cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 12:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): In dé […] partgirava in buép [laṣ ___ sén Vòns.
Gloss (with missing item): INDEF.M.SG day … mind.IMPF.3SG INDEF.M.SG boy \DB{DEF.F.PL} ___ up PN
The English translation of this sentence is:`One day [...] a boy was taking care of the cows at Vons.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Tuatschin possesses \isi{impersonal}, \isi{intransitive} (\ref{ex:intrans1}), mono-, and \isi{ditransitive verbs}. \isi{Impersonal verb}s require an \isi{expletive pronoun} in \isi{subject} position (\ref{ex:impers1}). \isi{Monotransitive verbs} usually have a \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:trans1} and \ref{ex:trans2}), but in rare cases they may have an \isi{indirect object} (\ref{ex:trans:indir})\footnote{udí da is a calque from German. udí `hear' is hören in German, and belong is gehören, which triggers dative case.}. Ditransitive verbs (\ref{ex:ditrans1} and \ref{ex:ditrans2}) have a direct and an \isi{indirect object}, the latter being marked by da/dad.\footnote{As shown in \sectref{sec:3.2.1.2} and \sectref{sec:3.6.1}, the dative articles li (see (\ref{ex:ditrans2}) as well as di are obsolescent, and the \isi{dative marker} a, which is used in rare cases, is a loan from \ili{Standard Sursilvan}.}. An exception is the verb \isi{dumandá}, which has two direct objects (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}) (see \sectref{sec:4.2.2}). Note that if the two objects are pronominal, the object of asking is usually not mentioned (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}). The \isi{indirect object} usually precedes the \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:ditrans2}).
A: word: vaca	 gloss: cow.F.SG
B: word: gidá	 gloss: help.INF
C: word: vacas	 gloss: cow.PL
D: word: stuèv'	 gloss: should.IMPF.3SG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 13:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): A quaj gang ___ [dad òmaṣdús].
Gloss (with missing item): and DEM.M.SG corridor ___ \DB{DAT} both.M.PL
The English translation of this sentence is:`And this corridor belonged to both [families].'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Tuatschin possesses \isi{impersonal}, \isi{intransitive} (\ref{ex:intrans1}), mono-, and \isi{ditransitive verbs}. \isi{Impersonal verb}s require an \isi{expletive pronoun} in \isi{subject} position (\ref{ex:impers1}). \isi{Monotransitive verbs} usually have a \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:trans1} and \ref{ex:trans2}), but in rare cases they may have an \isi{indirect object} (\ref{ex:trans:indir})\footnote{udí da is a calque from German. udí `hear' is hören in German, and belong is gehören, which triggers dative case.}. Ditransitive verbs (\ref{ex:ditrans1} and \ref{ex:ditrans2}) have a direct and an \isi{indirect object}, the latter being marked by da/dad.\footnote{As shown in \sectref{sec:3.2.1.2} and \sectref{sec:3.6.1}, the dative articles li (see (\ref{ex:ditrans2}) as well as di are obsolescent, and the \isi{dative marker} a, which is used in rare cases, is a loan from \ili{Standard Sursilvan}.}. An exception is the verb \isi{dumandá}, which has two direct objects (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}) (see \sectref{sec:4.2.2}). Note that if the two objects are pronominal, the object of asking is usually not mentioned (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}). The \isi{indirect object} usually precedes the \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:ditrans2}).
A: word: udéva	 gloss: belong.IMPF.3SG
B: word: udévan	 gloss: hear.IMPF.3PL
C: word: lèva	 gloss: want.IMPF.3SG
D: word: ugèn	 gloss: gladly
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 14:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): A quaj gang udéva ___ òmaṣdús].
Gloss (with missing item): and DEM.M.SG corridor belong.IMPF.3SG ___ both.M.PL
The English translation of this sentence is:`And this corridor belonged to both [families].'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Tuatschin possesses \isi{impersonal}, \isi{intransitive} (\ref{ex:intrans1}), mono-, and \isi{ditransitive verbs}. \isi{Impersonal verb}s require an \isi{expletive pronoun} in \isi{subject} position (\ref{ex:impers1}). \isi{Monotransitive verbs} usually have a \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:trans1} and \ref{ex:trans2}), but in rare cases they may have an \isi{indirect object} (\ref{ex:trans:indir})\footnote{udí da is a calque from German. udí `hear' is hören in German, and belong is gehören, which triggers dative case.}. Ditransitive verbs (\ref{ex:ditrans1} and \ref{ex:ditrans2}) have a direct and an \isi{indirect object}, the latter being marked by da/the morpheme ___.\footnote{As shown in \sectref{sec:3.2.1.2} and \sectref{sec:3.6.1}, the dative articles li (see (\ref{ex:ditrans2}) as well as di are obsolescent, and the \isi{dative marker} a, which is used in rare cases, is a loan from \ili{Standard Sursilvan}.}. An exception is the verb \isi{dumandá}, which has two direct objects (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}) (see \sectref{sec:4.2.2}). Note that if the two objects are pronominal, the object of asking is usually not mentioned (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}). The \isi{indirect object} usually precedes the \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:ditrans2}).
A: word: dad	 gloss: \DB{DAT}
B: word: siṣ	 gloss: six
C: word: carèzja	 gloss: love
D: word: curdada	 gloss: fall.PTCP.F.SG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 15:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [...] ___ carèzja] tgu stù dá [da quèlas].
Gloss (with missing item): … ___ love REL.1SG must.PRS.1SG give.INF \DB{DAT} DEM.F.PL
The English translation of this sentence is:`[...] my love that I have to give them.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Tuatschin possesses \isi{impersonal}, \isi{intransitive} (\ref{ex:intrans1}), mono-, and \isi{ditransitive verbs}. \isi{Impersonal verb}s require an \isi{expletive pronoun} in \isi{subject} position (\ref{ex:impers1}). \isi{Monotransitive verbs} usually have a \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:trans1} and \ref{ex:trans2}), but in rare cases they may have an \isi{indirect object} (\ref{ex:trans:indir})\footnote{udí da is a calque from German. udí `hear' is hören in German, and belong is gehören, which triggers dative case.}. Ditransitive verbs (\ref{ex:ditrans1} and \ref{ex:ditrans2}) have a direct and an \isi{indirect object}, the latter being marked by da/dad.\footnote{As shown in \sectref{sec:3.2.1.2} and \sectref{sec:3.6.1}, the dative articles li (see (\ref{ex:ditrans2}) as well as di are obsolescent, and the \isi{dative marker} a, which is used in rare cases, is a loan from \ili{Standard Sursilvan}.}. An exception is the verb \isi{dumandá}, which has two direct objects (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}) (see \sectref{sec:4.2.2}). Note that if the two objects are pronominal, the object of asking is usually not mentioned (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}). The \isi{indirect object} usually precedes the \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:ditrans2}).
A: word: mintga	 gloss: every
B: word: mia	 gloss: \DB{POSS.1SG.F.SG}
C: word: amiaz	 gloss: amid
D: word: spérts	 gloss: spirit.PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 16:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [...] [mia ___ tgu stù dá [da quèlas].
Gloss (with missing item): … \DB{POSS.1SG.F.SG} ___ REL.1SG must.PRS.1SG give.INF \DB{DAT} DEM.F.PL
The English translation of this sentence is:`[...] my love that I have to give them.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Tuatschin possesses \isi{impersonal}, \isi{intransitive} (\ref{ex:intrans1}), mono-, and \isi{ditransitive verbs}. \isi{Impersonal verb}s require an \isi{expletive pronoun} in \isi{subject} position (\ref{ex:impers1}). \isi{Monotransitive verbs} usually have a \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:trans1} and \ref{ex:trans2}), but in rare cases they may have an \isi{indirect object} (\ref{ex:trans:indir})\footnote{udí da is a calque from German. udí `hear' is hören in German, and belong is gehören, which triggers dative case.}. Ditransitive verbs (\ref{ex:ditrans1} and \ref{ex:ditrans2}) have a direct and an \isi{indirect object}, the latter being marked by da/dad.\footnote{As shown in \sectref{sec:3.2.1.2} and \sectref{sec:3.6.1}, the dative articles li (see (\ref{ex:ditrans2}) as well as di are obsolescent, and the \isi{dative marker} a, which is used in rare cases, is a loan from \ili{Standard Sursilvan}.}. An exception is the verb \isi{dumandá}, which has two direct objects (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}) (see \sectref{sec:4.2.2}). Note that if the two objects are pronominal, the object of asking is usually not mentioned (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}). The \isi{indirect object} usually precedes the \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:ditrans2}).
A: word: carèzja	 gloss: love
B: word: désidé̱ri	 gloss: longing
C: word: balèzja	 gloss: beauty.F.SG.ELAT
D: word: gjufnas	 gloss: young_woman.PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 17:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [...] [mia carèzja] tgu stù ___ [da quèlas].
Gloss (with missing item): … \DB{POSS.1SG.F.SG} love REL.1SG must.PRS.1SG ___ \DB{DAT} DEM.F.PL
The English translation of this sentence is:`[...] my love that I have to give them.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Tuatschin possesses \isi{impersonal}, \isi{intransitive} (\ref{ex:intrans1}), mono-, and \isi{ditransitive verbs}. \isi{Impersonal verb}s require an \isi{expletive pronoun} in \isi{subject} position (\ref{ex:impers1}). \isi{Monotransitive verbs} usually have a \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:trans1} and \ref{ex:trans2}), but in rare cases they may have an \isi{indirect object} (\ref{ex:trans:indir})\footnote{udí da is a calque from German. udí `hear' is hören in German, and belong is gehören, which triggers dative case.}. Ditransitive verbs (\ref{ex:ditrans1} and \ref{ex:ditrans2}) have a direct and an \isi{indirect object}, the latter being marked by da/dad.\footnote{As shown in \sectref{sec:3.2.1.2} and \sectref{sec:3.6.1}, the dative articles li (see (\ref{ex:ditrans2}) as well as di are obsolescent, and the \isi{dative marker} a, which is used in rare cases, is a loan from \ili{Standard Sursilvan}.}. An exception is the verb \isi{dumanthe morpheme ___}, which has two direct objects (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}) (see \sectref{sec:4.2.2}). Note that if the two objects are pronominal, the object of asking is usually not mentioned (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}). The \isi{indirect object} usually precedes the \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:ditrans2}).
A: word: dá	 gloss: give.INF
B: word: savèns	 gloss: often
C: word: raṣdá	 gloss: speak.INF
D: word: véjdar	 gloss: old.ADJ.UNM
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 18:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [...] [mia carèzja] tgu stù dá ___ quèlas].
Gloss (with missing item): … \DB{POSS.1SG.F.SG} love REL.1SG must.PRS.1SG give.INF ___ DEM.F.PL
The English translation of this sentence is:`[...] my love that I have to give them.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Tuatschin possesses \isi{impersonal}, \isi{intransitive} (\ref{ex:intrans1}), mono-, and \isi{ditransitive verbs}. \isi{Impersonal verb}s require an \isi{expletive pronoun} in \isi{subject} position (\ref{ex:impers1}). \isi{Monotransitive verbs} usually have a \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:trans1} and \ref{ex:trans2}), but in rare cases they may have an \isi{indirect object} (\ref{ex:trans:indir})\footnote{udí the morpheme ___ is a calque from German. udí `hear' is hören in German, and belong is gehören, which triggers the morpheme ___tive case.}. Ditransitive verbs (\ref{ex:ditrans1} and \ref{ex:ditrans2}) have a direct and an \isi{indirect object}, the latter being marked by the morpheme ___/the morpheme ___d.\footnote{As shown in \sectref{sec:3.2.1.2} and \sectref{sec:3.6.1}, the the morpheme ___tive articles li (see (\ref{ex:ditrans2}) as well as di are obsolescent, and the \isi{the morpheme ___tive marker} a, which is used in rare cases, is a loan from \ili{Stanthe morpheme ___rd Sursilvan}.}. An exception is the verb \isi{dumandá}, which has two direct objects (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}) (see \sectref{sec:4.2.2}). Note that if the two objects are pronominal, the object of asking is usually not mentioned (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}). The \isi{indirect object} usually precedes the \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:ditrans2}).
A: word: dal	 gloss: of.DEF.M.SG
B: word: maj	 gloss: never
C: word: da	 gloss: \DB{DAT}
D: word: gidá	 gloss: help.INF
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 19:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): […] Nossadùna lèva ___ [li gjuven préjr] [ina rancùnusciantscha pal survètsch].
Gloss (with missing item): … Our_Lady.F.SG want.IMPF.3SG ___ \DB{DAT} young.M.SG priest \DB{INDEF.F.SG} mark_of_gratitude.F.SG for.DEF.M.SG favour
The English translation of this sentence is:`[…] the Holy Virgin wanted to give the young priest a mark of gratitude for the favour [he had done her].'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Tuatschin possesses \isi{impersonal}, \isi{intransitive} (\ref{ex:intrans1}), mono-, and \isi{ditransitive verbs}. \isi{Impersonal verb}s require an \isi{expletive pronoun} in \isi{subject} position (\ref{ex:impers1}). \isi{Monotransitive verbs} usually have a \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:trans1} and \ref{ex:trans2}), but in rare cases they may have an \isi{indirect object} (\ref{ex:trans:indir})\footnote{udí da is a calque from German. udí `hear' is hören in German, and belong is gehören, which triggers dative case.}. Ditransitive verbs (\ref{ex:ditrans1} and \ref{ex:ditrans2}) have a direct and an \isi{indirect object}, the latter being marked by da/dad.\footnote{As shown in \sectref{sec:3.2.1.2} and \sectref{sec:3.6.1}, the dative articles li (see (\ref{ex:ditrans2}) as well as di are obsolescent, and the \isi{dative marker} a, which is used in rare cases, is a loan from \ili{Standard Sursilvan}.}. An exception is the verb \isi{dumanthe morpheme ___}, which has two direct objects (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}) (see \sectref{sec:4.2.2}). Note that if the two objects are pronominal, the object of asking is usually not mentioned (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}). The \isi{indirect object} usually precedes the \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:ditrans2}).
A: word: cunquaj	 gloss: since
B: word: vagnév’	 gloss: come.IMPF.3SG
C: word: raṣdá	 gloss: speak.INF
D: word: dá	 gloss: give
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 20:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): […] Nossadùna lèva dá ___ gjuven préjr] [ina rancùnusciantscha pal survètsch].
Gloss (with missing item): … Our_Lady.F.SG want.IMPF.3SG give ___ young.M.SG priest \DB{INDEF.F.SG} mark_of_gratitude.F.SG for.DEF.M.SG favour
The English translation of this sentence is:`[…] the Holy Virgin wanted to give the young priest a mark of gratitude for the favour [he had done her].'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Tuatschin possesses \isi{impersonal}, \isi{intransitive} (\ref{ex:intrans1}), mono-, and \isi{ditransitive verbs}. \isi{Impersonal verb}s require an \isi{expletive pronoun} in \isi{subject} position (\ref{ex:impers1}). \isi{Monotransitive verbs} usually have a \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:trans1} and \ref{ex:trans2}), but in rare cases they may have an \isi{indirect object} (\ref{ex:trans:indir})\footnote{udí da is a calque from German. udí `hear' is hören in German, and belong is gehören, which triggers dative case.}. Ditransitive verbs (\ref{ex:ditrans1} and \ref{ex:ditrans2}) have a direct and an \isi{indirect object}, the latter being marked by da/dad.\footnote{As shown in \sectref{sec:3.2.1.2} and \sectref{sec:3.6.1}, the dative articles the morpheme ___ (see (\ref{ex:ditrans2}) as well as di are obsolescent, and the \isi{dative marker} a, which is used in rare cases, is a loan from \ithe morpheme ___{Standard Sursilvan}.}. An exception is the verb \isi{dumandá}, which has two direct objects (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}) (see \sectref{sec:4.2.2}). Note that if the two objects are pronominal, the object of asking is usually not mentioned (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}). The \isi{indirect object} usually precedes the \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:ditrans2}).
A: word: caplùta	 gloss: chapel
B: word: li	 gloss: \DB{DAT}
C: word: gl’	 gloss: DEF.M.SG
D: word: lingja	 gloss: line
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 21:
You are a linguist specializing in Kalamang. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): […] Nossadùna lèva dá [li ___ préjr] [ina rancùnusciantscha pal survètsch].
Gloss (with missing item): … Our_Lady.F.SG want.IMPF.3SG give \DB{DAT} ___ priest \DB{INDEF.F.SG} mark_of_gratitude.F.SG for.DEF.M.SG favour
The English translation of this sentence is:`[…] the Holy Virgin wanted to give the young priest a mark of gratitude for the favour [he had done her].'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Tuatschin possesses \isi{impersonal}, \isi{intransitive} (\ref{ex:intrans1}), mono-, and \isi{ditransitive verbs}. \isi{Impersonal verb}s require an \isi{expletive pronoun} in \isi{subject} position (\ref{ex:impers1}). \isi{Monotransitive verbs} usually have a \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:trans1} and \ref{ex:trans2}), but in rare cases they may have an \isi{indirect object} (\ref{ex:trans:indir})\footnote{udí da is a calque from German. udí `hear' is hören in German, and belong is gehören, which triggers dative case.}. Ditransitive verbs (\ref{ex:ditrans1} and \ref{ex:ditrans2}) have a direct and an \isi{indirect object}, the latter being marked by da/dad.\footnote{As shown in \sectref{sec:3.2.1.2} and \sectref{sec:3.6.1}, the dative articles li (see (\ref{ex:ditrans2}) as well as di are obsolescent, and the \isi{dative marker} a, which is used in rare cases, is a loan from \ili{Standard Sursilvan}.}. An exception is the verb \isi{dumandá}, which has two direct objects (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}) (see \sectref{sec:4.2.2}). Note that if the two objects are pronominal, the object of asking is usually not mentioned (\ref{ex:trans:2DO}). The \isi{indirect object} usually precedes the \isi{direct object} (\ref{ex:ditrans2}).
A: word: stau	 gloss: COP.PTCP.UNM
B: word: gjuvans	 gloss: young.PL
C: word: pauc’	 gloss: little.F.SG
D: word: gjuven	 gloss: young.M.SG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D