cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 279:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... brarti suda empat ___ bisa masuk
Gloss (with missing item): ... mean already four ___ be.able enter
The English translation of this sentence is:[About local elections:] ‘... that means that already four people can be included (in the list of nominees)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The data in (\ref{Example_8.63}) to (\ref{Example_8.73}) suggests that the \textsc{nn}um order is favored in more specific and \isi{definite} constructions, namely to signal exhaustivity of \isi{definite} referents or unique positions within series or sequences. The \textsc{n}um\textsc{n} order, by contrast, is associated with less specific or less \isi{definite} constructions which express the absolute number of items denoted by the head nominal. These patterns contrast with \citegen[284]{Greenberg.1978b} cross-linguistic findings concerning the word order in \isi{noun} phrases with adnominal numerals:
A: word: kayu	 gloss: wood
B: word: orang	 gloss: person
C: word: manusia	 gloss: human.being
D: word: dorang	 gloss: 3PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 280:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ini suda ___ dua malam
Gloss (with missing item): D.PROX already ___ two night
The English translation of this sentence is:‘this is already two o’clock at night’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The data in (\ref{Example_8.63}) to (\ref{Example_8.73}) suggests that the \textsc{nn}um order is favored in more specific and \isi{definite} constructions, namely to signal exhaustivity of \isi{definite} referents or unique positions within series or sequences. The \textsc{n}um\textsc{n} order, by contrast, is associated with less specific or less \isi{definite} constructions which express the absolute number of items denoted by the head nominal. These patterns contrast with \citegen[284]{Greenberg.1978b} cross-linguistic findings concerning the word order in \isi{noun} phrases with adnominal numerals:
A: word: tajam	 gloss: be.sharp
B: word: jam	 gloss: hour
C: word: mandi	 gloss: bathe
D: word: sore	 gloss: afternoon
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 281:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ini suda jam ___ malam
Gloss (with missing item): D.PROX already hour ___ night
The English translation of this sentence is:‘this is already two o’clock at night’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The data in (\ref{Example_8.63}) to (\ref{Example_8.73}) suggests that the \textsc{nn}um order is favored in more specific and \isi{definite} constructions, namely to signal exhaustivity of \isi{definite} referents or unique positions within series or sequences. The \textsc{n}um\textsc{n} order, by contrast, is associated with less specific or less \isi{definite} constructions which express the absolute number of items denoted by the head nominal. These patterns contrast with \citegen[284]{Greenberg.1978b} cross-linguistic findings concerning the word order in \isi{noun} phrases with adnominal numerals:
A: word: dua	 gloss: two
B: word: dengang	 gloss: with
C: word: kedua	 gloss: second
D: word: siduasi	 gloss: Siduas
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 282:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de itu kalo ___ orang de biasa begitu
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG D.DIST when ___ person 3SG be.usual like.that
The English translation of this sentence is:‘if there’re many people, he’s usually like that’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Five quantifiers can occur in pre- or posthead position, namely \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’, \textitbf{brapa} ‘several’, \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’, \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’, and \textitbf{smua} ‘all’, as shown in (\ref{Example_8.78}) to (\ref{Example_8.92}). The other four quantifiers, that is, \textitbf{segala} ‘all’, \textitbf{sembarang} ‘any (kind of)’, \textitbf{(se)tiap} ‘every’, and \textitbf{stenga} ‘half’, only occur in prehead position where they signal nonnumeric quantities of countable referents, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_8.74}) to (\ref{Example_8.77}). While \textitbf{sembarang} ‘any (kind of)’ is only used with animate referents as in (\ref{Example_8.75}), \textitbf{(se)tiap} ‘every’ and \textitbf{stenga} ‘half’ are only used with inanimate referents as in (\ref{Example_8.76}) and (\ref{Example_8.77}), respectively.\footnote{To express the notion of ``every person'', speakers prefer quantification with \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’.} Quantifier \textitbf{segala} ‘all’ is always combined with the \isi{noun} \textitbf{macang} ‘variety’ with \textitbf{segala macang} expressing the notion of ``all kinds, whatever kind'' as in (\ref{Example_8.74}).
A: word: brapa	 gloss: several
B: word: banyak~banyak	 gloss: RDP~many
C: word: banyak	 gloss: many
D: word: panjang	 gloss: be.long
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 283:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de itu kalo banyak ___ de biasa begitu
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG D.DIST when many ___ 3SG be.usual like.that
The English translation of this sentence is:‘if there’re many people, he’s usually like that’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Five quantifiers can occur in pre- or posthead position, namely \textitbf{banyak} ‘many’, \textitbf{brapa} ‘several’, \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’, \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’, and \textitbf{smua} ‘all’, as shown in (\ref{Example_8.78}) to (\ref{Example_8.92}). The other four quantifiers, that is, \textitbf{segala} ‘all’, \textitbf{sembarang} ‘any (kind of)’, \textitbf{(se)tiap} ‘every’, and \textitbf{stenga} ‘half’, only occur in prehead position where they signal nonnumeric quantities of countable referents, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_8.74}) to (\ref{Example_8.77}). While \textitbf{sembarang} ‘any (kind of)’ is only used with animate referents as in (\ref{Example_8.75}), \textitbf{(se)tiap} ‘every’ and \textitbf{stenga} ‘half’ are only used with inanimate referents as in (\ref{Example_8.76}) and (\ref{Example_8.77}), respectively.\footnote{To express the notion of ``every its gloss ___'', speakers prefer quantification with \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’.} Quantifier \textitbf{segala} ‘all’ is always combined with the \isi{noun} \textitbf{macang} ‘variety’ with \textitbf{segala macang} expressing the notion of ``all kinds, whatever kind'' as in (\ref{Example_8.74}).
A: word: dorang	 gloss: 3PL
B: word: orang	 gloss: person
C: word: tukang	 gloss: craftsman
D: word: manusia	 gloss: human.being
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 284:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... buka ___ pu kulit smua
Gloss (with missing item): ... open ___ POSS skin all
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(they) peel off his entire skin’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Five quantifiers can occur in pre- or posthead position, namely \textitbf{banyak} ‘many’, \textitbf{brapa} ‘several’, \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’, \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’, and \textitbf{smua} ‘all’, as shown in (\ref{Example_8.78}) to (\ref{Example_8.92}). The other four quantifiers, that is, \textitbf{segala} ‘all’, \textitbf{sembarang} ‘any (kind of)’, \textitbf{(se)tiap} ‘every’, and \textitbf{stenga} ‘half’, only occur in prehead position where they signal nonnumeric quantities of countable referents, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_8.74}) to (\ref{Example_8.77}). While \textitbf{sembarang} ‘any (kind of)’ is only used with animate referents as in (\ref{Example_8.75}), \textitbf{(se)tiap} ‘every’ and \textitbf{stenga} ‘half’ are only used with inanimate referents as in (\ref{Example_8.76}) and (\ref{Example_8.77}), respectively.\footnote{To express the notion of ``every person'', speakers prefer quantification with \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’.} Quantifier \textitbf{segala} ‘all’ is always combined with the \isi{noun} \textitbf{macang} ‘variety’ with \textitbf{segala macang} expressing the notion of ``all kinds, whatever kind'' as in (\ref{Example_8.74}).
A: word: dei	 gloss: 3sg
B: word: de	 gloss: 3SG
C: word: begitu	 gloss: like.that
D: word: deng	 gloss: with
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 285:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... buka de ___ kulit smua
Gloss (with missing item): ... open 3SG ___ skin all
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(they) peel off his entire skin’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Five quantifiers can occur in pre- or posthead position, namely \textitbf{banyak} ‘many’, \textitbf{brapa} ‘several’, \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’, \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’, and \textitbf{smua} ‘all’, as shown in (\ref{Example_8.78}) to (\ref{Example_8.92}). The other four quantifiers, that is, \textitbf{segala} ‘all’, \textitbf{sembarang} ‘any (kind of)’, \textitbf{(se)tiap} ‘every’, and \textitbf{stenga} ‘half’, only occur in prehead position where they signal nonnumeric quantities of countable referents, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_8.74}) to (\ref{Example_8.77}). While \textitbf{sembarang} ‘any (kind of)’ is only used with animate referents as in (\ref{Example_8.75}), \textitbf{(se)tiap} ‘every’ and \textitbf{stenga} ‘half’ are only used with inanimate referents as in (\ref{Example_8.76}) and (\ref{Example_8.77}), respectively.\footnote{To express the notion of ``every person'', speakers prefer quantification with \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’.} Quantifier \textitbf{segala} ‘all’ is always combined with the \isi{noun} \textitbf{macang} ‘variety’ with \textitbf{segala macang} expressing the notion of ``all kinds, whatever kind'' as in (\ref{Example_8.74}).
A: word: hendro	 gloss: POSSR
B: word: pu	 gloss: POSS
C: word: hitam	 gloss: be.black
D: word: pukul	 gloss: hit
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 286:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... buka de pu ___ smua
Gloss (with missing item): ... open 3SG POSS ___ all
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(they) peel off his entire skin’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Five quantifiers can occur in pre- or posthead position, namely \textitbf{banyak} ‘many’, \textitbf{brapa} ‘several’, \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’, \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’, and \textitbf{smua} ‘all’, as shown in (\ref{Example_8.78}) to (\ref{Example_8.92}). The other four quantifiers, that is, \textitbf{segala} ‘all’, \textitbf{sembarang} ‘any (kind of)’, \textitbf{(se)tiap} ‘every’, and \textitbf{stenga} ‘half’, only occur in prehead position where they signal nonnumeric quantities of countable referents, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_8.74}) to (\ref{Example_8.77}). While \textitbf{sembarang} ‘any (kind of)’ is only used with animate referents as in (\ref{Example_8.75}), \textitbf{(se)tiap} ‘every’ and \textitbf{stenga} ‘half’ are only used with inanimate referents as in (\ref{Example_8.76}) and (\ref{Example_8.77}), respectively.\footnote{To express the notion of ``every person'', speakers prefer quantification with \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’.} Quantifier \textitbf{segala} ‘all’ is always combined with the \isi{noun} \textitbf{macang} ‘variety’ with \textitbf{segala macang} expressing the notion of ``all kinds, whatever kind'' as in (\ref{Example_8.74}).
A: word: badang	 gloss: body
B: word: pukul	 gloss: hit
C: word: tulang	 gloss: bone
D: word: kulit	 gloss: skin
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 287:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... buka de pu kulit ___
Gloss (with missing item): ... open 3SG POSS skin ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(they) peel off his entire skin’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Five quantifiers can occur in pre- or posthead position, namely \textitbf{banyak} ‘many’, \textitbf{brapa} ‘several’, \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’, \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’, and \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’, as shown in (\ref{Example_8.78}) to (\ref{Example_8.92}). The other four quantifiers, that is, \textitbf{segala} ‘its gloss ___’, \textitbf{sembarang} ‘any (kind of)’, \textitbf{(se)tiap} ‘every’, and \textitbf{stenga} ‘half’, only occur in prehead position where they signal nonnumeric quantities of countable referents, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_8.74}) to (\ref{Example_8.77}). While \textitbf{sembarang} ‘any (kind of)’ is only used with animate referents as in (\ref{Example_8.75}), \textitbf{(se)tiap} ‘every’ and \textitbf{stenga} ‘half’ are only used with inanimate referents as in (\ref{Example_8.76}) and (\ref{Example_8.77}), respectively.\footnote{To express the notion of ``every person'', speakers prefer quantification with \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’.} Quantifier \textitbf{segala} ‘its gloss ___’ is always combined with the \isi{noun} \textitbf{macang} ‘variety’ with \textitbf{segala macang} expressing the notion of ``its gloss ___ kinds, whatever kind'' as in (\ref{Example_8.74}).
A: word: papua	 gloss: Papua
B: word: tiap	 gloss: every
C: word: smua	 gloss: all
D: word: mulay	 gloss: start
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 288:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ macang dia biking
Gloss (with missing item): ___ variety 3SG make
The English translation of this sentence is:[About an ancestor’s achievements:] ‘all kinds (of things), he made (them)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Five quantifiers can occur in pre- or posthead position, namely \textitbf{banyak} ‘many’, \textitbf{brapa} ‘several’, \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’, \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’, and \textitbf{smua} ‘its gloss ___’, as shown in (\ref{Example_8.78}) to (\ref{Example_8.92}). The other four quantifiers, that is, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’, \textitbf{sembarang} ‘any (kind of)’, \textitbf{(se)tiap} ‘every’, and \textitbf{stenga} ‘half’, only occur in prehead position where they signal nonnumeric quantities of countable referents, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_8.74}) to (\ref{Example_8.77}). While \textitbf{sembarang} ‘any (kind of)’ is only used with animate referents as in (\ref{Example_8.75}), \textitbf{(se)tiap} ‘every’ and \textitbf{stenga} ‘half’ are only used with inanimate referents as in (\ref{Example_8.76}) and (\ref{Example_8.77}), respectively.\footnote{To express the notion of ``every person'', speakers prefer quantification with \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’.} Quantifier \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ is always combined with the \isi{noun} \textitbf{macang} ‘variety’ with \textitbf{the morpheme ___ macang} expressing the notion of ``its gloss ___ kinds, whatever kind'' as in (\ref{Example_8.74}).
A: word: tiap	 gloss: every
B: word: babi	 gloss: pig
C: word: segala	 gloss: all
D: word: malam	 gloss: night
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 289:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): segala ___ dia biking
Gloss (with missing item): all ___ 3SG make
The English translation of this sentence is:[About an ancestor’s achievements:] ‘all kinds (of things), he made (them)’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Five quantifiers can occur in pre- or posthead position, namely \textitbf{banyak} ‘many’, \textitbf{brapa} ‘several’, \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’, \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’, and \textitbf{smua} ‘all’, as shown in (\ref{Example_8.78}) to (\ref{Example_8.92}). The other four quantifiers, that is, \textitbf{segala} ‘all’, \textitbf{sembarang} ‘any (kind of)’, \textitbf{(se)tiap} ‘every’, and \textitbf{stenga} ‘half’, only occur in prehead position where they signal nonnumeric quantities of countable referents, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_8.74}) to (\ref{Example_8.77}). While \textitbf{sembarang} ‘any (kind of)’ is only used with animate referents as in (\ref{Example_8.75}), \textitbf{(se)tiap} ‘every’ and \textitbf{stenga} ‘half’ are only used with inanimate referents as in (\ref{Example_8.76}) and (\ref{Example_8.77}), respectively.\footnote{To express the notion of ``every person'', speakers prefer quantification with \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’.} Quantifier \textitbf{segala} ‘all’ is always combined with the \isi{noun} \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ with \textitbf{segala the morpheme ___} expressing the notion of ``all kinds, whatever kind'' as in (\ref{Example_8.74}).
A: word: brapa	 gloss: several
B: word: sembarang	 gloss: any(.kind.of)
C: word: kacang	 gloss: bean
D: word: macang	 gloss: variety
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 290:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): mungking ___ jam saja sa tidor
Gloss (with missing item): maybe ___ hour just 1SG sleep
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I slept for maybe just half an hour’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Five quantifiers can occur in pre- or posthead position, namely \textitbf{banyak} ‘many’, \textitbf{brapa} ‘several’, \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’, \textitbf{sedikit} ‘few’, and \textitbf{smua} ‘all’, as shown in (\ref{Example_8.78}) to (\ref{Example_8.92}). The other four quantifiers, that is, \textitbf{segala} ‘all’, \textitbf{sembarang} ‘any (kind of)’, \textitbf{(se)tiap} ‘every’, and \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’, only occur in prehead position where they signal nonnumeric quantities of countable referents, as illustrated in (\ref{Example_8.74}) to (\ref{Example_8.77}). While \textitbf{sembarang} ‘any (kind of)’ is only used with animate referents as in (\ref{Example_8.75}), \textitbf{(se)tiap} ‘every’ and \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ are only used with inanimate referents as in (\ref{Example_8.76}) and (\ref{Example_8.77}), respectively.\footnote{To express the notion of ``every person'', speakers prefer quantification with \textitbf{masing-masing} ‘each’.} Quantifier \textitbf{segala} ‘all’ is always combined with the \isi{noun} \textitbf{macang} ‘variety’ with \textitbf{segala macang} expressing the notion of ``all kinds, whatever kind'' as in (\ref{Example_8.74}).
A: word: stenga	 gloss: half
B: word: tenga	 gloss: middle
C: word: tempat	 gloss: place
D: word: bagiang	 gloss: part
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A