cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 303:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa su taru di ember ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG already put at bucket ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I already put (the fish) in the bucket here’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) illustrate the spatial uses of \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’. In both cases, adnominally used \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ indicates the location of an entity close to the speaker: \textitbf{ember the morpheme ___} ‘the bucket here’ in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and \textitbf{Sawar the morpheme ___} ‘Sawar here’ in (\ref{Example_7.50}). The actual distances signaled with \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ differ, however, depending on the speakers’ perceptions. In (\ref{Example_7.49}), \textitbf{ember the morpheme ___} ‘the bucket here’ is standing right next to the speaker. By contrast in (\ref{Example_7.50}), \textitbf{Sawar the morpheme ___} ‘Sawar here’ denotes a location that is situated about ten kilometers away from the speaker’s location. The speaker, however, perceives \textitbf{Sawar} as being close to his own location given that \textitbf{Apawer} is situated still further away. The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) also illustrate that \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ is used independently of the parameter of visibility: the \isi{locative} is used for a visible location in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and for an invisible one in (\ref{Example_7.50}).
A: word: temang	 gloss: friend
B: word: sini–nya	 gloss: L.PROX–3POSSR
C: word: ini	 gloss: D.PROX
D: word: sini	 gloss: L.PROX
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 304:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de mulay turung dari Apawer ... sampe di ___ sini
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG start descend from Apawer ... reach at ___ L.PROX
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he (the ancestor) started coming down from Apawer ... (and) reached Sawar here’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) illustrate the spatial uses of \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’. In both cases, adnominally used \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ indicates the location of an entity close to the speaker: \textitbf{ember sini} ‘the bucket here’ in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and \textitbf{its gloss ___ sini} ‘its gloss ___ here’ in (\ref{Example_7.50}). The actual distances signaled with \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ differ, however, depending on the speakers’ perceptions. In (\ref{Example_7.49}), \textitbf{ember sini} ‘the bucket here’ is standing right next to the speaker. By contrast in (\ref{Example_7.50}), \textitbf{its gloss ___ sini} ‘its gloss ___ here’ denotes a location that is situated about ten kilometers away from the speaker’s location. The speaker, however, perceives \textitbf{its gloss ___} as being close to his own location given that \textitbf{Apawer} is situated still further away. The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) also illustrate that \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ is used independently of the parameter of visibility: the \isi{locative} is used for a visible location in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and for an invisible one in (\ref{Example_7.50}).
A: word: mari	 gloss: hither
B: word: sawar	 gloss: Sawar
C: word: ada	 gloss: exist
D: word: niwerawar	 gloss: Niwerawar
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 305:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de mulay turung dari Apawer ... sampe di Sawar ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG start descend from Apawer ... reach at Sawar ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he (the ancestor) started coming down from Apawer ... (and) reached Sawar here’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) illustrate the spatial uses of \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’. In both cases, adnominally used \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ indicates the location of an entity close to the speaker: \textitbf{ember the morpheme ___} ‘the bucket here’ in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and \textitbf{Sawar the morpheme ___} ‘Sawar here’ in (\ref{Example_7.50}). The actual distances signaled with \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ differ, however, depending on the speakers’ perceptions. In (\ref{Example_7.49}), \textitbf{ember the morpheme ___} ‘the bucket here’ is standing right next to the speaker. By contrast in (\ref{Example_7.50}), \textitbf{Sawar the morpheme ___} ‘Sawar here’ denotes a location that is situated about ten kilometers away from the speaker’s location. The speaker, however, perceives \textitbf{Sawar} as being close to his own location given that \textitbf{Apawer} is situated still further away. The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) also illustrate that \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ is used independently of the parameter of visibility: the \isi{locative} is used for a visible location in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and for an invisible one in (\ref{Example_7.50}).
A: word: ini	 gloss: D.PROX
B: word: sini	 gloss: L.PROX
C: word: sini–nya	 gloss: L.PROX–3POSSR
D: word: bapa-tua	 gloss: uncle
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 306:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa su taru di ___ sini
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG already put at ___ L.PROX
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I already put (the fish) in the bucket here’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) illustrate the spatial uses of \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’. In both cases, adnominally used \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ indicates the location of an entity close to the speaker: \textitbf{the morpheme ___ sini} ‘the its gloss ___ here’ in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and \textitbf{Sawar sini} ‘Sawar here’ in (\ref{Example_7.50}). The actual distances signaled with \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ differ, however, depending on the speakers’ perceptions. In (\ref{Example_7.49}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___ sini} ‘the its gloss ___ here’ is standing right next to the speaker. By contrast in (\ref{Example_7.50}), \textitbf{Sawar sini} ‘Sawar here’ denotes a location that is situated about ten kilometers away from the speaker’s location. The speaker, however, perceives \textitbf{Sawar} as being close to his own location given that \textitbf{Apawer} is situated still further away. The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) also illustrate that \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ is used independently of the parameter of visibility: the \isi{locative} is used for a visible location in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and for an invisible one in (\ref{Example_7.50}).
A: word: ember	 gloss: bucket
B: word: terpol	 gloss: container
C: word: dari	 gloss: from
D: word: sembayang	 gloss: worship
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 307:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa su taru di ember ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG already put at bucket ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I already put (the fish) in the bucket here’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) illustrate the spatial uses of \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’. In both cases, adnominally used \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ indicates the location of an entity close to the speaker: \textitbf{ember the morpheme ___} ‘the bucket here’ in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and \textitbf{Sawar the morpheme ___} ‘Sawar here’ in (\ref{Example_7.50}). The actual distances signaled with \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ differ, however, depending on the speakers’ perceptions. In (\ref{Example_7.49}), \textitbf{ember the morpheme ___} ‘the bucket here’ is standing right next to the speaker. By contrast in (\ref{Example_7.50}), \textitbf{Sawar the morpheme ___} ‘Sawar here’ denotes a location that is situated about ten kilometers away from the speaker’s location. The speaker, however, perceives \textitbf{Sawar} as being close to his own location given that \textitbf{Apawer} is situated still further away. The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) also illustrate that \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ is used independently of the parameter of visibility: the \isi{locative} is used for a visible location in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and for an invisible one in (\ref{Example_7.50}).
A: word: bua	 gloss: fruit
B: word: ini	 gloss: D.PROX
C: word: sini–nya	 gloss: L.PROX–3POSSR
D: word: sini	 gloss: L.PROX
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 308:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de mulay turung dari Apawer ... sampe di ___ sini
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG start descend from Apawer ... reach at ___ L.PROX
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he (the ancestor) started coming down from Apawer ... (and) reached Sawar here’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) illustrate the spatial uses of \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’. In both cases, adnominally used \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ indicates the location of an entity close to the speaker: \textitbf{ember sini} ‘the bucket here’ in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and \textitbf{its gloss ___ sini} ‘its gloss ___ here’ in (\ref{Example_7.50}). The actual distances signaled with \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ differ, however, depending on the speakers’ perceptions. In (\ref{Example_7.49}), \textitbf{ember sini} ‘the bucket here’ is standing right next to the speaker. By contrast in (\ref{Example_7.50}), \textitbf{its gloss ___ sini} ‘its gloss ___ here’ denotes a location that is situated about ten kilometers away from the speaker’s location. The speaker, however, perceives \textitbf{its gloss ___} as being close to his own location given that \textitbf{Apawer} is situated still further away. The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) also illustrate that \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ is used independently of the parameter of visibility: the \isi{locative} is used for a visible location in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and for an invisible one in (\ref{Example_7.50}).
A: word: mari	 gloss: hither
B: word: niwerawar	 gloss: Niwerawar
C: word: sawar	 gloss: Sawar
D: word: dari	 gloss: from
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 309:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de mulay turung dari Apawer ... sampe di Sawar ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG start descend from Apawer ... reach at Sawar ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he (the ancestor) started coming down from Apawer ... (and) reached Sawar here’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) illustrate the spatial uses of \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’. In both cases, adnominally used \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ indicates the location of an entity close to the speaker: \textitbf{ember the morpheme ___} ‘the bucket here’ in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and \textitbf{Sawar the morpheme ___} ‘Sawar here’ in (\ref{Example_7.50}). The actual distances signaled with \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ differ, however, depending on the speakers’ perceptions. In (\ref{Example_7.49}), \textitbf{ember the morpheme ___} ‘the bucket here’ is standing right next to the speaker. By contrast in (\ref{Example_7.50}), \textitbf{Sawar the morpheme ___} ‘Sawar here’ denotes a location that is situated about ten kilometers away from the speaker’s location. The speaker, however, perceives \textitbf{Sawar} as being close to his own location given that \textitbf{Apawer} is situated still further away. The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) also illustrate that \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ is used independently of the parameter of visibility: the \isi{locative} is used for a visible location in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and for an invisible one in (\ref{Example_7.50}).
A: word: sini–nya	 gloss: L.PROX–3POSSR
B: word: ini	 gloss: D.PROX
C: word: sini	 gloss: L.PROX
D: word: datang	 gloss: come
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 310:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa su taru di ___ sini
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG already put at ___ L.PROX
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I already put (the fish) in the bucket here’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) illustrate the spatial uses of \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’. In both cases, adnominally used \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ indicates the location of an entity close to the speaker: \textitbf{the morpheme ___ sini} ‘the its gloss ___ here’ in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and \textitbf{Sawar sini} ‘Sawar here’ in (\ref{Example_7.50}). The actual distances signaled with \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ differ, however, depending on the speakers’ perceptions. In (\ref{Example_7.49}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___ sini} ‘the its gloss ___ here’ is standing right next to the speaker. By contrast in (\ref{Example_7.50}), \textitbf{Sawar sini} ‘Sawar here’ denotes a location that is situated about ten kilometers away from the speaker’s location. The speaker, however, perceives \textitbf{Sawar} as being close to his own location given that \textitbf{Apawer} is situated still further away. The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) also illustrate that \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ is used independently of the parameter of visibility: the \isi{locative} is used for a visible location in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and for an invisible one in (\ref{Example_7.50}).
A: word: sembayang	 gloss: worship
B: word: ember	 gloss: bucket
C: word: terpol	 gloss: container
D: word: dari	 gloss: from
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 311:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa su taru di ember ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG already put at bucket ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I already put (the fish) in the bucket here’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) illustrate the spatial uses of \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’. In both cases, adnominally used \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ indicates the location of an entity close to the speaker: \textitbf{ember the morpheme ___} ‘the bucket here’ in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and \textitbf{Sawar the morpheme ___} ‘Sawar here’ in (\ref{Example_7.50}). The actual distances signaled with \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ differ, however, depending on the speakers’ perceptions. In (\ref{Example_7.49}), \textitbf{ember the morpheme ___} ‘the bucket here’ is standing right next to the speaker. By contrast in (\ref{Example_7.50}), \textitbf{Sawar the morpheme ___} ‘Sawar here’ denotes a location that is situated about ten kilometers away from the speaker’s location. The speaker, however, perceives \textitbf{Sawar} as being close to his own location given that \textitbf{Apawer} is situated still further away. The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) also illustrate that \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ is used independently of the parameter of visibility: the \isi{locative} is used for a visible location in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and for an invisible one in (\ref{Example_7.50}).
A: word: rabu	 gloss: Wednesday
B: word: sini–nya	 gloss: L.PROX–3POSSR
C: word: sini	 gloss: L.PROX
D: word: ini	 gloss: D.PROX
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 312:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de mulay turung dari Apawer ... sampe di ___ sini
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG start descend from Apawer ... reach at ___ L.PROX
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he (the ancestor) started coming down from Apawer ... (and) reached Sawar here’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) illustrate the spatial uses of \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’. In both cases, adnominally used \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ indicates the location of an entity close to the speaker: \textitbf{ember sini} ‘the bucket here’ in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and \textitbf{its gloss ___ sini} ‘its gloss ___ here’ in (\ref{Example_7.50}). The actual distances signaled with \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ differ, however, depending on the speakers’ perceptions. In (\ref{Example_7.49}), \textitbf{ember sini} ‘the bucket here’ is standing right next to the speaker. By contrast in (\ref{Example_7.50}), \textitbf{its gloss ___ sini} ‘its gloss ___ here’ denotes a location that is situated about ten kilometers away from the speaker’s location. The speaker, however, perceives \textitbf{its gloss ___} as being close to his own location given that \textitbf{Apawer} is situated still further away. The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) also illustrate that \textitbf{sini} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ is used independently of the parameter of visibility: the \isi{locative} is used for a visible location in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and for an invisible one in (\ref{Example_7.50}).
A: word: mari	 gloss: hither
B: word: niwerawar	 gloss: Niwerawar
C: word: rabu	 gloss: Wednesday
D: word: sawar	 gloss: Sawar
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 313:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de mulay turung dari Apawer ... sampe di Sawar ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG start descend from Apawer ... reach at Sawar ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he (the ancestor) started coming down from Apawer ... (and) reached Sawar here’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) illustrate the spatial uses of \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’. In both cases, adnominally used \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ indicates the location of an entity close to the speaker: \textitbf{ember the morpheme ___} ‘the bucket here’ in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and \textitbf{Sawar the morpheme ___} ‘Sawar here’ in (\ref{Example_7.50}). The actual distances signaled with \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ differ, however, depending on the speakers’ perceptions. In (\ref{Example_7.49}), \textitbf{ember the morpheme ___} ‘the bucket here’ is standing right next to the speaker. By contrast in (\ref{Example_7.50}), \textitbf{Sawar the morpheme ___} ‘Sawar here’ denotes a location that is situated about ten kilometers away from the speaker’s location. The speaker, however, perceives \textitbf{Sawar} as being close to his own location given that \textitbf{Apawer} is situated still further away. The examples in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and (\ref{Example_7.50}) also illustrate that \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘\textsc{l.prox}’ is used independently of the parameter of visibility: the \isi{locative} is used for a visible location in (\ref{Example_7.49}) and for an invisible one in (\ref{Example_7.50}).
A: word: ini	 gloss: D.PROX
B: word: sini–nya	 gloss: L.PROX–3POSSR
C: word: laut	 gloss: sea
D: word: sini	 gloss: L.PROX
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D