cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 331:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kalo ikang ___ itu untuk tamu
Gloss (with missing item): if fish ___ D.DIST for guest
The English translation of this sentence is:‘as for the few fish, those are for the guests’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Most often,\textsc{ nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s signal a contrastive sense of exhaustivity: \textsc{n} \textitbf{banyak} translates with ``many (and not just a its gloss ___) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.83}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``several (and not just a its gloss ___) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.84}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``each \textsc{n }(with nobody missing)'' as in the elicited example in (\ref{Example_8.85}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{the morpheme ___} with ``its gloss ___ (and not many) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.86}), and \textsc{n} \textitbf{smua} with ``the entire collection of \textsc{n} (with nobody/nothing missing)'' as in (\ref{Example_8.88}). As mentioned above, the corpus includes only a its gloss ___ \isi{noun} phrases with adnominally used \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ one of which is presented in (\ref{Example_8.86}): \textitbf{ikang the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___ fish’. Alternatively, however, \textitbf{ikang the morpheme ___} could receive the predicative reading ‘the fish are its gloss ___’. Therefore, an additional elicited example is given in (\ref{Example_8.87}).
A: word: brapa	 gloss: several
B: word: sedikit	 gloss: few
C: word: bangung	 gloss: get.up
D: word: sedikit~sedikit	 gloss: RDP~few
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 332:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ smua dari kampung
Gloss (with missing item): ___ all from village
The English translation of this sentence is:‘we all are from the village’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Most often,\textsc{ nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s signal a contrastive sense of exhaustivity: \textsc{n} \textitbf{banyak} translates with ``many (and not just a few) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.83}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``several (and not just a few) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.84}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``each \textsc{n }(with nobody missing)'' as in the elicited example in (\ref{Example_8.85}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{sedikit} with ``few (and not many) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.86}), and \textsc{n} \textitbf{smua} with ``the entire collection of \textsc{n} (with nobody/nothing missing)'' as in (\ref{Example_8.88}). As mentioned above, the corpus includes only a few \isi{noun} phrases with adnominally used \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’ one of which is presented in (\ref{Example_8.86}): \textitbf{ikang sedikit} ‘few fish’. Alternatively, however, \textitbf{ikang sedikit} could receive the predicative reading ‘the fish are few’. Therefore, an additional elicited example is given in (\ref{Example_8.87}).
A: word: tong	 gloss: 1PL
B: word: kitong	 gloss: 1PL
C: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
D: word: papua	 gloss: Papua
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 333:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tong ___ dari kampung
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL ___ from village
The English translation of this sentence is:‘we all are from the village’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Most often,\textsc{ nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s signal a contrastive sense of exhaustivity: \textsc{n} \textitbf{banyak} translates with ``many (and not just a few) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.83}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``several (and not just a few) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.84}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``each \textsc{n }(with nobody missing)'' as in the elicited example in (\ref{Example_8.85}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{sedikit} with ``few (and not many) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.86}), and \textsc{n} \textitbf{the morpheme ___} with ``the entire collection of \textsc{n} (with nobody/nothing missing)'' as in (\ref{Example_8.88}). As mentioned above, the corpus includes only a few \isi{noun} phrases with adnominits gloss ___y used \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’ one of which is presented in (\ref{Example_8.86}): \textitbf{ikang sedikit} ‘few fish’. Alternatively, however, \textitbf{ikang sedikit} could receive the predicative reading ‘the fish are few’. Therefore, an additional elicited example is given in (\ref{Example_8.87}).
A: word: smua	 gloss: all
B: word: mulay	 gloss: start
C: word: wili	 gloss: Wili
D: word: tiap	 gloss: every
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 334:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kalo ___ sedikit, itu untuk tamu
Gloss (with missing item): if ___ few D.DIST for guest
The English translation of this sentence is:‘as for the few fish, those are for the guests’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Most often,\textsc{ nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s signal a contrastive sense of exhaustivity: \textsc{n} \textitbf{banyak} translates with ``many (and not just a few) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.83}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``several (and not just a few) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.84}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``each \textsc{n }(with nobody missing)'' as in the elicited example in (\ref{Example_8.85}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{sedikit} with ``few (and not many) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.86}), and \textsc{n} \textitbf{smua} with ``the entire collection of \textsc{n} (with nobody/nothing missing)'' as in (\ref{Example_8.88}). As mentioned above, the corpus includes only a few \isi{noun} phrases with adnominally used \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’ one of which is presented in (\ref{Example_8.86}): \textitbf{the morpheme ___ sedikit} ‘few its gloss ___’. Alternatively, however, \textitbf{the morpheme ___ sedikit} could receive the predicative reading ‘the its gloss ___ are few’. Therefore, an additional elicited example is given in (\ref{Example_8.87}).
A: word: perhatikang	 gloss: observe
B: word: posisi	 gloss: position
C: word: mancing	 gloss: fish.with.rod
D: word: ikang	 gloss: fish
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 335:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kalo ikang ___ itu untuk tamu
Gloss (with missing item): if fish ___ D.DIST for guest
The English translation of this sentence is:‘as for the few fish, those are for the guests’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Most often,\textsc{ nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s signal a contrastive sense of exhaustivity: \textsc{n} \textitbf{banyak} translates with ``many (and not just a its gloss ___) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.83}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``several (and not just a its gloss ___) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.84}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``each \textsc{n }(with nobody missing)'' as in the elicited example in (\ref{Example_8.85}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{the morpheme ___} with ``its gloss ___ (and not many) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.86}), and \textsc{n} \textitbf{smua} with ``the entire collection of \textsc{n} (with nobody/nothing missing)'' as in (\ref{Example_8.88}). As mentioned above, the corpus includes only a its gloss ___ \isi{noun} phrases with adnominally used \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ one of which is presented in (\ref{Example_8.86}): \textitbf{ikang the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___ fish’. Alternatively, however, \textitbf{ikang the morpheme ___} could receive the predicative reading ‘the fish are its gloss ___’. Therefore, an additional elicited example is given in (\ref{Example_8.87}).
A: word: jalang	 gloss: walk
B: word: sedikit~sedikit	 gloss: RDP~few
C: word: sedikit	 gloss: few
D: word: brapa	 gloss: several
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 336:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa ada bawa ___ sedikit buat mama dong
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG exist bring ___ few for mother 3PL
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I’m bringing a few taro roots for mother and the others’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Most often,\textsc{ nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s signal a contrastive sense of exhaustivity: \textsc{n} \textitbf{banyak} translates with ``many (and not just a few) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.83}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``several (and not just a few) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.84}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``each \textsc{n }(with nobody missing)'' as in the elicited example in (\ref{Example_8.85}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{sedikit} with ``few (and not many) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.86}), and \textsc{n} \textitbf{smua} with ``the entire collection of \textsc{n} (with nobody/nothing missing)'' as in (\ref{Example_8.88}). As mentioned above, the corpus includes only a few \isi{noun} phrases with adnominally used \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’ one of which is presented in (\ref{Example_8.86}): \textitbf{ikang sedikit} ‘few fish’. Alternatively, however, \textitbf{ikang sedikit} could receive the predicative reading ‘the fish are few’. Therefore, an additional elicited example is given in (\ref{Example_8.87}).
A: word: kladi	 gloss: taro.root
B: word: búmbuuu	 gloss: spice
C: word: jadi	 gloss: so
D: word: ruma	 gloss: house
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 337:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa ada bawa kladi ___ buat mama dong
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG exist bring taro.root ___ for mother 3PL
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I’m bringing a few taro roots for mother and the others’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Most often,\textsc{ nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s signal a contrastive sense of exhaustivity: \textsc{n} \textitbf{banyak} translates with ``many (and not just a its gloss ___) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.83}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``several (and not just a its gloss ___) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.84}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{masing-masing} with ``each \textsc{n }(with nobody missing)'' as in the elicited example in (\ref{Example_8.85}), \textsc{n} \textitbf{the morpheme ___} with ``its gloss ___ (and not many) \textsc{n}'' as in (\ref{Example_8.86}), and \textsc{n} \textitbf{smua} with ``the entire collection of \textsc{n} (with nobody/nothing missing)'' as in (\ref{Example_8.88}). As mentioned above, the corpus includes only a its gloss ___ \isi{noun} phrases with adnominally used \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ one of which is presented in (\ref{Example_8.86}): \textitbf{ikang the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___ fish’. Alternatively, however, \textitbf{ikang the morpheme ___} could receive the predicative reading ‘the fish are its gloss ___’. Therefore, an additional elicited example is given in (\ref{Example_8.87}).
A: word: brapa	 gloss: several
B: word: ketua	 gloss: chairperson
C: word: sedikit	 gloss: few
D: word: sedikit~sedikit	 gloss: RDP~few
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 338:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kalo di situ kang, ___ brapa saja bisa
Gloss (with missing item): if at L.MED you.know ___ several just be.able
The English translation of this sentence is:‘as for (the office) there, you know, (you) can (go there) any time’ (Lit. ‘several hours’)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Depending on the semantics of the head nominal, \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s with posthead \textitbf{brapa} ‘several’ can also mark unknown positions within series expressed by their referents, as in (\ref{Example_8.89}).
A: word: tajam	 gloss: be.sharp
B: word: sore	 gloss: afternoon
C: word: jam	 gloss: hour
D: word: puti	 gloss: be.white
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 339:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kalo di situ kang, jam ___ saja bisa
Gloss (with missing item): if at L.MED you.know hour ___ just be.able
The English translation of this sentence is:‘as for (the office) there, you know, (you) can (go there) any time’ (Lit. ‘several hours’)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Depending on the semantics of the head nominal, \textsc{nq}t\textsc{{}-np}s with posthead \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ can also mark unknown positions within series expressed by their referents, as in (\ref{Example_8.89}).
A: word: brapa	 gloss: several
B: word: parapara	 gloss: platform
C: word: ini	 gloss: D.PROX
D: word: banyak	 gloss: many
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 340:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): minum ___ banyak, minum te dulu
Gloss (with missing item): drink ___ many drink tea first
The English translation of this sentence is:‘drink lots of tea, drink tea for now!’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Noun phrases with uncountable referents are modified with posthead quantifiers only, as shown in (\ref{Example_8.90}) to (\ref{Example_8.92}). This restriction is due to the semantics of mass nouns which, per se, do not convey the sense of individuality encoded by the prehead position of the quantifiers, presenthe morpheme ___d in (\ref{Example_8.74}) to (\ref{Example_8.89}). Adnominal quantifiers for mass nouns are \the morpheme ___xtitbf{banyak} ‘many’ as in (\ref{Example_8.90}), \the morpheme ___xtitbf{sedikit} ‘few’ as in (\ref{Example_8.91}), or \the morpheme ___xtitbf{smua} ‘all’ as in (\ref{Example_8.92}).
A: word: kluarga	 gloss: family
B: word: minum	 gloss: drink
C: word: te	 gloss: tea
D: word: terbuka	 gloss: be.opened
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 341:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): minum te ___ minum te dulu
Gloss (with missing item): drink tea ___ drink tea first
The English translation of this sentence is:‘drink lots of tea, drink tea for now!’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Noun phrases with uncountable referents are modified with posthead quantifiers only, as shown in (\ref{Example_8.90}) to (\ref{Example_8.92}). This restriction is due to the semantics of mass nouns which, per se, do not convey the sense of individuality encoded by the prehead position of the quantifiers, presented in (\ref{Example_8.74}) to (\ref{Example_8.89}). Adnominal quantifiers for mass nouns are \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ as in (\ref{Example_8.90}), \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’ as in (\ref{Example_8.91}), or \textitbf{smua} ‘all’ as in (\ref{Example_8.92}).
A: word: brapa	 gloss: several
B: word: banyak~banyak	 gloss: RDP~many
C: word: kamar	 gloss: room
D: word: banyak	 gloss: many
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 342:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... buka ___ pu kulit smua
Gloss (with missing item): ... open ___ POSS skin all
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(they) peel off his entire skin’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Noun phrases with uncountable referents are modified with posthead quantifiers only, as shown in (\ref{Example_8.90}) to (\ref{Example_8.92}). This restriction is due to the semantics of mass nouns which, per se, do not convey the sense of individuality encothe morpheme ___d by the prehead position of the quantifiers, presented in (\ref{Example_8.74}) to (\ref{Example_8.89}). Adnominal quantifiers for mass nouns are \textitbf{banyak} ‘many’ as in (\ref{Example_8.90}), \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’ as in (\ref{Example_8.91}), or \textitbf{smua} ‘all’ as in (\ref{Example_8.92}).
A: word: dei	 gloss: 3sg
B: word: blakang	 gloss: backside
C: word: deng	 gloss: with
D: word: de	 gloss: 3SG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 343:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... buka de ___ kulit smua
Gloss (with missing item): ... open 3SG ___ skin all
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(they) peel off his entire skin’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Noun phrases with uncountable referents are modified with posthead quantifiers only, as shown in (\ref{Example_8.90}) to (\ref{Example_8.92}). This restriction is due to the semantics of mass nouns which, per se, do not convey the sense of individuality encoded by the prehead position of the quantifiers, presented in (\ref{Example_8.74}) to (\ref{Example_8.89}). Adnominal quantifiers for mass nouns are \textitbf{banyak} ‘many’ as in (\ref{Example_8.90}), \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’ as in (\ref{Example_8.91}), or \textitbf{smua} ‘all’ as in (\ref{Example_8.92}).
A: word: pu	 gloss: POSS
B: word: pukul	 gloss: hit
C: word: hendro	 gloss: POSSR
D: word: greja	 gloss: church
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 344:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... buka de pu ___ smua
Gloss (with missing item): ... open 3SG POSS ___ all
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(they) peel off his entire skin’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Noun phrases with uncountable referents are modified with posthead quantifiers only, as shown in (\ref{Example_8.90}) to (\ref{Example_8.92}). This restriction is due to the semantics of mass nouns which, per se, do not convey the sense of individuality encoded by the prehead position of the quantifiers, presented in (\ref{Example_8.74}) to (\ref{Example_8.89}). Adnominal quantifiers for mass nouns are \textitbf{banyak} ‘many’ as in (\ref{Example_8.90}), \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’ as in (\ref{Example_8.91}), or \textitbf{smua} ‘all’ as in (\ref{Example_8.92}).
A: word: badang	 gloss: body
B: word: kulit	 gloss: skin
C: word: tugu	 gloss: monument
D: word: pukul	 gloss: hit
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B