cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 16:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa bilang, i, sa=p kaka, de bilang ___ kaka?
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG say ugh! 1SG=POSS oSb 3SG say ___ oSb
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I said, ``ugh!, (that’s) my older sister'', she said, ``your older sister?'''
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The possessive marker can be reduced further to \textitbf{=p} ‘\textsc{poss}’, if the \isi{possessor \isi{noun} phrase} ends in a vowel, as in (\ref{Example_9.9}) to (\ref{Example_9.11}). In this case, the marker is cliticized to the possessor. In this type of reduced possessive construction, the possessor is almost always a singular personal \isi{pronoun}, such as short first person \textitbf{sa} ‘\textsc{1sg}’, second person \textitbf{ko} ‘\textsc{2sg}’ in (\ref{Example_9.9}), or short third person \textitbf{de} ‘\textsc{3sg}’ as in (\ref{Example_9.10}). The possessor may, however, also be expressed by a \isi{noun} as in (\ref{Example_9.11}), although in the corpus this example is the only one attested. Again, the same construction is used for alienable and inalienable possession.
A: word: ko=p	 gloss: 2SG=POSS
B: word: sa=p	 gloss: 1SG=POSS
C: word: maing	 gloss: play
D: word: skola	 gloss: go.to.school
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 17:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa bilang, i, sa=p kaka, de bilang ko=p ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG say ugh! 1SG=POSS oSb 3SG say 2SG=POSS ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I said, ``ugh!, (that’s) my older sister'', she said, ``your older sister?'''
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The possessive marker can be reduced further to \textitbf{=p} ‘\textsc{poss}’, if the \isi{possessor \isi{noun} phrase} ends in a vowel, as in (\ref{Example_9.9}) to (\ref{Example_9.11}). In this case, the marker is cliticized to the possessor. In this type of reduced possessive construction, the possessor is almost always a singular personal \isi{pronoun}, such as short first person \textitbf{sa} ‘\textsc{1sg}’, second person \textitbf{ko} ‘\textsc{2sg}’ in (\ref{Example_9.9}), or short third person \textitbf{de} ‘\textsc{3sg}’ as in (\ref{Example_9.10}). The possessor may, however, also be expressed by a \isi{noun} as in (\ref{Example_9.11}), although in the corpus this example is the only one attested. Again, the same construction is used for alienable and inalienable possession.
A: word: pisow	 gloss: knife
B: word: komputer	 gloss: computer
C: word: kaka	 gloss: oSb
D: word: br–ade-kaka	 gloss: VBLZ–siblings
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 18:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de timbul ___ cucu tanya dia, tete knapa
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG emerge ___ grandchild ask 3SG grandfather why
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(when) he (grandfather) emerged, his grandchild asked him, ``grandfather, what happened?'''
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The possessive marker can be reduced further to \textitbf{=p} ‘\textsc{poss}’, if the \isi{possessor \isi{noun} phrase} ends in a vowel, as in (\ref{Example_9.9}) to (\ref{Example_9.11}). In this case, the marker is cliticized to the possessor. In this type of reduced possessive construction, the possessor is almost always a singular personal \isi{pronoun}, such as short first person \textitbf{sa} ‘\textsc{1sg}’, second person \textitbf{ko} ‘\textsc{2sg}’ in (\ref{Example_9.9}), or short third person \textitbf{de} ‘\textsc{3sg}’ as in (\ref{Example_9.10}). The possessor may, however, also be expressed by a \isi{noun} as in (\ref{Example_9.11}), although in the corpus this example is the only one attested. Again, the same construction is used for alienable and inalienable possession.
A: word: depi	 gloss: 3sg:poss
B: word: de=p	 gloss: 3SG=POSS
C: word: deng	 gloss: with
D: word: torang	 gloss: 1PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 19:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de timbul de=p ___ tanya dia, tete knapa
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG emerge 3SG=POSS ___ ask 3SG grandfather why
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(when) he (grandfather) emerged, his grandchild asked him, ``grandfather, what happened?'''
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The possessive marker can be reduced further to \textitbf{=p} ‘\textsc{poss}’, if the \isi{possessor \isi{noun} phrase} ends in a vowel, as in (\ref{Example_9.9}) to (\ref{Example_9.11}). In this case, the marker is cliticized to the possessor. In this type of reduced possessive construction, the possessor is almost always a singular personal \isi{pronoun}, such as short first person \textitbf{sa} ‘\textsc{1sg}’, second person \textitbf{ko} ‘\textsc{2sg}’ in (\ref{Example_9.9}), or short third person \textitbf{de} ‘\textsc{3sg}’ as in (\ref{Example_9.10}). The possessor may, however, also be expressed by a \isi{noun} as in (\ref{Example_9.11}), although in the corpus this example is the only one attested. Again, the same construction is used for alienable and inalienable possession.
A: word: ana	 gloss: child
B: word: cucu	 gloss: grandchild
C: word: lucu	 gloss: be.funny
D: word: dalam	 gloss: inside
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 20:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): adu, ___ Ø mulut jahat skali
Gloss (with missing item): oh.no! ___ ... mouth be.bad very
The English translation of this sentence is:‘oh no!, father’s language is very bad’ (Lit. ‘father’s mouth’)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The possessive marker can also be elided, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.16}). The \isi{elision} is limited, however, to certain semantic kinds of possession. Attested are inalienable possession of body parts, as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) and (\ref{Example_9.13}), and kinship relations, as in (\ref{Example_9.14}) and (\ref{Example_9.15}). Most commonly, the possessor is human as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.15}), but it may also be animate nonhuman as in (\ref{Example_9.16}).
A: word: bapa-ade	 gloss: uncle
B: word: tete	 gloss: grandfather
C: word: sedikit	 gloss: few
D: word: bapa	 gloss: father
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 21:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): adu, bapa Ø ___ jahat skali
Gloss (with missing item): oh.no! father ... ___ be.bad very
The English translation of this sentence is:‘oh no!, father’s language is very bad’ (Lit. ‘father’s mouth’)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The possessive marker can also be elided, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.16}). The \isi{elision} is limited, however, to certain semantic kinds of possession. Attested are inalienable possession of body parts, as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) and (\ref{Example_9.13}), and kinship relations, as in (\ref{Example_9.14}) and (\ref{Example_9.15}). Most commonly, the possessor is human as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.15}), but it may also be animate nonhuman as in (\ref{Example_9.16}).
A: word: mulay	 gloss: start
B: word: mulut	 gloss: mouth
C: word: muka	 gloss: front
D: word: gigit	 gloss: bite
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 22:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {langsung} {potong} dia {buang} {tali-prutnya} ___ Ø tali-prut buang, tinggal isi saja
Gloss (with missing item): immediately cut 3SG throw(.away) intestines:3POSSR ___ ... intestines throw(.away) stay contents just
The English translation of this sentence is:[About killing dogs:] ‘cut him up at once (and) throw away the intestines, (after having) thrown away his intestines, just the meat remains’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The possessive marker can also be elithe morpheme ___d, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.16}). The \isi{elision} is limited, however, to certain semantic kinds of possession. Attested are inalienable possession of body parts, as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) and (\ref{Example_9.13}), and kinship relations, as in (\ref{Example_9.14}) and (\ref{Example_9.15}). Most commonly, the possessor is human as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.15}), but it may also be animate nonhuman as in (\ref{Example_9.16}).
A: word: de	 gloss: 3SG
B: word: deng	 gloss: with
C: word: tali-prut	 gloss: intestines
D: word: dei	 gloss: 3sg
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 23:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {langsung} {potong} dia {buang} {tali-prutnya} de Ø ___ buang, tinggal isi saja
Gloss (with missing item): immediately cut 3SG throw(.away) intestines:3POSSR 3SG ... ___ throw(.away) stay contents just
The English translation of this sentence is:[About killing dogs:] ‘cut him up at once (and) throw away the intestines, (after having) thrown away his intestines, just the meat remains’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The possessive marker can also be elided, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.16}). The \isi{elision} is limited, however, to certain semantic kinds of possession. Attested are inalienable possession of body parts, as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) and (\ref{Example_9.13}), and kinship relations, as in (\ref{Example_9.14}) and (\ref{Example_9.15}). Most commonly, the possessor is human as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.15}), but it may also be animate nonhuman as in (\ref{Example_9.16}).
A: word: mobil	 gloss: car
B: word: tali-prut	 gloss: intestines
C: word: pawlus	 gloss: Pawlus
D: word: tali-prutnya	 gloss: intestines:3POSSR
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 24:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): adu, ___ Ø mulut jahat skali
Gloss (with missing item): oh.no! ___ ... mouth be.bad very
The English translation of this sentence is:‘oh no!, father’s language is very bad’ (Lit. ‘father’s mouth’)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The possessive marker can also be elided, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.16}). The \isi{elision} is limited, however, to certain semantic kinds of possession. Attested are inalienable possession of body parts, as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) and (\ref{Example_9.13}), and kinship relations, as in (\ref{Example_9.14}) and (\ref{Example_9.15}). Most commonly, the possessor is human as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.15}), but it may also be animate nonhuman as in (\ref{Example_9.16}).
A: word: tete	 gloss: grandfather
B: word: bapa	 gloss: father
C: word: mulut	 gloss: mouth
D: word: bapa-ade	 gloss: uncle
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 25:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): adu, bapa Ø ___ jahat skali
Gloss (with missing item): oh.no! father ... ___ be.bad very
The English translation of this sentence is:‘oh no!, father’s language is very bad’ (Lit. ‘father’s mouth’)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The possessive marker can also be elided, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.16}). The \isi{elision} is limited, however, to certain semantic kinds of possession. Attested are inalienable possession of body parts, as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) and (\ref{Example_9.13}), and kinship relations, as in (\ref{Example_9.14}) and (\ref{Example_9.15}). Most commonly, the possessor is human as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.15}), but it may also be animate nonhuman as in (\ref{Example_9.16}).
A: word: cara	 gloss: manner
B: word: gigit	 gloss: bite
C: word: mulut	 gloss: mouth
D: word: mulay	 gloss: start
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 26:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ de Ø tangang kluar ke samping
Gloss (with missing item): ___ 3SG ... hand go.out to side
The English translation of this sentence is:[About an accident:] ‘the man’s arm stuck out sideways’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The possessive marker can also be elided, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.16}). The \isi{elision} is limited, however, to certain seits gloss ___tic kinds of possession. Attested are inalienable possession of body parts, as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) and (\ref{Example_9.13}), and kinship relations, as in (\ref{Example_9.14}) and (\ref{Example_9.15}). Most commonly, the possessor is huits gloss ___ as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.15}), but it may also be animate nonhuits gloss ___ as in (\ref{Example_9.16}).
A: word: bapa	 gloss: father
B: word: mace	 gloss: woman
C: word: kita	 gloss: 1PL
D: word: pace	 gloss: man
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 27:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): pace ___ Ø tangang kluar ke samping
Gloss (with missing item): man ___ ... hand go.out to side
The English translation of this sentence is:[About an accident:] ‘the man’s arm stuck out sideways’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The possessive marker can also be elithe morpheme ___d, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.16}). The \isi{elision} is limited, however, to certain semantic kinds of possession. Attested are inalienable possession of body parts, as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) and (\ref{Example_9.13}), and kinship relations, as in (\ref{Example_9.14}) and (\ref{Example_9.15}). Most commonly, the possessor is human as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.15}), but it may also be animate nonhuman as in (\ref{Example_9.16}).
A: word: de	 gloss: 3SG
B: word: deng	 gloss: with
C: word: dei	 gloss: 3sg
D: word: tangang	 gloss: hand
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 28:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): pace de Ø ___ kluar ke samping
Gloss (with missing item): man 3SG ... ___ go.out to side
The English translation of this sentence is:[About an accident:] ‘the man’s arm stuck out sideways’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The possessive marker can also be elided, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.16}). The \isi{elision} is limited, however, to certain semantic kinds of possession. Attested are inalienable possession of body parts, as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) and (\ref{Example_9.13}), and kinship relations, as in (\ref{Example_9.14}) and (\ref{Example_9.15}). Most commonly, the possessor is human as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.15}), but it may also be animate nonhuman as in (\ref{Example_9.16}).
A: word: jangang	 gloss: NEG.IMP
B: word: tangang	 gloss: hand
C: word: brat	 gloss: be.heavy
D: word: jempol	 gloss: thumb
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 29:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ Ø mama ini ke atas
Gloss (with missing item): ___ ... see 3SG POSS wife
The English translation of this sentence is:‘his mother here (went) up (there)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The possessive marker can also be elithe morpheme ___d, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.16}). The \isi{elision} is limited, however, to certain semantic kinds of possession. Attested are inalienable possession of body parts, as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) and (\ref{Example_9.13}), and kinship relations, as in (\ref{Example_9.14}) and (\ref{Example_9.15}). Most commonly, the possessor is human as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.15}), but it may also be animate nonhuman as in (\ref{Example_9.16}).
A: word: dei	 gloss: 3sg
B: word: de	 gloss: 3SG
C: word: deng	 gloss: with
D: word: tangang	 gloss: hand
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 30:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de Ø ___ ini ke atas
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG ... ___ 3SG POSS wife
The English translation of this sentence is:‘his mother here (went) up (there)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The possessive marker can also be elided, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.16}). The \isi{elision} is limited, however, to certain semantic kinds of possession. Attested are inalienable possession of body parts, as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) and (\ref{Example_9.13}), and kinship relations, as in (\ref{Example_9.14}) and (\ref{Example_9.15}). Most commonly, the possessor is human as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.15}), but it may also be animate nonhuman as in (\ref{Example_9.16}).
A: word: mama	 gloss: see
B: word: bapa	 gloss: father
C: word: perhatikang	 gloss: observe
D: word: mama-ade	 gloss: aunt
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 31:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de Ø mama ___ ke atas
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG ... see ___ POSS wife
The English translation of this sentence is:‘his mother here (went) up (there)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The possessive marker can also be elided, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.16}). The \isi{elision} is limited, however, to certain semantic kinds of possession. Attested are inalienable possession of body parts, as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) and (\ref{Example_9.13}), and kinship relations, as in (\ref{Example_9.14}) and (\ref{Example_9.15}). Most commonly, the possessor is human as in (\ref{Example_9.12}) to (\ref{Example_9.15}), but it may also be animate nonhuman as in (\ref{Example_9.16}).
A: word: ko=p	 gloss: 2SG=POSS
B: word: ini	 gloss: 3SG
C: word: dei	 gloss: 3sg
D: word: begini	 gloss: like.this
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B