cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 216:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): jadi {sperti} itu, harus bicara untuk dorang, ceritra ___ dorang
Gloss (with missing item): so similar.to D.DIST have.to speak for 3PL tell ___ 3PL
The English translation of this sentence is:‘so it’s like that, (we) have to speak to them (our children) for their benefit, talk to them for their benefit’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: With transfer verbs, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ introduces benefactive recipients, and with communication verbs it introduces benefactive addressees. That is, the referent is not merely a recipient or addressee. Benefactive \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ indicates that the referent is also the beneficiary of the transfer or communication, hence ``benefactive recipient'' and ``benefactive addressee''. This is illustrated with \textitbf{kasi the morpheme ___} ‘give to and its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_10.55}), and \textitbf{bicara the morpheme ___} ‘speak to and its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_10.56}).
A: word: untuk	 gloss: for
B: word: manusia	 gloss: human.being
C: word: guntur	 gloss: thunder
D: word: misalnya	 gloss: for.example
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 217:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): jadi {sperti} itu, harus bicara untuk dorang, ceritra untuk ___
Gloss (with missing item): so similar.to D.DIST have.to speak for 3PL tell for ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘so it’s like that, (we) have to speak to them (our children) for their benefit, talk to them for their benefit’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: With transfer verbs, \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ introduces benefactive recipients, and with communication verbs it introduces benefactive addressees. That is, the referent is not merely a recipient or addressee. Benefactive \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ indicates that the referent is also the beneficiary of the transfer or communication, hence ``benefactive recipient'' and ``benefactive addressee''. This is illustrated with \textitbf{kasi untuk} ‘give to and for’ in (\ref{Example_10.55}), and \textitbf{bicara untuk} ‘speak to and for’ in (\ref{Example_10.56}).
A: word: dorang	 gloss: 3PL
B: word: dong/dorang	 gloss: 3PL
C: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
D: word: setang	 gloss: evil.spirit
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 218:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tong mo pake ___ kamar mandi
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL want use ___ room bathe
The English translation of this sentence is:‘we want to use (the corrugated iron sheets) for the bathroom (roof)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Besides introducing animate referents, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ also introduces inanimate beneficiaries that are concrete, abstract, or temporal. In (\ref{Example_10.57}), the beneficiary is inanimate concrete: \textitbf{kamar mandi} ‘the bathroom’. In (\ref{Example_10.58}), the beneficiary is inanimate abstract: distal \isi{demonstrative} \textitbf{itu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ summarizes the speaker’s previous statements about balanced birth rates across families related by marriage. In (\ref{Example_10.59}) and (\ref{Example_10.60}), the beneficiary is temporal: \textitbf{taung ini} ‘this year’ in (\ref{Example_10.59}) and \textitbf{besok} ‘tomorrow’ in (\ref{Example_10.60}). Overall, however, these uses of benefactive \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ are quite rare, with the corpus including only very few examples.
A: word: guntur	 gloss: thunder
B: word: untuk	 gloss: for
C: word: misalnya	 gloss: for.example
D: word: klawar	 gloss: cave.bat
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 219:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tong mo pake untuk ___ mandi
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL want use for ___ bathe
The English translation of this sentence is:‘we want to use (the corrugated iron sheets) for the bathroom (roof)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Besides introducing animate referents, \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ also introduces inanimate beneficiaries that are concrete, abstract, or temporal. In (\ref{Example_10.57}), the beneficiary is inanimate concrete: \textitbf{the morpheme ___ mandi} ‘the bathits gloss ___’. In (\ref{Example_10.58}), the beneficiary is inanimate abstract: distal \isi{demonstrative} \textitbf{itu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ summarizes the speaker’s previous statements about balanced birth rates across families related by marriage. In (\ref{Example_10.59}) and (\ref{Example_10.60}), the beneficiary is temporal: \textitbf{taung ini} ‘this year’ in (\ref{Example_10.59}) and \textitbf{besok} ‘tomorrow’ in (\ref{Example_10.60}). Overall, however, these uses of benefactive \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ are quite rare, with the corpus including only very few examples.
A: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
B: word: sama	 gloss: to
C: word: kamar	 gloss: room
D: word: tingkat	 gloss: floor
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 220:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tong mo pake untuk kamar ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL want use for room ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘we want to use (the corrugated iron sheets) for the bathroom (roof)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Besides introducing animate referents, \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ also introduces inanimate beneficiaries that are concrete, abstract, or temporal. In (\ref{Example_10.57}), the beneficiary is inanimate concrete: \textitbf{kamar the morpheme ___} ‘the bathroom’. In (\ref{Example_10.58}), the beneficiary is inanimate abstract: distal \isi{demonstrative} \textitbf{itu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ summarizes the speaker’s previous statements about balanced birth rates across families related by marriage. In (\ref{Example_10.59}) and (\ref{Example_10.60}), the beneficiary is temporal: \textitbf{taung ini} ‘this year’ in (\ref{Example_10.59}) and \textitbf{besok} ‘tomorrow’ in (\ref{Example_10.60}). Overall, however, these uses of benefactive \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ are quite rare, with the corpus including only very few examples.
A: word: mandiri	 gloss: stand.alone
B: word: tuhang	 gloss: God
C: word: mandi	 gloss: bathe
D: word: cuci	 gloss: wash
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 221:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... {lahir} {ana} {suku} {A.,} a, {saya} {lahir} suku Y. ... tujuangnya hanya ___ itu
Gloss (with missing item): ... give.birth child ethnic.group A. ah! 1SG give.birth ethnic.group Y. ... purpose:3POSSR only ___ D.DIST
The English translation of this sentence is:[About the exchange of bride-price children:] ‘(our daughter) will give birth to a child (for) the A. family, well, I give birth for the Y. family ... its purpose is only for that (namely,\bluebold...a balanced birth rate across families)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Besides introducing animate referents, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ also introduces inanimate beneficiaries that are concrete, abstract, or temporal. In (\ref{Example_10.57}), the beneficiary is inanimate concrete: \textitbf{kamar mandi} ‘the bathroom’. In (\ref{Example_10.58}), the beneficiary is inanimate abstract: distal \isi{demonstrative} \textitbf{itu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ summarizes the speaker’s previous statements about balanced birth rates across families related by marriage. In (\ref{Example_10.59}) and (\ref{Example_10.60}), the beneficiary is temporal: \textitbf{taung ini} ‘this year’ in (\ref{Example_10.59}) and \textitbf{besok} ‘tomorrow’ in (\ref{Example_10.60}). Overall, however, these uses of benefactive \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ are quite rare, with the corpus including only very few examples.
A: word: misalnya	 gloss: for.example
B: word: untuk	 gloss: for
C: word: buaya	 gloss: crocodile
D: word: guntur	 gloss: thunder
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 222:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... {lahir} {ana} {suku} {A.,} a, {saya} {lahir} suku Y. ... tujuangnya hanya untuk ___
Gloss (with missing item): ... give.birth child ethnic.group A. ah! 1SG give.birth ethnic.group Y. ... purpose:3POSSR only for ___
The English translation of this sentence is:[About the exchange of bride-price children:] ‘(our daughter) will give birth to a child (for) the A. family, well, I give birth for the Y. family ... its purpose is only for that (namely,\bluebold...a balanced birth rate across families)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Besides introducing animate referents, \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ also introduces inanimate beneficiaries that are concrete, abstract, or temporal. In (\ref{Example_10.57}), the beneficiary is inanimate concrete: \textitbf{kamar mandi} ‘the bathroom’. In (\ref{Example_10.58}), the beneficiary is inanimate abstract: distal \isi{demonstrative} \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ summarizes the speaker’s previous statements about balanced birth rates across families related by marriage. In (\ref{Example_10.59}) and (\ref{Example_10.60}), the beneficiary is temporal: \textitbf{taung ini} ‘this year’ in (\ref{Example_10.59}) and \textitbf{besok} ‘tomorrow’ in (\ref{Example_10.60}). Overall, however, these uses of benefactive \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ are quite rare, with the corpus including only very few examples.
A: word: sana	 gloss: L.DIST
B: word: itu	 gloss: D.DIST
C: word: situ	 gloss: L.MED
D: word: acara	 gloss: festivity
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 223:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ taung ini kam kas los sa dulu
Gloss (with missing item): ___ year D.PROX 2PL give loosen 1SG first
The English translation of this sentence is:‘for (the rest of) this year you release me (from my duties) for now’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Besides introducing animate referents, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ also introduces inanimate beneficiaries that are concrete, abstract, or temporal. In (\ref{Example_10.57}), the beneficiary is inanimate concrete: \textitbf{kamar mandi} ‘the bathroom’. In (\ref{Example_10.58}), the beneficiary is inanimate abstract: distal \isi{demonstrative} \textitbf{itu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ summarizes the speaker’s previous statements about balanced birth rates across families related by marriage. In (\ref{Example_10.59}) and (\ref{Example_10.60}), the beneficiary is temporal: \textitbf{taung ini} ‘this year’ in (\ref{Example_10.59}) and \textitbf{besok} ‘tomorrow’ in (\ref{Example_10.60}). Overall, however, these uses of benefactive \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ are quite rare, with the corpus including only very few examples.
A: word: guntur	 gloss: thunder
B: word: untuk	 gloss: for
C: word: misalnya	 gloss: for.example
D: word: buat	 gloss: for
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 224:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): untuk ___ ini kam kas los sa dulu
Gloss (with missing item): for ___ D.PROX 2PL give loosen 1SG first
The English translation of this sentence is:‘for (the rest of) this year you release me (from my duties) for now’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Besides introducing animate referents, \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ also introduces inanimate beneficiaries that are concrete, abstract, or temporal. In (\ref{Example_10.57}), the beneficiary is inanimate concrete: \textitbf{kamar mandi} ‘the bathroom’. In (\ref{Example_10.58}), the beneficiary is inanimate abstract: distal \isi{demonstrative} \textitbf{itu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ summarizes the speaker’s previous statements about balanced birth rates across families related by marriage. In (\ref{Example_10.59}) and (\ref{Example_10.60}), the beneficiary is temporal: \textitbf{the morpheme ___ ini} ‘this its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_10.59}) and \textitbf{besok} ‘tomorrow’ in (\ref{Example_10.60}). Overall, however, these uses of benefactive \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ are quite rare, with the corpus including only very few examples.
A: word: ulang-taung	 gloss: birthday
B: word: bulang	 gloss: month
C: word: sana	 gloss: L.DIST
D: word: taung	 gloss: year
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 225:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): untuk taung ___ kam kas los sa dulu
Gloss (with missing item): for year ___ 2PL give loosen 1SG first
The English translation of this sentence is:‘for (the rest of) this year you release me (from my duties) for now’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Besides introducing animate referents, \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ also introduces inanimate beneficiaries that are concrete, abstract, or temporal. In (\ref{Example_10.57}), the beneficiary is inanimate concrete: \textitbf{kamar mandi} ‘the bathroom’. In (\ref{Example_10.58}), the beneficiary is inanimate abstract: distal \isi{demonstrative} \textitbf{itu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ summarizes the speaker’s previous statements about balanced birth rates across families related by marriage. In (\ref{Example_10.59}) and (\ref{Example_10.60}), the beneficiary is temporal: \textitbf{taung the morpheme ___} ‘this year’ in (\ref{Example_10.59}) and \textitbf{besok} ‘tomorrow’ in (\ref{Example_10.60}). Overall, however, these uses of benefactive \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ are quite rare, with the corpus including only very few examples.
A: word: sana	 gloss: L.DIST
B: word: sini	 gloss: L.PROX
C: word: ini	 gloss: D.PROX
D: word: begini	 gloss: like.this
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 226:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tong dari sa pu temang pinjam trening ___ besok
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL from 1SG POSS friend borrow tracksuit ___ tomorrow
The English translation of this sentence is:‘we (are back) from my friend (from whom we) borrowed a tracksuit for tomorrow’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Besides introducing animate referents, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ also introduces inanimate beneficiaries that are concrete, abstract, or temporal. In (\ref{Example_10.57}), the beneficiary is inanimate concrete: \textitbf{kamar mandi} ‘the bathroom’. In (\ref{Example_10.58}), the beneficiary is inanimate abstract: distal \isi{demonstrative} \textitbf{itu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ summarizes the speaker’s previous statements about balanced birth rates across families related by marriage. In (\ref{Example_10.59}) and (\ref{Example_10.60}), the beneficiary is temporal: \textitbf{taung ini} ‘this year’ in (\ref{Example_10.59}) and \textitbf{besok} ‘tomorrow’ in (\ref{Example_10.60}). Overall, however, these uses of benefactive \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ are quite rare, with the corpus including only very few examples.
A: word: ini	 gloss: D.PROX
B: word: misalnya	 gloss: for.example
C: word: guntur	 gloss: thunder
D: word: untuk	 gloss: for
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 227:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tong dari sa pu temang pinjam trening untuk ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL from 1SG POSS friend borrow tracksuit for ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘we (are back) from my friend (from whom we) borrowed a tracksuit for tomorrow’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Besides introducing animate referents, \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ also introduces inanimate beneficiaries that are concrete, abstract, or temporal. In (\ref{Example_10.57}), the beneficiary is inanimate concrete: \textitbf{kamar mandi} ‘the bathroom’. In (\ref{Example_10.58}), the beneficiary is inanimate abstract: distal \isi{demonstrative} \textitbf{itu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ summarizes the speaker’s previous statements about balanced birth rates across families related by marriage. In (\ref{Example_10.59}) and (\ref{Example_10.60}), the beneficiary is temporal: \textitbf{taung ini} ‘this year’ in (\ref{Example_10.59}) and \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_10.60}). Overall, however, these uses of benefactive \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ are quite rare, with the corpus including only very few examples.
A: word: kemaring	 gloss: yesterday
B: word: besar	 gloss: be.big
C: word: besok	 gloss: tomorrow
D: word: manusia	 gloss: human.being
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 228:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ taung ini kam kas los sa dulu
Gloss (with missing item): ___ year D.PROX 2PL give loosen 1SG first
The English translation of this sentence is:‘for (the rest of) this year you release me (from my duties) for now’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Besides introducing animate referents, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ also introduces inanimate beneficiaries that are concrete, abstract, or temporal. In (\ref{Example_10.57}), the beneficiary is inanimate concrete: \textitbf{kamar mandi} ‘the bathroom’. In (\ref{Example_10.58}), the beneficiary is inanimate abstract: distal \isi{demonstrative} \textitbf{itu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ summarizes the speaker’s previous statements about balanced birth rates across families related by marriage. In (\ref{Example_10.59}) and (\ref{Example_10.60}), the beneficiary is temporal: \textitbf{taung ini} ‘this year’ in (\ref{Example_10.59}) and \textitbf{besok} ‘tomorrow’ in (\ref{Example_10.60}). Overall, however, these uses of benefactive \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ are quite rare, with the corpus including only very few examples.
A: word: misalnya	 gloss: for.example
B: word: setang	 gloss: evil.spirit
C: word: guntur	 gloss: thunder
D: word: untuk	 gloss: for
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D