cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 0:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ á-sak=aka]
Gloss (with missing item): ___ 3S+IFV-multiply=on
The English translation of this sentence is:‘It is multiplying.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Another tail-head link can be seen a little further in the same narrative in \REF{ex:11:22}.
A: word: á-var	 gloss: 3S+IFV-give
B: word: a-ndaj	 gloss: 3S-be
C: word: á-ndaj	 gloss: 3S+IFV-PROG
D: word: aŋga	 gloss: POSS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 1:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): [á-ndaj ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3S+IFV-PROG ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘It is multiplying.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Another tail-head link can be seen a little further in the same narrative in \REF{ex:11:22}.
A: word: á-sak	 gloss: \SSS+IFV-multiply
B: word: á-sək=ala	 gloss: 3S+IFV-multiply=to
C: word: á-sak=aka	 gloss: 3S+IFV-multiply=on
D: word: dzijga	 gloss: all
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 2:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): \ulp{ndɛ}{~~~~~~} \ule{na} \ulp{lɪmɛ}{~~~~~~} \ule{ɗuw} \ulp{n\`ə-ɮʊg-ɔm}{~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~} \ulp{va}{~~~~~~} \ule{na} ___
Gloss (with missing item): so PSP 1PEX also oneS+PFV-plant-1PEX body PSP ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘So, we also, we fought (lit. planted body), all of us.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Although the presupposition-assertion construction is structurits gloss ___y a clause level phenomenon, it can function in information structuring at the proposition level both to mark a boundary in a discourse, to set topic, and in participant tracking\is{Cohesion!Participant tracking}. When a discourse conjunction or temporal adverb is marked as presupposed (\ref{ex:11:33}--\ref{ex:11:35}, see also \ref{ex:11:49} from \sectref{sec:11.5}), the clause as a whole marks a boundary in the discourse. Such a clause often indicates a time change or an episode boundary. Most of the episodes in the Disobedient Girl story (see \sectref{sec:1.5}) begin with a conjuction marked with na \REF{ex:11:34} or a na-marked temporal phrase (\ref{ex:11:33}, \ref{ex:11:35}). All na-marked elements are underlined in the examples.
A: word: ndɛ	 gloss: so
B: word: lɪmɛ	 gloss: 1PEX
C: word: dʒijga	 gloss: all
D: word: dzijga	 gloss: all
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 3:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): waja \ulp{ɬa}{~~~~~}\ulp{=ahaj}{~~~~~} \ule{na} \ulp{t\`{ɔ}-zɔm}{~~~~~~~~~~~} \ulp{gəvax}{~~~~~} \ule{na} ___ aŋga lɪmɛ ɮɔm
Gloss (with missing item): because cow=Pl PSP 3P+PFV-eat field PSP ___ POSS 1PEX five
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Because those cows, they ate all of that field that belonged to the five of us.’ (lit. because the cows, they ate the field, all of it, belonging to us five)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In both \REF{ex:11:48} and \REF{ex:11:49}, the final prominent element is jəyga ‘its gloss ___.’ The effect is to emphasise the totality of the events. In \REF{ex:11:48}, the fact that its gloss ___ of the field was destroyed by the cows is important to the story. In \REF{ex:11:49}, the story teller is emphasising that it was important that everyone fought against the Mbuko. In fact, people who did not fight were beaten after the skirmish with the Mbuko ended.
A: word: dzijga	 gloss: all
B: word: ndɛ	 gloss: so
C: word: aŋga	 gloss: POSS
D: word: dʒijga	 gloss: all
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 4:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): waja \ulp{ɬa}{~~~~~}\ulp{=ahaj}{~~~~~} \ule{na} \ulp{t\`{ɔ}-zɔm}{~~~~~~~~~~~} \ulp{gəvax}{~~~~~} \ule{na} {dzijga} ___ lɪmɛ ɮɔm
Gloss (with missing item): because cow=Pl PSP 3P+PFV-eat field PSP all ___ 1PEX five
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Because those cows, they ate all of that field that belonged to the five of us.’ (lit. because the cows, they ate the field, all of it, belonging to us five)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In both \REF{ex:11:48} and \REF{ex:11:49}, the final prominent element is jəyga ‘all.’ The effect is to emphasise the totality of the events. In \REF{ex:11:48}, the fact that all of the field was destroyed by the cows is important to the story. In \REF{ex:11:49}, the story teller is emphasising that it was important that everyone fought against the Mbuko. In fact, people who did not fight were beaten after the skirmish with the Mbuko ended.
A: word: aŋga	 gloss: POSS
B: word: dzijga	 gloss: all
C: word: aŋga=uwla	 gloss: POSS=oneS.POSS
D: word: ɗuw	 gloss: also
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 5:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): waja \ulp{ɬa}{~~~~~}\ulp{=ahaj}{~~~~~} \ule{na} \ulp{t\`{ɔ}-zɔm}{~~~~~~~~~~~} \ulp{gəvax}{~~~~~} \ule{na} {dzijga} aŋga ___ ɮɔm
Gloss (with missing item): because cow=Pl PSP 3P+PFV-eat field PSP all POSS ___ five
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Because those cows, they ate all of that field that belonged to the five of us.’ (lit. because the cows, they ate the field, all of it, belonging to us five)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In both \REF{ex:11:48} and \REF{ex:11:49}, the final prominent element is jəyga ‘all.’ The effect is to emphasise the totality of the events. In \REF{ex:11:48}, the fact that all of the field was destroyed by the cows is important to the story. In \REF{ex:11:49}, the story teller is emphasising that it was important that everyone fought against the Mbuko. In fact, people who did not fight were beaten after the skirmish with the Mbuko ended.
A: word: alɪmɛ	 gloss: 1PEX.POSS
B: word: ŋgɪndijɛ	 gloss: DEM
C: word: baj	 gloss: NEG
D: word: lɪmɛ	 gloss: 1PEX
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 6:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): waja \ulp{ɬa}{~~~~~}\ulp{=ahaj}{~~~~~} \ule{na} \ulp{t\`{ɔ}-zɔm}{~~~~~~~~~~~} \ulp{gəvax}{~~~~~} \ule{na} {dzijga} aŋga lɪmɛ ___
Gloss (with missing item): because cow=Pl PSP 3P+PFV-eat field PSP all POSS 1PEX ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Because those cows, they ate all of that field that belonged to the five of us.’ (lit. because the cows, they ate the field, all of it, belonging to us five)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In both \REF{ex:11:48} and \REF{ex:11:49}, the final prominent element is jəyga ‘all.’ The effect is to emphasise the totality of the events. In \REF{ex:11:48}, the fact that all of the field was destroyed by the cows is important to the story. In \REF{ex:11:49}, the story teller is emphasising that it was important that everyone fought against the Mbuko. In fact, people who did not fight were beaten after the skirmish with the Mbuko ended.
A: word: dzijga	 gloss: all
B: word: mʊfaɗ	 gloss: four
C: word: ɮɔm	 gloss: five
D: word: mà-zɔm	 gloss: 3S+HOR-eat
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 7:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): \ulp{ndɛ}{~~~~~~} \ule{na} \ulp{lɪmɛ}{~~~~~~} \ule{ɗuw} \ulp{n\`ə-ɮʊg-ɔm}{~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~} \ulp{va}{~~~~~~} \ule{na} ___
Gloss (with missing item): so PSP 1PEX also oneS+PFV-plant-1PEX body PSP ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘So, we also, we fought (lit. planted body), all of us.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In both \REF{ex:11:48} and \REF{ex:11:49}, the final prominent element is jəyga ‘its gloss ___.’ The effect is to emphasise the totality of the events. In \REF{ex:11:48}, the fact that its gloss ___ of the field was destroyed by the cows is important to the story. In \REF{ex:11:49}, the story teller is emphasising that it was important that everyone fought against the Mbuko. In fact, people who did not fight were beaten after the skirmish with the Mbuko ended.
A: word: dʒijga	 gloss: all
B: word: dzijga	 gloss: all
C: word: á-ndaj	 gloss: 3S+IFV-PROG
D: word: ndɛ	 gloss: so
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 8:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): waja \ulp{ɬa}{~~~~~}\ulp{=ahaj}{~~~~~} \ule{na} \ulp{t\`{ɔ}-zɔm}{~~~~~~~~~~~} \ulp{gəvax}{~~~~~} \ule{na} ___ aŋga lɪmɛ ɮɔm
Gloss (with missing item): because cow=Pl PSP 3P+PFV-eat field PSP ___ POSS 1PEX five
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Because those cows, they ate all of that field that belonged to the five of us.’ (lit. because the cows, they ate the field, all of it, belonging to us five)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In both \REF{ex:11:48} and \REF{ex:11:49}, the final prominent element is jəyga ‘its gloss ___.’ The effect is to emphasise the totality of the events. In \REF{ex:11:48}, the fact that its gloss ___ of the field was destroyed by the cows is important to the story. In \REF{ex:11:49}, the story teller is emphasising that it was important that everyone fought against the Mbuko. In fact, people who did not fight were beaten after the skirmish with the Mbuko ended.
A: word: dʒijga	 gloss: all
B: word: dzijga	 gloss: all
C: word: lɪmɛ	 gloss: 1PEX
D: word: ndɛ	 gloss: so
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 9:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): waja \ulp{ɬa}{~~~~~}\ulp{=ahaj}{~~~~~} \ule{na} \ulp{t\`{ɔ}-zɔm}{~~~~~~~~~~~} \ulp{gəvax}{~~~~~} \ule{na} {dzijga} ___ lɪmɛ ɮɔm
Gloss (with missing item): because cow=Pl PSP 3P+PFV-eat field PSP all ___ 1PEX five
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Because those cows, they ate all of that field that belonged to the five of us.’ (lit. because the cows, they ate the field, all of it, belonging to us five)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In both \REF{ex:11:48} and \REF{ex:11:49}, the final prominent element is jəyga ‘all.’ The effect is to emphasise the totality of the events. In \REF{ex:11:48}, the fact that all of the field was destroyed by the cows is important to the story. In \REF{ex:11:49}, the story teller is emphasising that it was important that everyone fought against the Mbuko. In fact, people who did not fight were beaten after the skirmish with the Mbuko ended.
A: word: mɔgʷɔm	 gloss: home
B: word: aŋga=uwla	 gloss: POSS=oneS.POSS
C: word: ɮɔm	 gloss: five
D: word: aŋga	 gloss: POSS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 10:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): waja \ulp{ɬa}{~~~~~}\ulp{=ahaj}{~~~~~} \ule{na} \ulp{t\`{ɔ}-zɔm}{~~~~~~~~~~~} \ulp{gəvax}{~~~~~} \ule{na} {dzijga} aŋga ___ ɮɔm
Gloss (with missing item): because cow=Pl PSP 3P+PFV-eat field PSP all POSS ___ five
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Because those cows, they ate all of that field that belonged to the five of us.’ (lit. because the cows, they ate the field, all of it, belonging to us five)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In both \REF{ex:11:48} and \REF{ex:11:49}, the final prominent element is jəyga ‘all.’ The effect is to emphasise the totality of the events. In \REF{ex:11:48}, the fact that all of the field was destroyed by the cows is important to the story. In \REF{ex:11:49}, the story teller is emphasising that it was important that everyone fought against the Mbuko. In fact, people who did not fight were beaten after the skirmish with the Mbuko ended.
A: word: alɪmɛ	 gloss: 1PEX.POSS
B: word: dzijga	 gloss: all
C: word: aŋga	 gloss: POSS
D: word: lɪmɛ	 gloss: 1PEX
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 11:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): waja \ulp{ɬa}{~~~~~}\ulp{=ahaj}{~~~~~} \ule{na} \ulp{t\`{ɔ}-zɔm}{~~~~~~~~~~~} \ulp{gəvax}{~~~~~} \ule{na} {dzijga} aŋga lɪmɛ ___
Gloss (with missing item): because cow=Pl PSP 3P+PFV-eat field PSP all POSS 1PEX ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘Because those cows, they ate all of that field that belonged to the five of us.’ (lit. because the cows, they ate the field, all of it, belonging to us five)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In both \REF{ex:11:48} and \REF{ex:11:49}, the final prominent element is jəyga ‘all.’ The effect is to emphasise the totality of the events. In \REF{ex:11:48}, the fact that all of the field was destroyed by the cows is important to the story. In \REF{ex:11:49}, the story teller is emphasising that it was important that everyone fought against the Mbuko. In fact, people who did not fight were beaten after the skirmish with the Mbuko ended.
A: word: aŋga	 gloss: POSS
B: word: mʊfaɗ	 gloss: four
C: word: mà-zɔm	 gloss: 3S+HOR-eat
D: word: ɮɔm	 gloss: five
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 12:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): \ulp{ndɛ}{~~~~~~} \ule{na} \ulp{lɪmɛ}{~~~~~~} \ule{ɗuw} \ulp{n\`ə-ɮʊg-ɔm}{~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~} \ulp{va}{~~~~~~} \ule{na} ___
Gloss (with missing item): so PSP 1PEX also oneS+PFV-plant-1PEX body PSP ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘So, we also, we fought (lit. planted body), all of us.’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In both \REF{ex:11:48} and \REF{ex:11:49}, the final prominent element is jəyga ‘its gloss ___.’ The effect is to emphasise the totality of the events. In \REF{ex:11:48}, the fact that its gloss ___ of the field was destroyed by the cows is important to the story. In \REF{ex:11:49}, the story teller is emphasising that it was important that everyone fought against the Mbuko. In fact, people who did not fight were beaten after the skirmish with the Mbuko ended.
A: word: dzijga	 gloss: all
B: word: ndɛ	 gloss: so
C: word: dʒijga	 gloss: all
D: word: á-ndaj	 gloss: 3S+IFV-PROG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 13:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ndɛ \ulp{kij}{~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~} \ulp{ɛlɛ}{~~~~~~} \ule{na} \ulp{n\`ə-zʊm-ɔm}{~~~~~~~~~~~} \ulp{ɛlɛ}{~~~~~~}\ulp{=atəta}{~~~~~~~~~} \ule{na} ___
Gloss (with missing item): so ID:looking eye PSP oneS+PFV-eat-1PEX thing=3P.POSS PSP ___
The English translation of this sentence is:‘So, one could see that we had not eaten their food.’ (lit. looking, we ate their thing, not)
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In \REF{ex:11:50}, two na{}-marked elements leave a negative particle highlighted at the end of the clause. The fact that the storytellers did not eat the people’s food was important since they would have been expected to eat.
A: word: lɪmɛ	 gloss: 1PEX
B: word: amɛ-ʒ-ɛ	 gloss: DEP-take-CL
C: word: baj	 gloss: NEG
D: word: asa-baj	 gloss: again-NEG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 14:
You are a linguist specializing in Moloko. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ndɛ asa bahaj a ɬa ___ ndahaŋ aka baj na asa ɬa=ahaj na
Gloss (with missing item): so if chief GEN cow ___ 3S on NEG PSP if cow=Pl PSP
The English translation of this sentence is:‘So, if the owner of the cows wasn’t there, [and] that the cows’
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \oldstylenums{3}\textsc{s} \DO pronomithe morpheme ___l the morpheme ___ (see \sectref{sec:7.3.2}) is identical to the presupposition marker the morpheme ___ and some ambiguity can be encountered in contexts where the morpheme ___ immediately follows a verb that has no locatiothe morpheme ___l or directiothe morpheme ___l extensions (which follow the DO pronomithe morpheme ___l but would precede a its gloss ___ marker). Two examples showing the ambiguity are (\ref{ex:11:52}--\ref{ex:11:53}). In \REF{ex:11:52}, the underlined the morpheme ___ could be interpreted as the presupposition marker since there are multiple the morpheme ___{}-marked elements in the clause and this fithe morpheme ___l underlined the morpheme ___ appears immediately before the fithe morpheme ___l (presumably) focussed element mənjəye ata ‘their habits.’ On the other hand, the morpheme ___ could be the \oldstylenums{3}\textsc{s} \DO pronomithe morpheme ___l for the verb mədakan ‘instructing to him,’ since the verb is in a construction which marks significant events (see stem plus ideophone auxiliary \sectref{sec:8.2.3}), so it is the event of the husband instructing his wife that is highlighted by the preceding the morpheme ___-marked elements.
A: word: á-ndaj	 gloss: 3S+IFV-PROG
B: word: a-sak	 gloss: 3S-multiply
C: word: na-faɗ	 gloss: oneS-place
D: word: na	 gloss: PSP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D