cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 632:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): paturaá nuuṭíl-u ta khayí ___ wée asím ǰinaazá khaṣeel-í wheelíl-u de
Gloss (with missing item): back return.PFV"=MSG SUB which ___ in 1PL.ERG corpse drag-CV bring.down.PFV"=MSG PST
The English translation of this sentence is:`When I returned to the place where we had dragged the dead body{\ldots}'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In (\ref{ex:13-191}), the relative clause is probably internal. Note that the construction as a~whole is extraposed to the temporal clause.
A: word: bh-áan-u	 gloss: become-PRS"=MSG
B: word: ilaqaa-í	 gloss: area-OBL
C: word: zhay-í	 gloss: place-OBL
D: word: khay-í	 gloss: which-F
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 633:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): paturaá nuuṭíl-u ta khayí zhay-í ___ asím ǰinaazá khaṣeel-í wheelíl-u de
Gloss (with missing item): back return.PFV"=MSG SUB which place-OBL ___ 1PL.ERG corpse drag-CV bring.down.PFV"=MSG PST
The English translation of this sentence is:`When I returned to the place where we had dragged the dead body{\ldots}'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In (\ref{ex:13-191}), the relative clause is probably its gloss ___ternal. Note that the construction as a~whole is extraposed to the temporal clause.
A: word: wée	 gloss: in
B: word: dawéel-i	 gloss: ask.for.PFV-F
C: word: wée)	 gloss: in]
D: word: paidáa	 gloss: born
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 634:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ máaṭu dhraǰaá ba šúul-a the phedíl-u heentá hasó kh-úu
Gloss (with missing item): ___ neck stretch.CV TOP sheaf-OBL to reach.PFV"=MSG CONDL 3MSG.REM.NOM eat-3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:`The one [of us] whose neck can reach the sheaf shall eat.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Quite similar to, and possibly not altogether distinct from, the relative clauses above are those that contain an~interrogative pronoun, often in combination with (or even fused with) an~indefinite word or particle ɡalá (B ɡalé) meaning `ever'. The resulting meaning is something like `whoever, whatever', referring to one in a~group of potential referents having a~non"=specific reference. The relative clause is often a~Conditional clause, and is therefore more clearly subordinate than the above described construction, and the correlative in the main clause is referred to with a~demonstrative or personal pronoun from the remote set (if at all explicit). Examples are given in (\ref{ex:13-192})--(\ref{ex:13-194}).
A: word: ɡubáa-ii	 gloss: what-GEN
B: word: kasée=ɡale	 gloss: who.GEN=ever
C: word: whaal-éen	 gloss: bring.down.3PL
D: word: kasée	 gloss: whose
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 635:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kasée=ɡale ___ dhraǰaá ba šúul-a the phedíl-u heentá hasó kh-úu
Gloss (with missing item): who.GEN=ever ___ stretch.CV TOP sheaf-OBL to reach.PFV"=MSG CONDL 3MSG.REM.NOM eat-3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:`The one [of us] whose neck can reach the sheaf shall eat.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Quite similar to, and possibly not altogether distinct from, the relative clauses above are those that contain an~interrogative pronoun, often in combination with (or even fused with) an~indefinite word or particle ɡalá (B ɡalé) meaning `ever'. The resulting meaning is something like `whoever, whatever', referring to one in a~group of potential referents having a~non"=specific reference. The relative clause is often a~Conditional clause, and is therefore more clearly subordinate than the above described construction, and the correlative in the main clause is referred to with a~demonstrative or personal pronoun from the remote set (if at all explicit). Examples are given in (\ref{ex:13-192})--(\ref{ex:13-194}).
A: word: aṭ-áan-u	 gloss: bring-PRS"=MSG
B: word: máaṭu	 gloss: neck
C: word: ṣiṣ	 gloss: head
D: word: máar-a	 gloss: die-3SG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 636:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kasée=ɡale máaṭu ___ ba šúul-a the phedíl-u heentá hasó kh-úu
Gloss (with missing item): who.GEN=ever neck ___ TOP sheaf-OBL to reach.PFV"=MSG CONDL 3MSG.REM.NOM eat-3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:`The one [of us] whose neck can reach the sheaf shall eat.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Quite similar to, and possibly not altogether distinct from, the relative clauses above are those that contain an~interrogative pronoun, often in combination with (or even fused with) an~indefinite word or particle ɡalá (B ɡalé) meaning `ever'. The resulting meaning is something like `whoever, whatever', referring to one in a~group of potential referents having a~non"=specific reference. The relative clause is often a~Conditional clause, and is therefore more clearly subordinate than the above described construction, and the correlative in the main clause is referred to with a~demonstrative or personal pronoun from the remote set (if at all explicit). Examples are given in (\ref{ex:13-192})--(\ref{ex:13-194}).
A: word: dhraǰaá	 gloss: stretch.CV
B: word: raaǰaá	 gloss: king
C: word: wheél-u	 gloss: bring.down.PFV"=MSG
D: word: nikhá	 gloss: come.out.IMP.SG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 637:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kasée=ɡale máaṭu dhraǰaá ___ šúul-a the phedíl-u heentá hasó kh-úu
Gloss (with missing item): who.GEN=ever neck stretch.CV ___ sheaf-OBL to reach.PFV"=MSG CONDL 3MSG.REM.NOM eat-3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:`The one [of us] whose neck can reach the sheaf shall eat.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Quite similar to, and possibly not altogether distinct from, the relative clauses above are those that contain an~interrogative pronoun, often in combination with (or even fused with) an~indefinite word or particle ɡalá (B ɡalé) meaning `ever'. The resulting meaning is something like `whoever, whatever', referring to one in a~group of potential referents having a~non"=specific reference. The relative clause is often a~Conditional clause, and is therefore more clearly subordinate than the above described construction, and the correlative in the main clause is referred to with a~demonstrative or personal pronoun from the remote set (if at all explicit). Examples are given in (\ref{ex:13-192})--(\ref{ex:13-194}).
A: word: yaába	 gloss: or
B: word: yhóol-u	 gloss: come.PFV"=MSG
C: word: kateeṇ-í	 gloss: what.kind-F
D: word: ba	 gloss: TOP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 638:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kasée=ɡale máaṭu dhraǰaá ba ___ the phedíl-u heentá hasó kh-úu
Gloss (with missing item): who.GEN=ever neck stretch.CV TOP ___ to reach.PFV"=MSG CONDL 3MSG.REM.NOM eat-3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:`The one [of us] whose neck can reach the sheaf shall eat.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Quite similar to, and possibly not altogether distinct from, the relative clauses above are those that contain an~interrogative pronoun, often in combination with (or even fused with) an~indefinite word or particle ɡalá (B ɡalé) meaning `ever'. The resulting meaning is something like `whoever, whatever', referring to one in a~group of potential referents having a~non"=specific reference. The relative clause is often a~Conditional clause, and is therefore more clearly subordinate than the above described construction, and the correlative in the main clause is referred to with a~demonstrative or personal pronoun from the remote set (if at all explicit). Examples are given in (\ref{ex:13-192})--(\ref{ex:13-194}).
A: word: óo	 gloss: o
B: word: maidúun-a	 gloss: field-OBL
C: word: šúul-a	 gloss: sheaf-OBL
D: word: c̣hetrúul-a	 gloss: Chitral-OBL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 639:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kasée=ɡale máaṭu dhraǰaá ba šúul-a ___ phedíl-u heentá hasó kh-úu
Gloss (with missing item): who.GEN=ever neck stretch.CV TOP sheaf-OBL ___ reach.PFV"=MSG CONDL 3MSG.REM.NOM eat-3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:`The one [of us] whose neck can reach the sheaf shall eat.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Quite similar its gloss ___, and possibly not alits gloss ___gethe morpheme ___r distinct from, the morpheme ___ relative clauses above are those that contain an~interrogative pronoun, often in combination with (or even fused with) an~indefinite word or particle ɡalá (B ɡalé) meaning `ever'. The resulting meaning is something like `whoever, whatever', referring its gloss ___ one in a~group of potential referents having a~non"=specific reference. The relative clause is often a~Conditional clause, and is the morpheme ___refore more clearly subordinate than the morpheme ___ above described construction, and the morpheme ___ correlative in the morpheme ___ main clause is referred its gloss ___ with a~demonstrative or personal pronoun from the morpheme ___ remote set (if at all explicit). Examples are given in (\ref{ex:13-192})--(\ref{ex:13-194}).
A: word: theníi-e	 gloss: do.VN"=GEN
B: word: khúna	 gloss: near.to
C: word: padúši	 gloss: after
D: word: the	 gloss: to
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 640:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kasée=ɡale máaṭu dhraǰaá ba šúul-a the ___ heentá hasó kh-úu
Gloss (with missing item): who.GEN=ever neck stretch.CV TOP sheaf-OBL to ___ CONDL 3MSG.REM.NOM eat-3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:`The one [of us] whose neck can reach the sheaf shall eat.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Quite similar to, and possibly not altogether distinct from, the relative clauses above are those that contain an~interrogative pronoun, often in combination with (or even fused with) an~indefinite word or particle ɡalá (B ɡalé) meaning `ever'. The resulting meaning is something like `whoever, whatever', referring to one in a~group of potential referents having a~non"=specific reference. The relative clause is often a~Conditional clause, and is therefore more clearly subordinate than the above described construction, and the correlative in the main clause is referred to with a~demonstrative or personal pronoun from the remote set (if at all explicit). Examples are given in (\ref{ex:13-192})--(\ref{ex:13-194}).
A: word: phedíl-u	 gloss: reach.PFV"=MSG
B: word: húuši	 gloss: wind
C: word: dhríṣṭ-u	 gloss: see.PFV"=MSG
D: word: phedíl-a	 gloss: arrive.PFV"=MPL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 641:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kasée=ɡale máaṭu dhraǰaá ba šúul-a the phedíl-u ___ hasó kh-úu
Gloss (with missing item): who.GEN=ever neck stretch.CV TOP sheaf-OBL to reach.PFV"=MSG ___ 3MSG.REM.NOM eat-3SG
The English translation of this sentence is:`The one [of us] whose neck can reach the sheaf shall eat.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Quite similar to, and possibly not altogether distinct from, the relative clauses above are those that contain an~interrogative pronoun, often in combination with (or even fused with) an~indefinite word or particle ɡalá (B ɡalé) meaning `ever'. The resulting meaning is something like `whoever, whatever', referring to one in a~group of potential referents having a~non"=specific reference. The relative clause is often a~Conditional clause, and is therefore more clearly subordinate than the above described construction, and the correlative in the main clause is referred to with a~demonstrative or personal pronoun from the remote set (if at all explicit). Examples are given in (\ref{ex:13-192})--(\ref{ex:13-194}).
A: word: heentá	 gloss: CONDL
B: word: atshareet-á	 gloss: Ashret-OBL
C: word: seentá	 gloss: CONDH
D: word: síinta	 gloss: CONDH
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 642:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ ɡubáa=ɡale maníit-u ta lhooméi kaṇ th-íi de
Gloss (with missing item): ___ what=ever say.PFV"=MSG SUB fox HOST do-3SG PST
The English translation of this sentence is:`Whatever the jackal told him, the fox gave heed to.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Quite similar to, and possibly not altogether distinct from, the relative clauses above are those that contain an~interrogative pronoun, often in combination with (or even fused with) an~indefinite word or particle ɡalá (B ɡalé) meaning `ever'. The resulting meaning is something like `whoever, whatever', referring to one in a~group of potential referents having a~non"=specific reference. The relative clause is often a~Conditional clause, and is therefore more clearly subordinate than the above described construction, and the correlative in the main clause is referred to with a~demonstrative or personal pronoun from the remote set (if at all explicit). Examples are given in (\ref{ex:13-192})--(\ref{ex:13-194}).
A: word: méeš	 gloss: man
B: word: ɡiḍ-á	 gloss: Damel-OBL
C: word: ṣiúul-a	 gloss: jackal-OBL
D: word: šúul-a	 gloss: sheaf-OBL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 643:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ṣiúul-a ___ maníit-u ta lhooméi kaṇ th-íi de
Gloss (with missing item): jackal-OBL ___ say.PFV"=MSG SUB fox HOST do-3SG PST
The English translation of this sentence is:`Whatever the jackal told him, the fox gave heed to.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Quite similar to, and possibly not altogether distinct from, the relative clauses above are those that contain an~interrogative pronoun, often in combination with (or even fused with) an~indefinite word or particle ɡalá (B ɡalé) meaning `ever'. The resulting meaning is something like `whoever, whatever', referring to one in a~group of potential referents having a~non"=specific reference. The relative clause is often a~Conditional clause, and is therefore more clearly subordinate than the above described construction, and the correlative in the main clause is referred to with a~demonstrative or personal pronoun from the remote set (if at all explicit). Examples are given in (\ref{ex:13-192})--(\ref{ex:13-194}).
A: word: kareé=ɡale	 gloss: when=ever
B: word: patú	 gloss: behind
C: word: ɡubáa=ɡale	 gloss: what=ever
D: word: kasée=ɡale	 gloss: who.GEN=ever
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 644:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ṣiúul-a ɡubáa=ɡale ___ ta lhooméi kaṇ th-íi de
Gloss (with missing item): jackal-OBL what=ever ___ SUB fox HOST do-3SG PST
The English translation of this sentence is:`Whatever the jackal told him, the fox gave heed to.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Quite similar to, and possibly not altogether distinct from, the relative clauses above are those that contain an~interrogative pronoun, often in combination with (or even fused with) an~indefinite word or particle ɡalá (B ɡalé) meaning `ever'. The resulting meaning is something like `whoever, whatever', referring to one in a~group of potential referents having a~non"=specific reference. The relative clause is often a~Conditional clause, and is therefore more clearly subordinate than the above described construction, and the correlative in the main clause is referred to with a~demonstrative or personal pronoun from the remote set (if at all explicit). Examples are given in (\ref{ex:13-192})--(\ref{ex:13-194}).
A: word: míiš-ii	 gloss: man-GEN
B: word: thíil-u	 gloss: do.PFV"=MSG
C: word: maníit-u	 gloss: say.PFV"=MSG
D: word: thaníit-u	 gloss: say.PFV"=MSG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 645:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ṣiúul-a ɡubáa=ɡale maníit-u ___ lhooméi kaṇ th-íi de
Gloss (with missing item): jackal-OBL what=ever say.PFV"=MSG ___ fox HOST do-3SG PST
The English translation of this sentence is:`Whatever the jackal told him, the fox gave heed to.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Quite similar to, and possibly not altogether distinct from, the relative clauses above are those that conthe morpheme ___in an~interrogative pronoun, often in combination with (or even fused with) an~indefinite word or particle ɡalá (B ɡalé) meaning `ever'. The resulting meaning is something like `whoever, whatever', referring to one in a~group of potential referents having a~non"=specific reference. The relative clause is often a~Conditional clause, and is therefore more clearly subordinate than the above described construction, and the correlative in the main clause is referred to with a~demonstrative or personal pronoun from the remote set (if at all explicit). Examples are given in (\ref{ex:13-192})--(\ref{ex:13-194}).
A: word: bh-íl-a	 gloss: become-PFV"=MPL
B: word: ta	 gloss: SUB
C: word: rhootašíi-a	 gloss: morning-OBL
D: word: biabeen-íim	 gloss: wilderness-PL.OBL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 646:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ húuši ziaát bh-íi de eendáa so musaafár šukhaáu teeṇíi huǰut-í pharé pail-óo de
Gloss (with missing item): ___ wind most become-3SG PST like.that DEF.MSG.NOM traveller coat REFL body-OBL toward fold-3SG PST
The English translation of this sentence is:`The stronger the wind blew, the more closely did the traveller fold his cloak around him.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: A similar construction (without ɡalá, and not explicitly conditional) can also be used with manner adverbials, as exemplified in (\ref{ex:13-195b}).
A: word: kanaá	 gloss: how
B: word: kanáa	 gloss: like.what
C: word: bhanǰ-ainíi-a	 gloss: beat-VN"=OBL
D: word: ɡubáa	 gloss: what
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B