cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 63:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tà-s=aŋ ɔkʷɔ ana [haj=atəta amɪ-g-ijɛ ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3P+PFV-cut=3S.IO fire DAT house=3P.POSS DEP-do-CL ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘They set fire to the house that the others had made.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the head noun is the direct object of the relative clause, the relative clause must contain a subject pronoun. The pronoun must be inserted before the verb in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:103}--\ref{ex:5:105}). It is interesting that this subject pronoun of the relative clause is sometimes a free pronoun (\ref{ex:5:104}, \ref{ex:5:105}, \ref{ex:5:109}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.1}) but in other cases is a possessive pronoun (\ref{ex:5:103}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.2}). Two examples from the same narrative\footnote{The entire narrative is not included in this work.} (\ref{ex:5:103} and \ref{ex:5:104}) use different pronouns for the subject of the relative clause. While \REF{ex:5:103} uses the \oldstylenums{3}\textsc{p} possessive pronoun ata, \REF{ex:5:104} uses the free pronoun təta. In some cases, the relative clause will contain the direct object pronominal na following the dependent verb. The \DO pronominal represents the noun phrase head. In the examples below, the direct object pronominal na is underlined. A gap for the direct object in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:104} and \ref{ex:5:109}) is indicated by {Ø}.
A: word: na=va	 gloss: 3S.DO=PRF
B: word: ma-ŋgəh=ata=aka=va	 gloss: NOM-hide=3P.IO=on=PRF
C: word: =va	 gloss: =PRF
D: word: nɔkʷ	 gloss: twoS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 64:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tà-s=aŋ ɔkʷɔ ana ___ amɪ-g-ijɛ na=va]
Gloss (with missing item): 3P+PFV-cut=3S.IO fire DAT ___ DEP-do-CL 3S.DO=PRF
The English translation of this sentence is:‘They set fire to the house that the others had made.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the head noun is the direct object of the relative clause, the relative clause must contain a subject pronoun. The pronoun must be inserted before the verb in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:103}--\ref{ex:5:105}). It is interesting that this subject pronoun of the relative clause is sometimes a free pronoun (\ref{ex:5:104}, \ref{ex:5:105}, \ref{ex:5:109}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.1}) but in other cases is a possessive pronoun (\ref{ex:5:103}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.2}). Two examples from the same narrative\footnote{The entire narrative is not included in this work.} (\ref{ex:5:103} and \ref{ex:5:104}) use different pronouns for the subject of the relative clause. While \REF{ex:5:103} uses the \oldstylenums{3}\textsc{p} possessive pronoun ata, \REF{ex:5:104} uses the free pronoun təta. In some cases, the relative clause will contain the direct object pronominal na following the dependent verb. The \DO pronominal represents the noun phrase head. In the examples below, the direct object pronominal na is underlined. A gap for the direct object in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:104} and \ref{ex:5:109}) is indicated by {Ø}.
A: word: na=va	 gloss: 3S.DO=PRF
B: word: haj=atəta	 gloss: house=3P.POSS
C: word: nɛhɛ=ahaj	 gloss: DEM=Pl
D: word: ahar=atəta	 gloss: hand=3P.POSS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 65:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tà-s=aŋ ɔkʷɔ ana [haj=atəta ___ na=va]
Gloss (with missing item): 3P+PFV-cut=3S.IO fire DAT house=3P.POSS ___ 3S.DO=PRF
The English translation of this sentence is:‘They set fire to the house that the others had made.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the head noun is the direct object of the relative clause, the relative clause must contain a subject pronoun. The pronoun must be inserted before the verb in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:103}--\ref{ex:5:105}). It is interesting that this subject pronoun of the relative clause is sometimes a free pronoun (\ref{ex:5:104}, \ref{ex:5:105}, \ref{ex:5:109}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.1}) but in other cases is a possessive pronoun (\ref{ex:5:103}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.2}). Two examples from the same narrative\footnote{The entire narrative is not included in this work.} (\ref{ex:5:103} and \ref{ex:5:104}) use different pronouns for the subject of the relative clause. While \REF{ex:5:103} uses the \oldstylenums{3}\textsc{p} possessive pronoun ata, \REF{ex:5:104} uses the free pronoun təta. In some cases, the relative clause will contain the direct object pronominal na following the dependent verb. The \DO pronominal represents the noun phrase head. In the examples below, the direct object pronominal na is underlined. A gap for the direct object in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:104} and \ref{ex:5:109}) is indicated by {Ø}.
A: word: amɪ-mɪnzɛr-ɛ	 gloss: DEP-see-CL
B: word: makar	 gloss: three
C: word: mɪ-g-ijɛ=aŋgʷɔ	 gloss: NOM-do-CL=twoS.POSS
D: word: amɪ-g-ijɛ	 gloss: DEP-do-CL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 66:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tà-s=aŋ ɔkʷɔ ana [haj=atəta amɪ-g-ijɛ ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3P+PFV-cut=3S.IO fire DAT house=3P.POSS DEP-do-CL ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘They set fire to the house that the others had made.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the head noun is the direct object of the relative clause, the relative clause must contain a subject pronoun. The pronoun must be inserted before the verb in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:103}--\ref{ex:5:105}). It is interesting that this subject pronoun of the relative clause is sometimes a free pronoun (\ref{ex:5:104}, \ref{ex:5:105}, \ref{ex:5:109}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.1}) but in other cases is a possessive pronoun (\ref{ex:5:103}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.2}). Two examples from the same narrative\footnote{The entire narrative is not included in this work.} (\ref{ex:5:103} and \ref{ex:5:104}) use different pronouns for the subject of the relative clause. While \REF{ex:5:103} uses the \oldstylenums{3}\textsc{p} possessive pronoun ata, \REF{ex:5:104} uses the free pronoun təta. In some cases, the relative clause will contain the direct object pronominal na following the dependent verb. The \DO pronominal represents the noun phrase head. In the examples below, the direct object pronominal na is underlined. A gap for the direct object in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:104} and \ref{ex:5:109}) is indicated by {Ø}.
A: word: sʊlɔm=ahaj	 gloss: good=Pl
B: word: na=va	 gloss: 3S.DO=PRF
C: word: =va	 gloss: =PRF
D: word: ma-ŋgəh=ata=aka=va	 gloss: NOM-hide=3P.IO=on=PRF
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 67:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ amɪ-ʒɪɗ-ɛ dəraj na] waj
Gloss (with missing item): ___ DEP-carry-CL head PSP who
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Who will win?’ (lit. the one to carry the head, who?)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In all of the above examples, the head noun can be modified by other modifiers in addition to the relative clause. Sometimes, however, the relative clause itself is the entire noun phrase (\refits gloss ___ex:5:107}--\refits gloss ___ex:5:108}). These noun phrases that consist of relative clauses take no other noun phrase modifiers. Also, they are apparently limited in the type of clause construction in which they can occur. They can only be the predicate of a larger predicate nominal construction (see \sectrefits gloss ___sec:10.1.2}). Examples \REFits gloss ___ex:5:107} and \REFits gloss ___ex:5:108} are interrogative constructions with a predicate nominal structure (see \sectrefits gloss ___sec:10.3.1}). We found no natural examples where a headless relative clause served as a matrix component in a matrix verbal clause. Example \REFits gloss ___ex:5:108} is an emphatic construction (see \sectrefits gloss ___sec:10.3.5}).
A: word: à-mbəɗ=va	 gloss: 3S+PFV-change=PRF
B: word: amə-tar=alʊkʷøjɛ	 gloss: DEP-call=twoP.IO
C: word: aka	 gloss: on
D: word: ø	 gloss: {
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 68:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [Ø ___ dəraj na] waj
Gloss (with missing item): { ___ head PSP who
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Who will win?’ (lit. the one to carry the head, who?)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In all of the above examples, the head noun can be modified by other modifiers in addition to the relative clause. Sometimes, however, the relative clause itself is the entire noun phrase (\ref{ex:5:107}--\ref{ex:5:108}). These noun phrases that consist of relative clauses take no other noun phrase modifiers. Also, they are apparently limited in the type of clause construction in which they can occur. They can only be the predicate of a larger predicate nominal construction (see \sectref{sec:10.1.2}). Examples \REF{ex:5:107} and \REF{ex:5:108} are interrogative constructions with a predicate nominal structure (see \sectref{sec:10.3.1}). We found no natural examples where a headless relative clause served as a matrix component in a matrix verbal clause. Example \REF{ex:5:108} is an emphatic construction (see \sectref{sec:10.3.5}).
A: word: ɛndɛɓ	 gloss: wisdom
B: word: mɪ-mbɪɗ-ɛ=ahaŋ	 gloss: NOM-remain-CL=3S.POSS
C: word: amɪ-g-ijɛ	 gloss: DEP-do-CL
D: word: amɪ-ʒɪɗ-ɛ	 gloss: DEP-carry-CL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 69:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [Ø amɪ-ʒɪɗ-ɛ ___ na] waj
Gloss (with missing item): { DEP-carry-CL ___ PSP who
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Who will win?’ (lit. the one to carry the head, who?)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In all of the above examples, the its gloss ___ noun can be modified by other modifiers in addition to the relative clause. Sometimes, however, the relative clause itself is the entire noun phrase (\ref{ex:5:107}--\ref{ex:5:108}). These noun phrases that consist of relative clauses take no other noun phrase modifiers. Also, they are apparently limited in the type of clause construction in which they can occur. They can only be the predicate of a larger predicate nominal construction (see \sectref{sec:10.1.2}). Examples \REF{ex:5:107} and \REF{ex:5:108} are interrogative constructions with a predicate nominal structure (see \sectref{sec:10.3.1}). We found no natural examples where a its gloss ___less relative clause served as a matrix component in a matrix verbal clause. Example \REF{ex:5:108} is an emphatic construction (see \sectref{sec:10.3.5}).
A: word: andəra	 gloss: peanut
B: word: mɛhɛr	 gloss: forehead
C: word: dəraj	 gloss: head
D: word: mɪ-ʒum-ɛ=uwla	 gloss: NOM-eat-CL=oneS.POSS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 70:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [Ø amɪ-ʒɪɗ-ɛ dəraj ___ waj
Gloss (with missing item): { DEP-carry-CL head ___ who
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Who will win?’ (lit. the one to carry the head, who?)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In all of the above examples, the head noun can be modified by other modifiers in addition to the relative clause. Sometimes, however, the relative clause itself is the entire noun phrase (\ref{ex:5:107}--\ref{ex:5:108}). These noun phrases that consist of relative clauses take no other noun phrase modifiers. Also, they are apparently limited in the type of clause construction in which they can occur. They can only be the predicate of a larger predicate nomithe morpheme ___l construction (see \sectref{sec:10.1.2}). Examples \REF{ex:5:107} and \REF{ex:5:108} are interrogative constructions with a predicate nomithe morpheme ___l structure (see \sectref{sec:10.3.1}). We found no the morpheme ___tural examples where a headless relative clause served as a matrix component in a matrix verbal clause. Example \REF{ex:5:108} is an emphatic construction (see \sectref{sec:10.3.5}).
A: word: à-vəl=ata	 gloss: 3S-give=3P.IO
B: word: na	 gloss: PSP
C: word: mə-mət=ava=alaj	 gloss: NOM-die=in=away
D: word: na-faɗ	 gloss: oneS-place
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 71:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ amɪ-ʒɪɗ-ɛ dəraj na] waj
Gloss (with missing item): ___ DEP-carry-CL head PSP who
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Who will win?’ (lit. the one to carry the head, who?)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In all of the above examples, the head noun can be modified by other modifiers in addition to the relative clause. Sometimes, however, the relative clause itself is the entire noun phrase (\refits gloss ___ex:5:107}--\refits gloss ___ex:5:108}). These noun phrases that consist of relative clauses take no other noun phrase modifiers. Also, they are apparently limited in the type of clause construction in which they can occur. They can only be the predicate of a larger predicate nominal construction (see \sectrefits gloss ___sec:10.1.2}). Examples \REFits gloss ___ex:5:107} and \REFits gloss ___ex:5:108} are interrogative constructions with a predicate nominal structure (see \sectrefits gloss ___sec:10.3.1}). We found no natural examples where a headless relative clause served as a matrix component in a matrix verbal clause. Example \REFits gloss ___ex:5:108} is an emphatic construction (see \sectrefits gloss ___sec:10.3.5}).
A: word: =aka=ala	 gloss: =on=to
B: word: amə-tar=alʊkʷøjɛ	 gloss: DEP-call=twoP.IO
C: word: ø	 gloss: {
D: word: dəraj	 gloss: head
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 72:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [Ø ___ dəraj na] waj
Gloss (with missing item): { ___ head PSP who
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Who will win?’ (lit. the one to carry the head, who?)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In all of the above examples, the head noun can be modified by other modifiers in addition to the relative clause. Sometimes, however, the relative clause itself is the entire noun phrase (\ref{ex:5:107}--\ref{ex:5:108}). These noun phrases that consist of relative clauses take no other noun phrase modifiers. Also, they are apparently limited in the type of clause construction in which they can occur. They can only be the predicate of a larger predicate nominal construction (see \sectref{sec:10.1.2}). Examples \REF{ex:5:107} and \REF{ex:5:108} are interrogative constructions with a predicate nominal structure (see \sectref{sec:10.3.1}). We found no natural examples where a headless relative clause served as a matrix component in a matrix verbal clause. Example \REF{ex:5:108} is an emphatic construction (see \sectref{sec:10.3.5}).
A: word: tə-dzap=ata	 gloss: 3P-group=3S.IO
B: word: amɪ-ʒɪɗ-ɛ	 gloss: DEP-carry-CL
C: word: mɪ-mbɪɗ-ɛ=ahaŋ	 gloss: NOM-remain-CL=3S.POSS
D: word: ndahaŋ	 gloss: 3S
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 73:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [Ø amɪ-ʒɪɗ-ɛ ___ na] waj
Gloss (with missing item): { DEP-carry-CL ___ PSP who
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Who will win?’ (lit. the one to carry the head, who?)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In all of the above examples, the its gloss ___ noun can be modified by other modifiers in addition to the relative clause. Sometimes, however, the relative clause itself is the entire noun phrase (\ref{ex:5:107}--\ref{ex:5:108}). These noun phrases that consist of relative clauses take no other noun phrase modifiers. Also, they are apparently limited in the type of clause construction in which they can occur. They can only be the predicate of a larger predicate nominal construction (see \sectref{sec:10.1.2}). Examples \REF{ex:5:107} and \REF{ex:5:108} are interrogative constructions with a predicate nominal structure (see \sectref{sec:10.3.1}). We found no natural examples where a its gloss ___less relative clause served as a matrix component in a matrix verbal clause. Example \REF{ex:5:108} is an emphatic construction (see \sectref{sec:10.3.5}).
A: word: andəra	 gloss: peanut
B: word: mɛhɛr	 gloss: forehead
C: word: dəraj	 gloss: head
D: word: malaŋ=ahaj	 gloss: great=Pl
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 74:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [Ø amɪ-ʒɪɗ-ɛ dəraj ___ waj
Gloss (with missing item): { DEP-carry-CL head ___ who
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Who will win?’ (lit. the one to carry the head, who?)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In all of the above examples, the head noun can be modified by other modifiers in addition to the relative clause. Sometimes, however, the relative clause itself is the entire noun phrase (\ref{ex:5:107}--\ref{ex:5:108}). These noun phrases that consist of relative clauses take no other noun phrase modifiers. Also, they are apparently limited in the type of clause construction in which they can occur. They can only be the predicate of a larger predicate nomithe morpheme ___l construction (see \sectref{sec:10.1.2}). Examples \REF{ex:5:107} and \REF{ex:5:108} are interrogative constructions with a predicate nomithe morpheme ___l structure (see \sectref{sec:10.3.1}). We found no the morpheme ___tural examples where a headless relative clause served as a matrix component in a matrix verbal clause. Example \REF{ex:5:108} is an emphatic construction (see \sectref{sec:10.3.5}).
A: word: na	 gloss: PSP
B: word: na-faɗ	 gloss: oneS-place
C: word: makar=ahaj	 gloss: three=Pl
D: word: mala	 gloss: Mala
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 75:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [ɛlɛ=ahaj ___ amɪ-ʒɪɗ-ɛ na] aŋga=uwla baj
Gloss (with missing item): thing=Pl ___ DEP-take-CL PSP POSS=oneS.POSS NEG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘The things that you brought [are] not belonging to me.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Plural head nouns in noun phrases containing a relative clause have so far only been noted in elicited relative clauses and their interpretation is ambiguous. In these noun phrases, speakers insert the plural =ahay in one of two places: the plural =ahay can occur immediately following the head noun, or in some instances it may follow the relative clause. The plural precedes the relative clause in (\ref{ex:5:110}--\ref{ex:5:111}).
A: word: tʃɛw	 gloss: two
B: word: nɔkʷ	 gloss: twoS
C: word: makar	 gloss: three
D: word: nɔkʷ=va	 gloss: twoS=PRF
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B