cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 169:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de mara deng pak ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG feel.angry(.about) with father ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he was angry with Mr. Bolikarfus’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The semantic distinctions between \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ and \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are subtle. When speakers want to emphasize the agent of the mental \isi{verb} they employ \textitbf{sama} ‘to’. If they want to signal that the object of the mental \isi{verb} is also involved in the mental process talked about, they use \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The contrastive examples in (\ref{Example_10.47}) and (\ref{Example_10.48}) illustrate this distinction. In (\ref{Example_10.47a}) \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ emphasizes the fact that the agent \textitbf{de} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{mara} ‘feels angry’ about the patient \textitbf{pak its gloss ___} ‘Mr. its gloss ___’ whereas the patient himself is not involved in this mental process. By contrast, in (\ref{Example_10.47b}) \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ signals that in some ways the patient \textitbf{pak its gloss ___} ‘Mr. its gloss ___’ has contributed to the agent’s anger. Likewise, in (\ref{Example_10.48a}) \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ focuses on the fact that the agent \textitbf{dia} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{takut} ‘feels afraid (of)’; again, the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘God’s children’ is not involved in this mental process. In (\ref{Example_10.48b}), by contrast, \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ signals that the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘God’s children’ has contributed in some ways to the agent’s fear.
A: word: bolikarfus	 gloss: Bolikarfus
B: word: seng	 gloss: corrugated.iron
C: word: mambramo	 gloss: Mambramo
D: word: ikang	 gloss: fish
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 170:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): memang dia takut ___ ana~ana Tuhang
Gloss (with missing item): indeed 3SG feel.afraid(.of) ___ RDP~child God
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(that evil spirit) indeed he/she feels afraid of God’s children’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The semantic distinctions between \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ and \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are subtle. When speakers want its gloss ___ emphasize the agent of the mental \isi{verb} they employ \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’. If they want its gloss ___ signal that the object of the mental \isi{verb} is also involved in the mental process talked about, they use \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The contrastive examples in (\ref{Example_10.47}) and (\ref{Example_10.48}) illustrate this distinction. In (\ref{Example_10.47a}) \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ emphasizes the fact that the agent \textitbf{de} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{mara} ‘feels angry’ about the patient \textitbf{pak Bolikarfus} ‘Mr. Bolikarfus’ whereas the patient himself is not involved in this mental process. By contrast, in (\ref{Example_10.47b}) \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ signals that in some ways the patient \textitbf{pak Bolikarfus} ‘Mr. Bolikarfus’ has contributed its gloss ___ the agent’s anger. Likewise, in (\ref{Example_10.48a}) \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ focuses on the fact that the agent \textitbf{dia} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{takut} ‘feels afraid (of)’; again, the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘God’s children’ is not involved in this mental process. In (\ref{Example_10.48b}), by contrast, \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ signals that the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘God’s children’ has contributed in some ways its gloss ___ the agent’s fear.
A: word: harus	 gloss: have.to
B: word: buaya	 gloss: crocodile
C: word: sama~sama	 gloss: RDP~be.same
D: word: sama	 gloss: to
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 171:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): memang dia takut sama ___ Tuhang
Gloss (with missing item): indeed 3SG feel.afraid(.of) to ___ God
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(that evil spirit) indeed he/she feels afraid of God’s children’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The semantic distinctions between \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ and \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are subtle. When speakers want to emphasize the agent of the mental \isi{verb} they employ \textitbf{sama} ‘to’. If they want to signal that the object of the mental \isi{verb} is also involved in the mental process talked about, they use \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The contrastive examples in (\ref{Example_10.47}) and (\ref{Example_10.48}) illustrate this distinction. In (\ref{Example_10.47a}) \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ emphasizes the fact that the agent \textitbf{de} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{mara} ‘feels angry’ about the patient \textitbf{pak Bolikarfus} ‘Mr. Bolikarfus’ whereas the patient himself is not involved in this mental process. By contrast, in (\ref{Example_10.47b}) \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ signals that in some ways the patient \textitbf{pak Bolikarfus} ‘Mr. Bolikarfus’ has contributed to the agent’s anger. Likewise, in (\ref{Example_10.48a}) \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ focuses on the fact that the agent \textitbf{dia} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{takut} ‘feels afraid (of)’; again, the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘God’s children’ is not involved in this mental process. In (\ref{Example_10.48b}), by contrast, \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ signals that the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘God’s children’ has contributed in some ways to the agent’s fear.
A: word: sana~sana	 gloss: RDP~LOC.DIST
B: word: sodara~sodara	 gloss: RDP~sibling
C: word: ana~ana	 gloss: RDP~child
D: word: dari	 gloss: from
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 172:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): memang dia takut sama ana~ana ___
Gloss (with missing item): indeed 3SG feel.afraid(.of) to RDP~child ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(that evil spirit) indeed he/she feels afraid of God’s children’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The semantic distinctions between \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ and \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are subtle. When speakers want to emphasize the agent of the mental \isi{verb} they employ \textitbf{sama} ‘to’. If they want to signal that the object of the mental \isi{verb} is also involved in the mental process talked about, they use \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The contrastive examples in (\ref{Example_10.47}) and (\ref{Example_10.48}) illustrate this distinction. In (\ref{Example_10.47a}) \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ emphasizes the fact that the agent \textitbf{de} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{mara} ‘feels angry’ about the patient \textitbf{pak Bolikarfus} ‘Mr. Bolikarfus’ whereas the patient himself is not involved in this mental process. By contrast, in (\ref{Example_10.47b}) \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ signals that in some ways the patient \textitbf{pak Bolikarfus} ‘Mr. Bolikarfus’ has contributed to the agent’s anger. Likewise, in (\ref{Example_10.48a}) \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ focuses on the fact that the agent \textitbf{dia} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{takut} ‘feels afraid (of)’; again, the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘its gloss ___’s children’ is not involved in this mental process. In (\ref{Example_10.48b}), by contrast, \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ signals that the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘its gloss ___’s children’ has contributed in some ways to the agent’s fear.
A: word: yesus	 gloss: Jesus
B: word: bertahang	 gloss: hold.(out/back)
C: word: tuhang	 gloss: God
D: word: sore	 gloss: afternoon
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 173:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): memang dia takut ___ ana~ana Tuhang
Gloss (with missing item): indeed 3SG feel.afraid(.of) ___ RDP~child God
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(that evil spirit) indeed he/she feels afraid of God’s children’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The semantic distinctions between \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ and \textitbf{the morpheme ___ang} ‘its gloss ___’ are subtle. When speakers want to emphasize the agent of the mental \isi{verb} they employ \textitbf{sama} ‘to’. If they want to signal that the object of the mental \isi{verb} is also involved in the mental process talked about, they use \isi{comitative} \textitbf{the morpheme ___ang} ‘its gloss ___’. The contrastive examples in (\ref{Example_10.47}) and (\ref{Example_10.48}) illustrate this distinction. In (\ref{Example_10.47a}) \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ emphasizes the fact that the agent \textitbf{de} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{mara} ‘feels angry’ about the patient \textitbf{pak Bolikarfus} ‘Mr. Bolikarfus’ whereas the patient himself is not involved in this mental process. By contrast, in (\ref{Example_10.47b}) \textitbf{the morpheme ___(ang)} ‘its gloss ___’ signals that in some ways the patient \textitbf{pak Bolikarfus} ‘Mr. Bolikarfus’ has contributed to the agent’s anger. Likewise, in (\ref{Example_10.48a}) \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ focuses on the fact that the agent \textitbf{dia} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{takut} ‘feels afraid (of)’; again, the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘God’s children’ is not involved in this mental process. In (\ref{Example_10.48b}), by contrast, \textitbf{the morpheme ___(ang)} ‘its gloss ___’ signals that the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘God’s children’ has contributed in some ways to the agent’s fear.
A: word: tuhang	 gloss: God
B: word: dang	 gloss: and
C: word: deng	 gloss: with
D: word: dengang	 gloss: with
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 174:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): memang dia takut deng ___ Tuhang
Gloss (with missing item): indeed 3SG feel.afraid(.of) with ___ God
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(that evil spirit) indeed he/she feels afraid of God’s children’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The semantic distinctions between \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ and \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are subtle. When speakers want to emphasize the agent of the mental \isi{verb} they employ \textitbf{sama} ‘to’. If they want to signal that the object of the mental \isi{verb} is also involved in the mental process talked about, they use \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The contrastive examples in (\ref{Example_10.47}) and (\ref{Example_10.48}) illustrate this distinction. In (\ref{Example_10.47a}) \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ emphasizes the fact that the agent \textitbf{de} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{mara} ‘feels angry’ about the patient \textitbf{pak Bolikarfus} ‘Mr. Bolikarfus’ whereas the patient himself is not involved in this mental process. By contrast, in (\ref{Example_10.47b}) \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ signals that in some ways the patient \textitbf{pak Bolikarfus} ‘Mr. Bolikarfus’ has contributed to the agent’s anger. Likewise, in (\ref{Example_10.48a}) \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ focuses on the fact that the agent \textitbf{dia} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{takut} ‘feels afraid (of)’; again, the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘God’s children’ is not involved in this mental process. In (\ref{Example_10.48b}), by contrast, \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ signals that the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘God’s children’ has contributed in some ways to the agent’s fear.
A: word: sana~sana	 gloss: RDP~LOC.DIST
B: word: klawar	 gloss: cave.bat
C: word: sodara~sodara	 gloss: RDP~sibling
D: word: ana~ana	 gloss: RDP~child
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 175:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): memang dia takut deng ana~ana ___
Gloss (with missing item): indeed 3SG feel.afraid(.of) with RDP~child ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(that evil spirit) indeed he/she feels afraid of God’s children’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The semantic distinctions between \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ and \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are subtle. When speakers want to emphasize the agent of the mental \isi{verb} they employ \textitbf{sama} ‘to’. If they want to signal that the object of the mental \isi{verb} is also involved in the mental process talked about, they use \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The contrastive examples in (\ref{Example_10.47}) and (\ref{Example_10.48}) illustrate this distinction. In (\ref{Example_10.47a}) \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ emphasizes the fact that the agent \textitbf{de} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{mara} ‘feels angry’ about the patient \textitbf{pak Bolikarfus} ‘Mr. Bolikarfus’ whereas the patient himself is not involved in this mental process. By contrast, in (\ref{Example_10.47b}) \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ signals that in some ways the patient \textitbf{pak Bolikarfus} ‘Mr. Bolikarfus’ has contributed to the agent’s anger. Likewise, in (\ref{Example_10.48a}) \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ focuses on the fact that the agent \textitbf{dia} ‘3\textsc{sg}’ \textitbf{takut} ‘feels afraid (of)’; again, the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘its gloss ___’s children’ is not involved in this mental process. In (\ref{Example_10.48b}), by contrast, \textitbf{deng(ang)} ‘with’ signals that the patient \textitbf{ana{\Tilde}ana Tuhang} ‘its gloss ___’s children’ has contributed in some ways to the agent’s fear.
A: word: kitong	 gloss: 1PL
B: word: yesus	 gloss: Jesus
C: word: bertahang	 gloss: hold.(out/back)
D: word: tuhang	 gloss: God
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 176:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de mara ___ pak Bolikarfus
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG feel.angry(.about) ___ father Bolikarfus
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he was angry about Mr. Bolikarfus’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Introducing objects of mental verbs\footnote{The examples in (\ref{Example_10.47a}) and (\ref{Example_10.48a}) are taken from the corpus while the examples in (\ref{Example_10.47b}) and (\ref{Example_10.48b}) are elicited.}
A: word: sama~sama	 gloss: RDP~be.same
B: word: depang	 gloss: front
C: word: sama	 gloss: to
D: word: harus	 gloss: have.to
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 177:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de mara sama ___ Bolikarfus
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG feel.angry(.about) to ___ Bolikarfus
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he was angry about Mr. Bolikarfus’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Introducing objects of mental verbs\footnote{The examples in (\ref{Example_10.47a}) and (\ref{Example_10.48a}) are taken from the corpus while the examples in (\ref{Example_10.47b}) and (\ref{Example_10.48b}) are elicited.}
A: word: burung	 gloss: bird
B: word: tete	 gloss: grandfather
C: word: pak	 gloss: father
D: word: pake	 gloss: use
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 178:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de mara sama pak ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG feel.angry(.about) to father ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he was angry about Mr. Bolikarfus’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Introducing objects of mental verbs\footnote{The examples in (\ref{Example_10.47a}) and (\ref{Example_10.48a}) are taken from the corpus while the examples in (\ref{Example_10.47b}) and (\ref{Example_10.48b}) are elicited.}
A: word: mambramo	 gloss: Mambramo
B: word: bolikarfus	 gloss: Bolikarfus
C: word: ikang	 gloss: fish
D: word: depang	 gloss: front
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 179:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): memang dia takut ___ ana~ana Tuhang
Gloss (with missing item): indeed 3SG feel.afraid(.of) ___ RDP~child God
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(that evil spirit) indeed he/she feels afraid of God’s children’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Introducing objects of mental verbs\footnote{The examples in (\ref{Example_10.47a}) and (\ref{Example_10.48a}) are taken from the corpus while the examples in (\ref{Example_10.47b}) and (\ref{Example_10.48b}) are elicited.}
A: word: harus	 gloss: have.to
B: word: sama~sama	 gloss: RDP~be.same
C: word: sama	 gloss: to
D: word: ruma-sakit	 gloss: hospital
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 180:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): memang dia takut sama ___ Tuhang
Gloss (with missing item): indeed 3SG feel.afraid(.of) to ___ God
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(that evil spirit) indeed he/she feels afraid of God’s children’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Introducing objects of mental verbs\footnote{The examples in (\ref{Example_10.47a}) and (\ref{Example_10.48a}) are taken from the corpus while the examples in (\ref{Example_10.47b}) and (\ref{Example_10.48b}) are elicited.}
A: word: sodara~sodara	 gloss: RDP~sibling
B: word: sana~sana	 gloss: RDP~LOC.DIST
C: word: kampung	 gloss: village
D: word: ana~ana	 gloss: RDP~child
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 181:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): memang dia takut sama ana~ana ___
Gloss (with missing item): indeed 3SG feel.afraid(.of) to RDP~child ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(that evil spirit) indeed he/she feels afraid of God’s children’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Introducing objects of mental verbs\footnote{The examples in (\ref{Example_10.47a}) and (\ref{Example_10.48a}) are taken from the corpus while the examples in (\ref{Example_10.47b}) and (\ref{Example_10.48b}) are elicited.}
A: word: bertahang	 gloss: hold.(out/back)
B: word: kapal	 gloss: ship
C: word: yesus	 gloss: Jesus
D: word: tuhang	 gloss: God
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 182:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de mara ___ pak Bolikarfus
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG feel.angry(.about) ___ father Bolikarfus
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he was angry with Mr. Bolikarfus’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Introducing objects of mental verbs\footnote{The examples in (\ref{Example_10.47a}) and (\ref{Example_10.48a}) are taken from the corpus while the examples in (\ref{Example_10.47b}) and (\ref{Example_10.48b}) are elicited.}
A: word: dengang	 gloss: with
B: word: dang	 gloss: and
C: word: deng	 gloss: with
D: word: satu	 gloss: one
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C