cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 132:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): maka=p-e i ___
Gloss (with missing item): thus=COP-DEP way ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`Behavior like that -- that’s it.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \isi{interjection} the morpheme ___ ‘that’s it’ is used to signal the \isi{emphatic} identification of a referent or to show approval of a thought or action.\footnote{Cf. \ili{Tok Pisin} em nau ‘it now’, used as an \isi{interjection} to mean ‘that’s it’.} The word may contain the word maw ‘correct’, although I consider it also possible that this shorter word is itself a \isi{backformation} from the morpheme ___ ‘that’s it’. The [-nam] ending suggests a pronominal origin of this word (cf. the \isi{emphatic} \isi{suffix} -nam ‘\textsc{emph}’, \sectref{sec:6.7}). Perhaps it is an elaboration of the form mï-nam ‘3\textsc{sg.subj}-\textsc{emph}’. The form the morpheme ___ ‘that’s it’ may take the ending [-e]. It is unclear whether this is the \isi{dependent marker} -e ‘\textsc{dep}’ (\sectref{sec:12.2.1}) or simply a further \isi{emphatic} \isi{syllable}. Sentences \REF{ex:otherwc:155} through \REF{ex:otherwc:158} exemplify the use of the morpheme ___ ‘that’s it’.
A: word: ma=la-ka-na	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=IRR-let-IRR
B: word: mawnam	 gloss: thats.it
C: word: amun	 gloss: now
D: word: mawnam-e	 gloss: thats.it-DEP?
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B