cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 32:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): He ta\ꞌo tako\ꞌa to rāua o ___ taŋata mo kai.
Gloss (with missing item): NTR cook_in_earth_oven also ART:of 3PL of ___ man for eat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘They also cooked people for them(selves) to eat.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Semantically, (\ref{ex:6.23}–\ref{ex:6.24}) are similar to the partitive\is{Partitive} construction discussed above. In both cases, the noun phrase refers to something which is destined for the person referred to; moreover, the sense is partitive\is{Partitive}: ‘some of the food, some of the clothes’. Also, in both cases the to{}-phrase is independent: there is no head noun to which it is attached. The difference is that in the partitive\is{Partitive} construction in (\ref{ex:6.16}–\ref{ex:6.18}) above the possessee is expressed by a genitive phrase o the morpheme ___ kahu which is semantically the head of the phrase (the noun phrase as a whole refers to ‘clothes’, not to ‘Vaha’), while in (\ref{ex:6.23}–\ref{ex:6.24}) it is not expressed at all.
A: word: te	 gloss: ART
B: word: amo	 gloss: clean
C: word: mate	 gloss: die
D: word: ruŋa	 gloss: above
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 33:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): He ta\ꞌo tako\ꞌa to rāua o te ___ mo kai.
Gloss (with missing item): NTR cook_in_earth_oven also ART:of 3PL of ART ___ for eat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘They also cooked people for them(selves) to eat.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Seits gloss ___tically, (\ref{ex:6.23}–\ref{ex:6.24}) are similar to the partitive\is{Partitive} construction discussed above. In both cases, the noun phrase refers to something which is destined for the person referred to; moreover, the sense is partitive\is{Partitive}: ‘some of the food, some of the clothes’. Also, in both cases the to{}-phrase is independent: there is no head noun to which it is attached. The difference is that in the partitive\is{Partitive} construction in (\ref{ex:6.16}–\ref{ex:6.18}) above the possessee is expressed by a genitive phrase o te kahu which is seits gloss ___tically the head of the phrase (the noun phrase as a whole refers to ‘clothes’, not to ‘Vaha’), while in (\ref{ex:6.23}–\ref{ex:6.24}) it is not expressed at all.
A: word: taŋata;	 gloss: person
B: word: rua	 gloss: two
C: word: kona	 gloss: place
D: word: taŋata	 gloss: man
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 34:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Te taŋata e ai rō \ꞌā tā\ꞌana kai, ka va\ꞌai ___ te taŋata \ꞌina \ꞌā\ꞌana kai.
Gloss (with missing item): ART man IPFV exist EMPH CONT POSS.3SG.A food IMP give ___ ART man NEG POSS.3SG.A food
The English translation of this sentence is:‘The man who has food, should give some to the man who does not have food.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Semantically, (\ref{ex:6.23}–\ref{ex:6.24}) are similar the morpheme ___ the partitive\is{Partitive} construction discussed above. In both cases, the noun phrase refers the morpheme ___ something which is destined for the person referred the morpheme ___; moreover, the sense is partitive\is{Partitive}: ‘some of the food, some of the clothes’. Also, in both cases the the morpheme ___{}-phrase is independent: there is no head noun the morpheme ___ which it is attached. The difference is that in the partitive\is{Partitive} construction in (\ref{ex:6.16}–\ref{ex:6.18}) above the possessee is expressed by a genitive phrase o te kahu which is semantically the head of the phrase (the noun phrase as a whole refers the morpheme ___ ‘clothes’, not the morpheme ___ ‘Vaha’), while in (\ref{ex:6.23}–\ref{ex:6.24}) it is not expressed at all.
A: word: mātou	 gloss: 1PL.EXCL
B: word: to	 gloss: ART:of
C: word: rivuho	 gloss: drawing
D: word: hīmene	 gloss: sing
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 35:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Te taŋata e ai rō \ꞌā tā\ꞌana kai, ka va\ꞌai to ___ taŋata \ꞌina \ꞌā\ꞌana kai.
Gloss (with missing item): ART man IPFV exist EMPH CONT POSS.3SG.A food IMP give ART:of ___ man NEG POSS.3SG.A food
The English translation of this sentence is:‘The man who has food, should give some to the man who does not have food.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Semantically, (\ref{ex:6.23}–\ref{ex:6.24}) are similar to the partitive\is{Partitive} construction discussed above. In both cases, the noun phrase refers to something which is destined for the person referred to; moreover, the sense is partitive\is{Partitive}: ‘some of the food, some of the clothes’. Also, in both cases the to{}-phrase is independent: there is no head noun to which it is attached. The difference is that in the partitive\is{Partitive} construction in (\ref{ex:6.16}–\ref{ex:6.18}) above the possessee is expressed by a genitive phrase o the morpheme ___ kahu which is semantically the head of the phrase (the noun phrase as a whole refers to ‘clothes’, not to ‘Vaha’), while in (\ref{ex:6.23}–\ref{ex:6.24}) it is not expressed at all.
A: word: mauku	 gloss: grass
B: word: te	 gloss: ART
C: word: mate	 gloss: die
D: word: ture	 gloss: judgment
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 36:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Te taŋata e ai rō \ꞌā tā\ꞌana kai, ka va\ꞌai to te ___ \ꞌina \ꞌā\ꞌana kai.
Gloss (with missing item): ART man IPFV exist EMPH CONT POSS.3SG.A food IMP give ART:of ART ___ NEG POSS.3SG.A food
The English translation of this sentence is:‘The man who has food, should give some to the man who does not have food.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Seits gloss ___tically, (\ref{ex:6.23}–\ref{ex:6.24}) are similar to the partitive\is{Partitive} construction discussed above. In both cases, the noun phrase refers to something which is destined for the person referred to; moreover, the sense is partitive\is{Partitive}: ‘some of the food, some of the clothes’. Also, in both cases the to{}-phrase is independent: there is no head noun to which it is attached. The difference is that in the partitive\is{Partitive} construction in (\ref{ex:6.16}–\ref{ex:6.18}) above the possessee is expressed by a genitive phrase o te kahu which is seits gloss ___tically the head of the phrase (the noun phrase as a whole refers to ‘clothes’, not to ‘Vaha’), while in (\ref{ex:6.23}–\ref{ex:6.24}) it is not expressed at all.
A: word: matahiapo	 gloss: firstborn
B: word: taŋata	 gloss: man
C: word: taŋata;	 gloss: person
D: word: eugenio	 gloss: Eugenio
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 37:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Te ŋā kai \ꞌāpī ra\ꞌe era... e ma\ꞌu ___ te hare pure \ꞌi ra\ꞌe.
Gloss (with missing item): ART PL food new first DIST IPFV carry ___ ART house prayer at first
The English translation of this sentence is:‘The first food... they first had to take some to the church (lit. carry those of the church)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Semantically, (\ref{ex:6.23}–\ref{ex:6.24}) are similar the morpheme ___ the partitive\is{Partitive} construction discussed above. In both cases, the noun phrase refers the morpheme ___ something which is destined for the person referred the morpheme ___; moreover, the sense is partitive\is{Partitive}: ‘some of the food, some of the clothes’. Also, in both cases the the morpheme ___{}-phrase is independent: there is no head noun the morpheme ___ which it is attached. The difference is that in the partitive\is{Partitive} construction in (\ref{ex:6.16}–\ref{ex:6.18}) above the possessee is expressed by a genitive phrase o te kahu which is semantically the head of the phrase (the noun phrase as a whole refers the morpheme ___ ‘clothes’, not the morpheme ___ ‘Vaha’), while in (\ref{ex:6.23}–\ref{ex:6.24}) it is not expressed at all.
A: word: rivuho	 gloss: drawing
B: word: rāua	 gloss: 3PL
C: word: to	 gloss: ART:of
D: word: mātou	 gloss: 1PL.EXCL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 38:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Te ŋā kai \ꞌāpī ra\ꞌe era... e ma\ꞌu to ___ hare pure \ꞌi ra\ꞌe.
Gloss (with missing item): ART PL food new first DIST IPFV carry ART:of ___ house prayer at first
The English translation of this sentence is:‘The first food... they first had to take some to the church (lit. carry those of the church)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Semantically, (\ref{ex:6.23}–\ref{ex:6.24}) are similar to the partitive\is{Partitive} construction discussed above. In both cases, the noun phrase refers to something which is destined for the person referred to; moreover, the sense is partitive\is{Partitive}: ‘some of the food, some of the clothes’. Also, in both cases the to{}-phrase is independent: there is no head noun to which it is attached. The difference is that in the partitive\is{Partitive} construction in (\ref{ex:6.16}–\ref{ex:6.18}) above the possessee is expressed by a genitive phrase o the morpheme ___ kahu which is semantically the head of the phrase (the noun phrase as a whole refers to ‘clothes’, not to ‘Vaha’), while in (\ref{ex:6.23}–\ref{ex:6.24}) it is not expressed at all.
A: word: hakaroŋo	 gloss: listen
B: word: ruŋa	 gloss: above
C: word: mate	 gloss: die
D: word: te	 gloss: ART
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 39:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Te ŋā kai \ꞌāpī ra\ꞌe era... e ma\ꞌu to te ___ pure \ꞌi ra\ꞌe.
Gloss (with missing item): ART PL food new first DIST IPFV carry ART:of ART ___ prayer at first
The English translation of this sentence is:‘The first food... they first had to take some to the church (lit. carry those of the church)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Semantically, (\ref{ex:6.23}–\ref{ex:6.24}) are similar to the partitive\is{Partitive} construction discussed above. In both cases, the noun phrase refers to something which is destined for the person referred to; moreover, the sense is partitive\is{Partitive}: ‘some of the food, some of the clothes’. Also, in both cases the to{}-phrase is independent: there is no head noun to which it is attached. The difference is that in the partitive\is{Partitive} construction in (\ref{ex:6.16}–\ref{ex:6.18}) above the possessee is expressed by a genitive phrase o te kahu which is semantically the head of the phrase (the noun phrase as a whole refers to ‘clothes’, not to ‘Vaha’), while in (\ref{ex:6.23}–\ref{ex:6.24}) it is not expressed at all.
A: word: tiare	 gloss: flower
B: word: piha	 gloss: room
C: word: hare	 gloss: house
D: word: noho	 gloss: stay
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 40:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Te ŋā kai \ꞌāpī ra\ꞌe era... e ma\ꞌu to te hare ___ \ꞌi ra\ꞌe.
Gloss (with missing item): ART PL food new first DIST IPFV carry ART:of ART house ___ at first
The English translation of this sentence is:‘The first food... they first had to take some to the church (lit. carry those of the church)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Semantically, (\ref{ex:6.23}–\ref{ex:6.24}) are similar to the partitive\is{Partitive} construction discussed above. In both cases, the noun phrase refers to something which is destined for the person referred to; moreover, the sense is partitive\is{Partitive}: ‘some of the food, some of the clothes’. Also, in both cases the to{}-phrase is independent: there is no head noun to which it is attached. The difference is that in the partitive\is{Partitive} construction in (\ref{ex:6.16}–\ref{ex:6.18}) above the possessee is expressed by a genitive phrase o te kahu which is semantically the head of the phrase (the noun phrase as a whole refers to ‘clothes’, not to ‘Vaha’), while in (\ref{ex:6.23}–\ref{ex:6.24}) it is not expressed at all.
A: word: pāhono	 gloss: answer
B: word: pure	 gloss: prayer
C: word: manurere	 gloss: airplane
D: word: vahine	 gloss: female
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 41:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): He toe e toru te \ꞌaŋahuru nō toe, ku oti \ꞌā ___ haho.
Gloss (with missing item): NTR remain NUM three ART ten just remain PRF finish CONT ___ outside
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Only thirty (men) were left, those outside were finished.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Possessive constructions occur not only as modifiers in the noun phrase, but in a range of other constructions as well. This section gives a concise listing; all of these constructions (with the exception of the elliptic construction in \REF{ex:6.34} below) are discussed in more detail elsewhere in this grammar.\footnote{\label{fn:287}Not included here are possessives expressing the subject of a relative clause in the “possessive-relative construction”; as argued in \sectref{sec:11.4.4}, these should be considered as normal noun-phrase possessors which are syntactically separate from the relative clause.}
A: word: rāua	 gloss: 3PL
B: word: rivuho	 gloss: drawing
C: word: mātou	 gloss: 1PL.EXCL
D: word: to	 gloss: ART:of
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 42:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ¿E ai rō \ꞌā te ika ___ roto?
Gloss (with missing item): ~IPFV exist EMPH CONT ART fish ___ inside
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Are there fish inside (the net)?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \subparagraph{\ref{sec:6.2.3}.5} Pthe morpheme ___ssessives the morpheme ___f the the morpheme ___{}-class may serve as the predicate the morpheme ___f existential-lthe morpheme ___cative clauses (\sectref{sec:9.3.2}); see \sectref{sec:6.3.1}.8 belthe morpheme ___w the morpheme ___n the lthe morpheme ___cative use the morpheme ___f pthe morpheme ___ssessives. In mthe morpheme ___dern Rapa Nui, Ø-pthe morpheme ___ssessives are used as in \REF{ex:6.31}; in the morpheme ___lder Rapa Nui, t{}-pthe morpheme ___ssessives were used as in (\ref{ex:6.32}–\ref{ex:6.33}).
A: word: o	 gloss: of
B: word: kona	 gloss: place
C: word: koihu	 gloss: Koihu
D: word: haho	 gloss: outside
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 43:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ¿E ai rō \ꞌā te ika o ___
Gloss (with missing item): ~IPFV exist EMPH CONT ART fish of ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Are there fish inside (the net)?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \subparagraph{\ref{sec:6.2.3}.5} Possessives of the o{}-class may serve as the predicate of existential-locative clauses (\sectref{sec:9.3.2}); see \sectref{sec:6.3.1}.8 below on the locative use of possessives. In modern Rapa Nui, Ø-possessives are used as in \REF{ex:6.31}; in older Rapa Nui, t{}-possessives were used as in (\ref{ex:6.32}–\ref{ex:6.33}).
A: word: ture	 gloss: judgment
B: word: roto	 gloss: inside
C: word: piroto	 gloss: pilot
D: word: rote	 gloss: inside_the
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 44:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): He taŋata ___ nei... Ŋata Vake te \ꞌīŋoa.
Gloss (with missing item): PRED person ___ PROX Ngata Vake ART name
The English translation of this sentence is:‘There was a man here, called Ngata Vake.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \subparagraph{\ref{sec:6.2.3}.5} Possessives of the o{}-class may serve as the predicate of existential-locative clauses (\sectref{sec:9.3.2}); see \sectref{sec:6.3.1}.8 below on the locative use of possessives. In modern Rapa Nui, Ø-possessives are used as in \REF{ex:6.31}; in older Rapa Nui, t{}-possessives were used as in (\ref{ex:6.32}–\ref{ex:6.33}).
A: word: rivuho	 gloss: drawing
B: word: to	 gloss: ART:of
C: word: tanu	 gloss: bury
D: word: mātou	 gloss: 1PL.EXCL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 45:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): He taŋata ___ ruŋa to te motu, ko Motu Tapu te \ꞌīŋoa.
Gloss (with missing item): PRED man ___ above ART:of ART islet PROM Motu Tapu ART name
The English translation of this sentence is:‘There was a man on the islet which was called Motu Tapu’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \subparagraph{\ref{sec:6.2.3}.5} Possessives of the o{}-class may serve as the predicate of existential-locative clauses (\sectref{sec:9.3.2}); see \sectref{sec:6.3.1}.8 below on the locative use of possessives. In modern Rapa Nui, Ø-possessives are used as in \REF{ex:6.31}; in older Rapa Nui, t{}-possessives were used as in (\ref{ex:6.32}–\ref{ex:6.33}).
A: word: to	 gloss: ART:of
B: word: rivuho	 gloss: drawing
C: word: mātou	 gloss: 1PL.EXCL
D: word: ruŋa	 gloss: above
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 46:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): He taŋata to ___ to te motu, ko Motu Tapu te \ꞌīŋoa.
Gloss (with missing item): PRED man ART:of ___ ART:of ART islet PROM Motu Tapu ART name
The English translation of this sentence is:‘There was a man on the islet which was called Motu Tapu’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \subparagraph{\ref{sec:6.2.3}.5} Possessives of the o{}-class may serve as the predicate of existential-locative clauses (\sectref{sec:9.3.2}); see \sectref{sec:6.3.1}.8 below on the locative use of possessives. In modern Rapa Nui, Ø-possessives are used as in \REF{ex:6.31}; in older Rapa Nui, t{}-possessives were used as in (\ref{ex:6.32}–\ref{ex:6.33}).
A: word: ruŋa	 gloss: above
B: word: uŋa	 gloss: send
C: word: raro	 gloss: below
D: word: ture	 gloss: judgment
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A