cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 149:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Nofi {tu} {itu} {bukang} bapa Lukas ___ Ø mama Nofita punya Ø
Gloss (with missing item): Nofi D.DIST D.DIST NEG father Lukas ___ ... mother Nofita POSS ...
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Nofi here, that’s not father Lukas’ (son nor) mother Nofita’s (son)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is also possible to omit the possessum when its identity was established earlier; this applies to inalienably as well as alienably possessed referents, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.28}) to (\ref{Example_9.31}). Such ‘\textsc{possessor} \textitbf{the morpheme ___}’ constructions are typically used in contexts where the possessor identity is under discussion.
A: word: mulut	 gloss: mouth
B: word: hendro	 gloss: POSSR
C: word: punya	 gloss: POSS
D: word: tanya	 gloss: ask
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 150:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Nofi {tu} {itu} {bukang} bapa Lukas punya Ø ___ Nofita punya Ø
Gloss (with missing item): Nofi D.DIST D.DIST NEG father Lukas POSS ... ___ Nofita POSS ...
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Nofi here, that’s not father Lukas’ (son nor) mother Nofita’s (son)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is also possible to omit the possessum when its identity was established earlier; this applies to inalienably as well as alienably possessed referents, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.28}) to (\ref{Example_9.31}). Such ‘\textsc{possessor} \textitbf{punya}’ constructions are typically used in contexts where the possessor identity is under discussion.
A: word: orang-tua	 gloss: parent
B: word: natanael	 gloss: Natanael
C: word: mama	 gloss: mother
D: word: mama-ade	 gloss: aunt
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 151:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Nofi {tu} {itu} {bukang} bapa Lukas punya Ø mama ___ punya Ø
Gloss (with missing item): Nofi D.DIST D.DIST NEG father Lukas POSS ... mother ___ POSS ...
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Nofi here, that’s not father Lukas’ (son nor) mother Nofita’s (son)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is also possible to omit the possessum when its identity was established earlier; this applies to inalienably as well as alienably possessed referents, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.28}) to (\ref{Example_9.31}). Such ‘\textsc{possessor} \textitbf{punya}’ constructions are typically used in contexts where the possessor identity is under discussion.
A: word: sodara~sodara	 gloss: RDP~sibling
B: word: blas	 gloss: teens
C: word: nofi	 gloss: Nofi
D: word: nofita	 gloss: Nofita
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 152:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Nofi {tu} {itu} {bukang} bapa Lukas punya Ø mama Nofita ___ Ø
Gloss (with missing item): Nofi D.DIST D.DIST NEG father Lukas POSS ... mother Nofita ___ ...
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Nofi here, that’s not father Lukas’ (son nor) mother Nofita’s (son)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is also possible to omit the possessum when its identity was established earlier; this applies to inalienably as well as alienably possessed referents, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.28}) to (\ref{Example_9.31}). Such ‘\textsc{possessor} \textitbf{the morpheme ___}’ constructions are typically used in contexts where the possessor identity is under discussion.
A: word: punya	 gloss: POSS
B: word: hendro	 gloss: POSSR
C: word: cepat	 gloss: be.fast
D: word: tanya	 gloss: ask
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 153:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ko liat ___ pu Ø bagus, suda kembang banyak
Gloss (with missing item): 2SG see ___ POSS ... be.good already flowering many
The English translation of this sentence is:‘you see Luisa’s (flowers) are good, (they are) already flowering a lot’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is also possible to omit the possessum when its identity was established earlier; this applies to inalienably as well as alienably possessed referents, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.28}) to (\ref{Example_9.31}). Such ‘\textsc{possessor} \textitbf{punya}’ constructions are typically used in contexts where the possessor identity is under discussion.
A: word: bisa	 gloss: be.able
B: word: natalia	 gloss: Natalia
C: word: luisa	 gloss: Luisa
D: word: kaka	 gloss: oSb
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 154:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ko liat Luisa ___ Ø bagus, suda kembang banyak
Gloss (with missing item): 2SG see Luisa ___ ... be.good already flowering many
The English translation of this sentence is:‘you see Luisa’s (flowers) are good, (they are) already flowering a lot’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is also possible to omit the possessum when its identity was established earlier; this applies to inalienably as well as alienably possessed referents, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.28}) to (\ref{Example_9.31}). Such ‘\textsc{possessor} \textitbf{the morpheme ___nya}’ constructions are typically used in contexts where the possessor identity is under discussion.
A: word: pukul	 gloss: hit
B: word: hendro	 gloss: POSSR
C: word: torang	 gloss: 1PL
D: word: pu	 gloss: POSS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 155:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ko liat ___ pu Ø bagus, suda kembang banyak
Gloss (with missing item): 2SG see ___ POSS ... be.good already flowering many
The English translation of this sentence is:‘you see Luisa’s (flowers) are good, (they are) already flowering a lot’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In `\textsc{possessor} \textitbf{punya}’ constructions, speakers most commonly employ long \textitbf{punya} ‘\textsc{poss}’, but as shown in (\ref{Example_9.30}) and (\ref{Example_9.31}), constructions with reduced \textitbf{pu} ‘\textsc{poss}’ are also possible.\footnote{In their analysis of similar possessive constructions in Classical Malay, \citet[157]{Yap.2004} conclude that Classical Malay \textitbf{(em)punya} constructions with omitted possessum denote “pronominal possessive constructions”. More specifically, \citet[7]{Yap.2007} maintains that “in such constructions (em)punya identifies a possessee in relation to its possessor (the genitive function), while at the same time alluding to the morphologically unrealized possessee as well (the pronominal function). Consequently, possessive pronominal (em)punya allows us to focus on the possessor, while still referring to the possessee”. It seems that this analysis is also applicable to Papuan Malay.} Elision of the possessor is unattested. Instead speakers employ a \isi{demonstrative}, as in (\ref{Example_9.19}), when the identity of the possessor has already been established.
A: word: diri	 gloss: self
B: word: luisa	 gloss: Luisa
C: word: bisa	 gloss: be.able
D: word: natalia	 gloss: Natalia
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 156:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ko liat Luisa ___ Ø bagus, suda kembang banyak
Gloss (with missing item): 2SG see Luisa ___ ... be.good already flowering many
The English translation of this sentence is:‘you see Luisa’s (flowers) are good, (they are) already flowering a lot’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In `\textsc{possessor} \textitbf{the morpheme ___nya}’ constructions, speakers most commonly employ long \textitbf{the morpheme ___nya} ‘\textsc{poss}’, but as shown in (\ref{Example_9.30}) and (\ref{Example_9.31}), constructions with reduced \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{poss}’ are also possible.\footnote{In their analysis of similar possessive constructions in Classical Malay, \citet[157]{Yap.2004} conclude that Classical Malay \textitbf{(em)the morpheme ___nya} constructions with omitted possessum denote “pronominal possessive constructions”. More specifically, \citet[7]{Yap.2007} maintains that “in such constructions (em)the morpheme ___nya identifies a possessee in relation to its possessor (the genitive function), while at the same time alluding to the morphologically unrealized possessee as well (the pronominal function). Consequently, possessive pronominal (em)the morpheme ___nya allows us to focus on the possessor, while still referring to the possessee”. It seems that this analysis is also applicable to Pathe morpheme ___an Malay.} Elision of the possessor is unattested. Instead speakers employ a \isi{demonstrative}, as in (\ref{Example_9.19}), when the identity of the possessor has already been established.
A: word: hendro	 gloss: POSSR
B: word: pu	 gloss: POSS
C: word: pukul	 gloss: hit
D: word: piring	 gloss: plate
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 157:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): bapa {masi} {kenal} kaka Siduas pu, masi kenal ___ pu muka
Gloss (with missing item): father still know oSb Siduas POSS still know ___ POSS front
The English translation of this sentence is:‘do you (‘father’) still know Siduas’, still know this (one)’s face?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In `\textsc{possessor} \textitbf{punya}’ constructions, speakers most commonly employ long \textitbf{punya} ‘\textsc{poss}’, but as shown in (\ref{Example_9.30}) and (\ref{Example_9.31}), constructions with reduced \textitbf{pu} ‘\textsc{poss}’ are also possible.\footnote{In their analysis of similar possessive constructions in Classical Malay, \citet[157]{Yap.2004} conclude that Classical Malay \textitbf{(em)punya} constructions with omitted possessum denote “pronominal possessive constructions”. More specifically, \citet[7]{Yap.2007} maintains that “in such constructions (em)punya identifies a possessee in relation to its possessor (the genitive function), while at the same time alluding to the morphologically unrealized possessee as well (the pronominal function). Consequently, possessive pronominal (em)punya allows us to focus on the possessor, while still referring to the possessee”. It seems that this analysis is also applicable to Papuan Malay.} Elision of the possessor is unattested. Instead speakers employ a \isi{demonstrative}, as in (\ref{Example_9.19}), when the identity of the possessor has already been established.
A: word: ini	 gloss: D.PROX
B: word: sini	 gloss: L.PROX
C: word: tugas	 gloss: duty
D: word: begini	 gloss: like.this
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 158:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): bapa {masi} {kenal} kaka Siduas pu, masi kenal ini ___ muka
Gloss (with missing item): father still know oSb Siduas POSS still know D.PROX ___ front
The English translation of this sentence is:‘do you (‘father’) still know Siduas’, still know this (one)’s face?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In `\textsc{possessor} \textitbf{the morpheme ___nya}’ constructions, speakers most commonly employ long \textitbf{the morpheme ___nya} ‘\textsc{poss}’, but as shown in (\ref{Example_9.30}) and (\ref{Example_9.31}), constructions with reduced \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{poss}’ are also possible.\footnote{In their analysis of similar possessive constructions in Classical Malay, \citet[157]{Yap.2004} conclude that Classical Malay \textitbf{(em)the morpheme ___nya} constructions with omitted possessum denote “pronominal possessive constructions”. More specifically, \citet[7]{Yap.2007} maintains that “in such constructions (em)the morpheme ___nya identifies a possessee in relation to its possessor (the genitive function), while at the same time alluding to the morphologically unrealized possessee as well (the pronominal function). Consequently, possessive pronominal (em)the morpheme ___nya allows us to focus on the possessor, while still referring to the possessee”. It seems that this analysis is also applicable to Pathe morpheme ___an Malay.} Elision of the possessor is unattested. Instead speakers employ a \isi{demonstrative}, as in (\ref{Example_9.19}), when the identity of the possessor has already been established.
A: word: pukul	 gloss: hit
B: word: pu	 gloss: POSS
C: word: besok	 gloss: tomorrow
D: word: hendro	 gloss: POSSR
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 159:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): bapa {masi} {kenal} kaka Siduas pu, masi kenal ini pu ___
Gloss (with missing item): father still know oSb Siduas POSS still know D.PROX POSS ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘do you (‘father’) still know Siduas’, still know this (one)’s face?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In `\textsc{possessor} \textitbf{punya}’ constructions, speakers most commonly employ long \textitbf{punya} ‘\textsc{poss}’, but as shown in (\ref{Example_9.30}) and (\ref{Example_9.31}), constructions with reduced \textitbf{pu} ‘\textsc{poss}’ are also possible.\footnote{In their analysis of similar possessive constructions in Classical Malay, \citet[157]{Yap.2004} conclude that Classical Malay \textitbf{(em)punya} constructions with omitted possessum denote “pronominal possessive constructions”. More specifically, \citet[7]{Yap.2007} maintains that “in such constructions (em)punya identifies a possessee in relation to its possessor (the genitive function), while at the same time alluding to the morphologically unrealized possessee as well (the pronominal function). Consequently, possessive pronominal (em)punya allows us to focus on the possessor, while still referring to the possessee”. It seems that this analysis is also applicable to Papuan Malay.} Elision of the possessor is unattested. Instead speakers employ a \isi{demonstrative}, as in (\ref{Example_9.19}), when the identity of the possessor has already been established.
A: word: terbuka	 gloss: be.opened
B: word: sebla	 gloss: side
C: word: muka	 gloss: front
D: word: cepat	 gloss: be.fast
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 160:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ini ___ Natanael pu laki pu mobil
Gloss (with missing item): D.PROX ___ Natanael POSS husband POSS car
The English translation of this sentence is:‘this is sister Natanael’s husband’s car’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Adnominal possessive constructions can be stacked to form \isi{recursive} possessive constructions, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.32}) to (\ref{Example_9.34}). Double possessive constructions, as in (\ref{Example_9.32}) and (\ref{Example_9.33}) are quite common, especially to express kinship and social relations, as in (\ref{Example_9.32}). Triple possessive constructions are also possible but extremely rare: the corpus contains only one such construction, which is presented in (\ref{Example_9.34}) in slightly modified form.
A: word: komputer	 gloss: computer
B: word: kaka	 gloss: oSb
C: word: br–ade-kaka	 gloss: VBLZ–siblings
D: word: orang	 gloss: person
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 161:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ini kaka ___ pu laki pu mobil
Gloss (with missing item): D.PROX oSb ___ POSS husband POSS car
The English translation of this sentence is:‘this is sister Natanael’s husband’s car’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Adnominal possessive constructions can be stacked to form \isi{recursive} possessive constructions, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.32}) to (\ref{Example_9.34}). Double possessive constructions, as in (\ref{Example_9.32}) and (\ref{Example_9.33}) are quite common, especially to express kinship and social relations, as in (\ref{Example_9.32}). Triple possessive constructions are also possible but extremely rare: the corpus contains only one such construction, which is presented in (\ref{Example_9.34}) in slightly modified form.
A: word: datang	 gloss: come
B: word: natanael	 gloss: Natanael
C: word: mandi	 gloss: bathe
D: word: isabela	 gloss: Isabela
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 162:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ini kaka Natanael ___ laki pu mobil
Gloss (with missing item): D.PROX oSb Natanael ___ husband POSS car
The English translation of this sentence is:‘this is sister Natanael’s husband’s car’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Adnominal possessive constructions can be stacked to form \isi{recursive} possessive constructions, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.32}) to (\ref{Example_9.34}). Double possessive constructions, as in (\ref{Example_9.32}) and (\ref{Example_9.33}) are quite common, especially to express kinship and social relations, as in (\ref{Example_9.32}). Triple possessive constructions are also possible but extremely rare: the corthe morpheme ___s contains only one such construction, which is presented in (\ref{Example_9.34}) in slightly modified form.
A: word: pu	 gloss: POSS
B: word: kecil	 gloss: be.small
C: word: hendro	 gloss: POSSR
D: word: pukul	 gloss: hit
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 163:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ini kaka Natanael pu ___ pu mobil
Gloss (with missing item): D.PROX oSb Natanael POSS ___ POSS car
The English translation of this sentence is:‘this is sister Natanael’s husband’s car’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Adnominal possessive constructions can be stacked to form \isi{recursive} possessive constructions, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_9.32}) to (\ref{Example_9.34}). Double possessive constructions, as in (\ref{Example_9.32}) and (\ref{Example_9.33}) are quite common, especially to express kinship and social relations, as in (\ref{Example_9.32}). Triple possessive constructions are also possible but extremely rare: the corpus contains only one such construction, which is presented in (\ref{Example_9.34}) in slightly modified form.
A: word: pernikaang	 gloss: marriage
B: word: laki~laki	 gloss: RDP~husband
C: word: luisa	 gloss: Luisa
D: word: laki	 gloss: husband
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D