cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 122:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... tong ___ deng bapa tu sayang dia
Gloss (with missing item): ... 1PL ___ with father D.DIST love 3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[but this child] I and (my) husband (emph) love her’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: siduasi	 gloss: Siduas
B: word: kitorang	 gloss: 1PL
C: word: kedua	 gloss: second
D: word: dua	 gloss: two
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 123:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... tong dua ___ bapa tu sayang dia
Gloss (with missing item): ... 1PL two ___ father D.DIST love 3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[but this child] I and (my) husband (emph) love her’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast its gloss ___ what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed its gloss ___ \isi{comitative} \textitbf{the morpheme ___ang} ‘its gloss ___’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast its gloss ___ ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases its gloss ___ an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated its gloss ___ the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: natalia	 gloss: Natalia
B: word: dengang	 gloss: with
C: word: deng	 gloss: with
D: word: dang	 gloss: and
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 124:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... tong dua deng ___ tu sayang dia
Gloss (with missing item): ... 1PL two with ___ D.DIST love 3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[but this child] I and (my) husband (emph) love her’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: bapa	 gloss: father
B: word: tete	 gloss: grandfather
C: word: bapa-ade	 gloss: uncle
D: word: smua	 gloss: all
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 125:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... tong dua deng bapa ___ sayang dia
Gloss (with missing item): ... 1PL two with father ___ love 3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[but this child] I and (my) husband (emph) love her’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: satu	 gloss: one
B: word: puti	 gloss: be.white
C: word: sana	 gloss: L.DIST
D: word: tu	 gloss: D.DIST
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 126:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ dua dengang Natanael pu maytua langsung pake spit
Gloss (with missing item): ___ two with Natanael POSS wife immediately use speedboat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he/she and Natanael’s wife immediately took the speedboat’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: tong	 gloss: 1PL
B: word: dong	 gloss: 3PL
C: word: dong/dorang	 gloss: 3PL
D: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 127:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dong} ___ dengang Natanael pu maytua langsung pake spit
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL ___ with Natanael POSS wife immediately use speedboat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he/she and Natanael’s wife immediately took the speedboat’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: dua	 gloss: two
B: word: siduasi	 gloss: Siduas
C: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
D: word: kedua	 gloss: second
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 128:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dong} dua ___ Natanael pu maytua langsung pake spit
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL two ___ Natanael POSS wife immediately use speedboat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he/she and Natanael’s wife immediately took the speedboat’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast its gloss ___ what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed its gloss ___ \isi{comitative} \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast its gloss ___ ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases its gloss ___ an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated its gloss ___ the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: puti	 gloss: be.white
B: word: jangang	 gloss: NEG.IMP
C: word: dang	 gloss: and
D: word: dengang	 gloss: with
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 129:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dong} dua dengang ___ pu maytua langsung pake spit
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL two with ___ POSS wife immediately use speedboat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he/she and Natanael’s wife immediately took the speedboat’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: natanael	 gloss: Natanael
B: word: datang	 gloss: come
C: word: ana	 gloss: child
D: word: isabela	 gloss: Isabela
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 130:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dong} dua dengang Natanael ___ maytua langsung pake spit
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL two with Natanael ___ wife immediately use speedboat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he/she and Natanael’s wife immediately took the speedboat’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Pathe morpheme ___an Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: pu	 gloss: POSS
B: word: cantik	 gloss: be.beautiful
C: word: hendro	 gloss: POSSR
D: word: pukul	 gloss: hit
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 131:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dong} dua dengang Natanael pu ___ langsung pake spit
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL two with Natanael POSS ___ immediately use speedboat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he/she and Natanael’s wife immediately took the speedboat’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: bangsat	 gloss: rascal
B: word: paytua	 gloss: husband
C: word: janda	 gloss: widow
D: word: maytua	 gloss: wife
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 132:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... ___ dua deng bapa tu sayang dia
Gloss (with missing item): ... ___ two with father D.DIST love 3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[but this child] I and (my) husband (emph) love her’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: markus	 gloss: Markus
B: word: tong	 gloss: 1PL
C: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
D: word: kitong	 gloss: 1PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 133:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... tong ___ deng bapa tu sayang dia
Gloss (with missing item): ... 1PL ___ with father D.DIST love 3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[but this child] I and (my) husband (emph) love her’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: siduasi	 gloss: Siduas
B: word: kedua	 gloss: second
C: word: waim	 gloss: Waim
D: word: dua	 gloss: two
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 134:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... tong dua ___ bapa tu sayang dia
Gloss (with missing item): ... 1PL two ___ father D.DIST love 3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[but this child] I and (my) husband (emph) love her’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast its gloss ___ what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed its gloss ___ \isi{comitative} \textitbf{the morpheme ___ang} ‘its gloss ___’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast its gloss ___ ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases its gloss ___ an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated its gloss ___ the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: deng	 gloss: with
B: word: derang	 gloss: 3PL
C: word: dang	 gloss: and
D: word: dengang	 gloss: with
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 135:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... tong dua deng ___ tu sayang dia
Gloss (with missing item): ... 1PL two with ___ D.DIST love 3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[but this child] I and (my) husband (emph) love her’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: jepang	 gloss: Japan
B: word: bapa-ade	 gloss: uncle
C: word: tete	 gloss: grandfather
D: word: bapa	 gloss: father
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 136:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... tong dua deng bapa ___ sayang dia
Gloss (with missing item): ... 1PL two with father ___ love 3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[but this child] I and (my) husband (emph) love her’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: sana	 gloss: L.DIST
B: word: tu	 gloss: D.DIST
C: word: dodo	 gloss: Dodo
D: word: satu	 gloss: one
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B