cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 100:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... Ø situ Natanael Ø situ Martin Ø ___ Aleks
Gloss (with missing item): ... ... L.MED Natanael ... L.MED Martin ... ___ Aleks
The English translation of this sentence is:[Choosing among potential candidates for the upcoming local elections:] ‘[Burwas (village can have) two candidates,] there (emph) is Natanael, there (emph) is Martin, there (emph) is Aleks’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: If speakers want to emphasize the predicate, they can front it. The corpus, however, includes only three utterances with fronted prepositional predicates, which are presented in (\ref{Example_12.27}) to (\ref{Example_12.29}). In each case the \isi{locative} \isi{preposition} \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ is omitted and the complement is a \isi{locative}, such as proximal \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ in (\ref{Example_12.27}), or medial \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.med}’ in (\ref{Example_12.28}) and (\ref{Example_12.29}).\footnote{One anonymous reviewers suggests an alternative reading of the \textitbf{the morpheme ___}{}-clause. The clause \textitbf{the morpheme ___ alang-alang} ‘there (\textsc{emph}) (is only) cogongrass’ parallels the preceding clause \textitbf{sebla tida ada ruma} ‘on that side aren’t (any houses)’. Hence, the predicate is not \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.med}’ but \textitbf{ada} ‘exist’, with the latter having been elided: \textitbf{the morpheme ___ Ø alang-alang} ‘there (\textsc{emph}) (is only) cogongrass’.} Fronted prepositional predicates with distal \textitbf{sana} ‘\textsc{l.dist}’ are also possible, but unattested in the corpus. (For more details on the omission of prepositions encoding location, see §\ref{Para_10.1.5}.)
A: word: picaang	 gloss: splinter
B: word: situ~situ	 gloss: RDP~L.MED
C: word: situ	 gloss: L.MED
D: word: obat	 gloss: medicine
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 101:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ø ___ {bua\Tildebua} banyak
Gloss (with missing item): ... ___ RDP\Tildefruit many
The English translation of this sentence is:
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: ‘\bluebold{here (}\blueboldSmallCaps{emph}\bluebold{)} are many different kinds of fruit (trees)’ \textstyleExampleSource{[080922-001a-CvPh.0418]}\footnote{Alternatively, the utterance in (\ref{Example_12.27}) could be interpreted as a \isi{numeral} predicate clause with a \isi{locational} adjunct, with \textitbf{bua{\Tilde}bua} ‘\textsc{rdp}{}-fruit’ as the subject, \textitbf{banyak} ‘many’ as the predicate, and \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ as a preposed \isi{locational} adjunct, giving the literal reading ‘here the various fruit (trees) are many’.}
A: word: sini	 gloss: L.PROX
B: word: sini–nya	 gloss: L.PROX–3POSSR
C: word: picaang	 gloss: splinter
D: word: ini	 gloss: D.PROX
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 102:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Roni masi ___ de pu {\bluebold{temang\Tildetemang}}
Gloss (with missing item): Roni still ___ 3SG POSS RDP\Tildefriend
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Roni is still with his friends’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Papuan Malay \isi{comitative} predicates are formed its gloss ___ prepositions encoding \isi{accompaniment}/instruments or goals, namely \isi{comitative} \textitbf{the morpheme ___ang} ‘its gloss ___’, its gloss ___ its short form \textitbf{the morpheme ___}, and goal \isi{preposition} \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ (see also §\ref{Para_10.2.1} and §\ref{Para_10.2.2}). In (\ref{Example_12.30}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___(ang)} ‘its gloss ___’ denotes the \isi{accompaniment} of the figure \textitbf{Roni} by the ground \textitbf{de pu temang{\Tilde}temang} ‘his friends’. In (\ref{Example_12.31}), \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ signals the association of the implied figure \textitbf{ana} ‘child’ its gloss ___ the ground \textitbf{saya} ‘1\textsc{sg}’.
A: word: dang	 gloss: and
B: word: deng	 gloss: with
C: word: dengang	 gloss: with
D: word: ana	 gloss: child
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 103:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Roni masi deng ___ pu {\bluebold{temang\Tildetemang}}
Gloss (with missing item): Roni still with ___ POSS RDP\Tildefriend
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Roni is still with his friends’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Papuan Malay \isi{comitative} predicates are formed with prepositions encoding \isi{accompaniment}/instruments or goals, namely \isi{comitative} \textitbf{the morpheme ___ngang} ‘with’, with its short form \textitbf{the morpheme ___ng}, and goal \isi{preposition} \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ (see also §\ref{Para_10.2.1} and §\ref{Para_10.2.2}). In (\ref{Example_12.30}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___ng(ang)} ‘with’ the morpheme ___notes the \isi{accompaniment} of the figure \textitbf{Roni} by the ground \textitbf{the morpheme ___ pu temang{\Tilthe morpheme ___}temang} ‘his friends’. In (\ref{Example_12.31}), \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ signals the association of the implied figure \textitbf{ana} ‘child’ with the ground \textitbf{saya} ‘1\textsc{sg}’.
A: word: deng	 gloss: with
B: word: dei	 gloss: 3sg
C: word: de	 gloss: 3SG
D: word: empat	 gloss: four
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 104:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Roni masi deng de ___ {\bluebold{temang\Tildetemang}}
Gloss (with missing item): Roni still with 3SG ___ RDP\Tildefriend
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Roni is still with his friends’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Pathe morpheme ___an Malay \isi{comitative} predicates are formed with prepositions encoding \isi{accompaniment}/instruments or goals, namely \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’, with its short form \textitbf{deng}, and goal \isi{preposition} \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ (see also §\ref{Para_10.2.1} and §\ref{Para_10.2.2}). In (\ref{Example_12.30}), \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ denotes the \isi{accompaniment} of the figure \textitbf{Roni} by the ground \textitbf{de the morpheme ___ temang{\Tilde}temang} ‘his friends’. In (\ref{Example_12.31}), \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ signals the association of the implied figure \textitbf{ana} ‘child’ with the ground \textitbf{saya} ‘1\textsc{sg}’.
A: word: pu	 gloss: POSS
B: word: uang	 gloss: money
C: word: hendro	 gloss: POSSR
D: word: pukul	 gloss: hit
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 105:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): hanya tiga saja ___ saya
Gloss (with missing item): only three just ___ 1SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘just only three (of my children) are with me’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Papuan Malay \isi{comitative} predicates are formed with prepositions encoding \isi{accompaniment}/instruments or goals, namely \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’, with its short form \textitbf{deng}, and goal \isi{preposition} \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ (see also §\ref{Para_10.2.1} and §\ref{Para_10.2.2}). In (\ref{Example_12.30}), \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ denotes the \isi{accompaniment} of the figure \textitbf{Roni} by the ground \textitbf{de pu temang{\Tilde}temang} ‘his friends’. In (\ref{Example_12.31}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ signals the association of the implied figure \textitbf{ana} ‘child’ with the ground \textitbf{saya} ‘1\textsc{sg}’.
A: word: sama	 gloss: to
B: word: sawar	 gloss: Sawar
C: word: harus	 gloss: have.to
D: word: sama~sama	 gloss: RDP~be.same
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 106:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): hanya tiga saja sama ___
Gloss (with missing item): only three just to ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘just only three (of my children) are with me’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Papuan Malay \isi{comitative} predicates are formed with prepositions encoding \isi{accompaniment}/instruments or goals, namely \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’, with its short form \textitbf{deng}, and goal \isi{preposition} \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ (see also §\ref{Para_10.2.1} and §\ref{Para_10.2.2}). In (\ref{Example_12.30}), \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ denotes the \isi{accompaniment} of the figure \textitbf{Roni} by the ground \textitbf{de pu temang{\Tilde}temang} ‘his friends’. In (\ref{Example_12.31}), \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ signals the association of the implied figure \textitbf{ana} ‘child’ with the ground \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘1\textsc{sg}’.
A: word: saya	 gloss: 1SG
B: word: sayang	 gloss: love
C: word: dei	 gloss: 3sg
D: word: blas	 gloss: teens
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 107:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de ___ Sofia
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG ___ Sofia
The English translation of this sentence is:‘she’s similar to Sofia’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Simulative predicates are formed with prepositions encoding comparisons, that is, similative \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘similar to’ and \textitbf{kaya} ‘like’ and equative \textitbf{sebagey} ‘as’ (see also §\ref{Para_10.3}). In (\ref{Example_12.32}) \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘similar to’ establishes a simulative relation between the figure \textitbf{de} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ and the ground \textitbf{Sofia}. Along similar lines, \textitbf{kaya} ‘like’ denotes a simulative relation between the figure \textitbf{de} ‘\textsc{sg}’ and the ground \textitbf{de pu bapa} ‘his father’ / \textitbf{Siduas} in (\ref{Example_12.33}). In (\ref{Example_12.34}), \textitbf{sebagey} ‘as’ expresses equatability between the figure \textitbf{sa} ‘\textsc{1sg}’ and the ground \textitbf{kepala acara} ‘the head of the festivity’. (See §\ref{Para_10.3.1} and §\ref{Para_10.3.2} for a detailed discussion of the prepositions \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘similar to’ and \textitbf{kaya} ‘like’ and their semantics.)
A: word: sperti–nya	 gloss: similar.to–3POSSR
B: word: glang	 gloss: bracelet
C: word: lima~lima	 gloss: RDP~five
D: word: sperti	 gloss: similar.to
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 108:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de sperti ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG similar.to ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘she’s similar to Sofia’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Simulative predicates are formed with prepositions encoding comparisons, that is, similative \textitbf{sperti} ‘similar to’ and \textitbf{kaya} ‘like’ and equative \textitbf{sebagey} ‘as’ (see also §\ref{Para_10.3}). In (\ref{Example_12.32}) \textitbf{sperti} ‘similar to’ establishes a simulative relation between the figure \textitbf{de} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ and the ground \textitbf{its gloss ___}. Along similar lines, \textitbf{kaya} ‘like’ denotes a simulative relation between the figure \textitbf{de} ‘\textsc{sg}’ and the ground \textitbf{de pu bapa} ‘his father’ / \textitbf{Siduas} in (\ref{Example_12.33}). In (\ref{Example_12.34}), \textitbf{sebagey} ‘as’ expresses equatability between the figure \textitbf{sa} ‘\textsc{1sg}’ and the ground \textitbf{kepala acara} ‘the head of the festivity’. (See §\ref{Para_10.3.1} and §\ref{Para_10.3.2} for a detailed discussion of the prepositions \textitbf{sperti} ‘similar to’ and \textitbf{kaya} ‘like’ and their semantics.)
A: word: sawar	 gloss: Sawar
B: word: nofita	 gloss: Nofita
C: word: natalia	 gloss: Natalia
D: word: sofia	 gloss: Sofia
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 109:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de pu muka ___ de pu bapa e kaya Siduas
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG POSS face ___ 3SG POSS father eh like Siduas
The English translation of this sentence is:‘his face is like his father, eh, like Siduas’ (face)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Simulative predicates are formed with prepositions encoding comparisons, that is, similative \textitbf{sperti} ‘similar to’ and \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ and equative \textitbf{sebagey} ‘as’ (see also §\ref{Para_10.3}). In (\ref{Example_12.32}) \textitbf{sperti} ‘similar to’ establishes a simulative relation between the figure \textitbf{de} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ and the ground \textitbf{Sofia}. Along similar lines, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ denotes a simulative relation between the figure \textitbf{de} ‘\textsc{sg}’ and the ground \textitbf{de pu bapa} ‘his father’ / \textitbf{Siduas} in (\ref{Example_12.33}). In (\ref{Example_12.34}), \textitbf{sebagey} ‘as’ expresses equatability between the figure \textitbf{sa} ‘\textsc{1sg}’ and the ground \textitbf{kepala acara} ‘the head of the festivity’. (See §\ref{Para_10.3.1} and §\ref{Para_10.3.2} for a detailed discussion of the prepositions \textitbf{sperti} ‘similar to’ and \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ and their semantics.)
A: word: kaya–nya	 gloss: like–3POSSR
B: word: kaya	 gloss: like
C: word: prempuang	 gloss: 10pt
D: word: begitu	 gloss: like.that
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 110:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de pu muka kaya de pu bapa e ___ Siduas
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG POSS face like 3SG POSS father eh ___ Siduas
The English translation of this sentence is:‘his face is like his father, eh, like Siduas’ (face)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Simulative predicates are formed with prepositions encoding comparisons, that is, similative \textitbf{sperti} ‘similar to’ and \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ and equative \textitbf{sebagey} ‘as’ (see also §\ref{Para_10.3}). In (\ref{Example_12.32}) \textitbf{sperti} ‘similar to’ establishes a simulative relation between the figure \textitbf{de} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ and the ground \textitbf{Sofia}. Along similar lines, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ denotes a simulative relation between the figure \textitbf{de} ‘\textsc{sg}’ and the ground \textitbf{de pu bapa} ‘his father’ / \textitbf{Siduas} in (\ref{Example_12.33}). In (\ref{Example_12.34}), \textitbf{sebagey} ‘as’ expresses equatability between the figure \textitbf{sa} ‘\textsc{1sg}’ and the ground \textitbf{kepala acara} ‘the head of the festivity’. (See §\ref{Para_10.3.1} and §\ref{Para_10.3.2} for a detailed discussion of the prepositions \textitbf{sperti} ‘similar to’ and \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ and their semantics.)
A: word: kaya	 gloss: like
B: word: begitu	 gloss: like.that
C: word: kaya–nya	 gloss: like–3POSSR
D: word: sini	 gloss: L.PROX
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 111:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): paling sa tra kerja, sa ___ kepala acara
Gloss (with missing item): most 1SG NEG work 1SG ___ head festivity
The English translation of this sentence is:[About organizing a festivity:] ‘most likely I won’t (have to) work, I’ll be the head of the festivity’ (Lit. ‘\bluebold{as the head ...}’)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Simulative predicates are formed with prepositions encoding comparisons, that is, similative \textitbf{sperti} ‘similar to’ and \textitbf{kaya} ‘like’ and equative \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ (see also §\ref{Para_10.3}). In (\ref{Example_12.32}) \textitbf{sperti} ‘similar to’ establishes a simulative relation between the figure \textitbf{de} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ and the ground \textitbf{Sofia}. Along similar lines, \textitbf{kaya} ‘like’ denotes a simulative relation between the figure \textitbf{de} ‘\textsc{sg}’ and the ground \textitbf{de pu bapa} ‘his father’ / \textitbf{Siduits gloss ___} in (\ref{Example_12.33}). In (\ref{Example_12.34}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ expresses equatability between the figure \textitbf{sa} ‘\textsc{1sg}’ and the ground \textitbf{kepala acara} ‘the head of the festivity’. (See §\ref{Para_10.3.1} and §\ref{Para_10.3.2} for a detailed discussion of the prepositions \textitbf{sperti} ‘similar to’ and \textitbf{kaya} ‘like’ and their semantics.)
A: word: dang	 gloss: and
B: word: kaya	 gloss: like
C: word: sebagey	 gloss: as
D: word: bagemana	 gloss: how
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 112:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): paling sa tra kerja, sa sebagey ___ acara
Gloss (with missing item): most 1SG NEG work 1SG as ___ festivity
The English translation of this sentence is:[About organizing a festivity:] ‘most likely I won’t (have to) work, I’ll be the head of the festivity’ (Lit. ‘\bluebold{as the head ...}’)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Simulative predicates are formed with prepositions encoding comparisons, that is, similative \textitbf{sperti} ‘similar to’ and \textitbf{kaya} ‘like’ and equative \textitbf{sebagey} ‘as’ (see also §\ref{Para_10.3}). In (\ref{Example_12.32}) \textitbf{sperti} ‘similar to’ establishes a simulative relation between the figure \textitbf{de} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ and the ground \textitbf{Sofia}. Along similar lines, \textitbf{kaya} ‘like’ denotes a simulative relation between the figure \textitbf{de} ‘\textsc{sg}’ and the ground \textitbf{de pu bapa} ‘his father’ / \textitbf{Siduas} in (\ref{Example_12.33}). In (\ref{Example_12.34}), \textitbf{sebagey} ‘as’ expresses equatability between the figure \textitbf{sa} ‘\textsc{1sg}’ and the ground \textitbf{the morpheme ___ acara} ‘the its gloss ___ of the festivity’. (See §\ref{Para_10.3.1} and §\ref{Para_10.3.2} for a detailed discussion of the prepositions \textitbf{sperti} ‘similar to’ and \textitbf{kaya} ‘like’ and their semantics.)
A: word: itu	 gloss: D.DIST
B: word: kepala	 gloss: head
C: word: leher	 gloss: neck
D: word: malam	 gloss: night
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B