cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 202:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Tuhang buat mujisat ___ kita
Gloss (with missing item): God make miracle ___ 1PL
The English translation of this sentence is:‘God made a miracle for us’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Usually, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ follows \isi{bivalent} verbs such as \textitbf{buat} ‘make, do’ or \textitbf{biking} ‘make’, and introduces beneficiaries encoded by peripheral adjuncts, as in (\ref{Example_10.51}) or (\ref{Example_10.52}), respectively. Only rarely is the beneficiary encoded by a nonverbal prepositional predicate (2 tokens) as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ tamu} ‘its gloss ___ the guests’ in (\ref{Example_10.53}), or an adnominal \isi{prepositional phrase} (2 tokens) as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ kafir} ‘its gloss ___ unbelievers’ in (\ref{Example_10.54}). As its gloss ___ the low token frequencies of two each, one consultant suggested that these constructions are not native Papuan Malay but represent instances of code-switching with Indonesian. The low frequencies support this statement.
A: word: untuk	 gloss: for
B: word: misalnya	 gloss: for.example
C: word: guntur	 gloss: thunder
D: word: kafir	 gloss: unbeliever
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 203:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Tuhang buat mujisat untuk ___
Gloss (with missing item): God make miracle for ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘God made a miracle for us’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Usually, \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ follows \isi{bivalent} verbs such as \textitbf{buat} ‘make, do’ or \textitbf{biking} ‘make’, and introduces beneficiaries encoded by peripheral adjuncts, as in (\ref{Example_10.51}) or (\ref{Example_10.52}), respectively. Only rarely is the beneficiary encoded by a nonverbal prepositional predicate (2 tokens) as in \textitbf{untuk tamu} ‘for the guests’ in (\ref{Example_10.53}), or an adnominal \isi{prepositional phrase} (2 tokens) as in \textitbf{untuk kafir} ‘for unbelievers’ in (\ref{Example_10.54}). As for the low token frequencies of two each, one consultant suggested that these constructions are not native Papuan Malay but represent instances of code-switching with Indonesian. The low frequencies support this statement.
A: word: hutang	 gloss: forest
B: word: kita	 gloss: 1PL
C: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
D: word: nofita	 gloss: Nofita
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 204:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... yang sa pu bini biking malam ___ anjing dorang
Gloss (with missing item): ... REL 1SG POSS wife make night ___ dog 3PL
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[I fed the dogs with papeda] which my wife had made in the evening for the dogs’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Usually, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ follows \isi{bivalent} verbs such as \textitbf{buat} ‘make, do’ or \textitbf{biking} ‘make’, and introduces beneficiaries encoded by peripheral adjuncts, as in (\ref{Example_10.51}) or (\ref{Example_10.52}), respectively. Only rarely is the beneficiary encoded by a nonverbal prepositional predicate (2 tokens) as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ tamu} ‘its gloss ___ the guests’ in (\ref{Example_10.53}), or an adnominal \isi{prepositional phrase} (2 tokens) as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ kafir} ‘its gloss ___ unbelievers’ in (\ref{Example_10.54}). As its gloss ___ the low token frequencies of two each, one consultant suggested that these constructions are not native Papuan Malay but represent instances of code-switching with Indonesian. The low frequencies support this statement.
A: word: misalnya	 gloss: for.example
B: word: untuk	 gloss: for
C: word: guntur	 gloss: thunder
D: word: bawa	 gloss: bring
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 205:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... yang sa pu bini biking malam untuk ___ dorang
Gloss (with missing item): ... REL 1SG POSS wife make night for ___ 3PL
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[I fed the dogs with papeda] which my wife had made in the evening for the dogs’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Usually, \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ follows \isi{bivalent} verbs such as \textitbf{buat} ‘make, do’ or \textitbf{biking} ‘make’, and introduces beneficiaries encoded by peripheral adjuncts, as in (\ref{Example_10.51}) or (\ref{Example_10.52}), respectively. Only rarely is the beneficiary encoded by a nonverbal prepositional predicate (2 tokens) as in \textitbf{untuk tamu} ‘for the guests’ in (\ref{Example_10.53}), or an adnominal \isi{prepositional phrase} (2 tokens) as in \textitbf{untuk kafir} ‘for unbelievers’ in (\ref{Example_10.54}). As for the low token frequencies of two each, one consultant suggested that these constructions are not native Papuan Malay but represent instances of code-switching with Indonesian. The low frequencies support this statement.
A: word: untuk	 gloss: for
B: word: petrus	 gloss: Petrus
C: word: banjir	 gloss: flooding
D: word: anjing	 gloss: dog
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 206:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... yang sa pu bini biking malam untuk anjing ___
Gloss (with missing item): ... REL 1SG POSS wife make night for dog ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[I fed the dogs with papeda] which my wife had made in the evening for the dogs’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Usually, \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ follows \isi{bivalent} verbs such as \textitbf{buat} ‘make, do’ or \textitbf{biking} ‘make’, and introduces beneficiaries encoded by peripheral adjuncts, as in (\ref{Example_10.51}) or (\ref{Example_10.52}), respectively. Only rarely is the beneficiary encoded by a nonverbal prepositional predicate (2 tokens) as in \textitbf{untuk tamu} ‘for the guests’ in (\ref{Example_10.53}), or an adnominal \isi{prepositional phrase} (2 tokens) as in \textitbf{untuk kafir} ‘for unbelievers’ in (\ref{Example_10.54}). As for the low token frequencies of two each, one consultant suggested that these constructions are not native Papuan Malay but represent instances of code-switching with Indonesian. The low frequencies support this statement.
A: word: dong/dorang	 gloss: 3PL
B: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
C: word: roni	 gloss: Roni
D: word: dorang	 gloss: 3PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 207:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ikang sedikit, itu ___ tamu
Gloss (with missing item): fish few D.DIST ___ guest
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(as for) the few fish, those are for the guests’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Usually, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ follows \isi{bivalent} verbs such as \textitbf{buat} ‘make, do’ or \textitbf{biking} ‘make’, and introduces beneficiaries encoded by peripheral adjuncts, as in (\ref{Example_10.51}) or (\ref{Example_10.52}), respectively. Only rarely is the beneficiary encoded by a nonverbal prepositional predicate (2 tokens) as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ tamu} ‘its gloss ___ the guests’ in (\ref{Example_10.53}), or an adnominal \isi{prepositional phrase} (2 tokens) as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ kafir} ‘its gloss ___ unbelievers’ in (\ref{Example_10.54}). As its gloss ___ the low token frequencies of two each, one consultant suggested that these constructions are not native Papuan Malay but represent instances of code-switching with Indonesian. The low frequencies support this statement.
A: word: untuk	 gloss: for
B: word: guntur	 gloss: thunder
C: word: tamu	 gloss: guest
D: word: misalnya	 gloss: for.example
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 208:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ikang sedikit, itu untuk ___
Gloss (with missing item): fish few D.DIST for ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(as for) the few fish, those are for the guests’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Usually, \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ follows \isi{bivalent} verbs such as \textitbf{buat} ‘make, do’ or \textitbf{biking} ‘make’, and introduces beneficiaries encoded by peripheral adjuncts, as in (\ref{Example_10.51}) or (\ref{Example_10.52}), respectively. Only rarely is the beneficiary encoded by a nonverbal prepositional predicate (2 tokens) as in \textitbf{untuk the morpheme ___} ‘for the its gloss ___s’ in (\ref{Example_10.53}), or an adnominal \isi{prepositional phrase} (2 tokens) as in \textitbf{untuk kafir} ‘for unbelievers’ in (\ref{Example_10.54}). As for the low token frequencies of two each, one consultant suggested that these constructions are not native Papuan Malay but represent instances of code-switching with Indonesian. The low frequencies support this statement.
A: word: kamu	 gloss: 2PL
B: word: tamu	 gloss: guest
C: word: laing	 gloss: be.different
D: word: kunjungang	 gloss: visit
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 209:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): di sana kang masi ___ untuk kafir
Gloss (with missing item): at L.DIST you.know still ___ for unbeliever
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(the area) over there, you know, is still a location for unbelievers’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Usually, \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ follows \isi{bivalent} verbs such as \textitbf{buat} ‘make, do’ or \textitbf{biking} ‘make’, and introduces beneficiaries encoded by peripheral adjuncts, as in (\ref{Example_10.51}) or (\ref{Example_10.52}), respectively. Only rarely is the beneficiary encoded by a nonverbal prepositional predicate (2 tokens) as in \textitbf{untuk tamu} ‘for the guests’ in (\ref{Example_10.53}), or an adnominal \isi{prepositional phrase} (2 tokens) as in \textitbf{untuk kafir} ‘for unbelievers’ in (\ref{Example_10.54}). As for the low token frequencies of two each, one consultant suggested that these constructions are not native Papuan Malay but represent instances of code-switching with Indonesian. The low frequencies support this statement.
A: word: sperti	 gloss: like
B: word: empat	 gloss: four
C: word: tempat	 gloss: place
D: word: mana	 gloss: where
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 210:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): di sana kang masi tempat ___ kafir
Gloss (with missing item): at L.DIST you.know still place ___ unbeliever
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(the area) over there, you know, is still a location for unbelievers’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Usually, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ follows \isi{bivalent} verbs such as \textitbf{buat} ‘make, do’ or \textitbf{biking} ‘make’, and introduces beneficiaries encoded by peripheral adjuncts, as in (\ref{Example_10.51}) or (\ref{Example_10.52}), respectively. Only rarely is the beneficiary encoded by a nonverbal prepositional predicate (2 tokens) as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ tamu} ‘its gloss ___ the guests’ in (\ref{Example_10.53}), or an adnominal \isi{prepositional phrase} (2 tokens) as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ kafir} ‘its gloss ___ unbelievers’ in (\ref{Example_10.54}). As its gloss ___ the low token frequencies of two each, one consultant suggested that these constructions are not native Papuan Malay but represent instances of code-switching with Indonesian. The low frequencies support this statement.
A: word: misalnya	 gloss: for.example
B: word: guntur	 gloss: thunder
C: word: untuk	 gloss: for
D: word: bicara	 gloss: speak
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 211:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): di sana kang masi tempat untuk ___
Gloss (with missing item): at L.DIST you.know still place for ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(the area) over there, you know, is still a location for unbelievers’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Usually, \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ follows \isi{bivalent} verbs such as \textitbf{buat} ‘make, do’ or \textitbf{biking} ‘make’, and introduces beneficiaries encoded by peripheral adjuncts, as in (\ref{Example_10.51}) or (\ref{Example_10.52}), respectively. Only rarely is the beneficiary encoded by a nonverbal prepositional predicate (2 tokens) as in \textitbf{untuk tamu} ‘for the guests’ in (\ref{Example_10.53}), or an adnominal \isi{prepositional phrase} (2 tokens) as in \textitbf{untuk the morpheme ___} ‘for its gloss ___s’ in (\ref{Example_10.54}). As for the low token frequencies of two each, one consultant suggested that these constructions are not native Papuan Malay but represent instances of code-switching with Indonesian. The low frequencies support this statement.
A: word: kafir	 gloss: unbeliever
B: word: masa	 gloss: be.impossible
C: word: anjing	 gloss: dog
D: word: terbuka	 gloss: be.opened
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 212:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa kasi hadia ___ kamu
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG give gift ___ 2PL
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I’ll give gifts to you for your benefit’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: With transfer verbs, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ introduces benefactive recipients, and with communication verbs it introduces benefactive addressees. That is, the referent is not merely a recipient or addressee. Benefactive \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ indicates that the referent is also the beneficiary of the transfer or communication, hence ``benefactive recipient'' and ``benefactive addressee''. This is illustrated with \textitbf{kasi the morpheme ___} ‘give to and its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_10.55}), and \textitbf{bicara the morpheme ___} ‘speak to and its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_10.56}).
A: word: taung	 gloss: year
B: word: misalnya	 gloss: for.example
C: word: untuk	 gloss: for
D: word: guntur	 gloss: thunder
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 213:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa kasi hadia untuk ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG give gift for ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I’ll give gifts to you for your benefit’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: With transfer verbs, \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ introduces benefactive recipients, and with communication verbs it introduces benefactive addressees. That is, the referent is not merely a recipient or addressee. Benefactive \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ indicates that the referent is also the beneficiary of the transfer or communication, hence ``benefactive recipient'' and ``benefactive addressee''. This is illustrated with \textitbf{kasi untuk} ‘give to and for’ in (\ref{Example_10.55}), and \textitbf{bicara untuk} ‘speak to and for’ in (\ref{Example_10.56}).
A: word: kamu~kamu	 gloss: RDP~2PL
B: word: baju	 gloss: shirt
C: word: kamu	 gloss: 2PL
D: word: tong	 gloss: 1PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 214:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): jadi {sperti} itu, harus bicara ___ dorang, ceritra untuk dorang
Gloss (with missing item): so similar.to D.DIST have.to speak ___ 3PL tell for 3PL
The English translation of this sentence is:‘so it’s like that, (we) have to speak to them (our children) for their benefit, talk to them for their benefit’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: With transfer verbs, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ introduces benefactive recipients, and with communication verbs it introduces benefactive addressees. That is, the referent is not merely a recipient or addressee. Benefactive \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ indicates that the referent is also the beneficiary of the transfer or communication, hence ``benefactive recipient'' and ``benefactive addressee''. This is illustrated with \textitbf{kasi the morpheme ___} ‘give to and its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_10.55}), and \textitbf{bicara the morpheme ___} ‘speak to and its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_10.56}).
A: word: misalnya	 gloss: for.example
B: word: motor	 gloss: motorbike
C: word: guntur	 gloss: thunder
D: word: untuk	 gloss: for
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 215:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): jadi {sperti} itu, harus bicara untuk ___ ceritra untuk dorang
Gloss (with missing item): so similar.to D.DIST have.to speak for ___ tell for 3PL
The English translation of this sentence is:‘so it’s like that, (we) have to speak to them (our children) for their benefit, talk to them for their benefit’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: With transfer verbs, \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ introduces benefactive recipients, and with communication verbs it introduces benefactive addressees. That is, the referent is not merely a recipient or addressee. Benefactive \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ indicates that the referent is also the beneficiary of the transfer or communication, hence ``benefactive recipient'' and ``benefactive addressee''. This is illustrated with \textitbf{kasi untuk} ‘give to and for’ in (\ref{Example_10.55}), and \textitbf{bicara untuk} ‘speak to and for’ in (\ref{Example_10.56}).
A: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
B: word: klawar	 gloss: cave.bat
C: word: dong/dorang	 gloss: 3PL
D: word: dorang	 gloss: 3PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D