cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 229:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): untuk ___ ini kam kas los sa dulu
Gloss (with missing item): for ___ D.PROX 2PL give loosen 1SG first
The English translation of this sentence is:‘for (the rest of) this year you release me (from my duties) for now’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Besides introducing animate referents, \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ also introduces inanimate beneficiaries that are concrete, abstract, or temporal. In (\ref{Example_10.57}), the beneficiary is inanimate concrete: \textitbf{kamar mandi} ‘the bathroom’. In (\ref{Example_10.58}), the beneficiary is inanimate abstract: distal \isi{demonstrative} \textitbf{itu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ summarizes the speaker’s previous statements about balanced birth rates across families related by marriage. In (\ref{Example_10.59}) and (\ref{Example_10.60}), the beneficiary is temporal: \textitbf{the morpheme ___ ini} ‘this its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_10.59}) and \textitbf{besok} ‘tomorrow’ in (\ref{Example_10.60}). Overall, however, these uses of benefactive \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ are quite rare, with the corpus including only very few examples.
A: word: ulang-taung	 gloss: birthday
B: word: taung	 gloss: year
C: word: kaya	 gloss: like
D: word: bulang	 gloss: month
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 230:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): untuk taung ___ kam kas los sa dulu
Gloss (with missing item): for year ___ 2PL give loosen 1SG first
The English translation of this sentence is:‘for (the rest of) this year you release me (from my duties) for now’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Besides introducing animate referents, \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ also introduces inanimate beneficiaries that are concrete, abstract, or temporal. In (\ref{Example_10.57}), the beneficiary is inanimate concrete: \textitbf{kamar mandi} ‘the bathroom’. In (\ref{Example_10.58}), the beneficiary is inanimate abstract: distal \isi{demonstrative} \textitbf{itu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ summarizes the speaker’s previous statements about balanced birth rates across families related by marriage. In (\ref{Example_10.59}) and (\ref{Example_10.60}), the beneficiary is temporal: \textitbf{taung the morpheme ___} ‘this year’ in (\ref{Example_10.59}) and \textitbf{besok} ‘tomorrow’ in (\ref{Example_10.60}). Overall, however, these uses of benefactive \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ are quite rare, with the corpus including only very few examples.
A: word: sini	 gloss: L.PROX
B: word: ini	 gloss: D.PROX
C: word: besok	 gloss: tomorrow
D: word: begini	 gloss: like.this
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 231:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tong dari sa pu temang pinjam trening ___ besok
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL from 1SG POSS friend borrow tracksuit ___ tomorrow
The English translation of this sentence is:‘we (are back) from my friend (from whom we) borrowed a tracksuit for tomorrow’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Besides introducing animate referents, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ also introduces inanimate beneficiaries that are concrete, abstract, or temporal. In (\ref{Example_10.57}), the beneficiary is inanimate concrete: \textitbf{kamar mandi} ‘the bathroom’. In (\ref{Example_10.58}), the beneficiary is inanimate abstract: distal \isi{demonstrative} \textitbf{itu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ summarizes the speaker’s previous statements about balanced birth rates across families related by marriage. In (\ref{Example_10.59}) and (\ref{Example_10.60}), the beneficiary is temporal: \textitbf{taung ini} ‘this year’ in (\ref{Example_10.59}) and \textitbf{besok} ‘tomorrow’ in (\ref{Example_10.60}). Overall, however, these uses of benefactive \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ are quite rare, with the corpus including only very few examples.
A: word: guntur	 gloss: thunder
B: word: mama-ade	 gloss: aunt
C: word: untuk	 gloss: for
D: word: misalnya	 gloss: for.example
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 232:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tong dari sa pu temang pinjam trening untuk ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL from 1SG POSS friend borrow tracksuit for ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘we (are back) from my friend (from whom we) borrowed a tracksuit for tomorrow’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Besides introducing animate referents, \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ also introduces inanimate beneficiaries that are concrete, abstract, or temporal. In (\ref{Example_10.57}), the beneficiary is inanimate concrete: \textitbf{kamar mandi} ‘the bathroom’. In (\ref{Example_10.58}), the beneficiary is inanimate abstract: distal \isi{demonstrative} \textitbf{itu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ summarizes the speaker’s previous statements about balanced birth rates across families related by marriage. In (\ref{Example_10.59}) and (\ref{Example_10.60}), the beneficiary is temporal: \textitbf{taung ini} ‘this year’ in (\ref{Example_10.59}) and \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_10.60}). Overall, however, these uses of benefactive \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ are quite rare, with the corpus including only very few examples.
A: word: besok	 gloss: tomorrow
B: word: besar	 gloss: be.big
C: word: camat	 gloss: subdistrict.head
D: word: kemaring	 gloss: yesterday
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 233:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tanya Sarles, bapa, ___ seng itu
Gloss (with missing item): ask Sarles father ___ corrugated.iron D.DIST
The English translation of this sentence is:‘father, ask Sarles about/for those corrugated iron (sheets)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In addition, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ introduces peripheral adjuncts that express the notion of circumstance, as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ seng itu} ‘about those corrugated iron sheets’ in (\ref{Example_10.61}), or \textitbf{the morpheme ___ masala tahang lapar} ‘about the problem of enduring to be hungry’ in (\ref{Example_10.62}).
A: word: indonesia	 gloss: Indonesia
B: word: guntur	 gloss: thunder
C: word: untuk	 gloss: for
D: word: misalnya	 gloss: for.example
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 234:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tanya Sarles, bapa, untuk ___ itu
Gloss (with missing item): ask Sarles father for ___ D.DIST
The English translation of this sentence is:‘father, ask Sarles about/for those corrugated iron (sheets)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In addition, \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ introduces peripheral adjuncts that express the notion of circumstance, as in \textitbf{untuk the morpheme ___ itu} ‘about those corrugated iron sheets’ in (\ref{Example_10.61}), or \textitbf{untuk masala tahang lapar} ‘about the problem of enduring to be hungry’ in (\ref{Example_10.62}).
A: word: seng	 gloss: corrugated.iron
B: word: senggi	 gloss: Senggi
C: word: manusia	 gloss: human.being
D: word: besi	 gloss: metal
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 235:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tanya Sarles, bapa, untuk seng ___
Gloss (with missing item): ask Sarles father for corrugated.iron ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘father, ask Sarles about/for those corrugated iron (sheets)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In addition, \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ introduces peripheral adjuncts that express the notion of circumstance, as in \textitbf{untuk seng the morpheme ___} ‘about those corrugated iron sheets’ in (\ref{Example_10.61}), or \textitbf{untuk masala tahang lapar} ‘about the problem of enduring to be hungry’ in (\ref{Example_10.62}).
A: word: orang	 gloss: person
B: word: sana	 gloss: L.DIST
C: word: itu	 gloss: D.DIST
D: word: situ	 gloss: L.MED
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 236:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ika biking papeda putar ___ de bapa
Gloss (with missing item): Ika make sagu.porridge stir ___ 3SG father
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Ika made sagu porridge, she stirred (it) for her father’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Most commonly, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ follows \isi{bivalent} action verbs such as \textitbf{putar} ‘stir’, and introduces peripheral adjuncts denoting human beneficiaries as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ de bapa} ‘its gloss ___ her father’ in (\ref{Example_10.63}). Considerably less frequently, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ introduces beneficiaries encoded by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{the morpheme ___ torang} ‘its gloss ___ us’ in the exchange in (\ref{Example_10.64}).
A: word: kamu	 gloss: 2PL
B: word: misalnya	 gloss: for.example
C: word: buat	 gloss: for
D: word: plabuang	 gloss: harbor
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 237:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ika biking papeda putar buat ___ bapa
Gloss (with missing item): Ika make sagu.porridge stir for ___ father
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Ika made sagu porridge, she stirred (it) for her father’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Most commonly, \textitbf{buat} ‘for’ follows \isi{bivalent} action verbs such as \textitbf{putar} ‘stir’, and introduces peripheral adjuncts the morpheme ___noting human beneficiaries as in \textitbf{buat the morpheme ___ bapa} ‘for her father’ in (\ref{Example_10.63}). Consithe morpheme ___rably less frequently, \textitbf{buat} ‘for’ introduces beneficiaries encothe morpheme ___d by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{buat torang} ‘for us’ in the exchange in (\ref{Example_10.64}).
A: word: de	 gloss: 3SG
B: word: dei	 gloss: 3sg
C: word: dorang	 gloss: 3PL
D: word: deng	 gloss: with
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 238:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ika biking papeda putar buat de ___
Gloss (with missing item): Ika make sagu.porridge stir for 3SG ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Ika made sagu porridge, she stirred (it) for her father’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Most commonly, \textitbf{buat} ‘for’ follows \isi{bivalent} action verbs such as \textitbf{putar} ‘stir’, and introduces peripheral adjuncts denoting human beneficiaries as in \textitbf{buat de the morpheme ___} ‘for her its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_10.63}). Considerably less frequently, \textitbf{buat} ‘for’ introduces beneficiaries encoded by adnominal prepositional phrases, as in \textitbf{buat torang} ‘for us’ in the exchange in (\ref{Example_10.64}).
A: word: pisow	 gloss: knife
B: word: bapa	 gloss: father
C: word: tete	 gloss: grandfather
D: word: bapa-ade	 gloss: uncle
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 239:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): slama ini de tida kasi uang ___ saya
Gloss (with missing item): as.long.as D.PROX 3SG NEG give money ___ 1SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘so far he hasn’t given (any) money to me for my benefit’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Benefactive \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ also introduces benefactive recipients and addressees encoded by oblique arguments, as shown in (\ref{Example_10.65}) and (\ref{Example_10.66}), respectively. Hence, like \textitbf{untuk} ‘its gloss ___’ (§\ref{Para_10.2.3}), benefactive \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ contrasts with \isi{goal-oriented} \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ (§\ref{Para_10.2.2}), which expresses recipients and addressees, as in (\ref{Example_10.43}) to (\ref{Example_10.45}), without, however, signaling the concurrent notion of beneficiary.
A: word: buat	 gloss: for
B: word: kapal	 gloss: ship
C: word: misalnya	 gloss: for.example
D: word: plabuang	 gloss: harbor
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 240:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): slama ini de tida kasi uang buat ___
Gloss (with missing item): as.long.as D.PROX 3SG NEG give money for ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘so far he hasn’t given (any) money to me for my benefit’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Benefactive \textitbf{buat} ‘for’ also introduces benefactive recipients and addressees encoded by oblique arguments, as shown in (\ref{Example_10.65}) and (\ref{Example_10.66}), respectively. Hence, like \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ (§\ref{Para_10.2.3}), benefactive \textitbf{buat} ‘for’ contrasts with \isi{goal-oriented} \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ (§\ref{Para_10.2.2}), which expresses recipients and addressees, as in (\ref{Example_10.43}) to (\ref{Example_10.45}), without, however, signaling the concurrent notion of beneficiary.
A: word: dei	 gloss: 3sg
B: word: saya	 gloss: 1SG
C: word: bicara	 gloss: speak
D: word: sayang	 gloss: love
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 241:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de ___ apa sama kitorang kitorang kasi
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG ___ what to 1PL 1PL give
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(whenever) she (our daughter) asks us (for) something, we give (it to her)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Benefactive \textitbf{buat} ‘for’ also introduces benefactive recipients and addressees encoded by oblique arguments, as shown in (\ref{Example_10.65}) and (\ref{Example_10.66}), respectively. Hence, like \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ (§\ref{Para_10.2.3}), benefactive \textitbf{buat} ‘for’ contrasts with \isi{goal-oriented} \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ (§\ref{Para_10.2.2}), which expresses recipients and addressees, as in (\ref{Example_10.43}) to (\ref{Example_10.45}), without, however, signaling the concurrent notion of beneficiary.
A: word: makang	 gloss: eat
B: word: tempat	 gloss: place
C: word: minta~minta	 gloss: RDP~request
D: word: minta	 gloss: ask
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 242:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de minta apa ___ kitorang kitorang kasi
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG ask what ___ 1PL 1PL give
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(whenever) she (our daughter) asks us (for) something, we give (it to her)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Benefactive \textitbf{buat} ‘for’ also introduces benefactive recipients and addressees encoded by oblique arguments, as shown in (\ref{Example_10.65}) and (\ref{Example_10.66}), respectively. Hence, like \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ (§\ref{Para_10.2.3}), benefactive \textitbf{buat} ‘for’ contrasts with \isi{goal-oriented} \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ (§\ref{Para_10.2.2}), which expresses recipients and addressees, as in (\ref{Example_10.43}) its gloss ___ (\ref{Example_10.45}), without, however, signaling the concurrent notion of beneficiary.
A: word: harus	 gloss: have.to
B: word: sama	 gloss: to
C: word: sama~sama	 gloss: RDP~be.same
D: word: skarang	 gloss: now
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 243:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de minta apa sama ___ kitorang kasi
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG ask what to ___ 1PL give
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(whenever) she (our daughter) asks us (for) something, we give (it to her)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Benefactive \textitbf{buat} ‘for’ also introduces benefactive recipients and addressees encoded by oblique arguments, as shown in (\ref{Example_10.65}) and (\ref{Example_10.66}), respectively. Hence, like \textitbf{untuk} ‘for’ (§\ref{Para_10.2.3}), benefactive \textitbf{buat} ‘for’ contrasts with \isi{goal-oriented} \textitbf{sama} ‘to’ (§\ref{Para_10.2.2}), which expresses recipients and addressees, as in (\ref{Example_10.43}) to (\ref{Example_10.45}), without, however, signaling the concurrent notion of beneficiary.
A: word: orang	 gloss: person
B: word: kitorang	 gloss: 1PL
C: word: torang	 gloss: 1PL
D: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 244:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): pi ambil kayu bakar, kayu bakar ___ Natal
Gloss (with missing item): go fetch wood burn wood burn ___ Christmas
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(we) went to get firewood, firewood for Christmas’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Benefactive \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ also introduces inanimate beneficiaries, as in the adnominal \isi{prepositional phrase} \textitbf{the morpheme ___ natal} ‘its gloss ___ Christmas’ in (\ref{Example_10.67}). This use, however, is very rare with the corpus including only this one example.
A: word: mama-ade	 gloss: aunt
B: word: buat	 gloss: for
C: word: plabuang	 gloss: harbor
D: word: misalnya	 gloss: for.example
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B