cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 20:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ naap wia aruf-i-nen na-ep on-a-k.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ thus 3p.ACC hit-Np-FU.1s say-SS.SEQ do-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `He tried to hit women that way.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{object}} as a syntactic role is not coded on the verb word except in the few object cross-referencing verbs (\sectref{sec:3.8.4.2.4}). A [+human] object must be referenced by an accusative pronoun (\sectref{sec:3.5.3}) preceding the verb in the verb phrase (\sectref{sec:4.5}), even if the object is also expressed by a full noun phrase earlier in the clause \REF{ex:5:x923}. The position of the object \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} in the argument structure of the clause is between the subject and the verb \REF{ex:5:x924}, but this syntactic definition is not very useful, as subject and object do not co-occur very often, and sometimes when they do, the object is fronted to the clause-initial theme position \REF{ex:5:x925}.
A: word: emeria=ke	 gloss: woman=CF
B: word: koora	 gloss: house
C: word: emeria=ko	 gloss: woman=NF
D: word: emeria	 gloss: woman
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 21:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Emeria naap ___ aruf-i-nen na-ep on-a-k.
Gloss (with missing item): woman thus ___ hit-Np-FU.1s say-SS.SEQ do-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `He tried to hit women that way.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{object}} as a syntactic role is not coded on the verb word except in the few object cross-referencing verbs (\sectref{sec:3.8.4.2.4}). A [+human] object must be referenced by an accusative pronoun (\sectref{sec:3.5.3}) preceding the verb in the verb phrase (\sectref{sec:4.5}), even if the object is also expressed by a full noun phrase earlier in the clause \REF{ex:5:x923}. The position of the object \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} in the argument structure of the clause is between the subject and the verb \REF{ex:5:x924}, but this syntactic definition is not very useful, as subject and object do not co-occur very often, and sometimes when they do, the object is fronted to the clause-initial theme position \REF{ex:5:x925}.
A: word: nia	 gloss: 2p.ACC
B: word: wiar	 gloss: 3.DAT
C: word: yiena	 gloss: 1p.GEN
D: word: wia	 gloss: 3p.ACC
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 22:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Amia mua=ke ___ erup nain wia nokar-e-k.
Gloss (with missing item): bow man=CF ___ two that1 3p.ACC ask-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `The policeman asked those two.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{object}} as a syntactic role is not coded on the verb word except in the few object cross-referencing verbs (\sectref{sec:3.8.4.2.4}). A [+human] object must be referenced by an accusative pronoun (\sectref{sec:3.5.3}) preceding the verb in the verb phrase (\sectref{sec:4.5}), even if the object is also expressed by a full noun phrase earlier in the clause \REF{ex:5:x923}. The position of the object \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} in the argument structure of the clause is between the subject and the verb \REF{ex:5:x924}, but this syntactic definition is not very useful, as subject and object do not co-occur very often, and sometimes when they do, the object is fronted to the clause-initial theme position \REF{ex:5:x925}.
A: word: wiam	 gloss: 3p.REFL
B: word: wiamiya	 gloss: 3p.COM
C: word: niam	 gloss: 2p.REFL
D: word: soma	 gloss: lover
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 23:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Amia mua=ke wiam ___ nain wia nokar-e-k.
Gloss (with missing item): bow man=CF 3p.REFL ___ that1 3p.ACC ask-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `The policeman asked those two.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{object}} as a syntactic role is not coded on the verb word except in the few object cross-referencing verbs (\sectref{sec:3.8.4.2.4}). A [+human] object must be referenced by an accusative pronoun (\sectref{sec:3.5.3}) preceding the verb in the verb phrase (\sectref{sec:4.5}), even if the object is also expressed by a full noun phrase earlier in the clause \REF{ex:5:x923}. The position of the object \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} in the argument structure of the clause is between the subject and the verb \REF{ex:5:x924}, but this syntactic definition is not very useful, as subject and object do not co-occur very often, and sometimes when they do, the object is fronted to the clause-initial theme position \REF{ex:5:x925}.
A: word: kuisow	 gloss: one
B: word: erup	 gloss: two
C: word: erup-i	 gloss: two=QM
D: word: op-ap	 gloss: hold-SS.SEQ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 24:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Amia mua=ke wiam erup ___ wia nokar-e-k.
Gloss (with missing item): bow man=CF 3p.REFL two ___ 3p.ACC ask-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `The policeman asked those two.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{object}} as a syntactic role is not coded on the verb word except in the few object cross-referencing verbs (\sectref{sec:3.8.4.2.4}). A [+human] object must be referenced by an accusative pronoun (\sectref{sec:3.5.3}) preceding the verb in the verb phrase (\sectref{sec:4.5}), even if the object is also expressed by a full noun phrase earlier in the clause \REF{ex:5:x923}. The position of the object \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} in the argument structure of the clause is between the subject and the verb \REF{ex:5:x924}, but this syntactic definition is not very useful, as subject and object do not co-occur very often, and sometimes when they do, the object is fronted to the clause-initial theme position \REF{ex:5:x925}.
A: word: nain=ko	 gloss: that1=NF
B: word: nain	 gloss: that1
C: word: eefin	 gloss: that2
D: word: uuw-owa=ke	 gloss: work-NMZ=CF
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 25:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Amia mua=ke wiam erup nain ___ nokar-e-k.
Gloss (with missing item): bow man=CF 3p.REFL two that1 ___ ask-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `The policeman asked those two.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{object}} as a syntactic role is not coded on the verb word except in the few object cross-referencing verbs (\sectref{sec:3.8.4.2.4}). A [+human] object must be referenced by an accusative pronoun (\sectref{sec:3.5.3}) preceding the verb in the verb phrase (\sectref{sec:4.5}), even if the object is also expressed by a full noun phrase earlier in the clause \REF{ex:5:x923}. The position of the object \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} in the argument structure of the clause is between the subject and the verb \REF{ex:5:x924}, but this syntactic definition is not very useful, as subject and object do not co-occur very often, and sometimes when they do, the object is fronted to the clause-initial theme position \REF{ex:5:x925}.
A: word: miiw-aasa	 gloss: land-canoe
B: word: wiar	 gloss: 3.DAT
C: word: wia	 gloss: 3p.ACC
D: word: nia	 gloss: 2p.ACC
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 26:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ emeria muuka wiipa eka=ke wia mu-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ woman son daughter river=CF 3p.ACC swallow-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `A man and his wife and children were drowned by the river.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{object}} as a syntactic role is not coded on the verb word except in the few object cross-referencing verbs (\sectref{sec:3.8.4.2.4}). A [+huits gloss ___] object must be referenced by an accusative pronoun (\sectref{sec:3.5.3}) preceding the verb in the verb phrase (\sectref{sec:4.5}), even if the object is also expressed by a full noun phrase earlier in the clause \REF{ex:5:x923}. The position of the object \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} in the argument structure of the clause is between the subject and the verb \REF{ex:5:x924}, but this syntactic definition is not very useful, as subject and object do not co-occur very often, and sometimes when they do, the object is fronted to the clause-initial theme position \REF{ex:5:x925}.
A: word: mua	 gloss: man
B: word: (mua)	 gloss: (man)
C: word: muut	 gloss: only
D: word: mua=ko	 gloss: man=NF
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 27:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mua ___ muuka wiipa eka=ke wia mu-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): man ___ son daughter river=CF 3p.ACC swallow-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `A man and his wife and children were drowned by the river.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{object}} as a syntactic role is not coded on the verb word except in the few object cross-referencing verbs (\sectref{sec:3.8.4.2.4}). A [+human] object must be referenced by an accusative pronoun (\sectref{sec:3.5.3}) preceding the verb in the verb phrase (\sectref{sec:4.5}), even if the object is also expressed by a full noun phrase earlier in the clause \REF{ex:5:x923}. The position of the object \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} in the argument structure of the clause is between the subject and the verb \REF{ex:5:x924}, but this syntactic definition is not very useful, as subject and object do not co-occur very often, and sometimes when they do, the object is fronted to the clause-initial theme position \REF{ex:5:x925}.
A: word: emeria=ko	 gloss: woman=NF
B: word: maneka	 gloss: big
C: word: emeria=ke	 gloss: woman=CF
D: word: emeria	 gloss: woman
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 28:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mua emeria ___ wiipa eka=ke wia mu-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): man woman ___ daughter river=CF 3p.ACC swallow-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `A man and his wife and children were drowned by the river.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{object}} as a syntactic role is not coded on the verb word except in the few object cross-referencing verbs (\sectref{sec:3.8.4.2.4}). A [+human] object must be referenced by an accusative pronoun (\sectref{sec:3.5.3}) preceding the verb in the verb phrase (\sectref{sec:4.5}), even if the object is also expressed by a full noun phrase earlier in the clause \REF{ex:5:x923}. The position of the object \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} in the argument structure of the clause is between the subject and the verb \REF{ex:5:x924}, but this syntactic definition is not very useful, as subject and object do not co-occur very often, and sometimes when they do, the object is fronted to the clause-initial theme position \REF{ex:5:x925}.
A: word: muuka	 gloss: son
B: word: takir(a)	 gloss: boy
C: word: kookal-owa=pa	 gloss: like-NMZ=LOC
D: word: muukar-eya	 gloss: give.birth-2/3s.DS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 29:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mua emeria muuka ___ eka=ke wia mu-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): man woman son ___ river=CF 3p.ACC swallow-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `A man and his wife and children were drowned by the river.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{object}} as a syntactic role is not coded on the verb word except in the few object cross-referencing verbs (\sectref{sec:3.8.4.2.4}). A [+human] object must be referenced by an accusative pronoun (\sectref{sec:3.5.3}) preceding the verb in the verb phrase (\sectref{sec:4.5}), even if the object is also expressed by a full noun phrase earlier in the clause \REF{ex:5:x923}. The position of the object \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} in the argument structure of the clause is between the subject and the verb \REF{ex:5:x924}, but this syntactic definition is not very useful, as subject and object do not co-occur very often, and sometimes when they do, the object is fronted to the clause-initial theme position \REF{ex:5:x925}.
A: word: piipa	 gloss: seaweed
B: word: wiipa	 gloss: daughter
C: word: wiip=iya	 gloss: daughter=COM
D: word: weetak	 gloss: no
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 30:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mua emeria muuka wiipa eka=ke ___ mu-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): man woman son daughter river=CF ___ swallow-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `A man and his wife and children were drowned by the river.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{object}} as a syntactic role is not coded on the verb word except in the few object cross-referencing verbs (\sectref{sec:3.8.4.2.4}). A [+human] object must be referenced by an accusative pronoun (\sectref{sec:3.5.3}) preceding the verb in the verb phrase (\sectref{sec:4.5}), even if the object is also expressed by a full noun phrase earlier in the clause \REF{ex:5:x923}. The position of the object \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} in the argument structure of the clause is between the subject and the verb \REF{ex:5:x924}, but this syntactic definition is not very useful, as subject and object do not co-occur very often, and sometimes when they do, the object is fronted to the clause-initial theme position \REF{ex:5:x925}.
A: word: oram	 gloss: just
B: word: wiar	 gloss: 3.DAT
C: word: nia	 gloss: 2p.ACC
D: word: wia	 gloss: 3p.ACC
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 31:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Siiwa erepam naap ___ ik-ok napuma sariar-e-k.
Gloss (with missing item): moon four thus ___ be-SS sickness heal-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `He was there about four months and his sickness was healed.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The verb \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ik}- `be' seldom occurs alone \REF{ex:5:x1458}. This is probably due to its very neutral semantic character. When it denotes being or living somewhere, it is accompanied by a locative adverbial phrase \REF{ex:5:x1459}. Another very common adverbial phrase accompanying the verb is a manner phrase, especially the adverb \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{naap} `thus' \REF{ex:5:x1460}. Rather than positing separate clause types with adverbials as arguments it seems reasonable to subsume clauses like these under intransitive clauses.
A: word: soma	 gloss: lover
B: word: yi-i-nan=i	 gloss: give.me-Np-FU.2s=QM
C: word: fan	 gloss: here
D: word: nan	 gloss: there
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 32:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Siiwa erepam naap nan ___ napuma sariar-e-k.
Gloss (with missing item): moon four thus there ___ sickness heal-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `He was there about four months and his sickness was healed.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The verb \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ik}- `be' seldom occurs alone \REF{ex:5:x1458}. This is probably due to its very neutral semantic character. When it denotes being or living somewhere, it is accompanied by a locative adverbial phrase \REF{ex:5:x1459}. Another very common adverbial phrase accompanying the verb is a manner phrase, especially the adverb \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{naap} `thus' \REF{ex:5:x1460}. Rather than positing separate clause types with adverbials as arguments it seems reasonable to subsume clauses like these under intransitive clauses.
A: word: kokom-ar-eya	 gloss: darkness-INCH-2/3s.DS
B: word: ikiw-em-ik-ok	 gloss: go-SS.SIM-be-SS
C: word: ik-ok	 gloss: be-SS
D: word: mauw-am-ik-ok	 gloss: work-SS.SIM-be-SS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 33:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Komor(a) muuka nain memel-am-ik-emkun ___ ik-ok iir oko uura baurar-e-k.
Gloss (with missing item): cuscus son that1 tame-SS.SIM-be-1s/p.DS ___ be-SS time other night escape-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is: `I was taming the cuscus and it was like that and then one night it escaped.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The verb \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ik}- `be' seldom occurs alone \REF{ex:5:x1458}. This is probably due to its very neutral semantic character. When it denotes being or living somewhere, it is accompanied by a locative adverbial phrase \REF{ex:5:x1459}. Another very common adverbial phrase accompanying the verb is a manner phrase, especially the adverb \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___' \REF{ex:5:x1460}. Rather than positing separate clause types with adverbials as arguments it seems reasonable to subsume clauses like these under intransitive clauses.
A: word: naapeya	 gloss: therefore
B: word: eneka	 gloss: tooth
C: word: naap=iw	 gloss: thus=INST
D: word: naap	 gloss: thus
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D