cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 40:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Yawana mï utam ma=wana-p ___
Gloss (with missing item): [name] 3SG.SUBJ yam 3SG.OBJ=cook-PFV ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`Yawana cooked and ate the yam.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \isi{Verb phrase}s may also be coordinated. When multiple verbs are truly coordinated in the same \isi{verb phrase}, then the \isi{TAM} marking should match on all the verbs, as in \REF{ex:complex:18} and \REF{ex:complex:19}.
A: word: ma=la-ama-p	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=IRR-eat-PFV
B: word: ma=ama-p-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=eat-PFV-DEP
C: word: ma=ama-p	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=eat-PFV
D: word: wow-en	 gloss: sleep.IPFV{-nmlz]}
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 41:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): min ko ___ ma=ama-p
Gloss (with missing item): 3DU just ___ 3SG.OBJ=eat-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`The two killed and ate it.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The first verb may be unmarked, however, especially if it is an occasionally \isi{defective verb} (\sectref{sec:4.3}), as in \REF{ex:complex:20} and \REF{ex:complex:21}.
A: word: itom	 gloss: father
B: word: ma=atï-na	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=hit-IRR
C: word: ma=asa-p	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=hit-PFV
D: word: ma=asa	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=hit
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 42:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): min ko ma=asa ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3DU just 3SG.OBJ=hit ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`The two killed and ate it.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The first verb may be unmarked, however, especially if it is an occasionally \isi{defective verb} (\sectref{sec:4.3}), as in \REF{ex:complex:20} and \REF{ex:complex:21}.
A: word: ma=ama-p-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=eat-PFV-DEP
B: word: ma=ama-p	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=eat-PFV
C: word: wap-en	 gloss: be.PST-NMLZ
D: word: ma=la-ama-p	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=IRR-eat-PFV
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 43:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Guren mï lïmndï lamndu ___ ma=asa-p
Gloss (with missing item): [name] 3SG.SUBJ eye pig ___ 3SG.OBJ=hit-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`Guren saw and killed the pig.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The first verb may be unmarked, however, especially if it is an occasionally \isi{defective verb} (\sectref{sec:4.3}), as in \REF{ex:complex:20} and \REF{ex:complex:21}.
A: word: nï=n	 gloss: 1SG=OBL
B: word: p-e	 gloss: be{-dep}
C: word: ma=ala-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=see-DEP
D: word: ma=ala	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=see
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 44:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Guren mï lïmndï lamndu ma=ala ___
Gloss (with missing item): [name] 3SG.SUBJ eye pig 3SG.OBJ=see ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`Guren saw and killed the pig.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The first verb may be unmarked, however, especially if it is an occasionally \isi{defective verb} (\sectref{sec:4.3}), as in \REF{ex:complex:20} and \REF{ex:complex:21}.
A: word: yanat	 gloss: daughter
B: word: ma=asa-p-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=hit-PFV-DEP]
C: word: ma=asa-p	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=hit-PFV
D: word: ngunan=kï-p	 gloss: 1DU.INCL=say-PFV
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 45:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): lamndu ___ ndï=ama-e
Gloss (with missing item): pig ___ 3PL=eat-IPFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`[They] would kill and eat pigs.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Moreover, there should be no dependent marking \is{dependent marker}(\sectref{sec:12.2}) on anything other than the \isi{final verb} in the \isi{phrase}. Of course, given the \isi{homophony} of the \isi{imperfective} and \isi{dependent} forms (/-e/), it is sometimes difficult to determine whether a verb is receiving \isi{imperfective} marking (\sectref{sec:4.4}), dependent marking (\sectref{sec:12.2.1}), or both. In \REF{ex:complex:22}, I analyze wali- ‘hit’ as taking the \isi{imperfective} \isi{suffix} -e ‘\textsc{ipfv}’.
A: word: an-asa-e	 gloss: 1PL.EXCL-hit-IPFV
B: word: ma=asa	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=hit
C: word: ndï=wali-e	 gloss: 3PL=hit-IPFV
D: word: wali-e	 gloss: hit-IPFV
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 46:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): lamndu wali-e ___
Gloss (with missing item): pig hit-IPFV ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`[They] would kill and eat pigs.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Moreover, there should be no dependent marking \is{dependent marker}(\sectref{sec:12.2}) on anything other than the \isi{final verb} in the \isi{phrase}. Of course, given the \isi{homophony} of the \isi{imperfective} and \isi{dependent} forms (/-e/), it is sometimes difficult to determine whether a verb is receiving \isi{imperfective} marking (\sectref{sec:4.4}), dependent marking (\sectref{sec:12.2.1}), or both. In \REF{ex:complex:22}, I analyze wali- ‘hit’ as taking the \isi{imperfective} \isi{suffix} -e ‘\textsc{ipfv}’.
A: word: ndï=ama-p	 gloss: 3PL=eat-PFV
B: word: ndï=tï	 gloss: 3PL=take
C: word: ma=ama-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=eat-IPFV
D: word: ndï=ama-e	 gloss: 3PL=eat-IPFV
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 47:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): lamndu ___ ndï=ama-e
Gloss (with missing item): pig ___ 3PL=eat-IPFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`[They] would kill and eat pigs.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Although it is common for both verbs in a coordinated \isi{phrase} to receive \isi{object marking}, this is not mandatory: in example \REF{ex:complex:22}, only the second of the two coordinated verbs takes the \isi{object marker}.
A: word: inda-e	 gloss: walk-IPFV
B: word: ndï=wali-e	 gloss: 3PL=hit-IPFV
C: word: wali-e	 gloss: hit-IPFV
D: word: an-asa-e	 gloss: 1PL.EXCL-hit-IPFV
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 48:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): lamndu wali-e ___
Gloss (with missing item): pig hit-IPFV ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`[They] would kill and eat pigs.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Although it is common for both verbs in a coordinated \isi{phrase} to receive \isi{object marking}, this is not mandatory: in example \REF{ex:complex:22}, only the second of the two coordinated verbs takes the \isi{object marker}.
A: word: ndï=ama-e	 gloss: 3PL=eat-IPFV
B: word: ma-ambi	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ-TOP
C: word: ma=ama-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=eat-IPFV
D: word: ndï=ama-p	 gloss: 3PL=eat-PFV
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 49:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Alimban mï lamndu ___ mundu ndï=wana-p
Gloss (with missing item): [name] 3SG.SUBJ pig ___ food 3PL=cook-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`Alimban killed the pig and cooked the meat.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: If a sentence contains two verbs that have different objects, then it is assumed that the \isi{coordination} occurs not between two verbs within a single \isi{verb phrase} but rather between two \isi{verb phrase}s. However, it is not always clear whether there are two \isi{verb phrase}s being coordinated within a single clause or there are two clauses being coordinated within a larger sentence. This is because it is common in Ulwa to omit subjects (\sectref{sec:11.1}). Thus, although example \REF{ex:complex:23} is translated as though the \isi{coordination} occurs within a single clause, it could alternatively be the case that there are two full clauses being coordinated, but that the subject in the second clause is omitted (i.e., ‘Alimban killed the pig and [he] cooked the meat’).
A: word: lïmndï	 gloss: eye
B: word: ndï=na-asa-p	 gloss: 3PL=DETR-hit-PFV
C: word: ma=asa-p	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=hit-PFV
D: word: ma=asa-p-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=hit-PFV-DEP]
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 50:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Alimban mï lamndu ma=asa-p mundu ___
Gloss (with missing item): [name] 3SG.SUBJ pig 3SG.OBJ=hit-PFV food ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`Alimban killed the pig and cooked the meat.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: If a sentence contains two verbs that have different objects, then it is assumed that the \isi{coordination} occurs not between two verbs within a single \isi{verb phrase} but rather between two \isi{verb phrase}s. However, it is not always clear whether there are two \isi{verb phrase}s being coordinated within a single clause or there are two clauses being coordinated within a larger sentence. This is because it is common in Ulwa to omit subjects (\sectref{sec:11.1}). Thus, although example \REF{ex:complex:23} is translated as though the \isi{coordination} occurs within a single clause, it could alternatively be the case that there are two full clauses being coordinated, but that the subject in the second clause is omitted (i.e., ‘Alimban killed the pig and [he] cooked the meat’).
A: word: ma=wana-p	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=cook-PFV
B: word: kawat	 gloss: [name]
C: word: ndï=wana-nda	 gloss: 3PL=cook-IRR
D: word: ndï=wana-p	 gloss: 3PL=cook-PFV
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 51:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): u wandam ma-na ___ nï wandam ma-na
Gloss (with missing item): 2SG jungle go-IRR ___ 2SG jungle go-IRR
The English translation of this sentence is:`Either you will go to the jungle or I will go to the jungle.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___mmthe mits gloss ___pheme ___n fthe mits gloss ___pheme ___r speakers tthe mits gloss ___pheme ___ \isi{bthe mits gloss ___pheme ___rrthe mits gloss ___pheme ___w} wthe mits gloss ___pheme ___rds frthe mits gloss ___pheme ___m \ili{Tthe mits gloss ___pheme ___k Pisin} when cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___the mits gloss ___pheme ___rdinated structures are desired, especially when they are \is{disjunctive cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___the mits gloss ___pheme ___rdinatithe mits gloss ___pheme ___n} disjunctive (i.e., ‘the mits gloss ___pheme ___r’) structures, as in sentences \REF{ex:cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___mplex:28}, \REF{ex:cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___mplex:29}, and \REF{ex:cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___mplex:30}, which \isi{bthe mits gloss ___pheme ___rrthe mits gloss ___pheme ___w} \ili{Tthe mits gloss ___pheme ___k Pisin} the mits gloss ___pheme ___ ‘the mits gloss ___pheme ___r’.
A: word: wopata	 gloss: [place]
B: word: ma=won-lï-p	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=cut-put-PFV
C: word: dumngul	 gloss: [name]
D: word: o	 gloss: or
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 52:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): wambana tï-n ma=la-nda ___ an ma wanwane ango-p i ndï=wana-p ndï=la-nda
Gloss (with missing item): fish take-PFV 3SG.OBJ=eat-IRR ___ 1PL.EXCL go mushroom pull.out-PFV go.PFV 3PL=cook{-pfv} 3PL=eat{-irr}
The English translation of this sentence is:`Either [they] would catch a fish and [we] would eat it or we would go, pick mushrooms, go cook them, and eat them.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___mmthe mits gloss ___pheme ___n fthe mits gloss ___pheme ___r speakers tthe mits gloss ___pheme ___ \isi{bthe mits gloss ___pheme ___rrthe mits gloss ___pheme ___w} wthe mits gloss ___pheme ___rds frthe mits gloss ___pheme ___m \ili{Tthe mits gloss ___pheme ___k Pisin} when cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___the mits gloss ___pheme ___rdinated structures are desired, especially when they are \is{disjunctive cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___the mits gloss ___pheme ___rdinatithe mits gloss ___pheme ___n} disjunctive (i.e., ‘the mits gloss ___pheme ___r’) structures, as in sentences \REF{ex:cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___mplex:28}, \REF{ex:cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___mplex:29}, and \REF{ex:cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___mplex:30}, which \isi{bthe mits gloss ___pheme ___rrthe mits gloss ___pheme ___w} \ili{Tthe mits gloss ___pheme ___k Pisin} the mits gloss ___pheme ___ ‘the mits gloss ___pheme ___r’.
A: word: o	 gloss: or
B: word: ango	 gloss: NEG
C: word: wopata	 gloss: [place]
D: word: u=kï-na-t	 gloss: 2SG=say-IRR-SPEC
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 53:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nï ma-na ___ nï mbï-p-na nï ango kalam
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG go-IRR ___ 1SG here-be-IRR 1SG NEG knowledge
The English translation of this sentence is:`Should I go or should I stay? I don’t know.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___mmthe mits gloss ___pheme ___n fthe mits gloss ___pheme ___r speakers tthe mits gloss ___pheme ___ \isi{bthe mits gloss ___pheme ___rrthe mits gloss ___pheme ___w} wthe mits gloss ___pheme ___rds frthe mits gloss ___pheme ___m \ili{Tthe mits gloss ___pheme ___k Pisin} when cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___the mits gloss ___pheme ___rdinated structures are desired, especially when they are \is{disjunctive cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___the mits gloss ___pheme ___rdinatithe mits gloss ___pheme ___n} disjunctive (i.e., ‘the mits gloss ___pheme ___r’) structures, as in sentences \REF{ex:cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___mplex:28}, \REF{ex:cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___mplex:29}, and \REF{ex:cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___mplex:30}, which \isi{bthe mits gloss ___pheme ___rrthe mits gloss ___pheme ___w} \ili{Tthe mits gloss ___pheme ___k Pisin} the mits gloss ___pheme ___ ‘the mits gloss ___pheme ___r’.
A: word: o	 gloss: or
B: word: wopata	 gloss: [place]
C: word: mukamba	 gloss: [name]
D: word: ma=wap	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=be.PST
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 54:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Kawana mï mïnda ___ utam ama-p
Gloss (with missing item): [name] 3SG.SUBJ banana ___ yam eat-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`Kawana ate either a banana or a yam.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: This \ili{Tthe mits gloss ___pheme ___k Pisin} \isi{lthe mits gloss ___pheme ___anwthe mits gloss ___pheme ___rd} the mits gloss ___pheme ___ ‘the mits gloss ___pheme ___r’ is used nthe mits gloss ___pheme ___t the mits gloss ___pheme ___nly tthe mits gloss ___pheme ___ cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___nnect clauses, but alsthe mits gloss ___pheme ___ tthe mits gloss ___pheme ___ cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___nnect elements within \isi{phrase}s, as in \REF{ex:cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___mplex:31}, \REF{ex:cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___mplex:32}, and \REF{ex:cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___mplex:33}.
A: word: wopata	 gloss: [place]
B: word: mbalus	 gloss: airplane
C: word: ma=i-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=go.PFV-DEP
D: word: o	 gloss: or
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 55:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): u ___ nï wandam ma-na
Gloss (with missing item): 2SG ___ 1SG jungle go-IRR
The English translation of this sentence is:`Either you or I will go to the jungle.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: This \ili{Tthe mits gloss ___pheme ___k Pisin} \isi{lthe mits gloss ___pheme ___anwthe mits gloss ___pheme ___rd} the mits gloss ___pheme ___ ‘the mits gloss ___pheme ___r’ is used nthe mits gloss ___pheme ___t the mits gloss ___pheme ___nly tthe mits gloss ___pheme ___ cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___nnect clauses, but alsthe mits gloss ___pheme ___ tthe mits gloss ___pheme ___ cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___nnect elements within \isi{phrase}s, as in \REF{ex:cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___mplex:31}, \REF{ex:cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___mplex:32}, and \REF{ex:cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___mplex:33}.
A: word: o	 gloss: or
B: word: kïkal-wana	 gloss: ear-feel
C: word: wopata	 gloss: [place]
D: word: atwana	 gloss: question
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 56:
You are a linguist specializing in Ulwa. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): mïnal ___ mil o utam o nongontam mï keka ndï=n u-p
Gloss (with missing item): taro ___ sugarcane or yam or kaukau 3SG.SUBJ completely 3PL=OBL put-PFV
The English translation of this sentence is:`[Whether it be] taro or sugarcane or yam or kaukau [= sweet potato], he planted them all.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: This \ili{Tthe mits gloss ___pheme ___k Pisin} \isi{lthe mits gloss ___pheme ___anwthe mits gloss ___pheme ___rd} the mits gloss ___pheme ___ ‘the mits gloss ___pheme ___r’ is used nthe mits gloss ___pheme ___t the mits gloss ___pheme ___nly tthe mits gloss ___pheme ___ cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___nnect clauses, but alsthe mits gloss ___pheme ___ tthe mits gloss ___pheme ___ cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___nnect elements within \isi{phrase}s, as in \REF{ex:cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___mplex:31}, \REF{ex:cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___mplex:32}, and \REF{ex:cthe mits gloss ___pheme ___mplex:33}.
A: word: ma=lï-p-e	 gloss: 3SG.OBJ=put{-pfv-dep}
B: word: o	 gloss: or
C: word: wopata	 gloss: [place]
D: word: ndï=mïmïl-aw-e	 gloss: 3PL=wring-put.IPFV-DEP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B