cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 706:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): so ɡiḍúuču paalawaáṇ so yambaáṭ ɡa ɡhin-í ___ de eesó na ṣandíl-u maní
Gloss (with missing item): DEF.MSG.NOM Dameli.man strong.man DEF mill.stone REL take-CV ___ PST 3MSG.REM.NOM NEG take.up.challenge.PFV"=MSG HSAY
The English translation of this sentence is:`The strong man of Damel, who used to walk with the millstone, apparently didn't take up the challenge'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In (\ref{ex:13-210}), the modifying string `who used to walk with the millstone' seems to function simultaneously as a~postposed non"=restrictive relative clause to `the Dameli strong man' and as a~preposed restrictive relative"=correlative clause to `that (one) didn't take up the challenge'.
A: word: b-íia	 gloss: go-1PL
B: word: bíi	 gloss: go.3SG
C: word: b-íi	 gloss: go-3SG
D: word: húuši	 gloss: wind
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 707:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): so ɡiḍúuču paalawaáṇ so yambaáṭ ɡa ɡhin-í b-íi ___ eesó na ṣandíl-u maní
Gloss (with missing item): DEF.MSG.NOM Dameli.man strong.man DEF mill.stone REL take-CV go-3SG ___ 3MSG.REM.NOM NEG take.up.challenge.PFV"=MSG HSAY
The English translation of this sentence is:`The strong man of Damel, who used to walk with the millstone, apparently didn't take up the challenge'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In (\ref{ex:13-210}), the modifying string `who used to walk with the millstone' seems to function simultaneously as a~postposed non"=restrictive relative clause to `the Dameli strong man' and as a~preposed restrictive relative"=correlative clause to `that (one) didn't take up the challenge'.
A: word: de	 gloss: PST
B: word: náhin-a	 gloss: NEG.be.PRS"=MPL
C: word: darwóoza	 gloss: door
D: word: deeúl-ii	 gloss: Dir-GEN
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 708:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): bhunaṛíi wée ___ šáali ṭópa dít-i šáali khéel-i
Gloss (with missing item): down.below.OBL in ___ Shali downside give.PFV-F Shali eat.PFV-F
The English translation of this sentence is:`Down there, the one that caught Shali ate her.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The modifying clause in (\ref{ex:13-211}), beginning with the morpheme ___, takes as a~whole the place of the transitive subject. Tentatively it is analysed as a (headless) internal relative clause.
A: word: ɡa	 gloss: REL
B: word: laahur-á	 gloss: Lahore-OBL
C: word: ɡaíl-u	 gloss: throw.PFV"=MSG
D: word: ninaám	 gloss: 3PL.PROX.ACC
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 709:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): bhunaṛíi wée ɡa ___ ṭópa dít-i šáali khéel-i
Gloss (with missing item): down.below.OBL in REL ___ downside give.PFV-F Shali eat.PFV-F
The English translation of this sentence is:`Down there, the one that caught Shali ate her.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The modifying clause in (\ref{ex:13-211}), beginning with ɡa, takes as a~whole the place of the transitive subject. Tentatively it is analysed as a (headless) internal relative clause.
A: word: šáali	 gloss: Shali
B: word: asíi	 gloss: 1PL.GEN
C: word: šišíi-e	 gloss: Shishi-GEN
D: word: zaalim"=aan-óom	 gloss: brute-PL"=OBL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 710:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): bhunaṛíi wée ɡa šáali ___ dít-i šáali khéel-i
Gloss (with missing item): down.below.OBL in REL Shali ___ give.PFV-F Shali eat.PFV-F
The English translation of this sentence is:`Down there, the one that caught Shali ate her.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The modifying clause in (\ref{ex:13-211}), beginning with ɡa, takes as a~whole the place of the transitive subject. Tentatively it is analysed as a (headless) internal relative clause.
A: word: th-éen	 gloss: do-3PL
B: word: ṭópa	 gloss: downside
C: word: páand-a	 gloss: path-OBL
D: word: dúu	 gloss: two
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 711:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): bhunaṛíi wée ɡa šáali ṭópa ___ šáali khéel-i
Gloss (with missing item): down.below.OBL in REL Shali downside ___ Shali eat.PFV-F
The English translation of this sentence is:`Down there, the one that caught Shali ate her.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The modifying clause in (\ref{ex:13-211}), beginning with ɡa, takes as a~whole the place of the transitive subject. Tentatively it is analysed as a (headless) internal relative clause.
A: word: dít-i	 gloss: give.PFV-F
B: word: kučúru	 gloss: dog
C: word: dít-ii	 gloss: give.PPTC"=GEN
D: word: adráx	 gloss: forest
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 712:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): anú ___ míi putr-á hanís the kitaáb dít-i hasó phoó
Gloss (with missing item): 3MSG.PROX.NOM ___ 1SG.GEN son-OBL 3SG.PROX.ACC to book give.PFV-F REM.MSG.NOM boy
The English translation of this sentence is:`This is the boy who my son gave a~book to yesterday.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some data (\ref{ex:13-212})--(\ref{ex:13-214})) suggests the possibility of regular anaphoric (personal or demonstrative) pronouns being used in the modifying clause, whether preposed or postposed. The evidence, however, is too scanty to draw any definite conclusions. Suffice it to say that the positions being thus relativised are low on the accessibility hierarchy (postpositional object and possessor, respectively), which is fully in line with typological predictions (\citealt[147--148]{keenan1985}; \citealt[226]{andrews_relative2007}). On the other hand, we have examples of relativisation of recipient (\ref{ex:13-199}) as well as possessor (\ref{ex:13-200}) by gapping.
A: word: ɡhoóṣṭ	 gloss: house
B: word: theníi	 gloss: do.VN
C: word: dhoóṛ	 gloss: yesterday
D: word: aáǰ	 gloss: today
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 713:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): anú dhoóṛ ___ putr-á hanís the kitaáb dít-i hasó phoó
Gloss (with missing item): 3MSG.PROX.NOM yesterday ___ son-OBL 3SG.PROX.ACC to book give.PFV-F REM.MSG.NOM boy
The English translation of this sentence is:`This is the boy who my son gave a~book to yesterday.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some data (\ref{ex:13-212})--(\ref{ex:13-214})) suggests the possibility of regular anaphoric (personal or demonstrative) pronouns being used in the modifying clause, whether preposed or postposed. The evidence, however, is too scanty to draw any definite conclusions. Suffice it to say that the positions being thus relativised are low on the accessibility hierarchy (postpositional object and possessor, respectively), which is fully in line with typological predictions (\citealt[147--148]{keenan1985}; \citealt[226]{andrews_relative2007}). On the other hand, we have examples of relativisation of recipient (\ref{ex:13-199}) as well as possessor (\ref{ex:13-200}) by gapping.
A: word: haans-éen-i	 gloss: stay-PRS-F
B: word: thíi	 gloss: 2SG.GEN
C: word: míiš	 gloss: man
D: word: míi	 gloss: 1SG.GEN
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 714:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): anú dhoóṛ míi ___ hanís the kitaáb dít-i hasó phoó
Gloss (with missing item): 3MSG.PROX.NOM yesterday 1SG.GEN ___ 3SG.PROX.ACC to book give.PFV-F REM.MSG.NOM boy
The English translation of this sentence is:`This is the boy who my son gave a~book to yesterday.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some data (\ref{ex:13-212})--(\ref{ex:13-214})) suggests the possibility of regular anaphoric (personal or demonstrative) pronouns being used in the modifying clause, whether preposed or postposed. The evidence, however, is too scanty to draw any definite conclusions. Suffice it to say that the positions being thus relativised are low on the accessibility hierarchy (postpositional object and possessor, respectively), which is fully in line with typological predictions (\citealt[147--148]{keenan1985}; \citealt[226]{andrews_relative2007}). On the other hand, we have examples of relativisation of recipient (\ref{ex:13-199}) as well as possessor (\ref{ex:13-200}) by gapping.
A: word: putr-á	 gloss: son-OBL
B: word: putr-óom	 gloss: son-PL.OBL
C: word: bh-éen-i	 gloss: become-PRS-F
D: word: ɡubáa	 gloss: some
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 715:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): anú dhoóṛ míi putr-á ___ the kitaáb dít-i hasó phoó
Gloss (with missing item): 3MSG.PROX.NOM yesterday 1SG.GEN son-OBL ___ to book give.PFV-F REM.MSG.NOM boy
The English translation of this sentence is:`This is the boy who my son gave a~book to yesterday.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some data (\ref{ex:13-212})--(\ref{ex:13-214})) suggests the possibility of regular anaphoric (personal or demonstrative) pronouns being used in the modifying clause, whether preposed or postposed. The evidence, however, is too scanty to draw any definite conclusions. Suffice it to say that the positions being thus relativised are low on the accessibility hierarchy (postpositional object and possessor, respectively), which is fully in line with typological predictions (\citealt[147--148]{keenan1985}; \citealt[226]{andrews_relative2007}). On the other hand, we have examples of relativisation of recipient (\ref{ex:13-199}) as well as possessor (\ref{ex:13-200}) by gapping.
A: word: hanís	 gloss: 3SG.PROX.ACC
B: word: trók-u	 gloss: weak-MSG
C: word: thaní	 gloss: QUOT
D: word: aniniaám	 gloss: 3PL.PROX.ACC
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 716:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): anú dhoóṛ míi putr-á hanís ___ kitaáb dít-i hasó phoó
Gloss (with missing item): 3MSG.PROX.NOM yesterday 1SG.GEN son-OBL 3SG.PROX.ACC ___ book give.PFV-F REM.MSG.NOM boy
The English translation of this sentence is:`This is the boy who my son gave a~book to yesterday.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some data (\ref{ex:13-212})--(\ref{ex:13-214})) suggests the morpheme ___ possibility of regular anaphoric (personal or demonstrative) pronouns being used in the morpheme ___ modifying clause, whethe morpheme ___r preposed or postposed. The evidence, however, is its gloss ___o scanty its gloss ___ draw any definite conclusions. Suffice it its gloss ___ say that the morpheme ___ positions being thus relativised are low on the morpheme ___ accessibility hierarchy (postpositional object and possessor, respectively), which is fully in line with typological predictions (\citealt[147--148]{keenan1985}; \citealt[226]{andrews_relative2007}). On the morpheme ___ othe morpheme ___r hand, we have examples of relativisation of recipient (\ref{ex:13-199}) as well as possessor (\ref{ex:13-200}) by gapping.
A: word: theníi-e	 gloss: do.VN"=GEN
B: word: khúna	 gloss: near.to
C: word: the	 gloss: to
D: word: kili-á	 gloss: key-PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 717:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): anú dhoóṛ míi putr-á hanís the ___ dít-i hasó phoó
Gloss (with missing item): 3MSG.PROX.NOM yesterday 1SG.GEN son-OBL 3SG.PROX.ACC to ___ give.PFV-F REM.MSG.NOM boy
The English translation of this sentence is:`This is the boy who my son gave a~book to yesterday.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some data (\ref{ex:13-212})--(\ref{ex:13-214})) suggests the possibility of regular anaphoric (personal or demonstrative) pronouns being used in the modifying clause, whether preposed or postposed. The evidence, however, is too scanty to draw any definite conclusions. Suffice it to say that the positions being thus relativised are low on the accessibility hierarchy (postpositional object and possessor, respectively), which is fully in line with typological predictions (\citealt[147--148]{keenan1985}; \citealt[226]{andrews_relative2007}). On the other hand, we have examples of relativisation of recipient (\ref{ex:13-199}) as well as possessor (\ref{ex:13-200}) by gapping.
A: word: qisá	 gloss: story
B: word: kitaáb	 gloss: book
C: word: pašaá	 gloss: show.CV
D: word: yaába	 gloss: or
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 718:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): anú dhoóṛ míi putr-á hanís the kitaáb ___ hasó phoó
Gloss (with missing item): 3MSG.PROX.NOM yesterday 1SG.GEN son-OBL 3SG.PROX.ACC to book ___ REM.MSG.NOM boy
The English translation of this sentence is:`This is the boy who my son gave a~book to yesterday.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some data (\ref{ex:13-212})--(\ref{ex:13-214})) suggests the possibility of regular anaphoric (personal or demonstrative) pronouns being used in the modifying clause, whether preposed or postposed. The evidence, however, is too scanty to draw any definite conclusions. Suffice it to say that the positions being thus relativised are low on the accessibility hierarchy (postpositional object and possessor, respectively), which is fully in line with typological predictions (\citealt[147--148]{keenan1985}; \citealt[226]{andrews_relative2007}). On the other hand, we have examples of relativisation of recipient (\ref{ex:13-199}) as well as possessor (\ref{ex:13-200}) by gapping.
A: word: dít-ii	 gloss: give.PPTC"=GEN
B: word: dít-i	 gloss: give.PFV-F
C: word: zanɡal-í	 gloss: forest-OBL
D: word: sum	 gloss: soil
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 719:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): asím ___ méeš ɡhašiǰíl-u baazúur-a phará so kuṇaák ba atesée ɡhooṣṭ-á the phreyíl-u
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL.ERG ___ man be.caught.PFV"=MSG bazaar-OBL along DEF.MSG.NOM child TOP 3SG.REM.GEN house-OBL to send.PFV"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`We sent the child to the house of the man who had been caught in the bazaar.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some data (\ref{ex:13-212})--(\ref{ex:13-214})) suggests the possibility of regular anaphoric (perthe morpheme ___nal or demonstrative) pronouns being used in the modifying clause, whether preposed or postposed. The evidence, however, is too scanty to draw any definite conclusions. Suffice it to say that the positions being thus relativised are low on the accessibility hierarchy (postpositional object and possesthe morpheme ___r, respectively), which is fully in line with typological predictions (\citealt[147--148]{keenan1985}; \citealt[226]{andrews_relative2007}). On the other hand, we have examples of relativisation of recipient (\ref{ex:13-199}) as well as possesthe morpheme ___r (\ref{ex:13-200}) by gapping.
A: word: ɡal-í	 gloss: throw-CV
B: word: adráx	 gloss: forest
C: word: so	 gloss: DEF.MSG.NOM
D: word: soóč	 gloss: thinking
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 720:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): asím so ___ ɡhašiǰíl-u baazúur-a phará so kuṇaák ba atesée ɡhooṣṭ-á the phreyíl-u
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL.ERG DEF.MSG.NOM ___ be.caught.PFV"=MSG bazaar-OBL along DEF.MSG.NOM child TOP 3SG.REM.GEN house-OBL to send.PFV"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`We sent the child to the house of the man who had been caught in the bazaar.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some data (\ref{ex:13-212})--(\ref{ex:13-214})) suggests the possibility of regular anaphoric (personal or demonstrative) pronouns being used in the modifying clause, whether preposed or postposed. The evidence, however, is too scanty to draw any definite conclusions. Suffice it to say that the positions being thus relativised are low on the accessibility hierarchy (postpositional object and possessor, respectively), which is fully in line with typological predictions (\citealt[147--148]{keenan1985}; \citealt[226]{andrews_relative2007}). On the other hand, we have examples of relativisation of recipient (\ref{ex:13-199}) as well as possessor (\ref{ex:13-200}) by gapping.
A: word: wheel-í	 gloss: take.down-CV
B: word: miiš-íi	 gloss: man-GEN
C: word: déeš	 gloss: village
D: word: méeš	 gloss: man
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 721:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): asím so méeš ___ baazúur-a phará so kuṇaák ba atesée ɡhooṣṭ-á the phreyíl-u
Gloss (with missing item): 1PL.ERG DEF.MSG.NOM man ___ bazaar-OBL along DEF.MSG.NOM child TOP 3SG.REM.GEN house-OBL to send.PFV"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`We sent the child to the house of the man who had been caught in the bazaar.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some data (\ref{ex:13-212})--(\ref{ex:13-214})) suggests the possibility of regular anaphoric (personal or demonstrative) pronouns being used in the modifying clause, whether preposed or postposed. The evidence, however, is too scanty to draw any definite conclusions. Suffice it to say that the positions being thus relativised are low on the accessibility hierarchy (postpositional object and possessor, respectively), which is fully in line with typological predictions (\citealt[147--148]{keenan1985}; \citealt[226]{andrews_relative2007}). On the other hand, we have examples of relativisation of recipient (\ref{ex:13-199}) as well as possessor (\ref{ex:13-200}) by gapping.
A: word: ɡhašiǰíl-u	 gloss: be.caught.PFV"=MSG
B: word: dhríṣṭ-u	 gloss: see.PFV"=MSG
C: word: ǰáan-a	 gloss: person-PL
D: word: khaṇiǰíl-u	 gloss: be.hit.PFV"=MSG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A