cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 52:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): dac̣h-íin ta {\ob}kaṭamúš bi náin-u iṇc̣ ___ náin-u{\cb}
Gloss (with missing item): look-3PL SUB Katamosh also not.be.PRS"=MSG bear ___ not.be.PRS"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`They saw that neither Katamosh nor the bear was there.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Rejection using ``separative'' conjunction and negation, \textit{the morpheme ___ na{\ldots}the morpheme ___ na}, is illustrated in (\ref{ex:13-42})--(\ref{ex:13-43}).
A: word: muqaabilá	 gloss: contest
B: word: bi	 gloss: also
C: word: daway-áa	 gloss: ask-INF
D: word: takṛá	 gloss: strong
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 53:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): bíiḍ-i raál ___ na th"=eeṇḍeéu naam"=eeṇḍeéu bi na
Gloss (with missing item): much-F high ___ not do-OBLG lower-OBLG also not
The English translation of this sentence is:`It should not be raised very high, neither should it be lowered [much].'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Rejection using ``separative'' conjunction and negation, \textit{the morpheme ___ na{\ldots}the morpheme ___ na}, is illustrated in (\ref{ex:13-42})--(\ref{ex:13-43}).
A: word: pharé	 gloss: toward
B: word: bi	 gloss: also
C: word: muqaabilá	 gloss: contest
D: word: th-íia	 gloss: do-1PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 54:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): bíiḍ-i raál bi ___ th"=eeṇḍeéu naam"=eeṇḍeéu bi na
Gloss (with missing item): much-F high also ___ do-OBLG lower-OBLG also not
The English translation of this sentence is:`It should not be raised very high, neither should it be lowered [much].'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Rejection using ``separative'' conjunction and negation, \textit{bi the morpheme ___{\ldots}bi the morpheme ___}, is illustrated in (\ref{ex:13-42})--(\ref{ex:13-43}).
A: word: har"=ainií	 gloss: take.away-VN
B: word: míiš=ee	 gloss: man=Q
C: word: na	 gloss: not
D: word: ǰinaazá	 gloss: corpse
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 55:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): bíiḍ-i raál bi na th"=eeṇḍeéu naam"=eeṇḍeéu ___ na
Gloss (with missing item): much-F high also not do-OBLG lower-OBLG ___ not
The English translation of this sentence is:`It should not be raised very high, neither should it be lowered [much].'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Rejection using ``separative'' conjunction and negation, \textit{the morpheme ___ na{\ldots}the morpheme ___ na}, is illustrated in (\ref{ex:13-42})--(\ref{ex:13-43}).
A: word: xálak-a	 gloss: people-PL
B: word: haṛé	 gloss: DIST
C: word: muqaabilá	 gloss: contest
D: word: bi	 gloss: also
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 56:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): bíiḍ-i raál bi na th"=eeṇḍeéu naam"=eeṇḍeéu bi ___
Gloss (with missing item): much-F high also not do-OBLG lower-OBLG also ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`It should not be raised very high, neither should it be lowered [much].'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Rejection using ``separative'' conjunction and negation, \textit{bi the morpheme ___{\ldots}bi the morpheme ___}, is illustrated in (\ref{ex:13-42})--(\ref{ex:13-43}).
A: word: na	 gloss: not
B: word: ɡúum"=ii	 gloss: go.PPTC.MSG"=GEN
C: word: phus"=ainií	 gloss: rid-VN
D: word: ǰinaazá	 gloss: corpse
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 57:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): eesé zanɡal-í áa baṭ-á ǰhulí harí so kuṇaák bheešóol-u ___ tasíi paaṇṭí ɡaḍ-íi de
Gloss (with missing item): REM forest-OBL IDEF stone-OBL on take.away.CV DEF.MSG.NOM child seat.PFV"=MSG ___ 3SG.GEN clothes take.off-3SG PST
The English translation of this sentence is:`In that forest he took the child to a~stone and seated him. When he had seated him, he took his [the child's] clothes off.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \spitzmarke{Subsequence.} Many dependent clauses with obvious temporal readings are in fact not much different from the sequential chaining discussed above (\sectref{sec:13-3}). Especially when it is a~matter of subsequence, and the subject remains the same, the Converb construction (i) is used, as in (\ref{ex:13-51})--(\ref{ex:13-52}). Sometimes, especially in narratives, an~immediately preceding finite verb is repeated but as a~converb, thus not adding any new information but instead highlighting the temporal relationship between the two events. This latter use of the converb is more typically adverbial~-- and the Converb clause to a~greater extent dependent~-- than its use in sequential chaining as laid out above.
A: word: bheš-í	 gloss: sit.down-CV
B: word: bheešaá	 gloss: seat.CV
C: word: bheešóol-u	 gloss: seat.PFV"=MSG
D: word: pahúrta	 gloss: after
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 58:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tíi taayúu hiǰrát thíil-i ___ the dhruú\simṣ-a yúul-u
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG.OBL from.there migration do.PFV-F ___ do.CV Drosh-OBL come.PFV"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`He migrated from there. When he had migrated, he came to Drosh.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \spitzmarke{Subsequence.} Many dependent clauses with obvious temporal readings are in fact not much different from the sequential chaining discussed above (\sectref{sec:13-3}). Especially when it is a~matter of subsequence, and the subject remains the same, the Converb construction (i) is used, as in (\ref{ex:13-51})--(\ref{ex:13-52}). Sometimes, especially in narratives, an~immediately preceding finite verb is repeated but as a~converb, thus not adding any new information but instead highlighting the temporal relationship between the two events. This latter use of the converb is more typically adverbial~-- and the Converb clause to a~greater extent dependent~-- than its use in sequential chaining as laid out above.
A: word: tas	 gloss: 3SG.ACC
B: word: hiǰrát	 gloss: migration
C: word: musaafár	 gloss: traveller
D: word: šiǰrá	 gloss: line
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 59:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tíi taayúu hiǰrát thíil-i hiǰrát ___ dhruú\simṣ-a yúul-u
Gloss (with missing item): 3SG.OBL from.there migration do.PFV-F migration ___ Drosh-OBL come.PFV"=MSG
The English translation of this sentence is:`He migrated from there. When he had migrated, he came to Drosh.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \spitzmarke{Subsequence.} Many dependent clauses with obvious temporal readings are in fact not much different from the morpheme ___ sequential chaining discussed above (\sectref{sec:13-3}). Especially when it is a~matter of subsequence, and the morpheme ___ subject remains the morpheme ___ same, the morpheme ___ Converb construction (i) is used, as in (\ref{ex:13-51})--(\ref{ex:13-52}). Sometimes, especially in narratives, an~immediately preceding finite verb is repeated but as a~converb, thus not adding any new information but instead highlighting the morpheme ___ temporal relationship between the morpheme ___ two events. This latter use of the morpheme ___ converb is more typically adverbial~-- and the morpheme ___ Converb clause to a~greater extent dependent~-- than its use in sequential chaining as laid out above.
A: word: xabaár	 gloss: news
B: word: theníi-e	 gloss: do.VN"=GEN
C: word: ɡhaṇḍ-í	 gloss: tie-CV
D: word: the	 gloss: do.CV
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 60:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): aḍaphará wháil-u ___ wháil-u ta tasíi uǰut-í maǰí xaaráx paidóo bhíl-i
Gloss (with missing item): halfways take.down.PFV"=MSG ___ take.down.PFV"=MSG SUB 3SG.GEN body-OBL in itching born become.PFV-F
The English translation of this sentence is:`He brought it partway down [the hill]. When he had brought it down that far, his whole body began itching.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the subject in the dependent clause is different from the subject in the main clause, as was the case in clause chaining, the corresponding construction is a~finite ta-clause (construction~(ii)). That can be seen in example (\ref{ex:13-53}) and (\ref{ex:13-54}). Again, the verb in the preceding finite clause is often repeated.
A: word: aḍapharíi	 gloss: from.middle
B: word: bhraáš	 gloss: slowly
C: word: aḍaphará	 gloss: halfways
D: word: ɡubáa=ɡale	 gloss: what=ever
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 61:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): aḍaphará wháil-u aḍaphará ___ ta tasíi uǰut-í maǰí xaaráx paidóo bhíl-i
Gloss (with missing item): halfways take.down.PFV"=MSG halfways ___ SUB 3SG.GEN body-OBL in itching born become.PFV-F
The English translation of this sentence is:`He brought it partway down [the hill]. When he had brought it down that far, his whole body began itching.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the subject in the dependent clause is different from the subject in the main clause, as was the case in clause chaining, the corresponding construction is a~finite ta-clause (construction~(ii)). That can be seen in example (\ref{ex:13-53}) and (\ref{ex:13-54}). Again, the verb in the preceding finite clause is often repeated.
A: word: wheél-u	 gloss: bring.down.PFV"=MSG
B: word: dít-u	 gloss: give.PFV"=MSG
C: word: wháil-u	 gloss: take.down.PFV"=MSG
D: word: thíil-u	 gloss: do.PFV"=MSG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 62:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): aḍaphará wháil-u aḍaphará wháil-u ___ tasíi uǰut-í maǰí xaaráx paidóo bhíl-i
Gloss (with missing item): halfways take.down.PFV"=MSG halfways take.down.PFV"=MSG ___ 3SG.GEN body-OBL in itching born become.PFV-F
The English translation of this sentence is:`He brought it partway down [the hill]. When he had brought it down that far, his whole body began itching.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the subject in the dependent clause is different from the subject in the main clause, as was the case in clause chaining, the corresponding construction is a~finite the morpheme ___-clause (construction~(ii)). That can be seen in example (\ref{ex:13-53}) and (\ref{ex:13-54}). Again, the verb in the preceding finite clause is often repeated.
A: word: ta	 gloss: SUB
B: word: rhootašíi-a	 gloss: morning-OBL
C: word: rhalá	 gloss: up
D: word: lhookeer-ó	 gloss: younger-MSG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 63:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ múṛ-u ta putr-óom tasíi hukumát bulooṣṭéel-i
Gloss (with missing item): ___ die.PFV"=MSG SUB son-PL.OBL 3SG.GEN government snatch.PFV-F
The English translation of this sentence is:`When the king died, the sons seized the power.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the subject in the dependent clause is different from the subject in the main clause, as was the case in clause chaining, the corresponding construction is a~finite ta-clause (construction~(ii)). That can be seen in example (\ref{ex:13-53}) and (\ref{ex:13-54}). Again, the verb in the preceding finite clause is often repeated.
A: word: dhraǰaá	 gloss: stretch.out.CV
B: word: ṣoo-íi	 gloss: king-GEN
C: word: raaǰaá	 gloss: king
D: word: bh-éen-i=ee	 gloss: become-PRS-F=CNJ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 64:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): raaǰaá ___ ta putr-óom tasíi hukumát bulooṣṭéel-i
Gloss (with missing item): king ___ SUB son-PL.OBL 3SG.GEN government snatch.PFV-F
The English translation of this sentence is:`When the king died, the sons seized the power.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the subject in the dependent clause is different from the subject in the main clause, as was the case in clause chaining, the corresponding construction is a~finite ta-clause (construction~(ii)). That can be seen in example (\ref{ex:13-53}) and (\ref{ex:13-54}). Again, the verb in the preceding finite clause is often repeated.
A: word: múṛ-im	 gloss: die.PFV"=FPL
B: word: naɡarǰúti	 gloss: Nagarjuti
C: word: múṛ-u	 gloss: die.PFV"=MSG
D: word: mheeríl-u	 gloss: kill.PFV"=MSG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 65:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): raaǰaá múṛ-u ___ putr-óom tasíi hukumát bulooṣṭéel-i
Gloss (with missing item): king die.PFV"=MSG ___ son-PL.OBL 3SG.GEN government snatch.PFV-F
The English translation of this sentence is:`When the king died, the sons seized the power.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the subject in the dependent clause is different from the subject in the main clause, as was the case in clause chaining, the corresponding construction is a~finite the morpheme ___-clause (construction~(ii)). That can be seen in example (\ref{ex:13-53}) and (\ref{ex:13-54}). Again, the verb in the preceding finite clause is often repeated.
A: word: dac̣h-aníi-e	 gloss: look-VN"=GEN
B: word: ta	 gloss: SUB
C: word: kaal-á	 gloss: year-PL
D: word: rhootašíi-a	 gloss: morning-OBL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 66:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ yhéel-i tas díi khooǰóol-u kanáa bhíl-i
Gloss (with missing item): ___ come.PFV-F 3SG.ACC from ask.PFV"=MSG what become.PFV-F
The English translation of this sentence is:`When Nagarjuti came, he asked her what happened.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It appears to be possible to leave out the subordinator ta, as in (\ref{ex:13-55}), and retain a~different"=subject reading, although that is not particularly common.
A: word: naɡarǰúti	 gloss: Nagarjuti
B: word: henrík	 gloss: Henrik
C: word: laɡaiǰ-éen-i	 gloss: be.applied-PRS-F
D: word: kaaláaṣ-a	 gloss: Kalasha-PL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 67:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): naɡarǰúti ___ tas díi khooǰóol-u kanáa bhíl-i
Gloss (with missing item): Nagarjuti ___ 3SG.ACC from ask.PFV"=MSG what become.PFV-F
The English translation of this sentence is:`When Nagarjuti came, he asked her what happened.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It appears to be possible to leave out the subordinator ta, as in (\ref{ex:13-55}), and retain a~different"=subject reading, although that is not particularly common.
A: word: yhéel-i	 gloss: come.PFV-F
B: word: c̣hatróol"=ii	 gloss: Chitral-GEN
C: word: kateeṇ-ú	 gloss: what.kind-MSG
D: word: khéel-i	 gloss: eat.PFV-F
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 68:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ se múṛ-im ta asím tenaám ḍhanɡéel"=im
Gloss (with missing item): ___ 3PL.NOM die.PFV"=FPL SUB 1PL.ERG 3PL.ACC bury.PFV"=FPL
The English translation of this sentence is:`When they died, we buried them.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The subsequential reading is contextually implicit rather than explicit in the examples given so far. However, a~separate temporal conjunction kareéɡale or kareé ɡalé ki `when' can also (especially in B), as seen in (\ref{ex:13-56}), be added to the ta-construction to make this reading obvious. This distinguishes it more clearly from simple clause chaining.
A: word: ɡá=ɡala	 gloss: what=ever
B: word: kareé=ɡale	 gloss: when=ever
C: word: kasée=ɡale	 gloss: who.GEN=ever
D: word: muṭ-á	 gloss: tree-OBL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 69:
You are a linguist specializing in Palula. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kareé=ɡale ___ múṛ-im ta asím tenaám ḍhanɡéel"=im
Gloss (with missing item): when=ever ___ die.PFV"=FPL SUB 1PL.ERG 3PL.ACC bury.PFV"=FPL
The English translation of this sentence is:`When they died, we buried them.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The subthe morpheme ___quential reading is contextually implicit rather than explicit in the examples given so far. However, a~the morpheme ___parate temporal conjunction kareéɡale or kareé ɡalé ki `when' can also (especially in B), as the morpheme ___en in (\ref{ex:13-56}), be added to the ta-construction to make this reading obvious. This distinguishes it more clearly from simple clauthe morpheme ___ chaining.
A: word: síinta	 gloss: CONDH
B: word: dac̣h-íim	 gloss: look-CPRD
C: word: seéb	 gloss: sir
D: word: se	 gloss: 3PL.NOM
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D