cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 151:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... tong ___ deng bapa tu sayang dia
Gloss (with missing item): ... 1PL ___ with father D.DIST love 3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[but this child] I and (my) husband (emph) love her’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As for the distinction of \isi{comitative} and inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} makes the following cross-linguistic observations. In a \isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} construction, the \isi{conjunction} of “its gloss ___ set-denoting \textsc{np}s [{\ldots}] ‘\{A, B\} and \{C, D\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C, D\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). In inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, by contrast, “some members of the second conjunct set are already included in the first conjunct set”; hence the result of the coordination is not the “union, but the \textitbf{unification} of the sets [such that] ‘\{A, B, C\} and \{B\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). This distinction also applies to Papuan Malay. While the constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) receive an inclusory reading, the \isi{comitative} ‘N1 \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ \textsc{N2}’ \isi{conjunction} construction in (\ref{Example_6.32}) receives an additive reading. (Comitative \isi{conjunction} constructions with \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are discussed in see §\ref{Para_14.2.1.1}.)
A: word: dua	 gloss: two
B: word: kedua	 gloss: second
C: word: yang	 gloss: REL
D: word: siduasi	 gloss: Siduas
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 152:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... tong dua ___ bapa tu sayang dia
Gloss (with missing item): ... 1PL two ___ father D.DIST love 3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[but this child] I and (my) husband (emph) love her’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As for the distinction of \isi{comitative} and inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} makes the following cross-linguistic observations. In a \isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} construction, the \isi{conjunction} of “two set-denoting \textsc{np}s [{\ldots}] ‘\{A, B\} and \{C, D\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C, D\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). In inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, by contrast, “some members of the second conjunct set are already included in the first conjunct set”; hence the result of the coordination is not the “union, but the \textitbf{unification} of the sets [such that] ‘\{A, B, C\} and \{B\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). This distinction also applies to Papuan Malay. While the constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) receive an inclusory reading, the \isi{comitative} ‘N1 \textitbf{the morpheme ___ang} ‘its gloss ___’ \textsc{N2}’ \isi{conjunction} construction in (\ref{Example_6.32}) receives an additive reading. (Comitative \isi{conjunction} constructions its gloss ___ \textitbf{the morpheme ___ang} ‘its gloss ___’ are discussed in see §\ref{Para_14.2.1.1}.)
A: word: deng	 gloss: with
B: word: mama-ade	 gloss: aunt
C: word: dengang	 gloss: with
D: word: dang	 gloss: and
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 153:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... tong dua deng ___ tu sayang dia
Gloss (with missing item): ... 1PL two with ___ D.DIST love 3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[but this child] I and (my) husband (emph) love her’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As for the distinction of \isi{comitative} and inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} makes the following cross-linguistic observations. In a \isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} construction, the \isi{conjunction} of “two set-denoting \textsc{np}s [{\ldots}] ‘\{A, B\} and \{C, D\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C, D\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). In inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, by contrast, “some members of the second conjunct set are already included in the first conjunct set”; hence the result of the coordination is not the “union, but the \textitbf{unification} of the sets [such that] ‘\{A, B, C\} and \{B\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). This distinction also applies to Papuan Malay. While the constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) receive an inclusory reading, the \isi{comitative} ‘N1 \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ \textsc{N2}’ \isi{conjunction} construction in (\ref{Example_6.32}) receives an additive reading. (Comitative \isi{conjunction} constructions with \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are discussed in see §\ref{Para_14.2.1.1}.)
A: word: tete	 gloss: grandfather
B: word: bapa-ade	 gloss: uncle
C: word: bapa	 gloss: father
D: word: kitong	 gloss: 1PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 154:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... tong dua deng bapa ___ sayang dia
Gloss (with missing item): ... 1PL two with father ___ love 3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[but this child] I and (my) husband (emph) love her’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As for the distinction of \isi{comitative} and inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} makes the following cross-linguistic observations. In a \isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} construction, the \isi{conjunction} of “two set-denoting \textsc{np}s [{\ldots}] ‘\{A, B\} and \{C, D\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C, D\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). In inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, by contrast, “some members of the second conjunct set are already included in the first conjunct set”; hence the result of the coordination is not the “union, but the \textitbf{unification} of the sets [such that] ‘\{A, B, C\} and \{B\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). This distinction also applies to Papuan Malay. While the constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) receive an inclusory reading, the \isi{comitative} ‘N1 \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ \textsc{N2}’ \isi{conjunction} construction in (\ref{Example_6.32}) receives an additive reading. (Comitative \isi{conjunction} constructions with \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are discussed in see §\ref{Para_14.2.1.1}.)
A: word: ise	 gloss: Ise
B: word: satu	 gloss: one
C: word: tu	 gloss: D.DIST
D: word: sana	 gloss: L.DIST
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 155:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ dua dengang Natanael pu maytua langsung pake spit
Gloss (with missing item): ___ two with Natanael POSS wife immediately use speedboat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he/she and Natanael’s wife immediately took the speedboat’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As for the distinction of \isi{comitative} and inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} makes the following cross-linguistic observations. In a \isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} construction, the \isi{conjunction} of “two set-denoting \textsc{np}s [{\ldots}] ‘\{A, B\} and \{C, D\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C, D\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). In inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, by contrast, “some members of the second conjunct set are already included in the first conjunct set”; hence the result of the coordination is not the “union, but the \textitbf{unification} of the sets [such that] ‘\{A, B, C\} and \{B\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). This distinction also applies to Papuan Malay. While the constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) receive an inclusory reading, the \isi{comitative} ‘N1 \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ \textsc{N2}’ \isi{conjunction} construction in (\ref{Example_6.32}) receives an additive reading. (Comitative \isi{conjunction} constructions with \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are discussed in see §\ref{Para_14.2.1.1}.)
A: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
B: word: dong/dorang	 gloss: 3PL
C: word: dong	 gloss: 3PL
D: word: anging	 gloss: wind
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 156:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dong} ___ dengang Natanael pu maytua langsung pake spit
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL ___ with Natanael POSS wife immediately use speedboat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he/she and Natanael’s wife immediately took the speedboat’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As for the distinction of \isi{comitative} and inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} makes the following cross-linguistic observations. In a \isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} construction, the \isi{conjunction} of “its gloss ___ set-denoting \textsc{np}s [{\ldots}] ‘\{A, B\} and \{C, D\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C, D\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). In inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, by contrast, “some members of the second conjunct set are already included in the first conjunct set”; hence the result of the coordination is not the “union, but the \textitbf{unification} of the sets [such that] ‘\{A, B, C\} and \{B\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). This distinction also applies to Papuan Malay. While the constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) receive an inclusory reading, the \isi{comitative} ‘N1 \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ \textsc{N2}’ \isi{conjunction} construction in (\ref{Example_6.32}) receives an additive reading. (Comitative \isi{conjunction} constructions with \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are discussed in see §\ref{Para_14.2.1.1}.)
A: word: dua	 gloss: two
B: word: katalq	 gloss: Katalq
C: word: kedua	 gloss: second
D: word: siduasi	 gloss: Siduas
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 157:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dong} dua ___ Natanael pu maytua langsung pake spit
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL two ___ Natanael POSS wife immediately use speedboat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he/she and Natanael’s wife immediately took the speedboat’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As for the distinction of \isi{comitative} and inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} makes the following cross-linguistic observations. In a \isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} construction, the \isi{conjunction} of “two set-denoting \textsc{np}s [{\ldots}] ‘\{A, B\} and \{C, D\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C, D\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). In inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, by contrast, “some members of the second conjunct set are already included in the first conjunct set”; hence the result of the coordination is not the “union, but the \textitbf{unification} of the sets [such that] ‘\{A, B, C\} and \{B\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). This distinction also applies to Papuan Malay. While the constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) receive an inclusory reading, the \isi{comitative} ‘N1 \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ \textsc{N2}’ \isi{conjunction} construction in (\ref{Example_6.32}) receives an additive reading. (Comitative \isi{conjunction} constructions its gloss ___ \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ are discussed in see §\ref{Para_14.2.1.1}.)
A: word: jangang	 gloss: NEG.IMP
B: word: kitong	 gloss: 1PL
C: word: dang	 gloss: and
D: word: dengang	 gloss: with
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 158:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dong} dua dengang ___ pu maytua langsung pake spit
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL two with ___ POSS wife immediately use speedboat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he/she and Natanael’s wife immediately took the speedboat’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As for the distinction of \isi{comitative} and inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} makes the following cross-linguistic observations. In a \isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} construction, the \isi{conjunction} of “two set-denoting \textsc{np}s [{\ldots}] ‘\{A, B\} and \{C, D\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C, D\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). In inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, by contrast, “some members of the second conjunct set are already included in the first conjunct set”; hence the result of the coordination is not the “union, but the \textitbf{unification} of the sets [such that] ‘\{A, B, C\} and \{B\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). This distinction also applies to Papuan Malay. While the constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) receive an inclusory reading, the \isi{comitative} ‘N1 \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ \textsc{N2}’ \isi{conjunction} construction in (\ref{Example_6.32}) receives an additive reading. (Comitative \isi{conjunction} constructions with \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are discussed in see §\ref{Para_14.2.1.1}.)
A: word: datang	 gloss: come
B: word: oktofina	 gloss: Oktofina
C: word: isabela	 gloss: Isabela
D: word: natanael	 gloss: Natanael
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 159:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dong} dua dengang Natanael ___ maytua langsung pake spit
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL two with Natanael ___ wife immediately use speedboat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he/she and Natanael’s wife immediately took the speedboat’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As for the distinction of \isi{comitative} and inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} makes the following cross-linguistic observations. In a \isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} construction, the \isi{conjunction} of “two set-denoting \textsc{np}s [{\ldots}] ‘\{A, B\} and \{C, D\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C, D\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). In inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, by contrast, “some members of the second conjunct set are already included in the first conjunct set”; hence the result of the coordination is not the “union, but the \textitbf{unification} of the sets [such that] ‘\{A, B, C\} and \{B\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). This distinction also applies to Pathe morpheme ___an Malay. While the constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) receive an inclusory reading, the \isi{comitative} ‘N1 \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ \textsc{N2}’ \isi{conjunction} construction in (\ref{Example_6.32}) receives an additive reading. (Comitative \isi{conjunction} constructions with \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are discussed in see §\ref{Para_14.2.1.1}.)
A: word: pu	 gloss: POSS
B: word: hendro	 gloss: POSSR
C: word: ana	 gloss: child
D: word: pukul	 gloss: hit
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 160:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dong} dua dengang Natanael pu ___ langsung pake spit
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL two with Natanael POSS ___ immediately use speedboat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he/she and Natanael’s wife immediately took the speedboat’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As for the distinction of \isi{comitative} and inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} makes the following cross-linguistic observations. In a \isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} construction, the \isi{conjunction} of “two set-denoting \textsc{np}s [{\ldots}] ‘\{A, B\} and \{C, D\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C, D\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). In inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, by contrast, “some members of the second conjunct set are already included in the first conjunct set”; hence the result of the coordination is not the “union, but the \textitbf{unification} of the sets [such that] ‘\{A, B, C\} and \{B\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). This distinction also applies to Papuan Malay. While the constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) receive an inclusory reading, the \isi{comitative} ‘N1 \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ \textsc{N2}’ \isi{conjunction} construction in (\ref{Example_6.32}) receives an additive reading. (Comitative \isi{conjunction} constructions with \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are discussed in see §\ref{Para_14.2.1.1}.)
A: word: janda	 gloss: widow
B: word: maytua	 gloss: wife
C: word: tong	 gloss: 1PL
D: word: paytua	 gloss: husband
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 161:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {baru} siapa ___ dengang dong dua turung bli ni
Gloss (with missing item): and.then who ___ with 3PL two descend buy D.PROX
The English translation of this sentence is:‘and then, who-is-it, Sarles and the two of them came down and bought this’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As for the distinction of \isi{comitative} and inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} makes the following cross-linguistic observations. In a \isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} construction, the \isi{conjunction} of “two set-denoting \textsc{np}s [{\ldots}] ‘\{A, B\} and \{C, D\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C, D\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). In inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, by contrast, “some members of the second conjunct set are already included in the first conjunct set”; hence the result of the coordination is not the “union, but the \textitbf{unification} of the sets [such that] ‘\{A, B, C\} and \{B\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). This distinction also applies to Papuan Malay. While the constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) receive an inclusory reading, the \isi{comitative} ‘N1 \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ \textsc{N2}’ \isi{conjunction} construction in (\ref{Example_6.32}) receives an additive reading. (Comitative \isi{conjunction} constructions with \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are discussed in see §\ref{Para_14.2.1.1}.)
A: word: sarles	 gloss: Sarles
B: word: mambramo	 gloss: Mambramo
C: word: besar	 gloss: be.big
D: word: sarmi	 gloss: Sarmi
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A