cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 441:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): e, ___ suru kam minum~minum di sini?
Gloss (with missing item): hey ___ order 2PL RDP~drink at L.PROX
The English translation of this sentence is:‘hey, who told you to keep drinking here’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In its pronominal uses, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ occurs in all syntactic positions, as shown (\ref{Example_5.233}) to (\ref{Example_5.240}), typically remaining in-situ. In the \isi{verbal clause} in (\ref{Example_5.233}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ takes the subject slot. In the corpus, however, verbal clauses with \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ in the subject slot are rare. Typically, speakers use equative nominal clauses when they want to question the identity of the clausal subject. In such nonverbal clauses, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ takes the subject slot while a headless relative clause takes the predicate slot. This is shown with the elicited contrastive example in (\ref{Example_5.234}). In this equative clause, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ is the subject, while the headless relative clause \textitbf{yang suru {\ldots}} ‘(the one) its gloss ___ ordered {\ldots}’ is the predicate. Likewise in (\ref{Example_5.235}), the \isi{interrogative} takes the subject slot while the headless relative clause \textitbf{yang datang {\ldots}} ‘(the one) its gloss ___ came {\ldots}’ takes the predicate slot.\footnote{\label{Footnote_5.168} Alternatively, as one anonymous reviewer points out, one could argue that in (\ref{Example_5.234}) and (\ref{Example_5.235}) the typical subject-predicate word order is inverted and that \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ does not take the subject but the predicate slot, whereas the relative clause introduced with \textitbf{yang} ‘\textsc{rel}’ takes the subject slot.
A: word: tinggal	 gloss: stay
B: word: siapa~siapa	 gloss: RDP~who
C: word: siapa	 gloss: who
D: word: mantang	 gloss: former
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 442:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ pu mata yang buta?
Gloss (with missing item): ___ POSS eye REL be.blind
The English translation of this sentence is:‘whose eyes are blind?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In its pronominal uses, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ occurs in all syntactic positions, as shown (\ref{Example_5.233}) to (\ref{Example_5.240}), typically remaining in-situ. In the \isi{verbal clause} in (\ref{Example_5.233}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ takes the subject slot. In the corpus, however, verbal clauses with \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ in the subject slot are rare. Typically, speakers use equative nominal clauses when they want to question the identity of the clausal subject. In such nonverbal clauses, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ takes the subject slot while a headless relative clause takes the predicate slot. This is shown with the elicited contrastive example in (\ref{Example_5.234}). In this equative clause, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ is the subject, while the headless relative clause \textitbf{yang suru {\ldots}} ‘(the one) its gloss ___ ordered {\ldots}’ is the predicate. Likewise in (\ref{Example_5.235}), the \isi{interrogative} takes the subject slot while the headless relative clause \textitbf{yang datang {\ldots}} ‘(the one) its gloss ___ came {\ldots}’ takes the predicate slot.\footnote{\label{Footnote_5.168} Alternatively, as one anonymous reviewer points out, one could argue that in (\ref{Example_5.234}) and (\ref{Example_5.235}) the typical subject-predicate word order is inverted and that \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ does not take the subject but the predicate slot, whereas the relative clause introduced with \textitbf{yang} ‘\textsc{rel}’ takes the subject slot.
A: word: siapa	 gloss: who
B: word: mantang	 gloss: former
C: word: barat	 gloss: west
D: word: siapa~siapa	 gloss: RDP~who
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 443:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): siapa ___ mata yang buta?
Gloss (with missing item): who ___ eye REL be.blind
The English translation of this sentence is:‘whose eyes are blind?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In its pronominal uses, \textitbf{siapa} ‘who’ occurs in all syntactic positions, as shown (\ref{Example_5.233}) to (\ref{Example_5.240}), typically remaining in-situ. In the \isi{verbal clause} in (\ref{Example_5.233}), \textitbf{siapa} ‘who’ takes the subject slot. In the corthe morpheme ___s, however, verbal clauses with \textitbf{siapa} ‘who’ in the subject slot are rare. Typically, speakers use equative nominal clauses when they want to question the identity of the clausal subject. In such nonverbal clauses, \textitbf{siapa} ‘who’ takes the subject slot while a headless relative clause takes the predicate slot. This is shown with the elicited contrastive example in (\ref{Example_5.234}). In this equative clause, \textitbf{siapa} ‘who’ is the subject, while the headless relative clause \textitbf{yang suru {\ldots}} ‘(the one) who ordered {\ldots}’ is the predicate. Likewise in (\ref{Example_5.235}), the \isi{interrogative} takes the subject slot while the headless relative clause \textitbf{yang datang {\ldots}} ‘(the one) who came {\ldots}’ takes the predicate slot.\footnote{\label{Footnote_5.168} Alternatively, as one anonymous reviewer points out, one could argue that in (\ref{Example_5.234}) and (\ref{Example_5.235}) the typical subject-predicate word order is inverted and that \textitbf{siapa} ‘who’ does not take the subject but the predicate slot, whereas the relative clause introduced with \textitbf{yang} ‘\textsc{rel}’ takes the subject slot.
A: word: gendong	 gloss: hold
B: word: pu	 gloss: POSS
C: word: hendro	 gloss: POSSR
D: word: pukul	 gloss: hit
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 444:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): e, ___ suru kam minum~minum di sini?
Gloss (with missing item): hey ___ order 2PL RDP~drink at L.PROX
The English translation of this sentence is:‘hey, who told you to keep drinking here’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In its pronominal uses, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ occurs in all syntactic positions, as shown (\ref{Example_5.233}) to (\ref{Example_5.240}), typically remaining in-situ. In the \isi{verbal clause} in (\ref{Example_5.233}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ takes the subject slot. In the corpus, however, verbal clauses with \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ in the subject slot are rare. Typically, speakers use equative nominal clauses when they want to question the identity of the clausal subject. In such nonverbal clauses, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ takes the subject slot while a headless relative clause takes the predicate slot. This is shown with the elicited contrastive example in (\ref{Example_5.234}). In this equative clause, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ is the subject, while the headless relative clause \textitbf{yang suru {\ldots}} ‘(the one) its gloss ___ ordered {\ldots}’ is the predicate. Likewise in (\ref{Example_5.235}), the \isi{interrogative} takes the subject slot while the headless relative clause \textitbf{yang datang {\ldots}} ‘(the one) its gloss ___ came {\ldots}’ takes the predicate slot.\footnote{\label{Footnote_5.168} Alternatively, as one anonymous reviewer points out, one could argue that in (\ref{Example_5.234}) and (\ref{Example_5.235}) the typical subject-predicate word order is inverted and that \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ does not take the subject but the predicate slot, whereas the relative clause introduced with \textitbf{yang} ‘\textsc{rel}’ takes the subject slot.
A: word: siapa~siapa	 gloss: RDP~who
B: word: mantang	 gloss: former
C: word: ayo	 gloss: come.on!
D: word: siapa	 gloss: who
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 445:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): e, ___ yang suru kam minum~minum di sini?
Gloss (with missing item): hey ___ REL order 2PL RDP~drink at L.PROX
The English translation of this sentence is:‘hey, who (is the one) who told you to keep drinking here’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In its pronominal uses, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ occurs in all syntactic positions, as shown (\ref{Example_5.233}) to (\ref{Example_5.240}), typically remaining in-situ. In the \isi{verbal clause} in (\ref{Example_5.233}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ takes the subject slot. In the corpus, however, verbal clauses with \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ in the subject slot are rare. Typically, speakers use equative nominal clauses when they want to question the identity of the clausal subject. In such nonverbal clauses, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ takes the subject slot while a headless relative clause takes the predicate slot. This is shown with the elicited contrastive example in (\ref{Example_5.234}). In this equative clause, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ is the subject, while the headless relative clause \textitbf{yang suru {\ldots}} ‘(the one) its gloss ___ ordered {\ldots}’ is the predicate. Likewise in (\ref{Example_5.235}), the \isi{interrogative} takes the subject slot while the headless relative clause \textitbf{yang datang {\ldots}} ‘(the one) its gloss ___ came {\ldots}’ takes the predicate slot.\footnote{\label{Footnote_5.168} Alternatively, as one anonymous reviewer points out, one could argue that in (\ref{Example_5.234}) and (\ref{Example_5.235}) the typical subject-predicate word order is inverted and that \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ does not take the subject but the predicate slot, whereas the relative clause introduced with \textitbf{yang} ‘\textsc{rel}’ takes the subject slot.
A: word: mantang	 gloss: former
B: word: siapa	 gloss: who
C: word: siapa~siapa	 gloss: RDP~who
D: word: mara	 gloss: feel.angry(.about)
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 446:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ yang datang jemput saya?
Gloss (with missing item): ___ REL come pick.up 1SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘who (is the one) who came (and) picked me up?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In its pronominal uses, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ occurs in all syntactic positions, as shown (\ref{Example_5.233}) to (\ref{Example_5.240}), typically remaining in-situ. In the \isi{verbal clause} in (\ref{Example_5.233}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ takes the subject slot. In the corpus, however, verbal clauses with \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ in the subject slot are rare. Typically, speakers use equative nominal clauses when they want to question the identity of the clausal subject. In such nonverbal clauses, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ takes the subject slot while a headless relative clause takes the predicate slot. This is shown with the elicited contrastive example in (\ref{Example_5.234}). In this equative clause, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ is the subject, while the headless relative clause \textitbf{yang suru {\ldots}} ‘(the one) its gloss ___ ordered {\ldots}’ is the predicate. Likewise in (\ref{Example_5.235}), the \isi{interrogative} takes the subject slot while the headless relative clause \textitbf{yang datang {\ldots}} ‘(the one) its gloss ___ came {\ldots}’ takes the predicate slot.\footnote{\label{Footnote_5.168} Alternatively, as one anonymous reviewer points out, one could argue that in (\ref{Example_5.234}) and (\ref{Example_5.235}) the typical subject-predicate word order is inverted and that \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ does not take the subject but the predicate slot, whereas the relative clause introduced with \textitbf{yang} ‘\textsc{rel}’ takes the subject slot.
A: word: mantang	 gloss: former
B: word: slasa	 gloss: Tuesday
C: word: siapa	 gloss: who
D: word: siapa~siapa	 gloss: RDP~who
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 447:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): e, ___ yang suru kam minum~minum di sini?
Gloss (with missing item): hey ___ REL order 2PL RDP~drink at L.PROX
The English translation of this sentence is:‘hey, who (is the one) who told you to keep drinking here’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In its pronominal uses, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ occurs in all syntactic positions, as shown (\ref{Example_5.233}) to (\ref{Example_5.240}), typically remaining in-situ. In the \isi{verbal clause} in (\ref{Example_5.233}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ takes the subject slot. In the corpus, however, verbal clauses with \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ in the subject slot are rare. Typically, speakers use equative nominal clauses when they want to question the identity of the clausal subject. In such nonverbal clauses, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ takes the subject slot while a headless relative clause takes the predicate slot. This is shown with the elicited contrastive example in (\ref{Example_5.234}). In this equative clause, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ is the subject, while the headless relative clause \textitbf{yang suru {\ldots}} ‘(the one) its gloss ___ ordered {\ldots}’ is the predicate. Likewise in (\ref{Example_5.235}), the \isi{interrogative} takes the subject slot while the headless relative clause \textitbf{yang datang {\ldots}} ‘(the one) its gloss ___ came {\ldots}’ takes the predicate slot.\footnote{\label{Footnote_5.168} Alternatively, as one anonymous reviewer points out, one could argue that in (\ref{Example_5.234}) and (\ref{Example_5.235}) the typical subject-predicate word order is inverted and that \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ does not take the subject but the predicate slot, whereas the relative clause introduced with \textitbf{yang} ‘\textsc{rel}’ takes the subject slot.
A: word: baru	 gloss: and.then
B: word: siapa	 gloss: who
C: word: siapa~siapa	 gloss: RDP~who
D: word: mantang	 gloss: former
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 448:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ yang datang jemput saya?
Gloss (with missing item): ___ REL come pick.up 1SG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘who (is the one) who came (and) picked me up?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In its pronominal uses, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ occurs in all syntactic positions, as shown (\ref{Example_5.233}) to (\ref{Example_5.240}), typically remaining in-situ. In the \isi{verbal clause} in (\ref{Example_5.233}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ takes the subject slot. In the corpus, however, verbal clauses with \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ in the subject slot are rare. Typically, speakers use equative nominal clauses when they want to question the identity of the clausal subject. In such nonverbal clauses, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ takes the subject slot while a headless relative clause takes the predicate slot. This is shown with the elicited contrastive example in (\ref{Example_5.234}). In this equative clause, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ is the subject, while the headless relative clause \textitbf{yang suru {\ldots}} ‘(the one) its gloss ___ ordered {\ldots}’ is the predicate. Likewise in (\ref{Example_5.235}), the \isi{interrogative} takes the subject slot while the headless relative clause \textitbf{yang datang {\ldots}} ‘(the one) its gloss ___ came {\ldots}’ takes the predicate slot.\footnote{\label{Footnote_5.168} Alternatively, as one anonymous reviewer points out, one could argue that in (\ref{Example_5.234}) and (\ref{Example_5.235}) the typical subject-predicate word order is inverted and that \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ does not take the subject but the predicate slot, whereas the relative clause introduced with \textitbf{yang} ‘\textsc{rel}’ takes the subject slot.
A: word: siapa	 gloss: who
B: word: siapa~siapa	 gloss: RDP~who
C: word: mantang	 gloss: former
D: word: besar	 gloss: be.big
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 449:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): dong cari ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL search ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘for whom are they looking?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Interrogative \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ also takes non-subject slots. In (\ref{Example_5.236}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ takes the direct object slot in a mono\isi{transitive clause}, in (\ref{Example_5.237}) a direct object slot in a \isi{double-object} construction, in (\ref{Example_5.238}) the oblique object slot, and in (\ref{Example_5.239}) the peripheral adjunct slot.\footnote{Alternatively, one could argue that in (\ref{Example_5.238}) \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ does not take an oblique object but an adjunct slot.} In addition, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ questions the possessor’s identity in adnominal possessive constructions, as in (\ref{Example_5.240}).
A: word: mantang	 gloss: former
B: word: siapa	 gloss: who
C: word: siapa~siapa	 gloss: RDP~who
D: word: mara	 gloss: feel.angry(.about)
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 450:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kwe mo pi kasi ___ di sana?
Gloss (with missing item): cake want go give ___ at L.DIST
The English translation of this sentence is:‘as for the cake, to whom do (you) want to go and give (it) over there?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Interrogative \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ also takes non-subject slots. In (\ref{Example_5.236}), \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ takes the direct object slot in a mono\isi{transitive clause}, in (\ref{Example_5.237}) a direct object slot in a \isi{double-object} construction, in (\ref{Example_5.238}) the oblique object slot, and in (\ref{Example_5.239}) the peripheral adjunct slot.\footnote{Alternatively, one could argue that in (\ref{Example_5.238}) \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ does not take an oblique object but an adjunct slot.} In addition, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ questions the possessor’s identity in adnominal possessive constructions, as in (\ref{Example_5.240}).
A: word: siapa~siapa	 gloss: RDP~who
B: word: bawa	 gloss: bring
C: word: siapa	 gloss: who
D: word: mantang	 gloss: former
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C