cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 11:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): pasar di ___ tu raaame
Gloss (with missing item): market at ___ D.DIST be.bustling
The English translation of this sentence is:‘the market down there is very bustling’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces a peripheral location as in \textitbf{di kampung} ‘in the village’ in (\ref{Example_10.1}), or \textitbf{di dia} ‘at hers’ in (\ref{Example_10.2}). When following placement verbs such as \textitbf{taru} ‘put’ in (\ref{Example_10.3}), \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces oblique \isi{locative} arguments that indicate the location of the referent, as in \textitbf{di sini} ‘here’. Frequently, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ also introduces nonverbal predicates, as in (\ref{Example_10.4}) (see §\ref{Para_12.4}). Only rarely, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces locations encoded by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{pasar di the morpheme ___ tu} ‘the market down there’ in (\ref{Example_10.5}). The examples in (\ref{Example_10.1}) to (\ref{Example_10.5}) also show that \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces animate and inanimate, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ are attested: \textsc{2sg}, \textsc{1pl}, and \textsc{3pl}.}
A: word: melawang	 gloss: oppose
B: word: bawa	 gloss: bottom
C: word: laing	 gloss: be.different
D: word: bawang	 gloss: onion
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 12:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): pasar di bawa ___ raaame
Gloss (with missing item): market at bottom ___ be.bustling
The English translation of this sentence is:‘the market down there is very bustling’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces a peripheral location as in \textitbf{di kampung} ‘in the village’ in (\ref{Example_10.1}), or \textitbf{di dia} ‘at hers’ in (\ref{Example_10.2}). When following placement verbs such as \textitbf{taru} ‘put’ in (\ref{Example_10.3}), \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces oblique \isi{locative} arguments that indicate the location of the referent, as in \textitbf{di sini} ‘here’. Frequently, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ also introduces nonverbal predicates, as in (\ref{Example_10.4}) (see §\ref{Para_12.4}). Only rarely, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces locations encoded by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{pasar di bawa the morpheme ___} ‘the market down there’ in (\ref{Example_10.5}). The examples in (\ref{Example_10.1}) to (\ref{Example_10.5}) also show that \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces animate and inanimate, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ are attested: \textsc{2sg}, \textsc{1pl}, and \textsc{3pl}.}
A: word: tu	 gloss: D.DIST
B: word: satu	 gloss: one
C: word: sana	 gloss: L.DIST
D: word: manusia	 gloss: human.being
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 13:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): waktu {saya} dengang bapa tinggal ___ kampung saya kerja sperti laki~laki
Gloss (with missing item): time 1SG with father stay ___ village 1SG work similar.to RDP~husband
The English translation of this sentence is:‘when I and (my) husband (‘father’) were living in the village, I worked like a man’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces a peripheral locits gloss ___ion as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ kampung} ‘in the village’ in (\ref{Example_10.1}), or \textitbf{the morpheme ___ the morpheme ___a} ‘its gloss ___ hers’ in (\ref{Example_10.2}). When following placement verbs such as \textitbf{taru} ‘put’ in (\ref{Example_10.3}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces oblique \isi{locits gloss ___ive} arguments thits gloss ___ inthe morpheme ___cits gloss ___e the locits gloss ___ion of the referent, as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ sini} ‘here’. Frequently, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ also introduces nonverbal prethe morpheme ___cits gloss ___es, as in (\ref{Example_10.4}) (see §\ref{Para_12.4}). Only rarely, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces locits gloss ___ions encoded by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{pasar the morpheme ___ bawa tu} ‘the market down there’ in (\ref{Example_10.5}). The examples in (\ref{Example_10.1}) to (\ref{Example_10.5}) also show thits gloss ___ \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces animits gloss ___e and inanimits gloss ___e, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ are its gloss ___tested: \textsc{2sg}, \textsc{1pl}, and \textsc{3pl}.}
A: word: di	 gloss: at
B: word: jaw	 gloss: be.far
C: word: sampe	 gloss: reach
D: word: dia	 gloss: 3SG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 14:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): waktu {saya} dengang bapa tinggal di ___ saya kerja sperti laki~laki
Gloss (with missing item): time 1SG with father stay at ___ 1SG work similar.to RDP~husband
The English translation of this sentence is:‘when I and (my) husband (‘father’) were living in the village, I worked like a man’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces a peripheral location as in \textitbf{di the morpheme ___} ‘in the its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_10.1}), or \textitbf{di dia} ‘at hers’ in (\ref{Example_10.2}). When following placement verbs such as \textitbf{taru} ‘put’ in (\ref{Example_10.3}), \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces oblique \isi{locative} arguments that indicate the location of the referent, as in \textitbf{di sini} ‘here’. Frequently, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ also introduces nonverbal predicates, as in (\ref{Example_10.4}) (see §\ref{Para_12.4}). Only rarely, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces locations encoded by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{pasar di bawa tu} ‘the market down there’ in (\ref{Example_10.5}). The examples in (\ref{Example_10.1}) to (\ref{Example_10.5}) also show that \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces animate and inanimate, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ are attested: \textsc{2sg}, \textsc{1pl}, and \textsc{3pl}.}
A: word: ojek	 gloss: motorbike.taxi
B: word: kampung-tana	 gloss: village-ground
C: word: laing	 gloss: be.different
D: word: kampung	 gloss: village
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 15:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ di bawa tu raaame
Gloss (with missing item): ___ at bottom D.DIST be.bustling
The English translation of this sentence is:‘the market down there is very bustling’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces a peripheral location as in \textitbf{di kampung} ‘in the village’ in (\ref{Example_10.1}), or \textitbf{di dia} ‘at hers’ in (\ref{Example_10.2}). When following placement verbs such as \textitbf{taru} ‘put’ in (\ref{Example_10.3}), \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces oblique \isi{locative} arguments that indicate the location of the referent, as in \textitbf{di sini} ‘here’. Frequently, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ also introduces nonverbal predicates, as in (\ref{Example_10.4}) (see §\ref{Para_12.4}). Only rarely, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces locations encoded by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ di bawa tu} ‘the its gloss ___ down there’ in (\ref{Example_10.5}). The examples in (\ref{Example_10.1}) to (\ref{Example_10.5}) also show that \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces animate and inanimate, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ are attested: \textsc{2sg}, \textsc{1pl}, and \textsc{3pl}.}
A: word: dasar	 gloss: base
B: word: jual	 gloss: sell
C: word: pasar	 gloss: market
D: word: dorang	 gloss: 3PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 16:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): pasar ___ bawa tu raaame
Gloss (with missing item): market ___ bottom D.DIST be.bustling
The English translation of this sentence is:‘the market down there is very bustling’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces a peripheral locits gloss ___ion as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ kampung} ‘in the village’ in (\ref{Example_10.1}), or \textitbf{the morpheme ___ the morpheme ___a} ‘its gloss ___ hers’ in (\ref{Example_10.2}). When following placement verbs such as \textitbf{taru} ‘put’ in (\ref{Example_10.3}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces oblique \isi{locits gloss ___ive} arguments thits gloss ___ inthe morpheme ___cits gloss ___e the locits gloss ___ion of the referent, as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ sini} ‘here’. Frequently, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ also introduces nonverbal prethe morpheme ___cits gloss ___es, as in (\ref{Example_10.4}) (see §\ref{Para_12.4}). Only rarely, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces locits gloss ___ions encoded by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{pasar the morpheme ___ bawa tu} ‘the market down there’ in (\ref{Example_10.5}). The examples in (\ref{Example_10.1}) to (\ref{Example_10.5}) also show thits gloss ___ \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces animits gloss ___e and inanimits gloss ___e, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ are its gloss ___tested: \textsc{2sg}, \textsc{1pl}, and \textsc{3pl}.}
A: word: dia	 gloss: 3SG
B: word: pawla	 gloss: Pawla
C: word: roni	 gloss: Roni
D: word: di	 gloss: at
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 17:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): pasar di ___ tu raaame
Gloss (with missing item): market at ___ D.DIST be.bustling
The English translation of this sentence is:‘the market down there is very bustling’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces a peripheral location as in \textitbf{di kampung} ‘in the village’ in (\ref{Example_10.1}), or \textitbf{di dia} ‘at hers’ in (\ref{Example_10.2}). When following placement verbs such as \textitbf{taru} ‘put’ in (\ref{Example_10.3}), \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces oblique \isi{locative} arguments that indicate the location of the referent, as in \textitbf{di sini} ‘here’. Frequently, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ also introduces nonverbal predicates, as in (\ref{Example_10.4}) (see §\ref{Para_12.4}). Only rarely, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces locations encoded by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{pasar di the morpheme ___ tu} ‘the market down there’ in (\ref{Example_10.5}). The examples in (\ref{Example_10.1}) to (\ref{Example_10.5}) also show that \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces animate and inanimate, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ are attested: \textsc{2sg}, \textsc{1pl}, and \textsc{3pl}.}
A: word: bawang	 gloss: onion
B: word: bawa	 gloss: bottom
C: word: maksut–nya	 gloss: purpose–3POSSR
D: word: sebla	 gloss: side
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 18:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): pasar di bawa ___ raaame
Gloss (with missing item): market at bottom ___ be.bustling
The English translation of this sentence is:‘the market down there is very bustling’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces a peripheral location as in \textitbf{di kampung} ‘in the village’ in (\ref{Example_10.1}), or \textitbf{di dia} ‘at hers’ in (\ref{Example_10.2}). When following placement verbs such as \textitbf{taru} ‘put’ in (\ref{Example_10.3}), \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces oblique \isi{locative} arguments that indicate the location of the referent, as in \textitbf{di sini} ‘here’. Frequently, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ also introduces nonverbal predicates, as in (\ref{Example_10.4}) (see §\ref{Para_12.4}). Only rarely, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces locations encoded by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{pasar di bawa the morpheme ___} ‘the market down there’ in (\ref{Example_10.5}). The examples in (\ref{Example_10.1}) to (\ref{Example_10.5}) also show that \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces animate and inanimate, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ are attested: \textsc{2sg}, \textsc{1pl}, and \textsc{3pl}.}
A: word: tu	 gloss: D.DIST
B: word: pasar	 gloss: market
C: word: satu	 gloss: one
D: word: sana	 gloss: L.DIST
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 19:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): dong lari ___ pante
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL run ___ coast
The English translation of this sentence is:‘they ran to the beach’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Prepositional phrases introduced with allative \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ denote direction its gloss ___ward a referent. Following motion verbs such as \textitbf{lari} ‘run’ in (\ref{Example_10.6}) or \textitbf{datang} ‘come’ in (\ref{Example_10.7}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ introduces oblique \isi{locative} arguments which indicate the goal of the motion, as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ pante} ‘its gloss ___ the beach’ or \textitbf{the morpheme ___ kiits gloss ___ng} ‘its gloss ___ us’, respectively. Allative \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ also very often introduces nonverbal predicates as in (\ref{Example_10.8}). The three examples also show that \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ introduces animate and inanimate, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ are attested: \textsc{1sg}, \textsc{3sg}, \textsc{2pl}.}
A: word: ke	 gloss: to
B: word: harus	 gloss: have.to
C: word: kejar	 gloss: chase
D: word: mandi	 gloss: bathe
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 20:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): dong lari ke ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL run to ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘they ran to the beach’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Prepositional phrases introduced with allative \textitbf{ke} ‘to’ denote direction toward a referent. Following motion verbs such as \textitbf{lari} ‘run’ in (\ref{Example_10.6}) or \textitbf{datang} ‘come’ in (\ref{Example_10.7}), \textitbf{ke} ‘to’ introduces oblique \isi{locative} arguments which indicate the goal of the motion, as in \textitbf{ke the morpheme ___} ‘to the beach’ or \textitbf{ke kitong} ‘to us’, respectively. Allative \textitbf{ke} ‘to’ also very often introduces nonverbal predicates as in (\ref{Example_10.8}). The three examples also show that \textitbf{ke} ‘to’ introduces animate and inanimate, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{ke} ‘to’ are attested: \textsc{1sg}, \textsc{3sg}, \textsc{2pl}.}
A: word: pante	 gloss: coast
B: word: laut	 gloss: sea
C: word: pante-timur	 gloss: Pante-Timur
D: word: bapa	 gloss: father
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 21:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... dia punya aroa datang ___ kitong kasi tanda
Gloss (with missing item): ... 3SG POSS departed.spirit come ___ 1PL give sign
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[so when there is another person (who) dies in a different village,] (then) his/her departed spirit comes to us (and) gives (us) a sign’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Prepositional phrases introduced with allative \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ denote direction its gloss ___ward a referent. Following motion verbs such as \textitbf{lari} ‘run’ in (\ref{Example_10.6}) or \textitbf{datang} ‘come’ in (\ref{Example_10.7}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ introduces oblique \isi{locative} arguments which indicate the goal of the motion, as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ pante} ‘its gloss ___ the beach’ or \textitbf{the morpheme ___ kiits gloss ___ng} ‘its gloss ___ us’, respectively. Allative \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ also very often introduces nonverbal predicates as in (\ref{Example_10.8}). The three examples also show that \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ introduces animate and inanimate, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ are attested: \textsc{1sg}, \textsc{3sg}, \textsc{2pl}.}
A: word: harus	 gloss: have.to
B: word: kejar	 gloss: chase
C: word: ke	 gloss: to
D: word: orang	 gloss: person
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 22:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... dia punya aroa datang ke ___ kasi tanda
Gloss (with missing item): ... 3SG POSS departed.spirit come to ___ give sign
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[so when there is another person (who) dies in a different village,] (then) his/her departed spirit comes to us (and) gives (us) a sign’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Prepositional phrases introduced with allative \textitbf{ke} ‘to’ denote direction toward a referent. Following motion verbs such as \textitbf{lari} ‘run’ in (\ref{Example_10.6}) or \textitbf{datang} ‘come’ in (\ref{Example_10.7}), \textitbf{ke} ‘to’ introduces oblique \isi{locative} arguments which indicate the goal of the motion, as in \textitbf{ke pante} ‘to the beach’ or \textitbf{ke the morpheme ___} ‘to us’, respectively. Allative \textitbf{ke} ‘to’ also very often introduces nonverbal predicates as in (\ref{Example_10.8}). The three examples also show that \textitbf{ke} ‘to’ introduces animate and inanimate, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{ke} ‘to’ are attested: \textsc{1sg}, \textsc{3sg}, \textsc{2pl}.}
A: word: seng	 gloss: corrugated.iron
B: word: tong	 gloss: 1PL
C: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
D: word: kitong	 gloss: 1PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D