cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 318:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kalo di situ kang, ___ brapa saja bisa
Gloss (with missing item): if at L.MED you.know ___ several just be.able
The English translation of this sentence is:‘as for (the office) there, you know, (you) can (go there) any time’ (Lit. ‘several hours’)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s with posthead \textitbf{banyak} ‘many’, \textitbf{brapa} ‘several’, \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’, \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’, and \textitbf{smua} ‘all’ typically signal exhaustivity of \isi{indefinite} countable referents, as shown in (\ref{Example_8.83}) to (\ref{Example_8.88}). Besides, \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s with posthead \textitbf{brapa} ‘how many’ can denote unknown positions within series of countable referents, as in (\ref{Example_8.89}). While the head in \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s is typically a \isi{noun}, as in (\ref{Example_8.83}), it can also be a personal \isi{pronoun} as in (\ref{Example_8.84}).
A: word: sore	 gloss: afternoon
B: word: jam	 gloss: hour
C: word: tajam	 gloss: be.sharp
D: word: skali	 gloss: very
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 319:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kalo di situ kang, jam ___ saja bisa
Gloss (with missing item): if at L.MED you.know hour ___ just be.able
The English translation of this sentence is:‘as for (the office) there, you know, (you) can (go there) any time’ (Lit. ‘several hours’)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s with posthead \textitbf{banyak} ‘many’, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’, \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’, \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’, and \textitbf{smua} ‘all’ typically signal exhaustivity of \isi{indefinite} countable referents, as shown in (\ref{Example_8.83}) to (\ref{Example_8.88}). Besides, \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s with posthead \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘how many’ can denote unknown positions within series of countable referents, as in (\ref{Example_8.89}). While the head in \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s is typically a \isi{noun}, as in (\ref{Example_8.83}), it can also be a personal \isi{pronoun} as in (\ref{Example_8.84}).
A: word: banyak	 gloss: many
B: word: bangung	 gloss: get.up
C: word: brapa	 gloss: several
D: word: parapara	 gloss: platform
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 320:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... baca ___ banyak skali
Gloss (with missing item): ... read ___ many very
The English translation of this sentence is:‘... (I’ve) read very many books’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s with posthead \textitbf{banyak} ‘many’, \textitbf{brapa} ‘several’, \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’, \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’, and \textitbf{smua} ‘all’ typically signal exhaustivity of \isi{indefinite} countable referents, as shown in (\ref{Example_8.83}) to (\ref{Example_8.88}). Besides, \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s with posthead \textitbf{brapa} ‘how many’ can denote unknown positions within series of countable referents, as in (\ref{Example_8.89}). While the head in \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s is typically a \isi{noun}, as in (\ref{Example_8.83}), it can also be a personal \isi{pronoun} as in (\ref{Example_8.84}).
A: word: terbuka	 gloss: be.opened
B: word: buku	 gloss: book
C: word: sembarang	 gloss: any(.kind.of)
D: word: baca	 gloss: read
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 321:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... baca buku ___ skali
Gloss (with missing item): ... read book ___ very
The English translation of this sentence is:‘... (I’ve) read very many books’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s with posthead \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’, \textitbf{brapa} ‘several’, \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’, \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’, and \textitbf{smua} ‘all’ typically signal exhaustivity of \isi{indefinite} countable referents, as shown in (\ref{Example_8.83}) to (\ref{Example_8.88}). Besides, \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s with posthead \textitbf{brapa} ‘how its gloss ___’ can denote unknown positions within series of countable referents, as in (\ref{Example_8.89}). While the head in \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s is typically a \isi{noun}, as in (\ref{Example_8.83}), it can also be a personal \isi{pronoun} as in (\ref{Example_8.84}).
A: word: banyak	 gloss: many
B: word: prempuang	 gloss: 10pt
C: word: brapa	 gloss: several
D: word: banyak~banyak	 gloss: RDP~many
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 322:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... baca buku banyak ___
Gloss (with missing item): ... read book many ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘... (I’ve) read very many books’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s with posthead \textitbf{banyak} ‘many’, \textitbf{brapa} ‘several’, \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’, \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’, and \textitbf{smua} ‘all’ typically signal exhaustivity of \isi{indefinite} countable referents, as shown in (\ref{Example_8.83}) to (\ref{Example_8.88}). Besides, \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s with posthead \textitbf{brapa} ‘how many’ can denote unknown positions within series of countable referents, as in (\ref{Example_8.89}). While the head in \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s is typically a \isi{noun}, as in (\ref{Example_8.83}), it can also be a personal \isi{pronoun} as in (\ref{Example_8.84}).
A: word: jadi	 gloss: so
B: word: dia	 gloss: 3SG
C: word: kali	 gloss: river
D: word: skali	 gloss: very
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 323:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa maki ___ brapa itu
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG abuse.verbally ___ several D.DIST
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I verbally abused several of them there’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s with posthead \textitbf{banyak} ‘many’, \textitbf{brapa} ‘several’, \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’, \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’, and \textitbf{smua} ‘all’ typically signal exhaustivity of \isi{indefinite} countable referents, as shown in (\ref{Example_8.83}) to (\ref{Example_8.88}). Besides, \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s with posthead \textitbf{brapa} ‘how many’ can denote unknown positions within series of countable referents, as in (\ref{Example_8.89}). While the head in \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s is typically a \isi{noun}, as in (\ref{Example_8.83}), it can also be a personal \isi{pronoun} as in (\ref{Example_8.84}).
A: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
B: word: mandi	 gloss: bathe
C: word: dorang	 gloss: 3PL
D: word: dong/dorang	 gloss: 3PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 324:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa maki dorang ___ itu
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG abuse.verbally 3PL ___ D.DIST
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I verbally abused several of them there’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s with posthead \textitbf{banyak} ‘many’, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’, \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’, \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’, and \textitbf{smua} ‘all’ typically signal exhaustivity of \isi{indefinite} countable referents, as shown in (\ref{Example_8.83}) to (\ref{Example_8.88}). Besides, \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s with posthead \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘how many’ can denote unknown positions within series of countable referents, as in (\ref{Example_8.89}). While the head in \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s is typically a \isi{noun}, as in (\ref{Example_8.83}), it can also be a personal \isi{pronoun} as in (\ref{Example_8.84}).
A: word: mambramo	 gloss: Mambramo
B: word: banyak	 gloss: many
C: word: brapa	 gloss: several
D: word: parapara	 gloss: platform
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 325:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... baca ___ banyak skali
Gloss (with missing item): ... read ___ many very
The English translation of this sentence is:‘... (I’ve) read very many books’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Most often,\textsc{ nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s signal a contrastive sense of exhaustivity: \textsc{n} \textitbf{banyak} translates with ``many (and not just a few) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.83}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``several (and not just a few) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.84}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``each \textsc{n }(with nobody missing)'' as in the elicited example in (\ref{Example_8.85}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{sedikit} with ``few (and not many) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.86}), and \textsc{n} \textitbf{smua} with ``the entire collection of \textsc{n} (with nobody/nothing missing)'' as in (\ref{Example_8.88}). As mentioned above, the corpus includes only a few \isi{noun} phrases with adnominally used \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’ one of which is presented in (\ref{Example_8.86}): \textitbf{ikang sedikit} ‘few fish’. Alternatively, however, \textitbf{ikang sedikit} could receive the predicative reading ‘the fish are few’. Therefore, an additional elicited example is given in (\ref{Example_8.87}).
A: word: terbuka	 gloss: be.opened
B: word: baca	 gloss: read
C: word: buku	 gloss: book
D: word: siapa	 gloss: who
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 326:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... baca buku ___ skali
Gloss (with missing item): ... read book ___ very
The English translation of this sentence is:‘... (I’ve) read very many books’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Most often,\textsc{ nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s signal a contrastive sense of exhaustivity: \textsc{n} \textitbf{the morpheme ___} translates with ``its gloss ___ (and not just a few) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.83}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``several (and not just a few) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.84}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``each \textsc{n }(with nobody missing)'' as in the elicited example in (\ref{Example_8.85}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{sedikit} with ``few (and not its gloss ___) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.86}), and \textsc{n} \textitbf{smua} with ``the entire collection of \textsc{n} (with nobody/nothing missing)'' as in (\ref{Example_8.88}). As mentioned above, the corpus includes only a few \isi{noun} phrases with adnominally used \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’ one of which is presented in (\ref{Example_8.86}): \textitbf{ikang sedikit} ‘few fish’. Alternatively, however, \textitbf{ikang sedikit} could receive the predicative reading ‘the fish are few’. Therefore, an additional elicited example is given in (\ref{Example_8.87}).
A: word: banyak	 gloss: many
B: word: brapa	 gloss: several
C: word: hendro	 gloss: POSSR
D: word: banyak~banyak	 gloss: RDP~many
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 327:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... baca buku banyak ___
Gloss (with missing item): ... read book many ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘... (I’ve) read very many books’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Most often,\textsc{ nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s signal a contrastive sense of exhaustivity: \textsc{n} \textitbf{banyak} translates with ``many (and not just a few) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.83}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``several (and not just a few) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.84}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``each \textsc{n }(with nobody missing)'' as in the elicited example in (\ref{Example_8.85}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{sedikit} with ``few (and not many) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.86}), and \textsc{n} \textitbf{smua} with ``the entire collection of \textsc{n} (with nobody/nothing missing)'' as in (\ref{Example_8.88}). As mentioned above, the corpus includes only a few \isi{noun} phrases with adnominally used \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’ one of which is presented in (\ref{Example_8.86}): \textitbf{ikang sedikit} ‘few fish’. Alternatively, however, \textitbf{ikang sedikit} could receive the predicative reading ‘the fish are few’. Therefore, an additional elicited example is given in (\ref{Example_8.87}).
A: word: kali	 gloss: river
B: word: skali	 gloss: very
C: word: jadi	 gloss: so
D: word: kladi	 gloss: taro.root
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 328:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa maki ___ brapa itu
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG abuse.verbally ___ several D.DIST
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I verbally abused several of them there’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Most often,\textsc{ nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s signal a contrastive sense of exhaustivity: \textsc{n} \textitbf{banyak} translates with ``many (and not just a few) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.83}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``several (and not just a few) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.84}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``each \textsc{n }(with nobody missing)'' as in the elicited example in (\ref{Example_8.85}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{sedikit} with ``few (and not many) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.86}), and \textsc{n} \textitbf{smua} with ``the entire collection of \textsc{n} (with nobody/nothing missing)'' as in (\ref{Example_8.88}). As mentioned above, the corpus includes only a few \isi{noun} phrases with adnominally used \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’ one of which is presented in (\ref{Example_8.86}): \textitbf{ikang sedikit} ‘few fish’. Alternatively, however, \textitbf{ikang sedikit} could receive the predicative reading ‘the fish are few’. Therefore, an additional elicited example is given in (\ref{Example_8.87}).
A: word: dorang	 gloss: 3PL
B: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
C: word: dong/dorang	 gloss: 3PL
D: word: banyak	 gloss: many
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 329:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa maki dorang ___ itu
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG abuse.verbally 3PL ___ D.DIST
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I verbally abused several of them there’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Most often,\textsc{ nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s signal a contrastive sense of exhaustivity: \textsc{n} \textitbf{banyak} translates with ``many (and not just a few) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.83}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``its gloss ___ (and not just a few) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.84}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``each \textsc{n }(with nobody missing)'' as in the elicited example in (\ref{Example_8.85}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{sedikit} with ``few (and not many) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.86}), and \textsc{n} \textitbf{smua} with ``the entire collection of \textsc{n} (with nobody/nothing missing)'' as in (\ref{Example_8.88}). As mentioned above, the corpus includes only a few \isi{noun} phrases with adnominally used \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’ one of which is presented in (\ref{Example_8.86}): \textitbf{ikang sedikit} ‘few fish’. Alternatively, however, \textitbf{ikang sedikit} could receive the predicative reading ‘the fish are few’. Therefore, an additional elicited example is given in (\ref{Example_8.87}).
A: word: banyak	 gloss: many
B: word: brapa	 gloss: several
C: word: parapara	 gloss: platform
D: word: bakar	 gloss: burn
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 330:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kalo ___ sedikit, itu untuk tamu
Gloss (with missing item): if ___ few D.DIST for guest
The English translation of this sentence is:‘as for the few fish, those are for the guests’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Most often,\textsc{ nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s signal a contrastive sense of exhaustivity: \textsc{n} \textitbf{banyak} translates with ``many (and not just a few) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.83}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``several (and not just a few) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.84}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``each \textsc{n }(with nobody missing)'' as in the elicited example in (\ref{Example_8.85}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{sedikit} with ``few (and not many) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.86}), and \textsc{n} \textitbf{smua} with ``the entire collection of \textsc{n} (with nobody/nothing missing)'' as in (\ref{Example_8.88}). As mentioned above, the corpus includes only a few \isi{noun} phrases with adnominally used \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’ one of which is presented in (\ref{Example_8.86}): \textitbf{the morpheme ___ sedikit} ‘few its gloss ___’. Alternatively, however, \textitbf{the morpheme ___ sedikit} could receive the predicative reading ‘the its gloss ___ are few’. Therefore, an additional elicited example is given in (\ref{Example_8.87}).
A: word: mancing	 gloss: fish.with.rod
B: word: perhatikang	 gloss: observe
C: word: air	 gloss: water
D: word: ikang	 gloss: fish
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D