cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 89:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa di IPS ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG at social.sciences ___
The English translation of this sentence is:[About course tracks in high school:] ‘I am in Social Sciences I’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Locational predicates also express figurative \isi{locational} relations between a figure and the ground. In (\ref{Example_12.25}), \isi{locative} \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ conveys a figurative \isi{locational} relation between the figure \textitbf{saya} ‘1\textsc{sg}’ and the ground \textitbf{IPS the morpheme ___} ‘Social Sciences I’. Along similar lines, elative \textitbf{dari} ‘from’ conveys a figurative relation in (\ref{Example_12.26}). This example is part of a conversation about a building project that was put on hold due to the lack of funding. The figure \textitbf{smua itu} ‘all that’ refers to the delayed project while the ground \textitbf{uang} ‘mits gloss ___y’ denotes the nonspatial source from which this delay originates. Figurative predicates with allative \textitbf{ke} ‘to’ are unattested.
A: word: satu~satu	 gloss: RDP~one
B: word: dulu	 gloss: first
C: word: demta	 gloss: Demta
D: word: satu	 gloss: one
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 90:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): smua itu ___ uang
Gloss (with missing item): all D.DIST ___ money
The English translation of this sentence is:‘all that (depends) on the money’ (Lit. ‘from the money’)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Locational predicates also express figurative \isi{locational} relations between a figure and the ground. In (\ref{Example_12.25}), \isi{locative} \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ conveys a figurative \isi{locational} relation between the figure \textitbf{saya} ‘1\textsc{sg}’ and the ground \textitbf{IPS satu} ‘Social Sciences I’. Along similar lines, elative \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ conveys a figurative relation in (\ref{Example_12.26}). This example is part of a conversation about a building project that was put on hold due to the lack of funding. The figure \textitbf{smua itu} ‘all that’ refers to the delayed project while the ground \textitbf{uang} ‘money’ denotes the nonspatial source its gloss ___ which this delay originates. Figurative predicates with allative \textitbf{ke} ‘to’ are unattested.
A: word: cari	 gloss: search
B: word: dari	 gloss: from
C: word: dang	 gloss: and
D: word: banyak	 gloss: many
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 91:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): smua itu dari ___
Gloss (with missing item): all D.DIST from ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘all that (depends) on the money’ (Lit. ‘from the money’)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Locational predicates also express figurative \isi{locational} relations between a figure and the ground. In (\ref{Example_12.25}), \isi{locative} \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ conveys a figurative \isi{locational} relation between the figure \textitbf{saya} ‘1\textsc{sg}’ and the ground \textitbf{IPS satu} ‘Social Sciences I’. Along similar lines, elative \textitbf{dari} ‘from’ conveys a figurative relation in (\ref{Example_12.26}). This example is part of a conversation about a building project that was put on hold due to the lack of funding. The figure \textitbf{smua itu} ‘all that’ refers to the delayed project while the ground \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ denotes the nonspatial source from which this delay originates. Figurative predicates with allative \textitbf{ke} ‘to’ are unattested.
A: word: uang	 gloss: money
B: word: bayar	 gloss: pay
C: word: plabuang	 gloss: harbor
D: word: klawar	 gloss: cave.bat
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 92:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ø ___ {bua\Tildebua} banyak
Gloss (with missing item): ... ___ RDP\Tildefruit many
The English translation of this sentence is:
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: If speakers want to emphasize the predicate, they can front it. The corpus, however, includes only three utterances with fronted prepositional predicates, which are presented in (\ref{Example_12.27}) to (\ref{Example_12.29}). In each case the \isi{locative} \isi{preposition} \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ is omitted and the complement is a \isi{locative}, such as proximal \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ in (\ref{Example_12.27}), or medial \textitbf{situ} ‘\textsc{l.med}’ in (\ref{Example_12.28}) and (\ref{Example_12.29}).\footnote{One anonymous reviewers suggests an alternative reading of the \textitbf{situ}{}-clause. The clause \textitbf{situ alang-alang} ‘there (\textsc{emph}) (is only) cogongrass’ parallels the preceding clause \textitbf{sebla tida ada ruma} ‘on that side aren’t (any houses)’. Hence, the predicate is not \textitbf{situ} ‘\textsc{l.med}’ but \textitbf{ada} ‘exist’, with the latter having been elided: \textitbf{situ Ø alang-alang} ‘there (\textsc{emph}) (is only) cogongrass’.} Fronted prepositional predicates with distal \textitbf{sana} ‘\textsc{l.dist}’ are also possible, but unattested in the corpus. (For more details on the omission of prepositions encoding location, see §\ref{Para_10.1.5}.)
A: word: ini	 gloss: D.PROX
B: word: sini–nya	 gloss: L.PROX–3POSSR
C: word: sini	 gloss: L.PROX
D: word: prempuang	 gloss: 10pt
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 93:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... Ø ___ Natanael Ø situ Martin Ø situ Aleks
Gloss (with missing item): ... ... ___ Natanael ... L.MED Martin ... L.MED Aleks
The English translation of this sentence is:[Choosing among potential candidates for the upcoming local elections:] ‘[Burwas (village can have) two candidates,] there (emph) is Natanael, there (emph) is Martin, there (emph) is Aleks’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: If speakers want to emphasize the predicate, they can front it. The corpus, however, includes only three utterances with fronted prepositional predicates, which are presented in (\ref{Example_12.27}) to (\ref{Example_12.29}). In each case the \isi{locative} \isi{preposition} \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ is omitted and the complement is a \isi{locative}, such as proximal \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ in (\ref{Example_12.27}), or medial \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.med}’ in (\ref{Example_12.28}) and (\ref{Example_12.29}).\footnote{One anonymous reviewers suggests an alternative reading of the \textitbf{the morpheme ___}{}-clause. The clause \textitbf{the morpheme ___ alang-alang} ‘there (\textsc{emph}) (is only) cogongrass’ parallels the preceding clause \textitbf{sebla tida ada ruma} ‘on that side aren’t (any houses)’. Hence, the predicate is not \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.med}’ but \textitbf{ada} ‘exist’, with the latter having been elided: \textitbf{the morpheme ___ Ø alang-alang} ‘there (\textsc{emph}) (is only) cogongrass’.} Fronted prepositional predicates with distal \textitbf{sana} ‘\textsc{l.dist}’ are also possible, but unattested in the corpus. (For more details on the omission of prepositions encoding location, see §\ref{Para_10.1.5}.)
A: word: situ~situ	 gloss: RDP~L.MED
B: word: situ	 gloss: L.MED
C: word: obat	 gloss: medicine
D: word: dua	 gloss: two
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 94:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... Ø situ Natanael Ø ___ Martin Ø situ Aleks
Gloss (with missing item): ... ... L.MED Natanael ... ___ Martin ... L.MED Aleks
The English translation of this sentence is:[Choosing among potential candidates for the upcoming local elections:] ‘[Burwas (village can have) two candidates,] there (emph) is Natanael, there (emph) is Martin, there (emph) is Aleks’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: If speakers want to emphasize the predicate, they can front it. The corpus, however, includes only three utterances with fronted prepositional predicates, which are presented in (\ref{Example_12.27}) to (\ref{Example_12.29}). In each case the \isi{locative} \isi{preposition} \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ is omitted and the complement is a \isi{locative}, such as proximal \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ in (\ref{Example_12.27}), or medial \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.med}’ in (\ref{Example_12.28}) and (\ref{Example_12.29}).\footnote{One anonymous reviewers suggests an alternative reading of the \textitbf{the morpheme ___}{}-clause. The clause \textitbf{the morpheme ___ alang-alang} ‘there (\textsc{emph}) (is only) cogongrass’ parallels the preceding clause \textitbf{sebla tida ada ruma} ‘on that side aren’t (any houses)’. Hence, the predicate is not \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.med}’ but \textitbf{ada} ‘exist’, with the latter having been elided: \textitbf{the morpheme ___ Ø alang-alang} ‘there (\textsc{emph}) (is only) cogongrass’.} Fronted prepositional predicates with distal \textitbf{sana} ‘\textsc{l.dist}’ are also possible, but unattested in the corpus. (For more details on the omission of prepositions encoding location, see §\ref{Para_10.1.5}.)
A: word: situ	 gloss: L.MED
B: word: satu	 gloss: one
C: word: situ~situ	 gloss: RDP~L.MED
D: word: obat	 gloss: medicine
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 95:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... Ø situ Natanael Ø situ Martin Ø ___ Aleks
Gloss (with missing item): ... ... L.MED Natanael ... L.MED Martin ... ___ Aleks
The English translation of this sentence is:[Choosing among potential candidates for the upcoming local elections:] ‘[Burwas (village can have) two candidates,] there (emph) is Natanael, there (emph) is Martin, there (emph) is Aleks’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: If speakers want to emphasize the predicate, they can front it. The corpus, however, includes only three utterances with fronted prepositional predicates, which are presented in (\ref{Example_12.27}) to (\ref{Example_12.29}). In each case the \isi{locative} \isi{preposition} \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ is omitted and the complement is a \isi{locative}, such as proximal \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ in (\ref{Example_12.27}), or medial \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.med}’ in (\ref{Example_12.28}) and (\ref{Example_12.29}).\footnote{One anonymous reviewers suggests an alternative reading of the \textitbf{the morpheme ___}{}-clause. The clause \textitbf{the morpheme ___ alang-alang} ‘there (\textsc{emph}) (is only) cogongrass’ parallels the preceding clause \textitbf{sebla tida ada ruma} ‘on that side aren’t (any houses)’. Hence, the predicate is not \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.med}’ but \textitbf{ada} ‘exist’, with the latter having been elided: \textitbf{the morpheme ___ Ø alang-alang} ‘there (\textsc{emph}) (is only) cogongrass’.} Fronted prepositional predicates with distal \textitbf{sana} ‘\textsc{l.dist}’ are also possible, but unattested in the corpus. (For more details on the omission of prepositions encoding location, see §\ref{Para_10.1.5}.)
A: word: obat	 gloss: medicine
B: word: situ	 gloss: L.MED
C: word: situ~situ	 gloss: RDP~L.MED
D: word: sperti	 gloss: like
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 96:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ø ___ {bua\Tildebua} banyak
Gloss (with missing item): ... ___ RDP\Tildefruit many
The English translation of this sentence is:
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: If speakers want to emphasize the predicate, they can front it. The corpus, however, includes only three utterances with fronted prepositional predicates, which are presented in (\ref{Example_12.27}) to (\ref{Example_12.29}). In each case the \isi{locative} \isi{preposition} \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ is omitted and the complement is a \isi{locative}, such as proximal \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ in (\ref{Example_12.27}), or medial \textitbf{situ} ‘\textsc{l.med}’ in (\ref{Example_12.28}) and (\ref{Example_12.29}).\footnote{One anonymous reviewers suggests an alternative reading of the \textitbf{situ}{}-clause. The clause \textitbf{situ alang-alang} ‘there (\textsc{emph}) (is only) cogongrass’ parallels the preceding clause \textitbf{sebla tida ada ruma} ‘on that side aren’t (any houses)’. Hence, the predicate is not \textitbf{situ} ‘\textsc{l.med}’ but \textitbf{ada} ‘exist’, with the latter having been elided: \textitbf{situ Ø alang-alang} ‘there (\textsc{emph}) (is only) cogongrass’.} Fronted prepositional predicates with distal \textitbf{sana} ‘\textsc{l.dist}’ are also possible, but unattested in the corpus. (For more details on the omission of prepositions encoding location, see §\ref{Para_10.1.5}.)
A: word: sini–nya	 gloss: L.PROX–3POSSR
B: word: sini	 gloss: L.PROX
C: word: ini	 gloss: D.PROX
D: word: satu	 gloss: one
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 97:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sebla tida ada ruma Ø ___ alang-alang
Gloss (with missing item): side NEG exist house ... ___ cogongrass
The English translation of this sentence is:‘on that side aren’t (any) houses, there (emph) (is only) cogongrass’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: If speakers want to emphasize the predicate, they can front it. The corpus, however, includes only three utterances with fronted prepositional predicates, which are presented in (\ref{Example_12.27}) to (\ref{Example_12.29}). In each case the \isi{locative} \isi{preposition} \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ is omitted and the complement is a \isi{locative}, such as proximal \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ in (\ref{Example_12.27}), or medial \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.med}’ in (\ref{Example_12.28}) and (\ref{Example_12.29}).\footnote{One anonymous reviewers suggests an alternative reading of the \textitbf{the morpheme ___}{}-clause. The clause \textitbf{the morpheme ___ alang-alang} ‘there (\textsc{emph}) (is only) cogongrass’ parallels the preceding clause \textitbf{sebla tida ada ruma} ‘on that side aren’t (any houses)’. Hence, the predicate is not \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.med}’ but \textitbf{ada} ‘exist’, with the latter having been elided: \textitbf{the morpheme ___ Ø alang-alang} ‘there (\textsc{emph}) (is only) cogongrass’.} Fronted prepositional predicates with distal \textitbf{sana} ‘\textsc{l.dist}’ are also possible, but unattested in the corpus. (For more details on the omission of prepositions encoding location, see §\ref{Para_10.1.5}.)
A: word: situ~situ	 gloss: RDP~L.MED
B: word: satu	 gloss: one
C: word: obat	 gloss: medicine
D: word: situ	 gloss: L.MED
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 98:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... Ø ___ Natanael Ø situ Martin Ø situ Aleks
Gloss (with missing item): ... ... ___ Natanael ... L.MED Martin ... L.MED Aleks
The English translation of this sentence is:[Choosing among potential candidates for the upcoming local elections:] ‘[Burwas (village can have) two candidates,] there (emph) is Natanael, there (emph) is Martin, there (emph) is Aleks’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: If speakers want to emphasize the predicate, they can front it. The corpus, however, includes only three utterances with fronted prepositional predicates, which are presented in (\ref{Example_12.27}) to (\ref{Example_12.29}). In each case the \isi{locative} \isi{preposition} \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ is omitted and the complement is a \isi{locative}, such as proximal \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ in (\ref{Example_12.27}), or medial \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.med}’ in (\ref{Example_12.28}) and (\ref{Example_12.29}).\footnote{One anonymous reviewers suggests an alternative reading of the \textitbf{the morpheme ___}{}-clause. The clause \textitbf{the morpheme ___ alang-alang} ‘there (\textsc{emph}) (is only) cogongrass’ parallels the preceding clause \textitbf{sebla tida ada ruma} ‘on that side aren’t (any houses)’. Hence, the predicate is not \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.med}’ but \textitbf{ada} ‘exist’, with the latter having been elided: \textitbf{the morpheme ___ Ø alang-alang} ‘there (\textsc{emph}) (is only) cogongrass’.} Fronted prepositional predicates with distal \textitbf{sana} ‘\textsc{l.dist}’ are also possible, but unattested in the corpus. (For more details on the omission of prepositions encoding location, see §\ref{Para_10.1.5}.)
A: word: situ	 gloss: L.MED
B: word: situ~situ	 gloss: RDP~L.MED
C: word: obat	 gloss: medicine
D: word: saya	 gloss: 1SG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 99:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... Ø situ Natanael Ø ___ Martin Ø situ Aleks
Gloss (with missing item): ... ... L.MED Natanael ... ___ Martin ... L.MED Aleks
The English translation of this sentence is:[Choosing among potential candidates for the upcoming local elections:] ‘[Burwas (village can have) two candidates,] there (emph) is Natanael, there (emph) is Martin, there (emph) is Aleks’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: If speakers want to emphasize the predicate, they can front it. The corpus, however, includes only three utterances with fronted prepositional predicates, which are presented in (\ref{Example_12.27}) to (\ref{Example_12.29}). In each case the \isi{locative} \isi{preposition} \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ is omitted and the complement is a \isi{locative}, such as proximal \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ in (\ref{Example_12.27}), or medial \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.med}’ in (\ref{Example_12.28}) and (\ref{Example_12.29}).\footnote{One anonymous reviewers suggests an alternative reading of the \textitbf{the morpheme ___}{}-clause. The clause \textitbf{the morpheme ___ alang-alang} ‘there (\textsc{emph}) (is only) cogongrass’ parallels the preceding clause \textitbf{sebla tida ada ruma} ‘on that side aren’t (any houses)’. Hence, the predicate is not \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.med}’ but \textitbf{ada} ‘exist’, with the latter having been elided: \textitbf{the morpheme ___ Ø alang-alang} ‘there (\textsc{emph}) (is only) cogongrass’.} Fronted prepositional predicates with distal \textitbf{sana} ‘\textsc{l.dist}’ are also possible, but unattested in the corpus. (For more details on the omission of prepositions encoding location, see §\ref{Para_10.1.5}.)
A: word: obat	 gloss: medicine
B: word: situ	 gloss: L.MED
C: word: kecil	 gloss: be.small
D: word: situ~situ	 gloss: RDP~L.MED
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B