cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 58:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ ndï nga=ma-na
Gloss (with missing item): ___ 3PL SG.PROX=go-IRR
The English translation of this sentence is:`The broken ones will go here.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Usually, however, the nature of the \isi{derivation} is clear from context. Further examples of \is{patient noun} \isi{patient}ive nominalizations are given in \REF{ex:nouns:39} and \REF{ex:nouns:40}.
A: word: nungun-u-p-en	 gloss: break-put-PFV-NMLZ
B: word: nï=wana-e-n	 gloss: 1SG=feel-IPFV{-?}
C: word: lo-wo-p-e	 gloss: IRR-sleep-PFV-DEP
D: word: nungun-u-p-op	 gloss: break-put-PFV-PFV
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 59:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ala yot=nï ma=asa-e mï ___
Gloss (with missing item): PL.DIST machete=OBL 3SG.OBJ=hit-DEP 3SG.SUBJ ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`They hit him with a machete and he died.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Although the nominalizing \isi{suffix} may serve certain \isi{aspect}ual functions, often it is difficult to discern the particular function of verbal ending with [\nobreakdash-en]. Moreover, speakers may sometimes employ a \is{paragoge} paragogic /n/ at the end of clauses, especially those marked by the \isi{dependent marker} -e ‘\textsc{dep}’ \REF{ex:nouns:41} or the \isi{homophonous} \isi{imperfective} \isi{suffix} -e ‘\textsc{ipfv}’ \REF{ex:nouns:42}.
A: word: ni-p-e	 gloss: [die-PFV-DEP]
B: word: ni-p-e-n	 gloss: die-PFV-DEP-?
C: word: wombïn	 gloss: work
D: word: inda-en	 gloss: walk-NMLZ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 60:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ndï ango kïkal ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL NEG ear ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`They weren’t listening to me.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Although the nominalizing \isi{suffix} may serve certain \isi{aspect}ual functions, often it is difficult to discern the particular function of verbal ending with [\nobreakdash-en]. Moreover, speakers may sometimes employ a \is{paragoge} paragogic /n/ at the end of clauses, especially those marked by the \isi{dependent marker} -e ‘\textsc{dep}’ \REF{ex:nouns:41} or the \isi{homophonous} \isi{imperfective} \isi{suffix} -e ‘\textsc{ipfv}’ \REF{ex:nouns:42}.
A: word: unda-en	 gloss: go-NMLZ
B: word: nï=wana-e-n	 gloss: 1SG=feel-IPFV{-?}
C: word: ma=wana-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=feel-DEP
D: word: ma=wala-i	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=feel-IPFV
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B