cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 96:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): an-mbï-i atwana ___ ndï ma=n nï=ta
Gloss (with missing item): out-here-go.PFV question ___ 3PL 3SG.OBJ=OBL 1SG=say
The English translation of this sentence is:`When [I] came out and asked, they told me.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Dependent marking \is{dependent marker} can also be used when the action of the \isi{main clause} occurred at a particular point in \isi{time} \isi{simultaneous} with that of the \isi{dependent clause}, generally yielding an \ili{English} translation with ‘when’, as in \REF{ex:complex:56} and \REF{ex:complex:57}.
A: word: anjikaka-e	 gloss: how-DEP
B: word: ndï=uta-e	 gloss: 3PL=grind-IPFV
C: word: njukuta=p-e	 gloss: small=COP{-dep}
D: word: ta-e	 gloss: say-DEP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 97:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ apïn=n ma=ama-p-e nï wa mbï-i ndï=moni p-e
Gloss (with missing item): ___ fire=OBL 3SG.OBJ=eat-PFV-DEP 1SG just here-go.PFV 3PL=between be-IPFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`After they burned it, I just came to this place and live among them.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, there is a simple \isi{sequential} \isi{temporal} relationship between a subordinate clause and the clause that follows it. That is, the \isi{dependent marker} on the subordinate clause marks the event described within it as occurring before the event described in the associated \isi{independent clause}, as in examples \REF{ex:complex:58} through \REF{ex:complex:64}.
A: word: anma	 gloss: good
B: word: ala=n	 gloss: PL.DIST=OBL
C: word: ala-nji	 gloss: PL.DIST{-poss}
D: word: ala	 gloss: PL.DIST
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 98:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ala ___ ma=ama-p-e nï wa mbï-i ndï=moni p-e
Gloss (with missing item): PL.DIST ___ 3SG.OBJ=eat-PFV-DEP 1SG just here-go.PFV 3PL=between be-IPFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`After they burned it, I just came to this place and live among them.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, there is a simple \isi{sequential} \isi{temporal} relationship between a subordinate clause and the clause that follows it. That is, the \isi{dependent marker} on the subordinate clause marks the event described within it as occurring before the event described in the associated \isi{independent clause}, as in examples \REF{ex:complex:58} through \REF{ex:complex:64}.
A: word: lïmndï	 gloss: eye
B: word: apïn=n	 gloss: fire=OBL
C: word: apïn	 gloss: fire
D: word: apïn=nï	 gloss: fire=OBL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 99:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ala apïn=n ___ nï wa mbï-i ndï=moni p-e
Gloss (with missing item): PL.DIST fire=OBL ___ 1SG just here-go.PFV 3PL=between be-IPFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`After they burned it, I just came to this place and live among them.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, there is a simple \isi{sequential} \isi{temporal} relationship between a subordinate clause and the clause that follows it. That is, the \isi{dependent marker} on the subordinate clause marks the event described within it as occurring before the event described in the associated \isi{independent clause}, as in examples \REF{ex:complex:58} through \REF{ex:complex:64}.
A: word: ambin-nji	 gloss: DU.REFL-POSS
B: word: ma=ama-p-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=eat-PFV-DEP
C: word: elvis	 gloss: [name]
D: word: ma=ama-p	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=eat-PFV
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 100:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ an-mbï na-i-e an mï=na-na-ama-p-e an tawnam na-u-lo-p
Gloss (with missing item): ___ out-here DETR-go.PFV-DEP 1PL.EXCL 3SG.SUBJ=DETR-DETR-eat-PFV-DEP 1PL.EXCL net DETR-from-go-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`After the two came out, we ate, and then we went to [our] mosquito nets.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, there is a simple \isi{sequential} \isi{temporal} relationship between a subordinate clause and the clause that follows it. That is, the \isi{dependent marker} on the subordinate clause marks the event described within it as occurring before the event described in the associated \isi{independent clause}, as in examples \REF{ex:complex:58} through \REF{ex:complex:64}.
A: word: ta-e	 gloss: say-DEP
B: word: min	 gloss: 3DU
C: word: min=n	 gloss: 3DU=OBL
D: word: ndin	 gloss: 3DU?
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 101:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): min ___ na-i-e an mï=na-na-ama-p-e an tawnam na-u-lo-p
Gloss (with missing item): 3DU ___ DETR-go.PFV-DEP 1PL.EXCL 3SG.SUBJ=DETR-DETR-eat-PFV-DEP 1PL.EXCL net DETR-from-go-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`After the two came out, we ate, and then we went to [our] mosquito nets.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, there is a simple \isi{sequential} \isi{temporal} relationship between a subordinate clause and the clause that follows it. That is, the \isi{dependent marker} on the subordinate clause marks the event described within it as occurring before the event described in the associated \isi{independent clause}, as in examples \REF{ex:complex:58} through \REF{ex:complex:64}.
A: word: u-awa	 gloss: 2SG-INT
B: word: dumngul	 gloss: [name]
C: word: an-mbï-u	 gloss: out-here-from
D: word: an-mbï	 gloss: out-here
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 102:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): min an-mbï ___ an mï=na-na-ama-p-e an tawnam na-u-lo-p
Gloss (with missing item): 3DU out-here ___ 1PL.EXCL 3SG.SUBJ=DETR-DETR-eat-PFV-DEP 1PL.EXCL net DETR-from-go-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`After the two came out, we ate, and then we went to [our] mosquito nets.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, there is a simple \isi{sequential} \isi{temporal} relationship between a subordinate clause and the clause that follows it. That is, the \isi{dependent marker} on the subordinate clause marks the event described within it as occurring before the event described in the associated \isi{independent clause}, as in examples \REF{ex:complex:58} through \REF{ex:complex:64}.
A: word: awaka	 gloss: [name]
B: word: na-i-e	 gloss: DETR-go.PFV-DEP
C: word: na-i-n	 gloss: DETR-come-PFV
D: word: na-i	 gloss: DETR-go.PFV
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 103:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): min an-mbï na-i-e ___ mï=na-na-ama-p-e an tawnam na-u-lo-p
Gloss (with missing item): 3DU out-here DETR-go.PFV-DEP ___ 3SG.SUBJ=DETR-DETR-eat-PFV-DEP 1PL.EXCL net DETR-from-go-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`After the two came out, we ate, and then we went to [our] mosquito nets.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, there is a simple \isi{sequential} \isi{temporal} relationship between a subordinate clause the morpheme ___d the clause that follows it. That is, the \isi{dependent marker} on the subordinate clause marks the event described within it as occurring before the event described in the associated \isi{independent clause}, as in examples \REF{ex:complex:58} through \REF{ex:complex:64}.
A: word: an-mbï-i	 gloss: out-here-go.PFV
B: word: anda=u	 gloss: SG.DIST=from
C: word: an	 gloss: 1PL.EXCL
D: word: wondi	 gloss: bandicoot
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 104:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): min an-mbï na-i-e an ___ an tawnam na-u-lo-p
Gloss (with missing item): 3DU out-here DETR-go.PFV-DEP 1PL.EXCL ___ 1PL.EXCL net DETR-from-go-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`After the two came out, we ate, and then we went to [our] mosquito nets.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, there is a simple \isi{sequential} \isi{temporal} relationship between a subordinate clause and the clause that follows it. That is, the \isi{dependent marker} on the subordinate clause marks the event described within it as occurring before the event described in the associated \isi{independent clause}, as in examples \REF{ex:complex:58} through \REF{ex:complex:64}.
A: word: ma=asa-p	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=hit-PFV
B: word: mbalus	 gloss: airplane
C: word: mï=na-na-ama-p-e	 gloss: 3SG.SUBJ=DETR-DETR-eat-PFV-DEP
D: word: mï=na-na-p	 gloss: 3SG.SUBJ=DETR-feed-PFV
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 105:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ an-mbï na-i-e an mï=na-na-ama-p-e an tawnam na-u-lo-p
Gloss (with missing item): ___ out-here DETR-go.PFV-DEP 1PL.EXCL 3SG.SUBJ=DETR-DETR-eat-PFV-DEP 1PL.EXCL net DETR-from-go-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`After the two came out, we ate, and then we went to [our] mosquito nets.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As example \REF{ex:complex:64} illustrates, multiple \isi{dependent clause}s may be strung together in succession.
A: word: ndin	 gloss: 3DU?
B: word: wolka	 gloss: again
C: word: min	 gloss: 3DU
D: word: min=n	 gloss: 3DU=OBL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 106:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): min ___ na-i-e an mï=na-na-ama-p-e an tawnam na-u-lo-p
Gloss (with missing item): 3DU ___ DETR-go.PFV-DEP 1PL.EXCL 3SG.SUBJ=DETR-DETR-eat-PFV-DEP 1PL.EXCL net DETR-from-go-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`After the two came out, we ate, and then we went to [our] mosquito nets.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As example \REF{ex:complex:64} illustrates, multiple \isi{dependent clause}s may be strung together in succession.
A: word: an-mbï-u	 gloss: out-here-from
B: word: nï=na-ta	 gloss: 1SG=give-COND
C: word: ulwa=p-e	 gloss: nothing=COP-DEP
D: word: an-mbï	 gloss: out-here
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 107:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): min an-mbï ___ an mï=na-na-ama-p-e an tawnam na-u-lo-p
Gloss (with missing item): 3DU out-here ___ 1PL.EXCL 3SG.SUBJ=DETR-DETR-eat-PFV-DEP 1PL.EXCL net DETR-from-go-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`After the two came out, we ate, and then we went to [our] mosquito nets.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As example \REF{ex:complex:64} illustrates, multiple \isi{dependent clause}s may be strung together in succession.
A: word: na-i-n	 gloss: DETR-come-PFV
B: word: na-i-e	 gloss: DETR-go.PFV-DEP
C: word: na-i	 gloss: DETR-go.PFV
D: word: ma=ala	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=for
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 108:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): min an-mbï na-i-e ___ mï=na-na-ama-p-e an tawnam na-u-lo-p
Gloss (with missing item): 3DU out-here DETR-go.PFV-DEP ___ 3SG.SUBJ=DETR-DETR-eat-PFV-DEP 1PL.EXCL net DETR-from-go-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`After the two came out, we ate, and then we went to [our] mosquito nets.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As example \REF{ex:complex:64} illustrates, multiple \isi{dependent clause}s may be strung together in succession.
A: word: an	 gloss: 1PL.EXCL
B: word: nï=kï-p-en	 gloss: 1SG=say-PFV-NMLZ
C: word: wolka	 gloss: again
D: word: anda=u	 gloss: SG.DIST=from
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 109:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): min an-mbï na-i-e an ___ an tawnam na-u-lo-p
Gloss (with missing item): 3DU out-here DETR-go.PFV-DEP 1PL.EXCL ___ 1PL.EXCL net DETR-from-go-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`After the two came out, we ate, and then we went to [our] mosquito nets.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As example \REF{ex:complex:64} illustrates, multiple \isi{dependent clause}s may be strung together in succession.
A: word: mï=na-na-p	 gloss: 3SG.SUBJ=DETR-feed-PFV
B: word: lo-ta	 gloss: go-COND
C: word: yanat	 gloss: daughter
D: word: mï=na-na-ama-p-e	 gloss: 3SG.SUBJ=DETR-DETR-eat-PFV-DEP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 110:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ na-i wambana ndï=uta-p min na-i wambana ndï=uta-p-e wa na-ma-n-e
Gloss (with missing item): ___ DETR-go.PFV fish 3PL=grind-PFV 3DU DETR-go.PFV fish 3PL=grind-PFV-DEP village DETR-go-IPFV-DEP
The English translation of this sentence is:`The two went and caught fish. After the two went and caught fish, [they] headed home.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Subordinate clauses marked with the \isi{dependent marker} -e ‘\textsc{dep}’ are used extensively in the rhetorical structure known as tail-head linkage, whereby the final clause of one sentence is more or less repeated at the start of the following sentence. In these structures, the \isi{final verb} of the first sentence is fully repeated somewhere in the first clause of the second sentence (i.e., it has the same exact \isi{object marker} and \isi{TAM} \isi{suffix}); the addition of the \isi{dependent marker} -e ‘\textsc{dep}’, however, allows the clause with the repeated verb to serve as a transition into a new \isi{independent clause}. In tail-head linkage constructions, it is possible for the entire pivot to be repeated exactly, as in \REF{ex:complex:65}.
A: word: min=n	 gloss: 3DU=OBL
B: word: ndï=wana-p	 gloss: 3PL=cook-PFV
C: word: ndin	 gloss: 3DU?
D: word: min	 gloss: 3DU
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 111:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): min ___ wambana ndï=uta-p min na-i wambana ndï=uta-p-e wa na-ma-n-e
Gloss (with missing item): 3DU ___ fish 3PL=grind-PFV 3DU DETR-go.PFV fish 3PL=grind-PFV-DEP village DETR-go-IPFV-DEP
The English translation of this sentence is:`The two went and caught fish. After the two went and caught fish, [they] headed home.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Subordinate clauses marked with the \isi{dependent marker} -e ‘\textsc{dep}’ are used extensively in the rhetorical structure known as tail-head linkage, whereby the final clause of one sentence is more or less repeated at the start of the following sentence. In these structures, the \isi{final verb} of the first sentence is fully repeated somewhere in the first clause of the second sentence (i.e., it has the same exact \isi{object marker} and \isi{TAM} \isi{suffix}); the addition of the \isi{dependent marker} -e ‘\textsc{dep}’, however, allows the clause with the repeated verb to serve as a transition into a new \isi{independent clause}. In tail-head linkage constructions, it is possible for the entire pivot to be repeated exactly, as in \REF{ex:complex:65}.
A: word: na-i-n	 gloss: DETR-come-PFV
B: word: na-i	 gloss: DETR-go.PFV
C: word: na-na-i	 gloss: DETR-DETR-go.PFV
D: word: wot	 gloss: younger
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 112:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): min na-i ___ ndï=uta-p min na-i wambana ndï=uta-p-e wa na-ma-n-e
Gloss (with missing item): 3DU DETR-go.PFV ___ 3PL=grind-PFV 3DU DETR-go.PFV fish 3PL=grind-PFV-DEP village DETR-go-IPFV-DEP
The English translation of this sentence is:`The two went and caught fish. After the two went and caught fish, [they] headed home.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Subordinate clauses marked with the \isi{dependent marker} -e ‘\textsc{dep}’ are used extensively in the rhetorical structure known as tail-head linkage, whereby the final clause of one sentence is more or less repeated at the start of the following sentence. In these structures, the \isi{final verb} of the first sentence is fully repeated somewhere in the first clause of the second sentence (i.e., it has the same exact \isi{object marker} and \isi{TAM} \isi{suffix}); the addition of the \isi{dependent marker} -e ‘\textsc{dep}’, however, allows the clause with the repeated verb to serve as a transition into a new \isi{independent clause}. In tail-head linkage constructions, it is possible for the entire pivot to be repeated exactly, as in \REF{ex:complex:65}.
A: word: maka	 gloss: thus
B: word: wambana	 gloss: fish
C: word: tambana	 gloss: [name]
D: word: upan	 gloss: fish.species
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B