cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 630:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {bapa} {Iskia} ___ bunu babi, bapa desa dorang dong bunu babi
Gloss (with missing item): father Iskia ___ kill pig father village 3PL 3PL kill pig
The English translation of this sentence is:‘father Iskia and his companions including Iskia killed a pig, father mayor and his companions including the mayor, they killed a pig’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Referential heterogeneity of Papuan Malay \isi{associative} inclusory expressions is illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.97}) to (\ref{Example_6.99}). In (\ref{Example_6.97}), \textitbf{bapa Iskia the morpheme ___} ‘father Iskia and them’ does not denote several people called \textitbf{Iskia}; neither does \textitbf{bapa desa dorang} ‘father mayor and them’ refer to more than one mayor. The same applies to the examples in (\ref{Example_6.98}) and (\ref{Example_6.99}) (in this context \textitbf{dokter} ‘doctor’ has a \isi{definite} reading as the local hospital has only one doctor). In each case, the plural \isi{pronoun} encodes a heterogeneous set of associates “centering around X”, the focal referent. Moreover, the pronouns include the focal referents in their reference.
A: word: katalq	 gloss: Katalq
B: word: dong	 gloss: 3PL
C: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
D: word: dong/dorang	 gloss: 3PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 631:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {bapa} {Iskia} dong bunu babi, ___ desa dorang dong bunu babi
Gloss (with missing item): father Iskia 3PL kill pig ___ village 3PL 3PL kill pig
The English translation of this sentence is:‘father Iskia and his companions including Iskia killed a pig, father mayor and his companions including the mayor, they killed a pig’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Referential heterogeneity of Papuan Malay \isi{associative} inclusory expressions is illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.97}) to (\ref{Example_6.99}). In (\ref{Example_6.97}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___ Iskia dong} ‘its gloss ___ Iskia and them’ does not denote several people called \textitbf{Iskia}; neither does \textitbf{the morpheme ___ desa dorang} ‘its gloss ___ mayor and them’ refer to more than one mayor. The same applies to the examples in (\ref{Example_6.98}) and (\ref{Example_6.99}) (in this context \textitbf{dokter} ‘doctor’ has a \isi{definite} reading as the local hospital has only one doctor). In each case, the plural \isi{pronoun} encodes a heterogeneous set of associates “centering around X”, the focal referent. Moreover, the pronouns include the focal referents in their reference.
A: word: bapa-ade	 gloss: uncle
B: word: tete	 gloss: grandfather
C: word: natanael	 gloss: Natanael
D: word: bapa	 gloss: father
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 632:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {bapa} {Iskia} dong bunu babi, bapa ___ dorang dong bunu babi
Gloss (with missing item): father Iskia 3PL kill pig father ___ 3PL 3PL kill pig
The English translation of this sentence is:‘father Iskia and his companions including Iskia killed a pig, father mayor and his companions including the mayor, they killed a pig’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Referential heterogeneity of Papuan Malay \isi{associative} inclusory expressions is illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.97}) to (\ref{Example_6.99}). In (\ref{Example_6.97}), \textitbf{bapa Iskia dong} ‘father Iskia and them’ does not denote several people called \textitbf{Iskia}; neither does \textitbf{bapa the morpheme ___ dorang} ‘father mayor and them’ refer to more than one mayor. The same applies to the examples in (\ref{Example_6.98}) and (\ref{Example_6.99}) (in this context \textitbf{dokter} ‘doctor’ has a \isi{definite} reading as the local hospital has only one doctor). In each case, the plural \isi{pronoun} encodes a heterogeneous set of associates “centering around X”, the focal referent. Moreover, the pronouns include the focal referents in their reference.
A: word: desa	 gloss: village
B: word: besar	 gloss: be.big
C: word: pemuda	 gloss: youth
D: word: kampung-tana	 gloss: village-ground
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 633:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {bapa} {Iskia} dong bunu babi, bapa desa ___ dong bunu babi
Gloss (with missing item): father Iskia 3PL kill pig father village ___ 3PL kill pig
The English translation of this sentence is:‘father Iskia and his companions including Iskia killed a pig, father mayor and his companions including the mayor, they killed a pig’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Referential heterogeneity of Papuan Malay \isi{associative} inclusory expressions is illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.97}) to (\ref{Example_6.99}). In (\ref{Example_6.97}), \textitbf{bapa Iskia dong} ‘father Iskia and them’ does not denote several people called \textitbf{Iskia}; neither does \textitbf{bapa desa the morpheme ___} ‘father mayor and them’ refer to more than one mayor. The same applies to the examples in (\ref{Example_6.98}) and (\ref{Example_6.99}) (in this context \textitbf{dokter} ‘doctor’ has a \isi{definite} reading as the local hospital has only one doctor). In each case, the plural \isi{pronoun} encodes a heterogeneous set of associates “centering around X”, the focal referent. Moreover, the pronouns include the focal referents in their reference.
A: word: dong/dorang	 gloss: 3PL
B: word: dorang	 gloss: 3PL
C: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
D: word: mambramo	 gloss: Mambramo
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 634:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ise ko tinggal di sini suda deng ___ dorang!
Gloss (with missing item): Ise 2SG stay at L.PROX just with ___ 3PL
The English translation of this sentence is:‘you Ise just stay here with aunt and her companions including aunt!’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Referential heterogeneity of Papuan Malay \isi{associative} inclusory expressions is illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.97}) to (\ref{Example_6.99}). In (\ref{Example_6.97}), \textitbf{bapa Iskia dong} ‘father Iskia and them’ does not denote several people called \textitbf{Iskia}; neither does \textitbf{bapa desa dorang} ‘father mayor and them’ refer to more than one mayor. The same applies to the examples in (\ref{Example_6.98}) and (\ref{Example_6.99}) (in this context \textitbf{dokter} ‘doctor’ has a \isi{definite} reading as the local hospital has only one doctor). In each case, the plural \isi{pronoun} encodes a heterogeneous set of associates “centering around X”, the focal referent. Moreover, the pronouns include the focal referents in their reference.
A: word: mama-tua	 gloss: aunt
B: word: mama-ade	 gloss: aunt
C: word: isabela	 gloss: Isabela
D: word: nene	 gloss: grandmother
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 635:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ise ko tinggal di sini suda deng mama-tua ___
Gloss (with missing item): Ise 2SG stay at L.PROX just with aunt ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘you Ise just stay here with aunt and her companions including aunt!’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Referential heterogeneity of Papuan Malay \isi{associative} inclusory expressions is illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.97}) to (\ref{Example_6.99}). In (\ref{Example_6.97}), \textitbf{bapa Iskia dong} ‘father Iskia and them’ does not denote several people called \textitbf{Iskia}; neither does \textitbf{bapa desa the morpheme ___} ‘father mayor and them’ refer to more than one mayor. The same applies to the examples in (\ref{Example_6.98}) and (\ref{Example_6.99}) (in this context \textitbf{dokter} ‘doctor’ has a \isi{definite} reading as the local hospital has only one doctor). In each case, the plural \isi{pronoun} encodes a heterogeneous set of associates “centering around X”, the focal referent. Moreover, the pronouns include the focal referents in their reference.
A: word: dong/dorang	 gloss: 3PL
B: word: katalq	 gloss: Katalq
C: word: dorang	 gloss: 3PL
D: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 636:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ {Iskia} dong bunu babi, bapa desa dorang dong bunu babi
Gloss (with missing item): ___ Iskia 3PL kill pig father village 3PL 3PL kill pig
The English translation of this sentence is:‘father Iskia and his companions including Iskia killed a pig, father mayor and his companions including the mayor, they killed a pig’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The semantic property “reference to groups” is shown in (\ref{Example_6.97}) and (\ref{Example_6.98}). In the two examples, the \textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl} \isi{noun} phrases denote coherent groups of inherently associated individuals, namely \textitbf{the morpheme ___ Iskia dong} ‘its gloss ___ Iskia and them’, \textitbf{the morpheme ___ desa dorang} ‘its gloss ___ mayor and them’, and \textitbf{mama-tua dorang} ‘aunt and them’, respectively. These examples also illustrate the notion of “ranking” in \isi{associative} inclusory expressions. The pragmatically highest ranking members are the focal referents \textitbf{the morpheme ___ Iskia} ‘its gloss ___ Iskia’ and \textitbf{the morpheme ___ desa} ‘its gloss ___ mayor’ in (\ref{Example_6.97}), and \textitbf{mama-tua} ‘aunt’ in (\ref{Example_6.98}). The remaining members of the plural sets, by contrast, are not fully enumerated but subsumed under the plural \isi{pronoun} \textitbf{dong/dorang} ‘3\textsc{pl}’.
A: word: sama	 gloss: to
B: word: bapa	 gloss: father
C: word: tete	 gloss: grandfather
D: word: bapa-ade	 gloss: uncle
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 637:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {bapa} ___ dong bunu babi, bapa desa dorang dong bunu babi
Gloss (with missing item): father ___ 3PL kill pig father village 3PL 3PL kill pig
The English translation of this sentence is:‘father Iskia and his companions including Iskia killed a pig, father mayor and his companions including the mayor, they killed a pig’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The semantic property “reference to groups” is shown in (\ref{Example_6.97}) and (\ref{Example_6.98}). In the two examples, the \textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl} \isi{noun} phrases denote coherent groups of inherently associated individuals, namely \textitbf{bapa its gloss ___ dong} ‘father its gloss ___ and them’, \textitbf{bapa desa dorang} ‘father mayor and them’, and \textitbf{mama-tua dorang} ‘aunt and them’, respectively. These examples also illustrate the notion of “ranking” in \isi{associative} inclusory expressions. The pragmatically highest ranking members are the focal referents \textitbf{bapa its gloss ___} ‘father its gloss ___’ and \textitbf{bapa desa} ‘father mayor’ in (\ref{Example_6.97}), and \textitbf{mama-tua} ‘aunt’ in (\ref{Example_6.98}). The remaining members of the plural sets, by contrast, are not fully enumerated but subsumed under the plural \isi{pronoun} \textitbf{dong/dorang} ‘3\textsc{pl}’.
A: word: iskia	 gloss: Iskia
B: word: arbais	 gloss: Arbais
C: word: miskin	 gloss: be.poor
D: word: sungay	 gloss: river
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 638:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {bapa} {Iskia} ___ bunu babi, bapa desa dorang dong bunu babi
Gloss (with missing item): father Iskia ___ kill pig father village 3PL 3PL kill pig
The English translation of this sentence is:‘father Iskia and his companions including Iskia killed a pig, father mayor and his companions including the mayor, they killed a pig’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The semantic property “reference to groups” is shown in (\ref{Example_6.97}) and (\ref{Example_6.98}). In the two examples, the \textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl} \isi{noun} phrases denote coherent groups of inherently associated individuals, namely \textitbf{bapa Iskia the morpheme ___} ‘father Iskia and them’, \textitbf{bapa desa dorang} ‘father mayor and them’, and \textitbf{mama-tua dorang} ‘aunt and them’, respectively. These examples also illustrate the notion of “ranking” in \isi{associative} inclusory expressions. The pragmatically highest ranking members are the focal referents \textitbf{bapa Iskia} ‘father Iskia’ and \textitbf{bapa desa} ‘father mayor’ in (\ref{Example_6.97}), and \textitbf{mama-tua} ‘aunt’ in (\ref{Example_6.98}). The remaining members of the plural sets, by contrast, are not fully enumerated but subsumed under the plural \isi{pronoun} \textitbf{the morpheme ___/dorang} ‘3\textsc{pl}’.
A: word: dong	 gloss: 3PL
B: word: kitong	 gloss: 1PL
C: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
D: word: dong/dorang	 gloss: 3PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 639:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {bapa} {Iskia} dong bunu babi, ___ desa dorang dong bunu babi
Gloss (with missing item): father Iskia 3PL kill pig ___ village 3PL 3PL kill pig
The English translation of this sentence is:‘father Iskia and his companions including Iskia killed a pig, father mayor and his companions including the mayor, they killed a pig’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The semantic property “reference to groups” is shown in (\ref{Example_6.97}) and (\ref{Example_6.98}). In the two examples, the \textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl} \isi{noun} phrases denote coherent groups of inherently associated individuals, namely \textitbf{the morpheme ___ Iskia dong} ‘its gloss ___ Iskia and them’, \textitbf{the morpheme ___ desa dorang} ‘its gloss ___ mayor and them’, and \textitbf{mama-tua dorang} ‘aunt and them’, respectively. These examples also illustrate the notion of “ranking” in \isi{associative} inclusory expressions. The pragmatically highest ranking members are the focal referents \textitbf{the morpheme ___ Iskia} ‘its gloss ___ Iskia’ and \textitbf{the morpheme ___ desa} ‘its gloss ___ mayor’ in (\ref{Example_6.97}), and \textitbf{mama-tua} ‘aunt’ in (\ref{Example_6.98}). The remaining members of the plural sets, by contrast, are not fully enumerated but subsumed under the plural \isi{pronoun} \textitbf{dong/dorang} ‘3\textsc{pl}’.
A: word: agus	 gloss: Agus
B: word: bapa	 gloss: father
C: word: tete	 gloss: grandfather
D: word: bapa-ade	 gloss: uncle
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 640:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {bapa} {Iskia} dong bunu babi, bapa ___ dorang dong bunu babi
Gloss (with missing item): father Iskia 3PL kill pig father ___ 3PL 3PL kill pig
The English translation of this sentence is:‘father Iskia and his companions including Iskia killed a pig, father mayor and his companions including the mayor, they killed a pig’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The semantic property “reference to groups” is shown in (\ref{Example_6.97}) and (\ref{Example_6.98}). In the two examples, the \textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl} \isi{noun} phrases denote coherent groups of inherently associated individuals, namely \textitbf{bapa Iskia dong} ‘father Iskia and them’, \textitbf{bapa the morpheme ___ dorang} ‘father mayor and them’, and \textitbf{mama-tua dorang} ‘aunt and them’, respectively. These examples also illustrate the notion of “ranking” in \isi{associative} inclusory expressions. The pragmatically highest ranking members are the focal referents \textitbf{bapa Iskia} ‘father Iskia’ and \textitbf{bapa the morpheme ___} ‘father mayor’ in (\ref{Example_6.97}), and \textitbf{mama-tua} ‘aunt’ in (\ref{Example_6.98}). The remaining members of the plural sets, by contrast, are not fully enumerated but subsumed under the plural \isi{pronoun} \textitbf{dong/dorang} ‘3\textsc{pl}’.
A: word: besar	 gloss: be.big
B: word: kampung-tana	 gloss: village-ground
C: word: mama-tua	 gloss: aunt
D: word: desa	 gloss: village
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 641:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {bapa} {Iskia} dong bunu babi, bapa desa ___ dong bunu babi
Gloss (with missing item): father Iskia 3PL kill pig father village ___ 3PL kill pig
The English translation of this sentence is:‘father Iskia and his companions including Iskia killed a pig, father mayor and his companions including the mayor, they killed a pig’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The semantic property “reference to groups” is shown in (\ref{Example_6.97}) and (\ref{Example_6.98}). In the two examples, the \textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl} \isi{noun} phrases denote coherent groups of inherently associated individuals, namely \textitbf{bapa Iskia dong} ‘father Iskia and them’, \textitbf{bapa desa the morpheme ___} ‘father mayor and them’, and \textitbf{mama-tua the morpheme ___} ‘aunt and them’, respectively. These examples also illustrate the notion of “ranking” in \isi{associative} inclusory expressions. The pragmatically highest ranking members are the focal referents \textitbf{bapa Iskia} ‘father Iskia’ and \textitbf{bapa desa} ‘father mayor’ in (\ref{Example_6.97}), and \textitbf{mama-tua} ‘aunt’ in (\ref{Example_6.98}). The remaining members of the plural sets, by contrast, are not fully enumerated but subsumed under the plural \isi{pronoun} \textitbf{dong/the morpheme ___} ‘3\textsc{pl}’.
A: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
B: word: dorang	 gloss: 3PL
C: word: anging	 gloss: wind
D: word: dong/dorang	 gloss: 3PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 642:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ise ko tinggal di sini suda deng ___ dorang!
Gloss (with missing item): Ise 2SG stay at L.PROX just with ___ 3PL
The English translation of this sentence is:‘you Ise just stay here with aunt and her companions including aunt!’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The semantic property “reference to groups” is shown in (\ref{Example_6.97}) and (\ref{Example_6.98}). In the two examples, the \textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl} \isi{noun} phrases denote coherent groups of inherently associated individuals, namely \textitbf{bapa Iskia dong} ‘father Iskia and them’, \textitbf{bapa desa dorang} ‘father mayor and them’, and \textitbf{the morpheme ___ dorang} ‘its gloss ___ and them’, respectively. These examples also illustrate the notion of “ranking” in \isi{associative} inclusory expressions. The pragmatically highest ranking members are the focal referents \textitbf{bapa Iskia} ‘father Iskia’ and \textitbf{bapa desa} ‘father mayor’ in (\ref{Example_6.97}), and \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_6.98}). The remaining members of the plural sets, by contrast, are not fully enumerated but subsumed under the plural \isi{pronoun} \textitbf{dong/dorang} ‘3\textsc{pl}’.
A: word: mama-tua	 gloss: aunt
B: word: nene	 gloss: grandmother
C: word: mama-ade	 gloss: aunt
D: word: pemuda	 gloss: youth
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A