cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 41:
You are a linguist specializing in Komnzo. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nze nima b=yan\stem{nor} ane kabe fof ___ maf won\stem{rsokn}wr.
Gloss (with missing item): FSG.ERG Quot MED=TSG.MASC:SBJ:NONPAST:IPFV:VENIT/shout DEM man EMPH ___ who.SG.ERG STSG:SBJ>FSG:OBJ:NONPAST:IPFV:VENIT/bother.
The English translation of this sentence is:`I said: ``He is shouting out there. This man who bothers me.'''
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Next, I describe which kinds of argument roles can be relativised in the \isi{matrix clause} (NP\textsubscript{\textsc{mat}}), and which can occur in the \isi{relative clause} (NP\textsubscript{\textsc{rel}}). As the examples in this section show, there is virtually no restriction on the possible argument roles. NP\textsubscript{\textsc{rel}} is expressed by the relative \isi{pronoun}, which can inflect for all cases ({\S}\ref{interrogatives-sec}). The examples given in this section include the following cases: \isi{ergative} (\ref{ex541}), \isi{absolutive} (\ref{ex542}, \ref{ex543}, \ref{ex546}), \isi{characteristic} (\ref{ex544}), \isi{dative} (\ref{ex551}), \isi{locative} (\ref{ex547}), and \isi{instrumental} (\ref{ex545}).
A: word: nzä	 gloss: FSG.ABS
B: word: nzä=nzo	 gloss: FSG.ABS=ONLY
C: word: drdr	 gloss: old.garden
D: word: th-ä-kwr-a-th	 gloss: STNSG.GAM-VC.textbarNDU-hit.RS-PST-STNSG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 42:
You are a linguist specializing in Komnzo. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ni fi ane zu\stem{mar}wrme ___ tharthar=en mane zf\stem{rä}rm.
Gloss (with missing item): FNSG but DEM FPL:SBJ>TSG.F:OBJ:PST:DUR/look ___ side=LOC which(ABS) TSG.F:SBJ:PST:DUR/be.
The English translation of this sentence is:`But we were looking at that (fire), which was on the side of the house.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Next, I describe which kinds of argument roles can be relativised in the \isi{matrix clause} (NP\textsubscript{\textsc{mat}}), and which can occur in the \isi{relative clause} (NP\textsubscript{\textsc{rel}}). As the examples in this section show, there is virtually no restriction on the possible argument roles. NP\textsubscript{\textsc{rel}} is expressed by the relative \isi{pronoun}, which can inflect for all cases ({\S}\ref{interrogatives-sec}). The examples given in this section include the following cases: \isi{ergative} (\ref{ex541}), \isi{absolutive} (\ref{ex542}, \ref{ex543}, \ref{ex546}), \isi{characteristic} (\ref{ex544}), \isi{dative} (\ref{ex551}), \isi{locative} (\ref{ex547}), and \isi{instrumental} (\ref{ex545}).
A: word: mnz	 gloss: house
B: word: mnz=fa	 gloss: house=ABL
C: word: komnzo	 gloss: only
D: word: ane	 gloss: DEM
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 43:
You are a linguist specializing in Komnzo. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kma wämne ane fof kwa\stem{kark}wé ane fof ___ mane thä\stem{narf}a ... keke watik-thé=märe.
Gloss (with missing item): Pot tree DEM EMPH FSG:SBJ:Rpst:IPFV/pull DEM EMPH ___ which(ABS) SG:SBJ>STPL:OBJ:PST:IPFV/press.down ... NEG enough-Adlzr=PRIV.
The English translation of this sentence is:`I should have pulled that tree (from the fence), which the tree was pushing down. No, (I was) not (strong) enough!'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Next, I describe which kinds of argument roles can be relativised in the \isi{matrix clause} (NP\textsubscript{\textsc{mat}}), and which can occur in the \isi{relative clause} (NP\textsubscript{\textsc{rel}}). As the examples in this section show, there is virtually no restriction on the possible argument roles. NP\textsubscript{\textsc{rel}} is expressed by the relative \isi{pronoun}, which can inflect for all cases ({\S}\ref{interrogatives-sec}). The examples given in this section include the following cases: \isi{ergative} (\ref{ex541}), \isi{absolutive} (\ref{ex542}, \ref{ex543}, \ref{ex546}), \isi{characteristic} (\ref{ex544}), \isi{dative} (\ref{ex551}), \isi{locative} (\ref{ex547}), and \isi{instrumental} (\ref{ex545}).
A: word: wämne=n	 gloss: tree=LOC
B: word: wämne	 gloss: tree
C: word: mane	 gloss: which
D: word: wämne=f	 gloss: tree=ERG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 44:
You are a linguist specializing in Komnzo. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): bundbo=nzo \stem{rä} ___ za\stem{wokth}.
Gloss (with missing item): SSG.All=ONLY TSG.F:NONPAST:IPFV/be ___ SSG:SBJ:IMP:PFV/choose.
The English translation of this sentence is:`It is up to you which one you choose!'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Next, I describe which kinds of argument roles can be relativised in the \isi{matrix clause} (NP\textsubscript{\textsc{mat}}), and which can occur in the \isi{relative clause} (NP\textsubscript{\textsc{rel}}). As the examples in this section show, there is virtually no restriction on the possible argument roles. NP\textsubscript{\textsc{rel}} is expressed by the relative \isi{pronoun}, which can inflect for all cases ({\S}\ref{interrogatives-sec}). The examples given in this section include the following cases: \isi{ergative} (\ref{ex541}), \isi{absolutive} (\ref{ex542}, \ref{ex543}, \ref{ex546}), \isi{characteristic} (\ref{ex544}), \isi{dative} (\ref{ex551}), \isi{locative} (\ref{ex547}), and \isi{instrumental} (\ref{ex545}).
A: word: zena=thamane	 gloss: today=TEMP.POSS
B: word: su-rmän-wr-m-∅	 gloss: TSG.MASC.Betatwo-close.EXT-NDU-DUR-STNSG
C: word: mane	 gloss: which(ABS)
D: word: zra	 gloss: swamp
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 45:
You are a linguist specializing in Komnzo. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): sukawi nima keke \stem{rä} zane fthé=thamane \stem{yé} ... ane kabe fof ___ waniwani zöbthé nz=wn\stem{mar}wre.
Gloss (with missing item): sukawi like.this NEG TSG.F:SBJ:NONPAST:IPFV/be DEM:PROX when=TEMP.POSS TSG.MASC:SBJ:NONPAST:IPFV/be ... DEM man EMPH ___ picture first IMMpst=FPL:SBJ>TSG.F:OBJ:NONPAST:IPFV:VENIT/see.
The English translation of this sentence is:`Sukawi, it is not like that. This is from that time ... really this man whose picture we just saw before.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Next, I describe which kinds of argument roles can be relativised in the \isi{matrix clause} (NP\textsubscript{\textsc{mat}}), and which can occur in the \isi{relative clause} (NP\textsubscript{\textsc{rel}}). As the examples in this section show, there is virtually no restriction on the possible argument roles. NP\textsubscript{\textsc{rel}} is expressed by the relative \isi{pronoun}, which can inflect for all cases ({\S}\ref{interrogatives-sec}). The examples given in this section include the following cases: \isi{ergative} (\ref{ex541}), \isi{absolutive} (\ref{ex542}, \ref{ex543}, \ref{ex546}), \isi{characteristic} (\ref{ex544}), \isi{dative} (\ref{ex551}), \isi{locative} (\ref{ex547}), and \isi{instrumental} (\ref{ex545}).
A: word: monme	 gloss: how
B: word: nafane=ma=wä	 gloss: TSG.POSS=CHAR=EMPH
C: word: mafane=ma=wä	 gloss: who.SG.POSS=CHAR=EMPH
D: word: baf=en	 gloss: Recog=LOC
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: C
Question 46:
You are a linguist specializing in Komnzo. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): mni w\stem{thomon}wrth ___ mä zf\stem{rä}rm.
Gloss (with missing item): fire STPL:SBJ>TSG.F:OBJ:NONPAST:IPFV/pile.up.fire ___ where TSG.F:SBJ:PST:DUR.
The English translation of this sentence is:`They prepare the fire where the hole was.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Next, I describe which kinds of argument roles can be relativised in the \isi{matrix clause} (NP\textsubscript{\textsc{mat}}), and which can occur in the \isi{relative clause} (NP\textsubscript{\textsc{rel}}). As the examples in this section show, there is virtually no restriction on the possible argument roles. NP\textsubscript{\textsc{rel}} is expressed by the relative \isi{pronoun}, which can inflect for all cases ({\S}\ref{interrogatives-sec}). The examples given in this section include the following cases: \isi{ergative} (\ref{ex541}), \isi{absolutive} (\ref{ex542}, \ref{ex543}, \ref{ex546}), \isi{characteristic} (\ref{ex544}), \isi{dative} (\ref{ex551}), \isi{locative} (\ref{ex547}), and \isi{instrumental} (\ref{ex545}).
A: word: fam	 gloss: thoughts
B: word: yfö=n	 gloss: hole=LOC
C: word: yfö=me	 gloss: hole=INS
D: word: yfö	 gloss: hole
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 47:
You are a linguist specializing in Komnzo. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ane fath=nzo zf\stem{rä}rm wämne keke ... dödö=nzo ... dödö ___ ŋa\stem{ren}wre fath.
Gloss (with missing item): DEM clearing=ONLY TSG.F:SBJ:PST:DUR/be tree NEG ... dödö=ONLY ... dödö ___ FPL:SBJ:NONPAST:IPFV/sweep clearing.
The English translation of this sentence is:`This was a clearing, no trees ... only dödö (Sida acuta) ... dödö, with which we sweep the clear places.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Next, I describe which kinds of argument roles can be relativised in the \isi{matrix clause} (NP\textsubscript{\textsc{mat}}), and which can occur in the \isi{relative clause} (NP\textsubscript{\textsc{rel}}). As the examples in this section show, there is virtually no restriction on the possible argument roles. NP\textsubscript{\textsc{rel}} is expressed by the relative \isi{pronoun}, which can inflect for all cases ({\S}\ref{interrogatives-sec}). The examples given in this section include the following cases: \isi{ergative} (\ref{ex541}), \isi{absolutive} (\ref{ex542}, \ref{ex543}, \ref{ex546}), \isi{characteristic} (\ref{ex544}), \isi{dative} (\ref{ex551}), \isi{locative} (\ref{ex547}), and \isi{instrumental} (\ref{ex545}).
A: word: mon=me	 gloss: how=INS
B: word: yfö	 gloss: hole
C: word: ane=me	 gloss: DEM=INS
D: word: mane=me	 gloss: which=INS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 48:
You are a linguist specializing in Komnzo. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): kma wämne ane fof kwa\stem{kark}wé ane fof ___ mane thä\stem{narf}a ... keke watik-thé=märe.
Gloss (with missing item): Pot tree DEM EMPH FSG:SBJ:Rpst:IPFV/pull DEM EMPH ___ which(ABS) SG:SBJ>STPL:OBJ:PST:IPFV/press.down ... NEG enough-Adlzr=PRIV.
The English translation of this sentence is:`I should have pulled that tree (from the fence), which the tree was pushing down. No, (I was) not (strong) enough!'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is harder to determine the argument role of NP\textsubscript{\textsc{mat}} because its presence is optional. We saw in (\ref{ex543}) that the relative \isi{pronoun} mane referred to the fence, which the burning tree had pushed down. But this is not expressed by a noun phrase, nor is the fence indexed in the verb of the \isi{matrix clause}. We only know about it from the preceding context of the story, and the \isi{plural} prefix in the verb of the \isi{relative clause}.\footnote{The word ŋarake `fence' is frequently used in the plural.} In (\ref{ex542}), the fire is not expressed as a noun phrase, but the prefix of the verbs zumarwrme `we were seeing it' and zfrärm `it was', both indexing mni `fire' (3\Sg.\F). However, we can always determine the argument role of NP\textsubscript{\textsc{mat}} from the context. The following argument roles are found in the examples given in this section: the single argument of an intransitive verb (\ref{ex541}), \isi{patient} (\ref{ex542}), location (\ref{ex547}), discourse \isi{topic} (\ref{ex548}), actor (\ref{ex549}), and \isi{recipient} (\ref{ex550}).
A: word: wämne=n	 gloss: tree=LOC
B: word: wämne	 gloss: tree
C: word: zöbthé	 gloss: first
D: word: wämne=f	 gloss: tree=ERG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 49:
You are a linguist specializing in Komnzo. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ni fi ane zu\stem{mar}wrme ___ tharthar=en mane zf\stem{rä}rm.
Gloss (with missing item): FNSG but DEM FPL:SBJ>TSG.F:OBJ:PST:DUR/look ___ side=LOC which(ABS) TSG.F:SBJ:PST:DUR/be.
The English translation of this sentence is:`But we were looking at that (fire), which was on the side of the house.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is harder to determine the argument role of NP\textsubscript{\textsc{mat}} because its presence is optional. We saw in (\ref{ex543}) that the relative \isi{pronoun} mane referred to the fence, which the burning tree had pushed down. But this is not expressed by a noun phrase, nor is the fence indexed in the verb of the \isi{matrix clause}. We only know about it from the preceding context of the story, and the \isi{plural} prefix in the verb of the \isi{relative clause}.\footnote{The word ŋarake `fence' is frequently used in the plural.} In (\ref{ex542}), the fire is not expressed as a noun phrase, but the prefix of the verbs zumarwrme `we were seeing it' and zfrärm `it was', both indexing mni `fire' (3\Sg.\F). However, we can always determine the argument role of NP\textsubscript{\textsc{mat}} from the context. The following argument roles are found in the examples given in this section: the single argument of an intransitive verb (\ref{ex541}), \isi{patient} (\ref{ex542}), location (\ref{ex547}), discourse \isi{topic} (\ref{ex548}), actor (\ref{ex549}), and \isi{recipient} (\ref{ex550}).
A: word: mnz	 gloss: house
B: word: baf=en	 gloss: Recog=LOC
C: word: komnzo	 gloss: only
D: word: mnz=fa	 gloss: house=ABL
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 50:
You are a linguist specializing in Komnzo. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): nze nima b=yan\stem{nor} ane kabe fof ___ maf won\stem{rsokn}wr.
Gloss (with missing item): FSG.ERG Quot MED=TSG.MASC:SBJ:NONPAST:IPFV:VENIT/shout DEM man EMPH ___ who.SG.ERG STSG:SBJ>FSG:OBJ:NONPAST:IPFV:VENIT/bother.
The English translation of this sentence is:`I said: ``He is shouting out there. This man who bothers me.'''
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is harder to determine the argument role of NP\textsubscript{\textsc{mat}} because its presence is optional. We saw in (\ref{ex543}) that the relative \isi{pronoun} mane referred to the fence, which the burning tree had pushed down. But this is not expressed by a noun phrase, nor is the fence indexed in the verb of the \isi{matrix clause}. We only know about it from the preceding context of the story, and the \isi{plural} prefix in the verb of the \isi{relative clause}.\footnote{The word ŋarake `fence' is frequently used in the plural.} In (\ref{ex542}), the fire is not expressed as a noun phrase, but the prefix of the verbs zumarwrme `we were seeing it' and zfrärm `it was', both indexing mni `fire' (3\Sg.\F). However, we can always determine the argument role of NP\textsubscript{\textsc{mat}} from the context. The following argument roles are found in the examples given in this section: the single argument of an intransitive verb (\ref{ex541}), \isi{patient} (\ref{ex542}), location (\ref{ex547}), discourse \isi{topic} (\ref{ex548}), actor (\ref{ex549}), and \isi{recipient} (\ref{ex550}).
A: word: nzun=wä	 gloss: FSG.DAT=EMPH
B: word: bäne=me	 gloss: Recog=INS
C: word: nzä=nzo	 gloss: FSG.ABS=ONLY
D: word: nzä	 gloss: FSG.ABS
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: D
Question 51:
You are a linguist specializing in Komnzo. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ni fi ane zu\stem{mar}wrme ___ tharthar=en mane zf\stem{rä}rm.
Gloss (with missing item): FNSG but DEM FPL:SBJ>TSG.F:OBJ:PST:DUR/look ___ side=LOC which(ABS) TSG.F:SBJ:PST:DUR/be.
The English translation of this sentence is:`But we were looking at that (fire), which was on the side of the house.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is harder to determine the argument role of NP\textsubscript{\textsc{mat}} because its presence is optional. We saw in (\ref{ex543}) that the relative \isi{pronoun} mane referred to the fence, which the burning tree had pushed down. But this is not expressed by a noun phrase, nor is the fence indexed in the verb of the \isi{matrix clause}. We only know about it from the preceding context of the story, and the \isi{plural} prefix in the verb of the \isi{relative clause}.\footnote{The word ŋarake `fence' is frequently used in the plural.} In (\ref{ex542}), the fire is not expressed as a noun phrase, but the prefix of the verbs zumarwrme `we were seeing it' and zfrärm `it was', both indexing mni `fire' (3\Sg.\F). However, we can always determine the argument role of NP\textsubscript{\textsc{mat}} from the context. The following argument roles are found in the examples given in this section: the single argument of an intransitive verb (\ref{ex541}), \isi{patient} (\ref{ex542}), location (\ref{ex547}), discourse \isi{topic} (\ref{ex548}), actor (\ref{ex549}), and \isi{recipient} (\ref{ex550}).
A: word: mnz	 gloss: house
B: word: komnzo	 gloss: only
C: word: mnz=fa	 gloss: house=ABL
D: word: baf=en	 gloss: Recog=LOC
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 52:
You are a linguist specializing in Komnzo. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): mni w\stem{thomon}wrth ___ mä zf\stem{rä}rm.
Gloss (with missing item): fire STPL:SBJ>TSG.F:OBJ:NONPAST:IPFV/pile.up.fire ___ where TSG.F:SBJ:PST:DUR.
The English translation of this sentence is:`They prepare the fire where the hole was.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: It is harder to determine the argument role of NP\textsubscript{\textsc{mat}} because its presence is optional. We saw in (\ref{ex543}) that the relative \isi{pronoun} mane referred to the fence, which the burning tree had pushed down. But this is not expressed by a noun phrase, nor is the fence indexed in the verb of the \isi{matrix clause}. We only know about it from the preceding context of the story, and the \isi{plural} prefix in the verb of the \isi{relative clause}.\footnote{The word ŋarake `fence' is frequently used in the plural.} In (\ref{ex542}), the fire is not expressed as a noun phrase, but the prefix of the verbs zumarwrme `we were seeing it' and zfrärm `it was', both indexing mni `fire' (3\Sg.\F). However, we can always determine the argument role of NP\textsubscript{\textsc{mat}} from the context. The following argument roles are found in the examples given in this section: the single argument of an intransitive verb (\ref{ex541}), \isi{patient} (\ref{ex542}), location (\ref{ex547}), discourse \isi{topic} (\ref{ex548}), actor (\ref{ex549}), and \isi{recipient} (\ref{ex550}).
A: word: mon=me	 gloss: how=INS
B: word: yfö	 gloss: hole
C: word: yfö=me	 gloss: hole=INS
D: word: yfö=n	 gloss: hole=LOC
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B