cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 516:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ kitong mo dapat uang?
Gloss (with missing item): ___ 1PL want get money
The English translation of this sentence is:‘how are we going to get money?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In its pronominal uses, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ can remain in-situ, in the unmarked clause-final position, or can occur in the marked clause-initial position. In the clause-final position, the \isi{interrogative} questions the specific manner of an event or activity such as the best way of transporting a pig in (\ref{Example_5.265}). In the clause-initial position, the scope of \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ is larger. Here it questions an entire proposition, as in (\ref{Example_5.266}) and (\ref{Example_5.267}), and not only a specific manner, as in (\ref{Example_5.265}). The example in (\ref{Example_5.267}) also sits gloss ___s that, depending on the context, fronted \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ also question reasons.
A: word: timur	 gloss: east
B: word: apa	 gloss: what
C: word: mana	 gloss: where
D: word: bagemana	 gloss: how
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 517:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de tanya juga, ___ ko bisa kasi ana ini?
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG ask also ___ 2SG be.able give child D.PROX
The English translation of this sentence is:[About bride-price children:] ‘she also asked (me), ``how can you give this child (of yours away)?'''
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In its pronominal uses, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ can remain in-situ, in the unmarked clause-final position, or can occur in the marked clause-initial position. In the clause-final position, the \isi{interrogative} questions the specific manner of an event or activity such as the best way of transporting a pig in (\ref{Example_5.265}). In the clause-initial position, the scope of \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ is larger. Here it questions an entire proposition, as in (\ref{Example_5.266}) and (\ref{Example_5.267}), and not only a specific manner, as in (\ref{Example_5.265}). The example in (\ref{Example_5.267}) also sits gloss ___s that, depending on the context, fronted \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ also question reasons.
A: word: bagemana	 gloss: how
B: word: apa	 gloss: what
C: word: mana	 gloss: where
D: word: pasti	 gloss: definitely
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 518:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... adu, babi ni sa harus angkat ___
Gloss (with missing item): ... oh.no! pig D.PROX 1SG have.to lift ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘[the pig was very big, I alone could not transport it, I thought,] ``oh no!, this pig, how am I going to transport it?'''
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In its pronominal uses, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ can remain in-situ, in the unmarked clause-final position, or can occur in the marked clause-initial position. In the clause-final position, the \isi{interrogative} questions the specific manner of an event or activity such as the best way of transporting a pig in (\ref{Example_5.265}). In the clause-initial position, the scope of \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ is larger. Here it questions an entire proposition, as in (\ref{Example_5.266}) and (\ref{Example_5.267}), and not only a specific manner, as in (\ref{Example_5.265}). The example in (\ref{Example_5.267}) also sits gloss ___s that, depending on the context, fronted \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ also question reasons.
A: word: bagemana	 gloss: how
B: word: mana	 gloss: where
C: word: mulay	 gloss: start
D: word: apa	 gloss: what
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 519:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): de tanya juga, ___ ko bisa kasi ana ini?
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG ask also ___ 2SG be.able give child D.PROX
The English translation of this sentence is:[About bride-price children:] ‘she also asked (me), ``how can you give this child (of yours away)?'''
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In its pronominal uses, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ can remain in-situ, in the unmarked clause-final position, or can occur in the marked clause-initial position. In the clause-final position, the \isi{interrogative} questions the specific manner of an event or activity such as the best way of transporting a pig in (\ref{Example_5.265}). In the clause-initial position, the scope of \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ is larger. Here it questions an entire proposition, as in (\ref{Example_5.266}) and (\ref{Example_5.267}), and not only a specific manner, as in (\ref{Example_5.265}). The example in (\ref{Example_5.267}) also sits gloss ___s that, depending on the context, fronted \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ also question reasons.
A: word: ceritra	 gloss: tell
B: word: apa	 gloss: what
C: word: mana	 gloss: where
D: word: bagemana	 gloss: how
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 520:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): dong tida taw itu, Yesus itu, injil itu ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL NEG know D.DIST Jesus D.DIST Gospel D.DIST ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘they don’t know, what’s-his-name, Jesus, (they don’t know) what the Gospel (is like)’ (Lit. ‘the gospel is how?’)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When used predicatively, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ can remain in-situ, as in (\ref{Example_5.268}) and (\ref{Example_5.270}), or can be fronted, as in (\ref{Example_5.269}) and (\ref{Example_5.271}). Similar to the predicative uses of the interrogatives discussed in the previous sections, the clause-final in-situ position is the unmarked one where the \isi{interrogative} is less prominent in comparison to the clause-initial subject, as sits gloss ___n in (\ref{Example_5.268}). When placed in the marked clause-initial position, by contrast, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ accentuates the questioning of the subject’s circumstance, as in (\ref{Example_5.269}). In addition, predicatively used \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ inquires about the well-being of one’s interlocutor(s) as in (\ref{Example_5.270}) and (\ref{Example_5.271}).
A: word: bagemana	 gloss: how
B: word: apa	 gloss: what
C: word: mana	 gloss: where
D: word: ceritra	 gloss: tell
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 521:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): yo, ko Herman ___
Gloss (with missing item): yes 2SG Herman ___
The English translation of this sentence is:[Greeting a visitor:] ‘yes, how are you, Herman?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When used predicatively, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ can remain in-situ, as in (\ref{Example_5.268}) and (\ref{Example_5.270}), or can be fronted, as in (\ref{Example_5.269}) and (\ref{Example_5.271}). Similar to the predicative uses of the interrogatives discussed in the previous sections, the clause-final in-situ position is the unmarked one where the \isi{interrogative} is less prominent in comparison to the clause-initial subject, as sits gloss ___n in (\ref{Example_5.268}). When placed in the marked clause-initial position, by contrast, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ accentuates the questioning of the subject’s circumstance, as in (\ref{Example_5.269}). In addition, predicatively used \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ inquires about the well-being of one’s interlocutor(s) as in (\ref{Example_5.270}) and (\ref{Example_5.271}).
A: word: dua~dua	 gloss: RDP~two
B: word: bagemana	 gloss: how
C: word: mana	 gloss: where
D: word: apa	 gloss: what
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 522:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... susa liat setang itu, ___ rupa setang
Gloss (with missing item): ... be.difficult see evil.spirit D.DIST ___ form evil.spirit
The English translation of this sentence is:[About evil spirits:] ‘[but for us who ... already believe in Jesus, we can’t,] (for us) it is difficult to see that evil spirit, what the evil spirit’s face (is like)’ (Lit. ‘how (is) the evil spirit’s form?’)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When used predicatively, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ can remain in-situ, as in (\ref{Example_5.268}) and (\ref{Example_5.270}), or can be fronted, as in (\ref{Example_5.269}) and (\ref{Example_5.271}). Similar to the predicative uses of the interrogatives discussed in the previous sections, the clause-final in-situ position is the unmarked one where the \isi{interrogative} is less prominent in comparison to the clause-initial subject, as sits gloss ___n in (\ref{Example_5.268}). When placed in the marked clause-initial position, by contrast, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ accentuates the questioning of the subject’s circumstance, as in (\ref{Example_5.269}). In addition, predicatively used \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ inquires about the well-being of one’s interlocutor(s) as in (\ref{Example_5.270}) and (\ref{Example_5.271}).
A: word: bagemana	 gloss: how
B: word: apa	 gloss: what
C: word: ikang	 gloss: fish
D: word: mana	 gloss: where
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 523:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): eh, ___ ipar?, sore, dari Jayapura?
Gloss (with missing item): hey! ___ sibling-in-law afternoon from Jayapura
The English translation of this sentence is:[Greeting a visitor:] ‘hey, how (is it going) brother-in-law?, (good) afternoon! (did you just get here) from Jayapura?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When used predicatively, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ can remain in-situ, as in (\ref{Example_5.268}) and (\ref{Example_5.270}), or can be fronted, as in (\ref{Example_5.269}) and (\ref{Example_5.271}). Similar to the predicative uses of the interrogatives discussed in the previous sections, the clause-final in-situ position is the unmarked one where the \isi{interrogative} is less prominent in comparison to the clause-initial subject, as sits gloss ___n in (\ref{Example_5.268}). When placed in the marked clause-initial position, by contrast, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ accentuates the questioning of the subject’s circumstance, as in (\ref{Example_5.269}). In addition, predicatively used \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ inquires about the well-being of one’s interlocutor(s) as in (\ref{Example_5.270}) and (\ref{Example_5.271}).
A: word: mana	 gloss: where
B: word: bagemana	 gloss: how
C: word: apa	 gloss: what
D: word: kang	 gloss: you.know
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 524:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): dong tida taw itu, Yesus itu, injil itu ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3PL NEG know D.DIST Jesus D.DIST Gospel D.DIST ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘they don’t know, what’s-his-name, Jesus, (they don’t know) what the Gospel (is like)’ (Lit. ‘the gospel is how?’)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When used predicatively, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ can remain in-situ, as in (\ref{Example_5.268}) and (\ref{Example_5.270}), or can be fronted, as in (\ref{Example_5.269}) and (\ref{Example_5.271}). Similar to the predicative uses of the interrogatives discussed in the previous sections, the clause-final in-situ position is the unmarked one where the \isi{interrogative} is less prominent in comparison to the clause-initial subject, as sits gloss ___n in (\ref{Example_5.268}). When placed in the marked clause-initial position, by contrast, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ accentuates the questioning of the subject’s circumstance, as in (\ref{Example_5.269}). In addition, predicatively used \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ inquires about the well-being of one’s interlocutor(s) as in (\ref{Example_5.270}) and (\ref{Example_5.271}).
A: word: apa	 gloss: what
B: word: mana	 gloss: where
C: word: bagemana	 gloss: how
D: word: dari	 gloss: from
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 525:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ... susa liat setang itu, ___ rupa setang
Gloss (with missing item): ... be.difficult see evil.spirit D.DIST ___ form evil.spirit
The English translation of this sentence is:[About evil spirits:] ‘[but for us who ... already believe in Jesus, we can’t,] (for us) it is difficult to see that evil spirit, what the evil spirit’s face (is like)’ (Lit. ‘how (is) the evil spirit’s form?’)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When used predicatively, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ can remain in-situ, as in (\ref{Example_5.268}) and (\ref{Example_5.270}), or can be fronted, as in (\ref{Example_5.269}) and (\ref{Example_5.271}). Similar to the predicative uses of the interrogatives discussed in the previous sections, the clause-final in-situ position is the unmarked one where the \isi{interrogative} is less prominent in comparison to the clause-initial subject, as sits gloss ___n in (\ref{Example_5.268}). When placed in the marked clause-initial position, by contrast, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ accentuates the questioning of the subject’s circumstance, as in (\ref{Example_5.269}). In addition, predicatively used \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ inquires about the well-being of one’s interlocutor(s) as in (\ref{Example_5.270}) and (\ref{Example_5.271}).
A: word: mana	 gloss: where
B: word: tanta	 gloss: aunt
C: word: bagemana	 gloss: how
D: word: apa	 gloss: what
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 526:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): yo, ko Herman ___
Gloss (with missing item): yes 2SG Herman ___
The English translation of this sentence is:[Greeting a visitor:] ‘yes, how are you, Herman?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When used predicatively, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ can remain in-situ, as in (\ref{Example_5.268}) and (\ref{Example_5.270}), or can be fronted, as in (\ref{Example_5.269}) and (\ref{Example_5.271}). Similar to the predicative uses of the interrogatives discussed in the previous sections, the clause-final in-situ position is the unmarked one where the \isi{interrogative} is less prominent in comparison to the clause-initial subject, as sits gloss ___n in (\ref{Example_5.268}). When placed in the marked clause-initial position, by contrast, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ accentuates the questioning of the subject’s circumstance, as in (\ref{Example_5.269}). In addition, predicatively used \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ inquires about the well-being of one’s interlocutor(s) as in (\ref{Example_5.270}) and (\ref{Example_5.271}).
A: word: apa	 gloss: what
B: word: bagemana	 gloss: how
C: word: mana	 gloss: where
D: word: satu	 gloss: one
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 527:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): eh, ___ ipar?, sore, dari Jayapura?
Gloss (with missing item): hey! ___ sibling-in-law afternoon from Jayapura
The English translation of this sentence is:[Greeting a visitor:] ‘hey, how (is it going) brother-in-law?, (good) afternoon! (did you just get here) from Jayapura?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When used predicatively, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ can remain in-situ, as in (\ref{Example_5.268}) and (\ref{Example_5.270}), or can be fronted, as in (\ref{Example_5.269}) and (\ref{Example_5.271}). Similar to the predicative uses of the interrogatives discussed in the previous sections, the clause-final in-situ position is the unmarked one where the \isi{interrogative} is less prominent in comparison to the clause-initial subject, as sits gloss ___n in (\ref{Example_5.268}). When placed in the marked clause-initial position, by contrast, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ accentuates the questioning of the subject’s circumstance, as in (\ref{Example_5.269}). In addition, predicatively used \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ inquires about the well-being of one’s interlocutor(s) as in (\ref{Example_5.270}) and (\ref{Example_5.271}).
A: word: bagemana	 gloss: how
B: word: mana	 gloss: where
C: word: hampir	 gloss: almost
D: word: apa	 gloss: what
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 528:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): saya tanya saya punya bapa, ___
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG ask 1SG POSS father ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I asked my father, ``how (did this happen)?'''
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In one-word utterances, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ questions the circumstances of an event or state, as in (\ref{Example_5.273}), or signals lack of understanding as in (\ref{Example_5.274}).
A: word: apa	 gloss: what
B: word: dua	 gloss: two
C: word: mana	 gloss: where
D: word: bagemana	 gloss: how
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 529:
You are a linguist specializing in Papuan Malay. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ bagemana?
Gloss (with missing item): ___ how
The English translation of this sentence is:[During a phone conversation with a bad connection:] ‘what?, what?’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In one-word utterances, \textitbf{the morpheme ___} ‘its gloss ___’ questions the circumstances of an event or state, as in (\ref{Example_5.273}), or signals lack of understanding as in (\ref{Example_5.274}).
A: word: mana	 gloss: where
B: word: pak	 gloss: bang!
C: word: bagemana	 gloss: how
D: word: apa	 gloss: what
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C