cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 52:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [war haj ŋgɪndijɛ ___ amɛ-ʒ-ɛ na=va] bɪlɛŋ ŋgɪndijɛ na
Gloss (with missing item): child millet DEM ___ DEP-take-CL 3S.DO=PRF one DEM PSP
The English translation of this sentence is:‘That grain that you have taken, that one [grain],’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the head noun is the direct object of the relative clause, the relative clause must contain a subject pronoun. The pronoun must be inserted before the verb in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:103}--\ref{ex:5:105}). It is interesting that this subject pronoun of the relative clause is sometimes a free pronoun (\ref{ex:5:104}, \ref{ex:5:105}, \ref{ex:5:109}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.1}) but in other cases is a possessive pronoun (\ref{ex:5:103}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.2}). Two examples from the same narrative\footnote{The entire narrative is not included in this work.} (\ref{ex:5:103} and \ref{ex:5:104}) use different pronouns for the subject of the relative clause. While \REF{ex:5:103} uses the \oldstylenums{3}\textsc{p} possessive pronoun ata, \REF{ex:5:104} uses the free pronoun təta. In some cases, the relative clause will contain the direct object pronominal na following the dependent verb. The \DO pronominal represents the noun phrase head. In the examples below, the direct object pronominal na is underlined. A gap for the direct object in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:104} and \ref{ex:5:109}) is indicated by {Ø}.
A: word: nɔkʷ	 gloss: twoS
B: word: tʃɛw	 gloss: two
C: word: nɔkʷ=va	 gloss: twoS=PRF
D: word: awak=uwla	 gloss: goat=oneS.POSS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 53:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [war haj ŋgɪndijɛ nɔkʷ ___ na=va] bɪlɛŋ ŋgɪndijɛ na
Gloss (with missing item): child millet DEM twoS ___ 3S.DO=PRF one DEM PSP
The English translation of this sentence is:‘That grain that you have taken, that one [grain],’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the head noun is the direct object of the relative clause, the relative clause must contain a subject pronoun. The pronoun must be inserted before the verb in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:103}--\ref{ex:5:105}). It is interesting that this subject pronoun of the relative clause is sometimes a free pronoun (\ref{ex:5:104}, \ref{ex:5:105}, \ref{ex:5:109}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.1}) but in other cases is a possessive pronoun (\ref{ex:5:103}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.2}). Two examples from the same narrative\footnote{The entire narrative is not included in this work.} (\ref{ex:5:103} and \ref{ex:5:104}) use different pronouns for the subject of the relative clause. While \REF{ex:5:103} uses the \oldstylenums{3}\textsc{p} possessive pronoun ata, \REF{ex:5:104} uses the free pronoun təta. In some cases, the relative clause will contain the direct object pronominal na following the dependent verb. The \DO pronominal represents the noun phrase head. In the examples below, the direct object pronominal na is underlined. A gap for the direct object in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:104} and \ref{ex:5:109}) is indicated by {Ø}.
A: word: amɛ-ʒ-ɛ	 gloss: DEP-take-CL
B: word: amɛ-ʒɛɗ-ɛ	 gloss: DEP-take-CL
C: word: makar=ahaj	 gloss: three=Pl
D: word: amɪ-g-ijɛ	 gloss: DEP-do-CL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 54:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [war haj ŋgɪndijɛ nɔkʷ amɛ-ʒ-ɛ ___ bɪlɛŋ ŋgɪndijɛ na
Gloss (with missing item): child millet DEM twoS DEP-take-CL ___ one DEM PSP
The English translation of this sentence is:‘That grain that you have taken, that one [grain],’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the head noun is the direct object of the relative clause, the relative clause must contain a subject pronoun. The pronoun must be inserted before the verb in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:103}--\ref{ex:5:105}). It is interesting that this subject pronoun of the relative clause is sometimes a free pronoun (\ref{ex:5:104}, \ref{ex:5:105}, \ref{ex:5:109}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.1}) but in other cases is a possessive pronoun (\ref{ex:5:103}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.2}). Two examples from the same narrative\footnote{The entire narrative is not included in this work.} (\ref{ex:5:103} and \ref{ex:5:104}) use different pronouns for the subject of the relative clause. While \REF{ex:5:103} uses the \oldstylenums{3}\textsc{p} possessive pronoun ata, \REF{ex:5:104} uses the free pronoun təta. In some cases, the relative clause will contain the direct object pronominal na following the dependent verb. The \DO pronominal represents the noun phrase head. In the examples below, the direct object pronominal na is underlined. A gap for the direct object in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:104} and \ref{ex:5:109}) is indicated by {Ø}.
A: word: =va	 gloss: =PRF
B: word: nɛ=ahaŋ	 gloss: oneS=3S.POSS
C: word: ma-ŋgəh=ata=aka=va	 gloss: NOM-hide=3P.IO=on=PRF
D: word: na=va	 gloss: 3S.DO=PRF
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 55:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [war haj ŋgɪndijɛ ___ amɛ-ʒ-ɛ na=va] bɪlɛŋ ŋgɪndijɛ na
Gloss (with missing item): child millet DEM ___ DEP-take-CL 3S.DO=PRF one DEM PSP
The English translation of this sentence is:‘That grain that you have taken, that one [grain],’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the head noun is the direct object of the relative clause, the relative clause must contain a subject pronoun. The pronoun must be inserted before the verb in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:103}--\ref{ex:5:105}). It is interesting that this subject pronoun of the relative clause is sometimes a free pronoun (\ref{ex:5:104}, \ref{ex:5:105}, \ref{ex:5:109}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.1}) but in other cases is a possessive pronoun (\ref{ex:5:103}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.2}). Two examples from the same narrative\footnote{The entire narrative is not included in this work.} (\ref{ex:5:103} and \ref{ex:5:104}) use different pronouns for the subject of the relative clause. While \REF{ex:5:103} uses the \oldstylenums{3}\textsc{p} possessive pronoun ata, \REF{ex:5:104} uses the free pronoun təta. In some cases, the relative clause will contain the direct object pronominal na following the dependent verb. The \DO pronominal represents the noun phrase head. In the examples below, the direct object pronominal na is underlined. A gap for the direct object in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:104} and \ref{ex:5:109}) is indicated by {Ø}.
A: word: awak=uwla	 gloss: goat=oneS.POSS
B: word: nɔkʷ=va	 gloss: twoS=PRF
C: word: nɔkʷ	 gloss: twoS
D: word: tʃɛw	 gloss: two
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 56:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [war haj ŋgɪndijɛ nɔkʷ ___ na=va] bɪlɛŋ ŋgɪndijɛ na
Gloss (with missing item): child millet DEM twoS ___ 3S.DO=PRF one DEM PSP
The English translation of this sentence is:‘That grain that you have taken, that one [grain],’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the head noun is the direct object of the relative clause, the relative clause must contain a subject pronoun. The pronoun must be inserted before the verb in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:103}--\ref{ex:5:105}). It is interesting that this subject pronoun of the relative clause is sometimes a free pronoun (\ref{ex:5:104}, \ref{ex:5:105}, \ref{ex:5:109}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.1}) but in other cases is a possessive pronoun (\ref{ex:5:103}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.2}). Two examples from the same narrative\footnote{The entire narrative is not included in this work.} (\ref{ex:5:103} and \ref{ex:5:104}) use different pronouns for the subject of the relative clause. While \REF{ex:5:103} uses the \oldstylenums{3}\textsc{p} possessive pronoun ata, \REF{ex:5:104} uses the free pronoun təta. In some cases, the relative clause will contain the direct object pronominal na following the dependent verb. The \DO pronominal represents the noun phrase head. In the examples below, the direct object pronominal na is underlined. A gap for the direct object in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:104} and \ref{ex:5:109}) is indicated by {Ø}.
A: word: amɛ-ʒ-ɛ	 gloss: DEP-take-CL
B: word: amɛ-ʒɛɗ-ɛ	 gloss: DEP-take-CL
C: word: nɔkʷ	 gloss: twoS
D: word: amɪ-g-ijɛ	 gloss: DEP-do-CL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 57:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [war haj ŋgɪndijɛ nɔkʷ amɛ-ʒ-ɛ ___ bɪlɛŋ ŋgɪndijɛ na
Gloss (with missing item): child millet DEM twoS DEP-take-CL ___ one DEM PSP
The English translation of this sentence is:‘That grain that you have taken, that one [grain],’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the head noun is the direct object of the relative clause, the relative clause must contain a subject pronoun. The pronoun must be inserted before the verb in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:103}--\ref{ex:5:105}). It is interesting that this subject pronoun of the relative clause is sometimes a free pronoun (\ref{ex:5:104}, \ref{ex:5:105}, \ref{ex:5:109}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.1}) but in other cases is a possessive pronoun (\ref{ex:5:103}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.2}). Two examples from the same narrative\footnote{The entire narrative is not included in this work.} (\ref{ex:5:103} and \ref{ex:5:104}) use different pronouns for the subject of the relative clause. While \REF{ex:5:103} uses the \oldstylenums{3}\textsc{p} possessive pronoun ata, \REF{ex:5:104} uses the free pronoun təta. In some cases, the relative clause will contain the direct object pronominal na following the dependent verb. The \DO pronominal represents the noun phrase head. In the examples below, the direct object pronominal na is underlined. A gap for the direct object in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:104} and \ref{ex:5:109}) is indicated by {Ø}.
A: word: ɛnɛŋ=ahaj	 gloss: another=Pl
B: word: =va	 gloss: =PRF
C: word: na=va	 gloss: 3S.DO=PRF
D: word: ma-ŋgəh=ata=aka=va	 gloss: NOM-hide=3P.IO=on=PRF
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 58:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tà-s=aŋ ɔkʷɔ ana ___ amɪ-g-ijɛ na=va]
Gloss (with missing item): 3P+PFV-cut=3S.IO fire DAT ___ DEP-do-CL 3S.DO=PRF
The English translation of this sentence is:‘They set fire to the house that the others had made.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the head noun is the direct object of the relative clause, the relative clause must contain a subject pronoun. The pronoun must be inserted before the verb in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:103}--\ref{ex:5:105}). It is interesting that this subject pronoun of the relative clause is sometimes a free pronoun (\ref{ex:5:104}, \ref{ex:5:105}, \ref{ex:5:109}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.1}) but in other cases is a possessive pronoun (\ref{ex:5:103}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.2}). Two examples from the same narrative\footnote{The entire narrative is not included in this work.} (\ref{ex:5:103} and \ref{ex:5:104}) use different pronouns for the subject of the relative clause. While \REF{ex:5:103} uses the \oldstylenums{3}\textsc{p} possessive pronoun ata, \REF{ex:5:104} uses the free pronoun təta. In some cases, the relative clause will contain the direct object pronominal na following the dependent verb. The \DO pronominal represents the noun phrase head. In the examples below, the direct object pronominal na is underlined. A gap for the direct object in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:104} and \ref{ex:5:109}) is indicated by {Ø}.
A: word: sʊlɔm=ahaj	 gloss: good=Pl
B: word: haj=atəta	 gloss: house=3P.POSS
C: word: ká-z=ala	 gloss: twoS+IFV-carry=to
D: word: ahar=atəta	 gloss: hand=3P.POSS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 59:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tà-s=aŋ ɔkʷɔ ana [haj=atəta ___ na=va]
Gloss (with missing item): 3P+PFV-cut=3S.IO fire DAT house=3P.POSS ___ 3S.DO=PRF
The English translation of this sentence is:‘They set fire to the house that the others had made.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the head noun is the direct object of the relative clause, the relative clause must contain a subject pronoun. The pronoun must be inserted before the verb in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:103}--\ref{ex:5:105}). It is interesting that this subject pronoun of the relative clause is sometimes a free pronoun (\ref{ex:5:104}, \ref{ex:5:105}, \ref{ex:5:109}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.1}) but in other cases is a possessive pronoun (\ref{ex:5:103}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.2}). Two examples from the same narrative\footnote{The entire narrative is not included in this work.} (\ref{ex:5:103} and \ref{ex:5:104}) use different pronouns for the subject of the relative clause. While \REF{ex:5:103} uses the \oldstylenums{3}\textsc{p} possessive pronoun ata, \REF{ex:5:104} uses the free pronoun təta. In some cases, the relative clause will contain the direct object pronominal na following the dependent verb. The \DO pronominal represents the noun phrase head. In the examples below, the direct object pronominal na is underlined. A gap for the direct object in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:104} and \ref{ex:5:109}) is indicated by {Ø}.
A: word: sʊlɔm=ahaj	 gloss: good=Pl
B: word: amɪ-g-ijɛ	 gloss: DEP-do-CL
C: word: mɪ-g-ijɛ=aŋgʷɔ	 gloss: NOM-do-CL=twoS.POSS
D: word: amɪ-mɪnzɛr-ɛ	 gloss: DEP-see-CL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 60:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tà-s=aŋ ɔkʷɔ ana [haj=atəta amɪ-g-ijɛ ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3P+PFV-cut=3S.IO fire DAT house=3P.POSS DEP-do-CL ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘They set fire to the house that the others had made.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the head noun is the direct object of the relative clause, the relative clause must contain a subject pronoun. The pronoun must be inserted before the verb in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:103}--\ref{ex:5:105}). It is interesting that this subject pronoun of the relative clause is sometimes a free pronoun (\ref{ex:5:104}, \ref{ex:5:105}, \ref{ex:5:109}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.1}) but in other cases is a possessive pronoun (\ref{ex:5:103}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.2}). Two examples from the same narrative\footnote{The entire narrative is not included in this work.} (\ref{ex:5:103} and \ref{ex:5:104}) use different pronouns for the subject of the relative clause. While \REF{ex:5:103} uses the \oldstylenums{3}\textsc{p} possessive pronoun ata, \REF{ex:5:104} uses the free pronoun təta. In some cases, the relative clause will contain the direct object pronominal na following the dependent verb. The \DO pronominal represents the noun phrase head. In the examples below, the direct object pronominal na is underlined. A gap for the direct object in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:104} and \ref{ex:5:109}) is indicated by {Ø}.
A: word: na=va	 gloss: 3S.DO=PRF
B: word: =va	 gloss: =PRF
C: word: ma-ŋgəh=ata=aka=va	 gloss: NOM-hide=3P.IO=on=PRF
D: word: ɬɪrɛlɛ=ahaŋ=ahaj	 gloss: work=3S.POSS=Pl
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 61:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tà-s=aŋ ɔkʷɔ ana ___ amɪ-g-ijɛ na=va]
Gloss (with missing item): 3P+PFV-cut=3S.IO fire DAT ___ DEP-do-CL 3S.DO=PRF
The English translation of this sentence is:‘They set fire to the house that the others had made.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the head noun is the direct object of the relative clause, the relative clause must contain a subject pronoun. The pronoun must be inserted before the verb in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:103}--\ref{ex:5:105}). It is interesting that this subject pronoun of the relative clause is sometimes a free pronoun (\ref{ex:5:104}, \ref{ex:5:105}, \ref{ex:5:109}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.1}) but in other cases is a possessive pronoun (\ref{ex:5:103}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.2}). Two examples from the same narrative\footnote{The entire narrative is not included in this work.} (\ref{ex:5:103} and \ref{ex:5:104}) use different pronouns for the subject of the relative clause. While \REF{ex:5:103} uses the \oldstylenums{3}\textsc{p} possessive pronoun ata, \REF{ex:5:104} uses the free pronoun təta. In some cases, the relative clause will contain the direct object pronominal na following the dependent verb. The \DO pronominal represents the noun phrase head. In the examples below, the direct object pronominal na is underlined. A gap for the direct object in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:104} and \ref{ex:5:109}) is indicated by {Ø}.
A: word: =aka=va	 gloss: =on=PRF
B: word: ahar=atəta	 gloss: hand=3P.POSS
C: word: haj=atəta	 gloss: house=3P.POSS
D: word: mɪ-ʒum-ɛ=uwla	 gloss: NOM-eat-CL=oneS.POSS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 62:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): tà-s=aŋ ɔkʷɔ ana [haj=atəta ___ na=va]
Gloss (with missing item): 3P+PFV-cut=3S.IO fire DAT house=3P.POSS ___ 3S.DO=PRF
The English translation of this sentence is:‘They set fire to the house that the others had made.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the head noun is the direct object of the relative clause, the relative clause must contain a subject pronoun. The pronoun must be inserted before the verb in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:103}--\ref{ex:5:105}). It is interesting that this subject pronoun of the relative clause is sometimes a free pronoun (\ref{ex:5:104}, \ref{ex:5:105}, \ref{ex:5:109}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.1}) but in other cases is a possessive pronoun (\ref{ex:5:103}, see \sectref{sec:3.1.2}). Two examples from the same narrative\footnote{The entire narrative is not included in this work.} (\ref{ex:5:103} and \ref{ex:5:104}) use different pronouns for the subject of the relative clause. While \REF{ex:5:103} uses the \oldstylenums{3}\textsc{p} possessive pronoun ata, \REF{ex:5:104} uses the free pronoun təta. In some cases, the relative clause will contain the direct object pronominal na following the dependent verb. The \DO pronominal represents the noun phrase head. In the examples below, the direct object pronominal na is underlined. A gap for the direct object in the relative clause (\ref{ex:5:104} and \ref{ex:5:109}) is indicated by {Ø}.
A: word: haj=atəta	 gloss: house\hspaceThis{[=3P.POSS
B: word: amɪ-mɪnzɛr-ɛ	 gloss: DEP-see-CL
C: word: amɪ-g-ijɛ	 gloss: DEP-do-CL
D: word: mɪ-g-ijɛ=aŋgʷɔ	 gloss: NOM-do-CL=twoS.POSS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C