cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 722:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): asím so méeš ɡhašiǰíl-u ___ phará so kuṇaák ba atesée ɡhooṣṭ-á the phreyíl-u
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL.ERG DEF.MSG.NOM man be.caught.PFV"=MSG ___ along DEF.MSG.NOM child TOP 3SG.REM.GEN house-OBL to send.PFV"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`We sent the child to the house of the man who had been caught in the bazaar.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some data (\ref{ex:13-212})--(\ref{ex:13-214})) suggests the possibility of regular anaphoric (personal or demonstrative) pronouns being used in the modifying clause, whether preposed or postposed. The evidence, however, is too scanty to draw any definite conclusions. Suffice it to say that the positions being thus relativised are low on the accessibility hierarchy (postpositional object and possessor, respectively), which is fully in line with typological predictions (\citealt[147--148]{keenan1985}; \citealt[226]{andrews_relative2007}). On the other hand, we have examples of relativisation of recipient (\ref{ex:13-199}) as well as possessor (\ref{ex:13-200}) by gapping.
A: word: ǰumeet-í	 gloss: mosque-OBL
B: word: panaahí	 gloss: shelter
C: word: khaṭúur-a	 gloss: log-PL
D: word: baazúur-a	 gloss: bazaar-OBL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 723:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): asím so méeš ɡhašiǰíl-u baazúur-a ___ so kuṇaák ba atesée ɡhooṣṭ-á the phreyíl-u
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL.ERG DEF.MSG.NOM man be.caught.PFV"=MSG bazaar-OBL ___ DEF.MSG.NOM child TOP 3SG.REM.GEN house-OBL to send.PFV"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`We sent the child to the house of the man who had been caught in the bazaar.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some data (\ref{ex:13-212})--(\ref{ex:13-214})) suggests the possibility of regular anaphoric (personal or demonstrative) pronouns being used in the modifying clause, whether preposed or postposed. The evidence, however, is too scanty to draw any definite conclusions. Suffice it to say that the positions being thus relativised are low on the accessibility hierarchy (postpositional object and possessor, respectively), which is fully in line with typological predictions (\citealt[147--148]{keenan1985}; \citealt[226]{andrews_relative2007}). On the other hand, we have examples of relativisation of recipient (\ref{ex:13-199}) as well as possessor (\ref{ex:13-200}) by gapping.
A: word: phará	 gloss: along
B: word: katoolíi-a	 gloss: fodder.sack-OBL
C: word: thanaáu	 gloss: string
D: word: aḍaphará	 gloss: halfways
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 724:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ teeṇíi kili-á dít-i de eesó phoó phus bhíl-u hín-u
Gloss (with missing item): ___ REFL key-PL give.PFV-F PST REM.MSG.NOM boy diappeared become.PFV"=MSG be.PRS"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`The boy whom I gave my keys has disappeared.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some data (\ref{ex:13-212})--(\ref{ex:13-214})) suggests the possibility of regular anaphoric (personal or demonstrative) pronouns being used in the modifying clause, whether preposed or postposed. The evidence, however, is too scanty to draw any definite conclusions. Suffice it to say that the positions being thus relativised are low on the accessibility hierarchy (postpositional object and possessor, respectively), which is fully in line with typological predictions (\citealt[147--148]{keenan1985}; \citealt[226]{andrews_relative2007}). On the other hand, we have examples of relativisation of recipient (\ref{ex:13-199}) as well as possessor (\ref{ex:13-200}) by gapping.
A: word: thíi	 gloss: 2SG.GEN
B: word: míiš	 gloss: man
C: word: míi	 gloss: 1SG.GEN
D: word: nóo	 gloss: name
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 725:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): míi ___ kili-á dít-i de eesó phoó phus bhíl-u hín-u
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG.GEN ___ key-PL give.PFV-F PST REM.MSG.NOM boy diappeared become.PFV"=MSG be.PRS"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`The boy whom I gave my keys has disappeared.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some data (\ref{ex:13-212})--(\ref{ex:13-214})) suggests the possibility of regular anaphoric (personal or demonstrative) pronouns being used in the modifying clause, whether preposed or postposed. The evidence, however, is too scanty to draw any definite conclusions. Suffice it to say that the positions being thus relativised are low on the accessibility hierarchy (postpositional object and possessor, respectively), which is fully in line with typological predictions (\citealt[147--148]{keenan1985}; \citealt[226]{andrews_relative2007}). On the other hand, we have examples of relativisation of recipient (\ref{ex:13-199}) as well as possessor (\ref{ex:13-200}) by gapping.
A: word: teeṇíi	 gloss: REFL
B: word: teṇ-teeṇíi	 gloss: RED-REFL
C: word: čooṇṭéel-i	 gloss: embroider.PPTC-F
D: word: teeṇ-teeṇíi	 gloss: RED"=REFL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 726:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): míi teeṇíi ___ dít-i de eesó phoó phus bhíl-u hín-u
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG.GEN REFL ___ give.PFV-F PST REM.MSG.NOM boy diappeared become.PFV"=MSG be.PRS"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`The boy whom I gave my keys has disappeared.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some data (\ref{ex:13-212})--(\ref{ex:13-214})) suggests the possibility of regular anaphoric (personal or demonstrative) pronouns being used in the modifying clause, whether preposed or postposed. The evidence, however, is too scanty to draw any definite conclusions. Suffice it to say that the positions being thus relativised are low on the accessibility hierarchy (postpositional object and possessor, respectively), which is fully in line with typological predictions (\citealt[147--148]{keenan1985}; \citealt[226]{andrews_relative2007}). On the other hand, we have examples of relativisation of recipient (\ref{ex:13-199}) as well as possessor (\ref{ex:13-200}) by gapping.
A: word: atshareet-á	 gloss: Ashret-OBL
B: word: kili-á	 gloss: key-PL
C: word: dhii-á	 gloss: daughter-PL
D: word: xat-í	 gloss: letter-PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 727:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): míi teeṇíi kili-á ___ de eesó phoó phus bhíl-u hín-u
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG.GEN REFL key-PL ___ PST REM.MSG.NOM boy diappeared become.PFV"=MSG be.PRS"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`The boy whom I gave my keys has disappeared.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some data (\ref{ex:13-212})--(\ref{ex:13-214})) suggests the possibility of regular anaphoric (personal or demonstrative) pronouns being used in the modifying clause, whether preposed or postposed. The evidence, however, is too scanty to draw any definite conclusions. Suffice it to say that the positions being thus relativised are low on the accessibility hierarchy (postpositional object and possessor, respectively), which is fully in line with typological predictions (\citealt[147--148]{keenan1985}; \citealt[226]{andrews_relative2007}). On the other hand, we have examples of relativisation of recipient (\ref{ex:13-199}) as well as possessor (\ref{ex:13-200}) by gapping.
A: word: dít-ii	 gloss: give.PPTC"=GEN
B: word: séer-i=ee	 gloss: fine-F=Q
C: word: dít-i	 gloss: give.PFV-F
D: word: ṭék-a	 gloss: peak-OBL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 728:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): míi teeṇíi kili-á dít-i ___ eesó phoó phus bhíl-u hín-u
Gloss (with missing item): 1SG.GEN REFL key-PL give.PFV-F ___ REM.MSG.NOM boy diappeared become.PFV"=MSG be.PRS"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`The boy whom I gave my keys has disappeared.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some data (\ref{ex:13-212})--(\ref{ex:13-214})) suggests the possibility of regular anaphoric (personal or the morpheme ___monstrative) pronouns being used in the modifying clause, whether preposed or postposed. The evithe morpheme ___nce, however, is too scanty to draw any the morpheme ___finite conclusions. Suffice it to say that the positions being thus relativised are low on the accessibility hierarchy (postpositional object and possessor, respectively), which is fully in line with typological predictions (\citealt[147--148]{keenan1985}; \citealt[226]{andrews_relative2007}). On the other hand, we have examples of relativisation of recipient (\ref{ex:13-199}) as well as possessor (\ref{ex:13-200}) by gapping.
A: word: tuúš	 gloss: some
B: word: náhin-a	 gloss: NEG.be.PRS"=MPL
C: word: deeúl-ii	 gloss: Dir-GEN
D: word: de	 gloss: PST
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 729:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ heensíl-u heentá eesó ḍhínɡar aaindá dapáara nakaám bh-áan-u
Gloss (with missing item): ___ stay.PFV"=MSG CONDL REM.MSG.NOM timber future for failed become-PRS"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`Such timber that has knots will be worthless in the future.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some data (\ref{ex:13-212})--(\ref{ex:13-214})) suggests the possibility of regular anaphoric (personal or demonstrative) pronouns being used in the modifying clause, whether preposed or postposed. The evidence, however, is too scanty to draw any definite conclusions. Suffice it to say that the positions being thus relativised are low on the accessibility hierarchy (postpositional object and possessor, respectively), which is fully in line with typological predictions (\citealt[147--148]{keenan1985}; \citealt[226]{andrews_relative2007}). On the other hand, we have examples of relativisation of recipient (\ref{ex:13-199}) as well as possessor (\ref{ex:13-200}) by gapping.
A: word: áaṛu	 gloss: knot
B: word: asée	 gloss: 1PL.GEN
C: word: karáaṛu	 gloss: leopard
D: word: ráaǰ-a	 gloss: rope
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 730:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): áaṛu ___ heentá eesó ḍhínɡar aaindá dapáara nakaám bh-áan-u
Gloss (with missing item): knot ___ CONDL REM.MSG.NOM timber future for failed become-PRS"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`Such timber that has knots will be worthless in the future.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some data (\ref{ex:13-212})--(\ref{ex:13-214})) suggests the possibility of regular anaphoric (personal or demonstrative) pronouns being used in the modifying clause, whether preposed or postposed. The evidence, however, is too scanty to draw any definite conclusions. Suffice it to say that the positions being thus relativised are low on the accessibility hierarchy (postpositional object and possessor, respectively), which is fully in line with typological predictions (\citealt[147--148]{keenan1985}; \citealt[226]{andrews_relative2007}). On the other hand, we have examples of relativisation of recipient (\ref{ex:13-199}) as well as possessor (\ref{ex:13-200}) by gapping.
A: word: heensíl-a	 gloss: stay.PFV"=MPL
B: word: maṇḍáu	 gloss: veranda
C: word: heensíl-u	 gloss: stay.PFV"=MSG
D: word: deníi	 gloss: give.VN
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 731:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): áaṛu heensíl-u ___ eesó ḍhínɡar aaindá dapáara nakaám bh-áan-u
Gloss (with missing item): knot stay.PFV"=MSG ___ REM.MSG.NOM timber future for failed become-PRS"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`Such timber that has knots will be worthless in the future.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some data (\ref{ex:13-212})--(\ref{ex:13-214})) suggests the possibility of regular anaphoric (personal or demonstrative) pronouns being used in the modifying clause, whether preposed or postposed. The evidence, however, is too scanty to draw any definite conclusions. Suffice it to say that the positions being thus relativised are low on the accessibility hierarchy (postpositional object and possessor, respectively), which is fully in line with typological predictions (\citealt[147--148]{keenan1985}; \citealt[226]{andrews_relative2007}). On the other hand, we have examples of relativisation of recipient (\ref{ex:13-199}) as well as possessor (\ref{ex:13-200}) by gapping.
A: word: c̣híitr=ee	 gloss: field=CNJ
B: word: heentá	 gloss: CONDL
C: word: síinta	 gloss: CONDH
D: word: seentá	 gloss: CONDH
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 732:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): rhootašíi-a ___ har"=ainií waxt yhóol-u ta
Gloss (with missing item): morning-OBL ___ take.away-VN time come.PFV"=MSG SUB
The English translation of this sentence is:`In the morning, at the time of taking the bride{\ldots}'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: A less"=accessible noun phrase may be expressed through nominalisation, whereby a~Verbal Noun becomes the possessor of the relativised entity. This seems to be especially common with time, location and means, as seen in (\ref{ex:13-215})--(\ref{ex:13-218}). The genitive case of the Verbal Noun is only explicitly present in the B variety (-e), whereas the genitive has been levelled in A.
A: word: ɡhambúri-m	 gloss: flower-PL
B: word: kaná	 gloss: shoulder.OBL
C: word: ǰanǰ	 gloss: wedding.party
D: word: ǰhambréeṛi	 gloss: bride
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 733:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): rhootašíi-a ǰhambréeṛi ___ waxt yhóol-u ta
Gloss (with missing item): morning-OBL bride ___ time come.PFV"=MSG SUB
The English translation of this sentence is:`In the morning, at the time of taking the bride{\ldots}'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: A less"=accessible noun phrase may be expressed through nominalisation, whereby a~Verbal Noun becomes the possessor of the relativised entity. This seems to be especially common with time, location and means, as seen in (\ref{ex:13-215})--(\ref{ex:13-218}). The genitive case of the Verbal Noun is only explicitly present in the B variety (-e), whereas the genitive has been levelled in A.
A: word: mhaar"=ainií	 gloss: kill-VN
B: word: čhaál	 gloss: kid
C: word: saatainií	 gloss: take.care.VN
D: word: har"=ainií	 gloss: take.away-VN
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 734:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): phaí ___ háat"=am čooṇṭéel-i rumiaál dít-i hín-i
Gloss (with missing item): girl ___ hand-INS embroider.PPTC-F handkerchief give.PFV-F be.PRS-F
The English translation of this sentence is:`The girl gave [him] a handkerchief, which she had embroidered herself.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Less commonly, Perfective Participles may be used attributively, as in (\ref{ex:13-219})--(\ref{ex:13-221}), and in those cases, the participials relativise the direct object. As an~additional means of distinguishing the participle from the formally identical finite perfective verb, an~explicit (but optional) participial marker (also referred to as an~adjectiviser in this work), such as bhaáu in (\ref{ex:13-221}), can be used.
A: word: teeṇíi	 gloss: REFL
B: word: teeṇ-teeṇíi	 gloss: RED"=REFL
C: word: man"=ainií	 gloss: say-VN
D: word: teṇ-teeṇíi	 gloss: RED-REFL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 735:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): phaí teeṇíi ___ čooṇṭéel-i rumiaál dít-i hín-i
Gloss (with missing item): girl REFL ___ embroider.PPTC-F handkerchief give.PFV-F be.PRS-F
The English translation of this sentence is:`The girl gave [him] a handkerchief, which she had embroidered herself.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Less commonly, Perfective Participles may be used attributively, as in (\ref{ex:13-219})--(\ref{ex:13-221}), and in those cases, the participials relativise the direct object. As an~additional means of distinguishing the participle from the formally identical finite perfective verb, an~explicit (but optional) participial marker (also referred to as an~adjectiviser in this work), such as bhaáu in (\ref{ex:13-221}), can be used.
A: word: bhešóol-u	 gloss: sit.down.CAUS.PFV"=MSG
B: word: atsharíit"=am	 gloss: Ashreti-PL.OBL
C: word: háat"=am	 gloss: hand-INS
D: word: haát	 gloss: hand
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 736:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): phaí teeṇíi háat"=am ___ rumiaál dít-i hín-i
Gloss (with missing item): girl REFL hand-INS ___ handkerchief give.PFV-F be.PRS-F
The English translation of this sentence is:`The girl gave [him] a handkerchief, which she had embroidered herself.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Less commonly, Perfective Participles may be used attributively, as in (\ref{ex:13-219})--(\ref{ex:13-221}), and in those cases, the participials relativise the direct object. As an~additional means of distinguishing the participle from the formally identical finite perfective verb, an~explicit (but optional) participial marker (also referred to as an~adjectiviser in this work), such as bhaáu in (\ref{ex:13-221}), can be used.
A: word: ṣaawóol"=ii	 gloss: put.on.PPTC.MSG"=GEN
B: word: čooṇṭéel-im	 gloss: write.PFV"=FPL
C: word: čooṇṭéel-i	 gloss: embroider.PPTC-F
D: word: hiǰrát	 gloss: migration
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C