cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 640:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mua unowa ___ ikiw-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): man many ___ go-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`We went with many people.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The postposition \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___/onaria}\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{/onaiyik} may be based on the third person singular genitive pronoun \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ona} and the clitic -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{iya}; \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{onaiyik} also includes the root of the verb \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ik}\nobreakdash- `be'. This postposition is more generic and can be used its gloss ___ noun phrases referring to people \REF{ex:3:x754} but is also common when referring to things \REF{ex:3:x755}. When the relationship between the two noun phrases is unequal, \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} may used, like in \REF{ex:3:x823}, where the other people carried the sick man. The subject marking on the verb is influenced by how active part the referents of the comitative noun phrase take in the action. When all the participants are active, the subject marking on the verb is plural. The speech in \REF{ex:3:x1819} was directed towards the villagers who were instructed to stay away from the Japanese troops.
A: word: panewowa	 gloss: old
B: word: onaiya	 gloss: with
C: word: yaiya	 gloss: 1s/p.uncle
D: word: eliw	 gloss: well
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 641:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Urom(a) ___ ik-ua.
Gloss (with missing item): stomach ___ be-PA.3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`She is/was pregnant.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The postposition \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___/onaria}\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{/onaiyik} may be based on the third person singular genitive pronoun \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ona} and the clitic -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{iya}; \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{onaiyik} also includes the root of the verb \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ik}\nobreakdash- `be'. This postposition is more generic and can be used its gloss ___ noun phrases referring to people \REF{ex:3:x754} but is also common when referring to things \REF{ex:3:x755}. When the relationship between the two noun phrases is unequal, \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} may used, like in \REF{ex:3:x823}, where the other people carried the sick man. The subject marking on the verb is influenced by how active part the referents of the comitative noun phrase take in the action. When all the participants are active, the subject marking on the verb is plural. The speech in \REF{ex:3:x1819} was directed towards the villagers who were instructed to stay away from the Japanese troops.
A: word: ook-owa	 gloss: follow-NMZ
B: word: yaiya	 gloss: 1s/p.uncle
C: word: eliw	 gloss: well
D: word: onaiya	 gloss: with
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 642:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mua napuma ___ Medebur ek-a-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): man sick ___ Medebur go-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`They went to Medebur with the sick man.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The postposition \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___/onaria}\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{/onaiyik} may be based on the third person singular genitive pronoun \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ona} and the clitic -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{iya}; \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{onaiyik} also includes the root of the verb \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ik}\nobreakdash- `be'. This postposition is more generic and can be used its gloss ___ noun phrases referring to people \REF{ex:3:x754} but is also common when referring to things \REF{ex:3:x755}. When the relationship between the two noun phrases is unequal, \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} may used, like in \REF{ex:3:x823}, where the other people carried the sick man. The subject marking on the verb is influenced by how active part the referents of the comitative noun phrase take in the action. When all the participants are active, the subject marking on the verb is plural. The speech in \REF{ex:3:x1819} was directed towards the villagers who were instructed to stay away from the Japanese troops.
A: word: mua=iya	 gloss: man=COM
B: word: onaiya	 gloss: with
C: word: eliw	 gloss: well
D: word: yaiya	 gloss: 1s/p.uncle
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 643:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mokok urupa kaik-i-man nain ___ baurar-eka.
Gloss (with missing item): eye cup tie-Np-PR.2p that1 ___ flee-IMP.2p
The English translation of this sentence is:`Flee with your ``eye cups'' (a singsing decoration) still on.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Another comitative postposition that mainly refers to things is \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___' \REF{ex:3:x824}--\REF{ex:3:x1818}. It originates from the combination of \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{feeke} `here' and -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{iya} `comitative', but the meaning does not reflect the deictic origin of the initial part. In those rare cases when it is attached to a [+human] noun phrase, the referent of this \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} is subordinate to the referent of the other \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} and not in control, but still influencing the subject marking of the verb \REF{ex:3:x825}.
A: word: feekiya	 gloss: with
B: word: feeke	 gloss: here.CF
C: word: pok-ap-ik-omkun	 gloss: sit.down-SS.SEQ-be-1s/p.DS
D: word: eliw	 gloss: well
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 644:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Maa eliw akena nain aaw-ep ___ ikiw-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): thing good very that1 take-SS.SEQ ___ go-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`He took the very good thing and went with it.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Another comitative postposition that mainly refers to things is \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___' \REF{ex:3:x824}--\REF{ex:3:x1818}. It originates from the combination of \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{feeke} `here' and -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{iya} `comitative', but the meaning does not reflect the deictic origin of the initial part. In those rare cases when it is attached to a [+human] noun phrase, the referent of this \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} is subordinate to the referent of the other \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} and not in control, but still influencing the subject marking of the verb \REF{ex:3:x825}.
A: word: feeke	 gloss: here.CF
B: word: eliw	 gloss: well
C: word: feekiya	 gloss: with
D: word: moro=ke	 gloss: Moro=CF
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 645:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Wiamun gelemuta pun aaw-ep ___ ikiw-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): 3s/p.brother small also take-SS.SEQ ___ go-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`He took his little brother too, and went with him.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Another comitative postposition that mainly refers to things is \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___' \REF{ex:3:x824}--\REF{ex:3:x1818}. It originates from the combination of \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{feeke} `here' and -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{iya} `comitative', but the meaning does not reflect the deictic origin of the initial part. In those rare cases when it is attached to a [+human] noun phrase, the referent of this \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} is subordinate to the referent of the other \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} and not in control, but still influencing the subject marking of the verb \REF{ex:3:x825}.
A: word: feekiya	 gloss: with
B: word: poka-poka	 gloss: RDP-trunk
C: word: feeke	 gloss: here.CF
D: word: eliw	 gloss: well
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 646:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Wekera ___ irak-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): 3s/p.sister ___ fight-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`He fought with his sister.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{dual}} comitative \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___, together (its gloss ___)' can only be used when two human participants are referred to \REF{ex:3:x752}. It can also occur alone, its gloss ___out a preceding noun phrase, when the participants are known from the person/number suffix in the verb, or from the context \REF{ex:3:x753}. The parties are considered equally active, so the verb is always in the plural.
A: word: okai(wi)=pa	 gloss: other.side=LOC
B: word: ikos=ko	 gloss: together=NF
C: word: ikos	 gloss: with
D: word: eliw	 gloss: well
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 647:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ ikiw-i-yen.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ go-Np-FU.1p
The English translation of this sentence is:`Let's go together (just the two of us).'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{dual}} comitative \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___, together (its gloss ___)' can only be used when two human participants are referred to \REF{ex:3:x752}. It can also occur alone, its gloss ___out a preceding noun phrase, when the participants are known from the person/number suffix in the verb, or from the context \REF{ex:3:x753}. The parties are considered equally active, so the verb is always in the plural.
A: word: muuka	 gloss: son
B: word: ikos=ko	 gloss: together=NF
C: word: ikos	 gloss: with
D: word: eliw	 gloss: well
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 648:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Auwa ___ wia maak-eya res aaw-ep merena puuk-a-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): 1s/p.father ___ 3p.ACC tell-2/3s.DS razor take-SS.SEQ leg cut-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`He told my father and the others, and they took a razor and made a cut on his leg.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{Associative}} \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `with others' is different from the comitative postpositions above in that only one of the parties is specified. The identity of `the others' is left unspecified \REF{ex:3:x826}, \REF{ex:3:x827}.
A: word: kuruma	 gloss: thick
B: word: amerika	 gloss: America
C: word: ame	 gloss: ASSOC
D: word: ame=ke	 gloss: ASSOC=CF
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 649:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Kuuten ___ miim-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): Kuuten ___ precede-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`Kuuten with (some) others went ahead of them.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{Associative}} \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ame} `with others' is different from the comitative postpositions above in that only one of the parties is specified. The identity of `the others' is left unspecified \REF{ex:3:x826}, \REF{ex:3:x827}.
A: word: me=ko	 gloss: not=NF
B: word: ame	 gloss: ASSOC
C: word: aakun-ow(a)	 gloss: talk-NMZ
D: word: ame=ke	 gloss: ASSOC=CF
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 650:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Iiriw miiwa ___ nain irak-owa marew, oram momor mauw-am-ik-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): earlier land ___ that1 fight-NMZ no(ne) just indiscriminately work-SS.SIM-be-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`Earlier there was no fighting for land, they just worked indiscriminately (on any land).'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{Muuta}\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ (nain)} `because of, its gloss ___' gives a reason its gloss ___ an action, when the reason is expressed in a noun phrase rather than a full clause. It has developed from the adverb \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `a little, only', and in some cases the meaning `only' is retained with the new function as well \REF{ex:3:x756}, \REF{ex:3:x1876}. The distal-1 demonstrative \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{nain} `that' is optional, and is left out especially when there is another demonstrative \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{nain} preceding \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} \REF{ex:3:x759}.
A: word: (muuta)	 gloss: (only)
B: word: pun	 gloss: also
C: word: muuta	 gloss: for
D: word: yiar	 gloss: 1p.DAT
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 651:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Iiriw miiwa muuta ___ irak-owa marew, oram momor mauw-am-ik-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): earlier land for ___ fight-NMZ no(ne) just indiscriminately work-SS.SIM-be-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`Earlier there was no fighting for land, they just worked indiscriminately (on any land).'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{Muuta}\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ (the morpheme ___)} `because of, for' gives a reason for an action, when the reason is expressed in a noun phrase rather than a full clause. It has developed from the adverb \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{muuta} `a little, only', and in some cases the meaning `only' is retained with the new function as well \REF{ex:3:x756}, \REF{ex:3:x1876}. The distal-1 demonstrative \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `that' is optional, and is left out especially when there is another demonstrative \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} preceding \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{muuta} \REF{ex:3:x759}.
A: word: wakesim-ep-pu-ami	 gloss: cover-SS.SEQ-CMPL-SS.SIM
B: word: nain	 gloss: that1
C: word: nain=ko	 gloss: that1=NF
D: word: eefin	 gloss: that2
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 652:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Yia amukar-owa ___ nain nan iiriw ifakim-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): 1p.ACC scold-NMZ ___ that1 there earlier kill-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`We killed her earlier (only) because she scolded us (lit: {\dots}for her scolding of us).'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{Muuta}\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ (nain)} `because of, its gloss ___' gives a reason its gloss ___ an action, when the reason is expressed in a noun phrase rather than a full clause. It has developed from the adverb \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `a little, only', and in some cases the meaning `only' is retained with the new function as well \REF{ex:3:x756}, \REF{ex:3:x1876}. The distal-1 demonstrative \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{nain} `that' is optional, and is left out especially when there is another demonstrative \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{nain} preceding \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} \REF{ex:3:x759}.
A: word: ekap-ep	 gloss: come-SS.SEQ
B: word: (muuta)	 gloss: (only)
C: word: pun	 gloss: also
D: word: muuta	 gloss: for
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 653:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Yia amukar-owa muuta ___ nan iiriw ifakim-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): 1p.ACC scold-NMZ for ___ there earlier kill-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`We killed her earlier (only) because she scolded us (lit: {\dots}for her scolding of us).'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{Muuta}\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ (the morpheme ___)} `because of, for' gives a reason for an action, when the reason is expressed in a noun phrase rather than a full clause. It has developed from the adverb \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{muuta} `a little, only', and in some cases the meaning `only' is retained with the new function as well \REF{ex:3:x756}, \REF{ex:3:x1876}. The distal-1 demonstrative \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `that' is optional, and is left out especially when there is another demonstrative \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} preceding \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{muuta} \REF{ex:3:x759}.
A: word: eefin	 gloss: that2
B: word: maneka	 gloss: big
C: word: nain=ko	 gloss: that1=NF
D: word: nain	 gloss: that1
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 654:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Opora ara nain ___ ifakim-u na-ep on-a-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): Talk section that1 ___ kill-IMP.1d say-SS.SEQ do-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`(Only) because of that talk they tried to kill him.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{Muuta}\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ (nain)} `because of, its gloss ___' gives a reason its gloss ___ an action, when the reason is expressed in a noun phrase rather than a full clause. It has developed from the adverb \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `a little, only', and in some cases the meaning `only' is retained with the new function as well \REF{ex:3:x756}, \REF{ex:3:x1876}. The distal-1 demonstrative \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{nain} `that' is optional, and is left out especially when there is another demonstrative \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{nain} preceding \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} \REF{ex:3:x759}.
A: word: muuta	 gloss: for
B: word: pun	 gloss: also
C: word: nainiw	 gloss: again
D: word: (muuta)	 gloss: (only)
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A