D: word: ma=lï-p	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=put-PFV
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A