cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 145:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Maa ___ fofola urup-eya maa op-iya iiw-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): food ___ foam rise-2/3s.DS food be.done-2/3s.DS dish.out-PA-3s\hspace{-1mm}
The English translation of this sentence is:`She cooked the food and when it boiled and was done she dished it out.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In process descriptions, the identity of people performing the actions is not important, and their topicality is low. In \REF{ex:8:x1481}, the person watching the fire in the coconut drying shed is not mentioned in any way. This example is also like \REF{ex:8:x1476} above, in that there are two clauses with a different low-topicality subject, here one of them [+human], intervening between the second \textsc{ss} clause and the final clause, where the original subject is picked up.
A: word: ikiw-i-nen	 gloss: go-NP-FU.1s
B: word: uup-ep	 gloss: cook-SS.SEQ
C: word: ik-ep	 gloss: roast-SS.SEQ
D: word: wiim-urup-ep	 gloss: escort-ascend-SS.SEQ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 146:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Maa uup-ep fofola ___ maa op-iya iiw-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): food cook-SS.SEQ foam ___ food be.done-2/3s.DS dish.out-PA-3s\hspace{-1mm}
The English translation of this sentence is:`She cooked the food and when it boiled and was done she dished it out.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In process descriptions, the identity of people performing the actions is not important, and their topicality is low. In \REF{ex:8:x1481}, the person watching the fire in the coconut drying shed is not mentioned in any way. This example is also like \REF{ex:8:x1476} above, in that there are two clauses with a different low-topicality subject, here one of them [+human], intervening between the second \textsc{ss} clause and the final clause, where the original subject is picked up.
A: word: p-urup-eya	 gloss: BPX-ascend-2/3s.DS
B: word: kir-ep	 gloss: turn-SS.SEQ
C: word: urup-eya	 gloss: rise-2/3s.DS
D: word: ir-am-ik-eya	 gloss: rise-SS.SIM-be-2/3s.DS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 147:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Maa uup-ep fofola urup-eya maa ___ iiw-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): food cook-SS.SEQ foam rise-2/3s.DS food ___ dish.out-PA-3s\hspace{-1mm}
The English translation of this sentence is:`She cooked the food and when it boiled and was done she dished it out.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In process descriptions, the identity of people performing the actions is not important, and their topicality is low. In \REF{ex:8:x1481}, the person watching the fire in the coconut drying shed is not mentioned in any way. This example is also like \REF{ex:8:x1476} above, in that there are two clauses with a different low-topicality subject, here one of them [+human], intervening between the second \textsc{ss} clause and the final clause, where the original subject is picked up.
A: word: op-iya	 gloss: be.done-2/3s.DS
B: word: amina=ke	 gloss: saucepan=CF
C: word: unow-iya	 gloss: many=COM
D: word: unukum-emi	 gloss: wrap-SS.SIM
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 148:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ aw-emi mua unow maneka iiwawun fikera kuum-emi saawirin-ow-iwkin aria fiker epia aw-i-non.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ burn-SS.SIM man many very altogether kunai.grass burn-SS.SIM round-CAUS-2/3p.DS alright kunai.grass fire burn-NP-FU.3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`They burn it and it burns and all the men burn and surround the kunai grass, (and) alright the kunai fire will burn.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Even an inanimate subject may override an animate/human one in \textsc{sr} marking, if its topicality is high enough. In \REF{ex:8:x1479} the subject/topic is \textstyleForeignWords{kunai} grass and the burning of the grass, which is such an important part of a pighunt that the hunt itself is called \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{fiker(a) kuumowa} `kunai-burning'. The grass is a continuing topic from the previous several sentences, so a noun phrase is not used for marking it.
A: word: kuum-eya	 gloss: burn-2/3.DS
B: word: ikos	 gloss: with
C: word: uruf-am-ika-iwkin	 gloss: see-SS.SIM-be-2/3p.DS
D: word: kuum-iwkin	 gloss: burn-2/3p.DS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 149:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Kuum-iwkin ___ mua unow maneka iiwawun fikera kuum-emi saawirin-ow-iwkin aria fiker epia aw-i-non.
Gloss (with missing item): burn-2/3p.DS ___ man many very altogether kunai.grass burn-SS.SIM round-CAUS-2/3p.DS alright kunai.grass fire burn-NP-FU.3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`They burn it and it burns and all the men burn and surround the kunai grass, (and) alright the kunai fire will burn.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Even an inanimate subject may override an animate/human one in \textsc{sr} marking, if its topicality is high enough. In \REF{ex:8:x1479} the subject/topic is \textstyleForeignWords{kunai} grass and the burning of the grass, which is such an important part of a pighunt that the hunt itself is called \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{fiker(a) kuumowa} `kunai-burning'. The grass is a continuing topic from the previous several sentences, so a noun phrase is not used for marking it.
A: word: aw-emi	 gloss: burn-SS.SIM
B: word: aaw-emi	 gloss: take-SS.SIM
C: word: yia	 gloss: 1s.ACC
D: word: aw-em-ik-eya	 gloss: burn-SS.SIM-be-2/3s.DS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 150:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Kuum-iwkin aw-emi mua unow maneka iiwawun fikera kuum-emi ___ aria fiker epia aw-i-non.
Gloss (with missing item): burn-2/3p.DS burn-SS.SIM man many very altogether kunai.grass burn-SS.SIM ___ alright kunai.grass fire burn-NP-FU.3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`They burn it and it burns and all the men burn and surround the kunai grass, (and) alright the kunai fire will burn.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Even an inanimate subject may override an animate/human one in \textsc{sr} marking, if its topicality is high enough. In \REF{ex:8:x1479} the subject/topic is \textstyleForeignWords{kunai} grass and the burning of the grass, which is such an important part of a pighunt that the hunt itself is called \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{fiker(a) kuumowa} `kunai-burning'. The grass is a continuing topic from the previous several sentences, so a noun phrase is not used for marking it.
A: word: p-er-iwkin	 gloss: BPX-go-2/3p.DS
B: word: saawirin-ow-iwkin	 gloss: round-CAUS-2/3p.DS
C: word: saawirin-owa	 gloss: surround-NMZ
D: word: ir-ow-(ow)-eya	 gloss: go.up-CAUS-CAUS-2/3s.DS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 151:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Wiawi ___ kuum-eya kuum-eya aw-ep eka iw-a-k na wia, eka=ke saanar-e-k.
Gloss (with missing item): 3s/p.father ___ burn-2/3s.DS burn-2/3s.DS burn-SS.SEQ river enter-PA-3s but no river=CF dry-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`It kept burning and burning their father and he burned and entered the river but no, the river dried.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: A medial verb with \textsc{ds} marking is used in two instances where it does not indicate a change of subject. Both types have two or more clauses with identical \textsc{ds} marking even though the subject is the same; only the last of those clauses really indicates a change of subject. One of them is recursion of a \textsc{ds} verb \REF{ex:8:x1493}, indicating continuity; the identification of the subject is suspended until the repetition ends \citep[201]{Reesink1987}.
A: word: enim-i-mik	 gloss: eat-Np-PR.1/3p
B: word: kuum-eya	 gloss: burn-2/3s.DS
C: word: kuum-e-mik	 gloss: burn-PA-1/3p
D: word: nomona	 gloss: stone
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 152:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Wiawi kuum-eya ___ kuum-eya aw-ep eka iw-a-k na wia, eka=ke saanar-e-k.
Gloss (with missing item): 3s/p.father burn-2/3s.DS ___ burn-2/3s.DS burn-SS.SEQ river enter-PA-3s but no river=CF dry-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`It kept burning and burning their father and he burned and entered the river but no, the river dried.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: A medial verb with \textsc{ds} marking is used in two instances where it does not indicate a change of subject. Both types have two or more clauses with identical \textsc{ds} marking even though the subject is the same; only the last of those clauses really indicates a change of subject. One of them is recursion of a \textsc{ds} verb \REF{ex:8:x1493}, indicating continuity; the identification of the subject is suspended until the repetition ends \citep[201]{Reesink1987}.
A: word: urupa	 gloss: cup
B: word: ika-inok=na	 gloss: be-IMP.3s=TP
C: word: kuum-e-mik	 gloss: burn-PA-1/3p
D: word: kuum-eya	 gloss: burn-2/3s.DS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 153:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Wiawi kuum-eya kuum-eya ___ aw-ep eka iw-a-k na wia, eka=ke saanar-e-k.
Gloss (with missing item): 3s/p.father burn-2/3s.DS burn-2/3s.DS ___ burn-SS.SEQ river enter-PA-3s but no river=CF dry-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`It kept burning and burning their father and he burned and entered the river but no, the river dried.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: A medial verb with \textsc{ds} marking is used in two instances where it does not indicate a change of subject. Both types have two or more clauses with identical \textsc{ds} marking even though the subject is the same; only the last of those clauses really indicates a change of subject. One of them is recursion of a \textsc{ds} verb \REF{ex:8:x1493}, indicating continuity; the identification of the subject is suspended until the repetition ends \citep[201]{Reesink1987}.
A: word: kuum-e-mik	 gloss: burn-PA-1/3p
B: word: ika-iwkin	 gloss: be-2/3p.DS
C: word: popor(a)	 gloss: quiet
D: word: kuum-eya	 gloss: burn-2/3s.DS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 154:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Efa ___ koora=pa efa uruf-am-ik-eya ikiw-i-nen ekap-i-nen.
Gloss (with missing item): 1s.ACC ___ house=LOC 1s.ACC see-SS.SIM-be-2/3.DS go-NP-FU.1s come-NP-FU.1s
The English translation of this sentence is:`You will keep seeing me, you will keep seeing me from the house, and I will come and go.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: A medial clause that has the same subject as the following medial clause may have \textsc{ds} marking if both the medial clauses relate to the same finite clause as their reference clause, and the first of the medial clauses gets expanded or defined more closely in the second one. The \textsc{ds} verbs may be identical \REF{ex:8:x1494}, but they do not need to be \REF{ex:8:x1495}, \REF{ex:8:x1496}.
A: word: kuuf-am-ik-eya	 gloss: watch-SS.SIM-be-2/3s.DS
B: word: uruf-am-ik-eya	 gloss: see-SS.SIM-be-2/3.DS
C: word: uruf-am-ika-iwkin	 gloss: see-SS.SIM-be-2/3p.DS
D: word: maak-eya	 gloss: tell-2/3s.DS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 155:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Efa uruf-am-ik-eya, koora=pa efa ___ ikiw-i-nen ekap-i-nen.
Gloss (with missing item): 1s.ACC see-SS.SIM-be-2/3.DS house=LOC 1s.ACC ___ go-NP-FU.1s come-NP-FU.1s
The English translation of this sentence is:`You will keep seeing me, you will keep seeing me from the house, and I will come and go.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: A medial clause that has the same subject as the following medial clause may have \textsc{ds} marking if both the medial clauses relate to the same finite clause as their reference clause, and the first of the medial clauses gets expanded or defined more closely in the second one. The \textsc{ds} verbs may be identical \REF{ex:8:x1494}, but they do not need to be \REF{ex:8:x1495}, \REF{ex:8:x1496}.
A: word: aw-emi	 gloss: burn-SS.SIM
B: word: kuuf-am-ik-eya	 gloss: watch-SS.SIM-be-2/3s.DS
C: word: uruf-am-ika-iwkin	 gloss: see-SS.SIM-be-2/3p.DS
D: word: uruf-am-ik-eya	 gloss: see-SS.SIM-be-2/3.DS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 156:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ...pon sisina=pa ___ piipa unowa=pa soomar-em-ik-eya mik-a-m.
Gloss (with missing item): ...turtle shallow.water=LOC ___ seaweed many=LOC walk-SS.SIM.be-2/3s.DS spear-PA-1s
The English translation of this sentence is:`{\dots} the turtle was in the shallow water, it was walking among a lot of seaweed and I speared it.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: A medial clause that has the same subject as the following medial clause may have \textsc{ds} marking if both the medial clauses relate to the same finite clause as their reference clause, and the first of the medial clauses gets expanded or defined more closely in the second one. The \textsc{ds} verbs may be identical \REF{ex:8:x1494}, but they do not need to be \REF{ex:8:x1495}, \REF{ex:8:x1496}.
A: word: ik-eya	 gloss: be-2/3s.DS
B: word: uruf-am-ik-eya	 gloss: see-SS.SIM-be-2/3.DS
C: word: ika-iwkin	 gloss: be-2/3p.DS
D: word: takira	 gloss: child
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 157:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ...pon sisina=pa ik-eya, piipa unowa=pa ___ mik-a-m.
Gloss (with missing item): ...turtle shallow.water=LOC be-2/3s.DS seaweed many=LOC ___ spear-PA-1s
The English translation of this sentence is:`{\dots} the turtle was in the shallow water, it was walking among a lot of seaweed and I speared it.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: A medial clause that has the same subject as the following medial clause may have \textsc{ds} marking if both the medial clauses relate to the same finite clause as their reference clause, and the first of the medial clauses gets expanded or defined more closely in the second one. The \textsc{ds} verbs may be identical \REF{ex:8:x1494}, but they do not need to be \REF{ex:8:x1495}, \REF{ex:8:x1496}.
A: word: mia	 gloss: body
B: word: ika-iwkin	 gloss: be-2/3p.DS
C: word: soomar-em-ik-eya	 gloss: walk-SS.SIM.be-2/3s.DS
D: word: soomar-em-ik-ok	 gloss: walk-SS.SIM-be-SS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 158:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ ik-ok wi Saramun=ke wiisa uf-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ be-SS 3p.UNM Saramun=CF dance.name dance-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`It was like that and (then) the Saramun people danced \textstyleForeignWords{wiisa}.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \textsc{ss} medial form of the verb `be' is used in the expression \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___ ikok} `it is/was its gloss ___ (and)', regardless of the following subject/topic \REF{ex:8:x1500}, \REF{ex:8:x1501}. The construction seems to have grammaticalized as an expression of an indefinite time span.
A: word: madang	 gloss: Madang
B: word: naap=iw	 gloss: thus=INST
C: word: naap	 gloss: thus
D: word: naapeya	 gloss: therefore
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 159:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Naap ___ wi Saramun=ke wiisa uf-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): thus ___ 3p.UNM Saramun=CF dance.name dance-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`It was like that and (then) the Saramun people danced \textstyleForeignWords{wiisa}.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \textsc{ss} medial form of the verb `be' is used in the expression \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{naap ikok} `it is/was thus (and)', regardless of the following subject/topic \REF{ex:8:x1500}, \REF{ex:8:x1501}. The construction seems to have grammaticalized as an expression of an indefinite time span.
A: word: mauw-am-ik-ok	 gloss: work-SS.SIM-be-SS
B: word: sesenar-ek-a-m	 gloss: buy-CNTF-PA-1s
C: word: ikiw-em-ik-ok	 gloss: go-SS.SIM-be-SS
D: word: ik-ok	 gloss: be-SS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 160:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ...mua me wia imen-a-mik. ___ ik-ok sarere uura buburia ona amia mua wiar kerer-ep opaimika=pa yia wu-a-k.
Gloss (with missing item): ...man not 3p.ACC find-PA-1/3p ___ be-SS Saturday night bald 3s.GEN bow man 3.DAT appear-SS.SEQ talk=LOC 1p.ACC put-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`{\dots} we didn't find the men. It was like that, and on Saturday evening the bald man himself went to the police and accused us.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \textsc{ss} medial form of the verb `be' is used in the expression \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___ ikok} `it is/was its gloss ___ (and)', regardless of the following subject/topic \REF{ex:8:x1500}, \REF{ex:8:x1501}. The construction seems to have grammaticalized as an expression of an indefinite time span.
A: word: naap=iw	 gloss: thus=INST
B: word: mua	 gloss: man
C: word: naapeya	 gloss: therefore
D: word: naap	 gloss: thus
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D