cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 623:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Teeria fain K10 wu-a-mik. ___ wi teeria nain pun K10 wu-a-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): group this K10 put-PA-1/3p ___ 3p.UNM group that1 too K10 put-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`This group put down K10. Therefore that group put down K10, too.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{Neemi} is used only in reasoning. It requires some point of similarity between the antecedent and the result clause \REF{ex:3:x736}.
A: word: neemi	 gloss: therefore
B: word: ekap-emi	 gloss: come-SS.SIM
C: word: naap	 gloss: thus
D: word: eliwa	 gloss: good
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 624:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ni moma uup-i-man=i? ___ nain yo saa uup-i-nen.
Gloss (with missing item): 2p.UNM taro cook-Np-2p=QM ___ that 1s.UNM rice cook-Np-FU.1s
The English translation of this sentence is:`Are you cooking taro? In that case I'll cook rice.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{Naap nain} can be translated into English with `therefore', `in that case', `if so, then'. It is made up of the manner adverb \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___' and the distal demonstrative \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{nain} `that'. It is a strong connective, stressing the fact that the proposition following the connective is a logical conclusion from the preceding proposition \REF{ex:3:x737}.
A: word: muutiw	 gloss: only
B: word: naapeya	 gloss: therefore
C: word: naap	 gloss: thus
D: word: naap=iw	 gloss: thus=INST
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 625:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ni moma uup-i-man=i? Naap ___ yo saa uup-i-nen.
Gloss (with missing item): 2p.UNM taro cook-Np-2p=QM thus ___ 1s.UNM rice cook-Np-FU.1s
The English translation of this sentence is:`Are you cooking taro? In that case I'll cook rice.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{Naap the morpheme ___} can be translated into English with `therefore', `in its gloss ___ case', `if so, then'. It is made up of the manner adverb \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{naap} `thus' and the distal demonstrative \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___'. It is a strong connective, stressing the fact its gloss ___ the proposition following the connective is a logical conclusion from the preceding proposition \REF{ex:3:x737}.
A: word: nain=ko	 gloss: that1=NF
B: word: on-e	 gloss: do-IMP.2s
C: word: nain	 gloss: that
D: word: maak-ep-pu-ami	 gloss: tell-SS.SEQ-CMPL-SS.SIM
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 626:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Maamuma senam aaw-e-mik. ___ wia, maa ele-eliwa sesek-a-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): money a.lot get-PA-1/3p ___ not thing RDP-good sell-PA-1/3
The English translation of this sentence is:`They got a lot of money. (That's) because they sold good things/foods.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is much less common in Mauwake to mark the reason clause than the result clause with a connective. When the reason clause is emphasized, it is marked with the connective \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} (\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{wia}) `because' and always follows the result clause rather than preceding it. The origin of the reason connective is in the question word \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___?' and the negator \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{wia} `no(t)'.\footnote{Moram as a reason connective is probably a calque on Tok Pisin bilong wanem `its gloss ___, because'. The negator, which does not influence the meaning of the connective, may have been added in Mauwake to help distinguish the connective from the question word.} The difference between \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___ wia} and \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} is that the former is mainly used across sentence boundary \REF{ex:3:x738}, and the latter within a sentence \REF{ex:3:x739}.
A: word: moram	 gloss: why
B: word: nefar	 gloss: 2s.DAT
C: word: samora	 gloss: bad
D: word: naapeya	 gloss: therefore
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 627:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Maamuma senam aaw-e-mik. Moram ___ maa ele-eliwa sesek-a-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): money a.lot get-PA-1/3p why ___ thing RDP-good sell-PA-1/3
The English translation of this sentence is:`They got a lot of money. (That's) because they sold good things/foods.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is much less common in Mauwake to mark the reason clause than the result clause with a connective. When the reason clause is emphasized, it is marked with the connective \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{moram} (\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___}) `because' and always follows the result clause rather than preceding it. The origin of the reason connective is in the question word \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{moram} `why?' and the negator \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `no(t)'.\footits gloss ___e{Moram as a reason connective is probably a calque on Tok Pisin bilong wanem `why, because'. The negator, which does its gloss ___ influence the meaning of the connective, may have been added in Mauwake to help distinguish the connective from the question word.} The difference between \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{moram the morpheme ___} and \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{moram} is that the former is mainly used across sentence boundary \REF{ex:3:x738}, and the latter within a sentence \REF{ex:3:x739}.
A: word: wia	 gloss: not
B: word: eefin	 gloss: that2
C: word: wiar	 gloss: 3.DAT
D: word: (me	 gloss: (not
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 628:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Miiw-aasa muf-owa me ikiw-e-mik, ___ os=ke naap ar-eya.
Gloss (with missing item): land-canoe pull-NMZ not go-PA-1/3p ___ 3s.FC=CF thus become-2/3s.DS
The English translation of this sentence is:`We didn't go to fetch a truck, because she had become like that (=died).'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is much less common in Mauwake to mark the reason clause than the result clause with a connective. When the reason clause is emphasized, it is marked with the connective \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} (\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{wia}) `because' and always follows the result clause rather than preceding it. The origin of the reason connective is in the question word \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___?' and the negator \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{wia} `no(t)'.\footnote{Moram as a reason connective is probably a calque on Tok Pisin bilong wanem `its gloss ___, because'. The negator, which does not influence the meaning of the connective, may have been added in Mauwake to help distinguish the connective from the question word.} The difference between \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___ wia} and \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} is that the former is mainly used across sentence boundary \REF{ex:3:x738}, and the latter within a sentence \REF{ex:3:x739}.
A: word: niena	 gloss: 2p.GEN
B: word: naapeya	 gloss: therefore
C: word: samora	 gloss: bad
D: word: moram	 gloss: why
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 629:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Nan pok-ap-ik-e-mik, ___ emeria.
Gloss (with missing item): there sit-SS.SEQ-be-PA-1/3p ___ woman.
The English translation of this sentence is:`They were sitting there, (both) husband and wife.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The comitative clitic is -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{iya} `with, and, both {\dots} and'. The clitic may be attached to either of the two related noun phrases \REF{ex:3:x775}, \REF{ex:3:x776}, or to both \REF{ex:3:x777}.
A: word: amia=iya	 gloss: bow=COM
B: word: ififa	 gloss: dry
C: word: mua=iya	 gloss: man=COM
D: word: mua=na	 gloss: man=TP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 630:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ wiip=iya kerer-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ daughter=COM appear-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`(Both) a son and a daughter appeared.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The comitative clitic is -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{iya} `with, and, both {\dots} and'. The clitic may be attached to either of the two related noun phrases \REF{ex:3:x775}, \REF{ex:3:x776}, or to both \REF{ex:3:x777}.
A: word: amirika	 gloss: day
B: word: muukar-eya	 gloss: give.birth-2/3s.DS
C: word: takir(a)	 gloss: boy
D: word: muuka	 gloss: son
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 631:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Muuka ___ kerer-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): son ___ appear-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`(Both) a son and a daughter appeared.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The comitative clitic is -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{iya} `with, and, both {\dots} and'. The clitic may be attached to either of the two related noun phrases \REF{ex:3:x775}, \REF{ex:3:x776}, or to both \REF{ex:3:x777}.
A: word: wiip=iya	 gloss: daughter=COM
B: word: wiipa	 gloss: daughter
C: word: maak-ep-pu-ami	 gloss: tell-SS.SEQ-CMPL-SS.SIM
D: word: osaiwa	 gloss: bird.of.paradise
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 632:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ kateres=iya, bom=iya kateres=iya (fuurk-a-mik).
Gloss (with missing item): ___ cartridge=COM bomb=COM cartridge=COM drop-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`They dropped (both) bombs and cartridges, (both) bombs and cartridges.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The comitative clitic is -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{iya} `with, and, both {\dots} and'. The clitic may be attached to either of the two related noun phrases \REF{ex:3:x775}, \REF{ex:3:x776}, or to both \REF{ex:3:x777}.
A: word: wiam=iya	 gloss: 3p.ACC=COM
B: word: bom=iya	 gloss: bomb=COM
C: word: weeser-eya	 gloss: finish-2/3s.DS
D: word: bom	 gloss: bomb
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 633:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Bom=iya ___ bom=iya kateres=iya (fuurk-a-mik).
Gloss (with missing item): bomb=COM ___ bomb=COM cartridge=COM drop-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`They dropped (both) bombs and cartridges, (both) bombs and cartridges.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The comitative clitic is -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{iya} `with, and, both {\dots} and'. The clitic may be attached to either of the two related noun phrases \REF{ex:3:x775}, \REF{ex:3:x776}, or to both \REF{ex:3:x777}.
A: word: mik-amkun	 gloss: spear-1s/p.DS
B: word: kateres=iya	 gloss: cartridge=COM
C: word: unow=iya	 gloss: many=COM
D: word: aaw-owa	 gloss: get-NMZ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 634:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Bom=iya kateres=iya, ___ kateres=iya (fuurk-a-mik).
Gloss (with missing item): bomb=COM cartridge=COM ___ cartridge=COM drop-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`They dropped (both) bombs and cartridges, (both) bombs and cartridges.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The comitative clitic is -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{iya} `with, and, both {\dots} and'. The clitic may be attached to either of the two related noun phrases \REF{ex:3:x775}, \REF{ex:3:x776}, or to both \REF{ex:3:x777}.
A: word: ir-ow-aw-ap	 gloss: climb-CAUS-CAUS-SS.SEQ
B: word: bom	 gloss: bomb
C: word: bom=iya	 gloss: bomb=COM
D: word: wiam=iya	 gloss: 3p.ACC=COM
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 635:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Bom=iya kateres=iya, bom=iya ___ (fuurk-a-mik).
Gloss (with missing item): bomb=COM cartridge=COM bomb=COM ___ drop-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`They dropped (both) bombs and cartridges, (both) bombs and cartridges.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The comitative clitic is -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{iya} `with, and, both {\dots} and'. The clitic may be attached to either of the two related noun phrases \REF{ex:3:x775}, \REF{ex:3:x776}, or to both \REF{ex:3:x777}.
A: word: muuta	 gloss: for
B: word: kateres=iya	 gloss: cartridge=COM
C: word: unow=iya	 gloss: many=COM
D: word: mik-amkun	 gloss: spear-1s/p.DS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 636:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mauwa ar-e-n, ___ nenar-e-mik=i?
Gloss (with missing item): what become-PA-2s ___ shoot.you-PA-1/3p=QM
The English translation of this sentence is:`What happened to you, did they shoot you with a gun?'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Occasionally the clitic can also be used to indicate instrument \REF{ex:3:x778}.
A: word: mua=iya	 gloss: man=COM
B: word: amia	 gloss: bow
C: word: amia=iya	 gloss: bow=COM
D: word: uruf-ek-a-m=na	 gloss: see-CNTF-PA-1s=TP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 637:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Yoli onak ___ efa amukar-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): Yoli 3s/p.mother ___ 1s.ACC scold-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`Yoli and his mother scolded me.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{Owawiya}\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{/owawik} `its gloss ___, together its gloss ___' is used only for humans; it can refer to two or more people \REF{ex:3:x821}. It can also occur by itself \REF{ex:3:x822}. The origin of the first part \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{owaw}- is unknown. The second part is either the comitative clitic -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{iya} or the root of the existential verb \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ik}\nobreakdash- `be', a reflection of an earlier construction \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___ ik}\nobreakdash- `be together' \REF{ex:3:x1817}.
A: word: owawik	 gloss: with
B: word: eliw	 gloss: well
C: word: um-i-nen	 gloss: die-Np-FU.1s
D: word: owawiya	 gloss: with
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 638:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ feeke pok-ap ik-ok soomar-ek-eka.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ here.CF sit-SS.SEQ be-SS walk-go-IMP.2p
The English translation of this sentence is:`(First) sit here with us and (then) go.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{Owawiya}\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{/owawik} `its gloss ___, together its gloss ___' is used only for humans; it can refer to two or more people \REF{ex:3:x821}. It can also occur by itself \REF{ex:3:x822}. The origin of the first part \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{owaw}- is unknown. The second part is either the comitative clitic -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{iya} or the root of the existential verb \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ik}\nobreakdash- `be', a reflection of an earlier construction \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___ ik}\nobreakdash- `be together' \REF{ex:3:x1817}.
A: word: owawiya	 gloss: with
B: word: eliw	 gloss: well
C: word: iki(w)-(e)p	 gloss: go-SS.SEQ
D: word: owawik	 gloss: with
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 639:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Iikir-ami onak ___ soomar-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): get.up-SS.SIM 3s/p.mother ___ walk-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`He got up and walked with his mother.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{Owawiya}\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{/the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___, together its gloss ___' is used only for humans; it can refer to two or more people \REF{ex:3:x821}. It can also occur by itself \REF{ex:3:x822}. The origin of the first part \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{owaw}- is unknown. The second part is either the comitative clitic -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{iya} or the root of the existential verb \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ik}\nobreakdash- `be', a reflection of an earlier construction \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{owawiya ik}\nobreakdash- `be together' \REF{ex:3:x1817}.
A: word: eliw	 gloss: well
B: word: owawiya	 gloss: with
C: word: pina	 gloss: guilt
D: word: owawik	 gloss: with
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D