cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 73:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa di ___ satu
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG at ___ one
The English translation of this sentence is:[About course tracks in high school:] ‘I (am) in Social Sciences I’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Elision of \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ and \textitbf{ke} ‘to’ is not possible, though, in nonverbal prepositional predicate clauses as this would create nominal clauses with unacceptable semantics. This is illustrated with elided \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ in (\ref{Example_10.28}), which is based on the example in (\ref{Example_10.4}), and with elided \textitbf{ke} ‘to’ in (\ref{Example_10.29}), which is based on the example in (\ref{Example_10.8}).
A: word: panjang	 gloss: be.long
B: word: ipa	 gloss: natural.sciences
C: word: ips	 gloss: social.sciences
D: word: pasar	 gloss: market
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 74:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa di IPS ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG at social.sciences ___
The English translation of this sentence is:[About course tracks in high school:] ‘I (am) in Social Sciences I’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Elision of \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ and \textitbf{ke} ‘to’ is not possible, though, in nonverbal prepositional predicate clauses as this would create nominal clauses with unacceptable semantics. This is illustrated with elided \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ in (\ref{Example_10.28}), which is based on the example in (\ref{Example_10.4}), and with elided \textitbf{ke} ‘to’ in (\ref{Example_10.29}), which is based on the example in (\ref{Example_10.8}).
A: word: bapa	 gloss: father
B: word: dulu	 gloss: first
C: word: satu	 gloss: one
D: word: satu~satu	 gloss: RDP~one
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 75:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa ___ ruma-sakit
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG ___ hospital
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I (went) to the hospital’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Elision of \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ and \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ is not possible, though, in nonverbal prepositional predicate clauses as this would create nominal clauses with unacceptable semantics. This is illustrated with elided \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ in (\ref{Example_10.28}), which is based on the example in (\ref{Example_10.4}), and with elided \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_10.29}), which is based on the example in (\ref{Example_10.8}).
A: word: harus	 gloss: have.to
B: word: kejar	 gloss: chase
C: word: kamu	 gloss: 2PL
D: word: ke	 gloss: to
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 76:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa ke ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG to ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I (went) to the hospital’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Elision of \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ and \textitbf{ke} ‘to’ is not possible, though, in nonverbal prepositional predicate clauses as this would create nominal clauses with unacceptable semantics. This is illustrated with elided \textitbf{di} ‘at, in’ in (\ref{Example_10.28}), which is based on the example in (\ref{Example_10.4}), and with elided \textitbf{ke} ‘to’ in (\ref{Example_10.29}), which is based on the example in (\ref{Example_10.8}).
A: word: obat	 gloss: medicine
B: word: buat	 gloss: for
C: word: sakit	 gloss: be.sick
D: word: ruma-sakit	 gloss: hospital
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 77:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): saya tidor Ø ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG sleep ... ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I slept (the entire) afternoon’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Elision of elative \textitbf{dari} ‘from’ and temporal \textitbf{sampe} ‘until’ is also not possible, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_10.30}) and (\ref{Example_10.31}). In the example in (\ref{Example_10.30}), which is based on (\ref{Example_10.10}), elative \textitbf{dari} ‘from’ is omitted, resulting in an ungrammatical utterance. In the example in (\ref{Example_10.31}), which is based on (\ref{Example_10.19}), temporal \textitbf{sampe} ‘until’ is elided. The result is a change in meaning of the entire utterance: ‘I slept (the entire) its gloss ___’.
A: word: sore	 gloss: afternoon
B: word: anjing	 gloss: dog
C: word: hari	 gloss: day
D: word: sorong	 gloss: Sorong
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 78:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... sa harus kluar ___ kam pu kluarga
Gloss (with missing item): ... 1SG have.to go.out ___ 2PL POSS family
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[I hadn’t thought that] I would have to depart from your family’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Elision of elative \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ and temporal \textitbf{sampe} ‘until’ is also not possible, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_10.30}) and (\ref{Example_10.31}). In the example in (\ref{Example_10.30}), which is based on (\ref{Example_10.10}), elative \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ is omitted, resulting in an ungrammatical utterance. In the example in (\ref{Example_10.31}), which is based on (\ref{Example_10.19}), temporal \textitbf{sampe} ‘until’ is elided. The result is a change in meaning of the entire utterance: ‘I slept (the entire) afternoon’.
A: word: cari	 gloss: search
B: word: kayu	 gloss: wood
C: word: dari	 gloss: from
D: word: dang	 gloss: and
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 79:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... sa harus kluar dari ___ pu kluarga
Gloss (with missing item): ... 1SG have.to go.out from ___ POSS family
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[I hadn’t thought that] I would have to depart from your family’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Elision of elative \textitbf{dari} ‘from’ and temporal \textitbf{sampe} ‘until’ is also not possible, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_10.30}) and (\ref{Example_10.31}). In the example in (\ref{Example_10.30}), which is based on (\ref{Example_10.10}), elative \textitbf{dari} ‘from’ is omitted, resulting in an ungrammatical utterance. In the example in (\ref{Example_10.31}), which is based on (\ref{Example_10.19}), temporal \textitbf{sampe} ‘until’ is elided. The result is a change in meaning of the entire utterance: ‘I slept (the entire) afternoon’.
A: word: bawa	 gloss: bring
B: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
C: word: kamar	 gloss: room
D: word: tong	 gloss: 1PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 80:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... sa harus kluar dari kam ___ kluarga
Gloss (with missing item): ... 1SG have.to go.out from 2PL ___ family
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[I hadn’t thought that] I would have to depart from your family’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Elision of elative \textitbf{dari} ‘from’ and temporal \textitbf{sampe} ‘until’ is also not possible, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_10.30}) and (\ref{Example_10.31}). In the example in (\ref{Example_10.30}), which is based on (\ref{Example_10.10}), elative \textitbf{dari} ‘from’ is omitted, resulting in an ungrammatical utterance. In the example in (\ref{Example_10.31}), which is based on (\ref{Example_10.19}), temporal \textitbf{sampe} ‘until’ is elided. The result is a change in meaning of the entire utterance: ‘I slept (the entire) afternoon’.
A: word: pukul	 gloss: hit
B: word: pu	 gloss: POSS
C: word: pagi	 gloss: morning
D: word: hendro	 gloss: POSSR
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 81:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... sa harus kluar dari kam pu ___
Gloss (with missing item): ... 1SG have.to go.out from 2PL POSS ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[I hadn’t thought that] I would have to depart from your family’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Elision of elative \textitbf{dari} ‘from’ and temporal \textitbf{sampe} ‘until’ is also not possible, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_10.30}) and (\ref{Example_10.31}). In the example in (\ref{Example_10.30}), which is based on (\ref{Example_10.10}), elative \textitbf{dari} ‘from’ is omitted, resulting in an ungrammatical utterance. In the example in (\ref{Example_10.31}), which is based on (\ref{Example_10.19}), temporal \textitbf{sampe} ‘until’ is elided. The result is a change in meaning of the entire utterance: ‘I slept (the entire) afternoon’.
A: word: kluar	 gloss: go.out
B: word: kluarga	 gloss: family
C: word: klawar	 gloss: cave.bat
D: word: ade-kaka	 gloss: siblings
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 82:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): saya tidor Ø ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG sleep ... ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I slept (the entire) afternoon’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Elision of elative \textitbf{dari} ‘from’ and temporal \textitbf{sampe} ‘until’ is also not possible, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_10.30}) and (\ref{Example_10.31}). In the example in (\ref{Example_10.30}), which is based on (\ref{Example_10.10}), elative \textitbf{dari} ‘from’ is omitted, resulting in an ungrammatical utterance. In the example in (\ref{Example_10.31}), which is based on (\ref{Example_10.19}), temporal \textitbf{sampe} ‘until’ is elided. The result is a change in meaning of the entire utterance: ‘I slept (the entire) its gloss ___’.
A: word: sini	 gloss: L.PROX
B: word: sorong	 gloss: Sorong
C: word: sore	 gloss: afternoon
D: word: hari	 gloss: day
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 83:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): saya tidor ___ sore
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG sleep ___ afternoon
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I slept until the afternoon’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Elision of elative \textitbf{dari} ‘from’ and temporal \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ is also not possible, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_10.30}) and (\ref{Example_10.31}). In the example in (\ref{Example_10.30}), which is based on (\ref{Example_10.10}), elative \textitbf{dari} ‘from’ is omitted, resulting in an ungrammatical utterance. In the example in (\ref{Example_10.31}), which is based on (\ref{Example_10.19}), temporal \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ is elided. The result is a change in meaning of the entire utterance: ‘I slept (the entire) afternoon’.
A: word: sampe	 gloss: until
B: word: inggris	 gloss: English
C: word: sama	 gloss: to
D: word: sampeee	 gloss: reach
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 84:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): saya tidor sampe ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG sleep until ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I slept until the afternoon’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Elision of elative \textitbf{dari} ‘from’ and temporal \textitbf{sampe} ‘until’ is also not possible, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_10.30}) and (\ref{Example_10.31}). In the example in (\ref{Example_10.30}), which is based on (\ref{Example_10.10}), elative \textitbf{dari} ‘from’ is omitted, resulting in an ungrammatical utterance. In the example in (\ref{Example_10.31}), which is based on (\ref{Example_10.19}), temporal \textitbf{sampe} ‘until’ is elided. The result is a change in meaning of the entire utterance: ‘I slept (the entire) its gloss ___’.
A: word: hari	 gloss: day
B: word: dengang	 gloss: with
C: word: sore	 gloss: afternoon
D: word: sorong	 gloss: Sorong
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 85:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sebentar Hurki datang ko pulang ___ mama-tua
Gloss (with missing item): in.a.moment Hurki come 2SG go.home ___ aunt
The English translation of this sentence is:‘in a moment (when) Hurki comes, you’ll go home with me (‘aunt’)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The associates introduced its gloss ___ \textitbf{the morpheme ___ang} ‘its gloss ___’ are most commonly animate human as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ mama-tua} ‘its gloss ___ aunt’ in (\ref{Example_10.32}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___ de pu temang{\Tilde}temang} ‘its gloss ___ his friends’ in (\ref{Example_10.33}), or in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ kamu} ‘its gloss ___ you’ in (\ref{Example_10.34}). These examples also show that the complements of \textitbf{the morpheme ___ang} ‘its gloss ___’ can be nouns or personal pronouns. Besides animate associates, \textitbf{the morpheme ___ang} ‘its gloss ___’ also introduces inanimate associates, as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ motor} ‘its gloss ___ (his) motorbike’ in (\ref{Example_10.35}), or in \textitbf{the morpheme ___} \textitbf{itu} ‘its gloss ___ those (spices)’ in (\ref{Example_10.36}). The associates introduced its gloss ___ \textitbf{the morpheme ___ang} ‘its gloss ___’ are either encoded in peripheral adjuncts as in (\ref{Example_10.32}), or (\ref{Example_10.34}) to (\ref{Example_10.36}), or in nonverbal predicates as in (\ref{Example_10.33}). The example in (\ref{Example_10.33}) also illustrates that prepositional phrases functioning as nonverbal predicates can be modified by adverbs, such as prospective \textitbf{masi} ‘still’; such \isi{modification} is unattested for prepositional phrases having other functions.
A: word: dengang	 gloss: with
B: word: deng	 gloss: with
C: word: dang	 gloss: and
D: word: mama-ade	 gloss: aunt
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 86:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sebentar Hurki datang ko pulang deng ___
Gloss (with missing item): in.a.moment Hurki come 2SG go.home with ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘in a moment (when) Hurki comes, you’ll go home with me (‘aunt’)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The associates introduced with \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are most commonly animate human as in \textitbf{deng the morpheme ___} ‘with its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_10.32}), \textitbf{deng de pu temang{\Tilde}temang} ‘with his friends’ in (\ref{Example_10.33}), or in \textitbf{deng kamu} ‘with you’ in (\ref{Example_10.34}). These examples also show that the complements of \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ can be nouns or personal pronouns. Besides animate associates, \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ also introduces inanimate associates, as in \textitbf{deng motor} ‘with (his) motorbike’ in (\ref{Example_10.35}), or in \textitbf{deng} \textitbf{itu} ‘with those (spices)’ in (\ref{Example_10.36}). The associates introduced with \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are either encoded in peripheral adjuncts as in (\ref{Example_10.32}), or (\ref{Example_10.34}) to (\ref{Example_10.36}), or in nonverbal predicates as in (\ref{Example_10.33}). The example in (\ref{Example_10.33}) also illustrates that prepositional phrases functioning as nonverbal predicates can be modified by adverbs, such as prospective \textitbf{masi} ‘still’; such \isi{modification} is unattested for prepositional phrases having other functions.
A: word: depang	 gloss: front
B: word: mama-ade	 gloss: aunt
C: word: nene	 gloss: grandmother
D: word: mama-tua	 gloss: aunt
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 87:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Roni masi ___ de pu temang~temang
Gloss (with missing item): Roni still ___ 3SG POSS RDP~friend
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Roni is still with his friends’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The associates introduced its gloss ___ \textitbf{the morpheme ___ang} ‘its gloss ___’ are most commonly animate human as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ mama-tua} ‘its gloss ___ aunt’ in (\ref{Example_10.32}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___ de pu temang{\Tilde}temang} ‘its gloss ___ his friends’ in (\ref{Example_10.33}), or in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ kamu} ‘its gloss ___ you’ in (\ref{Example_10.34}). These examples also show that the complements of \textitbf{the morpheme ___ang} ‘its gloss ___’ can be nouns or personal pronouns. Besides animate associates, \textitbf{the morpheme ___ang} ‘its gloss ___’ also introduces inanimate associates, as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ motor} ‘its gloss ___ (his) motorbike’ in (\ref{Example_10.35}), or in \textitbf{the morpheme ___} \textitbf{itu} ‘its gloss ___ those (spices)’ in (\ref{Example_10.36}). The associates introduced its gloss ___ \textitbf{the morpheme ___ang} ‘its gloss ___’ are either encoded in peripheral adjuncts as in (\ref{Example_10.32}), or (\ref{Example_10.34}) to (\ref{Example_10.36}), or in nonverbal predicates as in (\ref{Example_10.33}). The example in (\ref{Example_10.33}) also illustrates that prepositional phrases functioning as nonverbal predicates can be modified by adverbs, such as prospective \textitbf{masi} ‘still’; such \isi{modification} is unattested for prepositional phrases having other functions.
A: word: deng	 gloss: with
B: word: dengang	 gloss: with
C: word: pisow	 gloss: knife
D: word: dang	 gloss: and
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A