cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 15:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): In ___ da tgèsa, è `l gjat a `l tgaun, a tiar-tgèsa è sagir tùt quaj tga vò bigj’ ad alp. Als tiars-tgèsa èn atgnamajn cò, né sén majṣès, quaj è quèlas tgauras a nùrsas a pòrs.
Gloss (with missing item): INDEF.M.SG ___ of house.F.SG COP.PRS.3SG DEF.M.SG cat and DEF.M.SG dog and animal.M.SG-house.F.SG COP.PRS.3SG for_sure all DEM.UNM REL go.PRS.3SG NEG to alpine_pasture.M.SG DEF.M.PL animal.PL-house.F.SG COP.PRS.3PL actually here or on assembly_of_houses.M.SG DEM.GL COP.PRS.3SG DEM.F.PL goat.PL and sheep.F-PL and pig.M.PL
The English translation of this sentence is:`A tiar da tgèsa, these are cats and dogs, and tiar tgèsa are of course all those that do not go to the alpine pastures. The tiars tgèsa are actually here, or up in the assembly of houses, these are the goats, the sheep, and the pigs.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \isi{Compounding} is achieved by joining two nouns with the preposition da `of' (\ref{ex:the morpheme ___tgèsa1}), and also by juxtaposition of two nouns (\ref{ex:clutgebaselgja1}), whereby the second noun modifies the first one as in baun-pégna `oven bench', literally `bench-oven'. Which strategy is used depends on the compound, and in some cases the two strategies may apply to the same nouns with different meanings. This last point is best exemplified by (\ref{ex:the morpheme ___tgèsa1}).
A: word: tiar	 gloss: animal
B: word: tajṣ	 gloss: badger
C: word: tiars-tgèsa	 gloss: animal.PL-house.F.SG
D: word: tiars	 gloss: animal.PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 16:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): In tiar ___ tgèsa, è `l gjat a `l tgaun, a tiar-tgèsa è sagir tùt quaj tga vò bigj’ ad alp. Als tiars-tgèsa èn atgnamajn cò, né sén majṣès, quaj è quèlas tgauras a nùrsas a pòrs.
Gloss (with missing item): INDEF.M.SG animal ___ house.F.SG COP.PRS.3SG DEF.M.SG cat and DEF.M.SG dog and animal.M.SG-house.F.SG COP.PRS.3SG for_sure all DEM.UNM REL go.PRS.3SG NEG to alpine_pasture.M.SG DEF.M.PL animal.PL-house.F.SG COP.PRS.3PL actually here or on assembly_of_houses.M.SG DEM.GL COP.PRS.3SG DEM.F.PL goat.PL and sheep.F-PL and pig.M.PL
The English translation of this sentence is:`A tiar da tgèsa, these are cats and dogs, and tiar tgèsa are of course all those that do not go to the alpine pastures. The tiars tgèsa are actually here, or up in the assembly of houses, these are the goats, the sheep, and the pigs.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \isi{Compounding} is achieved by joining two nouns with the preposition the morpheme ___ `its gloss ___' (\ref{ex:tiartgèsa1}), and also by juxtaposition its gloss ___ two nouns (\ref{ex:clutgebaselgja1}), whereby the second noun modifies the first one as in baun-pégna `oven bench', literally `bench-oven'. Which strategy is used depends on the compound, and in some cases the two strategies may apply to the same nouns with different meanings. This last point is best exemplified by (\ref{ex:tiartgèsa1}).
A: word: laj-èt	 gloss: lake-DIM
B: word: da	 gloss: of
C: word: prandévan	 gloss: take.IMPF.1PL
D: word: dal	 gloss: of.DEF.M.SG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 17:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): In tiar da ___ è `l gjat a `l tgaun, a tiar-tgèsa è sagir tùt quaj tga vò bigj’ ad alp. Als tiars-tgèsa èn atgnamajn cò, né sén majṣès, quaj è quèlas tgauras a nùrsas a pòrs.
Gloss (with missing item): INDEF.M.SG animal of ___ COP.PRS.3SG DEF.M.SG cat and DEF.M.SG dog and animal.M.SG-house.F.SG COP.PRS.3SG for_sure all DEM.UNM REL go.PRS.3SG NEG to alpine_pasture.M.SG DEF.M.PL animal.PL-house.F.SG COP.PRS.3PL actually here or on assembly_of_houses.M.SG DEM.GL COP.PRS.3SG DEM.F.PL goat.PL and sheep.F-PL and pig.M.PL
The English translation of this sentence is:`A tiar da tgèsa, these are cats and dogs, and tiar tgèsa are of course all those that do not go to the alpine pastures. The tiars tgèsa are actually here, or up in the assembly of houses, these are the goats, the sheep, and the pigs.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \isi{Compounding} is achieved by joining two nouns with the preposition da `of' (\ref{ex:tiarthe morpheme ___1}), and also by juxtaposition of two nouns (\ref{ex:clutgebaselgja1}), whereby the second noun modifies the first one as in baun-pégna `oven bench', literally `bench-oven'. Which strategy is used depends on the compound, and in some cases the two strategies may apply to the same nouns with different meanings. This last point is best exemplified by (\ref{ex:tiarthe morpheme ___1}).
A: word: fétg-fétg	 gloss: RED\textasciitilde{very}
B: word: tgèsa-parvènda	 gloss: presbytery
C: word: crapa	 gloss: stone.COLL
D: word: tgèsa	 gloss: house.F.SG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 18:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): In tiar da tgèsa, è `l gjat a `l tgaun, a ___ è sagir tùt quaj tga vò bigj’ ad alp. Als tiars-tgèsa èn atgnamajn cò, né sén majṣès, quaj è quèlas tgauras a nùrsas a pòrs.
Gloss (with missing item): INDEF.M.SG animal of house.F.SG COP.PRS.3SG DEF.M.SG cat and DEF.M.SG dog and ___ COP.PRS.3SG for_sure all DEM.UNM REL go.PRS.3SG NEG to alpine_pasture.M.SG DEF.M.PL animal.PL-house.F.SG COP.PRS.3PL actually here or on assembly_of_houses.M.SG DEM.GL COP.PRS.3SG DEM.F.PL goat.PL and sheep.F-PL and pig.M.PL
The English translation of this sentence is:`A tiar da tgèsa, these are cats and dogs, and tiar tgèsa are of course all those that do not go to the alpine pastures. The tiars tgèsa are actually here, or up in the assembly of houses, these are the goats, the sheep, and the pigs.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \isi{Compounding} is achieved by joining two nouns with the preposition da `of' (\ref{ex:tiartgèsa1}), and also by juxtaposition of two nouns (\ref{ex:clutgebaselgja1}), whereby the second noun modifies the first one as in baun-pégna `oven bench', literally `bench-oven'. Which strategy is used depends on the compound, and in some cases the two strategies may apply to the same nouns with different meanings. This last point is best exemplified by (\ref{ex:tiartgèsa1}).
A: word: tiars-tgèsa	 gloss: animal.PL-house.F.SG
B: word: trèn	 gloss: train
C: word: véglja-véglja	 gloss: RED\textasciitilde{old}
D: word: tiar-tgèsa	 gloss: animal.M.SG-house.F.SG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 19:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): In tiar da tgèsa, è `l gjat a `l tgaun, a tiar-tgèsa è sagir tùt quaj tga vò bigj’ ad alp. Als ___ èn atgnamajn cò, né sén majṣès, quaj è quèlas tgauras a nùrsas a pòrs.
Gloss (with missing item): INDEF.M.SG animal of house.F.SG COP.PRS.3SG DEF.M.SG cat and DEF.M.SG dog and animal.M.SG-house.F.SG COP.PRS.3SG for_sure all DEM.UNM REL go.PRS.3SG NEG to alpine_pasture.M.SG DEF.M.PL ___ COP.PRS.3PL actually here or on assembly_of_houses.M.SG DEM.GL COP.PRS.3SG DEM.F.PL goat.PL and sheep.F-PL and pig.M.PL
The English translation of this sentence is:`A tiar da tgèsa, these are cats and dogs, and tiar tgèsa are of course all those that do not go to the alpine pastures. The tiars tgèsa are actually here, or up in the assembly of houses, these are the goats, the sheep, and the pigs.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \isi{Compounding} is achieved by joining two nouns with the preposition da `of' (\ref{ex:tiartgèsa1}), and also by juxtaposition of two nouns (\ref{ex:clutgebaselgja1}), whereby the second noun modifies the first one as in baun-pégna `oven bench', literally `bench-oven'. Which strategy is used depends on the compound, and in some cases the two strategies may apply to the same nouns with different meanings. This last point is best exemplified by (\ref{ex:tiartgèsa1}).
A: word: pér	 gloss: only
B: word: trá	 gloss: pull.INF
C: word: tiars-tgèsa	 gloss: animal.PL-house.F.SG
D: word: tiar-tgèsa	 gloss: animal.M.SG-house.F.SG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 20:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Lò fùva in pin ___ cun pauc’ aua.
Gloss (with missing item): there EXIST.IMPF.3SG INDEF.M.SG small ___ with little.F.SG water
The English translation of this sentence is:`There was a small lake with little water.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \isi{diminutive} of nouns is formed with the suffix -èt/-èta. (\ref{ex:dim1}) shows that the use of the \isi{diminutive} does not preclude the use of pin `small'.
A: word: tiar	 gloss: to
B: word: laj-èt	 gloss: lake-DIM
C: word: aua	 gloss: water
D: word: schulaj	 gloss: fall_rapidly.PTCP.M.PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B