cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 296:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ema eenin fikera=ke aw-o-k, aria ___ fikera=ke me aw-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): mountain that3 kunai.grass=CF burn-PA-3s, alright ___ kunai.grass=CF not burn-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`The kunai grass on that mountain (far away, invisible) burned, but the grass on this/that one (somewhat closer) did not burn.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Apart from the proximal demonstrative \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{fain} `this', the other demonstratives are not mutually exclusive. The distal-1 demonstrative \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{nain} `that' is the least restricted of the three, and it is extremely frequent, whereas both \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `this/that' and \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{eenin} `that' are very rarely used. In \REF{ex:3:x1749} the distances of the two mountains fit the specifications for \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} and \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{eenin} , and more than one distal demonstrative is needed for contrastive purposes:
A: word: kateres=iya	 gloss: cartridge=COM
B: word: eefin	 gloss: that2
C: word: eenin	 gloss: that3
D: word: eefan	 gloss: there2
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 297:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ takira fain=ke niir-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ boy this=CF play-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`It was these boys that played.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: There is no number distinction in demonstratives. When they modify a [+human] noun, plurality is shown in the person/number marking of the verb and optionally by an additional personal pronoun \REF{ex:3:x635}.
A: word: (yo/i)	 gloss: 1s/1p.UNM
B: word: na-eya	 gloss: say-2/3s.DS
C: word: okai(wi)=pa	 gloss: other.side=LOC
D: word: (wi)	 gloss: 3p.UNM
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 298:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): (Wi) takira ___ niir-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): 3p.UNM boy ___ play-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`It was these boys that played.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: There is no number distinction in demonstratives. When they modify a [+human] noun, plurality is shown in the person/number marking of the verb and optionally by an additional personal pronoun \REF{ex:3:x635}.
A: word: umuk-a-mik=na	 gloss: extinguish-PA-1/3p=TP
B: word: fain=ke	 gloss: this=CF
C: word: nain=ke	 gloss: that=CF
D: word: kain=ke	 gloss: which=CF
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 299:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mera ___ nain aaw-e-m.
Gloss (with missing item): fish ___ that1 get-PA-1s
The English translation of this sentence is:`I caught those three fish.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: With [-human] nouns, a quantifier in the \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} may be used \REF{ex:3:x636}, or distributive suffix on the verb \REF{ex:3:x637} to indicate plurality, or the number may be left unspecified \REF{ex:3:x638}.
A: word: naisow	 gloss: 2s.ISOL
B: word: arow=i	 gloss: three=QM
C: word: arow	 gloss: three
D: word: erepam	 gloss: four
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 300:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mera arow ___ aaw-e-m.
Gloss (with missing item): fish three ___ get-PA-1s
The English translation of this sentence is:`I caught those three fish.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: With [-human] nouns, a quantifier in the \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} may be used \REF{ex:3:x636}, or distributive suffix on the verb \REF{ex:3:x637} to indicate plurality, or the number may be left unspecified \REF{ex:3:x638}.
A: word: nain	 gloss: that1
B: word: nain=ko	 gloss: that1=NF
C: word: lawisiw	 gloss: somewhat
D: word: eefin	 gloss: that2
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 301:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mera ___ aaw-omak-e-m.
Gloss (with missing item): fish ___ get-DISTR.PL-PA-1s
The English translation of this sentence is:`I caught those (many) fish.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: With [-human] nouns, a quantifier in the \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} may be used \REF{ex:3:x636}, or distributive suffix on the verb \REF{ex:3:x637} to indicate plurality, or the number may be left unspecified \REF{ex:3:x638}.
A: word: nain=ko	 gloss: that1=NF
B: word: eefin	 gloss: that2
C: word: pepek	 gloss: enough
D: word: nain	 gloss: that1
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 302:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Amina ___ p-ekap-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): pot ___ BPX-come-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`We brought this pot / these pots.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: With [-human] nouns, a quantifier in the \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} may be used \REF{ex:3:x636}, or distributive suffix on the verb \REF{ex:3:x637} to indicate plurality, or the number may be left unspecified \REF{ex:3:x638}.
A: word: fain=iw	 gloss: this=INST
B: word: aria	 gloss: alright
C: word: fain	 gloss: this
D: word: feenap	 gloss: like.this
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 303:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ soo era=ke.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ fish.trap way=CF
The English translation of this sentence is:`That is the way (to catch fish) with a fish trap.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Mauwake follows the typical pattern: the neutral distal demonstrative \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `that' is anaphoric: it only refers to the text preceding it, as in \REF{ex:3:x639}, where the example sentence comes after the description of fishing with a fish trap. The proximal \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{fain} `this' is cataphoric, referring to the text following it \REF{ex:3:x640}. The other two demonstratives, \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{eefin} and \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{eenin}, are not used for text-internal reference at all.
A: word: eefin	 gloss: that2
B: word: nain	 gloss: that1
C: word: mua=pa	 gloss: man=LOC
D: word: nain=ko	 gloss: that1=NF
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 304:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Goron-ep ora-i-ya ___ maa muutitik iiwawun lalat-i-ya.
Gloss (with missing item): fall-SS.SEQ descend-Np-PR.3s ___ thing all.kinds altogether sweep-Np-3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`When it goes down, it sweeps everything with it.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Still another function for the demonstrative \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `that' is that of a nominalizer of otherwise finite verbal clauses (\sectref{sec:5.7.2}). A nominalized clause of this type may be a relative clause \REF{ex:3:x687} (\sectref{sec:8.3.1}), a complement clause \REF{ex:3:x689} (\sectref{sec:8.3.2}) or a temporal subordinate clause \REF{ex:3:x688} (\sectref{sec:8.3.3.1}).\footnote{All these clauses have a function that is consistent with the core meaning of `givenness' \citep{Haiman1978} or presupposition \citep{Reesink1987}.}
A: word: nain	 gloss: that1
B: word: weetak	 gloss: no
C: word: nain=ko	 gloss: that1=NF
D: word: eefin	 gloss: that2
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 305:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Wiawi eliw naak-e-k, ___ me ikiw-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): 3s/p.father all.right say-PA-3s ___ not go-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`He said yes (lit: all right) to his father, but didn't go.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The same demonstrative is also used as a strong adversative `but' \REF{ex:3:x690} (\sectref{sec:8.1.3}). In that function it is placed clause-initially rather than clause-finally.
A: word: eefin	 gloss: that2
B: word: nain	 gloss: that1
C: word: nain=ko	 gloss: that1=NF
D: word: yaisow	 gloss: 1s.ISOL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 306:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Owowa=pa ___ ik-emkun aasa maneka ekap-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): village=LOC ___ be-1s/p.DS canoe big come-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`As I was here in the village the big ship came.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The difference in the usage between the neutral and focused member of each pair is that the first is \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{only}} used with realis-type verb forms, i.e. past \REF{ex:3:x463}, \REF{ex:3:x1213} and present tense \REF{ex:3:x1214}, wits gloss ___as the second one is \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{mainly}} used with future \REF{ex:3:x464}, imperative \REF{ex:3:x465}, and counterfactual \REF{ex:3:x466}, i.e. irrealis-type forms. Yet Mauwake does not differentiate between realis and irrealis in verbs, and a possible explanation its gloss ___ is that only locative adverbs that are in focus can make it into a future, imperative or counterfactual clause, wits gloss ___as past or present clauses are less restrictive and use either focal or non-focal form.
A: word: nan	 gloss: there
B: word: lawisiw	 gloss: somewhat
C: word: fan	 gloss: here
D: word: fan-e-k	 gloss: here-PA-3s
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 307:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Yo fura belemuta ___ piipu-a-m.
Gloss (with missing item): 1s.UNM knife small ___ leave-PA-1s
The English translation of this sentence is:`I left the small knife (somewhere) here.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The difference in the usage between the neutral and focused member of each pair is that the first is \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{only}} used with realis-type verb forms, i.e. past \REF{ex:3:x463}, \REF{ex:3:x1213} and present tense \REF{ex:3:x1214}, whereas the second one is \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{mainly}} used with future \REF{ex:3:x464}, imperative \REF{ex:3:x465}, and counterfactual \REF{ex:3:x466}, i.e. irrealis-type forms. Yet Mauwake does not differentiate between realis and irrealis in verbs, and a possible explanation here is that only locative adverbs that are in focus can make it into a future, imperative or counterfactual clause, whereas past or present clauses are less restrictive and use either focal or non-focal form.
A: word: ikiw-em-ik-eya	 gloss: go-SS.SIM-be-2/3s.DS
B: word: efar	 gloss: 1s.DAT
C: word: eenan	 gloss: there3
D: word: eefan	 gloss: there2
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 308:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Wi aakisa fain manina ___ on-i-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): 3p.UNM now this garden ___ make-Np-PR.1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`Nowadays they make the garden(s) there (far away).'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The difference in the usage between the neutral and focused member of each pair is that the first is \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{only}} used with realis-type verb forms, i.e. past \REF{ex:3:x463}, \REF{ex:3:x1213} and present tense \REF{ex:3:x1214}, whereas the second one is \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{mainly}} used with future \REF{ex:3:x464}, imperative \REF{ex:3:x465}, and counterfactual \REF{ex:3:x466}, i.e. irrealis-type forms. Yet Mauwake does not differentiate between realis and irrealis in verbs, and a possible explanation here is that only locative adverbs that are in focus can make it into a future, imperative or counterfactual clause, whereas past or present clauses are less restrictive and use either focal or non-focal form.
A: word: eliwa	 gloss: good
B: word: feenap	 gloss: like.this
C: word: eenan	 gloss: there3
D: word: eefan	 gloss: there2
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 309:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Eliw ___ soop-i-yen.
Gloss (with missing item): well ___ bury-Np-FU.1p
The English translation of this sentence is:`We can bury him \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{here}}.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The difference in the usage between the neutral and focused member of each pair is that the first is \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{only}} used with realis-type verb forms, i.e. past \REF{ex:3:x463}, \REF{ex:3:x1213} and present tense \REF{ex:3:x1214}, whereas the second one is \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{mainly}} used with future \REF{ex:3:x464}, imperative \REF{ex:3:x465}, and counterfactual \REF{ex:3:x466}, i.e. irrealis-type forms. Yet Mauwake does not differentiate between realis and irrealis in verbs, and a possible explanation here is that only locative adverbs that are in focus can make it into a future, imperative or counterfactual clause, whereas past or present clauses are less restrictive and use either focal or non-focal form.
A: word: feekiya	 gloss: with
B: word: naap	 gloss: thus
C: word: feeke	 gloss: here.CF
D: word: neeke	 gloss: there.CF
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 310:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Ni koora epa ___ ku-eka.
Gloss (with missing item): 2p.UNM house place ___ build-IMP.2p
The English translation of this sentence is:`Build a/the house \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{over here}} in this place.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The difference in the usage between the neutral and focused member of each pair is that the first is \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{only}} used with realis-type verb forms, i.e. past \REF{ex:3:x463}, \REF{ex:3:x1213} and present tense \REF{ex:3:x1214}, whereas the second one is \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{mainly}} used with future \REF{ex:3:x464}, imperative \REF{ex:3:x465}, and counterfactual \REF{ex:3:x466}, i.e. irrealis-type forms. Yet Mauwake does not differentiate between realis and irrealis in verbs, and a possible explanation here is that only locative adverbs that are in focus can make it into a future, imperative or counterfactual clause, whereas past or present clauses are less restrictive and use either focal or non-focal form.
A: word: eefan	 gloss: there2
B: word: eefeke	 gloss: there2.CF
C: word: eefenap	 gloss: thus2
D: word: niam	 gloss: 2p.REFL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 311:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ ik-ek-a-k=na iwer(a) ififa=ke ifakim-ek-a-k.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ be-CNTF-PA-3s=TP coconut dry=CF kill-CNTF-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`If he had been \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{there}} a (falling) dry coconut would have killed him.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The difference in the usage between the neutral and focused member of each pair is that the first is \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{only}} used with realis-type verb forms, i.e. past \REF{ex:3:x463}, \REF{ex:3:x1213} and present tense \REF{ex:3:x1214}, whereas the second one is \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{mainly}} used with future \REF{ex:3:x464}, imperative \REF{ex:3:x465}, and counterfactual \REF{ex:3:x466}, i.e. irrealis-type forms. Yet Mauwake does not differentiate between realis and irrealis in verbs, and a possible explanation here is that only locative adverbs that are in focus can make it into a future, imperative or counterfactual clause, whereas past or present clauses are less restrictive and use either focal or non-focal form.
A: word: nain/nan/neeke	 gloss: that1/there/there.CF
B: word: neeke	 gloss: there1.CF
C: word: yo=ko	 gloss: 1s.UNM=NF
D: word: kae	 gloss: grandfather
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 312:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Miiw(a) aasa fa-ow(a) mua=ke ___ wia aaw-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): land canoe drive-NMZ man=CF ___ 3p.ACC take-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`\textstyleEmphasizedWords{{There}} the truck driver picked them up.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In the following examples \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} and\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ feeke} are used with past \REF{ex:3:x1146} -- \REF{ex:3:x1200} or present tense verbs \REF{ex:3:x1572} and indicate a temporary rather than permanent location, but this is probably secondary, or related, to the adverbs being focal: there is less need to focus on a permanent location than on a temporary one. Note that in these clauses it is possible to have two constituents with contrastive focus marking \REF{ex:3:x1146}, \REF{ex:3:x1572}.
A: word: wafur-ap-pu-owa	 gloss: throw-SS.SEQ-CMPL-NMZ
B: word: ika-i-n	 gloss: be-Np-PR.2s
C: word: neeke	 gloss: there1.CF
D: word: nain/nan/neeke	 gloss: that1/there/there.CF
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C