cyang33/LingGym huggingface dataset:
Question 101:
You are a linguist specializing in Komnzo. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): ___ efoth etfth kwof-rugr-m e zizi ... k-rä-bnaf-é.
Gloss (with missing item): ___ sun sleep FSG.Betatwo-sleep.EXT.NDU-DUR until afternoon ... M.BET-IRR.VC..NDU-wake.up.RS-FSG.
The English translation of this sentence is:`I fell asleep (for) a daytime nap. I was sleeping until the late afternoon ... and I woke up.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Ir\isi{realis} \isi{mood} is frequently used in narratives which report factual truths. Foley (\citeyear[389]{Foley:2000uh}) points out that Papuan languages often employ the realis-irrealis distinction for pragmatic purposes. In Komnzo, the pragmatic use comes from the alternation between \isi{irrealis} and \isi{realis} inflections especially in event sequencing. In this pattern, the \isi{irrealis} is used for backgrounding. Example (\ref{ex377}) is taken from a hunting story that occured many years ago. The story is told from a first-person perspective, thus, there is no reason to question the factual truth of what is being told. The clauses in (\ref{ex377}) describe a sequence of events: fall asleep > be sleeping > wake up. Only the foregrounded clause (`sleep') is expressed in \isi{realis} (\isi{past} \isi{durative}), whereas the \isi{backgrounded} clauses (`fall asleep' and `wake up') are expressed in \isi{irrealis} (\isi{perfective}). In that sense, the \isi{irrealis} verb forms act as a backgrounding bracket around the foregrounded clause.\footnote{Note that example (\ref{ex668}) on page \pageref{ex668} employs the same bracket-like use of the irrealis inflected verb forms. The only difference is that in (\ref{ex668}), the foregrounded event is in the non-past, whereas in (\ref{ex377}) the foregrounded event is in past durative.}
A: word: k-rä-mnzer-é	 gloss: M.BET-IRR.VC..NDU-fall.asleep.RS-FSG
B: word: zu-∅-kor-a-th	 gloss: FSG.GAM-DU-speak.RS-PST-STNSG
C: word: k-ra-ms-e	 gloss: M.BET-IRR.VC.DU-sit.RS-FNSG
D: word: k-rä-bth-∅	 gloss: M.BET-IRR.VC..NDU-finish.RS-STSG
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: A
Question 102:
You are a linguist specializing in Komnzo. You are given a sentence along with its morpheme breakdown, gloss, and translation. Words are separated by spaces, and morphemes are separated by hyphens. However, a word and its gloss are missing and represented by an underscore. Based on your understanding, please choose the most appropriate option. 
Sentence (with missing item): k-rä-mnzer-é efoth etfth ___ e zizi ... k-rä-bnaf-é.
Gloss (with missing item): M.BET-IRR.VC..NDU-fall.asleep.RS-FSG sun sleep ___ until afternoon ... M.BET-IRR.VC..NDU-wake.up.RS-FSG.
The English translation of this sentence is:`I fell asleep (for) a daytime nap. I was sleeping until the late afternoon ... and I woke up.'
Here is a relevant knowledge point for this example, with the related morphemes and glosses masked: Ir\isi{realis} \isi{mood} is frequently used in narratives which report factual truths. Foley (\citeyear[389]{Foley:2000uh}) points out that Papuan languages often employ the realis-irrealis distinction for pragmatic purposes. In Komnzo, the pragmatic use comes from the alternation between \isi{irrealis} and \isi{realis} inflections especially in event sequencing. In this pattern, the \isi{irrealis} is used for backgrounding. Example (\ref{ex377}) is taken from a hunting story that occured many years ago. The story is told from a first-person perspective, thus, there is no reason to question the factual truth of what is being told. The clauses in (\ref{ex377}) describe a sequence of events: fall asleep > be sleeping > wake up. Only the foregrounded clause (`sleep') is expressed in \isi{realis} (\isi{past} \isi{durative}), whereas the \isi{backgrounded} clauses (`fall asleep' and `wake up') are expressed in \isi{irrealis} (\isi{perfective}). In that sense, the \isi{irrealis} verb forms act as a backgrounding bracket around the foregrounded clause.\footnote{Note that example (\ref{ex668}) on page \pageref{ex668} employs the same bracket-like use of the irrealis inflected verb forms. The only difference is that in (\ref{ex668}), the foregrounded event is in the non-past, whereas in (\ref{ex377}) the foregrounded event is in past durative.}
A: word: s-ra-na-thr-m-th	 gloss: TSG.MASC.BET-IRR-eat.EXT-NDU-DUR-STNSG
B: word: kwof-rugr-m	 gloss: FSG.Betatwo-sleep.EXT.NDU-DUR
C: word: su-a-trik-wr-m-∅	 gloss: TSG.MASC.BETaone-VC.-tell.EXT-NDU-DUR-STSG
D: word: sf-rug-rm	 gloss: TSG.M.Betatwo-sleep.EXT.NDU-DUR
Please only return the letter (A–D). Do not say anything else.
Correct Answer: B