cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 54:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___
Gloss (with missing item): ___
The English translation of this sentence is: `Bring it!'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: This type of clause combination has given rise to a softer, less direct command, which is given with a medial different-subject form of a verb; the final clause is left out altogether \REF{ex:7:x1084}.\footnote{This fairly common use of a medial verb form in Papuan languages is probably the origin of the use of pastaim `first' in Tok Pisin commands, e.g. Kam pastaim `Come!'} This form is particularly common when commands are given to children.
A: word: ekap-eya	 gloss: come-2/3s.DS
B: word: p-ekap-eya	 gloss: BPX-come-2/3s.DS
C: word: p-er-iwkin	 gloss: BPX-go-2/3p.DS
D: word: -weetak	 gloss: -no
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 55:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Emeria manina ___ en-owa nop-ap or-eka.
Gloss (with missing item): woman garden ___ eat-NMZ search-SS.SEQ descend-IMP.2p
The English translation of this sentence is: `Women, go to the garden, look for food and come down.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The imperative of the final clause may have an influence on the medial clause(s) so that they are also interpreted as belonging within the scope of the command. This happens very easily with same-subject medial verbs \REF{ex:7:x1082}; it is also possible but much less likely when the subject changes \REF{ex:7:x1364}.\footnote{This example may also be interpreted to have two commands: a ``soft'' one, expressed with a medial verb, and a regular one.} Example \REF{ex:7:x1846} is ambiguous: in the situation where it was said, the medial clause was not in the scope of the final clause imperative; in some other situation it could be. When the medial verb has a first person form, imperative interpretation is not possible \REF{ex:7:x1083}.
A: word: ir-ap	 gloss: come/go-SS.SEQ
B: word: karu-eka	 gloss: run-IMP.2p
C: word: p-ikiw-ep	 gloss: BPX-go-SS.SEQ
D: word: ikiw-ep	 gloss: go-SS.SEQ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 56:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Emeria manina ikiw-ep en-owa ___ or-eka.
Gloss (with missing item): woman garden go-SS.SEQ eat-NMZ ___ descend-IMP.2p
The English translation of this sentence is: `Women, go to the garden, look for food and come down.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The imperative of the final clause may have an influence on the medial clause(s) so that they are also interpreted as belonging within the scope of the command. This happens very easily with same-subject medial verbs \REF{ex:7:x1082}; it is also possible but much less likely when the subject changes \REF{ex:7:x1364}.\footnote{This example may also be interpreted to have two commands: a ``soft'' one, expressed with a medial verb, and a regular one.} Example \REF{ex:7:x1846} is ambiguous: in the situation where it was said, the medial clause was not in the scope of the final clause imperative; in some other situation it could be. When the medial verb has a first person form, imperative interpretation is not possible \REF{ex:7:x1083}.
A: word: nop-ap-pu-ap	 gloss: clear-SS.SEQ-CMPL-SS.SEQ
B: word: ma-e-n=i	 gloss: say-PA-2s=QM
C: word: nop-ap	 gloss: search-SS.SEQ
D: word: imen-ap	 gloss: find-SS.SEQ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 57:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mua emeria wia ___ me efa enim-uk.
Gloss (with missing item): man woman 3p.ACC ___ not 2s.ACC eat-IMP.3p
The English translation of this sentence is: `Tell the people and let them not eat me.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The imperative of the final clause may have an influence on the medial clause(s) so that they are also interpreted as belonging within the scope of the command. This happens very easily with same-subject medial verbs \REF{ex:7:x1082}; it is also possible but much less likely when the subject changes \REF{ex:7:x1364}.\footnote{This example may also be interpreted to have two commands: a ``soft'' one, expressed with a medial verb, and a regular one.} Example \REF{ex:7:x1846} is ambiguous: in the situation where it was said, the medial clause was not in the scope of the final clause imperative; in some other situation it could be. When the medial verb has a first person form, imperative interpretation is not possible \REF{ex:7:x1083}.
A: word: weetak-eya	 gloss: no-2/3s.DS
B: word: maak-eya	 gloss: tell-2/3s.DS
C: word: naap=i	 gloss: thus=QM
D: word: maak-iwkin	 gloss: tell-2/3p.DS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 58:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Feeke wiar ___ kiiriw mua wiar urup-e.
Gloss (with missing item): here.CF 3.DAT ___ again man 3.DAT ascend-IMP.2s
The English translation of this sentence is: `Having been here with him (=your brother), go up to your husband again.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The imperative of the final clause may have an influence on the medial clause(s) so that they are also interpreted as belonging within the scope of the command. This happens very easily with same-subject medial verbs \REF{ex:7:x1082}; it is also possible but much less likely when the subject changes \REF{ex:7:x1364}.\footnote{This example may also be interpreted to have two commands: a ``soft'' one, expressed with a medial verb, and a regular one.} Example \REF{ex:7:x1846} is ambiguous: in the situation where it was said, the medial clause was not in the scope of the final clause imperative; in some other situation it could be. When the medial verb has a first person form, imperative interpretation is not possible \REF{ex:7:x1083}.
A: word: ik-ok	 gloss: be-SS
B: word: mauw-am-ik-ok	 gloss: work-SS.SIM-be-SS
C: word: ikiw-em-ik-ok	 gloss: go-SS.SIM-be-SS
D: word: wia	 gloss: 3p.ACC
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 59:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): No ___ sail-i-nan!
Gloss (with missing item): 2s.UNM ___ lie-Np-FU.2s
The English translation of this sentence is: `Don't lie!'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The second person future tense form is also used for a command, but this is its gloss ___ very common. It is used in a specific situation, its gloss ___ for giving generic commands or rules. The sentence \REF{ex:7:x1080} was said to a person who was suspected of lying, and in \REF{ex:7:x1081} parents give instructions to their daughter how to mourn.
A: word: (me	 gloss: (not
B: word: me	 gloss: not
C: word: emeria	 gloss: woman
D: word: kamenap	 gloss: what.like
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 60:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): No me ___
Gloss (with missing item): 2s.UNM not ___
The English translation of this sentence is: `Don't lie!'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The second person future tense form is also used for a command, but this is not very common. It is used in a specific situation, not for giving generic commands or rules. The sentence \REF{ex:7:x1080} was said to a person who was suspected of lying, and in \REF{ex:7:x1081} parents give instructions to their daughter how to mourn.
A: word: on-i-nan	 gloss: do-NP-FU.2s
B: word: yi-i-nan=i	 gloss: give.me-Np-FU.2s=QM
C: word: sail-i-nan	 gloss: lie-Np-FU.2s
D: word: kamin	 gloss: how.much
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 61:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Naap ma-emi ___ na.
Gloss (with missing item): thus say-SS.SIM ___ INTJ
The English translation of this sentence is: `Say like that and wail.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The second person future tense form is also used for a command, but this is not very common. It is used in a specific situation, not for giving generic commands or rules. The sentence \REF{ex:7:x1080} was said to a person who was suspected of lying, and in \REF{ex:7:x1081} parents give instructions to their daughter how to mourn.
A: word: eliwa=ki	 gloss: good=CF.QM
B: word: om-em-ika-i-nan	 gloss: cry-SS.SIM-be-Np-FU.2s
C: word: mua=iw	 gloss: man=LIM
D: word: om-em-ika-i-n	 gloss: cry-SS.SIM-be-Np-PR.2s
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B