cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 157:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kalo saya mara dengang ___ begitu sa takut
Gloss (with missing item): if 1SG feel.angry(.about) with ___ like.that 1SG feel.afraid(.of)
The English translation of this sentence is:‘if I was angry with someone like that I’d feel afraid’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In addition, \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ introduces oblique arguments of mental verbs, such as \textitbf{ingat} ‘remember’ in (\ref{Example_10.46}), \textitbf{mara} ‘feel angry (about)’ in (\ref{Example_10.47}), or \textitbf{takut} ‘feel afraid (of)’ in (\ref{Example_10.48}). Most of the objects of mental verbs introduced with \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ can also occur with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ (§\ref{Para_10.2.1}): compare \textitbf{mara sama} ‘feel angry about’ in (\ref{Example_10.47}) with \textitbf{mara dengang} ‘feel angry with’ in (\ref{Example_10.38}), or \textitbf{takut sama} ‘feel afraid of’ in (\ref{Example_10.48}) with \textitbf{takut dengang} ‘feel afraid of’ in (\ref{Example_10.39})\addtocounter{footnote}{-1}\footnotemark{}.
A: word: dorang	 gloss: 3PL
B: word: manusia	 gloss: human.being
C: word: orang	 gloss: person
D: word: sore	 gloss: afternoon
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 158:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): adu, kang dong terlalu takut ___ setang
Gloss (with missing item): oh.no! you.know 3PL too feel.afraid(.of) ___ evil.spirit
The English translation of this sentence is:‘oh no!, you know, they feel too afraid of evil spirits’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In addition, \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ introduces oblique arguments of mental verbs, such as \textitbf{ingat} ‘remember’ in (\ref{Example_10.46}), \textitbf{mara} ‘feel angry (about)’ in (\ref{Example_10.47}), or \textitbf{takut} ‘feel afraid (of)’ in (\ref{Example_10.48}). Most of the objects of mental verbs introduced its gloss ___ \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ can also occur its gloss ___ \isi{comitative} \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ (§\ref{Para_10.2.1}): compare \textitbf{mara sama} ‘feel angry about’ in (\ref{Example_10.47}) its gloss ___ \textitbf{mara the morpheme ___} ‘feel angry its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_10.38}), or \textitbf{takut sama} ‘feel afraid of’ in (\ref{Example_10.48}) its gloss ___ \textitbf{takut the morpheme ___} ‘feel afraid of’ in (\ref{Example_10.39})\addtocounter{footnote}{-1}\footnotemark{}.
A: word: kitong	 gloss: 1PL
B: word: dengang	 gloss: with
C: word: jangang	 gloss: NEG.IMP
D: word: dang	 gloss: and
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 159:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): adu, kang dong terlalu takut dengang ___
Gloss (with missing item): oh.no! you.know 3PL too feel.afraid(.of) with ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘oh no!, you know, they feel too afraid of evil spirits’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In addition, \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ introduces oblique arguments of mental verbs, such as \textitbf{ingat} ‘remember’ in (\ref{Example_10.46}), \textitbf{mara} ‘feel angry (about)’ in (\ref{Example_10.47}), or \textitbf{takut} ‘feel afraid (of)’ in (\ref{Example_10.48}). Most of the objects of mental verbs introduced with \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ can also occur with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ (§\ref{Para_10.2.1}): compare \textitbf{mara sama} ‘feel angry about’ in (\ref{Example_10.47}) with \textitbf{mara dengang} ‘feel angry with’ in (\ref{Example_10.38}), or \textitbf{takut sama} ‘feel afraid of’ in (\ref{Example_10.48}) with \textitbf{takut dengang} ‘feel afraid of’ in (\ref{Example_10.39})\addtocounter{footnote}{-1}\footnotemark{}.
A: word: sebla	 gloss: side
B: word: swanggi	 gloss: nocturnal.evil.spirit
C: word: setang	 gloss: evil.spirit
D: word: ketang	 gloss: crab
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 160:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kalo saya mara ___ orang begitu sa takut
Gloss (with missing item): if 1SG feel.angry(.about) ___ person like.that 1SG feel.afraid(.of)
The English translation of this sentence is:‘if I was angry with someone like that I’d feel afraid’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: %\footnote{Bivalent verbs such as \textitbf{mara} ‘feel angry (about)’ or \textitbf{takut} ‘feel afraid (of)’ do not require but allow two syntactic arguments (see §\ref{Para_5.3.1} and §\ref{Para_11.1}). That is, speakers quite commonly encode patients, such as \textitbf{orang} in (\ref{Example_10.38}) or \textitbf{setang} ‘evil spirit’ in (\ref{Example_10.39}), as oblique arguments rather than as direct objects}\todo[inline]{This is footnote 223 in Word, and is referenced twice}.
A: word: dang	 gloss: and
B: word: dengang	 gloss: with
C: word: pasar	 gloss: market
D: word: jangang	 gloss: NEG.IMP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 161:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kalo saya mara dengang ___ begitu sa takut
Gloss (with missing item): if 1SG feel.angry(.about) with ___ like.that 1SG feel.afraid(.of)
The English translation of this sentence is:‘if I was angry with someone like that I’d feel afraid’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: %\footnote{Bivalent verbs such as \textitbf{mara} ‘feel angry (about)’ or \textitbf{takut} ‘feel afraid (of)’ do not require but allow two syntactic arguments (see §\ref{Para_5.3.1} and §\ref{Para_11.1}). That is, speakers quite commonly encode patients, such as \textitbf{the morpheme ___} in (\ref{Example_10.38}) or \textitbf{setang} ‘evil spirit’ in (\ref{Example_10.39}), as oblique arguments rather than as direct objects}\todo[inline]{This is footnote 223 in Word, and is referenced twice}.
A: word: dorang	 gloss: 3PL
B: word: laing	 gloss: be.different
C: word: orang	 gloss: person
D: word: manusia	 gloss: human.being
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 162:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): adu, kang dong terlalu takut ___ setang
Gloss (with missing item): oh.no! you.know 3PL too feel.afraid(.of) ___ evil.spirit
The English translation of this sentence is:‘oh no!, you know, they feel too afraid of evil spirits’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: %\footnote{Bivalent verbs such as \textitbf{mara} ‘feel angry (about)’ or \textitbf{takut} ‘feel afraid (of)’ do not require but allow two syntactic arguments (see §\ref{Para_5.3.1} and §\ref{Para_11.1}). That is, speakers quite commonly encode patients, such as \textitbf{orang} in (\ref{Example_10.38}) or \textitbf{setang} ‘evil spirit’ in (\ref{Example_10.39}), as oblique arguments rather than as direct objects}\todo[inline]{This is footnote 223 in Word, and is referenced twice}.
A: word: dang	 gloss: and
B: word: jangang	 gloss: NEG.IMP
C: word: dia	 gloss: 3SG
D: word: dengang	 gloss: with
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 163:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): adu, kang dong terlalu takut dengang ___
Gloss (with missing item): oh.no! you.know 3PL too feel.afraid(.of) with ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘oh no!, you know, they feel too afraid of evil spirits’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: %\footnote{Bivalent verbs such as \textitbf{mara} ‘feel angry (about)’ or \textitbf{takut} ‘feel afraid (of)’ do not require but allow two syntactic arguments (see §\ref{Para_5.3.1} and §\ref{Para_11.1}). That is, speakers quite commonly encode patients, such as \textitbf{orang} in (\ref{Example_10.38}) or \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘evil spirit’ in (\ref{Example_10.39}), as oblique arguments rather than as direct objects}\todo[inline]{This is footnote 223 in Word, and is referenced twice}.
A: word: mama-ade	 gloss: aunt
B: word: setang	 gloss: evil.spirit
C: word: ketang	 gloss: crab
D: word: swanggi	 gloss: nocturnal.evil.spirit
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 164:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de mara ___ pak Bolikarfus
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG feel.angry(.about) ___ father Bolikarfus
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he was angry about Mr. Bolikarfus’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The semantic distinctions between \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ and \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are subtle. When speakers want its gloss ___ emphasize the agent of the mental \isi{verb} they employ \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’. If they want its gloss ___ signal that the object of the mental \isi{verb} is also involved in the mental process talked about, they use \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The contrastive examples in (\ref{Example_10.47}) and (\ref{Example_10.48}) illustrate this distinction. In (\ref{Example_10.47a}) \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ emphasizes the fact that the agent \textitbf{de} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{mara} ‘feels angry’ about the patient \textitbf{pak Bolikarfus} ‘Mr. Bolikarfus’ whereas the patient himself is not involved in this mental process. By contrast, in (\ref{Example_10.47b}) \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ signals that in some ways the patient \textitbf{pak Bolikarfus} ‘Mr. Bolikarfus’ has contributed its gloss ___ the agent’s anger. Likewise, in (\ref{Example_10.48a}) \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ focuses on the fact that the agent \textitbf{dia} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{takut} ‘feels afraid (of)’; again, the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘God’s children’ is not involved in this mental process. In (\ref{Example_10.48b}), by contrast, \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ signals that the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘God’s children’ has contributed in some ways its gloss ___ the agent’s fear.
A: word: taung	 gloss: year
B: word: sama	 gloss: to
C: word: harus	 gloss: have.to
D: word: sama~sama	 gloss: RDP~be.same
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 165:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de mara sama ___ Bolikarfus
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG feel.angry(.about) to ___ Bolikarfus
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he was angry about Mr. Bolikarfus’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The semantic distinctions between \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ and \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are subtle. When speakers want to emphasize the agent of the mental \isi{verb} they employ \textitbf{sama} ‘to’. If they want to signal that the object of the mental \isi{verb} is also involved in the mental process talked about, they use \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The contrastive examples in (\ref{Example_10.47}) and (\ref{Example_10.48}) illustrate this distinction. In (\ref{Example_10.47a}) \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ emphasizes the fact that the agent \textitbf{de} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{mara} ‘feels angry’ about the patient \textitbf{the morpheme ___ Bolikarfus} ‘Mr. Bolikarfus’ whereas the patient himself is not involved in this mental process. By contrast, in (\ref{Example_10.47b}) \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ signals that in some ways the patient \textitbf{the morpheme ___ Bolikarfus} ‘Mr. Bolikarfus’ has contributed to the agent’s anger. Likewise, in (\ref{Example_10.48a}) \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ focuses on the fact that the agent \textitbf{dia} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{takut} ‘feels afraid (of)’; again, the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘God’s children’ is not involved in this mental process. In (\ref{Example_10.48b}), by contrast, \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ signals that the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘God’s children’ has contributed in some ways to the agent’s fear.
A: word: satu	 gloss: one
B: word: pak	 gloss: father
C: word: pake	 gloss: use
D: word: tete	 gloss: grandfather
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 166:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de mara sama pak ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG feel.angry(.about) to father ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he was angry about Mr. Bolikarfus’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The semantic distinctions between \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ and \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are subtle. When speakers want to emphasize the agent of the mental \isi{verb} they employ \textitbf{sama} ‘to’. If they want to signal that the object of the mental \isi{verb} is also involved in the mental process talked about, they use \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The contrastive examples in (\ref{Example_10.47}) and (\ref{Example_10.48}) illustrate this distinction. In (\ref{Example_10.47a}) \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ emphasizes the fact that the agent \textitbf{de} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{mara} ‘feels angry’ about the patient \textitbf{pak its gloss ___} ‘Mr. its gloss ___’ whereas the patient himself is not involved in this mental process. By contrast, in (\ref{Example_10.47b}) \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ signals that in some ways the patient \textitbf{pak its gloss ___} ‘Mr. its gloss ___’ has contributed to the agent’s anger. Likewise, in (\ref{Example_10.48a}) \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ focuses on the fact that the agent \textitbf{dia} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{takut} ‘feels afraid (of)’; again, the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘God’s children’ is not involved in this mental process. In (\ref{Example_10.48b}), by contrast, \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ signals that the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘God’s children’ has contributed in some ways to the agent’s fear.
A: word: bolikarfus	 gloss: Bolikarfus
B: word: ikang	 gloss: fish
C: word: taung	 gloss: year
D: word: mambramo	 gloss: Mambramo
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 167:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de mara ___ pak Bolikarfus
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG feel.angry(.about) ___ father Bolikarfus
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he was angry with Mr. Bolikarfus’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The semantic distinctions between \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ and \textitbf{the morpheme ___ang} ‘its gloss ___’ are subtle. When speakers want to emphasize the agent of the mental \isi{verb} they employ \textitbf{sama} ‘to’. If they want to signal that the object of the mental \isi{verb} is also involved in the mental process talked about, they use \isi{comitative} \textitbf{the morpheme ___ang} ‘its gloss ___’. The contrastive examples in (\ref{Example_10.47}) and (\ref{Example_10.48}) illustrate this distinction. In (\ref{Example_10.47a}) \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ emphasizes the fact that the agent \textitbf{de} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{mara} ‘feels angry’ about the patient \textitbf{pak Bolikarfus} ‘Mr. Bolikarfus’ whereas the patient himself is not involved in this mental process. By contrast, in (\ref{Example_10.47b}) \textitbf{the morpheme ___(ang)} ‘its gloss ___’ signals that in some ways the patient \textitbf{pak Bolikarfus} ‘Mr. Bolikarfus’ has contributed to the agent’s anger. Likewise, in (\ref{Example_10.48a}) \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ focuses on the fact that the agent \textitbf{dia} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{takut} ‘feels afraid (of)’; again, the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘God’s children’ is not involved in this mental process. In (\ref{Example_10.48b}), by contrast, \textitbf{the morpheme ___(ang)} ‘its gloss ___’ signals that the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘God’s children’ has contributed in some ways to the agent’s fear.
A: word: orang	 gloss: person
B: word: dang	 gloss: and
C: word: deng	 gloss: with
D: word: dengang	 gloss: with
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 168:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de mara deng ___ Bolikarfus
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG feel.angry(.about) with ___ Bolikarfus
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he was angry with Mr. Bolikarfus’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The semantic distinctions between \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ and \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are subtle. When speakers want to emphasize the agent of the mental \isi{verb} they employ \textitbf{sama} ‘to’. If they want to signal that the object of the mental \isi{verb} is also involved in the mental process talked about, they use \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The contrastive examples in (\ref{Example_10.47}) and (\ref{Example_10.48}) illustrate this distinction. In (\ref{Example_10.47a}) \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ emphasizes the fact that the agent \textitbf{de} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{mara} ‘feels angry’ about the patient \textitbf{the morpheme ___ Bolikarfus} ‘Mr. Bolikarfus’ whereas the patient himself is not involved in this mental process. By contrast, in (\ref{Example_10.47b}) \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ signals that in some ways the patient \textitbf{the morpheme ___ Bolikarfus} ‘Mr. Bolikarfus’ has contributed to the agent’s anger. Likewise, in (\ref{Example_10.48a}) \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ focuses on the fact that the agent \textitbf{dia} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{takut} ‘feels afraid (of)’; again, the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘God’s children’ is not involved in this mental process. In (\ref{Example_10.48b}), by contrast, \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ signals that the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘God’s children’ has contributed in some ways to the agent’s fear.
A: word: pak	 gloss: father
B: word: kitong	 gloss: 1PL
C: word: tete	 gloss: grandfather
D: word: pake	 gloss: use
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A