cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 17:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [asa mɪʒɛ=ahaj tə-tsah-aj ɛlɛ ___ Hʊrmbʊlɔm ɛ-tʃɛŋ asa-baj
Gloss (with missing item): if person=Pl 3P-ask-CL thing ___ God 3S-hear again-NEG
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Even if people ask for anything, God doesn’t hear anymore.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: When the subordinated clause is delimited by ɗəw ‘its gloss ___' (\ref{ex:12:45}--\ref{ex:12:46}), the meaning of asa shifts to more of a concessive idea.
A: word: ɗuwɛr=ahaŋ	 gloss: sleep=3S.POSS
B: word: ɛnɛŋ	 gloss: another
C: word: ɗuw	 gloss: also
D: word: ndahaŋ	 gloss: 3S
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 18:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ k\'{ɛ}-g-ɛ akar na] náá-ɓ=ɔkʷ
Gloss (with missing item): ___ twoS+IFV-do-CL theft PSP oneS+POT-beat=twoS.IO
The English translation of this sentence is:‘If you steal, I will beat you.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Normally the subordinated clause is followed by the main clause (\ref{ex:12:42}--\ref{ex:12:47}), however the clause expressing the condition can be right-shits gloss ___ted in some contexts \REF{ex:12:48}. The the morpheme ___ clause is always delimited by na.
A: word: azana	 gloss: maybe
B: word: a-dal	 gloss: 3S-pass
C: word: asa-baj	 gloss: again-NEG
D: word: asa	 gloss: if
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 19:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): gəbar a-ndaj a-g=aw ___ bahaj à-paɗ-aj ʃɛʃɛ na]
Gloss (with missing item): fear 3S-PROG 3S-do=oneS.IO ___ chief 3S+PFV-crunch-CL meat PSP
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I am afraid that the chief ate meat.’ (lit. fear is doing me if the chief ate meat)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Normally the subordinated clause is followed by the main clause (\ref{ex:12:42}--\ref{ex:12:47}), however the clause expressing the condition can be right-shits gloss ___ted in some contexts \REF{ex:12:48}. The the morpheme ___ clause is always delimited by na.
A: word: ʃɛʃɛ	 gloss: meat
B: word: asa-baj	 gloss: again-NEG
C: word: asa	 gloss: if
D: word: azana	 gloss: maybe
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 20:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ asa ta-ndaj tə-ɮaɓ-aj ɛlɛ mɛmɛj na]
Gloss (with missing item): ___ if 3P-PROG 3P-pound-CL thing how PSP
The English translation of this sentence is:‘When something is being pounded,’ (lit. if perhaps they are pounding something,)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Other particles co-occurring with the conjunction asa ‘if’ can modify its force. Clauses subordinated by the dative marker plus ‘if’ ana asa have a strong expectation that the condition will be fulfilled \REF{ex:12:49}, while clauses subordinated by the morpheme ___ asa ‘its gloss ___ if’ carry the expectation that the condition might be fulfilled, rendering the subordinating clause to have almost a temporal meaning \REF{ex:12:50}.
A: word: mà-zɔm	 gloss: 3S+HOR-eat
B: word: adaŋ	 gloss: perhaps
C: word: azana	 gloss: maybe
D: word: zana=alɔkʷɔ	 gloss: clothes=1PIN
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 21:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [azana ___ ta-ndaj tə-ɮaɓ-aj ɛlɛ mɛmɛj na]
Gloss (with missing item): maybe ___ 3P-PROG 3P-pound-CL thing how PSP
The English translation of this sentence is:‘When something is being pounded,’ (lit. if perhaps they are pounding something,)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Other particles co-occurring with the conjunction the morpheme ___ ‘its gloss ___’ can modits gloss ___y its force. Clauses subordinated by the dative marker plus ‘its gloss ___’ ana the morpheme ___ have a strong expectation that the condition will be fulfilled \REF{ex:12:49}, while clauses subordinated by azana the morpheme ___ ‘maybe its gloss ___’ carry the expectation that the condition might be fulfilled, rendering the subordinating clause to have almost a temporal meaning \REF{ex:12:50}.
A: word: mà-paɗ-aj	 gloss: 3S+HOR-crunch-CL
B: word: azana	 gloss: maybe
C: word: asa-baj	 gloss: again-NEG
D: word: asa	 gloss: if
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 22:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [mak-aj war] ___ ʃɛʃɛ=ahaŋ]
Gloss (with missing item): leave[twoS.IMP]-CL {child ___ {meat=3S.POSS
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Leave the child alone; let him eat his meat.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Many clauses in a Moloko discourse are independent and are not linked grammatically to a preceding or following clause by a connector or by the presupposition marker na. The semantic nature of the connection between these unmarked, \nohyphens{juxtaposed} clauses is inferred from the context.\footnote{The presupposition marker na aids in making a connection between two clauses, because it makes it explicit that the first (na{}-marked) clause is known information. Na constructions have already been discussed in \sectref{sec:11.1}.} A juxtaposed clause can simply re-express the thought in the first clause. In \REF{ex:12:62}, the second clause restates in the negative that God is near. In \REF{ex:12:63}, the second clause makes more precise the general instruction in the first clause. In \REF{ex:12:64}, the second clause expands on what the speaker sees about the chief. In the examples in this section, each clause is delimited by square brackets and the juxtaposed clause is bolded.
A: word: mà-paɗ-aj	 gloss: 3S+HOR-crunch-CL
B: word: zana=alɔkʷɔ	 gloss: clothes=1PIN
C: word: à-paɗ-aj	 gloss: 3S+PFV-crunch-CL
D: word: mɪ-ʒʊm-ɛ	 gloss: NOM-eat-CL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 23:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [mak-aj war] [mà-paɗ-aj ___
Gloss (with missing item): leave[twoS.IMP]-CL {child 3S+HOR-crunch-CL ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Leave the child alone; let him eat his meat.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Many clauses in a Moloko discourse are independent and are not linked grammatically to a preceding or following clause by a connector or by the presupposition marker na. The semantic nature of the connection between these unmarked, \nohyphens{juxtaposed} clauses is inferred from the context.\footnote{The presupposition marker na aids in making a connection between two clauses, because it makes it explicit that the first (na{}-marked) clause is known information. Na constructions have already been discussed in \sectref{sec:11.1}.} A juxtaposed clause can simply re-express the thought in the first clause. In \REF{ex:12:62}, the second clause restates in the negative that God is near. In \REF{ex:12:63}, the second clause makes more precise the general instruction in the first clause. In \REF{ex:12:64}, the second clause expands on what the speaker sees about the chief. In the examples in this section, each clause is delimited by square brackets and the juxtaposed clause is bolded.
A: word: mɪ-mbɪɗ-ɛ=ahaŋ	 gloss: NOM-remain-CL=3S.POSS
B: word: ɗuw	 gloss: also
C: word: anzakar=atəta=ahaj	 gloss: chicken=3P.POSS=Pl
D: word: ʃɛʃɛ=ahaŋ	 gloss: {meat=3S.POSS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 24:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [nə-mənzar bahaj] ___ aka á-zɔm ʃɛʃɛ]
Gloss (with missing item): oneS-see chief ___ on 3S+IFV-eat meat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I see the chief; he is eating meat.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Many clauses in a Moloko discourse are independent and are not linked grammatically to a preceding or following clause by a connector or by the presupposition marker na. The semantic nature of the connection between these unmarked, \nohyphens{juxtaposed} clauses is inferred from the context.\footnote{The presupposition marker na aids in making a connection between two clauses, because it makes it explicit that the first (na{}-marked) clause is known information. Na constructions have already been discussed in \sectref{sec:11.1}.} A juxtaposed clause can simply re-express the thought in the first clause. In \REF{ex:12:62}, the second clause restates in the negative that God is near. In \REF{ex:12:63}, the second clause makes more precise the general instruction in the first clause. In \REF{ex:12:64}, the second clause expands on what the speaker sees about the chief. In the examples in this section, each clause is delimited by square brackets and the juxtaposed clause is bolded.
A: word: a-ndaj	 gloss: 3S-be
B: word: ndahaŋ	 gloss: 3S
C: word: mɪ-mbɪɗ-ɛ=ahaŋ	 gloss: NOM-remain-CL=3S.POSS
D: word: ʃɛʃɛ=ahaŋ	 gloss: {meat=3S.POSS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 25:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [nə-mənzar bahaj] [ndahaŋ ___ á-zɔm ʃɛʃɛ]
Gloss (with missing item): oneS-see chief 3S ___ 3S+IFV-eat meat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I see the chief; he is eating meat.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Many clauses in a Moloko discourse are independent and are not linked grammatically to a preceding or following clause by a cits gloss ___nector or by the presuppositiits gloss ___ marker na. The semantic nature of the cits gloss ___nectiits gloss ___ between these unmarked, \nohyphens{juxtaposed} clauses is inferred from the cits gloss ___text.\footnote{The presuppositiits gloss ___ marker na aids in making a cits gloss ___nectiits gloss ___ between two clauses, because it makes it explicit that the first (na{}-marked) clause is known informatiits gloss ___. Na cits gloss ___structiits gloss ___s have already been discussed in \sectref{sec:11.1}.} A juxtaposed clause can simply re-express the thought in the first clause. In \REF{ex:12:62}, the secits gloss ___d clause restates in the negative that God is near. In \REF{ex:12:63}, the secits gloss ___d clause makes more precise the general instructiits gloss ___ in the first clause. In \REF{ex:12:64}, the secits gloss ___d clause expands its gloss ___ what the speaker sees about the chief. In the examples in this sectiits gloss ___, each clause is delimited by square brackets and the juxtaposed clause is bolded.
A: word: =aka	 gloss: =on
B: word: aka	 gloss: on
C: word: akar	 gloss: theft
D: word: mɪ-mbɪɗ-ɛ=ahaŋ	 gloss: NOM-remain-CL=3S.POSS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 26:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [nə-mənzar bahaj] [ndahaŋ aka ___ ʃɛʃɛ]
Gloss (with missing item): oneS-see chief 3S on ___ meat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I see the chief; he is eating meat.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Many clauses in a Moloko discourse are independent and are not linked grammatically to a preceding or following clause by a connector or by the presupposition marker na. The semantic nature of the connection between these unmarked, \nohyphens{juxtaposed} clauses is inferred from the context.\footnote{The presupposition marker na aids in making a connection between two clauses, because it makes it explicit that the first (na{}-marked) clause is known information. Na constructions have already been discussed in \sectref{sec:11.1}.} A juxtaposed clause can simply re-express the thought in the first clause. In \REF{ex:12:62}, the second clause restates in the negative that God is near. In \REF{ex:12:63}, the second clause makes more precise the general instruction in the first clause. In \REF{ex:12:64}, the second clause expands on what the speaker sees about the chief. In the examples in this section, each clause is delimited by square brackets and the juxtaposed clause is bolded.
A: word: mà-zɔm	 gloss: 3S+HOR-eat
B: word: á-mənzar	 gloss: 3S+IFV-see
C: word: á-zɔm	 gloss: 3S+IFV-eat
D: word: mɪ-mbɪɗ-ɛ=ahaŋ	 gloss: NOM-remain-CL=3S.POSS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 27:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [nə-mənzar bahaj] [ndahaŋ aka á-zɔm ___
Gloss (with missing item): oneS-see chief 3S on 3S+IFV-eat ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘I see the chief; he is eating meat.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Many clauses in a Moloko discourse are independent and are not linked grammatically to a preceding or following clause by a connector or by the presupposition marker na. The semantic nature of the connection between these unmarked, \nohyphens{juxtaposed} clauses is inferred from the context.\footnote{The presupposition marker na aids in making a connection between two clauses, because it makes it explicit that the first (na{}-marked) clause is known information. Na constructions have already been discussed in \sectref{sec:11.1}.} A juxtaposed clause can simply re-express the thought in the first clause. In \REF{ex:12:62}, the second clause restates in the negative that God is near. In \REF{ex:12:63}, the second clause makes more precise the general instruction in the first clause. In \REF{ex:12:64}, the second clause expands on what the speaker sees about the chief. In the examples in this section, each clause is delimited by square brackets and the juxtaposed clause is bolded.
A: word: nɪŋgɛhɛ	 gloss: DEM
B: word: ndahaŋ	 gloss: 3S
C: word: ʃɛʃɛ	 gloss: meat
D: word: ʃɛʃɛ=ahaŋ	 gloss: {meat=3S.POSS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 28:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [kəra malaŋ ga] ___ pataw]
Gloss (with missing item): dog largeness ADJ ___ cat
The English translation of this sentence is:‘The dog is bigger than the cat.’ (lit. the dog [is] big, it is greater than the cat)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Two clauses linked by juxtaposition can also express a comparison (\ref{ex:12:68}--\ref{ex:12:69}). The first clause is a predicate-adjective clause (see \sectref{sec:10.1.2}) including the attribute being compared. The second clause establishes the comparison by means of the verb dal ‘pass.’
A: word: a-dal	 gloss: 3S-pass
B: word: ɔ-lɔ	 gloss: 3S-go
C: word: á-dal	 gloss: 3S+IFV-overtake
D: word: mu-wutʃ-ɛ	 gloss: NOM-write-CL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 29:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [kəra malaŋ ga] [a-dal ___
Gloss (with missing item): dog largeness ADJ 3S-pass ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘The dog is bigger than the cat.’ (lit. the dog [is] big, it is greater than the cat)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Two clauses linked by juxtaposition can also express a comparison (\ref{ex:12:68}--\ref{ex:12:69}). The first clause is a prediits gloss ___e-adjective clause (see \sectref{sec:10.1.2}) including the attribute being compared. The second clause establishes the comparison by means of the verb dal ‘pass.’
A: word: pataw	 gloss: cat
B: word: mɪ-ʒʊm-ɛ	 gloss: NOM-eat-CL
C: word: kəra	 gloss: dog
D: word: tawij	 gloss: 3P+said
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A