cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 137:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ dua dengang Natanael pu maytua langsung pake spit
Gloss (with missing item): ___ two with Natanael POSS wife immediately use speedboat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he/she and Natanael’s wife immediately took the speedboat’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
B: word: herman	 gloss: Herman
C: word: dong/dorang	 gloss: 3PL
D: word: dong	 gloss: 3PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 138:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dong} ___ dengang Natanael pu maytua langsung pake spit
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL ___ with Natanael POSS wife immediately use speedboat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he/she and Natanael’s wife immediately took the speedboat’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: siduasi	 gloss: Siduas
B: word: susana	 gloss: Susana
C: word: dua	 gloss: two
D: word: kedua	 gloss: second
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 139:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dong} dua ___ Natanael pu maytua langsung pake spit
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL two ___ Natanael POSS wife immediately use speedboat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he/she and Natanael’s wife immediately took the speedboat’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast its gloss ___ what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed its gloss ___ \isi{comitative} \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast its gloss ___ ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases its gloss ___ an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated its gloss ___ the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: jangang	 gloss: NEG.IMP
B: word: dengang	 gloss: with
C: word: dang	 gloss: and
D: word: pemuda	 gloss: youth
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 140:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dong} dua dengang ___ pu maytua langsung pake spit
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL two with ___ POSS wife immediately use speedboat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he/she and Natanael’s wife immediately took the speedboat’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: isabela	 gloss: Isabela
B: word: datang	 gloss: come
C: word: natanael	 gloss: Natanael
D: word: kitorang	 gloss: 1PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 141:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dong} dua dengang Natanael ___ maytua langsung pake spit
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL two with Natanael ___ wife immediately use speedboat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he/she and Natanael’s wife immediately took the speedboat’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Pathe morpheme ___an Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: hendro	 gloss: POSSR
B: word: pukul	 gloss: hit
C: word: pu	 gloss: POSS
D: word: mambramo	 gloss: Mambramo
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 142:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dong} dua dengang Natanael pu ___ langsung pake spit
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL two with Natanael POSS ___ immediately use speedboat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he/she and Natanael’s wife immediately took the speedboat’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: janda	 gloss: widow
B: word: markus	 gloss: Markus
C: word: maytua	 gloss: wife
D: word: paytua	 gloss: husband
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 143:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {baru} siapa ___ dengang dong dua turung bli ni
Gloss (with missing item): and.then who ___ with 3PL two descend buy D.PROX
The English translation of this sentence is:‘and then, who-is-it, Sarles and the two of them came down and bought this’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: besar	 gloss: be.big
B: word: maytua	 gloss: wife
C: word: sarmi	 gloss: Sarmi
D: word: sarles	 gloss: Sarles
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 144:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {baru} siapa Sarles ___ dong dua turung bli ni
Gloss (with missing item): and.then who Sarles ___ 3PL two descend buy D.PROX
The English translation of this sentence is:‘and then, who-is-it, Sarles and the two of them came down and bought this’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast its gloss ___ what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed its gloss ___ \isi{comitative} \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast its gloss ___ ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases its gloss ___ an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated its gloss ___ the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: jangang	 gloss: NEG.IMP
B: word: dengang	 gloss: with
C: word: ise	 gloss: Ise
D: word: dang	 gloss: and
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 145:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {baru} siapa Sarles dengang ___ dua turung bli ni
Gloss (with missing item): and.then who Sarles with ___ two descend buy D.PROX
The English translation of this sentence is:‘and then, who-is-it, Sarles and the two of them came down and bought this’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: dong/dorang	 gloss: 3PL
B: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
C: word: mama-tua	 gloss: aunt
D: word: dong	 gloss: 3PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 146:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {baru} siapa Sarles dengang dong ___ turung bli ni
Gloss (with missing item): and.then who Sarles with 3PL ___ descend buy D.PROX
The English translation of this sentence is:‘and then, who-is-it, Sarles and the two of them came down and bought this’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: siduasi	 gloss: Siduas
B: word: banyak	 gloss: many
C: word: kedua	 gloss: second
D: word: dua	 gloss: two
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 147:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ dorang dua pulang hari minggu cepat
Gloss (with missing item): ___ 3PL two go.home day Sunday be.fast
The English translation of this sentence is:‘father and he returned home quickly on Sunday’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: bapa-ade	 gloss: uncle
B: word: bapa	 gloss: father
C: word: tete	 gloss: grandfather
D: word: dari	 gloss: from
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 148:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): bapa ___ dua pulang hari minggu cepat
Gloss (with missing item): father ___ two go.home day Sunday be.fast
The English translation of this sentence is:‘father and he returned home quickly on Sunday’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: martin	 gloss: Martin
B: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
C: word: dong/dorang	 gloss: 3PL
D: word: dorang	 gloss: 3PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 149:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): bapa dorang ___ pulang hari minggu cepat
Gloss (with missing item): father 3PL ___ go.home day Sunday be.fast
The English translation of this sentence is:‘father and he returned home quickly on Sunday’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions presented in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) contrast with what \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} calls “\isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} constructions”, which denote additive relations. In Papuan Malay, such \isi{comitative} constructions are formed with \isi{comitative} \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’. The inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) also contrast with ``\textsc{n} \textsc{pro-pl}'' \isi{noun} phrases with an \isi{associative} inclusory reading. Both contrasts are illustrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_6.32}) and (\ref{Example_6.33}).
A: word: waim	 gloss: Waim
B: word: kedua	 gloss: second
C: word: dua	 gloss: two
D: word: siduasi	 gloss: Siduas
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 150:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... ___ dua deng bapa tu sayang dia
Gloss (with missing item): ... ___ two with father D.DIST love 3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[but this child] I and (my) husband (emph) love her’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: As for the distinction of \isi{comitative} and inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, \citet[33]{Haspelmath.2007c} makes the following cross-linguistic observations. In a \isi{comitative} \isi{conjunction} construction, the \isi{conjunction} of “two set-denoting \textsc{np}s [{\ldots}] ‘\{A, B\} and \{C, D\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C, D\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). In inclusory \isi{conjunction} constructions, by contrast, “some members of the second conjunct set are already included in the first conjunct set”; hence the result of the coordination is not the “union, but the \textitbf{unification} of the sets [such that] ‘\{A, B, C\} and \{B\}’ yields the set \{A, B, C\}” (\citeyear*[33]{Haspelmath.2007c}). This distinction also applies to Papuan Malay. While the constructions in (\ref{Example_6.26}) to (\ref{Example_6.29}) receive an inclusory reading, the \isi{comitative} ‘N1 \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ \textsc{N2}’ \isi{conjunction} construction in (\ref{Example_6.32}) receives an additive reading. (Comitative \isi{conjunction} constructions with \textitbf{dengang} ‘with’ are discussed in see §\ref{Para_14.2.1.1}.)
A: word: tong	 gloss: 1PL
B: word: kitong	 gloss: 1PL
C: word: kam	 gloss: 2PL
D: word: cantik	 gloss: be.beautiful
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A