cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 41:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Maa pela ___ / weetak-eya fofa er-a-m.
Gloss (with missing item): thing leaf ___ / no-2/3s.DS market go-PA-1s
The English translation of this sentence is: `I had no greens and went to the market.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The predicate function of the negators \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{weetak} and \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{marew} is also shown in the fact that they take a medial different-subject suffix, when the verbless negative possessive or existential-presentative clauses occur sentence-medially in a chaining structure \REF{ex:6:x1101}. \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{Wia} cannot be suffixed with the medial verb suffix.
A: word: weetak-eya	 gloss: no-2/3s.DS
B: word: baliwep	 gloss: well
C: word: marewa=ke=yon	 gloss: none=CF-perhaps
D: word: marew-eya	 gloss: no(ne)-2/3s.DS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 42:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Maa pela marew-eya / ___ fofa er-a-m.
Gloss (with missing item): thing leaf no(ne)-2/3s.DS / ___ market go-PA-1s
The English translation of this sentence is: `I had no greens and went to the market.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The predicate function of the negators \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{weetak} and \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{marew} is also shown in the fact that they take a medial different-subject suffix, when the verbless negative possessive or existential-presentative clauses occur sentence-medially in a chaining structure \REF{ex:6:x1101}. \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{Wia} cannot be suffixed with the medial verb suffix.
A: word: weetak-eya=na	 gloss: no-2/3s.DS=TP
B: word: akim-owa	 gloss: try-NMZ
C: word: weetak-eya	 gloss: no-2/3s.DS
D: word: marew-eya	 gloss: no(ne)-2/3s.DS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 43:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ napuma=ke ifakim-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ sickness kill-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `It wasn't sickness that killed him.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Papuan languages typically do its gloss ___ have lexicalized constituent negation of the type `its gloss ___hing', `nobody' etc., and even syntactic constituent negation may be lacking \citep[271--272]{Reesink1987}. But in Mauwake it is possible to negate various constituents within a clause, and, although very rarely, even inside a noun phrase. The basic constituent negator is \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___'. It precedes the negated elethe morpheme ___nt, which receives extra stress. Position of the negator, stress, and sothe morpheme ___tithe morpheme ___s the neutral focus clitic all interact in constituent negation \REF{ex:6:x1102}--\REF{ex:6:x1105}.
A: word: (me	 gloss: (not
B: word: nainiw	 gloss: again
C: word: emeria	 gloss: woman
D: word: me	 gloss: not
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 44:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Me ___ ifakim-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): not ___ kill-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `It wasn't sickness that killed him.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Papuan languages typically do not have lexicalized constituent negation of the type `nothing', `nobody' etc., and even syntactic constituent negation may be lacking \citep[271--272]{Reesink1987}. But in Mauwake it is possible to negate various constituents within a clause, and, although very rarely, even inside a noun phrase. The basic constituent negator is \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{me} `not'. It precedes the negated element, which receives extra stress. Position of the negator, stress, and sometimes the neutral focus clitic all interact in constituent negation \REF{ex:6:x1102}--\REF{ex:6:x1105}.
A: word: umuk-owa	 gloss: extinguish-NMZ
B: word: owowa	 gloss: village
C: word: napuma=ke	 gloss: sickness
D: word: napuma	 gloss: sick
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 45:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mua ___ me ekap-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): man ___ not come-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `One (particular) man did not come.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In clauses with \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{quantifiers}}, constituent negation has an important function disambiguating the meaning. If the subject or object noun phrase has a quantifier, the negation is dits gloss ___ in different ways depending on whether the quantifier is in the scope of the negation or not. In \REF{ex:6:x1142} the noun phrase with the particular quantifier \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___' is not in the scope of the negation, but in \REF{ex:6:x1143} it is. The neutral focus clitic is required to clarify the meaning; it can even be attached to some other constituent between the quantifier and the negator \REF{ex:6:x1147}.
A: word: weetak	 gloss: no
B: word: kuisow=ko	 gloss: one=NF
C: word: kuisow	 gloss: one
D: word: papako	 gloss: some
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 46:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mua kuisow ___ ekap-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): man one ___ come-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `One (particular) man did not come.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In clauses with \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{quantifiers}}, constituent negation has an important function disambiguating the the morpheme ___aning. If the subject or object noun phrase has a quantifier, the negation is done in different ways depending on whether the quantifier is in the scope of the negation or its gloss ___. In \REF{ex:6:x1142} the noun phrase with the particular quantifier \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{kuisow} `one' is its gloss ___ in the scope of the negation, but in \REF{ex:6:x1143} it is. The neutral focus clitic is required to clarify the the morpheme ___aning; it can even be attached to sothe morpheme ___ other constituent between the quantifier and the negator \REF{ex:6:x1147}.
A: word: me	 gloss: not
B: word: emeria	 gloss: woman
C: word: (me	 gloss: (not
D: word: uurika	 gloss: tomorrow
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 47:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mua ___ me ekap-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): man ___ not come-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `Not (even) one man came.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In clauses with \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{quantifiers}}, constituent negation has an important function disambiguating the meaning. If the subject or object noun phrase has a quantifier, the negation is done in different ways depending on whether the quantifier is in the scope of the negation or not. In \REF{ex:6:x1142} the noun phrase with the particular quantifier \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{kuisow} `one' is not in the scope of the negation, but in \REF{ex:6:x1143} it is. The neutral focus clitic is required to clarify the meaning; it can even be attached to some other constituent between the quantifier and the negator \REF{ex:6:x1147}.
A: word: aaw-urum-ep	 gloss: get-DISTR/A-SS.SEQ
B: word: maa=ko	 gloss: thing=NF
C: word: kuisow=iw	 gloss: one=INST
D: word: kuisow=ko	 gloss: one=NF
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 48:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mua kuisow=ko ___ ekap-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): man one=NF ___ come-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `Not (even) one man came.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In clauses with \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{quantifiers}}, constituent negation has an important function disambiguating the the morpheme ___aning. If the subject or object noun phrase has a quantifier, the negation is done in different ways depending on whether the quantifier is in the scope of the negation or its gloss ___. In \REF{ex:6:x1142} the noun phrase with the particular quantifier \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{kuisow} `one' is its gloss ___ in the scope of the negation, but in \REF{ex:6:x1143} it is. The neutral focus clitic is required to clarify the the morpheme ___aning; it can even be attached to sothe morpheme ___ other constituent between the quantifier and the negator \REF{ex:6:x1147}.
A: word: me	 gloss: not
B: word: emeria	 gloss: woman
C: word: (me	 gloss: (not
D: word: waa	 gloss: pig
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 49:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mua ___ owowa=pa=ko me ik-ua.
Gloss (with missing item): man ___ village=LOC=NF not be-PA.3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `Not (even) one man stayed in the village.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In clauses with \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{quantifiers}}, constituent negation has an important function disambiguating the meaning. If the subject or object noun phrase has a quantifier, the negation is dits gloss ___ in different ways depending on whether the quantifier is in the scope of the negation or not. In \REF{ex:6:x1142} the noun phrase with the particular quantifier \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___' is not in the scope of the negation, but in \REF{ex:6:x1143} it is. The neutral focus clitic is required to clarify the meaning; it can even be attached to some other constituent between the quantifier and the negator \REF{ex:6:x1147}.
A: word: keker	 gloss: fear
B: word: kuisow	 gloss: one
C: word: kuisow=ko	 gloss: one=NF
D: word: papako	 gloss: some
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 50:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mua kuisow ___ me ik-ua.
Gloss (with missing item): man one ___ not be-PA.3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `Not (even) one man stayed in the village.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In clauses with \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{quantifiers}}, constituent negation has an important function disambiguating the meaning. If the subject or object noun phrase has a quantifier, the negation is done in different ways depending on whether the quantifier is in the scope of the negation or not. In \REF{ex:6:x1142} the noun phrase with the particular quantifier \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{kuisow} `one' is not in the scope of the negation, but in \REF{ex:6:x1143} it is. The neutral focus clitic is required to clarify the meaning; it can even be attached to some other constituent between the quantifier and the negator \REF{ex:6:x1147}.
A: word: owowa=pa=ko	 gloss: village=LOC=NF
B: word: aakisa	 gloss: now
C: word: owowa=pa	 gloss: village=LOC
D: word: womokowa	 gloss: 3s/p.brother
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 51:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mua kuisow owowa=pa=ko ___ ik-ua.
Gloss (with missing item): man one village=LOC=NF ___ be-PA.3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `Not (even) one man stayed in the village.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In clauses with \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{quantifiers}}, constituent negation has an important function disambiguating the the morpheme ___aning. If the subject or object noun phrase has a quantifier, the negation is done in different ways depending on whether the quantifier is in the scope of the negation or its gloss ___. In \REF{ex:6:x1142} the noun phrase with the particular quantifier \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{kuisow} `one' is its gloss ___ in the scope of the negation, but in \REF{ex:6:x1143} it is. The neutral focus clitic is required to clarify the the morpheme ___aning; it can even be attached to sothe morpheme ___ other constituent between the quantifier and the negator \REF{ex:6:x1147}.
A: word: op-a-m	 gloss: hold-PA-1s,
B: word: (me	 gloss: (not
C: word: emeria	 gloss: woman
D: word: me	 gloss: not
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 52:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mua kuisow muuta ___ ekap-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): man one only ___ come-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `Only one man did not come.' Or: `Not only one man came (but more).'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The example \REF{ex:6:x1145} is ambiguous as to whether only one man did its gloss ___ go down or whether it is negated that only one man went. The first alternative is the more likely the morpheme ___aning, and if one wants to make sure to give the second the morpheme ___aning, the standard strategy for constituent negation \REF{ex:6:x1144} is used.
A: word: emeria	 gloss: woman
B: word: (me	 gloss: (not
C: word: me	 gloss: not
D: word: unow	 gloss: many
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 53:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ mua kuisow (muuta) ekap-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ man one (only) come-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `Not only one man came.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The example \REF{ex:6:x1145} is ambiguous as to whether only one man did its gloss ___ go down or whether it is negated that only one man went. The first alternative is the more likely the morpheme ___aning, and if one wants to make sure to give the second the morpheme ___aning, the standard strategy for constituent negation \REF{ex:6:x1144} is used.
A: word: me	 gloss: not
B: word: emeria	 gloss: woman
C: word: (me	 gloss: (not
D: word: uuw-owa	 gloss: work-NMZ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 54:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Emeria mua ___ Mua Maneka opora me ook-i-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): woman man ___ Man Big talk not follow-Np-PR.1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is: `All the people do not follow God's talk.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Similarly, with the universal quantifier \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___', the scope of the negation may be ambiguous. The preferred interpretation for \REF{ex:6:x1148} is that the statement about not following God's talk refers to its gloss ___ people, thus \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{no one}} follows it; but it may also be understood that even if its gloss ___ the people do not follow it, some do.
A: word: -weetak/wia	 gloss: -no
B: word: a''	 gloss: ah
C: word: unowiya	 gloss: all
D: word: unow=iya	 gloss: many=COM
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 55:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Emeria mua unowiya Mua Maneka opora ___ ook-i-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): woman man all Man Big talk ___ follow-Np-PR.1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is: `All the people do not follow God's talk.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Similarly, with the universal quantifier \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{unowiya} `all', the scope of the negation may be ambiguous. The preferred interpretation for \REF{ex:6:x1148} is that the statethe morpheme ___nt about its gloss ___ following God's talk refers to all people, thus \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{no one}} follows it; but it may also be understood that even if all the people do its gloss ___ follow it, sothe morpheme ___ do.
A: word: emeria	 gloss: woman
B: word: me	 gloss: not
C: word: arim-ep	 gloss: grow-SS.SEQ
D: word: (me	 gloss: (not
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 56:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Nain ___ mua unowiya opora wiar op-i-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): but ___ man all talk 3.DAT hold-Np-PR.1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is: `But not all men/people believe in him (= some do).'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: If the negator is in the constituent negation position, the statethe morpheme ___nt is unambiguous \REF{ex:6:x1149}. In this respect Mauwake behaves differently from Usan, which does its gloss ___ allow a constituent negation structure \citep[275--277]{Reesink1987}.
A: word: emeria	 gloss: woman
B: word: (me	 gloss: (not
C: word: akim-owa	 gloss: try-NMZ
D: word: me	 gloss: not
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 57:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Nain me mua ___ opora wiar op-i-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): but not man ___ talk 3.DAT hold-Np-PR.1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is: `But not all men/people believe in him (= some do).'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: If the negator is in the constituent negation position, the statement is unambiguous \REF{ex:6:x1149}. In this respect Mauwake behaves differently from Usan, which does not its gloss ___ow a constituent negation structure \citep[275--277]{Reesink1987}.
A: word: a''	 gloss: ah
B: word: unow=iya	 gloss: many=COM
C: word: unowiya	 gloss: all
D: word: akena	 gloss: very
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C