cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 302:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dari} {sini} {deng} {Papua-Lima,} {kembali} {juga} deng {Papua-Lima} ... ke sana deng Papua-Lima kembali deng Papua-Lima ___
Gloss (with missing item): from L.PROX with Papua-Lima return also with Papua-Lima ... to L.DIST with Papua-Lima return with Papua-Lima ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(I’ll leave) from here with the Papua-Lima (ship) and return also with the Papua-Lima (ship) ... (I’ll get) over there with the Papua-Lima (ship and) return with the Papua-Lima (ship) also’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The prepredicate position of the focus adverbs is illustrated in (\ref{Example_5.177}) to (\ref{Example_5.181}). Focus adverbs typically precede the subject. This is shown with \textitbf{cuma} ‘just’ in (\ref{Example_5.177}) and \textitbf{hanya} ‘only’ in (\ref{Example_5.179}). Most of them can its gloss ___ take a prepredicate position directly preceding the predicate; the exceptions are \textitbf{apalagi} ‘moreover’, \textitbf{kecuali} ‘except’ and \textitbf{kususnya} ‘especially’ which always precede the subject. The position directly preceding the predicate is shown with \textitbf{cuma} ‘just’ in (\ref{Example_5.178}) and \textitbf{hanya} ‘only’ in (\ref{Example_5.180}), respectively. Another exception is prepredicate \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’, which always directly precedes the predicate, as in (\ref{Example_5.181}); for its postpredi\-cate uses see (\ref{Example_5.182}). These examples its gloss ___ illustrate that focus adverbs not only modify verbal predicates, as in (\ref{Example_5.177}), and (\ref{Example_5.179}) to (\ref{Example_5.181}), but its gloss ___ nonverbal predicates, such as the \isi{numeral} predicate \textitbf{dua} ‘two’ in (\ref{Example_5.178}).
A: word: tugas	 gloss: duty
B: word: selaing	 gloss: besides
C: word: juga	 gloss: also
D: word: taung	 gloss: year
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 303:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): baru~baru de su turung, ___ de su pulang
Gloss (with missing item): RDP~recently 3SG already descend ___ 3SG already go.home
The English translation of this sentence is:[Reply to an interlocutor who is looking for someone:] ‘just now he already came by, (it’s) just (that) he already went home’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The prepredicate position of the focus adverbs is illustrated in (\ref{Example_5.177}) to (\ref{Example_5.181}). Focus adverbs typically precede the subject. This is shown with \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_5.177}) and \textitbf{hanya} ‘only’ in (\ref{Example_5.179}). Most of them can also take a prepredicate position directly preceding the predicate; the exceptions are \textitbf{apalagi} ‘moreover’, \textitbf{kecuali} ‘except’ and \textitbf{kususnya} ‘especially’ which always precede the subject. The position directly preceding the predicate is shown with \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_5.178}) and \textitbf{hanya} ‘only’ in (\ref{Example_5.180}), respectively. Another exception is prepredicate \textitbf{juga} ‘also’, which always directly precedes the predicate, as in (\ref{Example_5.181}); for its postpredi\-cate uses see (\ref{Example_5.182}). These examples also illustrate that focus adverbs not only modify verbal predicates, as in (\ref{Example_5.177}), and (\ref{Example_5.179}) to (\ref{Example_5.181}), but also nonverbal predicates, such as the \isi{numeral} predicate \textitbf{dua} ‘two’ in (\ref{Example_5.178}).
A: word: ruma	 gloss: house
B: word: hanya	 gloss: only
C: word: dalam	 gloss: inside
D: word: cuma	 gloss: just
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 304:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dari} {sini} {deng} {Papua-Lima,} {kembali} ___ deng {Papua-Lima} ... ke sana deng Papua-Lima kembali deng Papua-Lima juga
Gloss (with missing item): from L.PROX with Papua-Lima return ___ with Papua-Lima ... to L.DIST with Papua-Lima return with Papua-Lima also
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(I’ll leave) from here with the Papua-Lima (ship) and return also with the Papua-Lima (ship) ... (I’ll get) over there with the Papua-Lima (ship and) return with the Papua-Lima (ship) also’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Three focus adverbs take a postpredicate position, namely \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’, \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’, and \textitbf{saja} ‘just’. This is demonstrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_5.182}) to (\ref{Example_5.184}). (As shown in (\ref{Example_5.181}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ can its gloss ___ take a prepredicate position.) In clauses with peripheral adjuncts, the three adverbs can directly follow the predicate, such as the first \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ token in (\ref{Example_5.182}) and \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_5.183}). Alternatively, they can follow the adjunct, such as the second \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ token in (\ref{Example_5.182}) and \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_5.184}). Focus ad\isi{verb} \textitbf{saja} ‘just’ has the same distributional properties as \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’. The semantics expressed with the different positions again have to do with scope.
A: word: juga	 gloss: also
B: word: selaing	 gloss: besides
C: word: tugas	 gloss: duty
D: word: jangang	 gloss: NEG.IMP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 305:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dari} {sini} {deng} {Papua-Lima,} {kembali} {juga} deng {Papua-Lima} ... ke sana deng Papua-Lima kembali deng Papua-Lima ___
Gloss (with missing item): from L.PROX with Papua-Lima return also with Papua-Lima ... to L.DIST with Papua-Lima return with Papua-Lima ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(I’ll leave) from here with the Papua-Lima (ship) and return also with the Papua-Lima (ship) ... (I’ll get) over there with the Papua-Lima (ship and) return with the Papua-Lima (ship) also’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Three focus adverbs take a postpredicate position, namely \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’, \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’, and \textitbf{saja} ‘just’. This is demonstrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_5.182}) to (\ref{Example_5.184}). (As shown in (\ref{Example_5.181}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ can its gloss ___ take a prepredicate position.) In clauses with peripheral adjuncts, the three adverbs can directly follow the predicate, such as the first \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ token in (\ref{Example_5.182}) and \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_5.183}). Alternatively, they can follow the adjunct, such as the second \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ token in (\ref{Example_5.182}) and \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_5.184}). Focus ad\isi{verb} \textitbf{saja} ‘just’ has the same distributional properties as \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’. The semantics expressed with the different positions again have to do with scope.
A: word: selaing	 gloss: besides
B: word: tugas	 gloss: duty
C: word: ekor	 gloss: tail
D: word: juga	 gloss: also
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 306:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sa pulang ke Waim ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG go.home to Waim ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I went home to Waim again’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Three focus adverbs take a postpredicate position, namely \textitbf{juga} ‘also’, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, also’, and \textitbf{saja} ‘just’. This is demonstrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_5.182}) to (\ref{Example_5.184}). (As shown in (\ref{Example_5.181}), \textitbf{juga} ‘also’ can also take a prepredicate position.) In clauses with peripheral adjuncts, the three adverbs can directly follow the predicate, such as the first \textitbf{juga} ‘also’ token in (\ref{Example_5.182}) and \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, also’ in (\ref{Example_5.183}). Alternatively, they can follow the adjunct, such as the second \textitbf{juga} ‘also’ token in (\ref{Example_5.182}) and \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, also’ in (\ref{Example_5.184}). Focus ad\isi{verb} \textitbf{saja} ‘just’ has the same distributional properties as \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, also’. The semantics expressed with the different positions its gloss ___ have to do with scope.
A: word: akirnya	 gloss: finally
B: word: mandi	 gloss: bathe
C: word: lagi	 gloss: again
D: word: daging	 gloss: meat
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 307:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ise dong ___ duduk di sana
Gloss (with missing item): Ise 3PL ___ sit at L.DIST
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Ise and the others are also sitting over there’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Three focus adverbs take a postpredicate position, namely \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’, \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’, and \textitbf{saja} ‘just’. This is demonstrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_5.182}) to (\ref{Example_5.184}). (As shown in (\ref{Example_5.181}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ can its gloss ___ take a prepredicate position.) In clauses with peripheral adjuncts, the three adverbs can directly follow the predicate, such as the first \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ token in (\ref{Example_5.182}) and \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_5.183}). Alternatively, they can follow the adjunct, such as the second \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ token in (\ref{Example_5.182}) and \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_5.184}). Focus ad\isi{verb} \textitbf{saja} ‘just’ has the same distributional properties as \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’. The semantics expressed with the different positions again have to do with scope.
A: word: selaing	 gloss: besides
B: word: juga	 gloss: also
C: word: barat	 gloss: west
D: word: tugas	 gloss: duty
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 308:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dari} {sini} {deng} {Papua-Lima,} {kembali} ___ deng {Papua-Lima} ... ke sana deng Papua-Lima kembali deng Papua-Lima juga
Gloss (with missing item): from L.PROX with Papua-Lima return ___ with Papua-Lima ... to L.DIST with Papua-Lima return with Papua-Lima also
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(I’ll leave) from here with the Papua-Lima (ship) and return also with the Papua-Lima (ship) ... (I’ll get) over there with the Papua-Lima (ship and) return with the Papua-Lima (ship) also’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Three focus adverbs take a postpredicate position, namely \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’, \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’, and \textitbf{saja} ‘just’. This is demonstrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_5.182}) to (\ref{Example_5.184}). (As shown in (\ref{Example_5.181}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ can its gloss ___ take a prepredicate position.) In clauses with peripheral adjuncts, the three adverbs can directly follow the predicate, such as the first \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ token in (\ref{Example_5.182}) and \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_5.183}). Alternatively, they can follow the adjunct, such as the second \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ token in (\ref{Example_5.182}) and \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_5.184}). Focus ad\isi{verb} \textitbf{saja} ‘just’ has the same distributional properties as \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’. The semantics expressed with the different positions again have to do with scope.
A: word: tugas	 gloss: duty
B: word: selaing	 gloss: besides
C: word: babi	 gloss: pig
D: word: juga	 gloss: also
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 309:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dari} {sini} {deng} {Papua-Lima,} {kembali} {juga} deng {Papua-Lima} ... ke sana deng Papua-Lima kembali deng Papua-Lima ___
Gloss (with missing item): from L.PROX with Papua-Lima return also with Papua-Lima ... to L.DIST with Papua-Lima return with Papua-Lima ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(I’ll leave) from here with the Papua-Lima (ship) and return also with the Papua-Lima (ship) ... (I’ll get) over there with the Papua-Lima (ship and) return with the Papua-Lima (ship) also’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Three focus adverbs take a postpredicate position, namely \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’, \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’, and \textitbf{saja} ‘just’. This is demonstrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_5.182}) to (\ref{Example_5.184}). (As shown in (\ref{Example_5.181}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ can its gloss ___ take a prepredicate position.) In clauses with peripheral adjuncts, the three adverbs can directly follow the predicate, such as the first \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ token in (\ref{Example_5.182}) and \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_5.183}). Alternatively, they can follow the adjunct, such as the second \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ token in (\ref{Example_5.182}) and \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_5.184}). Focus ad\isi{verb} \textitbf{saja} ‘just’ has the same distributional properties as \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’. The semantics expressed with the different positions again have to do with scope.
A: word: mulay	 gloss: start
B: word: selaing	 gloss: besides
C: word: tugas	 gloss: duty
D: word: juga	 gloss: also
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 310:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de kembali ___ ke Papua
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG return ___ to Papua
The English translation of this sentence is:‘he came back again to Papua’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Three focus adverbs take a postpredicate position, namely \textitbf{juga} ‘also’, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, also’, and \textitbf{saja} ‘just’. This is demonstrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_5.182}) to (\ref{Example_5.184}). (As shown in (\ref{Example_5.181}), \textitbf{juga} ‘also’ can also take a prepredicate position.) In clauses with peripheral adjuncts, the three adverbs can directly follow the predicate, such as the first \textitbf{juga} ‘also’ token in (\ref{Example_5.182}) and \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, also’ in (\ref{Example_5.183}). Alternatively, they can follow the adjunct, such as the second \textitbf{juga} ‘also’ token in (\ref{Example_5.182}) and \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, also’ in (\ref{Example_5.184}). Focus ad\isi{verb} \textitbf{saja} ‘just’ has the same distributional properties as \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___, also’. The semantics expressed with the different positions its gloss ___ have to do with scope.
A: word: akirnya	 gloss: finally
B: word: lagi	 gloss: again
C: word: natanael	 gloss: Natanael
D: word: daging	 gloss: meat
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 311:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dari} {sini} {deng} {Papua-Lima,} {kembali} ___ deng {Papua-Lima} ... ke sana deng Papua-Lima kembali deng Papua-Lima juga
Gloss (with missing item): from L.PROX with Papua-Lima return ___ with Papua-Lima ... to L.DIST with Papua-Lima return with Papua-Lima also
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(I’ll leave) from here with the Papua-Lima (ship) and return also with the Papua-Lima (ship) ... (I’ll get) over there with the Papua-Lima (ship and) return with the Papua-Lima (ship) also’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Three focus adverbs take a postpredicate position, namely \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’, \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’, and \textitbf{saja} ‘just’. This is demonstrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_5.182}) to (\ref{Example_5.184}). (As shown in (\ref{Example_5.181}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ can its gloss ___ take a prepredicate position.) In clauses with peripheral adjuncts, the three adverbs can directly follow the predicate, such as the first \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ token in (\ref{Example_5.182}) and \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_5.183}). Alternatively, they can follow the adjunct, such as the second \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ token in (\ref{Example_5.182}) and \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_5.184}). Focus ad\isi{verb} \textitbf{saja} ‘just’ has the same distributional properties as \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’. The semantics expressed with the different positions again have to do with scope.
A: word: bagemana	 gloss: how
B: word: selaing	 gloss: besides
C: word: tugas	 gloss: duty
D: word: juga	 gloss: also
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 312:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): {dari} {sini} {deng} {Papua-Lima,} {kembali} {juga} deng {Papua-Lima} ... ke sana deng Papua-Lima kembali deng Papua-Lima ___
Gloss (with missing item): from L.PROX with Papua-Lima return also with Papua-Lima ... to L.DIST with Papua-Lima return with Papua-Lima ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘(I’ll leave) from here with the Papua-Lima (ship) and return also with the Papua-Lima (ship) ... (I’ll get) over there with the Papua-Lima (ship and) return with the Papua-Lima (ship) also’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Three focus adverbs take a postpredicate position, namely \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’, \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’, and \textitbf{saja} ‘just’. This is demonstrated with the examples in (\ref{Example_5.182}) to (\ref{Example_5.184}). (As shown in (\ref{Example_5.181}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ can its gloss ___ take a prepredicate position.) In clauses with peripheral adjuncts, the three adverbs can directly follow the predicate, such as the first \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ token in (\ref{Example_5.182}) and \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_5.183}). Alternatively, they can follow the adjunct, such as the second \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ token in (\ref{Example_5.182}) and \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’ in (\ref{Example_5.184}). Focus ad\isi{verb} \textitbf{saja} ‘just’ has the same distributional properties as \textitbf{lagi} ‘again, its gloss ___’. The semantics expressed with the different positions again have to do with scope.
A: word: selaing	 gloss: besides
B: word: juga	 gloss: also
C: word: tugas	 gloss: duty
D: word: ruma	 gloss: house
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B