cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 22:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): […] Nossadùna lèva dá [li gjuven ___ [ina rancùnusciantscha pal survètsch].
Gloss (with missing item): … Our_Lady.F.SG want.IMPF.3SG give \DB{DAT} young.M.SG ___ \DB{INDEF.F.SG} mark_of_gratitude.F.SG for.DEF.M.SG favour
The English translation of this sentence is:`[…] the Holy Virgin wanted to give the young priest a mark of gratitude for the favour [he had done her].'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Tuatschin possesses \isi{impersonal}, \isi{intransitive} (\ref{ex:intrans1}), mono-, and \isi{ditransitive verbs}. \isi{Impersonal verb}s require an \isi{expletive pronoun} in \isi{subject} position (\ref{ex:impers1}). \isi{Monotransitive verbs} usually have a \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:trans1} and \ref{ex:trans2}), but in rare cases they may have an \isi{indirect object} (\ref{ex:trans:indir})\footnote{udí da is a calque from German. udí `hear' is hören in German, and belong is gehören, which triggers dative case.}. Ditransitive verbs (\ref{ex:ditrans1} and \ref{ex:ditrans2}) have a direct and an \isi{indirect object}, the latter being marked by da/dad.\footnote{As shown in \sectref{sec:3.2.1.2} and \sectref{sec:3.6.1}, the dative articles li (see (\ref{ex:ditrans2}) as well as di are obsolescent, and the \isi{dative marker} a, which is used in rare cases, is a loan from \ili{Standard Sursilvan}.}. An exception is the verb \isi{dumandá}, which has two direct objects (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}) (see \sectref{sec:4.2.2}). Note that if the two objects are pronominal, the object of asking is usually not mentioned (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}). The \isi{indirect object} usually precedes the \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:ditrans2}).
A: word: sòntga	 gloss: holy
B: word: préjr	 gloss: priest
C: word: préfatschèntas	 gloss: intermediate_trade.PL
D: word: ampréndar	 gloss: learn.INF
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 23:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): […] Nossadùna lèva dá [li gjuven préjr] ___ rancùnusciantscha pal survètsch].
Gloss (with missing item): … Our_Lady.F.SG want.IMPF.3SG give \DB{DAT} young.M.SG priest ___ mark_of_gratitude.F.SG for.DEF.M.SG favour
The English translation of this sentence is:`[…] the Holy Virgin wanted to give the young priest a mark of gratitude for the favour [he had done her].'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Tuatschin possesses \isi{impersonal}, \isi{intransitive} (\ref{ex:intrans1}), mono-, and \isi{ditransitive verbs}. \isi{Impersonal verb}s require an \isi{expletive pronoun} in \isi{subject} position (\ref{ex:impers1}). \isi{Monotransitive verbs} usually have a \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:trans1} and \ref{ex:trans2}), but in rare cases they may have an \isi{indirect object} (\ref{ex:trans:indir})\footnote{udí da is a calque from German. udí `hear' is hören in German, and belong is gehören, which triggers dative case.}. Ditransitive verbs (\ref{ex:ditrans1} and \ref{ex:ditrans2}) have a direct and an \isi{indirect object}, the latter being marked by da/dad.\footnote{As shown in \sectref{sec:3.2.1.2} and \sectref{sec:3.6.1}, the dative articles li (see (\ref{ex:ditrans2}) as well as di are obsolescent, and the \isi{dative marker} a, which is used in rare cases, is a loan from \ili{Standard Sursilvan}.}. An exception is the verb \isi{dumandá}, which has two direct objects (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}) (see \sectref{sec:4.2.2}). Note that if the two objects are pronomthe morpheme ___l, the object of asking is usually not mentioned (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}). The \isi{indirect object} usually precedes the \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:ditrans2}).
A: word: fuméglja	 gloss: farmhand.COLL
B: word: tgéjnina	 gloss: which_one
C: word: vacas	 gloss: cow.PL
D: word: ina	 gloss: \DB{INDEF.F.SG}
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 24:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): […] Nossadùna lèva dá [li gjuven préjr] [ina ___ pal survètsch].
Gloss (with missing item): … Our_Lady.F.SG want.IMPF.3SG give \DB{DAT} young.M.SG priest \DB{INDEF.F.SG} ___ for.DEF.M.SG favour
The English translation of this sentence is:`[…] the Holy Virgin wanted to give the young priest a mark of gratitude for the favour [he had done her].'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Tuatschin possesses \isi{impersonal}, \isi{intransitive} (\ref{ex:intrans1}), mono-, and \isi{ditransitive verbs}. \isi{Impersonal verb}s require an \isi{expletive pronoun} in \isi{subject} position (\ref{ex:impers1}). \isi{Monotransitive verbs} usually have a \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:trans1} and \ref{ex:trans2}), but in rare cases they may have an \isi{indirect object} (\ref{ex:trans:indir})\footnote{udí da is a calque from German. udí `hear' is hören in German, and belong is gehören, which triggers dative case.}. Ditransitive verbs (\ref{ex:ditrans1} and \ref{ex:ditrans2}) have a direct and an \isi{indirect object}, the latter being marked by da/dad.\footnote{As shown in \sectref{sec:3.2.1.2} and \sectref{sec:3.6.1}, the dative articles li (see (\ref{ex:ditrans2}) as well as di are obsolescent, and the \isi{dative marker} a, which is used in rare cases, is a loan from \ili{Standard Sursilvan}.}. An exception is the verb \isi{dumandá}, which has two direct objects (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}) (see \sectref{sec:4.2.2}). Note that if the two objects are pronominal, the object of asking is usually not mentioned (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}). The \isi{indirect object} usually precedes the \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:ditrans2}).
A: word: rancùnusciantscha	 gloss: mark_of_gratitude.F.SG
B: word: ancùnuschju	 gloss: know.PTCP.UNM
C: word: banadiczjun	 gloss: blessing
D: word: òtg	 gloss: eight
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 25:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): […] Nossadùna lèva ___ [li gjuven préjr] [ina rancùnusciantscha pal survètsch].
Gloss (with missing item): … Our_Lady.F.SG want.IMPF.3SG ___ \DB{DAT} young.M.SG priest \DB{INDEF.F.SG} mark_of_gratitude.F.SG for.DEF.M.SG favour
The English translation of this sentence is:`[…] the Holy Virgin wanted to give the young priest a mark of gratitude for the favour [he had done her].'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Tuatschin possesses \isi{impersonal}, \isi{intransitive} (\ref{ex:intrans1}), mono-, and \isi{ditransitive verbs}. \isi{Impersonal verb}s require an \isi{expletive pronoun} in \isi{subject} position (\ref{ex:impers1}). \isi{Monotransitive verbs} usually have a \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:trans1} and \ref{ex:trans2}), but in rare cases they may have an \isi{indirect object} (\ref{ex:trans:indir})\footnote{udí da is a calque from German. udí `hear' is hören in German, and belong is gehören, which triggers dative case.}. Ditransitive verbs (\ref{ex:ditrans1} and \ref{ex:ditrans2}) have a direct and an \isi{indirect object}, the latter being marked by da/dad.\footnote{As shown in \sectref{sec:3.2.1.2} and \sectref{sec:3.6.1}, the dative articles li (see (\ref{ex:ditrans2}) as well as di are obsolescent, and the \isi{dative marker} a, which is used in rare cases, is a loan from \ili{Standard Sursilvan}.}. An exception is the verb \isi{dumanthe morpheme ___}, which has two direct objects (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}) (see \sectref{sec:4.2.2}). Note that if the two objects are pronominal, the object of asking is usually not mentioned (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}). The \isi{indirect object} usually precedes the \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:ditrans2}).
A: word: dá	 gloss: give
B: word: schanza	 gloss: chance.F.SG
C: word: ancù̱ntar	 gloss: towards
D: word: raṣdá	 gloss: speak.INF
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 26:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): […] Nossadùna lèva dá ___ gjuven préjr] [ina rancùnusciantscha pal survètsch].
Gloss (with missing item): … Our_Lady.F.SG want.IMPF.3SG give ___ young.M.SG priest \DB{INDEF.F.SG} mark_of_gratitude.F.SG for.DEF.M.SG favour
The English translation of this sentence is:`[…] the Holy Virgin wanted to give the young priest a mark of gratitude for the favour [he had done her].'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Tuatschin possesses \isi{impersonal}, \isi{intransitive} (\ref{ex:intrans1}), mono-, and \isi{ditransitive verbs}. \isi{Impersonal verb}s require an \isi{expletive pronoun} in \isi{subject} position (\ref{ex:impers1}). \isi{Monotransitive verbs} usually have a \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:trans1} and \ref{ex:trans2}), but in rare cases they may have an \isi{indirect object} (\ref{ex:trans:indir})\footnote{udí da is a calque from German. udí `hear' is hören in German, and belong is gehören, which triggers dative case.}. Ditransitive verbs (\ref{ex:ditrans1} and \ref{ex:ditrans2}) have a direct and an \isi{indirect object}, the latter being marked by da/dad.\footnote{As shown in \sectref{sec:3.2.1.2} and \sectref{sec:3.6.1}, the dative articles the morpheme ___ (see (\ref{ex:ditrans2}) as well as di are obsolescent, and the \isi{dative marker} a, which is used in rare cases, is a loan from \ithe morpheme ___{Standard Sursilvan}.}. An exception is the verb \isi{dumandá}, which has two direct objects (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}) (see \sectref{sec:4.2.2}). Note that if the two objects are pronominal, the object of asking is usually not mentioned (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}). The \isi{indirect object} usually precedes the \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:ditrans2}).
A: word: fatg	 gloss: make.PTCP.UNM
B: word: ganugljaṣ	 gloss: knee.F.PL
C: word: li	 gloss: \DB{DAT}
D: word: lingja	 gloss: line
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 27:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): […] Nossadùna lèva dá [li ___ préjr] [ina rancùnusciantscha pal survètsch].
Gloss (with missing item): … Our_Lady.F.SG want.IMPF.3SG give \DB{DAT} ___ priest \DB{INDEF.F.SG} mark_of_gratitude.F.SG for.DEF.M.SG favour
The English translation of this sentence is:`[…] the Holy Virgin wanted to give the young priest a mark of gratitude for the favour [he had done her].'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Tuatschin possesses \isi{impersonal}, \isi{intransitive} (\ref{ex:intrans1}), mono-, and \isi{ditransitive verbs}. \isi{Impersonal verb}s require an \isi{expletive pronoun} in \isi{subject} position (\ref{ex:impers1}). \isi{Monotransitive verbs} usually have a \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:trans1} and \ref{ex:trans2}), but in rare cases they may have an \isi{indirect object} (\ref{ex:trans:indir})\footnote{udí da is a calque from German. udí `hear' is hören in German, and belong is gehören, which triggers dative case.}. Ditransitive verbs (\ref{ex:ditrans1} and \ref{ex:ditrans2}) have a direct and an \isi{indirect object}, the latter being marked by da/dad.\footnote{As shown in \sectref{sec:3.2.1.2} and \sectref{sec:3.6.1}, the dative articles li (see (\ref{ex:ditrans2}) as well as di are obsolescent, and the \isi{dative marker} a, which is used in rare cases, is a loan from \ili{Standard Sursilvan}.}. An exception is the verb \isi{dumandá}, which has two direct objects (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}) (see \sectref{sec:4.2.2}). Note that if the two objects are pronominal, the object of asking is usually not mentioned (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}). The \isi{indirect object} usually precedes the \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:ditrans2}).
A: word: pauc’	 gloss: little.F.SG
B: word: piertg	 gloss: pig
C: word: gjuven	 gloss: young.M.SG
D: word: gjuvans	 gloss: young.PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 28:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): […] Nossadùna lèva dá [li gjuven ___ [ina rancùnusciantscha pal survètsch].
Gloss (with missing item): … Our_Lady.F.SG want.IMPF.3SG give \DB{DAT} young.M.SG ___ \DB{INDEF.F.SG} mark_of_gratitude.F.SG for.DEF.M.SG favour
The English translation of this sentence is:`[…] the Holy Virgin wanted to give the young priest a mark of gratitude for the favour [he had done her].'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Tuatschin possesses \isi{impersonal}, \isi{intransitive} (\ref{ex:intrans1}), mono-, and \isi{ditransitive verbs}. \isi{Impersonal verb}s require an \isi{expletive pronoun} in \isi{subject} position (\ref{ex:impers1}). \isi{Monotransitive verbs} usually have a \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:trans1} and \ref{ex:trans2}), but in rare cases they may have an \isi{indirect object} (\ref{ex:trans:indir})\footnote{udí da is a calque from German. udí `hear' is hören in German, and belong is gehören, which triggers dative case.}. Ditransitive verbs (\ref{ex:ditrans1} and \ref{ex:ditrans2}) have a direct and an \isi{indirect object}, the latter being marked by da/dad.\footnote{As shown in \sectref{sec:3.2.1.2} and \sectref{sec:3.6.1}, the dative articles li (see (\ref{ex:ditrans2}) as well as di are obsolescent, and the \isi{dative marker} a, which is used in rare cases, is a loan from \ili{Standard Sursilvan}.}. An exception is the verb \isi{dumandá}, which has two direct objects (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}) (see \sectref{sec:4.2.2}). Note that if the two objects are pronominal, the object of asking is usually not mentioned (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}). The \isi{indirect object} usually precedes the \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:ditrans2}).
A: word: scùlèta	 gloss: nursery_school.F.SG
B: word: sòntga	 gloss: holy
C: word: préjr	 gloss: priest
D: word: préfatschèntas	 gloss: intermediate_trade.PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 29:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): […] Nossadùna lèva dá [li gjuven préjr] ___ rancùnusciantscha pal survètsch].
Gloss (with missing item): … Our_Lady.F.SG want.IMPF.3SG give \DB{DAT} young.M.SG priest ___ mark_of_gratitude.F.SG for.DEF.M.SG favour
The English translation of this sentence is:`[…] the Holy Virgin wanted to give the young priest a mark of gratitude for the favour [he had done her].'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Tuatschin possesses \isi{impersonal}, \isi{intransitive} (\ref{ex:intrans1}), mono-, and \isi{ditransitive verbs}. \isi{Impersonal verb}s require an \isi{expletive pronoun} in \isi{subject} position (\ref{ex:impers1}). \isi{Monotransitive verbs} usually have a \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:trans1} and \ref{ex:trans2}), but in rare cases they may have an \isi{indirect object} (\ref{ex:trans:indir})\footnote{udí da is a calque from German. udí `hear' is hören in German, and belong is gehören, which triggers dative case.}. Ditransitive verbs (\ref{ex:ditrans1} and \ref{ex:ditrans2}) have a direct and an \isi{indirect object}, the latter being marked by da/dad.\footnote{As shown in \sectref{sec:3.2.1.2} and \sectref{sec:3.6.1}, the dative articles li (see (\ref{ex:ditrans2}) as well as di are obsolescent, and the \isi{dative marker} a, which is used in rare cases, is a loan from \ili{Standard Sursilvan}.}. An exception is the verb \isi{dumandá}, which has two direct objects (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}) (see \sectref{sec:4.2.2}). Note that if the two objects are pronomthe morpheme ___l, the object of asking is usually not mentioned (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}). The \isi{indirect object} usually precedes the \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:ditrans2}).
A: word: tgèsa	 gloss: home.F.SG
B: word: bigj’	 gloss: NEG
C: word: tgéjnina	 gloss: which_one
D: word: ina	 gloss: \DB{INDEF.F.SG}
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 30:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): […] Nossadùna lèva dá [li gjuven préjr] [ina ___ pal survètsch].
Gloss (with missing item): … Our_Lady.F.SG want.IMPF.3SG give \DB{DAT} young.M.SG priest \DB{INDEF.F.SG} ___ for.DEF.M.SG favour
The English translation of this sentence is:`[…] the Holy Virgin wanted to give the young priest a mark of gratitude for the favour [he had done her].'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Tuatschin possesses \isi{impersonal}, \isi{intransitive} (\ref{ex:intrans1}), mono-, and \isi{ditransitive verbs}. \isi{Impersonal verb}s require an \isi{expletive pronoun} in \isi{subject} position (\ref{ex:impers1}). \isi{Monotransitive verbs} usually have a \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:trans1} and \ref{ex:trans2}), but in rare cases they may have an \isi{indirect object} (\ref{ex:trans:indir})\footnote{udí da is a calque from German. udí `hear' is hören in German, and belong is gehören, which triggers dative case.}. Ditransitive verbs (\ref{ex:ditrans1} and \ref{ex:ditrans2}) have a direct and an \isi{indirect object}, the latter being marked by da/dad.\footnote{As shown in \sectref{sec:3.2.1.2} and \sectref{sec:3.6.1}, the dative articles li (see (\ref{ex:ditrans2}) as well as di are obsolescent, and the \isi{dative marker} a, which is used in rare cases, is a loan from \ili{Standard Sursilvan}.}. An exception is the verb \isi{dumandá}, which has two direct objects (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}) (see \sectref{sec:4.2.2}). Note that if the two objects are pronominal, the object of asking is usually not mentioned (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}). The \isi{indirect object} usually precedes the \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:ditrans2}).
A: word: rancùnusciantscha	 gloss: mark_of_gratitude.F.SG
B: word: ṣurangjù	 gloss: over_down
C: word: banadiczjun	 gloss: blessing
D: word: ancùnuschju	 gloss: know.PTCP.UNM
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 31:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [...] ina zagríndara […] ___ dumandau [la mùma da tgèsa] [in tgavégl da sia buéba].
Gloss (with missing item): … INDEF.F.SG Yenish … ___ ask.PTCP.UNM \DB{DEF.F.SG} mother of house.F \db{one} hair of POSS.3SG.F.SG girl
The English translation of this sentence is:`[…] a Yenish woman [...] asked the mother of the house for one hair from her daughter.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Tuatschin possesses \isi{impersonal}, \isi{intransitive} (\ref{ex:intrans1}), mono-, and \isi{ditransitive verbs}. \isi{Impersonal verb}s require an \isi{expletive pronoun} in \isi{subject} position (\ref{ex:impers1}). \isi{Monotransitive verbs} usually have a \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:trans1} and \ref{ex:trans2}), but in rare cases they may have an \isi{indirect object} (\ref{ex:trans:indir})\footnote{udí da is a calque from German. udí `hear' is hören in German, and belong is gehören, which triggers dative case.}. Ditransitive verbs (\ref{ex:ditrans1} and \ref{ex:ditrans2}) have a direct and an \isi{indirect object}, the latter being marked by da/dad.\footnote{As shown in \sectref{sec:3.2.1.2} and \sectref{sec:3.6.1}, the dative articles li (see (\ref{ex:ditrans2}) as well as di are obsolescent, and the \isi{dative marker} a, which is used in rare cases, is a loan from \ili{Standard Sursilvan}.}. An exception is the verb \isi{dumandá}, which has two direct objects (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}) (see \sectref{sec:4.2.2}). Note that if the two objects are pronominal, the object of asking is usually not mentioned (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}). The \isi{indirect object} usually precedes the \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:ditrans2}).
A: word: matévani	 gloss: put.IMPF.3PL.3PL
B: word: schòn	 gloss: in_fact
C: word: ò	 gloss: have.PRS.3SG
D: word: gjuven	 gloss: young.M.SG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C