cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 159:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ala ___ wandam i
Gloss (with missing item): PL.DIST ___ jungle go.PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`Everyone went to the jungle.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: At times, the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ may alternatively be translated as ‘everything’ or ‘everyone’. In these instances, the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ also follows \isi{subject marker}s or \isi{pronoun}s (as when the word functions elsewhere as a \isi{quantifier}), as in \REF{ex:det:177} and \REF{ex:det:178}.
A: word: wopa	 gloss: all
B: word: nga=asa	 gloss: SG.PROX=hit
C: word: keka	 gloss: completely
D: word: wopata	 gloss: [place]
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 160:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ ma=la-nda
Gloss (with missing item): ___ 3SG.OBJ=eat-IRR
The English translation of this sentence is:`All would eat it.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: However, it may also function somewhat like a \isi{pronoun}, forming its own NP \REF{ex:det:179}.
A: word: wopa	 gloss: all
B: word: keka	 gloss: completely
C: word: wopata	 gloss: [place]
D: word: nga=asa	 gloss: SG.PROX=hit
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 161:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): inom mï mïnda ___ wana-nda
Gloss (with missing item): mother 3SG.SUBJ banana ___ cook-IRR
The English translation of this sentence is:`Mother will cook all the bananas.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: One of the most interesting aspects of the \isi{syntactic} positioning of the \isi{quantifier} wopa ‘all’, however, is the fact that it follows not only \isi{subject marker}s, but also \isi{object marker}s. It is thus the only element known to intercede between \isi{object-marker} \isi{clitic}s and their associated verbs. Sentences \REF{ex:det:180} through \REF{ex:det:183} illustrate this unusual placement of wopa ‘all’.
A: word: ndï=wo-p-e	 gloss: 3PL=sleep-PFV-DEP
B: word: ndï=wopa	 gloss: 3PL=all
C: word: ndï=nap	 gloss: 3PL=for
D: word: ma=n	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=OBL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 162:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nï lïmndï ___ ala
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG eye ___ see
The English translation of this sentence is:`I saw everyone.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: One of the most interesting aspects of the \isi{syntactic} positioning of the \isi{quantifier} wopa ‘all’, however, is the fact that it follows not only \isi{subject marker}s, but also \isi{object marker}s. It is thus the only element known to intercede between \isi{object-marker} \isi{clitic}s and their associated verbs. Sentences \REF{ex:det:180} through \REF{ex:det:183} illustrate this unusual placement of wopa ‘all’.
A: word: ngala	 gloss: PL.PROX
B: word: ala=wopa	 gloss: PL.DIST=all
C: word: ala=ul	 gloss: PL.DIST=with
D: word: ngala=wana	 gloss: PL.PROX=feel
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 163:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): inom mï mïnda ___ ndï=wana-nda
Gloss (with missing item): mother 3SG.SUBJ banana ___ 3PL=cook-IRR
The English translation of this sentence is:`Mother will cook the whole bananas.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When preceding the \isi{object marker}, however, the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ can only have an \is{adjective} adjectival interpretation \REF{ex:det:184}.
A: word: wopata	 gloss: [place]
B: word: wopa	 gloss: all
C: word: ngala=n	 gloss: PL.PROX=OBL
D: word: keka	 gloss: completely
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 164:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ nji=n ma=lu-nda ma-n-e
Gloss (with missing item): ___ thing=OBL 3SG.OBJ=put-IRR go-IPFV-DEP
The English translation of this sentence is:`[I] am going to plant everything there.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \is{universal quantifier} \isi{collective universal quantifier} wopa ‘all’ may be contrasted, both formally and \isi{syntactic}ally, with the \is{universal quantifier} \isi{distributive universal quantifier} the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’. Unlike other modifiers, such as \isi{adjective}s (\sectref{sec:5.1}; cf. tïngïn ‘many’), and unlike the \isi{quantifier} wopa ‘all’, the \isi{quantifier} the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ occurs before the noun it modifies. Thus, like wopa ‘all’, the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ may exist in a class of its own. The use of the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ is illustrated by examples \REF{ex:det:185}, \REF{ex:det:186}, and \REF{ex:det:187}.
A: word: nungol	 gloss: child
B: word: wopa	 gloss: all
C: word: nunu	 gloss: every
D: word: ndï=wat-lï-p	 gloss: 3PL=atop-put-PFV
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 165:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): wa ___ wa u-lo-e
Gloss (with missing item): just ___ village from-go-IPFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`[They] just go around in every village.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \is{universal quantifier} \isi{collective universal quantifier} wopa ‘all’ may be contrasted, both formally and \isi{syntactic}ally, with the \is{universal quantifier} \isi{distributive universal quantifier} the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’. Unlike other modifiers, such as \isi{adjective}s (\sectref{sec:5.1}; cf. tïngïn ‘many’), and unlike the \isi{quantifier} wopa ‘all’, the \isi{quantifier} the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ occurs before the noun it modifies. Thus, like wopa ‘all’, the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ may exist in a class of its own. The use of the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ is illustrated by examples \REF{ex:det:185}, \REF{ex:det:186}, and \REF{ex:det:187}.
A: word: ma=ama-p	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=eat-PFV
B: word: nungol	 gloss: child
C: word: nunu	 gloss: every
D: word: wopa	 gloss: all
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 166:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): a ___ wombïn tembi ndï-ambi=la-ka-n
Gloss (with missing item): ah ___ work bad 3PL-TOP=IRR-let-IMP
The English translation of this sentence is:`Ah, every bad job -- forget about them!’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \is{universal quantifier} \isi{collective universal quantifier} wopa ‘all’ may be contrasted, both formally and \isi{syntactic}ally, with the \is{universal quantifier} \isi{distributive universal quantifier} the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’. Unlike other modifiers, such as \isi{adjective}s (\sectref{sec:5.1}; cf. tïngïn ‘many’), and unlike the \isi{quantifier} wopa ‘all’, the \isi{quantifier} the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ occurs before the noun it modifies. Thus, like wopa ‘all’, the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ may exist in a class of its own. The use of the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ is illustrated by examples \REF{ex:det:185}, \REF{ex:det:186}, and \REF{ex:det:187}.
A: word: ala	 gloss: PL.DIST
B: word: nunu	 gloss: every
C: word: nungol	 gloss: child
D: word: wopa	 gloss: all
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 167:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nï lamndu ___ ndï=asa-p
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG pig ___ 3PL=hit-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`I killed some pigs.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Other \isi{semantic}ally quantifier-like words do not occur between \isi{object marker}s and verbs, as wopa ‘all’ does; nor do they occur prenominally, as nunu ‘every’ does. Rather, they behave more like prototypical property-denoting words -- that is, they follow the \isi{head noun} of an NP and precede any \isi{subject marker} or \isi{object marker}. For example, when the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ modifies an object NP, it occurs before the \isi{object marker} (when present), as in \REF{ex:det:188} and \REF{ex:det:189}.
A: word: kuma	 gloss: some
B: word: moweka	 gloss: also
C: word: nga=andï-na	 gloss: SG.PROX=see-IRR
D: word: kuma=tï	 gloss: some=take
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 168:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nï lïmndï tïn ___ ndï=ala
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG eye dog ___ 3PL=see
The English translation of this sentence is:`I saw some dogs.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Other \isi{semantic}ally quantifier-like words do not occur between \isi{object marker}s and verbs, as wopa ‘all’ does; nor do they occur prenominally, as nunu ‘every’ does. Rather, they behave more like prototypical property-denoting words -- that is, they follow the \isi{head noun} of an NP and precede any \isi{subject marker} or \isi{object marker}. For example, when the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ modifies an object NP, it occurs before the \isi{object marker} (when present), as in \REF{ex:det:188} and \REF{ex:det:189}.
A: word: kuma	 gloss: some
B: word: moweka	 gloss: also
C: word: kuma=tï	 gloss: some=take
D: word: ala	 gloss: PL.DIST
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 169:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nï lamndu ___ ndï=asa-p
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG pig ___ 3PL=hit-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`I killed some pigs.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In examples \REF{ex:det:188} and \REF{ex:det:189}, the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ could also have the reading ‘a few’ (that is, ‘its gloss ___’ as opposed to ‘many’). For the sense ‘its gloss ___ of’ (that is, a \isi{partitive} quantity), the \isi{postposition} ul ‘with’ is employed, as in \REF{ex:det:190}, \REF{ex:det:191}, and \REF{ex:det:192}.
A: word: kuma	 gloss: some
B: word: moweka	 gloss: also
C: word: kuma=tï	 gloss: some=take
D: word: ngin	 gloss: net
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 170:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nï lïmndï tïn ___ ndï=ala
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG eye dog ___ 3PL=see
The English translation of this sentence is:`I saw some dogs.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In examples \REF{ex:det:188} and \REF{ex:det:189}, the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ could also have the reading ‘a few’ (that is, ‘its gloss ___’ as opposed to ‘many’). For the sense ‘its gloss ___ of’ (that is, a \isi{partitive} quantity), the \isi{postposition} ul ‘with’ is employed, as in \REF{ex:det:190}, \REF{ex:det:191}, and \REF{ex:det:192}.
A: word: ndï=wana-p	 gloss: 3PL=cook-PFV
B: word: moweka	 gloss: also
C: word: kuma	 gloss: some
D: word: kuma=tï	 gloss: some=take
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 171:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nï lïmndï tïn ___ kuma ndï=ala
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG eye dog ___ some 3PL=see
The English translation of this sentence is:`I saw some of the dogs.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In examples \REF{ex:det:188} and \REF{ex:det:189}, kuma ‘some’ could also have the reading ‘a few’ (that is, ‘some’ as opposed to ‘many’). For the sense ‘some of’ (that is, a \isi{partitive} quantity), the \isi{postposition} ul ‘with’ is employed, as in \REF{ex:det:190}, \REF{ex:det:191}, and \REF{ex:det:192}.
A: word: ndï=in	 gloss: 3PL=in
B: word: ndï=ula-e	 gloss: 3PL=weave-IPFV
C: word: ma=ama-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=eat-IPFV
D: word: ndï=ul	 gloss: 3PL=with
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 172:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nï lïmndï tïn ndï=ul ___ ndï=ala
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG eye dog 3PL=with ___ 3PL=see
The English translation of this sentence is:`I saw some of the dogs.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In examples \REF{ex:det:188} and \REF{ex:det:189}, the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ could also have the reading ‘a few’ (that is, ‘its gloss ___’ as opposed to ‘many’). For the sense ‘its gloss ___ of’ (that is, a \isi{partitive} quantity), the \isi{postposition} ul ‘with’ is employed, as in \REF{ex:det:190}, \REF{ex:det:191}, and \REF{ex:det:192}.
A: word: anda	 gloss: SG.DIST
B: word: kuma	 gloss: some
C: word: moweka	 gloss: also
D: word: kuma=tï	 gloss: some=take
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 173:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nï utam ___ kuma ama-p
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG yam ___ some eat-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`I ate some of the yams.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In examples \REF{ex:det:188} and \REF{ex:det:189}, kuma ‘some’ could also have the reading ‘a few’ (that is, ‘some’ as opposed to ‘many’). For the sense ‘some of’ (that is, a \isi{partitive} quantity), the \isi{postposition} ul ‘with’ is employed, as in \REF{ex:det:190}, \REF{ex:det:191}, and \REF{ex:det:192}.
A: word: ndï=ul	 gloss: 3PL=with
B: word: ngin=tï	 gloss: DU.PROX=take
C: word: ndï=ula-e	 gloss: 3PL=weave-IPFV
D: word: ndï=in	 gloss: 3PL=in
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 174:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nï utam ndï=ul ___ ama-p
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG yam 3PL=with ___ eat-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`I ate some of the yams.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In examples \REF{ex:det:188} and \REF{ex:det:189}, the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ could also have the reading ‘a few’ (that is, ‘its gloss ___’ as opposed to ‘many’). For the sense ‘its gloss ___ of’ (that is, a \isi{partitive} quantity), the \isi{postposition} ul ‘with’ is employed, as in \REF{ex:det:190}, \REF{ex:det:191}, and \REF{ex:det:192}.
A: word: ndï=ul	 gloss: 3PL=with
B: word: kuma	 gloss: some
C: word: moweka	 gloss: also
D: word: kuma=tï	 gloss: some=take
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 175:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): an lamndu ___ kuma asa-p
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL.EXCL pig ___ some hit-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`We killed some of the pigs.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In examples \REF{ex:det:188} and \REF{ex:det:189}, kuma ‘some’ could also have the reading ‘a few’ (that is, ‘some’ as opposed to ‘many’). For the sense ‘some of’ (that is, a \isi{partitive} quantity), the \isi{postposition} ul ‘with’ is employed, as in \REF{ex:det:190}, \REF{ex:det:191}, and \REF{ex:det:192}.
A: word: ndï=in	 gloss: 3PL=in
B: word: ndï=mop-lï-p	 gloss: 3PL=tie-put-PFV
C: word: ndï=ula-e	 gloss: 3PL=weave-IPFV
D: word: ndï=ul	 gloss: 3PL=with
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 176:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): an lamndu ndï=ul ___ asa-p
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL.EXCL pig 3PL=with ___ hit-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`We killed some of the pigs.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In examples \REF{ex:det:188} and \REF{ex:det:189}, the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ could also have the reading ‘a few’ (that is, ‘its gloss ___’ as opposed to ‘many’). For the sense ‘its gloss ___ of’ (that is, a \isi{partitive} quantity), the \isi{postposition} ul ‘with’ is employed, as in \REF{ex:det:190}, \REF{ex:det:191}, and \REF{ex:det:192}.
A: word: kuma=tï	 gloss: some=take
B: word: kuma	 gloss: some
C: word: ala=uta-ta	 gloss: PL.DIST=grind{-cond}
D: word: moweka	 gloss: also
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 177:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ ala woyambïn ala-nji wandam ala na-kï-p
Gloss (with missing item): ___ PL.DIST pointlessly PL.DIST{-poss} jungle PL.DIST DETR-say-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`Some people claimed absurdly that those are their jungles.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Like other modifiers, the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ can function as a substantive, whether in a subject NP, as in \REF{ex:det:193} and \REF{ex:det:194}; in a \isi{direct object} NP, as in \REF{ex:det:195} and \REF{ex:det:196}; or in an \isi{oblique} NP, as in \REF{ex:det:197}.
A: word: kuma=tï	 gloss: some=take
B: word: kuma	 gloss: some
C: word: nga-nji	 gloss: SG.PROX-POSS
D: word: moweka	 gloss: also
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B