cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 18:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): \ꞌIna ___ rū\ꞌau nei he turu mai ki Haŋa Roa.
Gloss (with missing item): NEG ___ old_woman PROX NTR go_down hither to Hanga Roa
The English translation of this sentence is:‘This old women did not go down to Hanga Roa.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) above, tthe morpheme ___ construction \textit{{\ꞌ}ina the morpheme ___ N VP} is a verbal clause in which the morpheme ___ N is tthe morpheme ___ preverbal subject. However, tthe morpheme ___ same sequence of elements may also be an existential clause\is{Clause!existential}, in which tthe morpheme ___ verb phrase is part of a relative clause\is{Clause!relative} (see (\ref{ex:10.107}–\ref{ex:10.109}) below on tthe morpheme ___ negation of existential clauses\is{Clause!existential}).
A: word: ¡ka	 gloss: ~IMP
B: word: he	 gloss: PRED
C: word: ¿he	 gloss: ~PRED
D: word: nehenehe	 gloss: beautiful
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 19:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): \ꞌIna he rū\ꞌau ___ he turu mai ki Haŋa Roa.
Gloss (with missing item): NEG PRED old_woman ___ NTR go_down hither to Hanga Roa
The English translation of this sentence is:‘This old women did not go down to Hanga Roa.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) above, the construction \textit{{\ꞌ}ina he N VP} is a verbal clause in which he N is the preverbal subject. However, the same sequence of elements may also be an existential clause\is{Clause!existential}, in which the verb phrase is part of a relative clause\is{Clause!relative} (see (\ref{ex:10.107}–\ref{ex:10.109}) below on the negation of existential clauses\is{Clause!existential}).
A: word: mata	 gloss: tribe
B: word: koā	 gloss: COLL
C: word: nei:	 gloss: PROX
D: word: nei	 gloss: PROX
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 20:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ¿\ꞌIna \ꞌō ___ mata o Hotu \ꞌIti he taŋitaŋi ki te Tūpāhotu?
Gloss (with missing item): ~~NEG really ___ tribe of Hotu Iti PRED cry:RED to ART Tupahotu
The English translation of this sentence is:‘The tribe of Hotu Iti doesn’t mourn for the Tupahotu, does it?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) above, tthe morpheme ___ construction \textit{{\ꞌ}ina the morpheme ___ N VP} is a verbal clause in which the morpheme ___ N is tthe morpheme ___ preverbal subject. However, tthe morpheme ___ same sequence of elements may also be an existential clause\is{Clause!existential}, in which tthe morpheme ___ verb phrase is part of a relative clause\is{Clause!relative} (see (\ref{ex:10.107}–\ref{ex:10.109}) below on tthe morpheme ___ negation of existential clauses\is{Clause!existential}).
A: word: ¡ka	 gloss: ~IMP
B: word: nehenehe	 gloss: beautiful
C: word: ¿he	 gloss: ~PRED
D: word: he	 gloss: PRED
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 21:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ¿\ꞌIna \ꞌō he ___ o Hotu \ꞌIti he taŋitaŋi ki te Tūpāhotu?
Gloss (with missing item): ~~NEG really PRED ___ of Hotu Iti PRED cry:RED to ART Tupahotu
The English translation of this sentence is:‘The tribe of Hotu Iti doesn’t mourn for the Tupahotu, does it?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) above, the construction \textit{{\ꞌ}ina he N VP} is a verbal clause in which he N is the preverbal subject. However, the same sequence of elements may also be an existential clause\is{Clause!existential}, in which the verb phrase is part of a relative clause\is{Clause!relative} (see (\ref{ex:10.107}–\ref{ex:10.109}) below on the negation of existential clauses\is{Clause!existential}).
A: word: matahiti	 gloss: year
B: word: mata	 gloss: tribe
C: word: koa	 gloss: happy
D: word: kaiŋa	 gloss: Kainga
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 22:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): \ꞌIna ___ rū\ꞌau nei he turu mai ki Haŋa Roa.
Gloss (with missing item): NEG ___ old_woman PROX NTR go_down hither to Hanga Roa
The English translation of this sentence is:‘This old women did not go down to Hanga Roa.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Constructions like (\ref{ex:10.98}–\ref{ex:10.99}) are quite distinct from (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) above. Firstly, tthe morpheme ___ noun phrase does not refer to a specific entity, but predicates tthe morpheme ___ existence of tthe morpheme ___ category as a whole: ‘tthe morpheme ___re is not...’ In tthe morpheme ___ second place, tthe morpheme ___ verb is marked in ways typical of relative clauses\is{Clause!relative}. While tthe morpheme ___ verb in (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) has tthe morpheme ___ neutral marker the morpheme ___, verbs in relative clauses\is{Clause!relative} are typically marked with tthe morpheme ___ aspectuals i or e or with zero marking, but not by the morpheme ___ (\sectref{sec:11.4.3}; \sectref{sec:11.4.5}).\footnote{\label{fn:492}That tthe morpheme ___se two constructions are distinct is confirmed by tthe morpheme ___ fact that i, e and zero marking never occur after \textit{{\ꞌ}ina} + proper noun or pronoun; tthe morpheme ___y are limited to constructions with a common noun, which are open to an existential analysis.}
A: word: he	 gloss: PRED
B: word: ¿he	 gloss: ~PRED
C: word: kore	 gloss: lack
D: word: nehenehe	 gloss: beautiful
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 23:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): \ꞌIna he rū\ꞌau ___ he turu mai ki Haŋa Roa.
Gloss (with missing item): NEG PRED old_woman ___ NTR go_down hither to Hanga Roa
The English translation of this sentence is:‘This old women did not go down to Hanga Roa.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Constructions like (\ref{ex:10.98}–\ref{ex:10.99}) are quite distinct from (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) above. Firstly, the noun phrase does not refer to a specific entity, but predicates the existence of the category as a whole: ‘there is not...’ In the second place, the verb is marked in ways typical of relative clauses\is{Clause!relative}. While the verb in (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) has the neutral marker he, verbs in relative clauses\is{Clause!relative} are typically marked with the aspectuals i or e or with zero marking, but not by he (\sectref{sec:11.4.3}; \sectref{sec:11.4.5}).\footnote{\label{fn:492}That these two constructions are distinct is confirmed by the fact that i, e and zero marking never occur after \textit{{\ꞌ}ina} + proper noun or pronoun; they are limited to constructions with a common noun, which are open to an existential analysis.}
A: word: kai	 gloss: food
B: word: nei:	 gloss: PROX
C: word: nei	 gloss: PROX
D: word: koā	 gloss: COLL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 24:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ¿\ꞌIna \ꞌō ___ mata o Hotu \ꞌIti he taŋitaŋi ki te Tūpāhotu?
Gloss (with missing item): ~~NEG really ___ tribe of Hotu Iti PRED cry:RED to ART Tupahotu
The English translation of this sentence is:‘The tribe of Hotu Iti doesn’t mourn for the Tupahotu, does it?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Constructions like (\ref{ex:10.98}–\ref{ex:10.99}) are quite distinct from (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) above. Firstly, tthe morpheme ___ noun phrase does not refer to a specific entity, but predicates tthe morpheme ___ existence of tthe morpheme ___ category as a whole: ‘tthe morpheme ___re is not...’ In tthe morpheme ___ second place, tthe morpheme ___ verb is marked in ways typical of relative clauses\is{Clause!relative}. While tthe morpheme ___ verb in (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) has tthe morpheme ___ neutral marker the morpheme ___, verbs in relative clauses\is{Clause!relative} are typically marked with tthe morpheme ___ aspectuals i or e or with zero marking, but not by the morpheme ___ (\sectref{sec:11.4.3}; \sectref{sec:11.4.5}).\footnote{\label{fn:492}That tthe morpheme ___se two constructions are distinct is confirmed by tthe morpheme ___ fact that i, e and zero marking never occur after \textit{{\ꞌ}ina} + proper noun or pronoun; tthe morpheme ___y are limited to constructions with a common noun, which are open to an existential analysis.}
A: word: nehenehe	 gloss: beautiful
B: word: he	 gloss: PRED
C: word: matariki	 gloss: file
D: word: ¿he	 gloss: ~PRED
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 25:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ¿\ꞌIna \ꞌō he ___ o Hotu \ꞌIti he taŋitaŋi ki te Tūpāhotu?
Gloss (with missing item): ~~NEG really PRED ___ of Hotu Iti PRED cry:RED to ART Tupahotu
The English translation of this sentence is:‘The tribe of Hotu Iti doesn’t mourn for the Tupahotu, does it?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Constructions like (\ref{ex:10.98}–\ref{ex:10.99}) are quite distinct from (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) above. Firstly, the noun phrase does not refer to a specific entity, but predicates the existence of the category as a whole: ‘there is not...’ In the second place, the verb is marked in ways typical of relative clauses\is{Clause!relative}. While the verb in (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) has the neutral marker he, verbs in relative clauses\is{Clause!relative} are typically marked with the aspectuals i or e or with zero marking, but not by he (\sectref{sec:11.4.3}; \sectref{sec:11.4.5}).\footnote{\label{fn:492}That these two constructions are distinct is confirmed by the fact that i, e and zero marking never occur after \textit{{\ꞌ}ina} + proper noun or pronoun; they are limited to constructions with a common noun, which are open to an existential analysis.}
A: word: kaiŋa	 gloss: Kainga
B: word: koa	 gloss: happy
C: word: matahiti	 gloss: year
D: word: mata	 gloss: tribe
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 26:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): \ꞌIna ___ rū\ꞌau nei he turu mai ki Haŋa Roa.
Gloss (with missing item): NEG ___ old_woman PROX NTR go_down hither to Hanga Roa
The English translation of this sentence is:‘This old women did not go down to Hanga Roa.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Constructions like (\ref{ex:10.98}–\ref{ex:10.99}) are quite distinct from (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) above. Firstly, tthe morpheme ___ noun phrase does not refer to a specific entity, but predicates tthe morpheme ___ existence of tthe morpheme ___ category as a whole: ‘tthe morpheme ___re is not...’ In tthe morpheme ___ second place, tthe morpheme ___ verb is marked in ways typical of relative clauses\is{Clause!relative}. While tthe morpheme ___ verb in (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) has tthe morpheme ___ neutral marker the morpheme ___, verbs in relative clauses\is{Clause!relative} are typically marked with tthe morpheme ___ aspectuals i or e or with zero marking, but not by the morpheme ___ (\sectref{sec:11.4.3}; \sectref{sec:11.4.5}).\footnote{\label{fn:492}That tthe morpheme ___se two constructions are distinct is confirmed by tthe morpheme ___ fact that i, e and zero marking never occur after \textit{{\ꞌ}ina} + proper noun or pronoun; tthe morpheme ___y are limited to constructions with a common noun, which are open to an existential analysis.}
A: word: hia	 gloss: yet
B: word: ¿he	 gloss: ~PRED
C: word: he	 gloss: PRED
D: word: nehenehe	 gloss: beautiful
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 27:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): \ꞌIna he rū\ꞌau ___ he turu mai ki Haŋa Roa.
Gloss (with missing item): NEG PRED old_woman ___ NTR go_down hither to Hanga Roa
The English translation of this sentence is:‘This old women did not go down to Hanga Roa.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Constructions like (\ref{ex:10.98}–\ref{ex:10.99}) are quite distinct from (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) above. Firstly, the noun phrase does not refer to a specific entity, but predicates the existence of the category as a whole: ‘there is not...’ In the second place, the verb is marked in ways typical of relative clauses\is{Clause!relative}. While the verb in (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) has the neutral marker he, verbs in relative clauses\is{Clause!relative} are typically marked with the aspectuals i or e or with zero marking, but not by he (\sectref{sec:11.4.3}; \sectref{sec:11.4.5}).\footnote{\label{fn:492}That these two constructions are distinct is confirmed by the fact that i, e and zero marking never occur after \textit{{\ꞌ}ina} + proper noun or pronoun; they are limited to constructions with a common noun, which are open to an existential analysis.}
A: word: koā	 gloss: COLL
B: word: nei	 gloss: PROX
C: word: hia	 gloss: yet
D: word: nei:	 gloss: PROX
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 28:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ¿\ꞌIna \ꞌō ___ mata o Hotu \ꞌIti he taŋitaŋi ki te Tūpāhotu?
Gloss (with missing item): ~~NEG really ___ tribe of Hotu Iti PRED cry:RED to ART Tupahotu
The English translation of this sentence is:‘The tribe of Hotu Iti doesn’t mourn for the Tupahotu, does it?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Constructions like (\ref{ex:10.98}–\ref{ex:10.99}) are quite distinct from (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) above. Firstly, tthe morpheme ___ noun phrase does not refer to a specific entity, but predicates tthe morpheme ___ existence of tthe morpheme ___ category as a whole: ‘tthe morpheme ___re is not...’ In tthe morpheme ___ second place, tthe morpheme ___ verb is marked in ways typical of relative clauses\is{Clause!relative}. While tthe morpheme ___ verb in (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) has tthe morpheme ___ neutral marker the morpheme ___, verbs in relative clauses\is{Clause!relative} are typically marked with tthe morpheme ___ aspectuals i or e or with zero marking, but not by the morpheme ___ (\sectref{sec:11.4.3}; \sectref{sec:11.4.5}).\footnote{\label{fn:492}That tthe morpheme ___se two constructions are distinct is confirmed by tthe morpheme ___ fact that i, e and zero marking never occur after \textit{{\ꞌ}ina} + proper noun or pronoun; tthe morpheme ___y are limited to constructions with a common noun, which are open to an existential analysis.}
A: word: ¿he	 gloss: ~PRED
B: word: nehenehe	 gloss: beautiful
C: word: koa	 gloss: happy
D: word: he	 gloss: PRED
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 29:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ¿\ꞌIna \ꞌō he ___ o Hotu \ꞌIti he taŋitaŋi ki te Tūpāhotu?
Gloss (with missing item): ~~NEG really PRED ___ of Hotu Iti PRED cry:RED to ART Tupahotu
The English translation of this sentence is:‘The tribe of Hotu Iti doesn’t mourn for the Tupahotu, does it?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Constructions like (\ref{ex:10.98}–\ref{ex:10.99}) are quite distinct from (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) above. Firstly, the noun phrase does not refer to a specific entity, but predicates the existence of the category as a whole: ‘there is not...’ In the second place, the verb is marked in ways typical of relative clauses\is{Clause!relative}. While the verb in (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) has the neutral marker he, verbs in relative clauses\is{Clause!relative} are typically marked with the aspectuals i or e or with zero marking, but not by he (\sectref{sec:11.4.3}; \sectref{sec:11.4.5}).\footnote{\label{fn:492}That these two constructions are distinct is confirmed by the fact that i, e and zero marking never occur after \textit{{\ꞌ}ina} + proper noun or pronoun; they are limited to constructions with a common noun, which are open to an existential analysis.}
A: word: matahiti	 gloss: year
B: word: mata	 gloss: tribe
C: word: muri	 gloss: near
D: word: kaiŋa	 gloss: Kainga
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 30:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): \ꞌIna ___ rū\ꞌau nei he turu mai ki Haŋa Roa.
Gloss (with missing item): NEG ___ old_woman PROX NTR go_down hither to Hanga Roa
The English translation of this sentence is:‘This old women did not go down to Hanga Roa.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textsc{Locative} clauses (\sectref{sec:9.4.1}) can be negated with \textit{{\ꞌ}ina} in front of tthe morpheme ___ subject. As in verbal clauses, tthe morpheme ___ subject has tthe morpheme ___ predicate marker the morpheme ___\is{the morpheme ___ (nominal predicate marker)}, even wthe morpheme ___n it has definite reference\is{Referentiality} (see (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) above).
A: word: nehenehe	 gloss: beautiful
B: word: ¿ki	 gloss: ~to
C: word: ¿he	 gloss: ~PRED
D: word: he	 gloss: PRED
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 31:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): \ꞌIna he rū\ꞌau ___ he turu mai ki Haŋa Roa.
Gloss (with missing item): NEG PRED old_woman ___ NTR go_down hither to Hanga Roa
The English translation of this sentence is:‘This old women did not go down to Hanga Roa.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textsc{Locative} clauses (\sectref{sec:9.4.1}) can be negated with \textit{{\ꞌ}ina} in front of the subject. As in verbal clauses, the subject has the predicate marker he\is{he (nominal predicate marker)}, even when it has definite reference\is{Referentiality} (see (\ref{ex:10.94}–\ref{ex:10.96}) above).
A: word: koā	 gloss: COLL
B: word: nei:	 gloss: PROX
C: word: muri	 gloss: near
D: word: nei	 gloss: PROX
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D