cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 221:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): dong {kerja} {ruma} {dari} {pagi} sampe malam de ___ pagi, baru dong kasi selesay smua
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL work house from morning until night 3SG ___ morning and.then 3PL GIVE finish all
The English translation of this sentence is:‘they worked on the house from morning until evening, the (
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In the elicited examples in (\ref{Example_9.37}) to (\ref{Example_9.39}), the possessive marker signals temporal \isi{locational} relations. In these examples, the third person singular \isi{pronoun} \textitbf{de} ‘\textsc{3sg}’ takes the possessor slot. It designates the temporal reference point for the event under discussion. The possessum slot is taken by a temporal expression such as \textitbf{besok} ‘tomorrow’ in (\ref{Example_9.37}), \textitbf{pagi} ‘morning’ in (\ref{Example_9.38}), and \textitbf{malam} ‘night’ in (\ref{Example_9.39}). This temporal expression denotes a specific point in time relative to the temporal reference point expressed by the possessor.
A: word: pukul	 gloss: hit
B: word: propinsi	 gloss: province
C: word: pu	 gloss: POSS
D: word: hendro	 gloss: POSSR
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 222:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): dong {kerja} {ruma} {dari} {pagi} sampe malam de pu ___ baru dong kasi selesay smua
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL work house from morning until night 3SG POSS ___ and.then 3PL GIVE finish all
The English translation of this sentence is:‘they worked on the house from morning until evening, the (
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In the elicited examples in (\ref{Example_9.37}) to (\ref{Example_9.39}), the possessive marker signals temporal \isi{locational} relations. In these examples, the third person singular \isi{pronoun} \textitbf{de} ‘\textsc{3sg}’ takes the possessor slot. It designates the temporal reference point for the event under discussion. The possessum slot is taken by a temporal expression such as \textitbf{besok} ‘tomorrow’ in (\ref{Example_9.37}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_9.38}), and \textitbf{malam} ‘night’ in (\ref{Example_9.39}). This temporal expression denotes a specific point in time relative to the temporal reference point expressed by the possessor.
A: word: pagi~pagi	 gloss: RDP~morning
B: word: ade	 gloss: LIG
C: word: pagi	 gloss: morning
D: word: pisow	 gloss: knife
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 223:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {Petrus} {deng} Tinus {dong} {pi} {mandi} di pante tadi pagi, ___ pu malam dong pi ke Jayapura
Gloss (with missing item): Petrus with Tinus 3PL go bathe at coast earlier morning ___ POSS night 3PL go to Jayapura
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Petrus and Tinus went bathing at the beach this morning (and) this (
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In the elicited examples in (\ref{Example_9.37}) to (\ref{Example_9.39}), the possessive marker signals temporal \isi{locational} relations. In these examples, the third person singular \isi{pronoun} \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{3sg}’ takes the possessor slot. It the morpheme ___signates the temporal reference point for the event unthe morpheme ___r discussion. The possessum slot is taken by a temporal expression such as \textitbf{besok} ‘tomorrow’ in (\ref{Example_9.37}), \textitbf{pagi} ‘morning’ in (\ref{Example_9.38}), and \textitbf{malam} ‘night’ in (\ref{Example_9.39}). This temporal expression the morpheme ___notes a specific point in time relative to the temporal reference point expressed by the possessor.
A: word: deng	 gloss: with
B: word: dei	 gloss: 3sg
C: word: de	 gloss: 3SG
D: word: pisow	 gloss: knife
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 224:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {Petrus} {deng} Tinus {dong} {pi} {mandi} di pante tadi pagi, de ___ malam dong pi ke Jayapura
Gloss (with missing item): Petrus with Tinus 3PL go bathe at coast earlier morning 3SG ___ night 3PL go to Jayapura
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Petrus and Tinus went bathing at the beach this morning (and) this (
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In the elicited examples in (\ref{Example_9.37}) to (\ref{Example_9.39}), the possessive marker signals temporal \isi{locational} relations. In these examples, the third person singular \isi{pronoun} \textitbf{de} ‘\textsc{3sg}’ takes the possessor slot. It designates the temporal reference point for the event under discussion. The possessum slot is taken by a temporal expression such as \textitbf{besok} ‘tomorrow’ in (\ref{Example_9.37}), \textitbf{pagi} ‘morning’ in (\ref{Example_9.38}), and \textitbf{malam} ‘night’ in (\ref{Example_9.39}). This temporal expression denotes a specific point in time relative to the temporal reference point expressed by the possessor.
A: word: hendro	 gloss: POSSR
B: word: maytua	 gloss: wife
C: word: pu	 gloss: POSS
D: word: pukul	 gloss: hit
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 225:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {Petrus} {deng} Tinus {dong} {pi} {mandi} di pante tadi pagi, de pu ___ dong pi ke Jayapura
Gloss (with missing item): Petrus with Tinus 3PL go bathe at coast earlier morning 3SG POSS ___ 3PL go to Jayapura
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Petrus and Tinus went bathing at the beach this morning (and) this (
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In the elicited examples in (\ref{Example_9.37}) to (\ref{Example_9.39}), the possessive marker signals temporal \isi{locational} relations. In these examples, the third person singular \isi{pronoun} \textitbf{de} ‘\textsc{3sg}’ takes the possessor slot. It designates the temporal reference point for the event under discussion. The possessum slot is taken by a temporal expression such as \textitbf{besok} ‘tomorrow’ in (\ref{Example_9.37}), \textitbf{pagi} ‘morning’ in (\ref{Example_9.38}), and \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_9.39}). This temporal expression denotes a specific point in time relative to the temporal reference point expressed by the possessor.
A: word: itu	 gloss: D.DIST
B: word: malam~malam	 gloss: RDP~night
C: word: malam	 gloss: night
D: word: sore	 gloss: afternoon
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 226:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kitong ikut ini ___ propinsi punya tu
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL follow D.PROX ___ province POSS D.DIST
The English translation of this sentence is:‘we attended (a meeting at), what’s-its-name, the provincial level (
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Another cross-linguistically rather common function of the possessive marker it to indicate an “association” between the possessum and the possessor \citep[285]{Dixon.2010}. This also applies to Papuan Malay, as shown in (\ref{Example_9.40}) and (\ref{Example_9.41}). In (\ref{Example_9.40}), \textitbf{punya} ‘\textsc{poss}’ signals that the possessum \textitbf{tu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ is associated with the possessor \textitbf{lima juta} ‘five million’, giving the emphatic reading ``a minimum of five-million (\textstyleChItalic{as opposed to lower prices})''.\footnote{Alternatively, one might classify the possessive construction in (\ref{Example_9.40}) as an “‘appositive genitive’, where the two \isi{noun} phrases are equated denotatively”, adopting the terminology used by \citet[193]{Quirk.1972}.} Along similar lines, in (\ref{Example_9.41}), the ligature indicates an association between the possessum \textitbf{tu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ and the possessor \textitbf{the morpheme ___ propinsi} ‘provincial level’, resulting in the emphatic reading ``(a meeting at) the provincial level (\textstyleChItalic{and not at the regency level})''.
A: word: kamar	 gloss: room
B: word: pisow	 gloss: knife
C: word: tingkat	 gloss: floor
D: word: angkat	 gloss: lift
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 227:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kitong ikut ini tingkat ___ punya tu
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL follow D.PROX floor ___ POSS D.DIST
The English translation of this sentence is:‘we attended (a meeting at), what’s-its-name, the provincial level (
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Another cross-linguistically rather common function of the possessive marker it to indicate an “association” between the possessum and the possessor \citep[285]{Dixon.2010}. This also applies to Papuan Malay, as shown in (\ref{Example_9.40}) and (\ref{Example_9.41}). In (\ref{Example_9.40}), \textitbf{punya} ‘\textsc{poss}’ signals that the possessum \textitbf{tu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ is associated with the possessor \textitbf{lima juta} ‘five million’, giving the emphatic reading ``a minimum of five-million (\textstyleChItalic{as opposed to lower prices})''.\footnote{Alternatively, one might classify the possessive construction in (\ref{Example_9.40}) as an “‘appositive genitive’, where the two \isi{noun} phrases are equated denotatively”, adopting the terminology used by \citet[193]{Quirk.1972}.} Along similar lines, in (\ref{Example_9.41}), the ligature indicates an association between the possessum \textitbf{tu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ and the possessor \textitbf{tingkat the morpheme ___} ‘provincial level’, resulting in the emphatic reading ``(a meeting at) the provincial level (\textstyleChItalic{and not at the regency level})''.
A: word: pinang	 gloss: betel.nut
B: word: maytua	 gloss: wife
C: word: propinsi	 gloss: province
D: word: distrik	 gloss: district
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 228:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kitong ikut ini tingkat propinsi ___ tu
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL follow D.PROX floor province ___ D.DIST
The English translation of this sentence is:‘we attended (a meeting at), what’s-its-name, the provincial level (
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Another cross-linguistically rather common function of the possessive marker it to indicate an “association” between the possessum and the possessor \citep[285]{Dixon.2010}. This also applies to Papuan Malay, as shown in (\ref{Example_9.40}) and (\ref{Example_9.41}). In (\ref{Example_9.40}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{poss}’ signals that the possessum \textitbf{tu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ is associated with the possessor \textitbf{lima juta} ‘five million’, giving the emphatic reading ``a minimum of five-million (\textstyleChItalic{as opposed to lower prices})''.\footnote{Alternatively, one might classify the possessive construction in (\ref{Example_9.40}) as an “‘appositive genitive’, where the two \isi{noun} phrases are equated denotatively”, adopting the terminology used by \citet[193]{Quirk.1972}.} Along similar lines, in (\ref{Example_9.41}), the ligature indicates an association between the possessum \textitbf{tu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ and the possessor \textitbf{tingkat propinsi} ‘provincial level’, resulting in the emphatic reading ``(a meeting at) the provincial level (\textstyleChItalic{and not at the regency level})''.
A: word: lawang	 gloss: oppose
B: word: hendro	 gloss: POSSR
C: word: punya	 gloss: POSS
D: word: tanya	 gloss: ask
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 229:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kitong ikut ini tingkat propinsi punya ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL follow D.PROX floor province POSS ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘we attended (a meeting at), what’s-its-name, the provincial level (
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Another cross-linguistically rather common function of the possessive marker it to indicate an “association” between the possessum and the possessor \citep[285]{Dixon.2010}. This also applies to Papuan Malay, as shown in (\ref{Example_9.40}) and (\ref{Example_9.41}). In (\ref{Example_9.40}), \textitbf{punya} ‘\textsc{poss}’ signals that the possessum \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ is associated with the possessor \textitbf{lima juta} ‘five million’, giving the emphatic reading ``a minimum of five-million (\textstyleChItalic{as opposed to lower prices})''.\footnote{Alternatively, one might classify the possessive construction in (\ref{Example_9.40}) as an “‘appositive genitive’, where the two \isi{noun} phrases are equated denotatively”, adopting the terminology used by \citet[193]{Quirk.1972}.} Along similar lines, in (\ref{Example_9.41}), the ligathe morpheme ___re indicates an association between the possessum \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ and the possessor \textitbf{tingkat propinsi} ‘provincial level’, resulting in the emphatic reading ``(a meeting at) the provincial level (\textstyleChItalic{and not at the regency level})''.
A: word: sana	 gloss: L.DIST
B: word: babi	 gloss: pig
C: word: satu	 gloss: one
D: word: tu	 gloss: D.DIST
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 230:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kitong ikut ini ___ propinsi punya tu
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL follow D.PROX ___ province POSS D.DIST
The English translation of this sentence is:‘we attended (a meeting at), what’s-its-name, the provincial level (
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Another cross-linguistically rather common function of the possessive marker it to indicate an “association” between the possessum and the possessor \citep[285]{Dixon.2010}. This also applies to Papuan Malay, as shown in (\ref{Example_9.40}) and (\ref{Example_9.41}). In (\ref{Example_9.40}), \textitbf{punya} ‘\textsc{poss}’ signals that the possessum \textitbf{tu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ is associated with the possessor \textitbf{lima juta} ‘five million’, giving the emphatic reading ``a minimum of five-million (\textstyleChItalic{as opposed to lower prices})''.\footnote{Alternatively, one might classify the possessive construction in (\ref{Example_9.40}) as an “‘appositive genitive’, where the two \isi{noun} phrases are equated denotatively”, adopting the terminology used by \citet[193]{Quirk.1972}.} Along similar lines, in (\ref{Example_9.41}), the ligature indicates an association between the possessum \textitbf{tu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ and the possessor \textitbf{the morpheme ___ propinsi} ‘provincial level’, resulting in the emphatic reading ``(a meeting at) the provincial level (\textstyleChItalic{and not at the regency level})''.
A: word: cara	 gloss: manner
B: word: tingkat	 gloss: floor
C: word: kamar	 gloss: room
D: word: angkat	 gloss: lift
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 231:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kitong ikut ini tingkat ___ punya tu
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL follow D.PROX floor ___ POSS D.DIST
The English translation of this sentence is:‘we attended (a meeting at), what’s-its-name, the provincial level (
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Another cross-linguistically rather common function of the possessive marker it to indicate an “association” between the possessum and the possessor \citep[285]{Dixon.2010}. This also applies to Papuan Malay, as shown in (\ref{Example_9.40}) and (\ref{Example_9.41}). In (\ref{Example_9.40}), \textitbf{punya} ‘\textsc{poss}’ signals that the possessum \textitbf{tu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ is associated with the possessor \textitbf{lima juta} ‘five million’, giving the emphatic reading ``a minimum of five-million (\textstyleChItalic{as opposed to lower prices})''.\footnote{Alternatively, one might classify the possessive construction in (\ref{Example_9.40}) as an “‘appositive genitive’, where the two \isi{noun} phrases are equated denotatively”, adopting the terminology used by \citet[193]{Quirk.1972}.} Along similar lines, in (\ref{Example_9.41}), the ligature indicates an association between the possessum \textitbf{tu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ and the possessor \textitbf{tingkat the morpheme ___} ‘provincial level’, resulting in the emphatic reading ``(a meeting at) the provincial level (\textstyleChItalic{and not at the regency level})''.
A: word: torang	 gloss: 1PL
B: word: propinsi	 gloss: province
C: word: distrik	 gloss: district
D: word: pinang	 gloss: betel.nut
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 232:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kitong ikut ini tingkat propinsi ___ tu
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL follow D.PROX floor province ___ D.DIST
The English translation of this sentence is:‘we attended (a meeting at), what’s-its-name, the provincial level (
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Another cross-linguistically rather common function of the possessive marker it to indicate an “association” between the possessum and the possessor \citep[285]{Dixon.2010}. This also applies to Papuan Malay, as shown in (\ref{Example_9.40}) and (\ref{Example_9.41}). In (\ref{Example_9.40}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{poss}’ signals that the possessum \textitbf{tu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ is associated with the possessor \textitbf{lima juta} ‘five million’, giving the emphatic reading ``a minimum of five-million (\textstyleChItalic{as opposed to lower prices})''.\footnote{Alternatively, one might classify the possessive construction in (\ref{Example_9.40}) as an “‘appositive genitive’, where the two \isi{noun} phrases are equated denotatively”, adopting the terminology used by \citet[193]{Quirk.1972}.} Along similar lines, in (\ref{Example_9.41}), the ligature indicates an association between the possessum \textitbf{tu} ‘\textsc{d.dist}’ and the possessor \textitbf{tingkat propinsi} ‘provincial level’, resulting in the emphatic reading ``(a meeting at) the provincial level (\textstyleChItalic{and not at the regency level})''.
A: word: kaka	 gloss: oSb
B: word: hendro	 gloss: POSSR
C: word: punya	 gloss: POSS
D: word: tanya	 gloss: ask
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C