cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 118:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): perna dia {punya} pikirang untuk de mo kasi ___ Ø
Gloss (with missing item): ever 3SG have thought for 3SG want give ___ ...
The English translation of this sentence is:‘once she had the thought that she wanted to abort (the child)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \isi{causative} in ({\ref{Example_11.62}), for example, is formed with non-agentive stative \textitbf{pusing} ‘be dizzy, be confused’. The use of \textitbf{biking} ‘make’ stresses the manipulating behavior of the causer \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana} ‘children’ which leads to the effect \textitbf{pusing} ‘be worried’; the causee \textitbf{mama} ‘mother’ has no control. The elicited examples in ({\ref{Example_11.63}) and ({\ref{Example_11.64}) contrast with the corresponding \textitbf{kasi}{}-causatives in ({\ref{Example_11.54}) and ({\ref{Example_11.55}). They show that \textitbf{biking}{}-causatives are also formed with \isi{monovalent} non-agentive dynamic bases, such as \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘abort’ or \textitbf{tenggelam} ‘sink’, respectively. Again, the manipulation itself is stressed. The base can also be agentive dynamic if the causee is animate but helpless. This is illustrated with the elicited example in ({\ref{Example_11.65}), which contrasts with the corresponding \textitbf{kasi}{}-\isi{causative} in ({\ref{Example_11.57}). The base is agentive dynamic \textitbf{hidup} ‘live’ but the animate causee is helpless and therefore has no control.
A: word: jatu	 gloss: fall
B: word: gugur	 gloss: fall(.prematurely)
C: word: nasi	 gloss: cooked.rice
D: word: tugu	 gloss: monument
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 119:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... tapi dong ___ bangkit dia lagi, biking hidup dia
Gloss (with missing item): ... but 3PL ___ be.resurrected 3SG again make live 3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:[About sorcerers who can resurrect the dead:] ‘[he’s already (dead),] but they resurrect him again, make him live’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \isi{causative} in ({\ref{Example_11.62}), for example, is formed with non-agentive stative \textitbf{pusing} ‘be dizzy, be confused’. The use of \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ stresses the manipulating behavior of the causer \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana} ‘children’ which leads to the effect \textitbf{pusing} ‘be worried’; the causee \textitbf{mama} ‘mother’ has no control. The elicited examples in ({\ref{Example_11.63}) and ({\ref{Example_11.64}) contrast with the corresponding \textitbf{kasi}{}-causatives in ({\ref{Example_11.54}) and ({\ref{Example_11.55}). They show that \textitbf{the morpheme ___}{}-causatives are also formed with \isi{monovalent} non-agentive dynamic bases, such as \textitbf{gugur} ‘abort’ or \textitbf{tenggelam} ‘sink’, respectively. Again, the manipulation itself is stressed. The base can also be agentive dynamic if the causee is animate but helpless. This is illustrated with the elicited example in ({\ref{Example_11.65}), which contrasts with the corresponding \textitbf{kasi}{}-\isi{causative} in ({\ref{Example_11.57}). The base is agentive dynamic \textitbf{hidup} ‘live’ but the animate causee is helpless and therefore has no control.
A: word: mungking	 gloss: maybe
B: word: bli	 gloss: buy
C: word: taru	 gloss: put
D: word: biking	 gloss: make
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 120:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... tapi dong biking bangkit dia lagi, ___ hidup dia
Gloss (with missing item): ... but 3PL make be.resurrected 3SG again ___ live 3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:[About sorcerers who can resurrect the dead:] ‘[he’s already (dead),] but they resurrect him again, make him live’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \isi{causative} in ({\ref{Example_11.62}), for example, is formed with non-agentive stative \textitbf{pusing} ‘be dizzy, be confused’. The use of \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ stresses the manipulating behavior of the causer \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana} ‘children’ which leads to the effect \textitbf{pusing} ‘be worried’; the causee \textitbf{mama} ‘mother’ has no control. The elicited examples in ({\ref{Example_11.63}) and ({\ref{Example_11.64}) contrast with the corresponding \textitbf{kasi}{}-causatives in ({\ref{Example_11.54}) and ({\ref{Example_11.55}). They show that \textitbf{the morpheme ___}{}-causatives are also formed with \isi{monovalent} non-agentive dynamic bases, such as \textitbf{gugur} ‘abort’ or \textitbf{tenggelam} ‘sink’, respectively. Again, the manipulation itself is stressed. The base can also be agentive dynamic if the causee is animate but helpless. This is illustrated with the elicited example in ({\ref{Example_11.65}), which contrasts with the corresponding \textitbf{kasi}{}-\isi{causative} in ({\ref{Example_11.57}). The base is agentive dynamic \textitbf{hidup} ‘live’ but the animate causee is helpless and therefore has no control.
A: word: biking	 gloss: make
B: word: mungking	 gloss: maybe
C: word: taru	 gloss: put
D: word: paling	 gloss: most
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 121:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... tapi dong biking bangkit dia lagi, biking ___ dia
Gloss (with missing item): ... but 3PL make be.resurrected 3SG again make ___ 3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:[About sorcerers who can resurrect the dead:] ‘[he’s already (dead),] but they resurrect him again, make him live’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \isi{causative} in ({\ref{Example_11.62}), for example, is formed with non-agentive stative \textitbf{pusing} ‘be dizzy, be confused’. The use of \textitbf{biking} ‘make’ stresses the manipulating behavior of the causer \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana} ‘children’ which leads to the effect \textitbf{pusing} ‘be worried’; the causee \textitbf{mama} ‘mother’ has no control. The elicited examples in ({\ref{Example_11.63}) and ({\ref{Example_11.64}) contrast with the corresponding \textitbf{kasi}{}-causatives in ({\ref{Example_11.54}) and ({\ref{Example_11.55}). They show that \textitbf{biking}{}-causatives are also formed with \isi{monovalent} non-agentive dynamic bases, such as \textitbf{gugur} ‘abort’ or \textitbf{tenggelam} ‘sink’, respectively. Again, the manipulation itself is stressed. The base can also be agentive dynamic if the causee is animate but helpless. This is illustrated with the elicited example in ({\ref{Example_11.65}), which contrasts with the corresponding \textitbf{kasi}{}-\isi{causative} in ({\ref{Example_11.57}). The base is agentive dynamic \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ but the animate causee is helpless and therefore has no control.
A: word: tinggal	 gloss: stay
B: word: hidup	 gloss: live
C: word: emosi	 gloss: feel.angry(.about)
D: word: siduasi	 gloss: Siduas
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 122:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... tapi dong kasi bangkit dia lagi, ___ hidup dia
Gloss (with missing item): ... but 3PL give be.resurrected 3SG again ___ live 3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:[About sorcerers who can resurrect the dead:] ‘[he’s already (dead),] but they resurrect him again, make him live’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \isi{causative} in ({\ref{Example_11.62}), for example, is formed with non-agentive stative \textitbf{pusing} ‘be dizzy, be confused’. The use of \textitbf{biking} ‘make’ stresses the manipulating behavior of the causer \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana} ‘children’ which leads to the effect \textitbf{pusing} ‘be worried’; the causee \textitbf{mama} ‘mother’ has no control. The elicited examples in ({\ref{Example_11.63}) and ({\ref{Example_11.64}) contrast with the corresponding \textitbf{the morpheme ___}{}-causatives in ({\ref{Example_11.54}) and ({\ref{Example_11.55}). They show that \textitbf{biking}{}-causatives are also formed with \isi{monovalent} non-agentive dynamic bases, such as \textitbf{gugur} ‘abort’ or \textitbf{tenggelam} ‘sink’, respectively. Again, the manipulation itself is stressed. The base can also be agentive dynamic if the causee is animate but helpless. This is illustrated with the elicited example in ({\ref{Example_11.65}), which contrasts with the corresponding \textitbf{the morpheme ___}{}-\isi{causative} in ({\ref{Example_11.57}). The base is agentive dynamic \textitbf{hidup} ‘live’ but the animate causee is helpless and therefore has no control.
A: word: siap	 gloss: provide
B: word: hidup	 gloss: live
C: word: kasi	 gloss: give
D: word: kasi–ang	 gloss: love–PAT
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 123:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... tapi dong kasi bangkit dia lagi, kasi ___ dia
Gloss (with missing item): ... but 3PL give be.resurrected 3SG again give ___ 3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:[About sorcerers who can resurrect the dead:] ‘[he’s already (dead),] but they resurrect him again, make him live’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \isi{causative} in ({\ref{Example_11.62}), for example, is formed with non-agentive stative \textitbf{pusing} ‘be dizzy, be confused’. The use of \textitbf{biking} ‘make’ stresses the manipulating behavior of the causer \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana} ‘children’ which leads to the effect \textitbf{pusing} ‘be worried’; the causee \textitbf{mama} ‘mother’ has no control. The elicited examples in ({\ref{Example_11.63}) and ({\ref{Example_11.64}) contrast with the corresponding \textitbf{kasi}{}-causatives in ({\ref{Example_11.54}) and ({\ref{Example_11.55}). They show that \textitbf{biking}{}-causatives are also formed with \isi{monovalent} non-agentive dynamic bases, such as \textitbf{gugur} ‘abort’ or \textitbf{tenggelam} ‘sink’, respectively. Again, the manipulation itself is stressed. The base can also be agentive dynamic if the causee is animate but helpless. This is illustrated with the elicited example in ({\ref{Example_11.65}), which contrasts with the corresponding \textitbf{kasi}{}-\isi{causative} in ({\ref{Example_11.57}). The base is agentive dynamic \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ but the animate causee is helpless and therefore has no control.
A: word: hidup	 gloss: live
B: word: tinggal	 gloss: stay
C: word: siduasi	 gloss: Siduas
D: word: tikus-tana	 gloss: spiny.bandicoot
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 124:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa di bawa, Roni ___ duduk sa di atas
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG at bottom Roni ___ sit 1SG at top
The English translation of this sentence is:[A ten-year old boy on a truck-trip:] ‘I was down (in the cargo area, but) Roni enabled me to sit on top (of the cab)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Causatives with agentive bases are unacceptable. This is due to the fact that \textitbf{biking}{}-causatives focus on the causer’s manipulation of circumstances itself while the causee has no control. This is illustrated with the unacceptable \textitbf{biking}{}-causatives in ({\ref{Example_11.66}) and ({\ref{Example_11.67}), which are formed with \isi{monovalent} dynamic \textitbf{duduk} ‘sit’ and \isi{bivalent} \textitbf{makang} ‘eat’, respectively. The two elicited examples contrast with the corresponding \textitbf{the morpheme ___i}{}-causatives in ({\ref{Example_11.56}) and ({\ref{Example_11.60}).
A: word: kas	 gloss: give
B: word: siap	 gloss: provide
C: word: bola	 gloss: ball
D: word: kasi	 gloss: give
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 125:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa di bawa, Roni kas ___ sa di atas
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG at bottom Roni give ___ 1SG at top
The English translation of this sentence is:[A ten-year old boy on a truck-trip:] ‘I was down (in the cargo area, but) Roni enabled me to sit on top (of the cab)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Causatives with agentive bases are unacceptable. This is due to the fact that \textitbf{biking}{}-causatives focus on the causer’s manipulation of circumstances itself while the causee has no control. This is illustrated with the unacceptable \textitbf{biking}{}-causatives in ({\ref{Example_11.66}) and ({\ref{Example_11.67}), which are formed with \isi{monovalent} dynamic \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ and \isi{bivalent} \textitbf{makang} ‘eat’, respectively. The two elicited examples contrast with the corresponding \textitbf{kasi}{}-causatives in ({\ref{Example_11.56}) and ({\ref{Example_11.60}).
A: word: duduk	 gloss: sit
B: word: istirahat	 gloss: rest
C: word: duduk~duduk	 gloss: RDP~sit
D: word: ketemu	 gloss: meet
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 126:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): saya ___ makang anjing deng papeda
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG ___ eat dog with sagu.porridge
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I fed the dogs with papeda’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Causatives with agentive bases are unacceptable. This is due to the fact that \textitbf{biking}{}-causatives focus on the causer’s manipulation of circumstances itself while the causee has no control. This is illustrated with the unacceptable \textitbf{biking}{}-causatives in ({\ref{Example_11.66}) and ({\ref{Example_11.67}), which are formed with \isi{monovalent} dynamic \textitbf{duduk} ‘sit’ and \isi{bivalent} \textitbf{makang} ‘eat’, respectively. The two elicited examples contrast with the corresponding \textitbf{the morpheme ___i}{}-causatives in ({\ref{Example_11.56}) and ({\ref{Example_11.60}).
A: word: siap	 gloss: provide
B: word: kas	 gloss: give
C: word: ambil	 gloss: fetch
D: word: kasi	 gloss: give
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 127:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): saya kas ___ anjing deng papeda
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG give ___ dog with sagu.porridge
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I fed the dogs with papeda’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Causatives with agentive bases are unacceptable. This is due to the fact that \textitbf{biking}{}-causatives focus on the causer’s manipulation of circumstances itself while the causee has no control. This is illustrated with the unacceptable \textitbf{biking}{}-causatives in ({\ref{Example_11.66}) and ({\ref{Example_11.67}), which are formed with \isi{monovalent} dynamic \textitbf{duduk} ‘sit’ and \isi{bivalent} \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’, respectively. The two elicited examples contrast with the corresponding \textitbf{kasi}{}-causatives in ({\ref{Example_11.56}) and ({\ref{Example_11.60}).
A: word: makang	 gloss: eat
B: word: deng	 gloss: with
C: word: makang–ang	 gloss: eat–PAT
D: word: makangang	 gloss: food
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 128:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {de} {bisa} {jalang} gigit, ___ manusia, sperti ular, de bisa gigit, orang mati
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG be.able walk bite ___ human.being similar.to snake 3SG be.able bite person die
The English translation of this sentence is:[About an evil spirit:] ‘he/she can go (and) bite (and) kill humans like a snake, he/she can bite (and) someone dies’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: For Papuan Malay, this suppletive relation is illustrated with the lexical causa\-tives \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ and \textitbf{tebang} ‘fell’ in ({\ref{Example_11.68}) and ({\ref{Example_11.70}), and their respective non-\isi{causative} counterparts \textitbf{mati} ‘die’ and \textitbf{jatu} ‘fall’ in ({\ref{Example_11.68}) and ({\ref{Example_11.69}), respectively.
A: word: meninggal	 gloss: die
B: word: bunu	 gloss: kill
C: word: bunuuu	 gloss: kill
D: word: sama	 gloss: to
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 129:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {de} {bisa} {jalang} gigit, {bunu} manusia, sperti ular, de bisa gigit, orang ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG be.able walk bite kill human.being similar.to snake 3SG be.able bite person ___
The English translation of this sentence is:[About an evil spirit:] ‘he/she can go (and) bite (and) kill humans like a snake, he/she can bite (and) someone dies’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: For Papuan Malay, this suppletive relation is illustrated with the lexical causa\-tives \textitbf{bunu} ‘kill’ and \textitbf{tebang} ‘fell’ in ({\ref{Example_11.68}) and ({\ref{Example_11.70}), and their respective non-\isi{causative} counterparts \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ and \textitbf{jatu} ‘fall’ in ({\ref{Example_11.68}) and ({\ref{Example_11.69}), respectively.
A: word: bunu	 gloss: kill
B: word: mati	 gloss: die
C: word: mati~mati	 gloss: RDP~die
D: word: baku	 gloss: RECP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 130:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): mo ___ sagu
Gloss (with missing item): want ___ sago
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(I) want to fell a sago tree’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: For Papuan Malay, this suppletive relation is illustrated with the lexical causa\-tives \textitbf{bunu} ‘kill’ and \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ in ({\ref{Example_11.68}) and ({\ref{Example_11.70}), and their respective non-\isi{causative} counterparts \textitbf{mati} ‘die’ and \textitbf{jatu} ‘fall’ in ({\ref{Example_11.68}) and ({\ref{Example_11.69}), respectively.
A: word: tebang	 gloss: fell
B: word: bebang	 gloss: burden
C: word: tabrak	 gloss: hit.against
D: word: jatu	 gloss: fall
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A