cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 105:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Yiena ___ maneka ikiw-owa nain ma-i-yem.
Gloss (with missing item): 1p.GEN ___ big go-NMZ that1 say-Np-PR.1s
The English translation of this sentence is: `I am talking about our going to town.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: . This is perhaps clearest with the subject, which in many languages gets possessive/genitive marking in a nominalized clause. In Mauwake this criterion is not very helpful. The pronominal subject of this first type of nominalized clause, if present, is often genitive \REF{ex:5:x1228}, but may be nominative as well. But also the subject of a finite clause can be nominative or genitive in form, depending on whether it is neutral or emphatic; and if the subject of a nominalized clause is also the theme, it is nominative rather than genitive \REF{ex:5:x1257}. A pronominal object in a nominalized clause is in the accusative \REF{ex:5:x1237}.
A: word: owow	 gloss: village
B: word: weetak	 gloss: no
C: word: owowa=pa=ko	 gloss: village=LOC=NF
D: word: kaakew	 gloss: which.village
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 106:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Yiena owow ___ ikiw-owa nain ma-i-yem.
Gloss (with missing item): 1p.GEN village ___ go-NMZ that1 say-Np-PR.1s
The English translation of this sentence is: `I am talking about our going to town.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: . This is perhaps clearest with the subject, which in many languages gets possessive/genitive marking in a nominalized clause. In Mauwake this criterion is not very helpful. The pronominal subject of this first type of nominalized clause, if present, is often genitive \REF{ex:5:x1228}, but may be nominative as well. But also the subject of a finite clause can be nominative or genitive in form, depending on whether it is neutral or emphatic; and if the subject of a nominalized clause is also the theme, it is nominative rather than genitive \REF{ex:5:x1257}. A pronominal object in a nominalized clause is in the accusative \REF{ex:5:x1237}.
A: word: maneka	 gloss: big
B: word: maneka=ke	 gloss: big=CF
C: word: maneka/gelemuta	 gloss: big/little
D: word: ikiw-owa	 gloss: go-NMZ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 107:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Yiena owow maneka ___ nain ma-i-yem.
Gloss (with missing item): 1p.GEN village big ___ that1 say-Np-PR.1s
The English translation of this sentence is: `I am talking about our going to town.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: . This is perhaps clearest with the subject, which in many languages gets possessive/genitive marking in a nominalized clause. In Mauwake this criterion is not very helpful. The pronominal subject of this first type of nominalized clause, if present, is often genitive \REF{ex:5:x1228}, but may be nominative as well. But also the subject of a finite clause can be nominative or genitive in form, depending on whether it is neutral or emphatic; and if the subject of a nominalized clause is also the theme, it is nominative rather than genitive \REF{ex:5:x1257}. A pronominal object in a nominalized clause is in the accusative \REF{ex:5:x1237}.
A: word: maak-omkun	 gloss: tell-1s/p.DS
B: word: na-ep	 gloss: say-SS.SEQ
C: word: ikiw-owa=ke	 gloss: go-NMZ=CF
D: word: ikiw-owa	 gloss: go-NMZ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 108:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Yiena owow maneka ikiw-owa ___ ma-i-yem.
Gloss (with missing item): 1p.GEN village big go-NMZ ___ say-Np-PR.1s
The English translation of this sentence is: `I am talking about our going to town.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: . This is perhaps clearest with the subject, which in many languages gets possessive/genitive marking in a nominalized clause. In Mauwake this criterion is not very helpful. The pronominal subject of this first type of nominalized clause, if present, is often genitive \REF{ex:5:x1228}, but may be nominative as well. But also the subject of a finite clause can be nominative or genitive in form, depending on whether it is neutral or emphatic; and if the subject of a nominalized clause is also the theme, it is nominative rather than genitive \REF{ex:5:x1257}. A pronominal object in a nominalized clause is in the accusative \REF{ex:5:x1237}.
A: word: eefin	 gloss: that2
B: word: nain	 gloss: that1
C: word: nain=ko	 gloss: that1=NF
D: word: ewur	 gloss: quickly
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 109:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Yo ___ wia.
Gloss (with missing item): 1s.UNM ___ no
The English translation of this sentence is: `I won't come.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: . This is perhaps clearest with the subject, which in many languages gets possessive/genitive marking in a nominalized clause. In Mauwake this criterion is not very helpful. The pronominal subject of this first type of nominalized clause, if present, is often genitive \REF{ex:5:x1228}, but may be nominative as well. But also the subject of a finite clause can be nominative or genitive in form, depending on whether it is neutral or emphatic; and if the subject of a nominalized clause is also the theme, it is nominative rather than genitive \REF{ex:5:x1257}. A pronominal object in a nominalized clause is in the accusative \REF{ex:5:x1237}.
A: word: ekap-o-k	 gloss: come-PA-3s
B: word: ekap-owa	 gloss: come-NMZ
C: word: asip-iwkin	 gloss: help-2/3p.DS
D: word: uruf-owa	 gloss: see-NMZ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 110:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Wiena teeria ___ wia kakalt-owa sira nain wia maak-e-k.
Gloss (with missing item): 3p.GEN family ___ 3p.ACC look.after-NMZ custom that1 3p.ACC tell-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `He talked to them about the custom of looking after their families well.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: . This is perhaps clearest with the subject, which in many languages gets possessive/genitive marking in a nominalized clause. In Mauwake this criterion is not very helpful. The pronominal subject of this first type of nominalized clause, if present, is often genitive \REF{ex:5:x1228}, but may be nominative as its gloss ___. But also the subject of a finite clause can be nominative or genitive in form, depending on whether it is neutral or emphatic; and if the subject of a nominalized clause is also the theme, it is nominative rather than genitive \REF{ex:5:x1257}. A pronominal object in a nominalized clause is in the accusative \REF{ex:5:x1237}.
A: word: a''	 gloss: ah
B: word: saan-ar-owa	 gloss: dry-INCH-NMZ
C: word: balisow	 gloss: well
D: word: baliwep	 gloss: well
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 111:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Wiena teeria baliwep ___ kakalt-owa sira nain wia maak-e-k.
Gloss (with missing item): 3p.GEN family well ___ look.after-NMZ custom that1 3p.ACC tell-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `He talked to them about the custom of looking after their families well.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: . This is perhaps clearest with the subject, which in many languages gets possessive/genitive marking in a nominalized clause. In Mauwake this criterion is not very helpful. The pronominal subject of this first type of nominalized clause, if present, is often genitive \REF{ex:5:x1228}, but may be nominative as well. But also the subject of a finite clause can be nominative or genitive in form, depending on whether it is neutral or emphatic; and if the subject of a nominalized clause is also the theme, it is nominative rather than genitive \REF{ex:5:x1257}. A pronominal object in a nominalized clause is in the accusative \REF{ex:5:x1237}.
A: word: wiar	 gloss: 3.DAT
B: word: wia	 gloss: 3p.ACC
C: word: nia	 gloss: 2p.ACC
D: word: ik-eya	 gloss: be-2/3s.DS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 112:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Wiena teeria baliwep wia ___ sira nain wia maak-e-k.
Gloss (with missing item): 3p.GEN family well 3p.ACC ___ custom that1 3p.ACC tell-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `He talked to them about the custom of looking after their families well.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: . This is perhaps clearest with the subject, which in many languages gets possessive/genitive marking in a nominalized clause. In Mauwake this criterion is not very helpful. The pronominal subject of this first type of nominalized clause, if present, is often genitive \REF{ex:5:x1228}, but may be nominative as well. But also the subject of a finite clause can be nominative or genitive in form, depending on whether it is neutral or emphatic; and if the subject of a nominalized clause is also the theme, it is nominative rather than genitive \REF{ex:5:x1257}. A pronominal object in a nominalized clause is in the accusative \REF{ex:5:x1237}.
A: word: ook-owa	 gloss: follow-NMZ
B: word: kakalt-owa	 gloss: look.after-NMZ
C: word: nomokowa	 gloss: tree
D: word: kakalt-am-ik-emkun	 gloss: look.after-SS.SIM-be-1s/p.DS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 113:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ suuw-owa eliwa aaw-ep kekan-e-k.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ push-NMZ good get-SS.SEQ get.strong-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `He got good thinking and became strong.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The nominalized verb may take an adjective as a modifier \REF{ex:5:x1240}:
A: word: wiar	 gloss: 3.DAT
B: word: kema=ko	 gloss: liver=NF
C: word: kema	 gloss: liver
D: word: kemal-ep	 gloss: pity-SS.SEQ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 114:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Kema ___ eliwa aaw-ep kekan-e-k.
Gloss (with missing item): liver ___ good get-SS.SEQ get.strong-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `He got good thinking and became strong.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The nominalized verb may take an adjective as a modifier \REF{ex:5:x1240}:
A: word: nain	 gloss: that1
B: word: uuw-owa	 gloss: work-NMZ
C: word: muf-owa	 gloss: pull-NMZ
D: word: suuw-owa	 gloss: push-NMZ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 115:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Kema suuw-owa ___ aaw-ep kekan-e-k.
Gloss (with missing item): liver push-NMZ ___ get-SS.SEQ get.strong-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `He got good thinking and became strong.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The nominalized verb may take an adjective as a modifier \REF{ex:5:x1240}:
A: word: ele-eliwa	 gloss: RDP-good
B: word: eliwa	 gloss: good
C: word: eliw	 gloss: well
D: word: nain=ko	 gloss: that1=NF
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 116:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): I uuw-owa yi-iwkin ___ uuw-owa=ke ik-ua.
Gloss (with missing item): 1p.UNM work-NMZ give.us-2/3p.DS ___ work-NMZ=CF be-PA.3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `When they give us work, working well is our duty.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Another structural indicator of the nominal status of a nominalized clause is the focus marking, which can be attached to the verb \REF{ex:5:x1238}.
A: word: balisow	 gloss: well
B: word: feeke	 gloss: here.CF
C: word: a''	 gloss: ah
D: word: baliwep	 gloss: well
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 117:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): I uuw-owa yi-iwkin baliwep ___ ik-ua.
Gloss (with missing item): 1p.UNM work-NMZ give.us-2/3p.DS well ___ be-PA.3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `When they give us work, working well is our duty.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Another structural indicator of the nominal status of a nominalized clause is the focus marking, which can be attached to the verb \REF{ex:5:x1238}.
A: word: uuw-owa=ke	 gloss: work-NMZ=CF
B: word: saan-ar-owa	 gloss: dry-INCH-NMZ
C: word: uuw-owa	 gloss: work-NMZ
D: word: ikiw-owa=ke	 gloss: go-NMZ=CF
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 118:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ epa maneka or-owa nain fofa=pa ... unow-iya taan-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ place big descend-NMZ that1 day=LOC ... many=COM fill-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is: `On the day of his coming down to the big place {\dots} all of them filled (the place).'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Nominalized clauses, like other noun phrases, use the far deictic \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{nain} `that' as a determiner \REF{ex:5:x1842}, \REF{ex:5:x1843}.
A: word: onaiya	 gloss: with
B: word: wiena	 gloss: 3p.GEN
C: word: ona	 gloss: 3s.GEN
D: word: uup-owa	 gloss: cook-NMZ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 119:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ona ___ maneka or-owa nain fofa=pa ... unow-iya taan-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): 3s.GEN ___ big descend-NMZ that1 day=LOC ... many=COM fill-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is: `On the day of his coming down to the big place {\dots} all of them filled (the place).'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Nominalized clauses, like other noun phrases, use the far deictic \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{nain} `that' as a determiner \REF{ex:5:x1842}, \REF{ex:5:x1843}.
A: word: uuw-owa=ke	 gloss: work-NMZ=CF
B: word: nepa	 gloss: bird
C: word: epa	 gloss: place
D: word: (epa/kame)	 gloss: place/side
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 120:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ona epa ___ or-owa nain fofa=pa ... unow-iya taan-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): 3s.GEN place ___ descend-NMZ that1 day=LOC ... many=COM fill-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is: `On the day of his coming down to the big place {\dots} all of them filled (the place).'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Nominalized clauses, like other noun phrases, use the far deictic \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{nain} `that' as a determiner \REF{ex:5:x1842}, \REF{ex:5:x1843}.
A: word: maneka=ke	 gloss: big=CF
B: word: maneka/gelemuta	 gloss: big/little
C: word: maneka	 gloss: big
D: word: on-owa	 gloss: make-NMZ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 121:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ona epa maneka ___ nain fofa=pa ... unow-iya taan-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): 3s.GEN place big ___ that1 day=LOC ... many=COM fill-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is: `On the day of his coming down to the big place {\dots} all of them filled (the place).'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Nominalized clauses, like other noun phrases, use the far deictic \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{nain} `that' as a determiner \REF{ex:5:x1842}, \REF{ex:5:x1843}.
A: word: p-or-owa	 gloss: BPX-descend-NMZ
B: word: manina	 gloss: garden
C: word: yo/yena	 gloss: 1s.UNM/1s.GEN
D: word: or-owa	 gloss: descend-NMZ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 122:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ona epa maneka or-owa ___ fofa=pa ... unow-iya taan-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): 3s.GEN place big descend-NMZ ___ day=LOC ... many=COM fill-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is: `On the day of his coming down to the big place {\dots} all of them filled (the place).'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Nominalized clauses, like other noun phrases, use the far deictic \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `that' as a determiner \REF{ex:5:x1842}, \REF{ex:5:x1843}.
A: word: nain=ko	 gloss: that1=NF
B: word: eefin	 gloss: that2
C: word: nain	 gloss: that1
D: word: muuka	 gloss: son
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C