cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 523:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ me efa suuw-a-k.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ not 1s.ACC push-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`He didn't \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{think}} of me.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Those nominal adjunct plus verb structures where the verb is transitive look like two-object clauses, and in a few cases behave like them syntactically. In \REF{ex:3:x452} the nominal adjunct \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___' is in its normal adjunct position, but in \REF{ex:3:x453} it is in object \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} position. The basic meanings of the two sentences are the same, but with a different prominence: \REF{ex:3:x452} encodes marked negative focus and \REF{ex:3:x453} verb focus. The clause \REF{ex:3:x1874} with an initial theme pronoun \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{yo} `I' is pragmatically more neutral than the others except in cases where the initial pronoun receives extra stress. Note the intervening negator also in \REF{ex:3:x1489} below.
A: word: kema	 gloss: liver
B: word: kemal-ep	 gloss: pity-SS.SEQ
C: word: kema=ko	 gloss: liver=NF
D: word: naeya	 gloss: therefore
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 524:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Me efa ___ suuw-a-k.
Gloss (with missing item): not 1s.ACC ___ push-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`He did \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{not}} think of me.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Those nominal adjunct plus verb structures where the verb is transitive look like two-object clauses, and in a few cases behave like them syntactically. In \REF{ex:3:x452} the nominal adjunct \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___' is in its normal adjunct position, but in \REF{ex:3:x453} it is in object \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} position. The basic meanings of the two sentences are the same, but with a different prominence: \REF{ex:3:x452} encodes marked negative focus and \REF{ex:3:x453} verb focus. The clause \REF{ex:3:x1874} with an initial theme pronoun \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{yo} `I' is pragmatically more neutral than the others except in cases where the initial pronoun receives extra stress. Note the intervening negator also in \REF{ex:3:x1489} below.
A: word: kuum-e-mik	 gloss: burn-PA-1/3p
B: word: kemal-ep	 gloss: pity-SS.SEQ
C: word: kema=ko	 gloss: liver=NF
D: word: kema	 gloss: liver
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 525:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ me efa suuw-a-k.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ not 1s.ACC push-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`He didn't \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{think}} of me.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Those nominal adjunct plus verb structures where the verb is transitive look like two-object clauses, and in a few cases behave like them syntactically. In \REF{ex:3:x452} the nominal adjunct \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___' is in its normal adjunct position, but in \REF{ex:3:x453} it is in object \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} position. The basic meanings of the two sentences are the same, but with a different prominence: \REF{ex:3:x452} encodes marked negative focus and \REF{ex:3:x453} verb focus. The clause \REF{ex:3:x1874} with an initial theme pronoun \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{yo} `I' is pragmatically more neutral than the others except in cases where the initial pronoun receives extra stress. Note the intervening negator also in \REF{ex:3:x1489} below.
A: word: kema=ko	 gloss: liver=NF
B: word: kema	 gloss: liver
C: word: ikum-am-ika-iwkin	 gloss: wonder.about-SS.SIM-be-2/3p.DS
D: word: kemal-ep	 gloss: pity-SS.SEQ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 526:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Yo me efa ___ suuw-a-k.
Gloss (with missing item): 1s.UNM not 1s.ACC ___ push-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`He didn't think of me.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Those nominal adjunct plus verb structures where the verb is transitive look like two-object clauses, and in a few cases behave like them syntactically. In \REF{ex:3:x452} the nominal adjunct \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___' is in its normal adjunct position, but in \REF{ex:3:x453} it is in object \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} position. The basic meanings of the two sentences are the same, but with a different prominence: \REF{ex:3:x452} encodes marked negative focus and \REF{ex:3:x453} verb focus. The clause \REF{ex:3:x1874} with an initial theme pronoun \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{yo} `I' is pragmatically more neutral than the others except in cases where the initial pronoun receives extra stress. Note the intervening negator also in \REF{ex:3:x1489} below.
A: word: kema=ko	 gloss: liver=NF
B: word: kema	 gloss: liver
C: word: soop-owa	 gloss: bury-NMZ
D: word: kemal-ep	 gloss: pity-SS.SEQ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 527:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Muuka gelemuta akena ___ me puk-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): son small very ___ not burst-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`Little boys/children do not think well (yet).'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Those nominal adjunct plus verb structures where the verb is transitive look like two-object clauses, and in a few cases behave like them syntactically. In \REF{ex:3:x452} the nominal adjunct \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___' is in its normal adjunct position, but in \REF{ex:3:x453} it is in object \textstyleAcronymallcaps{np} position. The basic meanings of the two sentences are the same, but with a different prominence: \REF{ex:3:x452} encodes marked negative focus and \REF{ex:3:x453} verb focus. The clause \REF{ex:3:x1874} with an initial theme pronoun \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{yo} `I' is pragmatically more neutral than the others except in cases where the initial pronoun receives extra stress. Note the intervening negator also in \REF{ex:3:x1489} below.
A: word: kema=ko	 gloss: liver=NF
B: word: kema	 gloss: liver
C: word: kemal-ep	 gloss: pity-SS.SEQ
D: word: ika-i-ya=na	 gloss: be-Np-PR.3s=TP
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 528:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ ir-a-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ ascend-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`They acted silly.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In cases where the adjunct only occurs with a certain verb it is difficult to give it a specified meaning apart from the verb \REF{ex:3:x454}. The same is true for verbs that do not occur independently, only with an adjunct \REF{ex:3:x455}.
A: word: eliw	 gloss: well
B: word: amirika=ke	 gloss: noon=CF
C: word: naruw	 gloss: ?
D: word: sesenar-e-n=i	 gloss: buy-PA-2s=QM
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 529:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Naap ___ tuup-am-ika-i-ya.
Gloss (with missing item): thus ___ ?-SS.SIM-be-Np-PR.3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`He is hoping so.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: In cases where the adjunct only occurs with a certain verb it is difficult to give it a specified meaning apart from the verb \REF{ex:3:x454}. The same is true for verbs that do not occur independently, only with an adjunct \REF{ex:3:x455}.
A: word: uroma	 gloss: stomach
B: word: kema	 gloss: liver
C: word: kemal-ep	 gloss: pity-SS.SEQ
D: word: kema=ko	 gloss: liver=NF
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 530:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Uura ___ ikiw-e-m.
Gloss (with missing item): night ___ go-PA-1s
The English translation of this sentence is:`Last night I had diarrhea.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Most of the verbs in Mauwake indicating physiological or psychological states and cognition are nominal adjunct plus verb constructions. The verb takes the person marking from the experiencer. \tabref{tab:3:nominaladjunctplusverbconstruction} gives only a small sample of these constructions, where the most common nominal is \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{kema} `liver'.\footnote{A good list of these is in \citet[47--63]{Kwan1989}, where she has described a large number of body image concepts formed with kema from semantic point of view. For that study the syntactic characteristics of the structures were not relevant.} The second column provides a literal translation. A few more examples of these constructions are in the sentences \REF{ex:3:x1490}-\REF{ex:3:x1489}.
A: word: mia	 gloss: body
B: word: uroma	 gloss: stomach
C: word: urom(a)	 gloss: stomach
D: word: is=iw	 gloss: 1p.FC=LIM
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 531:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Muuka gelemuta akena ___ me puk-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): son small very ___ not burst-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`Little boys/children do not think well (yet).'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Most of the verbs in Mauwake indicating physiological or psychological states and cognition are nominal adjunct plus verb constructions. The verb takes the person marking from the experiencer. \tabref{tab:3:nominaladjunctplusverbconstruction} gives only a small sample of these constructions, where the most common nominal is \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___'.\footnote{A good list of these is in \citet[47--63]{Kwan1989}, where she has described a large number of body image concepts formed with the morpheme ___ from semantic point of view. For that study the syntactic characteristics of the structures were not relevant.} The second column provides a literal translation. A few more examples of these constructions are in the sentences \REF{ex:3:x1490}-\REF{ex:3:x1489}.
A: word: kema=ko	 gloss: liver=NF
B: word: anu	 gloss: apart/aside
C: word: kemal-ep	 gloss: pity-SS.SEQ
D: word: kema	 gloss: liver
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 532:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Maamuma efar ___ aaw-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): money 1s.DAT ___ get-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`They stole money from me.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Adverbial adjuncts also have to precede the verb without any intervening words \REF{ex:3:x456}, \REF{ex:3:x457}.
A: word: wiok-ap	 gloss: follow.them-SS.SEQ
B: word: emi	 gloss: forbidden
C: word: ikum-i-mik	 gloss: wonder.about-NP-PR.1/3p
D: word: ikum	 gloss: illicitly
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 533:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Maa me efa ___ er-a-k.
Gloss (with missing item): food not 1s.ACC ___ go-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`The food wasn't enough for me.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Adverbial adjuncts also have to precede the verb without any intervening words \REF{ex:3:x456}, \REF{ex:3:x457}.
A: word: pepekim-ep	 gloss: measure-SS.SEQ
B: word: pepek	 gloss: enough
C: word: eliw	 gloss: well
D: word: kuisow	 gloss: one
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 534:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Maamuma efar ___ aaw-e-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): money 1s.DAT ___ get-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`They stole money from me.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some of the adverbial adjuncts, like \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___' \REF{ex:3:x456} and \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{pepek} `enough' \REF{ex:3:x457}, also function as independent adverbs, shown by an intervening pronoun \REF{ex:3:x458} and/or negator \REF{ex:3:x459}.
A: word: ikum	 gloss: illicitly
B: word: feekiya	 gloss: with
C: word: ikum-i-mik	 gloss: wonder.about-NP-PR.1/3p
D: word: emi	 gloss: forbidden
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 535:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Maa me efa ___ er-a-k.
Gloss (with missing item): food not 1s.ACC ___ go-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`The food wasn't enough for me.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some of the adverbial adjuncts, like \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ikum} `illicitly' \REF{ex:3:x456} and \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___' \REF{ex:3:x457}, also function as independent adverbs, shown by an intervening pronoun \REF{ex:3:x458} and/or negator \REF{ex:3:x459}.
A: word: eliw	 gloss: well
B: word: pepekim-ep	 gloss: measure-SS.SEQ
C: word: or-op	 gloss: go-SS.SEQ
D: word: pepek	 gloss: enough
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 536:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Yo oram ___ efa wu-a-n.
Gloss (with missing item): 1s.UNM for.nothing ___ 1s.ACC put-PA-2s
The English translation of this sentence is:`You accused me for theft without grounds.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some of the adverbial adjuncts, like \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___' \REF{ex:3:x456} and \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{pepek} `enough' \REF{ex:3:x457}, also function as independent adverbs, shown by an intervening pronoun \REF{ex:3:x458} and/or negator \REF{ex:3:x459}.
A: word: amia=iya	 gloss: bow=COM
B: word: ikum	 gloss: illicitly
C: word: ikum-i-mik	 gloss: wonder.about-NP-PR.1/3p
D: word: emi	 gloss: forbidden
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 537:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): No ___ me ma-e-n.
Gloss (with missing item): 2s.UNM ___ not say-PA-2s
The English translation of this sentence is:`You didn't say right.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Some of the adverbial adjuncts, like \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ikum} `illicitly' \REF{ex:3:x456} and \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___' \REF{ex:3:x457}, also function as independent adverbs, shown by an intervening pronoun \REF{ex:3:x458} and/or negator \REF{ex:3:x459}.
A: word: mokak-ikiw-em-ik-ok	 gloss: stare-go-SS.SIM-be-SS
B: word: pepekim-ep	 gloss: measure-SS.SEQ
C: word: pepek	 gloss: enough
D: word: eliw	 gloss: well
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 538:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Apura ___ suuw-am-ika-iwkin pok-ap ik-ok om-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): widow ___ push-SS.SIM-be-2/3p.DS sit.down-SS.SEQ be-SS cry-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`They were supporting the widow (sitting against her back) and she sat and wailed.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Other adjuncts like \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{the morpheme ___} `its gloss ___' \REF{ex:3:x460} and \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{anu} `apart' \REF{ex:3:x461}, only combine with verbs to form verbal groups, and it is hard to give them an exact meaning; the glosses below are just approximations.
A: word: ikos=ko	 gloss: together=NF
B: word: maneka=ke	 gloss: big=CF
C: word: maak-ep-pu-ami	 gloss: tell-SS.SEQ-CMPL-SS.SIM
D: word: ane	 gloss: together
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 539:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Apura ane ___ pok-ap ik-ok om-o-k.
Gloss (with missing item): widow together ___ sit.down-SS.SEQ be-SS cry-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`They were supporting the widow (sitting against her back) and she sat and wailed.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Other adjuncts like \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ane} `together' \REF{ex:3:x460} and \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{anu} `apart' \REF{ex:3:x461}, only combine with verbs to form verbal groups, and it is hard to give them an exact meaning; the glosses below are just approximations.
A: word: uruf-am-ika-iwkin	 gloss: see-SS.SIM-be-2/3p.DS
B: word: suuw-am-ika-iwkin	 gloss: push-SS.SIM-be-2/3p.DS
C: word: en-ep-pu-ap	 gloss: eat-SS.SEQ-CMPL-SS.SEQ
D: word: wu-am-ika-iwkin	 gloss: put-SS.SIM-be-2/3p.DS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B