cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 29:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): E ___ rō mai \ꞌā paurō te mahana ki a au.
Gloss (with missing item): IPFV ___ EMPH hither CONT every ART day to PROP 1SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Every day he speaks to me.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Clearly, in \REF{ex:3.9} the morpheme ___ is a verb, while in \REF{ex:3.10} it is a noun. So far, so good. In \REF{ex:3.7} above however, the morpheme ___ denotes an event, even though it is preceded by a determiner. It serves as the complement of oti, a verb which commonly takes a nominalised event word as complement. Thus, te the morpheme ___ in \REF{ex:3.7} is not nominal in the same way as te ŋā the morpheme ___ nei in \REF{ex:3.10}. Notice that this semantic difference correlates with certain syntactic differences: in \REF{ex:3.10}, the morpheme ___ is preceded by the plural marker ŋā, a noun phrase element; in \REF{ex:3.7} it is followed by a subject marked with the agentive e, something to be expected of a verb.
A: word: vānaŋa	 gloss: speak
B: word: parano	 gloss: Parano
C: word: vānaŋanaŋa	 gloss: talk:RED
D: word: poki	 gloss: child
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 30:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): E vānaŋa ___ mai \ꞌā paurō te mahana ki a au.
Gloss (with missing item): IPFV speak ___ hither CONT every ART day to PROP 1SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Every day he speaks to me.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Clearly, in \REF{ex:3.9} vānaŋa is a verb, while in \REF{ex:3.10} it is a noun. So far, so good. In \REF{ex:3.7} above however, vānaŋa denotes an event, even though it is preceded by a determiner. It serves as the complement of oti, a verb which commonly takes a nominalised event word as complement. Thus, te vānaŋa in \REF{ex:3.7} is not nominal in the same way as te ŋā vānaŋa nei in \REF{ex:3.10}. Notice that this semantic difference correlates with certain syntactic differences: in \REF{ex:3.10}, vānaŋa is preceded by the plural marker ŋā, a noun phrase element; in \REF{ex:3.7} it is followed by a subject marked with the agentive e, something to be expected of a verb.
A: word: tiene_que	 gloss: must
B: word: rō	 gloss: EMPH
C: word: nei:	 gloss: PROX
D: word: paurō	 gloss: every
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 31:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): E vānaŋa rō ___ \ꞌā paurō te mahana ki a au.
Gloss (with missing item): IPFV speak EMPH ___ CONT every ART day to PROP 1SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Every day he speaks to me.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Clearly, in \REF{ex:3.9} vānaŋa is a verb, while in \REF{ex:3.10} it is a noun. So far, so good. In \REF{ex:3.7} above however, vānaŋa denotes an event, even though it is preceded by a determiner. It serves as the complement of oti, a verb which commonly takes a nominalised event word as complement. Thus, te vānaŋa in \REF{ex:3.7} is not nominal in the same way as te ŋā vānaŋa nei in \REF{ex:3.10}. Notice that this semantic difference correlates with certain syntactic differences: in \REF{ex:3.10}, vānaŋa is preceded by the plural marker ŋā, a noun phrase element; in \REF{ex:3.7} it is followed by a subject marked with the agentive e, something to be expected of a verb.
A: word: hoto	 gloss: Hoto
B: word: ¿mai	 gloss: ~from
C: word: mai	 gloss: hither
D: word: kohe;	 gloss: kohe
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 32:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ka tai\ꞌo pūai ___ ŋā vānaŋa nei: raŋi, rano, rapu.
Gloss (with missing item): IMP read strong ___ PL word PROX raŋi rano rapu
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Read the following words aloud: raŋi, rano, rapu.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Clearly, in \REF{ex:3.9} vānaŋa is a verb, while in \REF{ex:3.10} it is a noun. So far, so good. In \REF{ex:3.7} above however, vānaŋa denothe morpheme ___s an event, even though it is preceded by a dethe morpheme ___rminer. It serves as the complement of oti, a verb which commonly takes a nominalised event word as complement. Thus, the morpheme ___ vānaŋa in \REF{ex:3.7} is not nominal in the same way as the morpheme ___ ŋā vānaŋa nei in \REF{ex:3.10}. Notice that this semantic difference correlathe morpheme ___s with certain syntactic differences: in \REF{ex:3.10}, vānaŋa is preceded by the plural marker ŋā, a noun phrase element; in \REF{ex:3.7} it is followed by a subject marked with the agentive e, something to be expecthe morpheme ___d of a verb.
A: word: paka	 gloss: conspicuous
B: word: te	 gloss: ART
C: word: kape	 gloss: boss
D: word: mate	 gloss: die
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 33:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ka tai\ꞌo pūai te ___ vānaŋa nei: raŋi, rano, rapu.
Gloss (with missing item): IMP read strong ART ___ word PROX raŋi rano rapu
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Read the following words aloud: raŋi, rano, rapu.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Clearly, in \REF{ex:3.9} vānaŋa is a verb, while in \REF{ex:3.10} it is a noun. So far, so good. In \REF{ex:3.7} above however, vānaŋa denotes an event, even though it is preceded by a determiner. It serves as the complement of oti, a verb which commonly takes a nominalised event word as complement. Thus, te vānaŋa in \REF{ex:3.7} is not nominal in the same way as te the morpheme ___ vānaŋa nei in \REF{ex:3.10}. Notice that this semantic difference correlates with certain syntactic differences: in \REF{ex:3.10}, vānaŋa is preceded by the plural marker the morpheme ___, a noun phrase element; in \REF{ex:3.7} it is followed by a subject marked with the agentive e, something to be expected of a verb.
A: word: ŋā	 gloss: PL
B: word: ŋāŋata	 gloss: men
C: word: kiko	 gloss: meat
D: word: kōnui	 gloss: far
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 34:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ka tai\ꞌo pūai te ŋā ___ nei: raŋi, rano, rapu.
Gloss (with missing item): IMP read strong ART PL ___ PROX raŋi rano rapu
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Read the following words aloud: raŋi, rano, rapu.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Clearly, in \REF{ex:3.9} the morpheme ___ is a verb, while in \REF{ex:3.10} it is a noun. So far, so good. In \REF{ex:3.7} above however, the morpheme ___ denotes an event, even though it is preceded by a determiner. It serves as the complement of oti, a verb which commonly takes a nominalised event its gloss ___ as complement. Thus, te the morpheme ___ in \REF{ex:3.7} is not nominal in the same way as te ŋā the morpheme ___ nei in \REF{ex:3.10}. Notice that this semantic difference correlates with certain syntactic differences: in \REF{ex:3.10}, the morpheme ___ is preceded by the plural marker ŋā, a noun phrase element; in \REF{ex:3.7} it is followed by a subject marked with the agentive e, something to be expected of a verb.
A: word: vānaŋanaŋa	 gloss: talk:RED
B: word: huru	 gloss: manner
C: word: vānaŋa	 gloss: word
D: word: vari	 gloss: Vari
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 35:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ka tai\ꞌo pūai te ŋā vānaŋa ___ raŋi, rano, rapu.
Gloss (with missing item): IMP read strong ART PL word ___ raŋi rano rapu
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Read the following words aloud: raŋi, rano, rapu.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Clearly, in \REF{ex:3.9} vānaŋa is a verb, while in \REF{ex:3.10} it is a noun. So far, so good. In \REF{ex:3.7} above however, vānaŋa denotes an event, even though it is preceded by a determiner. It serves as the complement of oti, a verb which commonly takes a nominalised event word as complement. Thus, te vānaŋa in \REF{ex:3.7} is not nominal in the same way as te ŋā vānaŋa nei in \REF{ex:3.10}. Notice that this semantic difference correlates with certain syntactic differences: in \REF{ex:3.10}, vānaŋa is preceded by the plural marker ŋā, a noun phrase element; in \REF{ex:3.7} it is followed by a subject marked with the agentive e, something to be expected of a verb.
A: word: nei	 gloss: PROX
B: word: mātou	 gloss: 1PL.EXCL
C: word: koā	 gloss: COLL
D: word: nei:	 gloss: PROX
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 36:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): I oti era ___ vānaŋa e te vi\ꞌe...
Gloss (with missing item): PFV finish DIST ___ speak AG ART woman
The English translation of this sentence is:‘When the woman had finished speaking...’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Clearly, in \REF{ex:3.9} vānaŋa is a verb, while in \REF{ex:3.10} it is a noun. So far, so good. In \REF{ex:3.7} above however, vānaŋa denothe morpheme ___s an event, even though it is preceded by a dethe morpheme ___rminer. It serves as the complement of oti, a verb which commonly takes a nominalised event word as complement. Thus, the morpheme ___ vānaŋa in \REF{ex:3.7} is not nominal in the same way as the morpheme ___ ŋā vānaŋa nei in \REF{ex:3.10}. Notice that this semantic difference correlathe morpheme ___s with certain syntactic differences: in \REF{ex:3.10}, vānaŋa is preceded by the plural marker ŋā, a noun phrase element; in \REF{ex:3.7} it is followed by a subject marked with the agentive e, something to be expecthe morpheme ___d of a verb.
A: word: nape	 gloss: to_name
B: word: teka	 gloss: turn
C: word: te	 gloss: ART
D: word: mate	 gloss: die
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 37:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): I oti era te ___ e te vi\ꞌe...
Gloss (with missing item): PFV finish DIST ART ___ AG ART woman
The English translation of this sentence is:‘When the woman had finished speaking...’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Clearly, in \REF{ex:3.9} the morpheme ___ is a verb, while in \REF{ex:3.10} it is a noun. So far, so good. In \REF{ex:3.7} above however, the morpheme ___ denotes an event, even though it is preceded by a determiner. It serves as the complement of oti, a verb which commonly takes a nominalised event word as complement. Thus, te the morpheme ___ in \REF{ex:3.7} is not nominal in the same way as te ŋā the morpheme ___ nei in \REF{ex:3.10}. Notice that this semantic difference correlates with certain syntactic differences: in \REF{ex:3.10}, the morpheme ___ is preceded by the plural marker ŋā, a noun phrase element; in \REF{ex:3.7} it is followed by a subject marked with the agentive e, something to be expected of a verb.
A: word: vānaŋanaŋa	 gloss: talk:RED
B: word: vānaŋa	 gloss: speak
C: word: hoi	 gloss: horse
D: word: puakiva	 gloss: Puakiva
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 38:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): I oti era ___ vānaŋa e te vi\ꞌe...
Gloss (with missing item): PFV finish DIST ___ speak AG ART woman
The English translation of this sentence is:‘When the woman had finished speaking...’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Clearly, in \REF{ex:3.9} vānaŋa is a verb, while in \REF{ex:3.10} it is a noun. So far, so good. In \REF{ex:3.7} above however, vānaŋa denothe morpheme ___s an event, even though it is preceded by a dethe morpheme ___rminer. It serves as the complement of oti, a verb which commonly takes a nominalised event word as complement. Thus, the morpheme ___ vānaŋa in \REF{ex:3.7} is not nominal in the same way as the morpheme ___ ŋā vānaŋa nei in \REF{ex:3.10}. Notice that this semantic difference correlathe morpheme ___s with certain syntactic differences: in \REF{ex:3.10}, vānaŋa is preceded by the plural marker ŋā, a noun phrase element; in \REF{ex:3.7} it is followed by a subject marked with the agentive e, something to be expecthe morpheme ___d of a verb.
A: word: mei	 gloss: wither
B: word: mate	 gloss: die
C: word: tere	 gloss: run
D: word: te	 gloss: ART
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 39:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): I oti era te ___ e te vi\ꞌe...
Gloss (with missing item): PFV finish DIST ART ___ AG ART woman
The English translation of this sentence is:‘When the woman had finished speaking...’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Clearly, in \REF{ex:3.9} the morpheme ___ is a verb, while in \REF{ex:3.10} it is a noun. So far, so good. In \REF{ex:3.7} above however, the morpheme ___ denotes an event, even though it is preceded by a determiner. It serves as the complement of oti, a verb which commonly takes a nominalised event word as complement. Thus, te the morpheme ___ in \REF{ex:3.7} is not nominal in the same way as te ŋā the morpheme ___ nei in \REF{ex:3.10}. Notice that this semantic difference correlates with certain syntactic differences: in \REF{ex:3.10}, the morpheme ___ is preceded by the plural marker ŋā, a noun phrase element; in \REF{ex:3.7} it is followed by a subject marked with the agentive e, something to be expected of a verb.
A: word: vānaŋa	 gloss: speak
B: word: rarahi	 gloss: important
C: word: vānaŋanaŋa	 gloss: talk:RED
D: word: teka	 gloss: turn
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 40:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ka tai\ꞌo pūai ___ ŋā vānaŋa nei: raŋi, rano, rapu.
Gloss (with missing item): IMP read strong ___ PL word PROX raŋi rano rapu
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Read the following words aloud: raŋi, rano, rapu.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Clearly, in \REF{ex:3.9} vānaŋa is a verb, while in \REF{ex:3.10} it is a noun. So far, so good. In \REF{ex:3.7} above however, vānaŋa denothe morpheme ___s an event, even though it is preceded by a dethe morpheme ___rminer. It serves as the complement of oti, a verb which commonly takes a nominalised event word as complement. Thus, the morpheme ___ vānaŋa in \REF{ex:3.7} is not nominal in the same way as the morpheme ___ ŋā vānaŋa nei in \REF{ex:3.10}. Notice that this semantic difference correlathe morpheme ___s with certain syntactic differences: in \REF{ex:3.10}, vānaŋa is preceded by the plural marker ŋā, a noun phrase element; in \REF{ex:3.7} it is followed by a subject marked with the agentive e, something to be expecthe morpheme ___d of a verb.
A: word: te	 gloss: ART
B: word: mate	 gloss: die
C: word: tuhi	 gloss: Tuhi
D: word: haŋa	 gloss: want
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 41:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ka tai\ꞌo pūai te ___ vānaŋa nei: raŋi, rano, rapu.
Gloss (with missing item): IMP read strong ART ___ word PROX raŋi rano rapu
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Read the following words aloud: raŋi, rano, rapu.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Clearly, in \REF{ex:3.9} vānaŋa is a verb, while in \REF{ex:3.10} it is a noun. So far, so good. In \REF{ex:3.7} above however, vānaŋa denotes an event, even though it is preceded by a determiner. It serves as the complement of oti, a verb which commonly takes a nominalised event word as complement. Thus, te vānaŋa in \REF{ex:3.7} is not nominal in the same way as te the morpheme ___ vānaŋa nei in \REF{ex:3.10}. Notice that this semantic difference correlates with certain syntactic differences: in \REF{ex:3.10}, vānaŋa is preceded by the plural marker the morpheme ___, a noun phrase element; in \REF{ex:3.7} it is followed by a subject marked with the agentive e, something to be expected of a verb.
A: word: paka	 gloss: conspicuous
B: word: ŋāŋata	 gloss: men
C: word: ŋāŋaro	 gloss: PL:disappear
D: word: ŋā	 gloss: PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 42:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ka tai\ꞌo pūai te ŋā ___ nei: raŋi, rano, rapu.
Gloss (with missing item): IMP read strong ART PL ___ PROX raŋi rano rapu
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Read the following words aloud: raŋi, rano, rapu.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Clearly, in \REF{ex:3.9} the morpheme ___ is a verb, while in \REF{ex:3.10} it is a noun. So far, so good. In \REF{ex:3.7} above however, the morpheme ___ denotes an event, even though it is preceded by a determiner. It serves as the complement of oti, a verb which commonly takes a nominalised event its gloss ___ as complement. Thus, te the morpheme ___ in \REF{ex:3.7} is not nominal in the same way as te ŋā the morpheme ___ nei in \REF{ex:3.10}. Notice that this semantic difference correlates with certain syntactic differences: in \REF{ex:3.10}, the morpheme ___ is preceded by the plural marker ŋā, a noun phrase element; in \REF{ex:3.7} it is followed by a subject marked with the agentive e, something to be expected of a verb.
A: word: hati	 gloss: break
B: word: vānaŋa	 gloss: word
C: word: huru	 gloss: manner
D: word: vānaŋanaŋa	 gloss: talk:RED
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 43:
You are a linguist specializing in Rapa Nui. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ka tai\ꞌo pūai te ŋā vānaŋa ___ raŋi, rano, rapu.
Gloss (with missing item): IMP read strong ART PL word ___ raŋi rano rapu
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Read the following words aloud: raŋi, rano, rapu.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Clearly, in \REF{ex:3.9} vānaŋa is a verb, while in \REF{ex:3.10} it is a noun. So far, so good. In \REF{ex:3.7} above however, vānaŋa denotes an event, even though it is preceded by a determiner. It serves as the complement of oti, a verb which commonly takes a nominalised event word as complement. Thus, te vānaŋa in \REF{ex:3.7} is not nominal in the same way as te ŋā vānaŋa nei in \REF{ex:3.10}. Notice that this semantic difference correlates with certain syntactic differences: in \REF{ex:3.10}, vānaŋa is preceded by the plural marker ŋā, a noun phrase element; in \REF{ex:3.7} it is followed by a subject marked with the agentive e, something to be expected of a verb.
A: word: iŋa	 gloss: NMLZ
B: word: nei	 gloss: PROX
C: word: nei:	 gloss: PROX
D: word: koā	 gloss: COLL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C