cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 0:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): waktu {saya} dengang bapa tinggal ___ kampung saya kerja sperti laki~laki
Gloss (with missing item): time 1SG with father stay ___ village 1SG work similar.to RDP~husband
The English translation of this sentence is:‘when I and (my) husband (‘father’) were living in the village, I worked like a man’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces a peripheral locits gloss ___ion as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ kampung} ‘in the village’ in (\ref{Example_10.1}), or \textitbf{the morpheme ___ the morpheme ___a} ‘its gloss ___ hers’ in (\ref{Example_10.2}). When following placement verbs such as \textitbf{taru} ‘put’ in (\ref{Example_10.3}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces oblique \isi{locits gloss ___ive} arguments thits gloss ___ inthe morpheme ___cits gloss ___e the locits gloss ___ion of the referent, as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ sini} ‘here’. Frequently, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ also introduces nonverbal prethe morpheme ___cits gloss ___es, as in (\ref{Example_10.4}) (see §\ref{Para_12.4}). Only rarely, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces locits gloss ___ions encoded by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{pasar the morpheme ___ bawa tu} ‘the market down there’ in (\ref{Example_10.5}). The examples in (\ref{Example_10.1}) to (\ref{Example_10.5}) also show thits gloss ___ \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces animits gloss ___e and inanimits gloss ___e, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ are its gloss ___tested: \textsc{2sg}, \textsc{1pl}, and \textsc{3pl}.}
A: word: di	 gloss: at
B: word: manis	 gloss: be.sweet
C: word: dia	 gloss: 3SG
D: word: pagi	 gloss: morning
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 1:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): waktu {saya} dengang bapa tinggal di ___ saya kerja sperti laki~laki
Gloss (with missing item): time 1SG with father stay at ___ 1SG work similar.to RDP~husband
The English translation of this sentence is:‘when I and (my) husband (‘father’) were living in the village, I worked like a man’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces a peripheral location as in \textitbf{di the morpheme ___} ‘in the its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_10.1}), or \textitbf{di dia} ‘at hers’ in (\ref{Example_10.2}). When following placement verbs such as \textitbf{taru} ‘put’ in (\ref{Example_10.3}), \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces oblique \isi{locative} arguments that indicate the location of the referent, as in \textitbf{di sini} ‘here’. Frequently, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ also introduces nonverbal predicates, as in (\ref{Example_10.4}) (see §\ref{Para_12.4}). Only rarely, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces locations encoded by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{pasar di bawa tu} ‘the market down there’ in (\ref{Example_10.5}). The examples in (\ref{Example_10.1}) to (\ref{Example_10.5}) also show that \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces animate and inanimate, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ are attested: \textsc{2sg}, \textsc{1pl}, and \textsc{3pl}.}
A: word: bapa	 gloss: father
B: word: kampung	 gloss: village
C: word: coba	 gloss: try
D: word: kampung-tana	 gloss: village-ground
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 2:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {jadi} {saya} {besar} di Ida dengang de punya laki tu ... besar ___ dia
Gloss (with missing item): so 1SG be.big at Ida with 3SG POSS husband D.DIST ... be.big ___ 3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘so I grew up with Ida and that husband of hers ..., (I) grew up at hers’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces a peripheral locits gloss ___ion as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ kampung} ‘in the village’ in (\ref{Example_10.1}), or \textitbf{the morpheme ___ the morpheme ___a} ‘its gloss ___ hers’ in (\ref{Example_10.2}). When following placement verbs such as \textitbf{taru} ‘put’ in (\ref{Example_10.3}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces oblique \isi{locits gloss ___ive} arguments thits gloss ___ inthe morpheme ___cits gloss ___e the locits gloss ___ion of the referent, as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ sini} ‘here’. Frequently, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ also introduces nonverbal prethe morpheme ___cits gloss ___es, as in (\ref{Example_10.4}) (see §\ref{Para_12.4}). Only rarely, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces locits gloss ___ions encoded by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{pasar the morpheme ___ bawa tu} ‘the market down there’ in (\ref{Example_10.5}). The examples in (\ref{Example_10.1}) to (\ref{Example_10.5}) also show thits gloss ___ \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces animits gloss ___e and inanimits gloss ___e, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ are its gloss ___tested: \textsc{2sg}, \textsc{1pl}, and \textsc{3pl}.}
A: word: di	 gloss: at
B: word: dia	 gloss: 3SG
C: word: acara	 gloss: festivity
D: word: dekat	 gloss: near
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 3:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {jadi} {saya} {besar} di Ida dengang de punya laki tu ... besar di ___
Gloss (with missing item): so 1SG be.big at Ida with 3SG POSS husband D.DIST ... be.big at ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘so I grew up with Ida and that husband of hers ..., (I) grew up at hers’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces a peripheral location as in \textitbf{di kampung} ‘in the village’ in (\ref{Example_10.1}), or \textitbf{di the morpheme ___} ‘at hers’ in (\ref{Example_10.2}). When following placement verbs such as \textitbf{taru} ‘put’ in (\ref{Example_10.3}), \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces oblique \isi{locative} arguments that indicate the location of the referent, as in \textitbf{di sini} ‘here’. Frequently, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ also introduces nonverbal predicates, as in (\ref{Example_10.4}) (see §\ref{Para_12.4}). Only rarely, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces locations encoded by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{pasar di bawa tu} ‘the market down there’ in (\ref{Example_10.5}). The examples in (\ref{Example_10.1}) to (\ref{Example_10.5}) also show that \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces animate and inanimate, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ are attested: \textsc{2sg}, \textsc{1pl}, and \textsc{3pl}.}
A: word: kepala	 gloss: head
B: word: diai	 gloss: 3SG
C: word: dei	 gloss: 3sg
D: word: dia	 gloss: 3SG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 4:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): skarang kamu kasi terpol~terpol, taru ___ sini
Gloss (with missing item): now 2PL give RDP~jerry.can put ___ L.PROX
The English translation of this sentence is:‘now you give (me) the jerry cans, put (them) here’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces a peripheral locits gloss ___ion as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ kampung} ‘in the village’ in (\ref{Example_10.1}), or \textitbf{the morpheme ___ the morpheme ___a} ‘its gloss ___ hers’ in (\ref{Example_10.2}). When following placement verbs such as \textitbf{taru} ‘put’ in (\ref{Example_10.3}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces oblique \isi{locits gloss ___ive} arguments thits gloss ___ inthe morpheme ___cits gloss ___e the locits gloss ___ion of the referent, as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ sini} ‘here’. Frequently, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ also introduces nonverbal prethe morpheme ___cits gloss ___es, as in (\ref{Example_10.4}) (see §\ref{Para_12.4}). Only rarely, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces locits gloss ___ions encoded by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{pasar the morpheme ___ bawa tu} ‘the market down there’ in (\ref{Example_10.5}). The examples in (\ref{Example_10.1}) to (\ref{Example_10.5}) also show thits gloss ___ \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces animits gloss ___e and inanimits gloss ___e, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ are its gloss ___tested: \textsc{2sg}, \textsc{1pl}, and \textsc{3pl}.}
A: word: dep	 gloss: 3SG:POSS
B: word: di	 gloss: at
C: word: ana~ana	 gloss: RDP~child
D: word: dia	 gloss: 3SG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 5:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): skarang kamu kasi terpol~terpol, taru di ___
Gloss (with missing item): now 2PL give RDP~jerry.can put at ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘now you give (me) the jerry cans, put (them) here’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces a peripheral location as in \textitbf{di kampung} ‘in the village’ in (\ref{Example_10.1}), or \textitbf{di dia} ‘at hers’ in (\ref{Example_10.2}). When following placement verbs such as \textitbf{taru} ‘put’ in (\ref{Example_10.3}), \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces oblique \isi{locative} arguments that indicate the location of the referent, as in \textitbf{di the morpheme ___} ‘here’. Frequently, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ also introduces nonverbal predicates, as in (\ref{Example_10.4}) (see §\ref{Para_12.4}). Only rarely, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces locations encoded by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{pasar di bawa tu} ‘the market down there’ in (\ref{Example_10.5}). The examples in (\ref{Example_10.1}) to (\ref{Example_10.5}) also show that \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces animate and inanimate, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ are attested: \textsc{2sg}, \textsc{1pl}, and \textsc{3pl}.}
A: word: sini	 gloss: L.PROX
B: word: kaya	 gloss: like
C: word: sini–nya	 gloss: L.PROX–3POSSR
D: word: ini	 gloss: D.PROX
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 6:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa ___ IPS satu
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG ___ social.sciences one
The English translation of this sentence is:[About course tracks in high school:] ‘I (am) in Social Sciences I’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces a peripheral locits gloss ___ion as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ kampung} ‘in the village’ in (\ref{Example_10.1}), or \textitbf{the morpheme ___ the morpheme ___a} ‘its gloss ___ hers’ in (\ref{Example_10.2}). When following placement verbs such as \textitbf{taru} ‘put’ in (\ref{Example_10.3}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces oblique \isi{locits gloss ___ive} arguments thits gloss ___ inthe morpheme ___cits gloss ___e the locits gloss ___ion of the referent, as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ sini} ‘here’. Frequently, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ also introduces nonverbal prethe morpheme ___cits gloss ___es, as in (\ref{Example_10.4}) (see §\ref{Para_12.4}). Only rarely, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces locits gloss ___ions encoded by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{pasar the morpheme ___ bawa tu} ‘the market down there’ in (\ref{Example_10.5}). The examples in (\ref{Example_10.1}) to (\ref{Example_10.5}) also show thits gloss ___ \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces animits gloss ___e and inanimits gloss ___e, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ are its gloss ___tested: \textsc{2sg}, \textsc{1pl}, and \textsc{3pl}.}
A: word: minta	 gloss: request
B: word: pernikaang	 gloss: marriage
C: word: di	 gloss: at
D: word: dia	 gloss: 3SG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 7:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa di ___ satu
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG at ___ one
The English translation of this sentence is:[About course tracks in high school:] ‘I (am) in Social Sciences I’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces a peripheral location as in \textitbf{di kampung} ‘in the village’ in (\ref{Example_10.1}), or \textitbf{di dia} ‘at hers’ in (\ref{Example_10.2}). When following placement verbs such as \textitbf{taru} ‘put’ in (\ref{Example_10.3}), \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces oblique \isi{locative} arguments that indicate the location of the referent, as in \textitbf{di sini} ‘here’. Frequently, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ also introduces nonverbal predicates, as in (\ref{Example_10.4}) (see §\ref{Para_12.4}). Only rarely, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces locations encoded by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{pasar di bawa tu} ‘the market down there’ in (\ref{Example_10.5}). The examples in (\ref{Example_10.1}) to (\ref{Example_10.5}) also show that \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces animate and inanimate, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ are attested: \textsc{2sg}, \textsc{1pl}, and \textsc{3pl}.}
A: word: bapa	 gloss: father
B: word: ips	 gloss: social.sciences
C: word: ipa	 gloss: natural.sciences
D: word: hancurkang	 gloss: shatter
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 8:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa di IPS ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG at social.sciences ___
The English translation of this sentence is:[About course tracks in high school:] ‘I (am) in Social Sciences I’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces a peripheral location as in \textitbf{di kampung} ‘in the village’ in (\ref{Example_10.1}), or \textitbf{di dia} ‘at hers’ in (\ref{Example_10.2}). When following placement verbs such as \textitbf{taru} ‘put’ in (\ref{Example_10.3}), \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces oblique \isi{locative} arguments that indicate the location of the referent, as in \textitbf{di sini} ‘here’. Frequently, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ also introduces nonverbal predicates, as in (\ref{Example_10.4}) (see §\ref{Para_12.4}). Only rarely, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces locations encoded by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{pasar di bawa tu} ‘the market down there’ in (\ref{Example_10.5}). The examples in (\ref{Example_10.1}) to (\ref{Example_10.5}) also show that \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces animate and inanimate, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ are attested: \textsc{2sg}, \textsc{1pl}, and \textsc{3pl}.}
A: word: satu	 gloss: one
B: word: sampe	 gloss: reach
C: word: satu~satu	 gloss: RDP~one
D: word: dulu	 gloss: first
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 9:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ di bawa tu raaame
Gloss (with missing item): ___ at bottom D.DIST be.bustling
The English translation of this sentence is:‘the market down there is very bustling’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces a peripheral location as in \textitbf{di kampung} ‘in the village’ in (\ref{Example_10.1}), or \textitbf{di dia} ‘at hers’ in (\ref{Example_10.2}). When following placement verbs such as \textitbf{taru} ‘put’ in (\ref{Example_10.3}), \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces oblique \isi{locative} arguments that indicate the location of the referent, as in \textitbf{di sini} ‘here’. Frequently, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ also introduces nonverbal predicates, as in (\ref{Example_10.4}) (see §\ref{Para_12.4}). Only rarely, \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces locations encoded by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ di bawa tu} ‘the its gloss ___ down there’ in (\ref{Example_10.5}). The examples in (\ref{Example_10.1}) to (\ref{Example_10.5}) also show that \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ introduces animate and inanimate, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ are attested: \textsc{2sg}, \textsc{1pl}, and \textsc{3pl}.}
A: word: pasar	 gloss: market
B: word: kayu	 gloss: wood
C: word: dasar	 gloss: base
D: word: jual	 gloss: sell
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 10:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): pasar ___ bawa tu raaame
Gloss (with missing item): market ___ bottom D.DIST be.bustling
The English translation of this sentence is:‘the market down there is very bustling’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Very commonly, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces a peripheral locits gloss ___ion as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ kampung} ‘in the village’ in (\ref{Example_10.1}), or \textitbf{the morpheme ___ the morpheme ___a} ‘its gloss ___ hers’ in (\ref{Example_10.2}). When following placement verbs such as \textitbf{taru} ‘put’ in (\ref{Example_10.3}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces oblique \isi{locits gloss ___ive} arguments thits gloss ___ inthe morpheme ___cits gloss ___e the locits gloss ___ion of the referent, as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ sini} ‘here’. Frequently, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ also introduces nonverbal prethe morpheme ___cits gloss ___es, as in (\ref{Example_10.4}) (see §\ref{Para_12.4}). Only rarely, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces locits gloss ___ions encoded by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{pasar the morpheme ___ bawa tu} ‘the market down there’ in (\ref{Example_10.5}). The examples in (\ref{Example_10.1}) to (\ref{Example_10.5}) also show thits gloss ___ \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ introduces animits gloss ___e and inanimits gloss ___e, as well as nominal and pronominal referents.\footnote{In the corpus only the following pronominal complements of \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, in’ are its gloss ___tested: \textsc{2sg}, \textsc{1pl}, and \textsc{3pl}.}
A: word: mandi	 gloss: bathe
B: word: tamu	 gloss: guest
C: word: di	 gloss: at
D: word: dia	 gloss: 3SG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C