cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 82:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ɡúum táa the róot-a ___ na róot-a ɡúum
Gloss (with missing item): go.PFV.MSG there to night-OBL ___ NEG night-OBL go.PFV.MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`He went there, during the night, not during the day.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \spitzmarke{Negation of subunits.} In the examples, so far, the entire predicate lies in the scope of the negation. But it is also possible to negate only a~phrase or a~subunit of a~clause, as in (\ref{ex:14-75})--(\ref{ex:14-77}). Here, however, the negated unit is especially marked or extraposed, and the negation does not occur in the ``regular'' immediately preverbal position, and therefore the scope of the negation has to be interpreted as narrowed down.
A: word: dees-óom	 gloss: day-OBL.PL
B: word: dees-á	 gloss: day-OBL
C: word: dees-á	 gloss: day-OBL
D: word: axpul-aán	 gloss: relative-PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 83:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ɡúum táa the róot-a dees-á ___ róot-a ɡúum
Gloss (with missing item): go.PFV.MSG there to night-OBL day-OBL ___ night-OBL go.PFV.MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`He went there, during the night, not during the day.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \spitzmarke{Negation of subunits.} In the examples, so far, the entire predicate lies in the scope of the negation. But it is also possible to negate only a~phrase or a~subunit of a~clause, as in (\ref{ex:14-75})--(\ref{ex:14-77}). Here, however, the negated unit is especially marked or extraposed, and the negation does not occur in the ``regular'' immediately preverbal position, and therefore the scope of the negation has to be interpreted as the morpheme ___rrowed down.
A: word: ɡhoóṣṭ	 gloss: house
B: word: na	 gloss: NEG
C: word: kháač-a	 gloss: bad-OBL
D: word: ǰinaazá	 gloss: corpse
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 84:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): eetás matíl-u seentá tasíi bi ɡhiíṛ bh-áan-u ___ na aksár dhruus-áan-a
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG.REM.ACC churn.PFV"=MSG CONDH 3SG.GEN also ghee become-PRS"=MSG ___ NEG often sip-PRS"=MPL
The English translation of this sentence is:`If that [liquid] is churned, it becomes ghee, but often that is not done, and [people actually] drink it.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \spitzmarke{Negation of subunits.} In the examples, so far, the entire predicate lies in the scope of the negation. But it is also possible to negate only a~phrase or a~subunit of a~clause, as in (\ref{ex:14-75})--(\ref{ex:14-77}). Here, however, the negated unit is especially marked or extraposed, and the negation does not occur in the ``regular'' immediately preverbal position, and therefore the scope of the negation has to be interpreted as narrowed down.
A: word: náqal	 gloss: copying
B: word: páak-a	 gloss: ripe-MPL
C: word: xušaán	 gloss: happy
D: word: xu	 gloss: but
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 85:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): eetás matíl-u seentá tasíi bi ɡhiíṛ bh-áan-u xu ___ aksár dhruus-áan-a
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG.REM.ACC churn.PFV"=MSG CONDH 3SG.GEN also ghee become-PRS"=MSG but ___ often sip-PRS"=MPL
The English translation of this sentence is:`If that [liquid] is churned, it becomes ghee, but often that is not done, and [people actually] drink it.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \spitzmarke{Negation of subunits.} In the examples, so far, the entire predicate lies in the scope of the negation. But it is also possible to negate only a~phrase or a~subunit of a~clause, as in (\ref{ex:14-75})--(\ref{ex:14-77}). Here, however, the negated unit is especially marked or extraposed, and the negation does not occur in the ``regular'' immediately preverbal position, and therefore the scope of the negation has to be interpreted as the morpheme ___rrowed down.
A: word: na	 gloss: NEG
B: word: heentá	 gloss: CONDL
C: word: túuri	 gloss: under
D: word: ǰinaazá	 gloss: corpse
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 86:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): eetás matíl-u seentá tasíi bi ɡhiíṛ bh-áan-u xu na ___ dhruus-áan-a
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG.REM.ACC churn.PFV"=MSG CONDH 3SG.GEN also ghee become-PRS"=MSG but NEG ___ sip-PRS"=MPL
The English translation of this sentence is:`If that [liquid] is churned, it becomes ghee, but often that is not done, and [people actually] drink it.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \spitzmarke{Negation of subunits.} In the examples, so far, the entire predicate lies in the scope of the negation. But it is also possible to negate only a~phrase or a~subunit of a~clause, as in (\ref{ex:14-75})--(\ref{ex:14-77}). Here, however, the negated unit is especially marked or extraposed, and the negation does not occur in the ``regular'' immediately preverbal position, and therefore the scope of the negation has to be interpreted as narrowed down.
A: word: asár	 gloss: effect
B: word: ɡal-úum=ee	 gloss: throw-1SG=Q
C: word: aksár	 gloss: often
D: word: ziaát	 gloss: most
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 87:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): dúi ta ɡaṭíl-u áak ḍaaku"=aan-óom"=ii qilaá tíi ___ ɡaṭáa bhóol-u
Gloss (with missing item): other CNTR win.PFV"=MSG IDEF robber-PL"=OBL"=GEN fort 3SG.OBL ___ win.INF be.able.to.PFV"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`When he had won everything else, there was a~den of thieves that he could not capture.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \spitzmarke{Negation in complex constructions.} With one complex construction involving the modal bha- `be able to', already touched upon briefly above (see examples (\ref{ex:14-59})--(\ref{ex:14-61})), we observed that the negative particle tends to precede both the complement"=taking verb and the infinitival complement. This underlines the high degree of clause integration pointed out in \sectref{subsec:13-5-2}. Although it is in fact the ability that is negated, the negation occurs closest to what is formally the subordithe morpheme ___te verb, and it is not even possible to negate the subordithe morpheme ___te verb only.
A: word: ǰinaazá	 gloss: corpse
B: word: ziaát	 gloss: most
C: word: bh-áanu	 gloss: become-PRS"=MSG
D: word: na	 gloss: NEG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 88:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): patráak nikhái ___ bháam
Gloss (with missing item): back get.out.INF ___ be.able.to.1SG
The English translation of this sentence is:`I won't be able to get back out [of the well].'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \spitzmarke{Negation in complex constructions.} With one complex construction involving the modal bha- `be able to', already touched upon briefly above (see examples (\ref{ex:14-59})--(\ref{ex:14-61})), we observed that the negative particle tends to precede both the complement"=taking verb and the infinitival complement. This underlines the high degree of clause integration pointed out in \sectref{subsec:13-5-2}. Although it is in fact the ability that is negated, the negation occurs closest to what is formally the subordithe morpheme ___te verb, and it is not even possible to negate the subordithe morpheme ___te verb only.
A: word: na	 gloss: NEG
B: word: ǰinaazá	 gloss: corpse
C: word: šiiy-í	 gloss: fall-CV
D: word: bhoóy	 gloss: daughter"=in"=law
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 89:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): uc̣hí ba se čúti-m-e zaríia baándi so baṭ húṇṭraak c̣huɡal-áan-u ___ kúuk-a se muṭ-á bheš-aníi the na uṛ-áan-u mhaás khainíi the na uṛ-áan-u
Gloss (with missing item): lift.up.CV TOP DEF paw-PL"=GEN means by DEF.MSG.NOM stone upward hurl-PRS"=MSG ___ crow-PL DEF tree-OBL sit.down-VN to NEG let-PRS"=MSG meat eat.VN to NEG let-PRS"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`After picking them up, it was throwing the stones with the help of its paws, not allowing the crows to sit in the tree, not allowing them to eat the meat.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In other complex constructions, with a~Verbal Noun in the complement and where the bond is not quite so tight between the complement"=taking predicate and the verbal element of the complement, it is obvious that either of the two clauthe morpheme ___s can be negated, either that coded by the matrix verb, as in (\ref{ex:14-78}) and (\ref{ex:14-79}), or the one coded by the Verbal Noun, as in (\ref{ex:14-80}) and (\ref{ex:14-81}).
A: word: se	 gloss: DEF
B: word: uḍheewíl-i	 gloss: flee.PFV-F
C: word: ɡubáa	 gloss: what
D: word: seéb	 gloss: sir
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 90:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): uc̣hí ba se čúti-m-e zaríia baándi so baṭ húṇṭraak c̣huɡal-áan-u se ___ se muṭ-á bheš-aníi the na uṛ-áan-u mhaás khainíi the na uṛ-áan-u
Gloss (with missing item): lift.up.CV TOP DEF paw-PL"=GEN means by DEF.MSG.NOM stone upward hurl-PRS"=MSG DEF ___ DEF tree-OBL sit.down-VN to NEG let-PRS"=MSG meat eat.VN to NEG let-PRS"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`After picking them up, it was throwing the stones with the help of its paws, not allowing the crows to sit in the tree, not allowing them to eat the meat.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In other complex constructions, with a~Verbal Noun in the complement and where the bond is not quite so tight between the complement"=taking predicate and the verbal element of the complement, it is obvious that either of the two clauses can be negated, either that coded by the matrix verb, as in (\ref{ex:14-78}) and (\ref{ex:14-79}), or the one coded by the Verbal Noun, as in (\ref{ex:14-80}) and (\ref{ex:14-81}).
A: word: pahúrta	 gloss: after
B: word: kúuk-a	 gloss: crow-PL
C: word: atsareet-á	 gloss: Ashret-OBL
D: word: kúuk-e	 gloss: crow-GEN
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 91:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): uc̣hí ba se čúti-m-e zaríia baándi so baṭ húṇṭraak c̣huɡal-áan-u se kúuk-a ___ muṭ-á bheš-aníi the na uṛ-áan-u mhaás khainíi the na uṛ-áan-u
Gloss (with missing item): lift.up.CV TOP DEF paw-PL"=GEN means by DEF.MSG.NOM stone upward hurl-PRS"=MSG DEF crow-PL ___ tree-OBL sit.down-VN to NEG let-PRS"=MSG meat eat.VN to NEG let-PRS"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`After picking them up, it was throwing the stones with the help of its paws, not allowing the crows to sit in the tree, not allowing them to eat the meat.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In other complex constructions, with a~Verbal Noun in the complement and where the bond is not quite so tight between the complement"=taking predicate and the verbal element of the complement, it is obvious that either of the two clauthe morpheme ___s can be negated, either that coded by the matrix verb, as in (\ref{ex:14-78}) and (\ref{ex:14-79}), or the one coded by the Verbal Noun, as in (\ref{ex:14-80}) and (\ref{ex:14-81}).
A: word: se	 gloss: DEF
B: word: muṭ-á	 gloss: tree-OBL
C: word: hairán	 gloss: surprised
D: word: seéb	 gloss: sir
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 92:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): uc̣hí ba se čúti-m-e zaríia baándi so baṭ húṇṭraak c̣huɡal-áan-u se kúuk-a se ___ bheš-aníi the na uṛ-áan-u mhaás khainíi the na uṛ-áan-u
Gloss (with missing item): lift.up.CV TOP DEF paw-PL"=GEN means by DEF.MSG.NOM stone upward hurl-PRS"=MSG DEF crow-PL DEF ___ sit.down-VN to NEG let-PRS"=MSG meat eat.VN to NEG let-PRS"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`After picking them up, it was throwing the stones with the help of its paws, not allowing the crows to sit in the tree, not allowing them to eat the meat.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In other complex constructions, with a~Verbal Noun in the complement and where the bond is not quite so tight between the complement"=taking predicate and the verbal element of the complement, it is obvious that either of the two clauses can be negated, either that coded by the matrix verb, as in (\ref{ex:14-78}) and (\ref{ex:14-79}), or the one coded by the Verbal Noun, as in (\ref{ex:14-80}) and (\ref{ex:14-81}).
A: word: muṭ	 gloss: tree
B: word: náin-u	 gloss: NEG.be.PRS"=MSG
C: word: muṭ-á	 gloss: tree-OBL
D: word: loomuṭ-á	 gloss: deodar.tree-OBL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 93:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): uc̣hí ba se čúti-m-e zaríia baándi so baṭ húṇṭraak c̣huɡal-áan-u se kúuk-a se muṭ-á ___ the na uṛ-áan-u mhaás khainíi the na uṛ-áan-u
Gloss (with missing item): lift.up.CV TOP DEF paw-PL"=GEN means by DEF.MSG.NOM stone upward hurl-PRS"=MSG DEF crow-PL DEF tree-OBL ___ to NEG let-PRS"=MSG meat eat.VN to NEG let-PRS"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`After picking them up, it was throwing the stones with the help of its paws, not allowing the crows to sit in the tree, not allowing them to eat the meat.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In other complex constructions, with a~Verbal Noun in the complement and where the bond is not quite so tight between the complement"=taking predicate and the verbal element of the complement, it is obvious that either of the two clauses can be negated, either that coded by the matrix verb, as in (\ref{ex:14-78}) and (\ref{ex:14-79}), or the one coded by the Verbal Noun, as in (\ref{ex:14-80}) and (\ref{ex:14-81}).
A: word: bheš-aníi	 gloss: sit.down-VN
B: word: típa	 gloss: now
C: word: bhéš-a	 gloss: sit.down-3SG
D: word: bheš-ainií	 gloss: sit.down-VN
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 94:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): uc̣hí ba se čúti-m-e zaríia baándi so baṭ húṇṭraak c̣huɡal-áan-u se kúuk-a se muṭ-á bheš-aníi ___ na uṛ-áan-u mhaás khainíi the na uṛ-áan-u
Gloss (with missing item): lift.up.CV TOP DEF paw-PL"=GEN means by DEF.MSG.NOM stone upward hurl-PRS"=MSG DEF crow-PL DEF tree-OBL sit.down-VN ___ NEG let-PRS"=MSG meat eat.VN to NEG let-PRS"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`After picking them up, it was throwing the stones with the help of its paws, not allowing the crows to sit in the tree, not allowing them to eat the meat.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In othe morpheme ___r complex constructions, with a~Verbal Noun in the morpheme ___ complement and where the morpheme ___ bond is not quite so tight between the morpheme ___ complement"=taking predicate and the morpheme ___ verbal element of the morpheme ___ complement, it is obvious that eithe morpheme ___r of the morpheme ___ two clauses can be negated, eithe morpheme ___r that coded by the morpheme ___ matrix verb, as in (\ref{ex:14-78}) and (\ref{ex:14-79}), or the morpheme ___ one coded by the morpheme ___ Verbal Noun, as in (\ref{ex:14-80}) and (\ref{ex:14-81}).
A: word: wáǰa	 gloss: reason
B: word: the	 gloss: to
C: word: theníi-e	 gloss: do.VN"=GEN
D: word: khúna	 gloss: near.to
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 95:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): uc̣hí ba se čúti-m-e zaríia baándi so baṭ húṇṭraak c̣huɡal-áan-u se kúuk-a se muṭ-á bheš-aníi the na uṛ-áan-u ___ khainíi the na uṛ-áan-u
Gloss (with missing item): lift.up.CV TOP DEF paw-PL"=GEN means by DEF.MSG.NOM stone upward hurl-PRS"=MSG DEF crow-PL DEF tree-OBL sit.down-VN to NEG let-PRS"=MSG ___ eat.VN to NEG let-PRS"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`After picking them up, it was throwing the stones with the help of its paws, not allowing the crows to sit in the tree, not allowing them to eat the meat.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In other complex constructions, with a~Verbal Noun in the complement and where the bond is not quite so tight between the complement"=taking predicate and the verbal element of the complement, it is obvious that either of the two clauses can be negated, either that coded by the matrix verb, as in (\ref{ex:14-78}) and (\ref{ex:14-79}), or the one coded by the Verbal Noun, as in (\ref{ex:14-80}) and (\ref{ex:14-81}).
A: word: mhaas-á	 gloss: meat-PL
B: word: aḍaphará	 gloss: halfways
C: word: mhaás	 gloss: meat
D: word: mhaaranií	 gloss: kill.VN
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 96:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): uc̣hí ba se čúti-m-e zaríia baándi so baṭ húṇṭraak c̣huɡal-áan-u se kúuk-a se muṭ-á bheš-aníi the na uṛ-áan-u mhaás ___ the na uṛ-áan-u
Gloss (with missing item): lift.up.CV TOP DEF paw-PL"=GEN means by DEF.MSG.NOM stone upward hurl-PRS"=MSG DEF crow-PL DEF tree-OBL sit.down-VN to NEG let-PRS"=MSG meat ___ to NEG let-PRS"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`After picking them up, it was throwing the stones with the help of its paws, not allowing the crows to sit in the tree, not allowing them to eat the meat.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In other complex constructions, with a~Verbal Noun in the complement and where the bond is not quite so tight between the complement"=taking predicate and the verbal element of the complement, it is obvious that either of the two clauses can be negated, either that coded by the matrix verb, as in (\ref{ex:14-78}) and (\ref{ex:14-79}), or the one coded by the Verbal Noun, as in (\ref{ex:14-80}) and (\ref{ex:14-81}).
A: word: khainíi	 gloss: eat.VN
B: word: kh"=ainií	 gloss: eat-VN
C: word: whaí	 gloss: come.down.CV
D: word: man"=ainíi	 gloss: say-VN
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A