cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 692:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mua ___ onak-e!
Gloss (with missing item): man ___ give.to.eat-IMP.2s
The English translation of this sentence is:`Give it to that man to eat!'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{neutral focus}} clitic -ko mostly occurs in irrealis-type clauses:\footnote{Because of this, it was called Irrealis focus clitic in J\"arvinen (1988b).} questions \REF{ex:3:x785}, commands \REF{ex:3:x786}, negative clauses \REF{ex:3:x787}, or those with future tense \REF{ex:3:x788}. Unlike the contrastive focus marker, the neutral focus marker can be attached to almost any element of a clause except the final verb. Neutral focus as a textual device is discussed further in \sectref{sec:9.3.2}.
A: word: nain-(ke)	 gloss: that1-(CF)
B: word: nain=ko	 gloss: that1=NF
C: word: oro-oro-oro-oro-mi	 gloss: RDP-RDP-RDP-descend-SS.SIM
D: word: nain=ke	 gloss: that=CF
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 693:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Oposia en-e-man nain ___ me uruf-a-m.
Gloss (with missing item): meat eat-PA-2p that1 ___ not see-PA-1s
The English translation of this sentence is:`I didn't (even) see the meat that you ate.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{neutral focus}} clitic -ko mostly occurs in irrealis-type clauses:\footnote{Because of this, it was called Irrealis focus clitic in J\"arvinen (1988b).} questions \REF{ex:3:x785}, commands \REF{ex:3:x786}, negative clauses \REF{ex:3:x787}, or those with future tense \REF{ex:3:x788}. Unlike the contrastive focus marker, the neutral focus marker can be attached to almost any element of a clause except the final verb. Neutral focus as a textual device is discussed further in \sectref{sec:9.3.2}.
A: word: no=ko	 gloss: 2s.UNM=NF
B: word: erepam	 gloss: four
C: word: yo=ko	 gloss: 1s.UNM=NF
D: word: niir-ow(a)	 gloss: laugh-NMZ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 694:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ uruf-i-yen.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ see-Np-FU.1p
The English translation of this sentence is:`We'll try and see.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{neutral focus}} clitic -ko mostly occurs in irrealis-type clauses:\footnote{Because of this, it was called Irrealis focus clitic in J\"arvinen (1988b).} questions \REF{ex:3:x785}, commands \REF{ex:3:x786}, negative clauses \REF{ex:3:x787}, or those with future tense \REF{ex:3:x788}. Unlike the contrastive focus marker, the neutral focus marker can be attached to almost any element of a clause except the final verb. Neutral focus as a textual device is discussed further in \sectref{sec:9.3.2}.
A: word: akena	 gloss: very
B: word: weeser-owa	 gloss: finish-NMZ
C: word: akim-ap=ko	 gloss: try-SS.SEQ=NF
D: word: akim-ap	 gloss: try-SS.SEQ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 695:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Sira nain ___
Gloss (with missing item): habit that1 ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`Will you give up that habit?'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The question marker -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{i} is a sentential clitic, used to form polar questions, and it attaches itself to the clause-final verb \REF{ex:3:x789} or another clause-final element \REF{ex:3:x790}. Its relationship to the alternative connective \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{e} `or' (\sectref{sec:3.11.2}) is unclear; it is possible that \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{i} was originally an alternative connective but was also employed as a question marker and became so established in this function that a new alternative connective \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{e} developed. It is not uncommon in \textstyleAcronymallcaps{TNG} Madang languages that the question marker and the alternative connective are either the same or closely related.\footnote{In Usan and Amele the alternative connector and the question marker are the same (\citealt[293]{Reesink1987}, \citealt[99]{Roberts1987}). Maia has -i `QM' and e `or' like Mauwake \citep[83,159]{Hardin2002}. Bargam has borrowed the Tok Pisin o as an alternative connector but has retained the clitic -e as the question marker \citep[53,122]{Hepner2002}. Kobon may use the alternative interrogative connector aka `or' sentence-finally in leading polar questions, where the speaker expects the addressee to agree with the proposition. }
A: word: piipua-i-nan=i	 gloss: leave-Np-FU.2s=QM
B: word: samo-samora	 gloss: RDP-bad
C: word: yi-i-nan=i	 gloss: give.me-Np-FU.2s=QM
D: word: ikiw-i-nan=i	 gloss: go-Np-FU.2s=QM
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 696:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Nobonob ikiw-e-man nain, owowa ___
Gloss (with missing item): Nobonob go-PA-2p that1 village ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`You went to Nobonob, is it a good village?'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The question marker -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{i} is a sentential clitic, used to form polar questions, and it attaches itself to the clause-final verb \REF{ex:3:x789} or another clause-final element \REF{ex:3:x790}. Its relationship to the alternative connective \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{e} `or' (\sectref{sec:3.11.2}) is unclear; it is possible that \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{i} was originally an alternative connective but was also employed as a question marker and became so established in this function that a new alternative connective \textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{e} developed. It is not uncommon in \textstyleAcronymallcaps{TNG} Madang languages that the question marker and the alternative connective are either the same or closely related.\footnote{In Usan and Amele the alternative connector and the question marker are the same (\citealt[293]{Reesink1987}, \citealt[99]{Roberts1987}). Maia has -i `QM' and e `or' like Mauwake \citep[83,159]{Hardin2002}. Bargam has borrowed the Tok Pisin o as an alternative connector but has retained the clitic -e as the question marker \citep[53,122]{Hepner2002}. Kobon may use the alternative interrogative connector aka `or' sentence-finally in leading polar questions, where the speaker expects the addressee to agree with the proposition. }
A: word: eliwa=i	 gloss: good=QM
B: word: eliwa=ki	 gloss: good=CF.QM
C: word: eliwa-ki	 gloss: good=CF.QM
D: word: kue-puuk-ap	 gloss: bite-cut-SS.SEQ
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 697:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mua kuisow manina ___ (e) arow=i (e) naap.
Gloss (with missing item): man one garden ___ (or) three=QM (or) thus
The English translation of this sentence is:`A man can have two gardens, or three, like that.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The question marker can also be used in statements, when two or more \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{alternatives}} are given \REF{ex:3:x791}:
A: word: erup=i	 gloss: two=QM
B: word: arow=i	 gloss: three=QM
C: word: erup	 gloss: two
D: word: amia=iya	 gloss: bow=COM
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 698:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mua kuisow manina erup=i (e) ___ (e) naap.
Gloss (with missing item): man one garden two=QM (or) ___ (or) thus
The English translation of this sentence is:`A man can have two gardens, or three, like that.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: The question marker can also be used in statements, when two or more \textstyleEmphasizedWords{{alternatives}} are given \REF{ex:3:x791}:
A: word: feekiya	 gloss: with
B: word: erup-i	 gloss: two=QM
C: word: arow=i	 gloss: three=QM
D: word: arow=pa	 gloss: three=LOC
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 699:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ me puuk-a-mik.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ not cut-PA-1/3p
The English translation of this sentence is:`They didn't cut it with a knife.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is possible to have two or more clitics attached to the same word; only the topic marker does not allow other clitics with it. A case marking clitic, forming a constituent with the preceding noun phrase, is placed first. Next comes the focus clitic \REF{ex:3:x792}, with the scope over a phrase but not forming a constituent. The limiter \nobreakdash-\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{iw} may have a phrase with the focus marking in its scope, so it follows the focus marker. When the limiter follows another clitic, there is a transition consonant <r>between the clitics \REF{ex:3:x795}, \REF{ex:3:x796}. The modal clitic \nobreakdash-\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{yon} `perhaps' (\sectref{sec:3.9.3}) may have a scope over a whole predication, so its position is after the limiter \REF{ex:3:x793}. The sentential clitic, with a scope over the whole sentence, comes last. When the contrastive focus marker -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ke} and the question marker -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{i} are adjacent, they become a portmanteau clitic -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ki} \REF{ex:3:x794}.
A: word: ku-am-ika-i-ya	 gloss: build-SS.SIM-be-Np-3s
B: word: kuruma	 gloss: thick
C: word: fura=iw=ko	 gloss: knife=INST=NF
D: word: fura=iw	 gloss: knife=INST
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 700:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ fiirim-eka.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ gather-IMP.2p
The English translation of this sentence is:`Gather them right at the \textstyleForeignWords{kunai} grass.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is possible to have two or more clitics attached to the same word; only the topic marker does not allow other clitics with it. A case marking clitic, forming a constituent with the preceding noun phrase, is placed first. Next comes the focus clitic \REF{ex:3:x792}, with the scope over a phrase but not forming a constituent. The limiter \nobreakdash-\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{iw} may have a phrase with the focus marking in its scope, so it follows the focus marker. When the limiter follows another clitic, there is a transition consonant <r>between the clitics \REF{ex:3:x795}, \REF{ex:3:x796}. The modal clitic \nobreakdash-\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{yon} `perhaps' (\sectref{sec:3.9.3}) may have a scope over a whole predication, so its position is after the limiter \REF{ex:3:x793}. The sentential clitic, with a scope over the whole sentence, comes last. When the contrastive focus marker -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ke} and the question marker -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{i} are adjacent, they become a portmanteau clitic -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ki} \REF{ex:3:x794}.
A: word: fikera=ke	 gloss: kunai.grass=CF
B: word: ikiw-em-ik-eya	 gloss: go-SS.SIM-be-2/3s.DS
C: word: mia=pa-r=iw	 gloss: body=LOC-{\O}=LIM
D: word: fikera=pa-r=iw	 gloss: kunai.grass=LOC-{\O}=LIM
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 701:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ maa en-emi ewur-ar-e-k.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ food eat-SS.SIM haste-INCH-PA-3s
The English translation of this sentence is:`Only he rushed with his food.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is possible to have two or more clitics attached to the same word; only the topic marker does not allow other clitics with it. A case marking clitic, forming a constituent with the preceding noun phrase, is placed first. Next comes the focus clitic \REF{ex:3:x792}, with the scope over a phrase but not forming a constituent. The limiter \nobreakdash-\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{iw} may have a phrase with the focus marking in its scope, so it follows the focus marker. When the limiter follows another clitic, there is a transition consonant <r>between the clitics \REF{ex:3:x795}, \REF{ex:3:x796}. The modal clitic \nobreakdash-\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{yon} `perhaps' (\sectref{sec:3.9.3}) may have a scope over a whole predication, so its position is after the limiter \REF{ex:3:x793}. The sentential clitic, with a scope over the whole sentence, comes last. When the contrastive focus marker -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ke} and the question marker -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{i} are adjacent, they become a portmanteau clitic -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ki} \REF{ex:3:x794}.
A: word: uruf-ek-a-m=na	 gloss: see-CNTF-PA-1s=TP
B: word: neeke-r=iw	 gloss: there.CF-{\O}=LIM
C: word: os=ke	 gloss: 3s.FC=CF
D: word: os=ke-r=iw	 gloss: 3s.FC=CF-{\O}=LIM
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 702:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Wi anim onoma pun o makena Krais=ke ___
Gloss (with missing item): 3p.UNM blade basis also 3s.UNM truly Christ=CF ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`Are also the authorities perhaps saying that he truly is Christ?'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is possible to have two or more clitics attached to the same word; only the topic marker does not allow other clitics with it. A case marking clitic, forming a constituent with the preceding noun phrase, is placed first. Next comes the focus clitic \REF{ex:3:x792}, with the scope over a phrase but not forming a constituent. The limiter \nobreakdash-\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{iw} may have a phrase with the focus marking in its scope, so it follows the focus marker. When the limiter follows another clitic, there is a transition consonant <r>between the clitics \REF{ex:3:x795}, \REF{ex:3:x796}. The modal clitic \nobreakdash-\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{yon} `perhaps' (\sectref{sec:3.9.3}) may have a scope over a whole predication, so its position is after the limiter \REF{ex:3:x793}. The sentential clitic, with a scope over the whole sentence, comes last. When the contrastive focus marker -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ke} and the question marker -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{i} are adjacent, they become a portmanteau clitic -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ki} \REF{ex:3:x794}.
A: word: na-i-mik	 gloss: say-NP-PR.1/3p
B: word: ma-i-n=i	 gloss: say-Np-PR.2s=QM
C: word: lawisiw	 gloss: somewhat
D: word: na-i-mik=yon=i	 gloss: say-Np-PR.1/3p=perhaps=QM
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 703:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Mua fain Saror ___
Gloss (with missing item): man this Saror ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`Is this man Saror's son?'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is possible to have two or more clitics attached to the same word; only the topic marker does not allow other clitics with it. A case marking clitic, forming a constituent with the preceding noun phrase, is placed first. Next comes the focus clitic \REF{ex:3:x792}, with the scope over a phrase but not forming a constituent. The limiter \nobreakdash-\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{iw} may have a phrase with the focus marking in its scope, so it follows the focus marker. When the limiter follows another clitic, there is a transition consonant <r>between the clitics \REF{ex:3:x795}, \REF{ex:3:x796}. The modal clitic \nobreakdash-\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{yon} `perhaps' (\sectref{sec:3.9.3}) may have a scope over a whole predication, so its position is after the limiter \REF{ex:3:x793}. The sentential clitic, with a scope over the whole sentence, comes last. When the contrastive focus marker -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ke} and the question marker -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{i} are adjacent, they become a portmanteau clitic -\textstyleStyleVernacularWordsItalic{ki} \REF{ex:3:x794}.
A: word: kaik-ow(a)	 gloss: tie-NMZ
B: word: eliwa=ki	 gloss: good=CF.QM
C: word: muuka	 gloss: son
D: word: muuka=ki	 gloss: son=CF.QM
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 704:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ kema=ko kir-ek-a-n aa!
Gloss (with missing item): ___ liver=NF turn-CNTF-PA-2s oh
The English translation of this sentence is:`Oh, if only you had changed your ways (lit: turned your liver)!'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: There are a lot of interjections in Mauwake; the following \tabref{tab:3:interjections} is not even nearly exhaustive. The pronunciation of interjections may differ from that of other words: intonational variations are greater, and lengthening, even extreme lengthening, of the final vowel is common. Interjections are not part of the normal clause structure, and they usually occur either sentence-initially or finally \REF{ex:3:x797}--\REF{ex:3:x800}. Some can also be placed between clauses in a coordinate sentence \REF{ex:3:x801}. The glosses given in \tabref{tab:3:interjections} for the interjections are just rough approximations.
A: word: puk-owa	 gloss: burst-NMZ
B: word: aa	 gloss: oh
C: word: dabela=pa	 gloss: cold=LOC
D: word: maake-miaw-i-yem	 gloss: tell-wander-NPS-PR.1s
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B
Question 705:
You are a linguist specializing in Mauwake. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): Aa, kema=ko kir-ek-a-n ___
Gloss (with missing item): oh liver=NF turn-CNTF-PA-2s ___
The English translation of this sentence is:`Oh, if only you had changed your ways (lit: turned your liver)!'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: There are a lot of interjections in Mauwake; the following \tabref{tab:3:interjections} is not even nearly exhaustive. The pronunciation of interjections may differ from that of other words: intonational variations are greater, and lengthening, even extreme lengthening, of the final vowel is common. Interjections are not part of the normal clause structure, and they usually occur either sentence-initially or finally \REF{ex:3:x797}--\REF{ex:3:x800}. Some can also be placed between clauses in a coordinate sentence \REF{ex:3:x801}. The glosses given in \tabref{tab:3:interjections} for the interjections are just rough approximations.
A: word: weeser-eya	 gloss: finish-2/3s.DS
B: word: aa	 gloss: oh
C: word: ik-owa=ke	 gloss: be-NMZ=CF
D: word: maake-miaw-i-yem	 gloss: tell-wander-NPS-PR.1s
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B